WEBVTT - Jazz/Lakers Postgame Spaces

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>M all right. Welcome to the State of the Lakers,

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>presented by DASH Radio. Thank you guys so much for

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:23.119
<v Speaker 1>coming to hang out on a Monday. I hope you

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>all had a great weekend. I think we just saw

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the best basketball I've seen the Lakers play in a very, very,

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>very long time, rose especially when you counted against the

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>talent that they had available. I guess we could look

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>back to some games, maybe against the Phoenix Suns early

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:42.879
<v Speaker 1>in that playoff series, where they looked this good. But

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:45.560
<v Speaker 1>this is the best I've seen them look relative to

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 1>their talent in a very probably since Game six of

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the NBA Finals. This was just an incredible, almost wired,

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a wired performance. I'm pretty stoked about it. We were

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>texting during the game. There's so so much to talk about,

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>and I look forward to getting to the bottom of

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>all of it with you. But first of all, Buddy,

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:06.039
<v Speaker 1>how are you doing and how is your weekend? It

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>was good. I am hyped for this one. Man. This

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>is to me the win of the year. I guess

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the other one could be our win against Cleveland earlier

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 1>before the Calvs became who they were. But now this

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>is the win of the year. Man, Utah is a

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>good team. They came in tonight, I think, wanting to

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:21.839
<v Speaker 1>continue there on a little bit of a losing streak.

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>They won their last one in Denver, second game back

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to back for them. But now this is a big win, man,

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>you go. They went up Utah, came back, roaring back,

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>went up ten, and then to come back in that

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:34.400
<v Speaker 1>fashion that fourth quarter, I think just highlighted a lot

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>of stuff that we can to build on here. But man,

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:38.759
<v Speaker 1>it's a really great win. I'm I'm excited to get

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>into this one. Yeah, So to start, I want to

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about, you know, the strategies we use against the

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Jazz and the reason the reason why I think they're

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>super you know, uh, you know relative, you know, they're

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>super important to projecting forward with this team because the

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Jazz do. The Jazz are extremely well coached, and they've

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>run very difficult scheme to guard, and they have pieces

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>that are, you know, similar to some of the things

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:10.079
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna see from other teams in the Western Conference

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that we might see in the playoffs. And you know,

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 1>you and I talked a lot after the last game

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>against the Nuggets about how the dumbest thing about what

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers were doing with their small ball groups was

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>playing too many small guys, and people think of small

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>people think of small ball having to do with the

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>center position, and it does, you know, on its surface,

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:32.639
<v Speaker 1>but the aggregate size of those lineups that succeed in

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the league are usually big. Like that Clippers lineup that

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>was so good. It's like they're getting Marcus Morris and

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Nicholas patum And and Kawhi Leonard and Paul George. So yeah,

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>there's no center, but everybody's everyone's huge outside of that, right,

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>And so that was part of it. And then also

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>with the Lakers small ball lineups, they were trying to

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 1>run traditional pick and roll coverages with Lebron underneath the basket,

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and one of the issues with that is that in

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>those situations, you're asking all those guards to to run

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 1>through so much contact and they're small players and they're

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:05.080
<v Speaker 1>struggling with it. So that you and I talked about

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>how this team needs to switch more because when you switch,

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>it allows you to make up for your size deficiencies

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:16.119
<v Speaker 1>by stagnating the opponent. This is something that I talked

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>about all the time on the show with you, and

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>there's such a there's a there's a key reason why

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I believe in the strategy because the Lakers had, even

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>with their bigger lineups that they played today, in terms

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>of the size of the wings that they played, you know,

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot more Austin Reeves, a lot more Stanley Johnson.

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Even with that, the Jazz were bigger, but their size

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>wasn't able to punish us to the extent that it

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>made up for what we were able to do to

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>them with our speed and our versatility on the perimeter.

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>And that's the key, because when you switch everything, you

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>turn a ball movement offense like the Utah Jazz into

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>an isolation offense. And they had seventeen points in the

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter, five of which were total garbage time. So

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you held them to twelve points in a pivotal basketball movement,

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the most dominant offenses in the league, because

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you switched everything shut off their actions forced them to

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>try to create against a set isolation defender, and as

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>a result, their offense fell to pieces that that philosophy

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>is modern basketball. And then on the other end, the

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Lakers were running a five out concept, which removed Ruddy

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.679
<v Speaker 1>Gobert from the equation, forced him to guard in space

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>where he struggled with with Stanley Johnson and his low

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:38.720
<v Speaker 1>center of gravity and his ability to kind of, you know,

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>navigate beneath Rudy Gobert with his speed and with his strength,

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:44.919
<v Speaker 1>and so we're gonna die further into it. But I

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 1>think that this style, you know, it's very indicative of

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:50.839
<v Speaker 1>what this team needs to be, what we need to

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>be at our best. Is this a big, small poll

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>line up that plays our bigger wings and then adapts

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 1>that adopts and uses and leans into the modern defensive

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>concepts that work in the NBA today. I don't think

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>obviously the Jazz didn't play as well as they could have,

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think it was a complete coincidence that

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:12.840
<v Speaker 1>they played as bad as they did because we directly

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>attacked their weaknesses ROJ we had purpose right with what

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:18.720
<v Speaker 1>we were doing. Like we watched that Denver game, there

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of stuff that just didn't make any sense.

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 1>We weren't going anything with the personnel. I thought tonight,

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>we just made Gobert garden space and Stanley Johnson obviously

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a big part of that. He was aggressive. I love that,

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, Stanley, he doesn't pass up jump shots, and

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 1>I think that has a domino effect to to his

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:36.359
<v Speaker 1>game where he's also aggressive with the ball, and Lebron

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>saw that he started screening for him right he was

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>able to get to the basket. We started Dwight Howard

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>in this game, and Dwight wasn't great through the throughout,

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:46.119
<v Speaker 1>but I thought him just starting kind of set a tone.

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I thought he played well. We had a nice coverage.

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>He wasn't He didn't nice stop switching as well. We

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>switched pretty much one through five. The only guy we

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't really switch with tonight was Malik Monk. But I

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 1>thought just our coverage was great. We were flying around

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you talk, couldn't get any open shot. I thought Dwight

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 1>took the rim away. We played him. We we had

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of our scheme where we played Dwight

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>against their small ball. You saw that as well, right,

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and like he kind of took and he took the

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>basket away. I thought it was great to see um.

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:13.280
<v Speaker 1>And then we just went small. We have Stanley Johnson

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:16.239
<v Speaker 1>playing the five, Lebron playing the five. We found minutes

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>without Lebron and Russ luck. I guess we'll get into later,

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:21.160
<v Speaker 1>but it was just a great energy win. Man and

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Utah is a really good team. They're very similar to

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Phoenix to me, where they have counters to everything. Their

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:28.280
<v Speaker 1>whole offense is predicated on a Gobert screen and roll

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>um and I thought Mike Conley kind of got going

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>with that. He was they were kind of hunting the

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>league monk in that way. But we just had a

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>great overall scheme. Man and Lebron was incredible again. We

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>had the apology right from Lebron James like I think

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 1>a couple of hours earlier and he comes out tonight

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>with this show. It was just an awesome team win

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think this is stuff we can build on. Man.

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Austin Reaves I think needs to play more. Stanley Johnson

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:50.280
<v Speaker 1>needs to play more. I think the young guys are

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>definitely showing out that needs to be on the floor.

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Austin Reeves THHD Stanley Johnson, like those guys need to

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>play um if you're not gonna get effort from other places.

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know, every rally started again. He had that

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:02.919
<v Speaker 1>big three. I thought he struggled throughout this night, but

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 1>just seeing those guys kind of turned the game around.

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>The Russell Westbrook big dunk. I know he kind of

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>struggled throughout, but I thought that was a big momentum changer. Uh.

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>And you know i'veen tweeting Jason, there's a good team

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>in here, and this is kind of what I mean,

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean Like this, We're not as

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>bad as we've shown and and it's very clear when

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>we haven't and when we don't. But we need to

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 1>play this hard like every night. I'm not expecting us

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to win every night. I don't even expect us to

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>win tonight against Utah even we were up six. I

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 1>was still kind of questioning it at halftime. But this

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>is how we have to play, man. And you see

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the effort and you see guys flying around Austin Reason

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>with the floater to a tip layup like those kind

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>of stuff is you know those kind of that kind

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>of energy is contagious. Stanley Johnson, that energy is contagious. Uh.

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>You know his play on Rudy Gobert. And we'll get

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>more into that, but just a good win, man. It's

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>it's exciting, uh, to finally have like a fun space

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess to talk about to talk about this. We

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>get to be positive for once, and so I do

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>want to start with Lebron, because he he was the

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>guy who you know, may or may not bendy catalyst

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>with his with his tweet, or at least an attitude change.

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>And I want to look at the box score for

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>a second, because so Lebron has seven and seven, which

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>is not a I popping stat line by any stretch

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of the imagination. It's not a bad one, but it's

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>not ipopping really quickly, really quickly. Hints again tonight, that's

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>fourteen straight games with at least twenty five plus. That's uh,

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the current record leader in the league. I heard them

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>bring that up in spectrum as wow, that's crazy, um.

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>But what's interesting about it is he was below from

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:36.319
<v Speaker 1>the field, and he was below from three, and he

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 1>couldn't make a free throw. But I thought it was

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 1>one of his best games of the season. And this

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>is the huge issue that I have with you know,

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>box score watching. It's something that I get into with

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:49.080
<v Speaker 1>people all the time when we're talking about basketball. It's like, heck,

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 1>it's something I've been dealing with with Lebron fans so

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>much over the course of the last week because I've

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:55.559
<v Speaker 1>been critical of the way he's played defense, and everyone

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>wants to be like, oh, he's averaging thirty four over

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>his last twelve games and saying it's like, hey, man, like,

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:04.079
<v Speaker 1>there's so much more that happens in a basketball game

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 1>than it grabbed the rebound of driving kick three, or

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you scoring the basket, scoring the basketball. There's so much

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 1>more that goes into winning a basketball game. Lebron was

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 1>freaking everywhere tonight, on both ends of the floor, flying around,

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 1>making plays, and then in that fourth quarter lineup with

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Austin Reeves, Malik Monks, Stanley Johnson and Thht he basically

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't have the ball in his hands and completely controlled

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the game because he understood that the Jazz were struggling

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 1>with how to navigate a coverage with him as the screener,

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and as a result, Stanley Johnson kept getting ahead of

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Steam because they wanted to go underneath that screen and

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 1>he was the Lebron was setting it almost down at

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the semi circle, at the bottom of the semi circle.

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>But again, what you saw tonight was a great example

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>of like Lebron playing at the level of the best

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>players in the world while having seven and seven shooting

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>below from the field, shooting below from three and can't

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>make a ree throw. That's the That's the idea that

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to hammer home here. Like when I'm when

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about what what shows me that Lebron is

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>engaged and that he cares. This is what I'm talking about.

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 1>This is what a good Lebron James game looks like,

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:18.319
<v Speaker 1>because against the best defenses in the league, he's probably

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 1>not often going to have incredible shooting nights. You know,

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>they're grind out games like we saw against Phoenix, They're

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>dog fights, they're complete boxing matches, and and Lebron is

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>such a weapon and that type of environment when he

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 1>embraces that, And so I wanted to give him some

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 1>some credit because he put his money where his mouth was.

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 1>He he said he was sorry for the way things

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 1>were going and that he promised things would get better.

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>And then he came out and he played, in my opinion,

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>his best game of the season, regardless of what the

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:49.199
<v Speaker 1>box score might say. So I wanted to give him

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:51.679
<v Speaker 1>a shout out. No, he was great, and I think,

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, I love that. Frank kind of noticed that

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Lebron's energy was kind and we talked about this in

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the space as well, Right lebron Is starting that center.

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>It was just not something probably does gonna be viable

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:02.680
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, for a long stretch, and he

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>did it for a nice stretch. The Lakers won like

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:06.319
<v Speaker 1>four in a row, and he was great defensively in

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>those But I just love that, you know, starting joy

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:11.079
<v Speaker 1>allows him that to be able to kind of work

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 1>through his game in that way where he doesn't have

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to be the full time crazy defender. He was awesome

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>though on that end. I thought all night. There was

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:18.559
<v Speaker 1>a few plays maybe he didn't get back to transition,

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>but for the most part, I thought he was, you know,

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>just a turnover creating, creating chaos on that end. And

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>then he played the center for a few minutes, right,

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>He played it next to Stanley Johnson in the fourth

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:29.559
<v Speaker 1>or you know with the second unit, and that second

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:31.199
<v Speaker 1>unit is really interesting. I love to kind of get

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>into that or again th h T Austin Reeves. I

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 1>believe it was Malik Monk with them as well. They yeah,

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:40.679
<v Speaker 1>they just and Stanley Johnson they just switched everything and

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>that and they kind of gave up the lead again.

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I believe in that third quarter, I thought, you know,

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:46.679
<v Speaker 1>U Tah turned up the pressure. Taylor was the only

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>ball handler where we took Brawn out in that situation.

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>But it's just a nice kind of change up. And

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the braun at the five being a change

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.199
<v Speaker 1>up instead of like our just main pitch. That makes

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the world's a difference. And I thought, you know, against

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>second units, against you know, a lot of teams second units,

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a tough her and Utah was unable to sustain that.

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>We build our lead that way, um and I think

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>that's the way this team has to go. Man, when

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>both of us have been begging for more switching, we

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:09.959
<v Speaker 1>got it a ton more to night. It was really

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 1>no noticeable. It jumped off the page and it just

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>confounded Utah. You know, like Jason, we looked like the

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Clippers in the playoffs last year, you know what, like

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:21.079
<v Speaker 1>like like Stanley Johnson and that Terrence Man role a

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit right where they try to hide go bear

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>um on on a guy who's a nonshooter, and they

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>give that guy the ball and just say, hey, you create.

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>And Stanley Johnson has enough ball handling, you know, skill

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>to where he can attack the basket he saw I

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:35.719
<v Speaker 1>think you tweeted about as well. In transition he saw

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>go bare back and he just went right into his

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>chest and he was able to score. And I think

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:40.839
<v Speaker 1>he has that kind of you know, skill level in it.

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>But it was cool to see us kind of out

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 1>skiing Utah, I thought, in this way, and we're not

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna be able to switch against like every team like this,

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 1>but it gets a team like Utah that's so that

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>relies so heavily on screen actions to to get their offense.

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>They just look psottos right, and they were you know,

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to kick out when there was no kickouts there,

0:12:57.480 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to find guys on the roll. I think it's

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 1>funny Bart gets seals, and I thought Stanley just a

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 1>great did a great job scramming them in the post

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>where like when Malik Monks would be down there, he

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>throws him out and he gets back on Golbert. He

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 1>was just incredible. But man, our our defense was good,

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>uh and we hit threes early. We went cold in

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the third, and to me, it's even more impressive Jason

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 1>that you know, Utah went up ten and it looked

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>like yeah, and we fought all the way back with

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 1>with Stanley at the five, Lebron and I think Austin

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:26.199
<v Speaker 1>Reeves is on the floor to this is a good

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Utah team like this, This isn't like the Atlanta Hawks

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 1>where I was saying, you know that I I think

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 1>they're good, but you know, their record doesn't display that

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:35.199
<v Speaker 1>Utah is a really good team. I believe they're twenty

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and ten when Gobert plays, so just that just gives

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you kind of a picture of what they do. But

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>now we we confounded him. I think this is a

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:44.680
<v Speaker 1>blueprint for we can do, at least until Anthony Davis

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>gets back. More switching, goes small, play, our younger guys,

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:50.439
<v Speaker 1>play the youth, have some exuberants there, and I think

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 1>we can kind of pick up a couple more wins here. Agree,

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>So I think I think we need to move a

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:57.199
<v Speaker 1>little bit further to same because he was the star

0:13:57.280 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>of the show, and ironically his little offensive flurry in

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter distracted from what would have been a

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>good game without any of that scoring. Because the way

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that the way that Stanley battled go Bear physically on

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>both ends of the floor was so impressive beyond like

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff that just goes unnoticed, like on so many of

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>those fourth quarter possessions. A long jump shot was going

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>up because perimeter players and the Lakers were doing their

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>jobs and forcing guys to take tough shots, and here

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>come these high rebounds off the rim. And Stand is

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>just in their fighting with Rudy, and the most important

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 1>thing is in order for you to hold your ground,

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you can't jump. And so he kept Rudy on the

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>ground in that fourth quarter by staying connected to him

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>in these box out situations. And there were there were

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I have to go back and watch the film, but

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 1>it seemed to me like there were at least a

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 1>half dozen plays in that fourth quarter where Rudy could

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>have had an offensive rebound if literally any other Laker

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>other than maybe Lebron was there matched up with him.

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>And then on the weeks on the on the perimeter,

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 1>those guys Austin and and Malik and t HD were

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>coming flying in to to secure the rebound while Stanley

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>was down there fighting. And again Stand we we can

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>get into it like the Lebron as a as a

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>screener things setting that low screen there around like seven

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>eight ft from the rim. Yet did a really good

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>job of disrupting uh Utah's defense and letting Stanley, who's

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>really like we've talked about, it's just a big, strong

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 1>athlete letting him get a head of steam go into

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the rim. That obviously was working, but Stanley was just

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>doing so much else on the court. I wanted to

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>give him that shot. Even early in the first half,

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>he was doing that thing Dwight always does where when

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 1>he's kind of like backpedaling against the guy driving to

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the basket, he's just kind of swiping down at the

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>basketball with like good instincts without losing his balance. And

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>he had a couple of steals in the first half

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>like that. Just just an unbelievable game. As you know,

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>our guy from Laker film room, he always describes Stanley

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>as a big, strong athlete who runs around and does stuff.

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>And I love that just him because that's what it is.

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Because when you have that type of physical frame and

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>that type of athleticism and you're playing your ass off,

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>it's like a wrecking ball on the basketball court, and

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and just good stuff just follows everywhere. And we need

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>so much more of that, and I'm hopeful that tonight

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 1>is that final kick in the butt to try to

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>get more minutes out of him. From Frank Yeah, man,

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>he he needs to play, and I thought he didn't

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>play enough in Denver. I think he had like thirteen

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>minutes in that Denver game. He's just a big small

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>ball five who plays hard. Writing you know, everyone wonders

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>why every Bradley starts every game, and I you know,

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>rationale behind that that Frank is going to is every

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Bradley plays hard. He doesn't play well every night, but

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>he plays hard. He has a baseline level that Frank

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Vogel expects and he gets that every night. And you

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>don't here at the ceiling that Mileek Monk brings, or

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>even the you know, chaos to Austin Reeves can bring.

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>But every Bradley he just trusts him. And I think

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Stanny Johnson has kind of proven to me that he

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>plays hard. Pretty much every moment he's on the floor,

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 1>he's always running back. There's never a time where I'm like,

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>oh man, Stanley kind of jog back. No, He's always

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 1>in a full sprint. And he has good defensive instincts too,

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's unfair to just say that he

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 1>plays hard. He's like, he has defensive instincts that are

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>there that are perfectly fit to me for a small

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Ball five, especially next to Lebron, and there were nights like,

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:22.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm very high on Donovan Mitchell. I think Mitchell was

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:24.119
<v Speaker 1>one of the best. Like I guard scores, He's a

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:26.440
<v Speaker 1>playoff killer. Stanley was able to switch on him and

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 1>stay in front of him, and he's strong enough. Mitchell

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:30.399
<v Speaker 1>is a super strong guy. He's strong enough where he

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 1>couldn't overpower him to the rim. And you saw Donovan

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Mitchell take a bunch of like forty footers right tonight,

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of that because the guy on the

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 1>other end is Lebron James and it's Stanley Johnson guarding

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 1>those screen actors, and that's just a lot tougher to me,

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 1>and Dono Mitchell is probably gonna be can be a

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:46.199
<v Speaker 1>lot better obviously than he showed tonight. But I'm just saying, like,

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 1>just in a way, I think this is this is

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 1>how this team needs to play. I love Dwight in

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the rotation. I think that just helps Uh, that just

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:54.919
<v Speaker 1>helps Lebron a lot. I thought Lebron looked like he

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 1>had a lot more energy as well on the defensive end,

0:17:57.160 --> 0:17:59.159
<v Speaker 1>not having to be the full time center. All this

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:01.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff is connected it and you saw the energy kind

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:03.360
<v Speaker 1>of just pick up and this team kind of goes

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>as Lebron goes. I think Pete said as well in

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the LFR pod he saw Lebron be super energized, but

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:10.400
<v Speaker 1>just play him around the youth man. I think we

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>were seeing that that's so necessary on this team. This

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>is an old team, but it has youthful players that

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:16.959
<v Speaker 1>can play, and I think, you know, Reeves and Stanley

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>are are part of that, and I think their minutes

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>are just gonna go up as as we go here.

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>But Stanley was definitely the name of the game tonight.

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 1>He was incredible. They put the ball in his hands.

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I always say that, you know, if you show aggression

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 1>to me, Lebron's gonna give you the basketball. Like Lebron

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>can kind of feel it, right, and he could tell

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that Stanley was, you know aggressive. Stanley was shooting mid

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 1>range pull ups, he was, you know, taking his corner

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 1>threes even if they weren't going in. I just think

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that shows the level of aggression that has a domino

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>effect on the rest of your game. When you when

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 1>you're a passive player, that kind of shows up in

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 1>all parts and to me, when you're aggressive player, that

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>shows up in all parts, and even though the jumpers

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:51.400
<v Speaker 1>don't go in, just the fact that he takes them

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:53.399
<v Speaker 1>to me kind of leads to the attacks at the

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 1>basket that he had. So yeah, he was the star

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>of this game for sure. Yeah, and one last on Stanley.

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's really interesting. He is, you know, one

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of the unique He's a very unique case of of

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>a young talented basketball player because we see so many

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>examples in NBA history of the you know, Jimmy Butler

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:15.680
<v Speaker 1>type kind of guy who, like, you have these great

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>physical tools, but you kind of grow up as like

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:23.400
<v Speaker 1>a forward slash center. So in the NBA you kind

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>of turned into like a wrecking ball type of wing

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:28.159
<v Speaker 1>and then over time you get more and more skilled

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and then you develop into this like, you know, perimeter

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>initiator type. That's your Jimmy Butler, like kaw while enertype. Well,

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Stanley Johnson's kind of the opposite because like he actually

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 1>growing up was a very good perimeter player. You know.

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:43.160
<v Speaker 1>He was one of the one of those mixtape heroes,

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the guys that was doing all the crazy

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff on YouTube that was getting millions of views, and

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>came into Arizona as a star and then basically turned

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>out as he got further in the game that he

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>wasn't skilled enough to be that type of perimeter initiators.

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 1>So then he defaulted it to Okay, I'll be the

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:03.680
<v Speaker 1>wrecking ball forward, you know, playing for Toronto, do it

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 1>all these defensive things. But because of that background that

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:10.400
<v Speaker 1>he has, he actually has a good amount of polish.

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Like that move. I think it was pretty late in

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>his fourth quarter run there where he like switched to

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>his left hand after gathering on that drive from Jordan Clarkson,

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Like Jordan was in behind him and was loading up

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:24.639
<v Speaker 1>to try to block him off the glass, and in

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 1>Stanley just switched hands and went to his left finished

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>on the right side. Did he finish on the right side, Yeah,

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>he finished with his left hand on the on the

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>right side of the room. And and then like some

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 1>of the footwork stuff, the way he keeps his balance,

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>like his his comfort level to for Lebron to be like, hey,

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 1>for this matchup to work, I want you to be

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the pick and roll ball handler here, Like for that

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:48.119
<v Speaker 1>to work, he needed to have the background that he

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 1>had as a perimeter player growing up, you know, uh,

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 1>coming up through high school and so I thought that

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>was a super interesting element there, Like, you know, will

0:20:56.760 --> 0:21:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Stanley have nights like that offensively that often? No, because

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>he's just not consistent enough with those things. But you

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:07.159
<v Speaker 1>know that that type of you know, versatility that he

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>has as a guy who can attack the close out

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:10.959
<v Speaker 1>and make a play for a teammate or go on

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the occasional offensive spurt just kind of raises the value

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that he brings because he always plays hard and because

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:19.640
<v Speaker 1>he does the dirty work. So I'm I'm a huge

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 1>fan of his game. You you had mentioned Avery Bradley,

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you. He plays hard. He needs to be

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 1>in the rotation. I think he's an NBA player. I

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 1>think he belongs on the Lakers. I think he belongs

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 1>on the roster. However, he needs his role needs to

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>be swapped with one of those guys that's just that's

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>just been better than him. He needs to be the

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 1>guy who's playing, you know, one shift in the first half,

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 1>one shift in the second half, you know, because you

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.640
<v Speaker 1>understand that you can get competent, you know, on ball,

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:47.400
<v Speaker 1>pressure defense and things like that in those moments. But

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:51.120
<v Speaker 1>he just too often is getting punished for his lack

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>of size, and then he actually is one of the

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 1>worst off ball defenders that we have on the team.

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:59.160
<v Speaker 1>He loses focus, he loses sight of his responsibility. He's

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:02.400
<v Speaker 1>on the ball and he's pressuring. He has some success

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 1>there even though he gives up a lot of straightline drives.

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 1>At least he's disruptive and makes it I feel uncomfortable.

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:11.119
<v Speaker 1>He brings some value, but you know, when we're evaluating

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>basketball players, you know, there's every player on the team

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:19.160
<v Speaker 1>brings some value, right, Like even DeAndre Jordan brings tallness,

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>you know. But the thing is is like the guys

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>who start typically bring more value than the guys who don't, right,

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:28.919
<v Speaker 1>And so my thing is like leaning on him so

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:32.160
<v Speaker 1>much like pulling Reeves after he had that magnificent start

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to the fourth quarter. To go back to Avery Bradley,

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, even when Avery Bradley was having a rough night,

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 1>that goes to show you that there's like a rotation

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>pattern there, right, And it's like, okay, Avery starts and

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:46.199
<v Speaker 1>he closes, and then Austin kind of dispels him. That

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 1>needs to be flipped, you know, Austin needs to start

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>so that we have more consistent energy to start these games,

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and Austin needs to close because he's just a better

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 1>basketball player right now. Then. Don't get me wrong, Austin

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Avery made a huge shot rubbed into my face because

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I was on Twitter complaining about himselfing back into the game.

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>But the point being like, these are these are the

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:07.440
<v Speaker 1>little kings we have to work out obviously, Like even

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:10.439
<v Speaker 1>if you can replicate this effort moving forward from the

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 1>whole team, and even if you can replicate some of

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>this schematic stuff moving forward for the whole team, there

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 1>are little details that have to get worked out. Like

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I actually disagree with you about Dwight. I don't even

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 1>think we'll get into that tonight. But the point is

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>is like there are little details that we still have

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to work out here, and that Avery Bradley Austin Reeves

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 1>dynamic is one that I think needs to get worked out. Yeah.

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting because I think, you know, every Badley kind

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of fits like the drop coverage type of scheme, and

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:39.159
<v Speaker 1>I think he fits out well with Dwight Howard. That's

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 1>why I thought that starting lineup, I thought they defended

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 1>at least well together. My issue with every Badley to me,

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:45.440
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't really fit a scheme when you're trying to

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>switch everything, right, and when it's him and Malik Monks

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:50.200
<v Speaker 1>out there, and when it's him and Malik Monk out there,

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 1>just there's a breaking point to when you're playing small, right,

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 1>So if you're ready playing small and the guards you're

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>playing are small like that, that there's no advantage to that, right. Plus,

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:00.439
<v Speaker 1>Avery Badley is a shooter, but he does space the

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 1>floor in the way like a real shooter does. Right,

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>He's not dynamic as a shooter. He's like he just

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 1>has to be completely wide open to shoot. And in

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 1>small ball, you kind of need guys who can kind

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:10.439
<v Speaker 1>of be not three level scores, but at least can

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>take it off the bounce a little bit. That's why

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's that fit there is ugly, especially

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the Rust Monk and Avery Bradley kind of, you know,

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:18.919
<v Speaker 1>it was kind of like that's just really tough to me,

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>especially defensively when you're trying to switch everything. Those guys

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:23.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of take the wrong angles on screens all the

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:25.159
<v Speaker 1>all the time, and those are guys you have to

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:26.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of cover for. And you and I always say

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 1>when we have like two to three guys to cover for,

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:30.679
<v Speaker 1>on defense. It's tough, so I kind of understand it.

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:32.880
<v Speaker 1>But you know, Reeves played eight minutes in the first half.

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>He ended up playing thirteen in the second half. I

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:36.679
<v Speaker 1>thought he came out because he kind of played a

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:39.400
<v Speaker 1>longer shift. Like that's my you know, just glass half

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:41.920
<v Speaker 1>full optimism there why Reeves didn't close the game. I

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be close, but I just thought he had

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a long fourth quarter shifts, so I'm thinking that's why

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:47.400
<v Speaker 1>they pulled him. The game was kind of in hander.

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we were up like six when when Reeves

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>came out, it was like to two or three minutes left.

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I think, Um, and you can kind of see the

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 1>game being under control. But yeah, and I think Austin

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>eventually takes those minutes like this, it's just too loud. Um.

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna ask you about HD because I think it's interesting.

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we are tell me if I'm wrong here.

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:07.159
<v Speaker 1>I think we are actively trying to find him on

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 1>ball possessions, and people are telling me, are we trying

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to find him on ball possessions? Are we trying to

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:13.159
<v Speaker 1>win games? Obviously you're trying to win games, but I

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>think you have to kind of, you know, create line

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>ups around your player skill sets, like that's just a

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 1>coach's job. And I think finding a couple of minutes

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 1>here where th HD can kind of the ball in

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:23.439
<v Speaker 1>his hands. And you talked about Lebron, He's becoming a

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>full time screener in a way that I just didn't expect.

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>And you see it also in the th HD lineups.

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>TC got the ball in a five out setting. We

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>always say that, you know, we always say about Russ

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:34.920
<v Speaker 1>get him five out spacing, but th HD especially can

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:37.920
<v Speaker 1>also kind of, uh, he can kind of be better

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:39.119
<v Speaker 1>for it if you kind of put him in some

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 1>spacing lineups and with Stanley at the five. Sley's not

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:44.399
<v Speaker 1>a pure shooter, but he spaces the game out for

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 1>him and just screen acttionsly where you can get to

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the basket. I thought he was under control attacking the rim.

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:50.439
<v Speaker 1>You see he has jumper getting a little bit more

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 1>comfortable every game. I think he hit another three tonight.

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>What you see from THHD because and his defense as well.

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I thought his defense on Mitchell and the fourth was

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 1>was super impressive, being able to take off the drive

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and still I think you got a hand on the

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 1>blood on the shot or not. He doesn't get it.

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:04.239
<v Speaker 1>He didn't get credit for a block. He did get

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:06.640
<v Speaker 1>a credit from for a block on it. I was wrong,

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>But yes, I thought his defense on Mature it was good.

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>What do you think? It was such a classic young

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:13.720
<v Speaker 1>guy up and down type of game because he had

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>that stretch in the third quarter where he made a

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 1>couple of offensive mistakes in a row and like miss

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:21.920
<v Speaker 1>a close out in the in the in the corner

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>for three that led to a time out. Like you know,

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>he had some down moments, but then he also had

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:30.360
<v Speaker 1>all of these up moments, which which is typical. Now

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I think, I think there's an interesting dynamics why Lebron

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 1>is setting more screens. So I have a theory about this,

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and I'm curious to see to see what you think.

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:41.919
<v Speaker 1>So obviously, with a guy like th HT as a

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>spot up shooter, and he has actually been shooting a

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:46.440
<v Speaker 1>little better of late, although he's still not a great

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:48.879
<v Speaker 1>three point shooter. But what you're seeing is, you know,

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I think Lebron understands that, like, hey, when I catch

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:53.680
<v Speaker 1>on the perimeter and I turned and I look at

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the defense and th HD s on the floor, or

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 1>even like some guys like Austin Reeves aren't really particularly

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:02.680
<v Speaker 1>getting guarded super close, or Russ is the same thing

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Stanley Johnson. There were stretches there in that fourth quarter

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:07.880
<v Speaker 1>where I think this is the big reason why Lebron

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>went to the screening position there is they would put

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Stanley in the corner and Rudy was just kind of

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:16.360
<v Speaker 1>standing at the block, you know, not really paying much

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 1>attention to Stanley. So what I think Lebron is seeing there.

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:23.160
<v Speaker 1>One of the consistent themes throughout Lebron's career is he

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 1>likes to be able to give the ball to someone else.

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 1>He's always like that. It's I was in a discussion

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>with someone about this today. One of the most common

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>misconceptions about Lebron is that he's not a ballhog. You know,

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 1>when he does have the ball, he does commandeer the possession.

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>That is true. But what he likes to do is

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>commandeer possession. Comment here two or three possessions in a row.

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 1>But then he wants to rest while he's on the floor.

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 1>And one of the ways that I think he's seeing

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:52.719
<v Speaker 1>that through taking advantage of spacing and also getting him

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 1>getting himself a chance to rest, is what if I

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 1>set the screen, because if I set the screen, they

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>absolutely are going to find a way to stay attached

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to me. Because I'm Lebron James and th HT has

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the basketball. Stanley Johnson has the basketball. You have to

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 1>guard him because if you don't like Stanley did, I'm

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>just gonna go down the lane every time and lay

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:19.400
<v Speaker 1>it up. And so it's an interesting counter to spacing issues.

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 1>It's something we talked about with Russell Lot. If you

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>get in, if you get him, either as a screener

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 1>or with the ball, you're so much of a threat

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that you have to be guarded. And so I thought

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 1>that was an interesting counter tonight, like, Okay, you know

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not shooting the ball is especially well. I need

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 1>rests because I've been defending super hard. I need to

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>stay effective, and I need your offense to stay effective

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 1>without me staring down the defense from the rim with

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>everybody packing the paint. So what if I start setting

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the ball screen? What if I take Rudy Gobert's man

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and turn him into the ball handler. So now Rudy

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 1>freaking Gobert is guarding a Hi can roll ball handler.

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>If I do that, I might be able to rest

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 1>on the floor while also taking advantage of some of

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the offensive limitations as spot up shooters of some of

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the guys that have in the floor. It's super interesting

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 1>because I think, you know, if there's one another thing

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 1>with Lebron, he doesn't he wants to win first and foremost.

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 1>And I thought that that was really interesting the way

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 1>that he kept spamming that Stanley Johnson actually because he

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't care if he doesn't touch the ball. He didn't

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>care that he only had twenty five tonight, Like he

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to win, and the best way for them

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to win was to do something jan Kee to to

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 1>screw with Utah's defense and putting Rudy Gobert in an

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 1>on ball defense position completely threw them off. Yeah. Yeah,

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it's like throwing Gobert and screen actions right, Like that's

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:46.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of the way you want to beat them. And

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought, you know, it's not just tonight either. Lebron

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 1>has been moving towards the screener for a lot of

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 1>these games. A lot of these, especially when we go

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 1>small league, monkst the ball handler a lot, even like

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 1>screening for th h T. I think it's just a

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:00.040
<v Speaker 1>nice wrinkle to our offense that we're finding gear. And

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I've always said, like, you know, the losses where what

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:03.960
<v Speaker 1>they are, but I think like we're starting to kind

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>of find things that work offensively. We just need to

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 1>have to have like some baseline level of defense to

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of keep up with it. And and I obviously

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 1>was was better than that. I don't think we're gonna,

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, play this level of defense every night, but

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 1>we can kind of keep up to it because our

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>offense has been scoring. At least for the last throw

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 1>away that Denver game, but offense has been kind of scoring.

0:30:20.720 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think Lebron being a screener is kind of

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>interesting with it. And I guess I guess we can

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of move this to Russ because I think it's fascinating. Um, obviously,

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I think you think Ye had the worst game than

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I did. Uh, the plus minus isn't very favorable to him,

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 1>but you know, I five for fourteen is what it is. Um,

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>he's still kind of you know, in that low turnover range.

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 1>He only had to turnovers to night. He's still kind

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of adjusting right to to this new kind of play style.

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's fascinating. And tell me, you know again,

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 1>if I'm wrong here. But I just feel like Russ.

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 1>We are kind of moving Russ more and more off ball,

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and we're kind of putting his possessions in very uh,

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 1>very purposeful, purposeful places, right, So we're starting to just

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 1>clear the left side him and just having him is so,

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, on the left side, and we're clearing that

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>whole side. So we just throw all the other four

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:07.239
<v Speaker 1>players on the right side. Russ has a one on

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 1>one attacked the ram or get to his bank shot.

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 1>But it's crazy to me how off the ball he is.

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I remember watching the first quarter, I was like, man,

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Russ hasn't really initiated offense um in a long time.

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I've been a proponent of this. It's

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 1>just interesting to watch it kind of play out in

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 1>real time. As you know, Lebron also moves to a

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 1>screener here, putting the bottom leak Monk's hand, putting the

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 1>ball on Thhd's hands, just other ball handles, right. You know,

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>we're moving more off ball. You are you seeing that

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 1>as well as we progress here in these games. Yeah,

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:37.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the accepting the most likely reality that

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Russ is going to be on the team for the

0:31:39.560 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>rest of the season. This is the best way to

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>use him. That goes without saying I mean, I think

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 1>it's unfortunate that a guy making this much is being

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 1>relegated to essentially a role player in terms of just

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the predicament as it pertains to the Lakers in there,

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, circumstances off the court. But that said, like

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>in this predicament, this is the best way to do it.

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I I what I what I have been calling out

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 1>with Russ is like, hey, like another good team, another

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 1>good defense and by for four teen, you know, like

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 1>these there's a consistent theme at this phase of his

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 1>career that when he plays against good defensive teams and

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 1>good defensive players, he's just not as impactful, not nearly

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 1>as impactful as he used to be. And you know,

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:30.239
<v Speaker 1>and so that that concerns me, right, because you know,

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:33.800
<v Speaker 1>in order for the Lakers to win the championship with

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:36.479
<v Speaker 1>the depth that they gave up, with the hustle that

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 1>they gave up in that trade, they need Russ to

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 1>play like a star, right. I mean, if you're gonna

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 1>beat these good teams at the top of the West,

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:48.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're gonna beat these good teams at the top

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of the East. I think you need more out of

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Russ than what you're getting, and I don't think he

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>can give that. So that's that's just the way that

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the way that I look at Russ played fine tonight.

0:32:57.720 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I was a little annoyed with him that he missed

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 1>a box out on the first possession of the game

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 1>after talking the way he did in the in the

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 1>press conference, and look like, I'll never lie to you guys,

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Like from objectively throughout Russ's career, I've never been a

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 1>fan of his brand of basketball. So I look at

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 1>this with bias and I'm you know, I encourage you

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 1>to find someone else who's more of a fan so

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 1>that you can get the alternate perspective, you know what

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean. But like the when I when I watched Russ,

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I I I his I find his brand of basketball

0:33:25.280 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>to be way less impactful than other people think he is.

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's a coincidence that the team had

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 1>their best stretch with him off the floor, you know

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 1>what I mean. I think I think with I always

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about fit, you know, like when when when Lebron

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and a D, especially when a D comes back. But

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 1>this team the best version of this team is, you know,

0:33:45.560 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 1>is what you saw in that fourth quarter, like this

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 1>modern switchy five out attack. And I don't think Russ

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 1>is attentive to enough to the details the way that

0:33:57.120 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>guys like Austin Reeves are or Stanley Johnson are. In

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 1>terms of their responsibilities, Like I was talking about, there's

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 1>a huge difference between like loud hustle, which is loud plays,

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:12.839
<v Speaker 1>and real hustle, which is I never miss my responsibility. Ever,

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 1>that's that's real hustle, and I think Russ struggles in

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:19.279
<v Speaker 1>that area. And I think that's why the team, you know,

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:21.879
<v Speaker 1>it seems to me, at least for me personally, when

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:24.399
<v Speaker 1>I've watched this team over the last few years, they're

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 1>at their best when they primarily lean into the strengths

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 1>of their superstars and then have guys around them that

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>are true hustle players, players that never miss their responsibilities.

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that's when they're at their best. So that's

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 1>just my view on that. And Russ, even though he

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:44.799
<v Speaker 1>had a bad game tonight, I mean not bad game,

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:46.400
<v Speaker 1>but even though he had a met game in my

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:49.720
<v Speaker 1>opinion tonight, even if he had a few good games

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 1>in a row, I would continue to go back to

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 1>that ideology because that's just the way I view the game.

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 1>So that's just my take on it. Again, Like I

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:01.239
<v Speaker 1>encourage you find somebody who's more of Russ, you know,

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 1>positive as somebody who's much more positive about Russ to

0:35:04.560 --> 0:35:06.359
<v Speaker 1>get another angle on it. I mean, you give some

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of that Raj, but I think you're a little closer

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:11.239
<v Speaker 1>to me than some of the Russ stands. But that said, like,

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:13.720
<v Speaker 1>it is interesting to see the way that they use him.

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:15.839
<v Speaker 1>My thing is like, if you're gonna put him off ball,

0:35:15.880 --> 0:35:18.319
<v Speaker 1>off the time, cut his minutes, and severely limit what

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 1>he can do offensively, then why in the hell did

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:22.879
<v Speaker 1>you make this trade to begin with? You know, like,

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 1>like that would be my question. But you're right, like,

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 1>assuming he's going to be on the roster for the

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:29.239
<v Speaker 1>rest of the season, this is the way you have

0:35:29.280 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to use him, right, And I'm so far past that, right,

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, Okay, he's here, the trade is made. You know,

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to figure out um and I can see

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:39.319
<v Speaker 1>them trying to figure out too. Why it's so so

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:41.359
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to me that you know, we're starting to put

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:43.160
<v Speaker 1>him even more off ball than we have, Like go

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 1>watch that first quarter, the first few possessions there, it's

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:48.399
<v Speaker 1>pretty much, you know, Russ on the week side while

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 1>we run like little screen actions for guys to come off.

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Even we ran some offensive Araby Bradley, which I thought

0:35:53.560 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 1>was a little weird as well, But you know, even

0:35:55.400 --> 0:35:57.319
<v Speaker 1>Bradly having the ball in his hands more, Rush is

0:35:57.320 --> 0:35:59.640
<v Speaker 1>more as a cutter now. Russ is more like the

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:02.439
<v Speaker 1>set dairy attack and I think that's where he's best.

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think, you know, you can still win that way,

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:06.919
<v Speaker 1>and too me, Russ doesn't have to be a third star.

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 1>He definitely has to be better than he's shown. You know,

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 1>he was what do you go again? Five for fourteen tonight.

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I thought, like, you know, four of those misses were

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:17.279
<v Speaker 1>like bad shots, like they were just you know, pull

0:36:17.400 --> 0:36:20.080
<v Speaker 1>up contested jump shots that you know, we're no reason.

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I thought the dunk again tonight, that was the most

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 1>That was the most athletic play I've seen from him

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:27.239
<v Speaker 1>this year, right, And I think that, yeah, yeah, And

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I saw him, you know, kind of jump and be

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:30.799
<v Speaker 1>able to dunk on Gobert in that way he was

0:36:30.880 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 1>able to and I think some of that also, you know,

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 1>we had Dwight Dwight had to be you know, guarded

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 1>on the law. Gobert backed up and he got a

0:36:37.040 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 1>dunk on him. And I think, you know, playing we

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 1>always think like give us space, but I think he

0:36:41.200 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 1>does like playing with the traditional center as well, which is,

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's kind of counterintuitive in terms of spacing,

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's just something he's been used to,

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, playing with Steven albums for that long and

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:52.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. I think he's just used to playing

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>with traditional centers. But yeah, it's just it's interesting to

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:56.839
<v Speaker 1>me how we're kind of going in this direction. And

0:36:56.880 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 1>like I said, i'm a proponent of it. It's just

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to see how the team kind of working it.

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:02.399
<v Speaker 1>But putting him on, putting on there, and I think

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 1>his impact can be in different ways. I think switching

0:37:04.640 --> 0:37:06.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of induces a little bit of better stuff. I

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's a guy you want chasing around screens,

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:11.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, chasing Mike Conley around, trying to you know,

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:13.560
<v Speaker 1>pick him up in different areas. I like, you know,

0:37:13.640 --> 0:37:15.440
<v Speaker 1>be able to switch, make him fight, you know, make

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 1>him win physical battles. I think that's what you have

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:19.279
<v Speaker 1>to do with him. But you know, I think he's

0:37:19.320 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of slowly getting there. Again, the plus minus wasn't

0:37:22.080 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 1>great for him tonight, but that's the kind of mover

0:37:25.400 --> 0:37:27.360
<v Speaker 1>going to this low turnover us. This is what you

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:29.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of get. It's not gonna be pretty, but I

0:37:29.320 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 1>just think, like it's fascinating to see where we've gone.

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess with him, not just on offense, but on

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:36.239
<v Speaker 1>defense as well. It's a it's a transition from him

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 1>from the player that you know, you thought you were

0:37:38.080 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 1>trading for, but this is not the guy you're kind

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of getting right now. You're getting more of an off

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:44.279
<v Speaker 1>ball player, even more than I even thought I would

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 1>get to. So I just want to like ask you

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 1>about that because I think it's interesting how the team's

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:51.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of also go in that direction. It's super interesting.

0:37:51.080 --> 0:37:54.280
<v Speaker 1>But again, it's about it's about leaning and leaning into strength,

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean? Moving forward? This is the

0:37:57.080 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 1>most interesting thing to to keep in mind, because you know,

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 1>one of our friends, one of our followers, just shared

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 1>with me a tweet that from David Mediment that said

0:38:04.560 --> 0:38:07.759
<v Speaker 1>that the Anthony Davis m R. I came back clean,

0:38:08.080 --> 0:38:10.440
<v Speaker 1>which is good news. So he's a ligamented heel, so

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:12.840
<v Speaker 1>that's good news, so I means he is progressing in

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the right direction, although I anticipate that he'll be out

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:18.759
<v Speaker 1>for at least another couple of weeks um really quickly though.

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:22.759
<v Speaker 1>On Anthony Davis, I believe he was cleared for full contact. Yeah,

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:26.920
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, yeah, he was cleared for full contact. Wow.

0:38:26.960 --> 0:38:31.839
<v Speaker 1>That's awesome. So hopefully sooner than hope. Hopefully not long.

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:34.960
<v Speaker 1>But again, so this is the thing because you know,

0:38:34.960 --> 0:38:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers also pretty much took it to the Miami

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:41.759
<v Speaker 1>Heat in a very similar game without Lebron a couple

0:38:41.760 --> 0:38:44.440
<v Speaker 1>of months ago. And like you said, there was that

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:46.879
<v Speaker 1>game against the Cleveland Cavaliers, which, as we know now

0:38:46.880 --> 0:38:49.000
<v Speaker 1>in retrospect, was a much better team than we thought.

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:53.799
<v Speaker 1>So you know, the key here is show me what

0:38:53.880 --> 0:38:56.799
<v Speaker 1>you're about. Did you guys finally have a wake up

0:38:56.800 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 1>call after forty two games of an NBA season or

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 1>is this just another blip in uh, you know, in

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 1>a what was basically a ship storm of the season,

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:09.360
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean. And so that's gonna be

0:39:09.400 --> 0:39:12.239
<v Speaker 1>the the curious thing to to watch to watch moving

0:39:12.280 --> 0:39:14.359
<v Speaker 1>forward in terms of just how serious these guys are.

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:16.919
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to hit on one last thing, guys

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:19.240
<v Speaker 1>before we get out of here, because I think Raj,

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you and I kind of fundamentally disagree on this. So

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to play Dwight tonight at all, and

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not. I don't think it's necessarily a coincidence that

0:39:27.600 --> 0:39:29.719
<v Speaker 1>he was minus nine now, or at least not in

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:31.759
<v Speaker 1>the gop Aarman as I should say. I would have

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:35.440
<v Speaker 1>staggered him against Gobert now. The reason why because I

0:39:35.480 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 1>agree with you. I think Dwight's a good player. I

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:42.799
<v Speaker 1>also think that Dwight uh is an awesome way to

0:39:42.920 --> 0:39:45.960
<v Speaker 1>keep Lebron from playing center all freaking game wall, So

0:39:46.000 --> 0:39:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you about everything that you say about that.

0:39:47.960 --> 0:39:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I also think while Dwight was on the Florid tonight,

0:39:50.800 --> 0:39:53.799
<v Speaker 1>in the twentiessothing minutes that he played, he did a

0:39:53.840 --> 0:39:56.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of positive things, So I want to frame it

0:39:56.080 --> 0:39:59.799
<v Speaker 1>like that to start. However, the reason why I think

0:39:59.800 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the Acres went minus nine in those minutes is when

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you play a traditional center against the Utah Jazz, you

0:40:06.200 --> 0:40:09.120
<v Speaker 1>played directly into their strengths. The reason why the Utah

0:40:09.200 --> 0:40:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Jazz has had so many so much regular season success

0:40:12.320 --> 0:40:14.719
<v Speaker 1>over the course of the last two seasons is the

0:40:14.760 --> 0:40:17.520
<v Speaker 1>fact that even though they don't have good perimeter defensive

0:40:17.520 --> 0:40:21.040
<v Speaker 1>players like Mike Conley not a great defensive player, Jordan

0:40:21.080 --> 0:40:23.759
<v Speaker 1>Clarkson not a great defensive player, Joe Angels kind of

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:26.600
<v Speaker 1>on the tail end of his career. Bogdanovitch, he's okay,

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:28.920
<v Speaker 1>He's had his moments. He can do well in certain matchups,

0:40:28.920 --> 0:40:32.239
<v Speaker 1>but he's not a great defensive player. Roy so Neil

0:40:32.320 --> 0:40:34.680
<v Speaker 1>there is their best defensive player on the perimeter. He's

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit undersized against bigger wings. Rudy or excuse me,

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Rudy Gay is a little bit inconsistent with his effort.

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:43.759
<v Speaker 1>They're not a great defensive team in theory when you

0:40:43.760 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 1>look at their personnel, but they've got Rudy Gobert, and

0:40:48.120 --> 0:40:51.799
<v Speaker 1>so when you play into their system, they they can

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:54.200
<v Speaker 1>succeed with you with their elite defensive scheme of just

0:40:54.280 --> 0:40:56.760
<v Speaker 1>chasing people off the line and funneling towards Rudy Gobert.

0:40:57.080 --> 0:40:59.480
<v Speaker 1>And one of the problems with playing Dwight Howard in

0:40:59.520 --> 0:41:01.960
<v Speaker 1>those minute and the reason why I disagreed with it,

0:41:02.040 --> 0:41:05.440
<v Speaker 1>is like, for instance, we were minus nine, but in

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that first shift that he played with the starters Lebron

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and Russ each made to pull up jump shots off

0:41:11.200 --> 0:41:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the dribble, and Avery Bradley made it. Three our first

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:18.640
<v Speaker 1>thirteen points, we're all on threes, four of which we're contested.

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:21.319
<v Speaker 1>So there we're not on three is for all our

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 1>first thirteen points, we're all on jump shots. Four of

0:41:24.160 --> 0:41:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the five were contested. So my point is is like

0:41:26.640 --> 0:41:28.319
<v Speaker 1>some of that's a little bit of fool's gold. Like

0:41:28.719 --> 0:41:31.720
<v Speaker 1>if two of those miss maybe the Dwight minutes instead

0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:34.680
<v Speaker 1>of being minus nine or minus fourteen, and now we're

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:37.000
<v Speaker 1>having a different type of conversation. So when when we're

0:41:37.000 --> 0:41:39.440
<v Speaker 1>talking strategy, I'm really curious to look back at this

0:41:39.520 --> 0:41:43.000
<v Speaker 1>game in the lineups, because I also disagreed without going

0:41:43.040 --> 0:41:45.880
<v Speaker 1>with with going without Lebron and Russ at the same time,

0:41:46.480 --> 0:41:48.480
<v Speaker 1>so because I know they had a little bit of

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:50.360
<v Speaker 1>success in the first stat just because they were playing

0:41:50.400 --> 0:41:53.200
<v Speaker 1>so much harder than Utah, but then that same lineup

0:41:53.239 --> 0:41:56.480
<v Speaker 1>was an absolute catastrophe in the second half, simply because

0:41:56.480 --> 0:41:59.560
<v Speaker 1>they just don't have any offensive decision making on the floor.

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:01.279
<v Speaker 1>You're ending a lot on th h T and he's

0:42:01.280 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 1>just very young and a veteran, a good veteran team

0:42:04.040 --> 0:42:06.240
<v Speaker 1>is gonna make th HD look bad. So I'm curious.

0:42:06.239 --> 0:42:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna look at the numbers later tonight or early

0:42:08.320 --> 0:42:10.719
<v Speaker 1>in the morning. But I bet you tonight, in the

0:42:10.760 --> 0:42:13.719
<v Speaker 1>minutes when Dwight was off the floor and when we

0:42:13.800 --> 0:42:16.880
<v Speaker 1>also had at least either Lebron or Russ on the floor,

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I bet you we were extremely dominant and that the

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:24.000
<v Speaker 1>only reason the game was close was because of those

0:42:24.280 --> 0:42:26.799
<v Speaker 1>stretches that I'm referring to. So again, this is a

0:42:26.880 --> 0:42:30.200
<v Speaker 1>sign for optimism, because I know you've described all the

0:42:30.239 --> 0:42:32.040
<v Speaker 1>things that Dwight did great, and I'm not trying to

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:35.920
<v Speaker 1>undercut that, but in my opinion, our offense faltered in

0:42:35.960 --> 0:42:39.759
<v Speaker 1>those minutes beyond what Dwight does good because in those

0:42:39.800 --> 0:42:43.120
<v Speaker 1>minutes we were playing into the Utah Jazz strengths and

0:42:43.239 --> 0:42:45.400
<v Speaker 1>turning ourselves into a jump shooting team, which is not

0:42:45.440 --> 0:42:48.919
<v Speaker 1>what we do really well. But again, like fixing those

0:42:48.960 --> 0:42:52.799
<v Speaker 1>little details, strategically playing Dwight at the right time, strategically

0:42:52.800 --> 0:42:57.359
<v Speaker 1>playing Lebron at the right time, never staggering so incorrectly

0:42:57.400 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 1>that we have no stars on the floor. If we

0:42:59.560 --> 0:43:02.400
<v Speaker 1>can fix those things in addition to the effort, in

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:05.760
<v Speaker 1>addition to the modern scheming in addition to this engaged

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:08.720
<v Speaker 1>two way Lebron. That's when I start to get really excited.

0:43:08.800 --> 0:43:11.040
<v Speaker 1>That's when when you're saying there's a good team in there,

0:43:11.440 --> 0:43:13.960
<v Speaker 1>That's what I see is like the good team potential.

0:43:14.320 --> 0:43:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Get rid of some of your own you know, self

0:43:16.719 --> 0:43:20.839
<v Speaker 1>sabotage stuff, and play into your strengths more. That's when

0:43:20.840 --> 0:43:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you can start to see this team be more consistently good. Yeah,

0:43:24.040 --> 0:43:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and the numbers, you know, support your claim here. I'm

0:43:26.200 --> 0:43:28.359
<v Speaker 1>just looking at it, you know, so do I only

0:43:28.360 --> 0:43:30.680
<v Speaker 1>played three minutes you know, where he was on the floor,

0:43:30.680 --> 0:43:33.360
<v Speaker 1>where Gobert wasn't on the floor. So uh that he

0:43:33.400 --> 0:43:35.640
<v Speaker 1>played eighteen minutes, you know, matching up with Golbert. The

0:43:35.719 --> 0:43:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Lakers aren't minus thirty two UM in that in that state. Uh,

0:43:39.560 --> 0:43:42.920
<v Speaker 1>in those minutes, the Lakers had an eighty nine offensive rating.

0:43:43.080 --> 0:43:44.319
<v Speaker 1>But I think, you know, a lot of that was

0:43:44.400 --> 0:43:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the third. To me, we just we

0:43:47.160 --> 0:43:49.480
<v Speaker 1>stayed with that starting lineup too long to me, and

0:43:49.520 --> 0:43:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought, you know, every I thought we missed a

0:43:51.040 --> 0:43:53.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of open threes. Every badly missed a bunch of

0:43:53.520 --> 0:43:56.000
<v Speaker 1>open threes. I thought to start um that quarter, And

0:43:56.080 --> 0:43:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that kind of you know, pushed the numbers

0:43:58.120 --> 0:43:59.799
<v Speaker 1>where they were. But it's gonna be a trade off

0:43:59.840 --> 0:44:01.759
<v Speaker 1>all the time. I just think, you know, do I

0:44:01.840 --> 0:44:04.160
<v Speaker 1>have It's just a changeup, right, It's just being able

0:44:04.200 --> 0:44:05.759
<v Speaker 1>to be versatile. It's just to be able to throw

0:44:06.040 --> 0:44:08.040
<v Speaker 1>different looks. So we don't have to play Lebron at

0:44:08.080 --> 0:44:09.680
<v Speaker 1>center of the whole game. We don't have to play

0:44:09.760 --> 0:44:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Dwight at the center of the whole game. We didn't tonight,

0:44:11.600 --> 0:44:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Like we don't have to choose one, right, we don't

0:44:13.560 --> 0:44:15.000
<v Speaker 1>have to be big and we don't have to be small.

0:44:15.040 --> 0:44:17.080
<v Speaker 1>We can kind of move as the game flows. And

0:44:17.120 --> 0:44:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought we did that tonight again. That's why I

0:44:19.080 --> 0:44:20.920
<v Speaker 1>think Dwight Howard starting was just it was great for

0:44:21.000 --> 0:44:22.759
<v Speaker 1>Lebron and he didn't have to start the game, you

0:44:22.800 --> 0:44:25.160
<v Speaker 1>know already the back line guy um and I thought,

0:44:25.200 --> 0:44:27.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, it just kind of limited their attacks and

0:44:27.360 --> 0:44:29.480
<v Speaker 1>he was good and the small ball lineup the Lakers

0:44:29.560 --> 0:44:31.279
<v Speaker 1>killed those where Dwight was on the floor. It was

0:44:31.320 --> 0:44:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a short stint, it was like three or four minutes,

0:44:33.520 --> 0:44:35.640
<v Speaker 1>but we were like a plus twenty in those minutes.

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:38.440
<v Speaker 1>But like it just like it took away Utah being

0:44:38.440 --> 0:44:40.040
<v Speaker 1>able just attacked the rim, because what do we talk

0:44:40.080 --> 0:44:41.920
<v Speaker 1>about when we went small with the teams? Do they

0:44:41.960 --> 0:44:44.000
<v Speaker 1>just hunt the rim? Right? We saw Dann Box do

0:44:44.120 --> 0:44:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that to us, John Morant do that to us. Um

0:44:46.280 --> 0:44:49.839
<v Speaker 1>when we played less Denver, Denver just made every open

0:44:49.880 --> 0:44:51.520
<v Speaker 1>three and we just quit in that game pretty early.

0:44:51.560 --> 0:44:53.440
<v Speaker 1>But you know, other guards just attacked us when we

0:44:53.480 --> 0:44:55.319
<v Speaker 1>played small, and I thought having Dwight out there at

0:44:55.400 --> 0:44:58.120
<v Speaker 1>least limited that just have some changeups, um, have some

0:44:58.239 --> 0:45:00.520
<v Speaker 1>versatility in the lineup, And that's what I though, Uh, Dwight,

0:45:00.600 --> 0:45:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, the numbers don't match up with him playing well,

0:45:02.520 --> 0:45:04.799
<v Speaker 1>they support your kind of claim there. I didn't know

0:45:04.840 --> 0:45:06.600
<v Speaker 1>we got killed that much in those minutes. Um, it

0:45:06.640 --> 0:45:09.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't feel that way, I guess to me. But but yeah,

0:45:09.200 --> 0:45:10.880
<v Speaker 1>it's just a changeup that we can kind of go to.

0:45:11.280 --> 0:45:12.759
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, giving Lebron a little bit of

0:45:12.840 --> 0:45:14.759
<v Speaker 1>arrest there and obviously when a comes back you can

0:45:14.800 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 1>feel that role full time, which again goes to your

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:20.000
<v Speaker 1>optimistic point there. You take Dwight Howard out and you

0:45:20.000 --> 0:45:22.440
<v Speaker 1>put maybe the best defensive player in basketball, Like, what

0:45:22.480 --> 0:45:23.960
<v Speaker 1>can this team become if if they can kind of

0:45:24.000 --> 0:45:27.760
<v Speaker 1>build on this So Dwight Lebron James on the court

0:45:27.800 --> 0:45:32.520
<v Speaker 1>at center without Dwight Howard Tonight plus twenty two, Lebron

0:45:32.600 --> 0:45:35.239
<v Speaker 1>j Lebron James on court with Dwight Howard at center,

0:45:35.320 --> 0:45:39.680
<v Speaker 1>minus eleven. We played eighteen point four minutes with Dwight

0:45:39.840 --> 0:45:42.960
<v Speaker 1>on the floor with Lebron and eighteen point nine with

0:45:43.040 --> 0:45:45.839
<v Speaker 1>Lebron on and Dwight off. Just just here, and again

0:45:45.840 --> 0:45:48.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying you're necessarily wrong, and and when it

0:45:48.360 --> 0:45:51.760
<v Speaker 1>comes to single game plus minus two that can be weird.

0:45:52.000 --> 0:45:53.799
<v Speaker 1>It's just a theory. It's a theory about the way

0:45:53.800 --> 0:45:56.040
<v Speaker 1>that I think you should attack. Like Dwight is an

0:45:56.040 --> 0:45:59.640
<v Speaker 1>awesome backup center because he does so well playing against

0:46:00.120 --> 0:46:02.920
<v Speaker 1>backup setters right then in playing them. So I like

0:46:03.040 --> 0:46:05.919
<v Speaker 1>leaning into that one. My last note that I had,

0:46:05.960 --> 0:46:08.279
<v Speaker 1>and it's ironic because you actually just reminded me of

0:46:08.320 --> 0:46:11.480
<v Speaker 1>it talking about Denver's three point shooting. You know, everyone

0:46:11.600 --> 0:46:13.640
<v Speaker 1>was like I saw some people on Twitter going like,

0:46:13.719 --> 0:46:17.120
<v Speaker 1>oh man, like the Utah Jazz mit some shots, and

0:46:17.280 --> 0:46:19.279
<v Speaker 1>because I think they went over nine from three to

0:46:19.400 --> 0:46:22.040
<v Speaker 1>start the start the fourth quarter if I remember correctly.

0:46:22.360 --> 0:46:24.400
<v Speaker 1>And then in the Denver game, I heard a lot

0:46:24.440 --> 0:46:26.279
<v Speaker 1>of people say like, oh, like, they just made all

0:46:26.320 --> 0:46:29.880
<v Speaker 1>their shots. You know, this is my biggest disconnect with

0:46:29.920 --> 0:46:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the analytic community. There is a certain amount of varying

0:46:34.040 --> 0:46:36.760
<v Speaker 1>outcomes that goes without saying, you know, like, for instance,

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Steph Curry is randomly having a year where he's shooting

0:46:39.719 --> 0:46:43.080
<v Speaker 1>poorly when he's wide open. That's I don't really know

0:46:43.120 --> 0:46:45.400
<v Speaker 1>how to rationalize that. I just think it's random, you know.

0:46:45.440 --> 0:46:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's associated with anything. I think it's

0:46:47.160 --> 0:46:51.160
<v Speaker 1>just random results. But I'm a big believer in the

0:46:51.200 --> 0:46:53.840
<v Speaker 1>fact that the defense actually does have a good amount

0:46:53.840 --> 0:46:56.520
<v Speaker 1>of impact on three point shots going in or whether

0:46:56.600 --> 0:46:58.919
<v Speaker 1>or not they whether or not they go in. And

0:46:59.000 --> 0:47:01.560
<v Speaker 1>when I watched the Denver game, I saw the Lakers

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:04.040
<v Speaker 1>giving up on rotations and giving up a ton of

0:47:04.080 --> 0:47:06.680
<v Speaker 1>wide open shots. There were some contested ones in there,

0:47:06.960 --> 0:47:09.080
<v Speaker 1>And whenever there is a contested one, you have a

0:47:09.080 --> 0:47:11.200
<v Speaker 1>tendency as a basketball fan to be like, oh, man,

0:47:11.280 --> 0:47:13.120
<v Speaker 1>like that's such bs, I can't believe he made that,

0:47:13.200 --> 0:47:16.000
<v Speaker 1>And it's like, actually, over the totality of the game,

0:47:16.560 --> 0:47:20.360
<v Speaker 1>those those contested shot percentages tend to kind of mimic

0:47:20.400 --> 0:47:23.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty closely with the with the amount of open shots

0:47:23.640 --> 0:47:26.600
<v Speaker 1>they get because they're directly related to comfort and rhythm.

0:47:26.640 --> 0:47:28.799
<v Speaker 1>If you let the team get comfortable and make a

0:47:28.840 --> 0:47:32.680
<v Speaker 1>ton of wide open shots, they're probably going to have

0:47:32.880 --> 0:47:35.719
<v Speaker 1>the confidence to knock down the big ones later. And

0:47:35.760 --> 0:47:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the reason why you taught me there were a couple

0:47:37.920 --> 0:47:40.320
<v Speaker 1>of wide open ones in that fourth quarter that they missed,

0:47:40.600 --> 0:47:42.160
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of the shots that they took in

0:47:42.200 --> 0:47:47.600
<v Speaker 1>that fourth quarter where it's like oh, man like like yeah, like, oh,

0:47:47.719 --> 0:47:50.319
<v Speaker 1>Lebron closed out on Jordan Clarkson and he kind of

0:47:50.320 --> 0:47:53.319
<v Speaker 1>shot that from like twenty seven feet with Lebron's hand

0:47:53.360 --> 0:47:56.239
<v Speaker 1>in his face, like that's not a good shot, you know,

0:47:56.440 --> 0:48:00.120
<v Speaker 1>or like you know, or uh, Donovan Mitchell taking a

0:48:00.280 --> 0:48:04.080
<v Speaker 1>quick early shot clock three because the Lakers have disrupted

0:48:04.080 --> 0:48:06.359
<v Speaker 1>his rhythm all night and he's frustrated because he hasn't

0:48:06.360 --> 0:48:08.359
<v Speaker 1>had a good night and he's just trying to make

0:48:08.440 --> 0:48:11.719
<v Speaker 1>something happen. It's like, Okay, that's good defense leading to

0:48:11.800 --> 0:48:14.680
<v Speaker 1>a miss and and you know, like I said, there's

0:48:14.800 --> 0:48:19.040
<v Speaker 1>some chance there, there's some relying on some luck there

0:48:19.120 --> 0:48:21.320
<v Speaker 1>that that takes place when it comes to three point shooting.

0:48:21.360 --> 0:48:24.320
<v Speaker 1>But I think the Lakers, I think the Nuggets shot

0:48:24.360 --> 0:48:26.799
<v Speaker 1>extremely well from three because the Lakers played a ship

0:48:26.880 --> 0:48:30.000
<v Speaker 1>defensive game, and I think the Jazz shot poorly from

0:48:30.000 --> 0:48:32.600
<v Speaker 1>three because the Lakers played a great defensive game. I

0:48:32.600 --> 0:48:35.239
<v Speaker 1>think they're directly related. And I think when people try

0:48:35.280 --> 0:48:37.319
<v Speaker 1>to gloss over that and trying to act as though

0:48:37.360 --> 0:48:40.200
<v Speaker 1>like the Lakers got lucky on tonight's game or got

0:48:40.280 --> 0:48:43.759
<v Speaker 1>unlucky against Denver, I think that's just a piss poor attitude.

0:48:44.080 --> 0:48:46.799
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's it's deflecting and it's and it's

0:48:46.920 --> 0:48:50.640
<v Speaker 1>not taking responsibility for outcomes. And I think that defense

0:48:50.960 --> 0:48:53.560
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely related to it. I think the Lakers, the

0:48:53.640 --> 0:48:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Lakers earned a poor Utah Jazz shooting night tonight. I

0:48:56.560 --> 0:48:59.440
<v Speaker 1>firmly believe that absolutely we are you able to rewatch

0:48:59.520 --> 0:49:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the Denver game? And I'm not sure he went back

0:49:01.040 --> 0:49:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and watched that monstrosity, Okay, but no, no, no, yeah no,

0:49:07.560 --> 0:49:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I just hate myself. But bones, you know, bones, bones Highland,

0:49:10.760 --> 0:49:13.319
<v Speaker 1>like he was contested, but not really right that dude

0:49:13.360 --> 0:49:17.120
<v Speaker 1>was comfortable on night. Utah was absolutely uncomfortable this whole game.

0:49:17.160 --> 0:49:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Like I felt like every shot they were kind of

0:49:19.480 --> 0:49:20.680
<v Speaker 1>there was a hand in their face, not just a

0:49:20.719 --> 0:49:22.839
<v Speaker 1>hand in their face, like a guy sprinting at them,

0:49:22.880 --> 0:49:24.759
<v Speaker 1>and you know you could see it the passes. I

0:49:24.760 --> 0:49:27.280
<v Speaker 1>think they turned the ball over Jason like seven times

0:49:27.280 --> 0:49:29.399
<v Speaker 1>in that first quarter. Like I think, like just because

0:49:29.400 --> 0:49:31.360
<v Speaker 1>of the switching right and even the jumpers that they

0:49:31.400 --> 0:49:33.560
<v Speaker 1>shot I thought were all contested. So I'm with you

0:49:33.600 --> 0:49:36.000
<v Speaker 1>on that. And Utah is probably better than this, right, Like,

0:49:36.040 --> 0:49:37.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure they can play a better game. I still

0:49:37.760 --> 0:49:40.319
<v Speaker 1>think they're a very good at least regular season team,

0:49:40.320 --> 0:49:44.080
<v Speaker 1>will see in the playoffs. And we also get Anthony

0:49:44.160 --> 0:49:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Davis back exactly absolutely, there it goes. And Utah, you

0:49:48.080 --> 0:49:50.359
<v Speaker 1>know they were missing I guess hasan whiteside, but they

0:49:50.360 --> 0:49:52.120
<v Speaker 1>were for the most part healthy, right, they had their

0:49:52.160 --> 0:49:54.560
<v Speaker 1>full full core of of guys that are that are

0:49:54.560 --> 0:49:56.239
<v Speaker 1>going to play when it matters. So, I mean, this

0:49:56.320 --> 0:49:57.799
<v Speaker 1>is the biggest win of the year. I don't think

0:49:57.800 --> 0:50:00.040
<v Speaker 1>it's close. Like this is really quickly into my and

0:50:00.239 --> 0:50:02.440
<v Speaker 1>he can't remember Jimmy Butler got hurt in the first half,

0:50:02.320 --> 0:50:05.480
<v Speaker 1>if I remember correctly, yes, exactly. And Cleveland, you know,

0:50:05.520 --> 0:50:06.920
<v Speaker 1>they were a young team by the time like that

0:50:06.960 --> 0:50:09.600
<v Speaker 1>on that mobile, I think barely play at any games

0:50:09.920 --> 0:50:11.759
<v Speaker 1>uh so far during his season. Now, this is the

0:50:11.760 --> 0:50:14.480
<v Speaker 1>biggest win the year man Utah's legit um, and this

0:50:14.600 --> 0:50:16.200
<v Speaker 1>is there's stuff to build on this. And you know

0:50:16.239 --> 0:50:18.359
<v Speaker 1>you can't say this turn the season around when you're

0:50:18.360 --> 0:50:21.239
<v Speaker 1>five hundred and forty two games in, like you know

0:50:21.280 --> 0:50:23.319
<v Speaker 1>that that would be kind of that'd be misguided to

0:50:23.360 --> 0:50:25.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of say that yet. But I think there's stuff

0:50:25.239 --> 0:50:27.719
<v Speaker 1>to build on. We play Indiana and Orlando next to

0:50:28.040 --> 0:50:30.120
<v Speaker 1>winnable games like you can. You can win both of

0:50:30.120 --> 0:50:32.200
<v Speaker 1>those even without a d S. So I think, you know,

0:50:32.200 --> 0:50:34.520
<v Speaker 1>there's stuff to take from it. Hopefully a D comes

0:50:34.560 --> 0:50:36.320
<v Speaker 1>back pretty soon on this road trip and then we

0:50:36.320 --> 0:50:37.880
<v Speaker 1>can kind of build from it. Man, this is an

0:50:37.920 --> 0:50:40.239
<v Speaker 1>exciting one. I agree. Did you have anything else on

0:50:40.280 --> 0:50:43.000
<v Speaker 1>your list? I'm finished really quickly. I want to ask you,

0:50:43.080 --> 0:50:44.799
<v Speaker 1>Am I just seeing things? Or did a Reason move

0:50:44.800 --> 0:50:46.719
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better tonight? Like did he find at

0:50:46.760 --> 0:50:48.600
<v Speaker 1>least he didn't find both of his legs, but did

0:50:48.600 --> 0:50:50.839
<v Speaker 1>he find one leg tonight? Like did the right leg

0:50:50.920 --> 0:50:54.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of you know, arrived to the did the did

0:50:54.280 --> 0:50:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the right leg arrived to the season, Like I'm watching him,

0:50:56.520 --> 0:50:58.480
<v Speaker 1>like you know, relocate Russ with driving the pain and

0:50:58.520 --> 0:51:00.719
<v Speaker 1>I see a Reason sprint to the core to get

0:51:00.719 --> 0:51:02.440
<v Speaker 1>to get the ball from and shoot the three, Like

0:51:02.800 --> 0:51:05.040
<v Speaker 1>do you think he arrived from a little bit at least,

0:51:05.040 --> 0:51:06.839
<v Speaker 1>like maybe one leg arrived, maybe he didn't get both

0:51:06.920 --> 0:51:09.400
<v Speaker 1>legs back. And I seeing things with that, So I

0:51:09.440 --> 0:51:11.920
<v Speaker 1>agree with you it was moving better tonight. But that

0:51:11.920 --> 0:51:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that almost pissed me off a little bit more because

0:51:14.440 --> 0:51:17.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, Trevor reason just knows better. Man, He's been

0:51:17.920 --> 0:51:21.680
<v Speaker 1>around the league long enough to know that this team

0:51:21.719 --> 0:51:24.800
<v Speaker 1>wasn't playing hard enough to win. And don't get me wrong,

0:51:24.840 --> 0:51:26.959
<v Speaker 1>I think conditioning is part of it. I think all

0:51:27.080 --> 0:51:29.960
<v Speaker 1>that his age, getting into a group, getting into rhythm,

0:51:29.960 --> 0:51:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that's all part of it. So I'm not

0:51:31.480 --> 0:51:35.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to undercut that by any stretch of the imagination.

0:51:35.440 --> 0:51:39.320
<v Speaker 1>But Trevor's defensive effort in his first you know whatever

0:51:39.320 --> 0:51:42.560
<v Speaker 1>it is half dozen games coming back from COVID was

0:51:42.640 --> 0:51:46.840
<v Speaker 1>so poor, and in him suddenly turning it up a

0:51:46.920 --> 0:51:49.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit when the rest of the team turns it up,

0:51:49.120 --> 0:51:50.839
<v Speaker 1>makes me feel like it was a little more him

0:51:50.880 --> 0:51:54.279
<v Speaker 1>and a little less conditioning. So that part's frustrating. But

0:51:54.400 --> 0:51:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I do, you know, I'm I'm a believer in the

0:51:56.560 --> 0:51:58.839
<v Speaker 1>Areasa fit. I think I think, I think you know,

0:51:59.080 --> 0:52:02.040
<v Speaker 1>when this team. If if the idealized version of this

0:52:02.080 --> 0:52:05.880
<v Speaker 1>team comes to to fruition and they consistently play hard,

0:52:06.200 --> 0:52:08.880
<v Speaker 1>they lean more into wings, Anthony Davis comes back, and

0:52:08.920 --> 0:52:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the talent chasm between them and all their opponents goes away.

0:52:12.280 --> 0:52:15.919
<v Speaker 1>In that universe, I think Trevor Rees is a fantastic fit.

0:52:16.600 --> 0:52:19.719
<v Speaker 1>But if if the team trends more like they did

0:52:19.719 --> 0:52:22.360
<v Speaker 1>against Denver and it turns into more of a you know,

0:52:22.400 --> 0:52:25.480
<v Speaker 1>a ship show, then his lack of athleticism and his

0:52:25.560 --> 0:52:28.359
<v Speaker 1>age and his lack of enthusiasm could become a like

0:52:28.520 --> 0:52:31.759
<v Speaker 1>a real negative. But I I definitely notice what you're

0:52:31.760 --> 0:52:35.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about. Um, I think he I think he helps

0:52:35.640 --> 0:52:38.080
<v Speaker 1>him a sense that he doesn't make mistakes, and I

0:52:38.120 --> 0:52:40.200
<v Speaker 1>think he's a good I think he could when he

0:52:40.280 --> 0:52:42.000
<v Speaker 1>really gets going to be a good kind of like

0:52:42.080 --> 0:52:44.400
<v Speaker 1>plug in guy, as that fit starter, kind of like

0:52:44.680 --> 0:52:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Wesley Matthews was for us in a lot of line

0:52:46.800 --> 0:52:48.880
<v Speaker 1>ups last year. I'd look at him as kind of

0:52:48.920 --> 0:52:50.680
<v Speaker 1>just like a sixth eight version of that, as long

0:52:50.680 --> 0:52:53.560
<v Speaker 1>as he plays hard. Um. But yeah, he definitely played

0:52:53.560 --> 0:52:55.120
<v Speaker 1>harder tonight and I did like that. Did you have

0:52:55.120 --> 0:52:57.120
<v Speaker 1>anything else on your list? Yeah? Last thing? You know,

0:52:57.160 --> 0:52:59.680
<v Speaker 1>he was our starting small forward right tonight, and again

0:52:59.719 --> 0:53:02.040
<v Speaker 1>just kind of feel a little bit into the Optimist Cup.

0:53:02.239 --> 0:53:04.080
<v Speaker 1>We don't really get a chance to pour into that

0:53:04.080 --> 0:53:05.759
<v Speaker 1>cup very often, so I'm gonna continue to do it.

0:53:06.000 --> 0:53:08.360
<v Speaker 1>He was. It was one for eight tonight, one for

0:53:08.440 --> 0:53:10.440
<v Speaker 1>six from three and twenty seven minutes, So you basically

0:53:10.480 --> 0:53:13.680
<v Speaker 1>got zero offense out of your small forward um and

0:53:13.680 --> 0:53:16.000
<v Speaker 1>every badly I think also didn't shoot well, I don't

0:53:16.000 --> 0:53:17.800
<v Speaker 1>remember what he shot, but and you were able to

0:53:17.840 --> 0:53:19.880
<v Speaker 1>be a really good U TAK team. So that's just

0:53:20.160 --> 0:53:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that's the context I want to keep from here. We

0:53:22.040 --> 0:53:24.080
<v Speaker 1>won this game with our defense, Like you know, we

0:53:24.160 --> 0:53:26.760
<v Speaker 1>hit a couple of big, tough shots, like you said,

0:53:26.800 --> 0:53:28.359
<v Speaker 1>a couple of pull up threes in the first quarter,

0:53:28.400 --> 0:53:30.360
<v Speaker 1>But we won this game with our defense, and I

0:53:30.360 --> 0:53:32.360
<v Speaker 1>want to kind of hammer that, and that's something you

0:53:32.400 --> 0:53:36.200
<v Speaker 1>can definitely build on even when Anthony Davis, before Anthony

0:53:36.239 --> 0:53:40.399
<v Speaker 1>Davis comes back, agree there's no possible way to look

0:53:40.400 --> 0:53:43.120
<v Speaker 1>at this game and not be enthusiastics. Like even if

0:53:43.120 --> 0:53:45.600
<v Speaker 1>you told me like the Jazz are in the locker room,

0:53:45.680 --> 0:53:48.920
<v Speaker 1>like knowing in their heads that they gave effort, I'd

0:53:48.960 --> 0:53:52.360
<v Speaker 1>still be I'd still be thrilled by the outcome, because

0:53:52.440 --> 0:53:55.719
<v Speaker 1>when you factor in the actual predicament, the Lakers are

0:53:55.719 --> 0:54:02.799
<v Speaker 1>in with their superstar power forward not available, with their

0:54:02.880 --> 0:54:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Russell Westbrook trade being mostly uh Like, I think you'd

0:54:06.480 --> 0:54:08.799
<v Speaker 1>be hard pressed to find someone who's thrilled with the

0:54:08.800 --> 0:54:11.040
<v Speaker 1>outcome of the Russell Westbrook trade. I mean, I think

0:54:11.239 --> 0:54:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I think most of us, I think are ranging from

0:54:13.680 --> 0:54:18.160
<v Speaker 1>either like me, like completely like disappointed and upset about it,

0:54:18.280 --> 0:54:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to you like not liking it but at least accepting it.

0:54:22.040 --> 0:54:25.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, like there's those are like the very outcomes there. Well,

0:54:25.719 --> 0:54:27.480
<v Speaker 1>like when you factor that in and the fact that

0:54:27.480 --> 0:54:30.520
<v Speaker 1>our our mid level exception guy hasn't played a minute,

0:54:30.560 --> 0:54:33.520
<v Speaker 1>probably won't play a minute because he had another setback today,

0:54:33.800 --> 0:54:36.319
<v Speaker 1>Like when you factor all of that in. For us

0:54:36.360 --> 0:54:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to handle the Utah Jazz on National TV when they

0:54:41.200 --> 0:54:44.360
<v Speaker 1>were fully healthy the way that we did after giving

0:54:44.480 --> 0:54:47.920
<v Speaker 1>up the lead and falling behind by ten points, I

0:54:48.000 --> 0:54:51.480
<v Speaker 1>take it as a huge positive. But yeah, so that's

0:54:51.520 --> 0:54:53.279
<v Speaker 1>all we offered tonight. Guys. This is gonna be on

0:54:53.360 --> 0:54:56.160
<v Speaker 1>dash Radio tomorrow morning at seven am Pacific Standard time.

0:54:56.239 --> 0:54:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Like always, this will also be on our podcast feed

0:54:59.400 --> 0:55:03.600
<v Speaker 1>here and about thirty minutes. We always appreciate you guys,

0:55:03.680 --> 0:55:05.640
<v Speaker 1>support and hanging with us. We will be back for

0:55:05.680 --> 0:55:09.399
<v Speaker 1>a busy week of Lakers basketball on Wednesday. We will

0:55:09.400 --> 0:55:11.120
<v Speaker 1>see you then. Enjoy the rest of your week guys,

0:55:11.160 --> 0:55:12.359
<v Speaker 1>and we we can talk to you in a couple of days.

0:55:12.760 --> 0:55:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Thanks everyone,