WEBVTT - Gregory Zuckerman on the Quant Revolution

0:00:02.279 --> 0:00:06.840
<v Speaker 1>This is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholts on Boomberg Radio.

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>This week on the podcast, I have a special guest.

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:12.840
<v Speaker 1>His name is Greg Zuckerman. He is a reporter for

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>The Wall Street Journal and an author of numerous books.

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:18.800
<v Speaker 1>The one we spend the better part of two hours

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:22.919
<v Speaker 1>discussing is the Man who Solved the Market, How Jim

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Simons launched the quant revolution. If you are at all

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>interested in so many things Renaissance technologies and Jim Simon's

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>quantitative investing, hedge funds, how difficult it is to beat

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the market, and how astonishing the performance of Renaissance technologies

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>has been. Let me tease you a little bit. Thirty

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>years sixty a year. That is just mind blowing. Nobody

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:55.639
<v Speaker 1>in the universe comes close. There wasn't anybody who does

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>half of that. That's what makes this so just completely

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>mind boggling ing. Uh. They are absolutely a unique entity.

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:07.479
<v Speaker 1>You will find this to be an absolutely fascinating conversation.

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I really enjoyed the book. I plowed through it in

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>a day and a half on the beach over the

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 1>holiday weekend, and it's not out until November five, So

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>by the time you're hearing this it will be available

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:23.559
<v Speaker 1>for pre order. All I can say is I enjoyed

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the book and I had a fascinating conversation with Greg,

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure you will enjoy it. So, with no

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:35.759
<v Speaker 1>further ado, my conversation with Greg Zuckerman. This is Masters

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>in Business with Very Ridholts on Boomberg Radio. My extra

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>special guest this week. I've been looking forward to this

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 1>conversation for a long time. Greg Zuckerman, Wall Street Journal

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>reporter and author, two time winner of the Geralds Lobe

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Award for Outstanding Business Reporting. He is the author of

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>The Frackers, The Outrageous inside story of the new Billionaire Wildcats,

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and The Greatest Trade Ever, How John Paulson defied Wall

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Street and made history. But his newest and most fascinating

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>book is Jim Simons, The man who solved the markets

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and launched a quant revolution. Greg Zuckerman, Welcome to Bloomberg.

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Great to be here. I think I sort of retitled

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the book for you. Um So I'm I'm fascinated by

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Jim Simon's ever since I was a high school student

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>applying to Stonybrook Math department, where he turned out to

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>be the chairman that plus six annual returns for thirty years.

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Those are just astonishing numbers. What was it that made

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 1>you decide to write a book about the most reclusive

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund manager ever? So? I've always wanted to. He's

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of if you're a financial journalist, and I focused

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>on the Bye side to a large extent, there's no

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>one more impressive. He's the white whale, isn't he? He

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>is the white whale. And yet he's also got this

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>mystique about him, part because they're such a secretive firm. Um,

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>others have tried. That was part of the allure as well,

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:08.920
<v Speaker 1>that others had reached out to him, he didn't want

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to work with them. I myself had tried. He didn't

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>want to cooperate. Uh. For whatever reason, that created an

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>added a level of mystique allure for me. So I

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>took the challenge on. So, in pursuit of this, you

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:26.519
<v Speaker 1>spoke to over forty current and former Renaissance employees. What

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>was that like? Well, early on it was quite difficult. Um,

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 1>no one wanted to talk to me. And why was that?

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I know, there's a little bit of paperwork involved as

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>to why some people were hesitants to speak with you right.

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>So Jim Simmons and his colleagues at the firm have

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>everyone signed forty page nondisclosures non competes and they're serious

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>about them. Um. I was warned early on, don't waste

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>your time, Greg, both by people internally, people that used

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>to work there. Simons himself said he wouldn't talk to me.

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>It got worse than that. Simon started telling people I

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>wanted to talk to not to talk to me, not

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>to cooperate with me. Another word, you would set up

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>a conversation with someone and he would get wind of

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>it and and quash it. Yeah. I had meetings set

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>up with senior people in the industry, in the quant world,

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:20.280
<v Speaker 1>billionaires who you wouldn't think would care what Jean Simon's

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 1>would think, these arrivals of renaissance. And yet right before

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>we were supposed to sit down, they said, sorry, I

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>can't talk to you, Greg. Jim asked me not to

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the family. It's you describe very much like the mafia. Right. Yes,

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>we're competing, but you still are things you don't do.

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 1>And one thing you don't do in the quant world

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>is get Jim Simon's upset. So here I was being told,

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>don't waste your time, Simon isn't gonna work with you.

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna work with you because Jim asked me

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:55.840
<v Speaker 1>not to. I had I literally had um my advance

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and not insignificant advance from my publisher on my death

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:03.039
<v Speaker 1>in my basement in my home in suburban New Jersey,

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and I wouldn't cash it because I wanted the ability

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to hand it back because you were concerned you wouldn't

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>be able to get anything done without any cooperation. Right. Um,

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>If you talk to my wife, she doesn't. She can

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>give you all kinds of conversations where I was whining

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:21.359
<v Speaker 1>and complaining and just frustrated and concerned that I wouldn't

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>be able to pull this thing off. Um. And at

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:27.479
<v Speaker 1>one point the accounting department from Penguin, they were like,

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>what this has in this check? Something's wrong because who what?

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 1>What author doesn't cash a check? You know? We don't

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 1>do so well. What was the turning point where you felt, Oh,

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>now I'm starting to at least get a little traction

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 1>with these guys. Right. So I went out to California

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and I spoke to some former colleagues of Simons who

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:50.160
<v Speaker 1>worked with Jim back in the day, back in the

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:54.159
<v Speaker 1>eighties and nineties, right, and their story was just too

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>fascinating not to do the book and too compelling. I mean,

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>these are interesting characters. As a or, you look for

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>just colorful color, colorful, intriguing individuals, characters you could write about,

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:09.359
<v Speaker 1>and they you couldn't do better than these people. They

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>um were temperamental, they were high strung, they were fascinating,

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>they were smart. They had accomplished all kinds of things

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:18.039
<v Speaker 1>in academia, and then they took on this challenge of

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to conquer the markets. So and there was all

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 1>kinds of intrigue that I wasn't really aware of behind

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the scenes. Um anger, fights, disputes, screaming matches, things that

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.720
<v Speaker 1>you know when you think of a quant and you know, mathematics,

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>mathematicians maybe just I did. I didn't really think they

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>lend like you and not yes, exactly scientific. Right. So

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>when I learned about the early story of Renaissance, and

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>it's quite fascinating, I said, you know what, how do

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I not write this book? It was a bit of

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>a leap. So I had the early part, but then

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>what do I do about the middle of the later

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>parts where people. There weren't as many people who had retired,

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>who were academics who might speak to me. These are

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:04.280
<v Speaker 1>more recent types of individuals, some still there. I had

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 1>to I had to work somehow get them to talk.

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 1>So what was the turning point? When did you start

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to have these folks speak with you? When I got

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>a good sense for the story? Um, I got some

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>people who work there to open up to me. And

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>why they spoke to me. I'm as a writer, you're

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>never a hundred percent sure. I believe that good stories

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>want to come out. And this is a great story.

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>This is the greatest financial um investor in modern history.

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Jim Simmons. His firm is the most impressive money making

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>operation in Wall Street history. So some of them were proud,

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>and some of them actually wanted to share and talk

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>to extent that they could, they kind of wouldn't tell me. Usually,

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>no secret source came out. Well, it leaked out so

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:54.559
<v Speaker 1>here and there. So that's my job as a writer.

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>You get a little snippet, they drop a little crumb

0:07:57.240 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>here and there. It's my job to kind of put

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>it together into some thing of a loafer, at least

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a half a loaf for for the readers, so they

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>gave me enough to give me encouragement. Yes, they weren't

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>laying out all the algorithms for me, not that I

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 1>would understand a mena or anyway. When when I finally

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and then I finally got Sigmons to speak, so discussed

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 1>that because for the longest time he said, no, I

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>want nothing to do with this, so I'm never gonna

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>speak to you. How did you finally get him to

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>sit down with you? And and how long did you

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>talk to him for? So we had and still have

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:30.679
<v Speaker 1>a complicated relationship. He didn't want the book to be written.

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>He still, as of a few months ago, asked, do

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 1>we do I really have to write this book? Um?

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Part of it is the guy makes a billion and

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a half dollars hardly going into the office and doesn't

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:45.559
<v Speaker 1>want to rock the boat. These are hard working individuals,

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:49.599
<v Speaker 1>scientists he's hired or helped hire or have joined subsequently,

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and he doesn't want to get them angry. He says,

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>he's a generally a pretty good guy, and here they

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>are working, slaving away. And if the guy making a

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>billion and a half dollars is talent secrets, um, they

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:03.679
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be thrilled with him. Um, So he didn't really

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>want this book being told. And but at some point

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:11.439
<v Speaker 1>he got the message that I wasn't going away, and

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 1>he realized I was doing serious research. So I was

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 1>talking to academics he worked with back in the day,

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Um code breakers. He's got this really rich, fascinating life

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>even before he got to Renaissance. If he had never

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>started Renaissance, he never even invested, he'd still be so

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>of ample sub be ample um opportunity to write a book,

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>there'd be reason to write about him. So UM. I

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>think when he started hearing from these seventy and eight

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 1>year old academics uh, from Princeton and other kinds of

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>places he worked with back in the seventies and in

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the sixties, even uh, he got the message I wasn't

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 1>going away, And I think he realized, while better to

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>talk to Zuckerman than um not share any perspective in

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>a book about him. In his firm, the joke I

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>used to hear from people who had Lucked in interviewees

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and other books was well, who do you want to

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 1>shape the story? Do you want do you want to

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>shape the narrative or do you want to let your

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>competitors and enemies shape the narrative, right, And that's a

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of my approach in my day to day writing

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>at the Wall Street Journal. UM I called the haircut approach.

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give you a haircut. You can sit still

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>or you can move around, but I'm gonna give you

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a haircut. And it's not to say that it's a

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 1>threat in any way. It's being it's just honest, right,

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:31.959
<v Speaker 1>a little blond, but yeah, And Simon's realized that there's

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 1>something to be said for working with me. But I

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 1>do want to make it clear that he wouldn't share

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 1>UM inside UM secrets, secret sauce, as you describe it.

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>So I don't want to suggest that he kind of

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>opened the kimono. That was still difficult to the end.

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 1>So it was so we sat down together multiple times

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:54.319
<v Speaker 1>for how many hours we add it all up was

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>over ten hours. Really, that's a lot of Jim Simon's FaceTime.

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>It was a lot of time, and the top ranged

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and included his recent life, which is also quite interesting

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:07.359
<v Speaker 1>what he's trying to do an autism research, science education,

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:12.359
<v Speaker 1>subsidizing teachers around the city of New York City, UM politics,

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit too. He's a big funder of democratic

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>causes and in candidates, so the topics ranged. He was

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:21.840
<v Speaker 1>generous with his time and though and regarding some of

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>those subjects, his early life and his mathematics. A guy

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:28.679
<v Speaker 1>like me needed help understanding. So I appreciate the help

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:31.680
<v Speaker 1>he gave me there And in terms of there you

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:34.719
<v Speaker 1>are you saying Jim Simons tutored you in in mathematics

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to some extent. Yeah, Um, he was quite helpful, because

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I listen, I had a lot of people helping me.

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 1>But he is a professor at heart, and I could

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>see him, even though he is objecting to your purpose,

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I could see him kind of saying, no, no, let

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>me explain the math here and and bring you along right.

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>And part of it is and I've learned this something

0:11:55.480 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>about mathematicians. Uh, little mistakes really bothered them more than

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>they do me or people that come from a different perspective.

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>So I think it would have just bothered him had

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>there been significant um errors in the book, be in

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.199
<v Speaker 1>regard to his early life, other parts of his life.

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>And I get that. You know, I would send small sections.

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 1>We don't send large sections, but small sections to various

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 1>top mathematicians, and they would get angry, Greg, this is

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>all wrong. How can you write this? It's overstayed as wrong.

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 1>You got you gotta change everything, and you know you're

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:33.319
<v Speaker 1>taken aback. Early on, I was taken aback. Eventually I

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:35.719
<v Speaker 1>learned not to be. And then you drill into it

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know, they're five percent was wrong, but

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 1>those that five percent really bothers them. So I got that.

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>So I think, if you're Jim Simons, this guy's writing

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a three fifty page book about you and your life. Um,

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:49.680
<v Speaker 1>if they were glaring dumb errors, it would have bothered him,

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>really would have would have said him, said him off.

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk a little bit about um, the book and

0:12:56.960 --> 0:13:00.679
<v Speaker 1>what's revealed in it. I've kind of been Jim Simon's

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>groupie for a few decades. I think I know about

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 1>everything that was public about him and Renaissance technologies and

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:13.080
<v Speaker 1>who worked there and there their approaches. But I found

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the book filled with so many surprises and so many

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>unknown things in the past. Um, tell us what you

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>thought was the most surprising thing you learned, and how

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>much of this is fresh new information that was never

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>publicly known before. Sure, So I've read everything that's been

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>written about Jim and his firm. I've watched every interview

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube. Are a few here and there. Uh, And

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I would say about nine of what's in my book

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:48.199
<v Speaker 1>is fresh and new. I think that's about right. I

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>felt like almost everything, like every now and then I

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>would recognize something. Oh, I kind of knew that, but

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:57.559
<v Speaker 1>every page it was a new revelation that was something

0:13:57.640 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>previously unknown to me. And as a writer, that's sort

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>of why I did it, to learn I didn't know

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 1>enough about this world and about Jim, and each of

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 1>these characters is potentially a book on their own right.

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 1>There were so many. I think that was one surprise.

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 1>There's so many rich characters at their firm. It's not

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of Jim and Okay, you hear a Bob Mercer

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and and Peter Brown. Time after time. I ran into fascinating, accomplished, quirky,

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>colorful characters. And the other surprise is how hard it

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>is to be a quant So you think of these

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 1>guys are mathematicians, they're scientists. You would think that instinctively

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>they would want to pursue a quantitative approach, the scientific method.

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 1>That's where they come from. And yet from the beginning

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>from Simons and his early colleagues, guys like Lennie Boum,

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Jim Max, Ellen, Burla Camp others, you see that there's

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>they're fighting their instinct there. Really their instinct is to

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of just trade like you and I do, just

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of look at the news and anticipate where the

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>world is going and the markets are going. And they

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>sometimes fall back into that pattern, even they that was

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>shot can. Uh. The early parts of the book describe

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Jim Simons as the derogatory term I use. He's a

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>macro tourist. He's like every day trader, watching TV, looking

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>for news, trading in and out of stuff, doing good

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>some days, losing money the other days. But there's nothing

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>special or unique about that. He was every newbie trader,

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>wasn't he listen? He had unique approaches what he thought

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>were unique approaches. I get into them. At one point

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 1>he consulted with this early economist named Alan Greenspan, and Uh,

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>they had different ways. They thought they had an edge,

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>but no, they didn't have an edge. Not only that,

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>but it tore him up inside and made it literally

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>physically made him ill. That he'd come into the office

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>just unsure of himself. Um, some days up, some days down.

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>They made a lot of money. At one point the

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>name gave back a lot of money. They were fallings

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>out with different types of people. But it's not just

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>early days. Even last year. End of last year. The

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>market is loading, as we recall and Q four exactly.

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>And Jim Simons and I write the story. I tell

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>this anecdote in the book. He's on vacation on his

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>huge ship somewhere and he starts panicking about the market

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and he calls his wealth manager. The guy's managing his money.

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Jim Simmons were twenty three billion dollars, so

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>he's quite the portfolio. And he's like, maybe we should

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>be buying some insurance here. That's like me panicking in

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the markets down? Hey, should I be selling? Like like,

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a big deal. I guess when it's twenty three

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars, it is a big deal. It is. But

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>he's a guy who made his twenty three billion dollars

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>on the scientific approach on, not on testing ideas and

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 1>having systematic approach to investing, not on these narratives and

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>nervousness and reacting all these behavioral mistakes that we all make.

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>He was about to make too. So even an eight

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>year old, the genius, the guy who solved the market,

0:16:57.200 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>as I call it, he is apt to um to

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>trade like everybody else. And the point being, it's not

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>easy being a quant You have to fight your instincts

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:09.360
<v Speaker 1>to some extent, even when you're a scientist and a mathematician.

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about that a sec. In the early

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:17.400
<v Speaker 1>days when renaissance was starting to become who Who, they

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 1>eventually become their big secret. They were really big data.

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Before big data was a thing, before crisp Ereuters or

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Dow Jones or Bloomberg made commercial database of market prices available,

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>they were effectively assembling their own. That was fairly unique,

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:40.399
<v Speaker 1>wasn't it. That's exactly right, and that was one of

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the early edges. And frankly, they were collecting data when

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:45.680
<v Speaker 1>no one cared about it, no one saw a need

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 1>for it. This is pre Bloomberg, pre everything else. They

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 1>were going down to the Fed collecting obscure pieces of data,

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>economic and other. They were going back in history, so um,

0:17:57.400 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>it was a several years later, but they were collecting

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff from like the late eighteen hundreds and they didn't

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>really have a purpose for a lot of that data

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 1>at the time. They had this instinct instinct that maybe

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 1>it's because they were scientists, that the more data the better,

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and any kind of data could be helpful and maybe

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:17.640
<v Speaker 1>not right now, but at some point down the road.

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>And yet that gave them a complete advantage because then

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:21.919
<v Speaker 1>they could test, they could create models, they could do

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 1>scenarios that others couldn't. And the way I like in

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 1>it is too a little bit like if you wanted

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 1>to create a library, Um, how long would it take you? Okay,

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>like your public library or local library probably take you,

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, a few months to collect all the books.

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>But what if you wanted to create the Library of Congress.

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:40.439
<v Speaker 1>It would be pretty impossible. Some of that stuff you

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:42.880
<v Speaker 1>just can't get your hands. And that's what Renaissance still

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>has today and and it does help them. So the

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>cost of building that database, and they were fastidious about

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:54.120
<v Speaker 1>making sure the data was clean and up to date

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and accurate. How to be substantial. The typical hedge fund

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 1>charges too, and twenty two percent management feed of the profits.

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:07.119
<v Speaker 1>But Simon thought the cost of the database needs to

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>be passed along. Two investors. So instead of charging two

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and twenty, he charged brace yourself five and forty four.

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Who the hell would pay that sort of fee when

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you're making a lot of money and LP how will

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:27.439
<v Speaker 1>have pay that kind of fee? And they their their returns,

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>which for the first time ever have been released, because

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>it's only always been a rumor. You're appendix one or

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Appendix B, I don't remember which. The end of the book,

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 1>you note since the medallion has averaged annual returns of

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:48.879
<v Speaker 1>sixty but that's before those five and thirty six or

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:53.640
<v Speaker 1>five and forty four fees. Afterwards, it's only thirty nine

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:57.160
<v Speaker 1>point one percent a year for thirty years. Those are

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:02.919
<v Speaker 1>just eye popping astonishing returns, right uh, and right as

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you suggest, you will pay for those kind of returns.

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:08.159
<v Speaker 1>You pay almost any feed. They kept raising the fees

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 1>partly to discourage investors from sticking in the funds, and

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>eventually they kicked out all the investors. And that's part

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of their secret to that they kept it. They kept

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>medallion as they realized it couldn't return these sort of

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 1>numbers beyond what is it, seven billion or eight billion

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars seven eight billion a year, So you know, you

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:28.679
<v Speaker 1>got to give Jim Simons all kinds of credit and

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>his colleagues, and they are the greatest modern day investors

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 1>in history. But you also want to um note that

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 1>they didn't they weren't able to grow it, and they

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:39.199
<v Speaker 1>knew they couldn't grow it beyond what it is right now,

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:41.880
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about the Medallion Fund ten billion dollars, So

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not like they kept growing its fifty billion dollars.

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>They knew they could not get those kinds of returns

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:52.359
<v Speaker 1>and and they currently keep the Medallion funds or actually

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:55.399
<v Speaker 1>it's been that way for fifteen twenty years. Is that

0:20:55.440 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>about right for just Simon's and the employees of Renaissance, right,

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Which is a wonderful way of keeping talent, recruiting in retention. Yeah,

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't even have to pay people there. I mean,

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:10.120
<v Speaker 1>they do pay nicely, but just the ability to invest

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>in Medallion retains top talent. It also makes them so

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>wealthy quite frankly, that a lot of these guys when

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 1>they leave, and the few women they're working there, when

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 1>they leave, they're not going to another Wall Street firm.

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>They've made so much money, they're doing philanthropy, They're going

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>back to academia other interesting things. So it's a it's

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a great way to retain talent, and it's also a

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:32.879
<v Speaker 1>great way to make sure people aren't gonna quit and

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 1>start rivals. So let's talk a little bit about one

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of the most significant people in the book other than

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Jim Simons, and that would be Bob Mercer. He uh.

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 1>By the time he joins Renaissance, Simmons has figured out

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 1>how to trade bonds, how to trade currencies, how to

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:56.439
<v Speaker 1>trade commodities, but he hasn't cracked equities. So Renaissance is

0:21:56.480 --> 0:22:01.199
<v Speaker 1>a small, unimportant firm generating some nice returns, helping to

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 1>make Simon's conventionally rich, not a billionaire, but rich. But

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Mercer comes along, how important to see to the Renaissance story.

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right. So around nine Renaissance was okay, middling

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of firm, respected by those who knew it. Most

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 1>people had no clue who they were. They were doing

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>nicely as you suggest, in commodities and currencies, uh futures,

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:31.680
<v Speaker 1>but couldn't make it happen in equities. And for some

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>of the people internally that was fine. They were getting

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:37.479
<v Speaker 1>wealthy who cares, but no scale, no influence. No, they

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>don't leave a mark on Wall Street. And that's what

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Simon's wanted. You want to leave a mark on the

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>world broadly and make a lot of money use that money.

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>And you couldn't do that unless they could crack equities because,

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:52.160
<v Speaker 1>as we know, um equities, you can manage much more

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 1>money um in the in the equity world and relative

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:58.360
<v Speaker 1>to the other types of world's fixed income in commodities, etcetera.

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>So they were frustrating, and there were a bunch of

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:05.159
<v Speaker 1>turning points within the Renaissance story. They almost fell apart

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>a number of times, more than I would have expected.

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 1>That's another kind of surprise from my research. There were

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>several times where they really it was it was touch

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and go whether they would keep going or not. So

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:18.880
<v Speaker 1>there were people within the firm and said give it up, Jim,

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 1>stop trying to figure out equities. And they almost gave

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>it up. And then this guy's you suggest. Bob Mercer

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:29.640
<v Speaker 1>came along and Peter Brown to speech recognition experts from IBM,

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and they built an improved equities trading system, much improved.

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 1>The engineering that technologies was much better. They combined all

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>kinds of different signals and factors into one system, which

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 1>is one of their great advantages too, as opposed to

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>different models. A lot of different quant firms have multiple

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 1>different models. They have one system and it's hard to

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>pull that off. And that's what it took somebody like

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Bomb Mercer to figure that out. So so one of

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the things we haven't talked about, it would be important

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to bring this up. Simmons isn't recruiting people from Wall Street.

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 1>He's not rating Morgan Stanley or Goldman Sachs. He's rating

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the IBM Watson team. He's rating academic math and computer

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:13.399
<v Speaker 1>science and physics department. He's taking former ns A codebreakers

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and hiring them. This is not the usual team of

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 1>wool Street whiz kids. These are really brilliant scientists, academicians

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and others, but no one is coming out of of

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Lower Manhattan. They're They're really a different cud, aren't they, Barry.

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>That speaks to the paradox of the whole Jim Simons

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:38.679
<v Speaker 1>and Renaissance story. The very people who figured out the market,

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 1>who conquered the market are pretty much the last people

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:43.879
<v Speaker 1>you would have expected, because they were people that didn't

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>know anything about the market. It's about you didn't know

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the white investing, not only that some of them were

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 1>aren't even capitalists internally when you talk to them. So

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>let's let's let's stick with that issue. We'll come back

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to the academic nature. I'm kind of fascinated by Bob Mercer.

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>The uxtaposition with him is, here's a guy who by

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:10.239
<v Speaker 1>all measures, brilliant, rational, completely mellow and even tempered, just

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a data driven mathematician professionally. But then I guess that's

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 1>his uh Dr Jekyl. But the Mr Hyde is his

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>personality when it comes to his personal politics is the

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:29.200
<v Speaker 1>polar opposite. He's a wild eyed conspiracy theorist. He trolls

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the other Renaissance Technology employees. Simons is a big democrat.

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the other academics at Renaissance are certainly

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 1>left of center, if not Democrats, or or even further left.

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:48.399
<v Speaker 1>How does Bob Mercer play in that environment? Yeah, so,

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 1>Bob Mercer as a scientist who demanded internally that everyone

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>stick to the scientific method, and it's a data driven firm.

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Everything has to be approved ever, no intuition exactly. And yet,

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>as you suggest, when it comes to his personal beliefs,

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 1>he believes every insane conspiracy theory out there. It's so

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:14.640
<v Speaker 1>shocking compared to who he is professionally. What I'm really

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to emphasize is how different personally his beliefs are. Yeah,

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, everything he argues against doing professionally he does personally.

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:31.639
<v Speaker 1>It seems just so odd. He demands proof when it

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 1>comes to work and not so much outside of work.

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, for a long time he was treated as

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a curiosity within Renaissance. He again to go into the

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 1>lunch room get under people's skin by talking, by sharing

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 1>some of these conspiracy theories about Hillary or somebody else,

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and people weren't sure internally whether he really believed in

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:52.440
<v Speaker 1>it or not. He was the boss, they didn't want

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:54.119
<v Speaker 1>to challenge him too much, so for a while they

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't take him seriously. They didn't think they needed to.

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 1>And then lo and behold as he as the firm

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 1>grew and he became a multi billionaire, they realized that

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:05.639
<v Speaker 1>he was funding all kinds of causes that many people,

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:09.199
<v Speaker 1>if not most people at Renaissance are really uncomfortable with,

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>unhappy about, and they were they were stuck. They don't

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>know what to do. We're talking about everything from Brexit.

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>He was helpful in terms of Brexit. Bright bart he

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:20.159
<v Speaker 1>was funding bright bart Um and then he got behind

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the Trump campaign. He's the one who put Kelly Anne

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Conway and Steve Bannon in the Trump campaign. And one

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>can argue, and people have said that there may not

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:31.640
<v Speaker 1>have been a Trump presidency were it not for this guy,

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Bob Mercer, which made everyone internally uncomfortable. And and let's

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:38.959
<v Speaker 1>set the stage for that. It's August of two thousand

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:42.919
<v Speaker 1>and sixteen. The Trump campaign is in the midst of imploding.

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>There have been a series of scandals. Back when scandals

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:50.360
<v Speaker 1>actually resonated, the whole Access Hollywood tape comes out. I mean,

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the Trump campaign was circling the drain before Robert Mercer

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>stepped in with a few handpicked people and a little

0:27:57.480 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 1>bit of cash. Right. So what happened was Bob Mur's daughter,

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca Mercer, who kind of runs the political side of

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 1>things in the family, she ran up to to Trump

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>at an event campaign event and say you better turn

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:14.479
<v Speaker 1>things around or else we're done. And they've been funding

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:18.439
<v Speaker 1>him financially. First they were Cruise, they were backing Take Cruise,

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and they after a lunch between Avanca and Rebecca Mercer.

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:26.160
<v Speaker 1>The Mercers switched gears and also CRUs lost. He got

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>out of the race. Then they switched gears. They became

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the top funders. I think that they eventually

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 1>hime the top funder for for Trump. Sobca Rebecca Mercer

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:37.960
<v Speaker 1>runs up to Donald Trump at an event says you're

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna lose unless you drastically change things, and Trump kind

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 1>of acknowledge. He's like, yeah, what do I do? And

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca said, You've got to work with this guy, Steve Bannon.

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 1>So Steve in Trump's like, all right, I'll meet with him.

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 1>So Steve Bennon goes out to the the country club

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 1>in New Jersey to talk to Trump, has to wait

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>through Trump goes through a couple of hot dogs, Um

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 1>ice cream Sunday, Um, plays golf and and you know,

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Bannon's waiting and waiting, and finally he gets an audience

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 1>with Trump and he lays out strategically what he should

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 1>be doing, and Trump listens to him. To his credit

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of this history. So if we're not

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 1>for Rebecca Mercer and Bob Mercer, it's not clear Trump

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 1>would have won. I can't get a good read on

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca Mercer in the book. She's really very minor character

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>relative to all these other scientists. Who is she and

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and and what was she doing before the election. So

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca Mercer, like her father, is very conservative. Rebecca homeschools

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>her children and believes in small government, low taxation, hates

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the Clintons like Bob Mercer um and but they also

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 1>believe in data. And they also believe in the fact

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that they got really frustrated with mainstream Republicans and they

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't think anybody was going to shake things up like

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>they thought it should be shaking up. And frankly, as

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:00.080
<v Speaker 1>an outsider, as a writer, I look at these two

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:02.960
<v Speaker 1>bowl and I see too that people that never really

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>contributed to broader society. It's not like I volunteered their

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 1>time to do something to run to support to fund

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 1>um broader society. By Mercer spent his whole life trying

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>to make money, or was first first trying to do

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 1>science and then trying to do to make money. Is

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 1>nothing wrong with that, But then all of a sudden

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 1>he becomes he and his daughter become the ones who

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>really have such a remarkable shift on society, on you

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and I I I find that a little distasteful. Frankly, Now,

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 1>weren't they though, on a bunch of philanthropic boards in

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the Museum and Natural History in New York and elsewhere?

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 1>But they had to be throwing some money around. Yes,

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that that was That was pre election though, wasn't it. Uh,

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a good question, Wenkley, go on the board. I mean,

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 1>come back to that, because it was only after the

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 1>election that the pressure started coming up to put Wait,

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 1>he's a climate denialist and he's on the board of

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the Natural Museum of Is is she on? Am my? Confusing?

0:30:56.720 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Who's on which board? Rebecca was on the board of

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Natural um boar of of Museum and National History in

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>New York, But she's also a climate denial Yes, Mercer

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 1>is a climate denialist. Um. They he believes that nuclear

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 1>war may not be as harmful as we all believe.

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Less should get past the radioactive cloud. It's really not

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that bad. That's the argument. There you go. Um again,

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 1>not based on science. There's like some stray he picked

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 1>up on some stray he sees on a stray scientific

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 1>paper that was since discredited. Um, which is again goes

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 1>back to the irony that a guy who demands science

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to his day to day work, when

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 1>it comes to his personal outside interests, he's less demanding.

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 1>And and then the other question that's so interesting is

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>how is Robert Mercer forced to step down as CEO

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>at Renaissance Technologies and and what is his role currently.

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 1>So Bob Mercer was at Renaissance throughout the campaign through

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the election, and many internally were unhappy about that, but

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 1>not everyone. Others thought he was a good leader. He

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 1>formed a really impressive partnership with a guy named Peter Brown.

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Peter Brown is tempestuous, He's always got great, crazy, interesting ideas.

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Some work, some don't, and Bob Mercer was the calm

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 1>one that was being in the yang and they worked

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 1>really well together. So internally some people were like, what

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 1>do we do here? Our CEO is still doing a

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 1>great job, We're still making six a year in the market.

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>But for the destroying democracy thing, he's fantastic and society

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 1>potentially um and even Jim Simons was was torn. So

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Jim Simons was the largest, one of the largest funders

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 1>of Hillary Clinton and his top employee, he Bob Mercer,

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 1>was the top funder for for Donald Trump, so he

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 1>was in a bind. Jim Simons, he couldn't fire his

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 1>employee for his political beliefs, and he also liked him.

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 1>He likes some one individual basis. And to Simon's credit,

0:32:56.840 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>he says in the book, who am I to tell

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:00.880
<v Speaker 1>him how to spend his own money? It's not my

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 1>decision exactly. And many were torn internally, but it got

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to the point where morale was being affected and they

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 1>were worried about their ability to recruit. And that's the

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 1>lifeblood for that of that place. What what about outside investors?

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 1>A lot of big institutions are not especially happy with Trump.

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 1>How were they dealing with Bob Mercer as CEO of Renaissance.

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:25.480
<v Speaker 1>So by then, um they had started a few outside

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds for institutions and others. They still had them dwing,

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 1>which is only for internal employees. But right by the

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 1>time the election, they had outside investors and many were unhappy.

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>But that said, the returns were still really good. So

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:40.320
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't clear to me that how many we're really

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna pull out over Bob Mercer's politics. The bigger issue

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 1>is that they were worried about their ability to keep

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>attracting talent, and that's what they worry about. That is

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:52.680
<v Speaker 1>their biggest concern because they're not competing necessarily with PDT

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and two Sigma only, they're also competing with Google and Facebook.

0:33:56.960 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>These are scientists who could go work somewhere else, and

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 1>they were concerned about their ability to keep recruiting them.

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 1>And at some point Jim Simons said, Bob, we've got

0:34:07.200 --> 0:34:09.400
<v Speaker 1>to talk. And I talked about that scene. I described

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 1>that scene in the book, and it was difficult for

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:15.759
<v Speaker 1>both of them. Bomb Mercer was effectively told to step down,

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and Jim Simons was telling his old friends who who

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:22.320
<v Speaker 1>helped make him a multibillionaire, that he could no longer

0:34:22.360 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 1>help run the firm. The secret source of anything is

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:32.360
<v Speaker 1>that ability to attract incredible talent from all manner of

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of academia and technology and science, isn't it. They have

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:40.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sauces that are secret and impressive. Um

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:44.239
<v Speaker 1>the collaborative. They're much more collaborative than most firms. They

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:46.839
<v Speaker 1>don't try to predict where the market is going. It's

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 1>all relationships. It's groups of stocks versus groups of stocks.

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Four thousand or so long, four thousands or so short UM.

0:34:52.520 --> 0:34:56.320
<v Speaker 1>They have many but among the most impressive. Most impressive

0:34:56.600 --> 0:34:59.720
<v Speaker 1>things about that firm is they still can recruit almost

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 1>any one for any area, and they get superstars from

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:07.520
<v Speaker 1>academia and other places. Quite fascinating. One of the things

0:35:07.560 --> 0:35:11.279
<v Speaker 1>I found so fascinating from the book that I did

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 1>not previously put together in my head but should have,

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 1>but the book made it clear. Jim Simons is really

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:27.400
<v Speaker 1>an outstanding builder of teams. He was deputy director at

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the subdivision of the UM National Security Agency Code Group.

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:35.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm during a blank on their name c RD,

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 1>it was called at the time CRD. Then at sunny

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Stony Brook, he takes what was essentially a modest state

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 1>school in New York, builds it into a powerhouse mathematics department,

0:35:46.800 --> 0:35:49.640
<v Speaker 1>like a world class math department, filled with Nobel laureates

0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and others. And then at Renaissance he builds another spectacular team.

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Is it fair describe to describe him as an architect

0:35:59.200 --> 0:36:02.479
<v Speaker 1>more than anything? I think that's fair, So listen. Jim

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Simons has his faults. UM, He's not a perfect individual,

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 1>but he's quite impressive in his ability to both do

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the math and the science, and when he wants through

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a needs two. He can do the algorithms, but more

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 1>importantly his ability to manage talents. And someone internally said

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to me, Greg, it's not his genius, but his ability

0:36:22.560 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to manage genius, which is not easy to do. It's

0:36:25.239 --> 0:36:29.320
<v Speaker 1>really not easy. And you think about these really quirky personalities,

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:31.319
<v Speaker 1>which really jumps out of you. I think when you

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 1>read the book, how many unusual, odd headstrong, um stubborn

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:41.719
<v Speaker 1>um top top scientists they've hired, and you know they're

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:45.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty wealthy. They could leave and go somewhere else, and

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:47.920
<v Speaker 1>he was able to create this incentive for them to

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:50.839
<v Speaker 1>stay and work together. Not just stay there, but they

0:36:50.880 --> 0:36:53.440
<v Speaker 1>work together. And like you suggest, you can see that

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:56.319
<v Speaker 1>pattern early on in his career. He was great as

0:36:56.320 --> 0:36:59.320
<v Speaker 1>a department chair at keeping people happy, all the different

0:36:59.360 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 1>personalities and kind of thing. Or you can't really force

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 1>someone who's a professor to do what what you'd like

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 1>them to do. You've got to create incentives. And that's

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:09.840
<v Speaker 1>exactly what he's done at Renaissance. And I think in

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:12.399
<v Speaker 1>some ways you can learn management skills from him as

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 1>much as you can learn how to create algorithms. So

0:37:15.080 --> 0:37:18.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the interesting parts of the development of Renaissance

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:23.759
<v Speaker 1>was um what took place in the mid nineties. So

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:27.960
<v Speaker 1>he's uh, Mercer and Brown, Peter Brown are working on

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the equities portion. Uh, and they're not making a whole

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:35.799
<v Speaker 1>lot of progress. It's expensive, it's time consuming, and it's

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:40.799
<v Speaker 1>simply not delivering the sort of returns that everybody has

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:45.560
<v Speaker 1>hoped for. And so in Simon says to Brown and Mercer, quote,

0:37:45.680 --> 0:37:48.080
<v Speaker 1>get your system to work in the next six months,

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:51.759
<v Speaker 1>or I'm pulling the plug unquote. How close was the

0:37:51.960 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 1>entire equities portion of Renaissance to um never becoming what

0:37:58.760 --> 0:38:01.799
<v Speaker 1>it became. Oh, it was very close. And one has

0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:05.360
<v Speaker 1>to also call or remember or note that Jim Simons

0:38:05.400 --> 0:38:09.520
<v Speaker 1>had remarkable patience. So he has this optimism that most

0:38:09.600 --> 0:38:13.319
<v Speaker 1>most people don't share. He encourages his people. People were

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 1>giving up internally about trying to figure out equities. People

0:38:16.520 --> 0:38:19.839
<v Speaker 1>were saying, it's a waste of our resources. Stopped distracting us,

0:38:20.080 --> 0:38:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and Simmons kept encouraging his team. And yet, as you know,

0:38:24.480 --> 0:38:27.759
<v Speaker 1>even he was at his wits end and ready to

0:38:27.800 --> 0:38:30.800
<v Speaker 1>move on and gave his employees, his staff, Bomb Mercer

0:38:30.840 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and Peter Brown a matter of months to figure it

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:35.640
<v Speaker 1>out because they had tried and failed over and over again,

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and there was a quirk, there was um, there was

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:40.759
<v Speaker 1>an error in the code. There was an error in

0:38:40.800 --> 0:38:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the code that a guy named David Magerman, who's colorful,

0:38:44.640 --> 0:38:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and you have to tell so, so let's I was

0:38:47.080 --> 0:38:50.400
<v Speaker 1>fascinated by that part of the book. So everything seems

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to make sense substractly, but it's losing money. It's not

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 1>making money. And one day one of the more junior

0:38:56.680 --> 0:39:00.359
<v Speaker 1>guys decides to literally go through the algorithm, him through

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the actual lines of code, line by line by line

0:39:03.680 --> 0:39:07.759
<v Speaker 1>by line, and ultimately finds an error where one of

0:39:07.800 --> 0:39:11.239
<v Speaker 1>the SMP prices is fixed, meaning it's supposed to update

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 1>automatically and it doesn't. It's a it's an entry number

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:18.879
<v Speaker 1>instead of a variable that pulls the data inaccurately. That's

0:39:18.880 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. So this guy, David Maggerman, was had just

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:25.839
<v Speaker 1>been hired a few years earlier from IBM. Early on

0:39:26.000 --> 0:39:29.880
<v Speaker 1>he got some had some accomplishments, and got some respect internally,

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:32.120
<v Speaker 1>but then he blew it. He made a series of

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:36.400
<v Speaker 1>dumb error's mistakes. Basically, he was doing things he should

0:39:36.440 --> 0:39:39.400
<v Speaker 1>have been doing. At one point he almost pulled the

0:39:39.400 --> 0:39:42.560
<v Speaker 1>plug on the whole system. It was embarrassing. He was embarrassed.

0:39:42.600 --> 0:39:45.600
<v Speaker 1>He was close to getting h really getting pushed out

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 1>of there. And he's the one who said, you know what,

0:39:47.680 --> 0:39:51.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe I can look at this system and find what

0:39:51.360 --> 0:39:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the bug is. And as you suggest, there was it

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:57.400
<v Speaker 1>was static. They were there, it wasn't updating, and the

0:39:57.440 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 1>system wasn't updating incorporating the new way SMP five hundred prices,

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:04.240
<v Speaker 1>which sort of you know, it's a surprise in itself.

0:40:04.280 --> 0:40:07.720
<v Speaker 1>You think of these top giants in science, they should

0:40:07.719 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 1>have made this kind of dumb mistake and thousands of

0:40:10.239 --> 0:40:12.840
<v Speaker 1>lines of code. Those mistakes happen, right, Yeah, but you

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:16.040
<v Speaker 1>think a Renaissance and Medallion and Jim Simmons, and who

0:40:16.080 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 1>are they? They're like you and I, or at least

0:40:18.000 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 1>not like this was before they became Renaissance. This was

0:40:21.040 --> 0:40:23.759
<v Speaker 1>really when they were also rents. Yes, but you know

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:26.239
<v Speaker 1>it also is a reminder that even the giants make

0:40:26.360 --> 0:40:31.000
<v Speaker 1>dumb right. And yes, so magerman Um picked up on

0:40:31.040 --> 0:40:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the mistake. Internally, he finally got some respect because he

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:37.600
<v Speaker 1>brought her over to bomb Mercer and it was Mercer's math.

0:40:38.080 --> 0:40:39.799
<v Speaker 1>He kind of got it wrong, and he kind of

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:43.120
<v Speaker 1>to to his credit by Mercer, there's some appealing aspects

0:40:43.120 --> 0:40:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to his personality as well. He said he owned up

0:40:45.040 --> 0:40:46.839
<v Speaker 1>to it and said, yeah, I screwed this up. Let's

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:48.960
<v Speaker 1>fix it, and they're off to the races. It Literally,

0:40:49.000 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 1>as soon as that's fixed, the things becomes a money

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:55.560
<v Speaker 1>printing machine. It's remarkable. And they went from managing Medallion

0:40:55.600 --> 0:40:57.879
<v Speaker 1>was about eight hundred million dollars or so at the time,

0:40:57.920 --> 0:41:02.399
<v Speaker 1>and Equities was like thirty four million dollars to ten

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:06.920
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars of the greatest hedge fund in man's mankind

0:41:06.960 --> 0:41:10.280
<v Speaker 1>modern financial history. So there was a small, tiny error

0:41:10.280 --> 0:41:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that he picked up on and the rest is history.

0:41:13.600 --> 0:41:16.719
<v Speaker 1>So other firms that are in the quant space, like

0:41:16.880 --> 0:41:20.560
<v Speaker 1>d E. Shaw, they had a big head start over Renaissance.

0:41:21.120 --> 0:41:24.440
<v Speaker 1>What was it about Jim Simons that allowed him to

0:41:24.600 --> 0:41:27.719
<v Speaker 1>catch up to people like David Shaw? There are a

0:41:27.719 --> 0:41:30.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of things they do better. Renaissance does a lot

0:41:30.200 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of things better than everybody else. There's a certain urgency

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:35.279
<v Speaker 1>within the firm that you feel when you're there and

0:41:35.320 --> 0:41:38.840
<v Speaker 1>you talk to people that you don't really necessarily get elsewhere.

0:41:38.840 --> 0:41:42.719
<v Speaker 1>There's a collaboration that you see internally. One model that

0:41:42.760 --> 0:41:46.799
<v Speaker 1>other firms don't share. There's a sense of humility. They

0:41:46.840 --> 0:41:50.560
<v Speaker 1>don't um They don't take too much risk. They pull

0:41:50.640 --> 0:41:54.280
<v Speaker 1>back risk during crisis, when things are are even internally

0:41:54.320 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 1>when people are saying heads put on more risk, they

0:41:56.040 --> 0:41:59.800
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking pull back. They use leverage. They use heavy leverage.

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:02.319
<v Speaker 1>People don't really focus on how much leverage. But they

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:04.319
<v Speaker 1>are a ten billion fund that can get over a

0:42:04.360 --> 0:42:08.239
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion dollars when they see the opportunities. Um, I

0:42:08.280 --> 0:42:10.160
<v Speaker 1>could go on and on. They really have the best

0:42:10.320 --> 0:42:13.200
<v Speaker 1>trading ability to see what their impact on the overall

0:42:13.280 --> 0:42:16.240
<v Speaker 1>market is, meaning they have the ability to execute trades

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:19.560
<v Speaker 1>without moving prices. That and they know when they'll move

0:42:19.600 --> 0:42:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the prices and when they won't, so they can play

0:42:21.640 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 1>with their signals and try to make them uh and

0:42:24.440 --> 0:42:26.839
<v Speaker 1>try to make sure their activity isn't picked up on

0:42:27.040 --> 0:42:29.640
<v Speaker 1>by rivals. They have some signals that they are internally

0:42:29.640 --> 0:42:32.800
<v Speaker 1>are proud of and think people aren't aware of. And

0:42:32.800 --> 0:42:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and there's sophisticate stuff where these are mathematical relationships. And

0:42:36.120 --> 0:42:38.320
<v Speaker 1>it's one thing that one thing I think everyone should

0:42:38.320 --> 0:42:40.720
<v Speaker 1>realize that it's not like they've got some secret sauce

0:42:40.760 --> 0:42:44.000
<v Speaker 1>about you know, when IBM goes up every day. These

0:42:44.040 --> 0:42:48.680
<v Speaker 1>are mathematical relationships between groups of stocks and and their

0:42:48.719 --> 0:42:52.080
<v Speaker 1>relationship to indexes, relationships to each other, relationships to factors.

0:42:52.280 --> 0:42:56.800
<v Speaker 1>It's complex, complicated stuff, um, but they have certain unique

0:42:56.800 --> 0:43:00.160
<v Speaker 1>insights that others don't. Just like seeing the world just

0:43:00.200 --> 0:43:03.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit with a better um with glasses when

0:43:03.120 --> 0:43:05.799
<v Speaker 1>everybody else isn't isn't wearing them. They can see things

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:10.120
<v Speaker 1>that others can quite interesting. There's a quote from one

0:43:10.160 --> 0:43:14.480
<v Speaker 1>of the researchers. Am I pronouncing this right? Panific? I

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:17.960
<v Speaker 1>love this quote. Quote. Our entire premise was that human

0:43:18.000 --> 0:43:20.840
<v Speaker 1>actors will react the way humans did in the past,

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and we have learned to take advantage of that. How

0:43:24.440 --> 0:43:29.440
<v Speaker 1>much of that is reflected in their algorithms? Yes, so

0:43:29.680 --> 0:43:32.440
<v Speaker 1>almost all of what they do is based on predictive

0:43:32.480 --> 0:43:39.400
<v Speaker 1>models that incorporate historic returns, historic moves in the market,

0:43:39.480 --> 0:43:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and they could be recent returns, they could be from

0:43:41.560 --> 0:43:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the late eight They don't usually use those, but they're

0:43:44.080 --> 0:43:45.880
<v Speaker 1>there if they want them to. So they've gotten the

0:43:45.920 --> 0:43:48.439
<v Speaker 1>better data, and it's cleaner than other people, and they

0:43:48.440 --> 0:43:50.719
<v Speaker 1>were cleaning it way before anybody else, and they cared

0:43:50.719 --> 0:43:54.080
<v Speaker 1>about this stuff more. But right, the genius of renaissance

0:43:54.320 --> 0:43:59.840
<v Speaker 1>is that we as investors, our behavior is somewhat repetitive,

0:44:00.040 --> 0:44:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and it maybe and it rhymes. Now, it's not clear

0:44:02.640 --> 0:44:05.560
<v Speaker 1>going forward whether that will continue. So things have changed.

0:44:05.600 --> 0:44:08.800
<v Speaker 1>We've got as we all know, um, passive investing is changing,

0:44:08.800 --> 0:44:11.319
<v Speaker 1>is dominating the market. Active investors don't play the same

0:44:11.400 --> 0:44:16.359
<v Speaker 1>role factor investing, etcetera. So will Medallion's models. Will renaissances

0:44:16.440 --> 0:44:20.000
<v Speaker 1>models continue to trounce the market even internally. They're not

0:44:20.840 --> 0:44:24.880
<v Speaker 1>sure and most of what they they're doing, they're not

0:44:25.000 --> 0:44:29.239
<v Speaker 1>high frequency traders. They're not long term investors. But they'll

0:44:29.280 --> 0:44:32.680
<v Speaker 1>buy and sell almost a pair, trade in groups of

0:44:32.719 --> 0:44:35.720
<v Speaker 1>stocks and hold it for days or weeks. That's pretty

0:44:36.080 --> 0:44:38.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a good way to look at it. Generally speak

0:44:38.160 --> 0:44:40.520
<v Speaker 1>on average is about a two day holding period, but

0:44:40.560 --> 0:44:43.640
<v Speaker 1>they'll get two weeks too. They'll do fast trading. They'll

0:44:43.680 --> 0:44:46.799
<v Speaker 1>do what looks like high frequency but really isn't. In

0:44:46.920 --> 0:44:49.400
<v Speaker 1>that they're doing that usually to break up their trade,

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:52.440
<v Speaker 1>so the rapid fire within seconds. But they're not in

0:44:52.520 --> 0:44:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and out necessarily. No, they're not flashboys. Their medium frequency

0:44:57.440 --> 0:44:59.960
<v Speaker 1>is what people call it in the industry. They frankly,

0:45:00.000 --> 0:45:02.879
<v Speaker 1>their technology is good, but it's not great. You would

0:45:02.880 --> 0:45:04.480
<v Speaker 1>think they would have the best of everything, and they

0:45:04.480 --> 0:45:06.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of poke fon it at each other internally that

0:45:07.000 --> 0:45:09.880
<v Speaker 1>they've got good technology, but it's not cutting edge necessary.

0:45:09.920 --> 0:45:12.120
<v Speaker 1>They're not co locating and all that kind of stuff.

0:45:12.120 --> 0:45:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Well they don't have to though. They're not sniffing out

0:45:14.160 --> 0:45:18.360
<v Speaker 1>other trades and front running them. They're executing their own strategies.

0:45:18.400 --> 0:45:20.480
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right. So people do get them confused with

0:45:20.600 --> 0:45:23.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of the flashboys. But yeah, generally speaking about two

0:45:23.680 --> 0:45:25.799
<v Speaker 1>days or so as a holding period, And and we

0:45:25.920 --> 0:45:29.439
<v Speaker 1>talked about in the early days, Jim Simons was sort

0:45:29.440 --> 0:45:34.680
<v Speaker 1>of a macro tourist. He still occasionally overrides the system.

0:45:34.800 --> 0:45:37.759
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about when that happens and and why does

0:45:37.800 --> 0:45:42.359
<v Speaker 1>he think his flawed human instinctual judgment is better than

0:45:42.400 --> 0:45:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the system. It is unusually a little bit surprising. They

0:45:45.200 --> 0:45:48.759
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking never override their models, and they take they

0:45:48.800 --> 0:45:52.759
<v Speaker 1>never can. We generally speak exactly in times of crisis.

0:45:53.080 --> 0:45:56.000
<v Speaker 1>The firm will pull back when they're not sure, when

0:45:56.000 --> 0:45:58.560
<v Speaker 1>they're worried, and that's part of that humility. So they

0:45:58.600 --> 0:46:02.160
<v Speaker 1>don't have this arrogance that our models will survive. The

0:46:02.320 --> 0:46:05.000
<v Speaker 1>ltc M kind of things. They're not. They're not you

0:46:05.080 --> 0:46:08.920
<v Speaker 1>know John mary um Weather and that team at all. Right,

0:46:09.000 --> 0:46:11.919
<v Speaker 1>they get scared like you and I. And even though

0:46:11.920 --> 0:46:14.680
<v Speaker 1>internally there are people that say, don't ever mess at

0:46:14.719 --> 0:46:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the models. People like Simons. He doesn't run things day

0:46:17.000 --> 0:46:19.480
<v Speaker 1>to day. But in terms of crisis I describe in

0:46:19.520 --> 0:46:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the book there were there's panic. There was panic. They're

0:46:22.160 --> 0:46:24.439
<v Speaker 1>like any other kind of trading firm. And in those

0:46:24.520 --> 0:46:28.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of times he overruled his colleagues and he said, yes,

0:46:29.040 --> 0:46:31.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll probably make money here if we stick with our models,

0:46:32.080 --> 0:46:34.520
<v Speaker 1>but I'm worried about surviving. And if you think about it,

0:46:34.560 --> 0:46:37.280
<v Speaker 1>they also borrow a lot of money, so they've got lenders,

0:46:37.320 --> 0:46:40.440
<v Speaker 1>banks and others, and those banks get nervous if they

0:46:40.440 --> 0:46:42.760
<v Speaker 1>pull back on them. That will affect things. So Simon's

0:46:42.880 --> 0:46:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that's part of Simon's his genius that again he can

0:46:45.400 --> 0:46:48.440
<v Speaker 1>manage really well too, and and and deal with investors

0:46:48.440 --> 0:46:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and borrowers as well. How much leverage do they use,

0:46:51.920 --> 0:46:54.520
<v Speaker 1>It depends. It ranges if they're excited about the market

0:46:54.600 --> 0:46:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and opportunities if they're not. But they can do ten

0:46:56.960 --> 0:47:00.600
<v Speaker 1>times or even more. It depends what opportunities and times

0:47:00.880 --> 0:47:03.960
<v Speaker 1>sounds like a lot. Long term capital management was a

0:47:04.040 --> 0:47:07.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred x. The big Wall Street banks in in the

0:47:08.080 --> 0:47:11.200
<v Speaker 1>sub prime era were fort x, so ten x almost

0:47:11.200 --> 0:47:14.560
<v Speaker 1>sounds modest. Also, you gotta remember they're long and short

0:47:14.600 --> 0:47:17.239
<v Speaker 1>all the time. Everything is hedged, and they're long again

0:47:17.280 --> 0:47:21.560
<v Speaker 1>about four thousand and short about four thousand on average equities.

0:47:21.840 --> 0:47:24.160
<v Speaker 1>So them leveraging up is not like you and I

0:47:24.520 --> 0:47:28.080
<v Speaker 1>going along Microsoft and leveraging up. It's it's different. It's

0:47:28.080 --> 0:47:31.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty balanced than the odds are against anything untoward happening.

0:47:31.840 --> 0:47:34.879
<v Speaker 1>And the thing to remember about renaissance is they only

0:47:34.920 --> 0:47:38.759
<v Speaker 1>get right barely more than fifty of the time, and

0:47:38.800 --> 0:47:41.200
<v Speaker 1>they're aware of that. So on the one hand, their

0:47:41.200 --> 0:47:45.080
<v Speaker 1>sharp ratio is crazy great, which allows them to leverage

0:47:45.200 --> 0:47:48.279
<v Speaker 1>up and borrow this money, and it's pretty impressive in

0:47:48.280 --> 0:47:51.080
<v Speaker 1>its own right, but also as a reminder, they realize

0:47:51.120 --> 0:47:53.959
<v Speaker 1>they're they're not they're not hitting home runs every single day.

0:47:54.280 --> 0:47:58.360
<v Speaker 1>It's like a casino. They're making small amounts all the time,

0:47:59.080 --> 0:48:02.880
<v Speaker 1>quite quite interest in and it's sort of laughable today.

0:48:02.920 --> 0:48:07.120
<v Speaker 1>But you listed in the book a number of fairly

0:48:07.360 --> 0:48:12.239
<v Speaker 1>famous UH investors and hedge fund managers today who in

0:48:12.280 --> 0:48:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the early days of renaissance. Jim Simons went saying, Hey,

0:48:17.640 --> 0:48:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm raising this fund and I'd like to have you

0:48:19.640 --> 0:48:23.759
<v Speaker 1>being an investor, and they pretty much across the board

0:48:23.800 --> 0:48:26.800
<v Speaker 1>said no, left him out of the office. Bruce Covernor

0:48:26.920 --> 0:48:31.200
<v Speaker 1>pulled Tutor Jones, who else famously said not to Simon's

0:48:31.480 --> 0:48:33.759
<v Speaker 1>Donald Sussman is the key one. Donald Sussman is one

0:48:33.800 --> 0:48:37.440
<v Speaker 1>of the most respected investors on Wall Straight. He backed

0:48:37.520 --> 0:48:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the Shaw, He's backed a lot of um famous investors

0:48:41.719 --> 0:48:44.719
<v Speaker 1>over the years, and he's a really well impressive guy

0:48:44.719 --> 0:48:46.839
<v Speaker 1>in his own right, got a great track record. And

0:48:46.920 --> 0:48:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Simmons came to him, hat in hand saying I think

0:48:51.080 --> 0:48:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I've got it, I think I've figured it out. I'd

0:48:53.840 --> 0:48:58.560
<v Speaker 1>like some backing from you. And it wasn't that Sussman disagreed.

0:48:58.600 --> 0:49:01.719
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't that he was necessary really skeptical of Jim Simons,

0:49:01.920 --> 0:49:04.279
<v Speaker 1>but he had already invested in d SHAW. I didn't

0:49:04.320 --> 0:49:07.839
<v Speaker 1>want to invest in a competitor, and there wasn't much

0:49:07.840 --> 0:49:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of a track record at that point. Is really when

0:49:11.600 --> 0:49:16.080
<v Speaker 1>they decided to go all in on quantitative investing UM,

0:49:16.200 --> 0:49:19.920
<v Speaker 1>using big data, using algorithms as opposed to using some

0:49:20.080 --> 0:49:23.640
<v Speaker 1>of the instinctive intuition type trading, and so there wasn't

0:49:23.719 --> 0:49:26.919
<v Speaker 1>much of a track record in when Jim Simons went

0:49:27.000 --> 0:49:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to speak to Donald sssman, So you can't blame him

0:49:29.200 --> 0:49:31.520
<v Speaker 1>too much. But yeah, there were a number of pretty

0:49:31.560 --> 0:49:34.359
<v Speaker 1>well respected investors I talked about in the book who

0:49:34.400 --> 0:49:37.480
<v Speaker 1>had an opportunity to invest in Medallion and passed on it.

0:49:37.800 --> 0:49:40.920
<v Speaker 1>And then a few years later, or maybe it's fifteen

0:49:41.000 --> 0:49:47.160
<v Speaker 1>years later, Simmons goes to the outside Medallion investors and says, hey,

0:49:47.160 --> 0:49:50.319
<v Speaker 1>thanks for the capital, but here, we're gonna give this

0:49:50.400 --> 0:49:53.000
<v Speaker 1>back to you. We we can't use it anymore. What

0:49:53.680 --> 0:49:57.120
<v Speaker 1>a What was the thinking there? And be what was

0:49:57.200 --> 0:50:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the reaction of the investors. They must have been pretty

0:50:00.640 --> 0:50:06.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, stunt. So they again have these remarkable models

0:50:06.360 --> 0:50:09.279
<v Speaker 1>that allow them to know how much they can make

0:50:09.840 --> 0:50:13.759
<v Speaker 1>in certain size, how much they impact the market, pretty sophisticated,

0:50:13.960 --> 0:50:16.439
<v Speaker 1>and they realized that a ten billion or more they're

0:50:16.440 --> 0:50:18.359
<v Speaker 1>going to really not be able to have those kind

0:50:18.360 --> 0:50:20.640
<v Speaker 1>of returns. Now, you and I would probably say fine,

0:50:20.680 --> 0:50:22.919
<v Speaker 1>instead of being up sixty six percent a year, will

0:50:22.960 --> 0:50:25.200
<v Speaker 1>be up thirty five percent a year, and we'll grow this,

0:50:25.239 --> 0:50:27.319
<v Speaker 1>say U m here and make the money. But no,

0:50:27.480 --> 0:50:30.319
<v Speaker 1>they wanted this hedge funds to be just for them

0:50:30.400 --> 0:50:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and to have these outstanding, remarkable returns. So they proceeded

0:50:34.440 --> 0:50:36.799
<v Speaker 1>to kick, as you suggest, kick their LPs out, kick

0:50:36.840 --> 0:50:39.560
<v Speaker 1>their investors out. And they were not happy. They weren't

0:50:39.640 --> 0:50:41.520
<v Speaker 1>they weren't thrilled. Some of them said, you know, I

0:50:41.600 --> 0:50:44.279
<v Speaker 1>stuck with you, Jim, through the difficult times, and here

0:50:44.320 --> 0:50:46.360
<v Speaker 1>you are kicking me out. And he kicked out his

0:50:46.440 --> 0:50:49.280
<v Speaker 1>friends too. He kicked everybody out, really, and he basically

0:50:49.360 --> 0:50:52.000
<v Speaker 1>was just a little cold. You know, Jim Simmons is

0:50:52.280 --> 0:50:55.840
<v Speaker 1>uh an fascinating guy. He's a scientist, he cares about society,

0:50:56.200 --> 0:50:59.040
<v Speaker 1>he's a huge philanthropist, um does all kinds of really

0:50:59.080 --> 0:51:02.680
<v Speaker 1>interesting things in education and science. He also really really

0:51:02.719 --> 0:51:06.719
<v Speaker 1>loves money and he as a tool for what it

0:51:06.760 --> 0:51:09.040
<v Speaker 1>can do, or just loves it. Let's not go overboard here.

0:51:09.040 --> 0:51:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Look for an academic that it comes across that he

0:51:12.760 --> 0:51:18.400
<v Speaker 1>is much more motivated by accumulating cash than the typical academy.

0:51:18.480 --> 0:51:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, it's no comparison. Quite honestly. He always

0:51:21.719 --> 0:51:23.640
<v Speaker 1>had one foot in the world of academia and one

0:51:23.680 --> 0:51:26.560
<v Speaker 1>foot out. He was always doing businesses and they're quite interesting.

0:51:26.600 --> 0:51:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I read about him in the book. He pursued trading

0:51:28.800 --> 0:51:32.359
<v Speaker 1>and business, not full time, and it never really worked

0:51:32.360 --> 0:51:34.799
<v Speaker 1>out completely, but he always had his outside interest. So yeah,

0:51:34.840 --> 0:51:39.080
<v Speaker 1>he always really was focused on getting rich and he

0:51:39.200 --> 0:51:41.120
<v Speaker 1>wanted to change the world with that money. But he

0:51:41.160 --> 0:51:43.839
<v Speaker 1>also just playing like getting wealthy. So here they were

0:51:44.200 --> 0:51:47.120
<v Speaker 1>with staring at the possibility of seeing the return slow down,

0:51:47.480 --> 0:51:50.719
<v Speaker 1>and he said, I'd rather kick out my investors than

0:51:51.280 --> 0:51:55.719
<v Speaker 1>risk the possibility of our returns. Uh dropping. And you

0:51:56.160 --> 0:52:01.360
<v Speaker 1>described earlier lots of colorful characters in the book, Simmons

0:52:01.480 --> 0:52:05.400
<v Speaker 1>is really one of the most colorful characters of everybody.

0:52:05.719 --> 0:52:10.240
<v Speaker 1>He's a chain smoking two packs of Merits a day.

0:52:10.280 --> 0:52:15.960
<v Speaker 1>There's a hilarious story about a group of institutional investors

0:52:16.000 --> 0:52:21.240
<v Speaker 1>from a healthcare company that are there for some um,

0:52:21.560 --> 0:52:26.279
<v Speaker 1>just kicking guitars to give Renaissance money. And there's also

0:52:26.360 --> 0:52:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a birthday kick involved. Tell that story. Sure, that's the

0:52:29.960 --> 0:52:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Robert Wood Johnson Foundation there, dedicated to public health, and

0:52:34.239 --> 0:52:38.520
<v Speaker 1>they came by Renaissances Long Island Offices to talk about

0:52:38.680 --> 0:52:41.799
<v Speaker 1>investing in Reef. That's one of their outside funds. This

0:52:41.920 --> 0:52:43.920
<v Speaker 1>was early on when they were raising money for it.

0:52:44.320 --> 0:52:47.400
<v Speaker 1>They were impressed. They were having a nice launch. People

0:52:47.440 --> 0:52:50.760
<v Speaker 1>around the table. Simon's comes in to finish off the sale.

0:52:50.920 --> 0:52:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Everyone's all excited. The salesman at Renaissance can see their commissions.

0:52:54.560 --> 0:52:56.279
<v Speaker 1>They can imagine how much they're gonna be making from

0:52:56.280 --> 0:53:00.440
<v Speaker 1>this big investment. And Simmons, as you suggest, is change smoking.

0:53:00.520 --> 0:53:03.279
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't care. He doesn't care. He's smoked, always a

0:53:03.480 --> 0:53:06.920
<v Speaker 1>cigarette in his hand. And he's also, you know, almost

0:53:06.960 --> 0:53:09.920
<v Speaker 1>eighty two, so it hasn't really impacted his life. So

0:53:09.960 --> 0:53:14.400
<v Speaker 1>he's in this meeting and Simons looks around the no ashtras.

0:53:14.440 --> 0:53:16.000
<v Speaker 1>He's looking for an ash tray, but he needs to

0:53:16.040 --> 0:53:20.040
<v Speaker 1>ash somewhere, and he sees this big fancy cake that

0:53:20.080 --> 0:53:24.080
<v Speaker 1>have been wheeled in uh to to to end the dinner,

0:53:24.160 --> 0:53:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to the lunch, and everyone's gonna have a piece of it.

0:53:26.840 --> 0:53:30.840
<v Speaker 1>So he reaches over and he sticks his cigarette deep

0:53:30.880 --> 0:53:33.839
<v Speaker 1>into that cake and he's Jim time. He just gets

0:53:33.920 --> 0:53:38.319
<v Speaker 1>up and raves goodbye, and that thing is sizzling as

0:53:38.400 --> 0:53:41.080
<v Speaker 1>he exits the room, and everyone just looking at each other.

0:53:41.200 --> 0:53:46.560
<v Speaker 1>And the Renaissance salesman are just um dumbfounded, apoplectic because

0:53:46.560 --> 0:53:48.800
<v Speaker 1>they've lost their commission. They're sure these are this is

0:53:48.840 --> 0:53:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the Robert Johnson Foundation dedicated to public health. So obviously

0:53:53.080 --> 0:53:57.480
<v Speaker 1>this guy just ashed and a sizzling vanilla cake right

0:53:57.560 --> 0:53:59.359
<v Speaker 1>in front of them. They're not gonna write a check.

0:53:59.400 --> 0:54:04.440
<v Speaker 1>But they did nonetheless speak for themselves, right. And in

0:54:04.480 --> 0:54:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the book, I was shocked to read this. Someone says

0:54:08.160 --> 0:54:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to Simon's your scientists, don't you know about the dangers

0:54:11.000 --> 0:54:14.640
<v Speaker 1>of smoking? What was his response? He said to them,

0:54:14.680 --> 0:54:17.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not clear. This his tongue in cheek. It probably wasn't.

0:54:17.360 --> 0:54:22.520
<v Speaker 1>But he researched his genes and according to his his work,

0:54:22.600 --> 0:54:26.080
<v Speaker 1>his research, he was is one of these unique people

0:54:26.160 --> 0:54:30.719
<v Speaker 1>that can actually withstand um, all the chain smoking that

0:54:30.800 --> 0:54:33.200
<v Speaker 1>he does, he inflicts on his body. He claims his

0:54:33.400 --> 0:54:38.399
<v Speaker 1>predisposition is to not get lung cancer. Genetically, he has

0:54:38.440 --> 0:54:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the lucky whatever it is gene that that means you

0:54:42.560 --> 0:54:45.920
<v Speaker 1>can smoke without ill effects. Yes, and he fooling himself

0:54:45.960 --> 0:54:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit like bom Mercer with his pseudo signs

0:54:48.600 --> 0:54:50.960
<v Speaker 1>outside of the office. Um. And that's one thing that's

0:54:51.000 --> 0:54:52.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of jumped out in the book, that these guys

0:54:52.480 --> 0:54:54.560
<v Speaker 1>are like you and I in so many ways. They've

0:54:54.600 --> 0:54:58.000
<v Speaker 1>got their foibles and they get emotional Um. In their lives,

0:54:58.000 --> 0:55:00.720
<v Speaker 1>and they get fights with their wives and scream matches

0:55:00.719 --> 0:55:03.880
<v Speaker 1>with their colleagues. And Jim Simmons, yes, has convinced himself

0:55:04.280 --> 0:55:06.839
<v Speaker 1>that he won't be impacted by smoking in it into

0:55:06.880 --> 0:55:09.560
<v Speaker 1>his credit. It hasn't impacted him, so you know, once

0:55:09.600 --> 0:55:12.719
<v Speaker 1>again he may be right. Uh, Greg, can you stick

0:55:12.719 --> 0:55:15.120
<v Speaker 1>around a bit? I have a bunch more questions. Happy,

0:55:15.440 --> 0:55:18.560
<v Speaker 1>We have been speaking with Greg Zuckerman, author of the

0:55:18.560 --> 0:55:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Man Who Solved the Market? How Jim Simon's launched the

0:55:22.239 --> 0:55:26.480
<v Speaker 1>quant revolution. If you enjoy this conversation, be sure and

0:55:26.600 --> 0:55:29.279
<v Speaker 1>come back for our podcast extras. Will we keep the

0:55:29.280 --> 0:55:34.200
<v Speaker 1>tape rolling and continue discussing all things renaissance technologies related.

0:55:34.640 --> 0:55:39.200
<v Speaker 1>You can find that at iTunes, Google podcast, Stitcher, Spotify,

0:55:39.280 --> 0:55:43.240
<v Speaker 1>wherever your finer podcasts are sold. We love your comments,

0:55:43.280 --> 0:55:46.520
<v Speaker 1>feedback and suggestions. You can write to us at m

0:55:46.560 --> 0:55:49.400
<v Speaker 1>IB podcast at Bloomberg dot net or give us a

0:55:49.440 --> 0:55:53.160
<v Speaker 1>review over at Apple iTunes. Check out my weekly column

0:55:53.160 --> 0:55:56.520
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg dot com. Sign up for my daily reads

0:55:56.640 --> 0:55:59.560
<v Speaker 1>at Rid Halts dot com. Follow me on Twitter at

0:55:59.640 --> 0:56:03.279
<v Speaker 1>Rid Halts. I'm Barry Retults. You're listening to Masters in

0:56:03.320 --> 0:56:09.759
<v Speaker 1>Business Radio. Welcome to the podcast. Greg, thank you so

0:56:09.840 --> 0:56:12.879
<v Speaker 1>much for doing this. I have to tell you I

0:56:12.960 --> 0:56:15.719
<v Speaker 1>really really enjoyed the book, not just because I'm a

0:56:16.239 --> 0:56:19.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, fascinated by Renaissance and I've had a handful

0:56:20.120 --> 0:56:24.719
<v Speaker 1>of dealings with Jim Simon's without his involvement. He he no,

0:56:24.840 --> 0:56:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I have never met, but um, when I was a

0:56:28.280 --> 0:56:30.000
<v Speaker 1>high school student trying to figure out where to go

0:56:30.080 --> 0:56:34.000
<v Speaker 1>to school, like towards Stony Brook, and there goes the

0:56:34.040 --> 0:56:39.080
<v Speaker 1>outgoing math uh department chairman. If you would have met him,

0:56:39.120 --> 0:56:41.319
<v Speaker 1>you would never have given him a penny. The joke

0:56:41.360 --> 0:56:43.680
<v Speaker 1>about all these people who passed on him. He had

0:56:43.680 --> 0:56:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the scruffy beard and you know, yellow fingers from nobody.

0:56:47.920 --> 0:56:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I could see how people wouldn't have taken him seriously.

0:56:50.520 --> 0:56:52.680
<v Speaker 1>But I have to tell you why I um. And

0:56:52.719 --> 0:56:56.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a funny story that I can't verify about the

0:56:56.120 --> 0:56:59.759
<v Speaker 1>alumni department. It's Stony Brook. Um. I can't even share

0:56:59.760 --> 0:57:01.960
<v Speaker 1>publicly because I don't know if it's true, but if

0:57:01.960 --> 0:57:05.080
<v Speaker 1>it is, it's pretty hilarious. I really enjoyed the book.

0:57:05.160 --> 0:57:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I normally take a ton of notes, and the books

0:57:08.000 --> 0:57:11.680
<v Speaker 1>are always marked up and underlined and with post its,

0:57:11.719 --> 0:57:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and oh, here's the question, and here's the topic. There

0:57:14.640 --> 0:57:17.880
<v Speaker 1>really is zero writing in the book because I read

0:57:17.920 --> 0:57:22.800
<v Speaker 1>it like a thriller. It's a fascinating tale about really

0:57:23.520 --> 0:57:27.240
<v Speaker 1>an amazing story with really interesting people. You did really

0:57:27.320 --> 0:57:30.760
<v Speaker 1>nice job on this, um, thank you. What What was

0:57:30.840 --> 0:57:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the process like writing this? This gotta be quite quite

0:57:33.600 --> 0:57:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a monstrousity to put together. It's hard, the hard thing

0:57:36.320 --> 0:57:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I ever did in my life. Really, I could. I

0:57:39.120 --> 0:57:42.480
<v Speaker 1>could totally see that the challenges We're getting people to talk,

0:57:42.520 --> 0:57:45.320
<v Speaker 1>and even when they started talking, understanding what they were

0:57:45.320 --> 0:57:47.360
<v Speaker 1>telling me, and I'm not a math guy, I had

0:57:47.360 --> 0:57:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to understand this is a different language quant to some extent,

0:57:50.240 --> 0:57:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and even at that point, trying to make it into

0:57:52.800 --> 0:57:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a narrative, as you suggest, I tried to appeal. I

0:57:55.040 --> 0:57:57.400
<v Speaker 1>want to try to appeal to everyone, um, the quantity

0:57:57.440 --> 0:58:04.440
<v Speaker 1>type people, mathematicians, scientists, but also just the average nonfiction readers.

0:58:05.320 --> 0:58:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I did. There were there were a few times where

0:58:08.000 --> 0:58:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm working all night in my basement and I hear

0:58:11.040 --> 0:58:13.640
<v Speaker 1>some sound upstairs and I'm like, oh, my kids left

0:58:13.680 --> 0:58:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the TV on again, And then I go up to

0:58:15.760 --> 0:58:17.480
<v Speaker 1>turn it off and there's no TV on. Then I

0:58:17.520 --> 0:58:20.480
<v Speaker 1>realized that sound, those sounds are the birds getting up

0:58:20.480 --> 0:58:23.360
<v Speaker 1>in the morning, went through the night. And part of

0:58:23.360 --> 0:58:26.880
<v Speaker 1>it is because I was fascinated by the story myself,

0:58:26.920 --> 0:58:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and these characters are interesting and intriguing and what they accomplished,

0:58:30.080 --> 0:58:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and the challenges they overcame, and the drama behind the

0:58:32.320 --> 0:58:35.160
<v Speaker 1>scenes that I wasn't aware of. So it was the

0:58:35.160 --> 0:58:38.040
<v Speaker 1>hardest thing ever did, but also it was rewarding and

0:58:38.080 --> 0:58:41.080
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to me in the In the early phases of this,

0:58:41.200 --> 0:58:44.200
<v Speaker 1>did you ever reach a point where you said, uh,

0:58:44.480 --> 0:58:47.080
<v Speaker 1>this is just going now, where I have to pull

0:58:47.080 --> 0:58:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the plug on this? Many times? I came close too

0:58:49.920 --> 0:58:52.200
<v Speaker 1>many times? He really, Yeah. I mean I wasn't close

0:58:52.280 --> 0:58:55.200
<v Speaker 1>to given up, but I couldn't figure out how I

0:58:55.240 --> 0:58:57.560
<v Speaker 1>was going to make it happen. And then I would

0:58:57.600 --> 0:59:00.360
<v Speaker 1>have a breakthrough. Someone would be kind enough to share

0:59:00.400 --> 0:59:02.200
<v Speaker 1>with me and and talk to me. Maybe would maybe

0:59:02.200 --> 0:59:04.320
<v Speaker 1>be on the record, maybe it wouldn't, but that would

0:59:04.400 --> 0:59:06.439
<v Speaker 1>keep me going now, would give me encouragement and deal

0:59:06.520 --> 0:59:10.200
<v Speaker 1>with all the people slamming the door on my face subsequently,

0:59:10.480 --> 0:59:13.600
<v Speaker 1>because then there'll be somebody kind enough to to share

0:59:13.840 --> 0:59:17.400
<v Speaker 1>right after that. When you spoke to people off the record,

0:59:18.240 --> 0:59:20.880
<v Speaker 1>how do you use that if you're telling somebody. I'm

0:59:20.920 --> 0:59:22.360
<v Speaker 1>not gonna quote you. I'm not going to use this.

0:59:22.840 --> 0:59:25.080
<v Speaker 1>How do you work that into the story. Does it

0:59:25.200 --> 0:59:28.760
<v Speaker 1>just give you enough background? Or what do you do

0:59:28.880 --> 0:59:33.120
<v Speaker 1>with off the record um conversations and with Simon's on

0:59:33.280 --> 0:59:35.120
<v Speaker 1>or off the record with you? Right? So I don't

0:59:35.160 --> 0:59:37.000
<v Speaker 1>do off the record. Off the record the way we

0:59:37.040 --> 0:59:38.880
<v Speaker 1>define at the Wall Street Journal means you can't use

0:59:38.920 --> 0:59:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that information. But I was up front with with all

0:59:41.200 --> 0:59:43.160
<v Speaker 1>these people and saying, I'd like to use your information

0:59:43.200 --> 0:59:46.600
<v Speaker 1>on background, meaning use it, right, but I won't name you,

0:59:46.640 --> 0:59:49.680
<v Speaker 1>won't quote you, won't cite you. And I um, I said,

0:59:49.720 --> 0:59:51.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've been around a little bit, so I

0:59:51.240 --> 0:59:53.120
<v Speaker 1>have a certain reputation. And I said, I'm not gonna

0:59:53.120 --> 0:59:54.680
<v Speaker 1>burn you. There's no incentive for me to burn you.

0:59:54.680 --> 0:59:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna name you. I'm not gonna tell anybody

0:59:56.760 --> 0:59:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Rento Science that we're talking. UM. So I got people

1:00:00.120 --> 1:00:05.400
<v Speaker 1>sufficiently comfortable, and Jim Simons was pretty darn open and

1:00:05.520 --> 1:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>frank and transparent. I have to tell you about what

1:00:08.320 --> 1:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to speak about. Again, I want to make

1:00:10.400 --> 1:00:12.760
<v Speaker 1>clear that he wasn't opening the kimono and telling me

1:00:12.760 --> 1:00:14.320
<v Speaker 1>all his signals. I had to get that stuff on

1:00:14.360 --> 1:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>my own, uh and his and how he dealt with

1:00:17.240 --> 1:00:19.360
<v Speaker 1>certain things, and the setbacks and the narrative and the

1:00:20.160 --> 1:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>drama behind the scenes. But he was quite cooperative about

1:00:24.480 --> 1:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>other things, and I have to thank them for that.

1:00:27.000 --> 1:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>So the early cancelations, the Cosa Nostra, Simon's don't say

1:00:32.080 --> 1:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>anything after you speak with Simmons? Do you circle back

1:00:35.440 --> 1:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>with the early cancelors And were they a little more

1:00:38.360 --> 1:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>open at that point? No, they still wouldn't talk to me.

1:00:41.000 --> 1:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>So I had to keep even after Simon says, all right,

1:00:43.640 --> 1:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll finally talk to you. You know why there because

1:00:45.360 --> 1:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>they were even concerned about the possibility that Jim might

1:00:48.080 --> 1:00:50.439
<v Speaker 1>get angry with him. Oh yeah, well you say that

1:00:50.520 --> 1:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Jim is talking to you about How do I know

1:00:52.480 --> 1:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>that's true? Jim? Yeah, But it just got too busy.

1:00:55.760 --> 1:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>This guy's it's got a lot going on, and you're

1:00:57.560 --> 1:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>not gonna call him up and say, can I talk

1:00:58.880 --> 1:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to Greg? Already? Did you told me I can't talk

1:01:01.120 --> 1:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>to Greg? But now can I talk to Greg? It

1:01:03.360 --> 1:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>wasn't worth their while. So I had to keep finding

1:01:05.600 --> 1:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>other people and and quite honestly, a lot of the

1:01:07.600 --> 1:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>people early on at the firm and in his life

1:01:10.640 --> 1:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>were old and um, and you're eighty something, You're like,

1:01:14.600 --> 1:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll say, who I what I want to who I

1:01:16.280 --> 1:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>want one. They've accomplished a lot in their own right.

1:01:18.280 --> 1:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these these are scientists that are big names,

1:01:21.360 --> 1:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>hollid names, and some of these fields. It's harder. You

1:01:23.800 --> 1:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>have to you have to focus on the fact that,

1:01:25.720 --> 1:01:28.320
<v Speaker 1>even setting aside when it came to Wall Street and investing,

1:01:28.320 --> 1:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>these people are really accomplished in their own right. So

1:01:30.960 --> 1:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>they're proud of what they've done. And some of these

1:01:32.880 --> 1:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>people don't mind talking. Huh that that's really that's really

1:01:36.240 --> 1:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>quite fascinating. UM. I have a quibble with you. Is

1:01:40.440 --> 1:01:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Jim Simons really the man who solved the markets? Or

1:01:43.840 --> 1:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>is he the guy who just figured out, here's how

1:01:46.880 --> 1:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to apply mathematics as a way to extract profits from

1:01:51.280 --> 1:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the markets. I didn't get the sense that he figured

1:01:55.920 --> 1:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>out the markets. The markets are just an a means

1:01:59.400 --> 1:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to an end for him. Yeah, to the extent that

1:02:01.600 --> 1:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>he's um recorded these remarkable to that extent he saw

1:02:08.760 --> 1:02:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the market. But right, there's no hidden understanding that jumps

1:02:14.200 --> 1:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>out of you that he knows that you and I

1:02:15.760 --> 1:02:18.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know he's as flum mixed by the day to

1:02:18.440 --> 1:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>day moves as anyone else. What he does and his

1:02:21.040 --> 1:02:25.520
<v Speaker 1>his colleagues really UM do understand is that what impacts

1:02:25.760 --> 1:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>prices is a lot more than you and I are

1:02:28.320 --> 1:02:32.080
<v Speaker 1>aware of. Now They've got whole levels of factors that

1:02:32.400 --> 1:02:34.240
<v Speaker 1>aren't included in the a q R s and the

1:02:34.280 --> 1:02:36.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff that you can buy off the shelf, etcetera. So

1:02:36.800 --> 1:02:39.240
<v Speaker 1>they are they have a better understanding of the market,

1:02:39.280 --> 1:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I would argue than anyone else, But maybe it's overstated

1:02:43.240 --> 1:02:46.640
<v Speaker 1>to say they completely solved it. So the other thing

1:02:46.720 --> 1:02:49.960
<v Speaker 1>that I thought was really intriguing UM in the book

1:02:50.960 --> 1:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>is despite these guys making boat tons of money, just

1:02:55.880 --> 1:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>so much compared to what they would have made had

1:02:59.000 --> 1:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>they stayed either IBM or Academia, they're making four and

1:03:03.560 --> 1:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>five and ten x plus whatever the Medallion Fund is

1:03:06.240 --> 1:03:12.160
<v Speaker 1>strowing off some of the um squabbles about money, especially

1:03:12.200 --> 1:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>in the later history of the firm. So I described

1:03:16.320 --> 1:03:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the firm as having four phases. The early macro tourism phase,

1:03:22.280 --> 1:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>then there's a later phase where they figure out um

1:03:27.120 --> 1:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>how to trade currencies, commodities and futures uh, and then

1:03:31.480 --> 1:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>when Mercer and Brown cracked the equity code is the

1:03:35.640 --> 1:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>third phase, and then the fourth phase they started bringing

1:03:37.880 --> 1:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of UM Russian computer scientists and other UM academicians.

1:03:45.600 --> 1:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>This like fourth generation of of the company really degenerates

1:03:51.280 --> 1:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>into this petty, jealous, backbiting envy to the point where

1:03:57.080 --> 1:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of them go to Simon's and say, you're

1:03:59.640 --> 1:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>making too much money. We demand some of it. How

1:04:03.080 --> 1:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the hell did does anyone get away with that? Yeah,

1:04:05.600 --> 1:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>they were people telling Jim Simmons he made too much money.

1:04:08.760 --> 1:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>There were people saying he should step down. There were

1:04:10.720 --> 1:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>people it was something of a coup. They tried to

1:04:13.960 --> 1:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>how does he not just say you you and you

1:04:16.640 --> 1:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you're fired. Go back to making nine dollars as a

1:04:19.840 --> 1:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>teaching assistant. Because I keep coming back to the point

1:04:23.000 --> 1:04:27.280
<v Speaker 1>that Jim Simmons loves money, and they were really valued employees,

1:04:27.320 --> 1:04:29.680
<v Speaker 1>so they could have been jerks, but he gets past that,

1:04:29.680 --> 1:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and he's a great manager. He wasn't insulted by that. Listen,

1:04:32.000 --> 1:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>if you're gonna hire some of the top scientists in

1:04:34.560 --> 1:04:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the world, you're gonna get the personalities that come with that,

1:04:37.920 --> 1:04:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and he embraced that, so he wasn't insulted. He doesn't

1:04:41.720 --> 1:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>take himself so seriously, and he actually gave back some

1:04:44.640 --> 1:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>equity and he and he said, maybe you guys are

1:04:47.200 --> 1:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>right and I'm talking too much of a cut. And

1:04:49.880 --> 1:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I give him credit for that. So it was amazing.

1:04:52.640 --> 1:04:56.040
<v Speaker 1>In the book, I'm like, I just don't know, because

1:04:56.120 --> 1:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>normally employees like that are so cancerous they could destroy

1:05:01.080 --> 1:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a company with the sort of petty, envious jealousies that

1:05:07.000 --> 1:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that you described in the book. I found that to

1:05:09.640 --> 1:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>be just completely shocking. Um and his I guess he

1:05:13.880 --> 1:05:18.840
<v Speaker 1>resolved in a way that was pretty uh, pretty reasonable. Yeah. Um.

1:05:19.120 --> 1:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>He again has a great instinct when it comes to people.

1:05:21.640 --> 1:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's not he's not just like this um quant

1:05:26.040 --> 1:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>uh focused on money and numbers and algorithms. He understands

1:05:30.280 --> 1:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>people and what what drives them. And he thought he

1:05:33.360 --> 1:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>could work with some of the people leading the coup. Yes,

1:05:35.960 --> 1:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>they were headstrong and tempestuous and difficult, but they had

1:05:40.040 --> 1:05:43.920
<v Speaker 1>potential as managers and he was right. He actually created

1:05:43.960 --> 1:05:47.360
<v Speaker 1>he turned them into pretty good managers. So, for for

1:05:47.400 --> 1:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason, he's got these talents on both sides the equation.

1:05:50.240 --> 1:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>So who's running Renaissance Technologies Now, it's not Jim Simon's

1:05:53.320 --> 1:05:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the CEO, and it's not Robert Mercer who's running the

1:05:56.160 --> 1:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>day to day. It's Peter Brown, who's a former IBM

1:05:59.120 --> 1:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>scientists just to work closely with Mercer and was considered

1:06:02.680 --> 1:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the more wild of the two. Yes, and when he

1:06:06.840 --> 1:06:10.040
<v Speaker 1>took over, when Bob Mercer stepped down, people internally were

1:06:10.080 --> 1:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>concerned because, as I said, Peter Brown is a little

1:06:14.680 --> 1:06:18.600
<v Speaker 1>bit tempestuous and gets emotional sometimes. I describe a couple

1:06:18.600 --> 1:06:21.960
<v Speaker 1>of scenes in my book where he panicked, he got nervous,

1:06:21.960 --> 1:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and he got scared. This was years ago, and he

1:06:23.600 --> 1:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>learned from those lessons, and later on when main market difficulties,

1:06:27.560 --> 1:06:30.280
<v Speaker 1>he didn't react that same way. But people worried about

1:06:30.280 --> 1:06:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Peter Brown taking over. And to his credit, he's aware

1:06:33.520 --> 1:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>of his flaws and his weaknesses, and he's been leaning

1:06:36.440 --> 1:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and we're talking the last few years, last couple of years,

1:06:38.440 --> 1:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>he's been leaning on his colleagues, his senior colleagues, much

1:06:41.120 --> 1:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>more than anyone had expected, and it's worked out nicely.

1:06:44.360 --> 1:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I imagine Brown is Mercer without the politics, um at

1:06:49.160 --> 1:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>least in actuality, because he's still working closely with Mercer. Yeah,

1:06:53.040 --> 1:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>but very different person now. Um, Bob Mercer is this

1:06:56.640 --> 1:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>cool customer. You don't really can't read him. Even his

1:06:59.520 --> 1:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>colleagues don't really understand. He's so on emotional. They don't

1:07:02.800 --> 1:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>stand where he stands on certain issues. You do not

1:07:05.760 --> 1:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>wonder when it comes to Peter Brown. So in some

1:07:08.720 --> 1:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>ways they offset each other. They worked really melded, and

1:07:11.840 --> 1:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>they messed really well together. And what is Jim Simon's

1:07:14.560 --> 1:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>doing today day to day at Renaissance? So he barely

1:07:18.680 --> 1:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>goes in the office and yet he makes about a

1:07:20.600 --> 1:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>billion and a half dollars a year gig. Yeah, but

1:07:24.160 --> 1:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>really he's But it's not to say he's not very

1:07:26.440 --> 1:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>hard at work. He runs a foundation and it's really active.

1:07:29.920 --> 1:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>One of the biggest supporters of science in the country.

1:07:33.040 --> 1:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>They're very active when it comes to things like autism research,

1:07:35.840 --> 1:07:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and they're cutting edge the back all kinds of cutting

1:07:38.200 --> 1:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>edge approaches. Um he supports, he funds. He he subsidizes

1:07:43.080 --> 1:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the salaries of high school math and science teachers in

1:07:46.040 --> 1:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>New York City, ten thousand of them because he doesn't

1:07:48.360 --> 1:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>want so many leaving. What does that to subsidize, Well,

1:07:52.480 --> 1:07:54.919
<v Speaker 1>it depends how many each year, but oh yeah, it's huge,

1:07:55.000 --> 1:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>like millions of dollars. I mean, he's worth twenty three

1:07:57.160 --> 1:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. But to his credit, he's on the cutting

1:07:59.680 --> 1:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>edge of all kinds of different approaches when it comes

1:08:01.960 --> 1:08:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to science education. UM. They published Planta, which is a

1:08:05.600 --> 1:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>basic fundamental science and mathematics magazine, which really who else

1:08:11.160 --> 1:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>covers that sort of stuff. And he's also trying to

1:08:13.960 --> 1:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>subsidize the work, and he isn't subsidizing the work of

1:08:16.680 --> 1:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>scientists trying to get at the beginning of life and

1:08:20.200 --> 1:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>how this world began, in the first moments of our existence,

1:08:24.479 --> 1:08:28.439
<v Speaker 1>of this universe existence. UM. They're trying to build out

1:08:28.439 --> 1:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>in Chile a UM all kind of massive array exactly

1:08:32.400 --> 1:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>of of ability to see, UM, go back in history

1:08:35.280 --> 1:08:38.679
<v Speaker 1>and see through the massive telescopes to see what happened.

1:08:38.680 --> 1:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>So he's on the cutting edge of all kinds of

1:08:40.240 --> 1:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>different science, and he's just as focused on that as

1:08:43.280 --> 1:08:45.799
<v Speaker 1>he was trying to crank out the sixty six percent

1:08:45.840 --> 1:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>returns at at the Medallion Fund. The current theory of

1:08:50.080 --> 1:08:53.519
<v Speaker 1>the Big Bang is under assault because some of it

1:08:53.560 --> 1:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to work, and some of the work that

1:08:56.479 --> 1:09:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Simon's is doing is to try and figure out if

1:09:00.200 --> 1:09:02.639
<v Speaker 1>not the Big Bang, then then how did the universe

1:09:02.720 --> 1:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>come into existence? Simons himself isn't a believer in the

1:09:05.600 --> 1:09:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Big Bang, and yet he's funding efforts to test if

1:09:08.880 --> 1:09:11.559
<v Speaker 1>it actually there's some proof to it, because deep down

1:09:11.560 --> 1:09:14.680
<v Speaker 1>inside he's a scientist. And show me the day to

1:09:14.680 --> 1:09:17.240
<v Speaker 1>show me the evidence, and if you can't disprove it,

1:09:17.280 --> 1:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>then that's the best we have to work with, right

1:09:19.240 --> 1:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>The Renaissance story, that Jim Simon story really is a

1:09:21.680 --> 1:09:24.840
<v Speaker 1>story about the scientific method. If you think about society

1:09:24.880 --> 1:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>today and you think about the White House, it's all

1:09:27.040 --> 1:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>about narratives. And if you think about Wall Street to

1:09:29.400 --> 1:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Pharaos and we work and people get carried away with

1:09:33.200 --> 1:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the narrative and it leads to problems. It leads to

1:09:36.320 --> 1:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>real issues. Whereas there's something that he said, I I've

1:09:39.200 --> 1:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>become a believer in the scientific method, where it's about data,

1:09:41.960 --> 1:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>it's about proof, and this that is to me one

1:09:45.280 --> 1:09:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of the lessons of the Renaissance. Jim Simon's story quite

1:09:48.040 --> 1:09:50.599
<v Speaker 1>quite fascinating. So we only have you for a finite

1:09:50.600 --> 1:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>amount of time. Let's jump to our favorite questions. We

1:09:54.080 --> 1:09:56.680
<v Speaker 1>ask this of all of our guests, sort of our

1:09:56.760 --> 1:09:59.799
<v Speaker 1>speed rounds. Tell us the first car you ever owned

1:10:00.080 --> 1:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>you're making model. Never owned a car at least, grew

1:10:03.960 --> 1:10:06.840
<v Speaker 1>up in Providence, Rhode Allen outside of my dad, taught

1:10:06.840 --> 1:10:10.200
<v Speaker 1>at Brown University. Nothing really going on. The most exciting

1:10:10.240 --> 1:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>thing was we walked to campus, my high school friends

1:10:12.439 --> 1:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and I and try to hit on girls and usually unsuccessfully.

1:10:16.000 --> 1:10:19.600
<v Speaker 1>So that required legs and not automobiles. So yeah, I

1:10:19.600 --> 1:10:22.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't really have a car. What's the most important thing

1:10:23.000 --> 1:10:26.679
<v Speaker 1>people don't know about, Greg Dockerman. I've got this separate

1:10:26.720 --> 1:10:29.080
<v Speaker 1>life where I write books for young people with my

1:10:29.120 --> 1:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>two sons. So we wrote two books called Rising Above,

1:10:31.479 --> 1:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>where we've interviewed sports stars who overcame challenges in their

1:10:35.160 --> 1:10:40.439
<v Speaker 1>youth racism, sexual abuse, um, physical abuse, all kinds of

1:10:40.479 --> 1:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>different emotional and other types of challenges, and we asked

1:10:43.280 --> 1:10:45.479
<v Speaker 1>them how they did it, and to us it was

1:10:45.520 --> 1:10:48.479
<v Speaker 1>really inspirational and we share those stories in our books.

1:10:49.479 --> 1:10:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Tell us who your early mentors were in the field

1:10:52.120 --> 1:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of journalism. Uh? Yeah, so I never really had great mentors,

1:10:59.240 --> 1:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>quite frank, have had a series of bad bosses early

1:11:02.240 --> 1:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>in my life before gaming. No, now, my my must

1:11:06.880 --> 1:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>a great early on. I'm talking so early on, I wasn't.

1:11:09.880 --> 1:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I stumbled into this profession. Oh really, what were the

1:11:12.320 --> 1:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>original plans? I was gonna go work on Wall Street.

1:11:15.040 --> 1:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I was reading books like Adam Smith and Ray Dirk's

1:11:19.080 --> 1:11:22.680
<v Speaker 1>You just got Ray Dirk's vaguely familiar. He had this

1:11:22.720 --> 1:11:24.519
<v Speaker 1>famous case. It went to Supreme court. He was an

1:11:24.520 --> 1:11:29.840
<v Speaker 1>insurance analyst who UM were shorting and and it was

1:11:29.880 --> 1:11:32.439
<v Speaker 1>a famous case, went Supreme court and he won, and

1:11:32.520 --> 1:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>he left an impression on me with a book. I

1:11:34.880 --> 1:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>was buying barrens as. At a young age in camp,

1:11:37.320 --> 1:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I was trading stocks. Um, I was a guy was

1:11:39.760 --> 1:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna go work on Wall Street. And I didn't really

1:11:43.520 --> 1:11:45.200
<v Speaker 1>do any summer kind of job. I was working in

1:11:45.280 --> 1:11:47.559
<v Speaker 1>camps and I didn't have an experience, didn't know any mine.

1:11:47.600 --> 1:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>My dad was an academic, and I graduated and it

1:11:50.120 --> 1:11:52.000
<v Speaker 1>did well, went to Brandon's University, did well, and I

1:11:52.000 --> 1:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>couldn't even get an interview on Wall Street. Was nine.

1:11:55.280 --> 1:11:57.479
<v Speaker 1>It was after the market had crashed a couple years earlier,

1:11:57.479 --> 1:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and um, I stumbled around. I start some some businesses

1:12:01.640 --> 1:12:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and some work, some didn't. And then I went in

1:12:04.160 --> 1:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>one day and interviewed to be a financial journalist. I'm like, wait,

1:12:07.880 --> 1:12:10.639
<v Speaker 1>I love writing and I love Wall Street They're gonna

1:12:10.720 --> 1:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>pay me to write about Wall Street? How great is that? So?

1:12:14.840 --> 1:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>What writers influenced the way you think about writing, either

1:12:18.600 --> 1:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>articles or books? So James Stewart first and foremost, Um, everything,

1:12:23.320 --> 1:12:25.960
<v Speaker 1>he's long standing Wall Street Journal reporter, right, and then

1:12:26.240 --> 1:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>then he went he's at the New York Times. Now

1:12:28.000 --> 1:12:31.320
<v Speaker 1>book author Um Danna Thieves. He wrote a book called

1:12:31.360 --> 1:12:34.559
<v Speaker 1>Follow the Story, which is about writing. And I've read

1:12:34.600 --> 1:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and reread that book numerous times, so that guides me. Um.

1:12:40.040 --> 1:12:42.639
<v Speaker 1>There's a editor at the Journal named Mike sikon Alfie

1:12:42.640 --> 1:12:46.200
<v Speaker 1>who I've learned a lot from. He's an investigative editor.

1:12:46.320 --> 1:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>He had we had a Poulterer a package that we

1:12:49.200 --> 1:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>won this past year, and he was the editor of

1:12:51.280 --> 1:12:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that group and he has left a big influence on me.

1:12:54.840 --> 1:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Since you mentioned a couple of books, tell us about

1:12:57.120 --> 1:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>your favorite books. What do you enjoy to read Wolf

1:13:00.000 --> 1:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Street related or not when you're not researching your own books? Oh? So,

1:13:05.040 --> 1:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Paul Auster, Philip Roth, you know the fiction there? Give

1:13:08.840 --> 1:13:11.479
<v Speaker 1>us some titles. When you say Philip Roth, I immediately

1:13:11.520 --> 1:13:13.760
<v Speaker 1>think of Portnoy's Complaint. But what else do you read?

1:13:14.040 --> 1:13:17.679
<v Speaker 1>You know? American pastoral is great? Um, there's really nothing

1:13:17.800 --> 1:13:19.960
<v Speaker 1>much that from him that I don't love and and

1:13:20.000 --> 1:13:23.639
<v Speaker 1>won't read. Um. I'm reading Patti Smith right now, her

1:13:23.640 --> 1:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>autobiography Kids. Yeah, all right, that's them reading the earlier one.

1:13:27.360 --> 1:13:31.080
<v Speaker 1>But she's brilliant in her own right, Um. Catch her

1:13:31.120 --> 1:13:33.280
<v Speaker 1>in the Ride at a young age left a huge

1:13:33.360 --> 1:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>influence in me in terms of being an outsider. And

1:13:36.120 --> 1:13:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that's what as a journalist I see myself. My job

1:13:39.240 --> 1:13:41.439
<v Speaker 1>is to kind of polke halls and look at the

1:13:41.439 --> 1:13:46.559
<v Speaker 1>foibles and mistakes and and and accomplishments of others people

1:13:46.640 --> 1:13:48.839
<v Speaker 1>in the world of finance. That's sort of my position

1:13:48.840 --> 1:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>in some ways. I saw myself in that character, the

1:13:53.040 --> 1:13:55.960
<v Speaker 1>holding coffeil character to some extent. What was the first

1:13:56.000 --> 1:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>author you mentioned before, Philip Paul Auster. Paul Auster's fiction

1:14:00.400 --> 1:14:02.960
<v Speaker 1>writer who's brilliant in his own way. He's got gets

1:14:02.960 --> 1:14:06.719
<v Speaker 1>into some give us a book to Uh. Brooklyn Diary

1:14:06.800 --> 1:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>is a good one. He's so many Brooklyn, All right,

1:14:10.160 --> 1:14:12.400
<v Speaker 1>well we'll go with that. Tell us about a time

1:14:12.439 --> 1:14:16.120
<v Speaker 1>you failed and what you learned from the experience. So many. So.

1:14:16.240 --> 1:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I got a tip that there was a guy who

1:14:18.760 --> 1:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>was running a fraud named Bernie Madoff, and that was

1:14:22.800 --> 1:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>probably two thousand and three. Al right, so there was

1:14:25.840 --> 1:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>already the Baron story, but nobody really picked up on

1:14:30.240 --> 1:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>it in a big way. Exactly right when did that?

1:14:33.880 --> 1:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe two one? And good source for the tip. It

1:14:37.040 --> 1:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>was a good source in the industry, but didn't have

1:14:39.360 --> 1:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>firsthand knowledge. So I started making some calls and it

1:14:42.960 --> 1:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>was early in the process. I got a call from

1:14:45.280 --> 1:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Bernie madoffs right hand person, and they said, he here,

1:14:48.200 --> 1:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>are you making calls on Bernie? Why don't you come

1:14:50.000 --> 1:14:52.400
<v Speaker 1>in and meet with him? And I was torn. At

1:14:52.400 --> 1:14:54.479
<v Speaker 1>that point. I hadn't done enough research, so I said,

1:14:55.000 --> 1:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to meet Bernie, but let's do it in

1:14:57.040 --> 1:15:00.160
<v Speaker 1>a week or two. Well, Greg, he travels a there

1:15:00.160 --> 1:15:02.479
<v Speaker 1>aren't gonna be many opportunities. If our you, I'd really

1:15:02.520 --> 1:15:05.479
<v Speaker 1>take advantage. So I went in met with Bernie. Was

1:15:05.520 --> 1:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>he charming? He was charming, but not convincing. I asked

1:15:08.960 --> 1:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>him a series of tough questions. I came out of

1:15:11.439 --> 1:15:14.240
<v Speaker 1>it unconvinced that it was legit, but I thought he

1:15:14.280 --> 1:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>was front running. I didn't think it was a complete fraud,

1:15:17.439 --> 1:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>not a ponzi, but he was. Because they were a

1:15:20.280 --> 1:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>legitimate trading operation, weren't they right, and I thought they

1:15:23.040 --> 1:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>were front running that legitimate trading and that's how you

1:15:25.000 --> 1:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>get the smooth returns. And I wasn't the only one

1:15:28.200 --> 1:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street who had that thought. And that's no excuse.

1:15:31.000 --> 1:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I should have pursued that story and I blew it.

1:15:33.280 --> 1:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I should have kept working on it. So what was

1:15:35.160 --> 1:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the lesson? The lesson is to keep pushing and and

1:15:39.120 --> 1:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>if you've got an instinct, and to keep pursue it.

1:15:41.240 --> 1:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>And you listen, some of my best stories, quite frankly,

1:15:43.960 --> 1:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>are those that editors were luke warm on and I

1:15:46.960 --> 1:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of kept going at it. You know. UM, give

1:15:49.760 --> 1:15:52.479
<v Speaker 1>us an example. I wrote. I wrote a front page story.

1:15:52.520 --> 1:15:54.559
<v Speaker 1>It became a front page story about John Paulson and

1:15:54.720 --> 1:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>his tremendous trade, uh the sun probably trade. And people

1:15:58.160 --> 1:16:01.719
<v Speaker 1>internally were kind of like, well, um, he must have cheated.

1:16:01.800 --> 1:16:03.439
<v Speaker 1>There's no ray he could have done it in a

1:16:03.520 --> 1:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>legitimate way. Um. I I wrote it. I broke the

1:16:07.680 --> 1:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>story on the London Whale. And even internally they're like

1:16:11.240 --> 1:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Jamie Diamond, JP Morrigan, there's no way they could have

1:16:14.280 --> 1:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that kind of embrace that kind of risk. Um. I

1:16:17.240 --> 1:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>did a story about a family, about a brother of

1:16:21.120 --> 1:16:23.920
<v Speaker 1>a of a woman in cancer FitzGeralds who died on

1:16:24.040 --> 1:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>nine eleven, and I wanted to tell the story of

1:16:26.960 --> 1:16:29.559
<v Speaker 1>how he wanted to tell the story how his his

1:16:29.680 --> 1:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>sister died on nine eleven. And I started researching, and

1:16:32.960 --> 1:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>people like you're never gonna find out exactly how she died.

1:16:35.800 --> 1:16:38.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know what, you work hard enough, and that's

1:16:38.120 --> 1:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the lesson. Sometimes you can actually piece things together. All right.

1:16:41.000 --> 1:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>So let's go back to our our speed round. Um,

1:16:44.439 --> 1:16:46.280
<v Speaker 1>what do you do for fun when you're not researching

1:16:46.320 --> 1:16:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and writing books? What what do you do to kick

1:16:48.160 --> 1:16:51.120
<v Speaker 1>back and relax? I obsess over the New York Yankees

1:16:51.360 --> 1:16:54.479
<v Speaker 1>with my son Eli, and play a lot of sports.

1:16:54.479 --> 1:16:57.719
<v Speaker 1>So I'm on a softball team, I'm on a basketball team. Um,

1:16:57.720 --> 1:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>still playing basketball? Yeah, not as well as I used to.

1:17:01.680 --> 1:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I've learned to come off the bench. It's been humbling. Yeah,

1:17:05.680 --> 1:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm a short, Like forty is where that all goes

1:17:08.800 --> 1:17:10.519
<v Speaker 1>to hell, right at the point where you have a

1:17:10.520 --> 1:17:12.880
<v Speaker 1>good run, workout and you're kind of happy about that.

1:17:12.920 --> 1:17:15.880
<v Speaker 1>But I'm pretty competitive, so you listen. If I can contribute,

1:17:16.120 --> 1:17:18.880
<v Speaker 1>then I'm proud. At this point, I don't need to

1:17:18.920 --> 1:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>start and dominate like I was a quick, good past,

1:17:22.960 --> 1:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>first point guard back in the day. And if I

1:17:25.720 --> 1:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>can come off the bench and help, that's fine. Today

1:17:28.280 --> 1:17:30.920
<v Speaker 1>that that's kind of kind of fun. Let's talk about

1:17:31.000 --> 1:17:34.439
<v Speaker 1>journalism a little bit. What are you most optimistic about today?

1:17:34.520 --> 1:17:36.920
<v Speaker 1>And what are you most pessimistic about? I'll start with

1:17:36.920 --> 1:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the most pessimistic. It's an easy question, right, I guess

1:17:40.080 --> 1:17:43.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a difficult time in some ways for journalists. We're

1:17:43.840 --> 1:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>in a time where it's more, um, it's open season

1:17:47.080 --> 1:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>some extent. You can criticize, you can be opening your

1:17:49.479 --> 1:17:52.639
<v Speaker 1>your criticism. So I wrote a story about Jeff Gunlack

1:17:52.920 --> 1:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago, Double Line fastest growing mutual

1:17:56.320 --> 1:18:00.439
<v Speaker 1>funds UM ever, two hundred billion dollars um, the new

1:18:00.520 --> 1:18:03.479
<v Speaker 1>bond Kings. People don't know who he is. And my

1:18:03.640 --> 1:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>story was sort of obvious. It was they had piqued

1:18:07.120 --> 1:18:10.559
<v Speaker 1>in a m they lost some money. People were coming out.

1:18:10.600 --> 1:18:12.879
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't like a flood of money, and the returns

1:18:13.160 --> 1:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>were good, but they're no longer great. And I wrote

1:18:16.120 --> 1:18:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the story and they were. They came back hard at me,

1:18:20.439 --> 1:18:24.480
<v Speaker 1>both privately and publicly. So he gets on this conference

1:18:24.520 --> 1:18:29.880
<v Speaker 1>call and he starts insulting me, he calls. He says, um,

1:18:30.000 --> 1:18:34.040
<v Speaker 1>um mother zucker. He calls me publicly mother mother Zucker.

1:18:34.080 --> 1:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>It was kind of amusing. Yeah, I kinda like, yeah,

1:18:36.760 --> 1:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I gotta like that. Um So, so there won't be

1:18:39.479 --> 1:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the greatest bond trader ever. The man who solved the

1:18:43.479 --> 1:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>bond markets not coming anytime. So through that book, sure,

1:18:46.120 --> 1:18:48.559
<v Speaker 1>if he does something special, I have a new challenge.

1:18:48.560 --> 1:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I like the challenge. Um but I do think there's

1:18:50.840 --> 1:18:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a new freedom that people have again not just on

1:18:54.960 --> 1:18:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street but in society, to be critical of the

1:18:58.920 --> 1:19:02.439
<v Speaker 1>media and and and me included. The flip side is

1:19:02.760 --> 1:19:06.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a new appreciation to there's a new appreciation of

1:19:06.160 --> 1:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>what we do. And I sense that as well. Readership

1:19:08.840 --> 1:19:10.920
<v Speaker 1>is up both at the Wall Street Journal where I am,

1:19:10.960 --> 1:19:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and elsewhere Washington Post, New York Times, all the Atlantic,

1:19:14.479 --> 1:19:17.080
<v Speaker 1>New York or all their subscriptions are through the roof

1:19:17.200 --> 1:19:20.400
<v Speaker 1>because they've been covering the new new thing, which is

1:19:21.040 --> 1:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration calling journalists the enemy of the people.

1:19:25.000 --> 1:19:27.439
<v Speaker 1>And and to some extent, he's right. We are going

1:19:27.479 --> 1:19:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to miss him. He brings news, He creates news every

1:19:29.880 --> 1:19:33.559
<v Speaker 1>single day. It's exhausting, it's emotionally draining for us but

1:19:33.680 --> 1:19:36.360
<v Speaker 1>it does sell papers and we are going to miss that.

1:19:36.800 --> 1:19:41.839
<v Speaker 1>So we had an interesting conversation about politics and the election,

1:19:42.400 --> 1:19:45.479
<v Speaker 1>and a bunch of people were talking about what could

1:19:45.560 --> 1:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>lead to Trump losing his reelection campaign, and my position

1:19:51.120 --> 1:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>was Trump fatigue. You know, I was praying after the election,

1:19:55.560 --> 1:19:57.880
<v Speaker 1>all right, now that's over, we can get back to normal.

1:19:58.240 --> 1:20:02.519
<v Speaker 1>I think it's used exhausting. People just want to get

1:20:02.560 --> 1:20:05.760
<v Speaker 1>back to normal. It's it's never ending, and it's too much. Yes,

1:20:06.080 --> 1:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>whether you agree with it or disagree with it, it's like,

1:20:08.040 --> 1:20:09.920
<v Speaker 1>you know what I'd like to go through a day

1:20:09.960 --> 1:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>where the president is not three front page stories every day. Yeah.

1:20:15.040 --> 1:20:16.960
<v Speaker 1>The question is do people feel that way in the

1:20:17.000 --> 1:20:20.799
<v Speaker 1>swing states? And in our country it's Pennsylvania and Ohio,

1:20:21.600 --> 1:20:28.200
<v Speaker 1>basically even Ohio. I don't think. I think Trump's got Ohio. Florida, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin,

1:20:28.200 --> 1:20:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and Michigan are going the other way. It's Pennsylvania, Ohio,

1:20:32.360 --> 1:20:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure maybe a toss up at this point, small,

1:20:35.000 --> 1:20:36.920
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't mean it's But if you look at

1:20:37.000 --> 1:20:40.920
<v Speaker 1>he won three states by seventy seven thousand votes and

1:20:40.960 --> 1:20:43.360
<v Speaker 1>that put him over the top. So whatever we talk

1:20:43.400 --> 1:20:46.120
<v Speaker 1>about nationally is a relevant. How how those three states

1:20:46.120 --> 1:20:50.400
<v Speaker 1>going to vote? That's Pennsylvania, Ohio, Florida, plus Michigan and Wisconsin.

1:20:50.400 --> 1:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>The real question to me is if he loses, what

1:20:52.840 --> 1:20:57.000
<v Speaker 1>does he do and what happens? Um does he leave

1:20:57.280 --> 1:21:00.160
<v Speaker 1>and what happens with Oh no, So my wife is

1:21:00.160 --> 1:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>in the same camp as you. There's no way on

1:21:03.120 --> 1:21:07.520
<v Speaker 1>God's green earth he stays if he loses and PS

1:21:07.840 --> 1:21:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the Secret Service would march him out of

1:21:10.280 --> 1:21:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the White House. Our job is to protect you, but

1:21:12.479 --> 1:21:16.640
<v Speaker 1>also to uphold the constitution, and most people agree with you.

1:21:16.680 --> 1:21:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I agree. I don't do that straight talk to people

1:21:19.200 --> 1:21:20.400
<v Speaker 1>in d C. I was just down in d C.

1:21:20.720 --> 1:21:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a really far fetched threat. I know

1:21:26.400 --> 1:21:28.639
<v Speaker 1>people there's there are a bunch of people who wonder

1:21:28.720 --> 1:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that something to listen. If you're a macro tourist as

1:21:31.920 --> 1:21:35.880
<v Speaker 1>as I am, and someone extend looking at world of politics, right,

1:21:36.040 --> 1:21:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you've got to at least consider all kinds of possibilities

1:21:39.160 --> 1:21:43.840
<v Speaker 1>nowadays more than ever, right to to say the just,

1:21:43.920 --> 1:21:45.719
<v Speaker 1>to say the least, and and what are you most

1:21:45.760 --> 1:21:49.559
<v Speaker 1>optimistic about with journalism? I just spoke to a group

1:21:49.640 --> 1:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>down in the DC area students, and it's easier to

1:21:53.880 --> 1:21:56.479
<v Speaker 1>have a voice. You can start a podcast, you can

1:21:56.520 --> 1:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>start a blog, you can break news locally, you can

1:22:00.080 --> 1:22:06.479
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, right right, you can do any of those things. Yeah,

1:22:06.439 --> 1:22:09.360
<v Speaker 1>there are new ways ways to have a voice that

1:22:09.400 --> 1:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>in the past there weren't. You don't have to be

1:22:11.320 --> 1:22:14.200
<v Speaker 1>in the mainstream meeting necessarily to have influence and have

1:22:14.240 --> 1:22:17.120
<v Speaker 1>an impact. So and you still can't have impact and

1:22:17.800 --> 1:22:20.160
<v Speaker 1>improve things and write about people. And that's one thing

1:22:20.200 --> 1:22:22.599
<v Speaker 1>I always tell journalists. Focus on the people. You can

1:22:22.640 --> 1:22:26.640
<v Speaker 1>get at important themes through the individuals, and they make

1:22:26.680 --> 1:22:28.680
<v Speaker 1>for the most memorable stories, at least the way I

1:22:29.080 --> 1:22:31.120
<v Speaker 1>look at it. You know, we didn't talk about the

1:22:31.240 --> 1:22:35.680
<v Speaker 1>John Paulson trade at all, So I'm gonna move this

1:22:35.800 --> 1:22:38.479
<v Speaker 1>back to the earlier part. This will be the last

1:22:38.560 --> 1:22:42.160
<v Speaker 1>question of the regular discussion, but I want to bring

1:22:42.200 --> 1:22:45.439
<v Speaker 1>it up here. So you write a book about John Paulson,

1:22:45.520 --> 1:22:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the greatest trade ever. But I find there's some really

1:22:49.439 --> 1:22:53.960
<v Speaker 1>interesting oddities about the trade, not that it's not legit,

1:22:55.439 --> 1:22:58.200
<v Speaker 1>but whether or not it was really John Paulson who

1:22:58.240 --> 1:23:03.680
<v Speaker 1>deserves all the credit. Uh. Polo Pellegrini is his research assistant,

1:23:03.720 --> 1:23:06.200
<v Speaker 1>seems to be the person who comes up with the

1:23:06.280 --> 1:23:09.120
<v Speaker 1>idea brings it to Paulson has to twist his arm

1:23:09.160 --> 1:23:11.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit to get him behind it. The trade

1:23:12.040 --> 1:23:17.640
<v Speaker 1>makes literally five billion, six billions for the funds Paulson,

1:23:17.800 --> 1:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and I don't remember if this was your book or

1:23:19.800 --> 1:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>your article or somewhere else. It's all a blur. Paulson

1:23:23.800 --> 1:23:29.120
<v Speaker 1>gives Pellegrini a bonus check for two hundred and fifty

1:23:29.160 --> 1:23:32.120
<v Speaker 1>million dollars, and I remembering that correctly? Was it? Was

1:23:32.120 --> 1:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>it more? It was one seventy five story, hundred seventy

1:23:36.080 --> 1:23:41.439
<v Speaker 1>five million dollars, and Pellegrini's responses, A hundred seventy five million?

1:23:42.000 --> 1:23:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I quit? Is that fair? It wasn't right then? It

1:23:45.439 --> 1:23:47.679
<v Speaker 1>was later on he quit? And how much later was it?

1:23:47.680 --> 1:23:49.479
<v Speaker 1>It was a good six months later, And it wasn't

1:23:49.520 --> 1:23:53.240
<v Speaker 1>necessarily Now he was okay with that hundred million. How

1:23:53.240 --> 1:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>do you be upset about that? Well, because it's not

1:23:55.920 --> 1:24:00.559
<v Speaker 1>even ten percent of the six billion agreed um. He

1:24:00.680 --> 1:24:02.439
<v Speaker 1>was fine with that. Listen, Paulson was the one taking

1:24:02.479 --> 1:24:04.679
<v Speaker 1>the risk. If the trade had blown up, it would

1:24:04.720 --> 1:24:06.559
<v Speaker 1>have blown up. But if if it hadn't worked out,

1:24:06.600 --> 1:24:08.559
<v Speaker 1>then Paulson would had to close down his fun probably

1:24:08.840 --> 1:24:11.439
<v Speaker 1>so Pellegarian was okay with that. UM. I think the

1:24:11.479 --> 1:24:14.200
<v Speaker 1>big argument is that Paulson to I don't give him

1:24:14.200 --> 1:24:17.160
<v Speaker 1>so much credit for being short housing. There were a

1:24:17.200 --> 1:24:21.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of people, if you recall you probably a lot

1:24:21.280 --> 1:24:23.559
<v Speaker 1>of people that were worried about housing. What I do

1:24:23.720 --> 1:24:26.559
<v Speaker 1>give John Paulson credit for is figuring out a way

1:24:26.600 --> 1:24:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to express that trade, express that bearishness, and that to

1:24:30.439 --> 1:24:33.200
<v Speaker 1>some exent is Paul Pella GREENI I agree Pella GREENI

1:24:33.680 --> 1:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>told John Paulson, hey, boss, there are these things called

1:24:37.120 --> 1:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>CDs contracts. Really, what are they? So Paul Paulson had

1:24:40.280 --> 1:24:42.680
<v Speaker 1>no idea what CDs contracts, and that obviously was the

1:24:42.760 --> 1:24:46.240
<v Speaker 1>key to the greatest trade ever. So I give Pellegrini

1:24:46.280 --> 1:24:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of credit in the book and otherwise um

1:24:49.120 --> 1:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>for coming up with a way to express that trade.

1:24:51.040 --> 1:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>But I also give John Paulson tremendous credit for he

1:24:53.760 --> 1:24:56.120
<v Speaker 1>was a fifty year old guy who didn't know anything

1:24:56.160 --> 1:24:58.559
<v Speaker 1>about the debt markets, and he threw himself into learning

1:24:58.600 --> 1:25:01.200
<v Speaker 1>about how to express the at trade win. Lots of

1:25:01.200 --> 1:25:04.120
<v Speaker 1>other people were sticking with equities and shorting equities. So

1:25:04.160 --> 1:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the postcript to Paulson is two subsequent hedge fund performances,

1:25:10.000 --> 1:25:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Pellegrini launches his own fund quickly raises a billion dollars

1:25:14.479 --> 1:25:17.640
<v Speaker 1>as the guy behind the Pulson trade. I think the

1:25:17.720 --> 1:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>first year he just shoots the lights out. It's like

1:25:20.120 --> 1:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>eight some crazy number. The second year they're barely up

1:25:25.160 --> 1:25:28.400
<v Speaker 1>for eight percent, six percent something like that. The third

1:25:28.479 --> 1:25:32.640
<v Speaker 1>year they're negative. They return the money and he basically

1:25:32.680 --> 1:25:36.160
<v Speaker 1>retires to some island in the Caribbean. More or less accurate.

1:25:36.920 --> 1:25:41.479
<v Speaker 1>So that's astonishing. Paulson, on the other hand, the fund

1:25:41.600 --> 1:25:46.040
<v Speaker 1>scales up to forty six billion dollars. He becomes a

1:25:46.040 --> 1:25:50.679
<v Speaker 1>macro tourist in gold and other things. It's a terrible bet.

1:25:50.760 --> 1:25:54.000
<v Speaker 1>He's a big buyer at the peak. The fund puts

1:25:54.080 --> 1:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>up some pretty crappy numbers for a couple of years,

1:25:57.720 --> 1:26:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and now the fund is back to what in little

1:26:00.439 --> 1:26:03.559
<v Speaker 1>digit billions. It's mostly his money too, so it's become

1:26:03.600 --> 1:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>a family office. And he proceeded to lose twenty or

1:26:06.600 --> 1:26:10.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty billion dollars, so someone said, and I haven't verified this,

1:26:10.560 --> 1:26:15.519
<v Speaker 1>but career wise, net net, he's a money loser for

1:26:15.600 --> 1:26:18.200
<v Speaker 1>his outside investors. I think it's close, and I would

1:26:18.280 --> 1:26:21.200
<v Speaker 1>argue that he missed the lesson of the greatest trade ever.

1:26:21.240 --> 1:26:22.599
<v Speaker 1>Why is it called why do I call the grad

1:26:22.600 --> 1:26:26.559
<v Speaker 1>strade ever? Because it had limited downside and remarkable upside.

1:26:26.560 --> 1:26:29.280
<v Speaker 1>And frankly, that's what he did his whole career, even

1:26:29.320 --> 1:26:31.519
<v Speaker 1>when he was a risk arb. He was getting into

1:26:31.520 --> 1:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>positions little riskier than most other risk carbs, but they

1:26:34.760 --> 1:26:37.479
<v Speaker 1>had potential for upside. A new buyer comes in in

1:26:37.520 --> 1:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a merger deal and limited downside because I already had

1:26:40.320 --> 1:26:42.720
<v Speaker 1>a deal. His whole career, he was doing those countrades

1:26:42.840 --> 1:26:45.280
<v Speaker 1>until he did the greatest trade ever. And then he

1:26:45.320 --> 1:26:47.719
<v Speaker 1>took on all this new money and he started betting

1:26:47.720 --> 1:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>on banks and on pharmaceutical companies with and gold lots

1:26:51.280 --> 1:26:53.519
<v Speaker 1>of upside, but also lots of downside. He missed the

1:26:53.960 --> 1:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>act opposite of what Simons did with medallion. Hey, this

1:26:57.280 --> 1:27:00.240
<v Speaker 1>won't scale, and we want to make sure we're are

1:27:00.280 --> 1:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>are upside and downside's reward is balanced. The greatest trade

1:27:06.439 --> 1:27:09.439
<v Speaker 1>led to the man who did not solve the market

1:27:10.000 --> 1:27:15.479
<v Speaker 1>the and that basically created what is now ostensibly a

1:27:15.479 --> 1:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund but really a family office for the Paulson

1:27:18.080 --> 1:27:20.559
<v Speaker 1>for Yeah, it's a great point that John Paulson is

1:27:20.600 --> 1:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>a very good investor, but he got too big And

1:27:22.840 --> 1:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>how many times have we seen that same store over

1:27:25.120 --> 1:27:28.639
<v Speaker 1>and over over and over? And you know it's these

1:27:28.640 --> 1:27:31.040
<v Speaker 1>guys are fallible like anybody else. You can be smart,

1:27:31.200 --> 1:27:33.240
<v Speaker 1>but take on too much money and then you're going

1:27:33.280 --> 1:27:35.160
<v Speaker 1>with your second best idea and your third best idea,

1:27:35.360 --> 1:27:37.760
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. And he missed that lesson. Everyone thinks I'm

1:27:37.800 --> 1:27:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the exception because I'm I did the greatest trade ever

1:27:41.120 --> 1:27:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and I caught this one before other people and they're wrong,

1:27:44.320 --> 1:27:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's tough to take on all that a O M.

1:27:46.360 --> 1:27:49.240
<v Speaker 1>And he's as you suggest, Jim Simons capped at least

1:27:49.240 --> 1:27:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the Medallion Fund. He capped that, so maybe he learned

1:27:51.840 --> 1:27:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that lesson for sure. And our last two questions, what

1:27:56.040 --> 1:27:58.639
<v Speaker 1>sort of advice would you give a recent college grad

1:27:58.680 --> 1:28:02.559
<v Speaker 1>who was interested in either becoming a journalist or a

1:28:02.600 --> 1:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>book author or covering Wall Street and finance? Well, this

1:28:08.120 --> 1:28:11.879
<v Speaker 1>is a broader recommendation for young people in general. Find

1:28:12.120 --> 1:28:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the people. Find the individuals in whatever area you're interested in.

1:28:16.280 --> 1:28:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Who are the pace setters, who are the key individuals

1:28:20.640 --> 1:28:23.519
<v Speaker 1>people that you are you respect, and reach out to them.

1:28:23.760 --> 1:28:25.479
<v Speaker 1>Send him a note, Hey, I'd love to buy a

1:28:25.560 --> 1:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>cup of coffee, give twenty minutes of your time. People

1:28:28.360 --> 1:28:30.720
<v Speaker 1>are generous with their time. You'd be surprised. I'm sure

1:28:30.720 --> 1:28:33.320
<v Speaker 1>you found the two people on Wall Street um senior.

1:28:33.400 --> 1:28:35.840
<v Speaker 1>People want to help, want to give back, are much

1:28:35.880 --> 1:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>more generous with your time than you might think. Don't

1:28:38.320 --> 1:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>be intimidated. If you've got genuine interest, reach out to them,

1:28:41.680 --> 1:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>tell them why you're interested in the area, form a

1:28:44.160 --> 1:28:47.960
<v Speaker 1>relationship and learn from them. And our final question, what

1:28:48.160 --> 1:28:50.639
<v Speaker 1>is it that you know about the world of writing

1:28:50.800 --> 1:28:54.439
<v Speaker 1>and journalism today that you wish you knew twenty five

1:28:54.520 --> 1:28:57.120
<v Speaker 1>years or so ago when you were first getting started.

1:28:58.120 --> 1:29:03.120
<v Speaker 1>That your relations tips are the most important thing you've got,

1:29:03.520 --> 1:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and you've got to develop them. You've got to be

1:29:07.520 --> 1:29:09.760
<v Speaker 1>kind to people that are kind to you. I always was,

1:29:09.880 --> 1:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>but it's been reinforced to me. But also the fact

1:29:13.439 --> 1:29:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that our reputations are created and recreated almost on a

1:29:17.479 --> 1:29:20.519
<v Speaker 1>daily basis, so you can be doing poorly at your job.

1:29:20.560 --> 1:29:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I've had times to the Wallstreet Journal where I was

1:29:22.640 --> 1:29:25.559
<v Speaker 1>a low man on the totem pole and people didn't

1:29:25.600 --> 1:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>really give me good assignments. And you can change that.

1:29:28.840 --> 1:29:30.679
<v Speaker 1>That's the beauty of it. You go break a story,

1:29:31.040 --> 1:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you can change, You can your reputation can transform. And

1:29:36.040 --> 1:29:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and if you blow it, you know your reputation is

1:29:38.439 --> 1:29:41.719
<v Speaker 1>impacted too. Is don't make any mistakes, but don't lose hope.

1:29:41.760 --> 1:29:44.719
<v Speaker 1>Just tomorrow is a new day. Go break a story. Huh.

1:29:44.920 --> 1:29:49.519
<v Speaker 1>Quite fascinating. We have been speaking with Gregory Zuckerman, the

1:29:49.640 --> 1:29:52.840
<v Speaker 1>author of The Man Who Solved the Market How Jim

1:29:52.840 --> 1:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Simon launched the quant revolution. If you enjoy this conversation well,

1:29:58.280 --> 1:30:00.320
<v Speaker 1>be sure to look up and intro down an on

1:30:00.400 --> 1:30:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Apple iTunes, where you could see any of our previous

1:30:04.080 --> 1:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and fifty eight conversations we've had over the

1:30:08.280 --> 1:30:12.439
<v Speaker 1>past five plus years. We love your comments, feedback and

1:30:12.560 --> 1:30:16.640
<v Speaker 1>suggestions right to us at m IB podcast at Bloomberg

1:30:16.680 --> 1:30:19.599
<v Speaker 1>dot net. Go to Apple iTunes and give us a review.

1:30:20.360 --> 1:30:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I would be remiss if I did not thank the

1:30:23.280 --> 1:30:27.479
<v Speaker 1>crack staff who helps put together this conversation each week.

1:30:27.880 --> 1:30:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Carolin O'Brien is my audio engineer. Attica val Brunn is

1:30:32.000 --> 1:30:35.599
<v Speaker 1>our project manager. Michael bat Nick is my reluctant head

1:30:35.600 --> 1:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of research. Mike Boyle is my producer. I'm Barry Ritolts.

1:30:40.560 --> 1:30:44.040
<v Speaker 1>You've been listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio,