WEBVTT - Inflation Data Outlook, Fintech, SALT, Ukraine Latest

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.120
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. This week, we're gonna

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>get some economic data, particularly some inflation data. We have

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>CPI tomorrow, pp I Wednesday, and we also have a

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve which is adamant in fighting inflation. So a

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:34.879
<v Speaker 1>lot of moving parts here that are gonna play into, uh,

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>what we may hear from the Federal Reserve next week.

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:39.599
<v Speaker 1>And when we talk Federal Reserve and interest rates and policy,

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:42.639
<v Speaker 1>we need to go to Danielle di Martino, Booth CEO

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and chief strategist for Quill Intelligence, former advisor at the

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. Danielle, thanks so much for

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:52.559
<v Speaker 1>joining us here. Again, a lot of inflation data we're

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna get today. What do you think the Federal Reserve

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>is really going to be focusing on? Well, I think

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that they're gonna go ahead and fade what they see

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>in in the headline CPI. I think that that has

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>been so well broadcast across so many different channels that

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be They're gonna really have their eye more

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>on the stickiness of the core and whether that is

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:18.559
<v Speaker 1>as as if as it's expected ticks up to six.

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Um My buddy, Ivy's Elman, who has been a longtime

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>veteran of the housing industry. She sees housing shelter both

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>O E R and rent. She sees that peaking at

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:34.960
<v Speaker 1>seven in the fall year over year. Now, that's that

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>is that's a good hundred and fifty basis point above

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>what it was. Yeah, Ivy's the best. I used to

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>work with Ivy back in today on the housing biz.

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Um So if you're the Federal Reserve, I mean, alright,

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>seventy five basis points as we get to next week.

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>But I guess that's that that's baked in. Is it

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>more just kind of the body language we get about

0:01:56.960 --> 0:01:59.639
<v Speaker 1>whether we pause and see if this stuff actually works

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>or whether we just keep moving higher. Well, I think

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>what we're going to be focused on are the things

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>that are less in the Fed's control, and that would

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>be what our food price is going to do. I

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>was seeing a report on on the terminal last night

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>that really really hot, blazing temperatures out west. That's affecting

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 1>how much we're paying for produce um. I think a

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of it is going to depend on on how

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>sticky rents are. Rents have begun to peek out. But

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>even in a shorter LAG world, which I argue and

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that's one of the things that people should

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>be paying close attention to. The effect of LAG has

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>been compressed monetary policies working faster. But that being said,

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>if Annie May figures, it figures it takes five quarters

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to see shelter inflation move its way through the c

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 1>p I, we still got high housing inflation for several

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>more quarters. So I've got a listener writing in Danielle

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:56.639
<v Speaker 1>and asks is if we get a five percent print,

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>is that high enough to get the Fed to continue

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>hikeing into a weakening environment? Or or what what cp

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:08.079
<v Speaker 1>I print matters in terms of the actual numbers? Well,

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and look, until the job is done, I mean, how

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>much more explicit can J Powell be? I don't think.

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think four is going to be acceptable. So

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:21.079
<v Speaker 1>until we're until we're back headed back down towards two percent,

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>which I guess we all interpret as three is headed

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>towards two. Right. Yeah, well, I mean that's that's kind

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of what the European Cential Bank alluded to its communications

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>last last week, is that three might be the new two.

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:34.679
<v Speaker 1>And but but in order for us to get there,

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>most of the work that's been done shows that you

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>have to have an appreciably bigger bump up in your

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>unemployment rate. And I think that that's where the focus is,

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's intriguing that, um that only Layle Brainerd

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>so far vice chair has said, you know, there are

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>risks if we begin to slow the economy too much.

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>You had to pay pretty close attention to what her

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>comments were last week, but that's what she said. Otherwise,

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>everybody's just a bunch of former dubs who are now

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>bowls in China shops. So, Danielle, I mean, aside from

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we've already had two quarters of negative

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>g d P, what is your UH recession outlook and

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:17.919
<v Speaker 1>maybe what are some of the parameters that kind of

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>kick you into recession and maybe keep us out of it,

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>or maybe make it deep versus not deep? How do

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>you think about that right now? I think about the

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>recession in terms of it being long. And what people

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>don't appreciate is that the National Bureau of Research Economic

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Economic Research, they they time recessions based on the level

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:41.679
<v Speaker 1>of GDP. SMP Global came out on Friday. They reduced

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 1>their third quarter GDP as of it two point six

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>per cent. I'm getting wonky here, but that means that

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:50.159
<v Speaker 1>it's not sufficient to offset the negative point eight percent

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>they're anticipating we see for the final print for the

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>second quarter. What that means is on a level, the

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>n b e R could come and surprise investors who

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>are like, woo, it's a happy you know, we're seeing

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>positive growth. The n b e R could come out

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:08.039
<v Speaker 1>and say, you know what, we're still in recession and

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>surprise people because it gauged off of the level. That's

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.280
<v Speaker 1>what the arbiters, that's how that's how they do it.

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to finally ask you about political pressure. How

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>much do you think, Danielle, the FED is going to

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>feel um if we start to get unemployment at four

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and a half five five and a half percent, or

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I should say, when we start to get unemployment around

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 1>five percent, and how will that affect this independent body. Well,

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that the winds will shift violently, um from

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 1>we're concerned about inflation to oh my gosh, our constituents

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>are losing their jobs. So it won't take the Beltway

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>crowds very long to go from eight point A to

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 1>point B. We saw news out of Goldman that they're

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:53.799
<v Speaker 1>uh that they're pursuing laughs just this morning. That being said,

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 1>this J. Powell sounds like a different person. And until

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>something breaks in credit, and I don't mean just bankruptcies rising,

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>our defaults increasing, but until something fundamental breaks that threatened

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 1>systemic risk. I see this J. Powell was pushing forward.

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>All right. Danielle, thank you so much for joining us

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 1>once again. We always appreciate getting your perspective. Danielle d

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Martino Booth. She's the CEO and chief strategists at Quill Intelligence,

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:21.159
<v Speaker 1>and she's a former advisor to the Federal Reserve Bank

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 1>of Dallas. And she brings up that Goldman Sacks news.

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Goldman Sacks prepares for layoffs as soon as next week.

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>That's according to the New York Times. Let's check up

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 1>with our next guest, David dts And managing Principal and

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:38.040
<v Speaker 1>senior portfolio strategist at Peacock Private Wealth Management based in Summit,

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey. David, thanks so much for joining us here.

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:43.280
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get a bunch of inflation data UH this

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:45.360
<v Speaker 1>week with CPI and p p I, and we know

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>our Federal Reserve is paying attention to that. How are

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you going to parse some of this data we're gonna

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>get this week? So absolutely, I think that's the number

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:58.160
<v Speaker 1>one issue is where is inflation uh in America today?

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>And of course last month we saw that headline inflation

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:05.160
<v Speaker 1>was flat. Uh, it still gave us an eight point

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>one percent year over year, which is far too high,

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>worse than like forty years, and the feder over Service

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>is reacting. But remember investors are always looking forward, and

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>what we're thinking we're gonna get come tuesday is actual

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>actually a dip about ten basis points in the therems

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:25.679
<v Speaker 1>of headline inflation as we're gonna see softer gasoline prices

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>at the pump, some softening and rent with the strong dollar,

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>um export prices are coming down to and so that

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>will help the narrative that perhaps for past peak inflation

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and things are going to start easy. So what does

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that mean for stocks? Does that mean the S and

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>p UM continues this rally that we've seen the past

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>few sessions. Yeah, it's a great question, very hard to

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>make a short term call. I think the the skeptic

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>would say, hey, you know, we've been buying. You know,

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>we're at four point one percent since last Tuesday. We've

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>been buying on anticipation that this is gonna be a

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>better print. And there could be what we say, you know,

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>buying the rumor and then selling the news, and people

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 1>take some profits if it just comes in as as

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned. Having said that, of course it could be

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better softer inflation, or that could give

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>investors greater confidence to continue to push prices higher. That

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be surprising, because you know, we're down eight on

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the SMP five since the high point in January. We

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>still should seek positive corporate earnings for Q three up

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>nearly four percent. We've got strong employment, the consumers continues

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:38.079
<v Speaker 1>to spend very resilient UM, so the reasons to be upbeat.

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>David Cratty Gupta brought up something at the top of

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the program which I thought was really interesting. She said

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>that the gains that Ukraine is making in the war

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:52.559
<v Speaker 1>against Russia, are UM allowing the dollar to kind of

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 1>let some of the pressure out, and the Bloomberg Dollar

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 1>index is down against UM. You know, the euro is gaining,

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the Pound is gaining. You think a positive turnaround for

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine in this war, a positive outlook would be good

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:09.599
<v Speaker 1>for stocks as well. Yeah, absolutely certainly. You know, the

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>concern of cources with any kind of you just don't

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>know where that geopolitical situation is going UM. And the

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 1>recent good news, well we already see now European natural

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>gas prices are UM now at a one month low UM,

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:30.199
<v Speaker 1>the euros starting to gain a little bit of momentum,

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:33.079
<v Speaker 1>the dollars down three percent from where it was last week.

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>That certainly can take the pressure off global inflation. That

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly can give investors confidence. Is obviously too early to

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>say we're out of the woods. I don't think Putin's

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna go down without a fight, but the news is

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 1>good and I think that could provide a tail win

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 1>for stocks going forward. Here I'll just say that I

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>do see t t F natural gas down almost eight

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>percent just today and UK natural gas down six and

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a half percent just today, So one month low, and

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 1>when we're going lower here on the exact crisis exactly.

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 1>And hey, how about the bond yields, David, I mean,

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, if I want to put my money in

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>a ten year bond, I'm getting three point three percent.

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>That's nothing to sneeze at. Him. That's actually a kind

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 1>of a return. Well, it is, and it isn't. Certainly

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot better return than at the start of

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the year. Has been one of the worst years on

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>UH in history, for for for bond investors. But you know,

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the fact of the matter is with the headline inflation

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>last month was eight point one percent year over year,

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>three point three percent is kind of something to steeze at.

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 1>And of course, and of course when you look at history,

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 1>three point three percent is not that great. You know,

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:45.319
<v Speaker 1>you've got the the earnings yield on the SMP about seventeen,

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:47.079
<v Speaker 1>which is going to give you what five and a

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>half percent, So I'll take five and a a half percent

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>over three point three percent. I think most retireason I

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>worked with they can't live on three point three percent

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>for the next ten years. Yeah, but you're happy to

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>get any kind of return, especially relative to other bonds.

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Um but do you think we're going to see the

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>tenure yield go up or was three and a half

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>percent the peak? It's harder to call the bond market

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>it is the stock market, you know. It all really

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 1>depends on inflation. If inflation does get out of control,

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 1>if the geopolitical developments worse in um, you're gonna see

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>bond investors running for the hills. Bond investors hate inflation if,

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, recession concerns come back. Although the

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 1>equity market hates recession, bond investors love it because that

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>brings down the inflation. So we're gonna have to see.

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>At this point, I still think it's a good deal

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>for investors to be in stock drilled to to three

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>point on the tenure. I hate inflation too, Yeah, who doesn't.

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I hate it more than you do. Well, you say

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 1>you're fine with a two percent target? Yeah, I like

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 1>zero percents. Not realistic. David Deed's managing principle and senior

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>portfolio strategist at Peacock Private Wealth Management. He got his

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>undergraded Dartmouth way back in the day, and I'm dating

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Mr d uh and his law degree from Universe Chicago.

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>That's not bad. That's a nice combo for sure. Combo. Now,

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>folks in our listeners, I am holding a load of

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>cash in my hand because that's what I do as

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 1>all street guy, that's what we always does. We came up,

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 1>we had wads of cash. But I am increasingly the

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>exception to that rule because everything's going digital now on

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the payment side, and I have to bed over the pandemic.

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing a lot more stuff of financially uh digitally,

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 1>you know. So it says nobody wanted to touch your

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>dirty cash. Exactly take exactly, yeah, exactly. Jeff Sloan he's

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:37.679
<v Speaker 1>at the point of all this. He's the CEO of

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Global Payments. Global Payments is in New York Stock Exchange

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>traded company GPN is a symbol you type into your

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Professional terminal like a market cap at thirty eight

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. I mean, these guys aren't small. They're based

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 1>down in Atlanta, Georgia employees. Jeff, thanks so much for

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 1>being on our Bloomberg Interactor Broker Studio. Talk to us

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>about your business, Global Payments, over the last two and

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>a half years of this pandemic. How is your business evolved? Well,

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I think you touched on with what you said with

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>your dirty cash example. The first trend coming out of

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic is really increased digitization. So for many decades

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>here in the United States and globally, people have moved

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:15.079
<v Speaker 1>away from cash and check toward digital, but the pandemic

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 1>really brought that forward by three to five years. Great

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:20.079
<v Speaker 1>example this is in our business. We do a lot

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of real estate payments. So it used to be you'd

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 1>write out of check to your landlord for the rent.

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>You'd walk down to the office or mail it. If

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>something was broken, you'd fill out of a form. In

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, no one want to touch a pen, a pencil,

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>a check. So what you do now is you go

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>on your phone, you click pay with your thumb your face,

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>You pay the account you know from your bank account,

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and if something is broken and we want to pull

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>up your car, you type in the valet thing and

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:43.439
<v Speaker 1>they put your car around the front. No one touches

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 1>paper anymore. It's a great example of what we've seen.

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 1>So um I've been since I've moved back to the US,

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>missing the ability that I had in Germany to do

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that because it's much easier they're used to making payments

0:13:56.880 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 1>UM digitally. Uh, how do you work with this market?

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>And I know you're active in those markets as well

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 1>in terms of avoiding fraud, because if you use Venmo

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 1>or zell or crypto UM, it's impossible to reverse those

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 1>those payments. That's a great question. So um Uh listen,

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 1>we're a technology company. We have six thousand people doing

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>nothing but building software all day and actually most of

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the major banks in North America and Western Europe use

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>our fraud prevention screens. So we're constantly scanning UM these

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>transactions to make sure they're good. We're looking for nominalies

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and kicking them out. But beyond that, if you step back,

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>every country is really different. The US is primarily a

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>credit and debit card, but increasingly kind of credit in

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the current environment, and they're very active fraud protections, both

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>as a regulatory and also as a legal matter for

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>use of those cards. So not only are we scanning

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>for those anomalies, but the banking regulators, legislators, they're doing

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>all the same thing. And I would say by and large,

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 1>consumers are protected UM in those markets from fraud. The

0:14:55.520 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>easiest uh, the ways to transfer money are also fairly expensive.

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean PayPal, for example, UM takes a pretty big cut.

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>How do you keep costs down? So the United States, interestingly,

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve came out last week with a movement

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>towards what's called FED now or real time payments account

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to account transfers, which we saw in Europe as you

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 1>described a number of years ago. UM. I think if

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>you have a Federal Reserve UM and a regulatory sponsored

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>intervention in the markets where you can provide for faster,

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>more reliable payments in a way that's auditable, UM, that

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>avoids the type of fraud that you're referencing, that's nothing

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 1>but good news for merchants, for consumers, and really for

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>global payments. Were in the business of moving money digitally.

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>If you want your money faster now, I actually have

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to borrow to provide that to you. I'm not gonna

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>have to do that. In the Brave New World, we

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>hear a lot more are a lot, most recently about

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>buy now, pay later. What does that mean to you?

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 1>By now pay later, and how does that impact your business?

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>So by now pay later, or I like to call

0:15:56.280 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>as layaway moway, I'm obviously revealing my age right by saying,

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>because I'm obviously not a gen z Er, by saying,

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>back in the day, you go to service merchandise, you

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>said I want this bicycle, and you put a hundred

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>dollars a month or whatever until you get it. But

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of course this is you get the thing first. So

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>it's more like a credit card, really, isn't it. In's debt. Yeah,

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that's right, that's exactly right. And what I think people

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>are worried about here is what we call debt stacking,

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>which is taking out multiple bmp L applications and no

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>one knows that you have a big pile of debt

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>open here doing something else. But to answer your question, um,

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>really it's not any different than installment lending. So what

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>we're doing is doing it on a very responsible basis,

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>meaning we don't balance sheet that's not our decision. That's

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a decision that traditional financial institutions make from an underwriting

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>UH and know your customer point of view, and we

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 1>do it through the regulated banking system. So we're working

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 1>with a number of financial institutions that West, for example

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>in the United Kingdom, as well as Barclays, as well

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>as number of retailers where it's an adjunct to your

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>bank hard lending. So those banks know you because you

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 1>have an account there, They know your credit profile, they

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>know that you have outstanding Um. I would say the

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>bnp O guys have done a really good job in

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 1>technology and bringing innovation to the point of sales. You

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:07.640
<v Speaker 1>go on a website, it's pinging you. Do you want

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to buy this? I'll give you five percent off, picking

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you now while you're shopping, paying you when you're checking out,

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:16.400
<v Speaker 1>packing you after we brought that kind of technology traditional

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 1>regulated institutions, which is much safer for everybody. How what

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>does the competition look like? Because, as Paul said, you're

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a huge business, but a lot of businesses and payments

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>are huge. This is kind of one of the most

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>popular Wall Street darlings, I guess really globally. So who

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:36.160
<v Speaker 1>are you going up against? Well, really varies by market,

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and our business has always been highly competitive. I don't

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>expect that to change the word technology company. We simply

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:43.640
<v Speaker 1>build better software and more markets and do a better

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>job selling it. That's really, build better software than Klarna,

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:51.719
<v Speaker 1>than Adin, than a firm, etcetera. Right, that's exactly right.

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>How do you how do you get an edge? On

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 1>those guys. Sure. So I think one of the things

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that we're really good at is listening to the market,

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:58.639
<v Speaker 1>listening what we're hearing from our customers and where they're going.

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Let me give you a great example, so pre Pandemic,

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 1>we do a lot of quick service restaurant um point

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of sale devices as well as online. So pre Pandemic

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>we did twenty million remote orders in the United States

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and nine team, which means you buy your burger king

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Hamburger on your phone, pay with your face, it gets

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 1>delivered through Uber Eats. Last year we did those same

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>things true in teledocts. So what we've been able to

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:23.719
<v Speaker 1>do is really identify trends like remote delivery and bridging

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the physical as well as the virtual world, and we

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 1>compeet by way of vertical markets restaurants, quick service restaurants, retail, healthcare,

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:35.160
<v Speaker 1>real estate. So while there are plenty of people competing

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>in things like e com, the answer to question is

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>we're very focused on competing in those vertical markets by

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:42.679
<v Speaker 1>way of GDP that we think are growing more quickly

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>than the average and are also lesser penetrated. Financial news

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 1>websites they do, yes, exactly right, Bloomberg dot com. How

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>do you look at crypto Because Matt loves crypto, I

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>could care less. Well, I think it's fascinating. I don't

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:56.440
<v Speaker 1>think it's fair to say I love it. I think

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 1>he's fascinating, the earliest, one of the earliest guys in media.

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:02.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, I bought bitcoin back when it was six

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars and promptly lost my passwords. So I understand the

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>benefits and the drawbacks to it, um. But the blockchain

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>technology is really the biggest benefit. Right do you do

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 1>you use it? Are you going to? We do? So?

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:19.439
<v Speaker 1>For example, if you buy crypto and your PayPal wallet

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>today and you're training it with somebody else, or you're

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>using it, that's actually our technology. UM, that's allowing you

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:26.399
<v Speaker 1>to buy it, settle it, that kind of thing, and

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>we do that globally. That's not just a US comments.

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 1>So I think crypto is a series of use cases.

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Let me tell you first where it doesn't work. So

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>there's almost no acceptance at the point of sale, a

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>physical or virtual point of sale. And the reason for

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:42.199
<v Speaker 1>that is there's so much volatility and stable coins in

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:44.879
<v Speaker 1>blockchain maybe the solution, but for right now, there's so

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>much volatility and ethereum or bitcoin and like it's very

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 1>hard to procure at the point of Sale'll think about

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a grocery store. How on earth those guys can take?

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 1>But I would say in the case of use cases, um,

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>having loyalty points paid in crypto, having payroll if you like,

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:01.920
<v Speaker 1>paid in crypto, those are good examples of use cases

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>where things work. All right, Jeff, thanks so much for

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Jeff Sloan, he's the CEO of Global Payments,

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>joining us in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. We're gonna

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>have more coming up. Got green on the screen where

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:16.679
<v Speaker 1>you're off our highs, but again still a nice start

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:19.400
<v Speaker 1>to the week. Let's see what what's going out there

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 1>with pretty Goop to cheese on markets correspond and she

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>joins us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. Pretty

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 1>what are you looking at? Yeah, well, I wanted to

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>take a quick minute and it she's my chart of

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:31.159
<v Speaker 1>the day actually because I think it's really important bringing

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:34.640
<v Speaker 1>it back full circle. Um, but it is European. Matt,

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:38.120
<v Speaker 1>close your ears. Um, this is significant because we're looking

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 1>at a chart nineteen fifty two g hashtag BTV nineteen

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:44.159
<v Speaker 1>fifty two. When you guys get to your terminal um

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 1>at your desks, what's important to note, and I'm going

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to describe it. You're looking at German and French power

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 1>prices over the last two years. Basically they go straight

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>up into come back down just a little bit, and

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 1>then this massive parabolic move into well right now, really

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 1>they've come back down from their August peak just to touch,

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 1>but they are still at historically high levels. This is

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:06.679
<v Speaker 1>something we've talked about a lot. When it comes to

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the European energy prices. They've come down tremendously, tremendously, but

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 1>historically they are still extremely high. And here's why this

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:18.239
<v Speaker 1>is important. This has everything to do with what you're

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:21.119
<v Speaker 1>seeing gas prices. And ordinarily for Americans we would think

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 1>that well, electricity has nothing to do with natural gas.

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't really make sense. But in Europe, the grid

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>work so that all the renewable energy sources um the

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:33.920
<v Speaker 1>gas prices or gas up driven power prices go from

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:37.159
<v Speaker 1>the highest price right and gas power plants have the

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>highest price, so they drive the market and it all

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>feeds into this one grid, which is um why gas

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 1>prices are affecting power prices. Um, what's significant here is

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:48.479
<v Speaker 1>the ripple effects over the weekend. I read these stories

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 1>that now to deal with this, the Eiffel Tower is

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>going to close their lights off earlier. Yeah, so the

0:21:55.840 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 1>glittering spectacle will not be that long. Yeah. London Underground

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>has been dealing with some really severe delays. Then they

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>don't have any uh, they go on strike every couple

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:12.639
<v Speaker 1>weeks anyway, So true, but severe delays based on power crunches. Specifically,

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:16.880
<v Speaker 1>basically there's no power to run the actual train, which

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 1>which is which is pretty extreme. Um. So those were

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the two that I thought were really interesting examples of

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 1>people of country that you say that are actively dealing

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 1>with this. And there you're seeing that also in I

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 1>mean in local, in a local way across Germany. So

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 1>you'll have towns like Hanover that previously you know, we're

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>doing just half of their lights at night. Now they're

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 1>just no more lights at Berlin forever has not turned

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>on the street lights at night, just because I don't

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:47.359
<v Speaker 1>know that it's super lefty town and they want to

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:51.879
<v Speaker 1>save electricity and they're also mega mega poor. That's the

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>thing about Berlin. The mayor once said, we're sexy but

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>poor you know that that was their tagline. But yeah,

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:00.640
<v Speaker 1>you see it all all over the place, like, uh,

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, the town swimming pool will only be operating

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 1>six hours a day instead of because they want to

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 1>save on power. Yeah, cratty Bloomer Markets carresponding, thank you

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 1>so much. We appreciate it. Speaking Jess Mett and she

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 1>covers equities for Bloomberg News, And Jess, you've got a

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>story out talking about corporate America. Is corporate America seeing

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>peak inflation? And what do they look at to kind

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of determine that? What do you got? So the big

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 1>thing is looking at and this is data I pulled

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg Intelligence was talking to you, right, so taking

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a look at there's some positive signs that have been emerging.

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's taking to a Jillian Wolf over there as

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 1>well as Windy Song. And so they were saying that

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 1>in the second quarter, the S and P five hundreds

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:45.440
<v Speaker 1>free cash flow fell again for the second straight quarter

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>on a ruling four quarter basis, but when it came

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to capital deployment, it's actually surging, and that suggests to

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:54.439
<v Speaker 1>them that companies don't expect that rising costs are actually

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to last. And also they're taking a

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:59.679
<v Speaker 1>look obviously, let this inflation distress and how that's been

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>picking away at the different cash flows, but they don't

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>see that necessarily being a detrimental thing because they're still

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 1>seeing balance sheet cash still above those pre pandemic levels.

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 1>So that could be a positive sign obviously ahead of

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the CPI data that we're going to get tomorrow. But

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>ahead of that, we did just get a few minutes

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:18.360
<v Speaker 1>ago an update from the New York's Fed consumer expectations

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to inflation projections, so on the longer term, rizon,

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 1>medium term, in short term. Again, those expectations came down

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>for the month of August, continuing those declines that we

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:29.200
<v Speaker 1>did see in July. So that could be an optimistic

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>sign ahead of that CPI data that we're going to

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 1>get tomorrow. All Right, what are we expecting tomorrow and

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>what does a beat or a miss mean for the

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve? Well, that's the crucial thing, right because even

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a slower inflation print seems unlikely that it's going to

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 1>end up swaying the Federal Reserve. And that was something

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that was echoed with They love the pc reportedly, they

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 1>prefer the PCs and tomorrow's CPI, Right, So when it

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>comes to and especially looking at the core numbers that's

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>going to strip out volatile components. If we're looking at

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 1>food and energy, it's projected to be six point one

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:05.359
<v Speaker 1>percent on a year over year basis, but then remain

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>unchanged at three tents of a percent when you're looking

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 1>month over month. So I feel like that is really

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the core number when you're looking at those month over

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 1>month differences. But then if obviously, if you're going to

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 1>look more on an annual basis, it's projected to rise

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 1>about eight percent in August from your earlier versus about

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:21.120
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half percent in July. But again, looking

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 1>at those month over month numbers are usually the key

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:25.920
<v Speaker 1>when I'm talking to strategists. Interesting, I mean, again, we've

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 1>got a nice move in the market here past couple

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of days. You just wonder kind of where are we here?

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe this market just really needs to get a sense

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:34.920
<v Speaker 1>of where this Federal Reserve is not necessary going to

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:38.119
<v Speaker 1>go with their next their meeting wednesday, but maybe some

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 1>of the language, the body language about do we wait

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:42.879
<v Speaker 1>to see how this stuff plays out or do we

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:45.640
<v Speaker 1>just continue to signal that we're in a rising, great

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 1>move and that big meeting obviously happening next week. It

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 1>begins on Tuesday, but we'll get the decision on Wednesday,

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and obviously here from Chairman Pale about a half hour

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>after that. But this week is a blackout period for

0:25:57.320 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the Feds. So last week was the last sort of

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 1>phase of parade of Fed speakers that we were going

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to hear, and clearly a lot of them still sticking

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:05.680
<v Speaker 1>with that hawk is stance. But what was interesting about

0:26:05.760 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 1>last week it didn't necessarily when you were hearing from them,

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 1>they didn't change their hawk is tone. But we did

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>see a bit obviously of a rebound with the US

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:16.160
<v Speaker 1>stock snapping three consecutive weeks of declines. But looking more ahead,

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting because more technically speaking, we're kind of where

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>we were if you looked a month ago when we

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:23.880
<v Speaker 1>were going to get those New York Fed inflation expectations

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>right ahead of the CPI numbers, And now we've looking

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:29.199
<v Speaker 1>at the SMP five hunted a cross back above the

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:31.399
<v Speaker 1>fifty day moving average, the one hundred day moving average,

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>but still below the two day moving average, which is

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:36.920
<v Speaker 1>about two. So that's really key right now, good stuff.

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate it. Jess Menten, equities reporter for a Bloomberg

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:43.680
<v Speaker 1>News Texas, A and M. How did they do this weekend?

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:48.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, pretty pretty good, as good as one could expect.

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:52.639
<v Speaker 1>But I am an but a lot of people were

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 1>obviously focusing on what was happening at the University of Texas,

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 1>which they did not beat Alabama. They came close, but

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that was kind of a big key,

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they did not win, So that was

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 1>hopeful good stuff. We have Salt in our Bloomberg Interactive

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 1>Broker studio because it's Monday and we always want to

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 1>kick off the week getting a sense of what's going

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>on on Wall Street, and Cheese are expert there. I

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 1>gotta start shanally with the Goldman News about cutting some people.

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:21.439
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's just part of their you know, as

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:24.119
<v Speaker 1>Matt was just saying, kind of their annual culling of people.

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>But it seems like it was just fifteen minutes ago

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>when every story coming out of Wall Street was how

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 1>much more do we have to pay these kids to

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 1>take a job on Wall Street? And now we're turning

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>around and laying them off. Only the worst ones though, right, yeah,

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and this year went by fast because that conversation ended

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:42.239
<v Speaker 1>last year right when you turned into this year. It's

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a much tough for economic environment. And you have to say,

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I have to say it, you know, if you're there,

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're making it to five per cent of head

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 1>count reductions, that's what's typical. If it's less than that,

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>which is what we expect, then it's not so bad

0:27:57.160 --> 0:28:00.360
<v Speaker 1>for a year that is facing a significant downturn. Now

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>it's still painful because these banks have hired massively last

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 1>year in the year before, and they have not seen

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>these types of cuts for two years. So this is

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a return of a strategic review that hasn't really happened

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 1>in the last couple of years. That will be fought

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:18.919
<v Speaker 1>again now. Alright, So I thought it was interesting when

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:20.919
<v Speaker 1>I heard you're gonna go to Assault. That is the

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Mooches conference, right, yes, yes, it is right. It is

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 1>in New York, it's at the Javit Center, but they

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>also have some around the world, in the Middle East,

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:32.399
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, and you know, I think you guys were

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:35.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about it, the idea that they sold of Skybridge

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to x where I was going to go. So okay,

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Scaramucci, who was who worked for President Trump for

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>like eleven days, speaking of stars like a cup of coffee. Right, Um,

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 1>he has a pretty successful conference business. What else? What

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 1>else does salt do? And why does Sam Bankman freed Um,

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the child billionaire who owns f t X, why does

0:28:58.040 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 1>he want a piece of the movie. He's a millennial

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>billion there, but you know, obvious, how old are you?

0:29:04.520 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Total genius? And he did really well? Um at Jane Street.

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 1>From your point, what does Skybridge do? They they've traditionally

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>invested in a lot of hedge funds, a hedge fund funds,

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 1>business alternatives, but they've also recently pivoted very strongly into crypto.

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 1>So about eight hundred million dollars of their two point

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>five billion dollars at the end of June were in

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>digital assets or digital asset linked companies, including f t X.

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Are you are you going to this car? I am.

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm interviewing Wedgewaters Greg Jensen. I'm interviewing Greg Jensen in

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the three pm hour today. You can find it on

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the term at all. Yeah, Greg Jensen, He's from Bridgewater

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Bridge awesome, world's largest hedge fund. And so you do

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 1>still have a lot of traditional investors there. And when

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I talked last week to Anthony Scaramucci about this FTX investment,

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 1>what he told me was two things. He's going to

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 1>be sixty in four in January. The mooch is going

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to be sixty. He looks good. And he told me

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>that he doesn't want to be Shakespearean figure looming over

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the firm. He wants to think about the next ten

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>years of Skybridge, the next generation, which includes his deputy

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>John Darcy, as well as you know, folks like f

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>t X and Sam bankmen Freed that can help Skybridge

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 1>get more into crypto and conversely, this is important f

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 1>t X get more intraded into traditional finance. So those

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>worlds are emerging and they're certainly gonna merge its salts today.

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Greg Jensen's only I know. I know he's a kid

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 1>snappers seventy four one to Dartmouth good stuff. Loves poker apparently.

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess he likes to take risk and read six

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred pages a weekend. From what I USPF is a

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 1>good poker player too. You know, I'm going to ask

0:30:40.960 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 1>him about that today. I want to get in on

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 1>this game, y'all. Want to join. Oh, there's a poker

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:46.640
<v Speaker 1>game of the players. I think we should have it

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>here at ower. Yeah. Also, yeah, I can get you

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 1>into a really really cool poker game because I know

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 1>our friend Mindy Grossman. She has a poker game that's

0:30:57.960 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>like a it's a women's center. I don't know if

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 1>it's women women who play poker these days. It's a

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 1>huge thing in finance at it's a big deal. I

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>think Caroline Hyde plays as well. She does, she indeed does.

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 1>We well got it all together here, all right, very

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 1>cool looking forward to that. What else is going on?

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 1>When I when I saw you coming into work this morning,

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you were listening to an ethereum podcast, she was listening

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to crypto podcast. Now, but you have you made some

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 1>interesting points about it. I mean, um, I was like, man, crypto,

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 1>what a joke? And you were like, no, there's real

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 1>returns here. There are. And remember, over the last ten years,

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 1>they're having significant returns, even in the crypto winter that

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you see now. But this is a moment of truth

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 1>for theoryum. Remember if bitcoin was the original, Ethereum is

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be the newer age, eco friendly younger brother's

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 1>about to get really eco friendly right, because they're gonna

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 1>reduce the energy needed um to verify transactions by they're

0:31:56.280 --> 0:32:00.240
<v Speaker 1>going to go to proof of steak from proof of work.

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Now as people put up more, more of their own

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 1>ethereum to steak, because that's how they are validating new nodes.

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 1>As people put up more money to the steak. Is

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 1>this an inflationary or deflationary force for ethereum which does

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:16.680
<v Speaker 1>not act as bitcoin does? Where bitcoin has a fixed supply,

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Ethereum is not fixed. So by staking more assets, are

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you then able to control kind of that inflationary force

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that's embedded within ethereum. I think it's so fun that

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 1>this kind of new age of technologists are really thinking

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 1>about this in macro terms, and it's a collision of

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the worlds. Whether it works out or not, On Thursday,

0:32:37.080 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 1>we will see the ethereums block chains much anticipated software upgrade,

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the so called Merge, is expected to take place around

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 1>all Thursday, September fift Sarah Mussouli from Bloomberg she sent

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 1>some stuff out that saved my bacon. Now be could

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 1>have reduces the crypto show. I mean, this explains everything,

0:32:56.160 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 1>So thank you, Sarah, thanks for listening. To the Bloomberg

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews with

0:33:02.080 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller.

0:33:07.160 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three. Put

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 1>on Fall Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at p T Sweeney.

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide at

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio