WEBVTT - How Police Lineups Work

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you should know from how Stuff Works

0:00:04.600 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark.

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>There's Charles w Chuck Bryant, there's Jerry out there outside

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the fish bowl, and also there's guest producer Noel in

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>our pal Ben. But yeah, I'm in the room this time. Man, Yeah,

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>on the mike. Thanks for having us. Uh, this is

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>way better than that time you have me on the

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:33.279
<v Speaker 1>April Fools episode. Well, I'm glad you brought that up

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:36.240
<v Speaker 1>because may remember Ben from that I think it was

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>two thirteen or fifteen something, ungodly time ago. It's my replacement. Yeah,

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>it was the April Fools joke for the three D

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:47.520
<v Speaker 1>printing episode. So this is your second time on the show. Yeah,

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the Internet shredgy Ben was it were? They were like

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>a target of abuse. I want to thank everybody for

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the very polite emails and as as we could tell, thankfully,

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Chuck is fine. They yeah, they took it easy on him.

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 1>We have very nice listeners. Something. And then know, this

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>might be the first time you're ever speaking on the podcast,

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 1>even though you've guess produced it like a million times.

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I think I may have mumbled something in the background

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the time. Really, so we're having you two on let's cut,

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>let's get down a business because you two have a

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>podcast together, right, I know you also are on Mini

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Crushed movie Crush. Yeah, you're also in real World's colliding

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>right now, Right, there's a lot I'm going over them all.

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>You're on stuff they don't want you to know. But

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you two, Ben and Nol have come together and made

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous history, which isn't awesome. Oh yeah, that's right. We're

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>just missing that. God I'm starting to sweat. But you

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>guys are on ridiculous history together. We are tell us

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 1>about that. So history is full of these cartoonish bizarre events,

0:01:54.720 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>often not covered in your typical history class. Sounds for Mimilier, right,

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>because for one reason or another, people thought that's no

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>way that didn't really happen. The first recorded instance of

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>a mooning did not result in the death of hundreds

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 1>of people, is surely not? Surely not? But it did,

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>And surely the US government did not have a plan

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 1>to shoot a nuclear missile at the moon, right, That

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>was just a Mr Show sketch, Sure not, but it

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>also was It was kind of parallel thinking. Is the

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Mr show sketch happened before this story became declassified Project

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>day one nine. So our continuing mission with Ridiculous History,

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>not to sound too star trekky about it, is to

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>find those moments, the bizarre people, places, and things throughout

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the span of human civilization that at least crack the

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:55.799
<v Speaker 1>both of us up on a continual basis. And sometimes

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>we do have to stop recording just for a second

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 1>because we're so tickled. Yeah wow, that's that's actually high qualities,

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:09.799
<v Speaker 1>mainly because we tickle each other physically. That's cheating, Ben,

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>You're making it sound so serious. It's actually a lot

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of fun. It's a fun show, right Yeah, Okay, Yeah,

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean I'm giving been a hard time, but yeah,

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:21.919
<v Speaker 1>that's definitely like we touch on from time to time.

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.920
<v Speaker 1>It'll it'll go into a heavier territory. Like, for example,

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>we did an episode about how women in Kansas in

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen twenties were imprisoned in labor camps for having STDs.

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Well that certainly falls under ridiculous, not exactly fun or

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 1>funny right now, ridiculous, But so it's it's it's all

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of those things. Some of them are you know, crack

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you up hilarious moments like Napoleon Bonaparte getting attacked by

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>bunnies or you know, the aforementioned stt labor camps or

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>racist special Olympics that were held here in the States.

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>And we're a complete uh well tomorrow phrase we use

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:02.119
<v Speaker 1>on the show each ship show. So so wait a minute,

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I think you are like, you need to name the

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>state that hosted that. It was St. Louis. Yeah. St Louis,

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>And it's because the World's Fair was happening in St.

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Louis and they were going to have it in Chicago.

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:19.359
<v Speaker 1>But the people hosting the World's Fair said, if you

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>don't do your Olympics as part of the World's Fair,

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>we're going to totally blow you out of the water

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>with how awesome our World's Fair is. And no one's

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna come to your Olympics. Scared them in the early

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 1>days of like, you know, not the earliest days of

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the Olympics, when they brought it back like in them,

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was not ancient room. It was not

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 1>in fact ancient Rome. And it was also it was

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>not a good example of the Olympics either because the

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 1>white supremacists who were in charge of the whole shebang

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>decided that this would be the perfect time to prove

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>their cockamamie ideas of like eugenic ideas of kind of

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:59.239
<v Speaker 1>like white superiority and like they would have indigenous people

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>competing in these Olympic events, but of course they didn't

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:04.280
<v Speaker 1>teach them how to, you know, do the events, so

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>they didn't just automatically know how to pull vault or

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>throw a javelin or whatever. So and one supremacists can

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>ruin anything. Anything they put their hands on, they really

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>can just turns to poop. Yeah, we are doing an

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>episode on flash events later, so stay tuned for there. So,

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 1>so before we give everything away, you guys tell everyone

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>where they can find ridiculous history and when. You can

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 1>find ridiculous history at our website. No, it's ridiculous history show,

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I think, so the website. It's definitely keep prepared for this.

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I've got steck of notes right here. Yeah, you can

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>find us an Apple podcast. You find us on Spotify,

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you can find us wherever you find your favorite shows,

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:50.280
<v Speaker 1>like stuff you should know or stuff they don't want

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>you to know, or I should I list the entire

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>pantheon of all the shows we have. It's too many

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:58.280
<v Speaker 1>at this point, but but yes, you can find us

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:02.599
<v Speaker 1>in all of those places. We also have a community page,

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 1>uh that we're really proud of and really happy with,

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>called ridiculous Historians on Facebook. Taking a total cue from

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the cisk army nice. Well, First of all, thank you

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>for all of the flattery that you've been heaping on

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 1>us for the last few minutes as much appreciated, but

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 1>also thank you for coming by. Appreciate it, guys, Thank

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 1>you guys for having so much. Let's do this every week. Yeah,

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>that might be been much. Let me check the sketch.

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I gotta tell you, I love those guys, but I'm

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>glad to get out of that that new studio box.

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>It's like a Fema trailer. Man. It's for malde hyde

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 1>wafting off slowly poisoning us. It is still offcasting. It

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 1>feels like, yeah, big time. It's in my hair, which

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>is now falling out. We're in bad shape. Well before,

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I like what you're wearing. By the way, thank you.

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I spilled a tremendous amount of coffee on myself and

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 1>luckily I had a bunch of samples of our new

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>T shirt. Yeah, and this is not just a plug. Everyone.

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Josh is literally wearing a Lewis the Child Skeptic T

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>shirt from the Stuff you Should Know store because they

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>sent us every shirt. I'm like, oh, great, to the

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>guy who has a hundred T shirts, here's twenty more.

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>But they are pretty cool. I'm pretty happy with this.

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:22.559
<v Speaker 1>Like the size of it. Look at the size, perfect size.

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>It's not so big that it wraps around and gets

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>all mangled by my love handles. But it's also not

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>so small that it looks like, you know, caved in chest.

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>You know what I mean. I didn't remember that reference

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>though I didn't neither like they listened to the Pie

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Piper episode. Oh there you go. It sounds like a

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>youth thing, yeah, Josh, But it was just an offhanded

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>comment I made. Now it's a T shirt I'm wearing,

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>which is I love. It makes a pretty great time

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>to be alive. By the way, I need to give

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a shout out to Brittney Shift. Um, Britney Shift sent

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>this idea to us. Okay, great, And the reason you

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>know we don't often take well that's not true. We

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of keep a kitty of listeners suggestions, but we

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>don't often like do one the next week and then

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 1>shout out the person. But I thought we had fully

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>exhausted our Crime and Punishment series. So I was delighted

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 1>that Britney Shifts sent this in and I was like,

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>why haven't we done police lineup? I don't know, it's

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a great question. Was just sitting there waiting. Yep. The

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>only other one that's left is what kind of shoes

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 1>detectives wear? That that's the last one? Is this? Yeah,

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that's gum shoe or crepe sold I think do you

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>knew that? Yeah? But I don't know how it relates

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 1>to cops. I guess they wore those. They are super comfortable.

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Cops are always walking around walking, yeah you know, but

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>sometimes when they're walking, they're actually out on the street

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 1>looking for people who resemble a suspect that they have

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>in the jail house. And they say, hey, you come

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>on over here, how would you like to make ten bucks?

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>And the person says exactly how copper and the cops says,

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.839
<v Speaker 1>by standing in is what we call a filler in

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a police or they do like Comber Simpson and when

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>they were like a boat raffle that they said he

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:26.439
<v Speaker 1>had to come down to the police station. Yeah, you

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>want a boat? Yeah, and then they beat him merciless

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>for like parking unpaid parking tickets. Also shout out to

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Beth at Schuster, who wrote to this article in the

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 1>n i J Journal the National Institute of Justice, I believe, so,

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 1>is that right? Yeah, they're pretty much committed to keeping

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>people from being wrongly convicted, so I would guess the

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>J stance for justice. Yeah, and this is this is

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a good start, and we had some other stuff we

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>added to it. But thank you Ms Schuster, Yeah for

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 1>your work up. Well, um, I already led into the

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>episode and it didn't take so let me try again.

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>This n i J article you sent calls out a

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>dude named Jerry Miller, who back was two years old,

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I believe. And Jerry Miller had a particularly bad day

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 1>when he was arrested and he was charged with robbing, kidnapping,

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and raping a woman, and he got convicted. He was

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:32.959
<v Speaker 1>convicted because two people, two eye witnesses, saw him in

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the lineup picked him out, and then later at trial

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the victim said, maybe that's him, maybe it's not, but

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>who cares. There's two eye witnesses that picked the show

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>out of a lineup. He's done. He did twenty four

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:51.319
<v Speaker 1>years in prison, and you may notice from the tone

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that I'm using here he was wrongfully convicted. He actually

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>got out of prison and was living life re leased

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>on parole, wearing an ankle bracelet a monitor constantly as

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>a registered sex offender. And then finally I think, um, oh,

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not quite sure two thousand seven. In two thousand seven,

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>as part of the Innocence Project, which we've done an

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>episode on with um, yeah, that lady what is her name? Oh, Haulleen,

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:29.679
<v Speaker 1>but it's definitely not Paulazon. Thank you, Jerry. Yeah, I

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>wanted to say Pauli Shore so bad. I just knew

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>it was wrong, but we didn't. Right, We did an

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Innocence Project episode, and under the Innocence Project, Jerry Miller

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>was exonerated through DNA evidence. He incontrovertibly did not do

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>this and lost twenty four years of his life because

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:54.839
<v Speaker 1>of flawed eyewitness testimony. Yeah, and so you know, this

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>is all about police lineups and more about I mean,

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll tell you how they work in a general sense,

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>but this sort of more about how you know, it's

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>such an imperfect system, but sort of The takeaway from

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>all of this that we're about to go over with

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>all the studies and the trying different things is kind

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>of like, you know, it's an imperfect system and we

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>can try and craft it the best way we can,

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>but human memory is imperfect. Identifying people in lineups is imperfect,

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and we're just it's kind of the best we got

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>right now. Right Well, a lot of people are like,

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 1>get rid of eyewitness testimony really altogether, yes, all together.

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Humans suck at eyewitness testimony. And there's a lot of

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 1>reasons why. It's not like people are out there like

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to have me a bad guy, show me

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>a lineup. I'm gonna pick one of those guys out.

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>They're not doing that. They're they're subject to basically the

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:56.719
<v Speaker 1>way our brains are wired. We don't walk around videotaping

0:12:56.800 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>everything that we see. Yeah, you know, we get sillly

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>bombarded with sensory information and under normal circumstances, you know,

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>you see a stranger on the street, you just see

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>there's another human. I've identified him as not a threat

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and keep walking by it. If that person turned out

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:18.959
<v Speaker 1>to be accused of a crime, um or or perpetrated

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>a crime, and you were brought in to say was

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>this the person you saw? Your brain is going to

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>try to reconstruct what little pieces of memory it formed

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 1>of that person. And there's a lot of things, a

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of factors that are involved that can make that

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>really difficult task even harder. Yeah. Like I am someone

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:45.199
<v Speaker 1>who has told myself, Chuck, pay attention. Like, if you're

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>ever in a situation like, pay attention, try and collect

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 1>yourself and try and remember a few really good details

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:55.439
<v Speaker 1>about the car or the person. So like, this is

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>on my mind. And I actually had a situation when

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I lived now I happened to me where I had

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to go through a police lineup and I failed. Oh really,

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>was the suspect there? No? Well no, here's here's the

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 1>quick version is I wasn't in a hit and run

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 1>this lady. Uh, these two lady, these two younger girls,

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 1>they were probably teenagers, hit me from behind in my car.

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I stopped my car, starting to get out and they

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>take off. So it's a hit and run. I chase them,

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>which is you should not do. Were you shooting into

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the air and again to slow down trying to shoot

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>out their tires? No, but I did chase him. Because

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I was so mad, and your adrenaline just shoots through

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the roof when something like that happens, so immediately you're

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>just not yourself and like recording details. So I was

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to catch up to get a license plate. I

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>saw that they went down the street that I knew

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>was a dead end. Um, it wasn't a cul de sect,

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>but it functioned to like a cul de sact. So

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I stopped where I was, got out of the car.

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Sure enough, twenty later they come halling but back towards me,

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and uh, the look on their faces was like you know, oh, snap,

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 1>there's the guy. And they just sped right past me.

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>And I saw their faces as they sped past me

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 1>in their car. The cops found the car, found the people,

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, we didn't do that, and so who

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 1>are these girls? These teenagers? Well that's the long and

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>short of it. Is all you have to do and

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>something like that. I said, didn't do it, and if

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I can't pick you out, then you get away. And

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>they showed me pictures of like, you know, these were

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>like teenage young teenage Hispanic women. They showed me probably

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>probably fifteen pictures and said, can you identify them. I

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>was like, no, it was a month ago. They sped

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>past me for a second, like I couldn't even hazard

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>a guess, and I didn't want to do that. You know,

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>well that's very sensible of you. Yeah, I just didn't

0:15:57.520 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>want to take a stab at it. So I was like, no,

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea, and they're basically like, sorry, they

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>said they didn't do it. Wow. It's like, but you

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>have the car and it's damaged, and like none of

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>that matters. They're like not not if you can't identify

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean I could see that. I think would be like, oh, yeah,

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that happened some other times in some other hit and runs.

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, but yeah. The long story short though, is

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm someone who has tried to tell myself to react

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>in the right ways, and I couldn't tell them much

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>beyond like the color of the car and sort of

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>would it looked like because you were seeing red? Because right,

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that's our that our bodies are not primed to form memories.

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>It's not where our where our energy goes. It's more

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>like getting away or shooting out the tires of a

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 1>car that just hit and ran. Right, But what you

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>did with that lineup is the other side of the coin.

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>The other problem with lineups is or eyewitness testimony from lineups,

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>is that sometimes people pick out people who are innocent

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and other times people fail to pick out the people

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 1>who are actually the perpetrators. So it's like you said,

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>they're very they're very flaw it's as flawed system. The

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 1>problem is is the wrong people can go to jail

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 1>and the people who actually did it can get away

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>with it. So that's an extremely flawed system. And when

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>something that um important is on the table, then um,

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:23.119
<v Speaker 1>it needs to be fixed. And there's a lot of

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>people looking into how it can be fixed, but we're

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>not there yet by any stretch. No, and here's the

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:33.919
<v Speaker 1>stat you were talking about the DNA exoneration. Uh, of

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the first three exonerations in the US were wrongfully convicted

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>because of eyewitness testimony and police lineups. Say it again,

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>seventy of the first hundred and eighty three. So like

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the Innocence Project, it's basically like a pilot study to

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>show through DNA exoneration all the ways that we wrongfully

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:02.400
<v Speaker 1>convict people. And what is coming to the to the

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>front is eyewitness testimony. Yeah, and that the basis of

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:09.640
<v Speaker 1>that is the police lineup right. And one other thing

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:12.439
<v Speaker 1>that's that's problematic with the eyewitness testimony is if you

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:16.120
<v Speaker 1>want to wow a jury, bring out an eyewitness who

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:19.160
<v Speaker 1>seems totally sure that what they saw or that they

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>saw the person they're pointing to and the defendant's table, yeah,

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:25.879
<v Speaker 1>or that that dramatic moment. It's like a movie trope.

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Now you know, is the person in this room right?

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Let the records show that witness is pointing at the defendant, right. Yeah.

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 1>So the problem is it has a huge impact, but

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:41.160
<v Speaker 1>it's also really crutty wit, really crutty um evidence. There's

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 1>this guy here, he had a great quote. He says

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>that um eyewitness testimony is a very unusual, complex kind

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:54.160
<v Speaker 1>of trace evidence, and it's difficult to recover, easy to contaminate,

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:57.439
<v Speaker 1>and very hard to handle. And that just there's no

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:01.199
<v Speaker 1>better description of eyewitness testimony. If I was ever in

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>court and someone identified me from the witness stand, I

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 1>would do that thing where you look at behind you

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:10.679
<v Speaker 1>when they pointed at you, just be like, I think

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:14.399
<v Speaker 1>they're talking behind me, and they would say no, and

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 1>they would point again, and I would move a little

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>bit more I'd be like, this is this witness is

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>clearly disturbed, and then if that, if that didn't work,

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you would escalate to I'm rubber and your glue. Yeah,

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that usually works, right. So there's a couple of other

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:33.719
<v Speaker 1>things that makes eyewitness testimony problematic, Chuck Um. In addition

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:39.879
<v Speaker 1>to not being like human video recorders, there are human VCRs.

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 1>There are, Um, there are circumstances, especially surrounding a crime,

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that can make it really difficult to remember. If you're

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 1>in a fight or flight situation, you're not forming memories.

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:54.359
<v Speaker 1>If there's a weapon, um, there are people tend to

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 1>focus on the weapon. Um. You me was mugged once

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and the opposite happened to her. She remember what the

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 1>person looked like, but she didn't even remember that there

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 1>was a weapon. And her friends were like, yeah, there

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>was a gun. Interesting, Yeah, and she went to a

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>lineup and like pick the guy out and bullet proof.

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:13.439
<v Speaker 1>So she is so she's like, take your gun and

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 1>shove it that I'm not even going to recognize it. No,

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 1>but that makes sense. If someone pulls a gun on

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you or has a switchblade or some other kind of

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>creepy weapon, the human instinct is to to focus your

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>attention on that thing pointed at you. And apparently people

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 1>can really describe the weapon, right, But you're focusing on

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the weapon, you're not focused on the person who's holding

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the weapon. Typically that helps a little bit, but not

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 1>as much as the face. Right. And then another problem

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>is if you are um, say uh an hispanic dude,

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 1>and you're a witness to a crime and it's a

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 1>white guy who's the perpetrator, you're going to have a

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:55.400
<v Speaker 1>tremendous amount of difficulty picking that white guy out, as

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:57.879
<v Speaker 1>sad as it is to say, from a lineup of

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:01.360
<v Speaker 1>other white guys, because I would this testimony that crosses

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:07.199
<v Speaker 1>race or ethnicities is known to be very unreliable because

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 1>it's just more difficult for somebody of an ethnicity or

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:15.919
<v Speaker 1>a race to to separate or identify people of another

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 1>ethnicity or race. Yeah, and I don't think it's the

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>case where people are like, oh, white people look the

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>same to me. It's just weird brain science, right, You

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:29.120
<v Speaker 1>just have a harder time. From way back when we

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:33.160
<v Speaker 1>were basically Tuck Tuck and Tuk Tuk lived with fifteen

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>other people that look just like him because they'd all

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>been in breeding for generations and generations, and they had

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to be on the lookout for another group of people

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:45.440
<v Speaker 1>who've been inbreeding for generations and generations that wanted their

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>jackfruit tree that they live by. What's jack fruit? O?

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 1>That word jack fruit, the big huge thing, the big

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:59.160
<v Speaker 1>huge one. It actually makes a killer barbecue vehicle shredded

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 1>like shredded vegan standing. Oh okay, it's really good, gotcha, gotcha?

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:06.639
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's take a break and we'll talk about

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the fundamentals of the run of the mill police lineup

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>right after this. All right, so, run of the mill

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>police lineups. I mentioned that before we left. Everyone's seen

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:40.880
<v Speaker 1>movies and TV shows, and it's not too far off. Actually,

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:42.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are a couple of ways you can

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>do it. Uh. There are lineups where you look at

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:48.719
<v Speaker 1>someone in front of your face. And then there are

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 1>lineups like I had in l A, where I look

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>at photographs the ones. You know. It's way more sexy

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>for a TV show or a movie to line them

0:22:57.040 --> 0:23:00.880
<v Speaker 1>up in the traditional way. It's extray or narrowly sexy

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:04.439
<v Speaker 1>like a live police lineup like you see on TV. Uh.

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>And then there are the simultaneous or sequential there's a

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of debate, which we'll get into in a minute,

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 1>about which is best. To me, it's pretty obvious that

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 1>sequential is best. Simultaneous is the one that you see

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>on TV. They line up six or seven dudes or ladies, uh,

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and you identify them. Uh usually well it depends. We'll

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 1>get into the fillers or the foils, but uh, only

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:29.359
<v Speaker 1>usually only one of those people is a suspect. And

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>in like the best ideal version of it. Uh, then

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 1>there're sequential, And that's when they bring out one person

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:38.199
<v Speaker 1>at a time and bring out like seven guys, just

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 1>one at a time, and you say, you know, let

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:41.639
<v Speaker 1>me know at the end of this which one you

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:43.439
<v Speaker 1>think it was, or if it's a photo lineup, they

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 1>show you one photo at a time. Exactly. Yeah, I

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 1>agree with you. I think sequential is head and shoulders

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:52.159
<v Speaker 1>the better one of the of the two. Yeah. And

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 1>here's the the final little piece of how it can

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:58.639
<v Speaker 1>vary is whether or not to the administrator that the

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:02.440
<v Speaker 1>person that's in charge of administrating the lineup knows who

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the purp is or not. Yeah. That's a big one, man.

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:07.440
<v Speaker 1>So it's either double blind, which means that they don't

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:10.360
<v Speaker 1>even know, and to me, it seems obvious that that's

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 1>always the best way because there are many many circumstances

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:16.639
<v Speaker 1>where you would actually even if you don't want to

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 1>or mean to lead a witness. And one example they

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 1>gave here in this article is if they say, and

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:25.879
<v Speaker 1>if they identify a filler or a foil a k a.

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>A person that was paid ten bucks, say that's the person,

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the administrator might say, take your time? Are you sure

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 1>like you really need to take your time? Which is

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 1>basically pretty much they or conversely, if if um, when

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>they're doing it sequentially, when they get to like number four,

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>they're like, WHOA get a load of this guy. Huh jeez,

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>look at that bag character. He's guilty of something. But

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>they can't like even just a smile or something like that,

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 1>like a non verbal que you don't even mean to do, right,

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 1>or you may mean to do because you know that

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>that's the guy, and you know it in your bones

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>that that guy did it, and you're leading the witness, right,

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:13.360
<v Speaker 1>it can be some some sort of nonverbal gesture. The

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>problem is is that most people, I can't say most people,

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 1>but it's been shown that some people, when they're brought

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>in as a witness for a police lineup, I feel

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>like it's their role. It's their job to pick somebody

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 1>for the cops. So they're more than happy to be

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>led by the cops because then they're fulfilling their role

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and they did what they were supposed to do. So

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>another another technique or way to administer a good lineup

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:43.879
<v Speaker 1>is to say, here, here's the lineup, whether it's sequential

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>one at a time or um all at once simultaneously. Right, Um,

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the suspect may or may not be in this lineup. Yeah,

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that seems like I think they found that reduced mistaken

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:03.919
<v Speaker 1>identity rates, uh were lower when they did this, So

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:07.399
<v Speaker 1>you would think just always do that right right, because

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>it says to the witness like the person may not

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 1>be in here. It's like a none of the above,

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:15.199
<v Speaker 1>the dreaded letter e none of the above. You're like,

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:17.919
<v Speaker 1>oh God, does that does that mean that they're that

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the answers not here? And so you may you may

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>say I don't I don't see them where. If they

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 1>don't say that, you're going to presume that the suspect

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>is in that lineup, and it's your job to find

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that person and you have to pick somebody. Yeah, most

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>people aren't going to think like I can't say so,

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm just not going to They're gonna be like three. Yeah. Well,

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>first of all, it's a crime against you most a

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of times when you're like picking out this purpose. Sure.

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh so you want them to be you know, found

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. Yeah, that's a really good point to you

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:54.359
<v Speaker 1>want you don't want them to get away with it.

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:55.920
<v Speaker 1>And the other thing too, is I think there's a

0:26:56.000 --> 0:27:01.120
<v Speaker 1>natural human instinct when given a test to not want

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:04.159
<v Speaker 1>to say I can't like you might feel like you

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>have failed. Right. That's why I admire you saying that,

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:09.399
<v Speaker 1>like with the phone lineup, you know, not not being

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>not just being like yeah, but if that wouldn't matter

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to my case, because if I would have said these

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 1>two and then they're like, no, that's not the lady

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:21.400
<v Speaker 1>whose car it was. But a lot of people still

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 1>would have right right, right, And they probably wouldn't say no,

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:25.879
<v Speaker 1>that's wrong. They would have been like, Okay, thanks a

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:27.880
<v Speaker 1>lot for your time or whatever, and then you would

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>have left. They have been like, god, he was so close. Uh.

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Some other research it's interesting that suggests when uh, there

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 1>is an offender in the lineup that young children and

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:43.880
<v Speaker 1>elderly perform about as well as just regularly young adults.

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>But when the lineup does not have the actual offender,

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:51.679
<v Speaker 1>then they commit mistakes a lot higher. And to me,

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that's just because I think kids and elderly might not

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 1>fully understand. I think they have to pick somebody. Okay, yeah,

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:01.959
<v Speaker 1>I agree, I think that's exactly what it is too.

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>But the research bears that out. It looks like so

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 1>there's there is some like you you talked about research,

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:11.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of research in this, but it's become ambiguous.

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Right if you step back and you listen to all

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:17.479
<v Speaker 1>of the different different things that you can do with

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a lineup, it becomes very clear that a sequential double

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:27.920
<v Speaker 1>blind lineup where either one photo of a suspect is

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 1>shown to the person at a time, or one live

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:33.119
<v Speaker 1>suspect is brought out to be looked at one person

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:37.199
<v Speaker 1>at a time and is administered by a cop or

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:40.959
<v Speaker 1>a worker somebody who doesn't know who the suspect is,

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that that's going to reduce the chance of a misidentification

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>or a failure of an identification, and that the person

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 1>who's being presented with these people is not going to

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 1>be able to guess, and if they actually do remember

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 1>who the perpetrator was, they're going to recognize them. It's

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 1>just obvious that that's the best way to do it. Right.

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>The thing is is there was a study in Illinois

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>UM that just completely rocked that idea that that that's

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the case, because there was a three or five year

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 1>study in Illinois that looked at different types of lineups

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and compared them side by side and found that actually,

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 1>know that a double blind sequential UM lineup actually produces

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>worse results than a UM a simultaneous non double blind one. Right.

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 1>But then again, not so fast with that because other

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 1>people since then have questioned the methodology they used in

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 1>that program and kind of said, you know, I don't

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>even know if we can take this research and take

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 1>these statistics seriously, right, because method methodologically it was a

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 1>screwed up study, Like they really dropped the ball on

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the study. Yeah, and um, I don't think we mentioned

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the two judgments either. During simultaneous lineups, when everyone's standing

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 1>there together, you use what's called relative judgment. In other words,

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 1>you compare all the dudes standing up there against one another,

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and with the ones where they trot them out one

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>at a time. They use something called absolute judgment, which

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 1>is supposedly means that they're comparing it to only their

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 1>memory and not to the people that came before or after. Right,

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 1>That's that's the hope, that's the ideal, right, right, But

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>with this reachers and research in the study, I kind

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of didn't even know what to think because it sort

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 1>of went against the grain and the findings. But then

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 1>they said, I don't even know if we can trust

0:30:38.240 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 1>these findings because the methodology was no good. So we

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 1>ended up sort of back at square one with the

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Illinois pilot program. It seems like, yeah, the reason why

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the methodolo methodology was so terrible. They used the double

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 1>blind procedure for sequential lineups, but they didn't use it

0:30:56.040 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 1>for simultaneous lineups. So if cops were advertently or inadvertently

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 1>leading people with simultaneous lineups, then of course those those

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 1>are going to produce um correct choices with suspects better

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 1>than the one that's a double blind sequential one. They

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 1>compared apples to oranges in the study. It's almost like

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a sixth grader came up with how to actually conduct

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the study that the Illinois legislature said, Illinois State Police,

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 1>go go figure this out, to do a three year

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 1>study on this, and they came back and said, huh,

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and it was it's terrible. And the problem is, if

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>it is true that a sequential double blind study is

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the way to go, that it is just smarter and

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>works better, that study set that back by years because

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 1>now all the cops all over the country heard they

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 1>did the study and it's actually worse not and the

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>design of the study was flawed methodologically, just it doesn't work. Yeah.

0:31:57.160 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>They even went to the cops UH at Illinois Pilot

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 1>program talk to them and they said the majority of

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the officers said they didn't think that it was superior

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 1>UH and said that witnesses who can identify the offender

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 1>can do so under either procedure UH and officers express

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 1>concerns that using a blind administrator disrupts the relationship an

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 1>investigator has tries to build with a witness. So I

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:24.560
<v Speaker 1>interpret all that as it's cops saying, can we just

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 1>keep doing it the way we've always done it because

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 1>it gets results right. But the thing is is, um,

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 1>they have some pretty good points in that if you

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 1>are running a lineup or whatever. You put together like

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a six pack is what it's called in the US,

0:32:39.160 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 1>where you've got three and three mug shots of people,

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:46.719
<v Speaker 1>um and or I think in Canada they usually use twelve.

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 1>But you put this thing together, then you have to

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 1>find like a patrol officer or a sergeant or somebody

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 1>who has no idea what's going on with your kids? Right,

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and then those that person is to go to the house,

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:04.840
<v Speaker 1>record the the what the person did, and then come

0:33:04.880 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 1>back and tell you. It's just an extra thing that

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:10.240
<v Speaker 1>cops are like, come on, dude, this is just making

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 1>it way too hard. Yeah. I mean they sit in

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 1>here that sometimes even have trouble coming up with the

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:21.479
<v Speaker 1>blind administrator. And maybe it's a it probably has everything

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to do with budgets. But my thought is like, why

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 1>isn't there one person that does only this. Oh, that's

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 1>a great question. That just is called the administrator the

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 1>fine of administrator and goes to the people's houses or

0:33:36.040 --> 0:33:38.959
<v Speaker 1>runs them in the in the precinct or whatever, and

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 1>this is the only thing that they do, Right, I'll

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 1>do it. Bring in the administrator. Yeah, that's a TV

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 1>show waiting to happen. Uh Yeah, I don't know, it's

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 1>probably budgetary. Um. They also found with a lot of

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 1>these when there's multiple purpose, it just goes haywire because

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 1>sometimes they'll put two of the purpose in the same lineup,

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 1>right right, so super confusing. That actually falls in line

0:34:05.320 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 1>with like how to build like a decent line up

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:11.239
<v Speaker 1>the right way, and we'll cover that and where they

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:15.360
<v Speaker 1>get people to stand in as suspects right after this,

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 1>All right, Chuck, So you were just talking about how

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:40.400
<v Speaker 1>if you have a lineup and you put two suspects

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:42.319
<v Speaker 1>that you've got, say there are two guys who robbed

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 1>some lady, um, and you have five people in the lineup,

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 1>but two of them are your suspects. That actually is

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:55.880
<v Speaker 1>totally unfair for the suspects because what you've done just

0:34:55.960 --> 0:35:00.759
<v Speaker 1>then is increase the chance that somebody could guess, just

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 1>guess randomly, uh at the suspect. Right. If you have

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 1>five people in a lineup and one of them are

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:10.919
<v Speaker 1>the suspect, then that person has a one in five

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:13.839
<v Speaker 1>chance of being chosen by random chance. But if there's

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 1>two suspects in a five person lineup, they have a

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:19.839
<v Speaker 1>two out of five chance, which is way more than

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:22.359
<v Speaker 1>a one in five chance. Some people might even say

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:26.720
<v Speaker 1>double the chance, right, and so it's just less fair.

0:35:26.920 --> 0:35:29.200
<v Speaker 1>So one of the standards that you want to fulfill

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:31.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're putting together a lineup in your cop is

0:35:32.000 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 1>that you have one suspect per lineup, which is tougher

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to do than you would think. Yeah, and it seems

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of the problem with this is uh

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and they even say so in the n i J

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:48.320
<v Speaker 1>articles that lab studies are one thing, but actually implementing

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:51.840
<v Speaker 1>this in the field they get different results. And people

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:54.839
<v Speaker 1>are doing lab research on one end, cops are out

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 1>in the field, sometimes they're in people's homes, sometimes they're

0:35:57.719 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 1>in the precinct. And it seems like the two heads

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:03.880
<v Speaker 1>aren't talking very much, and there are people, you know.

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:06.320
<v Speaker 1>They did like a live web chat at some point

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to bring together all these experts from around the world,

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and they kind of all around me were like, this

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 1>is a big mess and we need to all combined

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 1>forces to try and do the right thing. And the

0:36:17.160 --> 0:36:19.320
<v Speaker 1>feeling I get is that a lot of these police

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 1>precincts just kind of want to be left alone. Sure,

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:24.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they know what works, and it works, you know,

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 1>but does it well, that's the question, So, um, they

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:32.280
<v Speaker 1>fingered a collar, right, is that the right the gumsh

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you finger to call it? Yeah, then uh, it's it's

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:37.360
<v Speaker 1>all in a good day's work. But if they fingered

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:44.359
<v Speaker 1>the wrong collar, then it's no good so um. One

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:48.319
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons it's somebody cop would put a two

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:51.480
<v Speaker 1>suspects in a lineup. It's not just to like increase

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the chances that one of those suspects gets picked by

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 1>an eyewitness. It's because sometimes it can be hard to

0:36:56.680 --> 0:36:58.800
<v Speaker 1>come up with people for a lineup. Yeah, this was

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:02.439
<v Speaker 1>hard to believe, Like they can't find people sometimes, right, Well,

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:04.799
<v Speaker 1>and the reason why is because let's say you have

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:10.960
<v Speaker 1>multiple witnesses, and each witness gives you a different description

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:18.440
<v Speaker 1>of the perpetrator. Right, Ideally, you're going to find a

0:37:18.880 --> 0:37:23.799
<v Speaker 1>different lineup for each witness. Yeah, Like, if there's three witnesses,

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you should run three lineups because their descriptions are probably

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:31.520
<v Speaker 1>somewhat different. Right. That can be difficult, And there's a

0:37:31.520 --> 0:37:33.880
<v Speaker 1>couple of ways to handle a lineup. You can do

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a suspect matched lineup, where you've got a suspect and

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to keep your suspect from standing out, you make um

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 1>all the other people in the lineup look like you

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:49.680
<v Speaker 1>know your suspect. That's one way to do it. Another

0:37:49.920 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 1>is to do the perpetrator description match strategy, which is

0:37:55.719 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 1>you've got um and that's when you have no suspect, right,

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:02.000
<v Speaker 1>just ants. You can have a suspect, but you're creating

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:05.839
<v Speaker 1>your lineup based on what the what the witness has

0:38:05.920 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 1>described the perpetrator to look like, and then just throw

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:10.239
<v Speaker 1>the suspect in there right, which can be bad for

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the suspect because if the suspect the person you actually

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:15.719
<v Speaker 1>think did it, it doesn't look anything like the eye

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:18.279
<v Speaker 1>witness said that there's gonna be four redheads and the

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:21.360
<v Speaker 1>one blonde guy who's actually the suspect, he's going to

0:38:21.440 --> 0:38:23.399
<v Speaker 1>stand out like a sore throne. So there's a lot

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of different things that have to be massaged here to

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:29.200
<v Speaker 1>try to make everybody in the lineup basically look all

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 1>like the perpetrator the eyewitness described, or all like the

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:36.120
<v Speaker 1>suspect that you've got, because you don't want the suspect

0:38:36.120 --> 0:38:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to stand out. And there's a lot of techniques that

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:41.359
<v Speaker 1>they used to try to make everybody look the same. Yeah,

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:42.799
<v Speaker 1>one of the I mean they like you said, they

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:46.440
<v Speaker 1>dressed people. It was funny that one article said in

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the Bronx Precinct, they usually put them in Yankees hats. Right,

0:38:50.880 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 1>just line up a bunch of guys and Yankees, right.

0:38:52.880 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 1>That means that they have like five Yankees hats hanging

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 1>outside of the you know that room where they walk

0:38:57.680 --> 0:38:59.880
<v Speaker 1>them into. Wasn't Cramer in the lineup when he was

0:39:00.960 --> 0:39:05.319
<v Speaker 1>suspect totally serial killer suspect? Yes, I don't remember it

0:39:05.320 --> 0:39:06.880
<v Speaker 1>was a serial killer, but I remember he was in

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:08.799
<v Speaker 1>the line up. He kept turning the wrong way. Yeah,

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I think he was misidentified on the when they went

0:39:11.120 --> 0:39:13.719
<v Speaker 1>to l A to pitch the TV show, Cramer got

0:39:13.719 --> 0:39:16.799
<v Speaker 1>caught up in some like serial killer thing. I think

0:39:16.800 --> 0:39:19.520
<v Speaker 1>of that, and I think of the great lineup scene

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 1>in The Usual Suspects, which let's address that real quick,

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:26.279
<v Speaker 1>when they have to say something so well, we can't

0:39:26.280 --> 0:39:28.400
<v Speaker 1>repeat it here because there's bad words. Right. You know,

0:39:28.800 --> 0:39:30.880
<v Speaker 1>what I was going to say is that that lineup

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:33.759
<v Speaker 1>would never happen because not only do you have two

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:36.480
<v Speaker 1>suspects in there, all five people in the lineup are

0:39:36.520 --> 0:39:40.000
<v Speaker 1>your suspects, and they're not dressed the same Yep. Yeah,

0:39:40.000 --> 0:39:42.880
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a total movie line up, it would never happen.

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:45.359
<v Speaker 1>What were you going to say about them saying something? Well,

0:39:45.400 --> 0:39:47.480
<v Speaker 1>they had to recite a line. I don't know how

0:39:47.480 --> 0:39:50.960
<v Speaker 1>typical that is, though, you me. When she did her

0:39:51.000 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 1>line up, she remembered what the guy was saying, and

0:39:54.200 --> 0:39:57.000
<v Speaker 1>they that, okay, so that's the thing. And she was like,

0:39:57.040 --> 0:39:58.759
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, can I do they have to say

0:39:58.760 --> 0:40:01.399
<v Speaker 1>whatever I say they said? And the cop was like yeah,

0:40:01.440 --> 0:40:04.799
<v Speaker 1>and she's like, really what I wanted to say? Yeah?

