WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance TV: May 28th, 2026

0:00:02.360 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 2>with Lisa Bromwitz and Amrie Hordern. Join us each day

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 2>for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 2>from our global headquarters in New York City. We are

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app. So here's the laces.

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 2>This morning, the US of around exchanging fresh strikes with

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 2>the White House, saying little progress has been made towards

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 2>a deal. General Karen Gibson of Academy Securities, writing, I

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 2>suspect and hope negotiations may be more advanced than either

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 2>side is letting gone, at least publicly, despite the rhetoric

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 2>and in many ways the action too. General Gibson joins

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 2>us now for more. General, welcome to the program. Where

0:00:56.760 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 2>do you suspect we have made some progress?

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 3>Well?

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 4>I think that if we had a complete lack of progress,

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 4>we would be seeing more aggressive actions on the part

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 4>of the United States, whether that was additional significant sanctions

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 4>or strikes beyond the ones we've been doing. I maintain

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 4>that the ceasefire, while fragile, is still holding despite the

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 4>strikes that we've had over the last three days. What

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 4>characterizes these strikes is that they are very narrowly specific

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:34.400
<v Speaker 4>to aggressive actions that Iran was alleged to be making

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 4>in and around the Strait of Hormuz buonder a boss,

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 4>whether that was vessels laying minds that would potentially constrain

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 4>navigation and traffic, or one way drones. And it's important

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 4>to remember that even under a ceasefire, you do not

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 4>lose the inherent right of self defense. So if we

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 4>were not making progress in negotiations, we might see broader

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 4>strikes further somewhere else in Iran that more clearly violated

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 4>the ceasefire. But I think these are very defense related,

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 4>self defense related, and within the balance of the ceasefire.

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 5>If these are defense related, then is the United States

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 5>doing anything in terms of deterrence when it comes to Ron.

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think our presence acts as a deterrent as well.

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean the fact that if Iran were to out

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 4>of the blues strike some kind of golf infrastructure or

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 4>civilian targets or something else that was in the broader

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 4>golf region against one of our partners. I think it

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:31.799
<v Speaker 4>would be certainly I would expect the United States to

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 4>take some broad action, probably additional punishing air strikes. And

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 4>Iran knows that we can do that and that we're

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 4>prepared to do that, won't hesitate to do that, and

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 4>that in itself is a form of deterrence.

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 5>Given these recent clashes, do you understand where the red

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 5>lines are in terms of kinetic warfare between Iran and

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 5>the United States.

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so, again, you'd never give up the right of

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 4>self defense, even under a ceasefire. And so these were

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 4>activities that were identified that looked as though they would

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 4>threaten navigation or directly threaten our naval assets and air

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 4>assets that are there right off the Strait of Hormus.

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:12.679
<v Speaker 3>That's permitted.

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 4>I think that's an important distinction. And even Iran's counter

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:21.959
<v Speaker 4>strike in which they launched assets towards Kuwait, they claim

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 4>to have shot down one of our predators. I don't

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 4>believe it. It's always kind of a given that they're going

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 4>to exaggerate for their own domestic audiences, those are I

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 4>think probably within the bounds of the seasfire. I'd make

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 4>two more points there. One, if we were striking dual

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 4>use military civil infrastructure elsewhere in Iran that wasn't directly

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 4>related to the navigation in the straits, that's probably not

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 4>within the bounds of the ceasfire. Again back to if

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 4>Iran were to strike say Fugyra again in the Emirates

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 4>their port outside the Strait of Hormus, that would probably

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 4>not be within the bounds of the seasfire. But the

0:03:57.080 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 4>last point I'd make is that a ceasefire is not

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 4>a real physical thing. It's a construct that's developed between

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 4>the two negotiating sides by policymakers or leaders, and it's

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 4>really up to them to decide that a ceasefire is

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 4>no longer holding, whether it's because of a single shot

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 4>across the bow or something far more extensive.

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Don't know. You said something there that I thought was

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>really important that Iran it obviously exaggerates for its audience.

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>The US also trying to job oon markets, and this

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>is one reason why markets.

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:26.599
<v Speaker 6>Have tuned out.

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Who are the respective parties trying to speak to and

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:32.159
<v Speaker 1>how is that muddying the message.

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 4>That's a terrific point. I think, you know, both in

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:40.840
<v Speaker 4>both sides in probably any conflict, I think the leaders

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 4>are speaking, particularly in Iran, to their own domestic audience.

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 4>They need to appear strong. They need to make the

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 4>United States look weak. They want to make it look

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:52.359
<v Speaker 4>as though we are the ones that are about to

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 4>give an and concede something. You know, that strategic narrative

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 4>is actually also an area where we're competing. They are

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 4>speaking directly to their domestic audience. Our president is speaking

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 4>to our domestic audience. But there are also broader market

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 4>audiences that both are speaking to. And I think we

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 4>have to be really careful about taking literally everything that's

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 4>said by a spokesperson from either government. There's often truth

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 4>within it, but then there will be other things that

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 4>are said that are hyperbolic or again intended to calm

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 4>or influence markets, to shape public opinion, and to influence

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 4>the other side.

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us. More Bloomberg surveillance coming up after.

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 2>This Across Some cool news for you, the Treasury Department

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 2>launching the Trump account app today in collaboration with b

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 2>NY and Robin Hood. The partnership between the public and

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 2>private sector, aiming to expand access to long term investing

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 2>for American families. Robin Vinz, the BNY CEO, writing, we're

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 2>bringing together the Administration's vision and leadership, Robin Hood's digital accessibility,

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 2>and bn wise infrastructure. Robin and place to say, joined

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 2>the SIN Studio for more, Robin and Monarch, It's great

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 2>to be with you. This is a very cool day.

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 2>So let's spend some time on this. So you do

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 2>the back end and Robin Hood does the front end.

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, with a financial manager, and Robinhood is bringing all

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 7>of their expertise in the front end as you point

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:17.839
<v Speaker 7>out the app. And don't forget the National Design Studio

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 7>as well, because they've partnered with the Treasury Department, with BNY,

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 7>with Robinhood to make sure as part of the administration's

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 7>push to make services more accessible and easier to use

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 7>in the US.

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 3>What are sign up's like right now? Ahead of this?

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:34.359
<v Speaker 7>So five million accounts people indicated interest in the IRS

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 7>form forty five forty seven, So that was the first

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 7>step you had to actually register interest. And once you've

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 7>done that, you can go to trumpaccount dot com, which

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 7>will actually then take you to the app Store, and

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 7>then as the app store rankings grow, you'll see it

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:50.279
<v Speaker 7>easily pop up on the app stores, and then you

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 7>can download the app, and then you can actually register

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 7>and actually put the rest of the information get up

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 7>and going. Now, the actual program for investing the money

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:02.599
<v Speaker 7>does actually launch until July fourth, So these are ready

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 7>set moves ahead of the full go of July fourth.

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:08.479
<v Speaker 5>What does this mean for the future of B and Y.

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 5>Will you make money off of this or this is

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 5>solely for the public good?

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 6>Well, we believe in the program.

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 7>I think that's really if you step back from this

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 7>whole thing, what is the public policy? So the administration

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 7>really deserves a lot of credit President Trump, Secretary Bust

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 7>in particular the leadership of the Treasury Department in driving

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 7>this forward. That actually creates the framework to be able

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 7>to have everyone in America be able to participate in growth.

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 7>And so we provide as a company a bunch of

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 7>different services to the US government. We do it at

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 7>the state level, the local level, and at the federal level.

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 7>And so for us, we're frankly just proud to be

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 7>able to participate in this. Of course, as part of

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 7>providing the service, we're doing a bunch of different things,

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 7>So a robin hood, but it's the public policy that

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 7>we are most focused on.

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Here.

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 6>What else have we done well?

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 7>We were the first financial firm to actually offer matching

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 7>in to the program.

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 6>So remember how it works.

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 7>Everyone get who kid who's born in America, the parent

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 7>or guardian get to be able to put a thousand

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 7>bucks in if they want it's matching, or they can

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 7>put additional money. The government's going to put a thousand

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 7>bucks in. Employers can match. We've matched with the program,

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 7>and then we're really leveraging the power of compounding. And

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 7>this is the magic of the program. Just let's do

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 7>the math for a second two thousand bucks in right

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 7>at the beginning, a thousand bucks from the government, and

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 7>let's take the example of a B and Y employee,

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:32.319
<v Speaker 7>a thousand bucks from us. Now you've got two thousand bucks.

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 7>You compound that with the historic rate of return in

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:37.320
<v Speaker 7>the stock market over the past thirty years. Compound that

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 7>for the next thirty years, and in thirty years that

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 7>kid will have forty thousand bucks. Now if the parent

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 7>added just another ten bucks a week into the same program,

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 7>ten bucks a week that they're putting into that same account,

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 7>Now you'd have one hundred and forty thousand bucks at

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 7>the end of thirty years. Now that's real money. That's

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 7>participation in the American Dream. And I think that's the

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 7>program vision that the administration and the Treasury.

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 5>Sounds like almost an incentive to have a child in

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 5>America at this point. But when you think about post

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 5>Trunk twenty twenty eight, does this have longevity? Will it continue?

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:11.559
<v Speaker 5>Say a democratic president won?

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:13.559
<v Speaker 6>I think great public policy.

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 7>And again, stepping back from it, what is the policy

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 7>the American Dream? And what a time to be thinking

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 7>about this, the two hundred and fiftieth of America. The

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 7>American Dream is one of the things that's fueled this

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 7>country over the course of the past two hundred and

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 7>fifty years. But we have a problem, which is not

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 7>everyone is participating in the American Dream. And so now

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 7>you're talking about taking the forty percent of people in

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 7>America who have zero stake in the equity markets and

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 7>actually making them stakeholders in the American Dream and doing

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 7>it from birth. So the ability to do that, to

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 7>be able to grow, compound, participate, learn how to invest,

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 7>learn how to be part of the capital system that

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 7>we actually have. That's a really important piece of public policy,

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 7>and so none of us can predict the future. But

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:03.559
<v Speaker 7>this has been a bipartisan effort from the start. There

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:06.680
<v Speaker 7>have been folks on both sides of the aisle who've

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 7>joined into this. There have been wealthy philanthropists like Michael

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 7>and Susan Dell who said they're going to match employers

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:15.559
<v Speaker 7>like us are matching. I'd encourage all employers in America

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 7>who are able to do so, to be able to

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:22.079
<v Speaker 7>offer matching to that initial seed investment, and collectively, if

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 7>we can increase this participation, we're really growing participation in

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 7>the American dream. And I think that is why it's

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 7>a great piece of public policy, and so I really

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 7>hope that to see it be able to continue.

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 1>It also potentially improves the delta between people who feel

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>really disenchanted by Wall Street and feel like Wall Street's.

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 6>Really let them down.

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 1>As a number of people get very wealthy and they

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 1>aren't necessarily getting wealthy. I just wonder what the guardrails point. Yeah,

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>so try to say that, well, you can participate too.

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely, what sort of American dream is that if we

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 7>have a bunch of people who aren't participating in it.

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I just wonder the ideal versus the reality. When I

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>think about a robin Hood account, and then I think

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>about a teenager or some kid who has access to it,

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I think about my own experience, which is essentially it's

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>very high end gambling, but essentially gambling, right, I mean

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>it's essentially turning into trying to pick winners and losers.

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>How do you know that that's not going to be

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 1>leading to people going and saying we're going all in

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>on gamestap here's your future.

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think this is the key to the design

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 7>if you step back and think about what is it

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 7>the Secretary Berston and the Treasury Department. When you actually

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 7>get into the brass tax of how it works. You're

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 7>talking about custodial account. So for the right to start with,

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 7>the kid can't touch it until after they turn eighteen,

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 7>so there's no opportunity to be able to take the

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 7>money out and go and spend recklessly.

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 6>Not once they become eighteen.

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 7>As the law of the land, they become they own

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 7>their own future to some extent. Gives up by the way,

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 7>but up until then it's primarily about index funds. So

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 7>that initial investment will be index funds only, so people

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:49.959
<v Speaker 7>aren't having to make choice about individual stocks. They're participating

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 7>in the US stock market, They're participating in the growth

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 7>of the economy.

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:56.079
<v Speaker 6>And that's actually the design principle at work here.

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 2>You've got to acknowledge where the yellow trade comes from.

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 2>The yellow trade comes from this idea that they're not participating,

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 2>that the only way to benefit from this economy because

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:07.439
<v Speaker 2>they feel frozen out from the gains, is to take

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 2>these high stakes risks. So in some ways, this is

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 2>a long term goal to do something about the kind

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:14.359
<v Speaker 2>of thing that you're complaining.

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 1>About and potentially equalize people who feel completely less about

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and are earning minimum wage as other people do nothing

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and watch their money grow and create income. And this

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 1>is sort of the gap that you need to bridge

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>in order to create a little bit more of you know,

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the market and the economy can move a little more together.

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Rob and I just feel like we're losing the argument

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 2>at the moment. The arguments on the left and the

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 2>more populist argument seem to be winning this moment. We

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 2>see this in our UK, the shift towards the left

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 2>and the politics of labor. More recently, we see it

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 2>here in New York City, the heart of capitalism, and

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 2>a socialist mayor got elected in this city. What else

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 2>needs to be done to counter some of that, to

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 2>make sure that people recognize the benefit of free markets

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 2>and capitalism. The very idea that we've seen this mass

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 2>affluence in this country's free because of those things.

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think it is about inclusion ultimately and having

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 7>people be able to participate. So let's go back for

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 7>a second to this concept of the American dream and

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 7>let's define it. What actually makes up the American dream.

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 7>I'm an immigrant into the US. I've lived here for

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 7>twenty five years and like very excited to be able

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:20.959
<v Speaker 7>to be part of this. And if you think about

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 7>folks here in the US, what do they aspire to.

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 7>They aspire for a great life for their family. They

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 7>want to be able to have a great education, they

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 7>want to be able to grow, they want to be

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 7>able to have their own home. And so what I

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 7>think Trump accounts represent is one piece of the American dream,

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 7>which is the ability to have a stake in the country,

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 7>a stake in the capitalist system. And so to your point,

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:47.559
<v Speaker 7>it helps to include that forty percent of people who

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 7>today don't but there are more things. It's not by

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 7>itself the solution. Financial education matters a lot. That is

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 7>actually part of the app if you actually look at

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:58.839
<v Speaker 7>the Trump account app financial education, because we've got to

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 7>recognize that saving investing, starting.

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 6>Early, compounding.

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 7>You were just having that conversation the value of money

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 7>over time and the value of what it means if

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 7>you start early does make a difference.

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 6>But housing matters as well.

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 7>Owning your own home over the past fifty years has

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 7>really become part of what a lot of people define

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 7>as owning the America, being part of the American dream,

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 7>and being able to enjoy that. So as a company,

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 7>we've taken a step in that direction. About a month ago,

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 7>we announced a new program at BNY which is to

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 7>help people get that first step on the ladder. If

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 7>you work for us and you earn less than one

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 7>hundred thousand bucks, we will actually give and you're buying

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 7>your home, first home, we will give you the equivalent

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 7>of five thousand bucks after tax to be able to

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 7>help you with your down payment. The average home in

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 7>America median price about four hundred thousand bucks. Our largest

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 7>office is actually in Pittsburgh. The median price is about

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 7>two hundred and fifty three hundred thousand bucks. We've got

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 7>a huge at one of our largest growing offices is

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 7>down in Florida. There the medium price about four hundred

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 7>thousand bucks. The average down payment for that type of

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 7>home call it about thirty thousand bucks. Now, are there

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 7>government assistance programs for first time owners that are available?

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 7>And so depending on where you are, that might be teny, fifteen,

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 7>even twenty thousand bucks assistance, but you're still left with

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 7>a gap ten fifteen thousand bucks. So for us, that

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 7>five thousand dollars is bridging either fifty percent or a

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 7>third of their gap for the prospective homeowner, so they

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 7>can get their step on the property journey of the

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 7>American dream. So those things really matter. Now we're doing

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 7>that with Bank of America, who's our partner. They're providing

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 7>subsidized mortgages to our own employees.

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 3>He's figure on this, I know he is.

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 7>And he's also leading on this point, which is leaning

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 7>into the topic how can we actually help financial education?

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 7>So if you can give people through the Trump accounts

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 7>a staking capitalism over time so that they're part of

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 7>it and don't want to have to throw stones at

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 7>it and you give people a leg up on the

0:15:56.720 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 7>property dream. Now that's include and bringing people along the journey.

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 7>And I think again back to America two fifty, What

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 7>a time to be focusing on this.

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us. More Bloomberg surveillance coming up after this.

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 2>We begin this hour stocks edging lower as investors grow

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 2>cautious over and enter the war. Kady commits give out

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 2>for simplex writing. Despite the recent rally inequity markets, there

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 2>is clear fatigue over the continued conflict in the Middle East.

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Katie joins us. Now for more, Katie, welcome to the program.

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's just dissect the bond market sell off, the individual

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 2>drivers of it. What's been driving your tire?

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 8>Well, this is a good question because what we have

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 8>really seen, and I want to point this out, and

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 8>I really liked what Lisa said, is that you've seen

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 8>the bond market get ahead. So the bond market has

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 8>been selling off pretty aggressively since the geopolitical risk sort

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 8>of got into the market. We have seen some retracement

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 8>more recent in terms of yields coming back down. So

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 8>people thinking that some of this inflation uncertainty is going away.

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 8>But today just sort of reiterates that it's not gone yet,

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:13.439
<v Speaker 8>so we're kind of seeing that come back again today.

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:15.119
<v Speaker 8>So you can see that right in the chart that

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 8>you yields have gone up substantially on inflation concerns, but

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 8>that hasn't dissipated yet.

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Do you think we're overestimating the potential for yields to

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 2>fall on a resolution in Iran? Is there more to

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 2>this move up than just the Middle East?

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:32.439
<v Speaker 3>That's a good question.

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:35.440
<v Speaker 8>I think the positioning of the FED relative to other

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 8>central banks is also important. So if you look at

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:41.120
<v Speaker 8>where the US is sitting and how much higher US

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 8>rates are, that matters.

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 6>But also the fact.

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:47.119
<v Speaker 8>That other markets outside the United States is pricing in

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 8>things like hikes that does complicate sort of the relative

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 8>positioning of the US FED and sort of add on

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:54.680
<v Speaker 8>top of that sort of a.

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 3>Changing FED dynamic.

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 8>So I do think it's not just inflation, it's also

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 8>figuring out how monetary policy is going to be set

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 8>in a new FMC.

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 1>This is a great point, Katie. How much is a

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 1>move that we're seeing in bonds in the United States

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>have more to do with Japan and Europe frankly than

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>it does the United States.

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:14.119
<v Speaker 3>I think there's a mix.

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 8>I mean, just given how much bond moves have priced

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 8>outcuts and moved towards a higher chance of hikes. If

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:24.120
<v Speaker 8>you look outside the US, for example, the ECV or Japan,

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 8>even also Australia, you start to see a much bigger

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 8>shift globally towards a potential for hikes. And that means

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 8>that overall, across all regions, that there's more of a

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 8>chance of hikes, which could put pressure on the FED.

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:43.359
<v Speaker 8>But remember US rates are higher, so that means that

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 8>we have less need to move as quickly as other regions.

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 1>You follow trends, and you follow some of the momentum

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing in different technical readings across the market,

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and I wonder how much we've seen a breakdown between

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>yields going up and stocks responding in any way, shape

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>or form. I mean, how to course is this relative

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to history when the common mantra was when yields went up,

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>stocks went down, risk assets used to wabble, especially if

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>it was coming with some mixed readings on a consumer appetite.

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 8>So I love that you asked this question, because we

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 8>look at short term correlations between stocks and bonds and

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 8>whenever inflation is the key driver of stock bond movements,

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:25.920
<v Speaker 8>you tend to see positive COO movement or positive correlation.

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 8>And we have seen consistent positive correlation between stocks and

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 8>bonds since March.

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 6>It is not unprecedented.

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 8>We've been seeing that since particularly twenty twenty two. And

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:39.920
<v Speaker 8>it's just the point that stocks and bonds or bonds

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 8>basically do not provide a hedge during periods when inflation

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 8>is a persistent risk, and geopolitical risk is a key

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:51.159
<v Speaker 8>driver of inflation uncertainty. So I think for now bonds

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 8>are going to be much trickier for investors to deal with.

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 8>And until we see this inflation pulse go through and

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:00.400
<v Speaker 8>we figure out how much oil pigher oil prices change.

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:03.920
<v Speaker 8>Is the inflation dynamic. You can't count on bonds when

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 8>things are tough. At some point though.

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 5>Well what's going on in the conflict, and the inflation

0:20:08.600 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 5>driver start to hit equities at all.

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 8>It should at some point, because how I see geopolitical

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 8>risk is that initially it becomes an inflation impulse, which

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 8>is a stressor to bonds. But at the point where

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 8>we start to see that we need to have tightening,

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 8>we need to have we start to see an effect

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 8>on growth, that's when you start to see that the

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 8>equity markets will react. We have seen the equity markets

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 8>react to higher yields this month, so that might be

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:38.200
<v Speaker 8>an indication that there is starting to be some concern

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 8>about higher yields actually being a negative driver for equities.

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:45.199
<v Speaker 5>At Lisa Johnathan talking about all morning, likely we're going

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 5>to see the FED remove the easing bias. Would that

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:49.959
<v Speaker 5>be something that could be a catalyst for this equity

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 5>market Maybe it's to go to be softer or is

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:53.119
<v Speaker 5>it already baked in?

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I think I would kind of assume that

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 8>it's somewhat baked in at this point.

0:20:59.080 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 3>I do think it is.

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.920
<v Speaker 8>It's very interesting that they haven't removed it, just given

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 8>where we are in the current geopolitical landscape. I mean,

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 8>just the idea that you could cut rates in a

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:12.199
<v Speaker 8>period where you have a huge oil spike. It just

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:15.160
<v Speaker 8>kind of already puts the FED in a neutral stance already.

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 8>So I think some of it is already baked in,

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 8>But there's always room for surprise where you could actually

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 8>see that maybe this conflict accelerates more or you have

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 8>sort of more of a chance that that could be

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:28.919
<v Speaker 8>even less of a case that you are going to

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:31.679
<v Speaker 8>have a resolution that could be more negative for bots.

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Survendment's podcast, bringing you the best

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 2>in markets, economics, antient politics. You can watch the show

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:42.199
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg TV weekday mornings from six am to

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 2>nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify,

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:48.440
<v Speaker 2>or anywhere else you listen, and as always, on the

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app.