WEBVTT - Corbin's Struggles, Albies Is Back, Fantasy Football Best Ball Strategy

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune in app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Never do, didn't? Yeah?

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Right now? That's welcome you bag your host by day

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:25.559
<v Speaker 1>from five died from say Francis Frank stand ball, ladies

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and gentlemen yours and with that we're welcome you inside studio.

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>This is the BVFS. That is Frank Stample. I am

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 1>Gregg saucepan Frank Gregg. A happy hump day to you, buddy,

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>if you hit the middle of the week. Seems like

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 1>this week is going pretty fast too. It's past couple

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of weeks. Not as fast as last week, really not

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>as fast as last week. Fast meet was flying by.

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Feels feels pretty good right now, you feeling good. We've

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>got a lot going on, Greggy, a lot of baseball

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>action going on. Look at these nice little graphics may

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>by Alex. She's doing a fantastic job like those like

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>fantastic job. I don't even remember who Martino was throwing

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>shade very much, guys, I really appreciate that. I just

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>wish I can do you much better with video, because

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm about to throw a computer for the window. All right, fantastic.

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I thought Carl's ending the video. What happened to that.

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I've heard Carl say that about us three four times.

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, appreciate it. Yeah, we're not live video, but

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>but he's trying in progress, in progress, in progress. It's

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>crazy time right now. June is always a pretty wild

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>time because we're in the midst of fantasy baseball. There's

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot going on. We got the NBA Finals going

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>on right now, we have the NBA Playoffs coming up,

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>NBA Playoffs and the NBA Draft coming up next week

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and the final and uh, fantasy football is right around

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the corner. We'll talk to Davi's Maddick later on in

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the show. Get a little best Ball strategy in here

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>as well. Grad I was just talking to Davis right

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>before we went on the air about a little best

0:02:57.000 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>ball strategy about the US Opening, you know you don't

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 1>care about that starts tomorrow. Pebble Beach one of the

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:05.679
<v Speaker 1>majors in golf, so that's exciting. Just drafted my team.

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:10.679
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I'm sorry, Greg, I'm pretty useless when it

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>comes to golf, alright, But that's that's why we have Davis, right,

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Davis knows football. Davis. We have m on for golf.

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>He does the Fando video, he does random moons lega soccer.

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>He does not not even kidding. No, I know, I've

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>seen him talk about it. Yeah, it's ridiculous. He's out

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>of his mind, but I love it. Davids Mattock, Jolanes

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>is coming up. Told forty Virginia Zakis will join us tomorrow.

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>From inside injuries, lot of injuries. Last night I was

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>looking at my pit team before we went on the air,

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and we have three pickups per week and I have

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>used all three. Damn it already it's Wednesday. I used one. Today.

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm streaming Danny Duffy against the title. So I streamed

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Jared I cough on Monday, sorry, not only got bombed,

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>but was then sent to the bull then, so on

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday I lost Corey Seeger, Ryan Brazier, Jordan Lyles and

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Jose Irradio to the I l oh my God on

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>two is night, so I used to pick up to that.

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell if that's better or worse than the

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>fact that I had Paxton and Zac Wheelder my lot yesterday.

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I also Patric but I had um must Year. It's

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Naka and Patrick Corby and my litter. All right, let's go,

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>we both suck doing really well. This week is a

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 1>great week, Frank, great week. Everybody be sure to continue

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 1>taking our advice absolutely. And that actually leads us to

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a poll question, Frank that it was a great poll question.

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I actually didn't use this for the Polly what we'll

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>use it tomorrow. We put it on the rundown. I

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>was so excited. I was like, wow, Frank, this is

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>a great idea. I'm loving your creativity because I saw

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I saw people. I saw someone specifically, I tell you

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>during the break last night, and it was no, it wasn't.

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 1>And I just got so frustrated about like fantasy analysts

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that pumped themselves up too much. You have to be realistic, man.

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I understand, like you have a brand and you want

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to promote yourself as someone who gets a lot of

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>things correct, but nobody in this industry gets correct, Greg,

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>And you have to be able to you learn from

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>your mistakes. And what I think we do a lot

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:04.559
<v Speaker 1>is make fun of ourselves when we get things wrong,

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and you have to try and learn from it. This

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:07.840
<v Speaker 1>is one of those things that I think I take

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the other extreme a bit, like I get a lot

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 1>wrong and I don't mind talking about we probably shouldn't,

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:16.239
<v Speaker 1>like we've been saying this for years, that we shouldn't

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 1>talk about how it makes me get wrong, like it's

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>a right to do sometimes, Craig. We probably shouldn't give

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>people this impression that we're wrong all the time. But

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, we like to have fun with it. We

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 1>like to joke around, and I think it's it's a

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>much better approach in life overall to like don't take

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>things too seriously, like don't be too cocky. You gotta

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>be confident. But like these fantasy analysts who just only

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>tell you the things that they get right all the time,

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's such a tired look, Greg, And I'm

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:45.280
<v Speaker 1>over it. But we'll talk about that later on the week. Yeah, absolutely,

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>it's I can't even reveal it now. I didn't. I

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to put in your because I didn't want

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Davis Maddick to think we were like talking about him

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>or something. Oh he thought, he thought too, Yeah, I

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:56.159
<v Speaker 1>probably overthought it. Kidding me. Let's get into the news.

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>We got a lot going on, all right. So the

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:00.719
<v Speaker 1>biggest news for me, uh was and I'll get to

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 1>sell the top story. It's the top stuff in a moment.

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 1>But Corey Seeger, of course, the one thing you'd even

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>have on here. But Corey Singer was a rounding third

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>base last night. Shraine is hamstring. Dave Roberts immediately after

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the game was like, yeah, he's got a very significant

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:16.839
<v Speaker 1>hamstring strain. They think it's even more than a Grade

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 1>two with long the Virginia about it tomorrow. But Corey

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Seeger is going to be out for the next significant

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>period of time, I would assume past the All Star break.

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 1>And not a good look for Corey Seeger, very very unfortunate. Yeah,

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:31.040
<v Speaker 1>he was recently coming around as well, finally getting hot.

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 1>That's what makes this even more frustrating. You look at

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>in the month of June for Corey Seeger. Small sample

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>size forty yet bats but a four twenty five batting average,

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:43.600
<v Speaker 1>one homer, nine ribbies. He had five home runs in

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the month of May as well, so the power starting

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to come around a little bit, and then gets hit

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 1>with this hamstring injury, which seems like he's more than

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>likely going to land on the I l Y. I'll

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>just ask you the residual effects of this. If Corey

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Seeger is out, does that make Chris Taylor and everyday

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>player again? Yes? It does, despite how he struggled this year,

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 1>which means should he be owning in twelve team leagues again? No,

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's been dumb enough to be owned

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>in twelve team leagues. I think he's probably owned and

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>only leagues if he's not like that's where I'm jumping in.

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Certainly fifteen team leagues. I'm jumping in because he's going

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to play every day, have a solid spot in the order,

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:21.679
<v Speaker 1>but he becomes everyday player, the every day short stop,

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately hopefully with a consistent playing time. He bounced

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>his back and plays well. He's actually slacked off a

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit in June. Greg overall hasn't been a great year.

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>From two planning average ps, but he did show signs

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>in May. I remember talking about him that he was

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>heating up a little bit in May. For Chris Taylor,

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>he had three hundred with three homers and ten ribies

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and then kind of took a back seat here in

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>June as well. So strikes me as one of these

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>really shreeky players. But I think in deeper leagues, you know,

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>if you lose out on a Chris Taylor, I mean,

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>if you lose out on a Corey Seeger, then Chris

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Taylor looks like he's the next man up. Greg. Yes, absolutely,

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>So that's the biggest injury to go down last night.

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>As I mentioned, uh, that was Corey Seeger. A couple

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of other pitchers the Rania hit the aisle as I

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Jordan Lyles as well, but a lot of talking

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>about players coming off the aisle hopefully soon, and that

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>is some of our top stories. I mentioned Urani Yet,

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>so we're seeing Jordan yellow Moto getting the opportunity to

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>start here. UM four, Jose Irania in this rotation, he's

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>on the phoney man. It's one of the reasons he's

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>getting called up. He's making his debut. Came over in

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the Christian yellowsh deal. What should fantasy owners know about

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>your yellow modo? Uh, he's in Double A right now

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and he is a middling prospect. He's not a top prospect.

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 1>He was kind of more so one of the throw

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>ins in the Christian Yellow Deal. He has performed well

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>in the minor leagues. Three point seven five e r

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>A in the minors with four nine strikeouts and four

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>sixty three endings pitched. More so known for his curveball,

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:50.439
<v Speaker 1>it is a plus curveball. This is really frustrating that

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 1>he's getting a call from Double A while Zach Gallen

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>is completely destroying Triple A in the PCL. Mind you

0:08:56.840 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>where home runs, isolated power power in general is just

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 1>up crazy amounts in Triple A and in the minors

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>this year, and Zack Gallen is just absolutely destroying it

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and doesn't get the call because he's not on the

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 1>forty man roster. So situation to pay attention to. I

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:18.079
<v Speaker 1>still like stashing Zach Gallen, but Jordan Yamamoto just someone

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to pay attention to. Let's see what he does in

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>his start tonight again plus curveball and this year in

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:25.679
<v Speaker 1>Double A hit a three point five eight e r

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a last year in double A. In three starts he

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:31.079
<v Speaker 1>had a two point one two ear A, So I

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think that he has the meant upside kind more

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:35.719
<v Speaker 1>so projects as a middle to back end rotation arm.

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think anytime you have someone who's getting called

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 1>up that Marlins Park is their home park, Craig, you're

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>at least interested in deeper league, So pay attention to

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:47.199
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Yamamoto. Jordan Yellamoto is somebody that could help your

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 1>fantasy teams. It's crazy. I was just reading an article

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that like the Marlins rotations like the fifth best in

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the NL. They're good, but now they're beat up man

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:59.439
<v Speaker 1>with with both Urania Caleb Smith on the I L

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:01.839
<v Speaker 1>we'll see a yellooo can be and see if Zach

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Gallant will ultimately get the call for you Frank uh

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>And the rotation is good. The hitting the bullpend not

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>so much, but at least the Morons do seem to

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>be going at least in the right direction. Speaking of

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>young pitchers, Jess Lazardo and A. J. Puke finally made

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>their debuts in the minors UH for the UH for

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the respective teams. Lozzardo, I'm more we're super super excited

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>about him coming into the year. Him and Chris Paddock

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>were the guys are on the same level, and basically

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>as soon as one went, the other went in draft.

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Lazardo unfortunately hurts his shoulder towards end the spring, really

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 1>was shut down for about two months. Ramp things up,

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>pitched three shutout innings last night. Are you worried about

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the A's fast tracking him a little bit, bringing him

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:46.959
<v Speaker 1>back as a member of the bullpen, potentially stashing him

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:49.719
<v Speaker 1>in Triple A? Are you worried about that? Or are

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>you looking at him as a player that was going

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>to make the major league roster and we'll get the

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 1>chance that he deserves to start. I think he will

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>get the chance to start, Craig, because the Oakland A's

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>make the playoffs last year, I think they have aspirations

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>of making the playoffs again and making a run here,

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>but their pitching staff has not been good. And you're

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>right about Hazels Lozardo. He was on a similar plane

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:10.959
<v Speaker 1>as Chris Paddock, uh the lefty version. Let's call him that,

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:14.679
<v Speaker 1>the left of of Chris Paddock. Here in the American League,

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people liked him as a Rookie of

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the Year candidate before he got hurt in spring training.

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Only twenty percent owned in YAHOO leagues right now, you know,

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I just mentioned Zack Gallen, and he's performed mightily at

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:29.679
<v Speaker 1>Triple A. But honestly, Lazardo might get the call up

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to the majors sooner than a guy like Zach Gallen.

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>So if he's available in your league, Lozardo that is owned,

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I do expect him to be in the rotation. Um,

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>let's say, if not late June, early July, Greg then

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>they might hold him out until the second half of

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the season, but we could be looking at a potential

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>top forty starting pitcher rest of season once he gets

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>called up in the second half of the season. Uh.

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>You look at his numbers in the minors. He's been

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:56.200
<v Speaker 1>awesome at every level. A two point five not two

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>point four nine e r A in thirty four starts

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>in Minor League level two and seventy nine, trickouts in

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>A hundred and fifty five and two thirds and his

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Picture's a lot to like about Lozardo. When it comes

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to a j puck, I think he's probably more so

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>destined for the bullpen. He might have a multi ending

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 1>reliever role, something like Josh Hayter. I think he projects

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>long term as being in the rotation, but I don't

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:20.719
<v Speaker 1>know that they're gonna rush him into that this year.

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I think Lozardo is gonna get a chance though. All Right,

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>so Lozardo the name to watch. Also coming back from injury. Uh,

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>not that we care about him, but Eric Skogland is

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>coming back from Tommy John for the Royals. Just wanted

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>to note that he had his first start for Kansas

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 1>City in their minor league system last night as well.

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Picture that's not in the minors. That's not young or

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not as young as those guys. It's Mike Clevinger.

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>He had to rehab assignment begin over the weekend, started

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>last night as well, and cleve He's projected to start

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 1>on Monday. Frank for the Cleveland Indians about that, Yeah,

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 1>this is great news too because Clevinger was awesome to

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 1>start the year at the major league levels. So in

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>two starts he he had twenty two strikeouts and twelve

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>innings pitched. We were really really excited about that, obviously.

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>So the rehab going well for Clevinger. He's made uh

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:14.439
<v Speaker 1>two starts his first start wasn't as good. His second

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>start goes five, and the third and he's pitched last

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 1>night three hits, zero walks, five strikeouts, and it looks

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>like he's gonna be ready to go Monday, which you know,

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 1>if they play six or seven starts, i'd assume that

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>he would have a double start. Normally, I would want

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to take a more cautious approach when it comes to

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>someone that's just getting coming, just coming off the I

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 1>l right away, I wouldn't have them in my lineup.

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 1>But if he does have the two start week, then

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:41.839
<v Speaker 1>I might actually look to get Clevinger in there because

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>we know what his upside is. So yeah, this is

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:46.679
<v Speaker 1>a huge boost for you know, people who lost him.

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 1>He was being drafted as the top twenty starting pitcher

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and rightfully so it looked like he was going to

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 1>take that next step in his first two starts of

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:55.959
<v Speaker 1>the season. This is just another huge boost coming back

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>off the il Greggy. Yeah, absolutely, absolutely, Clevinger finally making

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>his way back. The Indians needed because he needs to

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>have to figure out if they are buyers or sellers.

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>We've heard about Trevor Bauer in trade talks for a while.

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 1>The scene to go with Corey Kluber. The Indians I believe,

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>are like ten and a half games back in the

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:14.319
<v Speaker 1>Al Central at the moment. They're gonna have to figure

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 1>it out soon because they have a lot to offer.

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:18.959
<v Speaker 1>They could rebuild very very quickly. UH. With teams like

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the Yankees and others come calling looking for starting pitching,

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the Indians very well may be open for business. Speaking

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>of the New York Yankees, Frank they're big Bombers, reiterated

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>after last night's second game the double header. They're coming

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>back because Jean Carlos Stanton started his rehab asigment yesterday

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>went two for four in Single A with a home run.

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I believe I expect him to d H today and

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>then move on to Triple A. If he goes to

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Triple A for a couple of games this weekend, he'll

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>be back next Monday, theoretically, and that would be very

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>very quickly for standing. When it comes to judge, he

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 1>also could you start a rehab assignment this weekend, potentially

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 1>in Scranton, and he could be back as soon as

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>next weekend for the Bombers who are headed to London

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>in about nine days. I think so I know the

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 1>plan is yet both they want them. They want them

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>for London. That's exactly they want both of them in

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the lineup for London. And if you waited and you

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 1>survived without Stanton and Judge, as long as you can

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>get through this rehab assignment, and that's not a guarantee

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>as we've seen with Joan Carlos Stanton before, they're coming back. Yes,

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Stanton two or four last night hit a home run

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>as well. Let's hope all is well when it comes

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>to both of these sluggers. But yeah, we're looking at,

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, by maybe next weekend both of these guys

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>in the lineup together, Greg and I think, you know,

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 1>there's probably as good a time as ever to talk

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>about who would be the biggest loser when it comes

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>to Stanton and Aaron Judge getting back in the lineup

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>because Guinn Fraser has performed well from an offensive perspective,

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 1>which is all we care about for fantasy. Not not

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>as good defensively obviously, but we know Aaron Hicks is

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna play center field for this team. I believe that

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Judge would play right field most days when he

0:15:56.600 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 1>first returns. Hendrick Morales probably one of the first casualties

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to go here, is it? Is it Cameron Maybn that

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>also gets cut here from the team, Greg Well, it's

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>not gonna fade. I think I think I think it's

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>one of them. I mean, when Stanton and Judge are

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>both back, I think I think it's one of them

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>because when stan say Stanton comes back first, mouse is gone. Yeah,

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 1>that's the first move and the next move when Judge

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 1>goes back, it's either going to be Maybn or Fraser,

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>one of them. It's not gonna be Clint Frasier, is it.

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it could be because when you have maybe

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>you have a guy that's faster than Clint Fraser and

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>plays better Fraser, you know you're not looking at a

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>guy that's a better hitter. At that point you had

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>your big boss. It's gonna be keussing here all over again.

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Greg Well, I think Keston here is a little bit

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>different because usin here he was performing well. Yeah, but

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have the feeling issues Frasier has. True, and

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I think they want to showcase Clint Frasier play every

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>day to potentially trade him. But they they've done that

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>so far. They had You want to look like he's

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>his trade value. I would agree with that, but you

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>want him to keep playing, to continue to raise it.

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>And the problem is he has absolutely nothing to prove

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>in triple A, which is annoying. Like he's he's a

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>major leaguer. Why Brett Gardner just go away? Is that?

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>What is that? What happens? Does Brett Gardner has become

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:06.920
<v Speaker 1>a fourth outfielder. Sure, but you gonna have Judge, Stanton,

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Hicks and Gardner. That's it. Those four rotate. That's the answer. Frank,

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh gosh, so I so you could be looking at

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 1>losing Clint Frasier here. Frustrating. Sorry, buddy, let's take a break.

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>We'll get into what happened last night when we come back.

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 1>BFS rollo right after this. Daily Roado dot Com learned

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 1>from the game's best DFS players. We don't just give

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:40.920
<v Speaker 1>you advice. We play every day, all major sports, all

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>year round. We never stopped industry leading DFS tools and

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>custom projections, and now the Daily Roado dot Com optimize

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>her in minutes, build an optimized line up for cash

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>games and tourneys. Learn from the game's best DFS players.

0:17:56.680 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Joined Daily Roado dot Com the following ad contains shocking material.

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Listener discretion is advised. Is someone in your family playing

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 1>a dangerous game of Russian Roulette? Over forty three thousand

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:13.239
<v Speaker 1>people die a year from drug overdose. A hundred and

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:17.439
<v Speaker 1>twenty people a day, five people every hour, one person

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:22.640
<v Speaker 1>every twelve minutes. Eight thousand people die every year from

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:26.360
<v Speaker 1>alcohol abuse. Over two hundred and forty people a day,

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>ten an hour, one person every six minutes. Somebody you know,

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe next learn how to help someone you love get

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>away from the drugs, alcohol, and bad influences. With the

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 1>f m l A, people can take a leave of

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 1>absence from their job and still keep it. Call now

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:47.399
<v Speaker 1>and learn how we can help you. Eight six six

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>four eight four nine six two one eight six six

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:55.880
<v Speaker 1>four eight four nine six two one. That's eight six

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>six four eight four ninety six one. Do you want

0:18:59.880 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to risk free wagers up to one thousand dollars? If so,

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:05.640
<v Speaker 1>go to points pet dot com forward slash grid, open

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>yourself up a points pet sports wagering account, enter the

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>promo code grid, and you'll get to risk free bets

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>of up to one thousand dollars. In addition to traditional betting,

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 1>points Pets also offers its own betting concept where customers

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 1>they're rewarded by how much they win their petting. That's

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>points pet dot Com Forward Slash Grid, enter the promo

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>code grid and get your two risk free bets of

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 1>up to one thousand dollars today. Alright, we're back here

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>on the BFF. Davis Magick s joining us about twenty

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:46.159
<v Speaker 1>minutes talking about some bestball football strategy, Frankie, and then

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you're getting into it, so we'll get some updates from

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Davis Maddock, who's running on NFL five package over rut

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Experts dot com. Let's get into some of the top

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's get into some of the top performance is from

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:02.879
<v Speaker 1>last night and give it all the home runs that

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>were hitting Phildelpia two nights ago. It was easy to

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 1>miss what Scott Kingery did not so much last night

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>where he home again coming off the I L. He's

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 1>been fantastic with five homers, two nine batting average, thirteen

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:16.360
<v Speaker 1>runs scored, twelve rivies and a stolen base as well.

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:18.879
<v Speaker 1>But frank you're a little bit nervous and not buying

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:22.959
<v Speaker 1>into this. You're not going all in. I like Scott Kingery,

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's a good ballpark and it's a good line

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:27.159
<v Speaker 1>up and he should be owned, but I will just

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>cast him some people that I don't know if he's

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to keep up this type of

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>production moving forward. He's got a two eighty nine batting

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>average since he's returned on May nineteen from his injury,

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>five homers, thirteen thirteen runs, twelve r bis and a

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:44.879
<v Speaker 1>stolen base. Expecting him to be a five category contributed

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 1>last year it didn't work out. But during this band,

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Greg a five percent walk rate a twenty eight point

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>eight percent strikeout rate to be fair, during this band,

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>he's also hitting the ball extremely hard, as hard contact

0:20:56.520 --> 0:21:00.200
<v Speaker 1>is massive, it's like over fifty percent. So we've seen

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:03.400
<v Speaker 1>guys that have these high strikeout rates, really really high

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:06.479
<v Speaker 1>strikeout rates, that are able to maintain a solid batting

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 1>average a two seventy ish range, like an Arrand Judge,

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>because when they make contact, they make really really hard contact.

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Scott Kingery not really the same body type as an

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Errand Judge. Not to say that, you know he's not

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a strong guy, but you can just tell he's not

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 1>as physically imposing as someone as that. So I do

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:26.920
<v Speaker 1>question if he's gonna be able to maintain this type

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 1>of hard contact whenever he makes contact, because he does

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>strike out a lot. Don't really love to play discipline. Again,

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>he should be owned, but I think you just have

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to temper expectations moving forward for someone like Scott Kingary. Again,

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 1>good line up, good ballpark. I like the player, but

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I do want to see him improve his plate discipline

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 1>as well. Greg, Yeah, Scott Kingary needs to improve that

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 1>plate discipline, but I still think he's doing that the

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to play every day and as a young player,

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that's what he needs. And maybe these numbers will normalize

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 1>a bit, maybe those strikeout percentage does come down, but

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 1>he's performing a high level right now. I like what

0:21:57.000 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm seeing from Kingary personally. Another let's atually get in

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the Philis game. I was gonna move on, but let

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>me get into this Phillies game. Um. From the last

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 1>night there will been uh it's beat ups. Randing Dominie

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:10.120
<v Speaker 1>has probably headed for Tommy John which which is brutal.

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>But last night through the Philadelphia Phillies, they were able

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to win this one four against Arizona and the willpen

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 1>broke down like this. Wandakas I's the eighth Hector Narros

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:23.679
<v Speaker 1>pitched the nineties fourteenth saying he can't even courage gave

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Kapler anymore. Well, yeah, because he's finally listened to me. Greg.

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, I went on that rants the first couple

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 1>of weeks of the season because Gabe kap are just

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 1>so frustrating. A lot of managers in baseball are frustrating

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to their bullpen usage. A lot of

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 1>matchups lefty, righty. We see that with the Minnesota Twins

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:43.359
<v Speaker 1>bullpen will get to that a little bit later on

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>as well. They've been using a lot of Taylor Rogers,

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Blake Parker so and in the Tampa Bay Rays, you know,

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:51.199
<v Speaker 1>they mix and match with their bullpen. But Hector Narros

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>has performed really, really well so far this year, and

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I think he should be He should continue to get

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 1>the same opportunities phil the Phillies moving forward, a pretty

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>damn good Phillies team, so he should be in position

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to save a lot of games. You pick this guy

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 1>up off the waiver wire earlier on in the season,

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 1>especially in deeper leagues, you were just hoping to get

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 1>all right, if I can grab a couple of saves

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>here a handful, maybe ten saves moving forward, because I

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>know this Phillies bullpen is going to be frustrating. I

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 1>think that you're gonna get a lot more than you

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 1>expected moving forward from Hector Nearus. So shout out to

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:22.159
<v Speaker 1>Gabe Kapler. I know I bashed you earlier on in

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the season, but you're going with the with the best

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:26.879
<v Speaker 1>reliever in your pen right now, and that is Hector Neris,

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 1>like I told you to do. Thank you for doing so.

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Hector nearis now up to fourteen saves on the season.

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Greg alrighty fourteen saves four Hector Nearest and when you

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 1>can trust at this moment for the Philadelphia Phillis will

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>see if they make a move at the deadline. I

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>mentioned coming down the stair yesterday after the program, John

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Jay plants here for the Iris Are Diamondbacks. Didn't pitch

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 1>well last night. Seven hits, four runs allowed in his

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>three innings of work, not great for him. KENNL. Marte

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:54.439
<v Speaker 1>last night had seventeenth home run of the year, the

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>third consecutive game that Marte has homeward for Arizona. He

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>has been absolutely fantastic, batting to eighty with a three

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>thirty on base percentage. It took Marte a while every

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:07.919
<v Speaker 1>day playing time, and I don't think anybody expecting him

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 1>to hit like this. He also has three steels forty

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 1>seven maybe he's forty two runs scored. He's been unbelievable

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:17.359
<v Speaker 1>for Arizona. Yeah, he has greg hard hit rate up

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 1>tremendously this year forty four point seven percent, up from

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:23.159
<v Speaker 1>last year at thirty six percent. He's also raised his

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:25.199
<v Speaker 1>fly ball right, so he's lifting the ball more. And

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>normally you look at a guy like Kettle Marte in

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:30.400
<v Speaker 1>years past, more so known for his speed, I'd never

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:32.399
<v Speaker 1>really expect him to take this huge jump in power,

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>but you look at him this year, he's actually added

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:36.440
<v Speaker 1>some more way to were joking about it during the broadcast.

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 1>He wears all these differ kind of elbow pads and

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and shitting guards and stuff. Kind of looks like a

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>superhero up there, kind of like an Eric Thames almost

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>just they wear all this different kind of padding. But

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:48.440
<v Speaker 1>he's really filled out. He's he's increased his power, his

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:51.160
<v Speaker 1>raw power, hitting the ball harder and raising it. So

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:53.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, shout out to two Diamondbacks this year in

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>warro Escobar and Kettle Marte, guys that were going later

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 1>on in drafts that have been two of the biggest

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>steels in Fantasy bass ball so far this year. I

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>don't really see any reason that Kettl Marte is going

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to decrease in production all that much either, because he

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:11.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't strike out a lot strikeout rate. Again, he's hitting

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the ball harder, he's lifting the ball. There's not a

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>lot that tells me that Kettl Marte is gonna regress

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>all that much this season. Greg, So if you drafted

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:20.919
<v Speaker 1>him just one of the biggest breakouts so far in

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:25.399
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen, yeah, absolutely definitely qualifies where the best and

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 1>biggest breakouts. Marte somebody that's or even on the waiver

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>wire in the past, someone you thought add the skills

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 1>to really produce. Finally nineteen, that is exactly what Kettel

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Marte is doing. Ozzi Alby is another one of these

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:42.159
<v Speaker 1>players that has broken out, and while it's been a

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 1>bit up and down this year, frank were once again

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 1>on the upswing when it comes to Azzi Alb's last night,

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the Braves were able to feat the Pirates and eight

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Intings rained out UH seven to five, and Azzi Alb's

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>hit his tenth whole run of the season. That dows

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 1>a bomb in the order betting two seventy three thirty VP.

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>But it's been a good year overall for Azzi Albis,

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>who has three homers in the last couple of games. Yeah,

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and last month Greg I was getting questions about people,

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:10.160
<v Speaker 1>should I drop Ausi Albis? He was dropped to my league?

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Should I add Aussie Albi's And it was a resounding yes,

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 1>he should be added. He's gonna be a streaky player.

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:19.160
<v Speaker 1>We've seen that by now. I still really young. Last

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>year awesome first half, dipped in the second half. Got

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:24.119
<v Speaker 1>off to an awesome start this year in the month

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:27.400
<v Speaker 1>of April, had a two eight batting average that month

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 1>six home runs, twelve ribbies, two stolen bases, and then

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>in May took a step back to thirty nine batting average,

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>only one homer and in this month again three oh

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:40.159
<v Speaker 1>three batting average, three home runs, five ribbies and greg

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:45.120
<v Speaker 1>since May seventeen, so it has it wasn't all of May.

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 1>It's it's you know, it was about half of May

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that he struggled. Since May seventeen on a three a

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:55.159
<v Speaker 1>three oh eight batting average A four oh four O

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 1>b P A four eight seven slug thirteen point eight

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 1>percent walk great, thirteen point eight percent strikeout rate. I

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:04.639
<v Speaker 1>love that plate discipline, not striking out as much, improving

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>his eye. He's walking more the hard contact during that

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:11.640
<v Speaker 1>stretch from May seventeenth on forty four point eight percent,

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine percent line drive. Right on the season, his

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 1>batting averages to seventy, expected batting average to eighty eight.

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 1>That's actually his expected numbers are up a lot from

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:23.639
<v Speaker 1>last year as well. So he's taking the steps to

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 1>move forward every year that he's been in the big leagues.

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:29.359
<v Speaker 1>And I said this about him last month Greg when

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:31.880
<v Speaker 1>he was struggling. I think Ozzie Albis is kind of

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out what player he wants to be

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 1>at the major league level. Does he want to be

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a line drive hitter who steals more basis? Does he

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 1>want to hit for power? Because it seems like he's

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:44.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of going through an internal debate at times. I

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:46.680
<v Speaker 1>think that he does have the potential to be a

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:49.679
<v Speaker 1>type player. He's actually in the eighty five percentile in

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 1>sprint speed as well. UH hasn't stolen as many bases

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:55.160
<v Speaker 1>as we've hoped, but you could see it. He has

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:57.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of pop in the bat, he has speed.

0:27:57.480 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I think he's kind of going through an internal debate

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 1>of what kind of player wants to be, which right

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:04.120
<v Speaker 1>now looks like a shrieky one. Greg makes him better

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 1>for Roto. But if he was dropped in your league,

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean totally, he shouldn't have been. Totally. Absolutely, he's

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:12.400
<v Speaker 1>too good, uh to be dropped in leagues. Too young,

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 1>still improving, and while streaky, you gotta be there for

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the good streaks the braves. As we said, one, seven, five,

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and I saw so many of these. I know Florio's

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>we did out Jake might have as well. The two

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Spider Man's facing each other, and did each of the

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:28.120
<v Speaker 1>last couple of weeks with Chris Archer versus Mike versus

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:30.199
<v Speaker 1>Mike Folton Evitch, and you look, these lines are very

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 1>very similar. Man five innings, five hits, four runs, four walks,

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 1>five kys for Faulty six innings, eight hits, seven runs,

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 1>two walks, eight cays at least for Archer. Archer allowed

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 1>five freaking home runs last night, back to back. Donald

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Sendamarkkis took a batter off back to back mccannon Azzi Alvis.

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Just a disastrous season for Chris McCann again later one

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>of the most terrible trades in recent memory, Greg, one

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of the worst changes. One of the worst trades that

0:28:57.160 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 1>we have our worst calls as well. Yeah, look, I

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 1>like Chris Archer coming into the year because you know,

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>he's been um I think he was a little overvalue

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of years. The ear a has been

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 1>over for the strikeout numbers have still been there for him.

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>But you know, this year, heading into the season, I

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>thought you could still get two hundred plus strikeouts from

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 1>this guy if he can stay healthy. Now he hasn't

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 1>been healthy, and when he's been on the field, strikeouts

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 1>have been there, but the production has just been so bad.

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 1>His ear ray near six at this point. Greg, you

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>mentioned it five home runs last night. It's almost as

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 1>if you have to try to give up five home

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 1>runs if you're a starting pitcher in the major leagues.

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Actually just had someone tweet me right now and said,

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, if Josh Bell wants to perform in the

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Home run Derby this year, he could just have Chris

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:43.719
<v Speaker 1>Archer be his batting practice pitcher. Here That's that's who

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 1>we're getting. He's walking a lot of guys and he's

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>giving home giving up home runs. That's just a recipe

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 1>for disaster. If you wanted to drop Chris Archer in

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:53.960
<v Speaker 1>a twelve team league, Greg, I don't think that I

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:56.720
<v Speaker 1>can fault someone for wanting to do that. In deeper leagues,

0:29:57.440 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably still holding out on because the waiver wires

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>is so barren, Like I have him in fifteen team

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 1>leagues and they're just not starting pitchers that are better

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 1>than him that are out there. But if you're if

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you're out there in a twelve team league and you

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:11.239
<v Speaker 1>know you're excited about an Alex Ray is coming up

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>or there there's another starting pitcher that has been performing well,

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I can't really fault someone for wanting to drop Chris

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Archer at this point, Craig, I want to drop Chris

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Archer Man. It's one of those guys where it's like

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a feel good drop, where not they deal with this

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>crap anymore. Yeah, Like I think people are still gonna

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:29.719
<v Speaker 1>gravitate towards the name of him, Like if you drop him,

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 1>someone else is probably going to pick him up, just

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 1>based off of his name. Value, but it's just gonna

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 1>end up being someone else's headache on the season. Man

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 1>like the underlying numbers, at least in years past, like

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>he's had the ERA slightly over four, and you could

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 1>point to an x fit of you know, a mid

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 1>three's and a sierra of mid three's. This year he's

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 1>got a five seven three e r A. The x

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>FIP is four seven six, the Sierra is four A two.

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:53.960
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't even say that he's gonna get that much better.

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 1>It's it's just been a disastrous season. He's always struggled

0:30:56.920 --> 0:30:59.239
<v Speaker 1>with with walks in his command. This year he's up

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to four point. I've three walks for nine. I mean,

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>that's Robbie Ray's territory. Greg it is. You don't want

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to be in Robbie ray walks territory. You don't, You

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 1>really don't. And I like, I'm looking at the waiver

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 1>wire in the league that I own, uh, Chris archer In,

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:12.959
<v Speaker 1>and I don't even know to pick up, Like none

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of these guys. All these guys are terrible, you know,

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:19.320
<v Speaker 1>drop Michael Javis. That was interesting, Michael dropping all though

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 1>he's really been bad, but he's been really bad. I

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 1>tweeted about him over the weekend. Basically the past week

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 1>or so, his strikeout rate is up over forty. He's

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 1>he's really really lost at the plate, and he didn't

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 1>play either last night or the night before, which is frustrating.

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 1>But we saw his upside earlier on in the season.

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, I guess you see this with

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of prospects, and you know we can talk

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>about Eloy him and is too. Everyone's freaking out about

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Eloy now in the month of June. He's got a

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>three thirteen batting average, three home runs, and ops over

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a thousand. So baseball players are going to be streaky.

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 1>No one's gonna be awesome for a hundred and sixty

0:31:55.320 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 1>two games. Even Mike Trout goes through slumps. He's gone

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>through stump that has dropped his batting average below three

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 1>d He's still Mike Trout. The counting stats are still awesome.

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 1>No one's gonna be great all season long, and especially

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 1>for a rookie. So Michael Javis is gonna struggle with

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the strikeouts, but the pop is legitimate from the middle

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 1>infield and he's in a really good lineup. So me personally,

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I would I would probably hold out unless again, like

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 1>if someone dropped someone who shouldn't have been dropped, like

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:24.560
<v Speaker 1>an Azzie Albi's, then yeah, you canna make a swap

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 1>like that, but just drop Michael Tavis for like the

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>flavor of the week. I'm probably not doing that because

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 1>we've seen Michael Javis upside already. Yeah. Absolutely, uh, fair enough,

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 1>let's go with me. Anything else I want to mention

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:39.720
<v Speaker 1>hell Ryan mckennat the two home runs. As I said,

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Donaldson also went deep when May that we mentioned yesterday,

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and he was My group of friends actually been talking

0:32:46.160 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 1>about it. Is Eli, him and ELOI. It's been on

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 1>an off season for him, which you should expect the

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 1>young player. And this is exactly what happens. ELOI homer

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 1>yesterday for the ninth time on the year. And then

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 1>is his average not good? It's just to thirty nine

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 1>or be also not good at two eight nine, And

0:33:04.880 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 1>yet you look at Elo and you you want him

0:33:07.600 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to be better. In June he has been, Frankie, Yeah,

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:13.360
<v Speaker 1>he's been. He's been tremendous in the month of June.

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Uh you know again, over three batting average, three home

0:33:16.240 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 1>runs and ops over a thousand in the month of

0:33:19.080 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 1>June seems like, you know, he's finally coming around a

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit. He's had to battle injuries. We saw a

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:25.959
<v Speaker 1>four hundred and seventy ft home run over the weekend.

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 1>The guy has immense power. I'm not I'm not really

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 1>worried when it comes to uh to. Elo himen is

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 1>in the month of June at forty seven point eight

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 1>percent hard hit rate a thirty nine percent fly ball

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 1>rate as well. So again he's getting his legs underneath

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:42.720
<v Speaker 1>and he's dealt with the injuries. Elo Himenez is gonna

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 1>be just fine, and your window to to buy low

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 1>on him is closing rapidly, Like if you can still

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 1>buy low on him, absolutely something I would try to

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 1>do because you won't be able to do it for

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:57.320
<v Speaker 1>much longer. The last hitter we want to mention from

0:33:57.600 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 1>last night, that will be we're done out. He predicted

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:05.080
<v Speaker 1>was gonna how and he did great. You know, I

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 1>actually looked at Freddie Parlton's line last night and I said,

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 1>this is so freakishly close to what I said it

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>was gonna be on the show. I think, like yesterday

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I said, oh, this is the performance is gonna give

0:34:13.200 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 1>you like six earned runs or three endings pitched. Well,

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:18.839
<v Speaker 1>it was pretty damn close to that great I believe

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 1>it was. It was six earned runs over four endings pitched.

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:23.839
<v Speaker 1>Still give you the seven strikeouts. So if you want

0:34:23.840 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 1>to get a silver lining at Freddie Parlta, he's he's

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 1>not good. He's just too predictable. And with your Don

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Alvarez the home run that he actually came off of

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Matt Alberts, and if you were watching that at bat

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:41.640
<v Speaker 1>through him three straight changeups, struggled mightily on the first two,

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:45.319
<v Speaker 1>and then on the third one he adjusted and it

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:47.319
<v Speaker 1>was like a pitch way below the zone and just

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:49.879
<v Speaker 1>muscled it out to right field and hit a home run.

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, those are the type of adjustments you want

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to see in the middle of a bat from a

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 1>young player. So gets three straight changeups, struggles with the

0:34:57.239 --> 0:34:59.800
<v Speaker 1>first two, sees a third one and just wax it

0:34:59.840 --> 0:35:01.840
<v Speaker 1>out out of the park. And so a lot of

0:35:01.840 --> 0:35:05.239
<v Speaker 1>people have actually been tweeting out the screenshot of the

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 1>side view. I mean, this was a ball that should

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 1>not have been hit a home run. Greg. It was

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a low pitch and it seemed like he was like

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:15.320
<v Speaker 1>like lunging for it. But the guy has legitimate power

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 1>and this is this is what we should expect from

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:21.759
<v Speaker 1>your Don Alvarez. Moving forward to get hyped everyone, He's

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:24.680
<v Speaker 1>finally here and he's about to take off. I think

0:35:24.680 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 1>he already has My friend Patrick Corban in that game

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:30.879
<v Speaker 1>with elohimte Is going back. Got rocked five innings, seven

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:34.280
<v Speaker 1>hits a loud, seven six hits a loud rather seven runs,

0:35:34.280 --> 0:35:35.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of a couple of home runs, including the

0:35:35.719 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 1>one to Eloy as well as Wellington Castido with a

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 1>grand slam in the bottom of the first in the

0:35:41.200 --> 0:35:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Rendon here in this one had two home runs

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:47.720
<v Speaker 1>his thirteen and fourteen of the year. Yeah, Patrick Corbin

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:51.160
<v Speaker 1>A little bit worried about Patrick Corbyn right now. Over

0:35:51.280 --> 0:35:57.080
<v Speaker 1>his last five starts has a six point eight seven

0:35:57.080 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 1>e r a greg and his slider that was such

0:35:59.920 --> 0:36:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a wipe out pitch for him last year has not

0:36:01.800 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 1>been nearly as good, So I do have some concerns

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 1>he's not getting as many whishs on that the isolated

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:09.759
<v Speaker 1>power is up against that slider and he relies on

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 1>it a lot. I mean, this is a pitch that

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:13.080
<v Speaker 1>he throws thirty five to forty percent of the time.

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:16.319
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't have a great sinker. He like works in

0:36:16.360 --> 0:36:18.640
<v Speaker 1>a change up. His fastball is not great either, So

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:21.120
<v Speaker 1>if a slider is not working for him, Greg, I

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:23.880
<v Speaker 1>don't really know what else he can go to. The

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 1>walks are up for Patrick Corbin as well, So I

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:29.840
<v Speaker 1>was worried about him coming to the year. Remember I

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:33.239
<v Speaker 1>couldn't really pinpointed. I was thinking that he throws his

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:36.120
<v Speaker 1>slider so much that this might result in an injury.

0:36:36.160 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know. I don't want to speculate, maybe

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 1>there's something going on, but you know, his past five starts,

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:44.280
<v Speaker 1>he he hasn't been great, and it's part it's partly

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:46.680
<v Speaker 1>due to his slider not being nearly as dominant as

0:36:46.680 --> 0:36:48.960
<v Speaker 1>it was last year. And to be honest, I just

0:36:49.000 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know what else he can go to if not

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:53.840
<v Speaker 1>his slider, because it's his best pitch, Greg, So I

0:36:53.880 --> 0:36:56.839
<v Speaker 1>do have some concern. Is a two star week next week?

0:36:57.200 --> 0:36:59.239
<v Speaker 1>If he struggles again in those two starts, he's going

0:36:59.239 --> 0:37:02.360
<v Speaker 1>to be someone that we're gonna be talking about benching

0:37:02.400 --> 0:37:05.359
<v Speaker 1>moving forward until he can figure it out. Let's take

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a break. We're not dropping him though, No we're not. No,

0:37:07.200 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 1>we're not dropping him I mean people get triggered happy.

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 1>I was getting questions last month about Ozzie albums. There

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:14.239
<v Speaker 1>might be pep out there, like oh should I drop

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Corbyn? Do not drop Patrick Corby? Take a break,

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:19.360
<v Speaker 1>We'll come back. Davis Maddock on the other side as

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 1>well of our best bets forever, We'll fly by twenty

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 1>minutes ago, stick around, we have fright after. The Fantasy

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Sports Network is ready to take you out to the

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:35.439
<v Speaker 1>ball game. Our experts and analysts are following the Boys

0:37:35.480 --> 0:37:37.920
<v Speaker 1>of Summer through all one, d and sixty two games

0:37:37.960 --> 0:37:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of the two thousand nineteen MLB season with the best

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:43.759
<v Speaker 1>fantasy baseball analysis in the industry. Catch the latest news

0:37:43.760 --> 0:37:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and notes every day to help you win your fantasy

0:37:45.800 --> 0:37:48.719
<v Speaker 1>leagues and your DA best tournaments. Will always want you

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:51.440
<v Speaker 1>back listening and watching the Fantasy Sports Network on the

0:37:51.480 --> 0:37:53.360
<v Speaker 1>f N T s Y Radio app and the FVN

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 1>T s Y YouTube channel. The Fantasy Sports Network where

0:37:56.200 --> 0:38:00.800
<v Speaker 1>we're root root rooting for your fantasy baseball team. Maurice

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Allen two thousand and fifteen, two thousands and sixteen European

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Long Drive Tour Champion two thousand seventeen, World Number one

0:38:10.440 --> 0:38:14.879
<v Speaker 1>me personally, I keep my game face on me all

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the time, especially coming out with the bunker, leaving the

0:38:21.680 --> 0:38:26.239
<v Speaker 1>range or even leaving the poorts. What's your story? Go

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to game face grooming dot com from all your athletic

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:34.239
<v Speaker 1>facial wipes and buddy cleansing needs the morning after. I've

0:38:34.239 --> 0:38:37.120
<v Speaker 1>never tweeted at someone on my team saying you sucked

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:39.799
<v Speaker 1>and not passed on, but you should see the things

0:38:39.800 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and people were tweeting Kyle Art. So then I think

0:38:41.680 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to myself, I'm like, wow, I bet you, it's not

0:38:43.520 --> 0:38:45.480
<v Speaker 1>even people in Toronto. It's not even rapping a from this.

0:38:45.600 --> 0:38:47.799
<v Speaker 1>But no, a lot of it was Ontario Toronto, like

0:38:47.840 --> 0:38:50.839
<v Speaker 1>the region raptor fan and somehow his fault, but they

0:38:50.920 --> 0:38:53.280
<v Speaker 1>lost the games. There's always gotta be that singtary blame

0:38:53.320 --> 0:38:55.760
<v Speaker 1>all the time, like we're in that plame game. Sweet

0:38:55.840 --> 0:38:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Days nine AMMI staring on F and T, s Y

0:38:57.920 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Radio and on your popular podcast provider can't get enough

0:39:01.040 --> 0:39:05.920
<v Speaker 1>fantasy football. Rhoto Experts has launched their NFL Fantasy Football package,

0:39:05.960 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 1>which includes the best math based seasonal projections and rankings

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:12.000
<v Speaker 1>available anywhere on the Internet. Davis Madig and the Rhoto

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 1>Experts are providing dynasty, season long betting, best ball, and

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:17.839
<v Speaker 1>NFL Draft content every day of the year to give

0:39:17.880 --> 0:39:20.360
<v Speaker 1>you an edge regardless of what type of fantasy football

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you play. Save temper cent at roto Experts dot com

0:39:23.080 --> 0:39:25.720
<v Speaker 1>with the promo code Van s Y. It's the NFL

0:39:25.800 --> 0:39:46.600
<v Speaker 1>three Fantasy Football package only at Rhoto Experts dot Com.

0:39:46.600 --> 0:39:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Bryan holl Uch, do you love this song? Seems like, yeah,

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 1>you knew, there's no doubt that, Brian, Yeah, I'm do.

0:39:57.200 --> 0:39:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I not like, are you saying that in my ear

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 1>on the air? Sounds like it's in the ear. Yeah,

0:40:03.440 --> 0:40:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I wanted on the air because no one can understand

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:07.799
<v Speaker 1>the conversation that we're having with that. You responding, there

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:12.560
<v Speaker 1>we go. Yeah, so I'm not into this. No, as

0:40:12.560 --> 0:40:14.320
<v Speaker 1>everyone knows, I'm not an E d M person like

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel like you were. You grew up in like

0:40:16.280 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the prime E d M era. I only really know VICI.

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't really know really, I'm not a big type

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:27.759
<v Speaker 1>of guy. He was a little bit more mainstream, I

0:40:27.760 --> 0:40:31.360
<v Speaker 1>would say, to greggy popish, but it's still like E

0:40:31.440 --> 0:40:33.920
<v Speaker 1>d M Technoi elements. I guess one person who I

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:36.840
<v Speaker 1>don't really see is liking Avici. That would be Davis Maddock,

0:40:37.520 --> 0:40:40.839
<v Speaker 1>not man. How's it going, guys? How do you feel

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:44.439
<v Speaker 1>about a VICI? You know, I can I can dig

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:46.080
<v Speaker 1>it a little bit, like I would never listen to

0:40:46.120 --> 0:40:48.279
<v Speaker 1>an E d M song of my own volition, and

0:40:48.320 --> 0:40:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not like mad when it's on, I'll take it.

0:40:52.480 --> 0:40:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll take it. Yeah. I feel like, you know, it's

0:40:54.840 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 1>probably most people like outside of actual like a d

0:40:57.800 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 1>M lovers. Yeah, probably like all right, if I hear

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:01.879
<v Speaker 1>of ET song, like, I'll listen to it. You didn't

0:41:01.880 --> 0:41:03.920
<v Speaker 1>make bad music, no, No No, you know what's really interesting.

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:07.200
<v Speaker 1>So like as we've gotten or we've gotten older, and

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:10.399
<v Speaker 1>like the hardcore E d M, at least my mind's

0:41:10.440 --> 0:41:16.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of gone. So you're yeah, yeah, alright, continue. It's

0:41:16.040 --> 0:41:19.840
<v Speaker 1>like it's been a little bit more mainstream type of music.

0:41:19.920 --> 0:41:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh, I kind of enjoy it, not

0:41:22.520 --> 0:41:25.799
<v Speaker 1>like the hardcore DIUM. Yeah, the hardcore d M. Yeah. Well,

0:41:25.800 --> 0:41:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean you're a Jersey guy, Greg, you should be

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 1>into it. Blow up man. All right, we're talking to

0:41:30.800 --> 0:41:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Davis Maddock on the eve of the U S Open

0:41:32.640 --> 0:41:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and shockolately enough, we're not even talking about golf, Davis,

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:38.560
<v Speaker 1>But I say you my team before we started. How

0:41:38.560 --> 0:41:41.200
<v Speaker 1>do you like my team this weekend? I like it.

0:41:41.239 --> 0:41:42.839
<v Speaker 1>You have you have a couple of the guys I'm

0:41:42.880 --> 0:41:46.440
<v Speaker 1>really big on, including including Can't Lay. Can't Lay is

0:41:46.480 --> 0:41:50.239
<v Speaker 1>definitely he's rounding into winning his first major championship. Really

0:41:50.239 --> 0:41:52.799
<v Speaker 1>would not be surprised to see him walking away with

0:41:52.800 --> 0:41:55.040
<v Speaker 1>it this week. Yeah, I agree, I think I think

0:41:55.040 --> 0:41:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Can't Lay is very close and between Cantle and Adam Scott.

0:41:57.560 --> 0:41:59.839
<v Speaker 1>I basically use your recommendations and the guys daily rod

0:41:59.920 --> 0:42:01.919
<v Speaker 1>d com and then they make a team. And that's

0:42:01.920 --> 0:42:04.720
<v Speaker 1>that's how I do. It's uh, that's my friends. Frankie.

0:42:04.840 --> 0:42:06.800
<v Speaker 1>We you know, I don't really watch much golf, but

0:42:06.880 --> 0:42:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I paid interest in majors. We do videos on it

0:42:09.640 --> 0:42:11.560
<v Speaker 1>every week, and five of us in a group, we

0:42:11.560 --> 0:42:14.360
<v Speaker 1>each picked six golfers in a draft and whoever is

0:42:14.360 --> 0:42:16.239
<v Speaker 1>the lowest total scoring in the week wins. All right,

0:42:16.280 --> 0:42:18.040
<v Speaker 1>So you're just throwing some darts here, Greg, So I'm

0:42:18.080 --> 0:42:20.479
<v Speaker 1>doing well, You're using you're using the advice of people

0:42:20.520 --> 0:42:22.520
<v Speaker 1>who actually know what they're talking about what they're talking

0:42:22.520 --> 0:42:24.759
<v Speaker 1>about when it comes to golf. But David's feel free

0:42:24.800 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 1>not to help Greig at all or answer him because

0:42:27.040 --> 0:42:28.799
<v Speaker 1>if he goes wrong, he will definitely let you know

0:42:28.840 --> 0:42:32.000
<v Speaker 1>about it. Well, I mean, fair enough. That's what you

0:42:32.000 --> 0:42:34.279
<v Speaker 1>should always say. You should always hold people accountable. And

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:37.719
<v Speaker 1>they're giving you, they're giving you horrible information. Thank you.

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I never forget. Like Davis, we did the Master's preview

0:42:40.960 --> 0:42:44.160
<v Speaker 1>for Fandel and he had like some crazy long shot

0:42:44.160 --> 0:42:46.200
<v Speaker 1>like three ft one. I was like, you're what are

0:42:46.239 --> 0:42:49.319
<v Speaker 1>you doing? You're just throwing? What are you doing? They won?

0:42:49.400 --> 0:42:51.040
<v Speaker 1>This guy was winning the tournament. I was like, oh

0:42:51.040 --> 0:42:54.640
<v Speaker 1>my god, David, you better be a million be it

0:42:54.719 --> 0:42:56.799
<v Speaker 1>to the madness graz it was. I felt so good

0:42:56.840 --> 0:42:58.719
<v Speaker 1>for him, and hopefully this week it's his boy Joel

0:42:58.800 --> 0:43:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Damon that come was through and wins him some cash

0:43:02.040 --> 0:43:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and wins uh this US Open Championship. Moving on from golf, though, Davis,

0:43:07.160 --> 0:43:10.320
<v Speaker 1>your other full time job is working full roto expertce

0:43:10.360 --> 0:43:15.399
<v Speaker 1>dot com NFL three and constantly producing content. And right

0:43:15.440 --> 0:43:18.919
<v Speaker 1>now over at rotor Experts dot com, you're putting out

0:43:19.000 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 1>information to help players with their Best Ball draft. Frankie,

0:43:22.120 --> 0:43:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I know you have started playing bestball and you have questions. Yeah,

0:43:27.120 --> 0:43:30.160
<v Speaker 1>so I I basically am going to continue like once

0:43:30.280 --> 0:43:32.480
<v Speaker 1>every best Ball draft that I'm doing, and so I'm

0:43:32.520 --> 0:43:34.480
<v Speaker 1>just gonna start up a new one until we basically

0:43:34.520 --> 0:43:36.239
<v Speaker 1>get to the start of the season because I like

0:43:36.320 --> 0:43:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to see where players are going in a DP, trends

0:43:38.480 --> 0:43:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and everything that's going on. Uh. The main question that

0:43:41.120 --> 0:43:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I have right now when it comes to uh, Best Ball, Davis,

0:43:44.120 --> 0:43:46.680
<v Speaker 1>is how are you handling Tyreek Hill? Especially when it

0:43:46.719 --> 0:43:49.759
<v Speaker 1>comes to you know this this uh, this this huge

0:43:49.760 --> 0:43:52.839
<v Speaker 1>concept that we have going on over at draft where um,

0:43:53.000 --> 0:43:55.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, someone like Tyreek Hill can really really be

0:43:55.320 --> 0:43:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a game changer obviously in Best Ball, but how are

0:43:58.000 --> 0:44:00.440
<v Speaker 1>you handling the Tyreek Hill situation? McCole hardmen, a lot

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of people excited about him being drafted by the Kansas

0:44:02.800 --> 0:44:05.759
<v Speaker 1>City Chiefs. Has electric speed, but when we don't know

0:44:05.840 --> 0:44:09.040
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen to a potentially suspended player, how

0:44:09.040 --> 0:44:11.480
<v Speaker 1>are you handling a situation like that? Because we know

0:44:11.560 --> 0:44:13.439
<v Speaker 1>that's how you Hill has amen upside on a week

0:44:13.440 --> 0:44:17.560
<v Speaker 1>to week basis. So I just have not taken Tyreek

0:44:17.640 --> 0:44:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Hill yet, especially in the Best Ball Championship. I have

0:44:20.680 --> 0:44:23.360
<v Speaker 1>avoided him. Those leagues do tend to be a little

0:44:23.360 --> 0:44:26.080
<v Speaker 1>bit sharper, so he probably slides even later. You know

0:44:26.239 --> 0:44:28.760
<v Speaker 1>in those in those drafts, you're probably not getting auto

0:44:28.800 --> 0:44:30.919
<v Speaker 1>picks or the people who you know are not even

0:44:30.920 --> 0:44:34.000
<v Speaker 1>aware that there is a suspension drafting in those. I

0:44:34.120 --> 0:44:38.080
<v Speaker 1>am pretty invested in the other Chiefs wide receivers though,

0:44:38.160 --> 0:44:42.879
<v Speaker 1>Sammy Watkins, DeMarcus Robinson, Micole Hardman. I've drafted all of them,

0:44:42.920 --> 0:44:46.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, on over ten percent of my rosters. In particular,

0:44:46.320 --> 0:44:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I think Sammy Watkins a DP is really intriguing. You know.

0:44:49.560 --> 0:44:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes you can get him in the fifth round early

0:44:51.600 --> 0:44:53.440
<v Speaker 1>on in the off season, you could get him in

0:44:53.480 --> 0:44:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the sixth round. Now in the fourth round, there's a

0:44:55.640 --> 0:44:58.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit more of a question between him and you know,

0:44:58.080 --> 0:45:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Chris Godwin, Kenny Golladay, those kind two guys. But Mcole

0:45:01.440 --> 0:45:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Hardman is a really interesting one to me because you

0:45:04.280 --> 0:45:05.960
<v Speaker 1>can really get him, you know, kind of in the

0:45:06.040 --> 0:45:08.280
<v Speaker 1>ninth tenth round, and then you can get to Marcus

0:45:08.360 --> 0:45:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Robinson with your very last pick of the draft. So

0:45:11.480 --> 0:45:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I actually have to Marcus Robinson on about twenty percent

0:45:13.960 --> 0:45:16.279
<v Speaker 1>of my draft Beastball teams that I've done so far,

0:45:16.320 --> 0:45:18.919
<v Speaker 1>because I sort of expect him to start the year

0:45:19.040 --> 0:45:24.239
<v Speaker 1>as the outside boundary receiver across from Sammy Watkins and

0:45:24.360 --> 0:45:28.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about that. That that huge tournament over on draft

0:45:28.239 --> 0:45:30.080
<v Speaker 1>round now draft dot com you can check it out.

0:45:30.120 --> 0:45:33.040
<v Speaker 1>You can also download the app, the draft app. It

0:45:33.200 --> 0:45:38.600
<v Speaker 1>is a massive best ball tournament that basically you go

0:45:38.640 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 1>throughout the season, greg and weeks one to twelve is

0:45:41.719 --> 0:45:43.239
<v Speaker 1>the regular season, and then you have a you have

0:45:43.239 --> 0:45:47.600
<v Speaker 1>playoff rounds weeks thirteen, quarterfinals weeks fourteen, semifinals week fifteen,

0:45:47.920 --> 0:45:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and in the finals in weeks sixteen. I mean we're

0:45:50.120 --> 0:45:52.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna have as many as a hundred and sixty five

0:45:52.400 --> 0:45:55.520
<v Speaker 1>thousand entrants in this best ball tournament. It's twenty five

0:45:55.560 --> 0:45:58.640
<v Speaker 1>dollar entry right now. So you play, you basically do

0:45:58.880 --> 0:46:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a twelve team draft, Greig, and you're competing against everyone

0:46:03.880 --> 0:46:06.319
<v Speaker 1>else and then who the highest scorers from those first

0:46:06.320 --> 0:46:08.479
<v Speaker 1>twelve weeks are going to move on to playoff rounds.

0:46:08.719 --> 0:46:11.760
<v Speaker 1>But there's like over three million dollars in prizes throughout

0:46:11.760 --> 0:46:14.520
<v Speaker 1>this thing, so it's really really crazy. It's a big

0:46:14.560 --> 0:46:17.000
<v Speaker 1>topic of conversation when it comes to Best Ball drafts

0:46:17.080 --> 0:46:19.040
<v Speaker 1>right now. How many interests do you have in this

0:46:19.160 --> 0:46:23.120
<v Speaker 1>so far? Davi's I think I've done five teams in

0:46:23.200 --> 0:46:26.279
<v Speaker 1>the Best Ball Championship thus far, Like One of the

0:46:26.320 --> 0:46:29.600
<v Speaker 1>things that we mentioned in our Ultimate Strategy Guide is

0:46:29.640 --> 0:46:32.440
<v Speaker 1>that drafting early in these leagues does tend to be

0:46:32.480 --> 0:46:35.000
<v Speaker 1>an advantage because you know, you have better odds of

0:46:35.080 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 1>finding twenty nineteens James Conner, right, Like, the more information

0:46:39.560 --> 0:46:41.840
<v Speaker 1>that you have before the rest of the crowd, the

0:46:41.880 --> 0:46:44.279
<v Speaker 1>better your chances of building a unique roster with like

0:46:44.320 --> 0:46:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a huge ADP value is. But pretty much every day

0:46:48.040 --> 0:46:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm registering for you know, one, five, and and ten

0:46:51.640 --> 0:46:54.560
<v Speaker 1>dollar slow drafts just because I love to always be

0:46:54.560 --> 0:46:57.440
<v Speaker 1>getting those notifications. I love to be always making those picks.

0:46:57.440 --> 0:46:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I I really want to have just a bunch of

0:46:59.520 --> 0:47:02.200
<v Speaker 1>best ball teams to be tracking this year. Yeah, you

0:47:02.239 --> 0:47:05.560
<v Speaker 1>wanna just constantly have these players to look at, constantly

0:47:05.600 --> 0:47:08.080
<v Speaker 1>track and see ultimately where you do end up hopefully

0:47:08.080 --> 0:47:09.880
<v Speaker 1>get in the playoffs and then try it and of

0:47:09.920 --> 0:47:13.040
<v Speaker 1>course win that three million dollar prize at the end

0:47:13.080 --> 0:47:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of it. We're talking to Davis Maddick here, oh Daily

0:47:15.520 --> 0:47:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Rhodo dot com and Rhodo Expert dot com NFL package.

0:47:19.600 --> 0:47:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's get into some strategy here, Davison. Now you don't

0:47:21.680 --> 0:47:23.600
<v Speaker 1>want to reveal too much, but we're trying to help

0:47:23.640 --> 0:47:27.480
<v Speaker 1>people out what is what have you learned. You've done

0:47:27.520 --> 0:47:30.840
<v Speaker 1>five leagues so far, five teams. What have you learned

0:47:31.000 --> 0:47:34.319
<v Speaker 1>thus far through your five drafts? Well, I've only I've

0:47:34.360 --> 0:47:36.520
<v Speaker 1>done five in the Best Ball Championship. I've done like

0:47:36.640 --> 0:47:39.680
<v Speaker 1>eighty of these, you know, outside of the Best Ball Championship.

0:47:40.120 --> 0:47:43.239
<v Speaker 1>So I would say probably the biggest thing you learn

0:47:43.400 --> 0:47:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and doing a bunch of drafts is what sort of

0:47:46.280 --> 0:47:50.640
<v Speaker 1>early picks are going to lead to your other roster construction. So,

0:47:50.920 --> 0:47:53.640
<v Speaker 1>for example, if you take Travis Kelsey at the beginning

0:47:53.640 --> 0:47:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of round two, you know you're probably waiting super late

0:47:56.640 --> 0:47:59.640
<v Speaker 1>to take a quarterback and you're probably only taking a

0:47:59.719 --> 0:48:02.319
<v Speaker 1>set can tight end. Or if you miss out on

0:48:02.360 --> 0:48:04.360
<v Speaker 1>a running back that you really like in the first

0:48:04.360 --> 0:48:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and second round, there's not a ton of value in

0:48:06.640 --> 0:48:08.720
<v Speaker 1>taking one of the guys that you only feel okay

0:48:08.719 --> 0:48:11.240
<v Speaker 1>about in the third or fourth round. So you're probably

0:48:11.239 --> 0:48:14.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna be going super wide receiver heavy early, and then

0:48:14.239 --> 0:48:17.239
<v Speaker 1>really you might even take eight running backs uh and

0:48:17.320 --> 0:48:19.880
<v Speaker 1>only go two quarterbacks, two tight ends and have a

0:48:19.960 --> 0:48:22.680
<v Speaker 1>lower number of wide receivers. So, like what you what

0:48:22.800 --> 0:48:26.600
<v Speaker 1>you learn through doing more drafts is just how to compete,

0:48:26.760 --> 0:48:29.600
<v Speaker 1>how to complete rosters, that are set up to compete

0:48:29.800 --> 0:48:34.160
<v Speaker 1>based on how the first couple of rounds go. Davis,

0:48:34.239 --> 0:48:39.120
<v Speaker 1>correct me if I'm wrong. These are eighteen round drafts. Correct, yeah, eighteen.

0:48:39.760 --> 0:48:42.680
<v Speaker 1>You start one quarterback, to running backs, three wide receivers,

0:48:42.719 --> 0:48:46.000
<v Speaker 1>one tight end, and a flex, no kicker, no defense.

0:48:46.440 --> 0:48:48.920
<v Speaker 1>And for those who are wondering who we're out there watching,

0:48:49.640 --> 0:48:52.640
<v Speaker 1>what is best ball? It's basically you know they they

0:48:52.640 --> 0:48:55.279
<v Speaker 1>put out your optimal lineup weekend and week out. You

0:48:55.280 --> 0:48:57.160
<v Speaker 1>don't have to sit your line up. So basically that's

0:48:57.160 --> 0:49:00.120
<v Speaker 1>why you hear so many analysts doing massive amoun out

0:49:00.160 --> 0:49:01.560
<v Speaker 1>of these best ball drafts because you don't have to

0:49:01.600 --> 0:49:04.440
<v Speaker 1>worry about anything in season. It's literally you just draft

0:49:04.480 --> 0:49:07.080
<v Speaker 1>and then throughout the season you earned fantasy points based

0:49:07.120 --> 0:49:10.920
<v Speaker 1>on the highest scorers on your roster on a weekly basis. Davis,

0:49:10.960 --> 0:49:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to ask you how do you normally construct

0:49:13.000 --> 0:49:15.839
<v Speaker 1>your teams? Because the way that I found myself doing

0:49:15.840 --> 0:49:18.160
<v Speaker 1>it is in these eighteen round drafts, I usually end

0:49:18.200 --> 0:49:20.680
<v Speaker 1>up with three quarterbacks, three tight ends, and in six

0:49:20.719 --> 0:49:23.399
<v Speaker 1>each of running backs and wide receivers. Do you find

0:49:23.400 --> 0:49:26.000
<v Speaker 1>yourself drafting more running backs and wide receivers than that

0:49:26.040 --> 0:49:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and maybe going with like only two tight ends two quarterbacks,

0:49:29.160 --> 0:49:31.680
<v Speaker 1>how do you normally handle the roster construction in best ball?

0:49:32.760 --> 0:49:35.680
<v Speaker 1>So the math that we have done actually says that

0:49:35.719 --> 0:49:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the three quarterback, three tight end strategy is bad. Those

0:49:39.239 --> 0:49:43.080
<v Speaker 1>teams tend to win leagues less on average than teams

0:49:43.080 --> 0:49:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that have five of those singular positions we call the

0:49:46.280 --> 0:49:49.600
<v Speaker 1>quarterback and the tight end position ones position. So you're

0:49:49.640 --> 0:49:51.680
<v Speaker 1>only starting one of the you're only required to start

0:49:51.760 --> 0:49:54.120
<v Speaker 1>one of them per week. Tight End scores can actually

0:49:54.239 --> 0:49:57.920
<v Speaker 1>count towards the flex, but you're really hurting your ceiling

0:49:58.040 --> 0:50:01.160
<v Speaker 1>by drafting that third quarterback or that third tight end

0:50:01.200 --> 0:50:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to make it six roster spots occupied by the quarterback

0:50:05.160 --> 0:50:08.319
<v Speaker 1>and tight end positions. Ideally, you would like to have

0:50:08.640 --> 0:50:11.440
<v Speaker 1>thirteen of your roster spots dedicated to running backs and

0:50:11.480 --> 0:50:14.960
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers. And the maths suggests that you're probably best

0:50:15.040 --> 0:50:19.239
<v Speaker 1>off with six running backs, seven wide receivers, two quarterbacks,

0:50:19.239 --> 0:50:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and three tight ends if you draft tight ends late,

0:50:21.840 --> 0:50:24.319
<v Speaker 1>three quarterbacks and two tight ends. If you draft one

0:50:24.320 --> 0:50:27.080
<v Speaker 1>of the stud tight ends early, all right, So that's

0:50:27.080 --> 0:50:29.480
<v Speaker 1>good to know because I've basically been doing it wrong

0:50:29.560 --> 0:50:31.560
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. So that's that's why we have

0:50:31.640 --> 0:50:33.959
<v Speaker 1>Davis on here to help out everybody with the best

0:50:34.040 --> 0:50:36.680
<v Speaker 1>with their best ball strategy, but specifically to help me

0:50:37.040 --> 0:50:40.400
<v Speaker 1>as well. Davis, we gotta get a few sleepers in

0:50:40.480 --> 0:50:42.600
<v Speaker 1>here before we let you go. Who are some of

0:50:42.640 --> 0:50:45.080
<v Speaker 1>your top guys that are going later on in drafts?

0:50:45.120 --> 0:50:47.560
<v Speaker 1>So some of the guys that I really like going

0:50:47.600 --> 0:50:51.640
<v Speaker 1>on later than the drafts. At quarterback, I'm taking Jamis

0:50:51.640 --> 0:50:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Winston and Dak Prescott, both of them after round ten

0:50:55.320 --> 0:50:59.080
<v Speaker 1>at a pretty heavy clip. At wide receiver, one of

0:50:59.080 --> 0:51:02.799
<v Speaker 1>the guys I really looking at is Curtis Samuel from Carolina.

0:51:02.920 --> 0:51:06.280
<v Speaker 1>He's really gonna step into that, uh that wide receiver

0:51:06.400 --> 0:51:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to role and what I project to be a pretty

0:51:08.600 --> 0:51:11.680
<v Speaker 1>good offense this year. Another thing I really like to

0:51:11.719 --> 0:51:14.080
<v Speaker 1>do with the wide receiver position is take Josh Allen

0:51:14.160 --> 0:51:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit later and then pair him with one

0:51:17.040 --> 0:51:20.280
<v Speaker 1>of John Brown or Robert Foster. Both of those guys

0:51:20.320 --> 0:51:23.440
<v Speaker 1>are are basically free uh super deep sleeper. A guy

0:51:23.440 --> 0:51:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I've taken a couple of times, Dylan cantreill E running

0:51:26.560 --> 0:51:29.360
<v Speaker 1>out projects to be the third wide receiver in San Diego,

0:51:29.400 --> 0:51:32.319
<v Speaker 1>which is over the last four years been a role

0:51:32.360 --> 0:51:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that brings about sixty five to seventy five targets per year,

0:51:36.160 --> 0:51:39.319
<v Speaker 1>but a pretty high touchdown role for a for that

0:51:39.440 --> 0:51:41.960
<v Speaker 1>low volume. So that's another guy that I really like.

0:51:42.120 --> 0:51:45.000
<v Speaker 1>And at tight end, a guy that really doesn't even

0:51:45.000 --> 0:51:47.560
<v Speaker 1>go drafted in a lot of these is Ricky Seals Jones.

0:51:47.840 --> 0:51:50.359
<v Speaker 1>I actually have him projected for more playing time and

0:51:50.360 --> 0:51:53.360
<v Speaker 1>more targets than Charles Clay. A lot of other fantasy

0:51:53.400 --> 0:51:57.320
<v Speaker 1>websites have that projected backwards, but looking at the Arizona offense,

0:51:57.360 --> 0:51:59.279
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really make much sense to have, you know,

0:51:59.360 --> 0:52:03.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of a slow plotting run blocker like like Charles

0:52:03.520 --> 0:52:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Clay in there. And Ricky Seals Jones actually finished seventh

0:52:06.440 --> 0:52:09.479
<v Speaker 1>at tight end last year in air yards despite playing

0:52:09.480 --> 0:52:12.120
<v Speaker 1>in that horrible Mike McCoy offense. So I'm pretty sure

0:52:12.120 --> 0:52:14.440
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be a starter from week one on in

0:52:14.920 --> 0:52:16.960
<v Speaker 1>what should be one of the most past heavy offenses

0:52:16.960 --> 0:52:19.880
<v Speaker 1>in football. Davis Maddick Daily, Rhoder dot Com, and of

0:52:19.920 --> 0:52:22.879
<v Speaker 1>course Rotal Experts dot com. The NFL three sixty five

0:52:22.880 --> 0:52:26.399
<v Speaker 1>package is available right now. Get ten percent off using

0:52:26.400 --> 0:52:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the promo code F and T is why we appreciate

0:52:28.520 --> 0:52:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the time, Davids. I know Frank we a lot more

0:52:30.640 --> 0:52:33.960
<v Speaker 1>questions for Davis. We'll do it again soon, man, Yeah, anytime.

0:52:34.200 --> 0:52:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Always glad to talk best ball. This is this is

0:52:36.440 --> 0:52:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the best and easiest way to play fantasy football. Anyone

0:52:39.440 --> 0:52:41.799
<v Speaker 1>who's anyone who tries it, I guarantee you will get

0:52:41.800 --> 0:52:44.120
<v Speaker 1>addicted to it. There you go. We enjoy, We enjoy it.

0:52:44.280 --> 0:52:46.919
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the US open and we'll talk to you soon.

0:52:46.960 --> 0:52:50.960
<v Speaker 1>That is Davis Maddock, Rotal Experts dot Com NFL fantasy

0:52:51.080 --> 0:52:54.000
<v Speaker 1>football package. Alright, we're gonna sign on YouTube now. At

0:52:54.040 --> 0:52:56.879
<v Speaker 1>the Window is next with Sean Gass the makia stick

0:52:56.920 --> 0:52:59.680
<v Speaker 1>around for is that Sean and at the Window coming

0:52:59.719 --> 0:53:02.960
<v Speaker 1>up next, Freggy. It's time to getting to our best

0:53:03.120 --> 0:53:06.759
<v Speaker 1>bets forever. Yesterday, okay day, it wasn't our best wasn't

0:53:06.920 --> 0:53:09.359
<v Speaker 1>or worst? We now, Houston, obviously that was a gimme,

0:53:09.520 --> 0:53:12.239
<v Speaker 1>not we You alright, keep saying we a team. It's

0:53:12.280 --> 0:53:14.200
<v Speaker 1>just you. We're a team. I don't just take credit, man,

0:53:14.200 --> 0:53:16.760
<v Speaker 1>We're a team effort. I'll take credit one, right, that's fine.

0:53:16.840 --> 0:53:18.719
<v Speaker 1>I try to make it a team effort. Houston was

0:53:18.760 --> 0:53:21.000
<v Speaker 1>an easy one for us. Unfortunately, we got very very

0:53:21.000 --> 0:53:24.600
<v Speaker 1>close with the Bull and Detroit that didn't work out

0:53:24.600 --> 0:53:26.759
<v Speaker 1>your pick, Frankie of Louise Castial, I believe with the

0:53:26.840 --> 0:53:28.800
<v Speaker 1>extra inning, so you were right there too. That was

0:53:28.840 --> 0:53:31.839
<v Speaker 1>a close game. Two pictures duel between Trevor Bauer and

0:53:32.160 --> 0:53:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Louise Castio. Both guys pitched really, really well. I thought

0:53:35.280 --> 0:53:37.560
<v Speaker 1>that the Cincinnati Reds offense might be able to muster

0:53:37.640 --> 0:53:40.680
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit more against Trevor Bauer, especially considering

0:53:40.719 --> 0:53:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that he walked five batters yesterday. So that was a

0:53:43.560 --> 0:53:45.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit disappointing. But it was a close game. But

0:53:45.520 --> 0:53:49.040
<v Speaker 1>you know what, you don't win any money for coming close, Greggy,

0:53:49.200 --> 0:53:50.920
<v Speaker 1>unless you play horse shoes, of course, you do not

0:53:51.040 --> 0:53:53.320
<v Speaker 1>win money for coming close. So we went won for

0:53:53.360 --> 0:53:55.560
<v Speaker 1>three yesterday. Frank Let's turn it around today. What is

0:53:55.560 --> 0:53:57.920
<v Speaker 1>your best bet forever? I actually have tooth that I

0:53:58.000 --> 0:54:00.399
<v Speaker 1>really like. There's two sides that I like in there,

0:54:00.960 --> 0:54:03.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty decent favorites. So I don't really love doing this,

0:54:03.640 --> 0:54:05.719
<v Speaker 1>but I'm gonna see exact Efflyin and the Phillies at

0:54:05.719 --> 0:54:09.040
<v Speaker 1>minus one forty four. He's performed much better at home

0:54:09.080 --> 0:54:11.799
<v Speaker 1>this year, while Merrill Kelly has been a disaster on

0:54:11.840 --> 0:54:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the road. We actually spoke about that on Monday with

0:54:14.120 --> 0:54:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Matt Modica so zac Eflyn and the Phillies money line

0:54:17.080 --> 0:54:19.879
<v Speaker 1>at minus one forty four. I also like Joey luke

0:54:19.960 --> 0:54:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Casey and the San Diego Padres going into San Francisco

0:54:23.800 --> 0:54:26.719
<v Speaker 1>against Sean Anderson and the Giants. You get the Padres

0:54:26.760 --> 0:54:29.560
<v Speaker 1>money line at minus one thirty two. So I like

0:54:29.680 --> 0:54:32.400
<v Speaker 1>both of those. You can play them separately. I wouldn't

0:54:32.400 --> 0:54:34.759
<v Speaker 1>be opposed to parlaying these two together. And if you

0:54:34.800 --> 0:54:37.160
<v Speaker 1>do that, Greg, you get it at plus one nineties seven.

0:54:37.480 --> 0:54:39.759
<v Speaker 1>That's the Phillies and the Padres tonight. I like both

0:54:39.800 --> 0:54:43.399
<v Speaker 1>of those winners. All right. There you go, the Padres

0:54:43.480 --> 0:54:45.080
<v Speaker 1>in there. I like Joliy lu Casey probably the best,

0:54:45.080 --> 0:54:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and the Phillies. You like their money line as a

0:54:47.239 --> 0:54:49.320
<v Speaker 1>winner minus one four. I was look at that Phillies

0:54:49.320 --> 0:54:51.960
<v Speaker 1>game as well. Lu Casey certainly stands out to me.

0:54:52.160 --> 0:54:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to find something else that I really like,

0:54:55.800 --> 0:54:58.600
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily finding it, to be totally honest with you,

0:54:59.200 --> 0:55:01.560
<v Speaker 1>um something calling out to me. The only thing I

0:55:01.640 --> 0:55:04.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of for whatever reason, I'm having a gut feeling

0:55:04.320 --> 0:55:08.040
<v Speaker 1>about what you got. Tell me it's not the Orios total.

0:55:08.239 --> 0:55:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Not going with the Orioles total. I am going with

0:55:10.000 --> 0:55:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the total. I'm going back to my total. Well, and

0:55:12.120 --> 0:55:15.000
<v Speaker 1>it's in that Battle of Ohio game between the Reds

0:55:15.080 --> 0:55:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and the Indians exactly sac and that eight asks laugh

0:55:18.719 --> 0:55:21.560
<v Speaker 1>on you know it's at nine and a half Police

0:55:21.600 --> 0:55:24.520
<v Speaker 1>that pitch pretty well against the Yankees des Lafani. We're

0:55:24.520 --> 0:55:28.399
<v Speaker 1>always questioning. But for whatever reason, I like the over

0:55:28.760 --> 0:55:31.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why. That's what my gut's telling me.

0:55:31.480 --> 0:55:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Your gut, rereg Susman's gut. Go with the gut. Go

0:55:34.800 --> 0:55:36.279
<v Speaker 1>over nine and a half. Over nine and a halfs

0:55:36.280 --> 0:55:37.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot of runs. The only way you're gonna know

0:55:37.800 --> 0:55:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that is if you're listening to this on demand literally

0:55:40.320 --> 0:55:42.759
<v Speaker 1>five minutes before the game starts, because it's at one time.

0:55:42.760 --> 0:55:45.480
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not allowed to say that one. Now we'll

0:55:45.480 --> 0:55:47.480
<v Speaker 1>put it on the record for you. Great record. It's

0:55:47.560 --> 0:55:49.080
<v Speaker 1>on the record. Man. How about how about this Cubs

0:55:49.080 --> 0:55:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and Rockies games over by the Ways plus one hundred,

0:55:51.200 --> 0:55:54.120
<v Speaker 1>so it is the underdog the Cups and Rockies. Greg.

0:55:54.440 --> 0:55:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I know it's in corps Field. The total is massive

0:55:56.560 --> 0:55:59.480
<v Speaker 1>at twelve, man, dare mess with the under I don't

0:55:59.520 --> 0:56:03.439
<v Speaker 1>message on, don't mess with undersons field. All right, Yeah,

0:56:03.440 --> 0:56:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm kind of getting trapped here the same

0:56:04.960 --> 0:56:06.719
<v Speaker 1>way you got trapped for the for the Orioles and

0:56:06.800 --> 0:56:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Rangers game a couple of weeks ago. But well, speaking

0:56:10.000 --> 0:56:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Orioles, though, David Hess Edwin Jackson, is there

0:56:14.080 --> 0:56:16.680
<v Speaker 1>a number that's high enough? This is a big number,

0:56:16.920 --> 0:56:18.560
<v Speaker 1>it's so big, it's ten and a half. But you

0:56:18.560 --> 0:56:21.799
<v Speaker 1>should probably take the over right, there's no number. And

0:56:21.840 --> 0:56:24.960
<v Speaker 1>when Jackson there was a quote over the weekend, I

0:56:25.000 --> 0:56:26.600
<v Speaker 1>actually feel bad for him. I feel bad for the

0:56:26.600 --> 0:56:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Blue Days to um after his last start where he

0:56:29.560 --> 0:56:32.759
<v Speaker 1>got rocked Greg They asked the Blue Jays manager believe

0:56:32.800 --> 0:56:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Montoya. They said, will Edwin Jackson be in the

0:56:36.480 --> 0:56:38.520
<v Speaker 1>rotation for another girl around because he's been so bad? Yeah,

0:56:38.640 --> 0:56:42.279
<v Speaker 1>so in effective bad. He said, quote, we just don't

0:56:42.320 --> 0:56:46.759
<v Speaker 1>have anybody. We just don't have anybody to pitch. Not

0:56:46.840 --> 0:56:49.600
<v Speaker 1>really a re endorsement for Edwin Jackson. Bad for the

0:56:49.600 --> 0:56:51.120
<v Speaker 1>guy you know once through a no hitter. I mean

0:56:51.600 --> 0:56:56.239
<v Speaker 1>you can he's come along like eight walks or something

0:56:56.239 --> 0:56:58.960
<v Speaker 1>that that's I want to think Davis Maddock for joining us,

0:56:58.960 --> 0:57:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and one of think Alex and the Eyes downstairs for

0:57:00.840 --> 0:57:03.279
<v Speaker 1>all of their help, and Brian as well, so we

0:57:03.320 --> 0:57:06.399
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. For Fanks Neville, I'm Greg Susman. We'll see

0:57:06.400 --> 0:57:09.319
<v Speaker 1>you tomorrow with Virginia sackets from Inside Injuries. Thank you

0:57:09.360 --> 0:57:18.440
<v Speaker 1>so much for watching. Good Long Go tomorrow. We hope

0:57:19.520 --> 0:57:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't catch the live show. Make sure to download

0:57:22.680 --> 0:57:24.800
<v Speaker 1>our podcast at the v n T S Y Sports

0:57:24.800 --> 0:57:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Network Audio Boom channel oh