WEBVTT - College Football Week 11 Preview (Ep. 127)

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 1>It's time to place your bets. Let's talk to the pros.

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:19.799
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to betting pros. It's me, Joey p Joe, Pieza, Pia,

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:22.480
<v Speaker 1>That of course is Scott Bogman, and it's you, and

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:25.280
<v Speaker 1>today it's all about college football. That's right. I had

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>a week off so special. Thank you to Bogman for

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:32.879
<v Speaker 1>being able to hold the fort down without me. I

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>know that was probably very easy to do, but I

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:38.239
<v Speaker 1>thank him anyway. And of course we're gonna recap what

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:41.480
<v Speaker 1>happened in week ten in college football and look ahead

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to week eleven. Already, some fun things going on here, Bogs.

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I missed you. It is good to see you again

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:51.160
<v Speaker 1>this week, my friend. I don't like going a certain

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 1>period of time without talking to you.

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 2>It's just that's right.

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Oh, anything over a week is too much.

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 2>So we're right at the cutoff here.

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, sixteights, I think, yeah, yeah, exactly. So you know

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 3>I missed you too. Luckily my guy Nick was able

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:07.759
<v Speaker 3>to fill in. We had a good time talking about

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 3>these games. Didn't like being hosts, though, I like being

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 3>analysts on these more than hosts, So you know, back

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 3>to normal.

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy, Yes, back to normal. And as you could see, also,

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>he's got the Vince Young jersey hung up. Now he's

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>got the fancy soundproofing. Look at you getting a big.

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Time on me, Scott trying to be a professional. You know.

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 1>Let me know how that works out. I'm still trying

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:34.400
<v Speaker 1>as well. But in the meantime, let's do a college

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:36.559
<v Speaker 1>football show, and let's first talk about what we learned

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>for week ten. I gotta tell you, when I got

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>back from my little mini vacation with the children for

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>a couple of days, I did catch some of the

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>highlights from this Perdue game. And one of my favorite

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>plays that I've seen all year in college football was

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that little trick play that they ran. Where are they fake?

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>And off one way, handoff the other way? Throw the

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>quarterback and five offensive linemen in front of that guy.

0:01:57.080 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>And I'm watching this, and I'm looking at it saying

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>to myself, well, that is spectacular play design. Look at this,

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>five guys in front of the one with a giant wall.

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 1>You couldn't draw it up better than that. And look purduce,

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the Kingslayer.

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:12.919
<v Speaker 3>These days they are they're the big game hunters, is

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 3>what I've been calling them. They take that number two Iowa,

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:17.519
<v Speaker 3>they take that number three Michigan State.

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 2>So they're a lot of fun to watch.

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 3>And they got another opportunity this week against Ohio State,

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:25.079
<v Speaker 3>so we'll see if the big game hunting streak can

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:26.119
<v Speaker 3>continue here for them.

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a lot to ask, but I don't

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>want to blow what we're doing next to the show

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and want to tease that around anything else that you

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>learned for Week ten from watching those games.

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean Bama Ohio State, and since he all survived

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:43.119
<v Speaker 3>another scare, you know, since he just like ever since

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:45.519
<v Speaker 3>everyone's been complaining about them not being number two in

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 3>the cfpeople, they have played like garbage. So it's still

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 3>winning and I think they're up to five now if

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm not mistaken, So they're up there.

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Bama.

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 3>Look, Bama is still very very good, but they're not

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 3>the you know, bullet roof Alabama team that we've been

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:04.080
<v Speaker 3>used to over the last few seasons. So, you know,

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 3>Georgia seems to be that team in Ohio State. Ohio

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 3>State had beaten everyone by twenty one points since the

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Oregon lost and then played you know, Nebraska hung with

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:16.839
<v Speaker 3>them that whole game. And uh, that's my fault. It's

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 3>because I put them in my in my article this week.

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 3>So I'm gonna take the run of that this week.

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 3>I think they'll get back on track eventually here. But

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 3>those were all pretty big ones. And then the one

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 3>that pissed me off the most, Joe, was TCU upsetting

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 3>Baylor after firing their head coach and having a first

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 3>time starting quarterback. And Baylor's been ranked, they've been great

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 3>this whole year and they completely blow that game to TCU.

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 3>And I was just like, well, of course this happens.

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 3>And Nick even warned me about it. He said, well,

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 3>you know the teams that fire their head coach.

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I was just gonna say, football guy, I'm a football guy.

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Every time you fire a head coach is like an

0:03:56.120 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>automatic w whether it's the NFL, whether it's college. It's crazy.

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>You need to you know what Baylor should do. It's

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>just fire head coach every single week and they'll be undefeated.

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 3>Baylor is so much better than TCU, though, Like it's

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 3>just it's one of those things where it's like I

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 3>know the trend, but come on, it's Baylor and TCU.

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 2>I know it's a road game, too.

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 3>It didn't work the part of the reason why I

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 3>had a you know, two games below five hundred week here,

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 3>tied for my worst week at three and seven, but

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:25.600
<v Speaker 3>still over five hundred for the year. So we will

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 3>get better and I still trust my lodge. You know,

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 3>a lot of those games I missed by a hair

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 3>here and a hair there, so you know, it is

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 3>what it is. Everyone has those weeks. But we will

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:36.119
<v Speaker 3>get better this week for sure.

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, look, I wasn't here, so it might as well

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>never have happened.

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 2>So that's right.

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So if I'm not here, it doesn't exist. That's

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:44.359
<v Speaker 1>why I always say, let's talk about the games that

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Bogman likes this week for a week and leven. Let's

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:50.359
<v Speaker 1>start with North Carolina at twenty fifth rank Pitt Pitt

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>is six and a half favorites and this one the

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>number seventy three. Pretty big number here, Bogs. Do you

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:57.799
<v Speaker 1>think this can live up to the hype?

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:02.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, I stupidly took the on the UNC Wake Forest

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 3>game last week, and I'll never do that again, So

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 3>definitely take the over seventy three here. You know, they

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 3>went over one hundred UNC and Wake last week. I

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 3>don't think they're going to get to that total this week.

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 3>But PIT is seven to two against the spread. UNC

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:17.359
<v Speaker 3>is four and five, but they're six and three to

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 3>playing to the over. Pitt is also seven and two

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 3>playing to the over, which is why I think this

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 3>game will go to the over. But I think in

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:27.159
<v Speaker 3>terms of playing this game against the spread, you know,

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 3>both these teams very very good on offense. Pitt first

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:34.719
<v Speaker 3>in scoring, u n C eleventh in scoring, but PITT

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 3>is forty fifth in scoring defense and UNC is one

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 3>hundred and tenth, So it's pretty easy Pit in the

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 3>fighting Kenny Picketts for the Panthers here. So I think

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 3>the Panthers win this one going away. But I do

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 3>also think that this game goes over. This it's the

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:52.839
<v Speaker 3>biggest total of the week, and I think.

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>It's just say it's a giant number. So if this

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:57.720
<v Speaker 1>goes over, this is what everybody should be watching because

0:05:57.720 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be entertaining football.

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 2>First name man, it's gonna be on.

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 3>You know you want to watch that or do you

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:05.160
<v Speaker 3>want to watch Baltimore and Miami.

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 2>I think I might rather watch Pitt.

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I do like watching Lamar, but I'm tempted. I'm tempted

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>with the seventy three.

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 2>That's why I have two screens in here. I can

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 2>watch both.

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 1>What happened?

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 2>You know?

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Picture and picture was like a thing when I was

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>growing up as a kid. I was gonna be the

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>big technology. And then I remember having a TV in

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the early two thousands that had it, and now you

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>never see that anymore. I don't understand why can't you

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>split four screens on a big seventy five inch TV? Now,

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't why you can't do that.

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, maybe you can, but I feel like the

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 3>maybe something with the cable companies in the box. It's

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 3>just not something they offer. It's like they want you

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 3>to buy more TVs.

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:43.279
<v Speaker 1>Somebody at the TV company got together with somebody over.

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 2>TVs so cheap. Why wouldn't you buy them?

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>You know that's true, But I mean space maybe that's

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>why why if I have a giant TV, why can't

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I just split the screen four ways? Anyway, these are

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>problems that need solving, also problem these are first world problems.

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>These are definitely people number nine Michigan at Penn State.

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:09.279
<v Speaker 1>Penn State really favored in this one by half a point.

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 2>They're at home.

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't care. They're terrible. No, I'm sick of Penn State.

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't care anymore. Forty eight and a half. They're

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Penn State. So let's still get a bowl game invitation.

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>But they're dead to me. I'm over it. Are they

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 1>dead to you? Here? I mean, can't we just take

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>number nine Michigan and call a day? Here?

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's what I'm doing.

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, Michigan seven and two against the spread, Penn

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 3>State six and three, though they're good against the spread,

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 3>but this one's easy Michigan for me. Penn State is

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 3>a one dimensional offense, twenty fifth of passing one hundred

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 3>and seventeenth and rushing. Michigan is ninth against the pass

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 3>this year. I think that's the big disconnect in this game.

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 3>Homefield advantage is enormous for Penn State, though, So I

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 3>do think this is going to play closer. I mean,

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 3>ninety percent of cash when I look this up. You know,

0:07:56.320 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 3>late last night was on Michigan, so understand people taking Michigan.

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 2>I think it's going to be close.

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 3>And I wouldn't say Michigan is great on offense and

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 3>Penn State is still really good on defense, but they've been.

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Trying out new stuff. Man. You know, they tried new personnel.

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 2>They tried to pass the ball a little bit more.

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 3>They've been mixing in JJ McCarthy, the backup quarterback as well,

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 3>just to get something different, which I don't really like

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 3>mixing the quarterbacks. But they're trying things, which is very

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 3>unlike Harbaugh and Michigan. And that's why I like them

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 3>in this game. I think they win this one, but

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 3>I do think it plays very, very much closer than

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 3>you expect. But I mean, if you're watching this game,

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:38.560
<v Speaker 3>you gotta watch Shahan Dotson man. He wide receiver for

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Penn State. He is so much faster than everyone on

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 3>the field. You can just see the NFL speed there.

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 3>It's a lot of fun to watch.

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, that might be the only fun thing to watch

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>when you're watching Penn State nowadays. Number one ranked Georgia

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 1>is twenty point favorites at Tennessee the numbers fifty six

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and a half. Is this just as simple as Georgia

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and the Under?

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Yeah, And it's for me.

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 3>It's Georgia and the Under moving forward until we see

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 3>them not do it. They control the pace of every

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 3>game this year. This game is gonna be no different.

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 3>Georgia has a cupcake in the FCSAR Charleston Southern. So

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 3>after this game again Tennessee, so they're not looking forward

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 3>to a tough matchup or anything. I think they pound

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:19.200
<v Speaker 3>Tennessee into the ground. So I would take Tennessee and

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:23.679
<v Speaker 3>take the under fifty six. It gets a little dicey,

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 3>but you know, because I guarantee you the first half

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 3>will play it a pace to go over. But then

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 3>Georgia will be up and they will sit on the

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 3>ball the whole fourth quarter and probably block a field

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 3>goal or two in this game too. It's just this

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 3>is Georgia easy.

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Perdue at number six. Ohio State Ohio State little, as

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.199
<v Speaker 1>you said, a little little close last week with Nebraska

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Perdue coming off another big w there. So is there

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>any scripture can write for anything differently? And do you

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 1>think last week's performance from both teams is going to

0:09:58.840 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>impact this week's wage?

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:04.680
<v Speaker 3>Not really, it will well, I mean it'll impact the

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 3>wagering for sure, because most people are on Purdue here.

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 3>But you know, look, Ohio State didn't beat Nebraska against

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 3>the spread because I picked them. We all know that, right,

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 3>So we can put that to bed. But I know

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 3>that Purdue has been the big game hunters, taking down

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 3>number two Iowa, number three Michigan State, and I get

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 3>number six Ohio State. But the Buckeyes they got beat

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 3>early against Oregon. They had their scare last week when

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 3>they played Nebraska. I think this is the letdown spot

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:35.679
<v Speaker 3>for Purdue, not Ohio State. I like the under here

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 3>because Purdue is playing tough defense this year. I just

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 3>don't think it's going to be enough to slow down

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 3>Ohio State. And Ohio State should be able to contain

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 3>Purdue better than the other two top five teams that

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 3>the boiler Makers beat this year did so I just

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:55.319
<v Speaker 3>I think this is an Ohio State drubbing and I'm

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:56.679
<v Speaker 3>going to take them and lay the points.

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 1>All right, Let's move on to Miami too, and a

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>half point favorites a f Florida State. The number for

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>this one is sixty one. Neither of these teams good

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>against the spread, So what do you do here in

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>this one?

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, look, and I picked Miami last week and

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 3>it didn't work out, But you know, both these teams

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 3>suck against the spread.

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 2>But I think Florida State straight up sucks.

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 3>I think they're right, Miami's dealt with some injuries, but

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 3>they put three straight wins together against much tougher competition

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:30.079
<v Speaker 3>than FSU was played. NC State Pit, Georgia Tech. Those

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 3>are hard teams to beat. Miami beat them all. They're

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 3>only two and a half point favorites here. I know

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 3>things can get weird in a rivalry games, so I'm

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 3>definitely not gonna put this one in my article or

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 3>anything because of the wackiness of rivalry games here.

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:46.080
<v Speaker 2>But I think Miami wins this one pretty easy.

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 1>All right. Michigan State eighth ranked at home thirteen point

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:53.079
<v Speaker 1>favorites against Maryland. Something to prove here this week for

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Michigan State, you think?

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 2>I think so.

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 3>They got to respond after coughing up to their undefeated

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 3>season to Purdue. In all four of Maryland's losses, they've

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 3>also lost against the spread, and I don't see this

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 3>game being much different, especially as a road game for

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:11.679
<v Speaker 3>the Terrapins. Michigan State does have the dead last passing

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 3>defense in the country one hundred and thirtieth. A lot

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 3>of that is probably because teams are playing catch up

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 3>against them, right, and that can't be overlooked Because I've

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 3>let it. I've made excuses for Michigan State before with that,

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:29.200
<v Speaker 3>but Maryland is ninety seventh in scoring defense. The Spartan

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 3>should roll right over them. They should control the clock.

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 3>I think this is Michigan State drubbing, but I'm not

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 3>gonna put it in the leans because I do think

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 3>Michigan State wins this one going away. But just understand

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 3>that if litl TUA looks good, that is the reason why.

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 3>Because Michigan State cannot stop anything as far as their

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 3>pass game goes.

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>So what about the sixty one and a half in

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 1>this game?

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 2>I play the over. I play the over on that

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:53.479
<v Speaker 2>for sure.

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>All right. Next is eleventh ranked Texas A and M

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>two and a half point favorites at number twelve ranked

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Old Miss fifty five and a half is the number.

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>These are two teams I guess theoretically are close to

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 1>each other. But what's your take on this game?

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I have this one that likes to and I

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 3>hate that I'm gonna go with Texas A and M.

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 3>But I think I have to. This is gonna be

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 3>who can control the ball in the pace of this game.

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 3>I think at Texas A and M, I think is

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 3>going to control the pace at the twenty seventh slowest

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:23.119
<v Speaker 3>pace in the country, which will pressure All Miss into mistakes.

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:25.439
<v Speaker 3>But Texas A and M has lost some games even

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 3>in a slow pace. They controlled the pace against Arkansas,

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 3>still lost that one. I mean, Arkansas plays to a

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 3>slower pace too, but Arkansas is pretty flexible. We've seen them,

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, play a game that goes over one hundred

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 3>points and beat Texas A and M twenty to ten,

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 3>so they're kind of, you know, more of a switch.

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 3>But they controlled the pace against Arkansas still one lost

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 3>that game. And then even though the game went over

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 3>against Mississippi State, one of only three games for Mississippi

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 3>State under fifty points, they lost that one too. But

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 3>the magic number here is twenty seven. All Miss has

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 3>lost both games they scored under twenty seven points with

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 3>the injuries at they got a ton of injuries, a

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:06.959
<v Speaker 3>wideout Ole Miss does Matt Crowe, I don't think he's

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 3>even practiced to this point this week, and it's Wednesday.

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 3>I think Texas A and M wins this one, even

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 3>as a road game, and I think they win it

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 3>by more than two and a half points because they

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 3>just don't think, you know, Ole Miss Liberty played them

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 3>tough last week, so they just don't have a lot

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 3>of juice on offense right now with so many players.

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Hur TCU at tenth ranked Oklahoma State. Oklahoma State is

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>thirteen point favorites. Fifty four and a half is the

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>number in this one. Oklahoma State good against the spread

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 1>on this year, TCU not. Is this the letdown game for.

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 3>TCU, absolutely letdown spot, one hundred percent. Okay State seven

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 3>and two against the spread, TCUs two, six and one,

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 3>and I look, I'm just gonna go ahead and doubt

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 3>them again. And you know, I've done this a couple

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 3>of times and it hasn't worked out for me.

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 2>But I'm fairly.

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 3>Confident this one is gonna work out for me. Absolute

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 3>leftdown spot for TCU. After the big win against Baylor,

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 3>I'll be taking Okay State here as a I don't

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 3>think TCU will be able to catch lightning in avolved twice.

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 3>TCU is still down their top running back, Zach Evans.

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 3>I think Okay State is just a much better team.

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 3>They won't be looking ahead. They got Texas Tech next week.

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 3>Okay State in an absolute beatdown. Baylor was looking forward

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 3>to this Oklahoma game, so I think that this is

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 3>a SmackDown f Okay State.

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, So those are all the likes. Let's move

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to the leans here and we'll start with first Oklahoma,

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>fourth ranked in the nation, five and a half point

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>favorites on the road at Baylor ranked eighteenth coming off

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>their losses we talked about. So after that, is this

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>where you know Baylor gets checked yet again here? Because

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>one would think here with fourth rank Oklahoma that this

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>should be a pretty strong performance there from Oklahoma against Baylor.

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Again the number sixty two and a half. So is

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>it just as simple as that or you have a

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit of worry here?

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I don't like this game.

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 3>I think it's gross Oklahoma, like you said, they're bad

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 3>against the spread. Baylor's been pretty good against the spread

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 3>outside last week. I think that Baylor was looking past

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 3>TCU obviously the struggles that TCU has had this year.

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 2>They fired their head.

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 3>Coach, they the first time starter and Chandler Morris, all

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 3>that stuff, and they're looking forward to this game. I

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 3>think this could be the week that Oklahoma gets exposed.

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 3>They're nine to zero, but have had so many close

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 3>calls it's crazy. But statistically this isn't the matchup to

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 3>end OU streak. Ou has a great passing offense, Baylor's

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 3>below average and passing defense, and Baylor has a great

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 3>rush offense and OU defending the run is what they

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 3>do best. So the matchup on paper is bad for Baylor.

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 3>So I'll take Oklahoma here, but I wouldn't be surprised

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 3>for this game goes either way, so I'll stay away

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 3>from it.

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 2>As far as laying my own money.

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Down, Mississippi State at sixteenth ranked Auburn. Auburn at home

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>is five and a half point favorites. The number is

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>fifty in this one. I'm not a big bon Knicks guy,

0:16:56.920 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>but do you think they could just do enough to

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>get to this fire and a half number.

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 3>I think you look at this and you go, this

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 3>is definitely Auburn. But I think I look at this

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 3>and I go, I'm taking the over for sure.

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Fifty points. I'll take the over.

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 3>Both these teams played to the under more often, but

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:16.880
<v Speaker 3>the average score. If you took the average offensive score

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:19.640
<v Speaker 3>both these teams, this game would be a fifty eight

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 3>point game. Defensively it would be forty six, So you're

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 3>asking to score five more points then they usually give

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 3>up two SEC teams, two SEC teams that play specifically

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 3>Mississippi State much better on offense than they do on defense,

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 3>so I have no idea who win this game. Bonicks

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 3>has been playing great, but was awful against Texas A

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 3>and M, which isn't a big surprise because the Aggies

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 3>played good defense. You know, they beat Bama. Mississippi State

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 3>has been great. They lost to Memphis, Arkansas and LSU

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 3>buy a field goal, but they beat Kentucky, Vandy and

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 3>Texas A and M. The only blowout loss that they've

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:56.880
<v Speaker 3>had was to Alabama. So my prediction for this game.

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 3>It'll be close, but go over. Missippi State has gone

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 3>over fifty and six of nine games, Auburn five of

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 3>nine games, So throw out the spread.

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 2>Play the over in this game.

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's what you've all been waiting for. Seventh rank

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame five and a half point favorites at Virginia

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>sixty four and a half is the number. Scott Bogman,

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 1>you are the worst when it comes to Notre Dame.

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's go Seanna. You are the best in life and

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:27.639
<v Speaker 1>in sports. You're my favorite person. You know that. But

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of Notre Dame. Let's call what is It's

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:32.400
<v Speaker 1>been rough? So what do you want to do with them?

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>In Week eleven?

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 2>You too, I think I have to take him here.

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 2>So this is going to be a lean.

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 3>But Virginia quarterback Brennan Armstrong is very questionable, very very questionable,

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 3>and even if he plays in this game, you got

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 3>to assume that he's not one hundred percent. And he's

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 3>been I mean, his name has come up in Heisman

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 3>talks because he's been so good. He's a really good

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 3>running quarterback, but he's been doing it passing this year.

0:18:57.040 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 3>So he's been He's had an incredible season, but the

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 3>whole offense revolves around him. So I would love to

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 3>tell you that I'm taking Notre Dame and locking it up,

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 3>but they've tortured me all year. So I'll just say

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 3>I love the under, the under sixty four and a half.

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 3>As Brendan Armstrong has been banged up and Notre Dame,

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 3>you know they love to wait until the fourth quarter

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 3>to score point, So give me, give me Notre Dame

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 3>and the under here. More confident in the under for sure.

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 1>Could say that about Penn State also, but yeah, I

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>think the under sounds about right to me. I think

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:29.679
<v Speaker 1>I think we're pretty safe there on the under in

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>this one. Last one in the Leans, Washington State at

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:35.640
<v Speaker 1>fifth rank Oregon Oregon fourteen point favorites in this one

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 1>fifty six and a half. Is that fourteen too big

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 1>of a number? Box? The Oregon is.

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:42.639
<v Speaker 3>Three and six against the spread, so I just really,

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 3>they really haven't had an impressive game outside of the

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 3>Ohio State win. Washington State isn't good, but they just

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:52.880
<v Speaker 3>beat Arizona State, who you know, I think is better

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 3>than them. They only lost the BYU by two. They

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 3>beat Stanford, who beat Oregon and really haven't been bad

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 3>for the past month. You know, this is another team

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 3>that they're you know, they didn't fire their head coach,

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 3>but Rollovich you know, refused to do the vaccine stuff

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 3>and federal jobs, so he got canned.

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Another team that responded after their coach left.

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 3>I think that Oregon should beat the crap out of Wazoo,

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 3>but that's just not how these games have been going

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 3>for them. So I'm gonna take Washington State, but I'm

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 3>gonna put this in the Leans for sure.

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:27.679
<v Speaker 2>I go over fifty six and a half is what

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 2>I would say.

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, last one here, actually no eight.

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 2>That's is the last one.

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>That is the last one. I thought we had one more,

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>but we don't. My goodness, time flies when you're having fun,

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Scott Bogmin, but it could be more college football. Make

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 1>sure you head over to Bettingpros dot com. We've got

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>all the consensus lines there from all the different houses,

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 1>so you can make all of your wagers in different

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 1>places and get the best possible odds you can get anywhere.

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:53.159
<v Speaker 1>And of course you can also check out all of

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Scott Bogman's right up every week for the college Football

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 1>slate over on Bettingpros dot com as well, and follow

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>him on the Twitter machine at Bogman's Sports. That'll do

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>it for us, But the story of the game goes

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 1>on for Scott Boggin. I'm Joey P. We'll see you

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:09.640
<v Speaker 1>next time, kids,