1 00:00:01,120 --> 00:00:04,560 Speaker 1: Welcome to Stuff you should know from how Stuff Works 2 00:00:04,600 --> 00:00:14,000 Speaker 1: dot com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark. 3 00:00:14,120 --> 00:00:17,680 Speaker 1: There's Charles w Chuck Bryant, there's Jerry out there outside 4 00:00:17,760 --> 00:00:21,200 Speaker 1: the fish bowl, and also there's guest producer Noel in 5 00:00:21,239 --> 00:00:25,239 Speaker 1: our pal Ben. But yeah, I'm in the room this time. Man, Yeah, 6 00:00:25,400 --> 00:00:29,040 Speaker 1: on the mike. Thanks for having us. Uh, this is 7 00:00:29,080 --> 00:00:30,800 Speaker 1: way better than that time you have me on the 8 00:00:30,840 --> 00:00:33,279 Speaker 1: April Fools episode. Well, I'm glad you brought that up 9 00:00:33,360 --> 00:00:36,240 Speaker 1: because may remember Ben from that I think it was 10 00:00:36,280 --> 00:00:42,000 Speaker 1: two thirteen or fifteen something, ungodly time ago. It's my replacement. Yeah, 11 00:00:42,240 --> 00:00:44,040 Speaker 1: it was the April Fools joke for the three D 12 00:00:44,159 --> 00:00:47,520 Speaker 1: printing episode. So this is your second time on the show. Yeah, 13 00:00:47,720 --> 00:00:50,040 Speaker 1: the Internet shredgy Ben was it were? They were like 14 00:00:50,080 --> 00:00:52,760 Speaker 1: a target of abuse. I want to thank everybody for 15 00:00:52,800 --> 00:00:55,840 Speaker 1: the very polite emails and as as we could tell, thankfully, 16 00:00:55,920 --> 00:00:58,200 Speaker 1: Chuck is fine. They yeah, they took it easy on him. 17 00:00:58,520 --> 00:01:00,920 Speaker 1: We have very nice listeners. Something. And then know, this 18 00:01:01,040 --> 00:01:03,440 Speaker 1: might be the first time you're ever speaking on the podcast, 19 00:01:03,440 --> 00:01:05,760 Speaker 1: even though you've guess produced it like a million times. 20 00:01:05,800 --> 00:01:07,520 Speaker 1: I think I may have mumbled something in the background 21 00:01:07,640 --> 00:01:14,960 Speaker 1: the time. Really, so we're having you two on let's cut, 22 00:01:15,080 --> 00:01:18,560 Speaker 1: let's get down a business because you two have a 23 00:01:18,640 --> 00:01:22,920 Speaker 1: podcast together, right, I know you also are on Mini 24 00:01:22,920 --> 00:01:27,120 Speaker 1: Crushed movie Crush. Yeah, you're also in real World's colliding 25 00:01:27,240 --> 00:01:29,440 Speaker 1: right now, Right, there's a lot I'm going over them all. 26 00:01:29,880 --> 00:01:31,920 Speaker 1: You're on stuff they don't want you to know. But 27 00:01:32,080 --> 00:01:34,680 Speaker 1: you two, Ben and Nol have come together and made 28 00:01:34,760 --> 00:01:38,840 Speaker 1: ridiculous history, which isn't awesome. Oh yeah, that's right. We're 29 00:01:38,840 --> 00:01:43,080 Speaker 1: just missing that. God I'm starting to sweat. But you 30 00:01:43,080 --> 00:01:46,440 Speaker 1: guys are on ridiculous history together. We are tell us 31 00:01:46,480 --> 00:01:54,440 Speaker 1: about that. So history is full of these cartoonish bizarre events, 32 00:01:54,720 --> 00:02:00,600 Speaker 1: often not covered in your typical history class. Sounds for Mimilier, right, 33 00:02:01,720 --> 00:02:08,480 Speaker 1: because for one reason or another, people thought that's no 34 00:02:08,639 --> 00:02:12,480 Speaker 1: way that didn't really happen. The first recorded instance of 35 00:02:12,480 --> 00:02:15,120 Speaker 1: a mooning did not result in the death of hundreds 36 00:02:15,120 --> 00:02:19,240 Speaker 1: of people, is surely not? Surely not? But it did, 37 00:02:19,480 --> 00:02:21,520 Speaker 1: And surely the US government did not have a plan 38 00:02:21,639 --> 00:02:24,960 Speaker 1: to shoot a nuclear missile at the moon, right, That 39 00:02:25,080 --> 00:02:27,760 Speaker 1: was just a Mr Show sketch, Sure not, but it 40 00:02:27,880 --> 00:02:30,320 Speaker 1: also was It was kind of parallel thinking. Is the 41 00:02:30,360 --> 00:02:36,040 Speaker 1: Mr show sketch happened before this story became declassified Project 42 00:02:36,200 --> 00:02:41,120 Speaker 1: day one nine. So our continuing mission with Ridiculous History, 43 00:02:41,200 --> 00:02:43,840 Speaker 1: not to sound too star trekky about it, is to 44 00:02:44,280 --> 00:02:49,040 Speaker 1: find those moments, the bizarre people, places, and things throughout 45 00:02:49,040 --> 00:02:52,440 Speaker 1: the span of human civilization that at least crack the 46 00:02:52,520 --> 00:02:55,799 Speaker 1: both of us up on a continual basis. And sometimes 47 00:02:55,800 --> 00:02:59,040 Speaker 1: we do have to stop recording just for a second 48 00:02:59,120 --> 00:03:04,960 Speaker 1: because we're so tickled. Yeah wow, that's that's actually high qualities, 49 00:03:05,000 --> 00:03:09,799 Speaker 1: mainly because we tickle each other physically. That's cheating, Ben, 50 00:03:09,840 --> 00:03:12,760 Speaker 1: You're making it sound so serious. It's actually a lot 51 00:03:12,800 --> 00:03:16,320 Speaker 1: of fun. It's a fun show, right Yeah, Okay, Yeah, 52 00:03:16,320 --> 00:03:18,720 Speaker 1: I mean I'm giving been a hard time, but yeah, 53 00:03:18,880 --> 00:03:21,919 Speaker 1: that's definitely like we touch on from time to time. 54 00:03:21,960 --> 00:03:24,920 Speaker 1: It'll it'll go into a heavier territory. Like, for example, 55 00:03:25,000 --> 00:03:27,760 Speaker 1: we did an episode about how women in Kansas in 56 00:03:27,800 --> 00:03:31,560 Speaker 1: the nineteen twenties were imprisoned in labor camps for having STDs. 57 00:03:32,600 --> 00:03:35,880 Speaker 1: Well that certainly falls under ridiculous, not exactly fun or 58 00:03:35,920 --> 00:03:39,880 Speaker 1: funny right now, ridiculous, But so it's it's it's all 59 00:03:39,880 --> 00:03:41,680 Speaker 1: of those things. Some of them are you know, crack 60 00:03:41,760 --> 00:03:45,040 Speaker 1: you up hilarious moments like Napoleon Bonaparte getting attacked by 61 00:03:45,040 --> 00:03:49,320 Speaker 1: bunnies or you know, the aforementioned stt labor camps or 62 00:03:50,360 --> 00:03:54,640 Speaker 1: racist special Olympics that were held here in the States. 63 00:03:55,080 --> 00:03:58,680 Speaker 1: And we're a complete uh well tomorrow phrase we use 64 00:03:58,720 --> 00:04:02,119 Speaker 1: on the show each ship show. So so wait a minute, 65 00:04:02,120 --> 00:04:04,160 Speaker 1: I think you are like, you need to name the 66 00:04:04,200 --> 00:04:11,080 Speaker 1: state that hosted that. It was St. Louis. Yeah. St Louis, 67 00:04:11,600 --> 00:04:14,680 Speaker 1: And it's because the World's Fair was happening in St. 68 00:04:14,720 --> 00:04:17,360 Speaker 1: Louis and they were going to have it in Chicago. 69 00:04:17,560 --> 00:04:19,359 Speaker 1: But the people hosting the World's Fair said, if you 70 00:04:19,400 --> 00:04:21,920 Speaker 1: don't do your Olympics as part of the World's Fair, 71 00:04:21,920 --> 00:04:23,520 Speaker 1: we're going to totally blow you out of the water 72 00:04:23,520 --> 00:04:25,080 Speaker 1: with how awesome our World's Fair is. And no one's 73 00:04:25,080 --> 00:04:27,400 Speaker 1: gonna come to your Olympics. Scared them in the early 74 00:04:27,480 --> 00:04:29,599 Speaker 1: days of like, you know, not the earliest days of 75 00:04:29,600 --> 00:04:31,760 Speaker 1: the Olympics, when they brought it back like in them, 76 00:04:31,839 --> 00:04:35,200 Speaker 1: you know, it was not ancient room. It was not 77 00:04:35,240 --> 00:04:39,159 Speaker 1: in fact ancient Rome. And it was also it was 78 00:04:39,200 --> 00:04:43,640 Speaker 1: not a good example of the Olympics either because the 79 00:04:43,680 --> 00:04:47,600 Speaker 1: white supremacists who were in charge of the whole shebang 80 00:04:48,400 --> 00:04:52,440 Speaker 1: decided that this would be the perfect time to prove 81 00:04:52,520 --> 00:04:56,000 Speaker 1: their cockamamie ideas of like eugenic ideas of kind of 82 00:04:56,040 --> 00:04:59,239 Speaker 1: like white superiority and like they would have indigenous people 83 00:04:59,279 --> 00:05:01,880 Speaker 1: competing in these Olympic events, but of course they didn't 84 00:05:01,920 --> 00:05:04,280 Speaker 1: teach them how to, you know, do the events, so 85 00:05:04,320 --> 00:05:06,680 Speaker 1: they didn't just automatically know how to pull vault or 86 00:05:06,839 --> 00:05:09,960 Speaker 1: throw a javelin or whatever. So and one supremacists can 87 00:05:10,040 --> 00:05:13,800 Speaker 1: ruin anything. Anything they put their hands on, they really 88 00:05:13,800 --> 00:05:17,120 Speaker 1: can just turns to poop. Yeah, we are doing an 89 00:05:17,160 --> 00:05:20,360 Speaker 1: episode on flash events later, so stay tuned for there. So, 90 00:05:20,360 --> 00:05:23,279 Speaker 1: so before we give everything away, you guys tell everyone 91 00:05:23,279 --> 00:05:26,800 Speaker 1: where they can find ridiculous history and when. You can 92 00:05:26,800 --> 00:05:31,719 Speaker 1: find ridiculous history at our website. No, it's ridiculous history show, 93 00:05:32,080 --> 00:05:36,480 Speaker 1: I think, so the website. It's definitely keep prepared for this. 94 00:05:37,200 --> 00:05:41,800 Speaker 1: I've got steck of notes right here. Yeah, you can 95 00:05:41,839 --> 00:05:44,200 Speaker 1: find us an Apple podcast. You find us on Spotify, 96 00:05:44,279 --> 00:05:46,640 Speaker 1: you can find us wherever you find your favorite shows, 97 00:05:47,160 --> 00:05:50,280 Speaker 1: like stuff you should know or stuff they don't want 98 00:05:50,360 --> 00:05:52,640 Speaker 1: you to know, or I should I list the entire 99 00:05:52,680 --> 00:05:55,520 Speaker 1: pantheon of all the shows we have. It's too many 100 00:05:55,560 --> 00:05:58,280 Speaker 1: at this point, but but yes, you can find us 101 00:05:58,320 --> 00:06:02,599 Speaker 1: in all of those places. We also have a community page, 102 00:06:03,000 --> 00:06:05,880 Speaker 1: uh that we're really proud of and really happy with, 103 00:06:06,120 --> 00:06:10,000 Speaker 1: called ridiculous Historians on Facebook. Taking a total cue from 104 00:06:10,000 --> 00:06:14,320 Speaker 1: the cisk army nice. Well, First of all, thank you 105 00:06:14,480 --> 00:06:16,800 Speaker 1: for all of the flattery that you've been heaping on 106 00:06:16,920 --> 00:06:19,120 Speaker 1: us for the last few minutes as much appreciated, but 107 00:06:19,200 --> 00:06:21,839 Speaker 1: also thank you for coming by. Appreciate it, guys, Thank 108 00:06:21,880 --> 00:06:25,599 Speaker 1: you guys for having so much. Let's do this every week. Yeah, 109 00:06:25,680 --> 00:06:27,560 Speaker 1: that might be been much. Let me check the sketch. 110 00:06:32,440 --> 00:06:34,640 Speaker 1: I gotta tell you, I love those guys, but I'm 111 00:06:34,680 --> 00:06:37,880 Speaker 1: glad to get out of that that new studio box. 112 00:06:38,400 --> 00:06:40,880 Speaker 1: It's like a Fema trailer. Man. It's for malde hyde 113 00:06:40,880 --> 00:06:44,279 Speaker 1: wafting off slowly poisoning us. It is still offcasting. It 114 00:06:44,279 --> 00:06:48,279 Speaker 1: feels like, yeah, big time. It's in my hair, which 115 00:06:48,320 --> 00:06:51,760 Speaker 1: is now falling out. We're in bad shape. Well before, 116 00:06:52,000 --> 00:06:53,880 Speaker 1: I like what you're wearing. By the way, thank you. 117 00:06:53,920 --> 00:06:56,600 Speaker 1: I spilled a tremendous amount of coffee on myself and 118 00:06:56,680 --> 00:06:58,440 Speaker 1: luckily I had a bunch of samples of our new 119 00:06:58,440 --> 00:07:02,400 Speaker 1: T shirt. Yeah, and this is not just a plug. Everyone. 120 00:07:02,880 --> 00:07:06,200 Speaker 1: Josh is literally wearing a Lewis the Child Skeptic T 121 00:07:06,360 --> 00:07:09,080 Speaker 1: shirt from the Stuff you Should Know store because they 122 00:07:09,160 --> 00:07:12,560 Speaker 1: sent us every shirt. I'm like, oh, great, to the 123 00:07:12,560 --> 00:07:15,440 Speaker 1: guy who has a hundred T shirts, here's twenty more. 124 00:07:16,640 --> 00:07:18,360 Speaker 1: But they are pretty cool. I'm pretty happy with this. 125 00:07:18,440 --> 00:07:22,559 Speaker 1: Like the size of it. Look at the size, perfect size. 126 00:07:22,600 --> 00:07:24,880 Speaker 1: It's not so big that it wraps around and gets 127 00:07:24,880 --> 00:07:27,800 Speaker 1: all mangled by my love handles. But it's also not 128 00:07:27,920 --> 00:07:31,880 Speaker 1: so small that it looks like, you know, caved in chest. 129 00:07:33,160 --> 00:07:35,880 Speaker 1: You know what I mean. I didn't remember that reference 130 00:07:35,920 --> 00:07:40,000 Speaker 1: though I didn't neither like they listened to the Pie 131 00:07:40,000 --> 00:07:42,800 Speaker 1: Piper episode. Oh there you go. It sounds like a 132 00:07:42,840 --> 00:07:45,920 Speaker 1: youth thing, yeah, Josh, But it was just an offhanded 133 00:07:45,960 --> 00:07:47,800 Speaker 1: comment I made. Now it's a T shirt I'm wearing, 134 00:07:47,840 --> 00:07:50,080 Speaker 1: which is I love. It makes a pretty great time 135 00:07:50,120 --> 00:07:53,400 Speaker 1: to be alive. By the way, I need to give 136 00:07:53,440 --> 00:07:57,560 Speaker 1: a shout out to Brittney Shift. Um, Britney Shift sent 137 00:07:57,880 --> 00:08:02,000 Speaker 1: this idea to us. Okay, great, And the reason you 138 00:08:02,040 --> 00:08:04,520 Speaker 1: know we don't often take well that's not true. We 139 00:08:04,600 --> 00:08:07,320 Speaker 1: kind of keep a kitty of listeners suggestions, but we 140 00:08:07,360 --> 00:08:11,200 Speaker 1: don't often like do one the next week and then 141 00:08:11,200 --> 00:08:15,200 Speaker 1: shout out the person. But I thought we had fully 142 00:08:15,320 --> 00:08:19,720 Speaker 1: exhausted our Crime and Punishment series. So I was delighted 143 00:08:20,440 --> 00:08:22,720 Speaker 1: that Britney Shifts sent this in and I was like, 144 00:08:22,920 --> 00:08:26,240 Speaker 1: why haven't we done police lineup? I don't know, it's 145 00:08:26,240 --> 00:08:30,480 Speaker 1: a great question. Was just sitting there waiting. Yep. The 146 00:08:30,520 --> 00:08:33,480 Speaker 1: only other one that's left is what kind of shoes 147 00:08:33,559 --> 00:08:41,480 Speaker 1: detectives wear? That that's the last one? Is this? Yeah, 148 00:08:41,559 --> 00:08:44,400 Speaker 1: that's gum shoe or crepe sold I think do you 149 00:08:44,480 --> 00:08:47,040 Speaker 1: knew that? Yeah? But I don't know how it relates 150 00:08:47,080 --> 00:08:50,240 Speaker 1: to cops. I guess they wore those. They are super comfortable. 151 00:08:50,559 --> 00:08:55,480 Speaker 1: Cops are always walking around walking, yeah you know, but 152 00:08:56,000 --> 00:08:59,360 Speaker 1: sometimes when they're walking, they're actually out on the street 153 00:09:00,040 --> 00:09:03,720 Speaker 1: looking for people who resemble a suspect that they have 154 00:09:03,880 --> 00:09:08,000 Speaker 1: in the jail house. And they say, hey, you come 155 00:09:08,000 --> 00:09:10,800 Speaker 1: on over here, how would you like to make ten bucks? 156 00:09:11,600 --> 00:09:15,560 Speaker 1: And the person says exactly how copper and the cops says, 157 00:09:16,080 --> 00:09:18,839 Speaker 1: by standing in is what we call a filler in 158 00:09:18,920 --> 00:09:23,040 Speaker 1: a police or they do like Comber Simpson and when 159 00:09:23,200 --> 00:09:24,920 Speaker 1: they were like a boat raffle that they said he 160 00:09:24,920 --> 00:09:26,439 Speaker 1: had to come down to the police station. Yeah, you 161 00:09:26,480 --> 00:09:30,360 Speaker 1: want a boat? Yeah, and then they beat him merciless 162 00:09:31,080 --> 00:09:34,760 Speaker 1: for like parking unpaid parking tickets. Also shout out to 163 00:09:34,840 --> 00:09:38,520 Speaker 1: Beth at Schuster, who wrote to this article in the 164 00:09:39,640 --> 00:09:43,840 Speaker 1: n i J Journal the National Institute of Justice, I believe, so, 165 00:09:44,040 --> 00:09:47,640 Speaker 1: is that right? Yeah, they're pretty much committed to keeping 166 00:09:47,679 --> 00:09:50,240 Speaker 1: people from being wrongly convicted, so I would guess the 167 00:09:50,360 --> 00:09:53,120 Speaker 1: J stance for justice. Yeah, and this is this is 168 00:09:53,160 --> 00:09:55,520 Speaker 1: a good start, and we had some other stuff we 169 00:09:55,559 --> 00:09:59,280 Speaker 1: added to it. But thank you Ms Schuster, Yeah for 170 00:09:59,320 --> 00:10:03,560 Speaker 1: your work up. Well, um, I already led into the 171 00:10:03,600 --> 00:10:06,160 Speaker 1: episode and it didn't take so let me try again. 172 00:10:06,960 --> 00:10:10,240 Speaker 1: This n i J article you sent calls out a 173 00:10:10,320 --> 00:10:15,160 Speaker 1: dude named Jerry Miller, who back was two years old, 174 00:10:15,200 --> 00:10:19,160 Speaker 1: I believe. And Jerry Miller had a particularly bad day 175 00:10:19,280 --> 00:10:23,840 Speaker 1: when he was arrested and he was charged with robbing, kidnapping, 176 00:10:24,240 --> 00:10:28,480 Speaker 1: and raping a woman, and he got convicted. He was 177 00:10:28,559 --> 00:10:32,959 Speaker 1: convicted because two people, two eye witnesses, saw him in 178 00:10:33,000 --> 00:10:36,080 Speaker 1: the lineup picked him out, and then later at trial 179 00:10:36,320 --> 00:10:40,040 Speaker 1: the victim said, maybe that's him, maybe it's not, but 180 00:10:40,120 --> 00:10:42,880 Speaker 1: who cares. There's two eye witnesses that picked the show 181 00:10:42,920 --> 00:10:47,920 Speaker 1: out of a lineup. He's done. He did twenty four 182 00:10:48,280 --> 00:10:51,319 Speaker 1: years in prison, and you may notice from the tone 183 00:10:51,320 --> 00:10:55,120 Speaker 1: that I'm using here he was wrongfully convicted. He actually 184 00:10:55,200 --> 00:10:57,800 Speaker 1: got out of prison and was living life re leased 185 00:10:57,800 --> 00:11:02,400 Speaker 1: on parole, wearing an ankle bracelet a monitor constantly as 186 00:11:02,440 --> 00:11:08,360 Speaker 1: a registered sex offender. And then finally I think, um, oh, 187 00:11:08,400 --> 00:11:11,520 Speaker 1: I'm not quite sure two thousand seven. In two thousand seven, 188 00:11:11,720 --> 00:11:14,160 Speaker 1: as part of the Innocence Project, which we've done an 189 00:11:14,200 --> 00:11:22,160 Speaker 1: episode on with um, yeah, that lady what is her name? Oh, Haulleen, 190 00:11:23,840 --> 00:11:29,679 Speaker 1: but it's definitely not Paulazon. Thank you, Jerry. Yeah, I 191 00:11:29,720 --> 00:11:32,120 Speaker 1: wanted to say Pauli Shore so bad. I just knew 192 00:11:32,160 --> 00:11:36,880 Speaker 1: it was wrong, but we didn't. Right, We did an 193 00:11:36,920 --> 00:11:41,640 Speaker 1: Innocence Project episode, and under the Innocence Project, Jerry Miller 194 00:11:41,840 --> 00:11:47,160 Speaker 1: was exonerated through DNA evidence. He incontrovertibly did not do 195 00:11:47,280 --> 00:11:50,400 Speaker 1: this and lost twenty four years of his life because 196 00:11:50,440 --> 00:11:54,839 Speaker 1: of flawed eyewitness testimony. Yeah, and so you know, this 197 00:11:54,920 --> 00:11:59,040 Speaker 1: is all about police lineups and more about I mean, 198 00:11:59,080 --> 00:12:01,120 Speaker 1: we'll tell you how they work in a general sense, 199 00:12:01,160 --> 00:12:05,840 Speaker 1: but this sort of more about how you know, it's 200 00:12:05,840 --> 00:12:09,280 Speaker 1: such an imperfect system, but sort of The takeaway from 201 00:12:09,320 --> 00:12:11,520 Speaker 1: all of this that we're about to go over with 202 00:12:11,559 --> 00:12:14,720 Speaker 1: all the studies and the trying different things is kind 203 00:12:14,720 --> 00:12:18,400 Speaker 1: of like, you know, it's an imperfect system and we 204 00:12:18,640 --> 00:12:21,120 Speaker 1: can try and craft it the best way we can, 205 00:12:21,880 --> 00:12:26,280 Speaker 1: but human memory is imperfect. Identifying people in lineups is imperfect, 206 00:12:26,520 --> 00:12:28,880 Speaker 1: and we're just it's kind of the best we got 207 00:12:29,000 --> 00:12:30,920 Speaker 1: right now. Right Well, a lot of people are like, 208 00:12:31,240 --> 00:12:36,080 Speaker 1: get rid of eyewitness testimony really altogether, yes, all together. 209 00:12:36,280 --> 00:12:41,000 Speaker 1: Humans suck at eyewitness testimony. And there's a lot of 210 00:12:41,040 --> 00:12:43,480 Speaker 1: reasons why. It's not like people are out there like 211 00:12:43,559 --> 00:12:45,920 Speaker 1: I want to have me a bad guy, show me 212 00:12:45,960 --> 00:12:47,920 Speaker 1: a lineup. I'm gonna pick one of those guys out. 213 00:12:48,280 --> 00:12:52,040 Speaker 1: They're not doing that. They're they're subject to basically the 214 00:12:52,040 --> 00:12:56,719 Speaker 1: way our brains are wired. We don't walk around videotaping 215 00:12:56,800 --> 00:13:00,360 Speaker 1: everything that we see. Yeah, you know, we get sillly 216 00:13:00,440 --> 00:13:06,160 Speaker 1: bombarded with sensory information and under normal circumstances, you know, 217 00:13:06,280 --> 00:13:08,160 Speaker 1: you see a stranger on the street, you just see 218 00:13:08,240 --> 00:13:10,600 Speaker 1: there's another human. I've identified him as not a threat 219 00:13:10,880 --> 00:13:13,600 Speaker 1: and keep walking by it. If that person turned out 220 00:13:13,640 --> 00:13:18,959 Speaker 1: to be accused of a crime, um or or perpetrated 221 00:13:18,960 --> 00:13:21,600 Speaker 1: a crime, and you were brought in to say was 222 00:13:21,640 --> 00:13:24,880 Speaker 1: this the person you saw? Your brain is going to 223 00:13:24,920 --> 00:13:28,760 Speaker 1: try to reconstruct what little pieces of memory it formed 224 00:13:28,760 --> 00:13:31,240 Speaker 1: of that person. And there's a lot of things, a 225 00:13:31,280 --> 00:13:34,480 Speaker 1: lot of factors that are involved that can make that 226 00:13:34,840 --> 00:13:39,400 Speaker 1: really difficult task even harder. Yeah. Like I am someone 227 00:13:39,520 --> 00:13:45,199 Speaker 1: who has told myself, Chuck, pay attention. Like, if you're 228 00:13:45,200 --> 00:13:48,880 Speaker 1: ever in a situation like, pay attention, try and collect 229 00:13:48,920 --> 00:13:52,480 Speaker 1: yourself and try and remember a few really good details 230 00:13:52,520 --> 00:13:55,439 Speaker 1: about the car or the person. So like, this is 231 00:13:55,520 --> 00:13:59,640 Speaker 1: on my mind. And I actually had a situation when 232 00:13:59,640 --> 00:14:02,040 Speaker 1: I lived now I happened to me where I had 233 00:14:02,080 --> 00:14:06,960 Speaker 1: to go through a police lineup and I failed. Oh really, 234 00:14:07,040 --> 00:14:10,640 Speaker 1: was the suspect there? No? Well no, here's here's the 235 00:14:10,679 --> 00:14:12,760 Speaker 1: quick version is I wasn't in a hit and run 236 00:14:12,840 --> 00:14:16,720 Speaker 1: this lady. Uh, these two lady, these two younger girls, 237 00:14:16,800 --> 00:14:20,840 Speaker 1: they were probably teenagers, hit me from behind in my car. 238 00:14:22,120 --> 00:14:24,320 Speaker 1: I stopped my car, starting to get out and they 239 00:14:24,360 --> 00:14:27,280 Speaker 1: take off. So it's a hit and run. I chase them, 240 00:14:27,320 --> 00:14:30,040 Speaker 1: which is you should not do. Were you shooting into 241 00:14:30,080 --> 00:14:32,040 Speaker 1: the air and again to slow down trying to shoot 242 00:14:32,040 --> 00:14:36,160 Speaker 1: out their tires? No, but I did chase him. Because 243 00:14:36,160 --> 00:14:38,360 Speaker 1: I was so mad, and your adrenaline just shoots through 244 00:14:38,360 --> 00:14:41,160 Speaker 1: the roof when something like that happens, so immediately you're 245 00:14:41,200 --> 00:14:45,040 Speaker 1: just not yourself and like recording details. So I was 246 00:14:45,080 --> 00:14:47,440 Speaker 1: trying to catch up to get a license plate. I 247 00:14:47,480 --> 00:14:49,880 Speaker 1: saw that they went down the street that I knew 248 00:14:50,000 --> 00:14:54,520 Speaker 1: was a dead end. Um, it wasn't a cul de sect, 249 00:14:54,560 --> 00:14:56,520 Speaker 1: but it functioned to like a cul de sact. So 250 00:14:56,560 --> 00:14:58,520 Speaker 1: I stopped where I was, got out of the car. 251 00:14:58,920 --> 00:15:02,800 Speaker 1: Sure enough, twenty later they come halling but back towards me, 252 00:15:03,560 --> 00:15:08,080 Speaker 1: and uh, the look on their faces was like you know, oh, snap, 253 00:15:08,200 --> 00:15:10,680 Speaker 1: there's the guy. And they just sped right past me. 254 00:15:10,720 --> 00:15:13,760 Speaker 1: And I saw their faces as they sped past me 255 00:15:13,800 --> 00:15:19,320 Speaker 1: in their car. The cops found the car, found the people, 256 00:15:19,600 --> 00:15:22,320 Speaker 1: and they're like, we didn't do that, and so who 257 00:15:22,400 --> 00:15:26,080 Speaker 1: are these girls? These teenagers? Well that's the long and 258 00:15:26,080 --> 00:15:27,640 Speaker 1: short of it. Is all you have to do and 259 00:15:27,640 --> 00:15:30,240 Speaker 1: something like that. I said, didn't do it, and if 260 00:15:30,360 --> 00:15:33,480 Speaker 1: I can't pick you out, then you get away. And 261 00:15:33,640 --> 00:15:37,480 Speaker 1: they showed me pictures of like, you know, these were 262 00:15:37,520 --> 00:15:41,720 Speaker 1: like teenage young teenage Hispanic women. They showed me probably 263 00:15:42,600 --> 00:15:45,920 Speaker 1: probably fifteen pictures and said, can you identify them. I 264 00:15:46,000 --> 00:15:49,240 Speaker 1: was like, no, it was a month ago. They sped 265 00:15:49,280 --> 00:15:52,600 Speaker 1: past me for a second, like I couldn't even hazard 266 00:15:52,600 --> 00:15:54,680 Speaker 1: a guess, and I didn't want to do that. You know, 267 00:15:54,920 --> 00:15:57,520 Speaker 1: well that's very sensible of you. Yeah, I just didn't 268 00:15:57,520 --> 00:15:59,000 Speaker 1: want to take a stab at it. So I was like, no, 269 00:15:59,080 --> 00:16:01,280 Speaker 1: I have no idea, and they're basically like, sorry, they 270 00:16:01,280 --> 00:16:03,040 Speaker 1: said they didn't do it. Wow. It's like, but you 271 00:16:03,120 --> 00:16:06,080 Speaker 1: have the car and it's damaged, and like none of 272 00:16:06,120 --> 00:16:08,200 Speaker 1: that matters. They're like not not if you can't identify 273 00:16:08,200 --> 00:16:09,880 Speaker 1: I mean I could see that. I think would be like, oh, yeah, 274 00:16:09,920 --> 00:16:12,560 Speaker 1: that happened some other times in some other hit and runs. 275 00:16:12,600 --> 00:16:16,600 Speaker 1: I mean, but yeah. The long story short though, is 276 00:16:16,720 --> 00:16:20,400 Speaker 1: I'm someone who has tried to tell myself to react 277 00:16:20,440 --> 00:16:24,480 Speaker 1: in the right ways, and I couldn't tell them much 278 00:16:24,520 --> 00:16:26,560 Speaker 1: beyond like the color of the car and sort of 279 00:16:26,560 --> 00:16:31,120 Speaker 1: would it looked like because you were seeing red? Because right, 280 00:16:31,240 --> 00:16:34,800 Speaker 1: that's our that our bodies are not primed to form memories. 281 00:16:34,840 --> 00:16:37,720 Speaker 1: It's not where our where our energy goes. It's more 282 00:16:37,800 --> 00:16:40,240 Speaker 1: like getting away or shooting out the tires of a 283 00:16:40,280 --> 00:16:43,080 Speaker 1: car that just hit and ran. Right, But what you 284 00:16:43,120 --> 00:16:47,120 Speaker 1: did with that lineup is the other side of the coin. 285 00:16:47,720 --> 00:16:52,320 Speaker 1: The other problem with lineups is or eyewitness testimony from lineups, 286 00:16:52,360 --> 00:16:55,920 Speaker 1: is that sometimes people pick out people who are innocent 287 00:16:56,600 --> 00:16:59,640 Speaker 1: and other times people fail to pick out the people 288 00:16:59,680 --> 00:17:02,600 Speaker 1: who are actually the perpetrators. So it's like you said, 289 00:17:02,600 --> 00:17:06,080 Speaker 1: they're very they're very flaw it's as flawed system. The 290 00:17:06,160 --> 00:17:09,359 Speaker 1: problem is is the wrong people can go to jail 291 00:17:09,640 --> 00:17:12,359 Speaker 1: and the people who actually did it can get away 292 00:17:12,400 --> 00:17:15,200 Speaker 1: with it. So that's an extremely flawed system. And when 293 00:17:15,280 --> 00:17:21,040 Speaker 1: something that um important is on the table, then um, 294 00:17:21,280 --> 00:17:23,119 Speaker 1: it needs to be fixed. And there's a lot of 295 00:17:23,119 --> 00:17:26,040 Speaker 1: people looking into how it can be fixed, but we're 296 00:17:26,080 --> 00:17:28,720 Speaker 1: not there yet by any stretch. No, and here's the 297 00:17:28,800 --> 00:17:33,919 Speaker 1: stat you were talking about the DNA exoneration. Uh, of 298 00:17:34,000 --> 00:17:40,320 Speaker 1: the first three exonerations in the US were wrongfully convicted 299 00:17:40,320 --> 00:17:43,760 Speaker 1: because of eyewitness testimony and police lineups. Say it again, 300 00:17:44,920 --> 00:17:48,720 Speaker 1: seventy of the first hundred and eighty three. So like 301 00:17:48,760 --> 00:17:53,720 Speaker 1: the Innocence Project, it's basically like a pilot study to 302 00:17:53,960 --> 00:17:58,840 Speaker 1: show through DNA exoneration all the ways that we wrongfully 303 00:17:58,920 --> 00:18:02,400 Speaker 1: convict people. And what is coming to the to the 304 00:18:02,440 --> 00:18:06,520 Speaker 1: front is eyewitness testimony. Yeah, and that the basis of 305 00:18:06,560 --> 00:18:09,640 Speaker 1: that is the police lineup right. And one other thing 306 00:18:09,680 --> 00:18:12,439 Speaker 1: that's that's problematic with the eyewitness testimony is if you 307 00:18:12,480 --> 00:18:16,120 Speaker 1: want to wow a jury, bring out an eyewitness who 308 00:18:16,119 --> 00:18:19,160 Speaker 1: seems totally sure that what they saw or that they 309 00:18:19,200 --> 00:18:23,080 Speaker 1: saw the person they're pointing to and the defendant's table, yeah, 310 00:18:23,200 --> 00:18:25,879 Speaker 1: or that that dramatic moment. It's like a movie trope. 311 00:18:25,920 --> 00:18:28,760 Speaker 1: Now you know, is the person in this room right? 312 00:18:28,840 --> 00:18:32,960 Speaker 1: Let the records show that witness is pointing at the defendant, right. Yeah. 313 00:18:33,240 --> 00:18:36,399 Speaker 1: So the problem is it has a huge impact, but 314 00:18:36,520 --> 00:18:41,160 Speaker 1: it's also really crutty wit, really crutty um evidence. There's 315 00:18:41,200 --> 00:18:43,680 Speaker 1: this guy here, he had a great quote. He says 316 00:18:43,720 --> 00:18:49,720 Speaker 1: that um eyewitness testimony is a very unusual, complex kind 317 00:18:49,720 --> 00:18:54,160 Speaker 1: of trace evidence, and it's difficult to recover, easy to contaminate, 318 00:18:54,320 --> 00:18:57,439 Speaker 1: and very hard to handle. And that just there's no 319 00:18:57,520 --> 00:19:01,199 Speaker 1: better description of eyewitness testimony. If I was ever in 320 00:19:01,359 --> 00:19:05,560 Speaker 1: court and someone identified me from the witness stand, I 321 00:19:05,600 --> 00:19:07,960 Speaker 1: would do that thing where you look at behind you 322 00:19:08,640 --> 00:19:10,679 Speaker 1: when they pointed at you, just be like, I think 323 00:19:10,720 --> 00:19:14,399 Speaker 1: they're talking behind me, and they would say no, and 324 00:19:14,400 --> 00:19:16,240 Speaker 1: they would point again, and I would move a little 325 00:19:16,240 --> 00:19:19,040 Speaker 1: bit more I'd be like, this is this witness is 326 00:19:19,080 --> 00:19:21,280 Speaker 1: clearly disturbed, and then if that, if that didn't work, 327 00:19:21,320 --> 00:19:24,160 Speaker 1: you would escalate to I'm rubber and your glue. Yeah, 328 00:19:24,160 --> 00:19:27,600 Speaker 1: that usually works, right. So there's a couple of other 329 00:19:27,680 --> 00:19:33,719 Speaker 1: things that makes eyewitness testimony problematic, Chuck Um. In addition 330 00:19:33,760 --> 00:19:39,879 Speaker 1: to not being like human video recorders, there are human VCRs. 331 00:19:40,640 --> 00:19:44,240 Speaker 1: There are, Um, there are circumstances, especially surrounding a crime, 332 00:19:44,280 --> 00:19:46,840 Speaker 1: that can make it really difficult to remember. If you're 333 00:19:46,840 --> 00:19:49,920 Speaker 1: in a fight or flight situation, you're not forming memories. 334 00:19:50,119 --> 00:19:54,359 Speaker 1: If there's a weapon, um, there are people tend to 335 00:19:54,520 --> 00:19:57,920 Speaker 1: focus on the weapon. Um. You me was mugged once 336 00:19:58,520 --> 00:20:01,280 Speaker 1: and the opposite happened to her. She remember what the 337 00:20:01,320 --> 00:20:03,639 Speaker 1: person looked like, but she didn't even remember that there 338 00:20:03,680 --> 00:20:05,720 Speaker 1: was a weapon. And her friends were like, yeah, there 339 00:20:05,800 --> 00:20:08,040 Speaker 1: was a gun. Interesting, Yeah, and she went to a 340 00:20:08,080 --> 00:20:10,560 Speaker 1: lineup and like pick the guy out and bullet proof. 341 00:20:10,640 --> 00:20:13,439 Speaker 1: So she is so she's like, take your gun and 342 00:20:13,480 --> 00:20:15,920 Speaker 1: shove it that I'm not even going to recognize it. No, 343 00:20:16,040 --> 00:20:17,879 Speaker 1: but that makes sense. If someone pulls a gun on 344 00:20:17,920 --> 00:20:20,520 Speaker 1: you or has a switchblade or some other kind of 345 00:20:20,560 --> 00:20:24,760 Speaker 1: creepy weapon, the human instinct is to to focus your 346 00:20:24,800 --> 00:20:27,399 Speaker 1: attention on that thing pointed at you. And apparently people 347 00:20:27,520 --> 00:20:32,359 Speaker 1: can really describe the weapon, right, But you're focusing on 348 00:20:32,400 --> 00:20:34,680 Speaker 1: the weapon, you're not focused on the person who's holding 349 00:20:34,680 --> 00:20:37,040 Speaker 1: the weapon. Typically that helps a little bit, but not 350 00:20:37,119 --> 00:20:40,280 Speaker 1: as much as the face. Right. And then another problem 351 00:20:40,359 --> 00:20:44,840 Speaker 1: is if you are um, say uh an hispanic dude, 352 00:20:45,240 --> 00:20:47,639 Speaker 1: and you're a witness to a crime and it's a 353 00:20:47,640 --> 00:20:50,879 Speaker 1: white guy who's the perpetrator, you're going to have a 354 00:20:50,920 --> 00:20:55,400 Speaker 1: tremendous amount of difficulty picking that white guy out, as 355 00:20:55,440 --> 00:20:57,879 Speaker 1: sad as it is to say, from a lineup of 356 00:20:57,920 --> 00:21:01,360 Speaker 1: other white guys, because I would this testimony that crosses 357 00:21:01,520 --> 00:21:07,199 Speaker 1: race or ethnicities is known to be very unreliable because 358 00:21:07,320 --> 00:21:10,879 Speaker 1: it's just more difficult for somebody of an ethnicity or 359 00:21:10,880 --> 00:21:15,919 Speaker 1: a race to to separate or identify people of another 360 00:21:15,960 --> 00:21:18,480 Speaker 1: ethnicity or race. Yeah, and I don't think it's the 361 00:21:18,520 --> 00:21:20,760 Speaker 1: case where people are like, oh, white people look the 362 00:21:20,760 --> 00:21:26,080 Speaker 1: same to me. It's just weird brain science, right, You 363 00:21:26,160 --> 00:21:29,120 Speaker 1: just have a harder time. From way back when we 364 00:21:29,119 --> 00:21:33,160 Speaker 1: were basically Tuck Tuck and Tuk Tuk lived with fifteen 365 00:21:33,160 --> 00:21:35,600 Speaker 1: other people that look just like him because they'd all 366 00:21:35,640 --> 00:21:39,520 Speaker 1: been in breeding for generations and generations, and they had 367 00:21:39,600 --> 00:21:42,000 Speaker 1: to be on the lookout for another group of people 368 00:21:42,240 --> 00:21:45,440 Speaker 1: who've been inbreeding for generations and generations that wanted their 369 00:21:46,000 --> 00:21:50,040 Speaker 1: jackfruit tree that they live by. What's jack fruit? O? 370 00:21:50,280 --> 00:21:53,000 Speaker 1: That word jack fruit, the big huge thing, the big 371 00:21:53,080 --> 00:21:59,160 Speaker 1: huge one. It actually makes a killer barbecue vehicle shredded 372 00:21:59,280 --> 00:22:04,000 Speaker 1: like shredded vegan standing. Oh okay, it's really good, gotcha, gotcha? 373 00:22:04,440 --> 00:22:06,639 Speaker 1: All right, let's take a break and we'll talk about 374 00:22:06,640 --> 00:22:10,240 Speaker 1: the fundamentals of the run of the mill police lineup 375 00:22:10,320 --> 00:22:32,040 Speaker 1: right after this. All right, so, run of the mill 376 00:22:32,080 --> 00:22:36,000 Speaker 1: police lineups. I mentioned that before we left. Everyone's seen 377 00:22:36,520 --> 00:22:40,880 Speaker 1: movies and TV shows, and it's not too far off. Actually, 378 00:22:41,080 --> 00:22:42,159 Speaker 1: I mean, there are a couple of ways you can 379 00:22:42,200 --> 00:22:46,280 Speaker 1: do it. Uh. There are lineups where you look at 380 00:22:46,320 --> 00:22:48,719 Speaker 1: someone in front of your face. And then there are 381 00:22:48,760 --> 00:22:51,480 Speaker 1: lineups like I had in l A, where I look 382 00:22:51,520 --> 00:22:54,560 Speaker 1: at photographs the ones. You know. It's way more sexy 383 00:22:54,720 --> 00:22:57,000 Speaker 1: for a TV show or a movie to line them 384 00:22:57,040 --> 00:23:00,880 Speaker 1: up in the traditional way. It's extray or narrowly sexy 385 00:23:01,000 --> 00:23:04,439 Speaker 1: like a live police lineup like you see on TV. Uh. 386 00:23:04,480 --> 00:23:07,320 Speaker 1: And then there are the simultaneous or sequential there's a 387 00:23:07,359 --> 00:23:09,200 Speaker 1: lot of debate, which we'll get into in a minute, 388 00:23:09,200 --> 00:23:11,960 Speaker 1: about which is best. To me, it's pretty obvious that 389 00:23:12,040 --> 00:23:14,920 Speaker 1: sequential is best. Simultaneous is the one that you see 390 00:23:14,960 --> 00:23:19,520 Speaker 1: on TV. They line up six or seven dudes or ladies, uh, 391 00:23:19,560 --> 00:23:22,800 Speaker 1: and you identify them. Uh usually well it depends. We'll 392 00:23:22,840 --> 00:23:26,399 Speaker 1: get into the fillers or the foils, but uh, only 393 00:23:26,600 --> 00:23:29,359 Speaker 1: usually only one of those people is a suspect. And 394 00:23:29,600 --> 00:23:32,720 Speaker 1: in like the best ideal version of it. Uh, then 395 00:23:32,720 --> 00:23:35,480 Speaker 1: there're sequential, And that's when they bring out one person 396 00:23:35,520 --> 00:23:38,199 Speaker 1: at a time and bring out like seven guys, just 397 00:23:38,240 --> 00:23:39,840 Speaker 1: one at a time, and you say, you know, let 398 00:23:39,840 --> 00:23:41,639 Speaker 1: me know at the end of this which one you 399 00:23:41,640 --> 00:23:43,439 Speaker 1: think it was, or if it's a photo lineup, they 400 00:23:43,440 --> 00:23:45,639 Speaker 1: show you one photo at a time. Exactly. Yeah, I 401 00:23:45,640 --> 00:23:48,439 Speaker 1: agree with you. I think sequential is head and shoulders 402 00:23:48,840 --> 00:23:52,159 Speaker 1: the better one of the of the two. Yeah. And 403 00:23:52,200 --> 00:23:54,520 Speaker 1: here's the the final little piece of how it can 404 00:23:54,600 --> 00:23:58,639 Speaker 1: vary is whether or not to the administrator that the 405 00:23:58,680 --> 00:24:02,440 Speaker 1: person that's in charge of administrating the lineup knows who 406 00:24:02,480 --> 00:24:05,360 Speaker 1: the purp is or not. Yeah. That's a big one, man. 407 00:24:05,520 --> 00:24:07,440 Speaker 1: So it's either double blind, which means that they don't 408 00:24:07,440 --> 00:24:10,360 Speaker 1: even know, and to me, it seems obvious that that's 409 00:24:10,400 --> 00:24:13,720 Speaker 1: always the best way because there are many many circumstances 410 00:24:13,720 --> 00:24:16,639 Speaker 1: where you would actually even if you don't want to 411 00:24:16,960 --> 00:24:19,800 Speaker 1: or mean to lead a witness. And one example they 412 00:24:19,840 --> 00:24:23,320 Speaker 1: gave here in this article is if they say, and 413 00:24:23,359 --> 00:24:25,879 Speaker 1: if they identify a filler or a foil a k a. 414 00:24:26,320 --> 00:24:29,080 Speaker 1: A person that was paid ten bucks, say that's the person, 415 00:24:29,800 --> 00:24:33,800 Speaker 1: the administrator might say, take your time? Are you sure 416 00:24:33,920 --> 00:24:35,600 Speaker 1: like you really need to take your time? Which is 417 00:24:35,600 --> 00:24:43,200 Speaker 1: basically pretty much they or conversely, if if um, when 418 00:24:43,200 --> 00:24:46,000 Speaker 1: they're doing it sequentially, when they get to like number four, 419 00:24:46,000 --> 00:24:50,240 Speaker 1: they're like, WHOA get a load of this guy. Huh jeez, 420 00:24:50,359 --> 00:24:53,560 Speaker 1: look at that bag character. He's guilty of something. But 421 00:24:53,640 --> 00:24:58,520 Speaker 1: they can't like even just a smile or something like that, 422 00:24:58,960 --> 00:25:01,840 Speaker 1: like a non verbal que you don't even mean to do, right, 423 00:25:02,080 --> 00:25:04,480 Speaker 1: or you may mean to do because you know that 424 00:25:04,480 --> 00:25:07,080 Speaker 1: that's the guy, and you know it in your bones 425 00:25:07,119 --> 00:25:10,320 Speaker 1: that that guy did it, and you're leading the witness, right, 426 00:25:10,320 --> 00:25:13,360 Speaker 1: it can be some some sort of nonverbal gesture. The 427 00:25:13,400 --> 00:25:17,000 Speaker 1: problem is is that most people, I can't say most people, 428 00:25:17,000 --> 00:25:20,119 Speaker 1: but it's been shown that some people, when they're brought 429 00:25:20,160 --> 00:25:23,520 Speaker 1: in as a witness for a police lineup, I feel 430 00:25:23,560 --> 00:25:26,600 Speaker 1: like it's their role. It's their job to pick somebody 431 00:25:26,640 --> 00:25:29,159 Speaker 1: for the cops. So they're more than happy to be 432 00:25:29,280 --> 00:25:31,560 Speaker 1: led by the cops because then they're fulfilling their role 433 00:25:31,640 --> 00:25:33,960 Speaker 1: and they did what they were supposed to do. So 434 00:25:34,040 --> 00:25:40,080 Speaker 1: another another technique or way to administer a good lineup 435 00:25:40,240 --> 00:25:43,879 Speaker 1: is to say, here, here's the lineup, whether it's sequential 436 00:25:44,320 --> 00:25:48,520 Speaker 1: one at a time or um all at once simultaneously. Right, Um, 437 00:25:49,280 --> 00:25:53,520 Speaker 1: the suspect may or may not be in this lineup. Yeah, 438 00:25:53,560 --> 00:25:57,480 Speaker 1: that seems like I think they found that reduced mistaken 439 00:25:57,520 --> 00:26:03,919 Speaker 1: identity rates, uh were lower when they did this, So 440 00:26:04,000 --> 00:26:07,399 Speaker 1: you would think just always do that right right, because 441 00:26:07,440 --> 00:26:10,560 Speaker 1: it says to the witness like the person may not 442 00:26:10,600 --> 00:26:12,359 Speaker 1: be in here. It's like a none of the above, 443 00:26:12,440 --> 00:26:15,199 Speaker 1: the dreaded letter e none of the above. You're like, 444 00:26:15,240 --> 00:26:17,919 Speaker 1: oh God, does that does that mean that they're that 445 00:26:18,000 --> 00:26:21,040 Speaker 1: the answers not here? And so you may you may 446 00:26:21,040 --> 00:26:23,840 Speaker 1: say I don't I don't see them where. If they 447 00:26:23,880 --> 00:26:26,800 Speaker 1: don't say that, you're going to presume that the suspect 448 00:26:26,880 --> 00:26:29,760 Speaker 1: is in that lineup, and it's your job to find 449 00:26:29,840 --> 00:26:33,560 Speaker 1: that person and you have to pick somebody. Yeah, most 450 00:26:33,560 --> 00:26:36,560 Speaker 1: people aren't going to think like I can't say so, 451 00:26:36,640 --> 00:26:41,040 Speaker 1: I'm just not going to They're gonna be like three. Yeah. Well, 452 00:26:41,040 --> 00:26:44,280 Speaker 1: first of all, it's a crime against you most a 453 00:26:44,280 --> 00:26:47,320 Speaker 1: lot of times when you're like picking out this purpose. Sure. 454 00:26:47,920 --> 00:26:50,480 Speaker 1: Uh so you want them to be you know, found 455 00:26:50,560 --> 00:26:52,840 Speaker 1: or whatever. Yeah, that's a really good point to you 456 00:26:52,840 --> 00:26:54,359 Speaker 1: want you don't want them to get away with it. 457 00:26:54,400 --> 00:26:55,920 Speaker 1: And the other thing too, is I think there's a 458 00:26:56,000 --> 00:27:01,120 Speaker 1: natural human instinct when given a test to not want 459 00:27:01,160 --> 00:27:04,159 Speaker 1: to say I can't like you might feel like you 460 00:27:04,200 --> 00:27:06,960 Speaker 1: have failed. Right. That's why I admire you saying that, 461 00:27:07,040 --> 00:27:09,399 Speaker 1: like with the phone lineup, you know, not not being 462 00:27:10,000 --> 00:27:15,520 Speaker 1: not just being like yeah, but if that wouldn't matter 463 00:27:15,560 --> 00:27:17,000 Speaker 1: to my case, because if I would have said these 464 00:27:17,040 --> 00:27:19,320 Speaker 1: two and then they're like, no, that's not the lady 465 00:27:19,320 --> 00:27:21,400 Speaker 1: whose car it was. But a lot of people still 466 00:27:21,440 --> 00:27:24,080 Speaker 1: would have right right, right, And they probably wouldn't say no, 467 00:27:24,200 --> 00:27:25,879 Speaker 1: that's wrong. They would have been like, Okay, thanks a 468 00:27:25,880 --> 00:27:27,880 Speaker 1: lot for your time or whatever, and then you would 469 00:27:27,880 --> 00:27:32,000 Speaker 1: have left. They have been like, god, he was so close. Uh. 470 00:27:32,080 --> 00:27:36,320 Speaker 1: Some other research it's interesting that suggests when uh, there 471 00:27:36,520 --> 00:27:39,840 Speaker 1: is an offender in the lineup that young children and 472 00:27:39,920 --> 00:27:43,880 Speaker 1: elderly perform about as well as just regularly young adults. 473 00:27:44,359 --> 00:27:47,320 Speaker 1: But when the lineup does not have the actual offender, 474 00:27:47,960 --> 00:27:51,679 Speaker 1: then they commit mistakes a lot higher. And to me, 475 00:27:51,800 --> 00:27:55,560 Speaker 1: that's just because I think kids and elderly might not 476 00:27:55,680 --> 00:27:59,760 Speaker 1: fully understand. I think they have to pick somebody. Okay, yeah, 477 00:27:59,800 --> 00:28:01,959 Speaker 1: I agree, I think that's exactly what it is too. 478 00:28:02,119 --> 00:28:05,000 Speaker 1: But the research bears that out. It looks like so 479 00:28:05,080 --> 00:28:08,040 Speaker 1: there's there is some like you you talked about research, 480 00:28:08,119 --> 00:28:11,920 Speaker 1: there's a lot of research in this, but it's become ambiguous. 481 00:28:12,080 --> 00:28:14,440 Speaker 1: Right if you step back and you listen to all 482 00:28:14,480 --> 00:28:17,479 Speaker 1: of the different different things that you can do with 483 00:28:17,520 --> 00:28:22,960 Speaker 1: a lineup, it becomes very clear that a sequential double 484 00:28:23,040 --> 00:28:27,920 Speaker 1: blind lineup where either one photo of a suspect is 485 00:28:27,920 --> 00:28:30,080 Speaker 1: shown to the person at a time, or one live 486 00:28:30,200 --> 00:28:33,119 Speaker 1: suspect is brought out to be looked at one person 487 00:28:33,160 --> 00:28:37,199 Speaker 1: at a time and is administered by a cop or 488 00:28:37,240 --> 00:28:40,959 Speaker 1: a worker somebody who doesn't know who the suspect is, 489 00:28:41,520 --> 00:28:47,040 Speaker 1: that that's going to reduce the chance of a misidentification 490 00:28:47,560 --> 00:28:50,880 Speaker 1: or a failure of an identification, and that the person 491 00:28:51,080 --> 00:28:54,480 Speaker 1: who's being presented with these people is not going to 492 00:28:54,520 --> 00:28:58,440 Speaker 1: be able to guess, and if they actually do remember 493 00:28:58,520 --> 00:29:03,000 Speaker 1: who the perpetrator was, they're going to recognize them. It's 494 00:29:03,160 --> 00:29:05,480 Speaker 1: just obvious that that's the best way to do it. Right. 495 00:29:06,000 --> 00:29:08,280 Speaker 1: The thing is is there was a study in Illinois 496 00:29:08,680 --> 00:29:13,040 Speaker 1: UM that just completely rocked that idea that that that's 497 00:29:13,120 --> 00:29:15,680 Speaker 1: the case, because there was a three or five year 498 00:29:15,760 --> 00:29:20,120 Speaker 1: study in Illinois that looked at different types of lineups 499 00:29:20,200 --> 00:29:22,960 Speaker 1: and compared them side by side and found that actually, 500 00:29:23,040 --> 00:29:29,480 Speaker 1: know that a double blind sequential UM lineup actually produces 501 00:29:29,800 --> 00:29:36,040 Speaker 1: worse results than a UM a simultaneous non double blind one. Right. 502 00:29:36,280 --> 00:29:40,080 Speaker 1: But then again, not so fast with that because other 503 00:29:40,160 --> 00:29:43,920 Speaker 1: people since then have questioned the methodology they used in 504 00:29:43,960 --> 00:29:47,200 Speaker 1: that program and kind of said, you know, I don't 505 00:29:47,240 --> 00:29:50,680 Speaker 1: even know if we can take this research and take 506 00:29:50,720 --> 00:29:55,640 Speaker 1: these statistics seriously, right, because method methodologically it was a 507 00:29:55,800 --> 00:29:59,120 Speaker 1: screwed up study, Like they really dropped the ball on 508 00:29:59,200 --> 00:30:01,480 Speaker 1: the study. Yeah, and um, I don't think we mentioned 509 00:30:01,520 --> 00:30:05,720 Speaker 1: the two judgments either. During simultaneous lineups, when everyone's standing 510 00:30:05,760 --> 00:30:08,400 Speaker 1: there together, you use what's called relative judgment. In other words, 511 00:30:08,440 --> 00:30:11,720 Speaker 1: you compare all the dudes standing up there against one another, 512 00:30:12,280 --> 00:30:14,440 Speaker 1: and with the ones where they trot them out one 513 00:30:14,480 --> 00:30:17,920 Speaker 1: at a time. They use something called absolute judgment, which 514 00:30:17,960 --> 00:30:21,400 Speaker 1: is supposedly means that they're comparing it to only their 515 00:30:21,440 --> 00:30:24,840 Speaker 1: memory and not to the people that came before or after. Right, 516 00:30:25,240 --> 00:30:28,040 Speaker 1: That's that's the hope, that's the ideal, right, right, But 517 00:30:28,120 --> 00:30:31,200 Speaker 1: with this reachers and research in the study, I kind 518 00:30:31,200 --> 00:30:33,480 Speaker 1: of didn't even know what to think because it sort 519 00:30:33,480 --> 00:30:36,520 Speaker 1: of went against the grain and the findings. But then 520 00:30:36,560 --> 00:30:38,240 Speaker 1: they said, I don't even know if we can trust 521 00:30:38,240 --> 00:30:43,080 Speaker 1: these findings because the methodology was no good. So we 522 00:30:43,200 --> 00:30:45,000 Speaker 1: ended up sort of back at square one with the 523 00:30:45,000 --> 00:30:47,920 Speaker 1: Illinois pilot program. It seems like, yeah, the reason why 524 00:30:47,960 --> 00:30:51,400 Speaker 1: the methodolo methodology was so terrible. They used the double 525 00:30:51,440 --> 00:30:56,040 Speaker 1: blind procedure for sequential lineups, but they didn't use it 526 00:30:56,040 --> 00:31:00,560 Speaker 1: for simultaneous lineups. So if cops were advertently or inadvertently 527 00:31:00,720 --> 00:31:04,640 Speaker 1: leading people with simultaneous lineups, then of course those those 528 00:31:04,680 --> 00:31:09,400 Speaker 1: are going to produce um correct choices with suspects better 529 00:31:09,480 --> 00:31:12,880 Speaker 1: than the one that's a double blind sequential one. They 530 00:31:13,080 --> 00:31:17,000 Speaker 1: compared apples to oranges in the study. It's almost like 531 00:31:17,400 --> 00:31:20,320 Speaker 1: a sixth grader came up with how to actually conduct 532 00:31:20,400 --> 00:31:24,680 Speaker 1: the study that the Illinois legislature said, Illinois State Police, 533 00:31:24,720 --> 00:31:27,360 Speaker 1: go go figure this out, to do a three year 534 00:31:27,400 --> 00:31:30,920 Speaker 1: study on this, and they came back and said, huh, 535 00:31:31,520 --> 00:31:35,720 Speaker 1: and it was it's terrible. And the problem is, if 536 00:31:35,760 --> 00:31:39,040 Speaker 1: it is true that a sequential double blind study is 537 00:31:39,080 --> 00:31:40,920 Speaker 1: the way to go, that it is just smarter and 538 00:31:40,960 --> 00:31:45,680 Speaker 1: works better, that study set that back by years because 539 00:31:45,680 --> 00:31:48,680 Speaker 1: now all the cops all over the country heard they 540 00:31:48,720 --> 00:31:51,720 Speaker 1: did the study and it's actually worse not and the 541 00:31:51,800 --> 00:31:57,120 Speaker 1: design of the study was flawed methodologically, just it doesn't work. Yeah. 542 00:31:57,160 --> 00:32:00,880 Speaker 1: They even went to the cops UH at Illinois Pilot 543 00:32:00,960 --> 00:32:03,080 Speaker 1: program talk to them and they said the majority of 544 00:32:03,080 --> 00:32:06,200 Speaker 1: the officers said they didn't think that it was superior 545 00:32:06,720 --> 00:32:09,320 Speaker 1: UH and said that witnesses who can identify the offender 546 00:32:09,360 --> 00:32:13,320 Speaker 1: can do so under either procedure UH and officers express 547 00:32:13,360 --> 00:32:17,040 Speaker 1: concerns that using a blind administrator disrupts the relationship an 548 00:32:17,040 --> 00:32:20,560 Speaker 1: investigator has tries to build with a witness. So I 549 00:32:20,640 --> 00:32:24,560 Speaker 1: interpret all that as it's cops saying, can we just 550 00:32:24,640 --> 00:32:27,520 Speaker 1: keep doing it the way we've always done it because 551 00:32:27,520 --> 00:32:30,680 Speaker 1: it gets results right. But the thing is is, um, 552 00:32:30,800 --> 00:32:33,600 Speaker 1: they have some pretty good points in that if you 553 00:32:33,680 --> 00:32:36,920 Speaker 1: are running a lineup or whatever. You put together like 554 00:32:36,960 --> 00:32:39,120 Speaker 1: a six pack is what it's called in the US, 555 00:32:39,160 --> 00:32:42,440 Speaker 1: where you've got three and three mug shots of people, 556 00:32:43,080 --> 00:32:46,719 Speaker 1: um and or I think in Canada they usually use twelve. 557 00:32:47,160 --> 00:32:49,200 Speaker 1: But you put this thing together, then you have to 558 00:32:49,200 --> 00:32:53,520 Speaker 1: find like a patrol officer or a sergeant or somebody 559 00:32:53,720 --> 00:32:57,560 Speaker 1: who has no idea what's going on with your kids? Right, 560 00:32:57,920 --> 00:33:00,320 Speaker 1: and then those that person is to go to the house, 561 00:33:00,520 --> 00:33:04,840 Speaker 1: record the the what the person did, and then come 562 00:33:04,880 --> 00:33:07,840 Speaker 1: back and tell you. It's just an extra thing that 563 00:33:08,000 --> 00:33:10,240 Speaker 1: cops are like, come on, dude, this is just making 564 00:33:10,280 --> 00:33:12,840 Speaker 1: it way too hard. Yeah. I mean they sit in 565 00:33:12,880 --> 00:33:16,240 Speaker 1: here that sometimes even have trouble coming up with the 566 00:33:16,280 --> 00:33:21,479 Speaker 1: blind administrator. And maybe it's a it probably has everything 567 00:33:21,520 --> 00:33:24,240 Speaker 1: to do with budgets. But my thought is like, why 568 00:33:24,440 --> 00:33:28,640 Speaker 1: isn't there one person that does only this. Oh, that's 569 00:33:28,680 --> 00:33:32,280 Speaker 1: a great question. That just is called the administrator the 570 00:33:32,720 --> 00:33:36,000 Speaker 1: fine of administrator and goes to the people's houses or 571 00:33:36,040 --> 00:33:38,959 Speaker 1: runs them in the in the precinct or whatever, and 572 00:33:39,040 --> 00:33:42,160 Speaker 1: this is the only thing that they do, Right, I'll 573 00:33:42,160 --> 00:33:45,440 Speaker 1: do it. Bring in the administrator. Yeah, that's a TV 574 00:33:45,440 --> 00:33:49,720 Speaker 1: show waiting to happen. Uh Yeah, I don't know, it's 575 00:33:49,720 --> 00:33:53,800 Speaker 1: probably budgetary. Um. They also found with a lot of 576 00:33:53,800 --> 00:33:58,000 Speaker 1: these when there's multiple purpose, it just goes haywire because 577 00:33:58,040 --> 00:34:01,640 Speaker 1: sometimes they'll put two of the purpose in the same lineup, 578 00:34:02,400 --> 00:34:05,280 Speaker 1: right right, so super confusing. That actually falls in line 579 00:34:05,320 --> 00:34:07,960 Speaker 1: with like how to build like a decent line up 580 00:34:08,000 --> 00:34:11,239 Speaker 1: the right way, and we'll cover that and where they 581 00:34:11,280 --> 00:34:15,360 Speaker 1: get people to stand in as suspects right after this, 582 00:34:34,320 --> 00:34:36,239 Speaker 1: All right, Chuck, So you were just talking about how 583 00:34:36,480 --> 00:34:40,400 Speaker 1: if you have a lineup and you put two suspects 584 00:34:40,480 --> 00:34:42,319 Speaker 1: that you've got, say there are two guys who robbed 585 00:34:42,400 --> 00:34:47,120 Speaker 1: some lady, um, and you have five people in the lineup, 586 00:34:47,160 --> 00:34:50,920 Speaker 1: but two of them are your suspects. That actually is 587 00:34:51,040 --> 00:34:55,880 Speaker 1: totally unfair for the suspects because what you've done just 588 00:34:55,960 --> 00:35:00,759 Speaker 1: then is increase the chance that somebody could guess, just 589 00:35:00,920 --> 00:35:05,960 Speaker 1: guess randomly, uh at the suspect. Right. If you have 590 00:35:06,080 --> 00:35:08,560 Speaker 1: five people in a lineup and one of them are 591 00:35:08,640 --> 00:35:10,919 Speaker 1: the suspect, then that person has a one in five 592 00:35:11,000 --> 00:35:13,839 Speaker 1: chance of being chosen by random chance. But if there's 593 00:35:13,840 --> 00:35:17,080 Speaker 1: two suspects in a five person lineup, they have a 594 00:35:17,120 --> 00:35:19,839 Speaker 1: two out of five chance, which is way more than 595 00:35:19,880 --> 00:35:22,359 Speaker 1: a one in five chance. Some people might even say 596 00:35:22,400 --> 00:35:26,720 Speaker 1: double the chance, right, and so it's just less fair. 597 00:35:26,920 --> 00:35:29,200 Speaker 1: So one of the standards that you want to fulfill 598 00:35:29,239 --> 00:35:31,960 Speaker 1: if you're putting together a lineup in your cop is 599 00:35:32,000 --> 00:35:38,080 Speaker 1: that you have one suspect per lineup, which is tougher 600 00:35:38,160 --> 00:35:40,600 Speaker 1: to do than you would think. Yeah, and it seems 601 00:35:40,640 --> 00:35:42,680 Speaker 1: like a lot of the problem with this is uh 602 00:35:42,719 --> 00:35:44,080 Speaker 1: and they even say so in the n i J 603 00:35:44,320 --> 00:35:48,320 Speaker 1: articles that lab studies are one thing, but actually implementing 604 00:35:48,360 --> 00:35:51,840 Speaker 1: this in the field they get different results. And people 605 00:35:51,880 --> 00:35:54,839 Speaker 1: are doing lab research on one end, cops are out 606 00:35:54,840 --> 00:35:57,680 Speaker 1: in the field, sometimes they're in people's homes, sometimes they're 607 00:35:57,719 --> 00:36:00,600 Speaker 1: in the precinct. And it seems like the two heads 608 00:36:00,640 --> 00:36:03,880 Speaker 1: aren't talking very much, and there are people, you know. 609 00:36:03,920 --> 00:36:06,320 Speaker 1: They did like a live web chat at some point 610 00:36:06,680 --> 00:36:08,840 Speaker 1: to bring together all these experts from around the world, 611 00:36:09,160 --> 00:36:11,680 Speaker 1: and they kind of all around me were like, this 612 00:36:11,760 --> 00:36:14,200 Speaker 1: is a big mess and we need to all combined 613 00:36:14,239 --> 00:36:17,120 Speaker 1: forces to try and do the right thing. And the 614 00:36:17,160 --> 00:36:19,320 Speaker 1: feeling I get is that a lot of these police 615 00:36:19,320 --> 00:36:21,960 Speaker 1: precincts just kind of want to be left alone. Sure, 616 00:36:22,080 --> 00:36:24,319 Speaker 1: I mean, they know what works, and it works, you know, 617 00:36:24,840 --> 00:36:28,640 Speaker 1: but does it well, that's the question, So, um, they 618 00:36:28,680 --> 00:36:32,280 Speaker 1: fingered a collar, right, is that the right the gumsh 619 00:36:32,280 --> 00:36:34,960 Speaker 1: you finger to call it? Yeah, then uh, it's it's 620 00:36:35,000 --> 00:36:37,360 Speaker 1: all in a good day's work. But if they fingered 621 00:36:37,360 --> 00:36:44,359 Speaker 1: the wrong collar, then it's no good so um. One 622 00:36:44,360 --> 00:36:48,319 Speaker 1: of the reasons it's somebody cop would put a two 623 00:36:48,320 --> 00:36:51,480 Speaker 1: suspects in a lineup. It's not just to like increase 624 00:36:51,520 --> 00:36:53,600 Speaker 1: the chances that one of those suspects gets picked by 625 00:36:53,600 --> 00:36:56,600 Speaker 1: an eyewitness. It's because sometimes it can be hard to 626 00:36:56,680 --> 00:36:58,800 Speaker 1: come up with people for a lineup. Yeah, this was 627 00:36:58,840 --> 00:37:02,439 Speaker 1: hard to believe, Like they can't find people sometimes, right, Well, 628 00:37:02,480 --> 00:37:04,799 Speaker 1: and the reason why is because let's say you have 629 00:37:04,880 --> 00:37:10,960 Speaker 1: multiple witnesses, and each witness gives you a different description 630 00:37:11,400 --> 00:37:18,440 Speaker 1: of the perpetrator. Right, Ideally, you're going to find a 631 00:37:18,880 --> 00:37:23,799 Speaker 1: different lineup for each witness. Yeah, Like, if there's three witnesses, 632 00:37:24,239 --> 00:37:28,080 Speaker 1: you should run three lineups because their descriptions are probably 633 00:37:28,480 --> 00:37:31,520 Speaker 1: somewhat different. Right. That can be difficult, And there's a 634 00:37:31,520 --> 00:37:33,880 Speaker 1: couple of ways to handle a lineup. You can do 635 00:37:34,080 --> 00:37:39,200 Speaker 1: a suspect matched lineup, where you've got a suspect and 636 00:37:39,520 --> 00:37:43,480 Speaker 1: to keep your suspect from standing out, you make um 637 00:37:43,560 --> 00:37:46,640 Speaker 1: all the other people in the lineup look like you 638 00:37:46,640 --> 00:37:49,680 Speaker 1: know your suspect. That's one way to do it. Another 639 00:37:49,920 --> 00:37:55,200 Speaker 1: is to do the perpetrator description match strategy, which is 640 00:37:55,719 --> 00:37:58,480 Speaker 1: you've got um and that's when you have no suspect, right, 641 00:37:58,560 --> 00:38:02,000 Speaker 1: just ants. You can have a suspect, but you're creating 642 00:38:02,040 --> 00:38:05,839 Speaker 1: your lineup based on what the what the witness has 643 00:38:05,920 --> 00:38:08,200 Speaker 1: described the perpetrator to look like, and then just throw 644 00:38:08,239 --> 00:38:10,239 Speaker 1: the suspect in there right, which can be bad for 645 00:38:10,280 --> 00:38:13,560 Speaker 1: the suspect because if the suspect the person you actually 646 00:38:13,560 --> 00:38:15,719 Speaker 1: think did it, it doesn't look anything like the eye 647 00:38:15,719 --> 00:38:18,279 Speaker 1: witness said that there's gonna be four redheads and the 648 00:38:18,320 --> 00:38:21,360 Speaker 1: one blonde guy who's actually the suspect, he's going to 649 00:38:21,440 --> 00:38:23,399 Speaker 1: stand out like a sore throne. So there's a lot 650 00:38:23,440 --> 00:38:26,040 Speaker 1: of different things that have to be massaged here to 651 00:38:26,120 --> 00:38:29,200 Speaker 1: try to make everybody in the lineup basically look all 652 00:38:29,280 --> 00:38:33,120 Speaker 1: like the perpetrator the eyewitness described, or all like the 653 00:38:33,160 --> 00:38:36,120 Speaker 1: suspect that you've got, because you don't want the suspect 654 00:38:36,120 --> 00:38:37,840 Speaker 1: to stand out. And there's a lot of techniques that 655 00:38:37,880 --> 00:38:41,359 Speaker 1: they used to try to make everybody look the same. Yeah, 656 00:38:41,400 --> 00:38:42,799 Speaker 1: one of the I mean they like you said, they 657 00:38:42,960 --> 00:38:46,440 Speaker 1: dressed people. It was funny that one article said in 658 00:38:46,480 --> 00:38:49,560 Speaker 1: the Bronx Precinct, they usually put them in Yankees hats. Right, 659 00:38:50,880 --> 00:38:52,680 Speaker 1: just line up a bunch of guys and Yankees, right. 660 00:38:52,880 --> 00:38:55,200 Speaker 1: That means that they have like five Yankees hats hanging 661 00:38:55,200 --> 00:38:57,600 Speaker 1: outside of the you know that room where they walk 662 00:38:57,680 --> 00:38:59,880 Speaker 1: them into. Wasn't Cramer in the lineup when he was 663 00:39:00,960 --> 00:39:05,319 Speaker 1: suspect totally serial killer suspect? Yes, I don't remember it 664 00:39:05,320 --> 00:39:06,880 Speaker 1: was a serial killer, but I remember he was in 665 00:39:06,880 --> 00:39:08,799 Speaker 1: the line up. He kept turning the wrong way. Yeah, 666 00:39:08,800 --> 00:39:11,080 Speaker 1: I think he was misidentified on the when they went 667 00:39:11,120 --> 00:39:13,719 Speaker 1: to l A to pitch the TV show, Cramer got 668 00:39:13,719 --> 00:39:16,799 Speaker 1: caught up in some like serial killer thing. I think 669 00:39:16,800 --> 00:39:19,520 Speaker 1: of that, and I think of the great lineup scene 670 00:39:19,520 --> 00:39:23,080 Speaker 1: in The Usual Suspects, which let's address that real quick, 671 00:39:23,160 --> 00:39:26,279 Speaker 1: when they have to say something so well, we can't 672 00:39:26,280 --> 00:39:28,400 Speaker 1: repeat it here because there's bad words. Right. You know, 673 00:39:28,800 --> 00:39:30,880 Speaker 1: what I was going to say is that that lineup 674 00:39:30,920 --> 00:39:33,759 Speaker 1: would never happen because not only do you have two 675 00:39:33,760 --> 00:39:36,480 Speaker 1: suspects in there, all five people in the lineup are 676 00:39:36,520 --> 00:39:40,000 Speaker 1: your suspects, and they're not dressed the same Yep. Yeah, 677 00:39:40,000 --> 00:39:42,880 Speaker 1: it's it's a total movie line up, it would never happen. 678 00:39:43,560 --> 00:39:45,359 Speaker 1: What were you going to say about them saying something? Well, 679 00:39:45,400 --> 00:39:47,480 Speaker 1: they had to recite a line. I don't know how 680 00:39:47,480 --> 00:39:50,960 Speaker 1: typical that is, though, you me. When she did her 681 00:39:51,000 --> 00:39:54,160 Speaker 1: line up, she remembered what the guy was saying, and 682 00:39:54,200 --> 00:39:57,000 Speaker 1: they that, okay, so that's the thing. And she was like, 683 00:39:57,040 --> 00:39:58,759 Speaker 1: wait a minute, can I do they have to say 684 00:39:58,760 --> 00:40:01,399 Speaker 1: whatever I say they said? And the cop was like yeah, 685 00:40:01,440 --> 00:40:04,799 Speaker 1: and she's like, really what I wanted to say? Yeah? 686 00:40:05,000 --> 00:40:07,239 Speaker 1: He's like, no, you have to say what they actually said. 687 00:40:07,480 --> 00:40:11,000 Speaker 1: Oh yeah, how did that result? Did she get the guy? Oh? 688 00:40:11,040 --> 00:40:13,040 Speaker 1: She picked him out of media? Okay, yeah, yeah, I 689 00:40:13,040 --> 00:40:16,560 Speaker 1: think I got busted. Nice man, you don't mug you me. 690 00:40:16,719 --> 00:40:19,960 Speaker 1: I'll tell you that, buddy. You hear that? Purpose right, 691 00:40:20,400 --> 00:40:23,799 Speaker 1: he started quaking in your boots. The one thing, too, 692 00:40:23,800 --> 00:40:26,239 Speaker 1: that caught me sort of off guard is that I 693 00:40:26,320 --> 00:40:29,320 Speaker 1: never thought about is the the part about whether or 694 00:40:29,320 --> 00:40:33,719 Speaker 1: not they're clean shaven, Like there could be details of omission, 695 00:40:34,160 --> 00:40:38,759 Speaker 1: Like if eyewitness doesn't remember or doesn't mention that they 696 00:40:38,800 --> 00:40:41,520 Speaker 1: either were clean shaven or not, then I think they 697 00:40:41,640 --> 00:40:45,520 Speaker 1: default just something that may not be accurate. And so 698 00:40:45,560 --> 00:40:48,040 Speaker 1: all of a sudden you're lineup, well, your lineup should 699 00:40:48,080 --> 00:40:51,000 Speaker 1: have all clean shaven dudes. You should just assume that 700 00:40:51,040 --> 00:40:53,839 Speaker 1: if they didn't say the guy had a beard, that 701 00:40:53,840 --> 00:40:56,719 Speaker 1: that doesn't that that doesn't mean that the guy had 702 00:40:56,719 --> 00:40:58,280 Speaker 1: a beard and they just didn't say it. You should 703 00:40:58,320 --> 00:41:00,720 Speaker 1: just assume it means that they're clean shave, and they 704 00:41:00,760 --> 00:41:02,799 Speaker 1: should all be clean shaven in the lineup, because if 705 00:41:02,840 --> 00:41:05,880 Speaker 1: you have five clean shaven guys and one filler or 706 00:41:05,880 --> 00:41:09,160 Speaker 1: one foil with a big beard like me, I might 707 00:41:09,200 --> 00:41:11,680 Speaker 1: get picked out just because I look different, right exactly, 708 00:41:11,920 --> 00:41:15,120 Speaker 1: Or if if the one guy's clean shaven, and you're like, well, 709 00:41:15,440 --> 00:41:17,600 Speaker 1: they didn't say that the person had a beard, but 710 00:41:17,640 --> 00:41:20,759 Speaker 1: they also didn't say they didn't have a beard. So 711 00:41:20,920 --> 00:41:23,279 Speaker 1: I can put this clean shaven suspect in with four 712 00:41:23,320 --> 00:41:25,600 Speaker 1: other guys who all have beards and make them stand out. 713 00:41:25,960 --> 00:41:29,120 Speaker 1: That's the opposite. And apparently there's this New York Times 714 00:41:29,200 --> 00:41:33,400 Speaker 1: article from years back about a guy named, um what 715 00:41:33,560 --> 00:41:37,400 Speaker 1: was his name, casting agent basically Robert Weston, Yeah, Robert Weston. 716 00:41:37,560 --> 00:41:40,960 Speaker 1: It's it's pretty interesting little article. Um. But in the 717 00:41:41,120 --> 00:41:44,759 Speaker 1: article it says that the Bronx cops that use this 718 00:41:44,800 --> 00:41:46,680 Speaker 1: guy to help fill lineups which we'll talk about in 719 00:41:46,680 --> 00:41:50,800 Speaker 1: a second. Um that that when they give the perpetrators 720 00:41:50,840 --> 00:41:53,879 Speaker 1: like the Yankees, hats or whatever for the lineup, like 721 00:41:54,239 --> 00:41:56,279 Speaker 1: the perpetrator is always the one who pulls it down 722 00:41:56,360 --> 00:41:58,480 Speaker 1: over his eyes, and they have to be like, dude, 723 00:41:58,920 --> 00:42:01,120 Speaker 1: putt see however, but else is wearing their hat makes 724 00:42:01,200 --> 00:42:03,120 Speaker 1: us exactly like that, or else they're going to pick 725 00:42:03,160 --> 00:42:06,400 Speaker 1: you out. So they actually are trying to help the 726 00:42:06,480 --> 00:42:09,279 Speaker 1: perpetrator at least, not stand up and be like me, 727 00:42:10,560 --> 00:42:13,680 Speaker 1: you know, and instead just keep it on the on 728 00:42:13,760 --> 00:42:16,799 Speaker 1: the level, at least as far as the Yankees had 729 00:42:16,880 --> 00:42:20,000 Speaker 1: brooms go. I so want to be a filler. I'm 730 00:42:20,040 --> 00:42:22,080 Speaker 1: sure you could do it. I want to have to 731 00:42:22,120 --> 00:42:24,279 Speaker 1: hang around long enough until the dude who looks like 732 00:42:24,320 --> 00:42:27,319 Speaker 1: you commits a crime, which in Atlanta, I'm sure there's 733 00:42:27,320 --> 00:42:30,120 Speaker 1: a lot of hipsters running around. For sure. I don't 734 00:42:30,120 --> 00:42:33,439 Speaker 1: look like a hipster. I don't know, uh, I look 735 00:42:33,480 --> 00:42:37,000 Speaker 1: like it the hipster gone bad. Oh yeah, I'm not 736 00:42:37,040 --> 00:42:38,360 Speaker 1: need enough to be a hips You look like a 737 00:42:38,440 --> 00:42:41,279 Speaker 1: hit and run hipster. Hipsters are super well cooft and 738 00:42:41,360 --> 00:42:43,719 Speaker 1: like squared Away. Oh I know what you mean. You 739 00:42:43,760 --> 00:42:46,840 Speaker 1: know your your jeans aren't pegged no, I look like 740 00:42:46,880 --> 00:42:50,840 Speaker 1: a hipster who slept in. So back to Robert Weston, 741 00:42:50,960 --> 00:42:53,400 Speaker 1: this guy in New York at the time, at least, 742 00:42:54,360 --> 00:42:56,200 Speaker 1: I can't believe how little money he made. He only 743 00:42:56,200 --> 00:43:00,600 Speaker 1: got ten dollars for putting together a complete lineup. Yeah, 744 00:43:00,920 --> 00:43:02,960 Speaker 1: and they said sometimes he does as many as four 745 00:43:02,960 --> 00:43:05,759 Speaker 1: in a day and sometimes not at all. Like so 746 00:43:05,800 --> 00:43:07,960 Speaker 1: a good day for him is forty bucks. That's what 747 00:43:08,000 --> 00:43:11,120 Speaker 1: it sounds like. Man. Maybe that's the problem is they 748 00:43:11,120 --> 00:43:14,080 Speaker 1: need to Well again, it's budgetary. Probably he's gonna say, 749 00:43:14,280 --> 00:43:16,960 Speaker 1: pay a little bit more, get a casting agent in there, 750 00:43:17,040 --> 00:43:19,719 Speaker 1: get some of those college educated fillers in there, right, 751 00:43:20,400 --> 00:43:22,640 Speaker 1: I guess. And and also it made it sound like, 752 00:43:24,440 --> 00:43:26,400 Speaker 1: I don't know, he's kind of pulling people off the street. 753 00:43:26,680 --> 00:43:30,879 Speaker 1: Sometimes they're homeless people. Sometimes they're like drug addicts. Well yeah, 754 00:43:31,160 --> 00:43:34,080 Speaker 1: I mean, I guess it depends on who the purpose. 755 00:43:34,640 --> 00:43:38,399 Speaker 1: Sometimes they get other cops that aren't busy to stand in, right, 756 00:43:38,640 --> 00:43:40,480 Speaker 1: I mean, these are people there's a real need. People 757 00:43:40,520 --> 00:43:42,880 Speaker 1: will go to a police station and stand in the 758 00:43:42,920 --> 00:43:45,600 Speaker 1: lineup for ten dollars. Right, they get paid as much 759 00:43:45,600 --> 00:43:47,960 Speaker 1: as the guy who organized the party. Right. But if 760 00:43:48,200 --> 00:43:51,360 Speaker 1: Robert Weston stands in himself. He'll get an extra twenty 761 00:43:51,360 --> 00:43:53,480 Speaker 1: bucks on top of putting the thing together right. How 762 00:43:53,520 --> 00:43:56,160 Speaker 1: many times he tries to do that, but he he 763 00:43:56,160 --> 00:43:58,160 Speaker 1: He even said like if they want white guys, I 764 00:43:58,200 --> 00:44:00,400 Speaker 1: don't know any white guys. So they go to homeless 765 00:44:00,440 --> 00:44:03,000 Speaker 1: shelters for that. And that's that's very much what cops do. 766 00:44:03,280 --> 00:44:05,480 Speaker 1: Cops will go find people on the street, they will 767 00:44:05,520 --> 00:44:09,080 Speaker 1: go to homeless shelters. They will have UM casting agents 768 00:44:09,160 --> 00:44:13,399 Speaker 1: like Robert Weston on their speed dial um and what 769 00:44:13,440 --> 00:44:18,360 Speaker 1: they'll say is, I've got a um, middle aged white 770 00:44:18,360 --> 00:44:23,120 Speaker 1: guy with a graying beard, and um he's about six 771 00:44:23,160 --> 00:44:27,160 Speaker 1: ft tall. Give me four other people that match that description, 772 00:44:27,800 --> 00:44:31,960 Speaker 1: and ideally four other people that that match that description 773 00:44:32,000 --> 00:44:34,799 Speaker 1: will show up and not three and then one other 774 00:44:34,880 --> 00:44:37,319 Speaker 1: total outlier or something like that. Well, the one cop 775 00:44:37,400 --> 00:44:39,440 Speaker 1: was complaining about his work, it was kind of funny 776 00:44:40,040 --> 00:44:42,399 Speaker 1: complaining about Robert Weston. He was like, he didn't bring 777 00:44:42,400 --> 00:44:45,600 Speaker 1: in good people. He always like fudges the ages and 778 00:44:45,640 --> 00:44:48,160 Speaker 1: the races and stuff. But the reason why they keep 779 00:44:48,239 --> 00:44:51,640 Speaker 1: using this guy is because he answers his fun doesn't 780 00:44:51,640 --> 00:44:53,719 Speaker 1: matter what time you call him. He can put a 781 00:44:53,760 --> 00:44:55,759 Speaker 1: lineup together for you. And if you have a very 782 00:44:55,800 --> 00:44:58,480 Speaker 1: limited amount of time. You can only hold the suspect 783 00:44:58,480 --> 00:45:00,879 Speaker 1: for so long without charging the them, but you want 784 00:45:00,920 --> 00:45:02,839 Speaker 1: to put them in a lineup for what's called an 785 00:45:02,880 --> 00:45:06,560 Speaker 1: investigatory lineup to where you just want to see maybe 786 00:45:06,560 --> 00:45:09,120 Speaker 1: bringing one witness just to see if you're on the 787 00:45:09,200 --> 00:45:11,839 Speaker 1: right track. You've got a very limited amount of time 788 00:45:11,880 --> 00:45:14,000 Speaker 1: and you need people like that, which means that you 789 00:45:14,040 --> 00:45:17,160 Speaker 1: may have a lower quality one. Fortunately, that would just 790 00:45:17,200 --> 00:45:19,480 Speaker 1: be for an investigatory one. If it were for a 791 00:45:19,560 --> 00:45:22,600 Speaker 1: confirmatory one. That's the one that you see on TV 792 00:45:22,680 --> 00:45:25,399 Speaker 1: where it's like you bring in a witness and you've 793 00:45:25,440 --> 00:45:27,520 Speaker 1: got your suspect and they're sitting in jail and you 794 00:45:27,600 --> 00:45:31,239 Speaker 1: bring them out. That is the one where like all 795 00:45:31,320 --> 00:45:33,440 Speaker 1: the t should be crossed in the eyes should be dotted, 796 00:45:33,719 --> 00:45:37,600 Speaker 1: because a good court, well here, and we'll want to 797 00:45:37,640 --> 00:45:40,440 Speaker 1: know the details of how that lineup went, and if 798 00:45:40,480 --> 00:45:43,400 Speaker 1: anything sounds hinky, they'll toss that lineup right out, that 799 00:45:43,440 --> 00:45:47,839 Speaker 1: eye witness testimony out. The worst possible version of all 800 00:45:47,880 --> 00:45:51,000 Speaker 1: of this is something called a show up. And this 801 00:45:51,040 --> 00:45:52,920 Speaker 1: is something this is also a movie trope that you 802 00:45:52,960 --> 00:45:55,719 Speaker 1: see and that's when an officer brings a witness to 803 00:45:55,800 --> 00:45:59,520 Speaker 1: a place to show the witness the suspect that's been 804 00:45:59,560 --> 00:46:03,359 Speaker 1: apprehend ended. So like they're in the back of a car, 805 00:46:04,040 --> 00:46:06,680 Speaker 1: or here's what happens in the movie. There's a guy 806 00:46:06,719 --> 00:46:09,600 Speaker 1: in the back of a police car handcuffed. They'll bring 807 00:46:09,680 --> 00:46:13,240 Speaker 1: the person who was robbed or whatever there to the scene. 808 00:46:13,640 --> 00:46:15,080 Speaker 1: They'll yank him out of the back of the car 809 00:46:15,160 --> 00:46:18,000 Speaker 1: and say, it's just the dirt bag who did it? 810 00:46:18,160 --> 00:46:21,760 Speaker 1: Like just one guy, and uh, that's clearly the worst 811 00:46:21,840 --> 00:46:23,759 Speaker 1: possible version of all of this, and the guys like, 812 00:46:23,800 --> 00:46:28,719 Speaker 1: I need more pay, I'm coming down. So so one 813 00:46:28,719 --> 00:46:30,640 Speaker 1: of the here's the reason why that show up is 814 00:46:30,680 --> 00:46:33,439 Speaker 1: so terrible, Chuck, Well, there's no other people that they're 815 00:46:33,480 --> 00:46:36,960 Speaker 1: comparing them to. That's one. But they're also in handcuffs, 816 00:46:37,000 --> 00:46:38,799 Speaker 1: in the back of a cop car or something like that. 817 00:46:38,840 --> 00:46:41,480 Speaker 1: They're in police custody. And so the eyewitness is going 818 00:46:41,560 --> 00:46:45,320 Speaker 1: to assume that, in addition to their testimony, the cops 819 00:46:45,360 --> 00:46:48,879 Speaker 1: obviously have something on this person, and so that must 820 00:46:48,880 --> 00:46:50,799 Speaker 1: mean that the cops know it's that person and this 821 00:46:50,840 --> 00:46:53,040 Speaker 1: is just a formality. So I'll be like, yeah, sure, 822 00:46:53,080 --> 00:46:56,160 Speaker 1: that was that person. That's the first problem with it. 823 00:46:56,200 --> 00:46:58,680 Speaker 1: The second problem is is that from that point on, 824 00:46:59,520 --> 00:47:03,319 Speaker 1: that person and that they've just seen now becomes the 825 00:47:03,480 --> 00:47:07,640 Speaker 1: star of their memory of that crime. It's like they 826 00:47:07,680 --> 00:47:12,120 Speaker 1: photoshop this person's face into that vague, shadowy face that's 827 00:47:12,160 --> 00:47:14,920 Speaker 1: holding the gun that they were actually focused on, and 828 00:47:14,960 --> 00:47:17,200 Speaker 1: from that moment on they just get more and more 829 00:47:18,120 --> 00:47:21,120 Speaker 1: certain that that was the person because that person is 830 00:47:21,160 --> 00:47:23,759 Speaker 1: now starring in their memories. And it's not just the 831 00:47:23,800 --> 00:47:27,560 Speaker 1: problem with the show up but with any um misidentification. 832 00:47:28,000 --> 00:47:30,560 Speaker 1: When they see that person and that person becomes seared 833 00:47:30,600 --> 00:47:33,920 Speaker 1: in their brain, they're positive from that point on, and 834 00:47:34,000 --> 00:47:37,080 Speaker 1: they can seem very confident in court, which again juries 835 00:47:37,200 --> 00:47:41,600 Speaker 1: by even though it's garbage, and weeks and months can 836 00:47:41,640 --> 00:47:44,880 Speaker 1: go by between the point that you have experienced a 837 00:47:44,920 --> 00:47:48,279 Speaker 1: crime and when you may be identifying someone or a 838 00:47:48,320 --> 00:47:50,640 Speaker 1: court for sure as months and months and months later. 839 00:47:51,320 --> 00:47:55,080 Speaker 1: So man, part of me does think, like, get rid 840 00:47:55,120 --> 00:47:57,520 Speaker 1: of all this. A lot of people say that, or 841 00:47:57,560 --> 00:48:00,360 Speaker 1: at the very least say, this is I would's test simony. 842 00:48:00,360 --> 00:48:04,399 Speaker 1: It's actually terrible testimony. Actually it's terrible evidence, but let's 843 00:48:04,400 --> 00:48:06,839 Speaker 1: do it right. But and if they did say that, 844 00:48:06,880 --> 00:48:11,200 Speaker 1: if they basically lowered what what how much weight eyewitness 845 00:48:11,280 --> 00:48:14,920 Speaker 1: testimony held in court. Then those cases that were built 846 00:48:15,239 --> 00:48:18,640 Speaker 1: entirely on eyewitness testimony wouldn't have a leg to stand on. 847 00:48:18,719 --> 00:48:21,440 Speaker 1: They have to go build a bigger case. Yeah, but 848 00:48:21,520 --> 00:48:24,400 Speaker 1: like in Umi's case, it worked, it did now it 849 00:48:24,680 --> 00:48:28,520 Speaker 1: like that, right. That's the problem is that you know 850 00:48:28,680 --> 00:48:34,640 Speaker 1: if if of the time is wrong, the time is right, 851 00:48:35,040 --> 00:48:38,400 Speaker 1: we think so, I mean, it's not It's not like 852 00:48:38,600 --> 00:48:41,560 Speaker 1: Arson investigation, which we're gonna do one on one day, 853 00:48:41,560 --> 00:48:44,000 Speaker 1: where it's just totally made up. Like it does have 854 00:48:44,040 --> 00:48:46,399 Speaker 1: some veracity, but there's a lot of flaws with it 855 00:48:46,640 --> 00:48:50,960 Speaker 1: and the really dicey. They need to figure it out 856 00:48:51,640 --> 00:48:54,799 Speaker 1: because of that, So they need to go do that now. 857 00:48:55,120 --> 00:48:58,840 Speaker 1: I mean, can you imagine anything worse than being misidentified 858 00:48:58,920 --> 00:49:03,120 Speaker 1: and serving two decades in prison for something you really 859 00:49:03,160 --> 00:49:07,040 Speaker 1: didn't do? No, I really can't. I mean I remember 860 00:49:07,040 --> 00:49:09,080 Speaker 1: how said I got when we did the Innocence Project. 861 00:49:09,160 --> 00:49:11,359 Speaker 1: It's just you hear these stories and then they get 862 00:49:11,360 --> 00:49:14,239 Speaker 1: out and they're like, man, here's there's four thousand bucks. 863 00:49:14,280 --> 00:49:16,279 Speaker 1: We feel pretty bad, right, go get yourself something nice. 864 00:49:16,320 --> 00:49:19,040 Speaker 1: Try to forget about all this, right. Yeah, did you 865 00:49:19,080 --> 00:49:21,800 Speaker 1: ever see that movie An Innocent Man with Tom Selick? 866 00:49:24,680 --> 00:49:27,560 Speaker 1: It's scared the Bejesus out of me. The same thing 867 00:49:27,600 --> 00:49:30,279 Speaker 1: happened to him when he was when he was he 868 00:49:30,480 --> 00:49:34,520 Speaker 1: was framed. Oh wait, that's high road to China. All right, 869 00:49:35,080 --> 00:49:37,399 Speaker 1: I got my stuff, makes it? No, that's quickly down 870 00:49:37,480 --> 00:49:41,040 Speaker 1: under that right? Uh? You got anything else? Nope? All right, 871 00:49:41,040 --> 00:49:43,799 Speaker 1: Well that's it for police lineups for now. We'll do 872 00:49:43,880 --> 00:49:46,120 Speaker 1: an update whenever they get it figured out. We did 873 00:49:46,120 --> 00:49:50,200 Speaker 1: one on police catches, right, Okay, is this it we've done? No? 874 00:49:50,360 --> 00:49:53,040 Speaker 1: We still got arson in the section. We got a 875 00:49:53,040 --> 00:49:58,520 Speaker 1: lot all right, um, yeah, okay, okay. If you want 876 00:49:58,520 --> 00:50:01,160 Speaker 1: to know more about police line ups then I don't know, 877 00:50:01,239 --> 00:50:03,000 Speaker 1: go hang around a police station. See if you can 878 00:50:03,040 --> 00:50:06,279 Speaker 1: stand in one, learn firsthand. Okay. Get a little sign 879 00:50:06,360 --> 00:50:11,160 Speaker 1: that says I will be your foil ten dollars. Uh. 880 00:50:11,200 --> 00:50:13,680 Speaker 1: And since I said ten dollars, it's time for listener Matt. 881 00:50:16,400 --> 00:50:19,920 Speaker 1: I'm gonna call this youngest fan is very cute email. Hey, guys, 882 00:50:19,920 --> 00:50:23,239 Speaker 1: love the podcast. You're doing it right? Uh, it's not 883 00:50:23,400 --> 00:50:26,960 Speaker 1: a Uh this email is not episode specific, but I 884 00:50:26,960 --> 00:50:28,560 Speaker 1: had to tell you about this. My husband and I 885 00:50:28,600 --> 00:50:30,839 Speaker 1: welcomed to our baby boy into the world a couple 886 00:50:30,840 --> 00:50:32,880 Speaker 1: of months ago, when I was pregnantly joked that the 887 00:50:32,920 --> 00:50:35,160 Speaker 1: baby would think that one of you was his dad 888 00:50:35,640 --> 00:50:39,640 Speaker 1: because he heard your voices so often. Ah, that's a 889 00:50:39,719 --> 00:50:43,799 Speaker 1: very funny joke in the family, you know, joke about 890 00:50:43,880 --> 00:50:47,560 Speaker 1: the paternity of your childhood. Uh. Now that he's here, 891 00:50:47,640 --> 00:50:49,960 Speaker 1: I've been playing music in the car instead of the podcast, 892 00:50:50,400 --> 00:50:53,160 Speaker 1: thinking music helps calm him. Well, one day he was 893 00:50:53,200 --> 00:50:54,839 Speaker 1: crying and crying in the car. I couldn't get him 894 00:50:54,880 --> 00:50:57,040 Speaker 1: to calm down. She was like, what's wrong with Doc? 895 00:50:57,200 --> 00:51:00,760 Speaker 1: And why is it doc and working? Uh. It couldn't 896 00:51:00,760 --> 00:51:02,400 Speaker 1: get him calmed down with any the usual tricks. So 897 00:51:02,440 --> 00:51:03,840 Speaker 1: I decided to heck with it. I'm gonna put on 898 00:51:03,840 --> 00:51:06,080 Speaker 1: the podcast and a kid you not. As soon as 899 00:51:06,120 --> 00:51:09,080 Speaker 1: you guys started talking, he stopped crying. My husband says 900 00:51:09,080 --> 00:51:13,880 Speaker 1: it was coincidence. Jealous, I say, stuff, you should know magic. 901 00:51:14,719 --> 00:51:17,440 Speaker 1: Now we're now we're back to always listening to you 902 00:51:17,480 --> 00:51:19,600 Speaker 1: guys in the car. Keep up with great work and 903 00:51:19,600 --> 00:51:22,480 Speaker 1: thanks for soothing my baby boy. And that is from 904 00:51:22,880 --> 00:51:28,880 Speaker 1: Sarah Strantz and our youngest fan, Frank from beautiful Mount Pleasant, 905 00:51:28,920 --> 00:51:32,439 Speaker 1: South Carolina. That's awesome. Thank you so much for that email. Frank, 906 00:51:32,520 --> 00:51:35,319 Speaker 1: go to sleep. Quiet now they named their baby after 907 00:51:35,360 --> 00:51:39,440 Speaker 1: our chair? Yeah right, that's pretty wouldn't that be amazing 908 00:51:39,480 --> 00:51:43,080 Speaker 1: if they actually did? Uh? And thank you also to 909 00:51:43,200 --> 00:51:46,960 Speaker 1: unnamed husband for being a good sport. Agreed. If you 910 00:51:47,000 --> 00:51:50,160 Speaker 1: want to send us agree email about how we're magic, 911 00:51:50,600 --> 00:51:52,640 Speaker 1: you can hang out with us on social media. Just 912 00:51:52,719 --> 00:51:55,240 Speaker 1: go to our website, Stuff you Should Know dot com. 913 00:51:55,280 --> 00:51:57,400 Speaker 1: And you can also send us an email to Stuff 914 00:51:57,480 --> 00:52:04,960 Speaker 1: podcast at how stuff works dot com. Yeah for more 915 00:52:05,000 --> 00:52:07,120 Speaker 1: on this and thousands of other topics. VI is it 916 00:52:07,160 --> 00:52:14,719 Speaker 1: how stuff works dot com? H