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:07.239
<v Speaker 1>He's like, no, you have to say what they actually said.

0:40:07.480 --> 0:40:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, how did that result? Did she get the guy? Oh?

0:40:11.040 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 1>She picked him out of media? Okay, yeah, yeah, I

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 1>think I got busted. Nice man, you don't mug you me.

0:40:16.719 --> 0:40:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you that, buddy. You hear that? Purpose right,

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:23.799
<v Speaker 1>he started quaking in your boots. The one thing, too,

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:26.239
<v Speaker 1>that caught me sort of off guard is that I

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:29.320
<v Speaker 1>never thought about is the the part about whether or

0:40:29.320 --> 0:40:33.719
<v Speaker 1>not they're clean shaven, Like there could be details of omission,

0:40:34.160 --> 0:40:38.759
<v Speaker 1>Like if eyewitness doesn't remember or doesn't mention that they

0:40:38.800 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 1>either were clean shaven or not, then I think they

0:40:41.640 --> 0:40:45.520
<v Speaker 1>default just something that may not be accurate. And so

0:40:45.560 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden you're lineup, well, your lineup should

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:51.000
<v Speaker 1>have all clean shaven dudes. You should just assume that

0:40:51.040 --> 0:40:53.839
<v Speaker 1>if they didn't say the guy had a beard, that

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:56.719
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't that that doesn't mean that the guy had

0:40:56.719 --> 0:40:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a beard and they just didn't say it. You should

0:40:58.320 --> 0:41:00.720
<v Speaker 1>just assume it means that they're clean shave, and they

0:41:00.760 --> 0:41:02.799
<v Speaker 1>should all be clean shaven in the lineup, because if

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:05.880
<v Speaker 1>you have five clean shaven guys and one filler or

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:09.160
<v Speaker 1>one foil with a big beard like me, I might

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:11.680
<v Speaker 1>get picked out just because I look different, right exactly,

0:41:11.920 --> 0:41:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Or if if the one guy's clean shaven, and you're like, well,

0:41:15.440 --> 0:41:17.600
<v Speaker 1>they didn't say that the person had a beard, but

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:20.759
<v Speaker 1>they also didn't say they didn't have a beard. So

0:41:20.920 --> 0:41:23.279
<v Speaker 1>I can put this clean shaven suspect in with four

0:41:23.320 --> 0:41:25.600
<v Speaker 1>other guys who all have beards and make them stand out.

0:41:25.960 --> 0:41:29.120
<v Speaker 1>That's the opposite. And apparently there's this New York Times

0:41:29.200 --> 0:41:33.400
<v Speaker 1>article from years back about a guy named, um what

0:41:33.560 --> 0:41:37.400
<v Speaker 1>was his name, casting agent basically Robert Weston, Yeah, Robert Weston.

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:40.960
<v Speaker 1>It's it's pretty interesting little article. Um. But in the

0:41:41.120 --> 0:41:44.759
<v Speaker 1>article it says that the Bronx cops that use this

0:41:44.800 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 1>guy to help fill lineups which we'll talk about in

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a second. Um that that when they give the perpetrators

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:53.879
<v Speaker 1>like the Yankees, hats or whatever for the lineup, like

0:41:54.239 --> 0:41:56.279
<v Speaker 1>the perpetrator is always the one who pulls it down

0:41:56.360 --> 0:41:58.480
<v Speaker 1>over his eyes, and they have to be like, dude,

0:41:58.920 --> 0:42:01.120
<v Speaker 1>putt see however, but else is wearing their hat makes

0:42:01.200 --> 0:42:03.120
<v Speaker 1>us exactly like that, or else they're going to pick

0:42:03.160 --> 0:42:06.400
<v Speaker 1>you out. So they actually are trying to help the

0:42:06.480 --> 0:42:09.279
<v Speaker 1>perpetrator at least, not stand up and be like me,

0:42:10.560 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, and instead just keep it on the on

0:42:13.760 --> 0:42:16.799
<v Speaker 1>the level, at least as far as the Yankees had

0:42:16.880 --> 0:42:20.000
<v Speaker 1>brooms go. I so want to be a filler. I'm

0:42:20.040 --> 0:42:22.080
<v Speaker 1>sure you could do it. I want to have to

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:24.279
<v Speaker 1>hang around long enough until the dude who looks like

0:42:24.320 --> 0:42:27.319
<v Speaker 1>you commits a crime, which in Atlanta, I'm sure there's

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:30.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of hipsters running around. For sure. I don't

0:42:30.120 --> 0:42:33.439
<v Speaker 1>look like a hipster. I don't know, uh, I look

0:42:33.480 --> 0:42:37.000
<v Speaker 1>like it the hipster gone bad. Oh yeah, I'm not

0:42:37.040 --> 0:42:38.360
<v Speaker 1>need enough to be a hips You look like a

0:42:38.440 --> 0:42:41.279
<v Speaker 1>hit and run hipster. Hipsters are super well cooft and

0:42:41.360 --> 0:42:43.719
<v Speaker 1>like squared Away. Oh I know what you mean. You

0:42:43.760 --> 0:42:46.840
<v Speaker 1>know your your jeans aren't pegged no, I look like

0:42:46.880 --> 0:42:50.840
<v Speaker 1>a hipster who slept in. So back to Robert Weston,

0:42:50.960 --> 0:42:53.400
<v Speaker 1>this guy in New York at the time, at least,

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe how little money he made. He only

0:42:56.200 --> 0:43:00.600
<v Speaker 1>got ten dollars for putting together a complete lineup. Yeah,

0:43:00.920 --> 0:43:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and they said sometimes he does as many as four

0:43:02.960 --> 0:43:05.759
<v Speaker 1>in a day and sometimes not at all. Like so

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:07.960
<v Speaker 1>a good day for him is forty bucks. That's what

0:43:08.000 --> 0:43:11.120
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like. Man. Maybe that's the problem is they

0:43:11.120 --> 0:43:14.080
<v Speaker 1>need to Well again, it's budgetary. Probably he's gonna say,

0:43:14.280 --> 0:43:16.960
<v Speaker 1>pay a little bit more, get a casting agent in there,

0:43:17.040 --> 0:43:19.719
<v Speaker 1>get some of those college educated fillers in there, right,

0:43:20.400 --> 0:43:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess. And and also it made it sound like,

0:43:24.440 --> 0:43:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, he's kind of pulling people off the street.

0:43:26.680 --> 0:43:30.879
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes they're homeless people. Sometimes they're like drug addicts. Well yeah,

0:43:31.160 --> 0:43:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess it depends on who the purpose.

0:43:34.640 --> 0:43:38.399
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes they get other cops that aren't busy to stand in, right,

0:43:38.640 --> 0:43:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these are people there's a real need. People

0:43:40.520 --> 0:43:42.880
<v Speaker 1>will go to a police station and stand in the

0:43:42.920 --> 0:43:45.600
<v Speaker 1>lineup for ten dollars. Right, they get paid as much

0:43:45.600 --> 0:43:47.960
<v Speaker 1>as the guy who organized the party. Right. But if

0:43:48.200 --> 0:43:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Robert Weston stands in himself. He'll get an extra twenty

0:43:51.360 --> 0:43:53.480
<v Speaker 1>bucks on top of putting the thing together right. How

0:43:53.520 --> 0:43:56.160
<v Speaker 1>many times he tries to do that, but he he

0:43:56.160 --> 0:43:58.160
<v Speaker 1>He even said like if they want white guys, I

0:43:58.200 --> 0:44:00.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know any white guys. So they go to homeless

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:03.000
<v Speaker 1>shelters for that. And that's that's very much what cops do.

0:44:03.280 --> 0:44:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Cops will go find people on the street, they will

0:44:05.520 --> 0:44:09.080
<v Speaker 1>go to homeless shelters. They will have UM casting agents

0:44:09.160 --> 0:44:13.399
<v Speaker 1>like Robert Weston on their speed dial um and what

0:44:13.440 --> 0:44:18.360
<v Speaker 1>they'll say is, I've got a um, middle aged white

0:44:18.360 --> 0:44:23.120
<v Speaker 1>guy with a graying beard, and um he's about six

0:44:23.160 --> 0:44:27.160
<v Speaker 1>ft tall. Give me four other people that match that description,

0:44:27.800 --> 0:44:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and ideally four other people that that match that description

0:44:32.000 --> 0:44:34.799
<v Speaker 1>will show up and not three and then one other

0:44:34.880 --> 0:44:37.319
<v Speaker 1>total outlier or something like that. Well, the one cop

0:44:37.400 --> 0:44:39.440
<v Speaker 1>was complaining about his work, it was kind of funny

0:44:40.040 --> 0:44:42.399
<v Speaker 1>complaining about Robert Weston. He was like, he didn't bring

0:44:42.400 --> 0:44:45.600
<v Speaker 1>in good people. He always like fudges the ages and

0:44:45.640 --> 0:44:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the races and stuff. But the reason why they keep

0:44:48.239 --> 0:44:51.640
<v Speaker 1>using this guy is because he answers his fun doesn't

0:44:51.640 --> 0:44:53.719
<v Speaker 1>matter what time you call him. He can put a

0:44:53.760 --> 0:44:55.759
<v Speaker 1>lineup together for you. And if you have a very

0:44:55.800 --> 0:44:58.480
<v Speaker 1>limited amount of time. You can only hold the suspect

0:44:58.480 --> 0:45:00.879
<v Speaker 1>for so long without charging the them, but you want

0:45:00.920 --> 0:45:02.839
<v Speaker 1>to put them in a lineup for what's called an

0:45:02.880 --> 0:45:06.560
<v Speaker 1>investigatory lineup to where you just want to see maybe

0:45:06.560 --> 0:45:09.120
<v Speaker 1>bringing one witness just to see if you're on the

0:45:09.200 --> 0:45:11.839
<v Speaker 1>right track. You've got a very limited amount of time

0:45:11.880 --> 0:45:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and you need people like that, which means that you

0:45:14.040 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 1>may have a lower quality one. Fortunately, that would just

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:19.480
<v Speaker 1>be for an investigatory one. If it were for a

0:45:19.560 --> 0:45:22.600
<v Speaker 1>confirmatory one. That's the one that you see on TV

0:45:22.680 --> 0:45:25.399
<v Speaker 1>where it's like you bring in a witness and you've

0:45:25.440 --> 0:45:27.520
<v Speaker 1>got your suspect and they're sitting in jail and you

0:45:27.600 --> 0:45:31.239
<v Speaker 1>bring them out. That is the one where like all

0:45:31.320 --> 0:45:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the t should be crossed in the eyes should be dotted,

0:45:33.719 --> 0:45:37.600
<v Speaker 1>because a good court, well here, and we'll want to

0:45:37.640 --> 0:45:40.440
<v Speaker 1>know the details of how that lineup went, and if

0:45:40.480 --> 0:45:43.400
<v Speaker 1>anything sounds hinky, they'll toss that lineup right out, that

0:45:43.440 --> 0:45:47.839
<v Speaker 1>eye witness testimony out. The worst possible version of all

0:45:47.880 --> 0:45:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of this is something called a show up. And this

0:45:51.040 --> 0:45:52.920
<v Speaker 1>is something this is also a movie trope that you

0:45:52.960 --> 0:45:55.719
<v Speaker 1>see and that's when an officer brings a witness to

0:45:55.800 --> 0:45:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a place to show the witness the suspect that's been

0:45:59.560 --> 0:46:03.359
<v Speaker 1>apprehend ended. So like they're in the back of a car,

0:46:04.040 --> 0:46:06.680
<v Speaker 1>or here's what happens in the movie. There's a guy

0:46:06.719 --> 0:46:09.600
<v Speaker 1>in the back of a police car handcuffed. They'll bring

0:46:09.680 --> 0:46:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the person who was robbed or whatever there to the scene.

0:46:13.640 --> 0:46:15.080
<v Speaker 1>They'll yank him out of the back of the car

0:46:15.160 --> 0:46:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and say, it's just the dirt bag who did it?

0:46:18.160 --> 0:46:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Like just one guy, and uh, that's clearly the worst

0:46:21.840 --> 0:46:23.759
<v Speaker 1>possible version of all of this, and the guys like,

0:46:23.800 --> 0:46:28.719
<v Speaker 1>I need more pay, I'm coming down. So so one

0:46:28.719 --> 0:46:30.640
<v Speaker 1>of the here's the reason why that show up is

0:46:30.680 --> 0:46:33.439
<v Speaker 1>so terrible, Chuck, Well, there's no other people that they're

0:46:33.480 --> 0:46:36.960
<v Speaker 1>comparing them to. That's one. But they're also in handcuffs,

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:38.799
<v Speaker 1>in the back of a cop car or something like that.

0:46:38.840 --> 0:46:41.480
<v Speaker 1>They're in police custody. And so the eyewitness is going

0:46:41.560 --> 0:46:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to assume that, in addition to their testimony, the cops

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:48.879
<v Speaker 1>obviously have something on this person, and so that must

0:46:48.880 --> 0:46:50.799
<v Speaker 1>mean that the cops know it's that person and this

0:46:50.840 --> 0:46:53.040
<v Speaker 1>is just a formality. So I'll be like, yeah, sure,

0:46:53.080 --> 0:46:56.160
<v Speaker 1>that was that person. That's the first problem with it.

0:46:56.200 --> 0:46:58.680
<v Speaker 1>The second problem is is that from that point on,

0:46:59.520 --> 0:47:03.319
<v Speaker 1>that person and that they've just seen now becomes the

0:47:03.480 --> 0:47:07.640
<v Speaker 1>star of their memory of that crime. It's like they

0:47:07.680 --> 0:47:12.120
<v Speaker 1>photoshop this person's face into that vague, shadowy face that's

0:47:12.160 --> 0:47:14.920
<v Speaker 1>holding the gun that they were actually focused on, and

0:47:14.960 --> 0:47:17.200
<v Speaker 1>from that moment on they just get more and more

0:47:18.120 --> 0:47:21.120
<v Speaker 1>certain that that was the person because that person is

0:47:21.160 --> 0:47:23.759
<v Speaker 1>now starring in their memories. And it's not just the

0:47:23.800 --> 0:47:27.560
<v Speaker 1>problem with the show up but with any um misidentification.

0:47:28.000 --> 0:47:30.560
<v Speaker 1>When they see that person and that person becomes seared

0:47:30.600 --> 0:47:33.920
<v Speaker 1>in their brain, they're positive from that point on, and

0:47:34.000 --> 0:47:37.080
<v Speaker 1>they can seem very confident in court, which again juries

0:47:37.200 --> 0:47:41.600
<v Speaker 1>by even though it's garbage, and weeks and months can

0:47:41.640 --> 0:47:44.880
<v Speaker 1>go by between the point that you have experienced a

0:47:44.920 --> 0:47:48.279
<v Speaker 1>crime and when you may be identifying someone or a

0:47:48.320 --> 0:47:50.640
<v Speaker 1>court for sure as months and months and months later.

0:47:51.320 --> 0:47:55.080
<v Speaker 1>So man, part of me does think, like, get rid

0:47:55.120 --> 0:47:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of all this. A lot of people say that, or

0:47:57.560 --> 0:48:00.360
<v Speaker 1>at the very least say, this is I would's test simony.

0:48:00.360 --> 0:48:04.399
<v Speaker 1>It's actually terrible testimony. Actually it's terrible evidence, but let's

0:48:04.400 --> 0:48:06.839
<v Speaker 1>do it right. But and if they did say that,

0:48:06.880 --> 0:48:11.200
<v Speaker 1>if they basically lowered what what how much weight eyewitness

0:48:11.280 --> 0:48:14.920
<v Speaker 1>testimony held in court. Then those cases that were built

0:48:15.239 --> 0:48:18.640
<v Speaker 1>entirely on eyewitness testimony wouldn't have a leg to stand on.

0:48:18.719 --> 0:48:21.440
<v Speaker 1>They have to go build a bigger case. Yeah, but

0:48:21.520 --> 0:48:24.400
<v Speaker 1>like in Umi's case, it worked, it did now it

0:48:24.680 --> 0:48:28.520
<v Speaker 1>like that, right. That's the problem is that you know

0:48:28.680 --> 0:48:34.640
<v Speaker 1>if if of the time is wrong, the time is right,

0:48:35.040 --> 0:48:38.400
<v Speaker 1>we think so, I mean, it's not It's not like

0:48:38.600 --> 0:48:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Arson investigation, which we're gonna do one on one day,

0:48:41.560 --> 0:48:44.000
<v Speaker 1>where it's just totally made up. Like it does have

0:48:44.040 --> 0:48:46.399
<v Speaker 1>some veracity, but there's a lot of flaws with it

0:48:46.640 --> 0:48:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and the really dicey. They need to figure it out

0:48:51.640 --> 0:48:54.799
<v Speaker 1>because of that, So they need to go do that now.

0:48:55.120 --> 0:48:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, can you imagine anything worse than being misidentified

0:48:58.920 --> 0:49:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and serving two decades in prison for something you really

0:49:03.160 --> 0:49:07.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't do? No, I really can't. I mean I remember

0:49:07.040 --> 0:49:09.080
<v Speaker 1>how said I got when we did the Innocence Project.

0:49:09.160 --> 0:49:11.359
<v Speaker 1>It's just you hear these stories and then they get

0:49:11.360 --> 0:49:14.239
<v Speaker 1>out and they're like, man, here's there's four thousand bucks.

0:49:14.280 --> 0:49:16.279
<v Speaker 1>We feel pretty bad, right, go get yourself something nice.

0:49:16.320 --> 0:49:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Try to forget about all this, right. Yeah, did you

0:49:19.080 --> 0:49:21.800
<v Speaker 1>ever see that movie An Innocent Man with Tom Selick?

0:49:24.680 --> 0:49:27.560
<v Speaker 1>It's scared the Bejesus out of me. The same thing

0:49:27.600 --> 0:49:30.279
<v Speaker 1>happened to him when he was when he was he

0:49:30.480 --> 0:49:34.520
<v Speaker 1>was framed. Oh wait, that's high road to China. All right,

0:49:35.080 --> 0:49:37.399
<v Speaker 1>I got my stuff, makes it? No, that's quickly down

0:49:37.480 --> 0:49:41.040
<v Speaker 1>under that right? Uh? You got anything else? Nope? All right,

0:49:41.040 --> 0:49:43.799
<v Speaker 1>Well that's it for police lineups for now. We'll do

0:49:43.880 --> 0:49:46.120
<v Speaker 1>an update whenever they get it figured out. We did

0:49:46.120 --> 0:49:50.200
<v Speaker 1>one on police catches, right, Okay, is this it we've done? No?

0:49:50.360 --> 0:49:53.040
<v Speaker 1>We still got arson in the section. We got a

0:49:53.040 --> 0:49:58.520
<v Speaker 1>lot all right, um, yeah, okay, okay. If you want

0:49:58.520 --> 0:50:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to know more about police line ups then I don't know,

0:50:01.239 --> 0:50:03.000
<v Speaker 1>go hang around a police station. See if you can

0:50:03.040 --> 0:50:06.279
<v Speaker 1>stand in one, learn firsthand. Okay. Get a little sign

0:50:06.360 --> 0:50:11.160
<v Speaker 1>that says I will be your foil ten dollars. Uh.

0:50:11.200 --> 0:50:13.680
<v Speaker 1>And since I said ten dollars, it's time for listener Matt.

0:50:16.400 --> 0:50:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna call this youngest fan is very cute email. Hey, guys,

0:50:19.920 --> 0:50:23.239
<v Speaker 1>love the podcast. You're doing it right? Uh, it's not

0:50:23.400 --> 0:50:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a Uh this email is not episode specific, but I

0:50:26.960 --> 0:50:28.560
<v Speaker 1>had to tell you about this. My husband and I

0:50:28.600 --> 0:50:30.839
<v Speaker 1>welcomed to our baby boy into the world a couple

0:50:30.840 --> 0:50:32.880
<v Speaker 1>of months ago, when I was pregnantly joked that the

0:50:32.920 --> 0:50:35.160
<v Speaker 1>baby would think that one of you was his dad

0:50:35.640 --> 0:50:39.640
<v Speaker 1>because he heard your voices so often. Ah, that's a

0:50:39.719 --> 0:50:43.799
<v Speaker 1>very funny joke in the family, you know, joke about

0:50:43.880 --> 0:50:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the paternity of your childhood. Uh. Now that he's here,

0:50:47.640 --> 0:50:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I've been playing music in the car instead of the podcast,

0:50:50.400 --> 0:50:53.160
<v Speaker 1>thinking music helps calm him. Well, one day he was

0:50:53.200 --> 0:50:54.839
<v Speaker 1>crying and crying in the car. I couldn't get him

0:50:54.880 --> 0:50:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to calm down. She was like, what's wrong with Doc?

0:50:57.200 --> 0:51:00.760
<v Speaker 1>And why is it doc and working? Uh. It couldn't

0:51:00.760 --> 0:51:02.400
<v Speaker 1>get him calmed down with any the usual tricks. So

0:51:02.440 --> 0:51:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I decided to heck with it. I'm gonna put on

0:51:03.840 --> 0:51:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the podcast and a kid you not. As soon as

0:51:06.120 --> 0:51:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you guys started talking, he stopped crying. My husband says

0:51:09.080 --> 0:51:13.880
<v Speaker 1>it was coincidence. Jealous, I say, stuff, you should know magic.

0:51:14.719 --> 0:51:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Now we're now we're back to always listening to you

0:51:17.480 --> 0:51:19.600
<v Speaker 1>guys in the car. Keep up with great work and

0:51:19.600 --> 0:51:22.480
<v Speaker 1>thanks for soothing my baby boy. And that is from

0:51:22.880 --> 0:51:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Strantz and our youngest fan, Frank from beautiful Mount Pleasant,

0:51:28.920 --> 0:51:32.439
<v Speaker 1>South Carolina. That's awesome. Thank you so much for that email. Frank,

0:51:32.520 --> 0:51:35.319
<v Speaker 1>go to sleep. Quiet now they named their baby after

0:51:35.360 --> 0:51:39.440
<v Speaker 1>our chair? Yeah right, that's pretty wouldn't that be amazing

0:51:39.480 --> 0:51:43.080
<v Speaker 1>if they actually did? Uh? And thank you also to

0:51:43.200 --> 0:51:46.960
<v Speaker 1>unnamed husband for being a good sport. Agreed. If you

0:51:47.000 --> 0:51:50.160
<v Speaker 1>want to send us agree email about how we're magic,

0:51:50.600 --> 0:51:52.640
<v Speaker 1>you can hang out with us on social media. Just

0:51:52.719 --> 0:51:55.240
<v Speaker 1>go to our website, Stuff you Should Know dot com.

0:51:55.280 --> 0:51:57.400
<v Speaker 1>And you can also send us an email to Stuff

0:51:57.480 --> 0:52:04.960
<v Speaker 1>podcast at how stuff works dot com. Yeah for more

0:52:05.000 --> 0:52:07.120
<v Speaker 1>on this and thousands of other topics. VI is it

0:52:07.160 --> 0:52:14.719
<v Speaker 1>how stuff works dot com? H