WEBVTT - Is Crypto B******t?

0:00:15.396 --> 0:00:23.916
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin from Pushkin Industries. This is Deep Background, the show

0:00:23.956 --> 0:00:27.036
<v Speaker 1>where we explored the stories behind the stories in the news.

0:00:27.476 --> 0:00:31.956
<v Speaker 1>I'm Noah Feldman. This week marked an important watershed in

0:00:31.996 --> 0:00:36.636
<v Speaker 1>the history of crypto and cryptocurrencies. Coin Base, one of

0:00:36.636 --> 0:00:41.236
<v Speaker 1>the leading exchanges for buying and selling crypto, went public,

0:00:41.556 --> 0:00:45.276
<v Speaker 1>and although appropriately enough, its share price was a little volatile,

0:00:45.556 --> 0:00:50.556
<v Speaker 1>it has achieved a very substantial valuation above the eighty

0:00:50.596 --> 0:00:56.076
<v Speaker 1>five billion dollar mark where it first launched. Simultaneously, Bitcoin,

0:00:56.276 --> 0:01:00.876
<v Speaker 1>the most popularly traded of the different crypto assets, remains,

0:01:01.196 --> 0:01:06.036
<v Speaker 1>notwithstanding its own volatility, at a price higher by almost

0:01:06.076 --> 0:01:11.036
<v Speaker 1>four times than what it was just a few months ago. Bitcoin,

0:01:11.236 --> 0:01:16.076
<v Speaker 1>the most popularly traded of the cryptocurrencies, retains a price

0:01:16.756 --> 0:01:20.916
<v Speaker 1>much much higher than it was just a few short

0:01:21.036 --> 0:01:25.636
<v Speaker 1>months ago. I am thoroughly fascinated by the phenomenon that

0:01:25.756 --> 0:01:29.516
<v Speaker 1>is crypto. For one thing. Among my friends, opinions seems

0:01:29.516 --> 0:01:35.076
<v Speaker 1>to be very deeply divided. On the one hand, are economists, investors,

0:01:35.636 --> 0:01:39.316
<v Speaker 1>capitalists of all kinds who tend themselves to be highly

0:01:39.396 --> 0:01:43.356
<v Speaker 1>skeptical of the idea that there's something of enduring value

0:01:43.476 --> 0:01:48.116
<v Speaker 1>or meaning in this new asset class. On the other hand,

0:01:48.316 --> 0:01:52.676
<v Speaker 1>are enthusiasts, open minded, creative tech people, many of whom

0:01:52.716 --> 0:01:58.036
<v Speaker 1>have themselves invested heavily in crypto, who are wildly optimistic

0:01:58.236 --> 0:02:01.396
<v Speaker 1>about the possibility of this asset class not only to endure,

0:02:01.716 --> 0:02:06.396
<v Speaker 1>but to grow and to develop and to spread. Alongside

0:02:06.476 --> 0:02:10.716
<v Speaker 1>this fascinating debate is a further question about the nature

0:02:10.836 --> 0:02:16.116
<v Speaker 1>of power. Who has power over finances? Is it individuals?

0:02:16.516 --> 0:02:20.076
<v Speaker 1>Is it the nation state? Is it a distributed international

0:02:20.156 --> 0:02:23.716
<v Speaker 1>network of the kind that, via the blockchain, is sought

0:02:23.716 --> 0:02:27.596
<v Speaker 1>to be created by the cryptocurrencies? A few questions could

0:02:27.636 --> 0:02:31.036
<v Speaker 1>be more relevant for this year's theme on deep background

0:02:31.276 --> 0:02:35.516
<v Speaker 1>the theme of power. To discuss all of these issues

0:02:35.516 --> 0:02:39.796
<v Speaker 1>with me, I'm joined today by a pioneer in crypto,

0:02:40.436 --> 0:02:44.676
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Lee. Bobby was the co founder and former CEO

0:02:44.876 --> 0:02:49.316
<v Speaker 1>of China's first bitcoin exchange. Right now, he's founder and

0:02:49.436 --> 0:02:53.836
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Ballet, a startup that helps people securely store

0:02:53.956 --> 0:02:58.156
<v Speaker 1>their digital assets in its own unique wallet. On top

0:02:58.236 --> 0:03:01.236
<v Speaker 1>of that, he's a member of the Bitcoin Foundation's Board

0:03:01.236 --> 0:03:05.316
<v Speaker 1>of Directors, and he's the author of a forthcoming book,

0:03:05.636 --> 0:03:10.356
<v Speaker 1>The Promise of Bitcoin. All in all, a perfect person

0:03:10.636 --> 0:03:21.676
<v Speaker 1>to answer my persistent crypto questions, Bobby thank you so

0:03:21.756 --> 0:03:25.076
<v Speaker 1>much for joining me. Let me start with the most

0:03:25.116 --> 0:03:30.996
<v Speaker 1>basic question, which is what exactly do you think crypto is?

0:03:30.996 --> 0:03:34.876
<v Speaker 1>Is it a currency or is it something else? Yeah,

0:03:34.956 --> 0:03:37.556
<v Speaker 1>this is a great way to start. So colloquially we

0:03:37.556 --> 0:03:41.036
<v Speaker 1>call a cryptocurrency, and bitcoin was the first to come

0:03:41.076 --> 0:03:43.836
<v Speaker 1>to market as a es central secryptocurrency in two thousand

0:03:43.876 --> 0:03:47.116
<v Speaker 1>and nine, and even the white paper called it peer

0:03:47.116 --> 0:03:49.916
<v Speaker 1>to peer electronic Cash's I think that's how it got

0:03:49.916 --> 0:03:54.996
<v Speaker 1>the name cryptocurrency. This year marks my ten year involvement

0:03:54.996 --> 0:03:58.716
<v Speaker 1>with bitcoin, and through my ten year journey I have

0:03:58.796 --> 0:04:02.556
<v Speaker 1>come to the current understanding is that cryptocurrency should be

0:04:02.636 --> 0:04:06.676
<v Speaker 1>more considered as a digital asset class rather than currency.

0:04:07.076 --> 0:04:10.116
<v Speaker 1>And the reason is that in society, when we think

0:04:10.116 --> 0:04:13.076
<v Speaker 1>of currency, we think of the money we use in

0:04:13.156 --> 0:04:15.796
<v Speaker 1>day to day, whether it's a paper notes, the coins

0:04:15.796 --> 0:04:18.916
<v Speaker 1>and bills, whether it's a forigm currency like the euro

0:04:19.116 --> 0:04:22.676
<v Speaker 1>or the Canadian dollar. And even though cryptocurrency in Bitcoin

0:04:22.996 --> 0:04:26.156
<v Speaker 1>have used the term currency in cryptocurrency digital currency over

0:04:26.196 --> 0:04:29.076
<v Speaker 1>the last ten to twelve years, I'm more and more

0:04:29.636 --> 0:04:33.396
<v Speaker 1>am a believer that fundamentally the power and the strength

0:04:33.436 --> 0:04:38.476
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoin is in its usefulness as a digital asset.

0:04:38.716 --> 0:04:42.356
<v Speaker 1>As a sort of a global reserve asset class. So

0:04:42.396 --> 0:04:45.076
<v Speaker 1>to answer your question promptly, it's more of an asset

0:04:45.396 --> 0:04:49.436
<v Speaker 1>than the currency that people are used to. That's really

0:04:49.436 --> 0:04:53.956
<v Speaker 1>helpful and it's totally reasonable. But most assets are either

0:04:54.236 --> 0:05:00.276
<v Speaker 1>a promise of future payment in some currency or form,

0:05:00.596 --> 0:05:05.916
<v Speaker 1>or an ownership stake in some legally constructed entity in

0:05:05.996 --> 0:05:10.596
<v Speaker 1>some form, or they're tangible, right. I mean, that's I

0:05:10.636 --> 0:05:11.956
<v Speaker 1>think if you know, we had to sort of do

0:05:11.996 --> 0:05:14.636
<v Speaker 1>assets one O one, we probably say, at least before

0:05:14.676 --> 0:05:18.436
<v Speaker 1>the emergence of crypto, that those are three classes of

0:05:18.476 --> 0:05:21.716
<v Speaker 1>what assets could be. Crypto doesn't seem to be any

0:05:21.756 --> 0:05:25.196
<v Speaker 1>of those three things. So I'm wondering what does it

0:05:25.236 --> 0:05:29.756
<v Speaker 1>mean to call it a digital asset class. Yeah, that's

0:05:29.796 --> 0:05:34.116
<v Speaker 1>a that's a great point. Basically, the tributional asset classes

0:05:34.116 --> 0:05:36.836
<v Speaker 1>people are most familiar with are the ones you talked about,

0:05:36.876 --> 0:05:42.396
<v Speaker 1>like stocks. Stocks fundamentally represent ownership in a company, which

0:05:42.436 --> 0:05:45.596
<v Speaker 1>is an entity that can make money through sales, revenue

0:05:45.636 --> 0:05:48.836
<v Speaker 1>through providing products and services to the community. So that's

0:05:48.876 --> 0:05:52.396
<v Speaker 1>the notion of a stock in a company. Bonds are

0:05:52.436 --> 0:05:55.436
<v Speaker 1>also an asset class. That's a notion of debt you're

0:05:55.556 --> 0:05:57.796
<v Speaker 1>lending your money to someone else, in this case the

0:05:57.876 --> 0:06:01.636
<v Speaker 1>United States government or any other foreign government, or even

0:06:01.676 --> 0:06:06.276
<v Speaker 1>a corporation like corporate debt, corporate bonds, and the ideas

0:06:06.316 --> 0:06:08.316
<v Speaker 1>that you lend it to them with a notion that

0:06:08.596 --> 0:06:10.956
<v Speaker 1>they're taking a risk to make the money, and then

0:06:10.996 --> 0:06:13.796
<v Speaker 1>you get rewarded with an interest rate. And the third

0:06:13.796 --> 0:06:17.156
<v Speaker 1>class is real estate, which, as you pointed out, it's

0:06:17.196 --> 0:06:19.836
<v Speaker 1>something very tangible. It's like a home, a plot of

0:06:19.956 --> 0:06:23.596
<v Speaker 1>land where you have title to it, and then it

0:06:23.636 --> 0:06:26.516
<v Speaker 1>gives you the government, society gives you the right to

0:06:27.436 --> 0:06:29.996
<v Speaker 1>stay in that or stay on that property. You own

0:06:30.036 --> 0:06:34.036
<v Speaker 1>that property and derive income, rental income, or whatever business

0:06:34.036 --> 0:06:36.516
<v Speaker 1>you do. And then the other asset class, the major

0:06:36.556 --> 0:06:42.116
<v Speaker 1>ast classes precious metals. So these are commodities. Most people

0:06:42.236 --> 0:06:44.556
<v Speaker 1>know them as gold and silver, but if you want

0:06:44.556 --> 0:06:47.596
<v Speaker 1>to just expend that, we also have things like diamond, jewelry,

0:06:47.956 --> 0:06:50.796
<v Speaker 1>and if you expend that further even fine art, more

0:06:50.836 --> 0:06:54.916
<v Speaker 1>tangible goods. The value of those kind of tangible assets

0:06:54.956 --> 0:06:57.356
<v Speaker 1>is in the eye to beholder. Why is that worth

0:06:57.396 --> 0:07:00.596
<v Speaker 1>something when when the only when it's only pretty right,

0:07:00.676 --> 0:07:02.596
<v Speaker 1>you can't eat it. I think that's a really good

0:07:02.596 --> 0:07:07.316
<v Speaker 1>clarifying question and I think we can direct it straight

0:07:07.316 --> 0:07:10.796
<v Speaker 1>at crypto because yeah, I think everyone can buy that.

0:07:10.836 --> 0:07:13.916
<v Speaker 1>There's something arbitrary about saying we value gold, or we

0:07:14.036 --> 0:07:17.596
<v Speaker 1>value silver, or we value diamonds. The question is whether,

0:07:17.956 --> 0:07:22.116
<v Speaker 1>if that's what crypto is going to be, is it

0:07:22.316 --> 0:07:26.516
<v Speaker 1>in some meaningful sense comparable to those assets. And I

0:07:26.556 --> 0:07:30.156
<v Speaker 1>think maybe that's a good place to then focus. Yeah,

0:07:30.196 --> 0:07:32.876
<v Speaker 1>so looking at gold and silver I think is very

0:07:32.956 --> 0:07:37.636
<v Speaker 1>insightful in terms of helping people understand why crypto, especially bitcoin,

0:07:37.996 --> 0:07:40.276
<v Speaker 1>can be valuable even as something that's sort of in

0:07:40.316 --> 0:07:42.836
<v Speaker 1>the ether. You can't touch it, you can't see it. Right,

0:07:42.916 --> 0:07:44.556
<v Speaker 1>For a lot of people, the virtual aspect of it

0:07:44.636 --> 0:07:47.116
<v Speaker 1>scares people. Imagine something like my mother who has never

0:07:47.156 --> 0:07:49.556
<v Speaker 1>seen or touched her. You know, she doesn't understand what

0:07:49.556 --> 0:07:52.836
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin really is is just a stream of numbers. Right. So,

0:07:52.996 --> 0:07:56.556
<v Speaker 1>going back to gold and silver, the reason why multiple

0:07:56.636 --> 0:08:00.356
<v Speaker 1>societies and multiple regions all around the world all ended

0:08:00.436 --> 0:08:03.876
<v Speaker 1>up using gold and silver as a monetary instrument, there's

0:08:03.916 --> 0:08:06.036
<v Speaker 1>a fundamental reason to it. It wasn't like there was

0:08:06.116 --> 0:08:09.036
<v Speaker 1>one king we said the whole earth shall use gold

0:08:09.236 --> 0:08:12.716
<v Speaker 1>and silver as money. Gold and silver evolved to become

0:08:12.796 --> 0:08:17.556
<v Speaker 1>money as instruments of monetary transfer independently in different, many

0:08:17.596 --> 0:08:20.996
<v Speaker 1>different regions all around the Earth. Okay, And I think

0:08:21.436 --> 0:08:24.316
<v Speaker 1>to crack that sort of mystery is to look at

0:08:24.316 --> 0:08:27.596
<v Speaker 1>the properties. It turns out that it's really fungible, it's

0:08:27.596 --> 0:08:31.876
<v Speaker 1>got this shiny look. But the really interesting thing about

0:08:31.916 --> 0:08:35.836
<v Speaker 1>gold is really dense. It means that for every similar

0:08:35.956 --> 0:08:38.596
<v Speaker 1>unit of volume where there's cubic inch or cubic centimeter,

0:08:38.996 --> 0:08:43.476
<v Speaker 1>it's very very heavy. And it turns out something dense

0:08:43.836 --> 0:08:48.076
<v Speaker 1>cannot it cannot be counterfeited using something lighter, whereas something

0:08:48.196 --> 0:08:51.836
<v Speaker 1>lighter can be can be counterfeited using something heavier. So

0:08:51.956 --> 0:08:55.076
<v Speaker 1>for that reason, I think, now certainly gold is not

0:08:55.116 --> 0:08:57.436
<v Speaker 1>the most heaviest element. But the fact that I was

0:08:57.476 --> 0:08:59.076
<v Speaker 1>just gonna I was just gonna say, Bobby, I mean,

0:08:59.116 --> 0:09:01.076
<v Speaker 1>I think what I naturally would say in response to

0:09:01.116 --> 0:09:03.836
<v Speaker 1>that is sure. One of the features that gold had

0:09:03.996 --> 0:09:06.196
<v Speaker 1>that made it useful was that because it's dense, it's

0:09:06.236 --> 0:09:09.476
<v Speaker 1>harder to fake. Of course, history is literally with people

0:09:09.476 --> 0:09:11.476
<v Speaker 1>who try to fake gold, and people try to use

0:09:11.556 --> 0:09:14.676
<v Speaker 1>lead and a whole range of other dense metals. Silver

0:09:14.836 --> 0:09:16.996
<v Speaker 1>was a little less dense, but it also managed to

0:09:17.036 --> 0:09:19.556
<v Speaker 1>become an effective exchange of value. But what I really

0:09:19.556 --> 0:09:22.636
<v Speaker 1>want to press us on is what are the features

0:09:22.636 --> 0:09:26.756
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoin that would be comparable and also why we

0:09:26.876 --> 0:09:30.116
<v Speaker 1>need another assets that's comparable to a gold and silver.

0:09:30.476 --> 0:09:33.836
<v Speaker 1>So bitcoin being a digital sort of ascid digital good,

0:09:33.876 --> 0:09:36.876
<v Speaker 1>digital currency, it shares none of the physical attributes or

0:09:36.916 --> 0:09:40.956
<v Speaker 1>properties of gold and silver. However, what it does share

0:09:41.396 --> 0:09:45.156
<v Speaker 1>is in terms of digital form, it is fungible. Okay,

0:09:45.356 --> 0:09:47.036
<v Speaker 1>So unlike a house. For example, if you have a

0:09:47.156 --> 0:09:50.436
<v Speaker 1>large house and now you want to retire, you can't

0:09:50.516 --> 0:09:53.996
<v Speaker 1>just say I want to sell off my unused garage

0:09:54.556 --> 0:09:57.116
<v Speaker 1>and go on a vacation with that money. Right the house,

0:09:57.156 --> 0:09:59.916
<v Speaker 1>You either sell the whole body. You were saying those

0:09:59.916 --> 0:10:01.916
<v Speaker 1>are arguments for a bitcoin as a currency, But as

0:10:01.956 --> 0:10:04.196
<v Speaker 1>you were saying, that's probably not the right way to

0:10:04.236 --> 0:10:06.356
<v Speaker 1>think about it. Now, I think we need more conceptual

0:10:06.396 --> 0:10:11.316
<v Speaker 1>clarity here, because assets can be translated into currencies. Right,

0:10:11.356 --> 0:10:14.556
<v Speaker 1>So if I'm owning, you know, pork belly futures, that's

0:10:14.556 --> 0:10:17.636
<v Speaker 1>an asset, an intangible asset. The pork bellies are still

0:10:17.636 --> 0:10:21.116
<v Speaker 1>on the pig, but I can trade them because there

0:10:21.236 --> 0:10:26.876
<v Speaker 1>is agreed upon mechanism that makes them fungible. A measure

0:10:26.876 --> 0:10:29.476
<v Speaker 1>of how much pork we're talking about accepted by a market,

0:10:29.996 --> 0:10:33.476
<v Speaker 1>and because I can translate them into currencies, so they

0:10:33.516 --> 0:10:35.756
<v Speaker 1>are salable assets. But no one would say that they

0:10:35.756 --> 0:10:38.156
<v Speaker 1>are currencies. You know, you bring up a good point.

0:10:38.156 --> 0:10:41.756
<v Speaker 1>So pork belly, technically the pork bellies you're talking about it,

0:10:41.836 --> 0:10:44.996
<v Speaker 1>it's probably the traded form, the commodity's futures former version.

0:10:45.156 --> 0:10:47.636
<v Speaker 1>These are future contracts. You're not literally talking about pork

0:10:47.676 --> 0:10:50.036
<v Speaker 1>belly that's on a live pig, right, So that's it's

0:10:50.076 --> 0:10:52.276
<v Speaker 1>what fantasy terms. It's like a derivative. So when you

0:10:52.356 --> 0:10:55.156
<v Speaker 1>say you want to then convert that to something else,

0:10:55.316 --> 0:10:58.676
<v Speaker 1>like like a supermarket, you know, grocery shopping, you really

0:10:58.716 --> 0:11:01.396
<v Speaker 1>need an into medium. And this is where the word

0:11:01.436 --> 0:11:04.716
<v Speaker 1>money comes in. That's why money was invented in a society.

0:11:04.756 --> 0:11:06.916
<v Speaker 1>So before money came about, it was all barter. As

0:11:06.956 --> 0:11:08.956
<v Speaker 1>you know, back then we didn't have pork belly contracts.

0:11:08.956 --> 0:11:11.796
<v Speaker 1>But if we did have prop valuy contracts, the contract

0:11:11.916 --> 0:11:14.636
<v Speaker 1>is worth this much value and you can only exchange

0:11:14.636 --> 0:11:16.596
<v Speaker 1>it for something else that's worth that much value because

0:11:16.596 --> 0:11:19.476
<v Speaker 1>there's no intermediate money to break it down and allow

0:11:19.476 --> 0:11:21.956
<v Speaker 1>you to spend smaller amounts. So money was a human

0:11:21.996 --> 0:11:27.516
<v Speaker 1>invention allowing people to exchange different valuable things, items and

0:11:27.556 --> 0:11:30.956
<v Speaker 1>promises so that they can save their value and use

0:11:30.996 --> 0:11:35.156
<v Speaker 1>it across time. Money is what transports value through time.

0:11:35.876 --> 0:11:38.716
<v Speaker 1>I'll drop the what's the difference between currency and money

0:11:38.796 --> 0:11:42.916
<v Speaker 1>as to philosophical a question? So I do understand that

0:11:42.956 --> 0:11:47.516
<v Speaker 1>the genius of the creation of crypto was to draw

0:11:47.556 --> 0:11:50.516
<v Speaker 1>on the metaphor of gold and silver, Right, why do

0:11:50.596 --> 0:11:53.276
<v Speaker 1>we need this new set of things? Let's say in

0:11:53.316 --> 0:11:56.556
<v Speaker 1>the best case scenario, crypto goes alongside gold and silver

0:11:56.716 --> 0:11:58.396
<v Speaker 1>and is treated sort of like the way gold and

0:11:58.436 --> 0:12:02.156
<v Speaker 1>silver are. Why do we need another asset class like this?

0:12:03.436 --> 0:12:06.636
<v Speaker 1>So technology has progressed really fast, and the Internet has

0:12:06.676 --> 0:12:12.716
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally changed how society operates, and up until bitcoin, how

0:12:12.756 --> 0:12:15.596
<v Speaker 1>does value transfer on the Internet. It's always through a

0:12:15.676 --> 0:12:18.116
<v Speaker 1>third party, meaning if you and I were to do business,

0:12:18.276 --> 0:12:20.076
<v Speaker 1>if I owe you money, I could send it to

0:12:20.116 --> 0:12:24.116
<v Speaker 1>you by PayPal, Venmo, or a bank transfer, Swift, wire transfer,

0:12:24.276 --> 0:12:27.116
<v Speaker 1>and so on so forth. It always involves a third party.

0:12:27.396 --> 0:12:30.876
<v Speaker 1>Over the last twelve years of Bitcoin's existence, it turns

0:12:30.876 --> 0:12:33.636
<v Speaker 1>out more and more people agree that what bitcoin can

0:12:33.676 --> 0:12:37.956
<v Speaker 1>provide society on the Internet in terms of payments is useful.

0:12:38.676 --> 0:12:41.636
<v Speaker 1>The evidence speaks for itself. Over the last twelve years,

0:12:41.636 --> 0:12:44.996
<v Speaker 1>we've seen more and more dollars worth of bitcoin being

0:12:45.036 --> 0:12:48.356
<v Speaker 1>transacted on the so called public blockchain, and I think

0:12:48.396 --> 0:12:51.036
<v Speaker 1>that trend will continue. So the only way to do

0:12:51.156 --> 0:12:53.396
<v Speaker 1>that transfer value through the Internet and the direct peer

0:12:53.436 --> 0:12:56.636
<v Speaker 1>to peer fashion. Today, at least the market degrees, bitcoin

0:12:56.876 --> 0:12:58.436
<v Speaker 1>is the most popular way to do that. From a

0:12:58.516 --> 0:13:03.236
<v Speaker 1>market capitalization and a sort of brute amount of volume

0:13:03.276 --> 0:13:07.796
<v Speaker 1>that goes on for bitcoin. I've a lot of people say,

0:13:08.076 --> 0:13:10.596
<v Speaker 1>you know, it doesn't make sense, but I'm a little

0:13:10.596 --> 0:13:12.196
<v Speaker 1>confused by it still because I've heard a lot of

0:13:12.236 --> 0:13:15.876
<v Speaker 1>people say that the original idea of crypto was just

0:13:15.916 --> 0:13:18.956
<v Speaker 1>what you said. It would be the online currency that

0:13:18.996 --> 0:13:21.676
<v Speaker 1>we would use to transact business on the Internet, and

0:13:21.796 --> 0:13:23.756
<v Speaker 1>for that reason, there was a logic to it, and

0:13:23.756 --> 0:13:26.596
<v Speaker 1>I think that made a good deal of sense. And yet,

0:13:27.476 --> 0:13:30.236
<v Speaker 1>because it turns out so far, at least that the

0:13:30.316 --> 0:13:34.556
<v Speaker 1>value of crypto, including bitcoin, has been extraordinarily volatile, that

0:13:34.636 --> 0:13:37.556
<v Speaker 1>has made people pretty skeptical of the idea or some

0:13:37.556 --> 0:13:39.236
<v Speaker 1>people at least that this will be the means of

0:13:39.276 --> 0:13:41.996
<v Speaker 1>exchange on the Internet. Add to that the fact that

0:13:42.236 --> 0:13:45.036
<v Speaker 1>there are governments out there in the world that don't

0:13:45.076 --> 0:13:48.036
<v Speaker 1>love the idea of their currencies over which they have

0:13:48.036 --> 0:13:50.716
<v Speaker 1>a certain amount of regulatory control, not total, but some

0:13:50.756 --> 0:13:55.436
<v Speaker 1>regulatory control being displaced, and who are also worried about

0:13:55.716 --> 0:13:59.996
<v Speaker 1>unregulated uses of currency transfer over the Internet. If that's

0:14:00.036 --> 0:14:05.116
<v Speaker 1>the case, then the argument for the value of crypto

0:14:05.196 --> 0:14:07.196
<v Speaker 1>then shouldn't be based on it as a means of

0:14:07.236 --> 0:14:11.156
<v Speaker 1>exchange on the internet, as something else, some store of value.

0:14:11.156 --> 0:14:13.396
<v Speaker 1>And I took that to be behind your initial statement

0:14:13.436 --> 0:14:16.676
<v Speaker 1>that it's too simple to think to think of crypto

0:14:16.836 --> 0:14:19.436
<v Speaker 1>as just a currency. It sounds like the arguments are

0:14:19.516 --> 0:14:22.836
<v Speaker 1>kind of constantly in motion. You know. If someone says, well,

0:14:22.916 --> 0:14:24.756
<v Speaker 1>is it a store of value? People say, no, no,

0:14:24.796 --> 0:14:27.196
<v Speaker 1>it's not a store of value. Primarily it's a mechanism

0:14:27.236 --> 0:14:28.996
<v Speaker 1>for doing business on the internet. Then someone says, well,

0:14:28.996 --> 0:14:30.556
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of hard to do that. People say, well,

0:14:30.836 --> 0:14:33.556
<v Speaker 1>it's a store of value, and it hedges against inflation

0:14:33.596 --> 0:14:35.596
<v Speaker 1>in the same way that holding gold might heade you

0:14:35.636 --> 0:14:38.196
<v Speaker 1>against inflation. And so that's the part that I'm just

0:14:38.236 --> 0:14:42.956
<v Speaker 1>a teeny bit confused by. Yeah, here's how I would

0:14:42.956 --> 0:14:48.236
<v Speaker 1>approach it. Okay, So bitcoin fundamentally is money, So let

0:14:48.236 --> 0:14:51.116
<v Speaker 1>me make that statement loud and clear. Bitcoin is money.

0:14:51.716 --> 0:14:54.916
<v Speaker 1>The usefulness is of money doesn't mean it has to

0:14:55.116 --> 0:14:59.276
<v Speaker 1>only be used for payments. Money has to hold its value.

0:14:59.356 --> 0:15:02.716
<v Speaker 1>So to clarify, for example, look at gold is money,

0:15:02.836 --> 0:15:05.236
<v Speaker 1>right traditionally people who leave gold is money, And the

0:15:05.316 --> 0:15:08.196
<v Speaker 1>same thing with the US dollars. We know for fact

0:15:08.396 --> 0:15:10.516
<v Speaker 1>that in a gift day, in a giving twenty four

0:15:10.556 --> 0:15:15.636
<v Speaker 1>hour period, this much gold goes around being exchanged for

0:15:15.636 --> 0:15:19.516
<v Speaker 1>people to buy and sell, okay, meaning trading hands. Okay,

0:15:19.636 --> 0:15:21.316
<v Speaker 1>now it turns out for gold and sober people don't

0:15:21.316 --> 0:15:24.076
<v Speaker 1>do that anymore much. Okay. However, for the US dollar,

0:15:24.156 --> 0:15:27.876
<v Speaker 1>we know how much US dollars traded is exchanged from

0:15:27.876 --> 0:15:30.036
<v Speaker 1>person to business and so on in a given day. Okay,

0:15:30.076 --> 0:15:34.516
<v Speaker 1>that's a large number. However, more US dollars stays put

0:15:34.596 --> 0:15:36.716
<v Speaker 1>in a given day than the amount of US dollar

0:15:36.756 --> 0:15:39.596
<v Speaker 1>that moves around. So my point is both of those

0:15:39.756 --> 0:15:43.036
<v Speaker 1>are valid and legitimate use cases of the US dollar,

0:15:43.316 --> 0:15:45.836
<v Speaker 1>meaning the US dollar as money is not just valuable

0:15:45.876 --> 0:15:48.916
<v Speaker 1>because it's changing hands to pay for coffee or grocery shopping,

0:15:49.036 --> 0:15:51.796
<v Speaker 1>but it's also extremely valuable the fact that staying put

0:15:52.036 --> 0:15:53.956
<v Speaker 1>sitting in the bank account, so this is what happens

0:15:53.956 --> 0:15:58.236
<v Speaker 1>with bitcoin as well. So Bitcoin today is valuable as

0:15:58.236 --> 0:16:02.276
<v Speaker 1>a digital asset, as digital cryptocurrency because of its two features.

0:16:02.276 --> 0:16:05.316
<v Speaker 1>One is it can be used to send as payment

0:16:05.356 --> 0:16:09.636
<v Speaker 1>of value between two individuals directly on the internet, or

0:16:09.676 --> 0:16:12.876
<v Speaker 1>it can also be used just staying put holding value.

0:16:13.036 --> 0:16:14.956
<v Speaker 1>Now to your point about what about the fact that

0:16:14.996 --> 0:16:18.276
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin prices fluctuate so much, And my explanation for that

0:16:18.356 --> 0:16:21.076
<v Speaker 1>is simple. One, Bitcoin is still young. We are in

0:16:21.116 --> 0:16:24.516
<v Speaker 1>the thirteenth year of bitcoin. Bitcoin is only twelve years old.

0:16:24.556 --> 0:16:27.476
<v Speaker 1>It hasn't even become a teenager yet. In my opinion,

0:16:27.556 --> 0:16:30.436
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin deserves to be in the greatest of all asset classes,

0:16:30.476 --> 0:16:35.476
<v Speaker 1>like housing, real estate, stocks, like bonds, like derivatives, and

0:16:35.556 --> 0:16:48.756
<v Speaker 1>like precious metals. We'll be back in a moment. One

0:16:48.756 --> 0:16:50.396
<v Speaker 1>thing you know a ton about, and I'd love to

0:16:50.436 --> 0:16:54.556
<v Speaker 1>get your thoughts on, is how the Chinese government has,

0:16:54.636 --> 0:16:56.876
<v Speaker 1>in the past and will in the future attempt to

0:16:56.956 --> 0:16:59.716
<v Speaker 1>regulate or engage bitcoin. And I'd really love to hear

0:16:59.756 --> 0:17:03.036
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts about that. And here's why. Sometimes one hears

0:17:03.476 --> 0:17:06.036
<v Speaker 1>big bitcoin optimists talking about how one of the huge

0:17:06.036 --> 0:17:08.516
<v Speaker 1>benefits of bitcoin as an asset class is that you

0:17:08.556 --> 0:17:13.556
<v Speaker 1>can sort of view the individual owner can evade central

0:17:13.636 --> 0:17:17.556
<v Speaker 1>governmental scrutiny. And what it makes me wonder is can

0:17:17.556 --> 0:17:20.356
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese government, using the regulatory tools that has available

0:17:20.396 --> 0:17:27.356
<v Speaker 1>to it, really substantially regulate the use of cryptocurrencies. Does

0:17:27.476 --> 0:17:31.036
<v Speaker 1>China suggest that other governments, even governments that are more

0:17:31.036 --> 0:17:35.116
<v Speaker 1>concerned about individual liberties like property rights, will also be

0:17:35.196 --> 0:17:38.076
<v Speaker 1>able in the long run to engage in pretty aggressive

0:17:38.156 --> 0:17:41.356
<v Speaker 1>regulation of bitcoins such that it's not really going to

0:17:41.356 --> 0:17:45.916
<v Speaker 1>be an asset that's in some way free of government regulation. Yeah,

0:17:45.996 --> 0:17:48.196
<v Speaker 1>that's a great question. I think there's a very important topic.

0:17:48.236 --> 0:17:53.476
<v Speaker 1>It's very timely as well. So here's my perspective. There's

0:17:53.516 --> 0:17:58.356
<v Speaker 1>a lot of confusion about the term regulating bitcoin. So

0:17:58.436 --> 0:18:01.876
<v Speaker 1>each country's government certainly has a right to regulate and

0:18:01.956 --> 0:18:08.516
<v Speaker 1>allow or disallow business activities. That said, today China openly

0:18:09.116 --> 0:18:15.636
<v Speaker 1>does not allow banks, exchanges, restaurants, and others to circulate

0:18:15.676 --> 0:18:19.516
<v Speaker 1>and transact in bitcoin. That's just a hard rule. It

0:18:19.556 --> 0:18:22.076
<v Speaker 1>may not be written in law, but all the implementation

0:18:22.236 --> 0:18:26.276
<v Speaker 1>is such that even in private, banks and exchanges are

0:18:26.316 --> 0:18:29.956
<v Speaker 1>told you cannot through this business relate to bitcoin. However,

0:18:30.116 --> 0:18:34.836
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin itself as as a pure commodity that cannot be

0:18:34.876 --> 0:18:38.836
<v Speaker 1>touched because it is decentralized, meaning no matter how the

0:18:38.916 --> 0:18:42.596
<v Speaker 1>Chinese government might hate bitcoin, might disallow it to circulate

0:18:42.636 --> 0:18:46.316
<v Speaker 1>in China, bitcoin itself can still exist and will still

0:18:46.316 --> 0:18:49.636
<v Speaker 1>exist and will not be squashed by Chinese government. Does

0:18:49.676 --> 0:18:53.556
<v Speaker 1>that make sense? So's there's a very minor distinction there.

0:18:53.716 --> 0:18:56.476
<v Speaker 1>It's a very important, it's a very subtle distinction that

0:18:56.516 --> 0:18:59.636
<v Speaker 1>people need to understand that bitcoin itself cannot be squashed

0:18:59.716 --> 0:19:02.396
<v Speaker 1>due to the decentralized nature. Let me ask you another

0:19:02.476 --> 0:19:05.636
<v Speaker 1>question about the creation of this asset class. The metaphor

0:19:05.676 --> 0:19:09.996
<v Speaker 1>of mining was used by the creators of crypto, and unfortunately,

0:19:09.996 --> 0:19:12.996
<v Speaker 1>it turns out that much like literal mining, which is

0:19:13.156 --> 0:19:16.236
<v Speaker 1>terribly destructive to the environment, and which people will do

0:19:16.316 --> 0:19:18.956
<v Speaker 1>anyway because they really want the gold and the silver

0:19:19.076 --> 0:19:22.156
<v Speaker 1>or the diamonds that they can get out of the earth, similarly,

0:19:22.796 --> 0:19:28.876
<v Speaker 1>mining crypto is detrimental to the environment, potentially extremely so.

0:19:29.196 --> 0:19:32.716
<v Speaker 1>I read recently that the amount of energy that's currently

0:19:32.756 --> 0:19:36.036
<v Speaker 1>being used in mining bitcoin is comparable to that used

0:19:36.036 --> 0:19:38.676
<v Speaker 1>by the country of Argentina in a year. In some

0:19:38.716 --> 0:19:41.036
<v Speaker 1>parts of the United States and of the world, it's

0:19:41.276 --> 0:19:44.956
<v Speaker 1>as high as ten percent of total energy use, and

0:19:45.196 --> 0:19:48.916
<v Speaker 1>we're already starting to hear environmentalist voices saying this is

0:19:48.956 --> 0:19:53.196
<v Speaker 1>a disaster, you know, much like mining was originally. Does

0:19:53.196 --> 0:19:55.556
<v Speaker 1>that seem to you to put a damper on the

0:19:55.556 --> 0:20:00.716
<v Speaker 1>possibilities of crypto? In other words, does sustainability effectively become

0:20:00.756 --> 0:20:06.076
<v Speaker 1>a limitation on the capacity of crypto in the long run. So,

0:20:06.236 --> 0:20:09.876
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately I don't share that perspective, And let me explain

0:20:09.916 --> 0:20:13.956
<v Speaker 1>to why. So, as you pointed out correctly, traditional mining

0:20:14.076 --> 0:20:17.116
<v Speaker 1>is very destructive, is very energy intensive. Any sort of

0:20:17.236 --> 0:20:20.956
<v Speaker 1>industry where they pull natural resources its destructive to the

0:20:20.996 --> 0:20:23.676
<v Speaker 1>earth if you look at it more holistically, any action

0:20:23.756 --> 0:20:27.956
<v Speaker 1>we do, when done to the excessive damages the earth

0:20:28.036 --> 0:20:31.796
<v Speaker 1>and the environment. So it's all about moderation, whether it's

0:20:31.836 --> 0:20:37.276
<v Speaker 1>fishing in the North Sea, whether it's it's mining. Forgive me,

0:20:37.396 --> 0:20:40.756
<v Speaker 1>humans have never been very moderate when it comes to mining,

0:20:40.796 --> 0:20:42.436
<v Speaker 1>you know. I mean the whole idea of a gold

0:20:42.516 --> 0:20:45.236
<v Speaker 1>rush is to embody the idea that people are not

0:20:45.316 --> 0:20:47.076
<v Speaker 1>moderate when it comes to mining, and so I don't

0:20:47.076 --> 0:20:51.276
<v Speaker 1>expect that people will be moderate when it's absolutely So

0:20:51.476 --> 0:20:54.556
<v Speaker 1>my point is, this is a government problem, it's a

0:20:54.596 --> 0:20:57.476
<v Speaker 1>regulation problem, it's a society problem. It's not a problem

0:20:57.516 --> 0:21:00.316
<v Speaker 1>unique with bitcoin. So even before bitcoin came around, if

0:21:00.316 --> 0:21:04.356
<v Speaker 1>you look at the petroleum oil industry, I mean, that's

0:21:04.436 --> 0:21:06.916
<v Speaker 1>hugely destructive. You know, if you want to pick on

0:21:06.996 --> 0:21:10.516
<v Speaker 1>we should pick on the energy industry self. Right, Why

0:21:10.556 --> 0:21:13.076
<v Speaker 1>do we rely on fossil fuels. We can criticize the

0:21:13.156 --> 0:21:15.276
<v Speaker 1>energy industry, and I'm very happy I do so on

0:21:15.276 --> 0:21:17.596
<v Speaker 1>my show, and I think it's totally legitimate to criticize it.

0:21:17.716 --> 0:21:21.396
<v Speaker 1>But what we're talking about here is not energy that's

0:21:21.436 --> 0:21:25.156
<v Speaker 1>being used for some necessary function to drive the economy.

0:21:25.196 --> 0:21:28.276
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about the inventions brand as you were saying,

0:21:28.276 --> 0:21:30.996
<v Speaker 1>of a brand new asset class, and that brand new

0:21:31.036 --> 0:21:34.156
<v Speaker 1>asset class doesn't need to exist, right. We could go

0:21:34.196 --> 0:21:36.556
<v Speaker 1>back to the drawing board like the clever people who

0:21:36.636 --> 0:21:40.556
<v Speaker 1>created cryptocurrencies did, and say, let's do something new. Let's

0:21:40.556 --> 0:21:43.516
<v Speaker 1>come up with a new asset class where mining it

0:21:43.556 --> 0:21:47.356
<v Speaker 1>does not require the destruction of the environment, and then

0:21:47.396 --> 0:21:49.556
<v Speaker 1>perhaps we could come up with some alternative. And I

0:21:49.556 --> 0:21:51.716
<v Speaker 1>think it is reasonable at this stage. As you were saying,

0:21:52.156 --> 0:21:55.356
<v Speaker 1>crypto is brand new, and if we look at something

0:21:55.396 --> 0:21:58.116
<v Speaker 1>that's brand new and is harming the environment, it seems

0:21:58.156 --> 0:22:01.356
<v Speaker 1>as a regulatory matter entirely plausible to say, let's ban

0:22:01.676 --> 0:22:04.196
<v Speaker 1>mining it, and if you ban the mining of it,

0:22:04.556 --> 0:22:08.996
<v Speaker 1>you will have greater protection for the environment. I disagree.

0:22:09.116 --> 0:22:11.916
<v Speaker 1>I very much disagree. The reason people mind bitcoin is

0:22:11.916 --> 0:22:15.596
<v Speaker 1>because the market forces convince people to want to mind bitcoin.

0:22:15.636 --> 0:22:19.276
<v Speaker 1>There's no directive by some evil empire that says thou

0:22:19.316 --> 0:22:21.636
<v Speaker 1>shalt mind bitcoin at the at the detriment of the

0:22:22.636 --> 0:22:24.276
<v Speaker 1>Wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait a minute,

0:22:24.316 --> 0:22:26.716
<v Speaker 1>Wait a minute. The free market doesn't care at all

0:22:26.716 --> 0:22:29.756
<v Speaker 1>about the environment, right. The very definition of why you

0:22:29.796 --> 0:22:34.276
<v Speaker 1>have environmental regulation is that, left unregulated, the free market

0:22:34.316 --> 0:22:36.876
<v Speaker 1>would destroy the earth. As in fact, I agree with you,

0:22:37.196 --> 0:22:38.836
<v Speaker 1>so think about it. If you want to regulate, you

0:22:38.836 --> 0:22:41.956
<v Speaker 1>should regulate the energy. If we bann fossil fuel, if

0:22:41.996 --> 0:22:46.036
<v Speaker 1>we banned coal production power plants, then bitcoin mining will

0:22:46.036 --> 0:22:49.396
<v Speaker 1>be all renewable energy and solar energy, wind energy, geo

0:22:49.436 --> 0:22:52.996
<v Speaker 1>thermal energy. If we ban all fossil fuel by regulation,

0:22:53.116 --> 0:22:55.796
<v Speaker 1>then by definition, bitcoin mining will still continue to be

0:22:55.876 --> 0:22:59.996
<v Speaker 1>unrenewable energy. I don't agree because although I strongly support

0:23:00.156 --> 0:23:03.676
<v Speaker 1>the limitations on the use of fossil fuels for energy,

0:23:03.996 --> 0:23:06.876
<v Speaker 1>the reason it's taking us a long time to get there,

0:23:07.076 --> 0:23:11.436
<v Speaker 1>as human societies. Is so much of our economy is

0:23:11.596 --> 0:23:19.156
<v Speaker 1>already bound up in useful methods of consuming those fossil fuels,

0:23:19.196 --> 0:23:22.636
<v Speaker 1>and it's taking There's a long transition period in historical terms,

0:23:22.876 --> 0:23:26.436
<v Speaker 1>as you transition economies to new forms of energy production,

0:23:26.476 --> 0:23:32.276
<v Speaker 1>and so adding in a new massive energy suck raises

0:23:32.316 --> 0:23:35.636
<v Speaker 1>the question of costs and benefits. So that's really the issue.

0:23:35.796 --> 0:23:40.196
<v Speaker 1>To me, you'd have to let me just finish. You'd

0:23:40.196 --> 0:23:43.996
<v Speaker 1>have to convince me that the benefits of crypto outweigh

0:23:43.996 --> 0:23:46.716
<v Speaker 1>its costs, and that to me, would be the regulatory question,

0:23:46.756 --> 0:23:48.876
<v Speaker 1>the same way it would be for any other a

0:23:48.996 --> 0:23:52.276
<v Speaker 1>human activity that takes up a lot of energy. No,

0:23:52.636 --> 0:23:55.076
<v Speaker 1>it's all subjective. Okay, here's what I mean by that.

0:23:55.756 --> 0:23:58.956
<v Speaker 1>So back to about democratic elected governments. What I love

0:23:58.996 --> 0:24:01.996
<v Speaker 1>about democratic governments. In the end, the government has right

0:24:02.156 --> 0:24:04.316
<v Speaker 1>to set the regulations. But in the end, the government

0:24:04.356 --> 0:24:06.996
<v Speaker 1>is also elected by the people. If the people of

0:24:07.036 --> 0:24:10.676
<v Speaker 1>the citizens of the country want to allow fossil fuel

0:24:10.756 --> 0:24:14.156
<v Speaker 1>learning cars and fossil fuel burning airlines and airplanes, then

0:24:14.196 --> 0:24:16.876
<v Speaker 1>so be it. But maybe one day the people will say, hey,

0:24:16.996 --> 0:24:18.716
<v Speaker 1>I'm fed up with fossil fuel, I'm fed up with

0:24:18.716 --> 0:24:23.516
<v Speaker 1>a greenhouse. Blah blah blah. Let's span all internal combustion

0:24:23.596 --> 0:24:27.596
<v Speaker 1>engine cars. Let's span all planes and only allow for

0:24:27.676 --> 0:24:31.996
<v Speaker 1>electric trains. Right, that's a valid approach too. And if

0:24:31.996 --> 0:24:34.996
<v Speaker 1>the people want to want to elect a government that says,

0:24:35.076 --> 0:24:39.116
<v Speaker 1>let's put the ban on all cryptocurrency, then so be it. Right.

0:24:39.196 --> 0:24:43.796
<v Speaker 1>All I'm saying is the people today have chosen to

0:24:43.796 --> 0:24:48.036
<v Speaker 1>embrace cryptocurrency, and by virtue of the amount of activity

0:24:48.036 --> 0:24:50.356
<v Speaker 1>that's going on and people doing it right, that's just

0:24:50.396 --> 0:24:53.476
<v Speaker 1>the evidence of people embracing it. The value is always

0:24:53.516 --> 0:24:56.236
<v Speaker 1>in the eye of the beholder. Babbie, I really want

0:24:56.236 --> 0:24:59.276
<v Speaker 1>to thank you for sharing your ideas and your expertise.

0:24:59.676 --> 0:25:08.236
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for joining me. Thank you. No, I'm really

0:25:08.236 --> 0:25:10.996
<v Speaker 1>grateful to by leave for joining us. On deep background,

0:25:11.196 --> 0:25:14.196
<v Speaker 1>I confess that I do feel still a little bit

0:25:14.236 --> 0:25:18.236
<v Speaker 1>confused about certain crucial aspects of crypto in the aftermath

0:25:18.276 --> 0:25:22.116
<v Speaker 1>of our conversation. For one thing, should we think of

0:25:22.156 --> 0:25:26.556
<v Speaker 1>crypto as a currency a form of money, or should

0:25:26.596 --> 0:25:29.316
<v Speaker 1>we think of crypto as an asset class that is

0:25:29.396 --> 0:25:32.756
<v Speaker 1>not indeed a form of money or a form of

0:25:32.796 --> 0:25:36.636
<v Speaker 1>currency in the way that gold and silver are. The

0:25:36.716 --> 0:25:39.676
<v Speaker 1>reason I asked that is not purely philosophical, because it

0:25:39.716 --> 0:25:43.116
<v Speaker 1>has everything to do with whether the world needs a

0:25:43.156 --> 0:25:46.476
<v Speaker 1>new asset class, and that question, in turn has to

0:25:46.516 --> 0:25:50.076
<v Speaker 1>do with whether the world will tolerate a new asset class.

0:25:50.956 --> 0:25:54.316
<v Speaker 1>Here's where the power of governments and regulators comes in.

0:25:55.076 --> 0:25:58.276
<v Speaker 1>I'm convinced that if governments really decided that they didn't

0:25:58.316 --> 0:26:02.876
<v Speaker 1>want crypto to continue, they would have the capacity, ultimately

0:26:03.116 --> 0:26:06.436
<v Speaker 1>to make it so difficult to engage in the sale

0:26:06.556 --> 0:26:09.516
<v Speaker 1>and trade of that asset that the sale of the

0:26:09.556 --> 0:26:14.556
<v Speaker 1>asset would inevitably decline. And although in a decentralized world

0:26:14.556 --> 0:26:18.556
<v Speaker 1>of computers the assets still might quote unquote exists somewhere

0:26:18.556 --> 0:26:21.636
<v Speaker 1>out there, they would really very much be likely to

0:26:21.676 --> 0:26:25.236
<v Speaker 1>decline in value if it was very costly to access them.

0:26:25.916 --> 0:26:28.996
<v Speaker 1>So what we need to know is what will governments do.

0:26:29.596 --> 0:26:33.916
<v Speaker 1>Will environmental regulators decide that this new asset class is

0:26:33.956 --> 0:26:36.316
<v Speaker 1>just too costly in terms of what it does to

0:26:36.356 --> 0:26:40.356
<v Speaker 1>the environment. Will government regulators be too worried about the

0:26:40.396 --> 0:26:45.836
<v Speaker 1>possibility of people using crypto for unlawful purposes, or more broadly,

0:26:45.836 --> 0:26:48.836
<v Speaker 1>of undercutting the power of the nation state to control

0:26:48.876 --> 0:26:52.156
<v Speaker 1>the finances of its nation and of the people who

0:26:52.236 --> 0:26:58.276
<v Speaker 1>live there. These are ongoing, pressing and challenging questions. Crypto

0:26:58.396 --> 0:27:02.756
<v Speaker 1>in some sense is the digital manifestation in financial terms

0:27:02.796 --> 0:27:07.596
<v Speaker 1>of the Internet. To that extent, crypto assets would continue

0:27:07.636 --> 0:27:11.556
<v Speaker 1>to exist wherever there was an Internet, even if government's

0:27:11.596 --> 0:27:16.156
<v Speaker 1>made it more difficult to access that. And in that sense,

0:27:16.556 --> 0:27:21.756
<v Speaker 1>especially with a broader public embrace of the possibilities of crypto,

0:27:21.956 --> 0:27:25.116
<v Speaker 1>it does seem entirely possible that even if it is

0:27:25.196 --> 0:27:28.196
<v Speaker 1>bad for the environment, we are still going to see

0:27:28.316 --> 0:27:32.636
<v Speaker 1>a significant expansion of crypto. If that's the case, all

0:27:32.716 --> 0:27:36.156
<v Speaker 1>it takes is for people to converge on the belief

0:27:36.636 --> 0:27:40.076
<v Speaker 1>that the asset is valuable, and that will make it so.

0:27:41.196 --> 0:27:44.116
<v Speaker 1>That might sound like magic, but it isn't. It's no

0:27:44.356 --> 0:27:48.756
<v Speaker 1>different than the basic economic logic of all money and

0:27:48.876 --> 0:27:54.036
<v Speaker 1>of all currency. My takeaway from my conversation with Bobby

0:27:54.076 --> 0:27:56.556
<v Speaker 1>Lee about crypto is that there is much more to

0:27:56.636 --> 0:27:59.516
<v Speaker 1>be said. It is an issue that we will revisit

0:27:59.676 --> 0:28:02.716
<v Speaker 1>here on a deep background, either in a further conversation

0:28:02.796 --> 0:28:06.876
<v Speaker 1>about crypto in its extensions, or more broadly when we

0:28:06.916 --> 0:28:11.836
<v Speaker 1>talk about financial and economic forms of power. Until the

0:28:11.836 --> 0:28:14.676
<v Speaker 1>next time I speak to you, be careful, be safe,

0:28:14.876 --> 0:28:17.516
<v Speaker 1>and be well. Deep background is brought to you by

0:28:17.556 --> 0:28:21.916
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin Industries. Our producer is Mo laboord our engineer is

0:28:21.916 --> 0:28:26.236
<v Speaker 1>Martin Gonzalez, and our shorerunner is Sophie Crane mckibbon. Editorial

0:28:26.276 --> 0:28:30.756
<v Speaker 1>support from noahm Osband. Theme music by Luis Guerra at Pushkin.

0:28:30.996 --> 0:28:34.996
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to Mia Lobell, Julia Barton, Lydia, Jean Coott, Heather Faine,

0:28:35.276 --> 0:28:39.716
<v Speaker 1>Carl mcniori, Maggie Taylor, Eric Sander, and Jacob Weisberg. You

0:28:39.756 --> 0:28:42.436
<v Speaker 1>can find me on Twitter at Noah R. Feldman. I

0:28:42.516 --> 0:28:44.916
<v Speaker 1>also write a column for Bloomberg Opinion, which you can

0:28:44.916 --> 0:28:49.076
<v Speaker 1>find at Bloomberg dot com slash Feldman. To discover Bloomberg's

0:28:49.076 --> 0:28:52.196
<v Speaker 1>original slate of podcasts, go to Bloomberg dot com slash

0:28:52.196 --> 0:28:55.436
<v Speaker 1>podcasts and if you liked what you heard today, please

0:28:55.436 --> 0:28:58.236
<v Speaker 1>write a review or tell a friend. This is deep

0:28:58.236 --> 0:28:58.756
<v Speaker 1>background