WEBVTT - Gretchen Morgenson: From Wall Street to Journalism

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>This is Master's in Business with Barry Ridholds on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:09.480 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>This week on the podcast, I have an extra special guest.

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Gretchen Morgensen is the Pulitzer Prize winning investigative journalist for

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:20.479
<v Speaker 1>The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times. She

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:25.600
<v Speaker 1>currently works at NBC News as an investigative reporter. She

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>has worked at Money Magazine, Forbes, worth all over the place.

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:34.239
<v Speaker 1>Her last book was a bestseller, Reckless Endangerment is all

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:38.200
<v Speaker 1>about the mortgage crisis. The current book is called These

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Are the Plunderers. How private Equity runs and recks America.

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>That's a little bit of a sensationalistic headline. When we spoke,

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 1>the focus and conversation is really emphasizes the largest of

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the large private equity firms. Yes, there's a legitimate need

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and use for private equities, especially in mid markets where,

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>to be blunt, Wall Street has just abandoned that space

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and gone up market, creating a vacuum. But we talk

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>about some really fascinating things. Thirty percent of operating rooms

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>are managed and run by doctors employed by private equity.

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>That's a shocking number. We looked at everything from retail

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>to nursing, homes, to hospitals, to insurance companies to manufacturers. Really,

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>private equity used to be a small, outperforming sector of alternatives.

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>It's now become giant, dominated by four firms, and no

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>longer generating outsize returns. It's really a kind of fascinating

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 1>aspect of this. As it's become more and more mainstream,

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>it appears some of the performance advantages may have gone away. Anyway,

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Gretchen is a legend on Wall Street. She's won Lobe

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Awards and just about every other journalistic award there is.

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>So when she dives into a space, really she does

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>not any stone on turn. I found this to be

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>really interesting conversation, and I think you will also, so,

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>with no further ado, my conversation with NBC's Gretchen Morgansen.

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk a little bit about your kind of

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting career. You start as an assistant editor at Vogue

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>magazine in the late seventies. How do you go from

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>that to being a financial columnist?

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, first of all, assistant editor is a little strong.

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 2>I was a secretary, and I got the job because

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 2>I could type more than thirty five words a minute. Okay,

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 2>So I was just out of college, brand new to

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:42.399
<v Speaker 2>New York. I had graduated from a small liberal arts

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 2>college in the Midwest, and my eyes were as big

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 2>as saucers as I came into New York. It was

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 2>the only job I could get. I wanted to be

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:54.359
<v Speaker 2>a journalist. This was back in the Watergate days, and

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:57.359
<v Speaker 2>you know, it was kind of exciting to think about

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:01.919
<v Speaker 2>possibly being a reporter. So that's my idea. Of course,

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 2>the silence from my job applications to the New York Times,

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 2>to Daily News, you name it was it was the

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:14.079
<v Speaker 2>silence was deafening. So Vogue was it?

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>So you didn't stay a secretary of Vogue for very

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:17.799
<v Speaker 1>long though.

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, I sort of worked my way up, if you

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:22.959
<v Speaker 2>can call it that, to writing their personal finance column,

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 2>which nobody read, by the way, at Vogue.

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>At Vogue, why they just wanted to have a little Hey,

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:31.519
<v Speaker 1>let's speak to women in our magazine.

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Yes, so I think they sold it against an ad page,

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 2>to be honest with you. But anyway, so it was

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 2>very you know, basic instruction, and I really enjoyed doing that.

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 2>And so I interviewed people, met a lot of folks,

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:47.839
<v Speaker 2>and then I was making very ten thousand dollars a year.

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>That's big money in the seven No really, not really,

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't even big money in the fifties years. Yeah,

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>thing is that? Is that what led you to your

0:03:57.680 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>interest in Wall Street?

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Yes, so I said to myself, I don't have a

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 2>rich dad, I don't have a rich husband. I'm going

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 2>to have to make it on my own, and so

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 2>what can I do? At about that time, Wall Street

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 2>was battling a sex discrimination case with the EEOC. They

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 2>had not hired enough women on the street this is

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:19.480
<v Speaker 2>the early eighties.

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Returned, Oh, thank goodness that got resolved. Yeah, now that

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>we have gender parody.

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Well not quite, but it's better than it was anyways,

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 2>definitely better. So they had to hire they had to

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:32.479
<v Speaker 2>start hiring women because they lost that case. And so

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 2>I applied to the big brokerage firms as a salesman

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Dean Witter, Merrill Lynch Prudential Base at the time, and

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 2>I got a job at Dean Witter. And the reason

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 2>I got the job was because I killed it on

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 2>the phone test.

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Really, well, you had been doing some journalism beforehand, so

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you're not afraid to ask people questions, right, So this

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>is in the eighties and the beginning of the huge

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>bull market, not that anyone knew in eighty two that

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:05.160
<v Speaker 1>strap yourself in the next eighteen years are going to

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 1>be a rocket ship.

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Wait wait, wait. When I sat down in my chair

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:11.919
<v Speaker 2>at Dean Witter Reynolds, the Dow Jones Industrial average was

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 2>at seven hundred and eighty one.

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Still under a thousand. That's unbelievable.

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:18.159
<v Speaker 2>So by the way, it made it hard to sell

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:21.359
<v Speaker 2>stocks because people were still in the looking backward phase.

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 2>They weren't looking forward. But August nineteen eighty two, you're

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 2>too young to remember that.

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, I have a vivid recollection.

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:31.839
<v Speaker 2>Was when the turn came and it was sort of like, okay,

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 2>stocks are way too cheap. This is where you want to.

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Be seven pe back then, right seven.

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 2>Pe on the SMP, and it was, you know, that

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 2>was the turning point. So I was really well positioned

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 2>for that move.

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 1>And you stayed at Dean Water for what three four years?

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>How long were you there?

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 2>I stayed three years. I lived through the bear market

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 2>that you don't remember of nineteen eighty three in tech

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 2>stocks when there were this sort of you know, initial

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 2>phase of personal computters and computing was becoming big, and

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 2>they just got way ahead of themselves.

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Even calling them tech stocks back then, what was the phrase, you.

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Know, I don't know. I think it was text stocks.

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, anyway, so.

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't recall that bear market.

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it was bad, it was vicious. It was over

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:18.599
<v Speaker 2>the summer of nineteen eighty three, and so I learned

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:22.160
<v Speaker 2>the hard way what happens when the stocks that you

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:25.479
<v Speaker 2>recommended to people because your firm was saying they would

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 2>be goodbyes go down and those people lose money.

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:31.359
<v Speaker 1>And I felt bad. It was just not in the

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>next six months.

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:34.479
<v Speaker 2>That's you know, they were ahead of themselves. You know,

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 2>the euphoria, the momentum was getting too.

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Was there euphoria in eighty three?

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Sure, no kidding, Oh yeah, Eagle Computer. I mean,

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 2>some of these things were high flyers. And so when

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 2>you had customers calling you up and saying, oh my gosh,

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 2>what happened to all my money? It was such a

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:54.600
<v Speaker 2>huge trauma for me. I really felt bad, and I

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 2>sort of felt like, if you have too much of

0:06:56.839 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 2>a capacity for guilt, maybe not the right business.

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>So is that what set you back into journalists?

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 2>That's what sent me back. However, I did have it

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 2>are I was now armed with a lot of information

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 2>about how the world works on Wall Street.

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>So that's exactly where I was going to go next.

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>You have a knack for finding some of Wall Street's

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>shadier operations. You've done this your whole career. How important

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>was working as a broker to giving you insight of, Hey,

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>here's how this stuff really works.

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 2>Very important, very I mean you really saw the inner workings.

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, how the sausage is made, as they say,

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 2>And so I would see how the over the counter desk,

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 2>over the counterstock desk would push stocks and you know,

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 2>encourage brokers to sell them, put a lot of commission

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 2>in them to move them because some big seller was

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 2>coming into the market. And you know, it just struck me.

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 2>There were a couple of things about it that I

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 2>just kept seeing how it really was. The customer was

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 2>not being put first, and there were, of course the

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 2>conflicted analysts that I then wrote about years later. I

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 2>saw that firsthand and was, you know, my customers were

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 2>harmed by that as well.

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>So let's put a little sunshine. Let's put a little

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>lipstick on this pig here it is. It's forty years later,

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the fiduciary side of the street, which was tiny in

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the eighties, is now not only large, but one of

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the fastest growing segments. While we're not even remotely close

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>to gender parody, it's certainly better than it was.

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 2>It's better than it was to spare. You don't have

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 2>strippers coming in for people's birthday parties like I saw

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 2>when I was a broker.

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, unbelievable.

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I saw it with my own eyes.

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I tell people who are the younger guys in the office,

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>go watch boiler Room, go watch Wolf of Wall Street.

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>They it's cinema verite. It just rings so and that

0:08:56.960 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>world is gone. It's like the bad part. It's good

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that it's gone. But there were some good aspects of that,

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:07.199
<v Speaker 1>Like there were training programs. They taught people what's a stock,

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>what's a bond. They used to do that at the

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:13.079
<v Speaker 1>bigger firms. Those are like tiny classes. Now, oh really,

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 1>they don't do that anymore. Yeah, they do it, but

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>just not what it was. So around the same time

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 1>you transition from Wall Street to journalism, the LBL boom

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>starts to take off. It becomes all the rage. What

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>were you thinking at the time, Hey, I'm gonna write

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a book in forty years or were you thinking this

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>is interesting or here comes problems? How did you see

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it back then?

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Back then? You know, it really just looked like a

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 2>very reasonable response to a decade or so of undervalued stocks,

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 2>right the nineteen seventies stocks were in the tank, you know,

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 2>the death of equities, you remember to cover, and so

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 2>it looked like it was really a pretty reasonable reaction

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 2>to what had been years of undervalue in the stock market.

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:07.560
<v Speaker 2>So the initial phase of LBOs were not as not

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 2>as pernicious as they are now because they were actually

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 2>taking over companies that had value. You know, they're sitting

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.080
<v Speaker 2>there in the stock price that you could see, like

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned the seven price earnings ratio. Yeah, so it

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 2>really was a little it was reasonable, It made sense.

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 2>It was a natural kind of outcome of what had

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 2>happened before.

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:34.319
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to talk a lot more about the book.

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>These are the plunderers, but I have to mention the

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>run of names that you really focus on in the book.

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>These obviously aren't all of private equity. There's a whole

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:48.959
<v Speaker 1>lot hundreds of other companies, but Apollo, Blackstone, Carlisle and

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 1>KKR really seems to be the key focus. Is it

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 1>their size, their sector, the way they practice their business?

0:10:56.840 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>What led you to those four?

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's their size first, Barry. I mean, these are

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 2>the leaders of the pack. These are the folks that

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 2>and the firms that set the tone, lead the way

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 2>other people mimic them. I mean, KKR was behind the

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 2>big Cahuna deal of the nineteen late nineteen eighties, r

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 2>j R Nibisco. So this is a group of firms

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 2>and people that really were there at the creation of

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 2>what we now call private equity, and they do it

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 2>in such size and in such scope that they have

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 2>enormous impact. And that's why we're focusing on them. Yes,

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 2>there are many, many private equity firms, but these really

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 2>are the folks who set the tone.

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 1>And you mentioned barbarians at the Gate in the book,

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>which focused on the KKR takeover of RJR Nimbisco. That

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>was sort of unfathomable at the time that someone could

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:04.199
<v Speaker 1>buy a giant publicly traded company strictly with low cost debt.

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:08.439
<v Speaker 1>Did that change the game going forward at that Once

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 1>r J or Nabisco was in play, does that mean

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:15.679
<v Speaker 1>anybody is in play? How did that affect what took

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>place over the next few decades.

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it also concerned Congress, as you remember, they

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 2>had hearings about it. I mean, it was such a

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:25.559
<v Speaker 2>gargantuan deal at the time that it really made a

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:28.079
<v Speaker 2>lot of people nervous. And you know, there were studies

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 2>done about what these deals would mean for workers, for pensions,

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:37.199
<v Speaker 2>and it really was sort of the beginning of questioning

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 2>what the impact of these deals would be. But they

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 2>just kept going, kept going, and there really was a

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 2>sense during the late eighties, especially after the crash of

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:51.680
<v Speaker 2>nineteen eighty seven, that we really don't want to meddle

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 2>with this. Let's just let the market take its course.

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 2>In fact, I think Secretary of the Treasury at the

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:02.440
<v Speaker 2>time said the Mark it will, you know, work out

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 2>these things and they will not become a problem.

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the market always works these things out eventually, but

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that eventually can take longer right then expected. You mentioned

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 1>they had a big impact, and they had a large

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 1>effect that they also generated a lot of fees and

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of moneies. What were the dollars like for

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>these mega deals like r j AR Nibisco.

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:26.839
<v Speaker 2>Well, at the time, it sounded big but if you

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 2>look back on it now, I don't know. I think

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 2>there was there's a number we have in the book,

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 2>maybe seventy million dollars or something in fees tokake care.

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's like not even around the right, that's

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 2>pocket chat, that's not that's walking around money.

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 2>So, you know, it's just gotten so so so much

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 2>bigger erys as you know, the markets and the capitol

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 2>pools have gotten so much bigger.

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Well we'll talk a little bit later about how as

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>these companies got bigger, Wall Street got bigger, and it's

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of created a void underneath. But it's really really

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see where all this began at a time

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and when nobody really wanted a lot of these companies.

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>They were some of these firms were, you know, all

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>but left for debt. So you start the book with

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the line that kind of cracked me up. Let the

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>looting begin. So let's start there. Where did this all begin?

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>And when did it move from hey, we're going to

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>help finance these companies that can't seem to get finance

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>to full on piracy and looting.

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, there are a couple of things that happen early

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 2>on that sort of you see the beginnings of that.

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 2>These are that these takeovers are not only designed to

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 2>find companies that are maybe undervalued or underperforming, we can

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 2>whip them into shape and then sell them later. That

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 2>while they're doing that, while they're monitoring them, while they

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 2>are looking at them, streamlining them, you know, improving their operations,

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 2>there are a lot of fees to be extracted from

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 2>these companies. So for starters, private equity firms will often

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 2>put people on the company's board, and sometimes those board

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 2>memberships will deliver earnings to those board members. Okay, you

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 2>also had this thing called monitoring fees, where a company

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 2>that was purchased by a private equity fund or firm

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 2>would have to pay the firm fees for its monitoring,

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 2>for its oversight, for its management expertise that it was

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 2>providing to the company. Now, that makes sense because you know,

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 2>they took over the company. There's presumably plus they're presumably

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 2>very good at managing, and they know what they're doing,

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 2>and they have a goal of selling it, you know,

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 2>at a profit later. However, the monitoring fees had this

0:15:56.680 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 2>really kind of abusive element to them. They typically structured

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 2>as ten year contracts, so the company would agree to

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 2>pay over ten years a certain amount of monitoring fees

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 2>every year to the private equity.

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Firm, regardless of profitability or.

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh yes, no, it was absolutely de rigor. They did

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 2>it every year top line. So if the private equity

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 2>firm sold the company after five years, the company still

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 2>had to pay, still had to cough up the remaining

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 2>five year contractual obligation of paying those monitorings.

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Now, wouldn't that just whoever's a purchaser knows this is happening.

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't that just lower the cost the purchase price by

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>that much? Maybe it's a liaity on the books, but.

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 2>Still it goes to these people. It is money for nothing.

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>It's good to be the case.

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 2>They are not doing the monitoring, and yet they're being

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 2>paid to do the monitoring.

0:16:56.560 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>So there are other fees like that that just sort

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>of away at the stability of a company.

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Well I think I'm trying to think, oh well, okay, Well,

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 2>first of all, the big fee that really ends up

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 2>and this is not a fee to the private equity firm.

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 2>But the big problem with many of these deals is

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 2>the debt interest costs. Okay, so when the private equity

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:26.160
<v Speaker 2>firm takes over a company, they pile on a lot

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 2>of debt on the company. It's expenses increase dramatically to

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:37.640
<v Speaker 2>pay those debt expenses, and oftentimes the companies will extract

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 2>the firms, I mean, will extract money in the form

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 2>of what's called dividend recapitalizations. They will load the company

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 2>with debt and then they'll take money out almost immediately,

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:57.399
<v Speaker 2>and that's just kind of a way of stripping the

0:17:57.480 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 2>company of well.

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>In other words, when you say that they load the

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>company with debt, they're borrowing a lot of capital. So

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 1>now the company is sitting with this cash with an

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>offsetting liability, meaning the company that's been purchased and the

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 1>pe owner slash manager will take fees out of that.

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, they take the dividend recapitalization, meaning that they take

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 2>a portion of what debt they've raised in cash for

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 2>themselves as a payout to themselves.

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>And who's lending this money to the company.

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 2>The banks could be Wall Street, could be private debt folks, but.

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 1>It's this is very often securitized and sold off into

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the market.

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 2>It can be collateralized loan obligations. Now it's big private debt.

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 2>But so you had these dividend recaps. In two thousand

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 2>and seven, firms extracted the private equity firms extracted twenty

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars from companies in the form of dividend recapitalizations,

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 2>and by twenty twenty one they were extracting seventy billion

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:03.920
<v Speaker 2>in div and recapitalizations. Now that's money that a company

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 2>has to pay back, right the debt that was raised

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 2>to cover it.

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>And it's not going into what the company's doing.

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 2>And it's not going into the company's operations, and it

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:16.400
<v Speaker 2>has an interest cost associated with it. So that's another

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.440
<v Speaker 2>piece of the puzzle that I think is worth.

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:24.119
<v Speaker 1>So we talked earlier about RJ or Nibisco. When you

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 1>look at the history of the eighties and even nineties

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:32.120
<v Speaker 1>era LBOs, they seem to be a lot of lesser known,

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily consumer facing companies, transport and logistics and manufacturing

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 1>like r JR is kind of one of the first

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:48.360
<v Speaker 1>names that the average person would know. How did that

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:52.440
<v Speaker 1>transition take place? What were most of the eighties era

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 1>LBOs focused on. These were really way under the radar

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of things. It's only later, or at least in

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the book you described that it's only later that it's

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>household brands and retailers and names we know. Explain that

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit if you would.

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think what was going on again we talked

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 2>a little bit about this earlier, is that these were

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:16.119
<v Speaker 2>the companies that were most undervalued. Remember, we were coming

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 2>out of a very bad recession, and so probably what

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 2>you had at that time, or you know, the industrial

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:27.400
<v Speaker 2>companies were the ones that were harmed, you know, very

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 2>very much by the recession, and so their price earnings

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 2>ratios were probably below the S and P average of seven,

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 2>and so that might have been why they were taking

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:39.640
<v Speaker 2>over and focusing more on them. But again, as this

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 2>practice and process sort of morphed into something else, it

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 2>became more about some of the big name companies that

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 2>you know. Now. A big pivotal moment was when the

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 2>junk bond market crashed in the early nineties. This was

0:20:56.000 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 2>after the SNL crisis. SNL's had been persued to buy

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 2>a lot of junk bonds. The market turned. Milkin and

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Drexel Burnham collapsed and failed. So you had this huge

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 2>market maker and junk bonds disappear. Junk bond market went

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 2>really into the toilet, and that also then created a

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 2>lot of distress in the market for companies that had

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 2>borrowed from the junk bond market, and now you had

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 2>those companies trading at very low prices. So again it

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:35.439
<v Speaker 2>was a distress situation that these companies took advantage of.

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 1>So how do you draw a distinction between LBO brands

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of private equity, the thing that some people call vulture capitalism,

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and credible mid market banking and merchant banking that is

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>really one of the few sources of capital for these

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 1>mid sized companies. Given that Wall Street started chasing all

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the big.

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Firms, Well, I think you know, there is a right

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 2>way and the wrong way to do this business, and

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 2>certainly there are many firms doing the right thing. As

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 2>far as what that might mean, Okay, less debt. Okay,

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 2>the debt that is levied onto these companies is can

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 2>be very damaging. And right now, Barry, we're going through

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 2>a period of rising interest rates and companies are experiencing

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:31.160
<v Speaker 2>distress because much of this debt is floating, it's not fixed.

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:34.199
<v Speaker 2>And so what you need to remember is that the

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 2>costs associated with borrowing money as a company when interest

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 2>rates are zero is a different story than when interest

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 2>rates are five so that is a huge part of

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 2>the puzzle. So how about putting a little more equity

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 2>into these deals instead of so much debt. How about

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 2>putting more of your own skin in the game kind

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 2>of a thing. And I think, you know, the massive

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 2>layoffs that often occur her are very detrimental. I think

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 2>that the asset stripping that has also occurred. Pensions, for instance,

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 2>are sold off. Overfunded pensions get sold off and that goes,

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:15.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, into the private equity firm instead of into

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 2>the company itself. So I think you can avoid some

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 2>of these practices very easily. You don't maybe get the

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 2>returns that you do when you have all those pieces

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 2>of the puzzle in place. But I think right now

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:34.199
<v Speaker 2>we have to think about this as is it a

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:38.639
<v Speaker 2>sustainable business model that you fire a lot of workers,

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 2>that you strip pensions and health benefits, that you levy

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 2>the debt on these companies, and that you want to

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 2>sell them in five years, which is short termism you

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 2>know that we often sort of deplore in the stock market.

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Is that is that really a business model that can

0:23:57.960 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 2>work for the long haul.

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>So when private equity really was ramping up in the

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 1>eighties and nineties. It was essentially an institutional allocation. This

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a mom and pop investment. Today that's changed. It's

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 1>really attracting a lot of retail dollars. How is that

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:16.360
<v Speaker 1>working out?

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, it's interesting. For years decades, as you say,

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 2>this was a investing strategy that was limited to sophisticated investors,

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:30.879
<v Speaker 2>you know, high network individuals, people who could you know,

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 2>take it stand the fact that it's opaque, that it

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 2>has high fees, that it is you know, not quite

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 2>as investing in an S and P five hundred stock

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 2>fund and not that simple. But now it is encroaching

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 2>onto the mom and pop in four O one k's

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 2>the Labor Department under Donald Trump did open the door

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:58.160
<v Speaker 2>for private equity to get into for a one case.

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 2>It had been prevented, had been barred from that before

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 2>because of this fiduciary duty idea and also because of

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:09.879
<v Speaker 2>the opacity of these instruments. But so yes, you have

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 2>it starting to seep into what we might call the

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 2>high net worth retail market. You know, some of these

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:22.439
<v Speaker 2>the Blackstone b reat is a perfect example of that.

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 2>That's a real estate investment trust that is a Blackstone entity,

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 2>and it has really done a lot to attract the

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of high net worth retail customers into that. So,

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:42.239
<v Speaker 2>you know, I think the private equity sees this as

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:49.120
<v Speaker 2>an opportunity because they're not really growing the institutional aspect

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 2>of their business. Pension funds perhaps maybe aren't growing as

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 2>much as they need them to, and so this is

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 2>a ripe market for them.

0:25:56.720 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, clearly four oh one K is now much estra

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 1>growing part of the allocation landscape then, either direct benefits

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 1>or pensions that that, if anything, that side of the

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 1>street is treating shrinking dramatically. Let's talk about some of

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the new areas that private equity seems to be playing

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 1>in the book talks about emergency care and er rooms

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 1>that have been privatized. I always think of er and

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:37.199
<v Speaker 1>those sort of emergency services as a service as a

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:41.440
<v Speaker 1>community good, not a for profit model. Am I naive

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 1>and not realizing we could monetize emergencies or should this

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:52.159
<v Speaker 1>be kept out of private asset allocators hands?

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 2>This is a really really crucial question for the whole

0:26:56.440 --> 0:27:00.240
<v Speaker 2>private equity industry. Now they have seized on healthcare as

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 2>a huge industry to really dive into to invest in

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 2>and you know why that is because it's seventeen percent

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:13.120
<v Speaker 2>of gross domestic products. So it's a big, big pool, okay,

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 2>of potential money. So you have private equity rolling up

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:21.439
<v Speaker 2>doctors practices, you have private equity going into dermatology practices,

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 2>imaging MRI Mriyes, anesthesiology is another big one, and yes,

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 2>emergency departments. Emergency departments is another. And the difficulty with

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 2>healthcare is that you are not supposed to put profits

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 2>ahead of patients.

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:43.479
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about hospitals. I don't understand how all

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 1>these not for profit hospitals get purchased and rolled up

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 1>into a chain of not for profit hospitals that are

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>managed for profitability. That seems to be, you know, counterintuitive.

0:27:57.960 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Tell us a little bit about what's.

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Going on now we're really talking about, Perry, is the

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:08.880
<v Speaker 2>staffing companies that staff the hospitals. Okay, So private equity

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:12.679
<v Speaker 2>is not buying the emergency departments. What private equity is

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:15.640
<v Speaker 2>doing is operating the emergency departments.

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Similar hotels operate for the hospital.

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay. And it's like any staffing company. You know, you're

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 2>a big whatever, you hire a staff and company to

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 2>help you find people. Okay, So there are two major

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 2>players in emergency departments. One is Team Health and the

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:35.679
<v Speaker 2>other is in Vision. Envision is owned by KKR and

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Team Health is Blackstone, and they control and other smaller

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 2>private equity firms control forty percent of the nation's emergency departments.

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Now you don't know this. When you go to the

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 2>emergency department, the hospital hires them. Of course, they say

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 2>to the hospital, we're going to improve your profitability. We're

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 2>going to help you, you know, make more money. We're

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 2>gonna you know, they'll say, improve patient care. But the

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 2>doctors that I have spoken to in emergency medicine say

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 2>that's absolutely not the case. That when the private equity

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 2>firms come in, they tell them how to do their business,

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 2>They tell them how to code for patient billings.

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, they're medical experts, aren't they private equity. Don't they

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 1>have a specialty in emergency care?

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 2>I know, I think they have.

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>They have a special so they're financers.

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry, Yes, they have a specialty financing.

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 1>But and you know, this is a horrife. I have

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to tell you. I don't have problem with private equity

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 1>pushing into real estate and other areas, but emergency rooms

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 1>seems if.

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 2>You're talking about you know, the coffee and donut, you know,

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 2>the private equity owns. Okay, if you don't like the

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:50.160
<v Speaker 2>coffee and the donut, you'll go somewhere else. But if

0:29:50.200 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 2>you're in need of an emergency department and this is

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 2>the only one in your town and you have to

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 2>go there and it's run by a private equity firm

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 2>that is putting profits ahead of patients, that's a problem.

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 1>And this has become very big, not necessarily in big cities,

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 1>but in the South, in rural areas, in places that

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 1>have very limited healthcare options and a shortage of doctors.

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not like there's the option of saying, oh, I

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 1>don't like Southwestern General, I'm going to go to Northeastern

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>General and that's a better emergency room. This is usually

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the only games in town.

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Is absolutely. Absolutely rural hospitals have really been hit by

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 2>this practice. The other thing very is that they don't

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 2>put the name on the door now over the emergency department.

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 2>They don't say Team Health is here, or they don't

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:47.239
<v Speaker 2>say Envision or KKR or Blackstone is running this, And

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 2>so try to find out if your emergency department is

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 2>run by one of these companies. It's very difficult to

0:30:53.960 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 2>do so again, it's opaque. Again, the consumer does not

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 2>know that this is happening. And so much of what

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 2>private equity has taken over is kind of like this

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 2>a stealth takeover because they don't put their names on

0:31:08.200 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 2>the door.

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about senior living. Since when are old

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>folks homes? A profit center? Tell us about that?

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 2>This is perhaps the biggest crisis I think, and it

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 2>really became very evident in a twenty twenty one study

0:31:27.120 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 2>by academics I think University of Chicago, you pen NYU

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 2>that studied long term mortality at nursing homes that were

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 2>owned by private equity and compared that with nursing homes.

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:43.840
<v Speaker 1>There's so much more efficient. Their mortality rates have to

0:31:43.840 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>be much better, right.

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:48.360
<v Speaker 2>There's so much more efficient because maybe they hire fewer

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 2>people to take care of the residents, that the mortality

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 2>rate is higher, the mortality a little higher. Ten percent.

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Really, that's a big number.

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Ten percent. And so these academics found that there were

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:08.480
<v Speaker 2>twenty thousand lives that they said were lost because at

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 2>private equity owned nursing homes, nursing facilities, and so you

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 2>have the situation the academic said, where the focus, the

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 2>extreme focus on cost cutting meant lower staffs meant you know,

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 2>lesser care essentially translated to lesser care. And this was

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 2>just a striking, striking study of the difference between and

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 2>they were comparing it to other for profit nursing homes.

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 2>So this was not just for profit versus nonprofit. This

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 2>was private equity for profit and nonprofit.

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 1>How did private equity healthcare, senior living nursing homes eers

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:51.200
<v Speaker 1>hospitals do during the COVID pandemic.

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, they did very well because they got a lot

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 2>of cares Act money from the government.

0:32:56.960 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how did the care itself, how did they

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 1>perform during the pandemic?

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, as you know, healthcare was a disaster, and partly

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 2>because we were so unprepared for the pandemic. And I

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 2>would argue Barry that one of the reasons we were

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 2>so unprepared was because healthcare had been a focus of

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 2>private equity since really the mid two thousands. Okay, so

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 2>HCA perfect example, that's a company that went private in

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 2>an LBO. And so what you had is these firms,

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 2>again focusing on cost cutting, and so they were not

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 2>likely to you know, stockpile ppe masks to buy ventilators

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 2>to prepare for a pandemic, and inform.

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 1>That's the full cost money.

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 2>That costs money, and it's money that sits on a shelf.

0:33:57.480 --> 0:33:59.880
<v Speaker 2>And these guys don't like money sitting on a shelf.

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 2>And so you know, you have this. You actually had

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 2>a study in Congress that had, you know, what might

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:10.799
<v Speaker 2>happen if we were to experience a pandemic, and it's

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 2>this is back in two thousand and five or six,

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 2>and it said we need to stockpile more than you

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 2>know when.

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 1>You had the Gate study in what twenty fifteen saying

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:22.719
<v Speaker 1>the same thing, just in time. Inventory doesn't work during

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 1>a pandemic. You can't get things. It turned out to

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 1>be very accurate, right.

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 2>And so, but all those years leading up to twenty twenty,

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 2>when the whole you know, world collapsed in March, all

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:35.440
<v Speaker 2>those years leading up to it, we had kind of

0:34:35.520 --> 0:34:42.800
<v Speaker 2>a draining of healthcare, a bleeding of healthcare companies because

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:46.280
<v Speaker 2>getting the fat out, cutting the costs down.

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to ask you a question now, but

0:34:49.280 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 1>it applies to insurance also, which we haven't we'll talk

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 1>about in a minute, But there are regulatory agencies at

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the federal level. Well, every state has a medical board.

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 1>How does this sort of four care profit with a

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 1>much worse mortality rate and much worse health outcomes, how

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 1>do they get by the state regulators? It would you

0:35:17.200 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 1>would imagine that statewide regulatory medical boards wouldn't really tolerate this.

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:27.279
<v Speaker 2>This is a sixty four trillion dollar question, Barry, and

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:31.520
<v Speaker 2>I would love for you to ask every state attorney general,

0:35:31.560 --> 0:35:36.719
<v Speaker 2>for instance, why haven't you gone after for profit medicine.

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 2>There is there are statutes in more than thirty states

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 2>across the country that bar what's called the corporate practice

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 2>of medicine. And these laws came into effect, you know,

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:54.240
<v Speaker 2>one hundred years ago when you had you know, quack

0:35:54.400 --> 0:35:57.799
<v Speaker 2>medicine show guys you know, out there selling you know,

0:35:57.960 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 2>crazy chures for everything, and they decided, these states decided

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:07.000
<v Speaker 2>that you can't have profits potentially coming ahead of patient care.

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:12.000
<v Speaker 2>And so doctors actually have to run these organizations. And

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 2>that is supposedly going to keep from a problem of

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 2>putting profits ahead of patients. But very very very few

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 2>state ags have enforced laws against the corporate practice of medicine.

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 2>And when they do bring cases. They are so tiny

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 2>and so minimalistic in the risk slap that they deliver

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 2>to these companies that it really is not even a

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:43.840
<v Speaker 2>cost of doing business. And so it's just like, okay, fine,

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:45.879
<v Speaker 2>I'll do it again and even bigger next time.

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:51.200
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk insurance. The insurance policy stuff seems just

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 1>absolutely egregious. How did private equity step into the insurance area? Again?

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 1>A very heavy regulated industry with separate, very robust statewide

0:37:06.480 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 1>oversight panels and boards. What's going on in the world

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:10.239
<v Speaker 1>of insurance.

0:37:11.160 --> 0:37:13.839
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm very interested to hear you say. It's very

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 2>robust on the state side.

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 1>At least that's how it's presented. Talk to people who

0:37:19.560 --> 0:37:23.840
<v Speaker 1>try and get licensed to do insurance things, or if

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:26.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a failure to pay out a policy in the

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:33.920
<v Speaker 1>litigation that follows, there seems to be some options for policyholders,

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 1>especially if you have a receptive governor or a state

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:43.600
<v Speaker 1>attorney general who can apply pressure through these insurance boards.

0:37:43.920 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Although maybe I'm living in the past.

0:37:46.760 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think it's spotty. Let's just say that there

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:54.319
<v Speaker 2>are some states where the regulation is aggressive, but there

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 2>are a lot where it is not. And as you

0:37:57.239 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 2>might guess some of these companies flock to the one

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:05.759
<v Speaker 2>to the states where the oversight is more of the minimalistic. Now,

0:38:05.880 --> 0:38:09.880
<v Speaker 2>the problem with insurance companies being owned by private equity

0:38:10.040 --> 0:38:13.359
<v Speaker 2>is that you can understand why they want to own

0:38:13.400 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 2>them because this is a pool of assets. It's a

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:22.960
<v Speaker 2>pool of money that they can really generate immense profits on.

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:29.200
<v Speaker 2>And it's unlike banks. It's not fast money or hot money.

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:33.319
<v Speaker 2>It isn't likely to leave quickly berry like we've seen

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:38.520
<v Speaker 2>in some of the recent bank problems. So insurance companies

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:46.800
<v Speaker 2>are really huge pools of very stable money for these companies,

0:38:46.840 --> 0:38:51.759
<v Speaker 2>for these private equity companies. And it's interesting because you're

0:38:51.800 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 2>supposed to in insurance be very conservative and most I

0:38:58.719 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 2>think most people who buy insurance policies really would prefer

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:08.480
<v Speaker 2>that they're ensure be a conservative entity that not taking risks.

0:39:08.520 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 2>We're not swinging for the fences here. You know. Yeah,

0:39:12.320 --> 0:39:15.400
<v Speaker 2>if I can get a higher yield, that's awesome, but

0:39:16.000 --> 0:39:18.480
<v Speaker 2>I really want to know that I'm going to get

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:22.040
<v Speaker 2>a payout when it comes time for my claim. So

0:39:22.880 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 2>what these companies are doing is buying these insurance companies.

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:32.320
<v Speaker 2>They're also buying up pension assets very So a corporation

0:39:32.600 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 2>has a pension, let's say it's Lockheed, Bristol Myers or

0:39:36.640 --> 0:39:41.520
<v Speaker 2>a couple, and the private equity firm will buy those

0:39:41.640 --> 0:39:47.040
<v Speaker 2>pension obligations. Lockheed or Bristol Myers gets it off their books,

0:39:47.200 --> 0:39:51.839
<v Speaker 2>they're happy. They transfer the risk that those obligations had

0:39:51.880 --> 0:39:56.840
<v Speaker 2>for them, and the private equity firm takes over that risk.

0:39:57.160 --> 0:40:00.920
<v Speaker 2>But now you don't have the pension benefit gearing corporation

0:40:01.560 --> 0:40:03.840
<v Speaker 2>backing you if the pension should fail.

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:06.839
<v Speaker 1>So a company could just get out from under the

0:40:07.120 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 1>PBG by selling it to a third party.

0:40:10.239 --> 0:40:13.960
<v Speaker 2>Correct. It's called a pension risk transfer, and they have

0:40:14.040 --> 0:40:18.080
<v Speaker 2>been happening like crazy. And private equity firms are the

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:20.719
<v Speaker 2>ones doing a lot of the pension risk transfers.

0:40:20.920 --> 0:40:21.840
<v Speaker 1>That's really interesting.

0:40:21.840 --> 0:40:25.000
<v Speaker 2>And so you have pensioners at Bristol Myers or Lockheed

0:40:25.200 --> 0:40:31.120
<v Speaker 2>or Cores as another who are really relying on private

0:40:31.160 --> 0:40:37.600
<v Speaker 2>equity to do the right thing for their pensions going forward,

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:41.399
<v Speaker 2>for their retirement, for their payouts when they need them.

0:40:41.880 --> 0:40:44.760
<v Speaker 2>And that I think is something that we really don't

0:40:44.840 --> 0:40:49.879
<v Speaker 2>understand the entire nature of. And unfortunately we'll see we

0:40:50.000 --> 0:40:54.160
<v Speaker 2>may see some problems with rising interest rates if some

0:40:54.200 --> 0:40:57.280
<v Speaker 2>of the investments that these private equity firms have made

0:40:57.840 --> 0:41:01.480
<v Speaker 2>in their insurance companies start having problems.

0:41:01.520 --> 0:41:05.399
<v Speaker 1>Are these arms length investments meaning you manage this as

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:08.839
<v Speaker 1>a fiduciary on behalf of the pensioner. You can't then

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:13.760
<v Speaker 1>turn around and festoon that pension filled with whatever junk

0:41:13.760 --> 0:41:17.600
<v Speaker 1>paper you're selling to the street, or does that happen?

0:41:17.719 --> 0:41:21.319
<v Speaker 2>That does happen? Now, they do have to disclose in

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:25.759
<v Speaker 2>their statutory filings with the insurance regulators how much of

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:31.880
<v Speaker 2>their investment portfolio in the insurance company is related transactions

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:37.040
<v Speaker 2>or related stocks or bonds or mortgages or whatever. So

0:41:37.080 --> 0:41:40.240
<v Speaker 2>they do have to disclose that. But I'm gonna guess

0:41:40.280 --> 0:41:43.080
<v Speaker 2>that very few people read those disclosures.

0:41:43.160 --> 0:41:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Huh. Quite interesting. Let's talk about the insurance deal of

0:41:48.239 --> 0:41:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the century. What's going on with Executive Life, What happened

0:41:52.960 --> 0:41:55.760
<v Speaker 1>there and how did that go off the rails.

0:41:56.280 --> 0:42:00.239
<v Speaker 2>Executive Life is where we start sort of the book,

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:04.880
<v Speaker 2>because it was such a such a massive failure, and

0:42:05.000 --> 0:42:06.800
<v Speaker 2>of course it was coming at the time of the

0:42:06.880 --> 0:42:08.440
<v Speaker 2>junk bond collapse.

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:13.920
<v Speaker 1>But this was a triple a highly regarded insurance company beforehand, this.

0:42:14.080 --> 0:42:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Was a highly rated insurance company had the highest rating,

0:42:18.560 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 2>but it was run by a guy who was kind

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:23.360
<v Speaker 2>of what we used to call in the old days

0:42:23.400 --> 0:42:26.480
<v Speaker 2>a gunslinger. He was a guy who was more of

0:42:26.520 --> 0:42:30.239
<v Speaker 2>a risk taker than your average insurance company executive. And

0:42:30.360 --> 0:42:33.799
<v Speaker 2>he bought a ton of junk bonds from Drexel. He

0:42:34.000 --> 0:42:37.720
<v Speaker 2>was one of their top clients when they were selling,

0:42:37.840 --> 0:42:42.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, these bonds of slightly you know, lower quality, lesser, slightly,

0:42:42.880 --> 0:42:45.759
<v Speaker 2>lesser known companies. He was there to buy. Okay, so

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:50.000
<v Speaker 2>his firm, his insurance company, had a ton of junk bonds,

0:42:50.040 --> 0:42:53.960
<v Speaker 2>and when that market turned it was dire.

0:42:54.440 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 1>So this was really separate from private equity. This was

0:42:58.760 --> 0:43:03.280
<v Speaker 1>just bad stud ward ship by an insurance executive who

0:43:03.440 --> 0:43:07.279
<v Speaker 1>should be conservative. And again the question where the regulators

0:43:07.360 --> 0:43:12.640
<v Speaker 1>when a conservative insurance company is buying junk I mean,

0:43:12.640 --> 0:43:14.680
<v Speaker 1>it's right there in the name. They don't even hide it,

0:43:15.160 --> 0:43:19.279
<v Speaker 1>junk bonds. What happened with the executive life they blow up?

0:43:19.760 --> 0:43:24.359
<v Speaker 2>They blow up. The Department of Insurance for the State

0:43:24.400 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 2>of California was at the time run by John Garrimndi,

0:43:28.719 --> 0:43:32.080
<v Speaker 2>who is now a representative in the House of Representatives

0:43:32.080 --> 0:43:37.560
<v Speaker 2>from California in Washington, and he was just brand new

0:43:37.560 --> 0:43:40.000
<v Speaker 2>in the job. It was a new elected position. Prior

0:43:40.040 --> 0:43:42.920
<v Speaker 2>to that it had been appointees of the government of governor.

0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:46.440
<v Speaker 1>But we have to run to ye to run that

0:43:46.520 --> 0:43:48.720
<v Speaker 1>could go right anyway.

0:43:48.800 --> 0:43:51.360
<v Speaker 2>So he won the big job, and the minute he

0:43:51.400 --> 0:43:53.920
<v Speaker 2>got in the door, it was, you know, junk bonds

0:43:53.920 --> 0:43:57.880
<v Speaker 2>were you know, cratering, and everybody was concerned about executive

0:43:57.880 --> 0:44:00.919
<v Speaker 2>life and would it be able to to pay its

0:44:01.000 --> 0:44:05.279
<v Speaker 2>policy holders, and so he seized the company. Now keep

0:44:05.280 --> 0:44:08.640
<v Speaker 2>in mind, Burry, that he seesed it probably at or

0:44:08.800 --> 0:44:12.840
<v Speaker 2>very near the bottom. Okay, So junk bonds were starting

0:44:12.840 --> 0:44:16.520
<v Speaker 2>to come back after he seized it. And so if

0:44:16.520 --> 0:44:20.960
<v Speaker 2>it had been worked out another way, it's possible, like

0:44:21.000 --> 0:44:25.239
<v Speaker 2>a reorganization, it's possible that the policy holders might not

0:44:25.280 --> 0:44:26.800
<v Speaker 2>have lost what they ended up losing.

0:44:27.040 --> 0:44:28.600
<v Speaker 1>What was the haircut the policy holder?

0:44:28.719 --> 0:44:30.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's still to this day we don't know,

0:44:31.320 --> 0:44:34.400
<v Speaker 2>but it certainly is in the three or four billion

0:44:34.480 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 2>dollar maybe.

0:44:37.320 --> 0:44:41.759
<v Speaker 1>Does that look like a third half a big chunk

0:44:41.800 --> 0:44:42.359
<v Speaker 1>though it was.

0:44:42.320 --> 0:44:44.440
<v Speaker 2>A big chunk for many people, you know, I mean

0:44:44.560 --> 0:44:47.280
<v Speaker 2>I know of some cases where it was forty percent

0:44:47.360 --> 0:44:51.360
<v Speaker 2>haircut for some policy holders. Right, it's very hard to

0:44:51.440 --> 0:44:54.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, getting numbers on this stuff. They really don't

0:44:54.000 --> 0:44:54.640
<v Speaker 2>want to help.

0:44:54.719 --> 0:44:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about the crazy rule that said, okay, now

0:44:57.920 --> 0:45:00.359
<v Speaker 1>we're going to shred all the documents related to this.

0:45:00.640 --> 0:45:01.279
<v Speaker 1>What the hell was that?

0:45:01.560 --> 0:45:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, okay, so let's just remember this happened in nineteen

0:45:05.000 --> 0:45:07.400
<v Speaker 2>ninety one. Okay, the insurance department took it over in

0:45:07.440 --> 0:45:12.960
<v Speaker 2>nineteen ninety one. Then we had Apollo Leon Black's new

0:45:13.000 --> 0:45:16.000
<v Speaker 2>firm after he flees from Drexel.

0:45:16.520 --> 0:45:21.719
<v Speaker 1>The record is burning Grexel collapse, Grexel collapse, which arguably

0:45:21.840 --> 0:45:24.520
<v Speaker 1>he didn't have anything to do with that was mostly Milkin's.

0:45:25.040 --> 0:45:27.520
<v Speaker 2>No, he was not in the junk bond area. He

0:45:27.600 --> 0:45:30.360
<v Speaker 2>was a corporate finance person, so he was raising money

0:45:30.360 --> 0:45:31.120
<v Speaker 2>for these companies.

0:45:31.160 --> 0:45:33.759
<v Speaker 1>So did he flee or did he just say, hey,

0:45:33.840 --> 0:45:35.480
<v Speaker 1>let's go launch our own Yeah, let's.

0:45:35.280 --> 0:45:37.319
<v Speaker 2>Go launch our own company, right, But I mean, it

0:45:37.440 --> 0:45:43.200
<v Speaker 2>was obviously a dire circumstance. So anyway, long story short,

0:45:43.560 --> 0:45:47.839
<v Speaker 2>he ends up getting a hold of this huge junk

0:45:47.880 --> 0:45:50.680
<v Speaker 2>bond portfolio, which was a lot of paper that he

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:53.719
<v Speaker 2>had put into Fred Carr's that's the name of the

0:45:53.719 --> 0:45:58.640
<v Speaker 2>guy who ran Executive Life that paper that Apollo really

0:45:58.719 --> 0:45:59.520
<v Speaker 2>knew what it was.

0:45:59.719 --> 0:46:02.920
<v Speaker 1>They was a salesperson and a financer.

0:46:03.120 --> 0:46:06.040
<v Speaker 2>He was the finance guy, right, and so he knew

0:46:06.080 --> 0:46:08.400
<v Speaker 2>the numbers, he knew the companies, and so he knew

0:46:08.440 --> 0:46:12.279
<v Speaker 2>that they were just distressed and that they could be

0:46:12.360 --> 0:46:15.600
<v Speaker 2>restructured and reorganized. And so he buys this portfolio of

0:46:15.640 --> 0:46:16.239
<v Speaker 2>John so Way.

0:46:16.320 --> 0:46:19.520
<v Speaker 1>He's New York based, right, he's New York based and

0:46:19.840 --> 0:46:24.120
<v Speaker 1>executive life is in California. But because of the relationship

0:46:24.160 --> 0:46:29.520
<v Speaker 1>with Drexel, he approaches California and says, we'd like to

0:46:29.520 --> 0:46:31.600
<v Speaker 1>buy this junk paper or did they hold an auction?

0:46:31.880 --> 0:46:32.360
<v Speaker 1>How did it go?

0:46:32.560 --> 0:46:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, it was with a French bank. Actually they were

0:46:36.600 --> 0:46:40.600
<v Speaker 2>representing the bank. They were acting as the investment manager

0:46:40.719 --> 0:46:42.319
<v Speaker 2>for the bank, and so it was going to be

0:46:42.360 --> 0:46:46.520
<v Speaker 2>taken over by this French bank. But anyway, so the

0:46:46.560 --> 0:46:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Department of Insurance sold it, sold the company cheap to

0:46:51.560 --> 0:46:55.480
<v Speaker 2>on the cheap absolutely absolutely, and so the people that

0:46:55.560 --> 0:46:59.760
<v Speaker 2>bought it in this case, the French bank and Apollo

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:03.440
<v Speaker 2>were able to ride the recovery of those junk bonds.

0:47:03.520 --> 0:47:07.600
<v Speaker 1>So when California sells this is there on behalf of

0:47:07.640 --> 0:47:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the policyholder, right, that's right? Is there any mandate? Hey,

0:47:11.160 --> 0:47:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you have to pay ninety cents on the dollar at least,

0:47:13.680 --> 0:47:18.799
<v Speaker 1>or or there any requirements. They're selling it inexpensively. What

0:47:18.960 --> 0:47:22.359
<v Speaker 1>riders is California attaching it to the new owners on

0:47:22.440 --> 0:47:26.280
<v Speaker 1>behalf of the people the California Insurance Board is supposed

0:47:26.280 --> 0:47:26.759
<v Speaker 1>to be operating on.

0:47:26.960 --> 0:47:30.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, California at the time said we think this is

0:47:30.040 --> 0:47:32.240
<v Speaker 2>a great deal. You're going to get at least ninety

0:47:32.280 --> 0:47:34.200
<v Speaker 2>cents on the dollar. Everybody is going to get at

0:47:34.280 --> 0:47:37.560
<v Speaker 2>least ninety cents on the dollar. And that is their story,

0:47:37.600 --> 0:47:40.120
<v Speaker 2>and they're sticking to that, and that's what they say.

0:47:40.160 --> 0:47:42.880
<v Speaker 1>They didn't require that as part of the purchase.

0:47:43.719 --> 0:47:46.399
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's what they said was going to happen as

0:47:46.440 --> 0:47:47.240
<v Speaker 2>part of the purchase.

0:47:47.239 --> 0:47:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I can't say all sorts of things. But until I

0:47:49.239 --> 0:47:52.160
<v Speaker 1>sign a contract that says I guarantee that I will

0:47:52.160 --> 0:47:55.440
<v Speaker 1>pay ninety cents out to each shareholder at a minimum,

0:47:55.880 --> 0:47:56.800
<v Speaker 1>it's just words.

0:47:57.000 --> 0:47:59.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Well, what happened was a lot of people did

0:47:59.800 --> 0:48:03.160
<v Speaker 2>not get ninety cents on the dollar. And there were

0:48:03.239 --> 0:48:05.279
<v Speaker 2>quite a few people who are very who are up

0:48:05.280 --> 0:48:07.880
<v Speaker 2>in arms, who wanted, you know, to be this to

0:48:07.920 --> 0:48:13.120
<v Speaker 2>be investigated. But you know, it is sort of a

0:48:13.200 --> 0:48:15.719
<v Speaker 2>moment in time that you look at and you say,

0:48:15.760 --> 0:48:19.040
<v Speaker 2>this is what can happen if an insurance company takes

0:48:19.360 --> 0:48:21.960
<v Speaker 2>risks with their policyholders' money.

0:48:22.320 --> 0:48:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Right, This all goes back to the gunslinger as opposed

0:48:25.480 --> 0:48:28.759
<v Speaker 1>to a conservative operator. There are a couple of other

0:48:28.840 --> 0:48:32.279
<v Speaker 1>regulatory questions that come up that I'm always sort of

0:48:32.360 --> 0:48:38.000
<v Speaker 1>fascinated about. The first is the performance reporting for private equity.

0:48:38.920 --> 0:48:42.280
<v Speaker 1>There have been lots of criticism from within Wall Street

0:48:42.800 --> 0:48:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that at best it's aggressive and at worst it's just

0:48:47.560 --> 0:48:51.759
<v Speaker 1>a fantasy. If you're committing capital to private equity, you

0:48:51.760 --> 0:48:54.520
<v Speaker 1>don't care when they do the purchase the sort of

0:48:54.560 --> 0:48:58.680
<v Speaker 1>internal rate of return to the endowments and pensions who

0:48:58.680 --> 0:49:02.000
<v Speaker 1>put money into private equity. They don't care about that,

0:49:02.080 --> 0:49:04.560
<v Speaker 1>But that seems to be the way they report. Tell

0:49:04.600 --> 0:49:09.359
<v Speaker 1>us a little bit about how performance numbers are ginned up.

0:49:09.360 --> 0:49:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know how to describe it.

0:49:11.640 --> 0:49:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, these are private companies, not the firms themselves. They're

0:49:15.239 --> 0:49:18.279
<v Speaker 2>publicly traded, as you know, but when they buy a

0:49:18.320 --> 0:49:21.520
<v Speaker 2>company and put it into a fund, it's a private company.

0:49:21.560 --> 0:49:25.760
<v Speaker 2>And so how they mark the value of that company

0:49:26.520 --> 0:49:29.600
<v Speaker 2>is you know, there's leeway there, Barry. They can value

0:49:29.640 --> 0:49:32.440
<v Speaker 2>it a certain way that. Let's just say the stock

0:49:32.480 --> 0:49:34.120
<v Speaker 2>market wouldn't value it.

0:49:34.239 --> 0:49:38.719
<v Speaker 1>But you're valuing it specifically how you're purchasing it, and

0:49:38.760 --> 0:49:41.400
<v Speaker 1>then if it's sold five years later, that's a hard dollar.

0:49:41.560 --> 0:49:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Correct.

0:49:42.640 --> 0:49:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Why is there so much wiggle room in.

0:49:44.480 --> 0:49:48.319
<v Speaker 2>Between because you haven't had a mark, you haven't had

0:49:48.360 --> 0:49:51.760
<v Speaker 2>a buyer, I tell you exactly what it's worth until

0:49:51.760 --> 0:49:53.719
<v Speaker 2>the end of the line when you actually do buy

0:49:53.719 --> 0:49:54.280
<v Speaker 2>the company.

0:49:54.760 --> 0:50:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Huh. Really interesting. And let's talk about tax loopholes. How

0:50:00.320 --> 0:50:03.720
<v Speaker 1>on earth is there still a carried interest tax loophole

0:50:03.840 --> 0:50:08.000
<v Speaker 1>for private equity, hedge funds and venture capital. You're talking

0:50:08.040 --> 0:50:12.640
<v Speaker 1>about a teeny tiny fraction of old taxpayers. Why the

0:50:12.680 --> 0:50:13.560
<v Speaker 1>special treatment?

0:50:14.960 --> 0:50:18.440
<v Speaker 2>It started out I think as a special treatment for

0:50:18.480 --> 0:50:22.920
<v Speaker 2>real estate, and it sort of morphed into this bigger,

0:50:23.840 --> 0:50:29.839
<v Speaker 2>bigger thing as the private equity venture world expanded. And

0:50:30.040 --> 0:50:34.880
<v Speaker 2>it essentially is that the managers executives of these companies

0:50:35.239 --> 0:50:38.680
<v Speaker 2>just to end up paying a far far lower rate

0:50:38.960 --> 0:50:44.040
<v Speaker 2>on their very beneficent payouts than you or I do.

0:50:44.800 --> 0:50:48.480
<v Speaker 2>And it's a loophole that people have tried to get

0:50:48.560 --> 0:50:53.359
<v Speaker 2>rid of for decades. We've had congressional hearings about it,

0:50:54.320 --> 0:50:58.319
<v Speaker 2>and yet it continues to stay on the books, and

0:50:58.960 --> 0:51:02.040
<v Speaker 2>boy they cry blood murder when it comes time for

0:51:02.080 --> 0:51:04.839
<v Speaker 2>people to say, look, maybe we should rethink this and

0:51:04.880 --> 0:51:07.080
<v Speaker 2>not let these guys be I mean, it's like a

0:51:07.120 --> 0:51:10.560
<v Speaker 2>billionaire minting machine to have this kind of a lower

0:51:10.640 --> 0:51:12.120
<v Speaker 2>tax rate on these folks.

0:51:13.239 --> 0:51:15.399
<v Speaker 1>Who wants to pay thirty seven percent when you could

0:51:15.400 --> 0:51:19.320
<v Speaker 1>pay essentially twenty three percent. Right, of course they're spending

0:51:19.400 --> 0:51:22.279
<v Speaker 1>money on lobbyists, right, cut my taxes in half? Where

0:51:22.320 --> 0:51:23.160
<v Speaker 1>do I sign up for that?

0:51:23.400 --> 0:51:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:51:23.680 --> 0:51:25.319
<v Speaker 1>Oh wait, I don't have access to that.

0:51:25.600 --> 0:51:28.719
<v Speaker 2>Really, start a private equity firm, Barry.

0:51:28.800 --> 0:51:31.360
<v Speaker 1>So here's what we'll do. We'll start a private equity farm.

0:51:31.800 --> 0:51:34.759
<v Speaker 1>We'll buy pensions and just put it in the S

0:51:34.760 --> 0:51:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and P five hundred and cost us five BIPs to

0:51:37.640 --> 0:51:40.080
<v Speaker 1>manage it. It'll be there's a lot of fat there

0:51:40.400 --> 0:51:43.760
<v Speaker 1>if he approaches it that way. So let's talk about

0:51:43.800 --> 0:51:48.879
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of pushback. I've seen some criticisms and

0:51:48.960 --> 0:51:52.720
<v Speaker 1>some stuff. I want to get your your take on it. First.

0:51:52.760 --> 0:51:57.279
<v Speaker 1>We touched on this earlier. Aren't the big firms and

0:51:57.320 --> 0:52:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the LBOs the lever buyouts very different than the middle

0:52:02.560 --> 0:52:08.080
<v Speaker 1>market smaller private equity firms that provide capital and equity

0:52:08.560 --> 0:52:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to small companies. How do we you know, aren't you

0:52:11.600 --> 0:52:14.239
<v Speaker 1>painting with too broad a brush? Goes some of the criticism.

0:52:14.440 --> 0:52:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, if you look at these firms, these folks, these

0:52:19.280 --> 0:52:23.680
<v Speaker 2>these really titans of industry, right, They're celebrated in the

0:52:23.719 --> 0:52:29.200
<v Speaker 2>business pages, they are you know, on TV all the time.

0:52:29.239 --> 0:52:31.799
<v Speaker 2>I mean, these are the people leading the way on

0:52:31.840 --> 0:52:35.399
<v Speaker 2>this industry. Now, again, there are others who are doing

0:52:35.440 --> 0:52:37.560
<v Speaker 2>it right and doing it in a better way, yes,

0:52:38.200 --> 0:52:41.160
<v Speaker 2>but what you want to focus on. These are the

0:52:41.160 --> 0:52:43.600
<v Speaker 2>folks that's at the tone. These are the folks that say,

0:52:43.640 --> 0:52:47.640
<v Speaker 2>here's how we're going to operate this. And these are

0:52:47.719 --> 0:52:52.719
<v Speaker 2>the folks that do have the biggest impact Barry because

0:52:52.800 --> 0:52:56.239
<v Speaker 2>of their size, and so that's why we really want

0:52:56.280 --> 0:52:59.279
<v Speaker 2>to focus on them. So when you have, you know,

0:52:59.400 --> 0:53:05.280
<v Speaker 2>two firms controlling thirty percent of emergency departments in this country,

0:53:05.440 --> 0:53:08.080
<v Speaker 2>that's a lot, you know, That's why you focus on

0:53:08.120 --> 0:53:11.880
<v Speaker 2>the big firms. They have the big impact, and so

0:53:12.040 --> 0:53:13.120
<v Speaker 2>that's why we're doing that.

0:53:13.239 --> 0:53:16.880
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about wealth inequality. You guys put a

0:53:16.880 --> 0:53:19.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of blame on private equity for making it worse,

0:53:20.360 --> 0:53:24.360
<v Speaker 1>But I look at wealth inequality and wage inequality and

0:53:24.400 --> 0:53:26.719
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of things. It's it's low wages and

0:53:26.760 --> 0:53:29.520
<v Speaker 1>a low minimum wage that hasn't gone up in forever.

0:53:29.760 --> 0:53:33.600
<v Speaker 1>It's corporate tax avoidance, it's the shifting of the tax

0:53:33.640 --> 0:53:37.560
<v Speaker 1>burden away from the wealthy and away from corporations to

0:53:37.640 --> 0:53:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the middle class. Aren't we putting too much blame on

0:53:41.440 --> 0:53:45.440
<v Speaker 1>private equity for exacerbating wealth inequality in America?

0:53:45.520 --> 0:53:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, the reason we think it's important to include them

0:53:48.800 --> 0:53:52.200
<v Speaker 2>in the mix is that we haven't really had that discussion.

0:53:52.360 --> 0:53:55.759
<v Speaker 2>I mean, private equity was not really mentioned as a

0:53:55.840 --> 0:53:59.560
<v Speaker 2>force in the inequality in the Gulf between rich and poor.

0:53:59.640 --> 0:54:03.280
<v Speaker 2>In am you know, you would hear about offshoring of jobs.

0:54:03.360 --> 0:54:07.880
<v Speaker 2>You would hear about companies going to Ireland so that

0:54:07.960 --> 0:54:10.040
<v Speaker 2>they wouldn't have to pay you know, the high.

0:54:09.840 --> 0:54:13.359
<v Speaker 1>Taxes, the double Dutch whatever.

0:54:13.239 --> 0:54:17.239
<v Speaker 2>Whatever, and so there has been a lot of discussion.

0:54:17.280 --> 0:54:22.520
<v Speaker 2>And of course the you know, uh, the defanging or

0:54:22.680 --> 0:54:27.960
<v Speaker 2>the the diminishment of unions, so you don't have a

0:54:28.000 --> 0:54:31.480
<v Speaker 2>balance of power between the worker and the corporation. But

0:54:31.600 --> 0:54:35.640
<v Speaker 2>you look at some of the forces behind those forces, right,

0:54:35.800 --> 0:54:41.040
<v Speaker 2>So pensions, great example, if you're starting to see private

0:54:41.080 --> 0:54:45.759
<v Speaker 2>equity firms taking over pensions, you know, and and or

0:54:46.360 --> 0:54:51.600
<v Speaker 2>stripping the pensions of the companies that they bankrupt. That

0:54:51.840 --> 0:54:57.400
<v Speaker 2>is a definite wealth gulf, right, That is a definite

0:54:57.480 --> 0:55:02.960
<v Speaker 2>impact on every day people main street America that I

0:55:03.080 --> 0:55:06.239
<v Speaker 2>just don't think we've really examined. So you just have

0:55:06.320 --> 0:55:11.440
<v Speaker 2>to look behind some of the practices when you have retailing.

0:55:12.080 --> 0:55:15.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, that's a big force, that a big area

0:55:15.440 --> 0:55:18.680
<v Speaker 2>that private equity has been very forceful in. You know,

0:55:19.400 --> 0:55:23.879
<v Speaker 2>almost six hundred thousand jobs lost in retailing. Now, yes,

0:55:23.960 --> 0:55:26.799
<v Speaker 2>some of that would have happened with the shift online,

0:55:27.239 --> 0:55:31.239
<v Speaker 2>but honestly, you know, there have been consequences like that.

0:55:31.520 --> 0:55:33.680
<v Speaker 2>So you look at that, and then you look at

0:55:33.760 --> 0:55:37.520
<v Speaker 2>the problems with healthcare and what it's doing to patients,

0:55:37.560 --> 0:55:40.880
<v Speaker 2>and so I do think that it is a force

0:55:40.960 --> 0:55:42.160
<v Speaker 2>to be reckoned with here.

0:55:42.040 --> 0:55:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Right, So I'm glad you brought up retail. Some of

0:55:45.000 --> 0:55:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the pushback I've seen is the United States has been

0:55:48.640 --> 0:55:53.080
<v Speaker 1>wildly over retailed twenty I think in two thousand and

0:55:53.640 --> 0:55:59.720
<v Speaker 1>seven we had twenty four square feet per capita versus Europe,

0:55:59.760 --> 0:56:02.880
<v Speaker 1>which was like fourteen and Japan which was like nine.

0:56:03.400 --> 0:56:06.520
<v Speaker 1>So we really had far more retailers than we knew

0:56:06.560 --> 0:56:09.359
<v Speaker 1>what to do. We built way too many malls, and

0:56:10.120 --> 0:56:13.560
<v Speaker 1>ultimately this was going to go through a huge set

0:56:13.560 --> 0:56:18.719
<v Speaker 1>of changes anyway. Private equity maybe it accelerated a little bit,

0:56:19.600 --> 0:56:24.880
<v Speaker 1>but we certainly can't blame the shrinking retail footprint on

0:56:25.080 --> 0:56:27.720
<v Speaker 1>pe can we.

0:56:26.840 --> 0:56:30.640
<v Speaker 2>We could maybe put some of it on them, right? Yeah?

0:56:30.680 --> 0:56:35.160
<v Speaker 2>And obviously you know, the shift online hurt some folks.

0:56:35.239 --> 0:56:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Toys r Us as an example of that.

0:56:37.760 --> 0:56:40.640
<v Speaker 1>But you know, more recently, Bedbath and Beyond that was

0:56:40.680 --> 0:56:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a publicly traded company. They hit the wall without private

0:56:44.920 --> 0:56:50.280
<v Speaker 1>equities help, That's right. So the biggest pushback I've seen

0:56:50.640 --> 0:56:54.400
<v Speaker 1>is go back to the eighties and nineties when LBOs

0:56:54.400 --> 0:56:59.080
<v Speaker 1>were first ramping up. Companies went from big to really big.

0:56:59.560 --> 0:57:02.879
<v Speaker 1>And as as these big, publicly traded mega companies went

0:57:02.960 --> 0:57:06.680
<v Speaker 1>up market, the banks, the brokers, all Wall Street chased

0:57:06.719 --> 0:57:10.280
<v Speaker 1>them and they just created this air pocket, this void

0:57:10.920 --> 0:57:15.520
<v Speaker 1>underneath where there used to be national banks and national

0:57:16.040 --> 0:57:21.080
<v Speaker 1>lenders servicing that industry. And they have nobody left to

0:57:21.120 --> 0:57:26.560
<v Speaker 1>service them. And that vacuum is into what good private

0:57:26.560 --> 0:57:30.080
<v Speaker 1>equity has stepped. If it wasn't for the private equity

0:57:30.080 --> 0:57:33.320
<v Speaker 1>below the four biggest companies, there's very little sources of

0:57:33.360 --> 0:57:37.439
<v Speaker 1>capital for these one hundred five hundred seven hundred million

0:57:37.520 --> 0:57:39.680
<v Speaker 1>dollar firms that Wall Street ignores.

0:57:40.760 --> 0:57:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think you have to say then if you're

0:57:43.440 --> 0:57:45.640
<v Speaker 2>going to say, Okay, they're not these companies are not

0:57:45.720 --> 0:57:50.520
<v Speaker 2>being banked properly, then that's great if you can get

0:57:50.760 --> 0:57:54.800
<v Speaker 2>money from private equity, but let's not bankrupt them in

0:57:55.000 --> 0:57:58.200
<v Speaker 2>the process. I mean, you have studied a study that

0:57:58.320 --> 0:58:03.240
<v Speaker 2>shows that bankruptcies her you know, far more with companies

0:58:03.280 --> 0:58:06.320
<v Speaker 2>that are private equitized than it does with other companies.

0:58:06.920 --> 0:58:10.440
<v Speaker 2>So I think that you, yes, if you want to

0:58:10.600 --> 0:58:14.960
<v Speaker 2>have the resources, you know, the capital is not being

0:58:15.000 --> 0:58:17.600
<v Speaker 2>assigned to these companies, but that doesn't mean that they

0:58:17.640 --> 0:58:22.959
<v Speaker 2>should be you know, abused, or that some of these

0:58:23.000 --> 0:58:25.360
<v Speaker 2>practices can't be questioned.

0:58:26.360 --> 0:58:29.000
<v Speaker 1>And my one of my favorite parts of the book.

0:58:29.200 --> 0:58:32.800
<v Speaker 1>You talk about equity ownership and wealth ownership in the

0:58:32.880 --> 0:58:37.520
<v Speaker 1>United States. In nineteen thirteen, the bottom ninety percent of

0:58:37.560 --> 0:58:42.280
<v Speaker 1>incomes owned about fifteen percent of the wealthy United States.

0:58:42.640 --> 0:58:46.400
<v Speaker 1>This is real estate businesses and publicly traded companies. By

0:58:46.440 --> 0:58:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the eighties that had more than doubled to thirty five

0:58:49.640 --> 0:58:54.000
<v Speaker 1>percent of the wealth in the US. Was that the peak.

0:58:54.040 --> 0:58:57.040
<v Speaker 1>What happened with that going forward?

0:58:57.200 --> 0:59:01.040
<v Speaker 2>That was the peak. And one of the reasons for

0:59:01.160 --> 0:59:04.720
<v Speaker 2>that very big, considerable growth, and that was the you know,

0:59:05.080 --> 0:59:08.640
<v Speaker 2>people were able to have a family without having two

0:59:08.760 --> 0:59:11.880
<v Speaker 2>wage earners, right, you were able to buy a house,

0:59:12.000 --> 0:59:17.040
<v Speaker 2>et cetera that moment in time. Also a huge contributor

0:59:17.080 --> 0:59:22.160
<v Speaker 2>to that was pensions, so corporate pensions that gave a

0:59:22.240 --> 0:59:29.880
<v Speaker 2>worker reasonable shot at a prosperous retirement, and those started

0:59:29.960 --> 0:59:34.600
<v Speaker 2>disappearing in the mid to late eighties. And so that's

0:59:34.720 --> 0:59:41.880
<v Speaker 2>a big factor in why the wealth held by the

0:59:41.920 --> 0:59:48.280
<v Speaker 2>main street America, the middle class, the big broad brush America.

0:59:49.160 --> 0:59:51.080
<v Speaker 2>That's why that has declined.

0:59:51.440 --> 0:59:55.840
<v Speaker 1>So here's I think my favorite pushback to the conversation

0:59:55.920 --> 0:59:59.080
<v Speaker 1>about wealth inequality. And I'm curious as to your thoughts.

0:59:59.520 --> 1:00:02.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not the top ten percent versus the bottom ninety

1:00:02.680 --> 1:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>percent where that big disparity has opened up. It's not

1:00:05.840 --> 1:00:09.600
<v Speaker 1>even the top one percent versus the bottom ninety nine percent,

1:00:09.920 --> 1:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>although that's certainly pretty meaty. It's the top point zero

1:00:14.520 --> 1:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>one percent versus even within the top one percent. There's

1:00:19.080 --> 1:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>this massive disparity. We didn't used to have that many

1:00:23.720 --> 1:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>billionaires in uber wealthy today versus I don't know, fifty

1:00:27.120 --> 1:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>one hundred years ago, how has the distribution of wealth

1:00:30.960 --> 1:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>shift in the United States, and what might come out

1:00:35.360 --> 1:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>of that going forward.

1:00:36.920 --> 1:00:39.000
<v Speaker 2>I just don't think it's a good thing to have

1:00:39.320 --> 1:00:45.560
<v Speaker 2>this coterie of extreme, extreme wealth at the top of

1:00:45.600 --> 1:00:50.920
<v Speaker 2>the pyramid. I mean, it's just not healthy. An economy

1:00:50.960 --> 1:00:55.320
<v Speaker 2>does better if the most people are prosperous, right, and

1:00:55.400 --> 1:01:03.200
<v Speaker 2>so these you know, multi multi, multi billionaires are really outliers.

1:01:03.720 --> 1:01:07.560
<v Speaker 2>But it points to a problem with the entire society.

1:01:07.760 --> 1:01:13.120
<v Speaker 2>And perhaps it's because we lawd wealthy people. But part

1:01:13.160 --> 1:01:16.880
<v Speaker 2>of it is this tax loophole that really is unfair.

1:01:17.800 --> 1:01:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Part of it is some of the practices that really

1:01:21.760 --> 1:01:26.480
<v Speaker 2>are aggressive and that end up harming companies and workers

1:01:27.120 --> 1:01:31.320
<v Speaker 2>and pensioners. And let's not forget the huge fees that

1:01:31.400 --> 1:01:36.960
<v Speaker 2>pensions pay to buy into private equity funds. And for

1:01:37.120 --> 1:01:41.400
<v Speaker 2>years those private equity funds outperformed the S and P

1:01:42.080 --> 1:01:43.800
<v Speaker 2>but they no longer do.

1:01:44.240 --> 1:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>So let's hit on that, because that's really interesting. This

1:01:47.560 --> 1:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>was a small asset class that, whether it was the

1:01:52.320 --> 1:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>ill liquidity premium or just the ability to go places

1:01:56.400 --> 1:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>where public markets couldn't, actually did better than the markets.

1:02:01.400 --> 1:02:04.439
<v Speaker 1>That risk premia seems to have evaporated.

1:02:05.080 --> 1:02:10.240
<v Speaker 2>It stopped out performing in like the mid two thousand so,

1:02:10.600 --> 1:02:14.560
<v Speaker 2>or you know, towards two thousand and eight, and so

1:02:14.680 --> 1:02:18.480
<v Speaker 2>you really have to wonder what the purpose of the

1:02:18.800 --> 1:02:22.760
<v Speaker 2>continued infatuation with private equity among pensions is if they

1:02:22.760 --> 1:02:25.800
<v Speaker 2>can get the same return in a S and P

1:02:25.960 --> 1:02:29.080
<v Speaker 2>five hundred with five basis points as a cost and

1:02:29.200 --> 1:02:33.160
<v Speaker 2>total transparency by the way, and a mark to market

1:02:33.240 --> 1:02:35.320
<v Speaker 2>that you see at the end of every business day

1:02:35.760 --> 1:02:37.880
<v Speaker 2>and so you know where you stand. So it's not

1:02:38.120 --> 1:02:41.080
<v Speaker 2>one of these fuzzy math situations where you don't really

1:02:41.120 --> 1:02:43.520
<v Speaker 2>know what the value of the fund is because it's

1:02:43.800 --> 1:02:48.440
<v Speaker 2>got private companies in it that are being marked by individuals,

1:02:48.520 --> 1:02:51.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, who have an ax to grind in the mark.

1:02:51.960 --> 1:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Really quite interesting, So let me give you one of

1:02:54.680 --> 1:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>my curveball questions I like to surprise guests with. So

1:02:59.360 --> 1:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>your care your history is Money Magazine in the early

1:03:02.960 --> 1:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>mid eighties and then Forbes and then Worth Magazine. But

1:03:08.120 --> 1:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>while you were at Forbes in nineteen ninety five, you

1:03:12.480 --> 1:03:16.640
<v Speaker 1>get tapped to be press secretary for then presidential election

1:03:16.800 --> 1:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>candidate Steve Forbes. What was that? Like, how different are

1:03:20.480 --> 1:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>political campaigns from covering finance?

1:03:24.160 --> 1:03:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, when Steve asked me to be his press secretary.

1:03:28.120 --> 1:03:31.160
<v Speaker 2>It was I thought, wow, this is going to be interesting.

1:03:31.960 --> 1:03:33.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, I even maybe thought this is going to

1:03:33.960 --> 1:03:36.680
<v Speaker 2>be fun. Right now, I'm a financial reporter, I am

1:03:36.680 --> 1:03:40.240
<v Speaker 2>not a Washington reporter, not a political reporter, and so

1:03:40.560 --> 1:03:42.680
<v Speaker 2>it was I had a different, you know, idea of

1:03:42.720 --> 1:03:45.920
<v Speaker 2>what it might be like. But anyway, it was a

1:03:46.240 --> 1:03:50.320
<v Speaker 2>very very tough six months, I can imagine, and you

1:03:50.320 --> 1:03:54.760
<v Speaker 2>know it was. So Steve was a candidate that had

1:03:54.960 --> 1:04:00.560
<v Speaker 2>economic ideas, okay, and one of them was the flat tax, which,

1:04:00.600 --> 1:04:02.520
<v Speaker 2>by the way, would have gotten rid of lobbyists.

1:04:02.640 --> 1:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>That was big benefles and all.

1:04:05.240 --> 1:04:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Those loopholes, right, flat tax. He was also for you know,

1:04:10.000 --> 1:04:13.800
<v Speaker 2>medical savings accounts and health savings accounts anyway, and so

1:04:14.040 --> 1:04:17.600
<v Speaker 2>I would have I would explain these concepts. And he

1:04:17.720 --> 1:04:20.760
<v Speaker 2>was against the double taxation of dividends, which of course

1:04:20.800 --> 1:04:23.919
<v Speaker 2>we have gotten rid of I think. Anyway, So those

1:04:23.960 --> 1:04:28.480
<v Speaker 2>were sort of three of his initial ideas, and I

1:04:28.520 --> 1:04:31.720
<v Speaker 2>would have to explain these to the Washington press corps.

1:04:32.400 --> 1:04:37.320
<v Speaker 2>The Washington press corps not being financially oriented and probably

1:04:37.360 --> 1:04:40.000
<v Speaker 2>not that interested. They were just interested in the horse race.

1:04:40.760 --> 1:04:44.400
<v Speaker 2>Now you know, Now we had he did very well

1:04:44.520 --> 1:04:48.160
<v Speaker 2>in New Hampshire, and so for a frenzied moment, it was,

1:04:48.200 --> 1:04:50.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, like this, you know, maybe he has a

1:04:50.760 --> 1:04:54.160
<v Speaker 2>chance or a shot. But anyway, it was it was

1:04:54.360 --> 1:04:58.280
<v Speaker 2>a very trying time for me, but I really became

1:04:58.320 --> 1:04:59.920
<v Speaker 2>a better journalist because of it.

1:05:00.080 --> 1:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Well that I was going to go there with that question,

1:05:02.120 --> 1:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>what was it like being on the other side of

1:05:05.520 --> 1:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the clamoring that scrum that you always see the photos of.

1:05:10.360 --> 1:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>How did that change how you do journalism and view journalists?

1:05:15.280 --> 1:05:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, I really after that decided that I really wanted

1:05:20.760 --> 1:05:25.320
<v Speaker 2>to give people a lot more time to respond to

1:05:25.680 --> 1:05:30.400
<v Speaker 2>my questions. And because I would be asked to answer

1:05:30.800 --> 1:05:34.680
<v Speaker 2>questions that were quite you know, comprehensive and or tricky,

1:05:34.760 --> 1:05:37.480
<v Speaker 2>difficult to come up with the answer in you know,

1:05:37.640 --> 1:05:41.520
<v Speaker 2>like minutes, and so it was very frustrating to not

1:05:41.560 --> 1:05:43.720
<v Speaker 2>be able to do that. And so I came away

1:05:43.720 --> 1:05:45.760
<v Speaker 2>from that experience saying, Okay, from now on, I'm going

1:05:45.840 --> 1:05:49.000
<v Speaker 2>to give everybody that I'm writing about more time to

1:05:49.120 --> 1:05:51.520
<v Speaker 2>respond because I don't want to be in that put

1:05:51.600 --> 1:05:53.240
<v Speaker 2>them in the situation that I was in.

1:05:53.320 --> 1:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Huh, all right, we only have you for a few

1:05:55.400 --> 1:05:58.480
<v Speaker 1>more minutes. Let me jump to my favorite questions that

1:05:58.560 --> 1:06:02.040
<v Speaker 1>we asked all of our guests, starting with tell us

1:06:02.080 --> 1:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>what you're streaming, what are you watching listening to? What's

1:06:05.000 --> 1:06:06.040
<v Speaker 1>keeping you entertained?

1:06:07.080 --> 1:06:10.280
<v Speaker 2>What am I streaming? Well, gosh, I really like the

1:06:10.520 --> 1:06:13.320
<v Speaker 2>BBC show Happy Valley. I don't know if you've seen that.

1:06:13.320 --> 1:06:16.560
<v Speaker 2>It's a kind of a detective, a pretty tough female

1:06:16.600 --> 1:06:20.880
<v Speaker 2>detective like that. I like Ted Lasso. I know that's

1:06:21.040 --> 1:06:25.919
<v Speaker 2>very mundane, but so those are the two right now.

1:06:26.080 --> 1:06:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about mentors who helped shape your career.

1:06:30.160 --> 1:06:34.880
<v Speaker 2>Jim Michaels, who was the editor of Forbes magazine. He

1:06:35.200 --> 1:06:41.680
<v Speaker 2>was a very tough, old newspaper reporter. He was at

1:06:41.800 --> 1:06:44.200
<v Speaker 2>UPI and he was the guy who broke the story

1:06:44.200 --> 1:06:48.520
<v Speaker 2>of Gandhi's assassination, so really knew how to do that

1:06:48.680 --> 1:06:51.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of you know, reporting. But he took his expertise

1:06:51.880 --> 1:06:56.080
<v Speaker 2>to business and really taught me how to look at businesses,

1:06:56.280 --> 1:07:03.360
<v Speaker 2>analyze balance sheets, income statements, really do contrarian reporting. He

1:07:03.440 --> 1:07:06.200
<v Speaker 2>was a guy who didn't want, you know, the conventional wisdom.

1:07:06.240 --> 1:07:09.240
<v Speaker 2>He wanted to question the conventional wisdom. He was very difficult,

1:07:09.400 --> 1:07:12.720
<v Speaker 2>very irascible, very demanding, but you really learned a lot.

1:07:12.960 --> 1:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Huh interesting. Let's talk about books. What are some of

1:07:16.080 --> 1:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>your favorites and what have you been reading recently.

1:07:19.640 --> 1:07:25.760
<v Speaker 2>I like nineteenth century fiction, so Anthony Twallop The Way

1:07:25.800 --> 1:07:29.320
<v Speaker 2>We Live Now, which is a really wonderful book about

1:07:29.360 --> 1:07:34.560
<v Speaker 2>a tycoon who is, you know, sort of a scoundrel

1:07:35.360 --> 1:07:39.760
<v Speaker 2>who sells shares in a railroad company that doesn't really

1:07:39.760 --> 1:07:40.680
<v Speaker 2>exist anyway.

1:07:41.600 --> 1:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, if you want the railroad to exist, that'll cost

1:07:44.600 --> 1:07:44.919
<v Speaker 1>you more.

1:07:45.480 --> 1:07:50.919
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Right now, I'm actually reading a biography of Genghis Khan.

1:07:51.440 --> 1:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh, which one Weatherford Jack Weatherford. It's I'm not sure

1:07:56.120 --> 1:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>if that's the one I read, but it's amazing.

1:07:58.720 --> 1:08:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And you know, that's a who's been kind of us.

1:08:03.480 --> 1:08:05.800
<v Speaker 2>He was kind of slimed, you know, and you know,

1:08:05.920 --> 1:08:09.240
<v Speaker 2>as being this terrible you know, marauder and everything, and

1:08:09.440 --> 1:08:13.680
<v Speaker 2>it's it's a different story altogether. So I'm really enjoying that.

1:08:14.080 --> 1:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Our last two questions, what sort of advice would you

1:08:17.280 --> 1:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>give to a recent college grad who was interested in

1:08:20.240 --> 1:08:24.839
<v Speaker 1>a career in either investigative journalism or finance.

1:08:25.920 --> 1:08:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, I would, of course say go with investigative reporting,

1:08:30.680 --> 1:08:33.719
<v Speaker 2>because I think we need more of it in this country.

1:08:33.800 --> 1:08:36.519
<v Speaker 2>I think we don't have as much as we need.

1:08:37.360 --> 1:08:41.280
<v Speaker 2>We have seen newspapers hollowed out, of course, closed down.

1:08:41.360 --> 1:08:44.800
<v Speaker 2>We've also seen that the costs of you know, associated

1:08:44.800 --> 1:08:47.680
<v Speaker 2>with investigative reporting. It's not easy. It's not something that

1:08:47.720 --> 1:08:50.479
<v Speaker 2>happens overnight. So it really is costly, and we've seen

1:08:50.520 --> 1:08:53.559
<v Speaker 2>that fewer and fewer of those folks. So I would say,

1:08:54.040 --> 1:08:56.080
<v Speaker 2>gung ho, if you can get a job doing that,

1:08:56.080 --> 1:08:58.200
<v Speaker 2>that it is going to be the most fun that

1:08:58.280 --> 1:09:01.920
<v Speaker 2>you're going to have. And also, so I'm doing a service.

1:09:02.400 --> 1:09:05.440
<v Speaker 1>And what do you know about the world of investigative

1:09:05.479 --> 1:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>reporting and finance today you wish you knew back in

1:09:09.439 --> 1:09:11.639
<v Speaker 1>the early eighties when you were first getting started.

1:09:12.479 --> 1:09:15.479
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's see, So what's about the world of finance

1:09:15.479 --> 1:09:17.760
<v Speaker 2>that I wish I knew thirty years ago? Is that

1:09:17.840 --> 1:09:20.440
<v Speaker 2>it isn't as hard as you think that it isn't.

1:09:20.560 --> 1:09:22.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, A lot of people come out of college

1:09:22.400 --> 1:09:25.240
<v Speaker 2>if they're not a financial person, like I was a

1:09:25.360 --> 1:09:28.479
<v Speaker 2>humanities major, you know, and you have this mental block

1:09:28.520 --> 1:09:31.400
<v Speaker 2>about numbers. I can't do numbers, or you know, it's

1:09:31.439 --> 1:09:34.679
<v Speaker 2>not that hard. It really isn't that hard. It's common sense.

1:09:34.960 --> 1:09:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Now there are people who are really extra special good

1:09:37.240 --> 1:09:39.920
<v Speaker 2>at it, but you know it's something that you can

1:09:40.840 --> 1:09:43.559
<v Speaker 2>can tackle. Don't feel like you have a mental block

1:09:43.600 --> 1:09:47.280
<v Speaker 2>against finance, and don't think that finance isn't important. Finance

1:09:47.360 --> 1:09:52.000
<v Speaker 2>is not a backwater is. It touches everyone. It touches

1:09:52.040 --> 1:09:56.120
<v Speaker 2>everybody in this country. It is political, it is everywhere,

1:09:56.200 --> 1:09:59.600
<v Speaker 2>and so just don't discount the importance of finance.

1:10:00.240 --> 1:10:03.559
<v Speaker 1>Really interesting. Thank you Gretchen for being so generous with

1:10:03.600 --> 1:10:06.960
<v Speaker 1>your time. We have been speaking with Gretchen Morgensen. She

1:10:07.120 --> 1:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>is the author of These Are the Plunderers, How Private

1:10:10.280 --> 1:10:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Equity Runs and RECs America. If you enjoy this conversation,

1:10:15.280 --> 1:10:17.519
<v Speaker 1>well be sure and check out any of the previous

1:10:17.600 --> 1:10:20.840
<v Speaker 1>five hundred we've done over the past I don't know

1:10:20.880 --> 1:10:25.480
<v Speaker 1>eight years. You can find those on YouTube, iTunes, Spotify,

1:10:26.040 --> 1:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you find your favorite podcasts. Sign up for

1:10:30.120 --> 1:10:32.840
<v Speaker 1>my daily reading list at Rid Halts dot com, follow

1:10:32.840 --> 1:10:37.080
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter at Ridholt's follow all of the Bloomberg

1:10:37.120 --> 1:10:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Family of podcasts at Podcasts. I would be remiss if

1:10:41.040 --> 1:10:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I did not thank the crack team that helps put

1:10:43.080 --> 1:10:47.679
<v Speaker 1>these conversations together each week. Sarah Livesey is my audio

1:10:47.760 --> 1:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>engineer at Tika of albrun is my project manager. Paris

1:10:52.240 --> 1:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Walt is my producer. Sean Russo is my researcher. I'm

1:10:57.040 --> 1:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Barry Ridholts. You've been listening to Mass in Business on

1:11:01.439 --> 1:11:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.