WEBVTT - 2021 NFL Draft Pass Catchers Preview

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Actually you're looking pail touchdown, Miami drawn. What is up,

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Dolph fans and welcome to the Drive Time Podcast, part

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>of the Miami Dolphins podcast network, covering your team, your

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Miami Dolphins. How's it going, everybody? I am your host,

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Travis Wingfield, And on today's show, we're gonna continue previewing

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:36.159
<v Speaker 1>the NFL Draft now just a week and a half

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>away at hard Rock Stadium are live Draft party and

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>YouTube show. Go ahead and makes you r s v

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>P to that or check us out on the YouTube channel.

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:48.519
<v Speaker 1>But on today's podcast we have Matt Harmon of Yahoo

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Sports and the Reception Perception Project talking all things wide receivers.

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>A busy, busy edition of the Drivetime Podcast today, Let's

0:00:56.560 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and jump right in Miami time and real

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>quick before we get to Matt Harmon, I've talked about

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:05.960
<v Speaker 1>this on the podcast just a little bit, that I'm

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:08.320
<v Speaker 1>back in South Florida for the first time since the

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>end of the season and doing the podcast from here,

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:13.319
<v Speaker 1>and I got to go to the offices at the

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>stadium for the first time. I had worked previously at

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the offices and Davy at the current old training facility

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>will be in the new facility sometime this summer hopefully,

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>but I was in the stadium for the first time,

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>and man, the views from hard Rock Stadium, the seeing

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the field, you know, just going to work and seeing

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 1>the actual field at hard Rock Stadium and and being

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>part of South Florida. It's it really is a dream

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 1>come true. And it kind of was a moment that

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:40.959
<v Speaker 1>I took to myself today to to just kind of

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>step back and look at everything and be like this,

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>this is where it's all at. This is where I

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 1>want to be. So I'm very grateful and happy to

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>be bringing you guys this coverage of Miami Dolphins football

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>here on the Drift Time podcast. And I've also been

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>talking a lot about F one Formula one racing because

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>of the Netflix show, and I'm gonna start watching the

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the weekly races. Just finished up the Sunday episode or

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Sunday Race, I should say, uh this this past weekend,

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I talked about the driving in South

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Florida and how it's a little bit enticing to drive

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:16.239
<v Speaker 1>like an F one Razor because everyone else out there

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 1>does well. I did go to the rental company to

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>replace my car, which is in the body shop because

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I was in that accident back in October. Somebody regretted

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>me getting that fixed, and all they had available for

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>me was Chrysler pacifica minivan, which don't don't knock it

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 1>because it's a great vehicle. But you know, thirty three

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>year old guy who doesn't have his wife and kid

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:38.959
<v Speaker 1>here in South Florida driving around minivan, maybe I feel

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit less cool. I don't know. You tell me,

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>is can you make a minivan any cool? I do

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>have the F one Emmy. They'll kind of buzzing that

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:48.080
<v Speaker 1>thing around down here in South Florida. And the reason

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I bring this all together was because I have a

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:52.679
<v Speaker 1>great story about driving in South Florida I wanted to

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>share before we get to Matt Harmon on the podcast.

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>There was I was on Miramara Parkway at a busy

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 1>intersection I think was Palm Avenue. It might have been

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>a busier street than that, but there's a shopping center

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>right by there, and somebody was pulling out of that

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>shoppings now are trying to get across to the left

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 1>turn lane. So I created a gap between me and

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the car ahead of me, so those cars had an

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>avenue to pull through and get through traffic and not

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>have to wait for another go round of a lengthy

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>traffic signal. And the person behind me, not even kidding,

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>pulls into the right hand turn lane, jumps in front

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>of me and takes that vacant spot that I left

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 1>nicely for people to use and cut off that entire

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.360
<v Speaker 1>way of traffic. So welcome to South Florida, baby, I

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>guess that's how we do it down here. That's enough

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of my driving stories. We're gonna go ahead and welcome

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>into the show right now, the author of Reception Perception,

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the best receiver minds in the entire game,

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Matt Harmon from y'all Who Sports. Let's go ahead and

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>roll this interview. And we've been talking past catchers on

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>this podcast weekly, if not daily, for months now, and

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>we're bringing it home with one of the heaviest hitters

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>in that world, in that realm. He's a wider for

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>writer and analysts for Yahoo. He's the creator of Reception Perception,

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>a great website, great content. They're talking all things pass catchers.

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>He is Matt Harmon, and Matt, I love the last

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>line of your Twitter bio. I did it my way.

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I love that. Welcome to the Drivetime Podcast. Hey, thanks

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>so much for having me, Travis. I really appreciate it.

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, that is a an ode to a Frank

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Sinatra lyric from the song My Way. Um it's it's

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 1>actually like a very personal sort of story about my

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>my grandmom who was very close with when she passed away.

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I remember like that song. Is it just it's you know,

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>it seems like a person at the end of their

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 1>life they're going on to the next journey, and they

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>did it their way. And I always kind of took

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:43.919
<v Speaker 1>after after that happened, and you know, pursuing a career

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>in football and everything like that, I was just sort

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 1>of looked at it as a you know, I want

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to do things my way. If I do uh, if

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I do this thing, if I actually make it happen

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and you know, spoiler alert, it happened, you worked out,

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 1>I want to do it my way. I want to

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>do it in a fashion that you know, I can

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, as a man, I can live with and

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I can look back on and be be proud of,

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>and and uh, you know I think that I like

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 1>to think I did a pretty decent job at it. Yeah,

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to follow up on that, because you know,

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I have a very unconventional path to this position myself,

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and I'm always curious to hear about people in this

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>industry's path because not everyone in this day and age

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>did the journalists journalism school route and then you do

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the high school paper and then you move up to college,

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>like not everyone does that these days. And so, you know,

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>my own path was your Your path obviously steeped heavily

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:31.720
<v Speaker 1>and charting, which I just love that work, and that's

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 1>that's how I came across your work. I did some

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of my own charting for a website that I created

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:38.599
<v Speaker 1>called third and ten five or six years ago, and

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>it taught me so much about the game because I

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:43.719
<v Speaker 1>just was so you know, intimate with every single detail

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 1>of every single play. So I wanted to ask you,

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>how did you get into charting and how did that

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>eventually evolved into reception perception? Yeah, it is interesting, like

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>this is back, you know, way in the origin story

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>of kind of pursuing this as a career. My original

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:01.920
<v Speaker 1>life and was to go back to school, uh and

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>continue my degree and in studying social theory, uh, in

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>like sociology, and eventually get a PhD and like become

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>an academic. Clearly, I'm sitting here in my backwards hat

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:13.559
<v Speaker 1>and looking at football players, like I did not become

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>an academic, right Basically, I just decided, like I loved football.

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 1>I was in just a pretty tough place in life.

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, life throws you curveballs and um needing to

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>respond to it in a way. I just found something

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 1>that I got a lot of joy from, which was

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>analyzing the game. You know, I was obsessed with football,

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:34.280
<v Speaker 1>was obsessed with fantasy. I knew like, you know, every

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Madden roster back to front in like the two thousand thirteen,

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and fourteen eras. So I started a website.

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 1>All my friends had really pushed me to go that direction.

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:47.600
<v Speaker 1>But you know, because I was literally a nobody, you know,

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>like just some guy in a one bedroom apartment in Lynchburg, Virginia,

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>just trying to figure out the game, just like you.

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to understand the intricacies of football from every situation.

0:06:57.720 --> 0:06:59.720
<v Speaker 1>So that's when I just started charting games, a lot

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of differ and stuff. You know, I did some work

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 1>with quarterbacks to decided I hated it, and you know,

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 1>offensive line, defensive line, just trying out different things, and

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that's something probably people don't don't really know

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 1>about that, you know. Like I said, I was charting

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>all these different positions and the one that just stuck

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to me really was wide receivers. Because I always tell

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>people if they're trying to start out in this space

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>or kind of trying to find their own way, My

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>my thing that I encourage everybody to do is try

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>to be the person that answers the question, the biggest

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>question that you have about football. For me, it was

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, what are wide receivers doing when they run

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>off the screen on Sundays? Because we know this anybody

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that follows football or anybody that plays fantasy football, like,

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>there's so much that goes into it. From a production standpoint.

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Someone has to go right for a wide receiver just

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to get a target, a catch, a yard, like be

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>able to put those points up on the board. They're

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 1>not if their own individual performances is very separate from

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>all that. So and if you just even any basic

0:07:57.000 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>staff but even more advanced that's like catch rate, yards

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>per target, it you're inherently welcoming in the variable of

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback at the bare minimum. But you're also the

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>offensive line's got to be blocking for them, right, They

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>gotta be put into a good position by the head coach.

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's really the where the idea of reception perception

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 1>came about. Was I wanted to try to isolate wide

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>receiver performance as much as possible from those outside variables

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and really study and try to quantify the qualitative reality

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>of route running because to me, it was look the

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>one thing that the wide receiver can control, like stats

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:33.959
<v Speaker 1>and just throw that out. They can't really control that

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>too much on their own. The one thing that they

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>can control is do they run good routes? Do they

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>get open uh? And do they present that good target

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>for the quarterback to earn a target? And then obviously

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:44.959
<v Speaker 1>do they catch the ball and do good things with

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>it after that? So perception perceptions and such you trying

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to tell you all of that anything you want to

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 1>know about a wide receiver, and that all came out

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:55.080
<v Speaker 1>of basically charting games and finding that one thing I

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>really wanted to figure out. I watched games at hard

0:08:57.679 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Rock Stadium now, so it's different from me, but back

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>when I is you know, uh, you know, fixed on

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the television set I would have the same complaint every Sunday.

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Give me a view where I can see the receivers

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 1>in downfield. Give me that that you mentioned Madden the

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 1>behind the formation, but pull it back a little bit

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>so I can see the entire box count and the

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:19.200
<v Speaker 1>receivers out wide. That's my lifelong dream right there. And

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>you also mentioned memorizing Madden rosters. I'll tell you my

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>little funny story here. I used to get the Pro

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly season previews and I would read all the

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>content and memorize the rosters and then recite them when

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I would go for jogs outside. So that's like my nerd,

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>my very nerd football thing. But we've got you on

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>here to talk about both Dolphins receivers and the college

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>receivers in this draft coming up in just a couple

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>of weeks here, and I have to start off before

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:45.679
<v Speaker 1>we get to the receiver class in the draft talking

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>about Will Fuller because a through my own tape study,

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I think he is an elite, elite level wide receiver

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and be the data you shared with regards to his

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:58.439
<v Speaker 1>win rate by route run is that of an elite,

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 1>elite wide receiver. So Matt, how good is Will Fuller. Yeah,

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:06.719
<v Speaker 1>I think the version of Will Fuller was incredible. I've

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>always been a big fan of his because one thing

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that you come to realize when you study wide receivers,

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, on a route by route basis and watch

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>off and they're getting separation, you start to not care

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 1>about things like drops, and like people forget about this.

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>But Will Fuller was slammed coming into the league as

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>a guy that couldn't catch the ball, which is crazy

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:28.079
<v Speaker 1>because he he's had you know, like he had one

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>big drop. I can remember when he was playing with

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the Texans against the Patriots in a playoff game and

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:35.319
<v Speaker 1>he has brock Oswhiler throwing the ball for God's sake,

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>So like maybe that's the one drop. Is not the

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>biggest problem that the team might have had. But you know,

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 1>this is a guy that never really developed those drop issues.

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think when you look at him, even on

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>a year by year basis, he had always been a

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>really strong separator and reception perception. You know, I break

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>things down not only by success rate versus man's own

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:55.959
<v Speaker 1>press coverage, but also by individual routes. You know, he'd

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>always had a really good and if people go to

0:10:57.520 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>reception perception dot Com and they sign up for the site,

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>they can see not only uh Will Fuller's twenty season,

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>but go compare it to his twenty nineteen season as well,

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>which I think is really useful because it shows you

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>even if you don't get the version of the player,

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at excellent success rate on deep routes, of

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>course we know that's part of it, but also routes

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>like the flat, the curl, you know, some of those

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>more shorter lay up patterns that are gonna be important

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:26.079
<v Speaker 1>for moving an offense down the field. And what I

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>always liked about Fuller two playing with the Texans before

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 1>was he just put defenses in such a bind. This

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:34.559
<v Speaker 1>is why I think a player like Jalen Waddle is

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 1>really going to be appealing for folks in the drafted.

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Fuller was never that number one receiver because the Texans

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>had DeAndre Hopkins, and it's like, Okay, we want to, uh,

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>just put some extra defensive attention to stopping DeAndre Hopkins,

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>But then you're gonna leave Will Fuller on your number

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:53.079
<v Speaker 1>two corner exposed there on the other side of the

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>field with no help. You're gonna get destroyed. And those

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 1>those games where it was Watson, Hopkins and Will Fuller.

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Those guys fired off to w It was real magic.

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>But going back to the season, which I think is really,

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:07.439
<v Speaker 1>of course the important part here, this is a player

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that jumped up huge in terms of success rate versus press.

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Like the Texans used him as an alpha wide receiver

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 1>out there as the ISO X guy, basically just put

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>him in DeAndre hopkins old spot, and he had the

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>best season of his career. And you can look at that,

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, look at that down the route tree as well.

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Only one route did he fall below the NFL average

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:30.320
<v Speaker 1>in terms of success, right, and that was the out route.

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Everything else, Like, the Dolphins are getting a complete player

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>in the peak version of Will Fuller, and uh, you know,

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it is sort of interesting just talk about like

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>where did this season come from? Um, But I think

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>he had this ability in him all along and it

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 1>was just taking that next step of development. So even again,

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:50.839
<v Speaker 1>at bare minimum you get the nineteen version of Fuller,

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 1>you're getting a really strong number two receiver that wins

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>in the most important areas, wins vertically right, and in

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the contested games, who has always been an underrated contested

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:02.079
<v Speaker 1>catch receiver, so you're bare minimum getting that player, but

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the version does show he has true number one receiver

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>upside in them as well. I'm glad you mentioned the

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>impact that he and those receivers in Houston have on

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the offense in general, because I went back and watch

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>this tape this last year and teams played too high

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>safety because you got him and Kenny Stills on the

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 1>other side, you know, taking the top off the defense.

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>That can have such a big benefit, not just for

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the run game, but for Mike is Sicky and Devonte

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Parker over the middle, and all the possession receivers Dolphins

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>have in that regard. So yeah, I I couldn't be

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>more excited about it. I'm glad you mentioned his old

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>tape because I went back and watched him his rookie

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 1>year compared to twenty, and he was running like you mentioned, curls, screens, flats.

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't doing a whole lot in the route tree.

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>But now he ran the whole damn thing and look

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>good doing it. So that's great to hear. Let's go

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>ahead and transition now into this college class, another one

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>that is coming in a build, possibly one of the

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 1>best receiver classes of all time again for back to

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>back years, and I want to stay on that frame

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:53.319
<v Speaker 1>of mind of the prototype. And one thing I've been

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>on about this offseason, Matt is the type of receiver

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>this offense could use. And I don't have a prototype

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:01.199
<v Speaker 1>per se if what Miami might want, but to consider

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Parker Williams, Hollands, even a tight end Mike Sicky. These

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>guys are contested catch this type of dude. So separators,

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>yak that sort of thing. So before we break into

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>this thing into tears, as far as who's in your

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 1>first tier, second tier, and so forth, I want to

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>get your best in class by category. Does that work

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>for you? I love that idea and I think it's

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 1>perfect for the Dolphins too, because of, like you said,

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>what they need. They had a lot of guys that

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>were redundant with each other last year. I think they

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>have a good start with Fuller, but there's a lot

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of room they can have in this draft class as well.

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>That's a word I've used a lot, redundancy. So let's

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and get into it. Then, Who's who's the

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>best separator in this class? Yeah? I think the best

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 1>separator It's easy. It's DeVante Smith, because when you break

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>it down by look, I actually I think folks if

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 1>they do go to Reception Perception and they subscribe and

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>they see the rookie data that's going to be hitting

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the site on Monday morning, uh, it's it's they're gonna

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>look at it and they're gonna see. Look, Jalen Waddle

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>is really high in terms of success rate verse man coverage.

0:14:57.440 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 1>He's right up there. But when you look at success

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>rate a lost the route tree across a press coverage

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>and man coverage, you're looking at DeVante Smith is a

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 1>guy that just knows how to get open. And I

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 1>we can talk more about Smith and and the you know,

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the weight concerns, the b M I concerns and all

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that and and sort of how you reconcile that when

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about him as a prospect. But I think

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>in terms of just best separator, there's a lot of

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>really good separators that I really like in this class,

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>but I think Smith does take the cake there. Yeah,

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you mentioned that. We I was expecting a

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>different direction, you know, the guy that everyone builds as

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a top receiver. But I'm with you on Davante Smith.

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure, we'll get to that guy here in just

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>a second. But who is the best yards after catch?

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Is it possibly Smith's teammate there at Alabama? This is interesting,

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>right because this is another again, this is a class

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 1>where I not only do I like a lot of

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 1>these guys as separators, I also think there's some really

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>good yards after catch threat players. Um you know, I

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>think of a player like Elijah Moore from Old Miss.

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>He's he's there as well. Uh you mentioned Jalen Waddles

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>A good a good a good bet there too. Maybe

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>not from the physicality standpoint where and it's kind of like,

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>do you want to talk about yards after catch from

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>from just a literally piling up yards after the catch?

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Because Wattle can do that in bunches. But if you're

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about like physical guys that break tackles, and this

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>is just a personal um like a personal bias, those

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>are the players. Because I do chart like how often

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>do you break one tackle, two tackles, get down on

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>first contact, everything like that. I do chart that as

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>well interception perceptions. So I end up I feel like

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>preferring those guys that break tackles with physicality and Jamaar Chase,

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>who is, you know, the consensus top receiver. He's really

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>underrated in that yards after catch away that he That's

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of why he's a tough player to find a

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>comparison for. I know, I've seen Davantae Adams, I've seen

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 1>um like a faster an Kin Bolden from my buddy

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jeremiah from the NFL Network. But the one I

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of landed on with him his early career Larry

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Fitzgerald because Fitzgerald was so good, Um we think of

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>him now is this big slot receiver, almost like a

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>tight end type of player. But Jamar Chase, I think

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 1>fits into that early career fits when he was absolutely

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 1>dominant in some of those Kurt Warner offenses for the

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Arizona Cardinals. But I said all that, Uh, the guy

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give it to though the best yards after

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 1>catching to the breaking tackles, for physicality, and people don't

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>think of this guy in this way, but it's for

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Shod Bateman from Minnesota. I love him as a separator.

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I love him as a contestant catch receiver. I think

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>his twenty nineteen film, which is the film that I

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>decided to go back and chart because I think people

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 1>don't really know this, but he was dealing. He actually

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 1>had COVID and had a rough battle with it and

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:30.879
<v Speaker 1>like lost a bunch of weight and just wasn't himself.

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 1>And he's playing in the slot after being an outside

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 1>X receiver in twenty nine. His twenty nineteen film, I

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>think is up there with Jamaar Chase, is up there

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>with Davonte Smith in terms of the best in the class.

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna give it to Bateman because I think

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>he is really underrated and how good he is after

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:51.919
<v Speaker 1>the catch. My good my good friend Matt Walman, who

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>writes the Rookie Scouting Portfolio, compared him to like pre

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 1>route that this is my same comparison for Bateman is

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Keenan Allen, like Justin Jeffers and that type of player.

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 1>But post catch, he's almost like Cordero Patterson, which like,

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to be Cordero Patterson runner rounds right,

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 1>because he's he's like a running back up at this point,

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:11.400
<v Speaker 1>but he's an He's not even awesome after catcher, which

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>why one of the best kick returners in NFL history.

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Now you mentioned Jamar Chase. The physicality of the Yak

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and you see that in the way he gets off

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of the release, off the line, the way he's just

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>so physical, so that that checks out Rashaan Bateman's twenty

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:26.159
<v Speaker 1>nineteen tape. I'm glad you mentioned that because I always

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>got confused watching him when number thirteen that switched the

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:30.879
<v Speaker 1>number zero. That always threw me off for some reason.

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, that's a great note about about having COVID

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:35.199
<v Speaker 1>and that's something you don't think about, and you know

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:37.679
<v Speaker 1>that's it's a much bigger deal. I think people let

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>on about so great stuff there, Matt, how about you

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>might have covered this again already, but the best contested

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>catch receiver in this class, Yeah, I'm almost tempted to

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 1>be a contrarian and give it to Davante Smith because

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:53.159
<v Speaker 1>I think the funny part about him is, you know,

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 1>he's a small guy, right, Everyone's worried about the uh,

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the size and the b of mine everything, but like

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>you watch him play, like he wins, He boxes out

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:05.399
<v Speaker 1>wins and contested catches against SEC defenders down the field

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and the short area, intermediate like wherever you want. Um.

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>He plays with a ton of physicality. But I'm gonna

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 1>go with consensus here and I'm gonna give it to

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Jamaar Chase. I think he is the best fifty fifty

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:18.199
<v Speaker 1>ball receiver in this draft class, not just because he wins,

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 1>but he gets a lot of those contested catches because

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 1>he plays so much downfield. UM, I definitely have some

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:26.919
<v Speaker 1>questions about Chase as a as an intermediate level separator.

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I think he can run slants. I think he can

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>run some of those shorter patterns, but you know, some

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>of the some of the more you know, the curls,

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:34.639
<v Speaker 1>the digs that out, stuff like that more in that

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 1>intermediate range. Got some questions there, But he's such a

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:41.120
<v Speaker 1>good downfield receiver and I love the like the idea

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:43.239
<v Speaker 1>of him running downfield routes with how good he is

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 1>as a contested catch treat as well. You had mentioned

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>will full Or kind of playing that exposition role and

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 1>filling in for DeAndre Hopkins and doing the whole entire

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:52.879
<v Speaker 1>route tree, the whole game from that position. And you know,

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:55.120
<v Speaker 1>going back to what coach Flores talks about all the time,

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 1>they like to have guys that play multiple positions and

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 1>that's not just restrictive to the defensive side of the football,

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>like Davanta Parker kicks inside and play slot a lot.

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 1>People people don't realize that because of his size and

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the downfield prowess, but he plays slot. He gets open

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 1>at that position quite frequently. And so you know, Lynn

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Boone is a slot guy. Jachem Grant does a little

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>bit of both inside outside. Uh. You know, we've talked

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 1>about DeVante Parker. He might be more of a traditional

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>X receiver who does kick inside sometimes. So taking all

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:22.959
<v Speaker 1>of that into account, you know, I guess this might

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 1>be a grouping question here. I want to know about

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>who's the best inside, who's the best outside, and who's

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the best combination of both in this draft class. I

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 1>love that's a fantastic point about positional versatility of wide receivers.

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>It's one thing that um, I probably didn't take into

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:42.920
<v Speaker 1>account enough about in reception perception in the early days

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 1>of you know, I've been doing this now for seven

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:47.120
<v Speaker 1>NFL seasons, so I like to say a lot on

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>on podcasts, and it shows that, like I probably made

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>statements based on reception perception data, you know, three or

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>four years ago, that I would never say now because

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:59.159
<v Speaker 1>that's just the benefit of more data, more context. Like

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 1>at this point I have three NFL players in the database,

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Like I pretty much know what the data is telling us,

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, but at different times during the charting process,

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I didn't always know that. And one thing I think

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 1>is key is where players lineup can often dictate the

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:16.880
<v Speaker 1>results of their route metrics, of their success rate verse

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 1>coverage metrics, or on the other hand, you know, for

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 1>a player, I always bring it to back to like Jujus,

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Miss Schuster, Cooper Cup, Like, those guys don't win at

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 1>a very high rate against man or press coverage, but

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 1>who cares Because they are those big slot receivers. They

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:34.119
<v Speaker 1>do so often line up against smaller corners on the

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:37.679
<v Speaker 1>inside or or even linebackers in zone coverage. Like, if

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>those guys can beast against z own coverage, I'm not

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>too worried about the fact that they can't get off pressed.

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>So I do love a guy though, that can play

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>all three positions, the X, the flank or the slot,

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>what have you. And I think there's a lot of

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:51.880
<v Speaker 1>like inside outside guys in this class. There's so many

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 1>players that are are slot receivers. Like I mentioned Elijah

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>More earlier, I think he might be the best pure

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:02.199
<v Speaker 1>slot receiver I know Jalen Waddle again, he lined up

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 1>a ton of the slot for Alabama. I think he

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>can play outside him a little more confident that he

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:08.679
<v Speaker 1>can be an outside receiver for Elijah More. He just

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:11.880
<v Speaker 1>so rarely faith press coverage. Only six point five percent

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 1>of his sampled routes and reception reception came against press.

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>That's incredibly low. That's nothing, and he's a great separator.

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:22.120
<v Speaker 1>But I think he could probably fit into that Doug Baldwin,

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:26.159
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Lockett mold of players. Honestly, sometimes I know this

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>is like wide receiver blasphemy, but sometimes there are some

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>shades of Antonio Brown, like early career Antonio Brown, the

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>way he transition like plucks the ball out of the

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 1>air and transitioned to yards after catch, stra at the

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 1>way that he uh he wins with foot quickness, at

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the break point of his routes. There are definitely some

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>shades of Antonio Brown to Elijah Moore's games. So maybe

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>he could be an outside receiver. But I think from

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>just a pure slot perspective, he's the best in a class.

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:54.640
<v Speaker 1>To me. I think if you're looking at outside separation,

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:57.879
<v Speaker 1>uh it is Davante Smith. But I think prototype wise,

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I think you have to give it to Rashad Bateman there, uh,

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>simply because you know he's again he has played both.

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 1>So maybe he's actually the answer to the best inside

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 1>outside designation. But he's just so it was so much

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>more effective as an outside vertical receiver. I tend to

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 1>think he has the upside to be a traditional X

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that can play on the outside. And sure it's smart

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 1>to give your top receiver of the route from the

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 1>slot because it's just so much easier throwing to the

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:28.440
<v Speaker 1>slot than it is, you know, the tight windows outside.

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>So I think he's probably the answer there in terms

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>of outside separator. And I actually think to Mark Chase

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 1>could be a guy that could could do both. Could

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>could maybe, like I said, Larry Fitzgerald, maybe transition from

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:41.199
<v Speaker 1>he was a pure X receiver in college, faced a

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:44.120
<v Speaker 1>ton of press based a ton of hard man coverage,

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's why you see so many of those contested

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 1>passes for him. But at the same time, I think

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>in the pros, maybe in that Larry Fitzgerald mold, the

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Michael Thomas mold, he could become an inside outside guy

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 1>like that. I actually think that might be the best

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:58.880
<v Speaker 1>way to optimally use him as a pro Just real

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>quick before I move on to a topic I'm really

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:03.479
<v Speaker 1>excited to ask you about here. You mentioned Elijah More.

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:05.159
<v Speaker 1>I can see the excitement both in your voice and

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 1>your face about the prospect of that. Love this guy.

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:10.160
<v Speaker 1>He's great, I am. I put a threat up about

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>him like two weeks ago. I just I can't the

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:14.239
<v Speaker 1>quickness and after the catch and the contesting. I mean,

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:16.159
<v Speaker 1>it's all, it's all there. It's fun to watch. But

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:18.919
<v Speaker 1>when you consider a guy that maybe is restrictive, not

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 1>completely restrictive inside, but more so than other prospects. Like,

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:24.360
<v Speaker 1>what's the value of that in the draft, because I'm

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:27.120
<v Speaker 1>thinking pick eighteen might be too high for that, pick

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty six, maybe the range we pick fifty for the Dolphins,

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Like where does that typical value come off the board? Yeah,

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 1>in in some way, we've gotten so far to the

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 1>point with slot receivers that they've essentially replaced the fullback

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>as the starter or like the the eleventh starter on

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a football team, Like everybody lives in eleven personnel for

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the most part. Um, like you want to have that

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>really good slot receiver. So but I also think we

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>developed so much of the slot receiver that there's different

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>types of guys, you know, the big slots in terms

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 1>of the Juju Cooper Cup that I mentioned earlier. They're

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 1>different from what I like to call the pop gun

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>slot receivers, like a Jamison Crowd or even like a

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Cole Beasley up there in Buffalo, you know inside the

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 1>A f C s there. Those are two examples of

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that type player. And then I think of guys that

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 1>are still smaller but true vertical weapons from the slot,

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and I think that fits that Tyler Lockett, Doug Baldwin

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>mold of players. They're they're always might go to examples there.

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I think Adam Feeland has been that player at different

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:27.920
<v Speaker 1>times in his career too. He's sort of a mix

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>of that big slot but also the vertical weapon from

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the slot as well. I think those guys that third

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:36.119
<v Speaker 1>group there, the vertical weapons from the slot to lock It,

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the Baldwin, the the Adam Delon guys, I think there's

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:45.880
<v Speaker 1>enough tactical value to constect consider them just as good

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:48.360
<v Speaker 1>as having a good outside receiver. Like all of those

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:50.440
<v Speaker 1>guys too. All three of those players I mentioned can

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:52.679
<v Speaker 1>play and function outside. You know, They're not like a

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Jamison crowded, like you have to use a Jamison crowd

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>on the slot. I do think Elijah More because he's

0:25:57.280 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>just such a good separator. I think he can hack

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 1>it out side as a flanker, just like I think

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:04.639
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Lockett or Adam Delon can hack it outside as

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>as a flanker as well. So I don't think there's

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:10.120
<v Speaker 1>a huge gap between a really good first round pick

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:12.160
<v Speaker 1>at at an outside receiver and a really good first

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>round pick in those vertical weapons slot receivers. I think

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the eight teen range is fine there. It's just about

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:21.679
<v Speaker 1>how much do you want to value the wide receiver

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 1>position as as a whole, because you know this is

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 1>a whole. Another conversation we can have. This position is

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>so so damn deep at this point. Like was the

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:33.719
<v Speaker 1>year that wide receiver was supposed to be the strength

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:37.119
<v Speaker 1>of the of the draft. It's sort of that again

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:41.400
<v Speaker 1>this year. But even like twenty nineteen, those classes were

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 1>considered like weak wide receiver drafts. But like the stars

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 1>of today and tomorrow came out of those classes. You

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:51.400
<v Speaker 1>took my Calvin Ridley, Terry McLaurin, a J Brown, DK Metcalf,

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>like those guys came out those years and and like

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>just took the wide receiver position when we weren't expecting it,

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:00.440
<v Speaker 1>took it to a whole another level. I'm shaking my

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 1>head because that's ridiculous. I go back to Daniel Jeremiah's advice,

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:05.880
<v Speaker 1>go go play corner man, Go play cornerback. You'll you'll

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>have a better chance, a better path to to get

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 1>in that big pay day someday. Uh, Matt Harmon, y'all,

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 1>who's sports and the reception perception just fantastic stuff there.

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>And you mentioned this off air before we got on

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the podcast here. You worked with next Gen Stats and

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 1>incorporated that stuff into your work at NFL dot com

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 1>when you were previously there. And you know, alternative data

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>has always been an attractive thank to me obviously with

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the charting and whatnot. And I think in any sport

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:31.159
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be a little bit of initial pause with

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:34.679
<v Speaker 1>regards to you know, possible new procedure, new ways of thinking.

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:37.440
<v Speaker 1>But I've also heard the lack of in person type

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 1>of scouting processes, you know, during this pandemic has helped

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 1>introduce some new ways of looking at players at the

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 1>very least increased it to the use of the pre

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 1>pandemic days. So how much have you incorporated GPS and

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>player tracking into your scouting process? And our teams using

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:56.680
<v Speaker 1>that stuff pretty heavily as well. I think they're they're

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 1>really tempted to get it to a point where teams

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:02.359
<v Speaker 1>want to use it much more than they were. Like

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you, man, I was at the NFL and

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:06.919
<v Speaker 1>summer two thousand and fifteen, that's when I started. That's

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 1>when I moved out here to l A for that job.

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the next gen guys, God bless him,

0:28:12.320 --> 0:28:16.159
<v Speaker 1>like gave this big presentation to a room full of

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>like me and and by the way, I'm sitting there

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>like what what the hell am I doing? You know,

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:25.159
<v Speaker 1>like like Bucky Brooks and a bunch of like former

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 1>players are are in there like getting this, getting this presentation,

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and everybody's just kind of like no, not like not interested,

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 1>not and like not interested in watching these like little

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 1>dots move on the field or how fast everyone's going. Meanwhile,

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, goofball, like low level editor that I was then,

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I was like very interested in this, you know, Like

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 1>so I have always had a fascination to it, and and

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I've always like basically from then on, like tried to

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>work with next gend as much as possible. Like I said,

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not there anymore, so I'm not really doing this

0:28:57.360 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 1>work at this point. But you know, back then, I

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 1>was in it's infancy in two thousand fifteen. I think

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 1>you're right, it was a very like I don't know

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>about all that type of situation. But and I think

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 1>they've gotten better and better about putting out metrics that

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 1>that really tell the story of the game. And I

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 1>think that's the biggest thing for me with with like

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>media facing analytics, it's all about and even like reception perception, right,

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:22.959
<v Speaker 1>there's there's a a deeper degree of that because I'm

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>actually like telling you what went on in on a game, right,

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm watching an absolutely absurd amount of routes. Nobody

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 1>should do this, like watching an absurd amount of game film,

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a serve amount of routes to tell you what happened

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 1>in the game. And I think that's the biggest thing

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 1>when like with analytics and data, it can they can

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 1>tell you better than almost anything else, like what happened

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>in a game, But you still need you know, folks

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 1>like yourself or you know, maybe me or whatever, like

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>someone to tell you why, like why this happened this way?

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 1>And so that was always my philosophy with the n

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 1>GS and and next gen tracking data. But on the

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 1>team side of it, I think the speed of the

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 1>game is something they're really trying to hone down on.

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've heard Daniel Jeremiah like there's been DJs

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 1>me like a couple of coffee or something. We've name

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>dropped him like fifty times here, but um, you know

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I've heard him talk about like basically teams essentially want

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 1>to just throw out the forty at some point and

0:30:14.360 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 1>only focus on that GPS data. And you know, I

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of people used to raise their

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 1>eyebrows at it because like what do I care that

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Tyreek Kill ran twenty three miles per hour and you

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 1>know Stefan Diggs ran twenty two miles per hour at

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 1>their top speed when yeah, they're just in the open field.

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 1>But if you can break it down by you know,

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 1>against this coverage on this third down play when he's

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>running this route like that can be really helpful and

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 1>scouting for sure, Yeah, when the balls in the air,

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 1>how fast is here moving? Right? Like? How much can

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 1>you separate once the ball has left the quarterback's hand.

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 1>That's it's so fascinating to me. How you know we

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>have this very not archaic way because tape still was king,

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, but to introduce the analytics and to really

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 1>just hone in on those things, it's it's so cool

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 1>to me, and I'm excited about the possible future of

0:30:57.080 --> 0:30:59.239
<v Speaker 1>what the NFL has in that. So Matt on this

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 1>podcast asked every positional expert. You're my second to last

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>interview here, going position by a position here. We have

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 1>running backs coming up later this week. Uh, I've been

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 1>asking to separate the classes by tears, and I think

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I probably have a good idea for who your top

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 1>tier is, um, you know where they go off the board,

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 1>But where's that drop off in terms of who's in

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that second tier? Maybe Rashaw Bateman's in that first tier

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 1>for you. Can you go through your first couple of

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 1>tiers for us and how you separate those two. Yeah,

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I do think Rashade Bateman is in that top tier.

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the first tier is Davante Smith, Jamar Chase,

0:31:31.360 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Waddle, and Rashad Bateman is in that tier. You know,

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and you could flip those guys around in terms of

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 1>rankings whatever. I think that next tier, and I'm honestly

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I am tempted to put Elijah More in that first tier.

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 1>You could tell like the excitement that I talked about

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 1>this guy with, but simply because of the questions about

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 1>how much like slot is he going to play or

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>how much like we just such limited exposure of him

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 1>against press coverage and and he's he's good against press

0:31:56.920 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>when he does face it, but there's just you know,

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:02.240
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be some transition questions there. I'll probably put

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 1>him at the very very top of that second tier.

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 1>And the second tier of players is interesting. Uh Dammy Brown,

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Dammy Brown from u n C. I've probably screwing his

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 1>first name up. I actually don't think I've ever actually

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 1>said it out loud. Um, Like, yeah, he's He's a

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 1>player from UNC that I really like in a way

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that like, you know what we're talking about will Fuller,

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 1>like what people thought he was going to be coming

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 1>into the NFL. You know, just a vertical threat, a

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 1>guy that probably can't really play X receiver but and

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:33.680
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna drop a lot of passes. But he's gonna

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 1>make big plays down the field. I like Brown and

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of that. Like I said, what people thought will

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 1>full of the haters, what the haters thought will Fuller

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 1>was going to be. I think Brown can actually be

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that player where he makes some mistakes, he has some drops,

0:32:45.920 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really always win in the contested game, but man,

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 1>he gets downfield. He's tough, he's physical, and I think

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 1>he has some upside to be a starting player in

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. Uh Derres Marshall. He's another guy in that

0:32:57.000 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>second tier, another player that I think can be that

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I as well. So it's it's an interesting group when

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 1>you get into that second tier of players, and then

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:09.400
<v Speaker 1>it comes down to, like those four guys into the

0:33:09.400 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 1>first year, I think you can figure it out, like

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 1>any team can find a way to deploy those guys

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and they'll be good pros. The next year is where

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna come down to fit a scheme, quarterback, all

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 1>of that type of stuff, or whether how much success

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna find even if they always do. Like I said,

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 1>you can isolate them and um, their individual performance can

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 1>be great in reception perception, but if you want to

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 1>find the best fit for them, I do think they're

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 1>it's going to sort of come down to um, come

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 1>down to that fit. Tyland Wallace is another guy too.

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I didn't mention him. He's a player that I think

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:42.959
<v Speaker 1>his best days might have not been his most recent season,

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 1>but I really do like his ability as a separator

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and as a downfield guy as well. I was really

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 1>bummed out when he got injured back in nineteen. Like

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, he was having a hell of a season

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>that year and winds up getting hurt. So, yeah, he's

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a he's a good looking receiver. You mentioned something there

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 1>about Elijah More maybe some of the perception about being,

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:00.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of pigeonholed kind of reminds me of

0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 1>rondel Moore a little bit because he didn't have it

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 1>on tape and didn't wasn't asked to be a lot

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:08.279
<v Speaker 1>of the intermediate and vertical stuff. But he just broke

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:10.799
<v Speaker 1>so many tackles before the lastcrimage that they didn't have

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to have him do that. So that's a good way

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to look at to like not this. Don't look at

0:34:14.480 --> 0:34:16.239
<v Speaker 1>a guy's tape of college and say he can't do

0:34:16.280 --> 0:34:18.279
<v Speaker 1>it because he wasn't asked to do. It's a very

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:21.360
<v Speaker 1>interesting dynamic there. So let's say Miami winds up with

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Jamar Chase or Davonte Smith or Jalen Waddle or Rashon Babin,

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:27.400
<v Speaker 1>whoever it might be. Let's say they get one of

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 1>those guys early and they circle back on day three

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and maybe you go more fit here with two in

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the offense and the quick rhythm game. Who do you

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 1>like as a possible day three fit with Miami at

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the receiver position? Yeah, I think. I don't know how

0:34:41.640 --> 0:34:43.239
<v Speaker 1>you feel about this with two of but I thought

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 1>coming into the NFL, he was very much like a timing,

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 1>anticipatory passer, you know, in that sort of Drew Brees

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:53.320
<v Speaker 1>mold Um. I actually talked to to her recently and

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 1>like made that comparison. I can tell I al right,

0:34:57.120 --> 0:34:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you was like, that's a little aggressive.

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:01.359
<v Speaker 1>I was like, come on, man, I'm trying to ip

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 1>up here, right. Um. I think though, that, like he

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:06.759
<v Speaker 1>that was what was interesting at first, Like when they

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 1>were coming into this receiver corps last year, you know,

0:35:09.640 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 1>they were really like more Fitzpatrick guys, right, like the

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>big contested receivers, DeVante Parker, Preston Williams, those guys are

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:18.960
<v Speaker 1>not by any means great separators, but they are those

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 1>great receivers. It was just like kind of an interesting

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:26.479
<v Speaker 1>fit um there if you're looking at if you're looking

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 1>at just again stylistically, what what I think to needs.

0:35:29.920 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think all of these guys can be that

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:35.279
<v Speaker 1>from that tier one can be that type of stylistic

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 1>fit with two. You know, someone that gets clean separation,

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:41.200
<v Speaker 1>can win on in breaking routes, can play a lot

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 1>of different positions. I think those are fits there too,

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:47.000
<v Speaker 1>um just in terms of like more Day three guys

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that could fit into that quick separation way, you know

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that might not have the same upside I look at

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:55.920
<v Speaker 1>i'man Ross st Brown from USC. He might be a

0:35:56.000 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Day two guy. He might be an early Day three

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:00.319
<v Speaker 1>player as well. There doesn't seem to be a ton

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 1>of buzz on him, but I could see him fitting

0:36:02.640 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 1>into sort of that pure slot receiver mold that like

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:10.359
<v Speaker 1>gets that quick inside outside um free release and could

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:12.080
<v Speaker 1>win in his routes that way. He's a player that

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I would at least keep an eye on. Um also,

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:17.479
<v Speaker 1>uh MARII Rodgers, I don't know if he's you know, again,

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:19.400
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to say where these guys are gonna go,

0:36:19.440 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>but he's another player that could go in the in

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the third round, in the fourth round. They could also

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 1>be that type of separator they can give, you know, Miami,

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:29.360
<v Speaker 1>a guy that they're not gonna funnel it ton of

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:32.120
<v Speaker 1>targets to, especially if they pick a player in the

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:34.800
<v Speaker 1>first round and they also have Devonte Parker and Will Fuller,

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:37.640
<v Speaker 1>but someone to add some more bodies to that room.

0:36:37.680 --> 0:36:39.920
<v Speaker 1>And then if you're looking at like do we want

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 1>another big play type of type of guy, I would

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:45.839
<v Speaker 1>look at James Darton as well. He or Jalen Darton.

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:48.719
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me, He's a guy that could win vertically. He's

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a smaller player. I know that Miami has a ton

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of like small gadgety type of receivers, but if you're

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:55.759
<v Speaker 1>looking for more speed, he's a guy to look at

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 1>as well. We have a ton of receivers in general

0:36:57.560 --> 0:36:59.880
<v Speaker 1>twelve and total right now, so they're all over the place.

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I know they suddenly just like got you know my guy,

0:37:02.640 --> 0:37:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Albert Wilson. I've always liked Albert Wilson. He's he's coming

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:06.920
<v Speaker 1>back after the opt out, like they had like a

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>ton of guys like fluction back into the room there,

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Albert Wilson, Alan Heards coming back. People forget about Lynn Bowed,

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and people forget about Malcolm Perry last year was a

0:37:14.040 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 1>fun player, you know, coming out of the draft process.

0:37:16.239 --> 0:37:17.799
<v Speaker 1>And I have to tell my audience I did not

0:37:17.880 --> 0:37:20.399
<v Speaker 1>grease Matt before this podcast because Matt, you just talked

0:37:20.400 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 1>about something that I feel like I've been trying to

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:25.440
<v Speaker 1>convince people of for a long time about replicating this

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 1>type of speed athletic you know, quick receivers with Towah,

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and I've had a hard I've kind of met some

0:37:30.880 --> 0:37:32.920
<v Speaker 1>resistance on that point as far as we'll just get

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:35.759
<v Speaker 1>him good receivers. No, there's there's stylistically, some things you

0:37:35.760 --> 0:37:38.839
<v Speaker 1>can do to really, you know, magnify his strength. So

0:37:39.120 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate you following along there. This is the first

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 1>time we've ever talked, so I did not grease on

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that point. I do want to bring it home with

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:47.160
<v Speaker 1>this though. But it's so true though, just just to

0:37:47.200 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 1>hammer on on that since since since we brought it

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:53.040
<v Speaker 1>up like this probably happened to be about three or

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 1>three years ago. So like doing reception perception, and you know,

0:37:57.200 --> 0:37:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'm an idiot. I didn't think about this

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 1>until then. But like I'm spending so much time with

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:05.200
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers, you're inherently spending so much time with quarterbacks,

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think you start to learn a lot about

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:12.360
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback based on the wide receivers that they thrive with. Um.

0:38:12.440 --> 0:38:14.680
<v Speaker 1>And I bring it back to Cooper Cup again, like

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Jared Goff just could would kind of go on the

0:38:17.160 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 1>fritz whenever Cooper Cup was out of the lineup, And

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:22.319
<v Speaker 1>I think it's clearly because Jared Goff wants to see

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:25.320
<v Speaker 1>this guy open, wide open against zone coverage in the

0:38:25.320 --> 0:38:26.839
<v Speaker 1>middle of the field and hit him on those lay

0:38:26.920 --> 0:38:29.360
<v Speaker 1>up throws over and over and over again. UM. I

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:32.440
<v Speaker 1>bring it to you know, Carolina in twenty nineteen, they

0:38:32.440 --> 0:38:35.320
<v Speaker 1>had Curtis Samuel as a vertical threat that just the

0:38:35.400 --> 0:38:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Alon I couldn't get that guy the ball. But

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:40.640
<v Speaker 1>DJ Moore running thirty five slants and digs per game

0:38:40.800 --> 0:38:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and on those like more rhythm lay up routes, Kyle

0:38:45.040 --> 0:38:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Allen was working well with Dj Moore. In a real

0:38:47.719 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 1>throwback example that everybody probably forgets about, Michael Crabtree. This

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:55.799
<v Speaker 1>is one of like reception perceptions early backpaths, like in

0:38:55.840 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the first year of doing this full fully full season

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:02.080
<v Speaker 1>charting and do that, and fourteen, you know, Michael Crabtree

0:39:02.160 --> 0:39:05.680
<v Speaker 1>was coming from the San Francisco forty Niners to the

0:39:05.719 --> 0:39:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Oakland Raiders. People basically left Crabtree for dead on that

0:39:08.600 --> 0:39:11.919
<v Speaker 1>free agent market. Um. But what reception perception was showing

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:13.719
<v Speaker 1>was like, this is a guy that still runs those

0:39:13.840 --> 0:39:17.880
<v Speaker 1>timing and rhythm routes really well, sort of in the

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:19.840
<v Speaker 1>same mold of what I would love to see the

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:22.279
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins get for to a guy that can win. And

0:39:22.280 --> 0:39:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I think even Jamaar Chase, like I've seen people like

0:39:24.960 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Nate Tye from The Athletic Football Show compare Jamar Chase

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to Michael Crabtree, and I think, you know, Larry Fitgerald

0:39:30.400 --> 0:39:33.600
<v Speaker 1>micro Crabtree. There's some connective tissue there as well, but

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:35.880
<v Speaker 1>he runs those timing and rhythm routes well. That was

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:37.760
<v Speaker 1>just not a good fit with the player that Colin

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Kaepernick had become at that point in his career. He

0:39:40.960 --> 0:39:42.520
<v Speaker 1>was very much more of a see it, throw at

0:39:42.520 --> 0:39:44.560
<v Speaker 1>guy that could, like he could rifle that ball to

0:39:44.640 --> 0:39:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to an Kwan Bolden, no problem, because like an Kwan

0:39:47.080 --> 0:39:48.839
<v Speaker 1>Bolden doesn't need to be open to catch the ball right.

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:53.239
<v Speaker 1>But when going from the player Kaepernick had become to

0:39:53.880 --> 0:39:58.239
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr, who is like not nearly the type of

0:39:58.600 --> 0:40:01.600
<v Speaker 1>physical talent that Colin Kaepernick buzz but was a much

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:05.080
<v Speaker 1>more timing based thrower. Um. You know, and Derek car

0:40:05.120 --> 0:40:06.359
<v Speaker 1>has got a lot of flaws, but I think one

0:40:06.400 --> 0:40:08.759
<v Speaker 1>of his best traits is that he does feel the

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:11.359
<v Speaker 1>timing and the rhythm of a play very well. Um

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:13.839
<v Speaker 1>and knows where ain't smart, like knows when things are

0:40:13.880 --> 0:40:16.000
<v Speaker 1>coming open. Crabtree had a couple of good years with

0:40:16.040 --> 0:40:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Oakland before eventually moving on as well. You know, So

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:21.640
<v Speaker 1>this is it's so key when you're scouting wide receivers,

0:40:21.840 --> 0:40:23.960
<v Speaker 1>when you're trying to find out their best fit. I

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:26.239
<v Speaker 1>do think reception perception is a good tool for that

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:28.960
<v Speaker 1>as well, because it matters so much. You know, you

0:40:28.960 --> 0:40:31.080
<v Speaker 1>could be a good wide receiver and even be a

0:40:31.080 --> 0:40:33.239
<v Speaker 1>productive wide receiver and like even be playing with a

0:40:33.280 --> 0:40:37.040
<v Speaker 1>good quarterback, but if the stylistic fit is not there,

0:40:37.520 --> 0:40:39.919
<v Speaker 1>it's just not going to happen the way people wanted to. Yeah,

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that chemistry takes you know, you can kind of develop

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:43.960
<v Speaker 1>quickly when you have that that fit and maybe does

0:40:44.080 --> 0:40:45.759
<v Speaker 1>never develop so you don't have that type of fit.

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:48.080
<v Speaker 1>And with this draft, like you mentioned, hopefully plenty of

0:40:48.120 --> 0:40:50.880
<v Speaker 1>options for all kinds of styles with this receiver class.

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:52.800
<v Speaker 1>But I want to finish up talking about one player

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:55.279
<v Speaker 1>who's not a receiver, but he kind of is. And

0:40:55.360 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you and I talked about an off air about how

0:40:57.040 --> 0:40:59.560
<v Speaker 1>good this guy is, and everyone's got to going, you know,

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:02.560
<v Speaker 1>first player off the board, first non quarterback off the board,

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Pitts. And you know I've talked about how you

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:08.040
<v Speaker 1>can add him to the to the running game, and

0:41:08.040 --> 0:41:10.120
<v Speaker 1>it gives you an extra gap if you have twelve personnel,

0:41:10.160 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 1>two more gaps to your running game, and then the

0:41:12.040 --> 0:41:13.719
<v Speaker 1>defense has to make a decision do we stay in

0:41:13.760 --> 0:41:15.640
<v Speaker 1>base because then I can flex him in, GESICKI out,

0:41:15.640 --> 0:41:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and all of a sudden, I've got a linebacker on

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:19.759
<v Speaker 1>two basically wide receivers, or if they want to go

0:41:19.880 --> 0:41:22.480
<v Speaker 1>six defensive backs and go dime. Now I've got forty

0:41:22.480 --> 0:41:25.040
<v Speaker 1>pounds on your dB in the running game. So it's

0:41:25.080 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a fun balance talk about. I want to hear you

0:41:27.080 --> 0:41:28.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about Kyle Pitts where he should go off the

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:32.759
<v Speaker 1>board and is he really that true matchup, dynamic, game

0:41:32.880 --> 0:41:35.920
<v Speaker 1>changing piece that so many people think he is. Yeah,

0:41:36.000 --> 0:41:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, there's a ton of skepticism about

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:41.080
<v Speaker 1>taking a tight end that high because the history of

0:41:41.120 --> 0:41:44.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not great. Um, you know, but Kyle Pitts is

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 1>not Eric Ebron, like Kyle Pitts is not t J. Hopkinson,

0:41:47.239 --> 0:41:50.080
<v Speaker 1>like if you flex, Hawkins is a pretty decent player.

0:41:50.560 --> 0:41:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Ebron has even had his moments. But like if you

0:41:52.560 --> 0:41:56.440
<v Speaker 1>flex uh t Ja Hockinson like out wide or something,

0:41:56.440 --> 0:41:58.719
<v Speaker 1>an X receiver like a cornerback is gonna laugh in

0:41:58.760 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 1>your face because like, sure he's bigger than him, but

0:42:01.000 --> 0:42:03.080
<v Speaker 1>he's a lot slower. Kyle Pitts is not that guy.

0:42:03.120 --> 0:42:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Like Kyle Pitts can line up everywhere. As you mentioned,

0:42:05.800 --> 0:42:07.719
<v Speaker 1>he might be one of the better receivers in the

0:42:07.760 --> 0:42:09.759
<v Speaker 1>draft class if he was just a wide receiver. But

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I think he presents so much more tactical value as

0:42:12.000 --> 0:42:14.600
<v Speaker 1>that tight end. And I love the fit with Miami.

0:42:14.640 --> 0:42:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't know if he's gonna get there,

0:42:16.040 --> 0:42:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Like he might go and pick four, he might go

0:42:17.360 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and pick five. He really is that good. But if

0:42:19.640 --> 0:42:21.400
<v Speaker 1>he's sitting there staring at you know, staring him in

0:42:21.440 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the face at six, I would really think long and

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:27.120
<v Speaker 1>hard about going with pits there, even though I like

0:42:27.200 --> 0:42:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Jamar Chase, I like Themont Smith, like Jillen Waddle, like

0:42:29.440 --> 0:42:31.440
<v Speaker 1>all these receivers that are probably going going to go

0:42:31.480 --> 0:42:32.840
<v Speaker 1>in the top half of the first round in the

0:42:32.880 --> 0:42:35.959
<v Speaker 1>NFL Draft. I think we talked about it like wide

0:42:35.960 --> 0:42:38.399
<v Speaker 1>receivers deep you know, you can find an impact wide

0:42:38.440 --> 0:42:40.520
<v Speaker 1>receiver and you already have like two guys. I think

0:42:40.560 --> 0:42:43.279
<v Speaker 1>Parker and Fuller is a there. There's not a lot

0:42:43.280 --> 0:42:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of long term stability there because Fuller is only on

0:42:45.560 --> 0:42:47.799
<v Speaker 1>a one year deal. Parker at some point he's gonna

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:49.719
<v Speaker 1>come up as well. There's not a lot of long

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:52.840
<v Speaker 1>term stability there but for one. And I think the

0:42:52.880 --> 0:42:55.839
<v Speaker 1>priority for one is like, at all costs, let's get

0:42:55.880 --> 0:42:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to a go and you know, let's put something around

0:42:58.160 --> 0:43:01.359
<v Speaker 1>him that can work. You got two guys that are

0:43:01.400 --> 0:43:04.800
<v Speaker 1>competent starting receivers, and at eighteen or thirty six or whatever,

0:43:05.480 --> 0:43:07.680
<v Speaker 1>you can come back for some of these second tier

0:43:08.120 --> 0:43:11.239
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers as well. So I would love pittss fit

0:43:11.320 --> 0:43:14.440
<v Speaker 1>in Miami because it's as you mentioned, Yeah, they have Mikeasecki,

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:17.359
<v Speaker 1>and I like Mikeasecki, but number one Mikeasecki is not,

0:43:17.560 --> 0:43:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, a player that would prevent you from taking

0:43:19.960 --> 0:43:22.000
<v Speaker 1>perhaps the best player in the draft. You know, no,

0:43:22.200 --> 0:43:24.120
<v Speaker 1>almost no one is at that level. Like you just

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:26.040
<v Speaker 1>get good players and you figure the rest out later.

0:43:26.280 --> 0:43:27.920
<v Speaker 1>And also, by the way, like if Mike Casseki ever

0:43:27.920 --> 0:43:30.520
<v Speaker 1>had a season where the Dolphins were gonna franchise tag him,

0:43:30.800 --> 0:43:33.279
<v Speaker 1>you bet his representatives are gonna be in that front

0:43:33.320 --> 0:43:35.640
<v Speaker 1>office like like, hey, look at where he lines up.

0:43:35.680 --> 0:43:37.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, look at how any lines up in this lot,

0:43:37.200 --> 0:43:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Like you're probably gonna have to tag this guy's the

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:40.480
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver right like there. You know they're gonna try

0:43:40.520 --> 0:43:42.399
<v Speaker 1>to do that Jimmy Graham things so you can as

0:43:42.440 --> 0:43:45.799
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, the options are limitless. Like I think if

0:43:45.800 --> 0:43:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the like compare what the Dolphins were playing with in

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:52.080
<v Speaker 1>like week fifteen, week fourteen of last season two then

0:43:52.200 --> 0:43:57.719
<v Speaker 1>week one or not sorry, week two, because I gotta gain.

0:43:57.719 --> 0:43:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have to get used to that. That's gonna

0:43:59.120 --> 0:44:00.520
<v Speaker 1>be almost as hard as trying to remember that we

0:44:00.520 --> 0:44:03.720
<v Speaker 1>have a seventeen game uh, and those and those records

0:44:03.719 --> 0:44:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and everything, But think about that Week two of NFL season,

0:44:08.040 --> 0:44:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Like you said, you've got pits and Gasecki as your

0:44:11.840 --> 0:44:15.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, tight ends, but also you put Gasecki

0:44:15.120 --> 0:44:17.239
<v Speaker 1>is that big slot, and then you've got Parker at

0:44:17.440 --> 0:44:20.480
<v Speaker 1>X and Fuller red Z or maybe vice versa. You

0:44:20.520 --> 0:44:24.000
<v Speaker 1>can move those guys around. That is a huge improvement.

0:44:24.280 --> 0:44:26.760
<v Speaker 1>And then again maybe you do have another receiver waiting

0:44:26.760 --> 0:44:29.160
<v Speaker 1>in the wings that you took later on in the

0:44:29.239 --> 0:44:33.200
<v Speaker 1>draft from this very interesting and deep class. Um there's

0:44:33.239 --> 0:44:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of potential there. If I was Miami, I

0:44:35.600 --> 0:44:38.360
<v Speaker 1>think I would just simply from the rarity of not

0:44:38.480 --> 0:44:41.200
<v Speaker 1>just a player like Kyle Pitts, but also the tight

0:44:41.280 --> 0:44:43.360
<v Speaker 1>end position in general is kind of a pain to

0:44:43.360 --> 0:44:46.000
<v Speaker 1>figure out as it is like anyone who plays mantasy football,

0:44:46.000 --> 0:44:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you that is a pain to try

0:44:47.640 --> 0:44:50.239
<v Speaker 1>to find a good tight end out there. Uh, it's

0:44:50.560 --> 0:44:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I would go with Pitts. I think over over some

0:44:52.719 --> 0:44:56.279
<v Speaker 1>of these receivers. May June, July, August, September. We got

0:44:56.320 --> 0:44:58.480
<v Speaker 1>about five months until the start of football season. You've

0:44:58.520 --> 0:45:00.680
<v Speaker 1>got me fired up, Matt. You're talking out that lineup

0:45:00.680 --> 0:45:02.960
<v Speaker 1>at hard Rock Stadium, getting out there and the hundred

0:45:03.000 --> 0:45:05.600
<v Speaker 1>degree weather, hundred percent humidity down here in South Florida.

0:45:05.880 --> 0:45:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait for it. Matt Harmon, y'all who sports

0:45:08.880 --> 0:45:12.040
<v Speaker 1>reception perception. I know you're dropping something big on Monday.

0:45:12.040 --> 0:45:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Where can the people find you on social What are

0:45:13.920 --> 0:45:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you working on promote the work Matt? Yeah, of course

0:45:17.840 --> 0:45:21.080
<v Speaker 1>on social media, Twitter and Instagram at Matt Harmon underscore

0:45:21.120 --> 0:45:23.400
<v Speaker 1>b y B. Don't bother follow him on Instagram unless

0:45:23.400 --> 0:45:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you really like dogs or cooking pictures, So let me

0:45:25.880 --> 0:45:28.360
<v Speaker 1>just stick with Twitter at Matt Harmon. Who doesn't like

0:45:28.400 --> 0:45:31.080
<v Speaker 1>those things? All right? At Matt Harmon underscore b y B.

0:45:31.200 --> 0:45:33.719
<v Speaker 1>On Twitter, use the hashtag reception perception to keep up

0:45:33.719 --> 0:45:36.200
<v Speaker 1>with what's going on there, and reception Perception. Dot com

0:45:36.400 --> 0:45:39.840
<v Speaker 1>is the UH is the u r L is the site. Uh.

0:45:40.200 --> 0:45:45.359
<v Speaker 1>The subscriptions will be available hopefully before Monday, but yeah,

0:45:45.440 --> 0:45:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Monday will be dropping all of the rookie Like some

0:45:48.040 --> 0:45:50.359
<v Speaker 1>of these rookies we talked about today, they're gonna get

0:45:50.480 --> 0:45:52.680
<v Speaker 1>dropped right away. And then before the NFL Draft, the

0:45:52.719 --> 0:45:54.680
<v Speaker 1>rest of the twelve or fifteen guys that I've worked

0:45:54.680 --> 0:45:56.680
<v Speaker 1>on this offseason, those will be up there as well.

0:45:56.840 --> 0:45:58.440
<v Speaker 1>And then in the summer. I mean, Will Fuller is

0:45:58.440 --> 0:46:00.520
<v Speaker 1>already on the site. He's a there because he was

0:46:00.520 --> 0:46:03.160
<v Speaker 1>a free agent, But we're talking about you know, forty

0:46:03.239 --> 0:46:06.240
<v Speaker 1>plus fifty plus NFL players are going to be added

0:46:06.280 --> 0:46:08.799
<v Speaker 1>to the site by the time training camps open in

0:46:08.880 --> 0:46:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the off season. They're just you're you're gonna get like,

0:46:11.200 --> 0:46:13.759
<v Speaker 1>if you're a fan of Reception Perception before this, you're

0:46:13.760 --> 0:46:16.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna get more access than you ever have before to

0:46:16.520 --> 0:46:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the data. Trust me on that. Or if you are

0:46:20.200 --> 0:46:22.080
<v Speaker 1>new to the series, you're gonna get blown away by

0:46:22.080 --> 0:46:24.000
<v Speaker 1>all the information that's about to hit you in the face.

0:46:24.120 --> 0:46:26.440
<v Speaker 1>You're doing yourself a disservice as a football fan if

0:46:26.440 --> 0:46:29.000
<v Speaker 1>you do not use this resource. It's so valuable. Matt.

0:46:29.120 --> 0:46:31.120
<v Speaker 1>We really appreciate your time today. Man, Let's come back

0:46:31.160 --> 0:46:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and do this maybe in training camp and preview this

0:46:33.160 --> 0:46:36.600
<v Speaker 1>receiver room when it is complete. Maybe, Yeah, let's lets

0:46:36.640 --> 0:46:38.560
<v Speaker 1>let's run this all back again, because it's gonna be

0:46:38.560 --> 0:46:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna be pretty fun group. And I'm

0:46:40.320 --> 0:46:42.839
<v Speaker 1>actually excited about the Dolphins offense for sure. I can't wait.

0:46:42.880 --> 0:46:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Thanks a lot, MA, I appreciate it, man, And away

0:46:45.880 --> 0:46:48.600
<v Speaker 1>he goes. And you know, I told Matt this off

0:46:48.640 --> 0:46:51.879
<v Speaker 1>air about how I'm always a little bit you kind

0:46:51.880 --> 0:46:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of dip your toe into the podcast guest you never

0:46:54.120 --> 0:46:57.160
<v Speaker 1>interviewed before with Matt. Before we got on the air,

0:46:57.239 --> 0:46:59.919
<v Speaker 1>we were laughing like football dorks, Like you can tell

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:02.439
<v Speaker 1>someone loves it like you do, and he definitely takes

0:47:02.440 --> 0:47:04.160
<v Speaker 1>it to another level in that regard. You heard him

0:47:04.280 --> 0:47:07.040
<v Speaker 1>giggling on the podcast and geeking out about these prospects.

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:09.560
<v Speaker 1>That's what makes this job so fun, the love and

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:11.839
<v Speaker 1>the passion and the fire for it. We are way

0:47:11.880 --> 0:47:14.319
<v Speaker 1>over time, but I don't think anyone's can playing out there.

0:47:14.400 --> 0:47:16.439
<v Speaker 1>We are gonna go ahead and wrap up this podcast though,

0:47:16.440 --> 0:47:19.200
<v Speaker 1>because as for today's time, that will be my time.

0:47:19.239 --> 0:47:21.719
<v Speaker 1>You all please be sure to subscribe to the podcast

0:47:21.760 --> 0:47:25.160
<v Speaker 1>on Apple, podcast, Spotify, wherever you get your podcast from.

0:47:25.320 --> 0:47:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead and leave us a rating, leave us a review.

0:47:27.760 --> 0:47:30.919
<v Speaker 1>Follow me on Twitter at Wingfield NFL. Follow the team

0:47:30.960 --> 0:47:34.080
<v Speaker 1>at Miami Dolphins. Check out The Fish Tank and the

0:47:34.120 --> 0:47:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Audible podcast and Miami Dolphins dot com. Until next time,

0:47:39.640 --> 0:47:40.160
<v Speaker 1>fins up