WEBVTT - India's Election Impacts Markets

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene along

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 2>with Paul Sweeney. Join us each day for insight from

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 2>the best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations. You

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 2>can also watch the show live on YouTube. Visit the

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Podcast channel on YouTube to see the show weekday

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 2>mornings from seven to ten am Eastern from our global

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 2>headquarters in New York City. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify,

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 2>or anywhere else you listen, and always I'm Bloomberg Radio,

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Terminal, and the Bloomberg Business App. We welcome

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:50.239
<v Speaker 2>all of you across America and around the world, and

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 2>particularly all of you listening in Indian now to without question,

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 2>our Bloomberg Conversation of the day on the historic moment

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 2>for the Indian people. Rugg Rojin is at Boot School.

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 2>He's O School. His financial book on the Crisis of

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 2>seven eight won every award fault Lines. He is one

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 2>of our great financial professors and of course a former

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 2>head of a Central Bank of India. Far more importantly

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 2>is always Rogin out front. He has a book he

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 2>is delivering Breaking the Mold on his India. It will

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 2>be a definitive two hundred and seventy pages. Look for

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 2>that from Princeton University Press. Shortly, Ragu, thank you so

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.759
<v Speaker 2>much for sending me the PDA for the book. I'm

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 2>going to cut to the Chase Professor the final sentence

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 2>of your book. They cannot have any more excuses. What

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 2>are the excuses Modi has now and what does he

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 2>need to move India to a new prosperity.

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, we have an election. The results have been coming

0:01:55.840 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 3>out and I think it's a splendid result because it

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 3>tells the government it needs to change course. The old

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 3>course was unviable and we can talk about that. Of course,

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 3>markets seem to be disappointed. We can talk about that

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 3>also why markets are reacting negatively. But I think what

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 3>is happening today is really, in the long run, really

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 3>good for India because it forces India to choose a

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 3>different course from the one it has been on, a

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 3>course which has led to much wider unemployment and distress

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 3>than needed in the country.

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Is this an election result that you see will bring

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 2>the technocratic and elite South together with a more emotional

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:46.360
<v Speaker 2>and historic North. Does it bring the polarity of India

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 2>together or do we have a more separate India in

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty six.

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 3>No, it's it's actually a win for democracy, and that's

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 3>good for India because what democracy does is it allows

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 3>the different paths to essentially express themselves and to negotiate.

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:08.799
<v Speaker 3>The problem earlier was India was trending towards a more

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:13.079
<v Speaker 3>autocratic country, a country with one leader who was who

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 3>are a larger than like image, and that unfortunately meant

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:21.639
<v Speaker 3>that the JP leadership wasn't listening, wasn't listening to the

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 3>economic news on the ground that people were actually suffering hardship,

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:29.919
<v Speaker 3>wasn't listening to the broader sense that you know, the

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 3>weaponization of various instruments of the government to put you know,

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 3>opposition party leaders in jail was simply not jelling and

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 3>it would have taken India down a course which was

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:43.839
<v Speaker 3>ruinous in the longer run, maybe in the short run

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 3>benefiti of the big, big business groups. And that's why

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 3>the market is reacting adversely.

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 2>But I think this is good Rock and Rogen with

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 2>us with Musco Chicago. We welcome all of you on

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 2>YouTube worldwide and particularly in South Asia. My colleague Damien Sassar,

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Professor Rogin, Professor Rajen.

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>You have mentioned the concept of an authoritarian democracy and

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>how India is moving into that sort of bucket. Talk

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to us a little bit about what this election means

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>for India and what it means for Numerendro Modi and

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>some of his policies on labor and whatnot.

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:22.039
<v Speaker 3>So I think the key number to look at in

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:27.039
<v Speaker 3>this election is the bgp's own seats in Parliament. They

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:31.679
<v Speaker 3>almost surely will fall short of a majority, which means

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 3>that they have to actually take the support of other

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 3>parties convince them to stay on board, which means they

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:42.279
<v Speaker 3>have to be much more sensitive to a broad based

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 3>set of policies. Now, the PGP has done some very

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 3>good things during its stint in power. For example, it

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 3>has improved the investment in infrastructure and you can see

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 3>Rhodes airports highways becoming much better in India. That's good. However,

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 3>what it has not articulated is a sensible policy for

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 3>broad based employment, and that almost surely requires policies on

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 3>human capital, how to skill up the workforce, how to

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 3>bring you know, industry together with universities and so on

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 3>to get people jobs. So the frustration with a BJP

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 3>has been mass unemployment, which is, you know, in an

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:26.919
<v Speaker 3>authority regime. They simply don't even acknowledge the fact that

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 3>unemployment has been growing and is especially amongst the youth.

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:34.479
<v Speaker 3>So what this election has done is essentially given them

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 3>a cold shower of reality that people are not happy

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 3>with your policies and that will force, you know, if

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 3>the BJP does come back to power after negotiating with allies,

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 3>it will force policies which are broader, more inclusive, and

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 3>more sensitive to the needs of the people. That's a

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 3>good thing.

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 2>This morning an extended interview with Rock and Roger of

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 2>the Buschool Chicago for those joining in America. A shock

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 2>a result or beginning of results, I should say, in

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 2>a Delhi election assumed to be dominant for mister Mody

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 2>and it was decidedly less so my colleague Damian Sassar.

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Professor Roger, and I want to take you back to

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>your former role as director of research at the IMF.

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 1>You're familiar with workers' remittances, the role they play in India,

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean the role they play globally. Eight hundred and

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 1>sixty million of remittances in twenty twenty three, India is

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>fifteen percent of that. Talk to us about what this

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>election means for the diaspora outside of India about the

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>flows of capital into India. Is it's going to change

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>things at all?

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:40.359
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think it's It can actually be good news

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 3>both from the perspective. Remittance is will continue regardless of

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 3>who's in part. This is more you know, a lot

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.480
<v Speaker 3>of money coming from the Middle East, some from the

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 3>United States and Europe for people to their families, and

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.479
<v Speaker 3>that will continue that there's no reason why that would

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 3>be disrupted. What is interesting, however, is foreign direct investment

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 3>has been slowing into India over the last couple of years.

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:07.279
<v Speaker 3>Some people argue that one of the reasons it has

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 3>been slowing is that, you know, people are worried about

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 3>arbitrary government policy, to the extent that a more democratic

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 3>dispensation at the center creates more stability about government policies,

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 3>especially it limits the weaponization of the tax authorities, of

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 3>the investigative authorities. Business actually will feel more comfortable, I hope,

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 3>and I think it is quite possible that private investment,

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 3>which has also be on the down as well as

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 3>foreign direct investment, could pick up slowly as it sees

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 3>policies emerge which are more comforting.

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Professor, within your new book, breaking the Mold, And I

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 2>guess the answer is for every central bank. The raging

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 2>vogue now is to pull climate change into some form

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 2>of monetary policy mandate from whatever the nation is. Climate

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 2>change is reality in India New Deli today, I believe

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 2>the high of one hundred and eleven, one hundred and fourteen?

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Fair nit, who's counting, Professor? What does India do and

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 2>what does Modi do to immediately break the mold on

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 2>a climate change out of control?

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, this is precisely what the book is about. Can

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 3>India afford to become another China? Does the world have

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 3>room for another China? Becoming a manufacturing giant? And that

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 3>was the direction the more the government was trying to

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 3>go in offering massive subsidies to capital intensive manufacturing and

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 3>it you know the reality is that China's already there.

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 3>There is very little place for another manufacturing giant, especially

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 3>given the protectionism that's right in the world. But India

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 3>has a card up its leave. It actually is doing

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 3>far better in services exports, which is much greener, much

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:03.679
<v Speaker 3>more sustainable and You're seeing a huge growth in skilled

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:08.559
<v Speaker 3>services exported to the rest of them, whether it's telemedicine, consulting,

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:12.679
<v Speaker 3>chip design, lots of new areas opening up. India accounts

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 3>of five percent of global trade there. That's good.

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 2>How do you unify a nation with over twenty languages?

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:22.319
<v Speaker 2>We in the United States are in a panic. I mean,

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 2>there's two languages in Chicago, the Cubs in a white Sox.

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 2>That's a different story. But ragu, how do you unify

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 2>towards a new India around twenty disparate languages?

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 3>Tom, It's more than that. It's twenty official languages, which

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 3>means they have enough people speaking it, but there are

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 3>six hundred additional dialects and languages. It's a vast complicated country.

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 3>And the only way it's unified is through democracy, because

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:58.840
<v Speaker 3>democracy allows each each community a voice. You talked about

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty six in in India, that's when the parliamentary

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 3>seats get reapportioned. When there will be a move to

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 3>have new seats in parliament for the more populous areas.

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:16.680
<v Speaker 3>That has to be done by consensus, and what I'm

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 3>so glad about is that it will be done by consensus.

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 3>Because democracy has re established itself in India and they

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 3>will have to negotiate how that reapportionment helps. So India

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:32.199
<v Speaker 3>is more politically stable as a result of this election,

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 3>is also going to be a greater friend for the

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:36.199
<v Speaker 3>democracies of the world.

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Damien, I know one of your focuses is on

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 2>India Russia, and of course it goes back to Neyhror's

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 2>visit in nineteen fifty five to Russia and all the

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 2>responses through the sixties of James John Kenneth Galbray think

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Kennedy trying to reaffirm an American presence from a distance.

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>That's absolutely right. And Professor Rajan, I'd really like to

0:10:56.440 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>hear your opinion on the relationship between India and Russia. Obviously,

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 1>they've been a big consumer of Russian barrels of Russian oil,

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and if you look at the tenure and the correlation

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 1>between the Indian tenure and Brent crude, it is pretty strong.

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>It has been since two thousand, So talk to us

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about that relationship India and Russia.

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, India sort of tilted towards Russia when the US

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:22.719
<v Speaker 3>tilted away from India. India and the United States were

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 3>quite friendly in the sixties, but then you know, as

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 3>the Bangladesh situation developed, the US tilted away from India,

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 3>and that's when Russia moved towards India. There was a

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 3>strong friendship through the sixties, seventies and eighties. India buys

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 3>a lot of military hardware from Russia, so it has

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 3>been attended that has changed. India increasingly is buying from

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 3>the West, you know, from France, from the United States,

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 3>and that relationship is strengthening. So this is a work

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 3>in process. India understands increasingly Russia is going to be

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 3>dependent on China, which is unfortunately. At this point the

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:11.479
<v Speaker 3>relationship between India and China is one antagonist.

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Soago, I've got time for one more question. I have

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:18.319
<v Speaker 2>to interrupt and be rude. If you are called upon

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 2>by mister Mody, will you serve the Indian people within

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 2>his new government.

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think that's an unlikely prospect. You know, my

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:32.079
<v Speaker 3>sort of inclination is whenever there's a government I can

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 3>agree with, I'm happy to work with them. I've always

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 3>been open with advice. Let's see what happens.

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Rogert, thank you so much. We're really anticipating breaking the

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:45.439
<v Speaker 2>mole two hundred and seventy pages from Princeton University pres

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 2>look for that from Professor Rogin the Bout School, Chicago.

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 2>It is legendary at the University of Virginia. The largest

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 2>birthday party ever in the history of the University of

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Virginia was on the lawn for Kate Moore. It was

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 2>only eight nine, ten years ago. Joining us now this morning,

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:17.680
<v Speaker 2>Kate Moore from black Rock and our global allocation team.

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Kate Moore, Happy birthday to you.

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.719
<v Speaker 4>Oh thanks Tom. I must say it's great to be

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 4>twenty nine again.

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 2>We're we're all work as SaaS. The only one getting

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 2>away to the Kate Moore's Damien Sassa is cottenshiseled and

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 2>doing thirty six holes on the golf course. Kate Moore,

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:36.719
<v Speaker 2>I want you to measure the level of xuberance right now.

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 2>I see a lot of fancy technical studies that say

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 2>we're just not as exuberant is nineteen ninety nine. Do

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:43.439
<v Speaker 2>you buy it?

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 4>I don't see a huge amount of exuberance. Actually, let's

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 4>just talk about exuberance. Over the course of twenty twenty four, right,

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:53.719
<v Speaker 4>we had gotten to a pretty excited place by the

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 4>end of March. Obviously, stocks were putting up big gains.

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:00.120
<v Speaker 4>At people who had been skeptics around the resilience of

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 4>you as economy had to throw in that towel. It

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 4>seemed like everyone was afraid of being underweight or under risked.

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 4>And I think a lot of that has faded. You know,

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 4>we had a tougher April, and now we've had a

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 4>lot of cross currents as companies have reported earnings, you know,

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 4>some good news and some just okay news, and lots

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 4>of unexpected sort of changes in the macro environment and

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 4>in the policy rate expectations. So I would say we're

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 4>just in a kind of a lukewarm but not negative,

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 4>but a lukewarm state at the moment.

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Happy birthday, Kate, and I agree with you. Things are

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 1>far more asymmetric. I mean they're not as asymmetric, the

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>far more two sided. Given the movie we've seen since.

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 2>April, you're saying there's an asymmetry between thirty nine and

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 2>twenty nine.

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>No asymmetry there whatsoever. So miss Moore King dollars flexing

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>its muscles yet again, right, I mean, let's be real here.

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is not a US exceptionalism move. This

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>is a risk off move. Every single currency in G

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>ten and EM with the exception of the pound, is

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>now down versus the dollar to date. Talk to us

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 1>about king dollar in the current environment.

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we've had a modest overweight to the dollar throughout

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 4>the course of this year. Not a huge bet, but

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 4>just kind of an expectation that US economy was going

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 4>to be stronger than some of our big trading partners

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 4>and therefore kind of justified. But I have to say,

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 4>I think there is a little bit of a risk

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 4>off element to it, as you suggest, and there is

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 4>also an understanding that the US economy is very resilient

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 4>and quite a lot of them both consumer although that's

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 4>you know people that did debate that, but the consumer

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 4>data and the corporate data is still really strong. So

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 4>you know, I'm not a great currency forecaster, but I

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 4>wouldn't bet against the dollar at least in the next

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 4>few months.

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Just in folks, I really want to bring this to

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 2>your attention. After Damien talks to Kate More of Blackrock,

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 2>we're thrilled to go to Delhi and we'll speak to

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Derek Wallbank of Bloomberg News on the stunning election. Damien.

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's stay here, Kate. Let's stay with the US.

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's stay with US equities, right. I mean, we've had

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>some pretty big moves in Telco and it year to date.

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Do we lean into that. I mean, if we had

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>this risk off move off, things sort of settling in here,

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is it you know, is this a buying opportunity?

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Damien. One of the things I will say is

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 4>I love that the leadership this year is really being

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 4>driven by fundamentals. I mean, I know there are skeptics

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 4>out there saying these this run can't continue. We know

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 4>the companies that are performing the best are those that

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 4>are putting up earnings during their earnings reporting, have affirmed

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 4>guidance and oftentimes raised guidance and set higher expectations. These

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 4>are companies on a really solid path, in some cases,

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 4>on a secular path, separate from the business cycle. We're

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 4>not in a position where people are just kind of

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 4>hyping up or speculating on what may happen in the future.

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 4>This technology is here today. These companies are delivering revenues

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 4>and they're printing cash. So because of that, I would

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 4>not fade the leadership of these big cap tech anytime soon.

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, But Kate, I mean value and quality are both

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>down as a strategy here to date, right, I mean,

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's been the low vol factor. I mean,

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to get into all that because everybody

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>calculates these industries a different way. But equity, I mean,

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a four percent year today, and I mean it

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 1>seems to be there, seem to be you know, some

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 1>technicals that work here now.

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there are a lot of technicals. And actually we

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 4>pay very close attention to positioning and sentiment to try

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 4>and time our entry and exit into different positions. And

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 4>we've been using options pretty aggressively. Given the ball market,

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 4>you know, we've been given a lot of opportunities to

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 4>buy very cheap fall and to sell all when you

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 4>know it was a good opportunity quickly, Kate, we're.

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 2>Out of time. But what's the sentiment did you see

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 2>among fancy people like at hedge funds on big tech?

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 2>Is there a big tech bet or have they pulled away?

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 4>I think they're constructive for the most part. Of course,

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 4>it's going to depend on this segment. We haven't seen

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:43.640
<v Speaker 4>huge shorting of the big names. In fact, no one

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 4>wants to really stand in front of that train. Whether

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:48.159
<v Speaker 4>you're a mutual fund investor, a retail investor, or a

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 4>hedge fund investor. I said, as long as these companies

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 4>continue to have the fundamentals, Tom, I think it's going

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 4>to be an important part of your portfolio for the

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:57.640
<v Speaker 4>balance of twenty twenty four.

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 2>Twenty nine. Candles Kate more Heavy Birthday, Thank thank you

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 2>so much for joining us. Folks. We have Julie Norman

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 2>on just because of time in this vamp that we

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 2>just did in Stanley Cup hockey. I'm not going to

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 2>harass her about Baltimore Orioles best team in baseball, but seriously,

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 2>this is the courage of Julie Norman of the University

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 2>of College London. She is, without question, one of the

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 2>experts in the world on a difficult word, terrorism and

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:29.399
<v Speaker 2>she has taken on the challenge of a book on

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 2>the political history of Gaza. Professor Norman honor to have

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 2>you with us this morning. What is the political future

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:39.359
<v Speaker 2>of Gaza?

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 5>Oh gosh, Tom, I think that's the question that is

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:44.360
<v Speaker 5>on everyone's mind right now, and it's certainly the one

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 5>that I think Biden is really trying to push Netnahu

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 5>on these days. You know, Biden put out this ceasefire

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 5>plan ostensibly approved by Israel, but part of that was

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 5>to get the ceasefire, and part of it was just

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 5>to get Netanyahu's starting to articulate what a day after

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 5>might look like in Gaza.

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, okay, but importantly everybody's running for election and posturing

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 2>for their domestic politics. Is the American relationship with Israel changed?

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Whatever the future is oft in Yahoo or Prime Minister

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Sasa or whatever it is, is the future changed in

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:21.880
<v Speaker 2>American Israeli relations?

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 5>You know, I think there's two ways to answer that.

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 5>One is governmental relations with Israel. And I would say,

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:33.199
<v Speaker 5>at that level, whether it's president, whether it's Congress, we

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 5>still see very strong support for Israel pretty much across

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 5>the board. Obviously some exceptions within Democratic Party representatives. I

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 5>think where we're seeing the shift those with public opinion,

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 5>obviously with young voters, young citizens in particular, and really

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 5>you know, on the more progressive wing, with the Democratic

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 5>Party more broadly now split essentially fifty to fifty on

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 5>leaning more sympathetic towards Palestinians and more sympathetic towards Israel.

0:19:57.440 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 5>So I do think that trend is going to continue,

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.399
<v Speaker 5>and it's one that lawmakers will have to grapple with

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 5>is you know, incoming years a bit more than they

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 5>have in the past.

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Norman, I'm curious to hear your thoughts of what's

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:09.880
<v Speaker 1>going on south the border. We had an election in Mexico,

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Claudie Shinbaum, Jewish former mayor for the city for Mexico City,

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>at thirty percentage point. When is president, does that change

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:22.239
<v Speaker 1>Mexico's relationship with Israel at all?

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it'll be interesting to see. You know, obviously very

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:27.159
<v Speaker 5>notable that she is not only the first woman, but

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 5>the first Jewish person to hold that office. But she

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 5>has made statements before that you know, she doesn't agree

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:36.120
<v Speaker 5>with Zionism. I think she does identify in fact as

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 5>like an anti Zionist. So she seems to be, at

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 5>least up until this point, upholding what Mexico stance has

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:45.880
<v Speaker 5>been as being very pro Palestine, you know, showing their

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:50.120
<v Speaker 5>showing their dissatisfaction with Israeli policies. But again, she's been

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 5>towing the line of her predecessor up until this point,

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 5>and I think we're not really sure what many of

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 5>her policies are going to be in general simply because

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 5>she's been simply a kind of walking the party line,

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 5>and once she's in office, we might see some changes.

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:05.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting that same feeling, doctor, I mean, just the

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty surrounding what her appointment means as president. But you know,

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 1>let's shift gears. Let's talk about Ukraine. Let's talk about

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 1>the I'MA funding that they received last week. I mean,

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:15.159
<v Speaker 1>that's good news, but there's another sort of summ and

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:18.160
<v Speaker 1>other fundraiser books with Biden talk to us about US

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainian relations. I mean, what do we expect there?

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So, you know, I think it's a tough spot

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:26.640
<v Speaker 5>for Biden right now. Obviously he got through the big

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 5>aid package, you know, two months ago. That was a

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 5>very long time coming. I think that's going to be

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 5>the last big infusion of military aid at least that

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 5>we see going to the going to Ukraine anytime soon.

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 5>And as the war goes on, I think Biden's getting

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 5>to a point of just as is the what is

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 5>the endgame here? What is all this going towards? And

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 5>I think those conversations are starting to happen more.

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:52.399
<v Speaker 2>Professor Norman, do your claimed expertise and I'm not saying

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 2>this to be Snyder snarky. I think it's a serious question.

0:21:56.200 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Is Hamas defeated or trending for defeated? How do you

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 2>gauge that? How do you measure that?

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so this has obviously been one of Israel's main objectives,

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 5>and the US right now is assessing that Hamas has

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:15.399
<v Speaker 5>been sufficiently depleted in the sense that they couldn't carry

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:18.679
<v Speaker 5>out a massive military attack, they couldn't govern effectively, that

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:21.400
<v Speaker 5>sort of thing. At this point, I would just say,

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:24.680
<v Speaker 5>though Hamas is so many different actors all at once.

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:28.880
<v Speaker 5>They're a military operation, they are a political party, they're

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 5>a social movement, and there's a lot of just everyday

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:35.160
<v Speaker 5>people who identify as Hamas supporters. So I don't think

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:39.360
<v Speaker 5>the movement itself is close to being wiped out. And honestly,

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 5>I feel like many that after the guys of war,

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 5>they will probably be able to recruit quite effectively, or

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 5>a group very similar to them will likely be able

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:48.679
<v Speaker 5>to recruit very effectively.

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>And doctor Norman talks to us a little, just a

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 1>bit just about I mean, look, I can't believe I'm

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>saying this.

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 2>Russia.

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Russian relationships with the West with the US specifically, I mean,

0:22:57.320 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>talk to us a little bit about, you know, what

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:01.439
<v Speaker 1>comes next for the country, what comes next for its

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 1>relationships with the former Soviet states. I mean, I'm thinking Armenia,

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking Azerbaijan, I'm thinking you know, I'm thinking quite frankly,

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:10.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, Luzbekistan and a lot of the sort of

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 1>step out of China. You talk to us a little

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>bit about what's going on there.

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:17.399
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, sure, so, I would say, you know, obviously, I

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 5>don't think things will change with the US, at least

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 5>within these next six months, at least during the Biden

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:25.159
<v Speaker 5>presidency and with the Ukraine War, But with much of

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:29.120
<v Speaker 5>the rest of the world, including former Soviet estates, including

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:31.919
<v Speaker 5>much of the global South, you know, they have viewed

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:35.200
<v Speaker 5>this war very differently than the US. They have continued,

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 5>you know, trading with Russia, taking advantage of cheaper prices

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 5>and really trying to kind of straddle both lines. So globally,

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 5>I feel like Russia is actually still doing fine with

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 5>man with many states, and they will probably continue on

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 5>that trajectory as as anti Western sentiment increases.

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Unfortunately, professor, we've got forty five seconds left since you

0:23:57.160 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 2>bleed Baltimore Orioles Orange with the new ownership. Should the

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 2>Orioles be aggressive at the trade deadline?

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:08.400
<v Speaker 5>Oh, I mean I would just say I put all

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 5>my trust in David Rubinstein, like whatever he thinks is best,

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 5>I will like trust. He's brought a lot of graphics

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:17.120
<v Speaker 5>to Baltimore and we're all just super excited.

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Nailed it. Professor Normany just knows how to get back

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 2>on the show. Julie Norman, thank you so much and

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 2>really anticipated as our most serious history about the political

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 2>history of GAZAOK for that. We'll have a substantial set

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 2>of economic data at ten o'clock and our economic indicators

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:49.440
<v Speaker 2>always brought to you by Commonwealth, supporting more than two

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:54.439
<v Speaker 2>thousand independent financial advisors with the solutions they need to

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:59.239
<v Speaker 2>grow a thriving business. Commonwealth go where you Grow. Visitcommonwealth

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 2>dot com to learn more. We thank Commonwealth for their

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:08.919
<v Speaker 2>real commitment to what we're doing here as well joining

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:12.199
<v Speaker 2>us for a peaceful conversation that the Damien the day is.

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>The interview of the day.

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I don't know about the interview of the day,

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 2>but let's get back to sanity and what the markets

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:21.680
<v Speaker 2>are doing. Lindsay Roster with US multisector Investing Goldman Sechs

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Asset Management. Which category of multisector is your most vibrant

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 2>study right now?

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 6>The most vibrant study would be structured product. What's interesting

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 6>about it is it isn't a market that you can

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:37.879
<v Speaker 6>just buy it all. This is a market that you

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:41.399
<v Speaker 6>absolutely have to be an active manager in billin colos

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:44.120
<v Speaker 6>and even in commercial mortgage pack security.

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 2>For the mere mortals out there, identify what structured product is.

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like I'm buying skyscrapers that are bankrupt? What

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 2>structured product?

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 6>Hopefully not skyscrapers that are bankrupt, although there was actually

0:25:56.240 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 6>a you could say a default in office based in

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:04.879
<v Speaker 6>New York recently. But really, what structured product is is

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:08.879
<v Speaker 6>a bucket of assets and there is a structured overlaid

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:12.919
<v Speaker 6>that allows you to have trunching, so splitting off the

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 6>stuff exactly, and different levels of it have different protection

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 6>levels or what they call fancy jargon credit enhancement. So

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 6>if you're the highest part of the capital structure, you're

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 6>going to have the most credit enhancement that comes typically

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:29.959
<v Speaker 6>with less threads. Hey I'm a Philly's girl, but I'll

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 6>let you go with the analogy.

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:34.160
<v Speaker 2>That's kind the white sox the lowest true. How would

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:35.359
<v Speaker 2>you respond to the argument.

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we all know about the one point seven

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:39.639
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollar private credit market, and we know about you know,

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the marketing that goes around that that these are. You know,

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>they have tighter covenants, they're safer that you talk to

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 1>us about the recoveries on first been loans, I'm hearing

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that recoveries on a lot of that debt are not

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 1>going to be as high as what you might otherwise

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>find in the public markets.

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so it it is really going to be collateral specific.

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:58.639
<v Speaker 6>But it goes back to again where I started with

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 6>active management. You want to make manager who is really

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 6>thinking about what they're investing in, and so you can

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 6>look at broad numbers like what are recovery rates? Are

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 6>they going to be lower? I would say, find your manager.

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 6>Find your manager who's going to do the right job.

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 6>And again, the big thing that's different between public credit

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:18.160
<v Speaker 6>and private credit is that private credit is less liquid

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 6>and what I mean by that your ability to get

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:22.959
<v Speaker 6>your money every single day less. So in the public

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:26.120
<v Speaker 6>markets we have daily liquidity. With that you get a premium.

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 6>By the way, though, in the private market too compensate

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 6>you for.

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:31.439
<v Speaker 1>That, Lindsay, I want to channel one of your former

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 1>colleagues a chapter the name of Sam Finkelstein now at

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Citadel I believe, a senior PM at Citdeley joined Griffin

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:41.359
<v Speaker 1>Dunn down in Miami, a former emerging market.

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Fly A manager.

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us about the role of emerging markets in

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:46.639
<v Speaker 1>a multi asset diversified portfolio.

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:49.400
<v Speaker 6>Yes, so you want to be able to look across

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 6>the globe into all asset classes for opportunity. As you're

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 6>both aware, it is a great opportunity set right now.

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 6>From a yield perspective, we've got yields that we haven't seen.

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 6>There's income and fixed income. We've heard that story. But

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:05.439
<v Speaker 6>you really want to go out there and find the

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 6>right place to get risk adjusted returns because spreads are

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 6>really tight. Emerging markets have been definitely an outperformer year

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:16.159
<v Speaker 6>to date. What's really driven that is that the double

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:19.159
<v Speaker 6>B and single B market has been open for financing,

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:22.160
<v Speaker 6>which is new. But we think about emerging markets as

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 6>a piece of the puzzle, and there is a lot

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:26.919
<v Speaker 6>of high risk, a lot of election risk. I mean,

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 6>certainly we've got election risk in the US. We don't

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 6>have to get into that, but their election risk in

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 6>emerging markets as well. We are finding more opportunity actually

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 6>in the US right now when our portfolios are tilted

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 6>more to the US in a multisector fruit.

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 1>So, Linda, I'd love to ask you about the US elections,

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 1>but we only have you for a limited amount of

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:46.600
<v Speaker 1>time and I need to channel Clive Asna's here your

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 1>g sam factor in disease. We talk about Carrie, we

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about value quality. What factors do you believe as

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 1>an investor you should be leaning into in the current environment.

0:28:55.680 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it would be idiosyncratic factors. You want to do

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 6>the right work here. If you think shout.

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Out there from what Gold say? Now you know it's

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 2>idiot idiosyncratic carriage. An idiosyncratic factor is the kids are

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 2>out of school and it's killing my bank account. Go

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 2>what do you got tom?

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 6>It means you got to do the homework right. You

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 6>got to figure out is this a company that's going

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 6>to pay you back? And that's really the point with bonds?

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 6>Are you going to get there?

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 2>But I'm kidding, but Damien as a really important question, folks.

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Does the factor shift and adjust and the waiting shift

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 2>I want to go back to one of your observations,

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 2>which was what's called the money Tower, the Michell New

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 2>York tower on Broadway at fifty five and sixty. Now,

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, we get the Pinatis Blackstone. They paid a

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 2>thousand of square foot or whatever. Ten years ago it

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 2>was a different mood and we see all these haircuts

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 2>going on. Now, come on, that's got to be an

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 2>opportunity for you or Goldman Sachs advising big foreign money.

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:55.560
<v Speaker 2>When does the big foreign money show up to buying

0:29:55.680 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 2>train wrecks like the money Tower. I'm broad seventeen forty Broadway.

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 6>When when they can make money on the investment?

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Is that now?

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 6>Well, it depends based on the forward. When you think

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 6>about who are the tenants, what's the leasing opportunities? Just

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 6>like you think about a normal corporate company, you know,

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 6>what's what's the forward, What's what's their growth opportunity? Is

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 6>this an exciting place to be? What's the quality of

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 6>the space that you're dealing with. If we think that

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 6>it makes sense and we think that the price is right,

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 6>then we can advise and help. But I think the

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 6>big thing right now is that there are a lot

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:33.960
<v Speaker 6>of assets trading at the wrong price. And so if

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 6>you just passively buy the world right now, you're you're

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 6>going to get burned. You need to have an active

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 6>manager to help you.

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:46.720
<v Speaker 2>Source within the fancy talk world. Damiens Hour and Lindsey Rossner,

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 2>the answer is you're waiting for price rationalization to occur.

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 6>That's right back to spreads being really tight. We're waiting

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 6>for the right time to get involved. That doesn't mean

0:30:56.800 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 6>we have no risk on our in our portfolios.

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:01.239
<v Speaker 2>You got to keep this and you gotta keep there.

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 6>There is some Carrie. I think. What's also really interesting

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 6>are there real val opportunities. And I'm going to give

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 6>you one that's not necessarily in my bond portfolio. But

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 6>right now you can go to France and see Taylor

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 6>Swift for two hundred dollars. The prices start in the

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 6>US two thousand plus global market. Vote with your feet,

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:23.720
<v Speaker 6>find the opportunity Taylor Swift in Paris. You know what

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 6>my sister did, and I'm not going to blame her

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 6>for not taking me. We have a phenomenal relationship because

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 6>you went with a bunch of friends. They had a

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:30.480
<v Speaker 6>great time.

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Now we're thinking about going on Argentina.

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 2>So let's go say that we got Mohamedelarian.

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 6>You may have seen Taylor Swift, Mohammed ray.

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 2>If Riley from Saint Louis went and Lindsay's sister went.

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Wasn't an Was everybody in the audience American in Paris?

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 6>There were there were there were many many Americans there.

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Yes, email it on YouTube live chat. Please did you

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 2>go see Taylor in Paris and save us from one

0:31:55.320 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 2>mark Lindsay.

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 1>You know you mentioned some of these less liquid segments

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:01.240
<v Speaker 1>of the fixing market is offering value, and you know,

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 1>when I think of those areas of the market, and

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 1>obviously for you guys at g SAM, you know these markets,

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you know who holds the bonds, you know, but I

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>get a little bit fearful because for me, this the

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 1>whole private credit. You know, these little clubs, these little syndicates,

0:32:12.560 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and then you hear what's going on with Vista, and

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>they're kind of, you know, fighting with each other because again,

0:32:17.400 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 1>everybody knows who holds the bonds, and you can kind

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 1>of show preference for one club at the expense of another.

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 1>So talk to us about those dynamics and how that

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 1>changes the playing field for you as an investor.

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, the dynamics are the same ones that have always

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:34.239
<v Speaker 6>been a portfolio construction. It's all about sizing and it's

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 6>about understanding your liquidity profile. And while yes, private credit

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 6>has grown, this concept of figuring that out and how

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 6>to get out on the right spot on the efficient

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 6>frontier isn't anything new.

0:32:45.000 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for joining thanke you for having to hold

0:32:48.040 --> 0:32:52.720
<v Speaker 2>you conversations. Multisector investing barely describes. It's the nuances of

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 2>piecing together where we are right now, particularly within commercial

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 2>real estate. This is a Bloombergs Surveillance podcast, bringing you

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 2>the best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations. You

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 2>can also watch the show live on YouTube. Visit the

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Podcast channel on YouTube to see the show weekday

0:33:14.640 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 2>mornings from seven to ten am Eastern from our global

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 2>headquarters in New York City. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify,

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:26.240
<v Speaker 2>or anywhere else you listen, and always on Bloomberg Radio,

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:29.640
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Terminal, and the Bloomberg Business App.