WEBVTT - U.S. Needs to Move Fast and Appoint a Czar to Puerto Rico, Rhodes Says

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot Com. I

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>am very pleased to welcome to the eleven three oh

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Studios Banker to the World, Bill Rhodes, President, chief executive

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 1>Officer of william Our Rhodes Global Advisors, also author of

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>a book, Banker to the World's Leadership Lessons from the

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 1>front Lines of Global Finance, with a forward by Paul Volker.

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Vocal Bill, I would love to get started with the

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>big question about China and North Korea right now in

0:00:56.800 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>markets UH, there is a perception that in general, traders

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>are underestimating the degree of risk with respect to North Korea,

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 1>the prospect of a conflict there, as well as with

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>China its response to that, as well as its ability

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to rein in its own UH situation with an inflated

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 1>credit market. From your perspective, how dire is this situation

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of developing in the region, and what's the

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>what's the best path forward here? Well, I think it's

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the biggest single problem we face in the world today, UH,

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and the only one that really can can help us

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>solve this UH is China, and China is right on

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the cusp of the biggest conference, the biggest political event

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>in the last five years, which is their nineteenth Party Congress,

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>which begins on the eighteenth of October. Because the President

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>of China, Hi Jinping, who is as strong as leader

0:01:54.880 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>of China since Dong Jo Ping, UH, is planning to

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>make a number of announcements, including who is going to

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>be on the Polar Bureau of the Standing Committee of

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:08.919
<v Speaker 1>the Polar Buro which runs the country, and there's a

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of speculation that he may make some changes there

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>even to the premiership of Li Kao Chong, not clear

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the rumors to that effect. And the person that's closest

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:21.919
<v Speaker 1>to him is Once sh Shan, who I know well

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>from over the years, who is now leading in a

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>corruption campaign and people are watching that very closely. So

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>she Jumping does not want any problems to disturb this,

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>so he is very unhappy with what Kim jong un

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:39.399
<v Speaker 1>is doing in Korea because this is making it very

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 1>difficult for China because people are leaning on China, mostly

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the United States and President Trump to do something about

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>stopping Kim Jong un from continuing to conduct nuclear tests

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:56.119
<v Speaker 1>and ballistic missile test because what he wants to do

0:02:56.720 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 1>is to marry the ballistic missile UH at the nuclear

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:05.359
<v Speaker 1>warhead and threatened the United States, Japan, whatever, And so

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the question is how do you stop them? And in

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:10.640
<v Speaker 1>my mind, the sanctions that have been agreed upon at

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the United Nations are helpful, but they're not a solution

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and they take time. We know that from what happened

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>in Iran, South Africa, they don't happen overnight. So what

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:23.799
<v Speaker 1>is necessary and what can stop Kim Jong un from

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>this and bring him to the table to negotiate, which

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>is what we would like to do, is to cut

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>off all his oil and gas supplies because the primary

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>user of oil and gas in North Korea or the

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>armed forces, and I think if we cut, if China

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>cuts off, which is gives them eight of their oil

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and gas UH at any particular moment, they will come

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>to the table within a couple of weeks. The only

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>other oil and gas are getting is from Russia, maybe

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>ten through brokers in Southeast Asia. Other than that, I

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>do not think that the banking uh you know, the

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>banking measures taken on sanctions or any of the others

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>are going to work. I think the only thing that

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>will work is to cut off the oil supplies, and

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:16.720
<v Speaker 1>China is the key to doing that. I think that

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:19.159
<v Speaker 1>if we don't badger them too much, and you know,

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>do quiet diplomacy with him, I think, uh, you know,

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>all these statements going back and forth are not helpful.

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I think some quiet diplomacy will do it because Shi

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Jin Pain does not want his great moment of glory

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>to be affected by what's going on by Kim Jong oon.

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I've been with him at one occasion four or five

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>years ago, and he made it very plain to me

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 1>that and the Chinese think this in general, that Kim

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Jong un is a pain in the neck. But the

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:48.600
<v Speaker 1>reason they haven't intervened and done anything earlier is they

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>do not want American influence on the Yellow That's why, uh,

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Chinese invaded North Korea to support uh

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the then government of Kim Il sung was because we

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 1>had we had sent troops in the Korean War right

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:06.919
<v Speaker 1>to the Yallow River. It was one of McArthur's mistakes.

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:09.599
<v Speaker 1>He underestimated the Chinese would go in. And the other

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>thing is if the regime collapses overnight, they're concerned about

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>all the refugees that may go into Manchuria Northern China.

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>But the Chinese do not like Kim jongun. They think

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 1>he's difficult, he's causing a problem, and particularly at this

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>great moment of importance for Shi Jin Pain. That's why

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>he's gone along with the earlier sanctions. But the only

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>one that will bring Uh Kim Jong un to the

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>table is to cut off all oil and gas supplies

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>to the country, and that will completely destabilize the military

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:46.359
<v Speaker 1>because they can't function without oil and gas. We're speaking

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:48.720
<v Speaker 1>with Bill Rhodes. He is the author of Banker to

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the World, Leadership Lessons from the front Lines of Global Finance.

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>And Bill, I want to turn your attention now to

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 1>the Caribbean and Venezuela and Puerto Rico, because I know

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 1>that you are died your distinguished career at City Bank

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>in Venezuela. You know the Caribbean region very well. You

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 1>can vice Chairman of of City corps. What can you

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>tell us about the region as a result of these hurricanes,

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and specifically what is necessary or what is possible rather

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>to fix the horrendous and catastrophic conditions that currently exist,

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 1>not only in Puerto Rico, but in many of these

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>live in Jamaica for a while also, so I remember it.

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:34.679
<v Speaker 1>But I think the situation Puerto Rico's is particularly dire.

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>You have to remember that this is an island or

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:41.719
<v Speaker 1>country because it's part of the United States. Uh, that

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>is basically in bankruptcy. That's a starter. When you take

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a look at Florida and Texas, say booming economies. Second

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 1>of all, they're isolated because they're an island, so you

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>can't take the railroads down like you were even in

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Katrina or or you know, or Texas or Florida. Everything

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>has to be flown in or sent in by ship. Uh.

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>They also have had a terrible zekea epidemic there, and

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>of course with all this water laying down, the mesqu

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>is going to go wild. A lot of people are

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 1>concerned about Colra. I think it is a dire situation.

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I think to try and compare it to the earlier

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>hurricanes is a big mistake. Uh, And we have to

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>move fast, very fast there or I think it's going

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>to be a complete debacle. In addition to all of this,

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>some of the leading talent of Puerto Rico has migrated

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to Florida in the last seven or eight years because

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>of the dire economic situation. You have four hundred thousand

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>uh Puerto Ricans living in Florida, most of have come

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>in the last decade. And what are the teachers? Uh, Doctors, lawyers,

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>architects are the cream of the crop that have left.

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>And so uh, you know, the island has been just

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>neuted of all of these of all of this expertise.

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that what we need to do

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>is put a czar down there, so like we did

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the general in in you know, in New Orleans, to

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>make sure that the aid gets there and it gets

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>there quickly. Who would you recommend to do that? And

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>what's the likelihood that we get a person who then

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>becomes responsible for making sure that these plans are carried

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>out and that people get the healthy Well, you see

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the problem. You have a governor. But the problem with

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the governor is he doesn't control what's going in All

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>he can do is control the island, so you need

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>someone who's there for the supplies. We can do it.

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>We should have learned that with Haiti. You gotta put

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, Bush may have screwed up at the beginning

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 1>uh in New Orleans, but he least he put in

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>a three star general got the thing moving well. I

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:41.839
<v Speaker 1>feel like you're talking about the flight of talent, and

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>they're about three and a half million people who currently

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 1>live on the island. The population has been shrinking rapidly.

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 1>How much more do you expect the population to shrink

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>in light of this humanitarian disaster? And how will that

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>affect the current negotiations of over the seventy four billion

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>dollars of death. The latest senses down there says three

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:02.320
<v Speaker 1>point four million. I think it's less than that because

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>they're not taking into account the number of people that

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>already left gone to Florida, you know, the talent pool.

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:10.679
<v Speaker 1>I said, so, uh, I think that you're going to

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:12.959
<v Speaker 1>have additional people leave, and you have all these small

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 1>towns through the mountains that that are cut off. I've

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>been talking to people down there, and really it's it's terrible.

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Hospitals don't have electricity to function. Um, and so we

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>have to make a much more massive effort I think

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that we've ever had to before in any of these

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>hurricanes because of the situation of the island. It would

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>be great if they were a booming economy. Uh and

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 1>uh uh you know they have been able to plan

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 1>for this, etcetera. So I think it's a very dire situation.

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think everything uh that can be done on

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a federal level by the United States, but also on

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a private level of companies that operate there, do whatever.

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Because people have to remember these are United States citizens.

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Their their soldiers for in World War One, World War two,

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the Korean War, in Vietnam, and you know some of

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:10.560
<v Speaker 1>them also fighting in Iraq Afghanistan. So we owe it

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to these people. And it's not like some far off place,

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you know. And and sometimes I get upset with some

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>members of depressed obviously not Bloomberg because you know the

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>importance of this, but others who kind of don't make

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a big thing of this. They say, well, it's just

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>another hurricane, and you know, that's some island off there,

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and they're not a state and all of this, which

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>is one of the ultimate solutions. I think statehood at

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 1>some point in time has to come there so they

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:41.320
<v Speaker 1>can basically integrate themselves more and get more in, you know,

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>in the way of help that the states are able

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to get. Uh. So uh, hopefully these issues will be forced.

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully we will do what's necessary here because otherwise, you know,

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 1>when we talk about all of these problems around the

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 1>world and stuff, we've got to think that we have

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous problem on our front door with Puerto Rico.

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say, what what about would would Jeb Bush?

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you think would he be a good person to

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>lead the reconstruction and revitalization of of Puerto Rico? I mean,

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 1>former governor of Florida, speaks fluent Spanish. I mean you

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>need somebody like that who's getting to get down there.

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I had mentioned a military man just because we had

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that in in New Orleans. But someone who can mobilize

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the administration and mobilize the whole government on the federal level,

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>but also you know, work closely with the governor on

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 1>domestic side, and also get the private sector, you know,

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>to be involved there. I think it's a critical must.

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>And hopefully when the President gets down there, he's gonna

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 1>see this. But you know time is passing. Bill Rhodes,

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:49.679
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. Really a pleasure

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to hear your thoughts, very insightful. Bill Rhodes is President,

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:56.079
<v Speaker 1>chief executive officer of William R. Rhodes Global Advisors, also

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 1>author of Banker to the World's Leadership Lessons from the

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>front Lines of Global finance. As the Federal Reserve talks

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 1>about reducing its balance sheet and as people look around markets,

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 1>some are getting increasingly concerned about financial stability, saying that

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:26.559
<v Speaker 1>all of the extra liquidity in markets set it up

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>for a massive fall. Here to weigh in on that,

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:32.719
<v Speaker 1>as Sheila Bear, former chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Also currently she is the president of Washington College, and

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>she joined us from our Washington, d C studio. Sheila,

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. I'd love to

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 1>get your take on the state of financial stability right

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>now and how concerned you are about the excessive liquidity

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and what can be done about that. Well, yes, it's

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a global problem. I mean financial assets. I

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>think about now of global GDP. There's a lot of

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>stocks and bonds out there, many multiples of what real

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the real economy would represent and it is de stabilizing it.

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:16.079
<v Speaker 1>It's looking for return, it's looking for a place to invest,

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and that creates asset bubbles. Uh and UH. The very

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>low interest rates also create obviously incentives to to borrow

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and taking a lot of leverage. That's one of the

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>reasons why we have so many financial assets now. So

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 1>it's the globe eclonomy really is a washing investment dollars

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>far greater than the opportunity for real economic investments. And

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:41.199
<v Speaker 1>that's why I'm so amused by this tax reform I think,

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I hope it's tax reform uh debate, because the suggestion

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:47.959
<v Speaker 1>that we need to incentivize even more investment dollars by

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>giving investor at tax breaks is something that I really

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:54.719
<v Speaker 1>just think is is counterintuitive, given as you say, we're

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a washing liquidity right now already. Well, maybe you could

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>just give us your thoughts on at least this specifics

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>as we know them. That the rate on corporations would

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>be set at that's down from the current thirty five,

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and that corporations would be allowed to immediately right off

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>their capital spending for at least five years. Yeah. Yeah, Well,

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I think there is some basis in terms of competitiveness

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of doing the business in the US, our corporate rates

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 1>are are not competitive, so I and I think there's

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>bipartisan support for that. So that doesn't bother me so much.

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>What really does bother me is the discussion of reducing

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the past through rate. That would be a huge well

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen the details. That would be a huge

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 1>benefit to private equity funds and hedge funds, which have

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>already uh, you know, really been able to cash in

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>in uh this uh so called recovery that's been heavily

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>driven by monetary policy, which has made it very cheap

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>for them to borrow and invest. It's also because safe

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>assets return provide such a low return. A lot of

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>people and and funds have endowment, college endowments, pensions, what

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>have you have piled into alternative investments the kind that

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>p funds and hedge funds offer, which is also benefited them.

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>So this idea that somehow we need to give them

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>more breaks, I don't I really don't understand that. And

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>uh to the extent we're talking about, you know, I

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>think people are saying, well, we don't want to give

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>more tax picts to the rich, but the rich seemed

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to be defined as wage earners, not those who make

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 1>their money from investment income. And that's really where the

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>super wealthy reside. That that top point one percent that's

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 1>done so well and this more been the recovery is

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>in that sweet spot. And to to give them this idea,

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, reducing the pass through rate is going to

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 1>benefit small business. Yes, there will be some small businesses

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that benefit, and we haven't seen the numbers yet, but

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>my guess as a line share, the benefit will go

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 1>to the hedge funds and p funds, and that's just counterintuitive.

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>So she from from what it sounds like to me,

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>you don't think that any kind of tax reformer, tax

0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>plan that's currently being proposed will substantially boost economic growth

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>in a way that will help the entire economy. Well,

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I think I think there's an argument for lowering the

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>corporate rate. We need to pay for it. We are

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 1>not overtaxed as a country. I get, Actually, the percentage

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 1>of taxes as are you know, all in federal, state,

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>local tax as a percentage of GDP is actually pretty

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 1>low compared to other developed countries. The problem here is

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the distribution and UH and UH the you know, the

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>highly inefficient favoritism and tax breaks and loopholes that the

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>code provides. So I think anything should be revenue neutral.

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I think taking the top rate down, which typically for corporations,

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 1>which typically is paid by the smaller companies. They don't

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>have the you know, the ability to move stuff overseas

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>or or have armies of tax lawyers to write special

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>breaks for them the tax code. That makes sense, but

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>you should broaden the base by paying for it. And yeah,

0:16:56.960 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I absolutely think that makes sense. Going to a territorial

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 1>system makes the tax code. The corporate code does give

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>affirmative obligations to move to move business and rep income overseas.

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:09.920
<v Speaker 1>So going to a territorial system, getting the top right

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 1>down to be more competitive, and finding a way to

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>pay for that through broadening the brace, I think that

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 1>could help the economy. Won't you won't take it up

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 1>to six percent, probably wouldn't even take it up with

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a three percent, but it certainly could help. And then

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>a middle a true middle class tax cut would make

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sense. Again, there's so much investment dollars,

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>somebody investment dollars slashing around already, the problems on the

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 1>demand side. This hasn't trickled down middle income and lower

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>income families, which growth has been very sluggish, and the

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>bottom tier they're still losing ground. You see that, particularly

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>with minority families, And you know, it's the right thing

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to do, but it's also the economically smart thing to do,

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:49.680
<v Speaker 1>because that's you know, they spend their income and they've

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>been struggling, and that hurts the broader economy too. So

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>providing real relief and additional spending power for the true

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:58.679
<v Speaker 1>middle class and lower middle class makes a lot of sense.

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:01.680
<v Speaker 1>But giving more tax breaks to very wealthy people that

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:05.239
<v Speaker 1>already paying rates already through cured interest or what have you,

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:08.399
<v Speaker 1>this makes no sense at all. Thanks very much. Sheila

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Bear is the former chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Well,

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're an investor in Bombardier, the Canadian maker of

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>aircraft and trains, you're having a very bad day because

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the stock is down more than eight and a half

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>percented open down more than six and this has to

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>do with its C series jet and a tariff of

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:43.160
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and twenty percent that the United States has

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>leveled against Bombardier to sell those planes into the United States.

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:50.719
<v Speaker 1>Here to tell us more is Andrew Mayetta. He's our

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg trade reporter. He joins US from Washington, and joining

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:57.959
<v Speaker 1>us from Edinburgh, Scotland is George Ferguson. He's our senior Aerospace,

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Defense and Airlines analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. Andrew, let's begin

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:04.399
<v Speaker 1>with you if you could just lay out exactly what

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 1>happened and why. Sure, So, Boeing brought a complaint in

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:14.399
<v Speaker 1>the US against the Bardier on two fronts. Basically, they

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 1>alleged that the Bardier has been receiving unfair government subsidies

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 1>for years from the Canadian government, from the Quebec government,

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and also that they've been trying to sell their C

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>series small passenger jet into the US at less than

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:38.959
<v Speaker 1>fair market value. And so this was the first ruling

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 1>by the Commerce Department. It's preliminary, as you said, it's

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>levi dad or rate of two UH. Customs will will

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 1>begin to collect those um. The final ruling will probably

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 1>come from the International Trade Commission next year when it

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>determines how much harm Boeing suffered. So, George, come on

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>in here. We see the Bombardier shares are down massively today,

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>nearly ten. How long lasting could this potential hit be

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>four Bombardier, So I think it could last quite a while.

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:20.199
<v Speaker 1>So that I think the challenge here really is that

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 1>Delta was a good portion of the order book, and

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I think a very important order because along with Left

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Hans and there's two large, well respected airlines operating the airplane.

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I think given this ruling, I think it's going to

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 1>be hard to sell to any other US airlines. I

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna be hard to deliver to Delta and

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>pay the pay the duty um. And I think that

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:43.879
<v Speaker 1>really puts a big portion of the order book in

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:47.880
<v Speaker 1>question here. So I think without Bombardier bringing more orders

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to the table in the near term, I think it's

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:53.679
<v Speaker 1>going to hurt the hurt the stocks and significantly here George,

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the seventy five jet order for Delta, right, Yeah,

0:20:57.000 --> 0:21:00.680
<v Speaker 1>they have a seventy order with a fifty option. Uh

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, so so they could be up to a

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>five about three fifty orders. But there's other challenges in

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:10.159
<v Speaker 1>the order book as well that we could talk to,

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>but maybe not enough time in this car. Well, I well,

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:14.719
<v Speaker 1>I was just gonna go on and say that, you know,

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not only workers in Canada that may suffer as

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 1>a result of this. Bombardier has a plan to Northern Ireland, correct,

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 1>but they do, they do. You Know. The thing is, though,

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>if I think if we start getting into the ripple

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>ramifications here, you're going to find that Boeing has plenty

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:34.199
<v Speaker 1>of plants around the world, and they're definitely suppliers in

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:37.119
<v Speaker 1>the UK that they could point to as well to

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:39.119
<v Speaker 1>say that there'd be a ripple effect on them. So

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's not going to go as far

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>as Bombardier may may may want. Canada probably has more

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>pulled given their you know, they purchased defense U S

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:53.159
<v Speaker 1>Defense equipment as well, so the Canadian discussion might be

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better. But I think the global global

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>parts supply stream is not going to help them that

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 1>much here. Andrew, how long has this action by the

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 1>U S. Commerce Department been in the works and was

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>this expected? Yeah, they brought the complaint in April, and

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I would say that this is h This was expected

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:21.119
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking, when the International Trade Commission finds on a

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:26.880
<v Speaker 1>preliminary basis that a company probably suffered injury, UH Commerce

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:29.919
<v Speaker 1>usually just applies a formula to determine what the preliminary

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 1>duties are going to be. Again, the key decision is

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 1>going to come next year when the International Trade Commission.

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Besides whether Boeing is really injured here and you know

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna way Bombardi's argument, a Bartier's argument is that

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Boeing wasn't even really competing for these for these uh

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 1>for this this uh this delta order. They're saying that,

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, Boeing kind of the facto excited that segment,

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>So how could they have suffered harm? So here's my question.

0:22:57.280 --> 0:23:00.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just on the surface, it seems like is

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>connected or will be connected to some of the NAFTA

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 1>renegotiations and just the ongoing tension between the US and

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Canada and the trade partnership. There is that a misreading

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:15.679
<v Speaker 1>of this. No, I think that that's bang on. Actually,

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned that I was in d C. I'm actually

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>an Ottawa Act the NAFTA talks now, so this is

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:23.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of landing like a grenade in the middle of

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the talks. And you know, as George alluded to, UH,

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:31.399
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister Trudeau has threatened not to buy Boeing c

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 1>c F E teens UH if if if it doesn't

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 1>drop the Bombardia case. So, I mean we've talked a

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit about what a trade war looks like. I mean,

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of what a low level trade war

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 1>looks like. You know, company brings a complaint in in

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:52.919
<v Speaker 1>an established forum, and then you know, the politicians come

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:55.879
<v Speaker 1>under a lot of pressure, like Prime Ministerture though is

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be under a lot of pressure right now

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 1>to deliver something of a Bartia. George in ten seconds,

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>do you agree that this is what a low grade

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:10.120
<v Speaker 1>trade war looks like? Sure? Andrewmeda, thank you so much

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. He's a trade reporter for Bloomberg News.

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Also George Ferguson, Senior Aerospace, Defense and Airlines analyst for

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. Definitely a fascinating issue and a salvo opened

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:27.880
<v Speaker 1>up amidst the ongoing NAFTA discussions. This will not be

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>received particularly well by the Canadians, certainly, and we will

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>wait for a response there well. Nike shares are down

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>nearly four percent today after earnings that were highly disappointing

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to to investors pretty broadly. To get him more details

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and why they were so disappointing, is Matt Townsend. He's

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 1>global business reporter for Bloomberg News and joins us in

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:04.239
<v Speaker 1>our eleven three oh studios. Mat. Uh, So, let's just

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:08.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about what the problem here is. As Nike laid out,

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the problem is the United States of America h Nike's

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 1>biggest market, Nike's biggest market. UM. If they're not growing

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 1>sales in the US, they're not basically growing overall, and

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>sales fail three in North America, which is most of

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the US. They said next quarter UM sales likely to

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:30.719
<v Speaker 1>fall again in the US or North America. So if

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you're a Nike investor, yes, overseas Asia is growing pretty well,

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>but if you don't get the home country growing, you're

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not you know, it's a struggle to invest in them.

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:43.160
<v Speaker 1>At this point. Is someone taking share from Nike? Of course, Yeah,

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 1>it's it's you know, Adidas. Uh, for the past two

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 1>years really has just been growing market share. Uh. Is

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that all the strength of all of their retro lots

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 1>of the retro is really strong because it is not

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>just athletic ware anymore, and this is you know, it's

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>casual where seven Yeah, I mean, sneakers are a fashion

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of staple nowadays people wear them to work. So

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:07.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, this idea that sneakers are just for people

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 1>doing sports, that's not true. And yes, so it's the

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 1>retro stuff, but it's also you know, they've had this

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 1>great success with a brand called Boost, which has gone

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>into many different forms. You know, Kanye West has a

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:21.360
<v Speaker 1>big Boost part of his business with Adidas, and they're

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 1>just there. If there's a if there's a war of

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>or coolness, Adidas is winning it right now, which is

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of surprising because Nike had that mantle for so

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:32.159
<v Speaker 1>long well, and it was because of the Air Jordan's, right,

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that was one big part of it, Air Jordan's.

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 1>But even even you know, some of their running shoes

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:39.680
<v Speaker 1>were immensely popular. It's just a regular shoe. I mean,

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.399
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's pretty striking. I mean, Nike did not

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>grow sales last quarter. They were flat, and they're basically

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:48.920
<v Speaker 1>saying we hope to revive growth in the second half.

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:51.679
<v Speaker 1>And when investors Investors Nailis asked them about this yesterday

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>on their call, they basically just said, the innovation pipeline,

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 1>it's great trust us. The things that are coming are

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 1>great trust trust. So that's the I mean, it's basically

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>you have to buy into the executives and their confidence.

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 1>And again Nike and all sort of their public interactions

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 1>are very confident still in the business. So you know,

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:13.879
<v Speaker 1>we'll see the second half is gonna be big. You know,

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned Adidas, or as Matt Miller of Bloomberg News

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>would say, uh, you know, it's it's sort of under

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>some pretty heavy scrutiny right now, just because the U. S.

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Attorney's Office in the Southern District of New York went

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>after the n c C Double A as well as Adidas, saying,

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:38.639
<v Speaker 1>you guys colluded to basically bribe coaches and schools to

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>use our products. I mean, could this potentially eat into

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Adidas's appeal and uh and frankly their bottom line potentially.

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Right now, analysts are not putting too much weight into it. Um.

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:53.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's been tons of scandals in college sports

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>involving brands that you know and who the effect on

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the bottom line was pretty minimal. But again, in this investigation,

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>there's definitely gonna be more shoes to drop, probably more

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 1>schools more. That's where you did that understated more schools.

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, the big question is do eventually the other

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:15.919
<v Speaker 1>brands get pulled into this because you know, Adidas was

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:21.360
<v Speaker 1>not the biggest player in signing American basketball players to contracts.

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 1>That's by far Nike is the biggest. Can you tell

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:28.680
<v Speaker 1>me about the possibility that Nike would actually buy something else?

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is it possible? Because I mean, you've got

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of competition at the high end, You've got

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of competition in the low end. Nike has

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the whole customizable, uh sort of franchise. But why don't

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 1>they go out and buy someone? I mean, you know,

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:44.959
<v Speaker 1>you look at what they've done in the past. That

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 1>was you know, for a while Converse worked, right, Chuck Taylor.

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 1>You've also got brands such as Jack Purcell. This is

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 1>a proliferation. Why don't they go out and buy somebody.

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 1>They decided a couple of years ago to double down

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 1>on the Nike brand. They sold off some of their

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 1>other brands, like they had a hockey band brand called

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Bauer Um. They had Khan actually several years ago that

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 1>they sat a private equity deal. Yeah, and but they're

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>basically saying the Nike brands are best brand has most

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>growth potential, So we're gonna focus on that now. You know,

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe things could change. Me, I haven't heard anything, am

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I reporting or you know that this could potentially be happening.

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 1>But the Nike brand is not as strong as it was,

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's part of the reason why the stock has

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 1>been depressed. You know, it is the worst performing stock

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>in the Dow last year for example. Well, Matt, how

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 1>much is this the death of fth leisure and them

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of suffering from that? Yeah, the death of ath leisure?

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's part of it. Um. You know, you think

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm just thinking that we've heard about it, but there's

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 1>a bubble for sure. Okay, But but I think for example,

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Lulu Lemon, I think of athletic, the Gap brand. In fact,

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be concentrating on that and getting rid

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of some Gap stores because that's what's selling. Yeah, I mean,

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the people have been speculating about this. ATHLETs are trend

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 1>dying down and a sort of cooling off. But for

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>sure that's hurtin Nike. And you know under arm or

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>two that more and more brands, non athletic brands, are

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 1>making athletic gear, So that's definitely a problem. Um. But

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean Nike, Nike's big issue is that

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 1>like I'm saying before, they were the coolest brand in

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:21.479
<v Speaker 1>the world forever, and now they've been challenged directly by

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Adidas on this and they need to respond. All right,

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to tell people about your collection of

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Stan smith sneakers there. I just want to point out

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe everybody's wearing sneakers to work, but nobody in this

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>office right now is wearing sneakers. I just want to

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 1>point that up, but go up. Thank you, well done.

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, our sartorial guide right there. Lisa Braunwait's all right,

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much. Matt Townsend, he's our global business reporter

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News talking about Nike two shares down about

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 1>two percent right now. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 1>P and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 1>interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa abramoits one before the podcast. You

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.