1
00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:07,040
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

2
00:00:07,720 --> 00:00:09,360
Speaker 2: Let's get back to the investment piece now, with a

3
00:00:09,360 --> 00:00:13,520
Speaker 2: particular focus on venture capital and the shift around climate,

4
00:00:13,560 --> 00:00:16,120
Speaker 2: but also defense spending as well. Venture capital investors bracing

5
00:00:16,160 --> 00:00:19,320
Speaker 2: a course and facing a dramatic year. The Trump administration's

6
00:00:19,320 --> 00:00:21,640
Speaker 2: focus on oil and gas production, rolling back as well

7
00:00:21,680 --> 00:00:24,439
Speaker 2: some of those environmental regulations and trying to act or

8
00:00:24,440 --> 00:00:28,040
Speaker 2: at least gut the Inflation Reduction Act has of course

9
00:00:28,040 --> 00:00:31,360
Speaker 2: wide ranging implications for startups and fundraising. Very pleased to say,

10
00:00:31,440 --> 00:00:33,720
Speaker 2: joining us now in the studio is Tommy Stadlin, the

11
00:00:33,840 --> 00:00:38,560
Speaker 2: co founder of Giant Ventures, a big player within this space. Tommy,

12
00:00:38,640 --> 00:00:42,200
Speaker 2: we have seen data that suggests that the flows into

13
00:00:42,320 --> 00:00:45,040
Speaker 2: some of these renewable energy startups and the climate shift

14
00:00:45,360 --> 00:00:49,200
Speaker 2: has started and will start to ebb in twenty twenty five.

15
00:00:49,520 --> 00:00:50,960
Speaker 2: Talk to us about what you're seeing in terms of

16
00:00:50,960 --> 00:00:53,599
Speaker 2: climate tech investing. Is there a chill wind now over

17
00:00:53,640 --> 00:00:54,040
Speaker 2: the space?

18
00:00:54,200 --> 00:00:56,160
Speaker 1: Well, let me say, first of all, climate change does

19
00:00:56,200 --> 00:00:58,280
Speaker 1: not care who's in the White House, and I don't

20
00:00:58,280 --> 00:01:00,920
Speaker 1: want to alarm your listeners before they've had their morning coffee,

21
00:01:00,960 --> 00:01:04,640
Speaker 1: but we're facing potentially a billion climate refugees, mass disruption,

22
00:01:04,720 --> 00:01:07,240
Speaker 1: to the global economy. So climate change is real, it's happening,

23
00:01:07,360 --> 00:01:09,280
Speaker 1: and I think rational actors are going to take action

24
00:01:09,360 --> 00:01:11,960
Speaker 1: against that. So what we're seeing is that the long

25
00:01:12,080 --> 00:01:14,360
Speaker 1: term decarbonization trend is going to happen. And if we

26
00:01:14,400 --> 00:01:17,679
Speaker 1: get anywhere close to decarbonizing the global economy by twenty fifty,

27
00:01:17,880 --> 00:01:19,600
Speaker 1: that I think is going to be bigger than the Internet,

28
00:01:19,640 --> 00:01:21,640
Speaker 1: both in terms of the losers, who are the incumbents

29
00:01:21,680 --> 00:01:24,200
Speaker 1: who have exposure to hydrocarbons, but also the winners, right

30
00:01:24,200 --> 00:01:27,479
Speaker 1: that people have exposures of these amazing new climate technology companies,

31
00:01:27,560 --> 00:01:29,080
Speaker 1: and so in the long run that trend is going

32
00:01:29,120 --> 00:01:29,800
Speaker 1: to continue.

33
00:01:30,000 --> 00:01:31,759
Speaker 3: What we're seeing is, yes, a.

34
00:01:31,720 --> 00:01:34,640
Speaker 1: Bit of a pause while people figure out what ex

35
00:01:34,680 --> 00:01:37,240
Speaker 1: actually is going on when the Trump administration, particularly in

36
00:01:37,280 --> 00:01:40,440
Speaker 1: the US, But actually we are seeing the underlying these

37
00:01:40,520 --> 00:01:43,520
Speaker 1: strong technology companies in climate those who don't require a

38
00:01:43,560 --> 00:01:46,360
Speaker 1: green premium, where they're not asking either governments to pay

39
00:01:46,400 --> 00:01:49,840
Speaker 1: a green premium or corporate customers are certainly consumers that

40
00:01:49,960 --> 00:01:52,280
Speaker 1: businesses which can stand on their own two feet. Those

41
00:01:52,280 --> 00:01:54,640
Speaker 1: companies are continuing to get funding and actually we've just

42
00:01:54,640 --> 00:01:57,400
Speaker 1: been involved in some of the most competitive climate technology

43
00:01:57,680 --> 00:02:00,720
Speaker 1: venture rounds we've ever seen. So it's steam ahead for

44
00:02:00,760 --> 00:02:02,840
Speaker 1: the strong commercial climate tech companies.

45
00:02:03,040 --> 00:02:04,200
Speaker 3: Those who require.

46
00:02:03,880 --> 00:02:07,640
Speaker 1: More capital to scale up and get cost competitive with hydrocarbons,

47
00:02:07,760 --> 00:02:09,000
Speaker 1: they are struggling at the moment.

48
00:02:09,440 --> 00:02:12,440
Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean, Bloomberg figures show the kind of dramatic

49
00:02:12,480 --> 00:02:15,960
Speaker 4: decline from twenty twenty four into twenty twenty five of

50
00:02:16,000 --> 00:02:18,400
Speaker 4: climate tech investing. Do you really think that europe can

51
00:02:18,480 --> 00:02:22,320
Speaker 4: hold out though against what is a sea change in

52
00:02:22,360 --> 00:02:25,919
Speaker 4: the White House? Or does it change the pitches from

53
00:02:26,000 --> 00:02:28,399
Speaker 4: companies in order to get that funding.

54
00:02:28,800 --> 00:02:31,440
Speaker 1: We're definitely seeing companies change their pitch, and actually some

55
00:02:31,520 --> 00:02:33,639
Speaker 1: of it is just a branding thing. So the words

56
00:02:33,639 --> 00:02:36,240
Speaker 1: climate tech are not particularly popular in the US right now,

57
00:02:36,360 --> 00:02:39,760
Speaker 1: we're seeing climate tech be rebranded as American dynamism. So

58
00:02:39,880 --> 00:02:43,840
Speaker 1: trends like nuclear anything which is energy for renewable, for

59
00:02:43,919 --> 00:02:47,800
Speaker 1: data centers in AI, more energy efficient AI chips, anything

60
00:02:47,840 --> 00:02:50,280
Speaker 1: which fits with this kind of muscular nationalism we're seeing

61
00:02:50,320 --> 00:02:52,280
Speaker 1: not just in the US but around the world is

62
00:02:52,320 --> 00:02:55,320
Speaker 1: doing very well. So look out for kind of European dynamism,

63
00:02:55,440 --> 00:02:59,120
Speaker 1: British dynamism, American dynamism. These companies haven't changed, but they

64
00:02:59,160 --> 00:03:01,520
Speaker 1: have rebranded their pitch. To make it work more, particularly

65
00:03:01,560 --> 00:03:03,880
Speaker 1: in the US. Okay, it's really interesting around the rebranding.

66
00:03:03,919 --> 00:03:05,640
Speaker 1: Isn't it to kind of cut through at least avoid

67
00:03:05,680 --> 00:03:07,799
Speaker 1: some of the scrutiny that may come from the Trump

68
00:03:07,840 --> 00:03:12,640
Speaker 1: and administration who's courses? There's something of an animus around this sector.

69
00:03:13,560 --> 00:03:17,040
Speaker 1: The defense space has been prominent. You're seeing massive spending

70
00:03:17,040 --> 00:03:19,799
Speaker 1: from the German government adjusting their fiscal rules in dramatic fashion.

71
00:03:19,800 --> 00:03:21,320
Speaker 1: You're seeing it from other nations as well to a

72
00:03:21,400 --> 00:03:24,919
Speaker 1: lesser extent. What are you seeing in terms of how

73
00:03:24,919 --> 00:03:27,440
Speaker 1: significant do you think that will be in terms of

74
00:03:27,840 --> 00:03:31,240
Speaker 1: funding into the defense space and the startups in Europe?

75
00:03:31,240 --> 00:03:33,560
Speaker 1: How are you leaning into that and is that pulling

76
00:03:33,560 --> 00:03:35,920
Speaker 1: funding away from some of these climate stories. Well, if

77
00:03:35,960 --> 00:03:37,440
Speaker 1: you just look at the numbers, we've seen about a

78
00:03:37,440 --> 00:03:42,120
Speaker 1: fivefold increase in venture investments into defense tech. So that's

79
00:03:42,120 --> 00:03:44,560
Speaker 1: still only about ten percent of European VC which goes

80
00:03:44,600 --> 00:03:47,960
Speaker 1: into defense tech and surrounding technologies, but it's a massive increase.

81
00:03:48,200 --> 00:03:51,000
Speaker 1: And in order to achieve that, we've had some investors

82
00:03:51,000 --> 00:03:53,800
Speaker 1: in private managers have to remove their vice clauses. So

83
00:03:53,800 --> 00:03:56,400
Speaker 1: we had a situation where LPs would say you can't

84
00:03:56,400 --> 00:03:59,720
Speaker 1: invest in porn, gambling or defense right, and we've now

85
00:03:59,720 --> 00:04:03,160
Speaker 1: come long way defenses escape that vice clause. And actually

86
00:04:03,240 --> 00:04:06,280
Speaker 1: even for firms like Mine Giant Menus where we're backing

87
00:04:06,280 --> 00:04:08,400
Speaker 1: companies that really matter, we're looking to create impact in

88
00:04:08,400 --> 00:04:11,520
Speaker 1: the world as well as financial returns. People are saying, well, actually,

89
00:04:11,600 --> 00:04:14,240
Speaker 1: isn't defense tech even more important than things like climate

90
00:04:14,280 --> 00:04:16,120
Speaker 1: and health Because we don't have a strong democracy here

91
00:04:16,120 --> 00:04:17,760
Speaker 1: in Europe, nothing else really matters.

92
00:04:17,880 --> 00:04:19,320
Speaker 3: So it's in a complete.

93
00:04:19,000 --> 00:04:23,120
Speaker 1: Turnaround from investors, from venture firms and also from entrepreneurs.

94
00:04:23,120 --> 00:04:26,240
Speaker 1: We're seeing really strong entrepreneurial talent choosing to build their

95
00:04:26,279 --> 00:04:28,960
Speaker 1: next company in defense, which here in Europe is just

96
00:04:29,000 --> 00:04:30,599
Speaker 1: completely unthinkable five years ago.

97
00:04:30,880 --> 00:04:35,000
Speaker 4: But is that money really now Because the money flowing,

98
00:04:35,040 --> 00:04:37,440
Speaker 4: for example, from the massive German package, it's not expected

99
00:04:37,480 --> 00:04:39,880
Speaker 4: to hit until twenty twenty six the UK defense space.

100
00:04:39,960 --> 00:04:44,280
Speaker 4: Also the increase in spending, you know it's months years

101
00:04:44,279 --> 00:04:47,000
Speaker 4: probably away from having a real impact. But you say

102
00:04:47,000 --> 00:04:49,240
Speaker 4: that the investing is happening already at your level.

103
00:04:49,520 --> 00:04:51,680
Speaker 1: I think the most interesing action actually is happening with

104
00:04:51,880 --> 00:04:54,080
Speaker 1: C stage investments, which have started to do well already.

105
00:04:54,080 --> 00:04:56,680
Speaker 1: So a company like Helsing for example, a really exciting

106
00:04:56,680 --> 00:04:59,719
Speaker 1: defense tech technology company here in Europe that was started

107
00:04:59,760 --> 00:05:01,840
Speaker 1: some years ago before all of this happened, but the

108
00:05:01,880 --> 00:05:03,599
Speaker 1: interest now is very, very large.

109
00:05:03,720 --> 00:05:04,839
Speaker 3: So I think what we'll see.

110
00:05:04,760 --> 00:05:07,320
Speaker 1: Is companies who've been tinkering at the edges before this

111
00:05:07,520 --> 00:05:09,960
Speaker 1: was an attractive area to invest in will now start

112
00:05:09,960 --> 00:05:12,120
Speaker 1: to get the scale up capital they really need. The

113
00:05:12,160 --> 00:05:16,720
Speaker 1: big question is will the incumbents in Europe, particularly the militaries,

114
00:05:16,960 --> 00:05:18,720
Speaker 1: are they going to have the capacity to work with

115
00:05:18,720 --> 00:05:21,120
Speaker 1: these defense tech startups in whether they have had no

116
00:05:21,240 --> 00:05:24,240
Speaker 1: practice of doing for so many decades, unlike the US

117
00:05:24,279 --> 00:05:26,880
Speaker 1: Department of Defense, which is so well versed at teaming

118
00:05:26,960 --> 00:05:29,920
Speaker 1: up with defense startups from a very early stage.

119
00:05:30,400 --> 00:05:35,000
Speaker 2: How do you, Tommy, how do you inject rationality into

120
00:05:35,240 --> 00:05:39,040
Speaker 2: these new, very hot themes. There's a temptation presumably to

121
00:05:39,800 --> 00:05:42,000
Speaker 2: pile in when a set I mean it's red hot

122
00:05:42,080 --> 00:05:44,320
Speaker 2: right now, and there's a bunch of startups and we've

123
00:05:44,320 --> 00:05:45,520
Speaker 2: spoken to a lot of them. A lot of them

124
00:05:45,560 --> 00:05:48,240
Speaker 2: are not going to survive, and a lot and a

125
00:05:48,240 --> 00:05:50,520
Speaker 2: few will do very well. How do you ensure that

126
00:05:50,560 --> 00:05:53,039
Speaker 2: you have the metrics in place and the structure in

127
00:05:53,040 --> 00:05:54,960
Speaker 2: place to ensure that you're putting the funding to play

128
00:05:55,279 --> 00:05:57,800
Speaker 2: in the companies that really get to matter and thrive

129
00:05:57,839 --> 00:05:58,599
Speaker 2: in the defense space.

130
00:05:59,160 --> 00:06:01,600
Speaker 1: Well, venture in general is so trendering, right, and so

131
00:06:01,680 --> 00:06:04,000
Speaker 1: everyone was a few years ago thought that blockchain was

132
00:06:04,040 --> 00:06:04,719
Speaker 1: the next big wave.

133
00:06:04,800 --> 00:06:06,560
Speaker 3: They thought AR and VR was going to be the

134
00:06:06,600 --> 00:06:08,039
Speaker 3: next wave. Neither we rereadly were.

135
00:06:08,279 --> 00:06:11,160
Speaker 1: Now it's ai, Now it's defense tech. What I think

136
00:06:11,360 --> 00:06:14,479
Speaker 1: fundamentally is that there are two big mega trends. There's AI,

137
00:06:14,600 --> 00:06:17,200
Speaker 1: which is going to fundamentally change the economy and particularly

138
00:06:17,240 --> 00:06:19,880
Speaker 1: the venture world. There's climate, which is a much slower

139
00:06:19,920 --> 00:06:22,839
Speaker 1: bum which is happening over a fifty year period of decarbonization.

140
00:06:23,839 --> 00:06:25,719
Speaker 1: And you've got to pick which are the mega trends

141
00:06:25,720 --> 00:06:27,440
Speaker 1: on which are not, and then just make sure you're

142
00:06:27,480 --> 00:06:31,080
Speaker 1: backing brilliant founders because ultimately, the best venture investing happens

143
00:06:31,160 --> 00:06:33,360
Speaker 1: regardless of what the trend, the sector, the company is

144
00:06:33,480 --> 00:06:35,159
Speaker 1: by backing extraordinary entrepreneurs.

145
00:06:36,000 --> 00:06:40,120
Speaker 4: I've heard the argument also though, that Europe can simply rebrand,

146
00:06:40,200 --> 00:06:42,720
Speaker 4: as you mentioned, can can sort of change the label

147
00:06:42,760 --> 00:06:44,840
Speaker 4: and still get the funding and still do the work

148
00:06:44,839 --> 00:06:48,400
Speaker 4: in diversity, acuity inclusion, for example. You hear that quite frequently.

149
00:06:48,520 --> 00:06:50,680
Speaker 4: Do you really think that the Trump administration is going

150
00:06:50,720 --> 00:06:53,440
Speaker 4: to fall for that. They have a lot of kind

151
00:06:53,480 --> 00:06:56,640
Speaker 4: of business leaders that the drive is going to be

152
00:06:56,839 --> 00:06:59,880
Speaker 4: very pointed, isn't it? Is that really feasible for you

153
00:07:00,279 --> 00:07:03,240
Speaker 4: to do that without there then being a clash.

154
00:07:03,520 --> 00:07:05,080
Speaker 1: I think on one of the topics you've just mentioned,

155
00:07:05,120 --> 00:07:07,799
Speaker 1: I completely agree with you. So diversity exctly an inclusion.

156
00:07:08,120 --> 00:07:11,520
Speaker 1: There is zero appetite for those type of startups and

157
00:07:11,600 --> 00:07:14,040
Speaker 1: even those corporate programs Europe in the US. That's been

158
00:07:14,080 --> 00:07:18,280
Speaker 1: astonishing to witness the sort of overnight reversal of companies

159
00:07:18,280 --> 00:07:21,040
Speaker 1: saying on their website, global companies saying this is a

160
00:07:21,080 --> 00:07:24,000
Speaker 1: core value diversity inclusion, and overnight suddenly it's not so

161
00:07:24,080 --> 00:07:26,240
Speaker 1: much of a core value it's removed. The difference there,

162
00:07:26,280 --> 00:07:28,640
Speaker 1: I think is unlike some of these diversity startups or

163
00:07:28,680 --> 00:07:32,040
Speaker 1: diversity policies where the ROI is harder to prove. In

164
00:07:32,080 --> 00:07:34,560
Speaker 1: climate tech, this is not a cost center anymore. We're

165
00:07:34,560 --> 00:07:36,680
Speaker 1: not talking about the year two thousand here where these

166
00:07:36,680 --> 00:07:39,720
Speaker 1: companies were lost making. These are seriously impressive companies that

167
00:07:39,760 --> 00:07:42,760
Speaker 1: are powering things like AI and are fundamentally cheaper than

168
00:07:42,760 --> 00:07:44,960
Speaker 1: the hydrocardon alternatives and.

169
00:07:44,840 --> 00:07:46,880
Speaker 3: Even in the US, people who want to.

170
00:07:46,880 --> 00:07:49,920
Speaker 1: Make money, which includes the entire Republican Party, are going

171
00:07:49,960 --> 00:07:51,760
Speaker 1: to get behind those trends, and so I think that

172
00:07:51,800 --> 00:07:54,080
Speaker 1: is a fundamental difference to the clean tech one point

173
00:07:54,160 --> 00:07:54,840
Speaker 1: o boom and bust.

174
00:07:55,080 --> 00:07:58,360
Speaker 4: I've also got one other question around the defense and

175
00:07:58,440 --> 00:08:02,120
Speaker 4: defense tech space. I mean, there is huge anticipation in

176
00:08:02,160 --> 00:08:04,600
Speaker 4: the UK about what money is going to flow from

177
00:08:04,640 --> 00:08:08,280
Speaker 4: Britain's additional defense spending capabilities, and there are high hopes

178
00:08:08,320 --> 00:08:12,040
Speaker 4: in the SMEs that that money from the MOD will flow.

179
00:08:12,560 --> 00:08:16,080
Speaker 4: But there's been disappointment for years, if not decades, in

180
00:08:16,160 --> 00:08:21,120
Speaker 4: this space. The MOD underspends and then perhaps will you know,

181
00:08:21,400 --> 00:08:24,360
Speaker 4: make a huge order from one of them primes and

182
00:08:24,400 --> 00:08:27,760
Speaker 4: the SMEs are kind of left to wither. Do you

183
00:08:27,840 --> 00:08:29,600
Speaker 4: really think that things are going to be different this

184
00:08:29,680 --> 00:08:30,360
Speaker 4: time around?

185
00:08:31,000 --> 00:08:31,600
Speaker 3: No, I don't.

186
00:08:31,680 --> 00:08:34,120
Speaker 1: I think the MOD has proven time and time again

187
00:08:34,160 --> 00:08:37,319
Speaker 1: it is not capable of effectively working with startup technology,

188
00:08:37,559 --> 00:08:39,400
Speaker 1: and I think what we'll see is the best UK

189
00:08:39,559 --> 00:08:42,240
Speaker 1: defense technology companies will have to go to the US

190
00:08:42,280 --> 00:08:44,360
Speaker 1: and partner up with the US, which is counter to

191
00:08:44,440 --> 00:08:46,680
Speaker 1: everything that we're seeing in the geopolitical trends. In terms

192
00:08:46,720 --> 00:08:49,160
Speaker 1: of European resilience. But I think that's just the reality

193
00:08:49,200 --> 00:08:51,760
Speaker 1: because the US government is so far ahead on their

194
00:08:51,800 --> 00:08:54,000
Speaker 1: ability to team up with startups. So we have to

195
00:08:54,000 --> 00:08:55,599
Speaker 1: fix that. But my hopes are not high for the

196
00:08:55,720 --> 00:08:57,480
Speaker 1: mod's ability to do that. They just don't have the

197
00:08:57,480 --> 00:08:58,360
Speaker 1: people in place to do it.

198
00:08:58,440 --> 00:09:01,120
Speaker 2: That's a damning It's a damag statement, isn't it about

199
00:09:01,120 --> 00:09:03,320
Speaker 2: the ability for the MOD to adjust to this moment

200
00:09:03,679 --> 00:09:07,480
Speaker 2: on the climate story? Is there a scenario where with

201
00:09:07,600 --> 00:09:10,560
Speaker 2: the US ripping up the Inflation Reduction Act and going

202
00:09:10,600 --> 00:09:13,480
Speaker 2: full bore on oil and gas, that Europe can position

203
00:09:13,559 --> 00:09:17,040
Speaker 2: itself to lead and win on climate technologies.

204
00:09:17,440 --> 00:09:19,600
Speaker 1: I think it's a massive opportunity for Europe to lead

205
00:09:19,640 --> 00:09:21,719
Speaker 1: and win. And one of the really exciting things we're

206
00:09:21,720 --> 00:09:26,360
Speaker 1: seeing is corporate, large corporate industrial players in Europe are

207
00:09:26,360 --> 00:09:28,360
Speaker 1: waking up and saying, okay, we can now partner with

208
00:09:28,400 --> 00:09:32,000
Speaker 1: climate technology startups and lead this decarbonization in a very

209
00:09:32,000 --> 00:09:34,360
Speaker 1: profitable way. And so a giant many of our investors

210
00:09:34,440 --> 00:09:37,640
Speaker 1: RLPs are the big European industrials who see this opportunity,

211
00:09:37,800 --> 00:09:39,040
Speaker 1: and so I think Europe has.

212
00:09:38,920 --> 00:09:40,760
Speaker 3: To sort of make use of the timing with.

213
00:09:40,760 --> 00:09:44,080
Speaker 1: The Trump administrations reversal on climate change and make use

214
00:09:44,120 --> 00:09:47,680
Speaker 1: of our strengths here, which basically is the big industrial giants,

215
00:09:47,679 --> 00:09:49,920
Speaker 1: people like BMW, who now have an opportunity to really

216
00:09:49,960 --> 00:09:53,199
Speaker 1: step up and lead and stop the you know, for

217
00:09:53,280 --> 00:09:56,720
Speaker 1: fatal reversal that they're facing with people like Tesla stealing

218
00:09:56,720 --> 00:09:57,360
Speaker 1: their lunch.

219
00:09:58,240 --> 00:10:01,959
Speaker 4: Our decisions being stored called by the Chomp administration. I mean,

220
00:10:02,240 --> 00:10:04,920
Speaker 4: we're all hesitating until tomorrow and we get the sort

221
00:10:04,920 --> 00:10:09,199
Speaker 4: of tariff news. Is the startup and VC space also

222
00:10:09,320 --> 00:10:12,080
Speaker 4: pausing because you know, you're full of energy and ideas,

223
00:10:12,280 --> 00:10:14,800
Speaker 4: and yet it does feel like there's so much uncertainty

224
00:10:14,840 --> 00:10:16,920
Speaker 4: now that a lot of the big businesses that we've

225
00:10:16,920 --> 00:10:20,439
Speaker 4: report on are pausing major decisions.

226
00:10:21,240 --> 00:10:22,839
Speaker 1: I can only really speak for my world, which is

227
00:10:22,840 --> 00:10:25,600
Speaker 1: a venture and a giant. We have invested more into

228
00:10:25,600 --> 00:10:27,679
Speaker 1: climate technology in the first quarter of this year that

229
00:10:27,760 --> 00:10:30,160
Speaker 1: we've ever invested before. Some of the rounds we've just

230
00:10:30,240 --> 00:10:32,400
Speaker 1: led to sort of Series B rounds in Silicon Valley

231
00:10:32,400 --> 00:10:35,199
Speaker 1: have been more competitive than any venture round I've experienced

232
00:10:35,240 --> 00:10:37,320
Speaker 1: in my career to date. So for the best assets,

233
00:10:37,360 --> 00:10:40,199
Speaker 1: the best climate technology companies which show a clear return

234
00:10:40,240 --> 00:10:43,360
Speaker 1: on investment because they're making money today, there has been

235
00:10:43,400 --> 00:10:45,920
Speaker 1: never been more appetite than I've ever seen in my career.

236
00:10:46,080 --> 00:10:49,400
Speaker 2: Tommy, briefly on talent, because you talked about your theory,

237
00:10:49,480 --> 00:10:51,199
Speaker 2: or at least your forecast that actually a lot of

238
00:10:51,240 --> 00:10:52,840
Speaker 2: the defense tech companies are going to have to go

239
00:10:52,880 --> 00:10:55,040
Speaker 2: to the US either to raise or to list in

240
00:10:55,080 --> 00:10:57,880
Speaker 2: some form, or to get those contracts from the Pentagon.

241
00:10:58,440 --> 00:11:01,199
Speaker 2: What are you saying on talent? Has the Trump administration

242
00:11:01,320 --> 00:11:04,720
Speaker 2: adjusted the flow of talent? I mean, up until the

243
00:11:04,800 --> 00:11:08,040
Speaker 2: end of last year, multiple founders and I would speak

244
00:11:08,040 --> 00:11:10,520
Speaker 2: to would talk about the allure of the US, whether

245
00:11:10,559 --> 00:11:12,560
Speaker 2: it's to raise funding, whether it's to list, whether it's

246
00:11:12,600 --> 00:11:15,280
Speaker 2: to find talent, whether it's to build headquarters, whether it's

247
00:11:15,280 --> 00:11:18,400
Speaker 2: to lean into the US market. Is any of that allures,

248
00:11:18,400 --> 00:11:19,880
Speaker 2: any of that shine coming off.

249
00:11:20,200 --> 00:11:21,800
Speaker 1: I think we are seeing a talent flow out of

250
00:11:21,800 --> 00:11:25,520
Speaker 1: the US for sure, and that ranges from global superstars

251
00:11:25,559 --> 00:11:28,400
Speaker 1: like Reid Hoffman, who we had with us at Giant

252
00:11:28,400 --> 00:11:30,280
Speaker 1: the other day, who spending more and more time here

253
00:11:30,280 --> 00:11:33,120
Speaker 1: in Europe, all the way down to young technical talent

254
00:11:33,440 --> 00:11:36,320
Speaker 1: moving from the US to places like Canada or to Europe.

255
00:11:36,440 --> 00:11:37,760
Speaker 3: And so yeah, there is a bit of a Trump

256
00:11:37,800 --> 00:11:38,679
Speaker 3: brain drain going on.

257
00:11:38,800 --> 00:11:40,560
Speaker 1: From those who frankly don't want to live in an

258
00:11:40,559 --> 00:11:44,160
Speaker 1: administration which has those values. So that's another really exciting

259
00:11:44,200 --> 00:11:47,040
Speaker 1: comportunity for Europe to stand up and gain in the

260
00:11:47,080 --> 00:11:47,920
Speaker 1: innovation economy.

261
00:11:48,520 --> 00:11:50,079
Speaker 4: Okay, I think we'll leave it there. Tommy, thank you

262
00:11:50,160 --> 00:11:52,080
Speaker 4: so much for being with us in the radio studio,

263
00:11:52,120 --> 00:11:53,400
Speaker 4: giving us lots to think about.

264
00:11:53,400 --> 00:11:53,640
Speaker 3: Stay.

265
00:11:53,679 --> 00:11:57,360
Speaker 4: Tommy Stadlin is the co founder of Giant Ventures and

266
00:11:57,400 --> 00:12:00,760
Speaker 4: that picture for venture capital and what money is being

267
00:12:00,800 --> 00:12:03,280
Speaker 4: invested now in Europe given the Trump administration.