WEBVTT - And, This is More With Speaker Newt Gingrich

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>This is Gavin Newsom and Newke Gingridge continues, you worked

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:20.240
<v Speaker 1>on this book, which again is you know, it's very

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>much in the spirit of Reagan to you talk about

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>his last speech. I mean, I mean that's where he

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>talked about Lady Liberty's torch. And you know, we talked

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>about that life force of New Americans, et cetera, and

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:37.279
<v Speaker 1>and and and again. My my fundamental concern about this

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>assault on higher education is the impact that we'll have

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:43.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of our capacity to get these pH ds

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and stem folks and and to be able to pull

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>uh that chill it's already I think having around the

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world, but pull the best in the

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>brightest minds and and and keep them as part of

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that innovation cycle. But you you specifically, I'm you brought

0:00:57.200 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>up in the book, which I loved, the Chinese Exclusion Act,

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and you know, so much of that comes from you know,

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the embers of that are very familiar folks out here

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 1>in the Bay Area. You know, I remember what I

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>would refer to unfairly. I would admit this guy Dennis Kerney,

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>who was sort of the original Trump, and he began

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and ended every speech by saying, whatever else we do.

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 1>The Chinese must go, and they were building virtual walls

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to keep the Chinese out, and of course the beginning

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>of the Chinese Exclusion Act ultimately came out of the

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Bay Area and some of those movements. But interesting to

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>me is we're now close to peak immigration. Again. We

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>dropped very low in nineteen seventy I think it was

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>four point eight percent, don't quote me, and now we're

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 1>closer to fourteen fourteen point eight wherever it is, again,

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>don't quote me, but it's significantly grown. How concerned are

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you talk about assimilation? You talked about the things you

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>can't talk about from a European prism. But as you

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>balance the journey to America and you balance this immigration

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>debate and deal with the ish of criminal behavior and

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote illegal immigration as you refer to it, how

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>do we find a balance? How do we strike that

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>balance at peril we go back to the instincts of

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the eighteen eighties, or go back, frankly to well, I

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 1>mean maybe we're back there today. Curious you're assessment, I

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:19.359
<v Speaker 1>think no.

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:24.920
<v Speaker 2>I think first of all, there were two huge challenges.

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:28.119
<v Speaker 2>One is sheer volume. I mean, you can't have six

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 2>eight nine million people crossing the border illegally. The other

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 2>which I began writing about in the eighties, I was

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:41.639
<v Speaker 2>visited one of the congressmen in Georgia by vietname. He's

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 2>a small business owner who said that when he came

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 2>over after the fall of Saigon, he and his brother

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 2>arrived and he went straight to work, and his brother

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 2>got hooked up in southern California with the welfare office

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 2>and learned that you could get public housing, and you

0:02:57.200 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 2>could get food stamps and so forth. And so his

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 2>brother never developed the kind of entrepreneurial drive because life

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 2>was adequate. And it hit me that what had worked

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 2>historically in America, which was very tough, people should not

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 2>kid themselves. You know. Clossa's grandmother came through all As Island.

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 2>We actually went up and looked at her. Her signature

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 2>and her.

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:24.359
<v Speaker 1>From Poland, Is that right, huh Polish?

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, she's her grandmother's Polish on her father's side. Ironically,

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 2>since she's been nominated to the ambassador of Switzerland, her

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:35.119
<v Speaker 2>grandmother on the on the Swiss side, which is her mother,

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 2>is from Burn, So she's actually gone back to her

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 2>grandmother's home area. But the paternal grandmother came from Poland

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen o eight and you can literally track her

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 2>coming in. Well, every person that came in was inspected

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 2>for health, and if you had a communicable disease, you

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 2>were excluded and sent back. Everybody was checked to see

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 2>if they were willing to go to work, and if

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 2>you weren't prepared to work, you were sent back. I mean,

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't you know, It wasn't an automatic open door.

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 2>It was it was a it was a controlled open door.

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 2>But there was a second part which was very tough.

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 2>People expected you to become American. They expected you to

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 2>learn English, they expected you to go to work, they

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 2>expected you to be a neighbor, expected you to pay

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:24.600
<v Speaker 2>the law. And so there's a great deal of socialization

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 2>that went into being an immigrant in the US. We

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 2>went into a cycle which which was captured in a

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 2>book called the Tragedy of American Compassion. UH, where starting

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:39.359
<v Speaker 2>really in the big way with the great society, it

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 2>became inappropriate to suggest to people that they give up

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 2>whatever wherever they came from. UH, to say that the

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:49.919
<v Speaker 2>habits and the culture you came from, aren't you know,

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 2>So if you happen to come from a place which

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 2>engages in clinterectomy. Who are we to suggest as a

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 2>matter of women's rights, then maybe that's not a very

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:01.280
<v Speaker 2>good habit, right. It would be like in the middle

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 2>of the nineteenth century when sutti was still practiced in

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 2>India and widows were expected to be burned on the

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 2>with their husbands. So the question becomes, can we find

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 2>a path back to work? And I voted for all this,

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 2>And in nineteen eighty six we passed the Simpson Zoliac.

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:26.360
<v Speaker 2>We thought we were giving an amnesty to three hundred thousand,

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 2>turned out to be three million. And Reagan and his

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 2>diary says, I signed the bill because we were going

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 2>to get control of the border, and we're going to

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:39.840
<v Speaker 2>have a work permit system so we could control immigration.

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 2>And of course he got neither. So is it one

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:44.279
<v Speaker 2>of the guys who voted for this thing?

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you were an advocate. I think what in nineteen

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>eighty five, right even before when it was in its

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>infancy in bill form.

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 2>So you know, I think you we're not going to

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 2>deport ten or twelve or fourteen million people. No, it's

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 2>not going to happen. We are going to deport most

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 2>of the criminals. And if you are here without having

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:10.159
<v Speaker 2>yet been a criminal, and you become a criminal, we're

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 2>going to deport you and then once. I mean my

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 2>theory of all this, which may be wrong, but it's

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 2>part of what we did a journey to America is

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 2>to remind people that it's okay to be against illegal immigration,

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 2>but you want to be passionately for legal immigration, and

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 2>you want to recognize that they're dividing lines. I'm very

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 2>concerned about the Dreamers, the people who came here two three,

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 2>four years of age. Tally, they should be treated differently

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 2>than they're being treated right now. It's just it's wrong

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 2>to toss them in as though they're illegal in any

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 2>traditional sense.

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>So is it just they're just a political football, then

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that's right.

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, and most of them don't speak the language of

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 2>their native country. They grew up in America. For all

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 2>practical purposes, it is their native country. So we couldn't

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 2>have that debate until we got control of the border.

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 2>My guess is that by sometime in twenty seven we

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:07.479
<v Speaker 2>will begin to have a very healthy debate. People will

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 2>have calmed down and will now be into how do

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 2>we solve this problem as opposed as just being so rigid,

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 2>and it may even happen starting in twenty six. I mean,

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 2>I thought that the speed I don't know what your

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 2>reaction was, but I thought the speed with which they

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 2>turned around the southern border was almost unbelievable.

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean directionally it had significantly declined in terms

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>of the total number of border crossings. But unquestionably, Yeah,

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the acuity to which in essence is shut down is

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>rather remarkable considering where we were two years prior. But

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>clearly the message was delivered a little bit. In the

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>last nine months to a year, the Biden administration starting.

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 2>To gradually shift, but then Tom came in and.

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>It really no no doubt. I mean, look, rhetoric matters,

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and I'm curious just from that perspect because I think

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it was rhetorical. I mean, it was

0:07:57.240 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>substantive in terms of some of the moves that he's made,

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>mostly rhetorical, I think in terms of the impacts even

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>occurring before in the executive orders when in effect, and

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>certainly no fundamental legislative shifts yet. But what are you

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>what about the rhetoric? What about sort of the pain

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of our diverse communities feel about the rhetoric

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>from the President himself. And you know, is it tactical

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>you say he supports legal immigration. We saw that debate

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>play out with a Bannon Musk frame, But that debate

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 1>is still pretty alive in the base of the mega

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:33.200
<v Speaker 1>movement right anti immagrant legal too.

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Look, the challenge for Trump's critics on this line of

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 2>reasoning is that he got the highest percentage any Republicans

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 2>ever gotten in the Hispanic community. He got the largest

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 2>percentage of African American males of any Republican since Eisenhower,

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, seventy years ago. Right, He's the first Republican

0:08:56.120 --> 0:09:00.959
<v Speaker 2>to get a majority of the Catholic vote. So an

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 2>awful lot of people who are first and second generation

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 2>legal immigrants who are as mad about illegal immigrants as

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 2>people whose relatives came over in seventeen hundred. I mean,

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:16.319
<v Speaker 2>there's a sense of I paid my dues, I waited,

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 2>I obeyed the law on at frankly, I left these

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 2>people behind. I don't want a Venezuelan gang in my neighborhood.

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 2>And while that's exaggerated, it's real enough, and particularly if

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 2>you look at the people you know who've been killed

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 2>or the people who've been raped. You don't need many symbols.

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 2>No country decide, you know, I don't. That's a risk.

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:41.679
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I just I miss. What I hate is how it's exploited.

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 1>And as we know, I mean, we all know the stats.

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, native born are more likely to commit crimes

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:58.199
<v Speaker 1>than forum born, legal or or without documentation. But you're right,

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean what you just said is Poe accurate. It

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't take that many examples.

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 2>And I suspect if you limited it down to MS

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 2>thirteen gang members be willing gang members. There are enough

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 2>examples there. You're right, you can earn a living off

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 2>of it.

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Look, I get your broader point, but I'm encouraged by

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>your core belief that Trump has the capacity, to your point,

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.679
<v Speaker 1>to move if he feels that we've made the progress

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>on the border to a much more comprehensive conversation.

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 2>You said publicly that we ought to really be thinking

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 2>about if you graduate in science or engineering, we give

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 2>you a green card with your graduation.

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Well that's been challenged by him eliminating all the foreign

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 1>students at Harvard.

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 2>But we'll see that's now let me suggest to you

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 2>as somebody who's studied Trump a pharamount. There's a there's

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 2>a John Wayne film where it's really mad at somebody

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 2>picks up a chair, breaks it over their head and

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 2>his partner turns and says, God, you get really go crazy.

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 2>As several foreign governments have learned. You take Trump head

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 2>on and he goes nuts, and he says, I'm going

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 2>to prove to you it's classic alpha male. I now

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 2>have to prove to you who's dominant. Well, Harvard decided

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 2>let's test this theory. Okay, So they now have Donald

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:33.679
<v Speaker 2>Trump about four o'clock every morning figuring out what he

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 2>can do next. And he is going to beat on

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 2>them and beat on them. There's nothing to do with

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the country. I hope not. Harvard has

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 2>decided to pick a head on fight. They're a big institution,

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 2>They've got a ton of money, they have great prestige,

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:50.319
<v Speaker 2>and we'll see whether or not they can. This is

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 2>a little bit like in I think it's nineteen o two,

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 2>they have a huge coal mine strike and Theodore Roosevelt

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 2>calls him the coal mine owners and says, this is

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 2>going to it's settled, and the coal mine. Unders say, well,

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 2>you don't understand, we own the coal mines. And Roosevelt says,

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 2>you don't understand. I am the President of United States,

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 2>and I will have the army take over all of

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 2>your minds. And they said, oh, well, let's talk. I mean,

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:20.719
<v Speaker 2>if Harvard were semi smart, you know, this is a

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 2>losing fight, you know, if they win round one in court,

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 2>because he's going to be there for four years. They

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:29.439
<v Speaker 2>were in one, win one round in court. The Justice

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Department will be there with round two, three and four,

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 2>and he's not going to give up until they cawtew.

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 2>It's just now he's not necessarily going to go and

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:40.199
<v Speaker 2>pick a fight with you know, uh, the Ohio State University,

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 2>partly because he likes their football team. As a general rule,

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 2>this is classically Trump behaves. You saw just do it

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 2>to the Europeans. The Europeans said, we don't want to talk.

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:54.439
<v Speaker 2>He said, fine, fifty percent tariff next Monday.

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>And then he negotiates against them.

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh facts, you do want to talk?

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, and then he delayed is the I mean,

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I by the you will you open this door? And

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>mister free trade, I remember you back in the day

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm old enough to remember after and everything else, and

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 1>that was bipartisan. It was hardly new Gingridge speaker, Gingridge.

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>It was celebrated in my party. So you you've evolved,

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of folks have not, just you know, including

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>by the way Democrats. I mean, the tariff policies were

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>advanced and uh and increased against China in particular during

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration, but not across the board, not with

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>this fits and starts, not negotiating against ourselves. Tell me,

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:40.479
<v Speaker 1>you tell me, tell me that you find the approach

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>to tariff's under the Trump administration full hearty uh and

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily productive at this stage? Or am I missing

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>this great negotiators capacity to deliver punches like a chess master.

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Five months from now? Are year four? Well?

0:13:57.880 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 2>I think I think a couple of things. One I

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 2>would say, looking back, I was wrong.

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you say that conveniently or do you I mean, no, I.

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:09.679
<v Speaker 2>Say that because I evolved over ten I'll give you

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:13.680
<v Speaker 2>the best example. I really thought, as did most of

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 2>the people who studied it, that opening up China economically

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 2>was a great step towards a more open China. And

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 2>I totally misunderstood Dung Challpegs Southern tour where he gave

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 2>the speeches about markets and said, you know, I don't

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 2>care whether it's a black cat or a white cat,

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 2>as long as it catches the rat, and sounded like

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 2>he was really talking about openness. Well, a couple of

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 2>years ago, I did a book called Trump and China,

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 2>and I went back and did a lot of research,

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 2>and I was frankly pretty embarrassed. I mean, Dung Shaopeng

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 2>was one of the twenty four people in Paris who

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 2>create the Chinese Commnist Party. He leaves Paris at the

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 2>end of World War One, goes to Moscow and spends

0:14:55.720 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 2>a year at Lenin University studying Marxism. Leninism. He is saying,

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 2>and none of us caught this. We have to have

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 2>a market to create enough prosperity to strengthen the party's

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 2>grip on the country, because if people stay too poor,

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 2>they're going to throw the party out. So I'm not

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 2>going to an open market so I can open up China.

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to open market so I can sustain the dictatorship.

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, since it is a dictatorship and

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 2>since we are China, if I get to rip you off.

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 2>That's fine, now part of my education. After I left

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 2>the speakership, I was approached by a former Walmart president

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 2>who's going to do a deal in China, and he

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 2>thought having a former speaker would help given negotiating. So

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 2>my lawyer talked to the Chinese lawyers and after he

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 2>looked at the proposed contract, he said, let me get

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 2>this straight. You can you can define what his interest

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 2>is worth on any given day, and you can buy

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 2>it at your definition. They said, yeah, that's how we

0:15:56.160 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 2>do things. He's not with my client. So it's been

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 2>looking at that. And then in the European case, the Europeans,

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 2>and this is a genuine tragedy, and I think you

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 2>have to read JD. Vans's speeches in Paris and Munich

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 2>in this context. And again I'm a European historian. I've

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 2>lived in four European countries and I have an enormous

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 2>affection for Europe. Historically, the Europeans decided to go to

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 2>litigation and regulation rather than innovation, literally the exact opposite

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 2>of Silicon Valley.

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting.

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 2>In the long run, that's a losing game. So what

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 2>they have to do is they have to somehow tax

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Amazon or Apple or Google or Meta or Microsoft because

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 2>they literally can't compete with them, and this isn't so

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 2>they rig the game in clever ways. And for a

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 2>very long time we operated within a model of somehow

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 2>trying to get to a balanced world where it would

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 2>also you know, the World Trade Organization would work. I

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 2>mean I was for China joining the WTO, and then

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 2>you realize after a while it just this current system

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 2>doesn't work. Now what Trump has done, which I don't

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 2>candidly don't think he's explained very well. Trump is a

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 2>reversion to the late nineteenth century Republican model, best articulated

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 2>by William McKinley, that we are going to have higher

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 2>tariff walls, we're going to have higher paid workers, we're

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 2>going to have huge prosperity, and in the end, because

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:28.879
<v Speaker 2>we're the largest economy, we have and I mean he

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 2>loves this. Yeah, he knows in every negotiation, including China,

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 2>in the end, he is the bank they're going to

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:40.120
<v Speaker 2>have to negotiate with it. Sure, And so he's now

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 2>going to have an exciting and enthusiastic six or eight months.

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:45.439
<v Speaker 2>I tell all of my friends, do not look at

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 2>your stock until August, right.

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Or the lack of stock in the warehouse because of

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 1>all the indecision and the business chill. I mean, a

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of people that aren't going to make it five months.

0:17:56.320 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>That's my fear and disproportionate number out here in America's

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>largest economy, California, with all that goods movement, that dock

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>workers and truckers, and obviously the small business supply chains.

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's being felt. It's pretty profound. I hope

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:15.239
<v Speaker 1>there's an endgame here, but time is not on the

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>side of a lot of these small entrepreneurs.

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 2>I think that's right. Look, there's gonna be a lot

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:23.119
<v Speaker 2>of floundering around, and ultimately we may be at a

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 2>better future, but the interim is going to be I

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:28.119
<v Speaker 2>tell people, this is not a beer party on a

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:32.679
<v Speaker 2>houseboat on a quiet lake. This is newing in the

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:36.159
<v Speaker 2>rapids of a wild river. And that's just a fact.

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>All right, Let's go back, just briefly, because I'd be

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 1>remiss if we didn't talk about it. So I here's

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:50.880
<v Speaker 1>this is how I spent my Memorial Day. I somehow

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 1>landed on a New Hampshire town hall that you and

0:18:55.520 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 1>President Clinton conducted together. It was shockingly civil tuned in

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>because I was expecting the opposite, and the fact that

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:07.199
<v Speaker 1>the President of the United States, the Speaker of the

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>House of Representatives, at the peak of their differences, engaged

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:15.640
<v Speaker 1>in a civil conversation. It makes me long for those

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>days or wait or not, because my reflection was one

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of critique and constant you know, just you know, confrontation, victriol,

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:31.639
<v Speaker 1>government shutdowns. So which was it? What was your relationship like?

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Do you remember that day in New Hampshire? What the

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 1>hell were you two thinking? And what's happened to our

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 1>country since? And how how much do you feel, mister

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>speaker in the lunch conversation responsible for the first some

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:52.399
<v Speaker 1>of that sort of toxicity as some have described in

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:55.679
<v Speaker 1>our politics as a relations to the relationship that you

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>had with our party, our party with you and the

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:03.199
<v Speaker 1>contract with American Oh.

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:05.639
<v Speaker 2>Wellther you just managed to ask about three different questions.

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I did, Yes.

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 2>So off, Gwen and I had a I think remarkably

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 2>good personal relationship. We were about the same age group,

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:19.119
<v Speaker 2>We're both we're both inherently graduate students. We like to

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 2>sit around and shoot the breeze about occasionally late at night.

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 2>I go down and have a drink with him, and

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 2>we just bsked. I mean it was just you know,

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 2>as you know, he is one of the great Yes,

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 2>it's in American history. I mean all that does relax

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:37.159
<v Speaker 2>and let him roll for a while. And so in

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 2>that sense, what happened was which was, which was? And

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:43.160
<v Speaker 2>I wrote a book on it called March to the Majority.

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 2>We spent sixteen years growing on Majority. All of it's

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 2>standing on Reagan's shoulders. The contract is entirely Reagan, but

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 2>when we won, because we had based everything we were

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:58.199
<v Speaker 2>doing on the American people, So every single item in

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 2>the contract is seventy percent or better. There's a big

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 2>fight in the White House in June of ninety five

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:10.160
<v Speaker 2>and Reagan's staff, I mean Carter Clinton's staff says, you've

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 2>got to fight Gingrich. You know, you owe it to

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 2>the to the party. And Clinton, Clinton, who had been

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:18.679
<v Speaker 2>beaten in nineteen eighty for reelection and knew that there

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 2>wasn't fun, said to them, I do that. I want

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:25.439
<v Speaker 2>to lose. I'm not going to fight Gingrich. I'm going

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 2>to protect the things that I have to protect, and

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to take shots I didn't want to can

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:30.879
<v Speaker 2>but I want to work with him because if I

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 2>work with him, I'll probably get reelected, and I like

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:35.640
<v Speaker 2>being in the White House. And it was a huge braw.

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:38.239
<v Speaker 2>I mean I remember one point, Leon Panetta. We were

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:41.400
<v Speaker 2>in a negotiating session and Panetta was screaming at him

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 2>and saying, you can't give that away. We had Democrats

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 2>who lost their seats because they voted for that, and

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:49.639
<v Speaker 2>Clinton's long, yeah, but I don't want to lose my seat,

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:52.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, And then he turned to me and said,

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 2>I guess I can't do that one. This may surprise you.

0:21:56.320 --> 0:22:00.080
<v Speaker 2>We negotiated for thirty five days, face to face. We

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 2>produced this.

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean literally the two of you in the room,

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:04.440
<v Speaker 1>not outsourcing.

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:07.399
<v Speaker 2>Staff other people around, but the two us sitting across

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 2>the table for thirty five days, and we produced the

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 2>only four balanced budgets in a century. And we did

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:16.360
<v Speaker 2>it because we listened to each other and we talk

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:19.199
<v Speaker 2>with each other. Now, I was a harsh partisan for

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 2>a reason you'll understand perfectly. I mean it's what you

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 2>have not You haven't really had the kind of quality

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:29.400
<v Speaker 2>of opposition you should have in California that Methought goes

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:32.640
<v Speaker 2>out and spends sixteen years and gradually becomes the majority,

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:35.120
<v Speaker 2>which is tragic. It's not good for the state.

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I hear you again. I mean I get that

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 1>argument absolutely, yeah, so sincerely, Yeah, No, So I.

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 2>Had to be polarizing because I'm the minority. I mean,

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 2>if I'm going to get in, I've got to make

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:49.919
<v Speaker 2>sure that people decide not to vote for the Democrats.

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 1>And so it's not your natural state. I mean it was,

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean it was. It was a very

0:22:57.960 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 1>intentional strategy.

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, like this, because I think in some ways

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 2>you'll identify my natural state is winning.

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:07.400
<v Speaker 1>There you go, I appreciate that.

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:12.440
<v Speaker 2>If sitting for thirty five days wins, I'm for winning fighting.

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 2>If closing the government for twenty seven days is a

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:19.359
<v Speaker 2>necessary prelude negotiate, I'm for closing the government for twenty

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 2>seven days. But they were It's not a personality thing.

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 2>They were instrumentalities of getting something done.

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:30.159
<v Speaker 1>And so that town Hall sort of reflected that that

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:33.639
<v Speaker 1>you guys had a civil conversation outdoors in New Hampshire.

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I think he said you happened to be there already

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 1>he was coming down. Do you remember it at all?

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Bo Bob Dole had we had this deal. Don't

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:45.159
<v Speaker 2>wanted to run for president, and he didn't want me

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 2>because I was the brand new guy on the block

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 2>and I was nationally pretty popular at that time. He

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 2>didn't want me to run for president. So he loaned

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:55.399
<v Speaker 2>me his entire New Hampshire organization, and I went up

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 2>and toured New Hampshire. And while we were up there,

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:00.360
<v Speaker 2>we suddenly heard, Oh, Bill Clinton's going to be here,

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 2>and so we promptly said to the press, wouldn't it

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 2>be great to get together and have a debate about

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 2>or a dialogue about election reform. Well, the White House

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 2>suddenly gets this call from the press corps. Is the

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 2>President willing to sit down with new Gingrich in New Hampshire.

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:20.919
<v Speaker 2>You can imagine what Clinton's staff said. Wow. And so

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 2>they then interviewed me, and I said I'd be delighted

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 2>because a great thing for America to have the two

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 2>of us told, oh, I wish one. Clinton goes, oh, yeah,

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 2>I guess we'll do it. And if you watch it,

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean he's very good.

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but I mean candidly, it was not I didn't

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:39.360
<v Speaker 1>enjoy it. You were. You were very good. I mean,

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:41.879
<v Speaker 1>answered tough questions. I mean a lot of seniors are

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:44.360
<v Speaker 1>there and you're talking about, you know, cuts to their

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 1>programs and others. I mean, it was, it was, it was.

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 1>It was a remarkably civil conversation at the highest level.

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 1>And but there's not been anything like that since well.

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, it was a tragedy. There's a book called

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 2>The Pact, written by guy I think a Duke, in

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:05.639
<v Speaker 2>which he found all the papers, interviewed people. Bill and

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 2>I actually had an agreement in late ninety seven that

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 2>we were going to launch an effort in ninety eight

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 2>to reform Medicare and social security, and he would do

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 2>it in the State of the Union. I would do

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 2>it in a major speech in Georgia, and we were

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:23.360
<v Speaker 2>going to work together. And then Lewinsky occurred. Well, at

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:25.880
<v Speaker 2>that point I had to become partisan, and he had

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:27.920
<v Speaker 2>to go to the left because it was the left

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 2>that was going to save him, and so boom. But

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 2>the book's kind of fascinating because it's really true. We

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:37.879
<v Speaker 2>did a lot of We created the Heart Rudman Commission,

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 2>which was the deepest and biggest review of national security

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:46.160
<v Speaker 2>since nineteen forty eight. And actually after I stepped down,

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 2>even though I had helped him impeach him in the house.

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 2>They called him, said would you like to serve on

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 2>the commission? Since you created it? She said yes, So

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 2>so it just did that kind of relationship.

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:59.919
<v Speaker 1>It's fascinating. And you reminded me of the impeachment. I mean,

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:02.920
<v Speaker 1>so what do you And it was the third part

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 1>of that three legged stool question. And forgive me for

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>not articulating it more effectively. But and again this is

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 1>not an indictment, but it was in the conversation of

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Lunch who said he was never more proud to be

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 1>associated with anything than the Contract with America, which was

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:20.400
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to me, how quick he was to not only

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:24.239
<v Speaker 1>defend it, but how reverential he thought it was at

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the time, in terms of just being a communication document,

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:30.200
<v Speaker 1>how it had transparency, how it did represent, as you said,

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the will of the American people, at least in terms

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of the seventy percent threshold, and the fact that you

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 1>submitted it to the public, meaning you tested that theory.

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>But the impeachment, the toxicity, the winning at all costs

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:47.160
<v Speaker 1>hardly new in novel and politics. So I'm not suggesting

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:51.640
<v Speaker 1>you're the OG in this space. But the tea part

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 1>people connect this moment to those moments? Is that fair unfair?

0:26:56.600 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Did Democrats oversimplify?

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 2>I think we founally mishandled the impeachment, and I think

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 2>it was partly because of Kenneth Starr. In my mind,

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:13.120
<v Speaker 2>the impeachment was about committing perjury, and it actually goes

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 2>back to arguments we have today about one or not

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:18.159
<v Speaker 2>whether the Supreme Court is ruled. And I suspect that

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 2>the Supreme Court already ruled, we wouldn't have had a

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 2>leg to stand on. But the question was it was

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 2>pretty clear that he had been convicted of committing perjury,

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 2>which you know is a follow me, and in fact,

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 2>he later on was barred from practicing law for five

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 2>years in Arkansas. I thought it was important as a

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:42.199
<v Speaker 2>matter of constitutional record that a president should be held accountable.

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:45.439
<v Speaker 2>But when Starr came out with his report, it was

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 2>so lurid and so related to sex that it poisoned

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:53.879
<v Speaker 2>the whole project. I'll never forget that summer. I was

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:56.159
<v Speaker 2>home in August and my two daughters and I went

0:27:56.240 --> 0:28:01.640
<v Speaker 2>to lunch at Okay Cafe, and and they both looked

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 2>at it, and they said to me, if our four oh

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 2>one case get destroyed, because of some stupid intern We're

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 2>going to be really pissed off. I thought, okay, I

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:17.479
<v Speaker 2>had clearly misunderstood the American people and how they were

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 2>going to rank, how this was going to work. And

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 2>in a way, Clinton's a whole behavior from ninety two

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 2>on changed the whole context in which you deal with

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 2>sexual issues in politics. Yeah, you couldn't imagine the Hillary

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 2>Clinton Donald Trump the last debate in a pre Bill

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Clinton world. That's insponsible.

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, and of course Bannon bringing out the ghosts of

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the past in the front row of that debate as well.

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 2>That it was Bannon who said to me, we concluded

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 2>she was going to go to the basement and we

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 2>were going to get there first.

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that was a look. Look in closing, give me

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 1>something more optimistic. Are we get Look, I'm new scum? Yeah,

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 1>mean here we are. I appreciate your book. Like June third,

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>we got We've got Trump's triumph. But in new scum

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 1>everything's scum. This, this sort of divisiveness, this everyone's longing

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to figure out a way to get damn back together

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and start to solve problems.

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Says a historian, One of two things has to happen either,

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 2>there has to be a very concerted effort to reach

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 2>out and to try to find bipartisan ways to work together.

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 2>I just did a podcast with Ted Cruz, who had

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 2>worked with the Amy Kloboshar, the Democrat from Minnesota on

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 2>the cour you would be very aware of just last week,

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 2>jump sign that bill right, totally bipartisan. Yeah, and it's

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 2>possible that you could see just enough bipartisanship on practical

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 2>things begin to reknit the system. Uh. Otherwise, what has

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 2>to happen is one side of the it has to win.

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, historically, when you're in a period where both

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 2>sides think it's life and death, and both sides think

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 2>they potentially could win or lose, the drive to more

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 2>and more extremism. I was right struck. Alan Gwelso is

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 2>an extraordinary professor of Abraham Lincoln, and Welso wrote me

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 2>at one point in the two thousand and four campaign

0:30:25.400 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 2>and said, the level of vitriol against Trump resembles the

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 2>level of vitriol against Lincoln among Southern slaveholders in the

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 2>eighteen sixty campaign. He said, you can row almost an

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 2>exact parallel, and it's because both the left in its

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 2>modern form, and the slaveholders actually saw their way of

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 2>life about to be extinguished. I mean Trump is a

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 2>mortal threat if you're AOC. He's not just a competitor.

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 2>But if he wins, her world has shrinks radically. So

0:30:57.400 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 2>you either have to get to a point where one

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 2>side clearly one this is FDR in thirty four thirty six,

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:07.040
<v Speaker 2>where he wins so decisively that everybody operates within the

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Rooseveltian world Jefferson after eighteen hundred, I would hope you

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 2>could have a combination. That is, I encourage constantly finding

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 2>ways to be bipartisan, because I think it's better for

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 2>the country. It's how the founding fathers designed the system.

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 2>They wanted to make it so hard that it's very,

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 2>very difficult, as we just saw in the House, for

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 2>a purely partisan effort to work. Yeah, and that's by design.

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean they wanted to avoid dictatorship by creating a

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:38.959
<v Speaker 2>machine so hard to work that we can't we can

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:40.520
<v Speaker 2>barely get it to work voluntarily.

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate it. And you have a chapter in the

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 1>book you talk about the two hundred and fiftieth anniversary,

0:31:47.920 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know, and our pride and the best of

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Greek democracy and the Roman Republic, three co equal branches

0:31:55.920 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of government. I hope that's the spirit that defines that.

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I have two final questions over under simple questions, Speaker

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Jeffreys sixty percent.

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Chance, oh forty five?

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Well see we're gonna have to have another episode

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 1>on that. And then twenty twenty eight, President Vance.

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Probably runs against Governor Newsom. Vice President Advance runs against Advance.

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 2>And look at some of your other candidates. I mean,

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 2>the governor, of all due respect, the governor of Illinois

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 2>as a presidential can give me a break.

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I'm not getting the middle, but I would

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 1>not be at all shocked to have a Newsome Advance election.

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Well that's a hell of a way to end this podcast.

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I appreciate you doing this. Uh it's

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a hell of a thing, and I hope folks

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 1>got a lot out of it. I certainly did. And

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 1>congratulations on your forty fourth book, Trump's Triumph on sale

0:32:57.040 --> 0:33:01.720
<v Speaker 1>June third, good sale. Good to see you, Thank you, sir.

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 2>It was a lot of fun. I hope you enjoyed it.