WEBVTT - Taylor Lorenz

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome, Welcome, Welcome back to the Bob Left Sex Podcast.

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>My guest today is Washington Post technology reporter Taylor Wrens,

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the social media expert. Taylor, good to have you on

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:26.439
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. Yeah, thank you for having me. So what's

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the future of Instagram? Gosh, Instagram is kind of in trouble,

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>to be honest. I feel like they're going through an

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>identity crisis right now. Um. I think that TikTok kind

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>of came and ate their lunch a little bit, and

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>now they're struggling to capture back some of that like

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>relevancy that they used to have. It's just become a

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>very saturated, bloated network. It's it's basically just like a

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>mobile version of the Facebook Blue app. And as many

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>of us know, the Facebook Blue app, the famous original

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Facebook book, is really really sort of struggling these days.

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>So Instagram's in trouble. Okay, let's go back to Facebook

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>because Facebook pre dates Instagram. Tell me your thoughts on Facebook.

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I think Facebook has just become one of those kind

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:20.039
<v Speaker 1>of like zombie companies. They can't innovate. Um, they basically

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 1>only innovate their acquisitions, which they can't do anymore. Because

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>of all the antitrust stuff. So they've kind of backed

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>themselves into a corner. Um, they made this hard pivot

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>into VR, UM, you know, renaming the company Meta. Mark Zuckerberg,

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, spent pretty much all last year hyping the

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:38.399
<v Speaker 1>so called Metaverse, which is literally just VR, which he's

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, hyped a million times before. UM. But they're

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of Hallmark product, which is the Horizons world, which

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>is the social VR experience, is pretty bad. It's I mean,

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>they sell it as something people can use for meetings

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and remote work, but it's just it looks like something

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that is from like ninety ninety eight. Like the graphics

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:04.559
<v Speaker 1>are just really bad. People don't have these headsets, People

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>don't really want to spend time in these headsets. I

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 1>think that we are probably at least a decade away

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:13.799
<v Speaker 1>from VR adult like sort of even go becoming slightly mainstream.

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think that Facebook Horizons is going to

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>be the app that that brings it there. So um.

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, Facebook is not in a great place, and

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>they've obviously just laid off tons of people as well. UM,

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:31.119
<v Speaker 1>and so we'll see kind of I think they're struggling

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to survive, right now, I mean they're still printing money

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>from the ads business. But yeah, let's slip it over

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to the users. Conventional wisdoms is and it's oldsters on Facebook.

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:48.359
<v Speaker 1>What is your assessment of who's still using Facebook? That's true. Um,

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a much older user base, especially when you compare

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:54.920
<v Speaker 1>it to something like TikTok or Snapchat or um other

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 1>social platforms, even Instagram. I mean Facebook, the core Facebook product.

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 1>The users have been aging for a while and they're

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>not capturing younger users. Um. There's if you ask a

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:08.079
<v Speaker 1>teenager if they use you know, Facebook proper, I think

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 1>they'll look at you funny. Um. Instagram, you know has

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:19.079
<v Speaker 1>a slightly better demographic portrait. Um, It's definitely has more

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 1>pop culture relevance. And so you do have young people

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 1>using it, but they're not necessarily creating a lot of

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 1>content or engaging with it heavily. They're kind of using

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 1>it like a phone book almost. Um, kind of like

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:32.919
<v Speaker 1>the way that we have millennials used to use Facebook

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>back in the day. So um, that's kind of where

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>things are with them. Okay, but one here's that Facebook

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>is still the megaphone for school cancelations, uh and other

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>community notices. Is that your experience? Yeah, I mean I

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of public officials use Facebook and Twitter

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>UM for the types of alerts like that. UM or

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, Facebook groups is still you know, going strong.

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 1>There's tons of Facebook groups for parents and things like that.

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Again goes back to that older user base, UM finding

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>utility in those types of things. So, yeah, those are great,

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:17.160
<v Speaker 1>but you can't sustain a multi you know, billion users

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:20.359
<v Speaker 1>social product with school closures. You need it to be

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>you know growing, and you need to be attracting younger users,

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:28.720
<v Speaker 1>and you need to be you know, increasing time on

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the platform, and that's just not happening right now. Okay,

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Historically oldsters are a step behind their children. Are the

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>oldsters going to migrate from Facebook or are they just

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be on Facebook and then they'll end their

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 1>usage of social media? Well that's a really good question.

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think I don't know if they'll adopt

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>something new. It's kind of notorious, really hard to get

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>older people to adopt new platforms because their social network

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>has already established. UM. They're just generally less likely to

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>download apps and kind of want to expand their world

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.919
<v Speaker 1>in that way, unless it's maybe interest base or location

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>based like something like next door is a good example. Um,

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>But I think I don't know that, you know, I

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:18.799
<v Speaker 1>don't know that they're going to necessarily adopt something new. Um.

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that Facebook might be with them, but I

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 1>think that they might start seeing themselves use Facebook less

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and less. I mean, even the boomers that we're using

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Facebook so much in are not necessarily using it as

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>much now because it's just becomes less of a utility

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:37.559
<v Speaker 1>and you have all of these other platforms cleaving off

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:40.720
<v Speaker 1>parts of what people use Facebook for. Next Door is

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:42.599
<v Speaker 1>a good example of this. Right, instead of joining a

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 1>local Facebook group for your community, you might just join

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>next door. Or instead of using you know, Facebook to

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of publish updates about your life, you might just

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>start a newsletter or move to email, um, things like that.

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:59.039
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's also a lot of worries around privacy. Um.

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Facebook does not have a great reputation for data privacy

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>or just user privacy in general, and I think that's

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:06.119
<v Speaker 1>also scared a lot of people away. I think people

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that were sharing tons of kidding photos on Facebook even

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:11.359
<v Speaker 1>a few years ago, I've been more wary lately to

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:15.600
<v Speaker 1>do that. Okay, let's switch over to their other product, Instagram.

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Then Instagram was a photo sharing site and then all

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, TikTok gain traction and you have all

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:26.719
<v Speaker 1>the people. I mean, there's a lot of issues here,

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:30.840
<v Speaker 1>but let's start with the people who used uh Instagram

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to both boost their base and monetize. Kardashians being a

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:38.919
<v Speaker 1>good example, they're complaining about the change of Instagram to

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>try to compete with TikTok going to video. What's your

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>assessment there, Well, Instagram pivoted hard to video. You know,

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:50.279
<v Speaker 1>back in when they launched a video product to compete

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 1>with Vine. That was their first kind of fora into video,

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's when you saw videos performing better in the feed. Um,

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>there's that whole sort of pivotal video that happened in

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the Mark Zuckerberg actually, as Lea said that Facebook would

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>become all video, I think by I think you said

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 1>that in sen and it really did end up coming true.

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>The same is true for Instagram. Of course, now you're

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing their latest video product, which is Reels, which is

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>direct sort of rip off of TikTok, And I think

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>you see these old school Instagram people like the Kardashians

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>complaining about that because they can't compete in the new environment, right.

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 1>They don't want to have to suddenly create reels. They

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>just want to be able to post the picture like

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>it's and it's going to get tons of engagement. UM.

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I would counter that with saying that those celebrities are

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>stagnant and um, you know, they need to adapt otherwise

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>they you know, users don't want that. A lot of

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:46.239
<v Speaker 1>this stuff is delivering what users desire, and users desire

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>engaging video content. Um, that's just what user behavior shows.

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:54.239
<v Speaker 1>So I think, um, you know, I think Instagram needs

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to improve discovery. The problem with Instagram is that they've

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>built this follower base social on networks. So in order

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, to UM, in order to see someone's content,

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you follow them, right, and then you get this feed

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>of content that you've opted into. So when you see

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>content that you haven't opted into, for instance, Instagram putting

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of reels into your feed, it's very jarring and frustrating

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, I did knocked into this, or as

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 1>something like TikTok, you don't opt into anything necessarily, you're

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>getting all of your content primarily delivered through this algorithmic

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>feed called before you page, so you don't have to

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>follow a single person on TikTok. You're gonna be getting

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, content served by the algorithm. And I think

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>those two, like the way that users approach those two networks,

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>that difference makes it very hard for Instagram to catch

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>up and insert new content into the feed and allow

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:52.199
<v Speaker 1>smaller creators to grow because people are very like averse

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>to it, and because you have these big celebrities that

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 1>are like, oh no, don't you know, don't mess with

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>my position on the app. I still want to be

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>able to reach my fans, if that makes sense. Absolutely so.

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Do we anticipate, you know, the Kardashians being the pinnacle here,

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>so we'll stay with them. You know, they have these

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>static photos that they employ stylists and all kinds of

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:18.439
<v Speaker 1>expensive people to get a perfect, unrealistic picture then ultimately

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 1>tag advertising into it. Uh, will they pivot to video

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>or that is? Is that a transition that's just too

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>much for them? They've they've pivot, They've pivoted to video.

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh pretty well, I mean they the Kardashians are just

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:38.439
<v Speaker 1>very smart about marketing in general. I mean they post

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>on stories like I think that if they wanted to,

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>they could hire a videographer to make great video content.

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look at someone like Jason deruloh, right, Like

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:51.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean not that Jason Derulo was posting really posed photos,

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>but he kind of was like I don't know if

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you remember that like iconic picture of him like getting

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>out of the pool. Like he was posting these like

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>thirst trap photos on Instagram for a while TikTok came

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>out and then he you know, leaned hard into TikTok

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:07.839
<v Speaker 1>and is now a video superstar. So it can be done. Um.

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the Kardashians are just maybe frustrated in general

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that the platform isn't giving them more considering how much

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:19.439
<v Speaker 1>they feel like they probably gave to the platform. Um,

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:21.560
<v Speaker 1>but I do think that they can. You know, they're

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>still it's not like they're totally irrelevant in culture, right,

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Like they're still relevant. They just need to up their

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>reels game a little bit. Well, if one assesses these

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>different networks, my viewpoint and we're all being fed different

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>videos on TikTok is there's a certain authenticity and credibility

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and uniqueness to the individual on the street that is

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:51.200
<v Speaker 1>a not embodied by traditional celebrities. And being not on

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the other traditional social networks. What's your viewpoint there? That's

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. I mean, that's exactly right. And I think,

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:01.719
<v Speaker 1>um into I wrote this piece for The Atlantic called

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the Instagram aathetic is Dead, and it was just about

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the end of that hyper curated photoshop. Look how that

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>was not performing. Photos were not performing any kind of

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>hyper curated image on Instagram in nineteen, which is bombing.

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think that was that real turning point where

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:26.079
<v Speaker 1>we started to create more of authenticity. It's no coincidence that,

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:29.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, TikTok also launched in and so I think

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>that's when we really started to see this shift towards

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>more raw content more Um, I don't, I don't. I

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>guess I shouldn't say authentic because a lot of it

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>is equally curated, but it's like a realness and uh,

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's not so polished looking. Um. You know,

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>people at that point in that during that shift, content

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>that was shot on an iPhone was outperforming stuff shot

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 1>on a DSLR, which was interesting because Instagram was always

0:11:56.760 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>built on this high quality photography. So yeah, I do

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>think that that shift has happened, and for people that

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:05.719
<v Speaker 1>are still sort of stuck in the old mindset. It's

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 1>hard for them to keep up, especially celebrities, because they

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>have these images right that they need to control and

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>they can't just always, you know, get on and be wild,

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and so I think they have to be very strategic

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>about their presence on and sort of how to grow.

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Jason Drule is a good example of this. He's managed

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to grow and be relatable and collaborate with big young

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>creators and but a lot of celebrities struggle in that area,

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>traditional celebrities. Okay, theoretically YouTube could have captured this market.

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Why did TikTok blow up? And YouTube means static? Yeah,

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>YouTube what a miss? I mean, I think they saw

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the rise of musically, they saw the TikTok gaining traction,

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and they still took a really long time to launch shorts.

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Um And I think it's been interesting to see. I mean,

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the thing is is that YouTube was just the the

0:12:57.360 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 1>king on top of the mountain for so long. It remains,

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:03.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, the most stable platform in terms of monetization

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of ways. Um And, I think that

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:08.559
<v Speaker 1>they were just sitting pretty on their high horse. And um,

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they did enough to prepare for something

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>like TikTok. I mean they should have seen that, they

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>should have seen this pivot towards short form video. Um.

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I think they would argue, you know, that they do

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.439
<v Speaker 1>have shorts, which is very similar to TikTok. The problem

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>again goes back to discovery. YouTube is a very saturated

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>platform where it's really hard to gain new subscribers. It's

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 1>notoriously like one YouTube subscriber is worth like a hundred

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 1>TikTok followers, um for fifty Instagram followers. Like, It's very

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 1>hard to get those subscribers on YouTube. So I think

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>that if YouTube really wants to compete with TikTok, they

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>need to nail discovery and they need to get better

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>about serving people, you know, engage in content from you

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 1>creators that they don't know, and helping those smaller creators grow. Okay,

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 1>not everybody is as up to speed as you are

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 1>on some of these issues. How did Musically, a youth

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:07.560
<v Speaker 1>oriented app which was ultimately pooh pooed worth into TikTok. Well,

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it was poo pooed by certain people. It

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>was certainly beloved and lauded, you know, by a lot

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of us. UM, that covered it especially, and we're paying attention,

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>But I think, yeah, didn't it appeal more to a

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>younger demo than TikTok does? Well, yeah, definitely. I think

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>it appealed to a lot of teenagers. And I mean

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the goal is to allow young people to make like

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>video selfies, and that really appealed to young people. And

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I think you see, you know, at that point, um,

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people in the tech world we're just

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>so anti content creator. I mean, if you look at

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>what a lot of these big bcs were saying about

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>influencers in the mid when when musically it was ascendant,

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>they just looked down on it because it was women,

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>it was young people, It was not people that they

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>considered serious people using it. Um. And that was obviously

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>such a huge oversight. Um. Meanwhile, you know it was

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>it was grow going at a crazy pace. UM. So

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 1>it was acquired by Byte Dance. Byte Dance kind of

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>cloned it and then acquired it by Dance of course.

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Is this you know, giant Chinese tech conglomerate. Um. And

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>then they relaunched musically as TikTok in August, So that

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>musically app just flipped flipped over to the TikTok with app,

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 1>but it had the same functionality. I mean, if you

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>spend any time on musically, it was very similar to

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>what TikTok is today. It's the same app. I mean

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the apps evolved a lot, but um, but yeah, So

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>what caused TikTok to blow up? Because certainly social media

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>networks are started, they don't necessarily gain traction. Well, so

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things. One discovery, I mean, they just

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>nailed discovery. There was so much saturation in in terms

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of that Instagram aesthetic, the millennial aesthetic, like it was

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>just it was oppressive and people wanted a space to

0:15:56.240 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>be fun and creative and kind of weird. Um. Short video,

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously is something that can become hugely culturally

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>relevant because it's culturally relevant because it's so share able. Um.

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, look at something like Vine. Vine wasn't around

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>that long, but if you look at the impact in

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the reach that Vine had, it was really punching above

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>its weight. Um. So people could share the TikTok's really

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>easily cross platforms. So you started to see a lot

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>of TikTok's all over Instagram. Um, and they did a

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>ton of outreach towards creators, like they really instead of

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>shunning creators and kind of treating them like you know,

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>third class citizens like Facebook and Instagram was doing, they

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>really leaned into you know, content creator stuff. And by

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the way, you know, Bob, it doesn't hurt that they're

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>owned by this multi billion dollar Chinese tech conglomerate that

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>spent a billion dollars alone marketing the app to young

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>people in its first year and in the States, Um,

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that's a huge amount of marketing and that that even

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>just paying for those downloads, you that's almost impossible for

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>any other it up to compete with. So I think

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that they, you know, they definitely got a leg up

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the page. Go into a little more

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>detail how they spent that billion dollars and how they

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 1>reached the potential customer base. Yeah, a lot of it

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:14.439
<v Speaker 1>was on app download ads, so again just getting those

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>download numbers, and they ran tons of ads on Snapchat.

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 1>They had this ambassador program for college students. Um, they

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, they they were like paying big content creators

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to post on the app. They were really just doing

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>so much in terms of marketing to get the word

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 1>out there. And I think it ended up being really

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>successful because you might get a teenager to download something

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's like whatever, you all download this app, will

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:43.120
<v Speaker 1>take a look. But then the content on the app

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:45.399
<v Speaker 1>ended up being really engaging, so people stuck around, and

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>before you know what, you're creating content on there yourself.

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think it just worked out super well. Now

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:57.199
<v Speaker 1>we hear again and again about the TikTok algorithm, and

0:17:57.240 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 1>of course when Trump was president and look like he

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 1>was going to shut down TikTok, they're gonna have to

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>sell to Microsoft. Why can this algorithm not be cloned

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>or replicated? Well, because they have the best product team

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 1>in the entire world, and our American social media companies

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:17.440
<v Speaker 1>are just wildly underprepared. I mean like they have not

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 1>spent their time focus focusing on recommendations. Like you know,

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 1>you would imagine that the explore page algorithm would be

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 1>far more sophisticated than it is right now on Instagram.

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:30.880
<v Speaker 1>It's just not. None of these platforms have focused on

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:35.640
<v Speaker 1>algorithmic discovery. They've been building these follow based models, um

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and so I think it's something that they didn't invest

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>in because they also didn't think that there would be

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>any competition, right, the biggest you know, we reported on this,

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:48.119
<v Speaker 1>but but so much of the TikTok backlash is it

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>is funded by Facebook basically, I mean, it's Facebook lobbying,

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>it's Facebook pr I reported UM Stories earlier story earlier

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:59.679
<v Speaker 1>this year about how Facebook was actually hired this UM

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 1>public and operative firm to plant negative stories about fake

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>TikTok challenges and local media across the country plant fake

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>op eds. So, you know, I think that these big

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>tech conglomerates don't like competition, and for a really long

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:16.640
<v Speaker 1>time they were able to squash or acquire every little

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:19.679
<v Speaker 1>bit of you know, competing app um and and of

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:21.479
<v Speaker 1>course this was the first time they couldn't do that.

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Does anybody in the landscape have a strategy to compete

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>or is it like the music business twenty years ago,

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 1>We're going to either sue lobby or do use all

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 1>our efforts to hold back the future and competitors. I

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 1>think right now we're seeing these big tech companies do

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>exactly what you just describe to lobby and do anything

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to hold back the future because they want to monopolize

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the future and they realize that they don't have a

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:52.439
<v Speaker 1>monopoly on it necessarily, right now because they have not

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>innovated enough. They've become too bloated, They've become stagnant. They're

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 1>not thinking um in innovative ways. And and so I

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 1>think that they've resorted to bullying kind of to maintain

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 1>their power. Um. But I think that can only hold

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:10.919
<v Speaker 1>for so long. We'll see. Okay, let's go to Snapchat.

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:12.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, when I think of Snapchat, I think a

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>second life sort of the original VR world, and it

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>had just a limited audience. It never grew. What's going

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 1>on with Snapchat because two quarters ago everyone was bullish

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>on it, said well, you know, their numbers are good,

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and then this last quarter the numbers were bad. Uh,

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>explain your viewpoint on that. Yeah. Snapchats also in a

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>really hard spot. Also recently did a lot of layoffs.

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think Snapchat, like you mentioned, just could

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>never scale. I mean, that's a famous acquisition target, right.

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:47.439
<v Speaker 1>Facebook wanted to buy them um and Evans people was

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>like no, um. And I think that they've just really

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 1>struggled there in this weird space where I think it's

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>unclear whether they're a messaging app or a social platform.

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>They're not really a social platform. They have content Discovery,

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's kind of it's it's different than TikTok, right,

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of separated out of the app is bifurcated,

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 1>so on one half is messaging and then one half

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>is the discovery page where you can see stuff from

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Daily Mail and other kind of news

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:19.400
<v Speaker 1>outlets and content creators. Um. And I don't know that

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that was the right decision to split those. I mean,

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:24.399
<v Speaker 1>they had their reasons, um, But I do think that

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>it's been hard for that to scale. I mean, it's

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 1>very hard for any company to compete with Facebook. It's

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:32.440
<v Speaker 1>really hard. Facebook has had such a monopoly on our

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>social media landscape. And I think that they really did

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of damage to Snapchat and I don't know

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the Snapchat will ever recover a little deeper. How do

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 1>they do damage to Snapchat? I mean cloning Instagrams and

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the way the Instagram cloned Stories, which is their kind

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 1>of breakout feature. I think that captured a huge amount

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 1>of audience that was previously on going to Snapchat for

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:57.879
<v Speaker 1>to produce that type of content. And just by cloning

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that feature alone, they think they cleaved off a lot

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of growth. Um. And then add dollars wise, I mean

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 1>stap chat just can't compete with Facebook's ad network or

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 1>Google's ad network um. And then I think just in

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:12.640
<v Speaker 1>terms of messaging, it's you know again, it just goes

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:15.400
<v Speaker 1>back to not it's not totally clear what snap chat

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>is for. It is used by a lot of younger people. Still,

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:19.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to discount it like it's dead or

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>anything like that, but I think it's kind of in

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a space like Twitter, where Twitter and Snapchat are both

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:28.239
<v Speaker 1>like relevant, but and they have similar I think they

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:31.640
<v Speaker 1>have similar user numbers UM for monthly actives, I can't remember,

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 1>but it's around. You know, they're both kind of like

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 1>that second tier trying to break up into the top tier.

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>But I haven't really been able to do it, and

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 1>they don't have a lot of money right now. Snapchats

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>they're shutting down a lot of stuff. So how do

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:47.439
<v Speaker 1>you think it plays out of Snapchat? I mean, I

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:49.639
<v Speaker 1>think that they have to worry about being caught in

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:52.120
<v Speaker 1>a death spiral, right Like, there's this point where you're

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:54.359
<v Speaker 1>shutting down all your innovation because you have to remain

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:57.640
<v Speaker 1>lean to compete and to just to you know, survive

0:22:57.720 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>as a company. But then that's also hard because you

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>can't invest in building things that are going to attract

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 1>future users or you know, thinking out in a five

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 1>year ten year plan, right, because you're focused on just

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 1>getting through this year. Um so we'll see. I mean,

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I really love Snapchat and I can't help but root

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 1>for them, just because they don't want to live in

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:19.959
<v Speaker 1>this world that's dominated by Facebook and Google. Um but

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:22.199
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't know, you know where it's going

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to go. Okay, let's move on to Twitter. Twitter people

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:37.160
<v Speaker 1>call is called the social network primarily by people who

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:40.680
<v Speaker 1>don't use it. I think Twitter is its own thing.

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, from the time we are speaking to the

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 1>time this airs. Who knows what Ellen Musk might be doing.

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 1>But what's your assessment as if today what's going on

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 1>at Twitter? Wait, Bob, that's interesting. Why would you just

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>say Twitter is not a social network? This we're splitting

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>years here in terms of what we call a social network.

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I find that if we talk about sharing, Okay,

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>people thought of Facebook and they were sharing you know

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:13.640
<v Speaker 1>what I did today? And when Twitter first game traction

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:17.119
<v Speaker 1>ten eleven, twelve years ago was like that, whereas the

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>people were getting the most traction on Twitter at this point,

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>it's based on information and people are gonna go there

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 1>because they want information as opposed to sharing where they

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>were that afternoon or something. It's funny because I would

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 1>say the same is true for Instagram and TikTok. Actually, um,

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that speaks to the broader shift in how

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>what users view social media what these platforms for. Um.

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:46.719
<v Speaker 1>A couple of years ago, I did a research study

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 1>actually on Instagram and news content, and a huge amount

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:53.160
<v Speaker 1>of people actually go to Instagram for new the way

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that you're thinking of sort of what people would go

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to Twitter for, especially if you're younger. So I think

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:01.160
<v Speaker 1>people are are so sally young people are just more

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>likely to get their news and information from social platforms,

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and so they sort of turned to all of these

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>social platforms. But you're a hundred percent right that Twitter

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 1>is really unique. I mean, what makes Twitter unique is

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>is not just the fact that it's You're right, it's

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 1>more like news oriented for sure. It's also the only text,

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:19.719
<v Speaker 1>primarily text based social network, right, Like you don't have

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>to attach an image or video to post on their

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the way that you do on Instagram and TikTok and stuff. Um.

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, now I've forgotten your question. Um, you brought

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>up you brought up another thing. Okay, one can certainly

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:36.719
<v Speaker 1>search on TikTok because you know, one of the latest

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>reports is young people uh search on Let's go back

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:44.719
<v Speaker 1>a step for a while. They're the big story was

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 1>people are doing their shopping searching on Amazon as opposed

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 1>to Google. Now they say young people are searching on TikTok.

0:25:55.840 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 1>And I don't find Instagram quite works that way. But

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the younger generation, when you talk about getting news from

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:10.159
<v Speaker 1>TikTok and Instagram, do you think they're just seeing it

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:14.199
<v Speaker 1>in their feet? Do you think they're ultimately searching for

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:17.399
<v Speaker 1>certain people, following certain people? How do What do you

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>think is going on there? Yeah? I think all of

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>that actually, Um, I mean certainly a huge amount of

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>it is just seeing it in their feet if it's TikTok, right,

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Because TikTok, it doesn't really matter who you follow. Who

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:30.719
<v Speaker 1>you follow is the sort of one signal to the algorithm. Um.

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 1>But when a big news event breaks, TikTok is where

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna find out about it. TikTok is where you're

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna see the discussion, especially pop culture news and um,

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, these big kind of like cultural discussions, those

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 1>are all happening on TikTok um and then Instagram as well.

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like look at in terms of the way

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that people were finding out information about the Black Lives

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Matter protests or a lot of the social justice issues

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and and election related news, like that's a lot of that.

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 1>People are getting that from Instagram and TikTok um, and

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>sometimes they are seeking it out too. I mean, definitely,

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 1>when a big thing breaks where you see people talking

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>about it, people will go on TikTok and search out

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 1>those terms and try and understand what's going on, um,

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and they'll usually find content creators. I mean, there's tons

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:16.680
<v Speaker 1>of massive news content creators on both of these platforms. Um.

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Just the way that people also go to YouTube right

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to learn about things, although that's a little bit more

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>longer form. UM. So I think that already a lot

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 1>of what people would theoretically go to Twitter four has

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:32.440
<v Speaker 1>already migrated off Twitter even pre elon. Okay, let's say

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm driving on the freeway. You know, the map apps

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>are so good. Right now, Let's say I see something

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>in the ear, I see a fire. Used to be

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 1>you would go literally turn on the TV. Only alcers

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 1>do that now then you might go to the newspaper

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:52.159
<v Speaker 1>in your local place at TV station, whereas if you

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>go on Twitter, No, you wouldn't go on Twitter for that,

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>though you would go on you would go on, well,

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm still may be wrong. Let me finish. In the

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>old days, if you were looking for information that was

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:10.119
<v Speaker 1>in your area, that something's happening, you hear a boom

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:13.119
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. I found if I went to Twitter, I

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:17.680
<v Speaker 1>could find information that I couldn't find elsewhere, and there

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:21.880
<v Speaker 1>was a certain efficiency in that. Whereas, let me pull

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the pull it back just a little bit, the oldsters

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:30.680
<v Speaker 1>criticize the youngsters for being uninformed. My belief is today's

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 1>younger generations are more informed on the news than ever

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>in the history of humanity. However, just like we see

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 1>an argument in politics people's specific news feeds, there's an

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 1>immediacy on Twitter where you can and as they say,

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>if it's a big story, someone gets shot, take us

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 1>get shot. Yeah, you're gonna see it on all these platforms.

0:28:56.840 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 1>But if the story is not that big, what is

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 1>it going to take to find it on Instagram or TikTok.

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 1>That's such a good point, and you know you're right.

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 1>You're right that Twitter has that real time search that's

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 1>really hard to find on other platforms. Um. You know,

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 1>it's funny. If I saw a video of a fire,

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I think most people's default place to upload that right

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>now would be TikTok if you wanted to sort of

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 1>alert people, right if you wanted to be like, WHOA,

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 1>this is crazy, I have this crazy thing that I've seen.

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I think five years ago you would have posted on Twitter.

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I think these days you post on TikTok and that.

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>But but in terms of searching, you're right, I mean certain.

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 1>The thing is you can search for recent stuff. I

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 1>mean you can. This TikTok search is very good. It

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 1>is very good. It's not exactly the same as Twitter, um,

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 1>because Twitter is text based. It's it's different. But I

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 1>do think that, um, you know, it allows people to

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:56.720
<v Speaker 1>search out like major like events, surviral things. You're right though, Bob,

0:29:56.760 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 1>that local like that local thing is really hard to

0:29:59.840 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 1>find on TikTok. You know, Twitter advanced search is just

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 1>more robust, and it allows you to kind of segment

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 1>out the content based on location, based on time like,

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can do time on TikTok to. But yeah,

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 1>it's there's that that has not TikTok search needs to

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 1>improve for sure. That's something that has haunted YouTube from

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 1>its inception, the tag issue. Whereas if you have a

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 1>text based thing, it's much easier to slice and dice

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the information. Where if I were to even put fire

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Santa Monica into TikTok, someone may even have a video

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 1>of the fire, but if the tags you're not right,

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I won't be able to see it. Well, the thing

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 1>is is that TikTok is smarter than that. It doesn't

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 1>matter if you tag it. It can still search based

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 1>off a lot of information, for instance, captions in the video,

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 1>location of the video. I mean, you're I don't think

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>actually concerned by location, but I think I do think

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that I've tried to find a lot of niche stuff

0:30:56.680 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok enough and been able to find it that

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 1>it knows a lot more about the videos um in

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>terms of text too. I think the captioning, I do

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 1>believe that the captions are searchable, like I do think

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 1>that that's a signal to search when you search on

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 1>TikTok um like the captions on actual video, not the

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 1>like the transcript of the video, I should say, rather

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 1>than the like thing that people write out about it. Right,

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:24.960
<v Speaker 1>But let's focus on Twitter specifically. Elon Musk now own

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 1>was being a great reduction and employment. He's spouting off

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 1>news is covering it on a micro level. What's the

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 1>future of TikTok? As I say, in between when we

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 1>talk and when this airs, all kinds of crazy things

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>can happen. That's a nature of Elon musk But from

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>where you see it today, Yeah, future of Twitter um

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>very hard to predict under Elon Musk. Um. I don't know.

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I I really wanted to give you on

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the benefit of the doubt, but he doesn't. He doesn't

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 1>understand social platforms at all. Um, And in fact, he's

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 1>aims very misguided about stuff. I'm very concerned about how

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:09.239
<v Speaker 1>anti free expression and anti free speech he is. I mean,

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Twitter has notoriously been in this platform where you can

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 1>say you know so much and you can communicate so much,

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and you can talk about these really hard, real world issues.

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 1>You cannot talk about these big issues on TikTok or Instagram.

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 1>You will immediately get community guidelines violation if you try

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and talk about Nazis, for instance, on either of those platforms, um,

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Whereas on Twitter you can have these open, hard political

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:35.239
<v Speaker 1>discussions Under Ellen. I think it's worrying because he is

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 1>so anti free expression, um that you already see him,

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, talking about things like banning quote unquote negative tweets.

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 1>What are negative tweets? Who knows? That's up to him

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 1>to decide. He's arbitrarily banned a lot of accounts that

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>are sort of leftist accounts or accounts focused on social

0:32:53.240 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 1>justice reporters, um, and then he's brought back um, you know,

0:32:58.360 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 1>far right extreme at us to have violated community guidelines before.

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's really worrying. He really just doesn't

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>understand content moderation at all. Um. He has lied a lot.

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he has lied so much always, but he

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:16.640
<v Speaker 1>really has lied a lot recently. UM. For instance, he

0:33:16.680 --> 0:33:18.480
<v Speaker 1>said that he was going to have this content moderation

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 1>counsel and nothing would be done without them. That was

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a complete lie. Um. You know, he's also making a

0:33:25.280 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of moderation decisions based on Twitter polls, which, as

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you'll you'all wroth, I hope and pronouncis day Right, the

0:33:31.720 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 1>former head of test and Safety of Twitter said, is

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the number one most easy to manipulate feature on the platform.

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, making any decision based off a Twitter poll

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that can be so easily manipulated by thoughts for an interest,

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 1>etcetera is so irresponsible. So um yeah, he's also fired

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:52.040
<v Speaker 1>all the teams that have to do with any kind

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:55.720
<v Speaker 1>of policing of child sexual abuse material for instance. You know,

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 1>so he can't even police his own platform. Um, it's

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not looking good. Okay, let's talk about the free expression.

0:34:05.360 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 1>We have those on the right who said a that

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Twitter was a left wing platform b uh elon muskeetians control.

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 1>He says it's about free speech, and you're talking about

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 1>it's the opposite of free speech. It's the absolute opposite. Also,

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:26.840
<v Speaker 1>let's just be clear, Bob, Twitter as Twitter as a

0:34:26.880 --> 0:34:31.520
<v Speaker 1>political investigation is shown as Twitter's own data showed. Right,

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 1>They released their own data showing that over and over

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:39.960
<v Speaker 1>agun Twitter has significantly amplified conservative voices. In fact, Twitter

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:44.279
<v Speaker 1>is a conservative news platform because conservative voices and far

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 1>right voices received significant amplification in the feed, far more

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 1>than anybody on the left. And that's been reported so

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>many times over. So anybody that says otherwise at this

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:57.160
<v Speaker 1>point is just lying. I mean they're just lying in

0:34:57.160 --> 0:34:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the face of all of this data. Listen, I agree

0:34:59.840 --> 0:35:03.520
<v Speaker 1>with you totally. But is that viewpoint being in the

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 1>news reporting world. Is this just a canard that the

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:10.839
<v Speaker 1>right has come up with the wedge issue to get

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 1>results they want. Are they conscious of this? Why does

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:17.920
<v Speaker 1>this story never die? Well, it never dies because these

0:35:17.920 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 1>people are lying. I mean, these people are lying. These

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 1>same people that are growing all day about free speech

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:24.880
<v Speaker 1>are the ones kind of banned books from libraries that

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:27.759
<v Speaker 1>they don't feel, you know, like it's just ridiculous. I mean,

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 1>as a journalist, someone that relies on the First Amendment

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to do my job, so such a staunch supporter of

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:37.880
<v Speaker 1>free speech, and you have these right wing you know,

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 1>politicians and far right reactionaries trying to silence I mean,

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to silence people. What they want is to silence

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 1>people on the left, and they will lie and do

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:51.080
<v Speaker 1>anything to do that. And it's it's very disappointing. It's

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 1>very disappointing. And I you know, obviously not saying that

0:35:55.719 --> 0:36:01.040
<v Speaker 1>every conservative is doing that, but you know, most most

0:36:01.080 --> 0:36:04.920
<v Speaker 1>of the loudest ones on Twitter are extremely hypocritical. I mean,

0:36:04.960 --> 0:36:09.239
<v Speaker 1>just Elon endorsing shadow banning people that he doesn't disagree with,

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 1>That's that's bad. I mean just saying like negative downraking

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote negative tweets. That's so terrifying because what is

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:20.319
<v Speaker 1>considered a negative tweet, right, that is a highly subjective

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:23.280
<v Speaker 1>thing to say that you are going to actually prevent

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 1>people from seeing that content in search results. I mean,

0:36:26.640 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 1>that's just if that was flipped, it would be a

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:31.960
<v Speaker 1>endless news cycle. But I feel like it's a similar

0:36:32.000 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's doing the Trump playbook, right, which is

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:38.799
<v Speaker 1>just kind of um, say anything and your actions can

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:41.560
<v Speaker 1>completely refute everything that you're saying, but it doesn't matter

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:43.839
<v Speaker 1>because you're just People are just gonna believe what you say,

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 1>even though behind the scenes you are literally doing absolutely

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:50.560
<v Speaker 1>everything against what you purport to believe. Um. And I

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know, people don't have a lot of media literacy

0:36:53.040 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 1>these days, so I think a lot of people fall

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 1>for it. Let's talk about the news business. Trump array

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of elected in sixteen, really starts amplifying his campaign eighteen

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 1>months before, and it is reported at infinitum There's a

0:37:09.680 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of criticisms, especially with TV News, that this is

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:17.839
<v Speaker 1>impacting ratings, selling ads, and there was a lot of

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:21.399
<v Speaker 1>criticism even at the Washington Post, the Margaret Sullivan, who's

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:24.120
<v Speaker 1>no now no longer with the paper, saying you have

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to take a side. Uh NPR did a story on

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:30.760
<v Speaker 1>that that you know, you just can't report this stuff.

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 1>You're playing into the hands now this time around, it seems,

0:37:36.280 --> 0:37:39.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, even led ironically by the right, the New

0:37:39.400 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 1>York Posts, they're giving him less oxygen. Okay, but I

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 1>don't want to make this about Trump. I want to

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:50.800
<v Speaker 1>make this about Elon Musk. The press is reporting literally

0:37:50.920 --> 0:37:53.680
<v Speaker 1>everything this guy dies. You would think literally world peace,

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, depends on Twitter. Okay, it's because the media

0:37:58.800 --> 0:38:01.839
<v Speaker 1>is addicted to Twitter. And look, Elon Musk is one

0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:04.120
<v Speaker 1>of the richest men in the world. Right, the juicy

0:38:04.239 --> 0:38:06.560
<v Speaker 1>story that people want to read, um and it does

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 1>have very serious business implications, and you know, Elan is

0:38:10.120 --> 0:38:13.399
<v Speaker 1>doing stuff that is endangering lives. Um So I think

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:16.759
<v Speaker 1>that's why you're getting so many stories. I don't think

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 1>that the stories can continue at this pace forever. But

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a really wild, you know, past

0:38:21.880 --> 0:38:25.800
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks. Um, And so you're not around of

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>bandwidth is commensurate with the reality of Ellen or people

0:38:31.600 --> 0:38:34.400
<v Speaker 1>are just so fascinated by Elon in the business and

0:38:34.440 --> 0:38:37.840
<v Speaker 1>addicted to Twitter that they're giving him all this space. Well,

0:38:37.840 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I would say people are giving him space, but I

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:42.520
<v Speaker 1>think they're rightfully debunking a lot of what he says, right,

0:38:42.560 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it's really important to um fact

0:38:46.239 --> 0:38:49.319
<v Speaker 1>check the stuff that he's saying, because he lies with

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:52.760
<v Speaker 1>such abandoned that I think it's important for the media

0:38:52.840 --> 0:38:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to definitely contextualize that stuff. Um. You know, I think

0:38:57.480 --> 0:39:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Ellen and Trump are very different. I mean, Elan is

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:03.719
<v Speaker 1>a business leader, right, he's not running a political campaign yet,

0:39:04.719 --> 0:39:06.919
<v Speaker 1>and I think Twitter, you know, the stuff that he's doing.

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 1>This deal even just the way that this deal happened

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:14.920
<v Speaker 1>was notable and had you know, real money implications for people,

0:39:14.960 --> 0:39:18.160
<v Speaker 1>like market implications. So um, I think, you know, I

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:20.440
<v Speaker 1>think it's a story worth covering. I think that just

0:39:20.520 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the way that you need to cover it you need

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to think about obviously, like the way that you're covering it.

0:39:25.960 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Like I think that's the problem with a lot of

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the Trump coverage to I mean, Cable news was so

0:39:31.719 --> 0:39:35.319
<v Speaker 1>incredibly irresponsible, right, Like the way that CNN and a

0:39:35.360 --> 0:39:39.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of outlets covered that election was completely irresponsible. I

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:42.520
<v Speaker 1>think now a lot of lessons have been learned, and certainly,

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I can tell you from working in you

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:47.520
<v Speaker 1>know where I work, that a lot of you know people,

0:39:47.600 --> 0:39:49.720
<v Speaker 1>people really think critically about a lot of this stuff,

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and um for as many stories I mean, and I

0:39:52.200 --> 0:39:54.320
<v Speaker 1>think that the Elon stories get a lot of shares.

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:57.320
<v Speaker 1>But it's not like everyone is only writing Elon stories

0:39:57.440 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 1>right like people are still writing all the other tech stories.

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:01.480
<v Speaker 1>It is just that those stories, that's what a lot

0:40:01.520 --> 0:40:03.680
<v Speaker 1>of people want to talk about right now because all

0:40:03.680 --> 0:40:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the media people are addicted to Twitter. Again, it is

0:40:05.920 --> 0:40:08.440
<v Speaker 1>their primary platform. If all the media people left Twitter,

0:40:08.760 --> 0:40:10.840
<v Speaker 1>it would not be getting the amount of oxygen that

0:40:10.840 --> 0:40:13.279
<v Speaker 1>it's getting. Well, I guess this is interesting to me

0:40:13.320 --> 0:40:16.399
<v Speaker 1>because I don't think the average person is either on

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:20.759
<v Speaker 1>Twitter or is concerned to this degree. But before I

0:40:20.800 --> 0:40:23.600
<v Speaker 1>got down that pipeline whige, I may not I see

0:40:23.640 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a similarity in Trump and in Elon, And then you

0:40:28.600 --> 0:40:33.600
<v Speaker 1>get to Kanye where they are a addicted to the

0:40:33.680 --> 0:40:39.000
<v Speaker 1>publicity and being in the public eye and be traditional

0:40:39.080 --> 0:40:41.440
<v Speaker 1>media doesn't understand. I mean, what you have to give

0:40:41.480 --> 0:40:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Trump credit on was A he was on social media.

0:40:45.640 --> 0:40:48.680
<v Speaker 1>B he was speaking English. I mean, this is why

0:40:48.960 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I voted for Hillary on a big left winger. But

0:40:51.800 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 1>when she said her favorite book was the Bible, I said,

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that's just complete horship. Okay, so she was complete, uh,

0:40:57.880 --> 0:41:04.080
<v Speaker 1>really untrustworthy. Whereas you have um Trump using the vernacular

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:09.239
<v Speaker 1>and it appealed to people, and he gained even to

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 1>this lead date, he gained purchase on people that the

0:41:12.200 --> 0:41:15.160
<v Speaker 1>media do not. Now I feel the same thing with

0:41:15.239 --> 0:41:18.799
<v Speaker 1>Elon if for no other reason. Okay, there's two things. One,

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:23.840
<v Speaker 1>he's a running Twitter, B is posting every day. CE

0:41:24.120 --> 0:41:27.520
<v Speaker 1>does have a CV superior to Trump and many of

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:30.080
<v Speaker 1>these other people. You know, it was involved in PayPal.

0:41:30.200 --> 0:41:33.600
<v Speaker 1>We can't slice and dice that. Tesla, whether he started

0:41:33.719 --> 0:41:37.920
<v Speaker 1>or not, under his egis it became quite an enterprise SpaceX.

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:42.040
<v Speaker 1>So you have the cult of Elon which he is feeding.

0:41:42.120 --> 0:41:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Now the other thing becomes a debate is this positive

0:41:45.239 --> 0:41:48.719
<v Speaker 1>or negative? Is it hurting or helping test actinly not

0:41:48.840 --> 0:41:53.960
<v Speaker 1>helping Tesla. And then you have Kanye who is addicted

0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:57.919
<v Speaker 1>to press in the same way. Kanye is literally mentally ill,

0:41:57.960 --> 0:42:01.480
<v Speaker 1>not that these others don't have flaws, and he seems

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to be self immolating, he's going to go down with

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the fire, etcetera. So on one hand, these people have

0:42:09.600 --> 0:42:13.840
<v Speaker 1>figured out the modern paradigm. On another level, they pushed

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:18.880
<v Speaker 1>it so far, certainly Trump and Kanye, where there's been backlash.

0:42:19.040 --> 0:42:21.319
<v Speaker 1>So if you want to get your message out, have

0:42:21.440 --> 0:42:25.560
<v Speaker 1>these people tapped into something or is this one and

0:42:25.680 --> 0:42:29.520
<v Speaker 1>done well? I think all of them are really expert

0:42:29.600 --> 0:42:33.320
<v Speaker 1>at leveraging the attention economy and like you said, speaking

0:42:33.360 --> 0:42:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to people and kind of feeding into people's base conspiracies,

0:42:38.239 --> 0:42:42.760
<v Speaker 1>especially I mean they're telling people what they want to hear. Trump, Elon, Kanye,

0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:46.799
<v Speaker 1>they will tell people, especially you know Elon lately he's

0:42:46.880 --> 0:42:49.400
<v Speaker 1>just telling people what they want to hear, whether or

0:42:49.400 --> 0:42:52.960
<v Speaker 1>not it's true, and stuff he says it's not true, right,

0:42:53.000 --> 0:42:57.120
<v Speaker 1>He's promoting wild conspiracy theories, but he knows that those

0:42:57.440 --> 0:43:00.359
<v Speaker 1>will play well online and that people will believe because

0:43:00.360 --> 0:43:03.360
<v Speaker 1>he's rich and this is America and we worship money

0:43:03.400 --> 0:43:05.040
<v Speaker 1>above all else. So that is why he has the

0:43:05.080 --> 0:43:08.040
<v Speaker 1>respect that he does. Um, I don't know. In terms

0:43:08.080 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 1>of backlash, I mean, I think you're right, like Kanye,

0:43:10.800 --> 0:43:14.399
<v Speaker 1>it's a totally different situation. Um, And I think it's

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:18.120
<v Speaker 1>very sad, um. You know, just the path that he's

0:43:18.120 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 1>gone down. Um. Trump, I think has alienated so many people,

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:25.279
<v Speaker 1>so many of like political leaders in the GOP, that

0:43:25.320 --> 0:43:27.920
<v Speaker 1>it's it's gonna be hard for him. Ellen doesn't have

0:43:27.960 --> 0:43:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to work within the constraints of the political world or

0:43:31.200 --> 0:43:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the entertainment industry. He kind of can played by his

0:43:34.480 --> 0:43:38.080
<v Speaker 1>own rule book. So I think we'll see. I think, Um,

0:43:38.120 --> 0:43:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, you mentioned Tesla. I think that if what

0:43:41.160 --> 0:43:45.680
<v Speaker 1>he's doing at Twitter ends up impacting Tesla enough um,

0:43:45.920 --> 0:43:48.120
<v Speaker 1>or you know, impacting his other companies enough, and he

0:43:48.160 --> 0:43:50.440
<v Speaker 1>really starts to lose a significant amount of money, I

0:43:50.440 --> 0:43:53.080
<v Speaker 1>think that's the only way that he can be sort

0:43:53.120 --> 0:43:56.680
<v Speaker 1>of held accountable, I guess for his actions or that's

0:43:56.719 --> 0:43:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the only time that people will start to question him.

0:43:58.640 --> 0:44:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I think as long as you know, he kind of

0:44:01.600 --> 0:44:03.880
<v Speaker 1>has the appearance of success, people won't. I mean, he

0:44:04.000 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 1>keeps crowing about these gaining user numbers, but he stopped

0:44:07.520 --> 0:44:10.880
<v Speaker 1>policing spam. He's just allowing spam on the platform, and

0:44:11.200 --> 0:44:13.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, millions of accounts that were being deleted every

0:44:13.920 --> 0:44:16.799
<v Speaker 1>week a spam. Now former Twitter employees have said are

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:19.480
<v Speaker 1>no longer being deleted, and then he's so it's just

0:44:19.600 --> 0:44:22.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of smoking mirrors. Um, but that can only

0:44:22.200 --> 0:44:25.279
<v Speaker 1>last so long. I think, you know, we'll see he

0:44:25.360 --> 0:44:30.200
<v Speaker 1>can't do this for five years, right, So, UM, I

0:44:30.200 --> 0:44:32.279
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it's an effective strategy or not yet.

0:44:39.719 --> 0:44:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about you specifically. Right in the Washington posted.

0:44:43.000 --> 0:44:45.239
<v Speaker 1>Let's just say you did not write every day in

0:44:45.280 --> 0:44:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the post one thing that would love for me to

0:44:49.160 --> 0:44:53.840
<v Speaker 1>write every day. Okay, well that's interesting, but leaving that aside,

0:44:54.280 --> 0:44:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the post is more far in advance at the time

0:44:56.560 --> 0:45:00.640
<v Speaker 1>where you work previously, and there are many more articles

0:45:00.680 --> 0:45:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that allow comments. Okay, so if you write once a week,

0:45:06.320 --> 0:45:08.759
<v Speaker 1>once every two weeks, usually it's more once once every

0:45:08.760 --> 0:45:11.759
<v Speaker 1>two weeks, you can see feedback that way. But you

0:45:11.800 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 1>are a very active poster on Twitter. What is your

0:45:17.239 --> 0:45:21.880
<v Speaker 1>motivation there? Oh? I post more on Instagram that I

0:45:21.920 --> 0:45:25.760
<v Speaker 1>do on Twitter, I think. But what we're talking about Twitter? Yeah,

0:45:25.800 --> 0:45:28.560
<v Speaker 1>but the sooner Twitter on a media group chat. I mean,

0:45:28.600 --> 0:45:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the value of Twitter is for what one reporting? I

0:45:31.200 --> 0:45:34.280
<v Speaker 1>cover Internet culture, right, so I gotta be on everything. Um,

0:45:34.320 --> 0:45:36.560
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, I post on everything. I kind of just

0:45:37.200 --> 0:45:40.200
<v Speaker 1>there's no platform that I don't post content on because

0:45:40.239 --> 0:45:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm constantly using it one to promote my stories, to

0:45:43.360 --> 0:45:46.240
<v Speaker 1>shape narratives. UM. You know, I talk a lot about

0:45:46.280 --> 0:45:49.319
<v Speaker 1>the media. I cover the media. I care a lot

0:45:49.400 --> 0:45:53.280
<v Speaker 1>about journalism and sort of under people understanding the information

0:45:53.360 --> 0:45:58.040
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem and our media environment. UM. I view Twitter mostly

0:45:58.080 --> 0:46:00.680
<v Speaker 1>as a place to talk to other journe us, but

0:46:00.719 --> 0:46:03.279
<v Speaker 1>I also find tons of sources there. I think there's

0:46:03.320 --> 0:46:05.760
<v Speaker 1>tons of people in tech on Twitter, so it's valuable

0:46:05.880 --> 0:46:09.600
<v Speaker 1>for that point to UM. But mostly I'm like trying

0:46:09.600 --> 0:46:12.880
<v Speaker 1>to think how I use I used every platform differently, UM,

0:46:12.920 --> 0:46:15.440
<v Speaker 1>but Twitter is definitely the one where I'm just like, hello, media,

0:46:15.520 --> 0:46:18.600
<v Speaker 1>people pay attention to this. I have a new story out.

0:46:18.719 --> 0:46:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Here's why this matters, you know, let's go at. Let's

0:46:21.680 --> 0:46:25.560
<v Speaker 1>go a little bit slower word from the outside, which

0:46:25.600 --> 0:46:30.799
<v Speaker 1>may not be accurate. Traditionally, except for the opinion calumnus

0:46:30.800 --> 0:46:34.200
<v Speaker 1>in the major newspapers, most of the reporters were faceless.

0:46:34.239 --> 0:46:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Their names were on the articles, but other than a couple,

0:46:37.560 --> 0:46:39.799
<v Speaker 1>most people really had no idea who those people were.

0:46:40.719 --> 0:46:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Whereas you were reporting on the bleeding edge social media

0:46:45.120 --> 0:46:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the scuttle butt was the traditional people

0:46:49.520 --> 0:46:51.960
<v Speaker 1>at the New York Times didn't like that you were

0:46:52.000 --> 0:46:55.839
<v Speaker 1>getting that much attention, and we're against the modern period.

0:46:55.880 --> 0:46:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm what was going on from that? Oh that's not true,

0:46:58.520 --> 0:47:00.920
<v Speaker 1>that's not true. Look at someone like Ben Smith. No

0:47:00.960 --> 0:47:06.480
<v Speaker 1>one loves attention like Ben Smith. Ben Smith left. Yeah,

0:47:06.560 --> 0:47:11.080
<v Speaker 1>we both left the Times for I think similar Ben

0:47:11.239 --> 0:47:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Smith thought that he was going for opportunities, and I

0:47:16.719 --> 0:47:19.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't feel from the Outtimes. Once again, I say, this

0:47:19.640 --> 0:47:23.960
<v Speaker 1>is perception as opposed to reality. Perception wasn't wasn't that

0:47:24.040 --> 0:47:29.640
<v Speaker 1>there was backlash against Ben Smith? Uh, but perception was

0:47:29.680 --> 0:47:33.000
<v Speaker 1>there was backlash against you. I'm constantly getting backlash from

0:47:33.239 --> 0:47:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Look at Fox News every week, Tucker Carlson is ranting

0:47:35.719 --> 0:47:39.120
<v Speaker 1>against me. I mean, I think that is constant backlash.

0:47:39.200 --> 0:47:42.720
<v Speaker 1>But I never received backlash from anyone at the Times

0:47:42.760 --> 0:47:45.759
<v Speaker 1>while I worked there. I mean, I they hired me

0:47:45.840 --> 0:47:48.359
<v Speaker 1>because of my stories. I don't know, and I really

0:47:48.400 --> 0:47:52.040
<v Speaker 1>disagree with you about people don't know the names. Look

0:47:52.080 --> 0:47:55.160
<v Speaker 1>at Maggie Haberman, somebody ten times more famous than me, right,

0:47:55.200 --> 0:47:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that has a cable news contract. That's an audience of

0:47:58.680 --> 0:48:01.760
<v Speaker 1>one point seven million On Twitter I mean I'm nowhere

0:48:02.320 --> 0:48:04.759
<v Speaker 1>near that big or you know, there's also amazing people

0:48:04.800 --> 0:48:07.080
<v Speaker 1>at the Times that I always looked up to, like

0:48:07.280 --> 0:48:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the critics. I mean, look at someone like John Kara Monica,

0:48:10.120 --> 0:48:13.560
<v Speaker 1>absolute legend in the pop you know, industry, and kind

0:48:13.560 --> 0:48:16.120
<v Speaker 1>of like coverage in New York and um, I mean,

0:48:16.120 --> 0:48:18.719
<v Speaker 1>there's just so many famous journalists at the Times. I

0:48:18.760 --> 0:48:22.680
<v Speaker 1>think the problem with The Times, or my my feelings

0:48:22.719 --> 0:48:24.560
<v Speaker 1>about The Times is that you can't you don't have

0:48:24.600 --> 0:48:27.440
<v Speaker 1>as much ownership, right, Like, it's a big place, and

0:48:27.480 --> 0:48:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I loved I mean, I loved working there, and I

0:48:30.440 --> 0:48:34.799
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I would work there still if if

0:48:34.880 --> 0:48:37.719
<v Speaker 1>I could have more of my own thing. Like, I

0:48:37.760 --> 0:48:40.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's a great place when you're learning stuff and

0:48:40.080 --> 0:48:41.759
<v Speaker 1>you're starting out and if you don't mind being in

0:48:41.800 --> 0:48:44.840
<v Speaker 1>service to the Times brand. But it's never you know,

0:48:44.840 --> 0:48:48.640
<v Speaker 1>it was never my I never aspired to work at

0:48:48.640 --> 0:48:51.480
<v Speaker 1>any of these legacy places at all. Um. And so

0:48:51.520 --> 0:48:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I think for me, I just you know, I'm not

0:48:54.000 --> 0:48:58.319
<v Speaker 1>just gonna take a paltry salary for way less money

0:48:58.360 --> 0:49:00.719
<v Speaker 1>than I could make and not own anything and not

0:49:00.760 --> 0:49:03.400
<v Speaker 1>be able to do any outside projects just to say

0:49:03.400 --> 0:49:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that I work at the New York Times. I don't

0:49:05.440 --> 0:49:08.600
<v Speaker 1>care about that. I don't think brands like that, um,

0:49:08.640 --> 0:49:12.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, to me matter so UM. While I love

0:49:12.320 --> 0:49:14.439
<v Speaker 1>the Times and I'm such a fan, I will remain

0:49:14.480 --> 0:49:16.680
<v Speaker 1>a subscriber for life. I love my friends there, and

0:49:16.719 --> 0:49:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I love my old editor. I would die for her. Um.

0:49:19.719 --> 0:49:23.520
<v Speaker 1>But you know, for me, it's just not where I

0:49:23.640 --> 0:49:27.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, I want wanted to kind of spend spend

0:49:27.440 --> 0:49:30.080
<v Speaker 1>my time, like I thought. I wanted to do work

0:49:30.120 --> 0:49:32.279
<v Speaker 1>somewhere where I could do more of my own UM

0:49:33.040 --> 0:49:36.040
<v Speaker 1>projects and have things that I kind of can manage

0:49:36.040 --> 0:49:37.719
<v Speaker 1>and control a little bit. And again that's just not

0:49:37.800 --> 0:49:39.560
<v Speaker 1>a knock at the Times, because I think that The

0:49:39.640 --> 0:49:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Times is amazing in terms of the resources that they have. UM.

0:49:43.400 --> 0:49:47.239
<v Speaker 1>And I'm you know, I still work with them on

0:49:47.320 --> 0:49:49.520
<v Speaker 1>things if I need to, you know, like I would.

0:49:49.600 --> 0:49:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not against them at all, but but I just

0:49:52.480 --> 0:49:56.160
<v Speaker 1>think for someone like me, it's not it's like I wanted.

0:49:56.239 --> 0:49:59.319
<v Speaker 1>I wanted more basically, Okay, but you know, I don't

0:49:59.360 --> 0:50:02.759
<v Speaker 1>want to h hammer at this point because once it's

0:50:02.840 --> 0:50:05.720
<v Speaker 1>very funny because people are so obsessed with the Times.

0:50:05.760 --> 0:50:07.799
<v Speaker 1>It's like, why didn't they ask me why I left

0:50:07.840 --> 0:50:10.120
<v Speaker 1>The Atlantic? Like why wait wait, wait, wait, wait wait,

0:50:10.719 --> 0:50:12.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going there. I was going somewhere to get

0:50:15.160 --> 0:50:20.400
<v Speaker 1>people do know who Maggie Haberman is, But many many

0:50:21.280 --> 0:50:23.880
<v Speaker 1>more people know who you are than any of the

0:50:23.920 --> 0:50:26.760
<v Speaker 1>pop critics, any of the movie critics at the Times.

0:50:27.680 --> 0:50:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I think, I will tell you I don't want to

0:50:32.040 --> 0:50:36.000
<v Speaker 1>go if you're I'm in the music business. Pop critics

0:50:36.000 --> 0:50:38.000
<v Speaker 1>in the New York Times, other than the publicity people

0:50:38.040 --> 0:50:41.720
<v Speaker 1>who want to get stories placed they were, they're meaningless

0:50:41.880 --> 0:50:46.719
<v Speaker 1>because wait, wait, this gets into a bigger thing. I mean, uh,

0:50:47.239 --> 0:50:48.839
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know if it's relevant to what we're

0:50:48.880 --> 0:50:51.240
<v Speaker 1>going on now. But as I say, looking from outside

0:50:51.280 --> 0:50:53.400
<v Speaker 1>of the bubble, this is one of the problems I

0:50:53.440 --> 0:50:55.640
<v Speaker 1>have with the News Business Center. It doesn't quite get

0:50:56.200 --> 0:50:59.120
<v Speaker 1>what's going on. I mean, it used to be a

0:50:59.120 --> 0:51:02.640
<v Speaker 1>critic could make or breakup, movie record whatever. That doesn't

0:51:02.680 --> 0:51:07.880
<v Speaker 1>even happen anymore. So they're working for the Times. Okay,

0:51:07.880 --> 0:51:11.239
<v Speaker 1>This guy pop critic at the Times. He wrote a

0:51:11.440 --> 0:51:18.120
<v Speaker 1>phenomenal book about Atlanta and hip Joe Cocarell, one of

0:51:18.120 --> 0:51:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the best in the business. Yea the video. The last

0:51:22.719 --> 0:51:26.960
<v Speaker 1>time I checked, his book had not had a single

0:51:27.040 --> 0:51:29.680
<v Speaker 1>review on Amazon. Over a month after it came out.

0:51:30.880 --> 0:51:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about Amazon reviews, but Joe, no, no, no, no,

0:51:34.840 --> 0:51:39.279
<v Speaker 1>this is just relative to impact, and I don't want

0:51:39.280 --> 0:51:41.520
<v Speaker 1>to This is not the most important story. But I

0:51:41.600 --> 0:51:44.799
<v Speaker 1>guarantee you if I went on Twitter right now and

0:51:44.840 --> 0:51:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I looked at Kara Monica's Twitter count follower account compared

0:51:49.280 --> 0:51:52.439
<v Speaker 1>to yours, it would be a small fraction. Well, yeah,

0:51:52.480 --> 0:51:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I've developed a huge audience on I started as an

0:51:55.680 --> 0:52:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Internet person. Yeah, but my point was people were traditional reporters. Okay,

0:52:07.760 --> 0:52:10.799
<v Speaker 1>they're jealous of that, of course they are. Of course

0:52:10.800 --> 0:52:12.840
<v Speaker 1>they're jealous of me. This has been my whole career.

0:52:13.680 --> 0:52:15.560
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know what to say other than I

0:52:15.640 --> 0:52:19.880
<v Speaker 1>am an extremely inclusive person. Ask anyone that I've ever

0:52:19.960 --> 0:52:22.359
<v Speaker 1>worked with. I mean, people at the Times will tell

0:52:22.400 --> 0:52:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you how much I go out of my way to

0:52:25.080 --> 0:52:30.759
<v Speaker 1>help people. I don't care about credit. I will time out.

0:52:31.160 --> 0:52:34.640
<v Speaker 1>The reason I brought this up was not to criticize you,

0:52:35.800 --> 0:52:40.080
<v Speaker 1>was to talk about the other people. Okay, that they're

0:52:40.160 --> 0:52:43.480
<v Speaker 1>stuck in a past paradigm. They worked for the Gray Lady.

0:52:44.000 --> 0:52:46.560
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to step out where you're living in there.

0:52:46.680 --> 0:52:49.080
<v Speaker 1>They shouldn't buy into that. They shouldn't buy into that.

0:52:49.200 --> 0:52:51.239
<v Speaker 1>I I tell this to young journalists all the time.

0:52:51.320 --> 0:52:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Don't buy into that. Don't then you are in service

0:52:54.080 --> 0:52:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of some big company. And one of these big companies

0:52:58.160 --> 0:53:00.879
<v Speaker 1>I graduated into the recession, and and the two thousand

0:53:00.960 --> 0:53:03.960
<v Speaker 1>eight recession was one of the really formative events of

0:53:04.000 --> 0:53:07.080
<v Speaker 1>my life. And the biggest thing I learned from that

0:53:07.280 --> 0:53:10.640
<v Speaker 1>it was companies will never have loyalty to you. They

0:53:10.640 --> 0:53:13.040
<v Speaker 1>will literally lay you off tomorrow if it's in their

0:53:13.080 --> 0:53:16.480
<v Speaker 1>best interests. Serving some news company for thirty years of

0:53:16.520 --> 0:53:19.279
<v Speaker 1>your life is not gonna you know, you can be

0:53:19.360 --> 0:53:22.160
<v Speaker 1>laid off. Look, this just happens literally on a weekly

0:53:22.200 --> 0:53:25.120
<v Speaker 1>basis in the media industry. And so I think when

0:53:25.120 --> 0:53:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I started out, and as I've built my career just

0:53:27.480 --> 0:53:31.880
<v Speaker 1>coming up, I never want to I don't view working

0:53:31.920 --> 0:53:35.120
<v Speaker 1>at a big place as stability, and certainly not a

0:53:35.120 --> 0:53:38.960
<v Speaker 1>big place where their brand is kind of everything is

0:53:38.960 --> 0:53:40.960
<v Speaker 1>in service of this brand and you have no control

0:53:40.960 --> 0:53:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and no ownership, and you are nothing, and you basically

0:53:42.960 --> 0:53:46.239
<v Speaker 1>are there to serve a big brand. I I just

0:53:46.480 --> 0:53:49.440
<v Speaker 1>that for me, I don't trust that. I don't trust that.

0:53:49.520 --> 0:53:51.239
<v Speaker 1>I think that is not going to lead to long

0:53:51.320 --> 0:53:53.000
<v Speaker 1>term stability. That's not to say that I wouldn't love

0:53:53.040 --> 0:53:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to work certain place, and I had a wonderful time

0:53:55.080 --> 0:54:00.240
<v Speaker 1>working there, But I just think, I I don't I

0:54:00.239 --> 0:54:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I'd never I always want to hedge. I don't trust

0:54:03.920 --> 0:54:07.400
<v Speaker 1>companies to ever have my best interest at heart, because

0:54:07.400 --> 0:54:09.239
<v Speaker 1>no company will have your best interests at heart. They're

0:54:09.280 --> 0:54:11.160
<v Speaker 1>there to make money at the end of the day.

0:54:11.280 --> 0:54:16.719
<v Speaker 1>And so I just, you know, personally, that's just I

0:54:16.719 --> 0:54:18.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know, that's just my feeling a lot of amazing,

0:54:20.800 --> 0:54:22.920
<v Speaker 1>you know. I think you've made that point well, but

0:54:23.040 --> 0:54:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to make a point in addition to that,

0:54:26.320 --> 0:54:30.839
<v Speaker 1>if something is going on in Ukraine, okay, or there's

0:54:30.880 --> 0:54:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a national or international crisis, no one covers it as

0:54:36.239 --> 0:54:39.840
<v Speaker 1>well as the major media outlets. I'm talking about print

0:54:39.880 --> 0:54:46.880
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to cable news. So that's a layer of stories, okay.

0:54:46.920 --> 0:54:49.799
<v Speaker 1>But I I remember the New Yorker, which is revered

0:54:49.840 --> 0:54:55.240
<v Speaker 1>amongst the intelligentsia, did a linked the story on ticketing,

0:54:56.360 --> 0:54:58.360
<v Speaker 1>and I talked to one of the key players in

0:54:58.360 --> 0:55:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the business and they say, what do you think of

0:55:00.440 --> 0:55:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the article? Is tell me something I don't know, you know,

0:55:03.600 --> 0:55:07.640
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing in there whatever, And what I find online

0:55:07.920 --> 0:55:13.120
<v Speaker 1>is there is an expert, an absolute expert, in every vertical.

0:55:13.960 --> 0:55:18.040
<v Speaker 1>This person is not working for traditional media, but they're findable. Now.

0:55:18.400 --> 0:55:20.160
<v Speaker 1>One of the reasons I have you on the podcast

0:55:20.280 --> 0:55:23.239
<v Speaker 1>is from my viewpoint, you're the number one expert that

0:55:23.360 --> 0:55:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I have found on social media. You happen to work

0:55:27.520 --> 0:55:30.040
<v Speaker 1>from major news outlet at this particular point in time,

0:55:30.320 --> 0:55:34.360
<v Speaker 1>but all these other people don't. So therefore, if you

0:55:34.400 --> 0:55:37.960
<v Speaker 1>want to get the heartbeat of not only America but

0:55:38.040 --> 0:55:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the world, it happens on line. And therefore you have

0:55:43.800 --> 0:55:48.839
<v Speaker 1>the older generation who pooh poos TikTok. Most people are

0:55:48.880 --> 0:55:52.520
<v Speaker 1>not on Twitter because they're narcissistic. They want to make

0:55:52.560 --> 0:55:56.200
<v Speaker 1>it about them, and unless you are a player in

0:55:56.200 --> 0:55:58.319
<v Speaker 1>the news business or famous for some other reason, it

0:55:58.360 --> 0:56:01.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work and it's not as simple in their minds

0:56:01.560 --> 0:56:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to use. Okay, So assessing what's going on is an

0:56:07.040 --> 0:56:12.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing. But I was driving somewhere different, which is

0:56:12.440 --> 0:56:20.360
<v Speaker 1>you are participating online every day, okay, And the question

0:56:20.480 --> 0:56:23.440
<v Speaker 1>becomes and listen, I'll say the same thing about me.

0:56:23.480 --> 0:56:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to say you're unique. To what degree

0:56:26.080 --> 0:56:29.239
<v Speaker 1>do you need the attention? Do you need the hit

0:56:29.320 --> 0:56:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of interaction? And to what degree does that drive your activity?

0:56:33.600 --> 0:56:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Bob I have I am a user. Do you know

0:56:36.200 --> 0:56:41.120
<v Speaker 1>how irresponsible it would be to go and write authoritatively

0:56:41.280 --> 0:56:44.399
<v Speaker 1>about these platforms when I'm not a user. I mean,

0:56:44.760 --> 0:56:47.720
<v Speaker 1>look at the stories that I have gotten. You don't

0:56:47.800 --> 0:56:50.759
<v Speaker 1>get those stories. Guys sitting on the sidelines and never

0:56:50.880 --> 0:56:53.240
<v Speaker 1>using the products that you're writing about. That's like asking

0:56:53.719 --> 0:56:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a you know, somebody that that does reviews of laptops

0:56:56.920 --> 0:56:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to never touch a computer. You have to use these

0:56:59.560 --> 0:57:01.600
<v Speaker 1>technolog jees and you have to really understand them, and

0:57:01.600 --> 0:57:04.680
<v Speaker 1>you have to understand the dynamics of them. What is

0:57:04.680 --> 0:57:07.280
<v Speaker 1>it like to be docked and and you know, receive

0:57:07.360 --> 0:57:09.160
<v Speaker 1>mass amount of rassman campaign? What does it like to

0:57:09.200 --> 0:57:11.600
<v Speaker 1>say the wrong thing on TikTok and have a zillion

0:57:11.680 --> 0:57:14.160
<v Speaker 1>stitches about you? These are things that I can cover

0:57:14.560 --> 0:57:18.760
<v Speaker 1>because I understand them so innately because I used the Internet,

0:57:19.000 --> 0:57:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and I understand that to a lot of people, they

0:57:21.800 --> 0:57:23.960
<v Speaker 1>don't like a reporter that uses the Internet. I mean,

0:57:24.000 --> 0:57:26.520
<v Speaker 1>this has been my entire career, and by the way,

0:57:26.560 --> 0:57:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I started as an Internet personality. I didn't start as

0:57:29.680 --> 0:57:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a journalist. I started as a person that got followers.

0:57:33.240 --> 0:57:37.400
<v Speaker 1>For most of my career, I've ran social right like I.

0:57:37.400 --> 0:57:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I have been in this since the beginning. And the

0:57:40.080 --> 0:57:43.040
<v Speaker 1>reason that I'm so good at reporting on it is

0:57:43.040 --> 0:57:45.720
<v Speaker 1>because I'm a user. And that is how you have

0:57:45.840 --> 0:57:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to be, as they say, close to the machine. That

0:57:48.000 --> 0:57:52.040
<v Speaker 1>is how you do good tech reporting. It's very irresponsible

0:57:52.360 --> 0:57:57.440
<v Speaker 1>to not participate and to not you know, not use TikTok,

0:57:57.520 --> 0:57:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to not whatever, and then report on it. I mean,

0:57:59.640 --> 0:58:01.120
<v Speaker 1>And that's how to say. And I say that because

0:58:01.120 --> 0:58:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I report on tech from user perspective. I was just

0:58:03.720 --> 0:58:05.680
<v Speaker 1>a business reporter and I was just reporting on what

0:58:05.720 --> 0:58:08.680
<v Speaker 1>happens in these companies. Sure, you know you don't have

0:58:08.720 --> 0:58:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to use it as much, but I think if you

0:58:11.600 --> 0:58:14.880
<v Speaker 1>are reporting on culture and Internet culture of course, also

0:58:14.960 --> 0:58:17.840
<v Speaker 1>just basic source building. I mean, the way to build

0:58:17.880 --> 0:58:21.560
<v Speaker 1>sources is to stay and stay in people's minds. And

0:58:21.680 --> 0:58:25.560
<v Speaker 1>if you just sort of disappear into the ether, you're

0:58:25.560 --> 0:58:27.600
<v Speaker 1>not going to get those stories. I mean, all of

0:58:27.640 --> 0:58:30.840
<v Speaker 1>my best scoops I've gotten from posting on the internet

0:58:30.880 --> 0:58:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and said, like I mean the TikTok one, for instance,

0:58:33.000 --> 0:58:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the targeted victory one. I'll just use that as an

0:58:34.760 --> 0:58:38.240
<v Speaker 1>example of one. Earlier this year, I quote tweeted when

0:58:38.600 --> 0:58:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Blumenthal said something about a made up TikTok challenge, and

0:58:41.000 --> 0:58:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I quote tweeted it and I was like, this is crazy,

0:58:43.080 --> 0:58:45.280
<v Speaker 1>this TikTok. This is not a TikTok challenge, and this

0:58:45.360 --> 0:58:47.360
<v Speaker 1>is made up by YouTube. Why is it that we

0:58:47.440 --> 0:58:50.120
<v Speaker 1>see all of this stuff in local media? Suddenly guess what,

0:58:50.240 --> 0:58:52.600
<v Speaker 1>my source saw that tweet and leaked me all the documents.

0:58:52.600 --> 0:58:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I got that amazing scoop. If you don't that, that's

0:58:55.560 --> 0:58:57.760
<v Speaker 1>just the nature of internet culture reporting. Everyone else on

0:58:57.800 --> 0:58:59.920
<v Speaker 1>my beat, by the way, is hype is the same one,

0:59:00.320 --> 0:59:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the exact same way. They just don't have the big following.

0:59:02.640 --> 0:59:04.439
<v Speaker 1>And I'm the oldest on the beat, and so whatever

0:59:04.480 --> 0:59:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I get where, I get what I get. But um,

0:59:07.480 --> 0:59:09.480
<v Speaker 1>but I mean, this is what we're covering. This is

0:59:09.520 --> 0:59:11.920
<v Speaker 1>our beat. It's like trying to cover culture and sitting

0:59:12.120 --> 0:59:13.720
<v Speaker 1>in your house all day and never going to a

0:59:13.760 --> 0:59:15.960
<v Speaker 1>concert or never watching a TV show. How are you

0:59:15.960 --> 0:59:17.840
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be a cultural critic if you don't participate

0:59:18.200 --> 0:59:21.919
<v Speaker 1>or consume? Well, put, but let's go back to something

0:59:21.960 --> 0:59:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you said a few minutes ago. You said, how you

0:59:24.600 --> 0:59:29.600
<v Speaker 1>use these platforms, And one way you use these platforms

0:59:29.680 --> 0:59:33.960
<v Speaker 1>is to amplify your story. None. You know, let's not

0:59:34.000 --> 0:59:36.960
<v Speaker 1>pointing gasoline on this. Let's just look at it calmly.

0:59:37.800 --> 0:59:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Does that work. I'm a writer also, I do I

0:59:41.480 --> 0:59:44.760
<v Speaker 1>do not. I do not hype my stories. I'm a

0:59:44.880 --> 0:59:48.160
<v Speaker 1>unique thing. It's not like I'm writing every day. But

0:59:48.480 --> 0:59:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I find which is not your issue. It turns off

0:59:51.120 --> 0:59:53.000
<v Speaker 1>people already read it. But if there's going to be

0:59:53.080 --> 0:59:56.040
<v Speaker 1>a virality, that's in the hands of the people who

0:59:56.040 --> 0:59:58.840
<v Speaker 1>writ no, no, no, no, no no no. I worked

0:59:58.840 --> 1:00:03.280
<v Speaker 1>in audience development, Bob. My job was audience development. The

1:00:03.360 --> 1:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>people who say, oh, I don't promote my own work,

1:00:06.680 --> 1:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>they're relying on the institution to promote their work. You know,

1:00:11.040 --> 1:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>you don't just publish things and have a built in

1:00:13.520 --> 1:00:16.040
<v Speaker 1>audience on the Internet. You need to reach people. And

1:00:16.080 --> 1:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the way to reach people is to put the content

1:00:19.600 --> 1:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>in front of them in a way they can consume. Right.

1:00:21.920 --> 1:00:24.439
<v Speaker 1>If I do a story, I don't just tweet it out.

1:00:24.440 --> 1:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I make a TikTok about it, I post about it

1:00:26.360 --> 1:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>on Instagram, I send it out, is an email alert

1:00:28.920 --> 1:00:32.160
<v Speaker 1>sometimes in my newsletter. All of these things are letting

1:00:32.320 --> 1:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the audience that cares about my work. No, Hey, there's

1:00:36.040 --> 1:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>this new story out just the way that the New

1:00:38.120 --> 1:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>York Times or the Washington Post would tweet a story

1:00:40.760 --> 1:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>out or whatever. I just don't rely on my employer

1:00:43.800 --> 1:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>to do any of that because I used to do

1:00:45.760 --> 1:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I used to have that job, right, I used to

1:00:47.520 --> 1:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>run social media for all of these big media companies,

1:00:50.280 --> 1:00:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and I know how much work goes into promoting people's stories,

1:00:52.720 --> 1:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and what a difference it makes when a reporter report

1:00:55.080 --> 1:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>promotes their own story. I mean, that's the goal. I

1:00:57.160 --> 1:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>wish we could get reporters to kind of do that,

1:01:00.160 --> 1:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>but they, of course don't generally feel like that's part

1:01:02.040 --> 1:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>of their job. And that's fine for me. I think, Um,

1:01:05.200 --> 1:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't just want to either, Like I also don't

1:01:07.320 --> 1:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>just want to promote my story, but I want to

1:01:08.880 --> 1:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>open a conversation about it. You mentioned comments. Comments are

1:01:12.600 --> 1:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>great for people that are subscribers or that you know,

1:01:15.320 --> 1:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>might have an account with the Washington Post, but it's

1:01:17.240 --> 1:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>not great to hear from the public. And I want

1:01:19.000 --> 1:01:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to hear from the public. I want my stories to

1:01:21.120 --> 1:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>generate conversation. I want to say, hey, look, I found

1:01:24.640 --> 1:01:26.840
<v Speaker 1>this information out. I'm putting this into the world. Let's

1:01:26.880 --> 1:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>discuss it. Do you have questions? Do you have thoughts,

1:01:30.440 --> 1:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>what you know? What what does this mean? And how

1:01:32.880 --> 1:01:34.959
<v Speaker 1>can we kind of further the conversation. Those are things

1:01:34.960 --> 1:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>that that are relevant and that inform future stories. I

1:01:37.920 --> 1:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>want that kind of feedback, and I want that relationship

1:01:40.920 --> 1:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>with my audience and the public so that I'm accountable.

1:01:45.120 --> 1:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>A lot of journalists go off into their you know,

1:01:47.520 --> 1:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Ivory tower, and then they you know, they say, oh,

1:01:50.480 --> 1:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and here's a story from me. I've come down and

1:01:52.680 --> 1:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>here's here's my story. No, I want to be in

1:01:55.760 --> 1:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the mix with everyone, with the public saying, hey, look

1:01:58.640 --> 1:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>this is what I found out, here's my story. What

1:02:00.480 --> 1:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>do you guys think? What questions do you have that

1:02:02.880 --> 1:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I can answer? What did I What could I do

1:02:04.480 --> 1:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>better for next time? Oh? That stuff is really important

1:02:07.720 --> 1:02:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to me. Okay, I think that's well articulated. Let me

1:02:11.560 --> 1:02:15.360
<v Speaker 1>shift the gears a little bit to clubhouse two sides.

1:02:18.240 --> 1:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's say, how come the medium anybody who followed tech

1:02:23.320 --> 1:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>history and was I knew this was a non starter

1:02:26.920 --> 1:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>from day one? Okay, how come everybody missed it and

1:02:32.800 --> 1:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>also talk about it? It's not quite as an inception,

1:02:36.640 --> 1:02:39.920
<v Speaker 1>But not long thereafter when it was still private, my

1:02:40.080 --> 1:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>ear quotes you got into a people attacked you tell

1:02:44.320 --> 1:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>us about that? Oh god, well, people attacked me all

1:02:47.040 --> 1:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>day on the internet. Um. Clubhouse, Yeah, I mean Clubhouse

1:02:50.920 --> 1:02:53.920
<v Speaker 1>was interesting. I will give them credit, Bob, even though

1:02:53.960 --> 1:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you're right that the platform was very doomed I think

1:02:56.280 --> 1:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>by intentional choices made by the VC firm that invested them. Um,

1:03:02.320 --> 1:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say that. You know what what it did

1:03:04.480 --> 1:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>is something that Snapchat did too, which is pioneer a

1:03:06.760 --> 1:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>new format. And I think you have to give Clubhouse

1:03:09.320 --> 1:03:13.080
<v Speaker 1>credit for that. Short form audio. Short form live audio

1:03:13.320 --> 1:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>was not a thing, right Twitter, Twitter Spaces would never

1:03:16.160 --> 1:03:18.920
<v Speaker 1>have existed if it wasn't for Clubhouse. I know, Spotify

1:03:19.000 --> 1:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>as green Room. There's all of these new sort of

1:03:21.760 --> 1:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>short audio products and features now in other other products

1:03:26.240 --> 1:03:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that we wouldn't have if there was no Clubhouse. So

1:03:29.320 --> 1:03:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I think you you really do have to give Clubhouse

1:03:32.400 --> 1:03:37.600
<v Speaker 1>credit for introducing that new sort of short form audio

1:03:37.720 --> 1:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>format just to stay with it. Short form. But what

1:03:41.360 --> 1:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>broke Clubhouse was long form? Yeah. Well, I think what

1:03:45.080 --> 1:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I actually descred what what broke Clubhouse was the way

1:03:49.000 --> 1:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>that they managed the app. I mean, I think they

1:03:50.920 --> 1:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>scaled without any protections for harassment and abuse, and it

1:03:54.600 --> 1:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>became very toxic and very overrun with spam. A lot

1:03:57.680 --> 1:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>of people say, oh, we don't want you know, this

1:03:59.320 --> 1:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>is Elon's favor thing. Oh we don't want any moderation.

1:04:02.000 --> 1:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>You know what makes people want moderation spam, And that

1:04:04.880 --> 1:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>is what happened with Clubhouse. It was overrun with these

1:04:07.720 --> 1:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>like scam rooms. And then also I think UM discovery

1:04:13.320 --> 1:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>was fundamentally broken. We're talking about discovery on TikTok right,

1:04:16.120 --> 1:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Like TikTok has this amazing ability to surface content that's

1:04:19.440 --> 1:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>interesting to you and follow, you know, encourage you to follow,

1:04:22.680 --> 1:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>an engage with people that are interesting. Clubhouse never nailed discovery.

1:04:26.600 --> 1:04:28.360
<v Speaker 1>It was way too late that they rolled out that,

1:04:28.400 --> 1:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>like algorithmic feed, at that point people had lost I

1:04:30.680 --> 1:04:33.280
<v Speaker 1>think they've benefited hugely from the early days of pandemic

1:04:33.280 --> 1:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>when everyone was caught in UM. But the main suggested

1:04:37.200 --> 1:04:39.280
<v Speaker 1>user list on that app had a bunch of and

1:04:39.360 --> 1:04:42.160
<v Speaker 1>recent Horwitz partners on it. I'll never forget this is

1:04:42.200 --> 1:04:44.840
<v Speaker 1>in my book, being at this TikTok house in Atlanta

1:04:44.920 --> 1:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>with a bunch of teenage you know, TikTokers in Atlanta,

1:04:48.560 --> 1:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and they're talking about Clubhouse and one of them is like,

1:04:50.240 --> 1:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, I love Clubhouse. You just have to follow

1:04:52.280 --> 1:04:54.600
<v Speaker 1>all these really old, weird white guy guys first to

1:04:54.640 --> 1:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>get onto the app. And I was like, show that

1:04:56.200 --> 1:04:58.360
<v Speaker 1>to me. What are you talking about. They're talking about

1:04:58.640 --> 1:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>being forced to follow work and recent to get onto

1:05:01.520 --> 1:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the app. That's very bad user experience. You should. I

1:05:06.840 --> 1:05:11.360
<v Speaker 1>think that in the case of Clubhouse, the investors, primary investors,

1:05:11.440 --> 1:05:14.280
<v Speaker 1>use that app to boost their own influence, which they

1:05:14.280 --> 1:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>continue to try and do over and over again because

1:05:16.320 --> 1:05:19.040
<v Speaker 1>they're so desperate to be influencers these days, um to

1:05:19.120 --> 1:05:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the detriment of discovery, and I think that they that

1:05:22.160 --> 1:05:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and then the crazy number of push alerts that they

1:05:24.320 --> 1:05:26.360
<v Speaker 1>would send. I just think that they burned the user

1:05:26.360 --> 1:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>base out. Users couldn't find interesting stuff, and then kind

1:05:29.640 --> 1:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>of like what happened to Snapchat once Instagram Stories rolled out,

1:05:33.000 --> 1:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>once Twitter spaces rolled out, once we had these competing products,

1:05:35.800 --> 1:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it just wasn't you know, people didn't need to go

1:05:39.240 --> 1:05:48.840
<v Speaker 1>to a specific app. Let's go back a step to

1:05:49.040 --> 1:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>heat hate in general. You know, I get hate every day.

1:05:53.240 --> 1:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I remember, you know, I remember this was about eight

1:05:56.200 --> 1:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Tina Fey wanted to won some award and

1:05:59.520 --> 1:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>she stood on stage and called out one of our haters.

1:06:01.920 --> 1:06:03.840
<v Speaker 1>You have someone that no one would know other than

1:06:05.120 --> 1:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>so that there's an incredible number of people were afraid

1:06:09.480 --> 1:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to play because of the hate. How do you cope

1:06:12.520 --> 1:06:15.160
<v Speaker 1>with the hate? Well, I mean I don't. What I

1:06:15.240 --> 1:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>experience is not just hate, right, I have for three

1:06:19.160 --> 1:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>years now been the target of a very coordinated smear

1:06:23.120 --> 1:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>campaign by um, you know, far right actors that are

1:06:27.400 --> 1:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that are politically motivated, that are very anti media. So, um,

1:06:31.960 --> 1:06:33.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's not just hate. I don't care about hate.

1:06:33.880 --> 1:06:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I cover YouTubers for a living, Bob, So if I

1:06:36.280 --> 1:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>cared about hate, I wouldn't you know, be in this

1:06:39.160 --> 1:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>in this beat different question. Lett's separate this out before you.

1:06:43.480 --> 1:06:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's just talk about average social media hate is supposed

1:06:45.840 --> 1:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to coordinate that you're talking about my hate? Okay, well

1:06:48.800 --> 1:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>does it? No? No? Does it literally just roll off

1:06:52.200 --> 1:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>your back? At this point? I think in most of

1:06:56.840 --> 1:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>it does because I have the last few years have

1:07:01.520 --> 1:07:09.160
<v Speaker 1>been so crazy, so crazy, I mean, so out of

1:07:09.200 --> 1:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>control experiences that I never thought I would have crazy,

1:07:12.960 --> 1:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>um that I think at this point, I'm I'm very

1:07:15.600 --> 1:07:18.280
<v Speaker 1>desensitized to it. But I also it's it's I mean,

1:07:18.320 --> 1:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>it's completely changed how I operated on the internet because

1:07:23.240 --> 1:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>because because of the backlash that I get. So tell

1:07:27.200 --> 1:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>tell me how you've changed. I mean, I just I'm

1:07:29.200 --> 1:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm extremely privacy oriented and like there's a reason that

1:07:33.720 --> 1:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you never see me post anything about my life, who

1:07:36.920 --> 1:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm friends with, I'm not. I'm not sharing any kind

1:07:40.480 --> 1:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>of details. People don't know anything about me because I

1:07:42.880 --> 1:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>don't want them to know anything about me, because I

1:07:44.840 --> 1:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>am intentionally private about that. When I'm on the Internet.

1:07:48.360 --> 1:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm on the Internet for fun and to connect for sure,

1:07:51.800 --> 1:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not you know, I'm just a lot more

1:07:54.160 --> 1:07:58.680
<v Speaker 1>private about you know, any kind of personal aspect of

1:07:58.720 --> 1:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>my life. Um in a that I so that works

1:08:02.640 --> 1:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>for something, But for either the weirdos or the people

1:08:09.680 --> 1:08:12.480
<v Speaker 1>who are out to get you, we know, everybody is

1:08:12.560 --> 1:08:16.519
<v Speaker 1>findable amation Oh yes, I mean I've been docs a

1:08:16.560 --> 1:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>million times over, as have my friends and family members.

1:08:20.479 --> 1:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>So let's segue back to the right wing campaign and

1:08:24.320 --> 1:08:26.439
<v Speaker 1>mix it all together. Tell me more about the right

1:08:26.439 --> 1:08:31.559
<v Speaker 1>wing campaign and to what degree you are fearful. Yeah, well,

1:08:31.600 --> 1:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean I've had very credible physical interactions, so I

1:08:36.320 --> 1:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>am very fearful of these people. I mean, these people

1:08:38.280 --> 1:08:43.080
<v Speaker 1>do not stay online. Unfortunately, they become radicalized and they

1:08:43.120 --> 1:08:47.320
<v Speaker 1>will try and physically harm you. Um. But what they

1:08:47.640 --> 1:08:50.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, what they succeed at most is reputational harm.

1:08:50.080 --> 1:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>And I've written many, many, many stories about this to

1:08:53.040 --> 1:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>try and help people understand. Um. But you know, a

1:08:57.280 --> 1:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago, he Booth began to sort of

1:09:00.960 --> 1:09:04.439
<v Speaker 1>fixate on me as this figure and this avatar for

1:09:04.960 --> 1:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>everything that they didn't like about you know, traditional media

1:09:08.280 --> 1:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>or which is very ironic because I'm the least traditional

1:09:10.360 --> 1:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>media person or the tech industry or whatever, um And

1:09:15.280 --> 1:09:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and they kind of just started using me as this

1:09:18.320 --> 1:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>like stand in right for like the liberal media or

1:09:21.960 --> 1:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>whatever they don't like that day. Much of it is

1:09:24.680 --> 1:09:26.560
<v Speaker 1>rooted in misogyny. I mean, if you look at the

1:09:26.600 --> 1:09:29.559
<v Speaker 1>attacks against me, it is the vast majority are just

1:09:29.680 --> 1:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>deeply misogynistic. And I think a lot of women tech

1:09:32.840 --> 1:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>reporters specifically get this. A lot of my friends went

1:09:35.720 --> 1:09:38.720
<v Speaker 1>through gamer Gate. UM. I don't know how familiar audiences

1:09:38.760 --> 1:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>with gamer Gate, but it was this hate campaign against women,

1:09:42.240 --> 1:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>um tech and gaming journalists and sort of against diversity

1:09:46.280 --> 1:09:48.680
<v Speaker 1>in games coverage in general. In the first half of

1:09:48.680 --> 1:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the ten UM spent almost ten years actually since gamer Gate,

1:09:52.120 --> 1:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think that the broader public still does not

1:09:54.960 --> 1:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>understand how these things work, and so they see things

1:09:58.240 --> 1:10:01.080
<v Speaker 1>like Tucker you know, ranting at me or Fox News

1:10:01.080 --> 1:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>doing these daily stories about me, and they think, Wow,

1:10:03.160 --> 1:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>she's controversial. They never actually dig into it and realize that, like,

1:10:08.240 --> 1:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>most of this is bullshit. I mean, have I like

1:10:10.520 --> 1:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>done stupid things of the pasture. I'm trying to think

1:10:12.920 --> 1:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of what I've done. I don't know. I think I've

1:10:14.000 --> 1:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>said I hate America and some stuff like that, maybe

1:10:16.960 --> 1:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>once or twice, but like, UM, you know, most of

1:10:20.240 --> 1:10:23.720
<v Speaker 1>it's just manufactured outrage and UM putting words in my

1:10:23.760 --> 1:10:27.320
<v Speaker 1>mouth or misrepresenting me. And I think, UM, that has

1:10:27.320 --> 1:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>been really hard to deal with, and it's really hard

1:10:28.920 --> 1:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>to deal with. It's really the only people that get

1:10:31.439 --> 1:10:34.559
<v Speaker 1>it are celebrities. Like I've found that the only people

1:10:34.560 --> 1:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>that I feel like I can talk to who really

1:10:36.960 --> 1:10:41.679
<v Speaker 1>understand seeing this image of themselves projected back to them

1:10:41.720 --> 1:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>through the media that's just so off base with how

1:10:44.200 --> 1:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>they really are, what really happened, or are famous people

1:10:46.920 --> 1:10:50.840
<v Speaker 1>that they deal with it every day. UM, And I

1:10:50.880 --> 1:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>don't consider myself as celebrities. So I think it's hard,

1:10:53.240 --> 1:10:54.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's hard to kind of deal with that.

1:10:55.000 --> 1:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not some a less movie star with a pr team.

1:10:58.320 --> 1:11:02.320
<v Speaker 1>It's it's just me. And oh it's hard, and it's

1:11:02.360 --> 1:11:04.519
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard. This stuff with my family is really hard.

1:11:04.560 --> 1:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, having people, um, you know, chow up to

1:11:08.640 --> 1:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>my parents house and swapped my parents and and attack

1:11:11.479 --> 1:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>my family members and and my friends and threatened my friends.

1:11:14.280 --> 1:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's been the hardest part that because I

1:11:16.080 --> 1:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>feel like I can't protect them. So anyway, that's why

1:11:20.880 --> 1:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm more careful about, you know, even saying who I'm with.

1:11:24.400 --> 1:11:27.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't want people mapping my social circle or things

1:11:27.760 --> 1:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>like that. I just would rather keep it all private.

1:11:30.840 --> 1:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>So what do you think when Tucker started to mention you,

1:11:36.400 --> 1:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>It was really I mean when it first started to

1:11:38.439 --> 1:11:42.080
<v Speaker 1>happen a couple of years ago, it was really, Um,

1:11:42.120 --> 1:11:44.519
<v Speaker 1>I was so upset. I mean it really it really.

1:11:44.520 --> 1:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I was getting suddenly a level of hate and attacks

1:11:47.640 --> 1:11:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's not just Tucker. I think Tucker is kind

1:11:50.120 --> 1:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of the peak of this whole ecosystem. Um, but it

1:11:54.040 --> 1:11:55.759
<v Speaker 1>was it was hard to deal with and it was overwhelming,

1:11:55.800 --> 1:11:58.200
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly I was getting you know, I changed my

1:11:58.200 --> 1:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>phone number, like I was getting so much hate on

1:12:02.840 --> 1:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>every platform and having people attack my relatives, and it

1:12:05.920 --> 1:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>was hard. Now I've been able to deal with it.

1:12:07.880 --> 1:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm like, oh god, he's on another one. You know,

1:12:09.880 --> 1:12:12.439
<v Speaker 1>I kind of treated like a YouTuber basically in my mind,

1:12:12.560 --> 1:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>like you know, when a YouTuber makes a video about me,

1:12:14.800 --> 1:12:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, whatever, I'm so used to this by now. Um,

1:12:18.320 --> 1:12:20.479
<v Speaker 1>And I started to feel that way a little bit

1:12:20.520 --> 1:12:22.639
<v Speaker 1>about the right wing media. But I spend a lot

1:12:22.680 --> 1:12:25.439
<v Speaker 1>of time trying to educate people, writing the stories that

1:12:25.479 --> 1:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I do about online harassment and being a voice in

1:12:29.120 --> 1:12:32.519
<v Speaker 1>the industry to try and help people understand what a

1:12:32.560 --> 1:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>smear campaign looks like. You know, this is manipulating someone's

1:12:35.960 --> 1:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>sco results, this is planting stories about them, this is

1:12:39.640 --> 1:12:42.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, last year, I dealt with a bot um

1:12:42.320 --> 1:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>somebody you know how basically use bots to send hundreds

1:12:46.439 --> 1:12:49.439
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of messages to every single person that follows me,

1:12:49.479 --> 1:12:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and most people have follow Washington Post um messages about

1:12:52.880 --> 1:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>me just sort of lying about me, saying that I'm

1:12:54.760 --> 1:12:57.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be fired, and I was, you know, controversial

1:12:57.479 --> 1:13:00.840
<v Speaker 1>at the times. All the stuff that's completely untrue. UM.

1:13:00.960 --> 1:13:03.479
<v Speaker 1>And you know, there's just there's a lot of that

1:13:03.479 --> 1:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>stuff that people don't understand what a smear campaign looks like.

1:13:05.880 --> 1:13:07.639
<v Speaker 1>They think, oh, it's just some mean tweets. I don't

1:13:07.680 --> 1:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>care about me and tweets. I don't even see mean tweets.

1:13:09.439 --> 1:13:12.439
<v Speaker 1>I have like all my filters on UM. But this

1:13:12.560 --> 1:13:15.479
<v Speaker 1>other stuff is very real, I mean very real threats.

1:13:15.520 --> 1:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I have to have security when I go to public

1:13:17.120 --> 1:13:18.840
<v Speaker 1>events a lot of the times now because these people

1:13:18.880 --> 1:13:25.200
<v Speaker 1>have physically, you know, tried to show up and physically army. Okay.

1:13:25.800 --> 1:13:29.919
<v Speaker 1>One other area that you're very vocal about is COVID

1:13:30.080 --> 1:13:39.720
<v Speaker 1>nineteen vaccinations. Everybody gets vaccinated. Everybody. Also it says you

1:13:39.760 --> 1:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>have an underlying immune condition. Is that correct? Yes, I'm

1:13:44.400 --> 1:13:48.639
<v Speaker 1>severely immuto compromised. UM. So I care a lot about UM,

1:13:48.680 --> 1:13:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, advocating for people like myself that are you know,

1:13:52.400 --> 1:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>not able to you know that we we can't operate

1:13:56.120 --> 1:13:58.599
<v Speaker 1>in the world UM the same way that that many

1:13:58.640 --> 1:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>others feel that they can and UM. You know, I

1:14:00.960 --> 1:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>think for disabled people throughout this pandemic, it's been really hard.

1:14:04.320 --> 1:14:07.440
<v Speaker 1>A lot of disabled people are still at home shielding

1:14:07.680 --> 1:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>UM or they've been forced back into really unsafe work environments,

1:14:11.240 --> 1:14:13.599
<v Speaker 1>UM having to put their health at risk. I've lost,

1:14:14.000 --> 1:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, several people that I was very close to

1:14:16.040 --> 1:14:19.360
<v Speaker 1>to COVID. UM. It's it's ongoing. I have, you know,

1:14:19.520 --> 1:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody very close to me as the hospital right now,

1:14:22.600 --> 1:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>UM sick. And so I think it's just really really

1:14:26.080 --> 1:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>important for members of the media to understand and remember that.

1:14:30.439 --> 1:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the problem with a lot of people, especially

1:14:33.120 --> 1:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>in traditional media, these really nice, cushy jobs. You know,

1:14:36.240 --> 1:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>they're able to go to their at Hampton's house or

1:14:38.320 --> 1:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Upstate New York during COVID and check out and be like, oh,

1:14:43.240 --> 1:14:45.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, everything's fine, I got the vaccine, I'm done.

1:14:46.200 --> 1:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>What they don't realize is there's thousands of people still

1:14:48.840 --> 1:14:50.719
<v Speaker 1>dying a week. I mean, I think the Washington Post

1:14:50.760 --> 1:14:54.479
<v Speaker 1>has done such great health reporting. Um Dan Diamond amazing

1:14:54.479 --> 1:14:58.519
<v Speaker 1>health reporter. We have Amanda Morris who covers disability issues

1:14:58.520 --> 1:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>for the Post now, and both of them have just

1:15:00.880 --> 1:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>done such great work kind of highlighting this. But I

1:15:04.000 --> 1:15:07.519
<v Speaker 1>try to always remember, always remind use my platform to

1:15:07.560 --> 1:15:11.479
<v Speaker 1>remind other people what it's like for those who don't

1:15:11.520 --> 1:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>have the same privileges and opportunities you know, someone like me,

1:15:15.600 --> 1:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't have the same protection against COVID. I mean,

1:15:17.680 --> 1:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I've had as many vaccines as you can possibly get,

1:15:20.720 --> 1:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and I God bless them, but they do not they

1:15:23.240 --> 1:15:26.080
<v Speaker 1>are not equally protective for all of us. Um of

1:15:26.120 --> 1:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>course I got evy shells as well, but now we

1:15:28.320 --> 1:15:32.680
<v Speaker 1>know that evy shell doesn't protecting. I have a similar situation.

1:15:32.760 --> 1:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>So I'm just gonna go here for a second. So

1:15:34.840 --> 1:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>what exactly is the issue that you know you're not

1:15:40.080 --> 1:15:42.599
<v Speaker 1>making antibodies because you have a treatment for b sells,

1:15:42.640 --> 1:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>So but I can't I definitely can't get into my

1:15:45.240 --> 1:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>personal health stuff that I take the treatment. I take

1:15:51.240 --> 1:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a treatment that wipes out all your B cells, and

1:15:55.560 --> 1:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>therefore the vaccines didn't work, and I got evy shelled.

1:15:59.320 --> 1:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I got the one before that, which was didn't work

1:16:02.040 --> 1:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>for a macron, and eventually my B cells came back

1:16:06.520 --> 1:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and I got three more vaccines. But it was I

1:16:09.400 --> 1:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>was living, you know, off the grid for two and

1:16:11.760 --> 1:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>a half years. But just to segue to another topic,

1:16:16.800 --> 1:16:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and you mentioned it earlier, you came to my attention

1:16:20.600 --> 1:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>primarily you're reporting on the influencers, which I've always found interesting.

1:16:26.720 --> 1:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>The first influencer that I really became interested in was

1:16:29.920 --> 1:16:33.240
<v Speaker 1>this one, Jena Marbles, and what I noticed, You know,

1:16:33.320 --> 1:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>with all these influencers who are not expressing. Let me

1:16:37.439 --> 1:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>back up a little bit. The entertainment business, like the

1:16:41.840 --> 1:16:46.559
<v Speaker 1>major media business, is always one step behind, and they

1:16:46.640 --> 1:16:50.559
<v Speaker 1>think they can always come in and clean up. This

1:16:50.640 --> 1:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>is like TikTok Records are bourbon on TikTok and they

1:16:54.880 --> 1:16:58.679
<v Speaker 1>want to manipulate the market, which at the time they can't,

1:16:59.000 --> 1:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and they believe they could. Anybody blows up on TikTok

1:17:02.280 --> 1:17:06.519
<v Speaker 1>will sign with them. That's I want to go into

1:17:06.560 --> 1:17:11.639
<v Speaker 1>depth there. And switching gears. They were under the uh

1:17:11.680 --> 1:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>they believed since these online influencers had so many followers,

1:17:18.040 --> 1:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>they would translate to traditional media. Okay, uh, you know

1:17:24.000 --> 1:17:27.439
<v Speaker 1>there's one of them, uh, TikTok you probably remember the name,

1:17:27.479 --> 1:17:29.799
<v Speaker 1>has their own TV show just like no one is watching.

1:17:30.080 --> 1:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, right, I don't want to go too far,

1:17:32.920 --> 1:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>but I want to talk about two elements. One that

1:17:35.920 --> 1:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>since most of these people don't have it in an

1:17:38.000 --> 1:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>eate talent, they are producing content two seven to the

1:17:43.600 --> 1:17:48.400
<v Speaker 1>point where they ultimately burn themselves out and abandoned the paradigm.

1:17:48.600 --> 1:17:55.599
<v Speaker 1>Two there is a whole house slash factory of producing content.

1:17:55.680 --> 1:17:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I know that those are not wholly related, but why

1:17:57.720 --> 1:18:01.599
<v Speaker 1>don't you start there? Yes, Um, you know, I think,

1:18:01.840 --> 1:18:04.440
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, Bob, it's really hard for these influencers

1:18:04.479 --> 1:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>because they burn themselves out and these platforms reward that.

1:18:09.320 --> 1:18:13.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these platforms push people into seven work schedules.

1:18:13.840 --> 1:18:15.680
<v Speaker 1>You can't take a break. If you don't post, you're

1:18:15.680 --> 1:18:19.200
<v Speaker 1>not monetizing. Um. And I think that that that stunds

1:18:19.240 --> 1:18:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of creativity, and I think it leads to

1:18:21.760 --> 1:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>burn out. Um. And I think that the traditional entertainment

1:18:25.320 --> 1:18:28.920
<v Speaker 1>industry is still learning how to leverage these people. Um.

1:18:28.960 --> 1:18:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it did not work necessarily to put them

1:18:31.400 --> 1:18:33.559
<v Speaker 1>in traditional movies. As you said, a lot of these

1:18:33.560 --> 1:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>people are not the most talented actors necessarily. I would

1:18:37.360 --> 1:18:41.720
<v Speaker 1>say music as an area that you know has worked out.

1:18:41.760 --> 1:18:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean somebody like Olivia Rodrigo or Shawn Mendez. There's

1:18:44.880 --> 1:18:46.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of like I mean Justin Bieber, I guess

1:18:46.920 --> 1:18:50.360
<v Speaker 1>came off YouTube, Like there are there are success stories there. Um,

1:18:50.400 --> 1:18:53.759
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's just it's a lot of traditional

1:18:53.880 --> 1:18:55.559
<v Speaker 1>entertainment is still kind of like what do we do

1:18:55.600 --> 1:18:57.519
<v Speaker 1>with these people? And then these people are trying to

1:18:57.600 --> 1:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of like build their own media companies and figure

1:19:01.280 --> 1:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>out their own strategy and do they even want to

1:19:03.800 --> 1:19:06.479
<v Speaker 1>be in traditional Hollywood? Does that even make sense? Right?

1:19:07.080 --> 1:19:08.479
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's kind of I don't know, it's

1:19:08.479 --> 1:19:12.880
<v Speaker 1>all evolving. Okay, So what about the creator houses and

1:19:13.000 --> 1:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the situation of groups of influencers at this point in time? Yes, um,

1:19:18.240 --> 1:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>so creator houses have been a thing since two thousand nine.

1:19:21.200 --> 1:19:25.439
<v Speaker 1>Um we had the first content creator house called The Station,

1:19:25.479 --> 1:19:28.519
<v Speaker 1>which ended up becoming Maker Studios UM. And pretty much

1:19:28.520 --> 1:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>ever since then, we've we've had you know, creative content

1:19:32.080 --> 1:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>houses UM all over l A, also Atlanta at other

1:19:34.920 --> 1:19:38.479
<v Speaker 1>places to Houston. UM. And people live together because it

1:19:38.560 --> 1:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>makes sense, right you're young. I think young creative people

1:19:41.760 --> 1:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>always want to live together. But in this case it

1:19:44.479 --> 1:19:47.479
<v Speaker 1>sort of has a direct financial incentive because you can

1:19:47.520 --> 1:19:50.160
<v Speaker 1>collaborate and kind of grow as a group and brand

1:19:50.200 --> 1:19:53.640
<v Speaker 1>yourself that way. It really I think it really that

1:19:53.720 --> 1:19:56.559
<v Speaker 1>whole like culture really exploded into the mainstream with the

1:19:56.600 --> 1:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Hype House and TikTok and I think in one you

1:19:59.800 --> 1:20:01.680
<v Speaker 1>saw so many of these houses, and you had all

1:20:01.720 --> 1:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>these management companies starting these houses and then now, I

1:20:04.760 --> 1:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>think lately is cooled off because people realized a lot

1:20:09.000 --> 1:20:11.200
<v Speaker 1>of these management companies realize that these houses are actually

1:20:11.240 --> 1:20:14.479
<v Speaker 1>just like huge liabilities. Um. Anytime you have a house

1:20:14.520 --> 1:20:18.120
<v Speaker 1>full of young people, it's not the easiest thing to manage.

1:20:18.160 --> 1:20:20.160
<v Speaker 1>So um. You know. So you're seeing a lot of

1:20:20.200 --> 1:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>management companies pulled back. But young people will always live

1:20:23.320 --> 1:20:27.679
<v Speaker 1>together in Hollywood. Okay, you yourself moved from the East

1:20:27.680 --> 1:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Coast to the West coast to be closer to this. Yes,

1:20:30.439 --> 1:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm a New Yorker for life, But I have to

1:20:33.000 --> 1:20:36.559
<v Speaker 1>say I love l A. And then and why do you?

1:20:36.720 --> 1:20:38.759
<v Speaker 1>Why do you? Why do you love l A? Well,

1:20:38.800 --> 1:20:41.639
<v Speaker 1>I have a lot of family in California. Um, and

1:20:41.760 --> 1:20:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I had spent a bunch of time in California. I

1:20:43.960 --> 1:20:45.479
<v Speaker 1>mean I was always here. I was here for like

1:20:45.880 --> 1:20:49.280
<v Speaker 1>several months in twenty nineteen and months like I've always

1:20:49.360 --> 1:20:52.439
<v Speaker 1>I was out here for like nine months at one point, uh,

1:20:52.600 --> 1:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>probably seven years ago. I've I've almost moved here, and

1:20:55.080 --> 1:20:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I've spent a lot of time here, But it wasn't

1:20:57.240 --> 1:20:59.639
<v Speaker 1>until I lived in l A full time. I feel

1:20:59.640 --> 1:21:02.640
<v Speaker 1>like that I really appreciated the city and got to

1:21:02.680 --> 1:21:05.160
<v Speaker 1>see so many more sides of it, like when you

1:21:05.360 --> 1:21:08.800
<v Speaker 1>come in and you're staying downtown or you're just staying

1:21:08.800 --> 1:21:10.599
<v Speaker 1>in West Hollywood and you're just going to a bunch

1:21:10.600 --> 1:21:13.360
<v Speaker 1>of influencer events, Like, that's not the way to like

1:21:13.439 --> 1:21:17.719
<v Speaker 1>experience l A. So now that I live here, I'm like, oh,

1:21:17.720 --> 1:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>this is actually great, and there's a lot of cool

1:21:20.800 --> 1:21:24.479
<v Speaker 1>people here and the weather I mean well, I mean,

1:21:24.520 --> 1:21:26.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, l A is a shitty tourist town, which

1:21:26.640 --> 1:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>is what you're referencing there. If you come, let me

1:21:29.080 --> 1:21:31.680
<v Speaker 1>hit the highlights. And you know, New Yorker comes to

1:21:31.840 --> 1:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>l A and says, you know, hey, you know, I

1:21:35.120 --> 1:21:37.920
<v Speaker 1>don't get it. There's not the cultural stuff, there's not

1:21:38.040 --> 1:21:41.759
<v Speaker 1>the street life. I'd rather live in New York. And

1:21:42.120 --> 1:21:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Angelino goes to New York, this greatest city in the world,

1:21:45.240 --> 1:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>but I'd rather live in l A. I aspire to

1:21:49.800 --> 1:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>be bi coastal. That would be really nice. Uh not

1:21:53.720 --> 1:21:56.040
<v Speaker 1>you know there yet, but I don't know. I mean,

1:21:56.040 --> 1:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>it's it's great out here. In my California relatives are

1:21:59.840 --> 1:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>all feeling very smug. I think about the fact that

1:22:03.040 --> 1:22:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I have become I've become such a l A booster. Okay, Now,

1:22:09.200 --> 1:22:11.479
<v Speaker 1>in hip hop there was a New York scene, l

1:22:11.520 --> 1:22:15.439
<v Speaker 1>A scene, Atlanta scene and talking to Joe Coscarelli, you

1:22:15.479 --> 1:22:20.479
<v Speaker 1>know he's talking about scenes in Sacramento, when in Idaho. Um,

1:22:20.600 --> 1:22:25.480
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the creator economy, obviously people are everywhere,

1:22:25.800 --> 1:22:28.880
<v Speaker 1>But are Los Angeles and you said to a degree Atlanta,

1:22:28.880 --> 1:22:31.360
<v Speaker 1>are those still very much the hot beds in the

1:22:31.400 --> 1:22:35.120
<v Speaker 1>major places? Yeah? I think Um, I mean I think

1:22:35.479 --> 1:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>l A, New York, Atlanta to a lesser extent, maybe

1:22:38.840 --> 1:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>like Houston and Orlando, like some cities in Florida, Miami.

1:22:43.760 --> 1:22:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, anywhere you have like creative people, it's it's

1:22:46.960 --> 1:22:49.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be that. That's that's where the content creator

1:22:50.200 --> 1:22:52.400
<v Speaker 1>industry is definitely like this this where the hubs are

1:22:52.840 --> 1:22:54.960
<v Speaker 1>really New York and l A for the brands, for

1:22:55.040 --> 1:22:57.879
<v Speaker 1>the managers, for the agents, but then you have lifestyle

1:22:57.920 --> 1:23:00.559
<v Speaker 1>influencers all over. I mean, this shift in media towards

1:23:01.160 --> 1:23:04.880
<v Speaker 1>personality driven media is not something that's just happening with Tiktoker's.

1:23:05.040 --> 1:23:07.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean a lot of parents, for instance, might follow

1:23:07.760 --> 1:23:11.160
<v Speaker 1>like a recipe in you know, influencers somewhere on TikTok

1:23:11.240 --> 1:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>or Instagram. That person might live in Charlotte, North Carolina,

1:23:14.120 --> 1:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a lot of people kind of all

1:23:17.080 --> 1:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>over moving into this line of work. But I do

1:23:20.320 --> 1:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>think that New York and l A or where it's

1:23:21.960 --> 1:23:26.559
<v Speaker 1>concentrated in Atlanta, because those are the entertainment hubs, since

1:23:26.600 --> 1:23:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you're so close to it. You know, people say that

1:23:29.520 --> 1:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>they want to be in the music business. The first

1:23:31.840 --> 1:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>thing is I tell them is no, you don't want

1:23:34.360 --> 1:23:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to be in the med You know, it's incredibly hard

1:23:38.200 --> 1:23:42.040
<v Speaker 1>work to get in and it's almost impossible to stay in. So,

1:23:42.200 --> 1:23:46.599
<v Speaker 1>having observed all these influencers, what would you tell to someone, Oh,

1:23:46.720 --> 1:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, because I'm sure you get the same thing

1:23:48.080 --> 1:23:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I get. Somebody says, oh, my kid, they got X

1:23:50.000 --> 1:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>number of followers, blah blah blah. What would you tell

1:23:52.280 --> 1:23:55.519
<v Speaker 1>that person? Probably everything you tell people in the music industry.

1:23:55.560 --> 1:23:58.679
<v Speaker 1>It's ten times harder than you think. Um, it's it's

1:23:58.760 --> 1:24:00.759
<v Speaker 1>really hard. I mean people are always like, oh, Taylor,

1:24:00.800 --> 1:24:04.040
<v Speaker 1>why aren't you independent? Because I know exactly how hard

1:24:04.080 --> 1:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it is, um to do that. It's like you don't

1:24:07.040 --> 1:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>have healthcare, you know, like you're everything is on you.

1:24:10.240 --> 1:24:14.400
<v Speaker 1>You're basically running a small business and most small businesses fail, right, Um,

1:24:14.479 --> 1:24:16.840
<v Speaker 1>And so I think it's just it's an incredible amount

1:24:16.880 --> 1:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>of pressure. You have to really be able to handle it.

1:24:19.680 --> 1:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>You have to be able to manage the business part

1:24:22.280 --> 1:24:24.720
<v Speaker 1>that the public. I mean, you're a public figure when

1:24:24.720 --> 1:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you become an influencer, get a following, and that's extremely

1:24:28.000 --> 1:24:31.519
<v Speaker 1>difficult to manage. Um. It's just it's hard. It's way

1:24:31.560 --> 1:24:34.400
<v Speaker 1>harder than you think. And I would say, if you

1:24:34.439 --> 1:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>have an option to do something more stable, you know,

1:24:36.920 --> 1:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>keep that in your back pocket always. But okay, we

1:24:41.040 --> 1:24:44.120
<v Speaker 1>always read about the people making big money. How many

1:24:44.200 --> 1:24:48.360
<v Speaker 1>people are really making big money, only the top one percent.

1:24:48.520 --> 1:24:50.519
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's the other thing that I think is

1:24:50.640 --> 1:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>very misconstrued is that people see it's like seeing you know,

1:24:54.439 --> 1:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>it's classic Hollywood, right, Like you see Jennifer Aniston and

1:24:57.760 --> 1:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>George Clooney and these actor and you think, well, that's

1:25:01.040 --> 1:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>what it is, you know, to act and be in Hollywood,

1:25:03.080 --> 1:25:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and then you realize it's actually going, you know, to

1:25:05.880 --> 1:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>forty seven auditions for Dorito's commercial that you probably won't

1:25:08.840 --> 1:25:11.479
<v Speaker 1>even get. So it's like, you know, it's like that.

1:25:11.520 --> 1:25:13.799
<v Speaker 1>But on the internet, it's like you see Mr Beast,

1:25:13.880 --> 1:25:16.719
<v Speaker 1>you see Charlie Demilio making you know, tens of millions

1:25:16.720 --> 1:25:19.479
<v Speaker 1>of dollars a year. But the reality is is that

1:25:19.600 --> 1:25:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you will probably make nothing close to that, and it's

1:25:23.439 --> 1:25:26.400
<v Speaker 1>very hard and it's very unstable in a lot of ways.

1:25:26.439 --> 1:25:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the traditional industry is unstable in different ways.

1:25:29.880 --> 1:25:32.200
<v Speaker 1>So I would never suggest anybody go into that either.

1:25:32.400 --> 1:25:34.559
<v Speaker 1>But um, I just think you have to be clear

1:25:34.600 --> 1:25:45.360
<v Speaker 1>eyed about that stuff. Okay, people understand the monetization on

1:25:45.439 --> 1:25:51.439
<v Speaker 1>YouTube their ads. Person who has the channel or the

1:25:51.479 --> 1:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>influence you gets a percentage of the ads. How exactly

1:25:54.840 --> 1:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>are people monetizing on TikTok. And an addition, of course,

1:25:58.880 --> 1:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the great things of TikTok is you can

1:26:01.880 --> 1:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>be nobody and be boosted to a lot of people,

1:26:05.320 --> 1:26:09.000
<v Speaker 1>which doesn't happen on YouTube. Conversely, you can be somebody

1:26:09.000 --> 1:26:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and not be boosted more. Tell me more about that

1:26:13.000 --> 1:26:15.960
<v Speaker 1>in the monetization on TikTok. Well, I would say, first

1:26:15.960 --> 1:26:18.360
<v Speaker 1>of all, you know, ads are not the only way

1:26:18.360 --> 1:26:20.599
<v Speaker 1>that people make money on YouTube, actually less and less.

1:26:20.640 --> 1:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>So people make a lot of money through merch and

1:26:23.360 --> 1:26:26.559
<v Speaker 1>through productizing themselves and that's something you see on TikTok too.

1:26:26.640 --> 1:26:29.400
<v Speaker 1>So people do make money through ads on TikTok, whether

1:26:29.439 --> 1:26:31.559
<v Speaker 1>it's through the creator. You know, their version of like

1:26:31.560 --> 1:26:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the YouTube Partner program is the UM the TikTok Creator

1:26:35.920 --> 1:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>fund UM. It functions a little bit differently. It's just

1:26:39.120 --> 1:26:41.240
<v Speaker 1>one pot of money. But basically, you know, you can

1:26:41.280 --> 1:26:43.680
<v Speaker 1>get paid based if you get enough views on your TikTok's.

1:26:43.720 --> 1:26:45.800
<v Speaker 1>And then also you're doing ads that our native ads.

1:26:45.880 --> 1:26:48.760
<v Speaker 1>So say, you know, Clorox pays you to shout out

1:26:48.800 --> 1:26:50.599
<v Speaker 1>Clorox in the video or put it in the back

1:26:50.640 --> 1:26:53.720
<v Speaker 1>of one of your TikTok's. Um, those are sort of

1:26:53.720 --> 1:26:55.240
<v Speaker 1>lots that. There are lots of different revenue models in

1:26:55.280 --> 1:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of advertising, and then um, e commerce and products

1:27:00.000 --> 1:27:01.439
<v Speaker 1>is how a lot of people make money too. So

1:27:01.600 --> 1:27:05.760
<v Speaker 1>merch lines um, Amazon storefronts where any time and you

1:27:05.760 --> 1:27:08.880
<v Speaker 1>know somebody, for instance, Lauren Wolf, this great lifestyle creator

1:27:08.920 --> 1:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>in New York, part of the Amazon Creator program. If

1:27:12.000 --> 1:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I go, you know, click, I'm like, wow, I love

1:27:14.000 --> 1:27:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that dress she's wearing. I click on her Amazon shop

1:27:16.200 --> 1:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>in her bio, and I buy that dress from Amazon.

1:27:19.360 --> 1:27:23.120
<v Speaker 1>She'll get a percentage of that. So affiliate revenue UM

1:27:23.160 --> 1:27:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and a million other ways. I mean, people charge for shoutouts,

1:27:26.560 --> 1:27:29.439
<v Speaker 1>people charge for comments. Like, there's lots of different things

1:27:29.479 --> 1:27:31.519
<v Speaker 1>that people can do to make money, and I think

1:27:31.560 --> 1:27:35.439
<v Speaker 1>it's about developing a sustainable revenue model for yourself. Some

1:27:35.479 --> 1:27:38.639
<v Speaker 1>people also don't even make money on YouTube or TikTok

1:27:38.720 --> 1:27:40.599
<v Speaker 1>and they make it all on Patreon, right, they just

1:27:40.640 --> 1:27:45.040
<v Speaker 1>have a really dedicated audience that will pay that subscription revenue. Okay. Uh.

1:27:45.439 --> 1:27:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I grew up in a different era where credibility was

1:27:48.240 --> 1:27:51.600
<v Speaker 1>king and people said no, Hey, people don't say no

1:27:51.680 --> 1:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>to anything. These days, the goals if you get any

1:27:55.360 --> 1:27:59.519
<v Speaker 1>traction to become a brand. But when I look at

1:27:59.560 --> 1:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the very site that people with longevity, it's still the

1:28:03.120 --> 1:28:06.960
<v Speaker 1>people who don't sell out and have credibility. What's your

1:28:07.040 --> 1:28:10.000
<v Speaker 1>viewpoint on that? Um, I think you're right. I mean,

1:28:10.040 --> 1:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you know what, somebody like Dude Perfect on YouTube, that

1:28:12.400 --> 1:28:14.639
<v Speaker 1>group and a few their sports YouTube first, Like, that's

1:28:14.680 --> 1:28:17.599
<v Speaker 1>a really good example of a group that has not

1:28:17.680 --> 1:28:20.320
<v Speaker 1>sold out like they have. They have turned down so

1:28:20.400 --> 1:28:22.439
<v Speaker 1>much stuff that they could have done and cheapened out

1:28:22.439 --> 1:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>their brand for and they never have. Like they've never

1:28:25.000 --> 1:28:27.080
<v Speaker 1>done the gambling ads or that type of stuff. As

1:28:27.120 --> 1:28:29.400
<v Speaker 1>far as I know, they've been creating contents the two

1:28:29.439 --> 1:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand nine. They've built a massive media company that rivals

1:28:33.680 --> 1:28:37.080
<v Speaker 1>any traditional sports media company in a lot of ways. Um,

1:28:37.120 --> 1:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, I think, but but but Bob, that's so hard.

1:28:39.920 --> 1:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>As we know, everybody wants easy money. You make one,

1:28:44.320 --> 1:28:46.519
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're like, oh, I'll make one, compromise here,

1:28:46.640 --> 1:28:50.479
<v Speaker 1>and then you compromise here, and then suddenly I'm less

1:28:50.520 --> 1:28:54.080
<v Speaker 1>worried about that side of it. But when I see

1:28:54.240 --> 1:28:58.200
<v Speaker 1>somebody hawking a product, if I see him, you know,

1:28:58.840 --> 1:29:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm immediately down them. Because this is one thing that

1:29:02.080 --> 1:29:05.639
<v Speaker 1>the entertainment business is still trying to cope with as

1:29:05.600 --> 1:29:08.639
<v Speaker 1>a result of the Internet, is that in a world

1:29:08.640 --> 1:29:12.560
<v Speaker 1>of unlimited product, consumers king and they have no loyalties.

1:29:13.280 --> 1:29:17.160
<v Speaker 1>So I find free just to finish my statement forgetting

1:29:17.160 --> 1:29:21.400
<v Speaker 1>someone who's selling clothing or other that whatever. Someone who says,

1:29:21.439 --> 1:29:24.360
<v Speaker 1>well you just follow me for me, but uh, you know,

1:29:24.439 --> 1:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>by vote of vitamin water or whatever you ultimately you

1:29:27.720 --> 1:29:31.479
<v Speaker 1>know it says, well, I'd really rather watch somebody else. Yeah,

1:29:31.520 --> 1:29:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it's interesting. It depends on how

1:29:34.000 --> 1:29:37.479
<v Speaker 1>aligned that product is with the creator. So in the

1:29:37.680 --> 1:29:40.160
<v Speaker 1>second half of the tens, which were sort of the

1:29:40.200 --> 1:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>golden age of spa Con, that's when people were just

1:29:42.360 --> 1:29:45.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of throwing money at influencers with big audiences because

1:29:45.000 --> 1:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have any sense of like targeted marketing. You

1:29:47.040 --> 1:29:49.200
<v Speaker 1>were getting a lot of those mismatches. That's where like

1:29:49.479 --> 1:29:54.160
<v Speaker 1>suddenly everyone was hawking the Gummy Bear hair vitamins or whatever.

1:29:54.800 --> 1:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>That's right. That's a bad experience for the fan because

1:29:58.080 --> 1:30:00.479
<v Speaker 1>the fans like, why am I Like, yeah, why are

1:30:00.520 --> 1:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you hawking this? However, I'll say somebody, you know, there's

1:30:04.120 --> 1:30:07.680
<v Speaker 1>somebody like Addison easter Lane, Addison ray On TikTok right,

1:30:07.720 --> 1:30:10.559
<v Speaker 1>like she's you know, talked about her skincare journey. She

1:30:10.600 --> 1:30:13.439
<v Speaker 1>launched the skincare line. It's makeup, it's she can kind

1:30:13.439 --> 1:30:15.240
<v Speaker 1>of work it into her content in a way that

1:30:15.280 --> 1:30:18.000
<v Speaker 1>feels organic, and it's her brand. It has her name

1:30:18.040 --> 1:30:22.040
<v Speaker 1>on it. So people feel a little bit more. That

1:30:22.080 --> 1:30:24.880
<v Speaker 1>seems to be the way that a better way to

1:30:24.920 --> 1:30:27.160
<v Speaker 1>make money. I guess, Well, let me just if you're

1:30:27.200 --> 1:30:30.280
<v Speaker 1>selling something based on your identity, I get it. Yeah,

1:30:30.680 --> 1:30:34.240
<v Speaker 1>But even so, most people are not. They're saying, hey,

1:30:34.280 --> 1:30:37.400
<v Speaker 1>this this brand wants to give me money, I'll take

1:30:37.439 --> 1:30:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the money. I'll do what they want. Well, I will

1:30:40.040 --> 1:30:43.960
<v Speaker 1>say most most influencers will not take the money unless

1:30:44.040 --> 1:30:46.439
<v Speaker 1>it aligns with their audience, and most brands don't want

1:30:46.439 --> 1:30:48.840
<v Speaker 1>to pay that money because brands want an r o I,

1:30:49.320 --> 1:30:51.600
<v Speaker 1>so they want to know do you have the demographic

1:30:51.640 --> 1:30:54.439
<v Speaker 1>that we are trying to reach and and are you

1:30:54.479 --> 1:30:56.679
<v Speaker 1>going to actually be able to convert? And if you're

1:30:56.680 --> 1:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>not going to convert those people, then the brand doesn't

1:30:58.800 --> 1:31:00.880
<v Speaker 1>want to do the deal, and influencer doesn't want to

1:31:00.920 --> 1:31:02.800
<v Speaker 1>do the deal because obvious a lot of times you too,

1:31:02.840 --> 1:31:04.880
<v Speaker 1>you get like bonuses based on your conversions and stuff

1:31:04.880 --> 1:31:07.960
<v Speaker 1>in your sales. So I think you're I think that

1:31:08.040 --> 1:31:10.000
<v Speaker 1>was more of a problem a few years ago, and

1:31:10.080 --> 1:31:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the industry is getting more and more sophisticated,

1:31:14.160 --> 1:31:16.880
<v Speaker 1>just the way that when when remember Bob, when like

1:31:17.360 --> 1:31:19.920
<v Speaker 1>banner ads started out, you still be getting these like

1:31:20.040 --> 1:31:22.280
<v Speaker 1>randomit and now you get super targeted stuff. I think

1:31:22.320 --> 1:31:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the same is happening. If you don't have a bad blocker, right,

1:31:26.640 --> 1:31:30.559
<v Speaker 1>there's no a yet. Let's flip the story over to

1:31:30.600 --> 1:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the advertiser themselves. There's a lot going on here. You

1:31:33.720 --> 1:31:38.200
<v Speaker 1>have apples, Uh, change in the OS such that the

1:31:38.320 --> 1:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>users can't be tracked, uh Facebook there well, people the

1:31:42.920 --> 1:31:48.000
<v Speaker 1>advertisers obviously want targeted ads what's the advertiser view point? Now?

1:31:48.040 --> 1:31:51.240
<v Speaker 1>On one end we have Twitter, where the advertisers many

1:31:51.320 --> 1:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>have pulled back because they're worried about being associated with

1:31:53.960 --> 1:31:57.599
<v Speaker 1>the bad actors the platform in general. On the other treme,

1:31:57.640 --> 1:32:00.240
<v Speaker 1>we have TikTok. What's going on in the average tis

1:32:00.280 --> 1:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>in community these days? Oh gosh, yeah, I mean, I

1:32:03.320 --> 1:32:06.559
<v Speaker 1>think advertisers are just The Twitter stuff is definitely thrown

1:32:06.600 --> 1:32:07.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people for a loop, and a lot

1:32:07.680 --> 1:32:09.679
<v Speaker 1>of people have just pulled their ads bed from Twitter.

1:32:10.240 --> 1:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I think more and more a lot of advertisers too,

1:32:12.840 --> 1:32:16.040
<v Speaker 1>are not fully pulling their money because they don't want

1:32:16.040 --> 1:32:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to do it with the backlash from elon, so they've

1:32:17.920 --> 1:32:20.880
<v Speaker 1>just cut it down to basically the minimum so that

1:32:20.960 --> 1:32:23.720
<v Speaker 1>they can kind of like fade out and not you know,

1:32:23.800 --> 1:32:27.479
<v Speaker 1>be caught in this press cycle. Um. I you know,

1:32:27.600 --> 1:32:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that advertisers are just they're you know, Google

1:32:32.400 --> 1:32:34.559
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook are still king for that type of stuff.

1:32:34.600 --> 1:32:36.479
<v Speaker 1>And I think in terms of the influencer marketing world,

1:32:36.520 --> 1:32:38.679
<v Speaker 1>they're still trying to figure out what's the most effective

1:32:38.680 --> 1:32:41.559
<v Speaker 1>way to to market a product and a lot of

1:32:41.560 --> 1:32:44.639
<v Speaker 1>that depends on the specific campaign. Um, but there's more.

1:32:44.680 --> 1:32:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's more options at these people's fingertips than

1:32:47.160 --> 1:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>than ever before. UM, I don't know, we're going into

1:32:50.320 --> 1:32:52.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of like I think a recession or like a

1:32:52.360 --> 1:32:54.439
<v Speaker 1>weird downturn. So I feel like a lot of people

1:32:54.439 --> 1:32:57.200
<v Speaker 1>have pulled back on a lot of experimental type stuff

1:32:57.240 --> 1:33:00.600
<v Speaker 1>they were doing even last year. Let's say I'm on

1:33:00.640 --> 1:33:06.439
<v Speaker 1>TikTok and I have a notable number of followers. Am

1:33:06.479 --> 1:33:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I just going to hear from the brands individually or

1:33:09.000 --> 1:33:12.759
<v Speaker 1>to Most of these people have managers or agents, maybe

1:33:12.760 --> 1:33:18.559
<v Speaker 1>even looking for brand opportunities. What's the landscape? Yeah, definitely.

1:33:18.640 --> 1:33:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I think once you get a certain follower, a count

1:33:21.680 --> 1:33:24.519
<v Speaker 1>or audience size, or you're getting in a decent amount

1:33:24.560 --> 1:33:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of attention online, you're gonna start getting hit up by

1:33:27.240 --> 1:33:31.800
<v Speaker 1>managers and agents. UM. Now, it's just like the music industry.

1:33:32.000 --> 1:33:35.360
<v Speaker 1>It depends. There's a lot of dubious people out there

1:33:35.400 --> 1:33:38.479
<v Speaker 1>that purport to be managers UM, that will sign you

1:33:38.520 --> 1:33:42.160
<v Speaker 1>into really restrictive contracts and exploit you. And so I

1:33:42.200 --> 1:33:45.479
<v Speaker 1>think that UM talent in any form needs to be

1:33:45.600 --> 1:33:48.400
<v Speaker 1>very careful of that. UM. It's a huge problem on

1:33:48.400 --> 1:33:52.080
<v Speaker 1>TikTok actually, UM. But there's also a lot of traditional

1:33:52.160 --> 1:33:54.400
<v Speaker 1>industry players in the space right like U T A,

1:33:54.560 --> 1:33:57.200
<v Speaker 1>wm ME, all all the big agencies, Brostein, all the

1:33:57.200 --> 1:34:00.400
<v Speaker 1>big talent agencies also have you know, TikTok manage and

1:34:00.439 --> 1:34:02.080
<v Speaker 1>so in those cases, those people will go out and

1:34:02.120 --> 1:34:04.600
<v Speaker 1>solicit deals, and they're gonna solicit the bigger deals, and

1:34:04.600 --> 1:34:08.760
<v Speaker 1>they're going to try and negotiate partnerships, bigger, you know,

1:34:09.240 --> 1:34:12.000
<v Speaker 1>deeper kind of working relationships instead of just like hey,

1:34:12.200 --> 1:34:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I send you product, you post for it, but you

1:34:16.400 --> 1:34:18.880
<v Speaker 1>are I was talking to someone who says, well, you

1:34:18.920 --> 1:34:23.840
<v Speaker 1>know they they heard from one advertiser and she got

1:34:23.880 --> 1:34:28.479
<v Speaker 1>five thousand for this, and you know they talked another one.

1:34:28.920 --> 1:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Can you make a living? Or those really few and

1:34:32.000 --> 1:34:34.680
<v Speaker 1>far between where they're you know, brands just reaching out

1:34:34.760 --> 1:34:37.800
<v Speaker 1>to individuals. Yeah, I mean, brands do reach out to

1:34:37.800 --> 1:34:40.479
<v Speaker 1>individuals and exactly like you said, there's no like, there's

1:34:40.520 --> 1:34:46.280
<v Speaker 1>no standard rate for anything. Everything is negotiable. Um. Analytics

1:34:46.280 --> 1:34:48.400
<v Speaker 1>are not great on a lot of stuff like That's

1:34:48.400 --> 1:34:50.599
<v Speaker 1>why people do focus on things like sales and affiliate

1:34:50.600 --> 1:34:53.680
<v Speaker 1>revenue stuff. Um. But you, I mean, you certainly can

1:34:53.800 --> 1:34:55.800
<v Speaker 1>make a living. It just depends on the audience that

1:34:55.840 --> 1:34:58.680
<v Speaker 1>you've cultivated, the vertical that you've cultivated it in and

1:34:58.720 --> 1:35:01.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, are you making family friendly content? Are you

1:35:01.240 --> 1:35:04.680
<v Speaker 1>not making family friendly content that affects the advertisers that

1:35:04.720 --> 1:35:08.000
<v Speaker 1>you can get the deals that you do. How loyal

1:35:08.040 --> 1:35:09.919
<v Speaker 1>is your fan base? You can have millions of followers,

1:35:09.920 --> 1:35:12.920
<v Speaker 1>but they're not that loyal versus having a hundred thousand

1:35:13.160 --> 1:35:15.760
<v Speaker 1>true dedicated fans where they're paying you twenty dollars a

1:35:15.760 --> 1:35:19.799
<v Speaker 1>month in subscription revenue. Right, So it just it really depends,

1:35:19.920 --> 1:35:24.439
<v Speaker 1>and it's there's so many factors that play for each person. Okay,

1:35:24.520 --> 1:35:26.800
<v Speaker 1>let's just go back to Twitter for a second. The

1:35:26.840 --> 1:35:30.679
<v Speaker 1>amazing thing about the Internet, which most people were oldsters

1:35:30.720 --> 1:35:33.519
<v Speaker 1>still don't understand, is it's is not a replica of

1:35:33.560 --> 1:35:37.439
<v Speaker 1>the physical world. Physical world. You know, you might be

1:35:37.479 --> 1:35:40.439
<v Speaker 1>able to drive ten miles and get a cheaper price,

1:35:40.520 --> 1:35:43.519
<v Speaker 1>but your time is worth something, gas, etcetera. So we

1:35:43.600 --> 1:35:48.320
<v Speaker 1>tend to have these behemoths in this world, Amazon, Google,

1:35:49.240 --> 1:35:53.680
<v Speaker 1>So there's always backlash against the Amazon, and there's always

1:35:53.760 --> 1:35:57.280
<v Speaker 1>people saying I'm deleting my account, deleting my account, and

1:35:57.320 --> 1:36:01.679
<v Speaker 1>it makes no difference. Okay, so when we look at Twitter,

1:36:01.760 --> 1:36:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I hear the same people and you hear about mastadon

1:36:04.680 --> 1:36:08.320
<v Speaker 1>whatever blah blah. Is Twitter too big to fail? Let

1:36:08.320 --> 1:36:10.760
<v Speaker 1>me kind of throw some other stuff in here. So

1:36:10.880 --> 1:36:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs dies, Okay, the power of one individual when

1:36:14.800 --> 1:36:17.920
<v Speaker 1>you can look at Trump and give that example how

1:36:17.960 --> 1:36:21.519
<v Speaker 1>they can influence you know so many people. Steve Jobs

1:36:21.680 --> 1:36:26.439
<v Speaker 1>was very much about Houston look ui interface, and since

1:36:26.560 --> 1:36:30.799
<v Speaker 1>his death, we've moved backwards. They're more buttons. It's harder

1:36:30.840 --> 1:36:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to use. That's one person. Okay, So Twitter, yes, if

1:36:36.280 --> 1:36:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you want to be on the up to date news, certainly, uh,

1:36:41.280 --> 1:36:46.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff that the major media reports that's there. Could Twitter

1:36:46.880 --> 1:36:51.519
<v Speaker 1>ever be clips by another site because people leave or

1:36:51.640 --> 1:36:55.720
<v Speaker 1>b but okay, it could be. Theoretically, you think it

1:36:55.760 --> 1:36:59.080
<v Speaker 1>would happen. I think it's already happening with TikTok. I

1:36:59.120 --> 1:37:02.000
<v Speaker 1>think that he huge part of what people would have

1:37:02.040 --> 1:37:04.439
<v Speaker 1>gone to Twitter for. They're going to TikTok for now,

1:37:05.640 --> 1:37:09.480
<v Speaker 1>just just slowly, because certainly there are a lot of politicals,

1:37:09.479 --> 1:37:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of major reporters on Twitter. Would they have

1:37:14.120 --> 1:37:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a home on TikTok. There are a lot of reporters

1:37:17.400 --> 1:37:20.760
<v Speaker 1>on on on TikTok too. It's just that it's it's

1:37:20.800 --> 1:37:23.679
<v Speaker 1>like the shifts to digital. I don't know if you remember,

1:37:23.760 --> 1:37:27.920
<v Speaker 1>but a big, a big controversy early in my career

1:37:27.920 --> 1:37:32.040
<v Speaker 1>when I was a blogger was people saying our bloggers journalists,

1:37:32.120 --> 1:37:36.639
<v Speaker 1>right do you remember that whole discussion so um and

1:37:36.640 --> 1:37:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and people always were saying, oh, you know Taylor the rends,

1:37:38.840 --> 1:37:41.760
<v Speaker 1>she's she's just a blogger. Um. And now I think

1:37:41.800 --> 1:37:44.240
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing that with social platforms right where you see

1:37:44.240 --> 1:37:47.439
<v Speaker 1>these journalists coming up on platforms native right, there's news

1:37:47.479 --> 1:37:50.800
<v Speaker 1>content creators, journalists just working on YouTube or TikTok, and

1:37:50.840 --> 1:37:52.880
<v Speaker 1>people are are sort of like, oh, you know, are

1:37:52.920 --> 1:37:55.200
<v Speaker 1>they doing real journalism? Are they real journalists? Yes, they

1:37:55.240 --> 1:37:56.880
<v Speaker 1>many of them are, and some of them are affiliated

1:37:56.920 --> 1:38:00.960
<v Speaker 1>with mainstream media. Is um, will every quarter that succeeds

1:38:00.960 --> 1:38:03.439
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter transfer over to TikTok or somethink? No, But

1:38:03.520 --> 1:38:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of them will move and and

1:38:06.120 --> 1:38:09.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of discipate to other platforms. I don't. I'm not

1:38:09.439 --> 1:38:11.240
<v Speaker 1>convinced that Twitter is going to die, by the way.

1:38:11.320 --> 1:38:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I wouldn't like make that bet at all,

1:38:14.479 --> 1:38:17.759
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that, like what people used Twitter

1:38:17.880 --> 1:38:22.120
<v Speaker 1>for previously, they're using other platforms for more and more

1:38:23.360 --> 1:38:26.400
<v Speaker 1>just to stay with Twitter for a second. When Twitter

1:38:26.520 --> 1:38:30.160
<v Speaker 1>started you just had your regular flow. Then they have

1:38:30.280 --> 1:38:34.519
<v Speaker 1>their algorithm where you can have your you know what

1:38:34.640 --> 1:38:37.879
<v Speaker 1>they think you want to watch. Then they have their news,

1:38:37.920 --> 1:38:42.920
<v Speaker 1>their trends, their lists. I don't Maybe I'm old school,

1:38:42.960 --> 1:38:45.439
<v Speaker 1>but I don't find that stuff useful. I just find

1:38:45.439 --> 1:38:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a traditional time based flow to be not that I

1:38:48.800 --> 1:38:50.960
<v Speaker 1>don't check the other stuff, but the time based flow

1:38:50.960 --> 1:38:54.160
<v Speaker 1>to be the most rewarding for me. What do you find? Yeah,

1:38:54.360 --> 1:38:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I like the time being. I mean I actually prefer

1:38:57.040 --> 1:39:00.679
<v Speaker 1>the algorithmic feed to the to the time based feed

1:39:00.680 --> 1:39:03.040
<v Speaker 1>only because I wollow so many people. I follow eight

1:39:03.040 --> 1:39:05.719
<v Speaker 1>thousand people because I restrict my replies. So I used

1:39:06.040 --> 1:39:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Twitter a little bit in a weird way. But certainly,

1:39:09.320 --> 1:39:12.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean, certainly, the feed is the core experience. Um,

1:39:12.640 --> 1:39:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I love Twitter. Spaces Trending needs to die. I mean,

1:39:16.600 --> 1:39:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I hate that the only time I go on there

1:39:18.400 --> 1:39:20.759
<v Speaker 1>is to make sure that my name isn't trending again. Honestly,

1:39:20.800 --> 1:39:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a I don't know who clicks on

1:39:22.960 --> 1:39:25.640
<v Speaker 1>those trending things that I think it's sort of a

1:39:25.680 --> 1:39:30.400
<v Speaker 1>bad distraction. Um. They bought Nuzzle, which was an amazing

1:39:30.439 --> 1:39:34.280
<v Speaker 1>app that surfaced most shared links and could really tell

1:39:34.320 --> 1:39:37.120
<v Speaker 1>you what people were saying and sort of collected conversation

1:39:37.120 --> 1:39:39.200
<v Speaker 1>around different stories and then they just shut it down.

1:39:39.280 --> 1:39:41.639
<v Speaker 1>And it's really too bad they didn't incorporate that into

1:39:41.640 --> 1:39:44.519
<v Speaker 1>their product in my opinion, So if you could snap

1:39:44.560 --> 1:39:49.040
<v Speaker 1>your fingers forgetting Elon and his personality, because this has

1:39:49.080 --> 1:39:53.920
<v Speaker 1>been been a debate from long in the Jack Dorsey years,

1:39:54.000 --> 1:39:56.519
<v Speaker 1>and in the investors wanted to change get rid of

1:39:56.560 --> 1:39:59.880
<v Speaker 1>them long before Elon. What would you do to in

1:40:00.000 --> 1:40:04.800
<v Speaker 1>improve the site? Well, Number one something I've advocated as

1:40:04.800 --> 1:40:06.360
<v Speaker 1>somebody that deals with a lot of for assement and

1:40:06.439 --> 1:40:12.200
<v Speaker 1>doxing is um is allowing users to define their experience

1:40:12.280 --> 1:40:15.120
<v Speaker 1>better on Twitter. A lot of things that people don't

1:40:15.120 --> 1:40:17.519
<v Speaker 1>like about Twitter is that it's like this open, broadcast

1:40:17.560 --> 1:40:20.280
<v Speaker 1>based social platform where you're sort of trying to reach everyone,

1:40:20.360 --> 1:40:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's hard when you're new. You have to build

1:40:22.360 --> 1:40:23.840
<v Speaker 1>up a following for it, you know, otherwise you're just

1:40:23.880 --> 1:40:27.439
<v Speaker 1>posting to the void. I think discovery I would improve,

1:40:27.560 --> 1:40:31.639
<v Speaker 1>and I would improve UM. I hate to say user safety,

1:40:31.680 --> 1:40:34.400
<v Speaker 1>but more allowing users control. Right, sometimes you want to

1:40:34.439 --> 1:40:37.160
<v Speaker 1>just post to your mutuals. It's crazy that you can't

1:40:37.160 --> 1:40:39.720
<v Speaker 1>do that on Twitter, right, like you have to either

1:40:39.800 --> 1:40:42.320
<v Speaker 1>post to everyone or post on a private account, but

1:40:42.360 --> 1:40:45.280
<v Speaker 1>then you can't post mutuals only like and now they

1:40:45.280 --> 1:40:47.600
<v Speaker 1>have this close friends thing, but it's very limited to

1:40:47.600 --> 1:40:50.040
<v Speaker 1>only a few people. That's just the whole thing is

1:40:50.080 --> 1:40:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a mess. I think that they need ability to segment

1:40:53.120 --> 1:40:55.720
<v Speaker 1>your audience. You need to be able to set expiration

1:40:55.840 --> 1:40:57.880
<v Speaker 1>dates on tweets, like the fact that tweets live forever

1:40:58.040 --> 1:41:01.000
<v Speaker 1>is crazy to me, especially when we're moving more and

1:41:01.040 --> 1:41:05.400
<v Speaker 1>more towards cephemeral media. So um. But yeah, the two

1:41:05.400 --> 1:41:07.479
<v Speaker 1>things that I would really focus on our discovery because

1:41:07.479 --> 1:41:09.519
<v Speaker 1>I think that's key to growing any kind of social platform.

1:41:09.640 --> 1:41:15.760
<v Speaker 1>And um and customization in terms of privacy protections. And

1:41:15.840 --> 1:41:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you know he's bad at about you know, the name

1:41:18.120 --> 1:41:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Twitter blue and your verification charging for verification? Do you

1:41:22.080 --> 1:41:25.200
<v Speaker 1>mean that actual thing right? And you believe it's dumb?

1:41:25.240 --> 1:41:28.599
<v Speaker 1>Why I wrote a lot. I wrote a long piece

1:41:28.600 --> 1:41:30.920
<v Speaker 1>for The Atlantic years ago about the problems with Twitter's

1:41:30.960 --> 1:41:34.400
<v Speaker 1>verification system. So I'm not defending the current system, but

1:41:34.760 --> 1:41:39.240
<v Speaker 1>his allowing anybody taking this thing that has become the

1:41:39.920 --> 1:41:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Twitter check mark has authority and value because it was

1:41:46.640 --> 1:41:48.920
<v Speaker 1>limited to a few amount of people. If you just

1:41:49.080 --> 1:41:52.720
<v Speaker 1>go and then allow anybody to buy it. It immediately

1:41:52.760 --> 1:41:56.040
<v Speaker 1>devalues your work, right, I think of it kind of

1:41:56.080 --> 1:41:58.640
<v Speaker 1>like look at what like Huffington posted right with their

1:41:58.680 --> 1:42:02.280
<v Speaker 1>contributor network or four. You're taking this valuable media brand

1:42:02.320 --> 1:42:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly you're letting anybody post on it, and that

1:42:05.040 --> 1:42:08.400
<v Speaker 1>ultimately devalues the brand. What he's doing is it sort

1:42:08.400 --> 1:42:09.760
<v Speaker 1>of doing that to the check mark. So it's like

1:42:09.840 --> 1:42:13.639
<v Speaker 1>it's it's also dangerous, as we saw, because people don't

1:42:13.680 --> 1:42:17.519
<v Speaker 1>know who they can trust anymore. Like the average people

1:42:17.560 --> 1:42:20.280
<v Speaker 1>are not super with it. So they see a blue checkmark,

1:42:20.280 --> 1:42:23.880
<v Speaker 1>they still think, oh, that's trustworthy. So I think his

1:42:23.960 --> 1:42:26.080
<v Speaker 1>whole stupid color code of verification thing is dumb. I

1:42:26.080 --> 1:42:28.120
<v Speaker 1>think he just has an ax to grind with journalists.

1:42:28.160 --> 1:42:30.719
<v Speaker 1>That's seriously what his skill is and what he doesn't

1:42:30.760 --> 1:42:34.559
<v Speaker 1>realize because he's so inept at understanding these things. But

1:42:34.640 --> 1:42:39.240
<v Speaker 1>it's like, you verifying a journalist is a service to

1:42:39.320 --> 1:42:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the user. It's not some crown that you're bestowing on

1:42:43.160 --> 1:42:47.240
<v Speaker 1>a journalist. You're letting average users know, wow, this is

1:42:47.280 --> 1:42:50.240
<v Speaker 1>who I who I think it is, and I can

1:42:50.280 --> 1:42:54.320
<v Speaker 1>trust this person that is. That is a valuable service.

1:42:55.200 --> 1:42:59.160
<v Speaker 1>And so to take that away is ultimately degrading. These

1:42:59.200 --> 1:43:03.639
<v Speaker 1>are experience. So pulling back the lens a little bit,

1:43:03.880 --> 1:43:09.000
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about TikTok in China. Okay, most most people

1:43:09.080 --> 1:43:12.880
<v Speaker 1>going on about this or not on TikTok a. To

1:43:13.000 --> 1:43:15.160
<v Speaker 1>what degree do you believe it's a problem and be

1:43:15.640 --> 1:43:18.080
<v Speaker 1>do you think we'll just continue to have a talk

1:43:18.200 --> 1:43:20.960
<v Speaker 1>or there will be a change here? Well, I mean,

1:43:21.080 --> 1:43:23.799
<v Speaker 1>I'll say that it's in Facebook's interest to just focus

1:43:23.800 --> 1:43:27.000
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok um and I think, I mean, look, China,

1:43:27.600 --> 1:43:29.680
<v Speaker 1>you know there there are there are reasons to be

1:43:29.760 --> 1:43:34.799
<v Speaker 1>concerned about China owning a popular social app. Right, although

1:43:34.840 --> 1:43:38.439
<v Speaker 1>I will say that the data is not kept in China, etcetera, etcetera.

1:43:38.479 --> 1:43:42.000
<v Speaker 1>There's no proof that they've you know, violated the stuff

1:43:42.040 --> 1:43:45.160
<v Speaker 1>that they've said. Um, but I my feeling is that

1:43:45.240 --> 1:43:49.320
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, making TikTok a scapegoat is really easy,

1:43:49.439 --> 1:43:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and that is absolutely what Facebook and Google and these

1:43:52.000 --> 1:43:54.360
<v Speaker 1>American tech companies would love. But I think we need

1:43:54.400 --> 1:43:56.599
<v Speaker 1>to take a hard look at user privacy and data

1:43:56.640 --> 1:43:59.759
<v Speaker 1>privacy specifically, because the truth is is that they basically

1:43:59.760 --> 1:44:02.759
<v Speaker 1>have no data privacy. People can buy our information anywhere

1:44:02.960 --> 1:44:04.479
<v Speaker 1>we have no control of our data. We don't have

1:44:04.520 --> 1:44:08.160
<v Speaker 1>anything like GDPR or even so I think the bigger

1:44:08.320 --> 1:44:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and also, there's so much money China, you know, money

1:44:11.080 --> 1:44:13.600
<v Speaker 1>from from China in Silicon Valley. I mean, look at

1:44:13.640 --> 1:44:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the gaming industry. It's just like it's so it's so um,

1:44:19.320 --> 1:44:21.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it's such bs to hear these people like crow

1:44:21.840 --> 1:44:25.400
<v Speaker 1>about China with TikTok and then turn around and you know,

1:44:26.000 --> 1:44:28.600
<v Speaker 1>not have anything to say about the fact that, you know,

1:44:28.680 --> 1:44:31.439
<v Speaker 1>there's tons of Chinese money in Silicon Valley and gaming

1:44:31.479 --> 1:44:34.080
<v Speaker 1>companies and all that. So I think, um, I think

1:44:34.120 --> 1:44:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that we need to kind of look at all of

1:44:36.080 --> 1:44:41.000
<v Speaker 1>those economic relationships and in general just allow for more

1:44:41.720 --> 1:44:45.160
<v Speaker 1>better data privacy protections that people can't just buy our

1:44:45.240 --> 1:44:48.360
<v Speaker 1>data and and you know, do whatever they want. We

1:44:48.400 --> 1:44:51.080
<v Speaker 1>have like no protections in this country. So hopefully we

1:44:51.120 --> 1:44:54.680
<v Speaker 1>have comprehensive reform. Realistically we are ever going to have

1:44:54.760 --> 1:44:58.519
<v Speaker 1>any reasonable privacy protection. I don't know, because you know,

1:44:58.520 --> 1:45:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the lawmakers in this country don't know how to use

1:45:00.760 --> 1:45:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the internet. They don't even understand stuff. Yeah, this is

1:45:06.240 --> 1:45:09.320
<v Speaker 1>why amazing. It just blows my mind. They don't understand

1:45:09.360 --> 1:45:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the business. They have hearings too late. They're you know, mesmerize,

1:45:13.720 --> 1:45:16.599
<v Speaker 1>don't understand it. It's just just a waste of time.

1:45:16.640 --> 1:45:21.759
<v Speaker 1>But staying with a similar concept that um oldsters believe

1:45:21.880 --> 1:45:26.080
<v Speaker 1>something is forever. If we talk about social media, we

1:45:26.120 --> 1:45:31.760
<v Speaker 1>saw friends, or we saw my Space, we saw Facebook, Instagram, TikTok.

1:45:32.960 --> 1:45:36.040
<v Speaker 1>In reality, the users have no loyalty to the platform.

1:45:36.120 --> 1:45:38.519
<v Speaker 1>They have a loyalty to their friends and what's new

1:45:38.520 --> 1:45:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and exciting. So what's next? Good question. Um yeah, I

1:45:46.000 --> 1:45:48.240
<v Speaker 1>do think that Facebook and Instagram are in trouble. I

1:45:48.240 --> 1:45:51.280
<v Speaker 1>think TikTok is clearly ascendant. I think also platforms to

1:45:51.600 --> 1:45:54.320
<v Speaker 1>watch or use live streaming platforms like Twitch, which is

1:45:54.360 --> 1:45:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I think under under respected for the role that it

1:45:59.240 --> 1:46:02.000
<v Speaker 1>plays in culture and not just gaming, but the rise

1:46:02.000 --> 1:46:05.280
<v Speaker 1>of just chatting streamers, the way that it's upending media.

1:46:06.040 --> 1:46:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Um I yeah, I just I basically I think Facebook

1:46:11.160 --> 1:46:13.240
<v Speaker 1>is in trouble. That's like the main one that if

1:46:13.280 --> 1:46:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you were to like look around and see like who's

1:46:16.120 --> 1:46:18.719
<v Speaker 1>first to struggle, it's them. Because as you mentioned, Bob,

1:46:18.800 --> 1:46:22.000
<v Speaker 1>like you know, these companies, especially tech companies, they really

1:46:22.080 --> 1:46:24.840
<v Speaker 1>they have somewhat of a shelf shelf life. It's hard

1:46:25.479 --> 1:46:27.880
<v Speaker 1>for a software company like a social platform to stay

1:46:27.920 --> 1:46:30.519
<v Speaker 1>relevant for that long because of the network effects and

1:46:30.560 --> 1:46:33.880
<v Speaker 1>all the other stuff. And I think Facebook is in trouble,

1:46:33.960 --> 1:46:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and TikTok and all of those types of apps are

1:46:36.920 --> 1:46:39.160
<v Speaker 1>more on the come up. Well, I'm more interested in

1:46:39.200 --> 1:46:42.559
<v Speaker 1>the bleeding edge, pushing the envelope in the rear. Look

1:46:42.600 --> 1:46:46.559
<v Speaker 1>at if we look at music okay, and we look

1:46:46.600 --> 1:46:49.960
<v Speaker 1>at Spotify, So what's that next after Spotify? Well, that's

1:46:50.040 --> 1:46:52.680
<v Speaker 1>hard for me to conceive because Spotify is an on

1:46:52.920 --> 1:46:55.880
<v Speaker 1>demand platform, so it's all in the history of music.

1:46:55.920 --> 1:46:58.599
<v Speaker 1>You get it what you want. The interface can look different,

1:46:59.080 --> 1:47:03.639
<v Speaker 1>but that since we've hit the wall, which is different

1:47:03.720 --> 1:47:08.120
<v Speaker 1>because essentially it's a marketplace and statistically for all the

1:47:08.160 --> 1:47:12.120
<v Speaker 1>pipe Bold playlists, they are not what dominates listening. So

1:47:13.120 --> 1:47:19.160
<v Speaker 1>when we look at the landscape, what comes after TikTok? Well? Yeah,

1:47:19.320 --> 1:47:22.519
<v Speaker 1>So one one big conversation that's been happening in the

1:47:22.520 --> 1:47:24.880
<v Speaker 1>creator world especially that just becomes more and more and

1:47:24.920 --> 1:47:27.040
<v Speaker 1>more of a discussion point is this idea of ownership.

1:47:27.080 --> 1:47:28.719
<v Speaker 1>And this goes back to what I was talking about,

1:47:28.720 --> 1:47:31.840
<v Speaker 1>is why I left The New York Times. Um, if

1:47:31.960 --> 1:47:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you are creating content on the Internet and you have

1:47:35.240 --> 1:47:42.080
<v Speaker 1>developed a audience on the Internet. You, Um, it's a

1:47:42.120 --> 1:47:44.960
<v Speaker 1>big point of tension like that that you don't have

1:47:45.080 --> 1:47:47.439
<v Speaker 1>direct access to them or you don't own that audience, right,

1:47:47.479 --> 1:47:50.920
<v Speaker 1>That audience is still mediated through these platforms, and that's

1:47:51.000 --> 1:47:53.960
<v Speaker 1>something that creators are less and less comfortable with and

1:47:54.040 --> 1:47:57.519
<v Speaker 1>okay with, especially as these platforms proved really volatile, right

1:47:57.560 --> 1:48:00.160
<v Speaker 1>their algorithms change, or they launched a new fee sure,

1:48:00.160 --> 1:48:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly their prioritizing that. So the big thing now,

1:48:04.080 --> 1:48:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I think is direct connection with an audience and ownership.

1:48:07.240 --> 1:48:10.400
<v Speaker 1>So you see people moving towards things like subscription based

1:48:10.439 --> 1:48:14.519
<v Speaker 1>revenue UM and stuff like sub stack, even not to

1:48:14.520 --> 1:48:16.200
<v Speaker 1>say that sub stack is gonna be around forever, but

1:48:16.320 --> 1:48:19.360
<v Speaker 1>something where you actually have a you have the contact

1:48:19.400 --> 1:48:23.160
<v Speaker 1>information for your fans and followers UM, and you can

1:48:23.160 --> 1:48:27.360
<v Speaker 1>reach them directly without an algorithm. That is very appealing

1:48:27.400 --> 1:48:29.519
<v Speaker 1>for creators. And if you look at a lot of

1:48:30.040 --> 1:48:32.280
<v Speaker 1>creators that are successful these days that are coming up,

1:48:32.320 --> 1:48:34.479
<v Speaker 1>there are people that have built that direct relationship with

1:48:34.479 --> 1:48:36.439
<v Speaker 1>their audience and then own a lot of their content

1:48:37.120 --> 1:48:39.120
<v Speaker 1>UM and so I think that's just going to be

1:48:39.160 --> 1:48:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a bigger I think whatever platforms comes next, ownership is

1:48:41.800 --> 1:48:44.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be a big part of that, allowing people

1:48:44.120 --> 1:48:48.280
<v Speaker 1>to own that relationship with their audience control you know,

1:48:48.320 --> 1:48:50.240
<v Speaker 1>who sees their stuff and how they reach people. I

1:48:50.280 --> 1:48:54.360
<v Speaker 1>just think whatever comes next will be more about that. Okay.

1:48:54.360 --> 1:48:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't wanna have a discussion about substecs business model.

1:48:57.040 --> 1:49:01.720
<v Speaker 1>That's going in the wrong. But on better it now

1:49:01.800 --> 1:49:06.000
<v Speaker 1>says on your handles, subscribe to my sub stack. Oh

1:49:06.120 --> 1:49:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I can't change. I can't change that because I changed it.

1:49:08.920 --> 1:49:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I made it that for one day and then Ellen

1:49:11.400 --> 1:49:14.000
<v Speaker 1>made that change where you can't change if you're verified,

1:49:14.040 --> 1:49:18.160
<v Speaker 1>you can't change your name anymore. Okay. I was wondering

1:49:18.200 --> 1:49:20.559
<v Speaker 1>because you don't post that off and on something. But

1:49:20.600 --> 1:49:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to get everyone's emails. So subscribe to myself

1:49:24.920 --> 1:49:27.200
<v Speaker 1>stack and give me your email address. I do send

1:49:27.240 --> 1:49:30.559
<v Speaker 1>it sometimes I send it to promote articles usually, Okay,

1:49:30.560 --> 1:49:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Just so I understand In terms of substack, do you

1:49:34.360 --> 1:49:36.720
<v Speaker 1>own your data a hundred percent or do they have

1:49:36.760 --> 1:49:40.160
<v Speaker 1>any access to your the emails, you collect, etcetera. You

1:49:40.200 --> 1:49:41.760
<v Speaker 1>own your you own your email list, and you can

1:49:41.760 --> 1:49:43.760
<v Speaker 1>take it wherever you want. You could leave stuff back

1:49:43.760 --> 1:49:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to but they don't get it. Hm. Okay, Okay, So

1:49:50.080 --> 1:49:55.559
<v Speaker 1>just for the naysayers, and this tends to be the

1:49:55.600 --> 1:49:59.840
<v Speaker 1>older audience, people over the age of thirty five, who

1:50:00.000 --> 1:50:06.720
<v Speaker 1>poo poo TikTok, etcetera. Explain, tell them what is good

1:50:06.760 --> 1:50:10.400
<v Speaker 1>about TikTok, why they should be on the platform, and

1:50:10.560 --> 1:50:16.800
<v Speaker 1>how to use the platform to their advantage. And definitely, uh, well,

1:50:16.800 --> 1:50:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll never say someone has to be on social media.

1:50:18.920 --> 1:50:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm very jealous of people that can live their life

1:50:21.200 --> 1:50:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and never set foot on on these apps. So you know,

1:50:24.280 --> 1:50:26.040
<v Speaker 1>it's if you don't want to do it, you don't

1:50:26.040 --> 1:50:27.880
<v Speaker 1>have to. But I will say that if you want

1:50:27.880 --> 1:50:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to reach people at scales, TikTok is the place to go. Um.

1:50:31.080 --> 1:50:33.559
<v Speaker 1>It can seem a little bit overwhelming because it's a

1:50:33.760 --> 1:50:36.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a creative tool. You know, they have a lot

1:50:36.320 --> 1:50:39.320
<v Speaker 1>of creative tools. I should say, uh, but it's pretty

1:50:39.360 --> 1:50:41.600
<v Speaker 1>simple to post. I mean it's you hold down the

1:50:41.600 --> 1:50:45.160
<v Speaker 1>middle button and record a video, just the way that

1:50:45.200 --> 1:50:48.879
<v Speaker 1>you went on Instagram stories. Um. I think it's valuable

1:50:48.920 --> 1:50:51.040
<v Speaker 1>because that's just where a lot of the cultural conversation

1:50:51.080 --> 1:50:53.200
<v Speaker 1>is happening. As you mentioned earlier, that's where people are

1:50:53.200 --> 1:50:56.120
<v Speaker 1>going to search for content and to shop. So if

1:50:56.200 --> 1:50:58.880
<v Speaker 1>you are promoting anything, or you want to be in

1:50:58.920 --> 1:51:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the cultural discussion, and that is where people are going. Okay, wait,

1:51:03.320 --> 1:51:06.439
<v Speaker 1>let's start one on one because most people, especially as

1:51:06.439 --> 1:51:11.839
<v Speaker 1>you get older, lurkers, So forget about creating content. Start

1:51:11.920 --> 1:51:16.599
<v Speaker 1>from downloading the app. Well, if you download the app,

1:51:16.960 --> 1:51:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the good thing about TikTok, I'll say, is

1:51:19.080 --> 1:51:21.720
<v Speaker 1>that you don't have to follow anyone. You can just

1:51:21.800 --> 1:51:24.000
<v Speaker 1>download the app and watch a bunch of videos and

1:51:24.240 --> 1:51:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the algorithm will learn what you like and it will

1:51:27.960 --> 1:51:30.479
<v Speaker 1>start to deliver you a very engaging feed. I mean,

1:51:30.479 --> 1:51:33.000
<v Speaker 1>one of my friends, she was extremely into cooking and

1:51:33.600 --> 1:51:35.160
<v Speaker 1>she just downloaded too. She still I don't think she

1:51:35.240 --> 1:51:37.840
<v Speaker 1>still has an account even but she you know, she'll

1:51:37.880 --> 1:51:40.240
<v Speaker 1>just you can just swipe through and watch a lot

1:51:40.240 --> 1:51:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of engage videos. It's like going on YouTube, right, I mean,

1:51:43.040 --> 1:51:45.559
<v Speaker 1>we all go on YouTube to watch and cooking videos.

1:51:45.600 --> 1:51:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I would say TikTok is great for learning, you know,

1:51:48.479 --> 1:51:50.879
<v Speaker 1>for skills. I tried to pay a little bit slower

1:51:50.920 --> 1:51:53.360
<v Speaker 1>because a little bit slower because for most people, the

1:51:53.439 --> 1:51:59.800
<v Speaker 1>initial hurdle is difficult. Download the app and then you say, oh,

1:52:00.080 --> 1:52:03.160
<v Speaker 1>just watch videos. You download the app and tell them

1:52:03.320 --> 1:52:08.800
<v Speaker 1>what happens to get them through their anxiety. Okay, oh god,

1:52:08.880 --> 1:52:11.479
<v Speaker 1>I have to. It's been a while. I don't know

1:52:11.560 --> 1:52:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the exact user flow in terms of UM, in terms

1:52:15.360 --> 1:52:18.400
<v Speaker 1>of what like what that pathway is when you download,

1:52:18.479 --> 1:52:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the screens UM. Basically, you download the app.

1:52:22.000 --> 1:52:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I will say, you download the app, and you are

1:52:24.840 --> 1:52:27.880
<v Speaker 1>very quickly funneled into the fore you page. That is

1:52:28.000 --> 1:52:29.800
<v Speaker 1>what they want you too. So you might have to

1:52:29.800 --> 1:52:32.639
<v Speaker 1>set up an account. You might not UM. I think

1:52:32.640 --> 1:52:34.280
<v Speaker 1>you might. You know, you might have to register for

1:52:34.320 --> 1:52:36.679
<v Speaker 1>some that will give you an automatic user name or whatever.

1:52:37.479 --> 1:52:40.040
<v Speaker 1>But then it will just feed you. It will see

1:52:40.080 --> 1:52:44.560
<v Speaker 1>you will be on a full screen video and it

1:52:44.600 --> 1:52:46.280
<v Speaker 1>will be up to you to watch that video or

1:52:46.360 --> 1:52:48.880
<v Speaker 1>swipe up and see the next video. And with every

1:52:48.920 --> 1:52:53.960
<v Speaker 1>swipe and every like, the algorithm will learn more about

1:52:53.960 --> 1:52:56.120
<v Speaker 1>you and it will deliver you, you know, the content

1:52:56.160 --> 1:52:58.960
<v Speaker 1>that you want to see. So it's it's really not

1:52:59.160 --> 1:53:01.920
<v Speaker 1>hard to download TikTok like it's it's a that's the

1:53:01.960 --> 1:53:05.160
<v Speaker 1>reason that they've scaled so much, right Like parents, I

1:53:05.200 --> 1:53:07.559
<v Speaker 1>mean there's so many there's more parents on TikTok and Facebook.

1:53:07.600 --> 1:53:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes I feel like I know that's not true, but

1:53:09.640 --> 1:53:14.800
<v Speaker 1>it feels like that sometimes, Okay, and pulling back the

1:53:14.920 --> 1:53:19.520
<v Speaker 1>lens all the way we're social media in the landscape,

1:53:19.680 --> 1:53:23.479
<v Speaker 1>as you say, the government, certainly in America you use

1:53:23.560 --> 1:53:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better or at least is bringing up

1:53:25.840 --> 1:53:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the issues in terms of what is the effect of

1:53:31.439 --> 1:53:36.440
<v Speaker 1>social media on the world at large, terms of everything

1:53:36.560 --> 1:53:42.200
<v Speaker 1>from consumerisism, politics to uh, how it affects buying influences.

1:53:42.240 --> 1:53:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Because many people have social media in a bubble as

1:53:45.280 --> 1:53:48.320
<v Speaker 1>large as it is, they see, well, it doesn't impact

1:53:48.400 --> 1:53:51.439
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world. To what degree does it?

1:53:51.560 --> 1:53:54.720
<v Speaker 1>And to what degree is it shaping our culture? I

1:53:54.720 --> 1:53:57.599
<v Speaker 1>mean it's completely shaping our culture. I think our pop

1:53:57.640 --> 1:54:01.320
<v Speaker 1>culture is Internet culture at this point. There is no distinction.

1:54:01.920 --> 1:54:05.280
<v Speaker 1>If you think about like the music, the entertainment we consume,

1:54:05.360 --> 1:54:09.800
<v Speaker 1>our political ecosystem is completely worked by the attention economy. Um.

1:54:10.439 --> 1:54:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think we were seeing that even preach Trump. Um.

1:54:13.160 --> 1:54:17.800
<v Speaker 1>It's affecting everything. I think connecting people at scale has

1:54:17.960 --> 1:54:22.439
<v Speaker 1>massive implications, um and literally everything. That's the core of

1:54:22.520 --> 1:54:24.800
<v Speaker 1>my beat. That's what I got into covering this whole

1:54:24.840 --> 1:54:27.599
<v Speaker 1>world for is that it's not just a bunch of

1:54:27.600 --> 1:54:30.960
<v Speaker 1>teenagers making videos on the internet. This these types of

1:54:30.960 --> 1:54:36.880
<v Speaker 1>technologies and communication technology in general. UM is it can

1:54:36.920 --> 1:54:40.640
<v Speaker 1>affect everything, business life, you know, literally anything you can

1:54:40.760 --> 1:54:43.240
<v Speaker 1>you can think of. Um, there's a great talk from

1:54:43.320 --> 1:54:46.440
<v Speaker 1>this UM. I can't remember who it was who gave it,

1:54:46.520 --> 1:54:48.440
<v Speaker 1>but it was. It was at XO x O and

1:54:48.480 --> 1:54:50.640
<v Speaker 1>he was talking which is a tech festival that doesn't

1:54:50.640 --> 1:54:53.200
<v Speaker 1>happen anymore. But UM, this guy was talking about the

1:54:53.240 --> 1:54:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Internet as a people connector and how the goal of

1:54:55.200 --> 1:54:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Internet has always been to sort of connected people. And

1:54:58.280 --> 1:55:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I think social media is the first time we're seeing

1:55:00.160 --> 1:55:03.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff happen at scale and seeing those connections happen at scale.

1:55:03.240 --> 1:55:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Obviously there's been a lot of downsize, but there's so

1:55:05.240 --> 1:55:10.360
<v Speaker 1>many upsides too, and it's not going anywhere. I think

1:55:10.360 --> 1:55:12.720
<v Speaker 1>things are changing in the social landscape. Not everyone wants

1:55:12.760 --> 1:55:15.600
<v Speaker 1>to reach every person on earth at scale at at

1:55:15.600 --> 1:55:19.360
<v Speaker 1>all times. I think we're realizing that that's generally not

1:55:19.400 --> 1:55:22.720
<v Speaker 1>always a good idea. But but it's you know, the

1:55:22.760 --> 1:55:25.360
<v Speaker 1>core of the Internet is still as a people connector

1:55:26.800 --> 1:55:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and what's your personal dream? And I mean, you know,

1:55:30.640 --> 1:55:32.839
<v Speaker 1>as you go down the pike, you're in your thirties

1:55:32.920 --> 1:55:35.240
<v Speaker 1>now one can easily do the math when you graduated

1:55:35.240 --> 1:55:38.560
<v Speaker 1>from college and you just want to do this to

1:55:38.600 --> 1:55:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the end of time or is there some you know,

1:55:41.160 --> 1:55:44.120
<v Speaker 1>something on the horizon that you right now say well

1:55:44.120 --> 1:55:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to be or do that. Yeah. I mean,

1:55:47.560 --> 1:55:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I my whole goal with my career, and I've had

1:55:50.280 --> 1:55:53.720
<v Speaker 1>a million different jobs and stuff, is just to help

1:55:53.760 --> 1:55:58.240
<v Speaker 1>people understand and the Internet and to take creative work

1:55:58.480 --> 1:56:02.280
<v Speaker 1>on the Internet seriously, Like I really really really want

1:56:02.320 --> 1:56:04.680
<v Speaker 1>that as somebody that does creative work on the Internet,

1:56:04.720 --> 1:56:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I just want people to understand that that that online

1:56:08.240 --> 1:56:11.000
<v Speaker 1>life is kind of our default reality now and people

1:56:11.000 --> 1:56:13.920
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't dismiss that. So I guess my my dream is

1:56:13.960 --> 1:56:16.080
<v Speaker 1>to impact the media and to build a better media

1:56:16.120 --> 1:56:19.200
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem and do whatever I have to do to get there.

1:56:19.360 --> 1:56:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I want in ten years there to be

1:56:22.640 --> 1:56:26.400
<v Speaker 1>a mediate ecosystem where one we're not condescending, you know,

1:56:26.440 --> 1:56:28.400
<v Speaker 1>to reporters, not saying that you're doing this, but it

1:56:28.440 --> 1:56:30.200
<v Speaker 1>happens a lot on time, like where it's not where

1:56:30.240 --> 1:56:33.120
<v Speaker 1>it's laughable to suggest that, oh, because a reporter uses

1:56:33.160 --> 1:56:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Twitter a lot, that they're you know, self promotional or whatever.

1:56:36.480 --> 1:56:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that we should just take all of that

1:56:38.520 --> 1:56:40.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff as a given and think, well, what does that

1:56:40.440 --> 1:56:43.280
<v Speaker 1>mean for media? I want a media landscape that's more

1:56:43.320 --> 1:56:47.280
<v Speaker 1>diverse that Pete, that that journalists are more secure in

1:56:47.320 --> 1:56:50.400
<v Speaker 1>their jobs, and that they have ownership over their work

1:56:50.440 --> 1:56:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and can see the upsides of their success, you know,

1:56:53.400 --> 1:56:56.920
<v Speaker 1>as much as these media companies have seen. So um yeah,

1:56:56.960 --> 1:56:58.360
<v Speaker 1>those are all the things. And I don't know that

1:56:58.400 --> 1:57:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll always be a writer. I've definitely not always been

1:57:00.440 --> 1:57:03.240
<v Speaker 1>a writer. At My background is in strategy, um and

1:57:03.240 --> 1:57:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and theis dev and audience development. So maybe I'll go

1:57:06.160 --> 1:57:10.320
<v Speaker 1>back to doing that or something, but just something to

1:57:10.400 --> 1:57:14.280
<v Speaker 1>make the media, you know, you know, build a version

1:57:14.280 --> 1:57:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of media that that I want to see. Okay, Taylor,

1:57:18.160 --> 1:57:20.760
<v Speaker 1>this has been great. You know. The problem is is

1:57:20.800 --> 1:57:23.120
<v Speaker 1>there's well to your advantage. On one level, there's only

1:57:23.160 --> 1:57:25.880
<v Speaker 1>one of you. I can't say, well, follow and pay

1:57:25.920 --> 1:57:28.360
<v Speaker 1>attention to the articles of Taylor the Rands and then

1:57:28.400 --> 1:57:30.280
<v Speaker 1>this person in that person, I don't know who those

1:57:30.320 --> 1:57:34.200
<v Speaker 1>other people were were. And for those who don't realize

1:57:34.240 --> 1:57:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you were history or your CV, you're really the authority.

1:57:38.880 --> 1:57:40.880
<v Speaker 1>So I want to thank you so much for taking

1:57:40.920 --> 1:57:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the time talk to my audience. Well, this is so

1:57:43.680 --> 1:57:46.680
<v Speaker 1>fun because you're such an icon and I'm very honored

1:57:46.720 --> 1:57:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to be included, and to be on this podcast is

1:57:49.120 --> 1:57:53.120
<v Speaker 1>so fun to chat. Wow. And I'll leave it at

1:57:53.160 --> 1:57:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that till next time. This is Bob Leftson,