WEBVTT - TechStuff Classic: TechStuff  Looks at Ballistics

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Get in touch with technology with tech Stuff from how

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com. Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff.

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jonathan Strickland. I'm the host of this podcast. I'm

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:20.479
<v Speaker 1>executive producer at how Stuff Works, and I heart radio

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and I love all things tech. Into this time for

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>another classic episode of tech Stuff. This episode originally published

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 1>on April eight, two thousand and twelve, and Chris Pallette,

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>my former editor and co host, and I decided to

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>sit down and talk about the science of ballistics and

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>using a ballistic forensic science too to investigate a crime scene.

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>So you are about to hear this classic episode where

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Chris and I kind of dig down into this very

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>interesting field. I hope you enjoy. We did a podcast

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>on nuclear weapons recently, Yes, we did, um, and right

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of it, for reasons that I can't

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>even fathom, I started thinking about other kinds of weapons

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and I thought, you know what, it would be kind

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of interesting to do a podcast on ballistics, which is

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:20.320
<v Speaker 1>basically the science of figuring out moving stuff projectiles work. Yeah, yeah,

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I I was. I agree, that was a cool idea. Yeah,

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 1>it's the science of deals with motion of projectiles. But

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>of course it's been used. Sorry, I didn't mean it

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 1>interrupt I was gonna say that, you know, ballistics, It

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:38.559
<v Speaker 1>also is kind of shorthand for a specific branch of forensics. Yes,

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>which is really what we're focusing on today. Yes, because

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:45.040
<v Speaker 1>when you get down to it, the actual study of

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>ballistics is in large part a matter of physics. Yes. Yes,

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of science involved in this. We know

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>how we much we hate science, dad gum it um.

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately for the scientists, but fortunately for h crime mystery writers.

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Bullets do not always behave themselves in terms of physics. Like,

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>they generally go where they're supposed to go, but they

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>don't always follow the normal path when they get there. Yeah,

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>let's just say that it's all due to little, tiny

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 1>individual differences on a very small scale. Because we don't

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>mean to say that bullets somehow defy the laws of physics. No,

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>but they don't always. They do always travel a predictable path,

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>right right. You might think, oh, well, if so and

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>so was standing here and shot such and such over there,

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>then the bullets should be right here. That's that's not

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>always the case. Even even saying the cartridge for the

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the case for the cartridge should be right here. That's

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>not always the case either. So to really understand this,

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>first of all, we need to talk a little bit

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>about how the forensics part of ballistics all came about

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. Yes, and and really ballistics people

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 1>have been trying to get the science behind uh forensics

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>ballistics down for quite some time, but it hasn't really

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>been that long that we really got it down pat.

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in the nineteenth century, Uh, there were people

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>who were trying to figure out how to do this,

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>but they were the methods they were using were not

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>at all scientific, right, And to understand how you would

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>be able to use ballistics to try and identify a

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>weapon that fired a particular projectile, you have to understand

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more about what goes on with these projectiles.

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>So sometime around oh, the late fifteen century, uh, the

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>people who were creating firearms at that time discovered something

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>which was that if you were to have a barrel

0:03:56.200 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of a weapon have some grooves in it to help

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>direct the projectile to spin as it comes out of

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the barrel, you improve the stability of that projectile's flight. Yeah.

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Previously they were what you call smooth bore which was

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>basically a a smooth tube. The inside of it was smooth,

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>so you would, uh, you know, say take your musket

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and fire a shot, fire a shot from it. Um. Actually,

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>you know this is this is I was getting ready

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to dismiss this in my head, but I think we

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 1>should mention this. Um. You know those early muskets where

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you would you know, uh, you'd have to get everything ready.

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 1>You'd have to put the wadding and the and the

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>powder in and then the musket ball and tamp it

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 1>all down with the rod before you could fire the weapon.

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:43.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, whether it's matchlock or flint lock, which we

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>talked about in another podcast. Um, but you have a

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:52.479
<v Speaker 1>basically a roundsh ball made of lead which is fired

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>using um, the explosive gunpowder and the the gases propelled

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:00.279
<v Speaker 1>the ball out of the tube, and you know they go, well,

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>they go where they go. They generally go in the

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 1>direction that the barrel was pointing. Yes, more specific than

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>that we cannot naked. Yeah, they weren't nearly as accurate

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>as a rifled barrel, which is what which is what

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan was just talking about, where they there are grooves

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>inside the barrel and they are um, and they travel

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>in a spiral patterns. I remember, correctly, didn't we talk

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>about something in the rim when they started grooving the barrel?

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>But they weren't. They weren't in a spiral pattern. They

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>were straight. It might may have been I remember, I'm sorry,

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I just came to mind. But eventually they did hit

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 1>onto the fact that a helical groove spiral groove would

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>h helical'd on where where that would create enough spend

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>so that the projectile would become much more stable off

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Like this is the same sort of idea you get

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>when you have a football player throwing a football, absolutely

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>American football. American football player, Um, how to touch the

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>ball with your hands? You know when you hear about

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>like when you hear about like a tight spiral that

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>helps that projectile, in this case the American football maintain

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a precise flight path. Well, while that was very useful

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:16.919
<v Speaker 1>in making firearms more accurate, it was not thought of

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>as a way of identifying a firearm based upon a

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 1>projectile that had been fired for several centuries. It wasn't

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>until the eighteen hundreds. Yeah, and uh, actually I have

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:30.919
<v Speaker 1>the earliest and this this is all from a website

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>called Firearms i D. And it was created by a

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>guy named Scott Doyle who did some amazing research on ballistics,

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the history of it and all of the elements that

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 1>go into identifying firearms. If you are interested in the subject,

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I recommend you check out Firearms i D because it

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>is truly exhaustive. I'm only going to give a small

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 1>fraction of what he made available. So the earliest event

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>he found, the earliest documented case of identifying a firearm

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>UH in a criminal case happened in eight in London,

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>and what had happened was a homeowner was killed by

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>by a gun and a servant was suspected of being

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the perpetrator. And UH a fellow named Henry Goddard UM

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>who was with the London Police or with a branch

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 1>of the London Police, was assigned the case and he

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>examined the the the projectile that killed this shop owner

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and determined that it was made by a particular mold

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>um by UH, which meant that it came from a

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:51.119
<v Speaker 1>specific company. And then he looked at the paper patch

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>that was used in the the the firing as well. Now,

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>this paper what it did was it created a seal

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>between the powered and the projectile so that when the

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>powdering knights and the gases expand, the projectile would have

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>a good seal on it, so it would it would

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>fly out properly. And you saw that this paper patch

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>had been made from some newspaper that had been in

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the room. He actually found the page where the newspaper

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>had been torn to make that patch, and so they

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>were able to determine that it was in fact the

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 1>servant who appeared to have fired on this shop owner.

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>And so that was the first case. Now in that case,

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't an idea, you know, specifically checking the bullet

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>for the spiral marks that would indicate, um, what gone

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 1>fired it, because that's that's something else we should mention.

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>These rifling marks, uh ifact, That's why we call it

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>a rifle. There's these rifling marks that are on the

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 1>bullet itself. That's that's caused as a bullet travels down

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>this this grooved barrel, it cards little scratches into the bullet. Yes,

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and so these scratches are unique to a particular weapon.

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Even even two weapons of the same make and model

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>will produce different scratches, at least on a on a

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:15.439
<v Speaker 1>tiny you know, beyond a superfluous glance, you'll be able

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to see that there are differences, and so it's almost

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 1>like a fingerprint. If you are able to see, you know,

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 1>tell that two different bullets are close enough and identity

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that these these markings are really really, you know, to

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 1>all intents and purposes identical. You can say that they

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 1>were both fired by the same weapon. So if you

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>happen to have that weapon in your possession and you've

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:41.679
<v Speaker 1>done a bunch of test firings and all the bullets

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>are coming out the same way and they matched the

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>bullet that was used in a crime, you can feel

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty confident saying that that, in fact was the weapon

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that was used in that crime. Um. So yeah, I

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>mean there, Um, there are many cases in which you

0:09:56.920 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>know this has been this has been used. I mean

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the first I read, and I read an

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>excellent article by Katherine ramsland um in uh in which

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>she was talking about do you remember learning about Sacco

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>and Vanzetti in your American history class? This very controversial?

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely absolutely, Um. This was a case in which, uh, Um,

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the payroll was being delivered to a shoe factory and

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:27.839
<v Speaker 1>a a couple of guys came up and shot the

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>guards and UM, you know, they basically made off with

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the money and UH so they started looking for information.

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:40.199
<v Speaker 1>This by the way, was April fifty, UM, and this

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 1>is when they started looking. Uh. This really was the

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>incident that made modern ballistics a science, I think, UM,

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>just from from the way they handled it. So UM,

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the investigators behind this uh collected all the evidence they could,

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 1>including the the spent shell casings. UM. They went back

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:04.679
<v Speaker 1>to looking at the manufacturers of of weapons. UM. There

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>were about six at the time that they looked at,

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and uh they turned out to be Remington, Winchester, and

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Peters UM that that could use these these casings. UM.

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 1>And what they what they ended up doing was they started,

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, looking around at you know, what they

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>could get from this information. And as it turns out,

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the incriminating factors was the fact that for

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the weapons that they had, the only bullets

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 1>that they could find, uh that would fit that weapon

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 1>or in Psacho's pocket. UM, which is pretty incriminating evidence,

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's not exactly that's circumstantial, you know. UM. So

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 1>what they did was they talked to somebody who had

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>worked with uh sort of preliminary ballistics technology. His name

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 1>was Albert H. Hamilton's and UH he actually had been

0:11:57.040 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>UM working with UH with other cases and UH he

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 1>wasn't completely scientific um in his methods, but he he

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 1>actually got stuck in the middle of the case and

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 1>during this UH the Sacco and Vanzettie case, UM came

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>in with new weapons that were uh similar to the

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>ones that they had and and basically disassembled them in

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>front of the judge who noticed that he was swapping

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>parts with the other gun and went, no, you can't

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:31.439
<v Speaker 1>do that, and they threw it out. But they did

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>give the information to Calvin Goddard, someone who is quite

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>famous in ballistics forensics. Yeah, he's he's I would argue

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>that he's probably considered by many people to be the

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>father of this technology. He worked with a guy named

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Charles Waite at in New York with the Bureau of

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Forensic Ballistics, and he was using microscopes and a helixometer,

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 1>which is a probe that you could use to look

0:12:57.240 --> 0:12:59.959
<v Speaker 1>at gun barrels. UM. I imagined that was used in

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the manufacturing of these weapons. UM. But what he did

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>was he fired these the weapons used or or in

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Sacco and Vanzetti's possession um into a lot of cotton

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and compared the casing and the bullet to the ones

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 1>recovered in the investigation, and they were similar enough, um

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to incriminate both of them. Now, um, Vanzetti, I mean,

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>they put both of them to death. But Vanzetti said

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 1>he was innocent, and uh apparently Sacco's uh last words

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 1>were long live anarchy, which doesn't exactly uh he he

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't exactly say, well, you know, I didn't do any

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>of that. But yeah, and in later years too, they've

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>still they continue to examine that and uh, right now,

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>although it's still controversial whether or not these guys were

0:13:56.080 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 1>railroaded or whether or not they actually did commit the crime. Um, Uh,

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>they still say that, Uh, the weapons still support Goddard's

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>findings even years later. So the technology we're using now

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:13.560
<v Speaker 1>suggest that those weapons were the ones used. Yeah. The

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>that Bureau of Forensic Ballistics was formed in in April

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>nineteen five in New York City, and the whole purpose

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>behind it was that by you remember, back in eighteen

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty five was the first time we see someone trying

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to identify a firearm, uh, after a crime has happened

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the firearm itself was the one that was used by NIVE.

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>There had been a lot of pioneers who worked on

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>this idea of identifying firearms based upon the projectiles they fired.

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>And uh, the problem was that the the resources were scattered, right.

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you had you had some communities that might

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 1>have an expert that resides within that community, but then

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, you might have hundreds of miles of of

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>area where there is no expert, there's no one to

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>call upon. And so the Bureau was formed as a

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>resource for law enforcement agencies across the United States. There

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>were other countries that were doing similar things. Actually, a

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of this early research where the idea was, hey, look,

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>they are these markings on this bullet. They're consistent with

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>every bullet that's fired from this particular gun, and they're

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>different from all the ones that are fired from that gun.

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>That kind of work was being done all over the world.

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>In fact, there were a lot of people in France

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 1>who wrote a lot of instrumental early papers on identifying

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>firearms based upon their projectiles or Yeah, and then to

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the FBI. The Federal Bureau of Investigation here in the

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>United States was directed by a their jaunty head of

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>staff Jagger Hoover. Yes, I think that's the first time

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I've ever heard is I think that's what Jay stands for, right,

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>John T. Edgar Hoover, Um, No, not at all. Uh

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>he know. I was more like really said that elite.

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh So it was a question mark, like the sarcastic kind.

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't actually an interrobang, gotcha. So he directed that

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the FBI should create a lab for ballistics forensics as well,

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and so this was becoming really serious business, and there

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 1>were there were a lot of early cases between you know,

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the late eighteen hundreds and and nineteen twenty that established

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>that this was a legitimate means of investigation. So let's

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit more about what you actually do

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>when you're trying to identify whether or not a particular

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>bullet was fired from a particular gun. First of all,

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>it helps if we if we talk about bullets and cartridges,

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>because we and we've done this in another podcast, but

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>it always helps because a lot of I think people

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>who are generally unfamiliar with guns don't know the anatomy

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of a gun. Yep. And that's part of why I

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>wanted to mention that about the muskets um because you know,

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 1>after a while they realized that the system that we're

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>about to talk about, it makes the weapons much more

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>reliable using those things, and faster to operate because rather

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 1>than having to put the powder in the in the

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:10.360
<v Speaker 1>wadding and all that stuff in there and and prepare

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the weapon to be fired. I mean, I saw I

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 1>can't even remember what show it was. I saw a

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:17.400
<v Speaker 1>thing on TV where they had somebody firing and must

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>get as fast as they could, just to see how

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>quickly a trained um musketeer could fire a weapon. It's

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>about three times per minute. Three times per minute is

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>considered an excellent time fast. Yeah, I know, I've seen

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I've seen artillery cruise that we're using, uh period cannon's

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 1>um actually wasn't a cannon, but anyway, it was. It

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 1>was an artillery gun, period artillery gun. And they talked

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>about how even with a well trained group of troops

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 1>who were familiar with the weapon, three times a minute

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:54.439
<v Speaker 1>was considered to be the peak performance. So one of

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the biggest innovations was the idea of why don't we

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>take the system of gunpowder and wadding and shot and

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>all that, and why don't we try and figure out

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:06.199
<v Speaker 1>a way of packaging it all into one thing that

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>you load into a gun once and then you fire.

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:11.919
<v Speaker 1>So instead of having to load in all these separate

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>pieces and pack them together and hope that it fires correctly,

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>it's all packaged together. And that's the idea behind the cartridge.

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:22.439
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the earliest cartridges were these little paper cartridges

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:26.360
<v Speaker 1>that had everything packed together, and uh, they were used

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>in the Civil War mainly, but then actually that was

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of the step between where you put the cartridge

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>in and then and then the musket ball right right,

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:36.879
<v Speaker 1>the shot. Yeah, the cartridge contained essentially all the stuff

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that you would have put in previously besides the shot itself. Well,

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the modern day cartridges have the the fuel that's going

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to push the the bullet forward, and the bullet itself

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 1>all packed together. So you've got a case that's typically

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:56.479
<v Speaker 1>made out of something like brass or maybe steel, depends

0:18:56.520 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>on the particular manufacturer, and the ammunition involved a typically brass,

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and then you have a bullet at the end. The

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 1>bullet is the actual projectile that will fire out the gun.

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>The case remains behind. Now, the case also contains it

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:15.640
<v Speaker 1>contains powder, primer and a primer mix and uh, and

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 1>that's the stuff that when a firing pin from the

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>weapon hits the primer, that ignites the primer, which then

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>in turn ignites the powder which creates this massive amount

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of gas. Massive and a relative term, I should say,

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:33.360
<v Speaker 1>um amount of gas within the case. That's what pushes

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that that bullet out of the weapon. So the case

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>remains behind. The case is actually altered by this because

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the gases are pretty hot. Then they pushed pretty hard,

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 1>so the case itself will change a little bit. Then

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 1>you have to extract the case from the weapon and

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:54.119
<v Speaker 1>put a new cartridge in its place in the chamber

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 1>of the weapon in order to fire it again. And

0:19:56.520 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 1>of course we've also talked about machine guns. Uh, if

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about an automatic weapon, you put in you

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:09.159
<v Speaker 1>have a magazine feeding mechanism, feeding mechanism that will automatically

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 1>pop the next it will pop the spent cartridge out

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 1>of the weapon, and uh, load the next cartridge in

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and ready to be fired. And it happens very very quickly.

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>So but it operates on the same same principle. So

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 1>here's the interesting thing, A couple of interesting things. First

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of all, we talked about the rifling with the grooves

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:30.919
<v Speaker 1>within the barrel which are going to cut into the bullet,

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 1>making a fingerprint on that bullet, so that if you

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 1>were to find two bullets fired by the same gun

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and you were to compare them side by side, you

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:43.199
<v Speaker 1>should be able to see the same markings on both

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 1>because it's it's going to carve it out the same way. Well,

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the same sort of thing goes plays for the cartridge

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 1>or like the case, rather for the cartridge. Um, the case,

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:57.199
<v Speaker 1>the spent cartridge is going to have some markings on

0:20:57.240 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>it as well. Um, some of it may be matches

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 1>just from you know, the way that it sits in

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 1>the chamber, or if there if there's an extractor, if

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>there's an actual mechanical element in there that kicks that

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:14.919
<v Speaker 1>spent cartridge out, that can leave a mark on the

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>case as well. So that way, if you don't maybe

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you don't even have the bullets, maybe you just have

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to spent cases, you can compare those and see. So

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I stepped one of identifying the weapon is identifying what

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>caliber of bullet was used, and you know what kind

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>of cartridge was used, because that will limit the type

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of weapons that could have fired that particular ammo, right,

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:41.119
<v Speaker 1>because not every gun fires every immunition. Because anyone who

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:44.440
<v Speaker 1>has ever worked with guns nose are very specific kinds

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of ammo that work with particular guns, and you cannot

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:50.159
<v Speaker 1>you cannot interchange them. Chris and I have more to

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 1>say about ballistics and forensics science, but first let's take

0:21:54.320 --> 0:22:04.679
<v Speaker 1>a quick break to thank our sponsor. Each weapon. Now,

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 1>each manufacturer when they make when they put the grooves

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 1>in there and the the section between UM. Basically the

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 1>ridges around the grooves are called lands. UM. Those metal

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>ridges basically are what helped the bullet reach its destination

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>by providing it the spin and accuracy UM. But they

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>also are are common to manufacturers. So one weapons manufacturer

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:37.439
<v Speaker 1>might put six grooves in the barrel, one might use four. UM.

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 1>So one of the things these marks left and they

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>are unique to every weapon. UM. These marks are going

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:46.879
<v Speaker 1>to help the forensics investigator if if if they can

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>find the bullets, they're going to be able to identify

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>which manufacturer made the gun. That will help track it

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>down and then from there they can look at other

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>things that will help them at least narrow down and say, well,

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 1>this couldn't have been Uh, this couldn't have been the

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>gun that fired it because it's not even the same manufacturer.

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 1>It's not the right people. So we can rule this

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>out because there they can look at specific guns, because

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 1>multiple manufacturers can make the same type of gun. Yes,

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, so narrowing it down to your first you

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>look at the caliber of the bullet, uh, and the

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 1>case so that you can determine what kind of ammo

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 1>was used. That narrows it down to a range of

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>weapons that might be able to fire that. Looking at

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the actual patterns on the bullet itself and well, we'll

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 1>give you at least an idea of of the specific

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>type of weapon used and the manufacturer. And then again

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 1>comparing that bullet with one like a test bullet fired

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:45.919
<v Speaker 1>from a weapon. We'll let you know if it's fired

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 1>from the same weapon. So you're you keep narrowing it down.

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>This is very scientific. I mean you're talking about going

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 1>from the general to the very specific. So you're just

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>eliminating all the other options until what you're left with

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 1>is the only, hopefully the only uh possible answer. And um,

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of different ways that that these

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 1>the cartridges can have marks on Besides the ejection UM mark,

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>there can be firing pen marks, so you can see

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>how the firing pin struck the bottom of the cartridge.

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:22.359
<v Speaker 1>That will tell you a lot about the type of weapon.

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Like there's certain weapons that have a very distinct firing

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:29.199
<v Speaker 1>pen mark, so like a square, one's good indicator that

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 1>was a glock that fired the weapon. And there are

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>certain marks that are you're going to find that are

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 1>common to particular types of weapons. So forensics experts will

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:44.880
<v Speaker 1>use that when they're actually examining UM bullets. So let's

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 1>let's say there's a there's a crime case. Let's make

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>this more specific. There's a crime case in which someone

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 1>was shot UM and the police have recovered a weapon

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>from a suspect. They do not know if the weapon

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:01.199
<v Speaker 1>is the one that was used used in the crime.

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>They do know that it matches the same UM model

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and maker of the weapon that was used in the crime.

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>But that's all I know. The forensics expert what they

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:14.959
<v Speaker 1>will do is they'll take the gun UM. They'll take

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:18.120
<v Speaker 1>possession of the gun that's from the suspect, and they'll

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 1>fire it into a water tank. And the water tank

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>is a long tank of water several, and it's usually

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>around ten feet long. It's got about three ft wide

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:31.239
<v Speaker 1>three ft high full of water and on one end

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of this water tank which is sealed on all sides,

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 1>which is important you don't want any stray bullets flying out.

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 1>There's a a hole through one side, a tube where

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:43.400
<v Speaker 1>you can fire. Through that tube, it goes into the water.

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 1>The water is meant to slow down the progress of

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the bullet, and as it slows down, it'll come to

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:54.400
<v Speaker 1>arrest at the bottom of the tank. You the forensics

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>expert will retrieve that bullet and then they take that

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>bullet and the bullet used in the crime, assuming they've

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 1>recovered a bullet, because otherwise there's no point in doing this.

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:06.159
<v Speaker 1>So they've recovered a bullet from the crime itself. You

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 1>put that and the test bullet or several test bullets

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 1>into a macroscope, a comparison macroscope, and you might think, hey, Jonathan,

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>what's a macroscope. I've heard of microscopes. Well, macroscope is

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a device that does magnify things, but it

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>usually magnifies them by a pretty small multiplier compared to

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a microscope. You know, microscopes you're talking about multiplying magnifying

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:38.879
<v Speaker 1>something by a hundred times or more. Macroscopes tend to

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>be five, ten, maybe twenty times, so it's not it's

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>not giving you that incredibly up close look that a

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>microscope would. It's called a comparison macroscope because you can

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:53.120
<v Speaker 1>actually put in two different items. So in this case,

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:54.919
<v Speaker 1>you put the bullet from the crime and the bullet

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 1>from the test, uh onto the little platform it actually

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and here's there with some sticky stuff some some you know,

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>it's essentially glue um, and then you put it through

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the microscope. The microscope directs the images up to the

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>viewfinder where you look in and you can actually see

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>side by side the two projectiles, so it looks like

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 1>it looks like they are, you know, right next to

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 1>each other, even though they're actually on two different little

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:26.680
<v Speaker 1>platforms on the macroscope itself, and it allows you to

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 1>take a really close look and compare those markings at

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 1>a a nice magnified level to determine whether or not

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 1>they are identical, or whether or not the markings are identical. Obviously,

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the bullets can't be yeah, because someone is probably saying yeah,

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 1>but Jonathan, why do they have to fire it into

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 1>a water tank. I mean, why couldn't they just you know, uh,

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:51.639
<v Speaker 1>go to the crime scene and shoot it off the

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:54.120
<v Speaker 1>wall and see what happens. Well for one thing, of course,

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 1>again you don't want stray bullets. But um, you know,

0:27:57.160 --> 0:27:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if any if a lot of people

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>know that. I mean, it probably is common sense when

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you think about it. But bullets the form quite a

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 1>bit in the process of firing them. Um. Actually, I

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:12.400
<v Speaker 1>remember my rifle recourse at camp when I was a kid. Um.

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Every once in a while, Uh, the instructor would take

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 1>us down to the end of the range and there

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 1>was a big pile of dirt there. So the bullets

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 1>would go through the targets and hit the dirt and

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 1>stopped there. So we would go in and dig some

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 1>of them out and they would come out in the

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 1>oddest shapes. The thing is, um, you want the bullet

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:30.879
<v Speaker 1>to be identifiable enough so that you can really see

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the markings on it. Um, and shooting it against something

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:36.880
<v Speaker 1>else that will catch it. Uh, you know, it will

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 1>also be deformed by the impact if the water slows

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>it down and it basically just drops to the bottom

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of the tank. Once it this forward momentum stops, um,

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>then it's going to be much less affected by the

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 1>impact of of uh its landing and um, then you

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>can get a good idea of what is actually going

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to look like in the marks that are on it.

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 1>And and sometimes the bullets retrieved from crime scenes are

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 1>in really bad shape, I mean, because they've they've gone

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>through various materials, especially if you know they maybe hit

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>like a door frame or something or you know whatever. Uh,

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>And it can be a challenge to identify them just

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 1>because the bullets themselves may not be indecent enough shape

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 1>for you to be able to make a good comparison.

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>But this is to try and make the the conditions

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>as ideal as possible so that you can at least

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:31.240
<v Speaker 1>narrow things down. You know, the goal really is to

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 1>see if you can eliminate that gun from suspicion, because

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 1>if you can, then you know you're on the wrong

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>track and you can go direct your attention elsewhere and

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 1>not waste time on something that ultimately is a dead end.

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:48.640
<v Speaker 1>So UM, yeah, I mean that's that's your basic approach.

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of interesting, like the whole process of developing this,

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there were there were earlier uh forensics experts

0:29:57.520 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 1>who would compare bullets. They didn't have the luxury of

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 1>a comparison macroscope to use, so in many cases they

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>were using photography. They would take um pictures of these

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>bullets and try and enlarge the photographs as large as

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>they could and compare them that way, and try and

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 1>find as many points of comparison as they could between

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the two to determine whether or not a bullet was

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 1>in fact fired by the same weapon as another bullet.

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 1>So again, points of comparison, just like with fingerprints, you know,

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you look for a certain number, and if you figure

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 1>that if you find now uh like a dozen or

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 1>two dozen points of comparison that are identical, the chances

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 1>of that being just coincidence are pretty slim. So that's

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 1>when you sit there and say, no, I'm pretty sure

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 1>this bullet was fired by the same gun as the

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 1>one that I tested. We've got a bit more to

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 1>say about ballistics, but before we do, let's take aim

0:30:52.920 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 1>at a commercial break and another thing that that Goddard

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 1>did along with his partner um back in the very

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 1>early days of all this, he started they started compiling

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a database of information about different weapons UM, which is,

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 1>if you think about it, rather crucial uh to doing

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 1>this because it allows you to know, you know, in

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 1>which direction and which angle a particular manufacturers uh lands

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 1>are going to show up inside the barrel. UM helps

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 1>you eliminate you know, they can look at a bullet

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and go, oh, well, I know that it's not this

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>or this or this or this, And by the scientific method,

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I've at least narrowed it down to one manufacturer and

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 1>from there, you know, and and having all that information

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 1>in a database and comparing the weapons uh and I'm sorry,

0:31:45.440 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the bullets side by side, it gives you, um the

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 1>ability to scientifically rule things out step by step. And

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:55.240
<v Speaker 1>he really created a method and a plan for doing

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:58.239
<v Speaker 1>this that set the stage for what we know as

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 1>modern ballistics work. Yeah. And it's if you read about again,

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I do urge you to check out more information about

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the progression of of keep gathering this information because it

0:32:11.560 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 1>goes beyond just comparing bullets to each other. The history

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of forensics is pretty fascinating and in some ways sometimes

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 1>darkly humorous and in some cases just bizarre. Like you'll

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:30.959
<v Speaker 1>you'll find out about people sheriffs who found a victim

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 1>who had um a hole in their shirt and there

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 1>was suspicion that perhaps a a gun had you know,

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the person had been shot by a gun and that

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:44.960
<v Speaker 1>a bullet had toward the whole. So the sheriff would

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 1>take the shirt out to a firing range and fire

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 1>bullets into it to see if the tears that were

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 1>made by the bullets were similar to the one that

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:54.120
<v Speaker 1>was on the shirt in the first place. Well, they

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 1>can tell, um whether a wound is an entrance wound

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 1>or an exit wound some by the the type of

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>hole that it leaves. I mean, if you're um right

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 1>on top of somebody, uh, it will um do more damage.

0:33:09.400 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 1>If you're firing at somebody at point blank range, um,

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 1>then if you are farther away. But you can tell

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:19.960
<v Speaker 1>by the direction of the fabric, you know, if it

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:22.640
<v Speaker 1>if it's going into the wound, then you could see

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 1>generally that it's probably an entrance wound. And if the

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 1>fibers are are spreading outward, then it's probably. And it

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 1>depends on the bullet too, of course, there are bullets

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 1>that do a lot more damage on on one side

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 1>or another, so that that factors into it. Too. Of

0:33:37.560 --> 0:33:41.400
<v Speaker 1>course they'll talk about things like blood spatter. Um, I

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 1>have a great story here. I want to want to

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 1>tell them so alright. So in uh, in nineteen o three,

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 1>a fellow named E. J. Churchill in London, England provided testimony,

0:33:56.880 --> 0:34:02.240
<v Speaker 1>uh do testimony that regards an experiment he had performed

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that involved shooting bullets into sheep's skulls. Yeah, so skulls

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 1>of sheep, not actual sheep at this point that the

0:34:10.719 --> 0:34:14.759
<v Speaker 1>sheep have already shuffled off the wooly mortal coil and

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:18.359
<v Speaker 1>their skulls have remained. And what had happened was, um,

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 1>it was all revolving around a case where there was

0:34:24.239 --> 0:34:26.880
<v Speaker 1>a young woman who or a woman I don't know

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 1>if she was young, actually a woman who was shot

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and killed in Essex, England. And uh they figured that

0:34:38.120 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 1>she had been shot by a thirty two caliber revolver,

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:46.000
<v Speaker 1>And so Churchill took a similar revolver with the same

0:34:46.040 --> 0:34:48.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of ammunition and a whole bunch of sheep skulls

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:53.799
<v Speaker 1>and started shooting the sheep skulls at various distances to

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 1>determine to kind of compare the damage done, to see

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 1>how far away the shooter might have been from the

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:06.920
<v Speaker 1>victim by observing, you know, the damage done to the

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 1>sheep skulls, and he came to the conclusion that the

0:35:10.960 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the revolver was shot somewhere between six and twelve inches

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 1>away from the victim, and this was used. This testimony

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 1>was used in the court case. In fact, the the

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:26.840
<v Speaker 1>accute suspect was found guilty and put to death. So

0:35:29.200 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the experiments early on were very practical, you know, the

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 1>idea of we have this one set of circumstances, we

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 1>need to try and recreate it as closely as possible

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to to determine whether or not the scenario we have

0:35:43.520 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 1>in our mind is actually at all accurate. And uh,

0:35:48.480 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and you know, like I said, the history of forensics

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:55.360
<v Speaker 1>is filled with stories that make that one seem tame

0:35:55.440 --> 0:35:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and boring in comparison. Well, and and there are others

0:35:58.800 --> 0:36:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that are oddly similar, um, that make you realize that

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:09.320
<v Speaker 1>it isn't always exact. Because um, Ramslin mentioned a case

0:36:09.600 --> 0:36:14.959
<v Speaker 1>that happened in Oklahoma where a robber used a seven

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 1>magnum and uh, there was a witness and he shot

0:36:19.160 --> 0:36:22.680
<v Speaker 1>her right in the head. I'm just sorry, um. And

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:26.240
<v Speaker 1>uh what happened was the bullet went into her skull,

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:29.960
<v Speaker 1>but it traveled around the inside of her skull before leaving,

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and she ended up surviving and testifying against the robber.

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 1>And then another case, uh, somebody got shot in the

0:36:38.640 --> 0:36:40.960
<v Speaker 1>wrist with a twenty two, which is a much smaller

0:36:41.000 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 1>caliber bullet um and the bullet went into a vein,

0:36:46.400 --> 0:36:51.200
<v Speaker 1>traveled into the heart and killed the person. Bullets don't

0:36:51.239 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 1>always do well. And I also think I've even heard

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of people getting shot in the head and the bullet

0:36:57.520 --> 0:37:01.440
<v Speaker 1>hits the skull and doesn't penetrate the skull, but rather

0:37:01.520 --> 0:37:06.320
<v Speaker 1>goes underneath the skin, travels around the skull, and pops

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:08.880
<v Speaker 1>out the other side without actually penetrating the skull itself.

0:37:08.960 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I remember, I distinctly remember when I was living in

0:37:11.560 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina, a police dog getting shot in the head

0:37:15.080 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and that happening. It's yeah, uh yeah, this is getting

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:22.239
<v Speaker 1>really much more gruesome than I had intended. You don't mean,

0:37:22.320 --> 0:37:23.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean for it to be gruesome, but I

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:26.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's a situation. Well, I mean, the dog, the

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 1>dog lives. Um, it's a it's a situation that shows

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:34.759
<v Speaker 1>you that, you know, we sort of assume that if

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you get shot, if you get shot in the right

0:37:36.600 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 1>place and at the bright distance that you know, there

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:41.759
<v Speaker 1>are very few chances that you're gonna make it if

0:37:41.760 --> 0:37:44.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody's doing what they're supposed to be or what they

0:37:44.040 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 1>intend to do, let's say, with the weapon. Um. But

0:37:46.920 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 1>bullets don't always behave themselves, which is why these ballistic

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:54.319
<v Speaker 1>forensics are so important because they you know, they've gotten

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:55.600
<v Speaker 1>it down to a science, so at least you have

0:37:55.640 --> 0:37:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a better idea of what's going on. And we should

0:37:57.360 --> 0:38:00.719
<v Speaker 1>also point out that stuff that this you know, we've

0:38:00.760 --> 0:38:03.840
<v Speaker 1>been talking a lot about bullets. The story is completely

0:38:03.880 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 1>different if you were to talk about things like shotguns.

0:38:06.280 --> 0:38:10.279
<v Speaker 1>They do not have the rifled barrels, so I mean

0:38:10.400 --> 0:38:14.239
<v Speaker 1>you're firing shot at that point, not not lots of

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:17.360
<v Speaker 1>little balls. Usually occasionally you might have a slug, you

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:20.719
<v Speaker 1>could do a shot slug, but at any rate, yeah,

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:24.280
<v Speaker 1>taser's yeah, totally different story there. But in those cases

0:38:24.280 --> 0:38:26.120
<v Speaker 1>it's that you have to look for different things. You

0:38:26.160 --> 0:38:28.759
<v Speaker 1>can't you know, obviously you can't compare bullets like you

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:33.320
<v Speaker 1>could with rifled weapons. UM. And in fact, Scott Doyle

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:36.319
<v Speaker 1>on his site rights it should be noted that not

0:38:36.440 --> 0:38:40.359
<v Speaker 1>all firearms leave consistent, reproducible marks. But overall, it has

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:42.800
<v Speaker 1>been my experience that around eighty percent of the firearms

0:38:42.840 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 1>that I examined produce what is sometimes called a mechanical

0:38:45.520 --> 0:38:49.200
<v Speaker 1>fingerprint on the bullets and cartridge cases that pass through them.

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:51.680
<v Speaker 1>So it is possible even for you to get a

0:38:51.719 --> 0:38:56.760
<v Speaker 1>gun that, through some reason or another, uh, the marks

0:38:56.800 --> 0:39:00.120
<v Speaker 1>that come out, they end up on the bullets the

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 1>cartridges are not I'm not reproducible, and it could just

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 1>be that there's, you know, uh, some sort of weird

0:39:07.160 --> 0:39:09.440
<v Speaker 1>faulty part of that gun. You know, it's there's a

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:12.759
<v Speaker 1>lot of different factors that could that could cause that.

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:15.520
<v Speaker 1>And in those cases, of course, then you can't you know,

0:39:15.600 --> 0:39:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the ballistics evidence, as far as comparing bullets to each other,

0:39:19.600 --> 0:39:21.920
<v Speaker 1>is no longer really reliable. You have to rely on

0:39:21.960 --> 0:39:25.200
<v Speaker 1>other kinds of evidence in in that uh, in that

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:28.919
<v Speaker 1>sort of case, I would be interesting to know if

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:33.719
<v Speaker 1>any UH law enforcement authorities who have worked with forensics

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and ballistics have are listening to our show, you know,

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:39.600
<v Speaker 1>so please let us know if you you are, because

0:39:39.640 --> 0:39:41.839
<v Speaker 1>this is interesting stuff, and thank you for the work

0:39:41.880 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 1>that you do because it makes a difference. And that

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:48.120
<v Speaker 1>concludes this classic episode of tech Stuff. I hope you

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:51.399
<v Speaker 1>guys enjoyed it. It's always interesting to go back and

0:39:51.400 --> 0:39:54.440
<v Speaker 1>take a listen to these old episodes, some of which

0:39:55.000 --> 0:39:58.640
<v Speaker 1>in the upcoming weeks are going to be quaint because

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:02.960
<v Speaker 1>we recorded them so many years ago and so much

0:40:03.000 --> 0:40:05.719
<v Speaker 1>has changed in that time. But I hope you join

0:40:05.800 --> 0:40:09.799
<v Speaker 1>me for those I very much enjoy revisiting them. If

0:40:09.800 --> 0:40:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you guys have any suggestions for future episodes of tech Stuff,

0:40:12.600 --> 0:40:14.800
<v Speaker 1>or you just want to get in touch, send an email.

0:40:14.880 --> 0:40:19.319
<v Speaker 1>The address is tech stuff at how stuff works dot com,

0:40:19.440 --> 0:40:21.720
<v Speaker 1>or pop on over to the website that's tech stuff

0:40:21.760 --> 0:40:25.000
<v Speaker 1>podcast dot com. That's where you're gonna find the archive

0:40:25.080 --> 0:40:28.279
<v Speaker 1>of all the old episodes. You're gonna find links to

0:40:28.440 --> 0:40:30.960
<v Speaker 1>our social media, you're gonna find a link to our

0:40:31.120 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 1>online store. And we greatly appreciate you listening and you

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 1>visiting our site, and I'll talk to you again really

0:40:38.680 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 1>soon for more on this and bathands of other topics.

0:40:46.800 --> 0:40:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Is that how stuff works dot com.