WEBVTT - Alphabet and Microsoft Kickoff Earnings Season for Big Tech

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Wait inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>global business, finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Yes, all right, just like our TV colleagues, we're going

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 2>to stay with earnings right now, guys, and we've got

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 2>a great voice. Microsoft alphabet so many out with earnings,

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 2>few others. Lucky for us, we have someone who invested

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 2>these names. He's like a gold mine. James Chackmak is

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 2>back with us partner and technology Alice at Clockwise Capital

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 2>three hundred and forty five million in assets under management.

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 2>But you check his holdings. These are the names Microsoft, Google, Visa,

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 2>so many.

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:51.880
<v Speaker 3>James.

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 4>Great to have you back with Tim and myself. How

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:54.279
<v Speaker 4>are you.

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 5>I'm doing great? How are you doing?

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's pick Microsoft first. It's rallying big time in

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 2>the after hours. Walk us through earnings.

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 4>I know you're just break. You're going through them just

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 4>like we are. What jumps out for you?

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean the big thing there is that you

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 3>continue to see resiliency on the.

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 5>On the cloud side.

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 3>While the legacy parts of their business anniversary the tougher

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 3>comps and come out stronger. So and at the same

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 3>time while being able to manage the bottom line. And

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 3>obviously it's a juggernaud it's ten percent of the queues

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 3>and so it's a big way of important stock for

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 3>the market. But the main thing is that the growth

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 3>sector factor continues to be where the money will likely

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:43.639
<v Speaker 3>continue to flow and coming out of the value area.

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 6>Okay, let's go to alphabet because shares are getting punished

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 6>in the after hours. Right now, we have three quarter

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 6>cloud revenue coming in below estimates eight point four to

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 6>one billion. Estimates were for eight point six billion dollars.

0:01:55.440 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 6>Alf BET third quarter revenue excluding traffic acquisition costs did

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 6>beat estimates, though, what's sticking out to you?

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean the big thing there is with the byside,

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 3>expectations were a little bit ahead of where the street was,

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:12.799
<v Speaker 3>you know, so the whisper numbers were looking for and

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 3>upwards of ten to fifteen percent upside of revision to

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 3>earnings as you look into next year, and you know,

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 3>with cloud coming in a little bit softer, you know

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 3>that may and then being a high margin you know contributor.

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 3>As you look down the road, you know that that

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 3>may be posing somewhat of aheadwind. We got to look

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 3>to the call to see, you know, what the what

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 3>the color is on things. But overall, you know, Alphabet's

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:36.799
<v Speaker 3>not going anywhere. Google's not going anywhere, and you know,

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 3>we just need to see how much of a blip

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:41.399
<v Speaker 3>this is. You know, is it a single quarter thing

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 3>or you know, doesn't have several quarters to work through.

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, down five percent right now, Carol.

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And what's interesting we initially saw Meta I think,

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 2>take a little bit of a hit in the after hours,

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:52.799
<v Speaker 2>but right now metas back up, but shares Alphabet still

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 2>down about five percent here all right, So in terms

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 2>of these are all important numbers and certainly they can

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 2>sway what we see in the overall market. Microsoft and Google, what.

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 4>Are what is it?

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:05.679
<v Speaker 2>Tim?

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:07.959
<v Speaker 6>I'm sorry, Snap is crossing right now, so I wanted

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 6>to make sure to get this in. We got a

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 6>red heat third quarter revenue for Snap coming in above

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 6>estimates one point one nine billion estimates for for one

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 6>point one one Snap just absolutely surging in the after

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 6>hours right now, up twenty percent. I think, Carol, this

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 6>is because the company authorized up to five hundred million

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 6>dollars in share buybacks. Also, James, I know you're following

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:27.799
<v Speaker 6>along live with us. The CEO, Jerry Hunter is set

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 6>to retire. Fourth quarter view is internal forecast, though we

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 6>should note is not a formal guidance. Some of those

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 6>headlines what sticks.

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Out to you well, and I'll just say they also

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 2>did talk about the fourth quarter. Fourth quarter revenue one

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 2>point thirty two billion to one point thirty eight billion.

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 2>The estimate is one point thirty three So.

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 4>Upside there not formal guidance.

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 2>Not formal guidance, but they're at least giving us some numbers,

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 2>So go ahead, James, take it away.

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, Snap actually had their numbers leak, you know,

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 3>a couple of weeks ago, and you know, so good

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 3>numbers were expected, you know, out of that this quarter.

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think the bigger pick your story is

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 3>that digital advertising continues to gain share versus legacy media,

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 3>and that trend is just going to be you know,

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 3>increased in full force with the assistance of AI and

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 3>the contributions of AI into the creation of content and

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 3>the creation of ads, which will drive down costs and

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 3>in turn likely increase the amount of ad spent that's

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 3>placed on digital platforms, and niche platforms like a Snap

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 3>will benefit. But at the end of the day, we

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 3>think that scale matters most, and companies like Meta and

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 3>Alphabet and to somewhat of a lesser extent, Amazon, you know,

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 3>will benefit. So the niche platforms are in a rising

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 3>times lifts all both situations right now. But as you look,

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, a little bit further down the road, we

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 3>think scale is going to win out over niche.

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:58.679
<v Speaker 2>I'm just going to say Snap is down about eighty

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 2>eight percent from its September.

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 4>Twenty twenty one high.

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 2>And yes, even though it's rallying in the after hours

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 2>up about twelve percent as we speak, it's a below

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 2>ten dollars stock. It's no longer you know, it used

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 2>to be up above the eighties. So a little as

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 2>you say, what is it.

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:15.600
<v Speaker 6>Went in went in down, zoom out. I mean, But

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 6>but speaking of I mean, I want to go to

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 6>James on this, because James, you've been covering Snap for years.

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 6>I mean, even in your previous role as a an

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:24.599
<v Speaker 6>analyst solely focused on tech. I mean, I think you

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 6>were covering the company even before when it went at iPod.

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:31.160
<v Speaker 6>You have a long history with that company. When did

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 6>you sour on it?

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 3>I soured on it maybe one or two quarters out

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 3>out of the gate, because essentially, you know, they had

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 3>positioned themselves as you know, a camera company, and you know,

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 3>we we took that bait and ran with it, because

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, the the DNA of a company matters, and

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 3>their points of differentiation matter, especially when you're going at

0:05:55.480 --> 0:06:00.080
<v Speaker 3>after a company like Meta and Alphabet, so you have

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:02.600
<v Speaker 3>to be differentiated in some way. And you know, they

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:06.119
<v Speaker 3>came up with the whole vertical camera and we're leading

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 3>into that. But you know, you'll read the first line

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:10.599
<v Speaker 3>of their perspectives it said it's a camera company. But

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 3>when you looked at what Evan Spiegel was actually trying

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:16.360
<v Speaker 3>to do was they were trying to be everything to everyone,

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 3>which is what Meta is, you know, a full scale

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 3>player like Meta, and they didn't embrace, embrace their their

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 3>niche different points of differentiation.

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 5>And if you try to be everything to everyone is

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 5>a niche.

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 3>Player, you lose. You know, Twitter tried to do that.

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 3>They lost snaps trying to do that. I mean, going

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 3>back to their IPO, you know they've lost tremendously, you know,

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:40.599
<v Speaker 3>despite the recent rally. So you know, you got to

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 3>know your DNA.

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 5>We've got to.

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:45.599
<v Speaker 3>Embrace it and don't be something that you don't be

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 3>something that, yeah, you say you're not.

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 2>So let's just remind everybody Alphabet at with earnings. It

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 2>is down about five percent in the aftermarket this after

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 2>those third quarter results.

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 4>What we're seeing that.

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 2>Traders are focusing on is the cloud unit reporting sales

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 2>missing estimates. So third quarter Google Cloud revenue of eight

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 2>point forty one billion, the estimate was eight point six billion.

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 2>And then you've got Microsoft going in the other direction,

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 2>up about five percent after their first quarter revenue tops

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 2>estimates in a big way. And then you've got Snapstoring

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:19.239
<v Speaker 2>up about thirteen percent. There are third quarter revenue topping estimates,

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 2>but keep in mind it's a stock that is way

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 2>way down from where it was a little perspective. So

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 2>some of the big tech names that we're seeing, and

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 2>we've also got Texas Instruments out.

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, really notable moves from some of these companies. I

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 6>want to go back to alphabet and talk a little

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 6>bit a bit more about what you get your thoughts

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 6>on alphabet as Carol mentioned James down six percent right

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 6>now in the postmarket. I know we have to wait

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 6>for the call. What's the question that you would ask

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 6>on the call if you were able to join.

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 3>For me, it would be about just continued cost discipline.

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm not worried about the top line. You're going to

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 3>have ebbs and clothes in the cloud, especially with the

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 3>uncertainty around the macro picture. You know, the sales cycles

0:07:57.840 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 3>of migrations and so.

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 6>Where do you want to see that cost discipline? Do

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 6>you want to see it in like you know, the

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 6>free massages at work type of thing, and free lunches

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 6>at work, like the thing that these tech companies are

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 6>known for. Do you want to see it in sort

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 6>of not investing as much as they're investing in new projects.

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 3>And both ideally, but obviously the big drag continues to

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 3>be in other projects that you know may or may

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 3>not come to fruition, and then most times they don't,

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 3>So continue discipline there and then tightening the belt around

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 3>their gn A the general operating expenses wherever they can,

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 3>because you know, with this kind of margins, well with

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 3>this kind of revenue and this kind the potential of

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 3>the incremental margins afforded by advertising dollars. You know, they

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:45.440
<v Speaker 3>should be able to continue to trend earnings in a

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 3>powerful way higher from where they are right now.

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 5>So I mean, my my offen focus on the bottom line.

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Hey, James, these are names that you have in your portfolio, Microsoft, Alphabet,

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 2>anything in these reports that make you want to go

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 2>out and buy some shares or sell some shares.

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, we grossed up both Alphabet and Microsoft going into

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:08.839
<v Speaker 3>the print. At the end of the day, though it

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 3>seems like a wash between those trades. You know, you

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 3>can't win them all if we try to win fifty

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 3>one percent of the time.

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 5>But the no, I don't think that it really changes.

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 3>You know, we are underweight Microsoft relative to the index,

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:30.560
<v Speaker 3>but we feel comfortable with our waiting there, and we

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 3>grossed up, you know, in anticipation of a potentially strong quarter.

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 3>Alphabet were marginally underweight relative to the index. Feel comfortable

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 3>with that. There need to get more color on it.

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 3>But you know, the other big ones are Meta, Tomorrow

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 3>and Amazon. You know, Thursday I leave. That will really

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:51.440
<v Speaker 3>kind of define what the rest of the year looks

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 3>like for the cues.

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 6>James Chockmack he's still with us. He's partner in Technology

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 6>Analystic Clockwise Capital. They about three hundred and forty five

0:09:57.000 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 6>million dollars in assets under management. He joins us once

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:03.959
<v Speaker 6>again on from Miami. We're talking today's Megacap Tech earnings

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 6>out just now and some other companies as well, and

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 6>for today's weekly Bloomberg Plugged in segment when we dig

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 6>into the ev space. We've got a lot to talk

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:15.559
<v Speaker 6>about with Tesla when it comes to Tesla, and we're

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 6>gonna do that with James. Tesla, James a top holding

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 6>in your portfolio. We want to get your thoughts on

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 6>that earnings call last week and Elon Musk Carol described

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 6>his mood I think as dour. I think that's fair

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 6>to say.

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 4>It's a bit of a bummer.

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 6>It was a bit of a bummer. What did you

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 6>What did you make of it?

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it was pretty bad.

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:39.319
<v Speaker 3>I mean it was as bad as you think.

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 5>You get it. It's the call that you never hoped for.

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:50.439
<v Speaker 5>It was how should I frame it?

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 3>Basically, every area of opportunity, an optionality to the upside

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:58.319
<v Speaker 3>was met with a caveat and.

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 5>You know, kicking the can down the road on.

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 3>The realization of those opportunities, whether it be the expansion

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 3>of margin on the power side of the business, whether

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 3>it be the cadence on the rollout of the of

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 3>the cyber truck, or the productivity gains and the margin

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 3>improvements on the production side, you know, all those things,

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:26.199
<v Speaker 3>you know, push the can down the road, Which essentially

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 3>means that our twenty twenty three targets moved to twenty

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:33.079
<v Speaker 3>twenty four, or our twenty twenty four price targets moved

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 3>to twenty twenty five, So essentially that call did a

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 3>one year reset on our valuations.

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, in the EV world, I feel like James,

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 2>a year from now is going to be even more

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 2>interesting potentially as we see more entrance into the EV

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 2>space right and more competition for Elon. So is do

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 2>we have to start thinking differently about this company that

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 2>maybe I don't know, I don't want to say viability,

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:02.560
<v Speaker 2>but just what its role is in its place and

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 2>its share of the market going forward.

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:08.680
<v Speaker 3>No, I think, you know, as you look at the

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 3>company fundamentally with a multi year horizon, which is increasingly

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 3>difficult to do in this market environment, and we kind of,

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:19.199
<v Speaker 3>you know, our time frames have moved from five years

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 3>to three years to one year.

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 5>Now we're looking at more like one.

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Month, sometimes even one week at this point, just given

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 3>the volatility. But you know, if you are able to

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:32.440
<v Speaker 3>take that multi year review, we think that it still

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 3>continues to be a tremendously undervalued asset relative to its potential,

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 3>the ability, the amount of dat it is amassed, relative

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 3>to the entire industry, every other competitor in the industry

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 3>combined that head start, there is something that is insurmountable,

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 3>and we think that they will continue to have the

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 3>opportunity there to monitor tis that. And at the same time,

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:05.319
<v Speaker 3>the power business is still in infancy stages and has

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 3>truly it's only about ten percent utilized right now of

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 3>their capacity that they've built out, So you know, there's

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 3>tremendous margin opportunity from that side as well, and I

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 3>think that people will increasingly stopped looking at Tesla as

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 3>an auto manufacturer and more as a holistic play on

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 3>on data and power.

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 2>We just want to mention Tom Emmer ends his speakership bid,

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 2>becoming the third GOP nominee to fail.

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 4>Nominee to fail. There's been a lot I.

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 6>Think he was making it pretty far earlier. Today.

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 2>I feel like there's a lot of horse trading going

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 2>on in closed rooms.

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, exactly.

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:40.439
<v Speaker 6>But Jays, we're not gonna we're not. Don't worry. We're

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 6>not going to ask for your thoughts. Maybe, hey, maybe, Speaker.

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 2>Of the House, what's easier, what's easier to figure out

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:47.679
<v Speaker 2>Elon in his world or what's going on in the

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 2>House of Representatives?

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 6>James to Washington.

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 5>Eli is easier, I'll tell you that.

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 6>Oh wow, Hey, James, a couple more Tesla questions. Uh,

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 6>you mentioned the cyber truck. How are you valuing the

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:01.559
<v Speaker 6>cyber truck when it comes to your analysis? And this

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:05.119
<v Speaker 6>is a category that you know, Ford absolutely just dominates

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 6>in here in the US GM as well in many

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 6>companies over the last twenty thirty years have tried to

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:12.199
<v Speaker 6>come in and take market share. It hasn't They haven't

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 6>necessarily succeeded. How do you think about the cyber truck?

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean it's a separate line item that we use.

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, we break it out by the model three

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 3>and three slash y and then X slash s and

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 3>then the cyber truck. So that's how we kind of

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 3>build it out and basically, you know, what we learned

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 3>from the call is that the cadence may not be

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 3>as steep as originally hoped or anticipated.

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 5>So that's a problem.

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 3>And it's a high cost, you know, it's it's a

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 3>high cost production vehicle, and if you're not pushing volume through,

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 3>it's going to hurt your margins. And and ultimately, you know,

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 3>the problem with Tesla near term is on the margin side.

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 3>And if you get lumpiness on the power business, which

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 3>is their fastest growing segment, as well as their highest

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 3>margin segment, which is a higher margin than their auto segment.

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 5>Then you just have uncertainty. Uncertainty, unfortunately leads the multiple compression.

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Hey, and you're fine on your clockwise core equity uh

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 2>and innovation ETF. Tesla's definitely a big holding. Have you

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 2>been buying or selling shares of Tesla?

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 5>Uh?

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 3>No, it's about a four percent weight. You know, our

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:30.239
<v Speaker 3>top holdings are around six.

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 5>Like uh, Amazons by Yeah, have you as of.

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 3>No, No, we've we've we've we we held out to

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 3>the full position basically here, you know, you know, just

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 3>looking at fundamentally, you know, you had downside of about

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 3>two hundred dollars technically downside of about two ten. You know,

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 3>we tested the technical limits on the downside, bounced off

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 3>of those. But you know, we may look the trim

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 3>because fundamentally, like I said, the valuation has been pushed

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 3>out one year and there may be better opportunities to

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 3>deploy capital. So if we get a broader market balance,

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 3>which we do anticipate is a high probable scenario, especially

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 3>after earnings this week, I think Tesla can be along

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 3>for the ride and at which point will likely make

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 3>that determination to trim and rotate into some of the

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 3>faster growth and potentially higher beta names.

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 6>Hey James, it's interesting here. You're you're up thirty three

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 6>point eight percent year to date in the ETF so

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 6>it's been a really good year. I'll performing the NASDAC

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 6>and the S and P five hundred. I was interested

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 6>to see that your top holding is one to three

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 6>month t bells.

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 4>What's that?

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 6>What's up with that?

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, what we typically like to do is we keep

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 3>ten percent cash on hand in a normal market environment,

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 3>and you know, if if we see risk, you know

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 3>that cash position can go from fifteen to twenty percent.

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 3>But you know, with the yields that we're seeing in

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 3>the market right now. I'm not going to just hold

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 3>it in pure cash. I park the cash that I

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:11.120
<v Speaker 3>have in the portfolio in BIL instead of just leaving

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 3>it in cash, because I can pick up super safe

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 3>yield and why not. So it's just a way.

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 6>That money as much money market fund essentially.

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, if I need cash to buy positions,

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 3>I use BIL as a source of cash. But it's

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 3>basically just a way to add additional yield for investors.

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 2>Hey, real quickly, thirty seconds, that's all we've got. Visa's

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:35.440
<v Speaker 2>up almost two percent in the after hours. It reported

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 2>a massive twenty five billion dollar buy back raise his

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 2>corely dividend. What do we need to know about Visa

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:42.959
<v Speaker 2>just quickly?

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean it's an oligopoly between that and MasterCard,

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:50.440
<v Speaker 3>you know there as long as you know, the broader

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 3>consumer continues to remain healthy, which we think will be

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:57.639
<v Speaker 3>the case. We don't see anything breaking just yet, hopefully not.

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 3>But as long as it continues to be the case,

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:02.920
<v Speaker 3>there will be a beneficiary. And it's just the buyback

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 3>and dividend increases just music to my ears.

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 5>So we continue to like it.

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that CEO and the press release saying we as

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 2>we enter a new fiscal year, I'm confident in our

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 2>ability to deliver against a backdrop of geopolitical and economic uncertainty.

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Talks about tremendous opportunity ahead.

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 7>So there you have it.

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 6>Is he headed to Washington to be Speaker of the House.

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 4>You're chalk mark, You're done, choc Mack. You can go

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 4>home now.

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:29.399
<v Speaker 2>Next Speaker of the House, James Chockmock over at Clockwise Capital.

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg.

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:39.159
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern Listen on

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business app,

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:49.399
<v Speaker 2>Just real quickly the latest on the Israel Hamas conflict,

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 2>because the headlines continue to cross as we speak. You

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 2>and Secretary General calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 2>at the Security Council, President bind Tim saying humanitarian aid

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 2>is not getting into Gaza fast enough. Secret Tape State

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Blinkln saying pauses in the conflict may be needed

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:09.360
<v Speaker 2>to organize help for civilians. As Israel extended its bombing campaign,

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 2>so as we said, the headlines continue.

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 6>And the conflict continues. Also, this was a must read

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 6>for US today on the Israel Hamas conflict, especially as

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 6>the most would argue that it is yes about what

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 6>happens next in terms of the expected Israel ground invasion

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 6>in response to Hamasa's surprise and deadly attack on Israel

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 6>now more than two weeks ago, and then what happens

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 6>after that, what's the future of Israel and Palestine existing

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 6>side by stide one state, two states, and what could

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 6>it have been a generation ago? Carol.

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, someone who has a very informed view on that

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 2>is the man who withdrew from Gaza some eighteen years

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 2>ago and had has a plan. I guess you could

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:47.120
<v Speaker 2>say we are so appreciative to have with us. Bloomberg

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 2>News International Affairs columnist Mark Champion, he's on the road.

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 2>As he continues to report on the conflict, he joins

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 2>us now on the phone from Israel. First stop, Mark,

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:57.879
<v Speaker 2>how are you and what are you seeing on a

0:19:57.960 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 2>daily and hourly basis?

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 8>Well, I mean fine, it's like a lot of war zones,

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:10.919
<v Speaker 8>it's very calm in most of the country. There was,

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:14.360
<v Speaker 8>you know, some alerts today in Tel Aviv, because there

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 8>was quite a big rocket shower, but generally, you know,

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 8>quite calm, quite quiet, and of course, you know, not

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 8>at all in Gaza and immediately around Gaza, where the

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:31.159
<v Speaker 8>Israeli armed forces are, you know, gathering in very large numbers,

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 8>and then up in the north where there's been some

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 8>you know, increasing exchanges of fire between Hezbollah and the

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:40.640
<v Speaker 8>Israeli defense forces.

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 6>I want to get to your column in just a

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 6>second mark and dedicate significant time to it because it's

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 6>it's such an important and it's such a great read.

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 6>But first I want to just ask you your opinion

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 6>on whether or not you think Israel is already fighting

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 6>a two front war will be fighting a two front

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 6>war soon.

0:20:57.200 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 8>Well, you know, that is in a way the immediate question.

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 8>So they are not yet fighting a two front war.

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 8>They are conducting, you know, fairly limited skirmishes and exchanges

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:15.679
<v Speaker 8>of fire with Hezbollah. Hesbela is a large force. It

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 8>is not as big as the IDF, but it is

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 8>a large force, around one hundred thousand troops or so.

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 8>They have, you know, an estimated one hundred one hundred

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:28.159
<v Speaker 8>and fifty thousand rockets and precision guided missiles. Many of

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:31.679
<v Speaker 8>those missiles are much larger than what Hamas has to

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:37.680
<v Speaker 8>fire at Israel. So if that becomes a second front,

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 8>it will be a very significant war and the Israelis

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 8>will have no alternative other than to go in and

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 8>to try and destroy you know, the rocket launchers, et

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:52.160
<v Speaker 8>cetera at source. So it will be a ground war

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:56.919
<v Speaker 8>and it will be large, much larger than what is

0:21:56.960 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 8>going to happen in the south where Hamas is embedded

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:05.120
<v Speaker 8>in a density urban area, so they are very difficult

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:07.439
<v Speaker 8>to get out. There's all these tunnels that they have

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:12.479
<v Speaker 8>spent years digging in preparation for exactly this event, and

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:15.120
<v Speaker 8>so it will be difficult, but they are in much

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:16.400
<v Speaker 8>smaller force, all right.

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:20.160
<v Speaker 2>So Mark, so as we contemplate the possibility or likelihood

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 2>of a large, dense ground war there in Israel and

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 2>in Gaza, we do need to and many would argue,

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 2>we need to think about what happens next, what's the plan?

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 4>Afterwards?

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:36.919
<v Speaker 2>You had an hour long approximately conversation with a former

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Israeli Prime minister. Can you talk to us about that

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 2>and his plan and his thinking about one state to state.

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 4>What has to happen?

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 8>Yes, I mean this is a hot omer and he

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 8>was the Prime minister. Just immediately after, Israel withdrew from Gaza.

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 8>So they took all the settlers out who had been

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 8>the Jewish settlers who had been in Gaza. They took

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 8>them out, not very willingly, and they also withdrew the

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 8>army because they had been occupying Gaza since nineteen s

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:17.880
<v Speaker 8>sixty seven in the Sixth Day War, and it decided,

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 8>you know, this is what it was telling me, And

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 8>what I really wanted to understand was so why, you know,

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:30.119
<v Speaker 8>why did they do this? What did they hope would happen?

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:33.439
<v Speaker 8>And then obviously something went wrong? So what went wrong?

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 8>And essentially what you said was, look, it had become

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 8>clear to us that the occupation needed to end because

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:47.160
<v Speaker 8>it was damaging obviously the Palestinas, but it was damaging

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:52.679
<v Speaker 8>us too because it was it is extremely unhealthy and

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 8>it makes you do things, you know, to other people

0:23:55.480 --> 0:24:00.080
<v Speaker 8>that are just are not good for you yourself. So

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.679
<v Speaker 8>society we felt we needed to start doing this. We

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:06.679
<v Speaker 8>have been trying to negotiate an agreement and agreed to

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 8>state solution and it wasn't happening. So we decided to

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:18.880
<v Speaker 8>just pull out and you know, separate and so then

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 8>he became prime minister, you know, immediately after that he

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 8>had actually been his brain child. But Arielsa sar on

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 8>his bars and the prime minister had a stroke, and

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 8>so he took over, and then he was not in

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:39.439
<v Speaker 8>power for very long before. So in two thousand and

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 8>eight they had came probably closer than they ever have

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:47.919
<v Speaker 8>to an agreement with the Palestinians, and so that was

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 8>what he was trying to do, to use this as

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:53.159
<v Speaker 8>a way to kind of force the pace on a

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 8>tuesdate solution. He then was out of power and Nyahou

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:00.440
<v Speaker 8>took over, and we've had fifteen years of a very

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 8>different policy which is essentially not aimed as a two

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:04.119
<v Speaker 8>state solution.

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, and this I just want to go to in

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 2>your column that he believes that it was Benjamin Nettnah

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 2>whose decision to build up a Maas and weaken its

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 2>West Bank rival the Palestinian authority to eliminate any credible

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 2>partner to continue settlement negotiations that change the whole direction

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 2>of travel. Does Benjamin Netanya who have to go in

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 2>order for there to be some kind of two state solution,

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 2>Which sounds like that's what he's arguing for or it

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:32.360
<v Speaker 2>is what he's arguing for.

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 8>Well, I mean that would definitely be Omett's point of view.

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 8>He thinks omet himself resigned he either there were corruption

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 8>charges against him and he was eventually convicted, but he resigned,

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 8>and he feels that Netta who should do exactly the same,

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 8>and he said that, you know, the longer he leaves it,

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 8>the messier it will be. But I think the real

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 8>issue here is that who's at the head of a

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 8>coalition government which is the most right wing that Israel

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:08.360
<v Speaker 8>has had, and it has been extremely aggressive in terms of,

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:14.120
<v Speaker 8>you know, pressing settlements into the West Bank and has

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 8>not pursued any kind of to state agreement. So if

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 8>you're going to have a solution, if you're going to

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:29.400
<v Speaker 8>have a strategy that envelops the military campaign and offers

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 8>some kind of end state for the Palestinians who will

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:37.199
<v Speaker 8>suffer during this, then it's going to be difficult for

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 8>this government to deliver it.

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 6>Well, Mark, we just have one minute left. But in

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:44.640
<v Speaker 6>your opinion or in Ulmart's opinion, it is even possible

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 6>moving forward given what's happened over the last fifteen years

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 6>with the rise in settlements, especially in the West Bank.

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 8>It will be extremely difficult and some of those settlements

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 8>will have to go, just like they did in Gata.

0:26:57.040 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 8>And that's his point. You know it can be done,

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 8>but it takes some very strong leadership.

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:03.879
<v Speaker 6>Is their political will within Israel to do this?

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:10.159
<v Speaker 8>At this point I can't see it, but you know

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:13.160
<v Speaker 8>there is going to be a huge reckoning with Netna

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 8>and his government over the security laps that led talks

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 8>over seven and we will have a new government, perhaps

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:21.200
<v Speaker 8>a new situation that would make it possible.

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:25.439
<v Speaker 2>Incredible column, and you know, you remind us of a

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:28.399
<v Speaker 2>lot of hatred and hostility among the Palestinians, and so

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 2>you understand maybe their anger here, but you also get

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:37.360
<v Speaker 2>into how they are a rising population so demographically very important,

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 2>which is why maybe a one state would not work.

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 2>It's brilliant and it really is a very smart part

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 2>of the conversation when we think about what happens next.

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Stay safe, Mark Champion, Bloomberg News, International Affairs Communists. Mark

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Champion joining us on this Tuesday on the phone where

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 2>it's getting lead there in Israel. All right, you are

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 2>listening and watching Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser along

0:27:58.680 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 2>with Tim Staneveek.

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern on Bloomberg Radio,

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business app, and YouTube. You can also listen

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 4>Okay, something.

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:22.679
<v Speaker 2>We talk about a lot, a lot wrong with the

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 2>Internet at the moment. The big social media platforms have

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:29.359
<v Speaker 2>embraced efficiency, and you've got moderators who once made sure

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:31.640
<v Speaker 2>that our feeds had a rough correspondence to.

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:34.119
<v Speaker 4>The truth have actually lost their jobs.

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:36.679
<v Speaker 2>So leaving regular users to sift through an ever accumulating

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 2>pile of the misinformation. Rage baden heads for chiechen chonga.

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 6>Do you see those in your on your ex?

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Do you see those, Carol so frustrated with X like

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't even I'm not even on it one.

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 6>Over and over again.

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, yeah, I mean, you know, I hear they're very relaxing,

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 7>great wind algorithm's not working.

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 4>They are productive.

0:28:57.480 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 6>Okay. There is an exception to all of this, though,

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 6>a shining beacon to the glory days of the Internet

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 6>and maybe even to knowledge in general. We're talking about Wikipedia.

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 6>It's the online encyclopedia. Of course, it doesn't collect personal

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 6>information about readers. It doesn't have any advertising. It does

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 6>make some appeals for you know, people to don'tate the time. Yeah,

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 6>it does. There are no influencers, and Carol, there's no

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:24.959
<v Speaker 6>cat turd. I just want to google it. I just

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 6>wanted to say cat turd on the radio.

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 2>It's probably a Wikipedia entry on it, so let's get

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 2>to it. Max Chafkin writes about it in today's edition.

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 6>Of Those were his words. I was just reading, right,

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 6>don't blame me for k at his.

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Desk, and he just chuckles his way through these things.

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 2>It's the BW Daily, the Bloomberg Business Week newsletter. It

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 2>gives you the power Business Week in a handy dandy form.

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Sign up at Bloomberg dot com slash Newsletters. You can

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 2>also read Max's story on the Bloomberg. He's here in

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 2>our studio.

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 4>Whoever thought Wikipedia?

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 7>Well, you know, it's one of these. It's like a

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 7>part of Internet that I think we all take for

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 7>granted that I, you know, have I've been only been

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 7>thinking about this over the last week or so because

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 7>Elon Musk has spent a lot of the last week

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:09.719
<v Speaker 7>attacking Wikipedia. He's in something of a tiff with the founder.

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 4>I just tell you he's ticked off at everything.

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 7>Well he's a.

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 6>Tiff prone, we should say.

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 7>But in any case, you know, Wikipedia is super interesting

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 7>because you know, it's been around since two thousand and one.

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 7>People who are about my age, you know, I'm forty one,

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 7>will remember that. You know, college professors, high school librarians

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 7>were very down on Wikipedia when it was launched in

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 7>its early years, but over the years there's been basically

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 7>study after studies showing that it's very accurate or compares

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 7>well to traditional research sources. And I think, really importantly,

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 7>as he said in that intro, tim it's doesn't it

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 7>doesn't do a lot of the stuff that we've come

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 7>to associate with the negative parts of the Internet. There's

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 7>no ads, there's not a lot of rage bait, and

0:30:53.080 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 7>there's a real care about about the truth. And and

0:30:57.480 --> 0:30:59.520
<v Speaker 7>what's super interesting when you look at sort of recent

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 7>research about Wikipedia is it's actually gotten less fringy over

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 7>the years, So sour our normal thought about social media

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 7>is it sort of tends to suck people into these

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 7>far right or far left or just weird and kooky

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 7>rabbit holes. Wikipedia has actually become less like that, which

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 7>is which is super interesting and I think, you know,

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 7>maybe worthy of acknowledgment, if not outright celebration.

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 6>So the question is is how Yeah.

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 7>So it's a couple of things. I mean, one one

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 7>big reason I think is the business model. You don't

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 7>have this engagement driven uh business model that depends on

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 7>getting people to stay there for a really long time.

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 7>So if your goal was to like maximize ad spend,

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 7>what you'd probably want to do is have lots of

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 7>controversial articles about you know, about the wildest topics you know,

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 7>so conspiracy theories or just like friends stuff. Wikipedia doesn't

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 7>do that. The other thing is there was a conscious

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 7>choice made by you know, moderators that these these people

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:02.479
<v Speaker 7>who work essentially for free totain Wikipedia to favor you know,

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 7>mainstream news outlets and academic journals over kind of what

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 7>you might think of as the do your own research

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 7>school of a fact finding. And that, of course is

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 7>in marked contrast to the trend that we've seen, not

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 7>just from Elon Musk right, who's been in this kind

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 7>of long running battle with the mainstream media. As he

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:24.120
<v Speaker 7>sees it, but also Facebook and all of the other

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 7>social networks, they've all moved away from news. They've all

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 7>moved towards this kind of like favoring influencers essentially over

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:36.280
<v Speaker 7>you know, academic papers and mainstream news organizations.

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:37.120
<v Speaker 6>And I think that's.

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 7>Had a negative impact on the sort of truthfulness of

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 7>what you find on the Internet.

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:43.240
<v Speaker 2>Not going to name names, but I think it's fair

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 2>to say that people in the media business, maybe a

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 2>few on air, you know, anchors and talent, occasionally are like, oh, Wikipedia,

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 2>I've just been jammed a story, like let me quickly

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 2>look there.

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 4>Having said that isn't accurate, like is it reliable?

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 7>So and when you talk to people who have studied this,

0:32:56.600 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 7>the answer broadly is yes. It compares well to you know,

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 7>traditional news and information sources. That said, it kind of

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 7>depends what you're looking at. So well trafficked Wikipedia entries

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 7>are extremely accurate. I talked to an academic, Amy Bruckman

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 7>at Georgia Tech, who said it's the most accurate information

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 7>source ever created in human history for topics that are

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:24.240
<v Speaker 7>sort of well trafficked, and that includes controversial topics. So

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:26.760
<v Speaker 7>if you look at the page for like the the

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:30.960
<v Speaker 7>the war in Israel. Right now, you will see a

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 7>you know, a thorough fair minded, very fact filled entry

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 7>for stuff that's more niche, where you maybe only have

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 7>one or two editors. Mean, it's a lot less reliable.

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 6>I don't even have I don't even think I have

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 6>a Well, you're gonna have to change that. Maybe someone

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 6>one of these you know, tens of thousands of editors

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 6>can go and do that. But but it actually brings

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 6>up a good point, Carol brings up a good point, Max,

0:33:53.200 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 6>is what happens when maybe a previously unknown presidential candidate

0:33:57.640 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 6>wants to jump into the spotlight and uh, you know,

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 6>hires some interns to go and try to you know,

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 6>kind of edit the Wikipedia entry a little bit.

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, you know, Vivik Ramaswami, he got caught out essentially

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 7>hiring somebody. This was actually disclosed on the Wikipedia page,

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:17.600
<v Speaker 7>so totally above board. But but I think that's a

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:20.799
<v Speaker 7>good example because he was called out number one and

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:24.440
<v Speaker 7>number two. It essentially called attention to the thing that

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 7>that he was interested in, you know, kind of affecting

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 7>the Wikipedia entry on which which was this fellowship he

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 7>had received from a Soros connected uh nonprofit and and

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:36.319
<v Speaker 7>I think this is this tends to happen a lot.

0:34:36.360 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 7>People will actually get caught trying to manipulate Wikipedia, and

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:41.879
<v Speaker 7>it sort of does a Streisand thing where it where

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:44.719
<v Speaker 7>it essentially calls attention to the ways that the truth is.

0:34:44.760 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 6>Being manipula effective.

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, that's the idea that when you deny something or

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 7>you try to cover it up, but it only calls

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:51.800
<v Speaker 7>more attention.

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 6>Barbara Streisand try to do it with one of our homes,

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 6>you know, years ago, and then everybody was like, oh,

0:34:56.239 --> 0:34:57.839
<v Speaker 6>Barbara Streisand's home, let's go find it.

0:34:57.920 --> 0:35:00.719
<v Speaker 7>And so so rich guys and power powerful people are

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:03.839
<v Speaker 7>constantly stepping in it, either trying to edit their own

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 7>Wikipedia pages that's like kind of amateur hour, or like

0:35:07.560 --> 0:35:10.000
<v Speaker 7>hiring someone to do it, which is the case that

0:35:10.080 --> 0:35:12.719
<v Speaker 7>happened here. And again I should say this was disclosed

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 7>and that's part of why we found out about it.

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 7>But Wikipedia has a very transparent system for showing you

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 7>how stuff is edited. So one thing that's great is

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:28.319
<v Speaker 7>that if some false fact or conspiracy theories shows up

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 7>on Wikipedia, it'll be taking care of. It'll be disappeared

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:34.640
<v Speaker 7>very quickly. That's the opposite of social media right where

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 7>you see these kind of engagement bait headlines and so

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:41.839
<v Speaker 7>on just circulate widely even after they've been debunked on Wikipedia,

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:45.240
<v Speaker 7>they go away and you have this paper trail essentially

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:46.920
<v Speaker 7>where you can go back and see what happens, so

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:49.360
<v Speaker 7>you can see was it deleted appropriately, what is the

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 7>truth of it? And so when you get into you know,

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 7>well trafficked topics such as presidential candidates, you're not necessarily

0:35:57.640 --> 0:36:01.680
<v Speaker 7>going to get the most the best article, but you're

0:36:01.719 --> 0:36:04.960
<v Speaker 7>going to get something that is likely to be mostly

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:09.880
<v Speaker 7>factually true, relatively fair and balanced, and importantly something that

0:36:09.920 --> 0:36:12.520
<v Speaker 7>you can kind of audit yourself. Right, they're these citations.

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:14.719
<v Speaker 7>You can go through it, you can decide, hey, how

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:16.360
<v Speaker 7>true is this? How much do I trust them?

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 2>It's like amazing, right in this kind of mess of

0:36:18.640 --> 0:36:21.200
<v Speaker 2>policing when it comes to social media, that there's kind

0:36:21.239 --> 0:36:24.319
<v Speaker 2>of these puritans or a I don't know if that's

0:36:24.360 --> 0:36:24.719
<v Speaker 2>the right.

0:36:24.800 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 7>I know non page very idealistic. Yes, it's a throwback

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:29.480
<v Speaker 7>to the the way the Internet was in.

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 6>Surly Max doesn't have a Wikipedia page, but he cited

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:36.560
<v Speaker 6>many times on Peter Tial's Wikipedia page that.

0:36:36.400 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 7>I'm not noteworthy enough, and that's a whole that's another

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:40.239
<v Speaker 7>big debate that that happens on.

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 6>You're noteworthy enough that means also read his book about

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:45.000
<v Speaker 6>Peter Teal's good.

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:47.440
<v Speaker 4>We could write. All I'm going to tell you is

0:36:47.440 --> 0:36:48.880
<v Speaker 4>you also have to check out his story.

0:36:49.239 --> 0:36:51.840
<v Speaker 2>Either go to ex or Twitter or at Chafkin, or

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:54.359
<v Speaker 2>go to the Bloomberg or Bloomberg dot com. Because there's

0:36:54.440 --> 0:36:56.839
<v Speaker 2>just one thing in there, because this is a family show,

0:36:56.880 --> 0:36:58.720
<v Speaker 2>but about Elon offering a billion dollars.

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:00.719
<v Speaker 4>But there was a name change, it would be called

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:02.839
<v Speaker 4>So we're gonna leave that on the table, shall we.

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 4>Sounds good, it'll make you chuckle though. Way, all right,

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:08.279
<v Speaker 4>we gotta run next check in. Yes, you deserve a

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:10.600
<v Speaker 4>Wikipedia page and so much more. He is calumnist for

0:37:10.640 --> 0:37:11.800
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Business Week.

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:13.880
<v Speaker 6>Also the author of the Contrarian Peter Teale and Silicon

0:37:13.960 --> 0:37:15.280
<v Speaker 6>Valley's Pursuit of Power.

0:37:17.960 --> 0:37:24.319
<v Speaker 5>I'm brother Marc, a journal Now about you? Let me drive?

0:37:24.560 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 3>Oh no, no, no, no, who's gone to drive?

0:37:27.640 --> 0:37:27.960
<v Speaker 7>Alright?

0:37:28.160 --> 0:37:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Please, I'll do the gravels.

0:37:30.480 --> 0:37:31.799
<v Speaker 2>Let's wait, I want to try.

0:37:31.840 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 5>It's good question that.

0:37:38.800 --> 0:37:41.600
<v Speaker 6>This is the drive to the clothes dot com.

0:37:41.920 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Thick, we'll dround yeld down on Bloomberg Radio.

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 2>All right, TikTok, everybody, we've got just under eighteen minutes

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:51.680
<v Speaker 2>left in today's trading session on this Tuesday, October twenty four.

0:37:51.760 --> 0:37:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Some big earnings coming out after the closing bell. Interesting

0:37:54.920 --> 0:37:56.680
<v Speaker 2>story that just crossed on the Bloomberg. The last time

0:37:56.760 --> 0:37:59.240
<v Speaker 2>US yield drew so much it sank the economy twice,

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:03.239
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about going back to I guess it is

0:38:03.760 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 2>the eighties.

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:06.280
<v Speaker 4>Maybe I got to look into this story.

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:07.920
<v Speaker 6>But no, Yeah, it's the biggest increase since the nineteen

0:38:07.960 --> 0:38:10.560
<v Speaker 6>eighties when pulled Volker's efforts to slay inflation. Push the

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:13.760
<v Speaker 6>ten year it's nearly double sixteen percent, Carol.

0:38:13.840 --> 0:38:14.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:38:14.040 --> 0:38:15.880
<v Speaker 4>See, so we've got a ways to go, folks.

0:38:16.280 --> 0:38:16.480
<v Speaker 5>We do.

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:18.200
<v Speaker 6>But you know what's coming sooner?

0:38:18.440 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, hopefully earnings.

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:22.040
<v Speaker 6>Earnings. Yeah, after the bell, we got a handful of earnings.

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:25.120
<v Speaker 6>We got Alphabet, we got Visa, we got Texas Instruments, Carol,

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:27.799
<v Speaker 6>we got Microsoft as well. No one better to talk

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:30.319
<v Speaker 6>about all these companies and the greater markets. And Sam

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 6>Stove All chief investment strategist at CFRA. He joins us

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 6>on Zoom from Allentown, Pennsylvania. Sam how are you, hey, Tim,

0:38:37.080 --> 0:38:39.319
<v Speaker 6>Good to talk to you, Hi, Carol, Hi. I want

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:40.919
<v Speaker 6>to we'll get to earnings in just a second, because

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:42.920
<v Speaker 6>they're going to be crossing fast and furious in just

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 6>about seventeen minutes. But first got to get your take

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 6>on the resilience of the US economy. Here we hear

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:50.560
<v Speaker 6>it over and over again, especially focused on the US

0:38:50.640 --> 0:38:54.640
<v Speaker 6>consumer yields above five percent, pretty much across the curve.

0:38:55.719 --> 0:38:56.279
<v Speaker 6>What's your take?

0:38:57.800 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 9>Well, and I think we're going to get an additional

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:03.160
<v Speaker 9>eyes on Thursday when we see the GDP number come

0:39:03.200 --> 0:39:04.160
<v Speaker 9>out for the third quarter.

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:05.960
<v Speaker 6>You think it'll be what do you think it'll be?

0:39:06.840 --> 0:39:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Well?

0:39:07.120 --> 0:39:10.239
<v Speaker 9>Street estimate is about four and a half. Our economists

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 9>are saying four point eight, and the most recent Atlanta

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:18.160
<v Speaker 9>Fed GDP now forecast was for five point four. So

0:39:18.760 --> 0:39:20.560
<v Speaker 9>it really seems as if it's going to be a

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:24.000
<v Speaker 9>very strong quarter. That said, however, I think we're going

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 9>to be slipping back to around the one percent area

0:39:27.560 --> 0:39:29.719
<v Speaker 9>for the final quarter of this year and the first

0:39:29.800 --> 0:39:30.479
<v Speaker 9>half of next.

0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:30.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:32.440
<v Speaker 4>So it was like, not what you did for me

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:34.800
<v Speaker 4>like yesterday, but what are you doing for me today?

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:35.080
<v Speaker 8>Sam?

0:39:35.400 --> 0:39:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Hey? So having said that, all right, so we're reporting,

0:39:38.280 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, for the most part, third quarter earnings. We're

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:44.560
<v Speaker 2>getting those reports. We are continuing to be surprised by

0:39:44.600 --> 0:39:48.320
<v Speaker 2>the resiliency in the economy. As you said, earnings. What

0:39:48.440 --> 0:39:51.640
<v Speaker 2>has surprised you most about what we've seen so far

0:39:51.719 --> 0:39:54.800
<v Speaker 2>this year when it comes to corporate earnings, well.

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:57.080
<v Speaker 9>As you said, just the resiliency of it all. Because

0:39:57.120 --> 0:39:59.919
<v Speaker 9>when you think about the brick wall in a sense

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:03.800
<v Speaker 9>of higher oil prices, higher interest rates that these companies

0:40:03.840 --> 0:40:06.799
<v Speaker 9>have been running into instead of bouncing off, they've been

0:40:07.200 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 9>breaking through them. So it looks as if this will

0:40:10.719 --> 0:40:14.840
<v Speaker 9>end up being another quarter in which we have the

0:40:14.960 --> 0:40:18.160
<v Speaker 9>actual results exceed end of quarter estimates. You know, we

0:40:18.239 --> 0:40:19.800
<v Speaker 9>thought it was going to be down one and a

0:40:19.840 --> 0:40:22.960
<v Speaker 9>half percent, but it looks as if it could be

0:40:23.120 --> 0:40:24.520
<v Speaker 9>swinging into the positive.

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:26.960
<v Speaker 6>So what does that mean for some of the companies

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:30.440
<v Speaker 6>that you follow, Well, what it certainly means is.

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:34.200
<v Speaker 9>That we're going to be sticking with the more growth

0:40:34.320 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 9>side of the equation that we've been sticking with since

0:40:36.680 --> 0:40:42.000
<v Speaker 9>the beginning of the year, so communications services, consumer discretionary technology,

0:40:43.040 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 9>and more recently energy, because we're looking for good growth now.

0:40:48.440 --> 0:40:51.360
<v Speaker 9>But also it gives us optimism for the market itself

0:40:51.480 --> 0:40:55.520
<v Speaker 9>in twenty twenty four, since all eleven sectors are expected

0:40:55.560 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 9>to post year on year gains and five of them

0:40:58.560 --> 0:41:00.560
<v Speaker 9>were expected to show double growth.

0:41:00.760 --> 0:41:02.960
<v Speaker 6>Wait a second, Carol, I thought higher interest rates were

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:05.800
<v Speaker 6>supposed to kill those growth companies.

0:41:06.560 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 9>I don't know, Sam, that's for you, Okay, Well, it

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:15.640
<v Speaker 9>would kill the growth if at or growth companies, if

0:41:15.760 --> 0:41:19.640
<v Speaker 9>the interest rates were to exceed profit growth, et cetera.

0:41:19.800 --> 0:41:24.040
<v Speaker 9>But with the economy doing so well, with the jobs

0:41:24.160 --> 0:41:27.320
<v Speaker 9>numbers holding up quite nicely, I mean, let's face it,

0:41:27.440 --> 0:41:31.040
<v Speaker 9>the unemployment rate that we're seeing today is well below

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:34.680
<v Speaker 9>what economists thought was the full employment rate many many

0:41:34.760 --> 0:41:35.120
<v Speaker 9>years ago.

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, therein lies the rub, right Like if higher rates

0:41:37.719 --> 0:41:40.800
<v Speaker 2>alone maybe not problematic, especially if people are working. But

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:43.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, as our Gina Martin Adams talked with this

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:45.480
<v Speaker 2>earlier in the week, she said, you know, margins have

0:41:45.520 --> 0:41:47.920
<v Speaker 2>held up because inflation backed off. If we start to

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:51.000
<v Speaker 2>see inflation kind of rearing its ugly head again, that

0:41:51.080 --> 0:41:55.200
<v Speaker 2>could potentially show that the cost equation of doing business

0:41:56.360 --> 0:41:58.920
<v Speaker 2>will show up in margins being squeezed. I'm just curious

0:41:58.960 --> 0:41:59.880
<v Speaker 2>if that's on your radars.

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:04.239
<v Speaker 9>Well, well, we did see the backup in inflation over

0:42:04.280 --> 0:42:10.760
<v Speaker 9>the last couple of CPI and PPI reports. Yet more encouragingly, however,

0:42:10.920 --> 0:42:13.840
<v Speaker 9>the PCE, the one that the Fed really likes to

0:42:13.960 --> 0:42:19.320
<v Speaker 9>look at, has actually been descending quite nicely. Expectations for

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:22.600
<v Speaker 9>later this week are that again we'll see a three

0:42:22.680 --> 0:42:26.640
<v Speaker 9>point seven percent year on year change for the core

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:29.799
<v Speaker 9>reading of PCE, and that'll be down from the three

0:42:29.840 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 9>to nine of the month before and four to three

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:34.960
<v Speaker 9>from the month before that. So the trend is still

0:42:35.040 --> 0:42:36.160
<v Speaker 9>our friend in that regard.

0:42:36.280 --> 0:42:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Can I ask you about the trend in terms of

0:42:38.400 --> 0:42:42.400
<v Speaker 2>the four megacaps? I'm talking about the big guys Meta, Amazon, Microsoft,

0:42:42.480 --> 0:42:46.040
<v Speaker 2>Google combined generated fifty three billion in profits last quarter,

0:42:46.320 --> 0:42:49.160
<v Speaker 2>about fifteen percent of the earnings generated by the other

0:42:49.440 --> 0:42:51.560
<v Speaker 2>four hundred and thirty seven s and.

0:42:51.600 --> 0:42:53.160
<v Speaker 4>P five hundred companies combined.

0:42:53.239 --> 0:42:56.040
<v Speaker 2>If you back out financial companies, you talk about it,

0:42:56.120 --> 0:42:56.880
<v Speaker 2>We talk about it.

0:42:57.080 --> 0:43:00.600
<v Speaker 4>You know about the the you know over waited.

0:43:00.400 --> 0:43:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Impact if you will, of a few good names, if

0:43:02.960 --> 0:43:06.160
<v Speaker 2>you will when it comes to the markets, How do

0:43:06.280 --> 0:43:08.239
<v Speaker 2>you think about that when it comes to earnings? And

0:43:08.280 --> 0:43:10.920
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if there's so much left out, as you say,

0:43:10.960 --> 0:43:13.800
<v Speaker 2>maybe that that provides investment opportunities going forward.

0:43:15.200 --> 0:43:17.680
<v Speaker 9>Well, certainly, you know, the question is, gee, what have

0:43:17.760 --> 0:43:21.480
<v Speaker 9>we been doing in terms of the megacaps. The Magnificent

0:43:21.600 --> 0:43:24.920
<v Speaker 9>seven really ruling the day in terms of price changes,

0:43:24.960 --> 0:43:29.160
<v Speaker 9>earnings growth, et cetera. And they have continued to do

0:43:29.320 --> 0:43:33.880
<v Speaker 9>relatively well. Looking last Friday at those sub industries and

0:43:34.000 --> 0:43:36.239
<v Speaker 9>there are one hundred and fifty three of them in

0:43:36.280 --> 0:43:39.480
<v Speaker 9>the S and P fifteen hundred and only eight percent

0:43:40.160 --> 0:43:44.000
<v Speaker 9>fewer than ten were above their fifty day and two

0:43:44.120 --> 0:43:48.080
<v Speaker 9>hundred day moving averages. And the interactive media and services

0:43:48.160 --> 0:43:51.439
<v Speaker 9>where you would find Alphabet system software, where you find

0:43:51.560 --> 0:43:55.560
<v Speaker 9>microsoftware were still among those. And I think it's because

0:43:55.719 --> 0:44:00.600
<v Speaker 9>analysts are expecting very strong earnings growth rates and looking

0:44:00.680 --> 0:44:05.000
<v Speaker 9>at the performance thus far in the year, Actually, what

0:44:05.160 --> 0:44:09.560
<v Speaker 9>we've been seeing is pretty good growth for the market

0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:11.719
<v Speaker 9>as a whole, but also for some of the sub

0:44:11.880 --> 0:44:16.000
<v Speaker 9>industries and some of the companies in them. Even though

0:44:16.440 --> 0:44:19.239
<v Speaker 9>the big Magnificent seven are the ones that really have

0:44:19.360 --> 0:44:24.440
<v Speaker 9>been driving everything, you've had participation with a good fifty

0:44:24.480 --> 0:44:28.080
<v Speaker 9>to sixty percent of the other companies within the SMP,

0:44:28.360 --> 0:44:31.040
<v Speaker 9>So it's not just those magnificent seven.

0:44:31.400 --> 0:44:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Eric always good to check in with you bwaw SAMs Doviell,

0:44:34.040 --> 0:44:35.960
<v Speaker 2>chief investment strategists over at CFR.

0:44:36.920 --> 0:44:41.520
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:44:41.719 --> 0:44:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:44:45.440 --> 0:44:48.879
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from three to six Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:44:49.120 --> 0:44:52.359
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:44:52.480 --> 0:44:55.400
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:44:55.680 --> 0:44:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg jermayalone