WEBVTT - Aviation Security Innovations Since 9/11 

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets podcast

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>called Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.919
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Steve Crowley is Executive

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>VP of K two Security Screening Group, also a former

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Assistant administrator at the Transportation Security Agency at the t

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 1>s A. And UM, we want to talk about the

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:38.880
<v Speaker 1>changes that we've seen in aviation security since nine eleven,

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the UH, the improvements really and in in safety and security,

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and then the vulnerabilities that may still exist. So Steve,

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:50.160
<v Speaker 1>thanks very much for joining us. I guess the changes

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>are pretty clear um to anyone over the age of

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>like thirty, right, because we we've all lived through it. Um,

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and remember the days before you had to take off

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>your shoe is now it's a lot more invasive, but

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not really that bad. Um. How how how much

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>have we seen in terms of improvements in in UH,

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in safety and security. Well, first, Paul, Matt, thank you

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:16.199
<v Speaker 1>for having me on your show. Um, the Aviation Security

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Enterprise has come a long way since non eleven. Um.

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Not only do we have better technology to look for

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>and identify the explosives and weapons, but we also have

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>better security tactics, techniques and procedures. I mean, both of

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 1>these things enhance our security posture. Let me give you

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>some specific examples. UM. You know, as you mentioned back then,

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>we walked through simple melo detector. UM. Now we have

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>UM checkpoint X rays. UH, we have checkpoint on person

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>body scanners. We have increased well, we went from actually

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>a contracted security team twenty years ago to a professional

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>t S A officer cadre of fifty thou strong people. UM.

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>And now we have more law enforcement presence in UH.

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>In the airports were hard in flight that doors, we

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>have air marshals. Kind of what I'm getting at bottom

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:09.079
<v Speaker 1>line is the Avia Security Enterprise has implemented a multi tiered,

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 1>multi layered approach to security. We didn't have this twenty

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Steve, with twenty years of hindsight, you guys

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>in a security screening business, was it almost I mean,

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>how did it happen? I guess? I mean, is it

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:26.919
<v Speaker 1>just that it was a different time and place, and

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>we didn't think about strengthening the doors and all that

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff. Well back then, if you remember, you know,

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>anything that happened pretty much, anything that happened with an

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 1>airline UM had to do with taking over the airline

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 1>to get to you know, hijacking one like to get

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>to another place. It was never really used never not really,

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>it was never used as a weapon. So it's twenty

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>years ago it's used that it was used as a weapon.

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>And so if you think about it, just hardening the

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 1>cockpit door, you know, they were able to get into

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the cockpit because they thought it was just a typical hijacking. Hey,

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>I have a knife, I'm not gonna hurt anybody. Just

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>let me, you know, talk to the pilot and and

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and that. You know, that changed obviously now we don't

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>view it as hijacking anymore. It's terrorism, and it's uh,

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, we will always think of it as airplane

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 1>as a weapon and never allow this to happen. You

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>know again, well, we haven't seen anything even remotely like

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:26.519
<v Speaker 1>that since um September eleven, have we? I mean, I

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't recall any reports of plane being hijacked and

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 1>then used as a weapon in the last twenty years.

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>That is correct, and that is it is because of

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the aviation security enhancements that we have made. I said

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>that the multi layered and multi tiered approach UM because

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>there were there there's not even attempts. There's there's there

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>were several attempts, uh probably any less than five UM

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:53.119
<v Speaker 1>to bring on an explosive UM, but that was all

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>failed and since then we have not had not even

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>an attempt And again that's because of whipped in place today.

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>How can technology steve make you know, this even safer? Again,

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>it seems a little low tech to have to send

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, get in line, take shoes off if you're

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>not t s a pre approved It seems like there

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:18.799
<v Speaker 1>should just be some technology solution that would maybe speed

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>up the process, make it less invasive. Yes, so there

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>are some changes that are happening again behind the scenes.

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:28.479
<v Speaker 1>You don't you don't necessarily some of them. But UM,

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>for one, even you know about what ten years ago

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 1>when they came out with pre check UM being able

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 1>to look at at folks and put put folks that

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 1>you're comfortable with a side so that you can actually

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>focus on those folks that you don't know about the unknowns.

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>That actually helps the process and go a little the

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>process to go a little faster efficient. But there are

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.239
<v Speaker 1>technologies that are that they're putting in place today, actually

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>computed tomography system called CT at the checkpoint. It's kind

0:04:56.000 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>of similar to the medical technology UM. It's a red

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>image technology that will allow you to kind of manipulate

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:05.279
<v Speaker 1>the bag as your bag, your carry on bagg is

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 1>going through victory or CT system that you don't actually

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>have to have someone to take out things and move

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>things around. You can actually digitally do that, so that

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:17.039
<v Speaker 1>becomes a more efficient process as well as these uh

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>what they're deploying is automated automated screening lanes which are

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>uh uh state of the art UM conveyance systems will

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>call it, and that allows basically the bags to automatically

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>be put into the X ray system or the CT system,

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the bins automatically come back. You can more than one

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 1>person can divest their stuff at at the same time,

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:41.040
<v Speaker 1>so thus you don't have to wait for that person

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>in front of you to finish. So it's things like

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that that do help the process along and they aren't

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at other things to even become more and more efficient.

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 1>You know the old Total Recall of someone going through

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>a Total Recall movie where you sup fall sports that

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you're going through. Well, we're not gonna get down to

0:05:57.320 --> 0:05:59.039
<v Speaker 1>the point of looking at you know, bones and stuff

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>like that. The ideas that have the passenger continuously walk

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:06.040
<v Speaker 1>down this this UH pathway where sensors are they are

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>looking at the individual, so we are moving in that

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>direction and that will happen in the in the future.

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:13.719
<v Speaker 1>So at first, I want to say, there's a remake

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>of Total Recall with Colin Ferrell that got really bad reviews,

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>but I thought it was amazing, So I highly recommend

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>checking out the remake. And then I want to ask,

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 1>are these technologies going to lead to um an easier

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>airport security? I mean, are we gonna eventually leave our

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>shoes on and maybe even carry liquids through? Yes, So

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the carrying liquid through, let me get that one first.

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>So the compute demography system that's being deployed today and

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that UH started we'll say a year and a half

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 1>ago for deployments, you can actually leave the liquids in

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>because those those systems can see that. So yes, that

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>will help with that leading laptops in the bag. The

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:55.720
<v Speaker 1>CT system will help with that leaving shoes on. They

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>are integrating uh, some sensors within those walk walk through

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>metal detectors as well as the omboy scanners to actually

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>be able to leave shoes on. UM. Will they always

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>be that way? Where? Yeah? Yeah, like for the entire

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>um you know, traveling public. No, my guess is you

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 1>will still have to do some of those for those

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>unknown high UM, the folks that need to be looked

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>at more more carefully than others. UM, you always have

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>that kind of capability of those technologies. UM, we'll be

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>able to support that. UM one way that they can

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>will be able to do it with shoes on wor

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>shoes off as an example. Uh, but it won't have

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>to be two separate technologies. Steve, where do you think

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>they're still risk in the system vulnerabilities in the system? Well, UM,

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Airports continuously conduct res assessments and security vulnerability assessments to

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>identify prioritizes and actually mitigate what they find. We know

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that the US aviation system is a high value, high

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>priority target for bad actors. UM, and I like to

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:00.679
<v Speaker 1>say the bad actor only has to get it right once,

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>while t s A and the Aviation Security Enterprise that

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>you know has to be able to get it right

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>every time. So everybody still needs to remain vigilant. But today,

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>not only do we have uh we have to be

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>bilion against that that conventional bad actor you know who

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>carries the explosive or a weapon on board, but we

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>have to also look at those asymmetric bad actors that

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>are going after um the threat factors such as cyber

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>threats or even the use of drones as weapons. So

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>those things exist, and so the bottom line is we

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 1>need to be five steps ahead of those bad actors

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 1>if we want to security that aviation enterprise. All right, Steve,

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>thanks very much for joining us. Steve Curly there is

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>executive VP the k TO Security Screening Group. Of course,

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>as we mentioned, he's a former assistant administrator at the

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>t s A as well, and m really has done

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>so much in security and in leadership, so really appreciate

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the time with you. Steve, Thanks very much for your

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:02.200
<v Speaker 1>insights on this UM. Well tomorrow, I guess the twenty

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:06.559
<v Speaker 1>year anniversary of nine eleven. Travel as we knew it

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>changed almost overnight and has become safer and more secure,

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:18.599
<v Speaker 1>so we appreciate it. This is Bloomberg. Let's talk a

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit about the crypto space, Michael Cameron, CEO of Skilling,

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and let's let's start with El Salvador and and what

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>happened the other day. You know, we saw UM the

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>country adopt bitcoin as I guess legal tender. And on

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the same day we had a big drop in the price.

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>So the two things related. Michael, Hi, Matt, thanks for

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:44.559
<v Speaker 1>having me. I do think they are related. I think

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a good old fashioned by the rumor, sell the news.

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I think some of the people looking for UM, there's

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people that like the link. You know,

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 1>this drop must equate to something that happened. I think

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking for that, it's by the room, sell

0:09:58.400 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the news. But also it was a bit of a

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.439
<v Speaker 1>stumbled rollout, and so I think some people thought it

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 1>made cloud the it make cloud the future for other

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 1>countries to follow suit. What does it mean, Michael, for

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>a company to adopt it and for a country, I'm sorry,

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to adopt bitcoin as legal tenor, what does that really

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>mean to you? I think it means that, I mean

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the obvious cases that it means that they have to

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that vendors and providers have to accept bitcoin as a

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>as a an asset that they'll accept. And so that's

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that comes with a lot of operational hurdles that they

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 1>have to get over, and uh that that you know,

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:39.439
<v Speaker 1>it's citizens have to adopt this and understand how to

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>how to use it now to convert from dollars over

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to BTC and and so on and so forth. So

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 1>at a very basic level, it just means that every

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 1>vendor from a little kiosk selling phone top ups to uh,

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:53.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, a large purchase of a furniture or a

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>car has to accept bitcoin. What about um skilling, You're

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>a trading form um that tries to make trading I

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>guess transparent and secure and you deal in over eight

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>d f x um Uh well pair currency pairs? Does

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>that include crypto? Yeah? So Skilling is a is a

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>ex and CFD broker. We deal, We do deal in crypto.

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>In fact, we're a leading provider of crypto. We have

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 1>twenties seven crypto assets right now, which includes the big

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>boys like Bitcoin and ether, but also the more nascent

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>cryptos like dog coin, shiba Inu and more. Well, how's

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>it going? How's that going right now? I mean, is

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>it still um an incredibly hot sector? Bitcoin is trading

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 1>for over forty dollars right now. It's still incredibly hot.

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>It is. It is the product that that that customers

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>want to trade, you know, where we we find that

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:56.719
<v Speaker 1>UM more and more customers are just exclusively trading cryptocurrencies

0:11:56.760 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 1>now Skilling it does attract. Skilling is a really relatively

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:02.439
<v Speaker 1>new fintech on the scene. Were only a few years old,

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and uh, we primarily attract a younger audience, but they

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and they almost exclusively dip their toe into crypto. Some

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:11.959
<v Speaker 1>of the older brokers still rely on a lot of

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 1>customers that trade the kind of the traditional assets, you know,

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the TAO and the SMP and gold and the Fiat currencies. UM.

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 1>But we are trying to push the envelope and just

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>offer all the cryptocurrencies that that are making the news,

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>making the headlines, and and it's still on fire. It's

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 1>still all that people want to trade right now, you know, Uh, Michael,

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>there's still a lot of skepticism out there about bitcoin

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and crypto in general. In fact, the Sweetish central banker

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>warned that bitcoin could eventually collapse. How do you kind

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of frame that type of thinking as this market continues

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to develop. I think that that skepticism is is a

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 1>little unfair. I think a better I think that these

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the way comments like that I think are are are

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be judged to be on the wrong side

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 1>of history. So this cryptocurrencies have with every passing year,

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 1>there's more and more use cases for both blockchain but

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 1>also cryptocurrencies, and so I feel like when there's comments

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>like that denigratee cryptocurrencies and the use of blockchain, it's

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>very shortsighted. Fiat currencies like the Prono, like the Swiss

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>frank are not um. They're not without volatility. I mean,

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>just a few, just a few januaries back, m a

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>currency here in Europe, dropped well appreciated. UM. So for

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>all the naysayers that say crypto is a scam or

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 1>it's too volatile, UM, fiat currencies are not above that.

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>European fiot currencies are not above that. And so I

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 1>think I think it's here to stay. I think UM,

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think comments like that aren't aren't gonna help

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and are going to be judged to be on the

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>wrong side of history. But We're gonna clearly need more regulation,

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 1>aren't we. I mean, you look at all the rip

0:13:56.080 --> 0:14:00.079
<v Speaker 1>offs going on and defy and um, the fact that

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>it's almost expected by investors. Not that you trade those

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>defy tokens also, but you see them. Yeah. Yeah, there's

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>more regulation coming, and I think that's that's a good

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:12.839
<v Speaker 1>thing for companies like Skilling. It's a very good thing.

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>We don't we're highly regulated as it is. You know,

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:17.959
<v Speaker 1>we have a significant amount of you know, a m

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>L and k y C checks we put customers through.

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>We don't accept cryptocurrencies right now as uh for deposits,

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 1>But um, it's something we're we're obviously we're eyeing, and

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>we know that all of our competitors and most brokerages

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>are looking into this. And there are leading companies out

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>there that do what they call KYT tracking, so that

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you can track the genesis of a cryptocurrency transaction. You

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>can track it very far back and you can see

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>you know where where it's been used. So, um, I

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>think the regulation is building and I and companies like

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>ours welcoming. Hey, Michael, thanks so much for joining us.

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Really appreciate it. Fascinating store here developing so just we

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>will obviously keep you on the loopas as we need

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>more discussion going forward. Michael Camerman, CEO of Skilling. I'm

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>a credit investor. Where do I go for yield? A

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of folks are looking at the private credit market

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and we've got an expert in that market. John Klient,

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>President and Chief operating Officer of New Mountain Finance Corporation. John,

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. Just give us,

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, for those folks that that aren't that you know, um,

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, knowledgeable about the private credit market, just framed

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>for us. What is the private credit market that you

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 1>guys playing well? Thanks for having me on the show.

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I really appreciate it. The private credit market, at least

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the way we think about it, is a market that

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>finances leverage buyouts for um uh for for financial sponsors

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 1>across a big continuum of size. So we're providing capital

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>to effectuate leverage buyouts, and historically we've done so in

0:15:56.960 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the middle market, but more and more private credit is

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>moving up market and and executing billion dollar tranches to

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>effectuate these larger buyouts. So what kind of return are

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>we talking about? So private credit the pitch across the

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>industry to investors is essentially in private credit you can

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>get consistent seven to ten percent returns essentially with floating

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>rate tranches so you can protect against inflation and changes

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>in the general macro environment. And across the industry, we've

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>we've done a good job achieving returns that are better

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>than the high yield market and the syndicated market, and

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that continues today. So it's interesting, John, I mean, you know,

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Matt and I we we talked a lot of folks

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 1>who in the private equity space and we're just amazed

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 1>by how much capital and is in the private equity

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>space looking for deals. Give us a sense of kind

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>of the deal flow that you guys are seeing right now.

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Right now, We've never seen deal flow as high as

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 1>we see it see it today. Uh. Here at New Mountain,

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 1>we have a private equity business and we also have

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the credit business which I'm in charge of. We manage

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>about over twenty billion in private equity, seven billion in credit.

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>And uh, I'll tell you, the zoom environment that we

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>have today has has really created tremendous deal velocity, tremendous

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 1>efficiencies and uh, there are tremendous amount of players with

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of capital to put to work, and essentially

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a major competition to to buy all the best assets,

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and so we've never seen anything like it, and I

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:35.160
<v Speaker 1>think that is driven by the large amount of fundraising

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen in private equity. And from my seat,

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 1>we're just trying to keep up with our clients to

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 1>raise money fast enough to to suit their needs and

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to be a little finance the bigger and bigger buyouts

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:50.400
<v Speaker 1>that that our clients are pursuing. So if I'm high

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>networth individual or family office, how long do I have

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to commit funds and and what kind of risk am

0:17:56.320 --> 0:18:00.679
<v Speaker 1>I taking? Well? Across UH, I have a credit There

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of different structures here at New Mountain.

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>We do manage a public BDC, so you can buy

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>our stock, buy and sell our stock on a daily

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 1>basis very easily. So you've got that daily liquidity and

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you kind of access to a diversified group of of

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:19.119
<v Speaker 1>of of private loans that we make to our sponsored clients.

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:22.160
<v Speaker 1>There are some structures um that are out there where

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:24.880
<v Speaker 1>as a high net worth individual or an institutional investor,

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 1>you have to commit to the fund of the asset

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>class over many years. So UH big picture, I'd say

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 1>there are different structures for different time horizons, and it's

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>possible to get access to private credit in a lot

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 1>of different ways with a lot of different time horizons. John,

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>earlier in my career, I was at the Chase Manhattan

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Bank and the corporate finance team, and we were lending

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>money to the media sector, which is a great cash

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>flowing industry and supportive of, you know, a good level

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of debt. What are some of the sectors that you

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>guys like from a private credit perspective. Here at New Mountain,

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 1>we're really focused on what we refer to as defensive

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>growth industries, So we're trying to lend to businesses that

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>we think are going going to do well no matter

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>what the economic environment looks like. Uh and I think

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>our sponsor clients are are geared the same way. So

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at software, technology, enabled business services, subscription data companies,

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 1>life sciences, especially materials, healthcare. I could go on and on,

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:26.440
<v Speaker 1>but it's a lot of niches that have really predictable,

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>recurring revenue models that that we can take comfort in

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:33.679
<v Speaker 1>as a lender. What are some of the biggest deals

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 1>you've been involved in. Can you tell us any of

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the deal details. Well, I can give you a bunch

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:42.880
<v Speaker 1>of deals. It's pretty amazing. Before before COVID, I'd say

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the biggest deals would barely touch a billion dollars in

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the private credit market. And today we're we're we're financing

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:51.440
<v Speaker 1>deals as small as a hundred million and as big

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>as three billion, where where we'd be a member of

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:56.919
<v Speaker 1>a of a club of lenders that financed those bigger deals.

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 1>But really post COVID, there's been an explosion of larger deals. Uh.

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:05.159
<v Speaker 1>You can think about stamps dot com, which is a

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>software business, Affordable Care which is a dentistry business, Galway

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 1>and insurance broker Um, a novel on Holdings which has

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>been announced that to take private lead by Norrik and Insight.

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>And these are all multibillion dollar deals, uh that that

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:22.639
<v Speaker 1>that are that are really popping up every day. So

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I need all my hands and toes to talk about

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the billion dollar deals and the private credit markets that

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 1>have occurred over the last over the last two months,

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>even John just about thirty seconds talked to us about

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:37.359
<v Speaker 1>credit quality out there. So I think credit quality is

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>really good as long as you stick to to the

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>sectors that have done well through COVID, so um, and

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:45.199
<v Speaker 1>essentially I think it's a lot of the sectors that

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>we focus on. Our book has been very strong through COVID,

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and we were we worry about credit quality is really uh,

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 1>companies that are that are exposed to secular change, supply

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Chaine disruption, which I'm sure you're talking a lot about

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>in your show, labor shore is. So we really we

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 1>really stay away from, uh, you know, industries that that

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that could be exposed to those those negative trends. I

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 1>think about automotive, retail, travel and leisure, heavy heavy industrials, uh,

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>consumer discretionary of course, you know energy. So I really

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:19.159
<v Speaker 1>think those are the industries that good, good lenders avoid.

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>John Klein, President, chief operating Officer at New Mountain Finance Corporation.

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate your time today. This is Bloomberg. Now let's get

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:37.400
<v Speaker 1>over to Don Steinbroger been Uh. We've been anxiously awaiting

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Agecroft Partners and he joins us now

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>at a Richmond, Virginia. Don great to have you on

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the program. Thanks so much for joining us. You say, um,

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:49.159
<v Speaker 1>this is the greatest asset raising environment in the history

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>of hedge funds. At least you have a paper out

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:53.679
<v Speaker 1>UM with that title. What do you mean by that?

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 1>In the history of hedge fund industry? This is the

0:21:55.720 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>best well I've been in the institutional investment and business

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>for thirty six years. And uh. There are three things

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 1>that drive flows to hedge funds and all of those

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 1>are are pointing to me to be UM very strong

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:15.919
<v Speaker 1>indicators that two thousand, uh twenty two will be the

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 1>best environment to raise money in the hedge fund industry.

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 1>The first is you're just starting with a large asset bates.

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, the hedge fund industry at the end of

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the second quarter was at four point three trillion, up

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:30.440
<v Speaker 1>from six hundred billion at the end of the turn

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of the century. It's grown every year but three this century.

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Before this year, flows the hedge fund industry had been static.

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Most of the growthy industry had come from performance, but

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that has changed. You seem very strong

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>flows into the hedge fund industry this year, and three

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>things are resulting in this strong flows. One is just

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the performance of the hedge fund industry has been very

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:59.719
<v Speaker 1>good over the past two years. Most investors are investing

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.679
<v Speaker 1>in head funds to protect on the down side and

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>add diversification, and they were very happy with performance first

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 1>quarter of last year when the markets sold off, they

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>were happy with the full year up ten percent. In

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the first six months of this year, hedge funds are

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>up ten percent, which was the best start of a

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:21.479
<v Speaker 1>year since. In addition to that, when you look at

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>flows from hedge fund industries, it tend to be dominated

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 1>by large institutional investors, and a lot of large institutional

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 1>investors have allocations to fixed income that are you know,

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:34.919
<v Speaker 1>expected to return in the mid two percent range, and

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a number of these large institutional investors are beginning to

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>shift money away from fixed income into uncorrelated hedge fund strategies,

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and some of them are also including hedge fund strategies

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and their fixed income portfolio like direct lending to stress debt,

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:56.479
<v Speaker 1>specialty financing. And the third thing that's helping that flows

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to the industry is the fact that the fees have

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>come down a lot. A lot of institutions used to

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:03.919
<v Speaker 1>point at the industry and say, hey, we don't want

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:06.919
<v Speaker 1>to pay two and twenty it's too much. But in

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 1>a recent survey by um UH of the industry, the

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 1>average management fee is now one point three eight percent

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and performance fee is UH fifteen point nine percent, and

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>that's standard hedge fund fee. There is a two tiered

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>fee structure which is giving large institutional investors a significant

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:33.199
<v Speaker 1>feed discount on the standard fee. So a lot of

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 1>these big institutional investors are able to get in it

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>like one in ten, which makes a lot more attractive.

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:40.719
<v Speaker 1>So you're to day you've had a hundred and fifty

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars pour into the hedge fund industry. The main

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 1>driver of assets next year is going to be manager turnover.

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, I just mentioned hundred and fifty net flows

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:55.399
<v Speaker 1>in the industry, but there is a natural turnover of

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:59.679
<v Speaker 1>managers and at if you assume the average investor Holton

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 1>manage for seven years, that means of the industry turns

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>over every year on four point three trillion dollars is

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>six hundred and forty five billion. And that's that's in

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>an average year. And we're predicting that the turnover will

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:20.239
<v Speaker 1>be record high next year and done. I guess my

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 1>thought process over the last four or five, six, seven

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.399
<v Speaker 1>years has been most of the hedge fund money is

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>going to the big players, the citadels of the World's

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the point seventy two is I don't see as many

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>folks coming off of Wall Street the trading desk and

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley and raising or billion on a long short fund.

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Are those days over? Where's the money going? Well? So

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I think of assets are going to five of funds,

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 1>and I do think disproportionate amount is going to the

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:58.680
<v Speaker 1>largest managers, and I think that's bad. I mean, when

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 1>you look at the performance of larger managers versus smaller

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 1>managers over long periods of time, larger managers underperform. You know,

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a hedge fund index called the h f R

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I index, and that index shows performance for hedge funds

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 1>that are equally weighted, so every hedge fund is weighted

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the same size, and they also have an asset weighted composit.

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at performance over the past or

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you to date, uh, the equally weighted one is up

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>ten and the asset weighted which is dominated by the largest,

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:41.360
<v Speaker 1>is up only six. So large hedge funds has significantly underperformed.

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:45.399
<v Speaker 1>Over twelve months, large hedge funds have underperformed by eight percent.

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:51.679
<v Speaker 1>They've underperformed by four percent over three years. So what

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:54.479
<v Speaker 1>happens is a lot of people like to invest in

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the glamorous hedge funds to the largest and they get

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:02.439
<v Speaker 1>way too much as that's a ner great security ideas,

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 1>get to looking over larger asset base, so the best

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>diamonds in the rough are not the largest hedge funds. Typically. Hey, Don,

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:12.160
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. We always appreciate getting

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:15.479
<v Speaker 1>a kind of the latest on the world of hedge funds,

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:18.879
<v Speaker 1>capital raising, where the money's going strategies, and we always

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>get that with Don Steinberg, CEO and President of Agecroft

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Partners based in the former capital the Confederacy, Richmond, Virginia,

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>home of the University of Richmond Spiders, my alma mater there. So, uh,

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 1>Don giving us the latest of hedge funds. You know,

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:35.439
<v Speaker 1>I kind of looked at the hedge fund business when

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I left Wall Street and I said, boy, that's a

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:39.879
<v Speaker 1>young man's game, and it is a difficult game, and

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the folks that make their living there, I think generally

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:45.160
<v Speaker 1>earn it. It is a tough game, but a lot

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 1>of successful folks there. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 1>Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews with

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller.

0:27:56.520 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller three. An onfall Sweeney,

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio