WEBVTT - Markets, REITs, And Flying Private

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets podcast

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>called Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. All right, let's check

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>in with Adam Kunsi's a portfolio manager at Winthrop Capital Management.

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:29.319
<v Speaker 1>Adam tough start to the week here, what do you

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>just make it today's trading? They thanks for having me. Yeah,

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think volatility is going to be the

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:38.279
<v Speaker 1>theme for the first quarter. This seems a little bit

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>like deja bou of the first quarter of last year,

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>where we saw interest rates start to pick up and

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:48.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously meaningly meaningfully kicking up this year. At

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the same time that's kind of pushing technology to roll over,

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and right now we're dealing with the fact that that

0:00:55.200 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the consumer is starting to weekend as well, just an

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and their behavior and the mentality on what they're doing,

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>what they're spending money on. So altility is going to

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:09.680
<v Speaker 1>be here for the foreseeable future. So what kind of

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>rate increases they're expecting, what kind of curve flattening you're expecting,

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and what what does that due to risk assets? Yeah,

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>so I mean the curse flatten considerably h eighty basis

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>points just over the last three months or so. So

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:26.319
<v Speaker 1>the bond market is absolutely telling you that that there's

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>something going on here um and and to just blame

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>it on COVID and COVID variants I think is incorrect

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 1>way to look at. And if you looked at retail

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 1>sales after the delta Barrea came out, actually jumped, but

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the reading here in December, saw

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the retail still has actually rolled over. And then you

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>look at savings rates are now back to pre COVID levels,

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and then just most recently consumer sentiment was back at

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>its lows. So all of those factors are going to

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>lead to a slowing economy, which you're seeing in the

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>flattening of the OL curve. And we think that's going

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to continue to get worse because the Feds likely not

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>going to take their foot off of the accelerator of

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:15.799
<v Speaker 1>of tightening their policy. They seem pretty ole bent on

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>on tightening and raising rates. So likely we see them

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>invert the curve, and so just you know, from that standpoint,

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>it's just a matter of time when we see some

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of recession at the market. All right, So given

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that backdrop, Adam, kind of where are you thinking about,

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, allocating capital? Uh? Yeah, So, I mean, if

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you think rates are gonna go up, you would think

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 1>fixed incomes not the place to be. But we particularly

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:46.080
<v Speaker 1>like the long end of the curve. Credit spreads have

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:50.079
<v Speaker 1>widened a little bit of the last couple of weeks.

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 1>So looking at your high quality thirty year bonds, I

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>think is a good place to be. You get some

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>yield pick up and there is potential for spread tightening.

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>But really the theme is moving up in quality, whether

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 1>you're in fixed income like I just mentioned, or even

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>in stocks. And really when we talk about high quality stocks,

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a lot of the names that that we've

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>been in and that have worked over the last couple

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of years. It's kind of question of, you know, do

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>you leave with the way you came to the dance

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>with and I think we do. Um And when you

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>look at companies like Apple and Microsoft's obviously in the

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>news today and Alphabet, they have business models that can

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>be sustainable through uh economic swings like we saw through

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>through COVID. We've seen it time and time again that

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>as as those companies sell off because investors think either

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>rates are going up and valuations are gonna come back down,

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>they sell, but then they come right back into them

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>because at the end of the day, they're cash flow

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 1>machines that that effectively have turned themselves into the most

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>defensive stocks in the SMP five. So we think that's

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to work, all right, Adam, thanks so

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Always appreciate getting your perspective. Adam

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Coon's portfolio manager for Winthrop Capital Management. I note here

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>he is a graduate of Indiana University. A Hoosier. Rough

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>start to the trading week here, inflation, rising interest rates,

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:27.039
<v Speaker 1>concerns about the FEDS aggressiveness, all factoring into some unsteady

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>trading show. We say, let's bring in a professional does

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>this stuff for living? Liz Young, head of investment strategy

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>for so Far. So, Liz, when you see a day

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>like today, I'm assuming it gets your attention. Anything more

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 1>than that, well, of course it gets our attention, it

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>gets everybody's attention, I'm sure, But when you see a

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:48.239
<v Speaker 1>day like today and even a month like we're having

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:52.039
<v Speaker 1>in January, I think it's to be expected given the

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:54.840
<v Speaker 1>environment that we're entering. And this is an environment that

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>is new to a lot of us, and it's something

0:04:57.200 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>that I think still has a lot of uncertainty around it,

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>around the paths of rate hikes, the speed of quantitative tightening,

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:09.479
<v Speaker 1>and the market is trying to understand what can still

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 1>win in this space. And the tina I hate to

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:15.360
<v Speaker 1>use that acronym. I think it's very overused, but that

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>tina mentality still very much at play because stocks offer

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:24.919
<v Speaker 1>the best reward opportunity. It's still better than fomo, UM

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and yolo definitely better than you. That's true. That's true. UM.

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 1>So I wonder when you're when you're looking at UM,

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a way to hedge against inflation? Is our stocks? The

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 1>best way? Do you think? I mean depends obviously on

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>what you buy, but UM, is there anything else that's better?

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I think stocks are the best bet right now because

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>we're in a place where the set is trying to

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 1>control inflation. Right so, if you're looking at let's say

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:55.280
<v Speaker 1>six months out, the set is trying to control inflation

0:05:55.520 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>on input costs and food and energy, so commodities are

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>going to see a volatile period. Uh as the said

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 1>tries to put a lid on a lot of that

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>price pressure that's moving upward. So when you look at stocks,

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 1>you have to choose your spots. But stocks can still

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>do pretty well in an inflationary environment. I think there's

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>been this belief that the stock market has to fall

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>if there's inflation, and that inflation is all bad, and

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that's not true. It's just that certain pockets of the

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>stock market are not going to do as well as

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>they did in a low inflationary environment. And that namely

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:33.280
<v Speaker 1>is tech or even just the NASDAC broadly given all

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of its tech exposure. And you look at things like

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the broader SMP or the TAO, or even small caps,

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>even though I know that the growthy part of small

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>caps are really getting hurt this year already. Uh, there

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:46.919
<v Speaker 1>are pockets of the stock market that can do really well.

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:49.480
<v Speaker 1>And I would point out look at the spread between

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 1>small cap growth and small cap value. Small cap value

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>coming into today was actually positive year to date, small

0:06:56.600 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>capt growth down almost eight percent. So it matters is

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.159
<v Speaker 1>the style that you're in. It matters the sector allocations

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 1>that you have in an inflationary environment. Liz, we've seen

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:09.280
<v Speaker 1>a big move up in oil prices and the in

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the energy space here again, oil w t A crewed

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>up another one point three percent today, that just under

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>eighty five dollars a barrel, continuing its climb. How do

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you think about energy stocks here? Is there more room

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to grow? Yeah? I do think there's more room to

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>go in energy, not only in oil prices but in

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>energy stocks. Uh. And I don't think it's necessarily a

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>long term play, but I think in the short term

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>here a tactical opportunity and energy, especially as in the

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>next few months we exit the winter months, and as

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you see, every time we have a new variant, we

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>don't lock down nearly as hard right across the globe,

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>so travel has really continued through oh Macron, and I

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>think any new bouts of a new variant that we

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>may have, travel will continue through that as well. And

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>that's just going to drive more demand for energy. And

0:07:57.760 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>if we get to a point where we are finally

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>real opening and out of this stop start cycle, there's

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be still quite a bit of demand for energy.

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>And then just think about the second derivative aspects of it.

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 1>How many people have bought cars over the last year,

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>how many people are dying to drive those cars to

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>further destinations and and dying to get on airplanes and

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>go to further places. So I think there's room for

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>energy here. I would only caution investors that you don't

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>want to see a ton of run up and energy

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>to a point where it gets frosty or hits a spike,

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>because when you get a spike in energy prices, very

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>frequently a huge spike and energy is something that comes

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>before a down draft in the economy. So we want

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to keep energy prices in control UM and I like

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to say things like I want them to take the stairs,

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.680
<v Speaker 1>not the elevator up by the way, another acronym that

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I hate as USP. But what is the unique selling

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>point or what makes so Far different UM from other

0:08:56.200 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 1>investment businesses. Well, so Far is an all in one

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:03.680
<v Speaker 1>app so it's not just an investment business. We have

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>ways that people can save, we have ways that people

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:08.680
<v Speaker 1>can spend. We have a credit card, and then we

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>have the invest platform that really offers our members a

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:15.679
<v Speaker 1>great way to invest and get started if they're new investors.

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>It offers them a lot of different opportunities. You can

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>buy I P O s on our platform, you can

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>buy fractional shares on our platform, so there's a lot

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 1>of great options. Crypto. You can buy a lot of

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>crypto on our platform. But what what what's different about

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>so far from say a robin Hood or a T

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>dum merit trade or any of these other platforms that

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess younger investors are using to invest. Yeah, what's

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:43.319
<v Speaker 1>different about it is that we offer all of the

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>solutions in one place. So a lot of the ones

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that are out there offering just an investing platform and

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>you still have to do your banking somewhere else, in

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>your credit card somewhere else, and you're lending somewhere else,

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and you can do every single one of them on ours, alright.

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we hear so much about it, and yes,

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>it's gotten so popular that I just wanted to that's interesting.

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>So you can do everything you don't need still a

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 1>traditional bank account, you don't need to apply for a

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:09.679
<v Speaker 1>credit card elsewhere, and you can I guess use those

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>uh services with each other, which probably it's got a

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 1>market cap about ten billion dollars. Although the stock is

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>off about prior twelve months after going public. I guess

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>in October. All right, Liz, great to get a chance

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to talk to you. Let's talk about the office real

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>estate space. Are people are gonna be coming back to

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the office. Do we need the companies and corporations need

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the space the footprint they had before the pandemic. I'm

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:42.440
<v Speaker 1>looking around here and I'm thinking the answer is noble

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>or do they need more? Uh? Yeah, made for We're

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>all sitting at these cubicles like little rat race rodents.

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's got four square feet like I would

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 1>like some room to stretch out. My dad, by the way,

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>had an office. I had at the door on it

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and you would go in there and he was the

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>only person in there. You could close the door and

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>have complete privacy. I had a table, a sofa like

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a little managing director at Credit Swiss First Boston. Those

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:16.719
<v Speaker 1>were the days, no Moss. Jeffrey Langbaum, Senior reat c

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>R E equity analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence, joins us. Jeff.

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I keep seeing in the news companies in New York

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>City and other urban areas continue the least space. Who's

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:30.679
<v Speaker 1>going to fill the space? I think the answer is

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:33.080
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in between what both of you are saying. Um,

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 1>but people may not be back five days a week

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:41.200
<v Speaker 1>like we were before. UM, but companies are setting themselves

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 1>up for a situation where people will be back some

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>amount of time and they need space for that UM.

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 1>And for each individual person, they might actually need more

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 1>space than they needed previously. UM. What that means for

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the overall size of the footprint still remains to be seen.

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>But the leases that we've that we're seeing getting done

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>in many cases are actually for more space than what

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>they had previously. So in terms of the return to work,

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>we've had a couple of false starts here right especially

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street, and everything seems to have gotten pushed back.

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:22.079
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you're a cool Stilicon Valley company, then forever. Um.

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:26.079
<v Speaker 1>If you're a conservative Wall Street bank, then like February

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>fully boosted. Please, when are we going to see things

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 1>get back to normal? Well, we'll see about that forever.

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm still skeptical about that. I think that most people

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>are going to need to be in an office UM

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 1>a portion of the time, whatever that may be, And

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the reason is that the companies want them

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 1>there the people making these leasing decisions want their employees

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>in person at least part of the time. UM and

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>that's why leases are getting signed as far as when

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously, you know, every time there's going to

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 1>be another spike of the virus is something that remains

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>some amount of the normality going forward. You know, there's

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:05.679
<v Speaker 1>gonna be pauses and fits and starts. But I think

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>at some point employers are going to want their employees back,

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and they're setting themselves up for when that's going to

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>be um and and you know, we'll see how long

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 1>it takes for it to get uh, you know, fully immersed. Jeff,

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>how do you think about just across the country. You know,

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:25.559
<v Speaker 1>we we had this migration of people from urban centers

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:30.199
<v Speaker 1>fleeing to whether it's Florida or Texas or wherever Idaho falls.

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is that a long lasting thing? Are you

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>seeing that in the vacancies and the rents or or

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>do you still see a future for the urban centers.

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I still see the future for the urban center. I

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>think that's where the the majority of the companies want

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to at least have their core, you know, central locations.

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's where the talent is that's where the

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 1>young people want to be. I think for the most part,

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you're obviously seeing some corporate relocations. You're seeing some satellite

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>offices opened, you know, throughout the South and you know,

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the South Florida the new hotbed. But but you're not

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing too many companies relocate in full force down there.

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think that that happens. Um. I think

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that you continue to have demand for places like New

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>York and San Francisco, even if on the margin there

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>are people migrating away from those cities. It's a bummer, dude.

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I was hoping you were going to say, look, obviously

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna keep New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, but let's

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>spread out a little bit, like we are in the office,

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, Let's some of us go to Austin. Let's

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>some of us go to like Taos. You know that. Uh,

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think I think some people are right,

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>But it's not companies wholesale leaving for those locations. Yeah. No,

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>that's what I thought. It would be cool. I mean,

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>it would be cool if big companies, huge corporations would

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>say we're leaving San Francisco, you know, and we're going

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to Myrtle Beach or whatever. Like. You know, we can

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>communicate with everybody in the world easily and electronically. We

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>don't need to be down the street. So but that's

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>just one of my pipe dreams. I want population centers

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>just to spread out. I think we're too dense really.

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, Jeff's first, how about in New York City,

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>what's just give us delay of the land in commercial

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>real estate in New York City, Well, office leasing in

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter was the highest that has been since

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter of two thousand nineteen. Has been a

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>steady uptick. Now we're still below pre pandemic levels, right,

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the amount of LEAs is being signed is still below

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>pre pandemic levels, and vacancy is elevated. Um rents are

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>falling because the vacancy is elevated. But what is really happening,

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I think, is the a migration of tenants to higher

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>quality buildings. There's going to be a bifurcation the newer

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and more recently renovated buildings with the highest amenities in

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the best locations. Those are going to be the ones

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:57.479
<v Speaker 1>that attract pennants and keep occupancy high and rent high,

0:15:57.600 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and those that are on the opposite end of the spectrum,

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>are really going to suffer and potentially you know, become

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 1>obsolete as office buildings and need to find some other

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>other use. And so I think that that will naturally,

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>over time reduce the amount of space um uh, you know,

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>overall available space, and get us back more towards a

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>period uh a position of equilibrium. All right, Jeff, thanks

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Always appreciating your thoughts on

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the real estate space. Jeff Langbaum, He's a senior read

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. He's been doing this for decades,

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>but he used to do it from the office. Yeah,

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 1>and I working from home today. And we'll see how

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>long that lasts here at Bloomberg LP. I get a

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 1>sense that we'll be coming back to the office at

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 1>some point and not too distant future. We'll see how

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 1>that plays out. Every corporation seems to be uh kind

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of dealing with that as well. So many industries have

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>been disrupted by this pandemic, by the economic disruption. One

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 1>of them is just broadly defined transportation, but particularly aviation,

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>and who wants to hop in an aircraft with two

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 1>yr you know, potentially infected people that's been a real

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>issue for the industry, and one of the results is

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 1>private aircraft travel has actually picked up during the pandemic.

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>We want to get some more color on that. Tal Kanan,

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>CEO of sky Harbor Group, joins us Talent, thanks so

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>much for taking that time here. Just briefly, let's start

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>off at just saying what is sky Harbor. What do

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 1>you guys do within the aviation space? Well, thanks for

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>having me conceptual Our business very simple. We we secure

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:34.200
<v Speaker 1>land at airports across the United States. These are mainly

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>airports and supports business aviation. We developed campuses of hangars

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:41.880
<v Speaker 1>for business aviation and then least them out long term

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 1>to corporate or individual tenants and manage them. That's good business.

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 1>And how did you I mean, you come from impressive

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>education and you are a fighter pilot yourself. Um, what's

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 1>your idea for this business that differentiates it from other

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 1>businesses in the space. Yeah, so a couple of things. First,

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:06.439
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's a non controversial statement. There is

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 1>massive unmet demand for hangar space in business aviation across

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the United States. And you know, just to kind of

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 1>give you a sense, put some numbers on it. Uh,

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the square footage of the US business aviation fleet grew

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>by twenty seven and a half million square feet between

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and two thousand and twenty. Now what's happened

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 1>in the last two years is just a very very

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>dramatic acceleration of that trend. You know, what we have

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>now is a situation where the vast majority you probably close,

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>of those who can afford private air travel in the

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 1>United States. I'm talking about both corporations and individuals UH

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 1>close to have not availed themselves of private aviation. And

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing right now, and I think your introduction

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>was very appropriate, appropriate on that we're seeing right now

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 1>is just a you know, the whole scale migration from

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>commercial aviation into private among those. By the way, why

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:01.679
<v Speaker 1>haven't day I mean, is it just not prudent to

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>spend your money that way? Tal It seems like the

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>jump from business class to your own jet is quite

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:13.639
<v Speaker 1>a bit. Yeah, I mean, for it is expensive. I

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>think culturally a lot of things, a lot of people,

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of corporations haven't like that look for a

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>long time, but increasingly that is a responsible thing to do,

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:24.479
<v Speaker 1>especially for a business. You know, that involves a lot

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of travel and sending people on kind of extended road

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 1>trips today using commercial travel is disruptive. And you know,

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the things you'll see it's it's not just

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not just the risk of contracting COVID nineteen on

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a commercial flight, it's the airline's reaction to COVID, which

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>has largely been to cancel and diminish a lot of routes.

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 1>So getting from secondary city to secondary city in the

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 1>United States today is much more difficult than it was

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>two years ago, and I think that's probably going to

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:57.199
<v Speaker 1>be the case for a while. Talent, how do you

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>think business travel is going to return? And we've seen

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:04.439
<v Speaker 1>generally leisure travel come back depending upon where we are

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>with with the various variants, but business travels something different.

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>How do you think about it? Well, so a couple

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>of things. First, in much of the country it already

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>has returned. And then some you know, if we look

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:18.679
<v Speaker 1>at kind of our facility in Miami, we look at

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the fuel volumes that fuel consumption by business aviation. We're

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>hitting record years. If you see delivery of new aircraft

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>was a record year. Delivery of new business aircraft two

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 1>is going to beat it. About twelve, so the market

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>is already speaking on this. You know, the the this,

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>this business aviation fleet in the United States will continue

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to expand by literally millions of square feet per year,

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I think for the foreseeable future. And I think one

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of the things that's worth looking at. Historically, the move

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>from commercial to business aviation has tended to be secular.

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:58.399
<v Speaker 1>You know. On once a company decides it's going to

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>start flying privately, it tends to go back to commercial aviation.

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>So we we think you can't go back. I will

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>tell you I a good friend of mine as a CEO,

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:13.160
<v Speaker 1>was a CEO of Major Carmaker, and after he retired,

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 1>his family made him take one trip on a commercial

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>flight and he said, man, I never want to do

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:21.160
<v Speaker 1>that again. Awful, awful explorence um and it is bad.

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>You know. They sit you right on top of each other.

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 1>They don't care about the risk of COVID. They will

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>they they will put you less than a safe social

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:33.160
<v Speaker 1>distance apartment in the plane and on the bus. And

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>tell I want to ask about Miami as a choice.

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I believe you're from Miami, but I know you studied

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 1>at Georgetown and then in the Northeast You've advised government

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:49.159
<v Speaker 1>task forces in Israel where you served in the military,

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>so you've been around. Why go back to your roots.

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Why choose Miami as a place to headquarter your company? Well,

0:21:56.640 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>so it's it's it's only one of our facilities right now. Yeah,

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:02.640
<v Speaker 1>we've been six facilities today. The company is actually headquartered

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 1>in New York. I will say it is one of

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 1>my favorites. And then you know, the just business growth

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of business aviation growth in South Florida has really been

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>off the charts, even compared to what we're seeing around

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the country. Yeah, I wanted to ask you know what

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:17.920
<v Speaker 1>you thought of the city. We've been talking a lot

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>about divertification away from New York, but I guess you,

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess what your experience proves is you still have

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to be in New York. It's still an incredibly important hub. Yeah,

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think, certainly from a business aviation perspective,

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you could cut New York in half and it would

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>still be you know, it still become a top five

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 1>market in the country for US. And I don't think

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 1>it's good to tell. You know, Matt's out there in

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the car market trying to buy a car and his

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 1>supply chains at killing them. You can't find anything wait list.

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>If I want to go out there and get an aircraft,

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:51.399
<v Speaker 1>a private jet, can I get one? Am I going

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to pay through the nose? Can I get in discounts?

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 1>What's the market like? Yeah, the short answer is you cannot.

0:22:56.680 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>You're absolutely right. It's a very relevant question. Uh. If

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>you look at the various websites you know where aircraft

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:05.880
<v Speaker 1>are traded, you know, they went from a year ago

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 1>advertising aircraft and now kind of aircraft wanted to see

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>a you know, like wanted um. So yes, There's been

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 1>also a lot of move movement in the secondary market

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 1>for used business aircraft, which is pro us right. Europe

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:24.199
<v Speaker 1>as a net seller of used business jets to the

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:27.160
<v Speaker 1>United States the net fire of business jets right now,

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and prices have gone up considerably in the secondary market

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 1>as well. By the way that those supply chain issues

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 1>are also you know, I think the aircraft oms feel

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that as well. But because the numbers are much smaller,

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, seven aircraft delivered in is a record years,

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:46.399
<v Speaker 1>nothing like the automotive industry, I think the impact of

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 1>the supply chain issues is a little bit lighter, all right,

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 1>So it sounds like I should hold onto my United miles.

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Then uh, Greg Jarrett proposes trade of plane. It's a

0:23:57.240 --> 0:24:00.240
<v Speaker 1>website that I peruse quite often. But you're not finding

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a G six fifty there. This is more like um

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 1>per cup exactly, more like a place for a piper cup.

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Towns great to have, sorry, even though you'll see the

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>christ that. Yeah, you know the prices are soaring. Um

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to you to use a bad punch, twel, I'd love

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to have you back on the program. I think really

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:24.159
<v Speaker 1>interesting stuff and um, it's a business. I think we

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>all would like to see grow a little bit. I

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:27.160
<v Speaker 1>think we all want a little piece of that little

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:30.439
<v Speaker 1>piece of private I would to play and travel. Talking

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 1>there with Talcane. He's the CEO of Sky Harbor Group.

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:39.159
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:42.959
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:46.719
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:50.400
<v Speaker 1>at Matt Miller V three. Put on false Sweeney I'm

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio