Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunt. President Trump made a
Speaker 1: compelling case to the American people last night for his
Speaker 1: entire agenda, but specifically why we need that wall. Now
Speaker 1: we have a deal on the table. Is it a
Speaker 1: good idea? Should Trump accepted? And also what is the
Speaker 1: latest on the Trump Muller Russia delusion. We will break
Speaker 1: that down for you and much more coming up on
Speaker 1: The buck Sexton Show. Bucks Sexton Permission, decoding the news
Speaker 1: and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American,
Speaker 1: You're a great American again. This is the buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: Analysts this weekend, some Democrats even proposed a measure that
Speaker 1: would force the release of thousands of criminal illegal aliens,
Speaker 1: including dangerous felons. Were setting the stage, We're setting the table.
Speaker 1: We're doing whatever we have to do. The walls being built,
Speaker 1: it'll continue. It's going at a rapid pace. Drugs pouring
Speaker 1: through the border kills tens of thousands of innocent Americans
Speaker 1: a year, including heroin, meth, cocaine, fent, and all so
Speaker 1: many others. They come through the southern border. I want
Speaker 1: people to come into our country, but they have to
Speaker 1: come in legally, and they have to come in through merit,
Speaker 1: through merit so they can help us build our country,
Speaker 1: make America grade again. Pretty soon we're gonna be seeing
Speaker 1: keep America grade, Keep America Gray. Welcome to the Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show. Everybody, President Trump last night in El Paso, Texas.
Speaker 1: Getting the crowd fired up there. Where are we on
Speaker 1: the border wall negotiations? Single most important issue today, most
Speaker 1: important issue in the country. Right now, we are days
Speaker 1: away from Valentine's Day. Hey, everybody, hopefully you've gotten your
Speaker 1: roses from your Rose authority, you know where that is.
Speaker 1: But we have Valentine's Day coming up here, and then
Speaker 1: we have a possible shutdown day I believe on Saturday,
Speaker 1: when you would have once again hundreds of thousands of
Speaker 1: government employees that would have to go without pay for
Speaker 1: a period of time. This comes after the single longest
Speaker 1: government shutdown in US history, and there's a lot of
Speaker 1: a lot of wrangling from both sides of what all
Speaker 1: this would mean. So here's where we've got. Here's where
Speaker 1: we are right now. And I don't think President Trump
Speaker 1: even I don't think he knew about this before he
Speaker 1: went on stage last night. Essentially, the offer on the
Speaker 1: table from this group in Congress is to extend the
Speaker 1: fence that are fencing that already exists by fifty five miles.
Speaker 1: So that would mean that the barrier that is currently
Speaker 1: in the southern borders six hundred and fifty four miles
Speaker 1: would go somewhere in the six hundred and seventy seven
Speaker 1: to six hundred and eighty one mile range. Fifty five
Speaker 1: new miles in total of barriers could go up in
Speaker 1: two areas of the Rio Grand Valley sector in Texas.
Speaker 1: This is what Congress is now putting forward to avert
Speaker 1: another government shutdown. The deal would allocate one point three
Speaker 1: eight billion dollars for those physical barriers, bothered fencing and
Speaker 1: levy walls. And the Left is going to say, Mexico's
Speaker 1: not paying for it, and it's not really a wall,
Speaker 1: that's all. That's all just noise, that's all sound and
Speaker 1: fury signifying nothing. It doesn't mean anything. What's more important.
Speaker 1: What is important here is that there is funding for
Speaker 1: physical barriers that are needed at the border. Trump wanted
Speaker 1: five point seven billion dollars. Now, there are a couple
Speaker 1: of ways to see this from this bipartisan group of
Speaker 1: seventeen lawmakers. That one point three eight billion that include
Speaker 1: some physical barriers, is, you know, a good start to things.
Speaker 1: But let's all remember that if it's one point three
Speaker 1: eight billion for fiscal year twenty nineteen, that means that
Speaker 1: there's not going to be any more funding that comes
Speaker 1: up in the election year obviously, So that means it's
Speaker 1: one point three eight billion dollars for Trump's first four
Speaker 1: years in office. That's not good. I'm not saying that
Speaker 1: this means he should outright reject the deal, but it's
Speaker 1: not a good deal. The fifty five miles of border
Speaker 1: fence that would be added to this that would be
Speaker 1: a part of this deal, assuming that it all went through,
Speaker 1: would give us some data to work with, because I
Speaker 1: think it would help a lot. You would see the
Speaker 1: San Diego effect, so to speak, that you've seen where
Speaker 1: San Diego put up a border barrier. I saw it
Speaker 1: was there, It works, the border patrol swears by it
Speaker 1: and wants more of it. You'd have that in the
Speaker 1: Rio Grand sector, which would be very helpful for trying
Speaker 1: to get more of this elsewhere the border pack. What
Speaker 1: happens if you get a Democrat fifty five miles, I mean,
Speaker 1: it'll it'll help but the problem is much much bigger
Speaker 1: than this. I don't know how y'all, y'all just came
Speaker 1: out there. I don't know how you all feel about this,
Speaker 1: but I think that this is it's a it's a
Speaker 1: bare minimum, a bare minimum deal. And Trump has even
Speaker 1: said that, you know, he's he's not thrilled about this.
Speaker 1: You know, he says it's not not the greatest thing
Speaker 1: he's seen Play clip nineteen. I don't think you're going
Speaker 1: to see a chef down. I wouldn't want to go
Speaker 1: to him now if you did have it. It's a
Speaker 1: Democrat's fault. And I accept the first one, and I'm
Speaker 1: proud of what we've accomplished because people learned during that
Speaker 1: shutdown all about the problems coming in from the southern border.
Speaker 1: I accept, I've always accepted it, But this one I
Speaker 1: would never accept if it happens. But I don't think
Speaker 1: it's going to happen. But this would be totally other Democrats.
Speaker 1: He's saying, This one's on the Democrats because they're just
Speaker 1: they are being unreasonable. This is unreasonable if they're willing
Speaker 1: to pay for fifty five miles of fence because it's
Speaker 1: needed border patrol, says they want a lot more than that.
Speaker 1: You know, why why can't we have more money for this?
Speaker 1: What's really there? You know, when you get down to it,
Speaker 1: the reason they won't give Trump the money is because
Speaker 1: they don't want Trump to get a political win here,
Speaker 1: and because they favor lawlessness. They favor this state of
Speaker 1: lawlessness at the border. They like it. They think that
Speaker 1: they benefit from it, and that's why they take the steps,
Speaker 1: they take the stances on all of this that they do.
Speaker 1: Here's here's Gavin Newsom, who is just a shameless, a
Speaker 1: shameless lib. I mean, as as as left wing loon
Speaker 1: as you're gonna find in any statewide office anywhere. He's
Speaker 1: a governor of California. Here here's what he has said
Speaker 1: about how he's pulling National Guard troops who do help
Speaker 1: the border. People who go on TV and say national
Speaker 1: Guard troops the border don't do anything, don't know what,
Speaker 1: don't know what the heck they're talking about, their lying
Speaker 1: or they don't know what they're talking about. We're both.
Speaker 1: I spoke to Border patrol. They say it is very
Speaker 1: helpful to have additional logistics support, surveillance support. They can
Speaker 1: do things that make the job easier, and border patrol
Speaker 1: is stretched thin, and the drug cartels and the human
Speaker 1: smugglers are taking advantage of it. The the drug smugglers
Speaker 1: that are poisoning cities across this country, wherever you are
Speaker 1: in this in this country, and now listening to this show,
Speaker 1: there is lethal fentanyl and car fentanyl on the streets
Speaker 1: tied to the Mexican cartels that the Democrat don't want
Speaker 1: to take sufficient action to fight. That's just what's happening.
Speaker 1: They don't want to do it. They don't want to
Speaker 1: make it harder for them. But Gavin Newsom is saying, well,
Speaker 1: let's make it. Let's actually make it harder for border
Speaker 1: patrol and immigrations and customs enforcement. Let's make it harder
Speaker 1: for them to do their job. And it's all because
Speaker 1: there is no crisis. Play thirteen. The crisis on the
Speaker 1: border is a manufactured crisis. We are not interested in
Speaker 1: participating in this political theater. I think it's nothing more
Speaker 1: than political theater. You're gonna add three thousand, seven hundred
Speaker 1: and fifty troops to the border, Why do you need
Speaker 1: the National Guard? The whole thing is ludicrous. Everybody that
Speaker 1: I talked about the border who is being honest because
Speaker 1: it's their job to secure it. Thinks that Gavin Newsom
Speaker 1: and his ilk are ludicrous. Thinks that the state of California,
Speaker 1: which its legislature has tried to criminalize as a private
Speaker 1: citizen assisting immigration and Customs enforcement federal agents in doing
Speaker 1: their jobs. California is complicit in illegal immigration as a state.
Speaker 1: That is what is happening here. And people who don't
Speaker 1: or don't think or say there is no crisis don't
Speaker 1: know what the heck they are talking about. Here's a
Speaker 1: border patrol agent who spoke at a pressor with the
Speaker 1: Trump art del Queto. Here's what he says about a
Speaker 1: plate eighteen. Now, we have an actual crisis at the border.
Speaker 1: We have caravan after caravan that are forming. We have
Speaker 1: unprecedented amounts of drugs that are coming into the country.
Speaker 1: We have more agents being attacked than we have before.
Speaker 1: And I know some of the news articles that are
Speaker 1: going out there are saying, oh, the numbers are going
Speaker 1: down and going down. I encourage everyone out there that
Speaker 1: sees these news articles to look at the dates, because
Speaker 1: the numbers were going down when President Trump first took over.
Speaker 1: And that's because as of Redick alone. He helped lower
Speaker 1: those numbers. But now we're seeing those numbers go back up,
Speaker 1: and they haven't stopped going up. There's a reason caravans
Speaker 1: keep forming. You know, They're not forming because they just
Speaker 1: want to get down to the line and then stop there.
Speaker 1: These caravans are forming because they are coming through. For
Speaker 1: those who say there's no crisis, again, there are either
Speaker 1: no nothings or liars at the border right now. This
Speaker 1: year we are on track to have half a million
Speaker 1: illegal crossers for the year. I mean, we're getting back
Speaker 1: to George W. Bush era illegal crossing numbers, which was
Speaker 1: a real peak because the Bushes were not good on immigration.
Speaker 1: By the way, as an aside, but the system that
Speaker 1: we have is being overwhelmed. This is intentional, This is
Speaker 1: a strategy. This is not a side product. This is
Speaker 1: not just happenstance. The system is being overwhelmed. Here's how
Speaker 1: this plays out right now. If you show up at
Speaker 1: our southern border, the caravans know this. The caravans are
Speaker 1: taking advantage of this. If you show up at our
Speaker 1: southern border and you know what to say, there is
Speaker 1: an almost certain future of being let into the United
Speaker 1: States with a promise to appear in court for your
Speaker 1: immigration hearing as an asylum seeker at some point in
Speaker 1: the future. We have a backlog right now of nine
Speaker 1: hundred thousand immigration cases. By this time next year, our backlog,
Speaker 1: based on the numbers we're seeing right now, is we're
Speaker 1: going to be a million and a half maybe two million.
Speaker 1: I mean we can. We do not have the resources
Speaker 1: to process all of these people that are they are
Speaker 1: illegal aliens in waiting as in the moment they don't
Speaker 1: show up for their hearings, the moment that they don't
Speaker 1: qualify for asylum, then there are illegals and they're supposed
Speaker 1: to be deported. They're not going to be deported. The
Speaker 1: system is going to come to a screeching halt. That
Speaker 1: is why the Democrats want fewer ice beds, fewer immigration
Speaker 1: and custom enforcement beds. They want this system to come
Speaker 1: to a screeching hall. This is it is classic Lensky.
Speaker 1: This is just bring the system down to get what
Speaker 1: you want. The anarchy and the lawlessness that is created
Speaker 1: by all this Democrats are in favor of. They are
Speaker 1: complicit in this, They want this. I'm sorry, I'm not
Speaker 1: playing this game anymore of Democrats are opposed to illegal
Speaker 1: immigration too. That is a lie they benefit from and
Speaker 1: are ideologically and emotionally sympathetic to favorable to illegal immigration,
Speaker 1: illegal alien entry into the United States. The Congress does
Speaker 1: not have the backbone to take action on this. The
Speaker 1: President can't do anything about it because he already has
Speaker 1: tried and the courts have blocked him, and Congress won't
Speaker 1: take action to change the asylum policy. What you're going
Speaker 1: to have based on the current For those who say
Speaker 1: there's no crisis, they're going to keep saying that until
Speaker 1: the crisis is so bad. It's already crisis. But the
Speaker 1: crisis is so bad that by the time even the
Speaker 1: Democrats can't ignore the reality starting them in the face.
Speaker 1: Then they're gonna say, well, you're right, we've got gosh,
Speaker 1: we've got you know, a million, two million asylum seekers
Speaker 1: in the country. But you know they're good, they're good
Speaker 1: Americans too. Now they're better than normal Americans. Let's just
Speaker 1: let's just amnesty them. Let's add this to the Dacca
Speaker 1: and Dappa conversation. That's where this is heading. They are
Speaker 1: building up a reserve of illegals in waiting to be legalized.
Speaker 1: They will not be deported. That's what has happening. These
Speaker 1: people are all skipping the immigration line, gaming the system,
Speaker 1: lying about their credible fear, lying about why they're coming
Speaker 1: into the country because they've been told to And I
Speaker 1: have been told by the people who know that this
Speaker 1: is going on. And you have idiots like Avenue Soon
Speaker 1: we're saying there's no crisis. What do you what do
Speaker 1: you call a system where anyone who shows up to
Speaker 1: the border and has a basic familiarity with the massive
Speaker 1: gaping holes in our system right now, all I have
Speaker 1: to do is say I got a credible fear. Then
Speaker 1: they gotta process you. The law says, they process you,
Speaker 1: they let you free, They say we're gonna give you
Speaker 1: a court date, please show up. The enforcement against those
Speaker 1: who don't show up is almost zero. The number of
Speaker 1: people deported who don't get a sign of the country
Speaker 1: these hearings is tiny. Over nine of those who show
Speaker 1: up and say I have a credible fear get to
Speaker 1: stay in the country. There are fifty thousand a month
Speaker 1: coming into the country. Fifty thousand. Who's gonna Who's gonna
Speaker 1: say in a year when it's a half a million,
Speaker 1: a million, and the backlog in the courts is so big,
Speaker 1: who's gonna say, yeah, you know what, let's round all
Speaker 1: them up and deport them because this really was a scam.
Speaker 1: You know the answer. The answer is nobody. We are
Speaker 1: being defrauded. The American are being defrauded by both parties
Speaker 1: on this issue, and if we don't take action, the
Speaker 1: crisis is going to become so big that we will
Speaker 1: be in a conversation nationally about the inevitability of an
Speaker 1: open border status. That is where we are heading. That
Speaker 1: is where we are going. And there are Republicans complicit
Speaker 1: on this thing too, as you can tell. I have
Speaker 1: not yet begun to radio, so stay with me. I
Speaker 1: don't think they ever are going to accomplish the abolished
Speaker 1: ICE that they've been saying they're going to do. But
Speaker 1: I've been saying what they're going to do, there's going
Speaker 1: bankrupt ICE to make them ineffective. They'll take their money
Speaker 1: way so they can't do their job. I mean the
Speaker 1: number they put on the table, like thirty two thousand
Speaker 1: cap beds. Understand, ICE is currently at forty seven thousand,
Speaker 1: which means they're fifteen thousand over the cap. Now we're
Speaker 1: halfway through the year. To to get to that thirty
Speaker 1: two thousand end of the year, they will had kill
Speaker 1: fifteen thousand BLOW thirty two. So that means there's a
Speaker 1: fifteen thousand above they got with fifteen thousand blow. ICE
Speaker 1: will have to release thirty thousand people from custody thirty thousand.
Speaker 1: I mean, what would that guy know about ICE. He
Speaker 1: was only the ICE director until recently, so I mean
Speaker 1: it's not like he knows what he oh oh wait, no,
Speaker 1: that's right, he knows exactly what he's talking about. That's
Speaker 1: Tom Holman, who I've had some great green room discussions
Speaker 1: over at Fox about immigration. I mean, really I like
Speaker 1: it because I can just go at him with all
Speaker 1: kinds of questions and he appreciates that. I'm I've really
Speaker 1: become a student of the issue and I really care.
Speaker 1: And you know, we had a whole conversation in the
Speaker 1: green room at Fox about third party safe agreement where
Speaker 1: you wait for your immigration hearing on the other side
Speaker 1: of the you know, the Mexico side of the US
Speaker 1: Mexico border, and how we could implement that. But the
Speaker 1: important point here is Democrats know exactly what they're doing.
Speaker 1: This is none of this is an accident. You know,
Speaker 1: they want to make it so that there is lax
Speaker 1: to no enforcement of immigration in the interior, and they
Speaker 1: want to make it that there are giant, gaping holes
Speaker 1: in our border policy so that people can just show up,
Speaker 1: turn themselves in, say the magic words, I have a
Speaker 1: credible fear, and that's it. That's all. She wrote. Fifty
Speaker 1: thousand people a month on schedule here for a half
Speaker 1: million a year. These are big numbers. It's a lot
Speaker 1: of people. It's a lot of people who are who
Speaker 1: are unvetted. We don't know what their deal is. You know,
Speaker 1: I love how the Democrats thing is. I mean, we
Speaker 1: only have sixteen hundred murders committed by illegal aliens who
Speaker 1: are currently in custody. Yeah, I'd like to see them
Speaker 1: say that to the families of those sixteen hundred people.
Speaker 1: You could fill a small stadium with the families of
Speaker 1: people who have been killed by illegal aliens in this country.
Speaker 1: But Democrats are like, there's no problem in legal aliens.
Speaker 1: They're better than Americans. They commit fewer times and Americans.
Speaker 1: This is one of and this is also why there's
Speaker 1: so much there's so much dishonesty, so many lies around
Speaker 1: this issue from the left, from the media, and from
Speaker 1: a lot of Republicans too. This is a scam. This
Speaker 1: is a giant fraud, the illegal alien scam. It's been
Speaker 1: perpetrated against the American people, against our wishes and against
Speaker 1: our will for thirty years now, and finally, finally we
Speaker 1: are having an honest conversation about the issue, at least
Speaker 1: some of us are. And the Democrats know they got
Speaker 1: to stop that right away. I think they've got to
Speaker 1: look at the details. The Office of Management Budget has
Speaker 1: probably found four or five billion dollars that they can reprogram,
Speaker 1: and the President could by next week sign the congressional
Speaker 1: bill keep the government open, pocket about a billion seven
Speaker 1: or a billion three in the bill itself and transfer
Speaker 1: an additional four or five billion, so he would get
Speaker 1: the barrier he wants, the country would see the government
Speaker 1: stay open. The Democrats would have gotten nothing except to
Speaker 1: prove that they're insanely anti blocking illegal immigrants. I mean,
Speaker 1: the idea that they wanted to cut seven thousand beds
Speaker 1: that detain the legals is the sort of stuff that
Speaker 1: I think is driving the Democratic Party towards a disaster
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty. I think Nude's right. I think that
Speaker 1: while we're often talking about the dollar amount here that
Speaker 1: Trump may or may not be able to get, it
Speaker 1: does not take into account, or rather that discussion does
Speaker 1: not take into account how much the conversation over immigration
Speaker 1: has changed and how people like like me now, for example,
Speaker 1: when I have to go up against generally you know,
Speaker 1: fake conservatives or who are never Trumpers or libs out there,
Speaker 1: they you know, they lose on the wall. They lose
Speaker 1: on the wall debate. They used to think that the
Speaker 1: wall was a mic drop, shut down the conversation moment.
Speaker 1: The wall doesn't work, Actually, idiot, the wall works. Okay,
Speaker 1: fences work, barriers work, walls work. This is very basic logic,
Speaker 1: never mind history at play, because we know from the
Speaker 1: walls that exist that it works. But I think that
Speaker 1: that the Trump administration should also, even if they get funding,
Speaker 1: I like where Newts heads at here, even if they
Speaker 1: get funding, they should go the route of okay, well,
Speaker 1: let's just appropriate some d D funds for this or
Speaker 1: whatever whatever it is we have to do. However it
Speaker 1: is that, you know, I mean, I can't pretend to
Speaker 1: be a government budgetary expert, you know, who knows how
Speaker 1: that stuff really works. But however they can do it,
Speaker 1: they should do it. The president has has a right
Speaker 1: to do this, as written in legislation. The president has
Speaker 1: a right to construct barriers and fencing to prevent the
Speaker 1: introduction of illegal drugs into America onto a arc and soil.
Speaker 1: There's statutes about this. There's statutes about the president declaring
Speaker 1: a national emergency. Those statutes exist for a reason, and
Speaker 1: people keep saying, well, they're going to challenge it in court. Okay,
Speaker 1: but maybe the Supreme Court takes it up pretty quickly.
Speaker 1: I mean, maybe you know, you got to go through
Speaker 1: these processes. You can't just say we're not going to
Speaker 1: get there, so let's not try. So maybe he takes
Speaker 1: the one point five billion and is able to do
Speaker 1: more than just that. That would be and also it'll
Speaker 1: show I mean, if the Ninth Circuit jumps in and says, oh,
Speaker 1: you can't do this with dd funds or whatever it
Speaker 1: may be, however that the administration goes about it, at
Speaker 1: least then we'll know that the Democrats are going to
Speaker 1: have to defend They're they're going to have to defend
Speaker 1: their love affair with illegal immigration in twenty twenty because
Speaker 1: that's what the Democratic Party now has. They are all
Speaker 1: in on illegal immigration. They think it's great. They think
Speaker 1: it's great. They won't say that because the American people
Speaker 1: are not solid majority of the American people are like, no,
Speaker 1: we actually want immigration law to be respected. Solid majorities
Speaker 1: in the in the sixty something percent range is not
Speaker 1: a close call, by the way. I was. You know,
Speaker 1: we had a Gavin Newsom. We played a clip from
Speaker 1: that guy before Governor California. He has just announced that
Speaker 1: just from on Fox News today, he is pulling the
Speaker 1: plug on the state's high speed rail project from LA
Speaker 1: to San Francisco. It was a decade behind schedule and
Speaker 1: billions of dollars in the red A seventy seven billion
Speaker 1: dollar bullet train. Folks, they have bailed on this thing.
Speaker 1: They how much? How much have this got built? You know,
Speaker 1: how much have this got done? They're willing to spend
Speaker 1: seventy seven billion dollars so rich yuppies in LA and
Speaker 1: San Francisco don't have to go through the TSA and
Speaker 1: get on a plane, but they won't spend five billion
Speaker 1: dollars so that we have an end to or at
Speaker 1: least a dramatic reduction in illegal immigration. That just gives
Speaker 1: you a sense where the Democrats monetary priorities lie and
Speaker 1: this bullet tray. And also keep in mind that in
Speaker 1: the Green we're gonna make fun of course, guys, you
Speaker 1: know I'm gonna make fun of the Green New Deal
Speaker 1: in a little bit, the Green New Deal, which is
Speaker 1: so preposterous now that Democrats only defense of it is
Speaker 1: to lie about it, to lie over and over again
Speaker 1: about it. The Green New Deal was talking about the
Speaker 1: expansion of rail to replace air travel. Well if we can't.
Speaker 1: After with a ten year delay and a projected seventy
Speaker 1: seven billion dollar budget for a train that would connect
Speaker 1: two cities in one state on the West coast, does
Speaker 1: anyone really think we are anywhere near being able to
Speaker 1: replace plane travel with train travel. It is a shame
Speaker 1: that train travel in this country isn't cheaper and nicer
Speaker 1: than it is. I will say that, I mean Amtrak
Speaker 1: is like something that we've borrowed from the Soviet Union.
Speaker 1: As I explained to yesterday, We've borrowed the Soviet Union's
Speaker 1: policies about women in the workplace and childcare provided by
Speaker 1: the state. We've also kind of borrowed the Soviet Union's
Speaker 1: train system, which is a shame. I mean, the the Amtrak,
Speaker 1: the Amtrak Northeast Regional food service car is like something
Speaker 1: from the nineteen eighties transported to modern day that hasn't
Speaker 1: changed a bit and still and still they lose I
Speaker 1: think it's ten million dollars a year in food service cost.
Speaker 1: So they're charging you like eight dollars for a frozen
Speaker 1: burrito that's probably you know, been sitting there for three years,
Speaker 1: and they still can't make any money. It is a
Speaker 1: It is an astonishing, astonishing fail on the part of liberals.
Speaker 1: But nonetheless, by the way, I also want to we
Speaker 1: had Tom Holman made a few good points that I wanted.
Speaker 1: I don't know if I have time for all of
Speaker 1: it here, but here's what he said about the spending
Speaker 1: bill and and what's happening play fifteen. A part of
Speaker 1: the what they're not talking about is that the end
Speaker 1: of the year they want to phase out all family beds,
Speaker 1: which means every family that crosses that border legally will
Speaker 1: be released directly from the border, not put into a
Speaker 1: family detention center where we screen them from measles, chicken pox,
Speaker 1: lice for for the release in the community. So there's
Speaker 1: things that we don't know about this bill yet. But
Speaker 1: I can tell you if ICE currently has forty nine
Speaker 1: thousand people in attention, not including families, so whatever that
Speaker 1: number is, let's say, let's say it's forty two thousand,
Speaker 1: if they got forty nine, I got a bail on
Speaker 1: Tom here. But he's giving you more of the details.
Speaker 1: And it's just he knows that this is all a
Speaker 1: game the Democrats are playing. Man. They don't want law
Speaker 1: enforce and be able to do it's job, and we
Speaker 1: will be right back. I watched this news conference. It
Speaker 1: was pretty sad. It was a sad look. Let them
Speaker 1: figure out what to do. But I felt, actually I
Speaker 1: felt sorry for his wife, and his wife saved him
Speaker 1: from doing. As you know, Michael Jackson, I think that
Speaker 1: the Republicans are going to do very well in Virginia.
Speaker 1: I think a lot of things are happening in Virginia.
Speaker 1: Virginia is ready to flip over to something. And I'll
Speaker 1: tell you, African Americans are coming to the Republican Party
Speaker 1: like nobody can believe. I hope what Trump is saying
Speaker 1: is true. I hope that there are more and more
Speaker 1: African Americans who realize that, you know, Trump just he
Speaker 1: really does just wanted to America where there's more economic dynamism, productivity, wealth, prosperity, freedom,
Speaker 1: and happiness. I mean, that's that's really what he's trying
Speaker 1: for everybody of every race. That's really what every conservative
Speaker 1: wants to But I mean that is, you know, Trump's
Speaker 1: goal is for people to have more freedom and more stuff,
Speaker 1: you know, more more materials. Let's be on more material wealth.
Speaker 1: I could use a little more material wealth. I'm sure
Speaker 1: some of you listening could use a little more material wealth.
Speaker 1: I mean, you know this is and I hope that
Speaker 1: that that understanding of the policy, forget about the forget
Speaker 1: about the style, focus on the substance. I hope that
Speaker 1: understanding of what Trump really stands for is going to
Speaker 1: resonate with it. Remember, it doesn't have to resonate with
Speaker 1: all the black community. I wish it would, but it
Speaker 1: doesn't have to. If it resonates with twenty percent of
Speaker 1: a black community, it would be it would be an
Speaker 1: electoral lights out for the Democrats in twenty twenty. I mean,
Speaker 1: they'd be they'd be they would be toast. I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm guessing about that number. I don't even know what,
Speaker 1: but the Democrats are counting. They count every year and
Speaker 1: every presidential election on having about ninety percent of the
Speaker 1: black vote, and I think in the Obama years it
Speaker 1: was like ninety eight or ninety nine. So if we
Speaker 1: could take some portion away of that support, and man,
Speaker 1: it would be great, you know, I would. I would
Speaker 1: really like to see more of this happening where especially
Speaker 1: the young African Americans who see what the parties stand for, like,
Speaker 1: I don't like this, this paternalistic, big state, big government
Speaker 1: approach from the left. I want to be my own
Speaker 1: I want to be my own boss, so to speak,
Speaker 1: not just in professionally, but in day to day life.
Speaker 1: I don't need people telling me how to think, what
Speaker 1: to do and anyway. It would it would be great.
Speaker 1: I hope that's true. That all said Northam is staying.
Speaker 1: Northam is not going anywhere, which is amazing that this guy, who,
Speaker 1: let's let's all be clear about this, is still to
Speaker 1: this day lying about the fact that he's in a photo.
Speaker 1: I mean, he tried to pull the kind of a
Speaker 1: verse in the Anthony Wiener where it's like that wasn't
Speaker 1: Anthony Wiener's you know what, that wasn't the wiener and
Speaker 1: if that didn't last very long, Northam has been like,
Speaker 1: that's not me in the black face photo on my
Speaker 1: yearbook page from my graduation yearbook, and it's the same
Speaker 1: in all the yearbooks. Yeah, okay, buddy. So he's just
Speaker 1: a shameless liar. But you know who is probably gonna
Speaker 1: have to resign? I think is Fairfax? The lieutenant governor
Speaker 1: who's an African American. I think he's in trouble. This
Speaker 1: is from Fox News Today. Newly revealed Facebook messages show
Speaker 1: that the second woman accusing Virginia Lieutenant Governor Justin Fairfax
Speaker 1: of sexual assault was making those allegations in private during
Speaker 1: the state's twenty seventeen election as she weighed whether to
Speaker 1: come forward or not. Facebook messages dating back as far
Speaker 1: as March of twenty seventeen and obtained by Fox News
Speaker 1: on Tuesday, show Meredith Watson and commenting on Fairfax's candidacy
Speaker 1: and telling contacts about the alleged rape. A message from
Speaker 1: March nineteen, twenty seventeen, read, this is absolutely disgusting. This
Speaker 1: dude raped me. The unknown contact respondent, was it reported
Speaker 1: and is there something that could be said, followed by
Speaker 1: a message asking if she would even want to say something.
Speaker 1: Watson replied that she quote didn't report it after how
Speaker 1: the university responded when she reportedly complained about an earlier
Speaker 1: alleged rape by former NBA player Corey Maghett while they
Speaker 1: were students at Duke University twenty years ago. So this
Speaker 1: is all in this Fox newspiece. I here is why,
Speaker 1: here's why he may have to resign. And you have
Speaker 1: all the different Democrat, all the different Democrat, you know,
Speaker 1: intersectional pieces colliding here in a sense because they really
Speaker 1: want to maintain the right to destroy Republicans with non
Speaker 1: credible allegations of sexual assault. These allegations against fair Fox
Speaker 1: are entirely credible. I believe them. I don't know why
Speaker 1: would you know? Now I started asking the questions, why
Speaker 1: would these women who truly have nothing to gain? Because
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party is not gonna They're not gonna go
Speaker 1: on the speaking tour, They're not going to be on
Speaker 1: the cover of Time magazine. They're not going to be
Speaker 1: louded as heroes as Blonsie Ford was. Oh the other
Speaker 1: two accusers of Kavan, off course, they just forgot about
Speaker 1: them because they were loons and they were liars. But
Speaker 1: Blonsie Ford, you know, became this big hero to the left,
Speaker 1: as I said she would, and the left was lying
Speaker 1: about that during the shears nothing to gain. You remember
Speaker 1: when I was here on the show, I said, I have
Speaker 1: have an all accuser, the first one. Blossie for it.
Speaker 1: She had a lot to gain. She's now a national name.
Speaker 1: She's a hero of the left forever. Every party she
Speaker 1: goes to in wherever she has that house in California,
Speaker 1: I mean, every time she goes to grocery store, they're
Speaker 1: gonna be women who come up here and say thank
Speaker 1: you so much for what you did. Even though she's
Speaker 1: a liar, she's a disturbed person. I think she's a
Speaker 1: liar full stop. Fairfax. Fairfax has two women accusing him
Speaker 1: that I think are entirely credible because of all the
Speaker 1: different factors that I'm working through with you now, and
Speaker 1: his actions surrounding this are very suspicious and weird to me.
Speaker 1: And I just would note that the Democrats can't figure
Speaker 1: out what is what is a bigger They view this
Speaker 1: through this. This is the Democrat prison that they're looking at.
Speaker 1: This ongoing to Backland, Virginia, through. Is it worse too
Speaker 1: during a blackfaced controversy with Northam and and Herring? Is
Speaker 1: it a worse look for the Democrat Party to have
Speaker 1: the black lieutenant governor resign on obviously unrelated issues, but
Speaker 1: that's the circumstances right now of the news cycle. Or
Speaker 1: to have a guy who stays in office that will
Speaker 1: prevent them, prevent Democrats down the line from weaponizing not
Speaker 1: credible allegations of sexual assault against Republicans day. That's the
Speaker 1: that's what's really happening here. That's the back and forth
Speaker 1: on the left as to what should be the end
Speaker 1: the end state of all this. I mean, they are
Speaker 1: as they look at this, they're trying to figure out
Speaker 1: what is more important for the party and to the party.
Speaker 1: I know, Kirsten jilla Brand. I mean there have been
Speaker 1: some prominent Democrats who have said they want Fairfax to resign.
Speaker 1: And you know, there's also this part of me though
Speaker 1: that says, look at what the look at what the
Speaker 1: Democrats approach in the Kavanaugh situation. Look with that has
Speaker 1: unleash now that we now owe the allegation is enough
Speaker 1: even though Calvanaugh has managed to and only because if
Speaker 1: he's incredible. He's incredible defense of his honor and his
Speaker 1: decency in front of his wife, in front of America.
Speaker 1: The only reason he got through. If he had sort
Speaker 1: of been a mealy mouth, you know, I don't really
Speaker 1: you know, he would have been called a sex abuser
Speaker 1: the rest of his life and wouldn't be on the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court, and would probably have been impeached from the
Speaker 1: DC Circuit Court. But he stood tall, and he fought back,
Speaker 1: and man, I was I'll be on. I was proud
Speaker 1: to be I was proud to be an American that day.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm proud every day, but you know what
Speaker 1: I mean. And but that created this standard of if
Speaker 1: somebody is accused of sexual misconduct of a whole wide variety.
Speaker 1: You know, I don't think anybody said that Al Franken
Speaker 1: in Minnesota was a was a rapist. They just said
Speaker 1: that he was a gropy stick the tongue down the throat,
Speaker 1: you know, sexual assaulter, slash groper and or you know,
Speaker 1: sexual abuse. I don't even know what you know, he
Speaker 1: used essentially crossing the line sexually with women, but not
Speaker 1: quite at the felony level. And you know, when you
Speaker 1: actually look at the statutes about this. It does break
Speaker 1: it down by like body part and what happened, and
Speaker 1: I mean that is what the law says, so there
Speaker 1: is some basis for it, you know. But they threw
Speaker 1: him under the bus too because they wanted to keep this.
Speaker 1: They know that this is the same way. I mean,
Speaker 1: you see those with Democrats and a lot of things,
Speaker 1: they know they'll fight dirtier, so they like to keep
Speaker 1: some of these dirty options open. Right. This is why
Speaker 1: they want donor lists to be public for all kinds
Speaker 1: of organizations, because they know the media is in their
Speaker 1: pocket and they will name and shame donors to Republican causes.
Speaker 1: They also want the me too weaponization for any sexual
Speaker 1: assault claim to be an open pathway for them to
Speaker 1: destroy Roy any Republican that they want when they really
Speaker 1: want to do it. So I think Fairfax is caught
Speaker 1: up in that in a way that I don't I
Speaker 1: don't see how. I don't see how he gets out
Speaker 1: of it. I mean, he may just sort of stay,
Speaker 1: but he will be a problem. He will be a
Speaker 1: problem for the Democrats for a long time to come
Speaker 1: because he can't he can't have this guy in office
Speaker 1: with those very credible Remember, credible is not proven. It's
Speaker 1: not the same thing those very credible accusations, and then
Speaker 1: have the equivalent of a Kavanaugh scenario without all of us,
Speaker 1: anybody who's honest and thought from the country saying okay, Democrats,
Speaker 1: you're a bunch of frauds, liars and hypocrites. Okay, good
Speaker 1: to know. More coming up. When do you want to
Speaker 1: spot that burglar when he's casing your home or after
Speaker 1: he's already gotten in? Asked John, Who's Blink camera alerted
Speaker 1: him to burglars trying to break in while he and
Speaker 1: his family were home? Or Shannon, who's Blink camera caught
Speaker 1: a thief stealing package? Is I hate people who steal backages? Man,
Speaker 1: It happens all the time. But both times Blink video
Speaker 1: clips actually were sent to the police to help convict
Speaker 1: the crooks. Blink motion activated indoor and outdoor cameras are
Speaker 1: wire free. They set up in minutes and run on
Speaker 1: two double A batteries that last up to two years,
Speaker 1: And if you're traveling, blinks Live feed option lets you
Speaker 1: monitor your home and check in on pets from anywhere
Speaker 1: using the Blink smartphone app. No contracts, no subscriptions, totally
Speaker 1: affordable and Blink works with Alexa. Blink camera systems make
Speaker 1: great gifts, and there are a brilliant way to monitor
Speaker 1: your package deliveries. Visit blink protect dot Com, slash Buck again,
Speaker 1: Blink protect dot Com, slash buck once again, Blink Protect
Speaker 1: dot Com slash Buck. Blink is an Amazon company. What
Speaker 1: if Beto gets a bigger crowd? That seems like, oh yeah,
Speaker 1: well that's what I'm wondering. Here are you gonna who
Speaker 1: did the advanced planning for this? Who said go to
Speaker 1: El Paso, Texas, where you are overwhelmingly unpopped were and
Speaker 1: where Meadow Aurora might actually have a counter? Is there
Speaker 1: any place that's more fun to be than a Trump rally?
Speaker 1: Is there? King, with the proud and incredible and great
Speaker 1: people of the State of Texas, we will make America
Speaker 1: wealthy again. We will make America strong again, we will
Speaker 1: make America safe again, and we will make America great again.
Speaker 1: Thank you, Texas, Thank you. So that was from last night.
Speaker 1: I mean it's like Trump gave a rock concert for
Speaker 1: He's like a one man walking Woodstock in terms of
Speaker 1: the audience that shows up. It's it's it's amazing, but
Speaker 1: you heard at the beginning there MSNBC, Nicole Wallace, you know,
Speaker 1: a former Bush, a former Bush of appointee or I
Speaker 1: forget what her job was in the Bush White House
Speaker 1: one of and Charlie Sykes noted smug, sanctimonious and not
Speaker 1: nearly as as smart as he seems to think. He
Speaker 1: is not even in the same universe. Never Trump or
Speaker 1: Charlie Sykes. I mean, they just said stupid stuff. There
Speaker 1: they are, they're on They're on the MSNBC. Charlie Sykes
Speaker 1: thinks he's a conservative now writes for the Bullwork because
Speaker 1: they're a bullwork against Trump? Is him? You know, he's
Speaker 1: he should be Nancy Pelosi's communications director. He does a
Speaker 1: great job advocating against conservatives, against the right, against Trump,
Speaker 1: and advocating for Democrats, because he's the real conservative. I mean,
Speaker 1: these never trumpers, they're gross. What they do is now dishonest,
Speaker 1: it's unseemly. All right, there are babies lives at stake here.
Speaker 1: There is the sovereignty of this country in the middle
Speaker 1: of a fight for it, the fight for whether we
Speaker 1: will have sovereignty or not, whether we'll have a future
Speaker 1: as a country or not. And Charlie Sykes wants to
Speaker 1: sit there like a like a bunch of high school
Speaker 1: girls about maybe Betto's rallies gonna be bigger. Beto's rally
Speaker 1: was laughable. Betto Robert O'Rourke, that's right, everybody, Robert, his
Speaker 1: name is not Betto. He just you know, this is
Speaker 1: another guy who trying to be a little edgy or
Speaker 1: trying to be a little cooler. And you could say, oh, Buck,
Speaker 1: but you know your name isn't Buck. Yeah, my name
Speaker 1: is Buckman. It's my grand my great grandmother's maiden name.
Speaker 1: And in the eighties, if you're born in certain parts
Speaker 1: of the country, people went by their middle names. I
Speaker 1: don't want to tell you it's been My name is
Speaker 1: not a little kid. But Betto is just trying to
Speaker 1: be like, hey, I'm like the hipster who's multicultural and
Speaker 1: all this stuff. He's as white as I He's the
Speaker 1: whitest dude I can see. He's white as I am.
Speaker 1: And he's adopting this this Latin nickname to give him
Speaker 1: a little more street cred. The guy's married to somebody.
Speaker 1: Somebody corrected me recently, the said Buck, you need to
Speaker 1: stop saying he's married to a billionaire. And then they
Speaker 1: sent me a an estimate from Forbes of the net
Speaker 1: worth of the family that he married into, and it
Speaker 1: said there there, This was a Democrat by the way
Speaker 1: who sent this to me, and it said they're worth
Speaker 1: I think four or five hundred million dollars. So I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: He's a half billionaire, all right, his wife is, and
Speaker 1: his wife is a an heiress to half a billion dollars,
Speaker 1: maybe not a billion dollars. This passes for you know,
Speaker 1: for democrats doing their due diligence. And the guy is
Speaker 1: just such a lightweight. He's a lightweight. Why doesn't he
Speaker 1: just like come out on like a skateboard. I'm just
Speaker 1: I'm just I'm better at Rourke and I'm just like really,
Speaker 1: I'm really cool, and i just want what's better for America,
Speaker 1: and I just really believe, and you know, I just don't.
Speaker 1: I just don't like walls and stuff. Play clip four.
Speaker 1: We stand for America and we stand against walls. We
Speaker 1: know that there is no bargain in which we can
Speaker 1: sacrifice some of our humanity to gain a little more security.
Speaker 1: We know that we deserve and will lose both of
Speaker 1: them if we do. We stand for the best traditions
Speaker 1: and values of this country, for our fellow humanity and
Speaker 1: who we are when we are at our best. And
Speaker 1: that's al Paso, Texas. I'm glad the country's there to
Speaker 1: see us. Oh, we stand for like what it's really good,
Speaker 1: I like the best of humanity and like America, and
Speaker 1: like we're all about making sure that like we're like
Speaker 1: really good to people and stuff. This guy, first of all,
Speaker 1: you never this is just a rule for life. You
Speaker 1: never want to be the guy who throws the really
Speaker 1: lame party across the street from the raging keg party
Speaker 1: that was Betto last night. You could have seen it.
Speaker 1: There were photos of this and they said that there
Speaker 1: were eight thousand people the better Betto rally. That was
Speaker 1: the that was the better organizer count. I'd say they
Speaker 1: were about from the photos I saw, twelve to fifteen hundred.
Speaker 1: Maybe Trump had max capacity in the arena eight thousand
Speaker 1: and probably another six to eight thousand outside the arena.
Speaker 1: And that's just based on the photos that I saw. Okay,
Speaker 1: So this idea that that he had from Wallace and
Speaker 1: psychs he Beto's rally might be bigger. Yeah, fat chance. Okay,
Speaker 1: Beto couldn't even win his Senate seed in Texas against
Speaker 1: Ted Cruz. So can we stop pretending he's he's like
Speaker 1: a national phenomenon, because like he's just he just reminds
Speaker 1: a lot of like like liberal women, and there are
Speaker 1: thirties and forties of like aaracter from friends that they
Speaker 1: thought was like really hot, and so they want to
Speaker 1: vote for him. It's garbage. This guy is. This guy
Speaker 1: is a nothing burger. He's a nothing burger. But I
Speaker 1: could have seen him last night. You know. Oh gods,
Speaker 1: my party's running low and alcohol, So can can you
Speaker 1: just like give me some zema because like we are
Speaker 1: some wine coolers, because I know your party's really crowded,
Speaker 1: like your Trump party, but like I just need some zema. Manum,
Speaker 1: we stand against walls. You know. One of my favorite
Speaker 1: questions when dealing with libs. What is what is among
Speaker 1: my very favorite questions of all What do you mean?
Speaker 1: Lib What are you talking? What are you saying? There
Speaker 1: are words coming out? But what are you saying? We
Speaker 1: stand against walls? Okay, this is like when I asked
Speaker 1: Max boot another fake conservative. It's really just all about him.
Speaker 1: I mean, he's he's a loon psychs boot. There's a
Speaker 1: whole bunch of them. Just I can't believe they were
Speaker 1: they spent as much time on the right as they did,
Speaker 1: because they clearly have no real ideological, ideological brotherhood with
Speaker 1: the right at all. I mean, it was all just
Speaker 1: a fraud for professional reasons, I guess. But you know,
Speaker 1: we stand against walls, as maximot this too. So if
Speaker 1: walls are racist and walls are immral, what do we
Speaker 1: do with the hundreds of fence that we already have?
Speaker 1: Did those come down? Because they're racist and imral and
Speaker 1: they don't work? So why don't we just tear them down?
Speaker 1: Oh no, that's a dumb idea. And now we're being
Speaker 1: told that there might be fifty five more miles or
Speaker 1: fifty five additional miles of steel slat fencing put up. Okay,
Speaker 1: we can do fifty, why can't we do five hundred?
Speaker 1: Is this a problem in principle? It's not a problem
Speaker 1: of funds, because the government has the money to do this.
Speaker 1: But we stand against walls. This is this is a
Speaker 1: This is a mindless talking point from somebody who is
Speaker 1: in no way impressive. There's nothing about this guy. He's
Speaker 1: just a guy who you know, sounds like a lib,
Speaker 1: walks and talks like a and has a wealthy family,
Speaker 1: so he doesn't have to worry about having a real job.
Speaker 1: That's just what he is, you know. I mean, he's
Speaker 1: someone who the notion of him being president is both
Speaker 1: hilarious and terrifying at the same time. I don't think
Speaker 1: to be a report. The rules of the Department say
Speaker 1: no report. I won't be shocked if anything regarding the
Speaker 1: president has made public other than we're done. Know what
Speaker 1: the case is. There is no case. People in the
Speaker 1: press say, well, he must have some surprise. He doesn't have.
Speaker 1: I know exactly what he has. I know exactly what
Speaker 1: every witness said, what every document said, I know exactly
Speaker 1: what he has, and I know what the conclusion of
Speaker 1: the result is. There's no basis, there's no exposure. It's
Speaker 1: been a terrible waste of time. This is one of
Speaker 1: the greatest frauds those country's ever seen. John Dowd laying
Speaker 1: it down. This guy is not messing around. I think that,
Speaker 1: you know, you get former White House attorney John Daoud.
Speaker 1: They're saying that that this should not be released. I
Speaker 1: just look at it from the perspective of what it
Speaker 1: will mean. You know what it will mean for the
Speaker 1: people that are currently not implicated in this, but that
Speaker 1: it has information on what does it mean for Trump?
Speaker 1: What does it mean for those around him? And and
Speaker 1: here's the problem that we face. No matter what the
Speaker 1: report says or does not say, no matter what information
Speaker 1: it contains, or they will the media, the Democratic Party
Speaker 1: will continue to spread lies and disinformation about the Russia
Speaker 1: collusion probe and all of these investigations of President Trump.
Speaker 1: They are debasing the law openly, actively with its strategic intent.
Speaker 1: They are debasing the law by using lawfare against this president.
Speaker 1: That is what is happening here, and they won't stop.
Speaker 1: They have never been interested in getting the truth. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's why I'm trying to prepare any conservatives who will listen,
Speaker 1: including colleagues of mine in the business, who think, oh,
Speaker 1: the Muller report, it's gonna you know, the Muller Report,
Speaker 1: and then you know, will move on to oh no, no,
Speaker 1: we're not moving They're not moving on to anything. When
Speaker 1: Muller does or does not release his report doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: When it is clearly that there are no collusion charges
Speaker 1: against Trump or any of the people that they've been
Speaker 1: telling us, Oh, they're gonna get Donald Trump Junior. Oh,
Speaker 1: they're gonna get you know, name somebody. And no, they're
Speaker 1: gonna get Kelly Ann Conway or somebody in the way.
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter. And they've been speculating about this for
Speaker 1: quite a long time. But you know, really they wanted
Speaker 1: to get Trump himself, or they at least wanted Man
Speaker 1: of four or Stone or COARSI or one of these
Speaker 1: guys to get nailed doing something that is an illegal
Speaker 1: effort to do something with regard to the election. Not illegal,
Speaker 1: Oh I didn't file my taxes properly. Who cares. They
Speaker 1: wanted to get them with something to justify this. But
Speaker 1: you're going to see and this is really frustrating, and
Speaker 1: I just wanted to be prepared. They already have a
Speaker 1: built in failsafe for this. They are going to say
Speaker 1: that the Russia collusion investigation was really get ready for
Speaker 1: It was really all about protecting the integrity of our elections.
Speaker 1: I know you want to barf as I'm saying it
Speaker 1: to you, and you should, because you know that's not
Speaker 1: what this is about. But that's we never saw the
Speaker 1: scope of them all our probe. We don't know what
Speaker 1: the full authorization of it really was. And yet we
Speaker 1: all know, based on the series of events that led
Speaker 1: to the Muller probe, that this was always about getting Trump.
Speaker 1: The Muller's charges against those Russians. That was ridiculous. That
Speaker 1: was a It was a purely political play. It was
Speaker 1: charging Russian nationals on a counterintelligence basis for stuff that
Speaker 1: they're never gonna see, you know, they're never going to
Speaker 1: see the inside of a courtroom for they're never going
Speaker 1: to be extradited as laughable, and he knows that. So
Speaker 1: but you see, they they did that in part to
Speaker 1: construct this narrative of seriousness about the investigation, because you
Speaker 1: always hear people like, oh, there have been you know,
Speaker 1: twenty some odd people indicted as part of the Yeah,
Speaker 1: and half of them are you know, a bunch of
Speaker 1: dudes in Moscow in the basement of some building who
Speaker 1: were putting up fake Facebook accounts. Okay, I don't think
Speaker 1: anybody sleeps more soundly at night because of any of that,
Speaker 1: and they shouldn't because it means nothing. But now, the
Speaker 1: way to save face, after all the hysterics, after all
Speaker 1: of the craziness in the media. I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: people saying things like, you know, what's her name, Louise
Speaker 1: mention that the Grand Marshal of the Supreme Court is
Speaker 1: about to arrest She had her own website for a while, folks,
Speaker 1: I mean, I mean the website that people actually read.
Speaker 1: She was the editor in chief. But you know that
Speaker 1: she's uh that the Grand Marshal of the Supreme Court
Speaker 1: is going to arrest Trump any day now. She went cuckoo.
Speaker 1: She went and there are a bunch of people that
Speaker 1: were just this guy I think his name is Eric
Speaker 1: Garland on Twitter. I've never heard this guy before. He
Speaker 1: got a huge Twitter following now, just a complete loon
Speaker 1: on the Trump Russia stuff. I mean, just living in
Speaker 1: some other, some other universe, you know, not not not
Speaker 1: a connection to reality whatsoever about how this is what's
Speaker 1: happening here. But all the people in the press that
Speaker 1: bought this stuff, all the CNN journos and MSNBC panels
Speaker 1: and the correspondence and all the serious talk from little
Speaker 1: tiny Stefanopolos on ABC, all that about collusion and Trump
Speaker 1: and he's just going to take down the administry. That's
Speaker 1: all going nowhere as well, you know, what they're gonna say, Oh, well,
Speaker 1: this was about protecting the integrity of our elections and
Speaker 1: making sure that Russian interference and our elections can't happen. Again,
Speaker 1: those are both lies. One, this was never about understanding
Speaker 1: the Russian and that that investing could have That investigation
Speaker 1: could have been done without a special counsel, could have
Speaker 1: been done by the DOJ. The only reason, the only
Speaker 1: rational for a special counsel, was that you needed somebody
Speaker 1: that was independent of the normal executive branch chain of
Speaker 1: command because Trump was implicated. That's the only reason. You
Speaker 1: don't need a special counsel to investigate Russia collusion. You
Speaker 1: don't need it, I'm sorry, Russian interference. Rather, you don't
Speaker 1: need it. You don't need it. So it doesn't even
Speaker 1: make any sense. But they're just gonna hope that the
Speaker 1: disinformation campaign here just put out so many lies and
Speaker 1: so much garbage that people can't figure out what's what,
Speaker 1: People can't decipher, and people we get tired. They wear
Speaker 1: us down. That's part of disinformation. They wear you down.
Speaker 1: You have jobs, you have lives, you have families. You
Speaker 1: can't you can't sit around, you know, Oh, I mean
Speaker 1: hopefully I do it for you, which to some extent here,
Speaker 1: but you know, you can't sit around and part through
Speaker 1: all this stuff, and I can't and you shouldn't because
Speaker 1: it's all nothing. But if you try to dig into
Speaker 1: this and understand what's true and you just find that
Speaker 1: it's just smokescreen after smokescreen, and the dishonesty is it's
Speaker 1: it's just stunning. It is truly stunning what the left
Speaker 1: has has managed to do here. And now they're going
Speaker 1: to say that it was always just about the Russian
Speaker 1: interference in the election, and without missing a beat, the
Speaker 1: Democrat House, Democrat controlled House, is going to pivot to
Speaker 1: Trump's taxes, Trump tower deals, Truman. They're just gonna Trump hotel,
Speaker 1: Trump steaks, Trump Trump tie bars or either everything. They're
Speaker 1: just gonna create all these investigations of this guy. It's
Speaker 1: never gonna go anywhere. But they understand that the mere
Speaker 1: existence of the investigation becomes its own propaganda tactic. Oh
Speaker 1: did you know the Southern District of New York is investigating,
Speaker 1: you know, this aspect of Trump or that look at
Speaker 1: what happened with the National Inquirer and the porn star payoffs.
Speaker 1: They're never gonna stop. I'm here to tell you that
Speaker 1: they're they're never going to stop because it was never
Speaker 1: about the truth. And so even when we come to
Speaker 1: the end of this and get the closest thing that
Speaker 1: any of them can reasonably expect would be the truth
Speaker 1: from them all, there probe that there was no Russia collusion,
Speaker 1: it's not gonna not gonna slow this down, the anti
Speaker 1: Trump mania not gonna stop it at all. In fact,
Speaker 1: in some ways it might even get kind of worse,
Speaker 1: because then it will just be a race to the
Speaker 1: bottom for various Democrats in Congress to start. And mind
Speaker 1: you a lot of Democrat lefty prosecutors sitting in places
Speaker 1: like the Southern District of New York who are going
Speaker 1: to know that this is a great way to make
Speaker 1: a name for yourself in a place like New York,
Speaker 1: San Francisco, Los Angeles, DC. You know, a great way
Speaker 1: to make a name for yourself is to find some
Speaker 1: investigation of Trump that you can start, that you can
Speaker 1: get away with, that your supervisors will sign off on.
Speaker 1: So and if anyone try to stop it, you know,
Speaker 1: then you go forward. You give all these interviews on CNN.
Speaker 1: Oh they're stifling me and I'm just trying to do oversight,
Speaker 1: just trying to protect our institutions. These people are dangerously
Speaker 1: dishonest and that's not going to change anytime soon. We'll
Speaker 1: be right back. The fact is that the real collision
Speaker 1: was between Hillary and the Democrats and the others with Russia.
Speaker 1: That's where the collusion. I'm starting to make a lot
Speaker 1: more sense. But that's where the collision is, with the
Speaker 1: Democrats and with Russia and with others. And by the way,
Speaker 1: there's also collusion between the Democrats and the fake news
Speaker 1: right here. Trump was on fire last night in El Paso, Texas.
Speaker 1: The real collusion, he says, between Russia and the Democrats. Well,
Speaker 1: we've got somebody who is a true expert on that
Speaker 1: particular topic. Among many others were joined by Greg Jarrett.
Speaker 1: He is a Fox News legal analyst. The paperback version
Speaker 1: of his best selling book The Russia Hoax, The Illicit
Speaker 1: Scheme to Clear Hillary Clinton and Frame Donald Trump, is
Speaker 1: out today. I recommend it to you all, mister Jarret
Speaker 1: grad to have you back, hey, but great to be
Speaker 1: with you, or is the pleasure? So tell me where
Speaker 1: do you see us right now in this whole Russia
Speaker 1: collusion delusion. I have heard from sources here in DC
Speaker 1: that it is in fact the case that we are,
Speaker 1: barring some unforeseen event, going to be seeing the end
Speaker 1: of the Muller probe very soon, as in weeks, not month.
Speaker 1: You know, I don't know if you believe that or not.
Speaker 1: But also I am seeing journalists who are starting to
Speaker 1: run with this. Well, they didn't disprove collusion either, which
Speaker 1: is quite a standard. What do you see happening? Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's sort of a crazy spin. The media is now
Speaker 1: depressed and apoplectic that even Democrats on the Senate Intelligence
Speaker 1: Committee admitted today that Senator Burr was correct when he said,
Speaker 1: after two years, we have come up with no evidence
Speaker 1: of collusion. In his committee interviewed more than two hundred
Speaker 1: people from multiple countries, examined three hundred thousand pages of documents.
Speaker 1: They came up with not a shred of evidence. And
Speaker 1: that's consistent with the House Intelligence Committee as well. So
Speaker 1: you and I have to believe that whatever Burr came
Speaker 1: up with no evidence of collusion, is more reliable than
Speaker 1: anything Robert Muller will come up with. Because the Senate
Speaker 1: Intel Committee has direct access to classified information that Muller
Speaker 1: doesn't have access too. So you know, after a couple
Speaker 1: of years now it turns out it was all the
Speaker 1: Russia hoax, which is the title of my book, And
Speaker 1: every day information seems to come out that only corroborates
Speaker 1: the thesis of my book. Do you have a strong
Speaker 1: opinion one way or the other on whether, the first
Speaker 1: of all, should Muller release whatever the report is, because
Speaker 1: my understanding from people I speak to at the Department
Speaker 1: of Justice is that it's really up to bar the
Speaker 1: incoming Attorney general's discretion, assuming he all goes according to
Speaker 1: plan with that. And you know, I've heard two schools
Speaker 1: of thought on this. On the one hand, it's a
Speaker 1: prosecutor's document. It's not supposed to be fair and even handed.
Speaker 1: It's just whatever they found in looking for crimes. On
Speaker 1: the other hand, people say, well, if they don't release it,
Speaker 1: then Democrats and I know this will happen. We'll just say, well,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of bad stuff in there, we just
Speaker 1: don't get to see it, and of course then there'll
Speaker 1: be the leak. So what do you think of all that? Well,
Speaker 1: you're absolutely right. The Special Counsel regulations are quite specific.
Speaker 1: They say that whatever information that is gathered by a
Speaker 1: special counsel is to be delivered to the Attorney General.
Speaker 1: And you know a lot of that information contains some
Speaker 1: classified documents and that of course would be protected. So
Speaker 1: it's it's up to the discretion of the Attorney General,
Speaker 1: who will be William Barr very shortly. And you know,
Speaker 1: he said in his confirmation here that he favors transparency
Speaker 1: that consistent with the regulations, he'll try to provide the
Speaker 1: public with as much information as he possibly can. But
Speaker 1: you know, it may be possible that Muller won't even
Speaker 1: write a report, but simply provide an accounting for his
Speaker 1: prosecutorial decisions, in which case there wouldn't actually be much
Speaker 1: to report because all of the people that have been
Speaker 1: indicted or plaed have nothing whatsoever to do with collusion
Speaker 1: or Trump Russia collusion, not a single person. We're speaking
Speaker 1: to Greg Jarrett, Fox News legal analyst. He has a
Speaker 1: book that is out in paperback today, so perfect timing here.
Speaker 1: It's a bestseller. You should check it out. The Russia Hoax,
Speaker 1: The illicit scheme to clear Hillary Clinton and frame Donald Trump. Greg,
Speaker 1: tell me about the We open this up with Trump
Speaker 1: last night saying the real collusion was with the Democrats
Speaker 1: and Russia. Where do you take that? How do you
Speaker 1: make that case? Well, I make that argument in my
Speaker 1: book that Hillary Clinton paid for Russian information that you know,
Speaker 1: she hid through a scheme that's akin to money laundering.
Speaker 1: She then fed that Russian information to the FBI and
Speaker 1: the Department of Justice. They knew it was dubious, if
Speaker 1: not totally fabricated, they didn't care. They used it as
Speaker 1: a pretext to launch the investigation of Trump and then
Speaker 1: to seek a warrant to spy on his campaign. They
Speaker 1: never had probable cause, they didn't have credible evidence, and
Speaker 1: so they ignored all the rules that I explained in
Speaker 1: the book are that govern their activities at the FBI
Speaker 1: and the Department of Justice. They lied to the FI
Speaker 1: support perpetrated a fraud. I mean, the only people who
Speaker 1: committed serious crimes related to Russia would be the FBI
Speaker 1: and the Department of Justice. People like James Comeey, and
Speaker 1: Andrew McCabe, and you know Peter Struck in Lisa Page
Speaker 1: and the machinations of Bruce or and Sally Yates over
Speaker 1: at the Department of Justice. And you know, these are
Speaker 1: the people who should be held accountable. So there really
Speaker 1: was no Trump Russia collusion. It was all a hoax.
Speaker 1: But there was Clinton Russia FBI collusion. Now to your
Speaker 1: point about accountability, Greg, I remember getting a lot, you know,
Speaker 1: years back, getting a lot of heat from from listeners
Speaker 1: and viewers when I said, guys, the day Obama won
Speaker 1: reelection was the day that any hope for accountability on
Speaker 1: Benghazi went away, and people got very mad at me.
Speaker 1: And I was basically right because I knew that once
Speaker 1: they were you know, once that regime had stayed in place,
Speaker 1: and you know that Obama was going to make sure
Speaker 1: and that the people that were are supposed to look
Speaker 1: into these things, it was just it was never gonna happen.
Speaker 1: There was never going to be real accountability with the
Speaker 1: people in power staying in power that had allowed that
Speaker 1: terrible debacle to occur. I'm concerned that a lot of people,
Speaker 1: a lot of people on the right now, a lot
Speaker 1: of conservatives and honestly just a lot of concerned Americans
Speaker 1: across the country look at the situation and are going
Speaker 1: to say, Okay, well, who we should breathe a sigh
Speaker 1: of relief here, there's no collusion they could prove against Trump.
Speaker 1: When what I want is, and this goes to what
Speaker 1: you were just saying, I want Sally Yates answering some
Speaker 1: real questions here. I want senior FBI officials that clearly
Speaker 1: abused their authority answering some questions. Do you think that
Speaker 1: we will get there? I mean, why hasn't Trump released
Speaker 1: some of the information that he told me three or
Speaker 1: four months ago he was going to release about the
Speaker 1: origins of the Russia collusion investigation, about different fiser processes.
Speaker 1: You know, where do you see that going? He still
Speaker 1: needs to declassify those documents. Wish would shed a normous
Speaker 1: light on how law enforcers became the law breakers. And yes,
Speaker 1: I do believe that Attorney General William Barr will re
Speaker 1: examine the conduct of these individuals at the FBI, the
Speaker 1: Department of Justice. He well knows that they have lost credibility,
Speaker 1: and you know that their good name and reputation has
Speaker 1: been sullied by the acts of people like James Commy,
Speaker 1: and Andrew McCabe, Peter struck lesa page and you know,
Speaker 1: I mean, under Barack Obama, the Department of Justice became
Speaker 1: the most political organization in Washington, and it operated very
Speaker 1: much like an organized crime family, with a conduct of
Speaker 1: people like Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch and James Commy
Speaker 1: at the FBI. It's unconscionable, it's wrong. But this is
Speaker 1: what Donald Trump was talking about when he said he
Speaker 1: was going to drain the swamp. Unfortunately, you know, the
Speaker 1: swamp didn't want to be drained, so they conspired to
Speaker 1: frame Trump for something he didn't do. The book is
Speaker 1: the Russia Hoax, the illicit scheme to clear Hillary Clinton
Speaker 1: and frame Donald Trump. It lays it all out in detail,
Speaker 1: and we're going to be coming to an interesting chapter,
Speaker 1: if not conclusion in well, at least the Russia hoax
Speaker 1: from the Muller probe pretty soon here. So definitely a
Speaker 1: book worth picking up. Greg Jarrett, thanks so much man
Speaker 1: for make the time and continued good luck on the book.
Speaker 1: Fuck thanks very much. Good to be with you today.
Speaker 1: You're right back team. Everywhere socialism has been everywhere it's
Speaker 1: been implemented. It's produced poverty, misery, repression, and despair. You
Speaker 1: take a look no matter where, yet there are those
Speaker 1: trying to implement socialism right here in the United States.
Speaker 1: So I again say, and I say it for the
Speaker 1: world to hear. America will never be a socialist country. Never.
Speaker 1: We're born free, we will live free, and we will
Speaker 1: die free. We will always be friend. How many of
Speaker 1: you ever would have thought that in your lifetime, I
Speaker 1: don't mean you know at some I mean ever in
Speaker 1: your lifetime, that it would be a somewhat controversial but
Speaker 1: true statement for the President of the United States to
Speaker 1: say that the Democratic Party, the other party, is interested
Speaker 1: in instituting socialism. And it's a fact. It's a fact.
Speaker 1: There are whole contingents of the Democratic Party that are
Speaker 1: open about it. And I would argue that on a
Speaker 1: policy level, it's what they all want. It's just a
Speaker 1: question of how honest they are about how quickly they
Speaker 1: want to get there. But this is now the country
Speaker 1: that we are living in. This is remarkable stuff. I
Speaker 1: remember when during the Obama years, if you merely said
Speaker 1: that Obama was pushing a quasi socialist agenda, people would
Speaker 1: shut you down. They would say, that's racist. You're just
Speaker 1: trying to otherwise him and otherise his ideas. I'm like, no,
Speaker 1: I just don't agree with his ideas. Has absolutely nothing
Speaker 1: to do with race. I think I think Elizabeth Warren.
Speaker 1: Socialism is every bit as stupid and a bad idea
Speaker 1: as Barack Obama. Socialism has nothing to do with skin color.
Speaker 1: It is a vicious, stupid lie to say otherwise. But
Speaker 1: the left does a lot of vicious stupid lying, as
Speaker 1: you know. But now we can see that there is
Speaker 1: a major divide between the parties based upon whether you
Speaker 1: are in favor of socialism or not. The left is
Speaker 1: embracing this, and I have been now doing this. I've
Speaker 1: been in media, and I was in intel work for
Speaker 1: seven years and I've been in media for nine, I
Speaker 1: guess or eight or nine now, And the entire time
Speaker 1: I've been saying and I've been a part of a
Speaker 1: movement here in conservative media trying to raise the alarm,
Speaker 1: trying to tell people that we are heading down a
Speaker 1: path towards socialism, that Democrats are pushing us there, and
Speaker 1: they're saying, no, we're not, No, we're not. Do you remember,
Speaker 1: I don't know how many of you ever had this
Speaker 1: if you have siblings, you know, I'm talking about where
Speaker 1: where if you had an older sibling, they would sometimes
Speaker 1: take your arm and like kind of smack you with
Speaker 1: your own hand, and they say stop smacking yourself. Stop
Speaker 1: smacking yourself. It's John. Do you know what I'm talking about?
Speaker 1: People do this, Yeah, of course right, and it's really
Speaker 1: it's it's infuriating and demeaning, but like you don't actually
Speaker 1: get hurt, but you get really angry. Stop hitting yourself.
Speaker 1: Stop hitting yourself. That's been the Democrats in power in
Speaker 1: this country with socialism, Oh America, stop stop doing more socialism.
Speaker 1: Why are you doing more socialism for yourself? You don't
Speaker 1: want either. And now they're just saying, oh, yeah, no,
Speaker 1: I'm slapping you in the face with my socialism. I
Speaker 1: am slapping you in the face with my socialism. And
Speaker 1: that's what the that's that's now a rallying cry for democrats.
Speaker 1: It has transitioned so quickly. And this is why the
Speaker 1: lunacy of the Green New Deal has been I think,
Speaker 1: such a wake up call because they could get away
Speaker 1: with all of this, just this anti Trump insanity for
Speaker 1: only so long before. Okay, you hate Trump, we get it.
Speaker 1: You think the Trump is literally worse than Hitler, We
Speaker 1: get it. What are you going to do? Democrats? And
Speaker 1: now that they have to actually say things, we've realized,
Speaker 1: Oh that's right. The Democrats are crazy, crazy, not normal,
Speaker 1: not rational, not reasonable. Okay, the Democrat left has gone
Speaker 1: bye bye, has gone into some other, some other universe
Speaker 1: with what they think this country should be and what
Speaker 1: it should do and what would work in this country.
Speaker 1: And that's why Trump's mockery, I think is essential here
Speaker 1: because it's not enough to just meet them on the
Speaker 1: battlefield of ideas. They also they are their ideas now
Speaker 1: are deserving of ridicule. The idea these are These are
Speaker 1: ideas that deserve to be made fun of. You know,
Speaker 1: we can argue about, you know, whether the marginal tax
Speaker 1: rate that would spur the most growth is you know,
Speaker 1: thirty seven percent or twenty five percent or you know,
Speaker 1: there's a right answer and a wrong answer, but at
Speaker 1: least there's a debate to be had about it. There's
Speaker 1: no debate with some of the stuff that they're talking about.
Speaker 1: Or rather, if we're going to have to debate them,
Speaker 1: it's not enough to just say why they're wrong. We
Speaker 1: have to now and I'm just telling you, we have
Speaker 1: to understand this and engage on this. We have to say,
Speaker 1: here's why you're wrong, Comma, and by the way, you're crazy.
Speaker 1: This is not like a close call. This is not
Speaker 1: an almost maybe sort of policy dispute. This is you
Speaker 1: have your wacko and the Green New Deal is a
Speaker 1: wake up call about the left's whacko and Trump went
Speaker 1: after it last night. Play clip eight tree. Last week,
Speaker 1: they introduced a massive government takeover that would destroy our
Speaker 1: incredible economic games. They introduced the so called Green New Deal.
Speaker 1: It sounds like a high school term paper that got
Speaker 1: a loan mark. It would shut down American energy, which
Speaker 1: I don't think the people in Texas are gonna be
Speaker 1: happy with that. It would shut down a little thing
Speaker 1: called air travel. How do you take a train to Europe?
Speaker 1: You know this this crazy senator from Hawaii. They said,
Speaker 1: do you like it? Yes? I like it very much.
Speaker 1: Oh really have an we getting to Hawaii on a trail.
Speaker 1: This is how we should speak about these ideas. You know,
Speaker 1: the the Rhymneyite approach would be, well, you know, I
Speaker 1: suppose it's feasible to build a couple thousand miles of
Speaker 1: underground tunnel for high speed rail, and you know we
Speaker 1: should be respectful of their ideas. No, no, no, no no.
Speaker 1: This needs to be called out and this needs to
Speaker 1: be ridiculed. These are bad and dangerous and silly ideas,
Speaker 1: all of those things, all of those pieces. And as
Speaker 1: we go into twenty twenty, we need to understand that
Speaker 1: this is not just a question of oh, they're wrong.
Speaker 1: This is they're so wrong that they need to be
Speaker 1: made to feel the sting of their stupidity a little
Speaker 1: bit here. Global Verification Network, that is the name you
Speaker 1: have to know if you have any need for background
Speaker 1: investigations for your company, any financial due diligence, you need
Speaker 1: any vetting, these are the guys that you need to use.
Speaker 1: Go to MYGVN dot com again, that's MYGBN dot com.
Speaker 1: You'll see more information about how they are a veteran
Speaker 1: owned and operated small business. They're headquartered in Chicago with
Speaker 1: risk mitigation experts spread out throughout the country, and they
Speaker 1: can work with your company in any industry, no matter
Speaker 1: what size your company. This is who you want to
Speaker 1: have doing the background checks for all of your new hires,
Speaker 1: all of your new employees. So for the people out
Speaker 1: there who are small to large business owners, I'm telling you,
Speaker 1: if you're not going to do it yourself, have your
Speaker 1: HR department reach out to them. Call eight seven seven
Speaker 1: six nine five one one seven nine. Again that's eight
Speaker 1: seven seven six nine five one one seven nine. Tell
Speaker 1: them Buck Sexton send you, tell them you're part of
Speaker 1: team Buck, and make sure that you go to Global
Speaker 1: Verification Network because they leave no stone unturned. One of
Speaker 1: the raps. I'm using your tough boss as you know
Speaker 1: that several stories will come out in the last week
Speaker 1: high staff turnover in the Senate. What do you think
Speaker 1: is fair about that criticism and what have you learned
Speaker 1: from it? Well, first of all, I love my staff.
Speaker 1: I wouldn't be where I am and we wouldn't be
Speaker 1: able to pass all those bills and do all that
Speaker 1: work if we didn't have great staff. I am tough,
Speaker 1: I push people, that is true. But my point is
Speaker 1: that I have high expectations for myself. I have high
Speaker 1: expectations for the people that work for me, and I
Speaker 1: have high expectations for this country. Amy klobaschar Senator from Minnesota.
Speaker 1: She has quite the interesting way of referring to her
Speaker 1: abusive and quasi psychotic approach to her staff high expectations.
Speaker 1: Let me tell you something, Okay, this woman is a nightmare.
Speaker 1: I don't know personally, and so I wish I could
Speaker 1: tell you that I've dealt with her. I've never even
Speaker 1: met her, never interviewed her. But I know other people
Speaker 1: here in DC who do know her, who have worked
Speaker 1: with her, and they say she is a nightmare. Let
Speaker 1: me also just reach a little bit here into the
Speaker 1: intelligence analyst bag of tricks and tell you that the
Speaker 1: the response to stories about you as a now presidential
Speaker 1: candidate for the Democrats, and why this person she's just
Speaker 1: trying to raise her profile and I mean she has
Speaker 1: no hope of being president. I mean absolutely, it's a
Speaker 1: delusional move for her to even be in the in
Speaker 1: the running. But for her to come forward and all
Speaker 1: these stories that come out about how she is really,
Speaker 1: really nasty to her staff. You got more than a
Speaker 1: dozen current and former staffers have come forward to say
Speaker 1: that she she quote this is from a mediaite, had
Speaker 1: a work environment that was run on fear, abuse and humiliation.
Speaker 1: Staffers say the overly critical senator would sometimes turn a
Speaker 1: single mistake into a multi day affair of shaming and demeaning,
Speaker 1: followed by post work, angry late night phone calls and
Speaker 1: all caps emails. The way she treats staff is disqualifying,
Speaker 1: said a former female staffer who made it clear the
Speaker 1: Klobaschar has fully earned a reputation as a horrible boss
Speaker 1: independent of her gender. End quote what I tell you yesterday.
Speaker 1: I mean this story. There's a lot more out today,
Speaker 1: but this. Whenever somebody plays the gender card on why
Speaker 1: people hate them as a boss, you know that they're
Speaker 1: a terrible boss. I'm I'm just speaking the truth because
Speaker 1: nobody cares what your gender is as a boss. They
Speaker 1: just care if you're good. They care if you're good
Speaker 1: to them, if you treat them well, if you're fair.
Speaker 1: That's all anybody cares about. There's no sane human being
Speaker 1: who's like, well, my boss is fantastic at his or
Speaker 1: her job. But because it's a her, I think that
Speaker 1: she's too aggressive, whereas she would be fine. That's that's
Speaker 1: a This is a myth, is a myth. It's like
Speaker 1: the pay gap. It's also a myth. The well, the
Speaker 1: way they explain Oh no, the way they explain the
Speaker 1: pay gap. It's not a gender a gender discrimination issue.
Speaker 1: It's a life choices and skill set issue. I know.
Speaker 1: Oh no, Buck, what are you doing? You're great? No,
Speaker 1: I'm right, I know what I'm talking about. Believe it
Speaker 1: or not. But she's horrible. I mean this much is
Speaker 1: what's clear. She's a horrible person. And you get all
Speaker 1: these Democrats to come forward, and you're seeing this the
Speaker 1: last couple of weeks. I mean, these Democrats that have
Speaker 1: been they have been talking about what a what a fraud,
Speaker 1: a liar, an idiot, a nasty person, gutter discourse, all that,
Speaker 1: all this stuff they say about Trump. How many Democrats?
Speaker 1: You got Democrats wearing black place and lying about a
Speaker 1: Democrats accused of raping multiple women, lying about it, saying
Speaker 1: horrible things about those women after the accusations. Klobuchar completely
Speaker 1: mistreats your staff and is horrible, like you, just all
Speaker 1: this and just the last couple of weeks, Elizabeth Warren delusional,
Speaker 1: thinks she's a Native American when she's not lying about
Speaker 1: not advancing herself when we know she did. These are
Speaker 1: the this is what we are offered as an alternative
Speaker 1: to Trump. We're supposed to take the people that were,
Speaker 1: you know, vote Evan McMullan. We're supposed to listen to them.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna get in it, by the way, I'm gonna
Speaker 1: get into that in a couple of minutes. That's a
Speaker 1: whole other thing. I got some we gotta talk these
Speaker 1: never trumpers. Have a talk to these never trumpers. But
Speaker 1: you can just tell from the way that Klobuchar is
Speaker 1: handling these different stories that the stories are true. That's
Speaker 1: that's what really comes forward here, because you know the
Speaker 1: answer to if somebody said Buck Sexton mistreats, you know,
Speaker 1: if somebody accused me, if somebody wrote a story Buck
Speaker 1: sex and mistreats people who work at at the Hill
Speaker 1: dot com. He's nasty to the staff on his show
Speaker 1: and everything else, I wouldn't say, well, yeah, I mean,
Speaker 1: I would say that's a lie. I treat everybody on
Speaker 1: my staff really well and they know that, and every
Speaker 1: single one of them also would come forward, I believe
Speaker 1: I would say that publicly, but I would just I
Speaker 1: wouldn't say, like, well, there were sometimes when I was
Speaker 1: a little hard on No, I'd say, I'm always respectful
Speaker 1: and professional to everybody in the Hill that has been
Speaker 1: my That's a nice situation, you know, other than the
Speaker 1: code reads that I give to producer Mike when he's
Speaker 1: smoking cigarettes outside with pretty ladies, which he doesn't technically
Speaker 1: do because he doesn't smoke cigarettes. But Uh, you know,
Speaker 1: I treat the staff very well, so the fact that
Speaker 1: she comes out in her response is not these these
Speaker 1: reports are baseless. I've never done this that it's I
Speaker 1: have high expectations for my staff. You know, she's one
Speaker 1: of these maniacal stop it nothing. Justify it all with
Speaker 1: your victimology narrative. Oh, it's I'm oppressed because of my gender.
Speaker 1: You know, she is the worst. I don't even know her.
Speaker 1: I can just tell you from reading about her and knowing.
Speaker 1: I mean, just the same way that I knew that
Speaker 1: Kasick was the worst until I met him, and then
Speaker 1: I'm like, Wow, this guy really is the worst. See
Speaker 1: kask is a dude. I'm I'm equal opportunity. I trash
Speaker 1: trash bags. I enjoy it. I speak the truth about
Speaker 1: human dumpster fires who are horrible to people, and I
Speaker 1: enjoy it. This is also why you'll notice that the
Speaker 1: people that I go after on this show in the
Speaker 1: media are overwhelmingly, not all, but overwhelmingly known to be
Speaker 1: terrible to other colleagues in media and to their staffs. Terrible.
Speaker 1: You know, some of them are even known to quote
Speaker 1: go bananas and quote at their staff at CNN because
Speaker 1: of some issues in the prompter, Drake Tapper. So you
Speaker 1: know when I when I have a problem with people
Speaker 1: that sounds personal, it is usually because my assessment is
Speaker 1: or my knowledge of them, which is true of last individual,
Speaker 1: is that they're not nice, not good people. And I
Speaker 1: like to share with you what is the truth Clovia
Speaker 1: shar I don't know personally, but it's all there. Man,
Speaker 1: she's a nightmare. And this was the most the most
Speaker 1: terrible thing I read about her. And there's a lot
Speaker 1: of stuff there's I mean, she let me give you
Speaker 1: some of the fun. She used to have her staff.
Speaker 1: Remember she's a senate staffer. I have her staff run
Speaker 1: personal errands for her, pick up her dry cleaning, pack
Speaker 1: her suitcases for travel, even clean and wash dishes at
Speaker 1: her house. And then this is the this is the
Speaker 1: truly line crossing, vile, despicable thing that I will never
Speaker 1: let this go. And I'm the Huffington Post is I mean,
Speaker 1: everyone's writing this. They she's she's done. I mean, she's
Speaker 1: finished before she even started with her president. She should be.
Speaker 1: I mean, she's a bad she's a nasty person. There's
Speaker 1: no excuse for being a nasty person, especially to your staff.
Speaker 1: You're a United States senator. You know you're making two
Speaker 1: hundred some odd grand a year. I think you got
Speaker 1: a staff all paid for by the taxpayer, all kinds
Speaker 1: of benefits. You're so privileged and lucky to have that position.
Speaker 1: She's such a mediocrity to begin with, just somebody that
Speaker 1: played the system the right way to get where she is,
Speaker 1: and she's gonna be mean to the people that work
Speaker 1: for her. They're trying to make her better at what
Speaker 1: she does, trying to help her. I have no I
Speaker 1: have no tolerance for a web. I hate bullies, and
Speaker 1: I hate a use of bosses, absolutely hate it. And
Speaker 1: you can tell us what I'm talking about the show,
Speaker 1: because I've I've had great bosses. I've had terrible bosses
Speaker 1: in the government and in the media. And you know,
Speaker 1: great bosses, great bosses actually, or even just good. I
Speaker 1: don't need great boss I just need a good bass,
Speaker 1: A decent boss, a competent and fair boss. That's all
Speaker 1: I need. That's all I really ask for. I've had
Speaker 1: more of those in media than not, but not all,
Speaker 1: and have had a couple of terrible When I say bosses,
Speaker 1: I mean people in the management chain too, right, not
Speaker 1: the boss, boss, but people that you know have some
Speaker 1: sort of authority over what you're doing. I've interacted with
Speaker 1: some terrible ones in the government. It was everything. I mean,
Speaker 1: and those of you whom I've spoken that. Tons of
Speaker 1: friends of the military side who will say this, and
Speaker 1: I know it's true. On the intelligence agency side, your
Speaker 1: boss is like everything. It's the number one reason I
Speaker 1: believe cited by people inside of government that they leave
Speaker 1: their position or they leave government altogether. Is a bad
Speaker 1: first line manager because they just you know, what are
Speaker 1: you doing, What are you doing well, what are you
Speaker 1: up to do? Why do you do this? Why do
Speaker 1: you know? Just micro management. Micro management is the professional
Speaker 1: equivalent of nagging at home, and nagging is really just
Speaker 1: a gateway to unappreciated at home, and unappreciated is the
Speaker 1: number one reason men site for why they actually cheat
Speaker 1: in relationships, not that they just found someone else that's
Speaker 1: so sexually, is they feel unappreciated, and nagging adds to that.
Speaker 1: Micro Managing is also a pathway to feeling unappreciated in
Speaker 1: an office environment. If you're getting lead in, lead light
Speaker 1: on you all the time, never telling you what you
Speaker 1: do well, always just just nitpicking on nonsense. It's totally toxic,
Speaker 1: and Klobaschar does that and then also just being mean
Speaker 1: to people. But beyond that, my my favorite detail about
Speaker 1: this clearly heinous woman is that when people try to
Speaker 1: leave her employment, she has and this is from the
Speaker 1: Huffing Post. This is reported openly by liberal by liberal
Speaker 1: media outlets. She will if she can, she will find
Speaker 1: out where they are going and trash them to that
Speaker 1: new employer, so the offer will be rescinded and they
Speaker 1: have no choice but to keep working for her. That
Speaker 1: these stories did not come out until she was running
Speaker 1: for president, and the Democrat media, which was sitting on
Speaker 1: this the whole time. They like her as a female
Speaker 1: senator from Virginia, I mean from a not Virginia, from Minnesota.
Speaker 1: You see. They like her in that role, so they'll
Speaker 1: cover for her. But they don't like her crowding the
Speaker 1: field with Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren and you know,
Speaker 1: so on and so forth. They don't like that. So
Speaker 1: now the truth can finally come out. Now they'll finally
Speaker 1: let it. Let it out there. Clobu sharp man, really
Speaker 1: in the pantheon of horrible bosses. We'll be right back.
Speaker 1: Oh what about the AARP, You might say, I've heard
Speaker 1: of that, right, people are in AARP, that's the thing. Well, yeah,
Speaker 1: it's a senior's organization. It's pretty well known. But is
Speaker 1: it known to you that AARP is a left wing
Speaker 1: political organization in a lot of ways. They fought hard
Speaker 1: for government run healthcare. That's right, their pro Obamacare. Forget
Speaker 1: that nonsense. If you want to join a senior's organization
Speaker 1: that represents you and your values and gets you great benefits,
Speaker 1: co with the conservative alternative, I recommend AMAC. Why AMAC? Well,
Speaker 1: first of all, your investment in AMAC allows AMAC to
Speaker 1: act for policy that's good for America. And over one
Speaker 1: point five million Americans have already joined that numbers growing
Speaker 1: all the time, including a lot of people in this audience.
Speaker 1: Please check them out. Stand with AMAC as they fight
Speaker 1: the good fight. Become a member today, Join right now
Speaker 1: at AMAC dot us slash buck. That's am AC dot
Speaker 1: us slash buck. AIMAK is better, better for you, better
Speaker 1: for America. I see some never trumpers are coming around
Speaker 1: to the light. I see some never trumpers are understanding,
Speaker 1: perhaps better now than they did before, what the real
Speaker 1: battle is, What the real fight is that lies ahead,
Speaker 1: and I'm I'm pleased, and I will say I always
Speaker 1: take the approach that we should welcome and any conservatives
Speaker 1: who have you know, I don't care what they've said
Speaker 1: about Trump in the past if they understand now the
Speaker 1: stakes and they want to be Trump supporters. I do
Speaker 1: not endorse people saying whoa would about would you sit
Speaker 1: in twenty No, we want people on our side coming
Speaker 1: to our side. Trump. Look, Trump's gonna need to help.
Speaker 1: Even if you think he's a lock for twenty twenty,
Speaker 1: which I wouldn't say he's a lock. I think he's
Speaker 1: looking good so far. I'm to say this now and
Speaker 1: we may have to replay this clip at some point
Speaker 1: later on in the show. My only fear for Trump
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty. It's not the candidates, it's not the wall,
Speaker 1: it's not any of that, because I think he's I
Speaker 1: think he's executing. He's starting to execute at a level
Speaker 1: where the base and the original Trump voters are going
Speaker 1: to come back and they're going to be with him.
Speaker 1: My concern is essentially a replay of two thousand and eight,
Speaker 1: when structural economic issues come roaring to the forefront and
Speaker 1: Trump gets blamed for what could be even a temporary
Speaker 1: maybe it's only a you know, a twelve month long
Speaker 1: dip or recession or whatever. But if the timing of
Speaker 1: that is bad, I think Trump is in trouble because
Speaker 1: that shatters the narrative of his competence that we've seen
Speaker 1: so far working so very well. Anyway, put that aside
Speaker 1: for a moment. We're gonna need all of the folks
Speaker 1: on the right on our side that we can get
Speaker 1: going into twenty twenty. And also, I think that as conservatives,
Speaker 1: we should always have the humility to evaluate and reevaluate
Speaker 1: our positions. We should not be dogmatic. We are not brainless,
Speaker 1: spoon fed talking points idealogus. I leave that to the left.
Speaker 1: I leave that to the you know whose streets are
Speaker 1: streets Occupy Wall Street. I mean, I leave that to them.
Speaker 1: I have no you know, no justice, no peace right,
Speaker 1: all that stuff. That's that's for them. I let the
Speaker 1: left do that. I don't. I don't want to go there.
Speaker 1: And I would just say that, you know the way
Speaker 1: that it's going right now with some of these the
Speaker 1: never Trumper I'm thinking of, And this is what brings
Speaker 1: me to this is, you know, Eric Ericson, who was
Speaker 1: a leader of the never Trump moving in twenty sixteen,
Speaker 1: and he's written a column now where he said, quote,
Speaker 1: I still struggle on the character issue, and I understand
Speaker 1: Christian friends who would rather sit out than get involved.
Speaker 1: But I also recognize that we cannot have the Trump
Speaker 1: administration with policies without President Trump, and there is much
Speaker 1: to like. God bless Eric Eriksson. You know, I'm first
Speaker 1: of all, he's always from from my interactions with him.
Speaker 1: He's always been a thoughtful and civil and decent guy.
Speaker 1: I don't know him well. I've actually never met him
Speaker 1: in person. I've just interacted with him in media world.
Speaker 1: But you know, I've I've never had I've never gotten
Speaker 1: a bad I've never had a bad exchange with him,
Speaker 1: and I've heard good things about them people at work
Speaker 1: with him. But you know, I think, you know, took
Speaker 1: him a while to come to this conclusion. I'm just
Speaker 1: happy he's coming to this conclusion. And I see my
Speaker 1: friend over at the New York Post, the very talented
Speaker 1: writer sarab Amari, who you've heard, I've had him on
Speaker 1: the show before. He's an Irani, an American, very talented writer,
Speaker 1: very smart, guy was at the Wall Street Journal out
Speaker 1: the New York Post, because I mean, we have like
Speaker 1: the smartest guests on this show. I'm just saying, but
Speaker 1: I saw that he wrote. He actually shared a Rich
Speaker 1: Lowry piece about the endorsement of in Fantaside in New York,
Speaker 1: and Sir Rob tweeted out today why I have lost
Speaker 1: patience with the romneyism and civility conservatism of die hard
Speaker 1: never Trumpers. Couldn't agree more, Sir Rob, wake up, never Trumpers.
Speaker 1: No one is saying you have to endorse Trump's infidelity
Speaker 1: or indorse every tweet. I mean, that's a strong man.
Speaker 1: No one says that. But this is what we got.
Speaker 1: You've got a president right now who is standing athwart
Speaker 1: left wing efforts to openly socialize our economy, to turn
Speaker 1: this into a socialist dystopia, to legalize and fantaside, to
Speaker 1: create open borders, as we've been talking about at length
Speaker 1: on this show. To you just go down the list, o,
Speaker 1: what you you think that? I mean, who's idn't remember
Speaker 1: the guy's name and read Evan McMullan. You think he's
Speaker 1: gonna protect us from this? It's ego that drives Oh
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, but it's true. It drives a lot of
Speaker 1: this never Trumper nonsense. I don't sit here and tell
Speaker 1: you that every Trump tweet is amazing, although I do
Speaker 1: really like a lot of what Trump does and says.
Speaker 1: By the way, I thought he was great last thing
Speaker 1: at the rally. I think it's great that he takes
Speaker 1: the media to task. The media is a corrupt institution,
Speaker 1: a wholly owned subsidiary of the Democratic Party. Okay, ten
Speaker 1: percent of media is conservative, ninety percent is liberal. This
Speaker 1: is insane. But you know, for Eric, I'm hoping this
Speaker 1: is the damn is breaking now because I'm telling you
Speaker 1: there are a lot of their trojan horses. There are
Speaker 1: people who were never really that conservative to begin with,
Speaker 1: but they thought that, you know, Romney was gonna win,
Speaker 1: and they kind of rode the McCain train for a
Speaker 1: while back in the day, and you know, they're part
Speaker 1: of the pundit consultant media class. And when Trump won
Speaker 1: and they didn't get to play with their favorite toy anymore,
Speaker 1: they just wanted to kick sand at people and leave
Speaker 1: the sandbox. They didn't want to play ball. I'm not
Speaker 1: okay with that. There's too much at stake here. I mean,
Speaker 1: Democrats are openly lying about legalizing infanticide. They can try
Speaker 1: to spin this similar they want to legalize in fanticide.
Speaker 1: That is what they're doing. They're not that smart, they're
Speaker 1: not that clever. I understand what they're doing, and it's abhorrent.
Speaker 1: Trump is putting judges on the Supreme Court and judges
Speaker 1: in federal and federal courtrooms across the country. Who at
Speaker 1: least we'll try to stop this stuff. He's deregulating, he's
Speaker 1: cutting taxes, he's trying to get actual border security, and
Speaker 1: he doesn't hate business, and he's not some social justice
Speaker 1: intersectional identity politics shill. You know, I think the guy
Speaker 1: deserves some credit. And you know, Eric Ericson and anybody
Speaker 1: else who wants to wants to be a part of
Speaker 1: Trump twenty twenty, I say, God bless and jump in
Speaker 1: the water. Is warm man ken to have you. So
Speaker 1: I'm gonna update you all all this. Jessie Smallitt alleged
Speaker 1: hate crime debacle in Chicago. This is Maga country, he claims.
Speaker 1: The two rednecks in the middle of Chicago said, I
Speaker 1: mean it's not I can't say it definitely didn't happen.
Speaker 1: I can just tell you it almost definitely didn't happen.
Speaker 1: But I've got some new details on that. The media
Speaker 1: is dropping that story like like a hot potato man.
Speaker 1: They don't want any part of it. I will tell
Speaker 1: you that I'm not going to drop it because I
Speaker 1: had some of the Blue Check mafia come after me
Speaker 1: with what do you not believe him? Because it's not
Speaker 1: a credible story. You you imbeciles. But I also just
Speaker 1: want to say that we just got our last our
Speaker 1: last numbers in for the radio show. They break it
Speaker 1: down by every we have. We have ratings for every
Speaker 1: station across the country, and while every single one of
Speaker 1: you listening, I find all of you precious and appreciate
Speaker 1: every one of you that gives me your time, including
Speaker 1: of course our wonderful podcast team, which is growing by
Speaker 1: tens of thousands. Um. I also just want to say
Speaker 1: thank you, though, specifically to KFAB out in Omaha, Nebraska,
Speaker 1: KLBJ in Austin, and WO WO and Fort Wayne, Indiana,
Speaker 1: three stations that have just become real stalwarts for us.
Speaker 1: I mean, we've got such such great audience growth in
Speaker 1: those areas and people really coming out to listen to
Speaker 1: the show. So if you're part of that as one,
Speaker 1: lets you know it is it is noticed. It's noticed
Speaker 1: all over the country. But those those three stations, and
Speaker 1: those three metro areas in particular, were really thankful for
Speaker 1: all the growth that we've seen. But those you listen
Speaker 1: out and KiB Los Angeles, and I could just rattle
Speaker 1: off all these stations all across the country. Are are
Speaker 1: are obviously really helping us out. But I want to
Speaker 1: just give a quick shout out there, and let me
Speaker 1: also just say the Jesse Smollett story. So here's the
Speaker 1: latest detail on this one. Chicago police say Jesse Smollett
Speaker 1: gave insufficient phone records that were heavily redacted and do
Speaker 1: not prove he was talking to his manager at the
Speaker 1: time of the racist, homophobic attack. Okay, I don't need
Speaker 1: much time to break this down. How did I know
Speaker 1: this guy beyond the lack of just a credible story
Speaker 1: that he had, How did I have a feeling here
Speaker 1: real indication that he was why and when the police
Speaker 1: asked him for his phone? Yes, from a civil rights perspective,
Speaker 1: from it, I understand, you know you can you can say, well,
Speaker 1: the police don't have a Warrant'm not gonna give them
Speaker 1: my phone. That's fine. But if the police, if someone
Speaker 1: breaks into your house, do you say, police, you can't
Speaker 1: enter without a warrant. No, you're a victim. You want it,
Speaker 1: you want you understand that you're in a victim status,
Speaker 1: not in a being investigated status. This guy Smalllett, who
Speaker 1: claims that they threw a noose that two individuals that
Speaker 1: no one's ever found, no one knows what they look like,
Speaker 1: never called on video, threw a noose around his neck
Speaker 1: through bleach on him and lightly bruised his face and
Speaker 1: like a rib a little bit. And he walked around
Speaker 1: with this noise on and went home with a news
Speaker 1: on the whole thing, and happened to be out of
Speaker 1: surveillance camerange. What happens anyway, The police said, can we
Speaker 1: have your phone just to verify because you said you're
Speaker 1: on the phone with your manager. We're just kind of
Speaker 1: verify facts. He said, no, you can't have my phone. Okay, Well,
Speaker 1: now these people have said, well that's kind of weird, dude.
Speaker 1: It's legal, but it's weird. And now they've said, all right,
Speaker 1: well just give us your phone records. Now he has
Speaker 1: submitted redacted phone records to the police. What is that
Speaker 1: You're just like blacking outlines in your phone record and
Speaker 1: the phone records don't even prove he was on the
Speaker 1: on the phone to his manager. So someone won't explain
Speaker 1: that to me. Oh, I have an explanation. He's lying
Speaker 1: unless there's another explanation somebody else wants to throw out there?
Speaker 1: Does that? Anybody else want to give you something? Else? Here?
Speaker 1: Just waiting. I'm waiting. Roll calls up next, like soft
Speaker 1: butter on warm toast. Time to spread some freedom, coast
Speaker 1: to coast. It's time for roll call. Roll call time, everybody.
Speaker 1: It's really one of the most fun parts of the show.
Speaker 1: You can always tell my my energy picks up a
Speaker 1: little because I get to hear from all of you,
Speaker 1: which means that I get to be in a reactive
Speaker 1: mode instead of a constructive mode, which is always more fun.
Speaker 1: Let's get to it. Facebook dot Com, slash buck Sexton
Speaker 1: and that's where I hope you will send me all
Speaker 1: of your messages, all of your thoughts on the things.
Speaker 1: And here we go. Dale Rights the Marshall Island Lie
Speaker 1: Lockheed Martin recently built a massive, state of the art
Speaker 1: radar facility on the island of Qua Jeline, along with
Speaker 1: a brand new diesel power plant. Why would the government
Speaker 1: spend hundreds of millions of dollars if the sea levels
Speaker 1: are going to raise above the island in fifteen years.
Speaker 1: They wouldn't. This is just another example of climate change hysteria. Dale.
Speaker 1: I've said this before, and I know that people. They
Speaker 1: act like it must be some kind of oversimplification or
Speaker 1: I'm trying to be glib, or I'm kidding. I will
Speaker 1: believe the climate change catastrophists when they will sell me
Speaker 1: beachfront property in Malibu. And remember there are homes in
Speaker 1: Malibu that are on the beach. Okay, they are right
Speaker 1: on the beach. You walk, you know, twenty yards and
Speaker 1: you're in the ocean. I will believe the climate change
Speaker 1: alarmist when they will sell me what are now ten
Speaker 1: million dollars beach front homes for pennies in the dollar.
Speaker 1: Then I'll believe them. So it's not really that hard
Speaker 1: sell me. You're Malibu beach front property at a pennies
Speaker 1: on the dollar rate. You know, I could probably I
Speaker 1: could probably scratch together, you know, with a little loan
Speaker 1: from a bank, maybe maybe one hundred k. I'll take
Speaker 1: that ten million dollar off off your hands rather that
Speaker 1: ten million dollar property for one hundred kunds. That sounds
Speaker 1: good to me. Will I have to pay some very
Speaker 1: high insurance rates, sure, but I'll figure that out. Always
Speaker 1: look at where people are putting their money. It's it's
Speaker 1: very easy to say things. When people put their money
Speaker 1: on things or in things, when it affects them directly,
Speaker 1: then you know how they really feel. Douglass. Right, So
Speaker 1: you want to learn a country music go to YouTube
Speaker 1: for five songs. To understand country music fans, you need
Speaker 1: Willie Nelson. My heroes have always been cowboys. Toby Keith
Speaker 1: courtesy of the Red, White, and Blue. I actually know
Speaker 1: that song. To understand men and women, you need David
Speaker 1: Allan Cole stand By Your Man and a Little Big
Speaker 1: Town Better Man. For the best song ever George Jones
Speaker 1: he stopped Loving Her today. Douglas, I'm gonna add all
Speaker 1: of those onto my Spotify playlist. Thank you very much
Speaker 1: for the suggestions, and I'm going to educate myself a
Speaker 1: bit more on country music. See some people in the
Speaker 1: conservative media world who are from, oh, the New York
Speaker 1: area or Boston or DC. They like to do this
Speaker 1: whole Yeah, hello, country music is I'm a conservative, you know.
Speaker 1: I don't like the sort of patronizing nonsense. If I
Speaker 1: didn't grow up in Tennessee. Now, people can like music
Speaker 1: from anywhere. But country music wasn't a part of my upbringing.
Speaker 1: It wasn't a part of the cultural world, you know,
Speaker 1: in which I grew up. So when I asked you
Speaker 1: about it, I want to I want to learn more
Speaker 1: about country music because it would be inauthentic for me
Speaker 1: to pretend like, oh, I just love you know. There,
Speaker 1: I am in my pickup truck, I am a drinking
Speaker 1: my whiskey, and my wife just laugh me and you know, no,
Speaker 1: that's not my background. I want to know from people
Speaker 1: who do have country music as part of something that
Speaker 1: matters to them, that they grew up with, that they
Speaker 1: love now. I want them to tell me so that
Speaker 1: I can adopt it. I want to culturally appropriate country
Speaker 1: music as a born and raised New Yorker. You know
Speaker 1: that's because I'm in favor of cultural appropriation. I want
Speaker 1: to appropriate country music, just like I want to appropriate
Speaker 1: from the South usage of the term y'all, because it
Speaker 1: makes a lot of sense. I just always think it's
Speaker 1: funny there. There's I see so many people that do these,
Speaker 1: especially for these industry publications. You know, these guys will
Speaker 1: be like, yes, I love I love America, the Constitution
Speaker 1: and country music. And I'm like, aren't you from Los Angeles?
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm not saying and before you write me
Speaker 1: not it's Buck, you can love country music being from anywhere.
Speaker 1: I know. I'm saying that they're people who are clearly
Speaker 1: pandering to the redder parts of the country with their
Speaker 1: you know, I love I love country music. I'm like,
Speaker 1: you drive a Maserati to work and you live in
Speaker 1: the most liberal part of the country and you're born
Speaker 1: and raised there. But I'm sure you're all about Toby Keith. Anyway,
Speaker 1: David Right's the following, Hey, Buck, heard someone mentioned jiu
Speaker 1: jitsu to you a few days ago. I think you
Speaker 1: find it would be an excellent self defense program. Would
Speaker 1: also be good for Miss Molly as it was developed
Speaker 1: to allow a smaller person to win against a larger person.
Speaker 1: I know you have limited time, you should check out
Speaker 1: the Gracie Academy online. There are some good information about
Speaker 1: the programs they offer. Their good luck and see you
Speaker 1: on the mat doc Hey man, thank you. I look
Speaker 1: jiu jitsu. I've seen a fair amount of it done.
Speaker 1: I've seen I've watched clips of it, and and I've
Speaker 1: watched even some documentary stuff on jiu jitsu. It's really
Speaker 1: interesting and I do think it obviously would be very effective.
Speaker 1: So there's that. Do I have the time to do it.
Speaker 1: I'm really just trying to get into the gym. My
Speaker 1: twenty nineteen is to get enough sleep that I can
Speaker 1: get back to the gym, because really it's a sleep
Speaker 1: issue for those of you out there. You know, as
Speaker 1: we're going into the last phase here of flu season,
Speaker 1: which you never want to get February flu because you're
Speaker 1: close to that, You're close to the finish line here,
Speaker 1: and you know you don't want to get wrecked with
Speaker 1: a week of flu, which is happening to people that
Speaker 1: I know, and the most important part of immunity. I
Speaker 1: had to explain this to a colleague at work who
Speaker 1: told me that he wasn't getting enough sleep, the most
Speaker 1: important part of immunity for your average person. Okay, I mean,
Speaker 1: obviously you need white blood cells and T cells. I'm
Speaker 1: not saying that, but sleep you have to get enough sleep.
Speaker 1: I know people think that they're like a hero if
Speaker 1: they only get five hours of sleep at night and
Speaker 1: they get up early in the morning and they run,
Speaker 1: they work, putting a lot of stress in your system.
Speaker 1: You really eight hours is preferable. Seven is a minimum.
Speaker 1: Anything less than seven you're putting I don't care who
Speaker 1: you are, You're putting strain on your system that is
Speaker 1: going to manifest itself in other ways. So getting more
Speaker 1: sleep is key for all of you out there, and
Speaker 1: it's one of the more important things that we could
Speaker 1: I think all focus on and naps are good. Cstays nice,
Speaker 1: but you really need contiguous you know, are r em sleep.
Speaker 1: You need to get into that stuff. Leanna writes. I
Speaker 1: highly recommend two documentaries by Curtis Bowers, an Idaho legislator,
Speaker 1: exposing how Americans have been slowly manipulated into going along
Speaker 1: with leftist ideas that will destroy our country, Agenda Grinding
Speaker 1: Down and Grinding America Down Rather and Agenda Two Masters
Speaker 1: of Deceit, available on Amazon. Have you seen either one
Speaker 1: of these? Very eye opening for people who aren't really
Speaker 1: paying attention, Leanna, Not only have I not seen either
Speaker 1: one of those I have never heard of either one
Speaker 1: of those, so I'm certainly interested in your suggestion and
Speaker 1: I will check it out. Thank you very much for
Speaker 1: sending me your thoughts. Jeremy. Right, I've heard it said
Speaker 1: that the music that most influenced your life and that
Speaker 1: you enjoy the most is what you listen to between
Speaker 1: fifteen and twenty five. I'm your age and love country
Speaker 1: music from the nineties. Garth Brooks is still a favorite
Speaker 1: Shields High. Jeremy. I'm familiar with some of Garth's stuff.
Speaker 1: I've definitely had. I've had mixed tapes that'll tell you
Speaker 1: how old I am that had Garth Brooks on it.
Speaker 1: But in terms of your real kind of main country
Speaker 1: music stuff, I don't have much in the way of
Speaker 1: background or or knowledge. So indeed, by the way I
Speaker 1: had to, I got a confession for you guys. I
Speaker 1: had to shave the beard, and not because I didn't
Speaker 1: like it. I actually like it a lot. I like
Speaker 1: not having a shave. I think, you know, it's it's
Speaker 1: fun to see the red hairs and the white hairs
Speaker 1: and are all mixing together there. And the beard was
Speaker 1: starting to come in pretty nice, but it was a
Speaker 1: little long around on the at the top around the lip,
Speaker 1: and it was starting to like actually irritate the skin
Speaker 1: around the lip a little because it got so long.
Speaker 1: So I was I should have gotten scissors. Instead, I
Speaker 1: took a clipper, like an idiot. I know, you can
Speaker 1: make fun make fun of me. This was a bozo
Speaker 1: weak sauce move. I took the clippers though last night
Speaker 1: before into bed, and I and I kind of went
Speaker 1: and you know, clippers, you gotta kind of like push
Speaker 1: a little more, and it's it's a little less, especially
Speaker 1: I don't have fancy clippers. You know, you gotta kind
Speaker 1: of get after a little bit more to actually get
Speaker 1: it to cut hair. And I essentially took a chunk
Speaker 1: out of my what would be the kind of mustache
Speaker 1: portion on the left and then I was like, well,
Speaker 1: now I look like it. Now it looked like an imbecile.
Speaker 1: So I'm gonna need to even this out. So then
Speaker 1: I had to go on the right side and I
Speaker 1: went I went up and I was like, well, this
Speaker 1: is great. Now it's even and I look like Hitler
Speaker 1: with mutton chops. So I didn't want to look like
Speaker 1: Hitler with mutton chops. So I just had to shave
Speaker 1: it all off and it's gonna I'm not gonna grow
Speaker 1: it out again. Not that you all need to know
Speaker 1: about my facial hair situation, but if you saw me
Speaker 1: on Hill TV today, for example, you'd be like, what
Speaker 1: happened to the beard? And I like the beard. It's
Speaker 1: coming back the beard. We'll be back brand rights. Hey
Speaker 1: Buck Shields High. Oh WHOA long message. I was at
Speaker 1: the Trump rally in al Paso last night. I was
Speaker 1: standing very close to the press pool on the floor
Speaker 1: and saw the aftermath of that pair of clown shows
Speaker 1: shoving the BBC reporter. Well, I agree with most Trump policy,
Speaker 1: with most Trump policy issues, and the very apparent biased
Speaker 1: the media displays day in and day out. I would
Speaker 1: like to express, after seeing it firsthand, that I would
Speaker 1: be nervous as a journalist. The truth of the matter is,
Speaker 1: there were sixty five hundred plus people in that arena,
Speaker 1: and you're guaranteed to have one or two idiots in
Speaker 1: that kind of a crowd. Don Junior and Trump himself
Speaker 1: hammered the media, hammered on the media while indicating through
Speaker 1: gestures directly at them. This is just my opinion, but
Speaker 1: I must add it seems like he's playing with fire.
Speaker 1: I would like to apologize to the journalist on the
Speaker 1: behalf of the other six thousand, four hundred nine one
Speaker 1: people that attend to the rally in the arena. Don't
Speaker 1: get me wrong, I'm not a sympathizer for the media.
Speaker 1: Just seems there has to be a better way. Curious
Speaker 1: on your thoughts, Brent. Brent, I'll be honest with you,
Speaker 1: my friend. I don't even know I saw some stuff
Speaker 1: on this story, but I would be I would be
Speaker 1: exceeding my knowledge to pretend that I really know anything
Speaker 1: about what happened in this instance. So that's my way
Speaker 1: of saying I will look into it, and if I
Speaker 1: have any any thoughts, I will share them with you.
Speaker 1: For sure. Let's see what we have here. Whoops, TJ rites,
Speaker 1: damn it, Buck no country. Really, Hey, at least I'm TJ.
Speaker 1: At least I'm honest with you. Right. At least I'm
Speaker 1: not some city slicker who pretends to be some guy
Speaker 1: who you know. I'm a city slicker who grew up fishing, hunting, shooting,
Speaker 1: so all that is legit. I mean, there are photos
Speaker 1: some of you have seen me from when I was
Speaker 1: I have photos of me at the range when I'm
Speaker 1: ten years old that I've I've posted online before. I
Speaker 1: have photos of me fishing when I'm probably five or
Speaker 1: six years old with my dad and my brothers. So
Speaker 1: all that's that's in my past, that's in my life,
Speaker 1: that's been a part of my life. Country is not
Speaker 1: something that I It's not that I don't like it.
Speaker 1: I have not been exposed too much of it. I
Speaker 1: grew up in New York City when everybody listened to
Speaker 1: hip hop. I mean, if I could give you two
Speaker 1: bands or two acts, I should say that typified what
Speaker 1: you would hear. When I was in high school, it
Speaker 1: was all you're gonna laugh, a lot of oasis and
Speaker 1: a lot of notorious big. That was like you were
Speaker 1: either an oasis person or a notorious big or both.
Speaker 1: But those were those were the kinds of acts that
Speaker 1: you spend a lot of time on. Anyway, TJ writes,
Speaker 1: here's a couple I really enjoy. Eric Church, It's always
Speaker 1: a go to. Justin Moore. Look up his song guns,
Speaker 1: You'll love it. Cody Johnson, he is red dirt country.
Speaker 1: I don't know what that means. And Whiskey Myers TJ.
Speaker 1: I'm adding them all to the Spotify playlist. My friend,
Speaker 1: thank you so much for sending along team. That's gonna
Speaker 1: be our wonderful show from the Freedom Hut DC until
Speaker 1: tomorrow when we have another fantastic show Shields High. You
Speaker 1: don't have to use some liberal, left wing progressive email
Speaker 1: service that make sure that they have fancier knap rooms
Speaker 1: in Silicon Valley and you know, more giant balls to
Speaker 1: roll around on during yoga time. Right, you can go
Speaker 1: with a conservative alternative, a conservative email service. That's why
Speaker 1: I recommend ipatriots dot Us. Ipatriots dot us is secure,
Speaker 1: it's private and includes all the stuff you want. Larger
Speaker 1: attachment sizes, better cloud storage, more cloud storage, and your
Speaker 1: email and files are safe and by the way, not
Speaker 1: shared with third parties. And the money that you pay
Speaker 1: to ipatriots dot us does not go to support liberal
Speaker 1: agenda items. You need to check them out. New offer
Speaker 1: today for ipatriots dot us. Enter promo code buck sign
Speaker 1: up for month to month service today and get the
Speaker 1: first month totally free. You won't be charged until your
Speaker 1: second month of service at the specify month to month. Right,
Speaker 1: you can cancel anytime and you can pick your desired
Speaker 1: Ipatriots email address during checkout. Go to ipatriots dot us
Speaker 1: now