WEBVTT - Lifetime Terms, Lifetime Bans, and the Return of Roaring Kitty

0:00:15.564 --> 0:00:26.044
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Welcome back to Risky Business, a show about making

0:00:26.084 --> 0:00:28.724
<v Speaker 1>better decisions. I'm Maria Kanakova.

0:00:28.364 --> 0:00:29.164
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Nate Silver.

0:00:29.564 --> 0:00:32.444
<v Speaker 1>Today we'll be talking about a few different things, starting

0:00:32.524 --> 0:00:36.524
<v Speaker 1>with Justice Sonya Sotomayor and whether or not she should retire.

0:00:36.364 --> 0:00:38.804
<v Speaker 2>And we'll talk about degenerate sports betting in the world

0:00:38.844 --> 0:00:41.484
<v Speaker 2>of professional athletes. A Major League Baseball player were suspended

0:00:41.484 --> 0:00:44.684
<v Speaker 2>for life last week for betting on his own team's games.

0:00:45.164 --> 0:00:48.844
<v Speaker 1>And talking about a different area of degeneracy, we're going

0:00:48.884 --> 0:00:50.964
<v Speaker 1>to be giving you a little taste of the world

0:00:51.124 --> 0:00:56.404
<v Speaker 1>of memestocks with the return of Roaring Kitty aka Keith

0:00:56.444 --> 0:00:59.284
<v Speaker 1>gill get a little bit into what that means for

0:00:59.564 --> 0:01:10.604
<v Speaker 1>the world of trading more broadly, So so Nate. There's

0:01:10.684 --> 0:01:12.484
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of talk, and we've talked about the

0:01:12.484 --> 0:01:14.364
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court right now and what's going on with it.

0:01:14.684 --> 0:01:18.884
<v Speaker 1>Something that we haven't talked about is the fact that

0:01:19.004 --> 0:01:22.284
<v Speaker 1>one of the only liberal justices, Sonya so to Mayor,

0:01:23.244 --> 0:01:26.724
<v Speaker 1>is reaching a point where she is getting older. She's

0:01:26.764 --> 0:01:29.884
<v Speaker 1>seventy years old. She is not in great health. She

0:01:29.924 --> 0:01:34.244
<v Speaker 1>has diabetes. She often travels with a physician, and we're

0:01:34.724 --> 0:01:37.804
<v Speaker 1>nearing the end of the Biden administration, and as you

0:01:37.844 --> 0:01:40.684
<v Speaker 1>and I have discussed on previous episodes, we don't know

0:01:40.724 --> 0:01:42.964
<v Speaker 1>if Biden is going to get reelected. We don't know

0:01:42.964 --> 0:01:45.244
<v Speaker 1>if the Democrats are going to stay in power. So

0:01:45.484 --> 0:01:48.164
<v Speaker 1>what does this mean for the Supreme Court? What does

0:01:48.204 --> 0:01:51.604
<v Speaker 1>this mean for justice? So to Mayor, should she be

0:01:51.764 --> 0:01:56.404
<v Speaker 1>considering retiring right now? While Biden can still definitely replace her?

0:01:57.484 --> 0:02:00.684
<v Speaker 2>So she is sixty nine, she turns seventy later this month.

0:02:01.044 --> 0:02:04.244
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. I'm so sorry, Sonya. I aged you and

0:02:04.324 --> 0:02:05.684
<v Speaker 1>I and I apologize.

0:02:05.844 --> 0:02:08.244
<v Speaker 2>That's what we call a newspeg in the business. It's

0:02:08.284 --> 0:02:10.684
<v Speaker 2>almost her seventieth birth. We're getting ahead of the news

0:02:10.684 --> 0:02:13.164
<v Speaker 2>and therefore that's why we're partly why we're doing this now,

0:02:13.164 --> 0:02:16.164
<v Speaker 2>but also because we as you said, Maria, it maybe

0:02:16.644 --> 0:02:19.124
<v Speaker 2>toward the end of Biden's We are toward the end

0:02:19.124 --> 0:02:20.764
<v Speaker 2>of his first term in office, and maybe the end

0:02:20.804 --> 0:02:23.564
<v Speaker 2>of any terms in office. If the polls are right,

0:02:23.644 --> 0:02:28.924
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump is ahead right now, although it's close. If

0:02:29.404 --> 0:02:32.964
<v Speaker 2>Biden does prevail, Democrats could also lose the Senate. There

0:02:33.004 --> 0:02:36.724
<v Speaker 2>are Democratic held seats, for example, up in West Virginia

0:02:36.764 --> 0:02:41.004
<v Speaker 2>and Montana. In West Virginia, Joe Manchin has retired, so

0:02:41.084 --> 0:02:45.924
<v Speaker 2>that seat's like gone for sure. Montana, to a lesser extent,

0:02:46.004 --> 0:02:49.244
<v Speaker 2>Ohio are tough hoolder Democrats, So even if Biden returns

0:02:49.244 --> 0:02:53.524
<v Speaker 2>to the presidency, you might have an uncooperative Republican Senate.

0:02:54.644 --> 0:02:59.284
<v Speaker 2>So you asked, should she consider retiring, and the answer

0:02:59.404 --> 0:03:02.604
<v Speaker 2>she should not just consider. She should retire today. Go

0:03:02.644 --> 0:03:05.244
<v Speaker 2>take one of these university president jobs everybody is quitting.

0:03:05.324 --> 0:03:08.284
<v Speaker 2>Go be president of Yale or Harvard, or go, you know,

0:03:08.684 --> 0:03:12.084
<v Speaker 2>go make lots of money selling a book co under

0:03:12.084 --> 0:03:13.964
<v Speaker 2>the World Series of Poker main event. I'm sure she's

0:03:14.004 --> 0:03:16.644
<v Speaker 2>a very candy poker player, but she should absolutely retire

0:03:16.764 --> 0:03:20.084
<v Speaker 2>if she actually cares about any of the values that

0:03:20.084 --> 0:03:23.124
<v Speaker 2>she purports secure about, these kind of liberal, progressive values.

0:03:23.124 --> 0:03:26.004
<v Speaker 2>Because she doesn't retire, then she could very easily be

0:03:26.044 --> 0:03:30.644
<v Speaker 2>replaced by another conservative justice, leading to a seven to

0:03:30.884 --> 0:03:32.844
<v Speaker 2>two conservative majority.

0:03:33.644 --> 0:03:37.084
<v Speaker 1>And that is that's going to be difficult to overcome.

0:03:37.404 --> 0:03:40.084
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if we have a seven to two conservative majority,

0:03:40.364 --> 0:03:42.364
<v Speaker 1>it could be I mean, I don't know how many

0:03:42.484 --> 0:03:45.724
<v Speaker 1>presidentss will need before the Supreme Court is more balanced.

0:03:46.964 --> 0:03:47.924
<v Speaker 1>Could be a time.

0:03:48.924 --> 0:03:53.204
<v Speaker 2>So it's not just that like the Supreme Court would

0:03:53.284 --> 0:03:55.484
<v Speaker 2>increase our conerns would increase their majority. It's also that,

0:03:55.564 --> 0:03:58.844
<v Speaker 2>like believe it or not, the Supreme Court agrees on

0:03:58.924 --> 0:04:02.924
<v Speaker 2>more issues than you might think. But where that middle

0:04:02.924 --> 0:04:05.884
<v Speaker 2>point falls is is important.

0:04:06.124 --> 0:04:06.324
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:04:06.444 --> 0:04:09.364
<v Speaker 2>The fact that it does fall with the Barrett Or

0:04:09.484 --> 0:04:12.564
<v Speaker 2>or Kevina or on some issues. Justice Gorsich is a

0:04:12.604 --> 0:04:16.924
<v Speaker 2>little bit heterodox on some issues versus like an alito

0:04:17.124 --> 0:04:19.364
<v Speaker 2>or something like that. Like that also has a material

0:04:19.844 --> 0:04:21.884
<v Speaker 2>impact as far as how far they will go on

0:04:22.204 --> 0:04:22.964
<v Speaker 2>certain issues.

0:04:23.244 --> 0:04:25.804
<v Speaker 1>I completely agree with you, Yeah, and I think that,

0:04:25.884 --> 0:04:29.204
<v Speaker 1>and I think that we should really look at the

0:04:29.244 --> 0:04:33.524
<v Speaker 1>past to kind of guide Justice Sotomayor's decision right now,

0:04:33.684 --> 0:04:35.804
<v Speaker 1>because I'm gonna I'm just gonna go ahead and say this,

0:04:36.284 --> 0:04:39.804
<v Speaker 1>and fellow female liberals are going to get really really

0:04:39.804 --> 0:04:42.884
<v Speaker 1>mad at me, But I am so fucking mad at

0:04:43.044 --> 0:04:47.124
<v Speaker 1>RBG that like, for me, her entire legacy is tainted,

0:04:47.404 --> 0:04:51.404
<v Speaker 1>like the sheer hubris of not retiring when she could

0:04:51.444 --> 0:04:53.644
<v Speaker 1>have been replaced and of being like, no, I'm going

0:04:53.724 --> 0:04:57.124
<v Speaker 1>to live forever. I'm fucking RBG like, look at my

0:04:57.244 --> 0:05:01.844
<v Speaker 1>legacy like I'm invincible, and she, like her legacy is

0:05:01.964 --> 0:05:05.804
<v Speaker 1>Roe v. Wade being overturned. That's her legacy, because if

0:05:05.844 --> 0:05:08.084
<v Speaker 1>she had retired early, we would have had an entirely

0:05:08.124 --> 0:05:10.964
<v Speaker 1>different court. And like I used to be like such

0:05:11.004 --> 0:05:13.844
<v Speaker 1>a you know, such an avid RBG fan, and I'm

0:05:13.884 --> 0:05:16.444
<v Speaker 1>not anymore because I think that with that one decision,

0:05:16.524 --> 0:05:19.844
<v Speaker 1>she's single handedly set woman back much further than she

0:05:19.884 --> 0:05:22.244
<v Speaker 1>ever advanced them. I said it. People are going to

0:05:22.524 --> 0:05:24.564
<v Speaker 1>get mad at me, but I think that that is

0:05:24.844 --> 0:05:28.004
<v Speaker 1>the truth, and I am so pissed at her, like

0:05:28.044 --> 0:05:31.004
<v Speaker 1>from beyond the grave, that I just I can rant forever.

0:05:31.804 --> 0:05:33.764
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm glad you said it. I mean, in the

0:05:34.004 --> 0:05:36.604
<v Speaker 2>Silver Bulletin post I wrote about sort of mayor said

0:05:36.604 --> 0:05:40.404
<v Speaker 2>that her retirement is a political IQ test, and that's

0:05:40.484 --> 0:05:42.844
<v Speaker 2>you know, that's a little bit of invective. She's, I'm

0:05:42.844 --> 0:05:45.444
<v Speaker 2>sure a very smart woman. I'm not sure how smart

0:05:45.484 --> 0:05:49.364
<v Speaker 2>some of the kind of liberal political observers are frankly right,

0:05:50.284 --> 0:05:55.124
<v Speaker 2>because the excuses are dumb. Frankly just dumb. They'll say, well,

0:05:55.964 --> 0:05:59.244
<v Speaker 2>you can't force a Latina justice to retire, Well, sure

0:05:59.244 --> 0:06:02.924
<v Speaker 2>you can. There are lots of qualified Latina associate justices

0:06:02.924 --> 0:06:05.404
<v Speaker 2>and things like that could replace her, if you believe

0:06:05.444 --> 0:06:08.124
<v Speaker 2>that's an important thing to do, right or if people say, oh,

0:06:08.164 --> 0:06:11.764
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of like it ablest to worry about her diabetes. Well,

0:06:11.764 --> 0:06:14.004
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry if you write in the Constitution that you

0:06:14.084 --> 0:06:16.444
<v Speaker 2>have a lifetime appointment to something, which, by the way,

0:06:16.524 --> 0:06:17.804
<v Speaker 2>I think is a bad idea. I think she'd be

0:06:17.844 --> 0:06:20.644
<v Speaker 2>limited toward eighteen years or something like that. But if

0:06:20.684 --> 0:06:25.324
<v Speaker 2>it's a lifetime appointment, absolutely it's the public's responsibility almost

0:06:25.404 --> 0:06:28.244
<v Speaker 2>to consider, like the health of the justices that it

0:06:28.284 --> 0:06:31.844
<v Speaker 2>plays out strategically. But historically justices wait to time their

0:06:31.884 --> 0:06:36.484
<v Speaker 2>retirements for partisan reasons, right, they want to be replaced

0:06:36.524 --> 0:06:39.484
<v Speaker 2>by the same party that appointed them in the first place.

0:06:40.484 --> 0:06:43.404
<v Speaker 2>So that's not new. You know. Justice Kennedy, for example,

0:06:43.444 --> 0:06:46.124
<v Speaker 2>who was more moderate, did so under Trump when he

0:06:46.164 --> 0:06:50.804
<v Speaker 2>had some time to go. So look, maybe son of

0:06:50.844 --> 0:06:53.404
<v Speaker 2>mayor is not a believer in the polls that show

0:06:53.684 --> 0:06:56.884
<v Speaker 2>Biden trailing, and again that is close. The issue is

0:06:57.484 --> 0:06:59.964
<v Speaker 2>just as much, if not more, about the Senate in

0:07:00.004 --> 0:07:03.124
<v Speaker 2>a long term where in the Senate, North Dakota has

0:07:03.164 --> 0:07:05.924
<v Speaker 2>as many senators as California despite having what it is,

0:07:06.004 --> 0:07:08.764
<v Speaker 2>you know, one fortieth of the population or things like that.

0:07:09.084 --> 0:07:12.804
<v Speaker 2>Currently in the Trumpian coalition, the GOP does better among

0:07:13.404 --> 0:07:16.724
<v Speaker 2>rural voters, white rural voters in particular, and they are

0:07:16.724 --> 0:07:20.244
<v Speaker 2>overrepresented by quite a lot in the Senate. So look,

0:07:20.364 --> 0:07:23.604
<v Speaker 2>if the GOP gets attacked together, they would have potentially

0:07:23.644 --> 0:07:26.844
<v Speaker 2>a relatively durable advantage to the Senate. I do think

0:07:26.924 --> 0:07:29.684
<v Speaker 2>I kind of once you go out more than five

0:07:29.764 --> 0:07:32.844
<v Speaker 2>or ten years, it kind of becomes a fuzzy crystal ball.

0:07:32.884 --> 0:07:35.124
<v Speaker 2>But the basic math is that, like, you don't know

0:07:35.164 --> 0:07:38.684
<v Speaker 2>what's going to happen in terms of medium term political future.

0:07:38.884 --> 0:07:41.604
<v Speaker 2>You're about to turn seventy years old, you have diabetes,

0:07:41.724 --> 0:07:44.284
<v Speaker 2>and like and like I don't know, Like, by the way,

0:07:44.644 --> 0:07:47.124
<v Speaker 2>what is the ego involved here? Like it just kind

0:07:47.124 --> 0:07:50.524
<v Speaker 2>of weirdly, it's weirdly stubborn. It makes me think less

0:07:50.564 --> 0:07:52.644
<v Speaker 2>of people who seek out power, I suppose.

0:07:52.964 --> 0:07:55.364
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely, I totally agree. And by the way, an

0:07:55.444 --> 0:07:57.884
<v Speaker 1>important point that you're making that you didn't make explicit

0:07:58.364 --> 0:08:01.244
<v Speaker 1>is that it matters not just who wins the presidency

0:08:01.284 --> 0:08:03.724
<v Speaker 1>but what the majority is in the Senate. Because let's

0:08:03.724 --> 0:08:09.404
<v Speaker 1>not forget the Garland disaster where Obama tried to appoint

0:08:09.604 --> 0:08:12.684
<v Speaker 1>him and the Senate just literally blocked the hearings and

0:08:13.204 --> 0:08:16.724
<v Speaker 1>Garland didn't even get a chance to be considered, and

0:08:16.764 --> 0:08:17.844
<v Speaker 1>that's something that can happen.

0:08:18.284 --> 0:08:19.844
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it reminds me a little bit of like,

0:08:20.564 --> 0:08:24.804
<v Speaker 2>you know, sometimes the failure to make a change is

0:08:24.804 --> 0:08:26.884
<v Speaker 2>the biggest risk, right, It's like, well, why would I

0:08:26.884 --> 0:08:29.444
<v Speaker 2>disrupt the status quota? Why I have this job? You know,

0:08:30.164 --> 0:08:32.724
<v Speaker 2>seventy years old is not that old for a woman

0:08:32.764 --> 0:08:36.204
<v Speaker 2>who presumably has good health care, even if she has diabetes.

0:08:37.244 --> 0:08:40.244
<v Speaker 2>But like, sometimes the status quo is the riskier is

0:08:40.284 --> 0:08:42.724
<v Speaker 2>the riskier path, right? You know? Right now that she

0:08:42.804 --> 0:08:47.244
<v Speaker 2>can be replaced by another liberal justice. Democrats in the Senate,

0:08:47.244 --> 0:08:49.164
<v Speaker 2>even the Joe Manchins of the world, have been very

0:08:49.204 --> 0:08:52.484
<v Speaker 2>loyal to Biden on judicial appointments. You don't know anything

0:08:52.484 --> 0:08:55.844
<v Speaker 2>beyond what happens in November. And by the way, in

0:08:55.924 --> 0:08:59.124
<v Speaker 2>terms of like pure political tactics, to have a big

0:08:59.204 --> 0:09:01.764
<v Speaker 2>fight over the Supreme Court, this is an issue where

0:09:01.764 --> 0:09:05.244
<v Speaker 2>Democrats now are more charged up and talk about abortion

0:09:05.364 --> 0:09:07.724
<v Speaker 2>rights and things like that. I'm sure whoever is now

0:09:07.724 --> 0:09:09.564
<v Speaker 2>many it would be subject to lots of abuse from

0:09:09.564 --> 0:09:12.164
<v Speaker 2>Republican commentators. This would also be I think a good

0:09:12.164 --> 0:09:16.324
<v Speaker 2>way to rile up democrats generate more enthusiasm, which is

0:09:16.364 --> 0:09:20.364
<v Speaker 2>a bit flagging for Biden right now, But I don't know.

0:09:20.564 --> 0:09:22.364
<v Speaker 2>People are like, well, you shouldn't think of politics in

0:09:22.444 --> 0:09:25.924
<v Speaker 2>terms of expected values. Yes you should, Yes you should.

0:09:27.044 --> 0:09:28.924
<v Speaker 1>By the way, everyone who says it's not a game,

0:09:29.324 --> 0:09:31.084
<v Speaker 1>like did you look up? Did you see what the

0:09:31.124 --> 0:09:31.964
<v Speaker 1>Senate tried to do?

0:09:32.124 --> 0:09:32.284
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:09:32.444 --> 0:09:34.244
<v Speaker 1>They're trying to figure out how do I how do

0:09:34.284 --> 0:09:37.164
<v Speaker 1>I game it right? Like they are, This is gamesmanship.

0:09:37.564 --> 0:09:40.244
<v Speaker 1>This is exactly what gamesmanship is, to try to figure

0:09:40.244 --> 0:09:42.204
<v Speaker 1>out how do I gain an edge, how do I

0:09:42.364 --> 0:09:44.924
<v Speaker 1>use the rules to try to do what I want?

0:09:45.244 --> 0:09:48.084
<v Speaker 1>Even though the intention is not that right. I understand

0:09:48.124 --> 0:09:49.844
<v Speaker 1>what the spirit of the Constitution is and I don't

0:09:49.844 --> 0:09:52.164
<v Speaker 1>give a fuck. I'm just going to do like what

0:09:52.284 --> 0:09:55.244
<v Speaker 1>I can within the rules so that so that we win.

0:09:55.644 --> 0:09:59.444
<v Speaker 1>And I think that it's absolutely a game in that respect.

0:09:59.604 --> 0:10:03.124
<v Speaker 1>And it brings out the types of people I've written

0:10:03.124 --> 0:10:05.964
<v Speaker 1>before about kind of the difference between sportsmanship and gamesmanship,

0:10:06.284 --> 0:10:10.924
<v Speaker 1>And the Republicans are definitely much more in gamesmanship, and

0:10:10.964 --> 0:10:14.524
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats are trying to take the higher sportsmanlike road,

0:10:14.644 --> 0:10:17.324
<v Speaker 1>and that ain't working out so well when the other

0:10:17.364 --> 0:10:19.244
<v Speaker 1>people are are better gamesmen.

0:10:20.484 --> 0:10:23.924
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know. The White House has also not said

0:10:23.964 --> 0:10:26.364
<v Speaker 2>anything about this in part because they have a candidate

0:10:26.604 --> 0:10:29.204
<v Speaker 2>who is eighty one years old and Aldea, people are

0:10:29.364 --> 0:10:31.724
<v Speaker 2>being too old for office is a big no no

0:10:31.844 --> 0:10:33.404
<v Speaker 2>topic that they don't want to get into. But also,

0:10:33.524 --> 0:10:36.764
<v Speaker 2>like some of it comes down to identity politics. I

0:10:36.764 --> 0:10:39.804
<v Speaker 2>think it's fair to say I personally think if you

0:10:39.924 --> 0:10:43.324
<v Speaker 2>kind of take progressive politics seriously, the notion that like

0:10:43.844 --> 0:10:47.484
<v Speaker 2>having someone who represents the group, I think that's substantively

0:10:47.884 --> 0:10:51.564
<v Speaker 2>smaller impact than like six three versus seven to two

0:10:51.764 --> 0:10:54.364
<v Speaker 2>or down the line, who knows seven two verses eight one,

0:10:54.644 --> 0:10:56.964
<v Speaker 2>or five four versus six three or something like that.

0:10:58.084 --> 0:11:01.004
<v Speaker 2>But this is why I don't really find people who

0:11:01.044 --> 0:11:05.084
<v Speaker 2>are into politics. I don't really they're not my crowd really, right,

0:11:05.524 --> 0:11:07.804
<v Speaker 2>because this is this is such a no brainer. This

0:11:07.884 --> 0:11:10.684
<v Speaker 2>is not quote whereas we talked about Biden the other week,

0:11:10.804 --> 0:11:12.804
<v Speaker 2>like by retiring, it's kind of really tough either way.

0:11:12.804 --> 0:11:15.124
<v Speaker 2>That's really close. This is not close. Now, this is

0:11:15.204 --> 0:11:17.044
<v Speaker 2>like absolute no brainer.

0:11:17.484 --> 0:11:19.324
<v Speaker 1>Totally agree with you. And by the way, I learned

0:11:19.324 --> 0:11:21.204
<v Speaker 1>the hard way. Like when you were saying I think

0:11:21.484 --> 0:11:24.124
<v Speaker 1>a really important point is that you know, seeking the

0:11:24.204 --> 0:11:26.444
<v Speaker 1>status quo kind of saying like oh, like this is

0:11:26.484 --> 0:11:28.884
<v Speaker 1>the this is the safer way to do it is

0:11:29.244 --> 0:11:31.684
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes not safer, right. I learned this the hard way

0:11:31.724 --> 0:11:34.164
<v Speaker 1>when I started playing poker. That like, if you try

0:11:34.244 --> 0:11:37.244
<v Speaker 1>to do nothing, that's also very much in action, right,

0:11:37.324 --> 0:11:39.484
<v Speaker 1>That is, that is very much a choice, that is

0:11:39.564 --> 0:11:42.044
<v Speaker 1>very much doing something, and it's doing something that's not

0:11:42.164 --> 0:11:44.324
<v Speaker 1>optimal and you're not doing it for the right reasons.

0:11:44.324 --> 0:11:46.604
<v Speaker 1>And that's what's happening right now. So like, get your

0:11:46.604 --> 0:11:50.044
<v Speaker 1>ass in gear, actually look at the incentives, look at

0:11:50.084 --> 0:11:52.884
<v Speaker 1>the future, and try to figure out. I think this

0:11:52.964 --> 0:11:55.324
<v Speaker 1>is also really important what risks are worth it and

0:11:55.364 --> 0:11:58.444
<v Speaker 1>what risks aren't because there is so much uncertainty here.

0:11:58.644 --> 0:12:01.164
<v Speaker 1>We don't know what the percentages are because there is

0:12:01.204 --> 0:12:03.724
<v Speaker 1>this uncertainty about you know, who's going to win the presidency,

0:12:03.724 --> 0:12:07.204
<v Speaker 1>who is going to win the Senate? Is that risk

0:12:07.484 --> 0:12:10.084
<v Speaker 1>worth it? And I think in this particular case, it's

0:12:10.124 --> 0:12:12.044
<v Speaker 1>just a slam duck. No, it absolutely is not.

0:12:18.484 --> 0:12:32.404
<v Speaker 2>We'll be right back. Last week, Major League Baseball suspended

0:12:32.484 --> 0:12:37.244
<v Speaker 2>San Diego Padres shortstop Tikipeda Marcano permanently for allegedly having

0:12:37.244 --> 0:12:40.164
<v Speaker 2>bet on baseball games while a member of the Pittsburgh Pirates.

0:12:40.444 --> 0:12:42.964
<v Speaker 2>It also suspended four other players of who are now

0:12:42.964 --> 0:12:45.444
<v Speaker 2>in the minor leagues for a year for betting on

0:12:45.564 --> 0:12:49.604
<v Speaker 2>games not involving their teams. So there's been a lot

0:12:49.644 --> 0:12:52.404
<v Speaker 2>of gambling scandal news coming out of baseball and other

0:12:52.444 --> 0:12:55.164
<v Speaker 2>sports slightly of course, earlier this year, maybe the best

0:12:55.164 --> 0:13:00.724
<v Speaker 2>player in the world, Shohe Otane, his former interpreter and BFF.

0:13:00.444 --> 0:13:04.444
<v Speaker 1>Potentially a potentially former BFF.

0:13:03.564 --> 0:13:09.764
<v Speaker 2>I if I committed seventeen million dollars of wirefrag involving

0:13:09.764 --> 0:13:11.364
<v Speaker 2>your account, Maria, would we still be friends?

0:13:12.484 --> 0:13:15.444
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely? Nate, I would forgive You're in a heartbeat, because

0:13:15.684 --> 0:13:18.644
<v Speaker 1>that would mean that I somehow had seventeen million dollars.

0:13:19.084 --> 0:13:21.484
<v Speaker 2>There you go, if you you know what's seventeen million?

0:13:21.524 --> 0:13:22.644
<v Speaker 2>If you signed a fifty.

0:13:22.404 --> 0:13:26.724
<v Speaker 1>Between friends, what's seventeen between what's minus yours'n But as

0:13:26.764 --> 0:13:29.284
<v Speaker 1>you were saying, Misahara plaed guilty.

0:13:29.044 --> 0:13:33.804
<v Speaker 2>Right, he pled guilty, and Major League Baseball closed the investigation,

0:13:33.964 --> 0:13:36.284
<v Speaker 2>which I know. I actually still a couple of questions

0:13:36.324 --> 0:13:40.164
<v Speaker 2>about Otani's involvement that will communiately never hear anything about

0:13:40.204 --> 0:13:43.484
<v Speaker 2>ever again. But yeah, So this is the first suspension

0:13:43.524 --> 0:13:46.204
<v Speaker 2>for gambling at related reasons since Pete Rose, who also

0:13:46.364 --> 0:13:50.244
<v Speaker 2>was alleged to have bet on his own team. Now, Marcano,

0:13:50.764 --> 0:13:54.324
<v Speaker 2>from what I read, has not planned to appeal, at

0:13:54.404 --> 0:13:58.004
<v Speaker 2>least not for right now. In fairness to him, there

0:13:58.084 --> 0:14:01.764
<v Speaker 2>is a somewhat mitigating circumstance, which is that when he

0:14:01.924 --> 0:14:05.204
<v Speaker 2>was making these bets, he was injured, not actively playing

0:14:05.204 --> 0:14:07.564
<v Speaker 2>for the Pirates. But still, the theory of the case

0:14:07.644 --> 0:14:09.724
<v Speaker 2>is that even if you're betting on your own team,

0:14:10.004 --> 0:14:12.764
<v Speaker 2>you still have inside information that's valuable. Right if you

0:14:12.844 --> 0:14:15.564
<v Speaker 2>know that a certain player is healthy and therefore likely

0:14:15.604 --> 0:14:19.004
<v Speaker 2>to play, Right if you know that the team was

0:14:19.124 --> 0:14:21.364
<v Speaker 2>up all night at the strip club, maybe you'd choose

0:14:21.364 --> 0:14:24.604
<v Speaker 2>not to bet that game, for example. So, and this

0:14:24.724 --> 0:14:27.764
<v Speaker 2>is like literally a rule posted in every Major League

0:14:27.804 --> 0:14:31.004
<v Speaker 2>Baseball clubhouse. You bet on games involving your own team,

0:14:31.084 --> 0:14:32.764
<v Speaker 2>you are suspended for life. It is one of the

0:14:32.844 --> 0:14:35.964
<v Speaker 2>least ambuist rules in all of Baseball's rule book.

0:14:36.644 --> 0:14:38.644
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I think that it's a rule that makes

0:14:38.724 --> 0:14:42.284
<v Speaker 1>complete sense, right, because if you're betting on your own

0:14:42.324 --> 0:14:46.684
<v Speaker 1>team or providing information, I mean, that is like, that's

0:14:46.924 --> 0:14:50.404
<v Speaker 1>a different kind of inside baseball, right, that is not

0:14:50.524 --> 0:14:53.244
<v Speaker 1>the good kind. And I think that when we see

0:14:53.284 --> 0:14:56.364
<v Speaker 1>suspensions like this, I think it's really important as the

0:14:56.444 --> 0:15:00.204
<v Speaker 1>ubiquity of sports betting goes up, as we have these

0:15:00.244 --> 0:15:02.804
<v Speaker 1>apps everywhere, as it's possible to do all these crazy

0:15:02.804 --> 0:15:05.684
<v Speaker 1>parlay bets, as it's possible to bet while events are

0:15:05.764 --> 0:15:09.324
<v Speaker 1>actually going on, all of these new capabilities that haven't

0:15:09.484 --> 0:15:11.804
<v Speaker 1>existed in the past. I think it's incredibly important to

0:15:11.844 --> 0:15:13.804
<v Speaker 1>be strict about this. By the way, I also think

0:15:13.844 --> 0:15:17.524
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of hilarious in a way. Hilarious might be

0:15:17.524 --> 0:15:21.324
<v Speaker 1>the wrong word. But how bad Marcano still was. I mean,

0:15:21.364 --> 0:15:23.684
<v Speaker 1>I think he won just over four percent.

0:15:24.124 --> 0:15:27.084
<v Speaker 2>Well that's a little so this is something that was mislading.

0:15:27.804 --> 0:15:31.244
<v Speaker 2>There's spin involved here, okay. I mean, so Pason's winning

0:15:31.364 --> 0:15:35.084
<v Speaker 2>four percent of his bets because he's beending multi leg parlays,

0:15:35.204 --> 0:15:37.444
<v Speaker 2>right see, but on the pirates to win, and you

0:15:37.564 --> 0:15:39.964
<v Speaker 2>bet on five other teams to win, and therefore, you know,

0:15:40.084 --> 0:15:42.284
<v Speaker 2>take like two of the fifth power if they're all

0:15:42.284 --> 0:15:44.924
<v Speaker 2>fifty to fifty bets, and so he's doing multi team

0:15:44.964 --> 0:15:48.284
<v Speaker 2>parlays where you usually lose. But like when you win,

0:15:48.364 --> 0:15:50.724
<v Speaker 2>you win a lot. So the four percent is kind

0:15:50.764 --> 0:15:54.244
<v Speaker 2>of misleading. That might be the expected value in terms

0:15:54.244 --> 0:15:57.524
<v Speaker 2>of how often he's supposed to win. There is one

0:15:57.604 --> 0:16:00.844
<v Speaker 2>irony though, which is that like he was apparently using

0:16:00.884 --> 0:16:03.684
<v Speaker 2>one of the legal sports books that like tipped off

0:16:04.284 --> 0:16:08.724
<v Speaker 2>Major League Baseball. So yeah, these guys will, you know,

0:16:08.804 --> 0:16:12.004
<v Speaker 2>squeal on you if you're a major League Baseball player

0:16:12.044 --> 0:16:14.204
<v Speaker 2>you decide to bet on games they are. They have

0:16:14.284 --> 0:16:17.764
<v Speaker 2>incentives though, to be concerned about about action that could

0:16:17.804 --> 0:16:20.724
<v Speaker 2>compromise their deal with the leagues. They have concerns about

0:16:20.764 --> 0:16:23.404
<v Speaker 2>game integrity too. In some ways, I've been surprised there

0:16:23.404 --> 0:16:26.844
<v Speaker 2>hasn't been even more of a backlash. But look, if

0:16:26.884 --> 0:16:29.564
<v Speaker 2>you're a major League Baseball player, my advice to you

0:16:29.764 --> 0:16:33.204
<v Speaker 2>is do not use like DraftKings or fan duel or

0:16:33.484 --> 0:16:35.884
<v Speaker 2>a partner that's in bed with Major League Baseball. Right,

0:16:36.364 --> 0:16:39.084
<v Speaker 2>use some offshore illegal betting website. There's less likelihood of

0:16:39.124 --> 0:16:40.244
<v Speaker 2>being detected.

0:16:40.124 --> 0:16:43.844
<v Speaker 1>Like Epaimzuhara did for seventeen pillion dollars.

0:16:44.164 --> 0:16:48.764
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, at least gave himself a chance, right Epei was

0:16:48.804 --> 0:16:50.324
<v Speaker 2>smart enough to know you're not going to fucking bet

0:16:50.324 --> 0:16:52.724
<v Speaker 2>on fan duel. Then you're drawing dead.

0:16:54.044 --> 0:16:56.284
<v Speaker 1>By the way it is, I think it's interesting to

0:16:56.324 --> 0:16:58.884
<v Speaker 1>note when I was saying that it's it's crucial that

0:16:59.404 --> 0:17:01.564
<v Speaker 1>people are being caught that the four players who were

0:17:01.604 --> 0:17:03.804
<v Speaker 1>suspended for a year, they all bet just a few

0:17:03.884 --> 0:17:06.604
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars, right like that. That was they didn't make

0:17:06.644 --> 0:17:09.044
<v Speaker 1>big bets, they made tiny bets, and they were still suspended.

0:17:09.484 --> 0:17:12.284
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's actually a really important hardline to

0:17:12.364 --> 0:17:14.324
<v Speaker 1>draw that it doesn't have to be in the millions,

0:17:14.324 --> 0:17:16.484
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't have to be in the hundreds of thousands.

0:17:16.484 --> 0:17:18.524
<v Speaker 1>This was like one hundred bucks, two hundred bucks, you know,

0:17:18.524 --> 0:17:19.564
<v Speaker 1>four hundred bucks.

0:17:19.844 --> 0:17:25.044
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you know, Marcano's bets were larger. The totalsme

0:17:25.244 --> 0:17:29.404
<v Speaker 2>was low six figures. But you know, I doubt that

0:17:29.524 --> 0:17:32.924
<v Speaker 2>he is betting to make a profit, right. I mean,

0:17:32.964 --> 0:17:37.404
<v Speaker 2>you take a bunch of competitive young men. In any industry,

0:17:38.324 --> 0:17:40.644
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of DJM, as we would call it,

0:17:40.684 --> 0:17:44.324
<v Speaker 2>a lot of degeneracy, and things like poker high six

0:17:44.324 --> 0:17:46.244
<v Speaker 2>poker games are often played on the back of team

0:17:46.244 --> 0:17:49.884
<v Speaker 2>planes and things like that. These people are around a

0:17:49.924 --> 0:17:52.164
<v Speaker 2>lot of money all the time. The rookies are not

0:17:52.164 --> 0:17:54.524
<v Speaker 2>making that much, but they're around people who are making

0:17:54.884 --> 0:17:57.364
<v Speaker 2>lots and lots and lots of money. You know, the

0:17:57.364 --> 0:18:02.324
<v Speaker 2>one case where there really was some kind of expected

0:18:02.404 --> 0:18:04.604
<v Speaker 2>value for the person making the bets, was the NBA

0:18:04.644 --> 0:18:08.484
<v Speaker 2>player John tay Porter, who was apparently had been dealt

0:18:08.484 --> 0:18:13.044
<v Speaker 2>in somehow to individual player parlays where why people were

0:18:13.084 --> 0:18:15.684
<v Speaker 2>betting on this obscure player named John tay Porter is

0:18:15.724 --> 0:18:21.324
<v Speaker 2>hard to know, but he basically intentionally tanked the games, right.

0:18:21.324 --> 0:18:24.284
<v Speaker 2>He would intentionally make up a fake injury allegedly. He

0:18:24.324 --> 0:18:28.564
<v Speaker 2>would intentionally like not hustle after rebounds, allegedly so that

0:18:28.724 --> 0:18:31.924
<v Speaker 2>his betters would achieve the under on like how many

0:18:32.044 --> 0:18:34.284
<v Speaker 2>points that John tay Porter would receive, and that was

0:18:34.364 --> 0:18:36.924
<v Speaker 2>very suspicious. I mean, I think the NBA got lucky

0:18:36.924 --> 0:18:39.564
<v Speaker 2>that that scandal broke at about the same time as

0:18:39.564 --> 0:18:43.804
<v Speaker 2>the Otani scandal broke, because that actually affected directly affected

0:18:44.364 --> 0:18:46.964
<v Speaker 2>game integrity, and that's like a kind of deeper level

0:18:47.004 --> 0:18:49.724
<v Speaker 2>of hell, I think than what Markana did.

0:18:50.004 --> 0:18:52.044
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree with you, and I'm really glad I

0:18:52.084 --> 0:18:54.284
<v Speaker 1>was going to bring John tay Porter up because I

0:18:54.324 --> 0:18:56.324
<v Speaker 1>think that what is going on there is actually the

0:18:56.324 --> 0:19:00.524
<v Speaker 1>bigger issue, because it's amazing that he was caught. And

0:19:00.604 --> 0:19:04.004
<v Speaker 1>if you think about the fact that I think the

0:19:04.164 --> 0:19:08.164
<v Speaker 1>much bigger issue isn't players like betting themselves because they'll

0:19:08.164 --> 0:19:11.324
<v Speaker 1>get caught, right, Like you'll figure it out. But players

0:19:11.404 --> 0:19:15.444
<v Speaker 1>giving other betters inside information and then actually affecting outcomes

0:19:15.484 --> 0:19:18.284
<v Speaker 1>when they're in the games, that's much more difficult to police,

0:19:18.404 --> 0:19:20.684
<v Speaker 1>especially if you're smart about it. Right, all of a sudden,

0:19:20.724 --> 0:19:23.204
<v Speaker 1>if you see millions on this obscure player who's then

0:19:23.244 --> 0:19:26.124
<v Speaker 1>pulling off some crazy shit that you know that you

0:19:26.284 --> 0:19:30.124
<v Speaker 1>are thinking of, like, what in the world that's a

0:19:30.164 --> 0:19:33.324
<v Speaker 1>red flag? But imagine you're smarter about it, right, Imagine

0:19:33.324 --> 0:19:35.844
<v Speaker 1>you're actually someone who kind of is a better cheater,

0:19:36.084 --> 0:19:38.564
<v Speaker 1>who kind of stays under the radar, who manages to

0:19:38.604 --> 0:19:41.884
<v Speaker 1>do it a little bit less blatantly, less often fakes

0:19:41.924 --> 0:19:44.684
<v Speaker 1>you know, doesn't fake injuries quite as much, doesn't throw

0:19:44.724 --> 0:19:47.324
<v Speaker 1>games in quite as obvious a way, but does it anyway.

0:19:47.724 --> 0:19:50.404
<v Speaker 1>And that to me is the much bigger and much

0:19:50.444 --> 0:19:54.524
<v Speaker 1>scarier issue, because that can really affect game integrity, It

0:19:54.564 --> 0:19:58.204
<v Speaker 1>can affect the entire kind of gaming community because it

0:19:58.324 --> 0:20:01.044
<v Speaker 1>just goes against the heart of why people play games,

0:20:01.124 --> 0:20:04.604
<v Speaker 1>why people watch games, you know what this is all about.

0:20:05.084 --> 0:20:06.804
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that's the much bigger thing we

0:20:06.844 --> 0:20:07.724
<v Speaker 1>should be thinking about.

0:20:08.004 --> 0:20:12.124
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, betting on the visual accomplishments raises this risk a lot,

0:20:12.324 --> 0:20:15.244
<v Speaker 2>like you should not be taking that much action on

0:20:15.364 --> 0:20:19.164
<v Speaker 2>anything involving John tay Porter, right, Like, who the fuck

0:20:19.204 --> 0:20:21.084
<v Speaker 2>is going to bet that unless they have some type

0:20:21.084 --> 0:20:23.564
<v Speaker 2>of inside angle. I mean I was at like a

0:20:24.404 --> 0:20:27.884
<v Speaker 2>Summer League game in Las Vegas about a year ago.

0:20:27.924 --> 0:20:29.844
<v Speaker 2>Now Summer League coincides with the end of the World

0:20:29.884 --> 0:20:33.084
<v Speaker 2>Series of Poker and watching in the game and see

0:20:33.124 --> 0:20:37.364
<v Speaker 2>like some team executive two rows in front of me

0:20:37.724 --> 0:20:41.844
<v Speaker 2>and giant font on his cell phone is talking about

0:20:41.844 --> 0:20:44.804
<v Speaker 2>how the New York Nixian a trade for og Ananobi,

0:20:45.084 --> 0:20:49.244
<v Speaker 2>which didn't happen then but did actually happen several months later.

0:20:49.284 --> 0:20:52.124
<v Speaker 2>If I having not really it's not really inside information,

0:20:52.204 --> 0:20:54.684
<v Speaker 2>I mean a public area of a stadium, right, But

0:20:54.804 --> 0:20:59.924
<v Speaker 2>like information has a way of slipping out about injuries,

0:20:59.964 --> 0:21:02.924
<v Speaker 2>about fatigue, you know, about like I know, you know

0:21:02.964 --> 0:21:05.484
<v Speaker 2>some people will hang around tennis tournaments, for example, and

0:21:05.804 --> 0:21:07.964
<v Speaker 2>see which player is having like a cheating scandal with

0:21:08.004 --> 0:21:10.804
<v Speaker 2>his girlfriend or looks like they're coming in hungover and

0:21:10.844 --> 0:21:14.284
<v Speaker 2>things like that. You know, information has a way of

0:21:14.444 --> 0:21:17.924
<v Speaker 2>getting out. And to limit your liability by focusing on

0:21:18.004 --> 0:21:22.324
<v Speaker 2>more major and more robust wagering categories would be prudent.

0:21:22.404 --> 0:21:26.244
<v Speaker 2>But you know, but look it's a money grab. The

0:21:26.324 --> 0:21:28.444
<v Speaker 2>long term sustainability of any of this, I think is

0:21:28.484 --> 0:21:31.604
<v Speaker 2>not as assumed as some of the big sports betting

0:21:31.644 --> 0:21:34.324
<v Speaker 2>companies would would right in their stock market and their

0:21:34.324 --> 0:21:37.324
<v Speaker 2>ten k's and things like that. So but you know,

0:21:37.364 --> 0:21:40.964
<v Speaker 2>at the very least they are smart enough to partner

0:21:41.004 --> 0:21:44.044
<v Speaker 2>with the leagues when they detect activity that undermines gain

0:21:44.084 --> 0:21:46.644
<v Speaker 2>and integrity, to at least tip them off to snitch

0:21:47.404 --> 0:21:48.244
<v Speaker 2>on their customers.

0:21:48.484 --> 0:21:50.404
<v Speaker 1>No, absolutely, and I think we're not just talking about

0:21:50.444 --> 0:21:52.764
<v Speaker 1>US sports betting, US sports book. This is happening in

0:21:52.804 --> 0:21:55.404
<v Speaker 1>sports all over the world, and some of the worst

0:21:55.524 --> 0:21:58.124
<v Speaker 1>are actually in Europe and in places where there are

0:21:58.164 --> 0:22:00.924
<v Speaker 1>lots of athletes who are not paid very well. And

0:22:00.964 --> 0:22:04.884
<v Speaker 1>a lot of times they're young, right, they're teenagers. They're

0:22:04.964 --> 0:22:08.164
<v Speaker 1>still developing their sense of self, their sense of kind

0:22:08.204 --> 0:22:10.924
<v Speaker 1>of right and wrong and kind of gray areas and

0:22:11.004 --> 0:22:14.764
<v Speaker 1>long term consequences isn't fully developed. Because, by the way,

0:22:14.764 --> 0:22:16.284
<v Speaker 1>if you're like a seventeen year old guy, you're a

0:22:16.284 --> 0:22:20.364
<v Speaker 1>prefrontal cortex ain't fully developed yet. Your ability to kind

0:22:20.404 --> 0:22:23.324
<v Speaker 1>of think through long term decisions isn't fully developed. And

0:22:23.324 --> 0:22:24.844
<v Speaker 1>if someone says, do you want to make you know

0:22:25.124 --> 0:22:28.644
<v Speaker 1>a quick ten grand, a quick you know this. You're like, Okay,

0:22:29.004 --> 0:22:31.204
<v Speaker 1>you know this might not be a bad idea. All

0:22:31.244 --> 0:22:33.404
<v Speaker 1>I have to do is, you know, if I'm a

0:22:33.444 --> 0:22:36.044
<v Speaker 1>tennis player, I just serve a little bit off right,

0:22:36.164 --> 0:22:39.284
<v Speaker 1>just one time. That's all it takes. I just lose

0:22:39.324 --> 0:22:39.804
<v Speaker 1>one point.

0:22:39.844 --> 0:22:40.604
<v Speaker 2>What's one point?

0:22:40.644 --> 0:22:43.084
<v Speaker 1>You know? I just do this a few times, and

0:22:43.524 --> 0:22:46.244
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, I have money. And you don't think, wait,

0:22:46.364 --> 0:22:49.004
<v Speaker 1>if I'm caught, there goes my career, and there goes

0:22:49.284 --> 0:22:52.004
<v Speaker 1>kind of any chance I have of all these future earnings.

0:22:52.284 --> 0:22:55.124
<v Speaker 1>You just don't make that math. You're thinking much more

0:22:55.204 --> 0:22:59.524
<v Speaker 1>in the moment. You're thinking much more immediate gratification as

0:22:59.524 --> 0:23:02.884
<v Speaker 1>opposed to kind of long term expected value. And I

0:23:02.924 --> 0:23:05.444
<v Speaker 1>think that that is something that people just need to

0:23:05.444 --> 0:23:07.844
<v Speaker 1>be aware of, need to be aware who the vulnerable

0:23:07.884 --> 0:23:10.124
<v Speaker 1>players are. And I think that teams need to guard

0:23:10.164 --> 0:23:12.684
<v Speaker 1>against that, need to train against that, need to kind

0:23:12.684 --> 0:23:14.964
<v Speaker 1>of talk to them and explicitly say what the long

0:23:15.044 --> 0:23:17.444
<v Speaker 1>term consequences are and remind them a bit. I know

0:23:17.484 --> 0:23:20.364
<v Speaker 1>you said in baseball, you know it can't be more explicit,

0:23:20.764 --> 0:23:25.324
<v Speaker 1>but still like have more reminders, constantly, have these reminders

0:23:25.364 --> 0:23:27.364
<v Speaker 1>of like this is what you don't want to do

0:23:27.524 --> 0:23:28.764
<v Speaker 1>or else it's going to be bad.

0:23:29.044 --> 0:23:32.324
<v Speaker 2>But in an environment that like encourages gambling, where there's

0:23:32.324 --> 0:23:34.844
<v Speaker 2>like draft Kings or FanDuel or Caesars ads on the

0:23:34.844 --> 0:23:39.284
<v Speaker 2>outfield wall and poker games in the team plane, you're

0:23:39.404 --> 0:23:42.164
<v Speaker 2>and neverly going to have some of this with with

0:23:42.364 --> 0:23:45.844
<v Speaker 2>rich young men and not fully formed pre front prefrontal cortexes.

0:23:45.884 --> 0:23:49.684
<v Speaker 1>What is it called, yep, prefrontal cortex Okay, yeah, yeah, no,

0:23:49.804 --> 0:23:52.604
<v Speaker 1>I think that's I think that's exactly right. And if

0:23:52.644 --> 0:23:54.964
<v Speaker 1>we if we want to give kind of a nod

0:23:55.004 --> 0:23:58.164
<v Speaker 1>to the next layer, which is the uh musuhara of it,

0:23:58.244 --> 0:24:01.604
<v Speaker 1>all right, that you have you have also these situations

0:24:01.604 --> 0:24:05.604
<v Speaker 1>where even if someone like Otani isn't cheating directly, isn't

0:24:05.644 --> 0:24:09.484
<v Speaker 1>isn't sports betting, there are incentives for people close to

0:24:09.684 --> 0:24:12.364
<v Speaker 1>these individuals to try to take advantage.

0:24:12.764 --> 0:24:15.684
<v Speaker 2>Major League Baseball seemed pretty excited about being able to

0:24:15.724 --> 0:24:18.284
<v Speaker 2>wrap up that investigation. I mean, there's still a question

0:24:19.244 --> 0:24:25.164
<v Speaker 2>why didn't Otani notice seventeen million dollars missing from his account?

0:24:25.364 --> 0:24:26.884
<v Speaker 2>Like that's a pretty fucking good question.

0:24:27.044 --> 0:24:29.524
<v Speaker 1>I think, yes it is, and we don't know, right,

0:24:29.604 --> 0:24:32.604
<v Speaker 1>and but I think that it's important to just throw

0:24:32.644 --> 0:24:37.604
<v Speaker 1>those questions out there because it is. Even though as

0:24:37.644 --> 0:24:40.044
<v Speaker 1>someone who has seen a lot of victims of con artists,

0:24:40.284 --> 0:24:43.164
<v Speaker 1>I'm very sympathetic to Otani if we look at it

0:24:43.204 --> 0:24:46.724
<v Speaker 1>as a typical con situation that he was potentially conned

0:24:46.764 --> 0:24:50.964
<v Speaker 1>my Musahara, you know, charmed by him, That Musuhara is

0:24:51.004 --> 0:24:53.044
<v Speaker 1>the one who had access to his bank accounts, got

0:24:53.044 --> 0:24:55.244
<v Speaker 1>all the alerts, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. Like

0:24:55.364 --> 0:24:58.804
<v Speaker 1>you can make excuses up to a point, but as

0:24:58.844 --> 0:25:03.764
<v Speaker 1>you say, seventeen million dollars is a big number for anyone,

0:25:04.084 --> 0:25:07.164
<v Speaker 1>and so you have to then ask Clake, was he

0:25:07.284 --> 0:25:11.124
<v Speaker 1>knowingly looking the other way? Was he involved? Like what

0:25:11.204 --> 0:25:13.404
<v Speaker 1>was going on? And I think these are questions that

0:25:13.444 --> 0:25:15.644
<v Speaker 1>should be asked, but that won't be asked because the

0:25:15.724 --> 0:25:20.644
<v Speaker 1>incentives are completely misaligned here because nobody wants Otani to

0:25:20.684 --> 0:25:23.724
<v Speaker 1>be involved because he's the star, and we want the

0:25:23.764 --> 0:25:27.484
<v Speaker 1>star to keep being an untarnished star, and we want

0:25:27.484 --> 0:25:29.484
<v Speaker 1>this other guy to take the fall. And I do

0:25:29.844 --> 0:25:32.364
<v Speaker 1>agree with you though that there are still some question marks,

0:25:32.364 --> 0:25:35.284
<v Speaker 1>and unfortunately I think that all we can do is speculate.

0:25:35.284 --> 0:25:37.284
<v Speaker 1>We're never going to know, But I want to be

0:25:37.364 --> 0:25:39.484
<v Speaker 1>careful and not to just say, oh, like this is

0:25:39.524 --> 0:25:42.124
<v Speaker 1>a problem of modern sports books, because like, let's not

0:25:42.244 --> 0:25:45.924
<v Speaker 1>forget you know, the Chicago Black Sox, like shit like

0:25:45.964 --> 0:25:48.404
<v Speaker 1>this has been going on in sports for a very

0:25:48.644 --> 0:25:53.524
<v Speaker 1>very long time before fan dual or DraftKings or any

0:25:53.524 --> 0:25:56.204
<v Speaker 1>of these things. And so these are kind of these

0:25:56.244 --> 0:26:00.684
<v Speaker 1>are problems and deep kind of issues of humanity that

0:26:00.764 --> 0:26:02.964
<v Speaker 1>I think are never going to quite go away no

0:26:02.964 --> 0:26:04.324
<v Speaker 1>matter what the regulations say.

0:26:04.884 --> 0:26:07.764
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, look, there are two categories. One is there may

0:26:07.804 --> 0:26:10.604
<v Speaker 2>be cases where it is in your financial interest to

0:26:10.724 --> 0:26:13.564
<v Speaker 2>throw a game, right, one preventative measure is just paying

0:26:13.604 --> 0:26:16.684
<v Speaker 2>everybody really well, including the umpires, by the way, where

0:26:16.724 --> 0:26:19.684
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of on the surface irrational for you to

0:26:19.764 --> 0:26:23.524
<v Speaker 2>gamble at that point, although sometimes people gamble for irrational reasons.

0:26:23.524 --> 0:26:25.044
<v Speaker 2>For me, one thing you always remind me of is

0:26:25.084 --> 0:26:28.124
<v Speaker 2>that like most con artists are not motivated strictly by.

0:26:27.964 --> 0:26:31.804
<v Speaker 1>Money, Yes, absolutely true. Something I also remind you of, Nate,

0:26:31.924 --> 0:26:34.764
<v Speaker 1>is that even though most con artists are not motivated

0:26:34.804 --> 0:26:37.924
<v Speaker 1>by money, most people are not con artists. And so

0:26:38.004 --> 0:26:40.284
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's a more hopeful way to end

0:26:40.364 --> 0:26:44.124
<v Speaker 1>this segment. That most athletes are also, you know, not

0:26:44.204 --> 0:26:48.164
<v Speaker 1>degenerate gamblers, not con artists, and going to be in

0:26:48.204 --> 0:26:50.404
<v Speaker 1>the sport for the right reason. They want to excel,

0:26:50.684 --> 0:26:52.524
<v Speaker 1>they want to do well. They don't want to throw

0:26:52.564 --> 0:27:14.044
<v Speaker 1>the game. We'll be back in a minute. So recently

0:27:14.644 --> 0:27:17.844
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a resurgence of a stock that we haven't

0:27:17.844 --> 0:27:20.444
<v Speaker 1>heard talked about for a few years now, game Stop,

0:27:20.964 --> 0:27:27.244
<v Speaker 1>because Roaring Kitty aka Keith Gill is back. And for

0:27:27.324 --> 0:27:30.724
<v Speaker 1>those of you who followed the Game Stop short squeeze

0:27:31.084 --> 0:27:35.684
<v Speaker 1>several years ago, Roaring Kitty was kind of the big

0:27:35.764 --> 0:27:39.804
<v Speaker 1>force that had game Stop just go on an unprecedented

0:27:39.964 --> 0:27:43.604
<v Speaker 1>run and put some very famous hedge funds out of

0:27:43.604 --> 0:27:48.044
<v Speaker 1>business and ended up, you know, having this just insane

0:27:48.124 --> 0:27:51.924
<v Speaker 1>impact on the markets. And then Keith Gill Roaring Kitty

0:27:51.964 --> 0:27:55.964
<v Speaker 1>went silent, and a few weeks ago, all of a sudden,

0:27:56.044 --> 0:27:59.284
<v Speaker 1>for the first time, this dormant account started posting memes

0:27:59.844 --> 0:28:04.884
<v Speaker 1>and what happened. Game Stop is back, baby. The stock

0:28:05.124 --> 0:28:09.404
<v Speaker 1>just went through the roof once again, and Roaring Kitty

0:28:09.444 --> 0:28:12.884
<v Speaker 1>has since made more posts and shown his own holdings,

0:28:13.724 --> 0:28:18.564
<v Speaker 1>including over one hundred million in game Stop stock, and

0:28:19.044 --> 0:28:22.244
<v Speaker 1>the markets are reacting and game Stop is reacting. The

0:28:22.284 --> 0:28:25.164
<v Speaker 1>sec is reacting. Lots of players are reacting to this

0:28:25.484 --> 0:28:29.164
<v Speaker 1>and trying to figure out what's going on. Is it legal?

0:28:29.284 --> 0:28:31.804
<v Speaker 1>Kind of what are the repercussions of this, Nate? Is

0:28:31.844 --> 0:28:33.164
<v Speaker 1>this something that you've been following?

0:28:34.644 --> 0:28:36.964
<v Speaker 2>I wrote about game stop a little bit in my

0:28:37.044 --> 0:28:42.084
<v Speaker 2>book from the standpoint of game theory. Actually, so, Maria,

0:28:42.124 --> 0:28:44.364
<v Speaker 2>maybe we should actually talk about some of the game

0:28:44.444 --> 0:28:47.524
<v Speaker 2>theory behind shit coins and meme stocks.

0:28:47.844 --> 0:28:49.604
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I think that's a great idea, Nate, because I

0:28:49.604 --> 0:28:52.164
<v Speaker 1>do think that that's central to this conversation.

0:28:52.484 --> 0:28:56.844
<v Speaker 2>And the meming part of it. Eme is actually very

0:28:56.884 --> 0:29:00.044
<v Speaker 2>central to how the game theory works, believe it or not.

0:29:00.244 --> 0:29:04.404
<v Speaker 2>Like to simplify a bit, typically, what you have is,

0:29:04.484 --> 0:29:08.284
<v Speaker 2>let's say you have like an overvalued asset. In principle,

0:29:08.804 --> 0:29:13.084
<v Speaker 2>people who own that asset could sort of literally conspire

0:29:13.284 --> 0:29:16.684
<v Speaker 2>or collude to keep the asset at an artificial value.

0:29:16.684 --> 0:29:20.164
<v Speaker 2>As long as nobody sells, right, then it maintains at

0:29:20.204 --> 0:29:23.044
<v Speaker 2>least nominally its value, or maybe it keeps going up

0:29:23.084 --> 0:29:25.364
<v Speaker 2>if everyone's being like hotal hold on for dear life

0:29:25.564 --> 0:29:27.884
<v Speaker 2>and wants to kind of boost the asset further. So

0:29:28.364 --> 0:29:30.884
<v Speaker 2>the problem with that is that, like you have in

0:29:31.004 --> 0:29:34.524
<v Speaker 2>game theory terms a prisoner's dilemma where every party has

0:29:34.524 --> 0:29:40.324
<v Speaker 2>a strong incentive to defect. Right if Game Stop is

0:29:40.364 --> 0:29:45.884
<v Speaker 2>priced that fifty dollars when the fundamentals price should be

0:29:45.924 --> 0:29:49.324
<v Speaker 2>two dollars or something like that. A share you really

0:29:49.404 --> 0:29:51.764
<v Speaker 2>have a strong incentive to get out while you can

0:29:52.324 --> 0:29:56.684
<v Speaker 2>and take your profits. That could trigger a collapse in

0:29:56.764 --> 0:30:00.804
<v Speaker 2>the share price. However, due to the power of means,

0:30:01.284 --> 0:30:04.284
<v Speaker 2>a sort of coordination is possible in the prisoner's dilemma.

0:30:04.564 --> 0:30:07.244
<v Speaker 2>This is what happens when Maria. Let's say you and

0:30:07.324 --> 0:30:11.884
<v Speaker 2>I commit a and we're in separate jail, says, I

0:30:11.884 --> 0:30:14.884
<v Speaker 2>don't know what's the most likely crime we were to commit.

0:30:15.484 --> 0:30:17.524
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to speculate on this night. You and

0:30:17.564 --> 0:30:20.924
<v Speaker 1>I are complete. Maybe we're not going to get any crimes. Ever,

0:30:21.324 --> 0:30:22.604
<v Speaker 1>so let's say.

0:30:22.484 --> 0:30:26.364
<v Speaker 2>We kidnapped Justice Sonya sot of mayor. Okay, okay, that

0:30:26.364 --> 0:30:29.204
<v Speaker 2>would be a pretty serious crime, very serious. But let's

0:30:29.204 --> 0:30:31.644
<v Speaker 2>say the government is having trouble proving it, and therefore

0:30:31.804 --> 0:30:34.964
<v Speaker 2>we are in separate prison cells, and the government says, well,

0:30:35.964 --> 0:30:39.884
<v Speaker 2>you can confess to the crime and get a lower sentence,

0:30:39.924 --> 0:30:43.044
<v Speaker 2>or you can remain silent and we'll see what happens

0:30:43.124 --> 0:30:46.884
<v Speaker 2>right now. If neither of us were to confess the

0:30:46.924 --> 0:30:49.444
<v Speaker 2>way this works, we would kind of get like a

0:30:49.484 --> 0:30:51.604
<v Speaker 2>slap on the risk because the government can't really prove

0:30:51.644 --> 0:30:54.604
<v Speaker 2>its case. But the game theory is such that not

0:30:54.684 --> 0:30:57.884
<v Speaker 2>being able to coordinate on our strategy, we both wind

0:30:57.964 --> 0:31:00.524
<v Speaker 2>up stitching on one another and wind up getting a

0:31:00.564 --> 0:31:03.524
<v Speaker 2>worse sentence as a result. It's kind of the very simplified,

0:31:03.564 --> 0:31:07.924
<v Speaker 2>podcast friendly version of the prisoner's dilemma. If we could coordinate, though,

0:31:08.404 --> 0:31:11.404
<v Speaker 2>I went to a prediction markets conference this weekend in

0:31:11.404 --> 0:31:14.844
<v Speaker 2>California where a guy had a T shirt on saying

0:31:14.884 --> 0:31:18.244
<v Speaker 2>I cooperate in the prisoner's dilema, meaning that if we

0:31:18.284 --> 0:31:20.524
<v Speaker 2>can single to one another that we are cooperating and

0:31:20.524 --> 0:31:23.724
<v Speaker 2>this is great. Sure, yeah, this is what happens in

0:31:23.804 --> 0:31:25.764
<v Speaker 2>situations like the Internet.

0:31:25.844 --> 0:31:26.004
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:31:26.284 --> 0:31:28.164
<v Speaker 2>If you're like, we're all of this together against a

0:31:28.204 --> 0:31:30.884
<v Speaker 2>stupid hedge fund, against Wall Street and inherently a stock

0:31:31.004 --> 0:31:34.604
<v Speaker 2>like AMC Theaters or game Stop is like, it's kind

0:31:34.644 --> 0:31:36.564
<v Speaker 2>of a joke, right, These are like kind of Blockbuster

0:31:36.724 --> 0:31:40.164
<v Speaker 2>video dinosaur companies. It's kind of funny. And the fact

0:31:40.204 --> 0:31:44.444
<v Speaker 2>that like that through Matt Levine, the economics writer for

0:31:44.484 --> 0:31:47.444
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg calls it the meme theory of value. You are

0:31:47.484 --> 0:31:50.364
<v Speaker 2>kind of literally creating something out of nothing.

0:31:50.804 --> 0:31:52.964
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So I think that we have some bigger questions

0:31:52.964 --> 0:31:56.284
<v Speaker 1>here though, that are like much bigger than Roaring Kitty

0:31:56.604 --> 0:31:59.444
<v Speaker 1>and is more about like the roaring kitties of the world. Right,

0:31:59.524 --> 0:32:01.924
<v Speaker 1>So this, you know, what happened in twenty twenty one,

0:32:02.284 --> 0:32:05.524
<v Speaker 1>totally unprecedented. What's happening right now shows that this is

0:32:05.564 --> 0:32:09.684
<v Speaker 1>a thing that might actually not be so one off, right,

0:32:09.724 --> 0:32:13.004
<v Speaker 1>it might actually be repeating, and we might be in

0:32:13.044 --> 0:32:16.004
<v Speaker 1>a position where kind of memes, stocks, shit coins, these

0:32:16.044 --> 0:32:19.004
<v Speaker 1>types of things really do have an impact on the

0:32:19.004 --> 0:32:23.724
<v Speaker 1>broader financial markets that we see these degrees of irrationality

0:32:23.844 --> 0:32:27.324
<v Speaker 1>or is it irrational that are playing out in the

0:32:27.364 --> 0:32:30.564
<v Speaker 1>broader stock market, where people in kind of the traditional

0:32:30.764 --> 0:32:33.884
<v Speaker 1>market analysis are going to have to look at this

0:32:33.924 --> 0:32:36.724
<v Speaker 1>differently and try to figure out has the world changed.

0:32:37.044 --> 0:32:38.924
<v Speaker 1>Do we need to change how we think about this?

0:32:39.244 --> 0:32:40.844
<v Speaker 1>You know, do we need to change where we think

0:32:40.884 --> 0:32:43.764
<v Speaker 1>the dumb money is or how it operates, or whether

0:32:43.804 --> 0:32:46.524
<v Speaker 1>it's actually dumb? And I think that these are really

0:32:46.564 --> 0:32:50.444
<v Speaker 1>important questions, especially as crypto becomes a much bigger world

0:32:50.804 --> 0:32:56.164
<v Speaker 1>and memes are the universal language. In some ways, these

0:32:56.204 --> 0:32:58.364
<v Speaker 1>are things that just did not exist in the stock

0:32:58.364 --> 0:33:01.404
<v Speaker 1>market or in the financial markets in the past. Yeah.

0:33:01.484 --> 0:33:03.324
<v Speaker 2>Look, it's a little bit of a blow to kind

0:33:03.324 --> 0:33:08.844
<v Speaker 2>of efficient market hypothesis. Clearly, stocks like AMC or GameStop

0:33:09.204 --> 0:33:12.404
<v Speaker 2>are unmoored from any notion of kind of the fundamental values.

0:33:12.404 --> 0:33:14.924
<v Speaker 2>Although with that said, like a lot of things are

0:33:14.964 --> 0:33:18.524
<v Speaker 2>kind of in the eye of a beholder, you know

0:33:18.684 --> 0:33:21.844
<v Speaker 2>why everyone thinks that like a Picasso or a or

0:33:21.884 --> 0:33:24.284
<v Speaker 2>a Keith Herring or whatever else. You know, why are

0:33:24.324 --> 0:33:27.044
<v Speaker 2>those works of art valuable? I mean often I think

0:33:27.044 --> 0:33:31.084
<v Speaker 2>they do have esthetic value, but it's inherently kind of subjective.

0:33:31.284 --> 0:33:33.524
<v Speaker 2>It speaks to, I think the kind of maybe inherent

0:33:34.204 --> 0:33:37.444
<v Speaker 2>unpredictability of the modern world. It speaks a little bit

0:33:37.484 --> 0:33:41.164
<v Speaker 2>to like the way that these kind of faceless, leaderless

0:33:41.364 --> 0:33:45.524
<v Speaker 2>internet mobs, because Arren Kenny is not like giving explicit instructions,

0:33:45.524 --> 0:33:48.964
<v Speaker 2>He's just kind of communicating through through memes and vibes,

0:33:49.004 --> 0:33:52.004
<v Speaker 2>and people kind of infer what he's saying, and it

0:33:52.084 --> 0:33:53.924
<v Speaker 2>kind of starts to chain a momentum that kind of

0:33:54.244 --> 0:33:57.084
<v Speaker 2>can sustain itself for some period of time, and can

0:33:57.124 --> 0:33:58.924
<v Speaker 2>you time it well enough that you kind of get

0:33:58.924 --> 0:34:00.764
<v Speaker 2>out before the bubble inevitably bursts.

0:34:01.364 --> 0:34:04.804
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And is this something that is going to be replicable? Right?

0:34:05.164 --> 0:34:07.924
<v Speaker 1>I think that I think that that's another question because

0:34:08.164 --> 0:34:10.204
<v Speaker 1>I think other people have tried to be roaring kitty

0:34:10.604 --> 0:34:14.044
<v Speaker 1>and have failed. But I do think that, you know,

0:34:14.124 --> 0:34:17.804
<v Speaker 1>there is irrationality in the stock markets in general, and

0:34:17.844 --> 0:34:21.444
<v Speaker 1>always has been one of my favorite quotes from Daniel Konneman,

0:34:21.524 --> 0:34:25.684
<v Speaker 1>who won the Nobel Prize in Economics for his work

0:34:25.724 --> 0:34:29.444
<v Speaker 1>on kind of biases and irrationality. He consulted for a

0:34:29.444 --> 0:34:31.804
<v Speaker 1>bunch of hedge funds and he came to the conclusion

0:34:32.284 --> 0:34:36.364
<v Speaker 1>that basically traders were gambling. They were not playing poker.

0:34:37.124 --> 0:34:39.684
<v Speaker 1>And he said that poker players are you know, much

0:34:39.724 --> 0:34:42.644
<v Speaker 1>more much more rational, and can actually, you know, you

0:34:42.684 --> 0:34:44.644
<v Speaker 1>can figure out who the winning players are, where the

0:34:44.724 --> 0:34:47.204
<v Speaker 1>edge is, et cetera. Gambling. If you're just gambling in

0:34:47.204 --> 0:34:49.004
<v Speaker 1>a casino, you can't. And he said, what you guys

0:34:49.004 --> 0:34:51.084
<v Speaker 1>are doing is gambling. And no one listened to him,

0:34:51.684 --> 0:34:54.484
<v Speaker 1>and they thought that he was, you know, just full

0:34:54.484 --> 0:34:56.524
<v Speaker 1>of it, and so they didn't take any of his

0:34:56.724 --> 0:35:00.164
<v Speaker 1>recommendations to heart. And but I think that that's a

0:35:00.204 --> 0:35:04.364
<v Speaker 1>really kind of important insight that this is not necessarily

0:35:04.484 --> 0:35:07.044
<v Speaker 1>counter to how a lot of decision making in the

0:35:07.044 --> 0:35:09.684
<v Speaker 1>stock markets has worked in the past. It's just a

0:35:09.804 --> 0:35:13.884
<v Speaker 1>new element, a new world, and kind of putting some

0:35:13.964 --> 0:35:16.204
<v Speaker 1>of the stuff on steroids, right, blowing it up in

0:35:16.244 --> 0:35:18.804
<v Speaker 1>a way that it hasn't been blown up before, and

0:35:18.884 --> 0:35:22.324
<v Speaker 1>potentially kind of making that exponentially more powerful.

0:35:22.844 --> 0:35:26.284
<v Speaker 2>Maria, I'm not I'm not one to like dispute too

0:35:26.404 --> 0:35:28.844
<v Speaker 2>much the late Daniel Connoman, right.

0:35:28.804 --> 0:35:31.924
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's why that's why I consulted my Okay, that's

0:35:31.924 --> 0:35:34.444
<v Speaker 1>why I couched my views with Danny Connoman, right because

0:35:34.444 --> 0:35:36.324
<v Speaker 1>I know that you can disagree with me, but he's

0:35:36.364 --> 0:35:39.324
<v Speaker 1>he's harder to disagree with. Please continue.

0:35:40.924 --> 0:35:44.124
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, like I when you have like the

0:35:44.324 --> 0:35:50.564
<v Speaker 2>practice of like actual traders betting millions of dollars versus academics,

0:35:50.724 --> 0:35:55.444
<v Speaker 2>even academics as smart as Daniel Conneman, I'm not sure

0:35:55.484 --> 0:35:59.364
<v Speaker 2>I take the academic side. I think it's really easy

0:35:59.364 --> 0:36:02.484
<v Speaker 2>to like come to some theorical conclusion when you don't

0:36:02.524 --> 0:36:06.804
<v Speaker 2>have skin in the game that might not be robust necessarily.

0:36:07.124 --> 0:36:09.484
<v Speaker 2>I talk to a guy named John Coates for my book,

0:36:09.524 --> 0:36:14.084
<v Speaker 2>who is a former trader turned neuroscientists, and he actually

0:36:14.124 --> 0:36:15.884
<v Speaker 2>thought when he was working on desks at Wall Street

0:36:15.884 --> 0:36:18.884
<v Speaker 2>that the traders didn't take enough risk. It's hard to

0:36:18.924 --> 0:36:22.044
<v Speaker 2>get people to be properly, properly risk adjusted until they

0:36:22.124 --> 0:36:23.644
<v Speaker 2>kind of had a winning streak. Then they got all

0:36:23.684 --> 0:36:26.124
<v Speaker 2>this testosterone and other chemicals running around the brain and

0:36:26.164 --> 0:36:29.004
<v Speaker 2>that coome like faeral animals and go kind of crazy, right,

0:36:29.044 --> 0:36:33.564
<v Speaker 2>And that's kind of what can cause bubbles. But yeah, look,

0:36:33.644 --> 0:36:36.044
<v Speaker 2>I mean because there's kind of two forms of efficient

0:36:36.644 --> 0:36:40.524
<v Speaker 2>market hypothesis, right. There's kind of like the hard form that, yes,

0:36:41.684 --> 0:36:47.044
<v Speaker 2>stocks actually do represent a probabilistic discounted projection of future

0:36:47.164 --> 0:36:50.244
<v Speaker 2>corporate earnings, Like that's clearly not true when it comes

0:36:50.244 --> 0:36:55.164
<v Speaker 2>to something like game Stop. The softer form is just that, Okay,

0:36:55.524 --> 0:36:57.644
<v Speaker 2>you think you can meet the market, go ahead and

0:36:57.724 --> 0:37:01.244
<v Speaker 2>try it. You might understand that like yes, GameStop is

0:37:01.284 --> 0:37:03.364
<v Speaker 2>O were valued, but good luck in trying to time

0:37:03.444 --> 0:37:05.964
<v Speaker 2>exactly kind of win that bubble bursts.

0:37:07.044 --> 0:37:11.604
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I think that the bigger point here when

0:37:11.644 --> 0:37:14.444
<v Speaker 1>you said that anyone can try, And something that I

0:37:14.524 --> 0:37:16.764
<v Speaker 1>think Conoman was trying to get at is that, of

0:37:16.844 --> 0:37:19.044
<v Speaker 1>course there are traders and there are certain investors who

0:37:19.044 --> 0:37:21.484
<v Speaker 1>can beat the markets. Right, there are people who are

0:37:21.804 --> 0:37:24.404
<v Speaker 1>very good at this, who kind of understand, who analyze well,

0:37:24.444 --> 0:37:27.324
<v Speaker 1>who have the right data, right approach, whatever it is.

0:37:28.684 --> 0:37:32.164
<v Speaker 1>But that's not true for the majority. But if you

0:37:32.204 --> 0:37:35.524
<v Speaker 1>talk to anyone individual, they always think that they're the

0:37:35.564 --> 0:37:38.444
<v Speaker 1>ones are who are actually more rational and can beat

0:37:38.444 --> 0:37:41.124
<v Speaker 1>the markets and are making better decisions. And I think

0:37:41.124 --> 0:37:45.804
<v Speaker 1>that that's just an overall human flaw. Yeah.

0:37:45.844 --> 0:37:47.924
<v Speaker 2>Look, if ten percent of people in the world are

0:37:47.964 --> 0:37:50.204
<v Speaker 2>the truly rational ones, there's no guarantee that you're in

0:37:50.244 --> 0:37:53.404
<v Speaker 2>the ten percent. The correlation, like self perception and reality

0:37:53.484 --> 0:37:56.284
<v Speaker 2>is probably fairly discordant sometimes.

0:37:56.964 --> 0:37:59.524
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I think that that's just something that's very

0:37:59.524 --> 0:38:02.604
<v Speaker 1>important to remember, whether you're a roaring kitty, whether you're

0:38:02.644 --> 0:38:06.124
<v Speaker 1>one of the portfolio managers who is on the other

0:38:06.244 --> 0:38:10.524
<v Speaker 1>side and short game stop, or whether you're someone who's

0:38:10.564 --> 0:38:13.324
<v Speaker 1>just an outside observer thinking how do I get in

0:38:13.404 --> 0:38:24.124
<v Speaker 1>on this in the future and make a killing. You

0:38:24.164 --> 0:38:28.124
<v Speaker 1>and I have totally switched positions this week, Knate, because

0:38:28.364 --> 0:38:30.764
<v Speaker 1>last week when we were recording, I was in New

0:38:30.764 --> 0:38:33.524
<v Speaker 1>Haven about to go to Ireland and you were deep

0:38:33.524 --> 0:38:36.244
<v Speaker 1>in the World Series. And now I am finally back

0:38:36.284 --> 0:38:39.244
<v Speaker 1>in Vegas and you are back in New York City,

0:38:39.484 --> 0:38:44.604
<v Speaker 1>so we have swapped, and unfortunately I'm not making a

0:38:44.604 --> 0:38:46.724
<v Speaker 1>deep run. I've played exactly one event since I've been

0:38:46.764 --> 0:38:50.764
<v Speaker 1>back and I busted. So that didn't that didn't go

0:38:50.804 --> 0:38:53.844
<v Speaker 1>according to plan, and I'll play again today. But you

0:38:54.044 --> 0:38:56.844
<v Speaker 1>managed to go deep in a second event that was

0:38:57.004 --> 0:39:00.204
<v Speaker 1>not the event that we were talking about. So congratulations,

0:39:00.804 --> 0:39:01.204
<v Speaker 1>thank you.

0:39:01.324 --> 0:39:03.884
<v Speaker 2>Although it ended in a very disappointing way. This was

0:39:03.884 --> 0:39:05.884
<v Speaker 2>that five thousand dollars in a limit hold them event

0:39:05.964 --> 0:39:06.684
<v Speaker 2>number sixteen.

0:39:07.524 --> 0:39:08.404
<v Speaker 1>That's a big deal name.

0:39:08.564 --> 0:39:11.844
<v Speaker 2>I finished eighteen place out of eight hundred and something runners.

0:39:11.884 --> 0:39:14.004
<v Speaker 1>However, congratulations, thank.

0:39:13.884 --> 0:39:18.164
<v Speaker 2>You, Maria. I still am mildly heartbroken about it, because.

0:39:18.284 --> 0:39:20.604
<v Speaker 1>You want dolences, congratulate.

0:39:20.644 --> 0:39:25.884
<v Speaker 2>Dolence is like the most common poker emotion basically, So

0:39:25.964 --> 0:39:29.284
<v Speaker 2>I kind of lost on a bad beat, which I'm

0:39:29.324 --> 0:39:31.524
<v Speaker 2>not gonna dwell on. I saw your new substack post,

0:39:31.604 --> 0:39:34.684
<v Speaker 2>Maria about like players complaining about bad beats. But basically

0:39:34.724 --> 0:39:38.324
<v Speaker 2>I had pocket fives against jack ten offsuit on a

0:39:38.364 --> 0:39:42.484
<v Speaker 2>board of jack ten five, So I had a set.

0:39:42.724 --> 0:39:44.964
<v Speaker 2>My opponent have the kind of next best time that

0:39:45.004 --> 0:39:47.444
<v Speaker 2>isn't a set. Which is jack ten for two pair.

0:39:47.884 --> 0:39:50.804
<v Speaker 2>Unfortunately a jacket on the turn. And so this dude,

0:39:50.804 --> 0:39:53.284
<v Speaker 2>by the way, won the fucking event. I think I

0:39:53.404 --> 0:39:56.884
<v Speaker 2>deserved like half his prize pool. Basically would be.

0:39:56.924 --> 0:39:59.364
<v Speaker 1>An awesome nate by the way, if it worked that way,

0:39:59.484 --> 0:40:00.764
<v Speaker 1>that would be a great role.

0:40:00.884 --> 0:40:02.964
<v Speaker 2>You like tag the chips that you have equity in.

0:40:03.764 --> 0:40:05.764
<v Speaker 2>I'm not complaining about this past year.

0:40:06.684 --> 0:40:09.204
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you are just just acknowledged that you're complaining about

0:40:09.204 --> 0:40:10.324
<v Speaker 1>the bat beat and move on.

0:40:10.924 --> 0:40:12.764
<v Speaker 2>We cover important news that the worlds there is a

0:40:12.764 --> 0:40:15.364
<v Speaker 2>poker and part of the news is that a player

0:40:15.524 --> 0:40:17.564
<v Speaker 2>who had a lot of chips was eliminated in eighteenth place,

0:40:17.884 --> 0:40:23.444
<v Speaker 2>you know, conveying the news, all right. However, the news

0:40:23.884 --> 0:40:27.524
<v Speaker 2>my reporting suggests this player got very lucky at several

0:40:27.524 --> 0:40:30.444
<v Speaker 2>earlier points in this tournament. For example, this player had

0:40:30.484 --> 0:40:34.364
<v Speaker 2>pocket queens all against all against aces and the queen's won.

0:40:34.844 --> 0:40:37.804
<v Speaker 2>This player had pocket ten's almost all all in against

0:40:38.124 --> 0:40:41.164
<v Speaker 2>pocket kings and the tens one, for example.

0:40:41.604 --> 0:40:48.884
<v Speaker 1>So player mister Nathaniel Silver got got ridiculously lucky to

0:40:48.964 --> 0:40:52.444
<v Speaker 1>even get to the point where his set could be cracked.

0:40:52.684 --> 0:40:56.244
<v Speaker 1>All right, So let's reframe that as god beats are

0:40:56.284 --> 0:41:01.244
<v Speaker 1>good now, but you did you did bust in unfortunate circumstances.

0:41:01.804 --> 0:41:05.004
<v Speaker 2>Uh, Maria, what about what about Europe? How's the series

0:41:05.044 --> 0:41:05.804
<v Speaker 2>gone for you so far?

0:41:05.884 --> 0:41:07.124
<v Speaker 1>My update sucks?

0:41:07.364 --> 0:41:11.724
<v Speaker 2>Oh no, are you? Are you over?

0:41:13.044 --> 0:41:16.164
<v Speaker 1>I well no, my first event I won the ten

0:41:16.244 --> 0:41:17.124
<v Speaker 1>k bounties, so.

0:41:17.404 --> 0:41:18.724
<v Speaker 2>Oh it's pretty good.

0:41:18.924 --> 0:41:22.724
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so other together but otherwise zero cashes.

0:41:23.324 --> 0:41:26.004
<v Speaker 2>It's the line between success and failure is soaked in

0:41:26.764 --> 0:41:29.124
<v Speaker 2>in poker, by the way, because like the first week

0:41:29.124 --> 0:41:31.404
<v Speaker 2>into it, I had like one mini cash out of

0:41:31.444 --> 0:41:33.244
<v Speaker 2>been Like now it's like, oh, I'm having a really

0:41:33.284 --> 0:41:36.044
<v Speaker 2>great World series. You know, it's all pretty fucking arbitrary,

0:41:36.124 --> 0:41:37.924
<v Speaker 2>and it all it all. I mean, it doesn't necessarily

0:41:37.964 --> 0:41:40.484
<v Speaker 2>even out. It's like the Gambler's fallacy. But like over

0:41:40.604 --> 0:41:41.084
<v Speaker 2>long rning.

0:41:41.164 --> 0:41:42.604
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for reading my substack.

0:41:42.724 --> 0:41:48.204
<v Speaker 2>Natee read maria subsection. She needs revenue now to make

0:41:48.284 --> 0:41:50.004
<v Speaker 2>up for her poker losses, folks.

0:41:50.044 --> 0:41:53.444
<v Speaker 1>Yes, because the my update sucks is because the one

0:41:53.484 --> 0:41:55.844
<v Speaker 1>event I played was a twenty five thousand dollars by

0:41:55.884 --> 0:41:58.284
<v Speaker 1>an event and I did not cash in it. So

0:41:58.364 --> 0:42:00.564
<v Speaker 1>I went from being flat for the World Series to

0:42:00.644 --> 0:42:02.844
<v Speaker 1>being down twenty five thousand dollars.

0:42:03.564 --> 0:42:06.884
<v Speaker 2>Maybe if you concentrated more on the poker and not

0:42:06.924 --> 0:42:09.084
<v Speaker 2>your newsletter. Maria, you wouldn't have busted.

0:42:08.804 --> 0:42:11.964
<v Speaker 1>Out, but I feel like I owe it to my fans.

0:42:11.964 --> 0:42:13.804
<v Speaker 1>And my newsletter is about all the things I did

0:42:13.844 --> 0:42:16.284
<v Speaker 1>wrong or other people did wrong, so that I played better.

0:42:16.484 --> 0:42:18.604
<v Speaker 1>And today is the day we change all of that

0:42:18.764 --> 0:42:21.124
<v Speaker 1>so that next week, when we're recording, we can talk

0:42:21.124 --> 0:42:23.684
<v Speaker 1>about my deep run. How's that for optimism.

0:42:24.244 --> 0:42:24.764
<v Speaker 2>It's a deal.

0:42:25.204 --> 0:42:38.524
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's do it. That's it for today. We

0:42:38.644 --> 0:42:41.844
<v Speaker 1>have already been getting some listener questions, which is amazing.

0:42:42.284 --> 0:42:44.764
<v Speaker 1>Please keep them coming. We want to hear from you,

0:42:45.044 --> 0:42:47.204
<v Speaker 1>and we will be addressing some of the questions in

0:42:47.244 --> 0:42:51.444
<v Speaker 1>segments on our podcast going forward. We even have an

0:42:51.564 --> 0:42:55.244
<v Speaker 1>email address for you to use. Now, it's just Risky Business.

0:42:55.284 --> 0:42:59.004
<v Speaker 1>One word at Pushkin dot fm.

0:42:59.004 --> 0:43:01.044
<v Speaker 2>And don't forget to rate and review the show. We

0:43:01.044 --> 0:43:02.484
<v Speaker 2>will not tell you which day to give, but you

0:43:02.484 --> 0:43:04.724
<v Speaker 2>can probably infer which ones we like more.

0:43:06.364 --> 0:43:10.284
<v Speaker 1>Risky Business is hosted by me Maria Kondakova knee Mate Silver.

0:43:11.204 --> 0:43:15.204
<v Speaker 1>The show is a co production of Pushkin Industries and iHeartMedia.

0:43:15.524 --> 0:43:19.404
<v Speaker 1>This episode was produced by Isabelle Carter. Our associate producer

0:43:19.444 --> 0:43:23.004
<v Speaker 1>is Gabriel Hunter chang Our executive producer is Jacob Goldstein.

0:43:23.244 --> 0:43:25.644
<v Speaker 2>And if you want to listen to an AD free version,

0:43:25.644 --> 0:43:28.284
<v Speaker 2>sign up for Pushkin Plus. For six pinninety nine a month,

0:43:28.524 --> 0:43:31.604
<v Speaker 2>you get access to ad free listening. Thanks for tuning in.