1 00:00:05,120 --> 00:00:08,440 Speaker 1: This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane, along 2 00:00:08,480 --> 00:00:12,320 Speaker 1: with Jonathan Farrell and Lisa Abramowitz joined us each day 3 00:00:12,360 --> 00:00:16,840 Speaker 1: for insight from the best and economics, geopolitics, finance and investment. 4 00:00:17,239 --> 00:00:22,079 Speaker 1: Subscribe to Bloomberg Surveillance on demand on Apple, Spotify and 5 00:00:22,239 --> 00:00:26,479 Speaker 1: anywhere you get your podcasts, and always on Bloomberg dot Com, 6 00:00:26,600 --> 00:00:30,440 Speaker 1: the Bloomberg Terminal, and the Bloomberg Business app. This is 7 00:00:30,440 --> 00:00:34,200 Speaker 1: a joy. Michelle Meyer I was discovered with her expertise 8 00:00:34,240 --> 00:00:37,560 Speaker 1: on the consumer and housing a number of years ago. 9 00:00:37,880 --> 00:00:41,000 Speaker 1: She had a sterling career with Global Wall Street and 10 00:00:41,040 --> 00:00:44,800 Speaker 1: now gives us an information knowledge with their economics that 11 00:00:44,880 --> 00:00:49,480 Speaker 1: you can only get at MasterCard. With the MasterCard Economics Institute. 12 00:00:49,760 --> 00:00:53,959 Speaker 1: Chief US Consumer expert, Michelle Meyer joins us this morning. Michelle, 13 00:00:54,000 --> 00:00:57,000 Speaker 1: you get the data like no other market economist in 14 00:00:57,040 --> 00:01:03,280 Speaker 1: the game. What is the state of the American consumer? Um? Yeah, Tom, So, 15 00:01:03,400 --> 00:01:06,960 Speaker 1: we are absolutely looking at the consumer with a high 16 00:01:07,080 --> 00:01:09,880 Speaker 1: level of detail, and what we're seeing, and what we 17 00:01:10,040 --> 00:01:12,959 Speaker 1: have been seeing for a while, is that the consumer 18 00:01:13,120 --> 00:01:16,320 Speaker 1: is out there, able and willing to spend. And this 19 00:01:16,360 --> 00:01:19,119 Speaker 1: speaks to the inflation data. It speaks to the labor 20 00:01:19,160 --> 00:01:22,880 Speaker 1: market data that the consumer still has purchasing power. Right 21 00:01:23,040 --> 00:01:26,120 Speaker 1: you have a labor market that's still expanding. Income growth 22 00:01:26,280 --> 00:01:29,920 Speaker 1: is out there, aggregate income growth in particular, there's still 23 00:01:29,959 --> 00:01:33,399 Speaker 1: some savings buffer and there's still access to expand um 24 00:01:33,440 --> 00:01:39,240 Speaker 1: the balance sheet. So to underestimate consumer has been um 25 00:01:39,280 --> 00:01:43,080 Speaker 1: you know, has been a problem without without getting into 26 00:01:43,120 --> 00:01:46,960 Speaker 1: the Vatican secrets. Are you seeing massive credit card usage? 27 00:01:47,080 --> 00:01:50,840 Speaker 1: And how do the higher interest rates of credit cards 28 00:01:51,200 --> 00:01:55,400 Speaker 1: fold into your optimism on the consumer. Look, what we're 29 00:01:55,400 --> 00:01:57,960 Speaker 1: saying about the consumer is that they are using all 30 00:01:58,000 --> 00:02:00,440 Speaker 1: of their sources of purchasing power, and the news is 31 00:02:00,480 --> 00:02:02,680 Speaker 1: that they still have a lot of purchasing power coming 32 00:02:02,760 --> 00:02:05,919 Speaker 1: from the labor market from job creation. So at the moment, 33 00:02:06,040 --> 00:02:08,079 Speaker 1: you still have a lot of income flowing in a 34 00:02:08,160 --> 00:02:11,760 Speaker 1: disposable income which is supporting that spending in real time, 35 00:02:12,160 --> 00:02:15,400 Speaker 1: so consumers don't necessarily have to rely as much on 36 00:02:15,440 --> 00:02:18,280 Speaker 1: other sources. It's not as though the consumer is strained 37 00:02:18,400 --> 00:02:21,000 Speaker 1: right now. They're doing a really good job being able 38 00:02:21,040 --> 00:02:23,480 Speaker 1: to navigate what has been for the last year some 39 00:02:23,520 --> 00:02:27,079 Speaker 1: pretty high prices um and that is what fuel the 40 00:02:27,120 --> 00:02:31,079 Speaker 1: inflationary numbers that we have seen all throughout last year UM. 41 00:02:31,080 --> 00:02:33,640 Speaker 1: But yes, the consumer of course is utilized savings. The 42 00:02:33,639 --> 00:02:37,639 Speaker 1: consumer of course has um increased credit card used as well. 43 00:02:37,760 --> 00:02:40,080 Speaker 1: You've seen, you know, from the Federal Reserve G nineteen 44 00:02:40,160 --> 00:02:43,440 Speaker 1: data UM revolving credit outstanding has been on the rise 45 00:02:43,680 --> 00:02:48,000 Speaker 1: after the post pandemic period where consumers paid down their debt. Michelle, 46 00:02:48,000 --> 00:02:49,880 Speaker 1: I'm looking right now. We just got a number of 47 00:02:50,240 --> 00:02:53,240 Speaker 1: data points from the United States government and the markets 48 00:02:53,240 --> 00:02:55,160 Speaker 1: are slow to respond, but they are starting to respond 49 00:02:55,200 --> 00:02:58,000 Speaker 1: a bit more. You see the naztack down now near 50 00:02:58,040 --> 00:03:01,240 Speaker 1: session lows around down one per and ahead of the open. 51 00:03:01,840 --> 00:03:04,480 Speaker 1: Do you get the sense that people have bought into 52 00:03:04,480 --> 00:03:07,680 Speaker 1: the disinflation story too much that we could see even 53 00:03:07,760 --> 00:03:12,160 Speaker 1: another bout of reinflation that sends cp I even higher. 54 00:03:13,600 --> 00:03:16,680 Speaker 1: So to me that the useful way of looking at 55 00:03:16,760 --> 00:03:20,200 Speaker 1: inflation is to understand the different drivers of inflation. So 56 00:03:20,240 --> 00:03:24,080 Speaker 1: the good news on the disinflationary storyline is that the 57 00:03:24,120 --> 00:03:28,920 Speaker 1: supply side has really um come back, right. You've seen this, 58 00:03:28,919 --> 00:03:32,720 Speaker 1: this repair of supply chains. You've seen the restocking of retailers. 59 00:03:32,720 --> 00:03:36,560 Speaker 1: So inventory levels are back to normal and retailers have 60 00:03:36,640 --> 00:03:39,080 Speaker 1: been able to return to just in time. Inventories which 61 00:03:39,120 --> 00:03:43,000 Speaker 1: makes UM pricing much easier, much more transparent, and during 62 00:03:43,040 --> 00:03:46,440 Speaker 1: the holiday season we did see UM consumers enjoy a 63 00:03:46,440 --> 00:03:49,520 Speaker 1: lot more promotions and discounts. So on the good side 64 00:03:49,600 --> 00:03:52,880 Speaker 1: of the equation, I do think there is a disinflationary 65 00:03:52,960 --> 00:03:56,120 Speaker 1: story UM for services, which is going to be more 66 00:03:56,160 --> 00:03:59,839 Speaker 1: tied particularly the super core which takes out housing, UM 67 00:04:00,080 --> 00:04:01,880 Speaker 1: is going to be more tied to the labor market, 68 00:04:02,000 --> 00:04:04,200 Speaker 1: and there we know there's still some wage pressure, we 69 00:04:04,240 --> 00:04:07,080 Speaker 1: know there's still a lot more stickiness. So that's just 70 00:04:07,120 --> 00:04:09,440 Speaker 1: gonna take time. So I do think it's really important 71 00:04:09,480 --> 00:04:12,080 Speaker 1: when you're looking at inflation is to be able to 72 00:04:12,440 --> 00:04:16,120 Speaker 1: separate the different parts of the inflation narrative based off 73 00:04:16,160 --> 00:04:19,080 Speaker 1: of those drivers of inflation. So I don't think the 74 00:04:19,120 --> 00:04:22,440 Speaker 1: disinflationary story is over, but we have to be aware 75 00:04:22,640 --> 00:04:25,680 Speaker 1: that it's going to take time. So what's your sense 76 00:04:25,800 --> 00:04:27,840 Speaker 1: of where the market is wrong. I'm looking right now 77 00:04:28,000 --> 00:04:29,839 Speaker 1: to your break even, So are close to two point 78 00:04:29,920 --> 00:04:31,960 Speaker 1: nine percent that in two years from now you're going 79 00:04:32,000 --> 00:04:35,440 Speaker 1: to get a three percent essentially inflation? Right? Is that rate? 80 00:04:35,520 --> 00:04:38,080 Speaker 1: Is that bang in line with your expectations based on 81 00:04:38,120 --> 00:04:41,080 Speaker 1: the consumer spending and the consumer spending power that you 82 00:04:41,120 --> 00:04:44,640 Speaker 1: see in the granular data. I think over that time 83 00:04:44,640 --> 00:04:48,320 Speaker 1: frame that does seem pretty reasonable because if again, if 84 00:04:48,360 --> 00:04:52,400 Speaker 1: you think about the core goods components prior to the pandemic, 85 00:04:52,440 --> 00:04:56,640 Speaker 1: those were deflationary components. They were seeing price reductions, and 86 00:04:56,680 --> 00:04:59,599 Speaker 1: then you have this dramatic increase in the level of 87 00:04:59,640 --> 00:05:02,760 Speaker 1: price this which does not seem sustainable. So a mean 88 00:05:02,880 --> 00:05:05,240 Speaker 1: reversion back to more normal levels or more of a 89 00:05:05,400 --> 00:05:09,400 Speaker 1: of a disinflationary tendency for those categories seems right. And 90 00:05:09,400 --> 00:05:11,359 Speaker 1: the labor market, we know is not going to be 91 00:05:11,360 --> 00:05:13,880 Speaker 1: able to continue at this rate forever. And the FED 92 00:05:14,200 --> 00:05:17,200 Speaker 1: is committed to cooling down the labor market. So if 93 00:05:17,240 --> 00:05:19,760 Speaker 1: you believe in the Fed's resolve, which I think we should, 94 00:05:19,839 --> 00:05:23,680 Speaker 1: and they're communicating that we should, then yes, inflation should 95 00:05:23,760 --> 00:05:26,280 Speaker 1: ultimately come down. It's just going to take time. This 96 00:05:26,360 --> 00:05:29,080 Speaker 1: whole cycle is taking time, and that's what we have 97 00:05:29,160 --> 00:05:31,479 Speaker 1: to remember. Mishelle Mayer has been too long. Thank you 98 00:05:31,520 --> 00:05:44,560 Speaker 1: so much MasterCard Economics with us at this morning pit 99 00:05:44,640 --> 00:05:47,600 Speaker 1: a cheer, good morning to you, get to see you. 100 00:05:47,800 --> 00:05:51,920 Speaker 1: The head of Actress Strategy of Security. I said, thank you. 101 00:05:52,680 --> 00:06:00,800 Speaker 1: I think obnoxious arts or something, and Bloomberg, I gotta 102 00:06:00,800 --> 00:06:02,760 Speaker 1: admit that. Okay, let's get a light shot on the 103 00:06:02,760 --> 00:06:04,440 Speaker 1: door when he came out mark a kind of a ship. 104 00:06:04,480 --> 00:06:06,640 Speaker 1: JP Morgan made some headlines in the last twenty four hours. 105 00:06:06,640 --> 00:06:08,400 Speaker 1: He's had a difficult time calling this market over the 106 00:06:08,440 --> 00:06:11,840 Speaker 1: last twelve eighteen months, the USA could market anyway, and 107 00:06:11,960 --> 00:06:14,919 Speaker 1: yet this phrase volmer getting two point oh and in 108 00:06:15,000 --> 00:06:18,880 Speaker 1: it was this acronym zero d T E zero days 109 00:06:18,920 --> 00:06:20,880 Speaker 1: to expire. And I think a lot of our audience 110 00:06:20,880 --> 00:06:23,960 Speaker 1: are hearing more and more about those options. Can we 111 00:06:24,000 --> 00:06:25,880 Speaker 1: have a bit of a clinic here, can you define 112 00:06:26,040 --> 00:06:28,839 Speaker 1: for all of us what is zero D T E 113 00:06:29,080 --> 00:06:31,360 Speaker 1: and what is it doing to this market? So every 114 00:06:31,440 --> 00:06:33,720 Speaker 1: day now they create options that expire either that day 115 00:06:33,800 --> 00:06:36,080 Speaker 1: or the next day. So there's a huge volume in that, 116 00:06:36,360 --> 00:06:39,719 Speaker 1: and there are weekly options as well, So single stocks 117 00:06:39,720 --> 00:06:41,960 Speaker 1: tend to be more weakly. Ets tend to have the 118 00:06:42,040 --> 00:06:44,920 Speaker 1: daily and volumes have just been driving through that, and 119 00:06:45,000 --> 00:06:46,680 Speaker 1: I think it has a couple of repercussions. One is 120 00:06:46,680 --> 00:06:49,320 Speaker 1: people are really literally gambling and you can sit there. 121 00:06:49,480 --> 00:06:51,880 Speaker 1: There's a Bloomberg screen called m OsO, which is the 122 00:06:51,920 --> 00:06:54,360 Speaker 1: most active traded. It's almost like watching a horse race. 123 00:06:54,400 --> 00:06:56,479 Speaker 1: You'll see the spy four twelve calls and the Spy 124 00:06:56,560 --> 00:06:59,680 Speaker 1: four thirteen calls Spy fourteen. It's almost this laddering. So 125 00:06:59,720 --> 00:07:01,960 Speaker 1: I think people are treading a lot of this. Volumes 126 00:07:01,960 --> 00:07:05,240 Speaker 1: have exploded heard as much as equity volumes can be 127 00:07:05,320 --> 00:07:07,279 Speaker 1: related and tied back to the hedging of these single 128 00:07:07,360 --> 00:07:10,400 Speaker 1: day options. So it's a very massive driver, and I 129 00:07:10,440 --> 00:07:13,880 Speaker 1: think it's why we're seeing, you know, moves just that 130 00:07:13,960 --> 00:07:16,080 Speaker 1: are amplified. So maybe something that would be a half 131 00:07:16,120 --> 00:07:18,640 Speaker 1: percent move based on the news becomes a one and 132 00:07:18,680 --> 00:07:20,320 Speaker 1: a half to two percent move, and it's going in 133 00:07:20,360 --> 00:07:23,040 Speaker 1: both directions. You touched on it briefly. Can you explain 134 00:07:23,120 --> 00:07:25,920 Speaker 1: how this becomes self fulfilling for the people that Let's 135 00:07:25,920 --> 00:07:28,160 Speaker 1: say I am an institution and I sell you some 136 00:07:28,280 --> 00:07:30,720 Speaker 1: of these very very short dated, cool options. What do 137 00:07:30,800 --> 00:07:32,760 Speaker 1: I have to do on the other side which leads 138 00:07:32,800 --> 00:07:35,440 Speaker 1: to this becoming somewhat self fulfilling. Yeah, So let's say 139 00:07:35,480 --> 00:07:38,560 Speaker 1: the day starts spy at you know, four hundred, and 140 00:07:39,080 --> 00:07:41,000 Speaker 1: someone buys a four or five call way out of 141 00:07:41,040 --> 00:07:42,720 Speaker 1: the money right one and a quarter. All of a sudden, 142 00:07:42,760 --> 00:07:44,440 Speaker 1: as it starts going to four or three, whoever sold 143 00:07:44,480 --> 00:07:47,160 Speaker 1: that call has to start buying spy, which tends to 144 00:07:48,680 --> 00:07:51,000 Speaker 1: exaggerate the price move. Then it starts getting to four 145 00:07:51,080 --> 00:07:52,720 Speaker 1: or five. They've got to buy more. And then what 146 00:07:52,840 --> 00:07:54,640 Speaker 1: we're seeing happen is someone starts buying the four oh 147 00:07:54,720 --> 00:07:57,280 Speaker 1: eight calls and that starts putting pressure and you see 148 00:07:57,320 --> 00:08:00,440 Speaker 1: almost the lattering type trade and it occurs over and over, 149 00:08:00,720 --> 00:08:02,480 Speaker 1: and I think it reminds me a lot of what 150 00:08:02,600 --> 00:08:04,120 Speaker 1: we are seeing about a year and a half two 151 00:08:04,160 --> 00:08:06,080 Speaker 1: years ago, where you kind of had those gamma squeezes 152 00:08:06,280 --> 00:08:08,400 Speaker 1: and that was very much individual stocks. It started on 153 00:08:08,480 --> 00:08:11,080 Speaker 1: Monday with people buying the weekly options, and now it's 154 00:08:11,120 --> 00:08:13,120 Speaker 1: moved down to this daily option. And so the other 155 00:08:13,200 --> 00:08:15,280 Speaker 1: reason I think Vix is kind of irrelevant to me. 156 00:08:15,680 --> 00:08:18,520 Speaker 1: So Vix only calculates options with twenty seven to thirty 157 00:08:18,600 --> 00:08:21,680 Speaker 1: five days of expiration. As more and more people gravitate 158 00:08:21,760 --> 00:08:25,760 Speaker 1: towards these daily options, yeah, and the volatility doesn't get 159 00:08:25,800 --> 00:08:27,160 Speaker 1: picked up in that. So I think that's where the 160 00:08:27,200 --> 00:08:29,280 Speaker 1: surprises are going to come. People are looking at Vicks 161 00:08:29,320 --> 00:08:32,120 Speaker 1: for the hedging. It's all occurring this daily and weekly options. 162 00:08:32,160 --> 00:08:35,560 Speaker 1: Let's do iron shoals. One is a rule of thumb 163 00:08:35,679 --> 00:08:39,600 Speaker 1: options that drived out of four times leverage. Futures drive 164 00:08:39,679 --> 00:08:43,240 Speaker 1: out at ten times leverage. With these short dated options, 165 00:08:43,640 --> 00:08:46,360 Speaker 1: what is their leverage equivalent? It's got to be way higher, 166 00:08:46,520 --> 00:08:48,760 Speaker 1: way higher. I think it's the hundreds to one. You know, 167 00:08:48,800 --> 00:08:53,440 Speaker 1: people like fture, you do the regulator step in here. 168 00:08:53,520 --> 00:08:55,160 Speaker 1: This is a train wreck waiting to happen. You and 169 00:08:55,240 --> 00:08:56,920 Speaker 1: I know it. You know, I think people are going 170 00:08:56,960 --> 00:08:59,160 Speaker 1: to start looking at this. It's really hard to figure 171 00:08:59,160 --> 00:09:01,520 Speaker 1: out what just fis this. You're starting to see again 172 00:09:01,559 --> 00:09:03,880 Speaker 1: all like the meme stock type things where my Twitter 173 00:09:03,960 --> 00:09:06,120 Speaker 1: feeds filled with people who promised to make a thousand 174 00:09:06,160 --> 00:09:10,120 Speaker 1: dollars into a hundred thousand dollars because it's truly gambling. Um, 175 00:09:10,840 --> 00:09:13,560 Speaker 1: there's no binomial model or anything that's going to predict this, right, 176 00:09:13,600 --> 00:09:15,360 Speaker 1: you buy something out of the money and you hope 177 00:09:15,400 --> 00:09:17,720 Speaker 1: it triggers. And what we're also seeing, I think if 178 00:09:17,720 --> 00:09:19,959 Speaker 1: you look in the background on the days calls are working, 179 00:09:20,360 --> 00:09:22,880 Speaker 1: people really push hard on some of the most shorted 180 00:09:22,920 --> 00:09:26,120 Speaker 1: stocks and vice versa. So stay away from the jargon. Gama, folks, 181 00:09:26,240 --> 00:09:29,679 Speaker 1: is basically a form of acceleration. What is going to 182 00:09:29,800 --> 00:09:32,160 Speaker 1: happen is we're gonna have a level change due to 183 00:09:32,280 --> 00:09:35,520 Speaker 1: news whatever equities are going to go up or down. 184 00:09:35,800 --> 00:09:38,200 Speaker 1: What will then happen to the people playing a one 185 00:09:38,280 --> 00:09:41,440 Speaker 1: day duration in a leverage way out past ten to one. Well, 186 00:09:41,440 --> 00:09:43,040 Speaker 1: the people who get it right are going to make 187 00:09:43,200 --> 00:09:44,800 Speaker 1: a lot of money. They're going to keep pushing out 188 00:09:44,800 --> 00:09:47,360 Speaker 1: the others. That's where you'll see liquidity start playing back. 189 00:09:47,400 --> 00:09:50,280 Speaker 1: And I think that's what happens now is you've got 190 00:09:50,320 --> 00:09:52,680 Speaker 1: all these algos kind of with this full level of liquidity, right, 191 00:09:52,679 --> 00:09:55,120 Speaker 1: they're all trying to scalp a tiny bit, and as 192 00:09:55,160 --> 00:09:58,040 Speaker 1: these moves start, they do you believe there's there's risk 193 00:09:58,120 --> 00:10:02,000 Speaker 1: here on major Wall Street firm usks. I don't think 194 00:10:02,040 --> 00:10:04,640 Speaker 1: it's there as much as individuals though. I think it's 195 00:10:04,679 --> 00:10:10,920 Speaker 1: really has started gravitating more and more towards um you know, retail, 196 00:10:11,000 --> 00:10:13,800 Speaker 1: not just retail traders, but institutional traders are gravitating this. 197 00:10:13,960 --> 00:10:15,760 Speaker 1: You're not getting these types of volumes because it's mom 198 00:10:15,800 --> 00:10:17,640 Speaker 1: and pop or you know, the kids playing. This is 199 00:10:17,679 --> 00:10:21,000 Speaker 1: definitely at the big institutional desks as a trading strategy. 200 00:10:21,120 --> 00:10:23,760 Speaker 1: What's the larger consequence of this? Is it a matter 201 00:10:23,960 --> 00:10:27,079 Speaker 1: of just really muddied signals from a market that doesn't 202 00:10:27,120 --> 00:10:29,880 Speaker 1: really cohere with any of the larger economic trends, or 203 00:10:30,160 --> 00:10:33,240 Speaker 1: is this something that's a more significant whipsaw waiting to 204 00:10:33,320 --> 00:10:36,560 Speaker 1: happen in a sort of unexpected downdraft that could happen suddenly. 205 00:10:37,240 --> 00:10:39,360 Speaker 1: So I think the first thing is it's just much 206 00:10:39,400 --> 00:10:40,880 Speaker 1: harder to get a good read on the market. Right 207 00:10:40,960 --> 00:10:43,360 Speaker 1: These moves are amplified, so you can't see that. You've 208 00:10:43,400 --> 00:10:45,120 Speaker 1: got to be watching these things or else you're gonna 209 00:10:45,120 --> 00:10:47,439 Speaker 1: miss signals. I think the most obvious day was the 210 00:10:47,520 --> 00:10:50,079 Speaker 1: Thursday after the f O m C when NASDAC was 211 00:10:50,120 --> 00:10:52,760 Speaker 1: up five points. You could just see this really trading 212 00:10:53,080 --> 00:10:56,120 Speaker 1: through these zero day expiration options, So you've got to 213 00:10:56,160 --> 00:10:58,920 Speaker 1: be watching this. It dilutes information, and I think you 214 00:10:59,000 --> 00:11:00,640 Speaker 1: just have to be prepared that whatever you think it 215 00:11:00,679 --> 00:11:02,640 Speaker 1: can move. If you think it's a one to move, 216 00:11:02,800 --> 00:11:04,840 Speaker 1: you could get five to ten percent, I think much easier. 217 00:11:05,000 --> 00:11:07,240 Speaker 1: So is it just a matter of volatility or does 218 00:11:07,280 --> 00:11:10,400 Speaker 1: it also affect the trajectory sort of the directionality and 219 00:11:10,520 --> 00:11:13,160 Speaker 1: also the persistency of a rally because of the self 220 00:11:13,160 --> 00:11:15,840 Speaker 1: fulfilling aspect. I think it can. It can make things 221 00:11:15,920 --> 00:11:17,959 Speaker 1: extend a little bit, because you it just makes it 222 00:11:18,040 --> 00:11:19,480 Speaker 1: if we live in a world where there's kind of 223 00:11:19,480 --> 00:11:21,520 Speaker 1: almost windshield white browt goes. You're looking to who you 224 00:11:21,559 --> 00:11:25,080 Speaker 1: can stop out, shorts or long. It makes the chances 225 00:11:25,120 --> 00:11:27,400 Speaker 1: that they hit triggers higher, and then you keep pushing 226 00:11:27,440 --> 00:11:29,680 Speaker 1: it higher and higher, right, and you get these much 227 00:11:29,760 --> 00:11:33,360 Speaker 1: more exaggerated moves, which forces everyone who's short to close out. 228 00:11:33,679 --> 00:11:35,280 Speaker 1: And now I think you switch back. And the other 229 00:11:35,360 --> 00:11:37,520 Speaker 1: thing I think it was really done is as a contrarian, 230 00:11:37,559 --> 00:11:40,439 Speaker 1: you're always trying to figure out, Okay, what's market positioning 231 00:11:40,480 --> 00:11:42,960 Speaker 1: you want to bet against that. I think market position 232 00:11:43,040 --> 00:11:45,840 Speaker 1: now turns on a dime, the ability to move huge 233 00:11:45,880 --> 00:11:48,760 Speaker 1: amounts of risk through relatively short dated options. I think 234 00:11:48,800 --> 00:11:51,040 Speaker 1: it's changed that risk position so it used to take 235 00:11:51,800 --> 00:11:53,640 Speaker 1: weeks to a month for every and ago from over 236 00:11:53,720 --> 00:11:55,880 Speaker 1: bought to over sold. I think these things happen in 237 00:11:56,200 --> 00:11:59,000 Speaker 1: days or weeks now. So what's your projection of how 238 00:11:59,080 --> 00:12:01,480 Speaker 1: this plays out? We've all these cute narratives trying to 239 00:12:01,600 --> 00:12:04,560 Speaker 1: pin off the heels of certain market action. How does 240 00:12:04,600 --> 00:12:06,439 Speaker 1: this play out as you see the boiling of the 241 00:12:06,520 --> 00:12:08,680 Speaker 1: frog with respect to higher rates in the front end. 242 00:12:08,760 --> 00:12:10,400 Speaker 1: If it's like everything else, I think what we'll see 243 00:12:10,480 --> 00:12:12,000 Speaker 1: is one down day where we go through some of 244 00:12:12,040 --> 00:12:15,440 Speaker 1: the triggers that you know, stop the exchanges, and then 245 00:12:15,480 --> 00:12:17,880 Speaker 1: regulators will pay attention because no one ever pays that 246 00:12:18,000 --> 00:12:20,480 Speaker 1: much attention when the bias tends to be higher. I 247 00:12:20,520 --> 00:12:22,560 Speaker 1: think it's going to take a big down day where 248 00:12:22,600 --> 00:12:24,760 Speaker 1: no one can explain why it says we start hitting 249 00:12:24,800 --> 00:12:28,280 Speaker 1: all these triggers on the NASDAC and New York's doctors 250 00:12:28,360 --> 00:12:31,839 Speaker 1: changes understand the Vulmageddon two points of the mark I 251 00:12:31,920 --> 00:12:35,280 Speaker 1: was talking about it repeat a kind of repeat a yeah, 252 00:12:35,280 --> 00:12:36,680 Speaker 1: and I read a bit of his I think it's 253 00:12:36,720 --> 00:12:38,360 Speaker 1: a little bit off there because the one thing that 254 00:12:38,440 --> 00:12:40,760 Speaker 1: we had in team is people trading the vix directly. 255 00:12:40,800 --> 00:12:42,559 Speaker 1: There were all those vix E t n s and 256 00:12:42,640 --> 00:12:45,000 Speaker 1: they had that ability to actually trade the vixed futures 257 00:12:45,280 --> 00:12:47,599 Speaker 1: and there were really interesting trigger points at four to 258 00:12:47,679 --> 00:12:50,240 Speaker 1: four fifteen PM that let people push that. Yeah, I 259 00:12:50,320 --> 00:12:51,960 Speaker 1: think we'll see this, and I think you're gonna see 260 00:12:52,600 --> 00:12:54,240 Speaker 1: how I look at liquidy, whether it's in the bond 261 00:12:54,320 --> 00:12:56,400 Speaker 1: market or equities. Again, it's all these little out goes 262 00:12:56,440 --> 00:12:58,160 Speaker 1: fighting around and as soon as they start losing money, 263 00:12:58,320 --> 00:13:00,400 Speaker 1: they start shutting off and bid off off for goes 264 00:13:00,520 --> 00:13:03,160 Speaker 1: wider and that's why you're going to see these exaggerated moves. 265 00:13:03,320 --> 00:13:12,360 Speaker 1: I hear now annoyed to cheering. Cheer better to be cheerful. 266 00:13:17,240 --> 00:13:19,600 Speaker 1: Have you watched Top Gun before? Of course they haven't. 267 00:13:20,080 --> 00:13:21,520 Speaker 1: I don't know if you saw. But ahead of it, 268 00:13:21,679 --> 00:13:24,520 Speaker 1: one of our generals and animals I work with, um 269 00:13:25,000 --> 00:13:27,199 Speaker 1: General Wallace was actually a Top Gun instructor. So that 270 00:13:27,280 --> 00:13:31,360 Speaker 1: was pretty stories about that. What did he say watch 271 00:13:31,440 --> 00:13:34,200 Speaker 1: the movie? He said that the movie was fairly realistic. 272 00:13:34,280 --> 00:13:36,200 Speaker 1: There were all sorts of people at this and there 273 00:13:36,240 --> 00:13:38,920 Speaker 1: were some people who are just phenomenal pilots, not necessarily 274 00:13:38,960 --> 00:13:41,280 Speaker 1: great people, but phenomenal pilots, and there were others. There 275 00:13:41,280 --> 00:13:43,720 Speaker 1: were great people. And it really was because I think 276 00:13:43,760 --> 00:13:45,960 Speaker 1: it was in the Vietnam War our kill rate had 277 00:13:46,000 --> 00:13:49,199 Speaker 1: gone down so much they felt the need to train better. Pay. 278 00:13:49,320 --> 00:13:51,800 Speaker 1: This was awesome. Thanks Abamitous, you come back in three 279 00:13:51,880 --> 00:13:54,640 Speaker 1: days when we look at Cheer. What we've got to 280 00:13:54,679 --> 00:13:56,600 Speaker 1: talk about with pay is the object's been shot at 281 00:13:56,640 --> 00:13:59,079 Speaker 1: the sky. I mean, Academy security is perfectly placed to 282 00:13:59,120 --> 00:14:01,640 Speaker 1: have this conversation. Probably we have a lot of time 283 00:14:01,840 --> 00:14:04,480 Speaker 1: that I know you have. Peter, thank you as always 284 00:14:04,520 --> 00:14:12,240 Speaker 1: pitter cheer of Academy Security, John Nan Russ Coastrick Global 285 00:14:12,280 --> 00:14:15,720 Speaker 1: Allocation Fund portfolio manager over a black Rock Russ, let's 286 00:14:15,720 --> 00:14:18,040 Speaker 1: start there. The closing low on the two year I 287 00:14:18,080 --> 00:14:21,360 Speaker 1: think was January just north of four four point zero 288 00:14:21,440 --> 00:14:23,960 Speaker 1: eight percent. We're higher by about fifty basis points since then. 289 00:14:24,320 --> 00:14:28,760 Speaker 1: Over that same period, we've seen the nastag absolutely ripped. Russ. 290 00:14:29,320 --> 00:14:33,760 Speaker 1: What gives good more and Joathan you it's it's interesting 291 00:14:33,800 --> 00:14:37,080 Speaker 1: because when you think about last year, last year was 292 00:14:37,200 --> 00:14:40,400 Speaker 1: very driven by rate beta, in other words, the sensitivity 293 00:14:40,440 --> 00:14:43,840 Speaker 1: of the stock market, particularly growth stocks and even more 294 00:14:43,880 --> 00:14:47,440 Speaker 1: than nay early growth names to both nominal and real rates. 295 00:14:47,840 --> 00:14:49,920 Speaker 1: And exactly as you point out, you know, we've seen 296 00:14:50,000 --> 00:14:53,560 Speaker 1: this move higher rates and the nastack is ripping. My 297 00:14:53,720 --> 00:14:57,440 Speaker 1: guess is the simple answers You've had a reversal from 298 00:14:57,560 --> 00:15:00,560 Speaker 1: really extreme positioning in the end of twenty two, and 299 00:15:00,640 --> 00:15:04,880 Speaker 1: that hasn't clearly ended yet. You had massive tax laws 300 00:15:04,960 --> 00:15:07,560 Speaker 1: selling in the end of twenty two, you had massive 301 00:15:07,680 --> 00:15:10,080 Speaker 1: shorts in a lot of these names. As people have 302 00:15:10,200 --> 00:15:13,120 Speaker 1: come into the new year, that that pressure is abated, 303 00:15:13,680 --> 00:15:15,680 Speaker 1: I don't think that can carry us throughout the year. 304 00:15:16,000 --> 00:15:18,360 Speaker 1: I don't think you know, meme stocks and early growth 305 00:15:18,400 --> 00:15:21,240 Speaker 1: of what leads us in twenty two parting in twenty three. 306 00:15:21,680 --> 00:15:23,760 Speaker 1: But a lot of us has been a reversal of 307 00:15:23,880 --> 00:15:26,280 Speaker 1: that very tough year you had, particularly at the end 308 00:15:26,680 --> 00:15:30,840 Speaker 1: in two RUSS beneath the radar. Really not even reported 309 00:15:30,880 --> 00:15:34,000 Speaker 1: in the western press was Japan g DP. The nominal 310 00:15:34,120 --> 00:15:38,480 Speaker 1: GDP of Japan was sub two percent. Is that the 311 00:15:38,600 --> 00:15:42,080 Speaker 1: great miscall in the markets now is we don't understand 312 00:15:42,160 --> 00:15:46,920 Speaker 1: the impact of an elevated and more persistent nominal GDP 313 00:15:47,320 --> 00:15:50,480 Speaker 1: in the United States, and as John Farrell mentions as well, 314 00:15:50,720 --> 00:15:54,320 Speaker 1: in war torn Europe. Well, I think this is actually 315 00:15:54,360 --> 00:15:56,840 Speaker 1: really important point. Tom. You ask why is the stock 316 00:15:56,920 --> 00:15:59,400 Speaker 1: market up? And let's leave the meme stocks out for 317 00:15:59,440 --> 00:16:02,760 Speaker 1: a moment. You know, the glass is half full argument 318 00:16:02,960 --> 00:16:05,720 Speaker 1: is exactly what you're alluding to. So you had a 319 00:16:05,880 --> 00:16:08,600 Speaker 1: view three or four months ago about a hard landing, 320 00:16:08,920 --> 00:16:11,280 Speaker 1: you know, let's call that, you know, the economy contracting 321 00:16:11,640 --> 00:16:14,280 Speaker 1: one or two percent, and now you've got a better 322 00:16:14,360 --> 00:16:17,320 Speaker 1: and better likelihood off either soft or new landing. So 323 00:16:17,440 --> 00:16:20,600 Speaker 1: if you have one percent growth in twenty three, which 324 00:16:20,640 --> 00:16:23,520 Speaker 1: doesn't seem outlandish right now, in three or four percent 325 00:16:23,600 --> 00:16:26,320 Speaker 1: inflation on top of that, that's four or five percent 326 00:16:26,400 --> 00:16:31,040 Speaker 1: nominal GDP. That is a much bigger tailwind for earning 327 00:16:31,120 --> 00:16:33,680 Speaker 1: his growth in the US, probably to some extent in 328 00:16:33,720 --> 00:16:37,240 Speaker 1: Europe as well, that investors are expecting six months ago. 329 00:16:37,280 --> 00:16:39,520 Speaker 1: And that's one of the reasons, probably the right reason 330 00:16:39,600 --> 00:16:41,960 Speaker 1: them or the stock market has been as resilient as 331 00:16:42,000 --> 00:16:44,240 Speaker 1: it's been, you know, at Lisa, this is really important. 332 00:16:44,320 --> 00:16:48,120 Speaker 1: Nominal GDP across the pandemic from a high seventeen percent, 333 00:16:49,000 --> 00:16:52,920 Speaker 1: that's a boom economy, you know, fear missing out down 334 00:16:52,960 --> 00:16:56,480 Speaker 1: to ten percent, down to nine percent. Phenomenal GDP in 335 00:16:56,520 --> 00:16:59,720 Speaker 1: America seven point three percent versus under two percent. And 336 00:16:59,800 --> 00:17:02,200 Speaker 1: you pen and we're wondering why stocks are going up, Well, 337 00:17:02,320 --> 00:17:04,200 Speaker 1: there's a spirit out there in the U. S. It's 338 00:17:04,240 --> 00:17:06,640 Speaker 1: it's irrefutable. And this really goes to the question rus 339 00:17:06,720 --> 00:17:08,960 Speaker 1: and I'd love your take on this. How much of 340 00:17:09,040 --> 00:17:11,760 Speaker 1: the rally that we've seen, the sort of rethink of 341 00:17:11,800 --> 00:17:15,160 Speaker 1: what we saw last year is justified based on better 342 00:17:15,240 --> 00:17:19,679 Speaker 1: than expected economic data. Well, I think it is justified. 343 00:17:19,760 --> 00:17:21,280 Speaker 1: You know, again, I think the stocks can have a 344 00:17:21,440 --> 00:17:24,320 Speaker 1: decent year, you know, but the mystery is less wire 345 00:17:24,440 --> 00:17:27,840 Speaker 1: stocks up up versus why are parts of the market 346 00:17:28,000 --> 00:17:31,040 Speaker 1: leading that really shouldn't be leading in environmental races are 347 00:17:31,080 --> 00:17:33,480 Speaker 1: still climbing. But I do think we have an environment 348 00:17:33,520 --> 00:17:35,919 Speaker 1: we're look, we're getting to the clot We're getting closer 349 00:17:36,040 --> 00:17:37,920 Speaker 1: to the end of that FED cycle, and maybe it 350 00:17:38,000 --> 00:17:40,800 Speaker 1: goes a quarter point more than the market thanks right now, 351 00:17:41,240 --> 00:17:43,840 Speaker 1: but we're still seeing the end of that process. We 352 00:17:44,000 --> 00:17:48,359 Speaker 1: do have a better economic outlook with better nominal GDP. Uh. 353 00:17:48,480 --> 00:17:50,200 Speaker 1: None of this means we're going straight up and you 354 00:17:50,359 --> 00:17:53,440 Speaker 1: chase every momentum stock out there. But I think the 355 00:17:53,520 --> 00:17:56,480 Speaker 1: reality is in an environment where you avoid a recession, 356 00:17:56,840 --> 00:17:59,520 Speaker 1: where nominal GDP is let's call it four or five percent, 357 00:18:00,160 --> 00:18:02,840 Speaker 1: and rate volatility is probably going to be lower by 358 00:18:02,840 --> 00:18:05,560 Speaker 1: the end of the year, that's not a bad environment 359 00:18:05,880 --> 00:18:07,720 Speaker 1: and it probably leads stocks higher by the end of 360 00:18:07,760 --> 00:18:10,359 Speaker 1: the year. Okay, So based on that, how would you 361 00:18:10,440 --> 00:18:13,119 Speaker 1: play this? Would you basically sell tech stocks by the 362 00:18:13,240 --> 00:18:16,239 Speaker 1: rest and perhaps not have as much in cash as 363 00:18:16,280 --> 00:18:19,360 Speaker 1: people expect because this is an opportunity in other assets 364 00:18:19,440 --> 00:18:22,480 Speaker 1: that people are discounting it too much. Well, you know, 365 00:18:22,560 --> 00:18:25,280 Speaker 1: and it's probably right now, you know, cash actually doesn't 366 00:18:25,320 --> 00:18:27,439 Speaker 1: look so bad right now, at least compared to UH, 367 00:18:27,920 --> 00:18:30,120 Speaker 1: some of the other parts of the curve, just given 368 00:18:30,160 --> 00:18:31,920 Speaker 1: the fact that you are getting a lot to sit out. 369 00:18:32,240 --> 00:18:34,000 Speaker 1: But yes, I do think you want to go back 370 00:18:34,080 --> 00:18:37,760 Speaker 1: to something that is, you know, judiciously embracing risks. Now, 371 00:18:37,840 --> 00:18:40,640 Speaker 1: I don't think it's all about growth first value. Matter 372 00:18:40,640 --> 00:18:43,080 Speaker 1: of fact, in our portfolio, what we've been doing is 373 00:18:43,080 --> 00:18:45,680 Speaker 1: we've been emphasizing two things. We're still going for quality 374 00:18:46,200 --> 00:18:48,720 Speaker 1: UH and that's because we're in an environment where again 375 00:18:48,800 --> 00:18:51,200 Speaker 1: the economy, we don't think it's going into recession, but 376 00:18:51,359 --> 00:18:54,440 Speaker 1: there will be some deceleration, and we're splitting the difference 377 00:18:54,520 --> 00:18:57,480 Speaker 1: on the growth value debate. We're going for garth. GARP 378 00:18:57,640 --> 00:19:00,520 Speaker 1: is a style growth at a reasonable price that tends 379 00:19:00,560 --> 00:19:04,360 Speaker 1: to do really well when you have an economic deceleration, 380 00:19:04,840 --> 00:19:07,280 Speaker 1: but not a contraction. So yeah, I think it's more 381 00:19:07,280 --> 00:19:10,960 Speaker 1: about picking your spots, having companies with strong cash flow 382 00:19:11,680 --> 00:19:13,760 Speaker 1: rather than making these big bets on tech or not 383 00:19:13,920 --> 00:19:17,600 Speaker 1: tech catch up and Bryce Semitistan with the rust strict 384 00:19:17,640 --> 00:19:30,480 Speaker 1: that of blan Croft just because of time and it's 385 00:19:30,680 --> 00:19:34,119 Speaker 1: huge popularity, people lean forward on Global Wall Street. For 386 00:19:34,200 --> 00:19:36,119 Speaker 1: the gentleman from Penn State, they threw him out of 387 00:19:36,119 --> 00:19:39,439 Speaker 1: State college years ago. Yes, too many curious questions. Dan 388 00:19:39,560 --> 00:19:43,119 Speaker 1: Ives joins US now equity analysts at Wedbush. Dan I 389 00:19:43,200 --> 00:19:45,760 Speaker 1: was talking about Scott Galloway and the four earlier. Let's 390 00:19:45,800 --> 00:19:49,960 Speaker 1: call it the ives for the four big companies a 391 00:19:50,080 --> 00:19:56,480 Speaker 1: year from now, Bloomberg models three billion dollars free cash flow. 392 00:19:57,040 --> 00:20:01,040 Speaker 1: What's the quality of the predictability that persist stancy of 393 00:20:01,160 --> 00:20:05,560 Speaker 1: the Big four's free cash flow? Oh, I think right 394 00:20:05,600 --> 00:20:09,520 Speaker 1: now we're looking visibility and more. I think that's the 395 00:20:09,680 --> 00:20:12,399 Speaker 1: big difference to what even when you go back a 396 00:20:12,480 --> 00:20:14,439 Speaker 1: few years ago, and that's what you've seen coming out 397 00:20:14,520 --> 00:20:18,440 Speaker 1: of Coupertino. It's what's happening in Redmond and well as 398 00:20:18,520 --> 00:20:21,160 Speaker 1: big tech, and I think that's been a big sort 399 00:20:21,200 --> 00:20:24,159 Speaker 1: of headline during earnings. You know, better than feared, and 400 00:20:24,280 --> 00:20:27,600 Speaker 1: I think investors as under investment in tech going into 401 00:20:27,640 --> 00:20:29,920 Speaker 1: the years I've seen these two thousand and nine. Should 402 00:20:29,960 --> 00:20:36,200 Speaker 1: Tim Cook fear China? I think ultimately he embraces China. 403 00:20:36,240 --> 00:20:38,920 Speaker 1: I mean, like a Cook is able to navigate China 404 00:20:39,320 --> 00:20:42,240 Speaker 1: as well as any CEO in the world, understand that 405 00:20:42,400 --> 00:20:45,280 Speaker 1: the hearts and lungs of the supply chain, but also 406 00:20:45,320 --> 00:20:48,200 Speaker 1: that's of demand terms of iPhones, and I can tell 407 00:20:48,240 --> 00:20:51,520 Speaker 1: you even as of this week, iPhone demand looks strong 408 00:20:51,680 --> 00:20:55,280 Speaker 1: in China and globally, and that's really what I believe 409 00:20:55,320 --> 00:20:58,680 Speaker 1: continues to move Apple higher. Dan. Last year, we talked 410 00:20:58,680 --> 00:21:00,399 Speaker 1: a lot about the interest rate sense of ativity of 411 00:21:00,440 --> 00:21:02,560 Speaker 1: the tech space. Are you saying that it's less interest 412 00:21:02,640 --> 00:21:07,040 Speaker 1: rate sensitive? Now? Look, I think the New York City 413 00:21:07,080 --> 00:21:10,040 Speaker 1: cab driver at this point has sort of factored that 414 00:21:10,119 --> 00:21:12,400 Speaker 1: into the stock go he's going into earlier this year. 415 00:21:12,920 --> 00:21:15,720 Speaker 1: I think now when you look, investors have sort of 416 00:21:15,800 --> 00:21:18,120 Speaker 1: gotten used to it. Dave factor that in in terms 417 00:21:18,160 --> 00:21:19,800 Speaker 1: of what the Fed's gonna do. We're in the eighth 418 00:21:19,960 --> 00:21:23,320 Speaker 1: ninth inning, and now it just comes down to valuations 419 00:21:23,359 --> 00:21:26,520 Speaker 1: relative to the last five years based on growth is 420 00:21:26,520 --> 00:21:28,560 Speaker 1: as good as we've seen. That's why I think right 421 00:21:28,600 --> 00:21:32,119 Speaker 1: now at these tech names continue move higher because what 422 00:21:32,240 --> 00:21:35,240 Speaker 1: we see with fundamentals demand holding up, and you have 423 00:21:35,560 --> 00:21:38,639 Speaker 1: all that beaked into the stocks, which is why these 424 00:21:38,680 --> 00:21:41,720 Speaker 1: stocks have moved up on lowered guidance and what I 425 00:21:41,720 --> 00:21:44,000 Speaker 1: would say B plus type of earners. You said that 426 00:21:44,119 --> 00:21:46,320 Speaker 1: that people have gotten used to it. It's basically been 427 00:21:46,400 --> 00:21:49,240 Speaker 1: baked in, and yet there has been a pretty market 428 00:21:49,280 --> 00:21:51,600 Speaker 1: shift in the market since the beginning of the year 429 00:21:51,640 --> 00:21:54,639 Speaker 1: in terms of where the expectation for race is, how 430 00:21:54,720 --> 00:21:56,320 Speaker 1: far the FED will have to go. At what point 431 00:21:56,359 --> 00:21:59,240 Speaker 1: does it start to change the discussion around the factor 432 00:21:59,320 --> 00:22:02,560 Speaker 1: the feature in the tech shares that we've seen here 433 00:22:02,600 --> 00:22:06,040 Speaker 1: to date. Yeah, at least it's a great question. I 434 00:22:06,160 --> 00:22:10,080 Speaker 1: just think from a tech investor perspective, the CPI PPI 435 00:22:10,200 --> 00:22:13,880 Speaker 1: white knuckle print these macro I feel like, well, that's 436 00:22:13,920 --> 00:22:16,760 Speaker 1: in the rearview. I mean, investors understand you could have 437 00:22:16,800 --> 00:22:20,200 Speaker 1: another twenty five. Obviously things can move around from a 438 00:22:20,240 --> 00:22:23,359 Speaker 1: FED perspective, but either way likes the end of the tunnel. 439 00:22:23,520 --> 00:22:26,840 Speaker 1: And now we're starting to get to an investor environment 440 00:22:26,920 --> 00:22:30,159 Speaker 1: where a soft landing or no landing looks like what 441 00:22:30,240 --> 00:22:32,640 Speaker 1: we're seeing across tech earnings. Dan, I want to ask 442 00:22:32,680 --> 00:22:35,000 Speaker 1: a question that we've gone over many times before, but 443 00:22:35,080 --> 00:22:39,919 Speaker 1: it always bears review and Rana at Bloomberg Intelligence has 444 00:22:39,960 --> 00:22:43,360 Speaker 1: a vision of where the cloud is going? What does 445 00:22:43,440 --> 00:22:46,720 Speaker 1: the IVES cloud look like five or dare I say 446 00:22:46,840 --> 00:22:50,680 Speaker 1: ten years out? These big tech juggernauts, do they have 447 00:22:50,840 --> 00:22:54,320 Speaker 1: degrees of freedom to move larger in revenue, larger in 448 00:22:54,440 --> 00:22:58,440 Speaker 1: market share, larger in global imprint footprint, I should say 449 00:22:59,760 --> 00:23:01,960 Speaker 1: they look I think right now, and you think I'm 450 00:23:02,000 --> 00:23:04,840 Speaker 1: moving to the cloud, only forty of Workwoods moved to 451 00:23:04,920 --> 00:23:06,960 Speaker 1: the cloud. And I think that when I look at 452 00:23:07,040 --> 00:23:10,080 Speaker 1: the vision, it's really going to be about artificial intelligence 453 00:23:10,560 --> 00:23:13,119 Speaker 1: and about that data. And that's why you're seeing this 454 00:23:13,280 --> 00:23:16,359 Speaker 1: game of thrones playoff between Microsoft, which is top of 455 00:23:16,400 --> 00:23:20,040 Speaker 1: the race. Google obviously the debacle last week. But you're 456 00:23:20,040 --> 00:23:23,720 Speaker 1: gonna see Amazon, You're gonna see Apple and others dive 457 00:23:23,800 --> 00:23:25,680 Speaker 1: into deep end of the pool because that's gonna be 458 00:23:25,720 --> 00:23:28,320 Speaker 1: an eight hundred billion dollar market in a minimum that 459 00:23:28,400 --> 00:23:31,160 Speaker 1: we see him the next five or six years. Yeah. 460 00:23:31,160 --> 00:23:32,880 Speaker 1: I looked in and I walked by the Apple store 461 00:23:33,000 --> 00:23:36,320 Speaker 1: yesterday and Fifth Avenue, and I pointed to Mrs Keane 462 00:23:36,480 --> 00:23:40,200 Speaker 1: where I stood in the sidewalk with the wonderful Lawrence Haverty, 463 00:23:40,280 --> 00:23:43,320 Speaker 1: Larry Haverty, who taught us all how to do securities 464 00:23:43,359 --> 00:23:46,679 Speaker 1: analysis on these tech companies, and he and I did 465 00:23:46,720 --> 00:23:49,680 Speaker 1: a stand up interview a decade ago, twelve years ago, 466 00:23:49,800 --> 00:23:53,440 Speaker 1: thirteen years ago over the death of Apple. Is that 467 00:23:53,560 --> 00:23:57,159 Speaker 1: gloom still out there? I think it's the same that 468 00:23:57,280 --> 00:23:59,840 Speaker 1: said Mahomes was never gonna win another super Bowl. I 469 00:24:00,040 --> 00:24:03,360 Speaker 1: I think it's just it's you just continue to ultimately 470 00:24:03,520 --> 00:24:06,440 Speaker 1: have an install base that's increasing. They're gaining share in 471 00:24:06,640 --> 00:24:11,160 Speaker 1: China and now you have one point two billion iPhones worldwide, 472 00:24:11,200 --> 00:24:14,280 Speaker 1: yet nine is seventy five million eighteen months ago. And 473 00:24:14,400 --> 00:24:16,720 Speaker 1: that which is why, in my opinion, this is a 474 00:24:16,880 --> 00:24:20,280 Speaker 1: rocket Gibraltar. Tech stock haters will continue to hate, but 475 00:24:20,359 --> 00:24:22,600 Speaker 1: I think again it will be a three trillion dollar 476 00:24:22,720 --> 00:24:25,920 Speaker 1: market at So we talked last year a lot about 477 00:24:25,960 --> 00:24:28,040 Speaker 1: the winners and the losers of the tech space and 478 00:24:28,080 --> 00:24:30,080 Speaker 1: that there would be bifurcation, and yet it seems like 479 00:24:30,200 --> 00:24:32,840 Speaker 1: there isn't bifurcation, and that that story has basically gone 480 00:24:32,840 --> 00:24:34,639 Speaker 1: out the window. What do you make of that? The 481 00:24:34,720 --> 00:24:37,040 Speaker 1: fact that Apple is being lumped in again with Meta 482 00:24:37,160 --> 00:24:41,920 Speaker 1: or Facebook. Look, I think what you're starting to see 483 00:24:42,080 --> 00:24:44,320 Speaker 1: is the head counter cuts and you've seen that with 484 00:24:44,440 --> 00:24:48,800 Speaker 1: Zuckerberg and when Meta has done that's really, along with activism, 485 00:24:48,960 --> 00:24:51,040 Speaker 1: put a bottom on a lot of these stocks in 486 00:24:51,280 --> 00:24:53,440 Speaker 1: terms of you know, and now you're gonna start to 487 00:24:53,560 --> 00:24:55,840 Speaker 1: see I think over the next six and nine months 488 00:24:55,960 --> 00:24:59,600 Speaker 1: more of a deviation at least fundamental between winner and losers. 489 00:25:00,040 --> 00:25:02,240 Speaker 1: But the one thing I point out, is that any 490 00:25:02,359 --> 00:25:05,000 Speaker 1: of the frothy names that continues to get sold off, 491 00:25:05,119 --> 00:25:09,520 Speaker 1: you have significant emanate dry powder, but financial and strategic 492 00:25:09,800 --> 00:25:12,119 Speaker 1: as well as active as they're going to swell across 493 00:25:12,240 --> 00:25:15,800 Speaker 1: the board. Salesforces a perfect example. Yeah, you know so 494 00:25:15,960 --> 00:25:18,080 Speaker 1: many that hate it. You know, if you go back 495 00:25:18,320 --> 00:25:20,600 Speaker 1: forty five days ago and now I think there's a 496 00:25:20,680 --> 00:25:24,159 Speaker 1: stock that a significant upset because of activism and because 497 00:25:24,240 --> 00:25:27,199 Speaker 1: of ultimately numbers better than fear. Are we now comparing 498 00:25:27,280 --> 00:25:29,600 Speaker 1: my homes to Apple? Is that what we're doing now? Down? 499 00:25:31,000 --> 00:25:32,919 Speaker 1: U mean? I look, I think for Apple you got 500 00:25:33,080 --> 00:25:39,760 Speaker 1: to start to go to Montana level, for great quarterback, 501 00:25:39,840 --> 00:25:44,760 Speaker 1: for Kansas City, just not my homes Queer Hall of 502 00:25:44,840 --> 00:25:46,920 Speaker 1: Favorite book. I mean in terms of what Cook and 503 00:25:47,000 --> 00:25:51,080 Speaker 1: Cooper Tino have done, Tom Brady like, again, that's better, 504 00:25:51,560 --> 00:25:54,680 Speaker 1: that's better. My homes didn't hit in quite the same way. 505 00:25:55,680 --> 00:25:59,520 Speaker 1: Wet Bush Stamp. Thank you. Subscribe to the Bloomberg Surveillance 506 00:25:59,560 --> 00:26:03,880 Speaker 1: podcast sun, Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else you get your podcasts. 507 00:26:04,359 --> 00:26:08,439 Speaker 1: Listen live every weekday starting at seven am Easter. I'm 508 00:26:08,480 --> 00:26:11,840 Speaker 1: Bloomberg dot Com, the I Heart Radio app, tune In, 509 00:26:12,280 --> 00:26:15,680 Speaker 1: and the Bloomberg Business app. You can watch us live. 510 00:26:15,880 --> 00:26:20,160 Speaker 1: I'm Bloomberg Television and always on the Bloomberg Terminal. Thanks 511 00:26:20,200 --> 00:26:24,080 Speaker 1: for listening. I'm Tom Keane, and this is Bloomberg