WEBVTT - Surveillance: Hochul Calls for Small Business Relief

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. Daily

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>we bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg Joining Us.

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Now placed the side Chris Hobby West fogout Securities, head

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>of Equity Strategy, momentum is too rich for our blood.

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:38.239
<v Speaker 1>Whilst Fog Chris, what does that made? So? What that

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 1>means is excuse me. Momentum strategies have gone too far right.

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Everyone during the recession ran to momentum strategies. They bid

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>them up to a level that I don't think is sustainable.

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>And this setup is very much what we've seen in

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand three, two thousand and nine. You have a recession,

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>everyone runs to the safety momentum, they bid them up

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>to a level that's not sustainable. Recovery comes around and

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>PM say, oh, I need to get cyclicality. They run

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>from momentum. It becomes a contra indicator and next thing

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, somebody says we have a two thousand sigma event,

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>which isn't true. We have a point of inflection, which

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>is what happens when momentum strategies, because ultimately you make

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 1>a deal with the devil. You you buy momentum. It

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>continues to go up, it performs, but when it turns,

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>it turns very badly, and you need to get out quickly. Chris,

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 1>given the unusually uncertain in the United Kingdom and the

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:31.960
<v Speaker 1>United States and frankly everywhere else, what is your revenue

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and down the income statement call? What's your actual fundamental

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 1>call on what the stock market will do? So our

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 1>our stock market call for is very pedestrian. We're looking

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>at mid single digit returns. And what we've been saying

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>to clients for sometimes, if you want higher returns, if

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you want more competitive rates of returns, you need to

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>look down the market capitalization, smaller caps, you need to

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>add more cyclicality, higher COVID beta, and you need to

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>start going into the financials. All right, So Chris, right

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>now you say that your antim no MO, You're not

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>going to go at the momentum. The price of admission

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>is to hy So what do you do with your money?

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>So what you do is it's very simple that the

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>opposite of MOE is contraring you're looking for opportunities that

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>are less picked over. And again I'm gonna sound like

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a broken record. Obviously small caps have worked in it.

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I worked for the last couple of weeks, last couple

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of months, but if you look at a multi year basis,

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:29.639
<v Speaker 1>they've really underperformed. And we want to look for things

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>that give you more value, things that that will work

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>in an early recovery, more cyclicality. And you can find

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:38.639
<v Speaker 1>that in financials, you can find that industrials. You can

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:41.359
<v Speaker 1>even find that in the commodity space. So we want

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you to be diversified, but we want you to have

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>these certain characteristics in your portfolio. Do you stand the

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 1>knot of spice? For that, Chris um you go across

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the globe. So so typically when value works, when cyclicality works,

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>it works better overseas. US is very growth heavy, is

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>very tech heavy. So I think you can source that

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>in a number of different places, including the States, but

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the rest of the world is going to

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>act a lot better in Chris. If that's the case,

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>where's the opportunity now? Where is it running away from US?

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean some of these are moon shot trajectories right now, right,

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>which is why we say we're antim A lot of

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>these companies have had these parabolic moves. There will be

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a day of reckoning the value that you're paying, what

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the costum admission is just too high. And ultimately, when

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you have an alternative, when the economy begins to recover,

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>which is what it's doing, people will come back to cyclicality.

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>They'll want the old economy and they'll run very quickly

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>from it. But to answer your question, yes, every day

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>we go higher, we feel like we're stealing from tomorrow.

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>There's a limited amount of opportunity here and it's getting

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>less and less every day. An time out. You've been

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>at home with the kids too long. Chris could not

0:03:56.200 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>be more right. Chris crib to catch up. Thanks for

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>depend My best to you and a family. Sell me

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>that wowst Fago. I can't say I've never done this,

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think I've ever done this. We just

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about a job's day twenty twenty one days ahead

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>of schedule. It's a late job's day. January eight. Tom

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Purcelli joins with RBC Capital Markets. Tom frame up that

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>key January eight report. How grim is it gonna be? Yeah?

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look it's still a little early, but we

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 1>we are acknowledging that you could see another decline UM

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>in for that December report, and you just haven't seen

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of real improvement in in UH continuing claims.

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Obviously we've seen UM initial claims arise at it, but

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a continuing part that's really gonna feed most

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:49.839
<v Speaker 1>UH into the you know, sort of what our what

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>our call is going to be as relates to the

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>peril reports. So yeah, I think I think, Look, it's

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>not just this December report. I mean, I think the

0:04:56.600 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>reality is UM, if states continue to shut down, then

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you're going to see UM perhaps even the January report,

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the report for January come in come in negative. So

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I think we're gonna go through a rough patch. Now look,

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>let me be clear, UM and I'm happy to talk

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>about sort of the near term as as much as

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>you like. But while we're gonna go through his rough

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>patch here, we have to recognize that twenty one is

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>shaping up to be a pretty good year. You know,

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>all the p or I should say it this way,

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>all the pieces are in place for twenty one to

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>be a pretty good year. What does Q two Q

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>three look like when does the service sector go back

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to work? Based on RBC research. Yeah, so we as

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>my daughter rolls through the shot up that you gave

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>her ten of time, you gave her ten dollars? Did

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you give her ten dollars to shovel the driveway this morning? Time?

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>You gotta go bigger, You gotta go twenty dollars. Welcome

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty dollars. You gotta go twenty dollars. They won't shovel

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>it for anything under that. Yeah. Um, and and now

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I see through the corner. My my dog is about

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to walk through as well. We love. I think the

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>question was about when do we get back to uh

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>gaining jobs? And look, I think the reality is we

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>we could be gaining jobs. Um, you know, sort of

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:18.279
<v Speaker 1>shortly into the into the new year. You know, it

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>was funny, Tom. I think one of the things that

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I think is being really underappreciated is think about, um,

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the recent reports that we got from the

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 1>n f I B or from I s M or

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>even the Beige Book. They were talking about labor tightness.

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>We think about that they were talking about labor tightness

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's all of this. So I think, what one

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>up happening is as we continue into the year, as

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:41.479
<v Speaker 1>states start the process of reopening again, we think you

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 1>could easily be back down toward full employment by the

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>middle of the year. I mean, I think that that's

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>a foregone conclusion from our perspective. I think the bigger

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>question is, you know, how much progress do we make

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:54.160
<v Speaker 1>over the balance of the year, beyond beyond the middle

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>of the year, so you could be below full employment

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>by by the end of twenty one, Tom, I feel

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>like we're part of your family. It's really lovely, I've

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 1>got to say. And you're doing a great job just

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>plowing through with all the distractions in the background that

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>you clearly see in the back of your eye. I

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>do wonder, you know, a lot of people discount some

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of the data that we're getting, saying it's messy, it's noisy,

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>it's complicated because the numbers are so big, and they're

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>reporting from states. Has been called into question. But there

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>has been a transformation in the labor force to a

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 1>more technological society. And I was looking today at a

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>story that talked about Amazon warehouse workers and how they

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>are paid pretty low wages and a great number of

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 1>them have to receive food stamps. What are we going

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to see on the other side of this pandemic in

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>terms of the transformation and they and the ability for

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>people to get middle income jobs on the other side. Yes,

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 1>so look, I think again the Job Openings report is

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be pretty instructive in this regard. And I

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>think what we have to keep in mind be able

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the most seven million job openings um and and they're

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>fairly broad based. I mean again, look when you look

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>at the IM report, you know, the i M Report,

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>they're not necessarily tough about how you know, lack of

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of ability to hire for you know, ultra um you know,

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>high level executive jobs. I mean, they're they're looking for

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>people on basically you know, sort of UM in the

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing space UM. And they're having a hard time finding

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>workers in that capacity. So there are jobs out there.

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just gonna take time for for this

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>healing process to to to continue. UM. But I think

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>by the time again, I think next year at this time,

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and you know, let's let's let's promise to have another

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>conversation on December seventeenth, assuming that's not a weekend UM

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think, well, the story will be very, very different.

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that it's you're going to be below full

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>employment by that point next year, we'll be talking about

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>how hot the fetes running it some you think in

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>nine months, I do, Jonathan. I think that you know

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:51.959
<v Speaker 1>again here too, we think the conversation is going to

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:55.080
<v Speaker 1>change pretty abruptly. I mean, I've said many times I

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:57.599
<v Speaker 1>think even to you all, that you know, Powell is

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>not incentivized to talk pause typically about the economic backdrop,

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>right He's he's more incentivized to, you know, say, hey,

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>we're we're we're cautious, we're ready to do what we

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>can in etcetera. But I think there's gonna have to

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>be at some point of pivot over the course of

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:15.559
<v Speaker 1>twenty one where we move from this, hey things are

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of looking really bad too. Hey, actually

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>things are looking pretty good and we're actually starting to

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>see some inflationary pressures really start to build. We wouldn't

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>be the least bit surprised if the FED moves away

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:27.559
<v Speaker 1>from this notion of you know, hey, we're gonna we're

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be able to raise rates until twenty three

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>or beyond. We can easily make an argument that you

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>could see a rate hike in in twenty two. Now,

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>before anyone falls out of their chair, I think what

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>people have to keep in mind is we're not talking

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>about you know, there's a difference between hiking rates and

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>actually having tight policy. The removals and combination in and

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of itself doesn't mean that you have tight policy. It

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 1>means that you're removing some accommodation. And so if the

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>backdrop evolves as we think, which is to say, you know,

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 1>five percent growth with upside risk uh core inflation, that's

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, north of two percent and even touches two

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent over the course of twenty one,

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna be really difficult for the FED

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:08.719
<v Speaker 1>to latch onto this notion that they're not going to

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>do anything until twenty three. I mean that, uh you

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 1>know that, that to me is just entirely too far fetch.

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Even Powell himself has acknowledged that things in the medium

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 1>that they're upside risks in the medium term. Um you

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 1>know that, that to us is he's he's right to

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 1>say that because we think that there are um and

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>in that context, there's gonna be no scenario again short

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:30.440
<v Speaker 1>of things really collapsing again that they're gonna, you know,

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>not be able to touch rates until twenty three and

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and I would be mindful of time, but I think

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 1>we have to keep in mind. I think everyone's looking

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>for the steepener in in one look, and I'm sympathetic

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>to the idea of a bit more steepening here in

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the immediate term. But I think as the year progresses again,

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 1>as you get towards the back end of the year,

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I can make the argument that the curse actually starts

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to flight because I think the front end of the

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>market will start to sniff out pretty early. The FED

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>is actually gonna be late to the party, and thus

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I could see again the curve is gonna rise in general,

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:06.199
<v Speaker 1>but I see two year yields rising faster than tents,

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and you can actually see some curve flattening as the

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:10.679
<v Speaker 1>year progressive. It's the time. Let's build on this. Let's

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>think about a little bit more of the communication that

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:14.839
<v Speaker 1>we've had in the last twenty four hours. It's the

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>quantitative outcome based guidance. A feature or a buck do

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you think? Uh So? I love this question. Um, they

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be a feature, but I think it's a bug.

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think it's really hard. Look there, the

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 1>reality is we don't know, you know. Powell's asked one

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:35.439
<v Speaker 1>of the reporters asked him a great question yesterday and

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:37.439
<v Speaker 1>it was basically and it was basically, how do we know,

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you know when when when we've sort of when when

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>we've met your objectives? Um? You know, is the step

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 1>a good summary of economic projections? Is that a good

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 1>guy post? And basically said no, He's like, it's not

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a good guy post because he doesn't know exactly what

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 1>it is. And I'm sympathetic to that, but I think

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>there's the problem with this, this you know, quote unquote

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>outcome based guidance. If we don't really know what output

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:02.079
<v Speaker 1>we're aiming for, then how do you know when you've arrived? Um?

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think this whole notion of of of shifting

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the framework, I think it's gonna want to proving to

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>be quite messy for the FED down the road because

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>we just don't have the guide post in place. And

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>again I'm sort of sympathetic to them on some level,

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>but on the other you know, I don't know why

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 1>they had to actively down this path, um, particularly if

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to set up the right guid post

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:23.559
<v Speaker 1>and we don't know what they are within your enthusiasm?

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you just assume service sector inflation reverts to its

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>three percentage? Mean? Yeah, Tom, So I think we do.

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think you know. One of the things

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 1>that people I think are are you know, seem to

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>forget is that we we we are from a service

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>sector inflation perspective, it just persistently runs it around a

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>three percent page um. And guess where we have a

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of room to make up from a spending perspective.

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:53.559
<v Speaker 1>In twenty one services right, goods have killed it. You know,

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 1>they're well north of where we were pre COVID. Services

0:12:57.960 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>is the ladder um and that's going to be the

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 1>area that we really make if services are lagging? Does

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that mean you pay fifty dollars to your daughter to

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>shovel the driveway? Actually, that's why she just ran away.

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 1>She's she's going right. Who we really want to meet

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 1>is young Preston, poor Sally who understands up to date?

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Is he around? Tom? He's crushed it this year. He

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 1>has set from our VC. Send our regards to the family, Tom,

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>thank you. I love about this year. There's only one

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 1>thing I love about this year because this year has

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>been terrible for so many reasons for everybody. How natural

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that's now become. Remember when they have an interviewers in

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong several years ago and the child walked in

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and it was like, whoa, there's a child in the room.

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:52.559
<v Speaker 1>And then at the start of this everyone was like, whoa,

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:55.959
<v Speaker 1>there's Now it's just yeah, everyone's working at home. Who

0:13:55.960 --> 0:14:01.200
<v Speaker 1>else is going to come in? Bring the dog? Right now?

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:04.079
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna migrate to this pandemic into what to do?

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:07.239
<v Speaker 1>What to do can be personified by a given restaurant

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in New York, in Chicago, in l A and points

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 1>in between. The Lieutenant Governor of the Empire State is

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Kathy Hokel, and she joins us this morning on any

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>number of topics. Cathy, there's snow in New York. It's

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>not gonna work outdoors today. It's not going to work

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>indoors either. How badly the small business? How badly do

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>local and state need this fiscal stimulus? We definitely need it.

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I've been saying this for months. Governor Como has been

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 1>saying this for month. Governor Como leaves the National Governor's

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Association a bipartisan group, every one of them, Republicans and Democrats,

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>have been clamoring for help from Congress to give to

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>state local governments, but also direct relief for our small businesses.

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>In particular. I was in the city just yesterday day

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>before the restaurants. I sat down with restaurant owners. They

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>are starving, They're literally starving. We have to help them.

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>The Settle government can right now help with a stimulus plan.

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't help the state local governments, which is pathetic,

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the abdication of their responsibility. So we are in trouble,

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 1>but at least get some money to the small businesses.

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Right now, the reporting, including our Kevin surreally is state

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and local aid won't be in this bill. I guess

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna get done. You know the timeline as well,

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 1>What is your and Governor Cuomo's timeline to where things

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>fall apart if you don't get aid in the stimulus

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>we right now, our expectations are that it's not going

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to be in there, and what we're being told unless

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>there's some uh you know howiday gift that's going to

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 1>come our way, which we pray for, but not if

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>we manage our expectations, it doesn't come. What we're going

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to do is to be able to allocate one point

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:56.479
<v Speaker 1>five billion dollars of state money to the essential services

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that otherwise would not be funded. You cannot have a

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>plan to have a mass distribution of vaccinations throughout the

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>state and at the same time cut healthcare workers from

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>hospitals and clinics. It doesn't work. So we're planning on

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a Joe Biden presidency. We expect that we'll be able

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>to get more help from from the federal government. And

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you it all comes down in Georgia. Amazing

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 1>that the destiny of New York State is going to

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>come down to who wins the election in the Senate races,

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>in the in the runoffs in Georgia in the early January.

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>If it's if we can have a majority of Democrats,

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 1>they understand this, they've lived this, they actually have empathy

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>for people, they'll be able to get the job done.

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Short of that, and we're gonna have to deal with

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>this in our budget in March, and we'll have to

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>make serious, serious cuts at that time. But right now,

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>we're just not going to do We're not going to

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>lay off teachers, We're not going to lay off health

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>care workers. We're not going to lay off police officers

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 1>right now just because Washington is failing abjectively. So we're

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>going to get it done in New York State will

0:16:57.400 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 1>be in financial trouble, but we'll have to deal with

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>it in on budget in March. All right, let's talk

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>about what that means. You say major cuts, Does it

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>also mean raising taxes? That is absolutely on the table.

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 1>The last thing we've wanted to do in New York

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>State is to raise taxes, particularly in these troubled times.

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>We understand that that is not a good plan. The

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:19.679
<v Speaker 1>plan A, it's it's not a good plan. B. It's

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 1>not a good plan. See. But we may get to

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 1>that point if we don't get that that essential assistance

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 1>from the federal government to help offset the fifteen billion

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars that we're now faced and the whole we're facing. Uh,

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>we're going to need to do something we don't want

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:37.639
<v Speaker 1>to have to do that the federal government can alleviate that. Again,

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:40.479
<v Speaker 1>this is not because of how New York manages its finance.

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:43.920
<v Speaker 1>This is because of a global pandemic. This is not

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:46.880
<v Speaker 1>anything we had any control over. We're doing the very

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>best we can and we get this vaccine out. I'm

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:51.640
<v Speaker 1>telling you sure that I'm standing here in New York

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>State will be the very first state to be COVID

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:56.919
<v Speaker 1>free because we're going to be very aggressive about this.

0:17:57.000 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>That should be good news to businesses in New York

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:02.159
<v Speaker 1>to know the states across this country. I'm not going

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to be what we are in a few months. We're

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be very aggressive about this. It requires us

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to have money for healthcare workers to get that vaccine

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>in people's arms. So let's talk about the process of

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>rolling out the vaccine. You said that New York State

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 1>will be among the first. What is the timetable for

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the rollout as you see it now? It's going on

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:23.640
<v Speaker 1>right now. We have different phases. We are in Phase one,

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 1>which is nursing home residents, staff, high risk costol workers.

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Those are literally out there being administered in hospitals all

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:33.679
<v Speaker 1>over the state of New York. And we're proud that

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>New York State had the very first individual one of

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 1>our footline workers in Queens be the first in the nations.

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 1>So we're excited about that. So we are also planning

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>for phase two. Phase two will be essential workers and

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>priority general public meeting knows with co morbidity underlying health conditions,

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>so will be focusing on them as well. So we

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's going to come until later January. But

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you, if we can get more supplies begin

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>this would be a wonderful gift. Or we can get

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 1>more supplies when Maderna gets approved and Fightser is able

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 1>to come up with more, we will have no problem

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:13.639
<v Speaker 1>getting this out two New Yorkers. We have a very

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:16.360
<v Speaker 1>crest of plan that we've been working on since last

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 1>July to get this into communities all over the state

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and in rural areas and in communities of color that

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 1>have been hard. As said, we're going to have to

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>overcome a lot of reluctance and that's part of our

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:31.640
<v Speaker 1>public relations campaign that's going on as we speak. Lieutenant Government,

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:33.680
<v Speaker 1>we only have so much time, about sixty seconds left.

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 1>But if you could tell me where we are just

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of considering another lockdown, We've had a lot

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 1>about that in the last couple of weeks. What's your

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>take at the moment, we don't have to do that.

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 1>There's there is a plan if people right now change

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 1>their behavior. Those who have been ignoring the mask mandates

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 1>and ignoring our request that they stay socially distance. If

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>they change their behavior, literally, we can get through these

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 1>holidays and we'll start seeing a decline. Right now in

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 1>New York state is about six per that inspection rate.

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 1>That is still the fourth lowest in the nation. So

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I give a lot of credit to New Yorkers for

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 1>its hearing to this, but it's trending upward, and we're

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>worried about hospitalization capacity. Right now, we're about for the

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>state available and if that starts getting much lower, then

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>we have to talk about shutdown. But that is not

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 1>our that that is where we hope not to end up.

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:23.159
<v Speaker 1>And we're not going to talk about that right now

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 1>because we don't know what the behavior of people will

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.879
<v Speaker 1>be over the holidays. So we can't control that. Individuals

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:30.680
<v Speaker 1>can control that, and we may not have to talk

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:33.199
<v Speaker 1>about any more shutdowns. That is the last thing you

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:35.119
<v Speaker 1>want to do here in the state of New York. Kathy,

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you, New York LI Toennant Governor that Kathy, Kathy,

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:44.160
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much. I'm going far away and John

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Farrell knows this shows matthre Wererik and Steven Stanley lived

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 1>it with AMers Pierrepont. It was called plug and chug.

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 1>You got a formula something new Tony and and you

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:55.920
<v Speaker 1>throw in the data and come up with an answer.

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Steven Stanley, can you plug and chug now on the

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>American economy? Me? Can you take the data, throw it

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:05.359
<v Speaker 1>in and actually come up with an outlook? Not if

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you're using your pre pandemic formulas. There's no doubt about

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:10.439
<v Speaker 1>it that the data have changed. I think with the

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>claims numbers, you know, a big part of the issue

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:16.399
<v Speaker 1>is the changes in the program. The extra benefits that

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 1>were on offer UM earlier in the year just led

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:23.119
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of unusual activity, people filing that were

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:26.479
<v Speaker 1>ineligible before, probably a lot of people filing that didn't

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, shouldn't have gotten benefits. So the levels of

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:33.360
<v Speaker 1>those claims numbers are definitely off UM. But I think

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to Mike's point from before, the fact that it is

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>rising is consistent with what we're saying out there, which

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 1>is that as the pandemic intensifies UM, you're starting to

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>see a little bit of retrenchment some of those high

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 1>contact industries. Thanks maving in the wrong direction state and

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 1>it's the semi seven st still early. But if you

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:52.959
<v Speaker 1>have two pencil in a cold for the payrolls report

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>for this month, what would it be right now? Yeah,

0:21:57.040 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 1>my forecast, but I'm gonna say probably UM, still positive,

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 1>but certainly weaker than in November. UM. I think, you know,

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the areas that are most sensitive to the pandemic, restaurants

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and some of the service categories are probably going to

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>be down in December. But there's still, you know, a

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>good amount that's going on that's good in the in

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the economy right now, certainly housing, I think, manufacturing, UM

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and some other categories. So we'll see how it plays out.

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>But I think, you know, the markets have concluded that

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 1>whatever happens in November December, UM, things are going to

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>turn up next year. So you know, I think in

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:33.959
<v Speaker 1>some ways it's less important now what happens in the

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 1>near term because of the prospect of vaccines, experience, the

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 1>experience of this year staven that we can turn the

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>economy off, turn it back on again, and it was

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:45.679
<v Speaker 1>snapped right back really quickly, and that the parallel is

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>not what happened ten years ago in the financial crisis,

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 1>it's what happened maybe in China through this year. If

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>we can get a vaccination program ramped up, then what

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 1>China has managed to achieve we can achieve in Europe

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 1>and the United States. Do you share that view, Stephen,

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:00.159
<v Speaker 1>I've heard so many times in the last couple of weeks.

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:03.719
<v Speaker 1>I absolutely do. I I thought that from the beginning

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:07.120
<v Speaker 1>that the recovery would be faster and more vigorous than

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>than most people thought. I mean, that was certainly true

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:12.200
<v Speaker 1>in the spring and summer. UM. We've had a bit

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 1>of a setback now, which is understandable given the evolution

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic UM. But you know, I do see

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:20.639
<v Speaker 1>the economy getting back to something close to normal in

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the second half of next year. One thing that John

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>was talking about is this churn that we're seeing in

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the labor market. Initially people who are getting laid off

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:31.120
<v Speaker 1>for the lower wage workers. Is that changing, I mean,

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 1>is this churn leading to more higher paid UH wage

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:39.639
<v Speaker 1>higher paid wage employees getting laid off and trying to

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>find something perhaps with lower income Well, I mean, I

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:47.239
<v Speaker 1>think the impetus at the margin um is still going

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to be that low paid. It's it's those high contact industries.

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:52.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, restaurants is kind of the poster child for

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:55.879
<v Speaker 1>that dynamic, and those are still going to be mostly uh,

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 1>lower wage jobs. I think the you know, the white

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>color um phenomenon that you discussed is one that's gonna

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:06.120
<v Speaker 1>be much slower moving. So it is there in the background,

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's gonna get overwhelmed most months, I think, until

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:12.879
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic is done, simply because the greater churn is

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 1>occurring in those service industries. Meanwhile, given the uncertainty that

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about, Steven, with respect to the actual numbers,

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 1>when do they matter? When do they change the trajectory

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 1>of the recovery too well? I think when when we've

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:29.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of turned the corner on the pandemic really. I mean,

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like from the public health officials that we're

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about probably the spring, when most people will have

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>access to a vaccine. And I think at that point,

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the that's when we're really going to

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 1>have a sense of how much of what we've seen

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to be structural as opposed to just strictly

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 1>short term. And I think that's the real question from

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the markets perspective. I mean, do you do you get

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>all the way back to where we were in February

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 1>of or are you only going to get part way

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 1>back or you're gonna have an unemployment rate at six

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>percent or five percent UM? And you know, I think

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>that's really the question at this point that the markets

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>are probably most focused on UM heading into next year.

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Steven Stanley, You've got a great clarity about what they do,

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>not what they say. What are corporations in America doing

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 1>right now? Not the pr not the lip service, not

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the CEO blather, What are they really doing in terms

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of investment and in terms of strategy given this economy? Well,

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, certainly, the durable goods numbers that we've gotten

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:40.119
<v Speaker 1>so far this year have been surprisingly and consistently better

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:45.400
<v Speaker 1>than expected. So investment, especially in equipment has been UM

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I think encouraging. It suggests that businesses are willing to

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>look past this and and certainly I think businesses have

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:54.400
<v Speaker 1>a longer UH time horizon and their decision making than

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:57.919
<v Speaker 1>most households. So that makes sense. UM. Again, as the

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>as the hope that we can get back to something

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>close to normal UH gets closer and closer, I think

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 1>businesses are gonna get back more and more toward a

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:10.679
<v Speaker 1>business as usual approach. That's I think, you know, to

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>your point, though, that's mostly for big businesses. If you're

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:15.360
<v Speaker 1>a small business and you're in one of these sectors

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that's being restrained by social distancing rules, then obviously it

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 1>becomes a day to day, maybe week to week endeavor

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>just to stay alive. So, um, you know, hoping to

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>see something from Congress this week, but there are a

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of businesses I think that are just hoping to

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 1>make it to next month and next year. Small business

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 1>in the labor markets certainly asking for it much much

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>more loudly. In the last couple of wait stament. Thank

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you Stamen Stanley ms Pappon, Chief Economist, Thanks for listening

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer.

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before the podcast. You

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio.