WEBVTT - 2008 Crisis Lesson: Be Greedy When Others Are Fearful

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penl Podcast. I'm Paul Swinge. You,

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>along with my co host Lisa Brahma wits each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money. Whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.959
<v Speaker 1>Podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. March nine will mark the tenth

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>anniversary of the market bottom during the global financial crisis.

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>On that day, the intra day low and the SMP

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>five hundred touch six hundred and sixties six. Since then,

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the market is up over three So to give us

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a sense of kind of what has been driving the

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>market and what to look forward to going forward, we

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>welcome to Charlie bobrinsko A. Charlie's a vice chairman ahead

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 1>of of the investment group at Ariel Investments with over

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>close to fourteen billion dollars under management uh arials based

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>in Chicago, but Charlie joins us here in our Bloomberg

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Interactive Broker's studio. Charlie, welcome to our studios. What looking back,

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>what were some all the lessons that you guys at Ariel,

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you folks at Ariel, take from the financial crisis and

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 1>then what's happened since over the last ten years. Yeah,

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 1>some of its relearning old lessons. The biggest one is

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>that you have to be greedy when others are fearful.

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>And people were very fearful in two thousand and nine,

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and it was the best time to be a buyer,

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>but boy didn't feel like it at the time. People

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>felt great about stocks in two thousand and one, and

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>it was a terrible time to invest in stocks. So

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 1>by when others are selling, sell when others are buying,

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>be greedy when those are fearful. Those are the lessons

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>we relearned so and right now unfortunately possibly for investors, investors,

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>for for those who are seeking those values, retail investors

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>don't seem either particularly greedy or particularly fearful. They just

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of are following what's going on, and they're being

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>almost dare I say it, prudent. I'm just wondering, from

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>your perspective, is there alpha left? Is there a place

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>for an active manager to really generate significant returns? So

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>when we make presentations to investment committees at institutional investors,

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>they're still pretty nervous. They keep asking questions about when

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>is this going to end? Hasn't this rally going on

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>too long? We're gonna have a recession here any day.

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>There's been a shift to UM fixed income ld I

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>investing at pension plans. We think the institutional investor is

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>still pretty nervous. A lot of questions we get about

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>our earnings recession coming the first two quarters, we don't

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>see it. So I'm gonna just say that the market

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:26.919
<v Speaker 1>in general is still pretty nervous. So, Charlie, it's interesting

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>because the markets up. The SMP is up over eleven

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:31.359
<v Speaker 1>percent this year, and one of the stats that that

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>really caught my eye is just that this this round

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>trip we've had since early December, that thirty seven percent

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>move up roughly in SMP from the So when you

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 1>think about that, one could argue that, gee, maybe today's

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:44.679
<v Speaker 1>now and now's the time to sell that kind of

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 1>made eleven percent. Isn't that good enough? And what's your

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>view for the remainder of this year? For example? Yeah,

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>so are the flagship fund of arial is the aerial fund,

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:56.239
<v Speaker 1>which is actually up eighteen percent when the SMP was

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:59.799
<v Speaker 1>up eleven on Tuesday, and um, you know, I will

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>say it was dirt cheap after the drop last quarter.

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>At the beginning of the year we were at thirteen

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>times forward earnings. We're not at dirt cheap anymore. We're

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>probably close to fair value, but there are still pockets

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>of cheapness and there's pockets of overvalued. We think there's

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>still a safety bid of stable stocks are considered stable stocks, Utilities,

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 1>high paying UM consumers, staples are still overpriced. What's not

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>expensive are anything that's considered cyclical. You still have a

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of people thinking and recessions coming that global growth

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>is going to close, is going to slow down. So

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>we love the alternative asset managers KKR and Blackstone, which

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>are considered high beta and cyclical, and they're very cheap

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>right now, as are a lot of industrials. So I'm

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>looking right now at SP five hundred, that's up more

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>than eleven year to date including reinvested dividends. How much

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>further does it have to go? What's gonna be the

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>full year return? So we think neither we nor anybody

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>else can have a good prediction on that. UM. We

0:03:57.640 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>can at any given time give you a view on

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>relati of value. But we don't think anybody's any good

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>at at predicting the short term. We think of frankly,

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the secret to investing is focusing on the long term

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and not spending too much time worrying about the short term. However,

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>at certain times, however, here is an exact number for

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the but it is actually true that that market multiples

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>are a pretty good predictor of returns. And so when

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you had at the beginning of the year um our

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 1>value stocks at around thirteen times, that was cheap and

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>low p s do tend to produce high returns even

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>in the short term. There's a great statistic that when

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the pe ratio drops by in the market, it's often

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a very good period of time to invest for even

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the next twelve months. Does Aerial invest all on I

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 1>P O S uh Not usually UM, And the reason

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 1>is because we want to UM investing companies that have

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:57.159
<v Speaker 1>a proven sustainable competitive advantage. UH. We're value investors, so

0:04:57.200 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>we look at earnings. A lot of the companies are

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna becoming public this year have no earnings. People are

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 1>talking about multiples of sales, So we would be very

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>cautious on some of the valuations that we're seeing for

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>companies that are coming. Charlie, why do you feel about concentration,

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:13.279
<v Speaker 1>because I've been hearing about more funds that are going

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>in to say fifteen names, and that's it. Yeah, we're

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>very concentrated. We believe in focus. Uh. We have in

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the Aerial Fund of forty stocks. Buffett talks about why

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>it's so much better to invest in your top twenty

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 1>ideas rather than putting money into your thirties best idea.

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:34.160
<v Speaker 1>We think it's if you're really diversified with a hundred stocks,

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>very hard to beat the indexes after fees. So we

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:41.239
<v Speaker 1>believe in focus, you can know those names better. Uh. Frankly,

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>there's stocks like KKR that are very cheap, and we'll

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:46.359
<v Speaker 1>put a lot of money into KR five percent of

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a position. When did you start that bet? In two

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:53.720
<v Speaker 1>thousand and thirteen when the US government downgraded Uh? Uh.

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 1>When S ANDP downgraded the U S government from triple A,

0:05:57.320 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>everybody thought the high yield market was going to close

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and kick Hare's stock went from eighteen to twelve, and

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 1>it became a wonderful opportunity because of the two and

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty didn't go away. Um, but the stock got reduced

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in price by it's gone now from twelve to UH three.

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And then one of the reasons was it was a

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 1>partnership that index funds can't buy and kk are converted

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>into a sea corps and now everybody can buy them.

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Vanguard just bought eight percent of the company in the

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>last quarter. Yeah, and I'm looking at the shares right now.

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 1>KKR shares have risen more than sixty since March. Charlie Bobrinskoy,

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being with us a vice

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 1>chair and head of the investment group and portfolio manager

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>at Aerial Investments, which is in New York City, to

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>celebrate the ten year anniversary of the financial crisis and

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>rather celebrate what's after the financial crisis and the crisis itself.

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't so long ago that things were starting to

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>look up a little bit for General Electric. There was

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>a sense that there was going to be a restructuring,

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>a path forward. What happened ge the shares having it's

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>their biggest two day decline right now since November, in

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the red by more than four percent today. Karen you

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Blhart of Bloomberg Intelligence joining us here in our Interactive

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Broker Studios Karen covers industrials here. What's going on now? Uh, well,

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've had a lack of disclosure on so

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>it has been anybody's guests. We've had no guidance for

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>over nine months and we are a long awaiting the

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>fourteenth where they would give us twenty nineteen. And yesterday

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Cult gave a little preview of what they're going to

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>announce next week and said that negative, that cash flow,

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>which was four point eight billion positive this year, was

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be in the negative column next year. And

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:57.679
<v Speaker 1>it was a total surprise. So what's driving this negative?

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Surprising casual? Which of the remaining businesses? I know, I

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>know they've sold off a lot of businesses. They've really

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>focused what's causing the problems now, good old power. But

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>in addition to that, and this is one of the

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>problems with the last year, they apparently got a billion

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>plus in pre payments from their little renewable business, okay,

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 1>which they didn't mention when cash flow was better than expected. Right,

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>this year they have to start delivering that stuff. That business,

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 1>that little tiny business is going to shift from a

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>billion positive to probably you know, I don't know up

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>to a billion negatives, So that's two billion of the shortfall.

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Why didn't they tell us there was a one time

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:33.559
<v Speaker 1>last year? But this, but this raises another question. Right,

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>one sort of hallmark of general Electrics problems has been

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if accounting issues is sort of a

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:44.439
<v Speaker 1>strong way of putting it, but the inaccurate accounting statements

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 1>or statements that have not fully disclosed the depth of

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the problems at the organization for a variety of reasons.

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Does this just sort of confirmed that nothing on that

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>front has dramatically changed and that these surprises will keep coming. Well,

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that that is part of it. People are hanging their

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>hat on you know, this is a this is a

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, an honest guy, a really good operator. He's

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna he's gonna, you know, give us, you know, the details,

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and uh, this was like dropping a bomb. And and

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>but the second one is power. Power. You know it's

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna it's taking him longer to get his arms around it.

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any doubt that he will. But Power

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>is going to be worse this year. And again some

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 1>of that could have been disclosed. These are very long

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>term contracts. They did very bad contracts over the last

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>two years just to get orders on the books, and

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>guess what now they've got to ship them and they're

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>shipping very probably some some deals at losses and that's

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be a multi year workout, you know, kind

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>of like an engineering construction company that gets a bad

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>contract and takes years to work through the backlog. Right. Um,

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:45.599
<v Speaker 1>but then also, um, you know, the cost structure is

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 1>not anywhere near in line with where revenues are today,

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's ongoing. He laid they laid off twenty four

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 1>thousand people in that division a loan last year. They've

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>cut a number of plants. It's not enough. So that's

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>what he's telling us. They have to do more. Okay,

0:09:57.280 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 1>so let's now they've they've done a lot in terms

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>of the the M and A, the restructuring in the company.

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that they are done with that in

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 1>terms of selling what I guess people would call non

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>core assets. Are the assets that g has today is

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that it now they still have about fourteen billion in

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>stock ownership of Baker Hughes that that business is already offline,

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>it's it's being run independently, but they have a fourteen

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:22.680
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar ownership there. They have about another four billion

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:24.559
<v Speaker 1>that they can get out of the web tech business

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that they sold um, and then it's going to be

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>smaller units I think from here. But even in the

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:32.959
<v Speaker 1>power division there's two pieces now that the non gas piece.

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>There's stuff in there that they can sell um. But

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the big stuff is probably behind us. So alright,

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 1>So of course, I'm sorry. I am very focused on

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the debt side of this, just because that is the

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 1>nature of my d n A. That is I'm sorry,

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 1>it is who I am. I'm looking right now. General

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Electric perpetual bonds UH five debt is the biggest loser

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 1>among the investment grading universe today. Another decline in price

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that means higher implied borrowing call. How crucial is it

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the General Electric gets its act together and is able

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to give better disclosure and frankly, a better view into

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>just how much more can sell in the valuations that

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>will be able to achieve in order to avoid paying

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:17.680
<v Speaker 1>criminally high interest rates are prohibitively high interest rates and

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a potential downgrade. Well, I think they bought some time

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>with that twenty billion dollar assets sale that they announced

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 1>last week that will significantly help the debt burden. They're

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:29.320
<v Speaker 1>not going to get the money until the fourth quarter

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of next year. But uh, you know, there's a good

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:34.839
<v Speaker 1>shot that the credit agency agencies will say, look, we

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>gotta get a lot of cash coming. And um, it's

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the deal with Danaher uh. And I think that really

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:43.319
<v Speaker 1>brought them time the sales at selling something for three

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>billion or five billion or four billion, there was still

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of worry. Um, and now this they got

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a chunk of change coming, which will I think alleviate

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 1>some of that those fairs. The one risk is what

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>if some of these these unknown liabilities are much bigger

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>than we think. Right. There's a lot of lawsuits out there. Um,

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a number, there's a long term healthcare

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>insurance thing that do they really have their arms around that?

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think they're okay with this big asset sail

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 1>if nothing big hits them, you know, unexpectedly. But there's

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 1>room for that. There's room for the unexpected here. All right.

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:18.719
<v Speaker 1>Let's lastly, let's talk about the dividend. I'm looking on

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg terminal. Now there's a forty two um ascent

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 1>dividend yielding about three point eight percent. Is that safe? No,

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>they cut the dividend um to a penny because so

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>so it's um they had and they're saving four billion

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>dollars by doing that. Well, actually it's an eight billion

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>annual cost that's now uh not like millions. So this

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 1>this is not the GE we grew up with, building, growing,

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>buying dividends for widows and orphans. That's that those days

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>are gone, right. You know, he's said down the road

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 1>he wants to be two and a half times leverage

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and and and a competitive dividend. But that's really quite

0:12:57.160 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a bit down the road. Count double hard. Thank you

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>so much, uh, Karen Uberhart, senior industrial analysts been covering

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>GE forever, not the age you She's our our best

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>in Bloomberg Intelligence, so thanks so much. As usual, there

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of news in the healthcare space. First,

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 1>we have the announcement that the FDA has approved Johnson

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and Johnson nasal spray that works to I guess alleviate

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 1>symptoms of depression. We also have news that of the

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>sudden resignation of the Food and Drug Administration's Commissioner, Scott

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:42.200
<v Speaker 1>gott Leaps. Help us break down all that's going on

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:45.080
<v Speaker 1>in healthcare, We bringing our friend, Max Nis and Max's biotech,

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>pharma and healthcare columnist for Bloomberg Opinion. He joins us

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>here in our Bloomberg eleven three year studios. Max, welcome

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 1>once again. Uh this Johnson and Johnson News. The story

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>seems like a big deal, is it? It definitely is.

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's the first kind of real novel depression medicine

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>in more than a decade, and it's the first one,

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, in an even longer time that has kind

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of a genuinely different way of working on the brain.

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>And then kind of the third differentiation factors that it's

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 1>it's fast acting. What we have generally takes you know,

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>weeks to kick in. You have to build kind of

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a concentration up over time. So this has the potential

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>be used in a lot of interesting different ways for

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>people that are kind of in you know, an acute

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 1>moment of crisis or who just don't respond to existing therapies.

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>And that that is a pretty big population. So you

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>know what else is fast acting cocaine ventanyl? I mean

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 1>is is this is ketamine? Is this potentially the next

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>opioid crisis? So you know, it's it's a it's a

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 1>relative of ketamine and a close one. And I think

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the potential for abuse is something that the FDA definitely

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>considered as opposed to you know, whether it's the equivalent

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>of just giving someone a party drug that they did

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>run kind of you know, randomized you know, late stage trials,

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>in control trials in really sick patients and it did

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>have an impact. Well flipping on its head, right, have

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 1>there been studies done of people who let's say, uh,

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>it took katamine or took other party drugs, took ecstasy,

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and that that actually helped with depression? You know that

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>there have been a lot of attempts to to study this,

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>but not in kind of the scale and riggor of

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>of this trial. And you know, beyond the fact that it,

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, has this kind of psychoactive effect that that

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>people have chased, uh, there does seem to be some

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of you know, scientific evidence that there is an

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>effect on the brain that you know, there's there's like

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>a medical thesis that they're chasing here for why it

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>might help people with depression. It's not let's give people

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a happy drug and let's see if they get happy.

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Known some mats, I know, the antidepressant market in general

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>is a monster market. Is there a sense of how

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>big this sub part of it is, so that that's

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the big question. You know, treatment resistant population is potentially

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>millions of people. The question is how many of them

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>are are going to end up getting getting Johnson and

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Johnson drugs. And that's that's a trickier question. This isn't

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, you just get a pack of pills and

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>take them. You have to go to a licensed office,

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>take it, and then sit there for two hours while

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you're monitors for symptoms of association and sedition. Then you're

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 1>not supposed to operate heavy machinery for the rest of it.

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 1>It's gotta find someone to give you a ride, so

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that that's a really hard thing for for people that

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>are working to do. And then you know, this isn't

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>something that your average psychiatrists is equipped to handle, so

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>that that is likely to kind of keep it from

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 1>reaching its full addressable market at least anytime soon. And

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I just want to be very clear. I mean, I've

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of been talking about this with a light tone,

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>but it's really not frankly underscores how much the epidemic

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 1>of suicides in this country has absolutely been exploding, especially

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>among the younger populations. I do want to shift gears

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit to the Food and Drug Administration UH

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>or just basically the chief of the US Food and

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Drug Administration, UH, Scott Gottlieb resigned suddenly. It seems like

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:09.639
<v Speaker 1>there was nothing on toward it and why he resigned.

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:12.680
<v Speaker 1>There was no kind of push, It was a personal issue.

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>How big of a loss is this and how much

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:19.680
<v Speaker 1>does it affect the industries? Yeah, I think it's pretty significant. Um,

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>everyone likes Scott. He he you know that there's even you,

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 1>even even me, Um, you know, obviously there's some such

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>people that really like, you know, selling tobacco and vape

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>pens less fans because he took kind of an aggressive

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 1>regulatory stance on them. But he was seen as someone

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:41.880
<v Speaker 1>that that understood the industry, worked really hard and pushed

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:44.439
<v Speaker 1>on a lot of significant public health issues in a

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>way that you hadn't really seen from previous commissioners. It

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 1>can be a quiet job, and you know, it's a

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 1>technical administrative post, but he turned into something that was

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot more communicative and and active on the policy front.

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 1>So I think he he will bend, and not just

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:03.159
<v Speaker 1>by by drug makers who saw him as someone that

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:06.440
<v Speaker 1>was really pushing to modernize the agency and and make

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>it easier for innovative therapies to make it to market,

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>but but for further country as a whole. You know, Uh,

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>it's really the exception when you have kind of a

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 1>relatively drama free and competent um leader of an agency

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>in this day and age of relative to the past.

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>So is there any sense of who's going to replace Gottlieb?

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>And and and just in general, the big farm and

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 1>all their lobbyists, did they have an influence on who

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:34.719
<v Speaker 1>gets selected? Um? You know, I imagine we're we're not

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>going to get someone that they really hate, just because

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>that is a big lobby and and it's one that

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:42.640
<v Speaker 1>has a lot of influence in Congress. But but there

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>is a chance that we could get a left field candidate.

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 1>And I'm just thinking of you know, the people that

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 1>were rumored to be considered alongside Scott Gotlieb. One of

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>them was kind of a Peter theel affiliated investor who

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>um has some some pretty um out of the mainstream

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 1>I'll save views on on regulation of medicines, which is

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:05.479
<v Speaker 1>to say that they shouldn't be regulated very much. Uh

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>that that's um a position that you might think that

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>drug makers are in favor of, but actually would potentially

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 1>be pretty chaotic, so that that's a potential negative. But

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:18.879
<v Speaker 1>we could just get you know, a pretty mainstream bureaucrat

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 1>as well. It won't be as exciting as Gottlie, but

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 1>probably won't cause any harm, So we'll see. You know,

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 1>you started off talking about this with respect that tobacco

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>companies and invaping companies were not that excited about him

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>being there and are more excited about him leaving. We

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 1>did see a pop in their shares. Do you expect

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that to last or do you think that any successor

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 1>would would adopt the same kinds of policies. Uh, you know,

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I I wouldn't be too surprised if they at least

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 1>continue got Leave's efforts. Maybe they won't be as kind

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of publicly energetic about them. Um, but you know, I

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's much of a push that these these

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:57.880
<v Speaker 1>companies can make to to kind of combat the general

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 1>rise of of kind of further regulations industries. On the

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:05.400
<v Speaker 1>public health impact is is pretty obvious. You don't want

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 1>people getting addicted to tobacco or or Nicktine products, one

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:11.679
<v Speaker 1>wear another and uh, it's the role of the FDA

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 1>and one wear another to to take a role in that.

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 1>So how is the FDA today? Is it generally perceived

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 1>as a good bipartisan view or is it really And

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:23.160
<v Speaker 1>then then in the lap of big pharma or on consumers,

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 1>where is you have to kind of proceed right now? Uh?

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think the god Leave FDA at least

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>was was kind of respected to a certain extent by

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>by people on both sides of the aisle, which is

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:37.360
<v Speaker 1>an achievement in itself. I think you'll find people that

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that do feel that it tends to lean too much

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>in the way of of pharma. And and that was

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:45.159
<v Speaker 1>a criticism of god lea who who had some industry experience,

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time he did things that were

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of to the detriment of the industry, calling people

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>out for kind of abuses of the generic approval system UM,

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>for pricing things like that and UM. But on the

0:20:58.119 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>other hand, you have people that want to push for

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the FT two more of an active role. Sulie Max,

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 1>he said, thank you so much for being with us.

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Max Neson Biotech Fireman, healthcare columnist with Bloomberg Opinion. We

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>always value your perspective. Good morning. Well it, as Lisa

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:29.680
<v Speaker 1>said earlier, the market seems to be discounting that the

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:32.199
<v Speaker 1>Fed is done raising rates, at least for the New

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 1>York term. But there is an interesting column out this

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>morning by former New York Fed President Bill Dudley that said,

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>don't assume that there may be room for the Fed

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 1>to perhaps even raise rates at some point later this year.

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Help us dig into this issue and outlooks for rates.

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>We bring in Carl Ricka Donna. Carl's the chief US

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:55.199
<v Speaker 1>economist for Bloomberg Economics. He joins us live barely in

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg leven three studios here in New York. You're

0:21:58.040 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna take that sitting down very much alive. Just he's

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 1>one floor way and he made it with the second

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 1>of spirit. Thanks Carl. So what do you make, Carl

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.679
<v Speaker 1>of Bill Dudley's column about rates and the outlook for

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 1>nineteen I agree with what the former New York Fed

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>president is saying, and we've maintained that view as well. Uh,

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a pause, not a peak for interest rates.

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:22.479
<v Speaker 1>We can look at the you know, the the grand

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>scope of history and the economy has never rolled over

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 1>with interest rates as accommodative as they are at the moment.

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:32.399
<v Speaker 1>And so we look at real GDP growth relative to

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 1>real interest rates, and real interest rates are essentially at zero.

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>They have to rise significantly higher, maybe two hundred basis

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>points higher, to actually be depressing economic growth. Alright, so

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>let's take a little bit more into exactly what Bill

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Dudley said. He said that probably the economy would underperform

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>for the first half of this year. He thinks that

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 1>patients indicates the Fed won't be raising rates in the

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>first half of ten. However, he expects the economy to

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>re accelerate in the second half off and basically prompt

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the Fed to rethink its patience. Do you agree with that?

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:10.359
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that. And here's the story. So the

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 1>economy grew about break it down. The economy grew about

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 1>three percent last year. That's well above trend growth. And

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>when you grow above trend, two things happen. One, the

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>unemployment rate moves lower, and two you generate inflation pressure,

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 1>so you get an acceleration and inflation. We saw both

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 1>of those things last year. Uh, the economy is moderating

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:32.679
<v Speaker 1>this year, so we're going from two point nine or

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>three percent growth down to my team is expecting something

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.679
<v Speaker 1>close to two point four percent, still above trend. So

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you get exactly what you got last You're just in

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>a slightly smaller dose, and so that the expectation is right.

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:46.679
<v Speaker 1>The earning season is not looking that great. If you

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>talk to our chief equity strategist, Gina Martin Adams, she'll

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:53.719
<v Speaker 1>say that that we may even be potentially contending with

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>an earnings recession, not an economic recession, but an earnings recession,

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:00.399
<v Speaker 1>or at the very least a soft patch in the

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:02.439
<v Speaker 1>first part of this year. And so we have this,

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, equity market correction in Q four, a soft

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 1>patch for corporate earnings, residual seasonality issues with the GDP numbers,

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 1>where we get a soft print in Q one. Once

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:17.120
<v Speaker 1>we get to mid year and central bankers sit back

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and assess what's happening in the economy, they're going to

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:21.639
<v Speaker 1>see that we still have growth that is above trend,

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 1>we have an unemployment rate heading into mid three, territory

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:30.160
<v Speaker 1>pressures running. It's the hottest of the cycles, and they'll say,

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>in that environment, we're not done. We have to keep hiking.

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 1>How surprised will markets be if when the Fed? If

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:38.639
<v Speaker 1>the Fed hikes again this year, well, the Fed doesn't

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>want them to be surprised. So while the Fed kind

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>of led the market to this point in terms of

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the rate increases we've seen, the Fed got burned in

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Q four. Uh. This means now the Fed is going

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:53.199
<v Speaker 1>to follow, not lead the market to interest rate. So

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the Fed is gonna let the market beg for it,

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>uh and then be happy to oblige them. And by

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>letting the market beg for it, it means that we'll

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:03.399
<v Speaker 1>see a steepening of the yield curve. The Fed lets

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the market price in more inflation expectations. You see a

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 1>bare steepening of the yield curve, and then the Fed

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>steps in and says, we'll help you address the inflation

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 1>problem and layer some rate hikes in. Give us a

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>sense of timing here, is this a third quarter type environment?

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Because I think if you look at them, I think

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the market's discounting really nothing for twenty nights, right. The

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>market is saying nothing. Economists are saying they're still hikes coming.

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 1>I like the market better than economists, but go ahead,

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>that's that's you. But they're gonna beg for it. That's

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 1>what they're going to go on. So the way the

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:36.880
<v Speaker 1>timing of this works out right, we have to wait

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:39.399
<v Speaker 1>until we have a sense that we're in the clear

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:42.880
<v Speaker 1>from this earnings recession, which means probably by the time

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 1>we get the Q two GDP numbers, which would be

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the end of July. Uh, that would be the time

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>where you'll start to see both market participants and FED

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>policymakers say, Okay, the economy is still running a little hot,

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of additional accommodation is warranted, and so

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I think we see two hikes in the back half

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of the year, probably at the September meeting, in the

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 1>December meeting. The December is a bolder call, and so

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the risk is not symmetric around that. The

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:10.360
<v Speaker 1>risk is we would only get one hike this year.

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:13.160
<v Speaker 1>But we do have the view that you know, we're

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be contending with a still robust economic environment

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and the Fed's going to have to do more. They'll

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>just speak really fast the meeting to indicate that they're

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:23.439
<v Speaker 1>not patient any longer. I just have to ask you,

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I just have to ask you, really, in thirty seconds,

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:28.879
<v Speaker 1>how much of the slowdown that we're saying in the

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 1>first half is due to this trade skirmish that's been

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:36.920
<v Speaker 1>going on. That's an interesting question. I think second element

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to that, I think it's just a confluence of factors.

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I think we're we're blaming trade too much. Uh, and

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll realize that domestic economic fundamentals are still very strong.

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 1>And I keep going back to that unemployment rate generating

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 1>wage pressures that is a backstop to consumer spending, and

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the domestic economic outlook is still very robust. Cacadonna telling

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 1>it like it is here in the Bluebergetter Active Broker Studios.

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:04.679
<v Speaker 1>Cara Kadona, chief you as economist for Bloomberg Economics, talking

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:07.720
<v Speaker 1>about that Bill Dudley column really interesting to me. Uh,

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 1>the idea that the market right now has completely written

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>off rate hikes and yet we have former Fed officials

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 1>coming out and saying, you guys are being a little premature.

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast.

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:24.680
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Paul Sweeney, I'm

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:27.399
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pt Sweeney. I'm Lisa Abram Woyd's I'm

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa Abram woits one before the podcast.

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio