WEBVTT - How Stable Coins Will Create Prosperity

0:00:04.600 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>So the big question is this, how do investors like

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:11.800
<v Speaker 1>us get access to the ideas, information, and most importantly,

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the right people that give us the tools and information

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>we need to make informed and educated decisions to have success.

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:22.319
<v Speaker 1>That is the question, and this podcast will give us

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the answers. This is Mark Moss, your host. Let's get

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>this started. Hello, and welcome to another episode of the

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:32.599
<v Speaker 1>Market Disruptors podcast. Today I am joined by Matt Gurgler

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and he is general counsel for Reserve stable Coin. He

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 1>is a an attorney. He's working with a stable coin,

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>but he actually comes from the payment space, working with

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Venmo and also working in a blockchain research company as well.

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>He gets the technology side, he gets the illegal side. Man,

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>he just gets it. It It was a really good conversation.

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>We talk about the remittance industry. We talk about stable coins,

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the pegs, how they work, maybe if they don't work.

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>We talk about Facebook's coin which used to be a

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:04.039
<v Speaker 1>stable coin. We get into regulations, talking about what may

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 1>or may not hold back the industry, and so much more.

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a really good conversation I really enjoyed. We're definitely

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna have Matt back, so let's go ahead and just

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>jump right into this. All right, guys, welcome to another

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>episode of the Market Disruptors podcast. Today I am with

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:23.120
<v Speaker 1>General Counsel of Reserve stable Coin Matt Girdler, and Uh,

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 1>we've had some conversations before in the past. He's super knowledgeable.

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited to dig intoay because there's some new developments

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>in the stable coin space I want to jump into.

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, welcome Matt. Great to be here. Mark All Hi, good,

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy to have you. Happy to jump into the

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 1>conversations today. So UM, I gave you a quick intro,

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 1>but for those um that are listening, why don't you

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>just kind of tell us who you are and how

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:46.479
<v Speaker 1>you got to the black blockchain space and what you're

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>doing right now. Sure. Um I got involved in the

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>blockchain CRYP the currency space back inteen, around the time

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>that the bit license was being proposed. I had been

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>working during my one of my summers during law school

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>at Venmo helping them apply for money transmitter licenses in

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>New York. Basically took their money transmitter statute, made it

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>more onerous, and applied it to a technology rather than

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:12.239
<v Speaker 1>how technology is used. And so UM I got involved

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>with my background at Venmo and trying to fight against

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the bit license at the time, and I thought, you

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>know what, there are a lot of problems in our

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>financial system, predominantly dealing with remittances, cross border payments, UM

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>clearing and sort of the time, and I realized that

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrencies generally are blockchain generally would be intensive solution to this,

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>and so that sort of got me down the rabbit hole. UM.

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I realized that a lot of attorneys, because there wasn't

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>much legal guidance at the time, so they would try

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>to rely on their experience, but they didn't truly understand

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the technology. So that's sort of the bridge that I

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>tried to UM. That's why I tried to bridge was

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>studying the technology at a level where I could sort

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of bridge between the lawyers that had been practicing for

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty years and the engineers who had never realized that

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>this law was applicable to them. UM. So the speed

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.959
<v Speaker 1>up my background. I worked in big law law from

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 1>old Mill Bank UM. Then I went off to co

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>found an institutional research firm UM for cryptocurrencies, basically writing

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>detailed twenty eight page research reports on individual cryptocurrencies for

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>institutional investors. Focused predominantly on the legal and regulatory risks

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that might be real and investment. Some of the projects

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:27.119
<v Speaker 1>we covered were can um paisas so UM. I've looked

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>at some of the more unique regulatory athletics there. Unless

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 1>UM did laws of research last year to join a

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>reserve as their full time general council UM. What really

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>interests me about Reserve is there's two tokens in their protocol,

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>a stable coin and a secondary token. So after reviewing

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>all the different ways that crypto currencies have been launched

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and the legal and regulatory risk, I was then able

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to apply my background and learnings to the launch it

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>to new crypto currencies. Yeah. Cool, that is a that

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>is a really um, really good background that you have.

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty cool. You know. One thing that I love

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>about the space bitcoin and and the space is that

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>it's multidisciplinary, right, so like you have to really understand

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of different subjects at depth to really grasp

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.919
<v Speaker 1>how deep this goes. And so you you know, obviously

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 1>being an attorney gives you one side of it. Uh,

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:22.480
<v Speaker 1>spending time at digital assets research and really digging in

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>gives you that technology side. And then having the even

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 1>payment space like at Venmo. Uh So, man, that's that's

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 1>an awesome background that you have that I'm sure helps

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:35.159
<v Speaker 1>you a lot with what you're doing now. You're now

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:39.280
<v Speaker 1>with this new um stable coin reserve. Uh. And and

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>let's just talk about stable coins for a minute. So, uh,

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>stable coins are something that's become very popular like kind

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>of like over the last year. A couple of things. One,

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, really, there's nothing stable, right, everything is always moving.

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>So what's it stable against? That's that's one thing. Um,

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>So why don't you tell me about that? What what

0:04:57.160 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>is it stable against? Is it stable against the dollar

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>or what's it stay able against? It's well, this is

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:06.160
<v Speaker 1>a cop out answer, but it's stable against something. And

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>every stable coin is going to be different, Um, the

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>more noteworthy ones, Heather Gemini usd um see all of

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:19.479
<v Speaker 1>the dollar backs, the outcoin. It's stable relative to the

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>price of the dollar, subject to counterparty risk and so

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the quote. But when you think about it, the US

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>dollar isn't stable. It is an inflationary currency, so we

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:32.719
<v Speaker 1>can't say that it's a stable and generally, but it

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:35.479
<v Speaker 1>is stable relative to the price of the dollar ideally,

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and then you can go to different uh, trust tokens

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:42.479
<v Speaker 1>coming out with their I think their pound back stable coin,

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:44.919
<v Speaker 1>and so that will be stable versus a town. But

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>as we look at exchange rates between the pound and

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the dollar, those fluctuated and so even those won't be

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 1>stable against each other. So stable really comes down to

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>what are you trying to do. At least with reserve,

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:59.919
<v Speaker 1>we're focused a lot more on the developing countries places

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 1>is where their native currency is going through hyper inflation.

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>So our initial launch area, um, most likely next quarter

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:12.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to be UM trying to give Venezuelans an

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to put their money into their boulevards into something

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that is more stable than the boulevard initially will be

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>pegged to the dollar. Right. It's dealing with ten percent

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:26.039
<v Speaker 1>daily inflation, right, so as soon as people receive boul

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>of ours, they have to find a way to get

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:30.280
<v Speaker 1>out of bolivars otherwise tomorrow will be ten percent less,

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>ten percent less the day after, and that's compounding the

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>wrong direction. Right. So, um, you know, one thing is

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>this This thing is global, and a lot of people

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:42.480
<v Speaker 1>in the United States we get kind of trapped with this,

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:45.039
<v Speaker 1>like thinking that everything is like the United States and

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 1>the US dollar is the reserve currency of the world,

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>so it's you know, we the dollars seem stable to us,

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>but in other countries they deal with this changing in

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>value all the time, right, They're always watching these exchange

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>rates and so forth. I don't want to I've too

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:02.480
<v Speaker 1>far down this rabbit hole, but maybe just poke at

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>it a little bit. But you know, we talked about

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>stable to what right, everything's moving, And it's interesting, I mean,

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>if you really want to go into the history of money,

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>for five thousand years, the world kind of was on

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the gold standard really up into the early nineteen hundreds

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and so and really I believe and and history shows

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that for a few hundred years, from like the four

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>hundreds to the seventeen hundreds, the world saw a massive

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>prosperity when the whole world was on this unified gold standard.

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>And it's really interesting that we don't have a measurement

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>of wealth today. So imagine if I needed to, I

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 1>was building a house and like whatever, the yard was changed,

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Like the yard is this long today, but now the

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>yards this long tomorrow, right, Or like the weight was

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>this one day and the weights this, Like you need

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>these standard units to measure things against, and I think

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>that we don't. We don't obviously we don't have that today.

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Every everything is measure it against each other, but not

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>against a standard. What do you what do you say

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>about that? Well, if you think about gold, just generally, um,

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 1>gold fluctuates in price. So even if it's going to

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>be backing a currency like it was with the gold standard,

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>at the price of gold, it's going to fluctuate. What

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>does it fluctuate against? It fluctuates against the currency. Well,

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and there's the open market for trading, Like if you

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>treat gold as a commodity like a lot of virtual

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:30.119
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrencies are are are are are going to be argued

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to be um, that's just a volatile asset. Um. But

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>if each currency was measured in gold, for example, so

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the US dollars this many dollars to announce the gold,

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:44.439
<v Speaker 1>the euros this many euros to announce a goal, the

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>boulevards this many boulevards to announce the gold, at least

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>everything was tied to one general measurement. But and then

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>we would have something to stable against compared against like

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:56.439
<v Speaker 1>so even if we had like a stable coin that

0:08:56.520 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>was paid to a basket of currencies. UM, at least

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>we have something to compare what is stable. I don't

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 1>know if it just seems it seems weird, like how

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 1>do you even back into that equation when you have

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>nothing to measure stability against. And I think that is

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>an interesting perspective, especially where we're the world is going

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>through globalization. Everyone's becoming more tied together, they're more international transactions. UM.

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, UM, it doesn't

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 1>need to be a stable coin. Maybe it could be bitcoin,

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>it could be another virtual currency that doesn't currently exist. UM.

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:37.079
<v Speaker 1>When I when I initially got interested in the industry,

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 1>people are talking about how you would travel around the

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>world and not need to convert into the currency of

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>that local jurisdiction because there would just be a global,

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 1>universal payment mechanism that you could use. At the time,

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:52.719
<v Speaker 1>it was the point because there are only maybe a

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred cryptocurrencies at the time. But now there's no reason

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:58.680
<v Speaker 1>that it needs to be a stable point. Of course,

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>it could be a stable but then again, if you're

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>dealing with something on a global level, if you're stable

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 1>against one currency, you're not stable to the rest of

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the world. Just hold hold the currency right? Why not

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>just hold the currency right? And then you could say

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>to take what UM libra is trying to do with

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the basket of different currencies. So you're stable relative to

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a basket of currencies. So I guess the question is

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>more stable than not. I think it's definitely less small atile. Yeah,

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I want to jump into libra. We're gonna table that

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.320
<v Speaker 1>for now though. But one thing, you know, I've studied money,

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and i've I've I've been a big believer in gold

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>of investing goal for a long time. And one thing

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting if you look at UM prices throughout history

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:44.199
<v Speaker 1>and you compare them against a basket of assets. So

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>what is this home in the medium home price compared

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to how many barrels of oil would it take? How

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>many ounces of gold would it take? How many right,

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 1>how how much copper would it take? And you can

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>compare it to assets. That's one thing. And I haven't

0:10:56.880 --> 0:10:59.959
<v Speaker 1>really seen any stable coins pegging into baskets of assets.

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Have you seen that? Wow? I and pretty your audience.

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I did not lay that up for you, but that's

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:09.960
<v Speaker 1>a beautiful softball throw to me. Um, that's actually what

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:12.839
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to I was I wasn't trying to do that,

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 1>so I guess tell us how you guys are different. Yeah, So, um,

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>this was more over the long term, and it's so

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>eventually we want to have all of our assets on Chaine. Um,

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 1>we want to put the assets collateralizing outstanding stable coin

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>into appreciating but safe assets. Think tokenized treasuries, think tokenized bonds,

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 1>things that are relatively safe but are appreciating. And the

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:41.560
<v Speaker 1>ideas that if you get these assets all around the world,

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you could create a basket of assets that is stable

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:49.680
<v Speaker 1>just generally, not against any currency, not against anything else,

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>just stable against the portfolio that's back in it. Of course,

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 1>you then have to have a portfolio that is reasonably stable,

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:59.439
<v Speaker 1>which is difficult and until we could prove that we

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 1>could do it, it's all an idea. But that's what

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to do is create a portfolio of assets,

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>got to have a stable coin that makes it where

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the stable poin long term isn't back to any currency

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>of any jurisdiction. Yeah, because I think you know, I've

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I've come out and I've said many times, especially in

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:19.439
<v Speaker 1>response to this growing thing of modern monetary theory MMT,

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>where they want to just print more money. And I

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:28.319
<v Speaker 1>say that money is not wealth. Money measures wealth. Wealth

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:32.680
<v Speaker 1>is assets, and so it makes sense to peg it

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 1>not against money, because money is nothing. Money is a measurement.

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>To peg it, just peg it to the actual wealth, right,

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the actual assets. That makes sense? Um? So why so?

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>So these stable coins have really started to get popular.

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>We've seen a bunch of them jumping up, A bunch

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of big companies, institutions, vcs, etcetera are jumping on board

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:54.680
<v Speaker 1>with the stable coins. Um. I want to know why

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>people should care about stable coins. I want to know

0:12:57.280 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 1>why companies want to develop stable coins, and why do

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 1>individual people care about stable coins? Sure? Um, I think

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>that this sort of the interesting stable coins came out

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>of the bubble bursting at the end of early eighteen.

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people were still saying cryptocurrencies are gonna

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>solve remittances. They're going to be a store of value

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>for people in countries that um, whose wealth is deteriorating

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>because of the local financial system. But when bitcoin loses

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>or a cryptocurrency generally loses value during a bubble, well,

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>what you're trying to solve doesn't really solve it. So

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that's sort of where the idea of well

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:39.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe stable points to be a lot more interesting. And

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 1>also as you have depths, you're going to need a

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>stable payment mechanism within the depth anyway. But um, I

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>find that more of a long term thing than a

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:49.439
<v Speaker 1>short term thing. I think the developing countries is more

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 1>um an interesting short term play. So that's like the

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>retail play, right, So, like from a retail perspective as

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 1>a user, like if I put all my money in

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin or whatever point, it loses, like, that's horrible, I

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 1>lose everything. So why don't I just put it into

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a stable coin that doesn't lose value? That's kind of

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:10.680
<v Speaker 1>like an individual retails perspective. I guess then you have

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to tell me why it's better than whatever currency I'm holding,

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:16.959
<v Speaker 1>Like why not just keep it in the dollar? Then? Right,

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>then there's that. Yeah, and it comes down to um

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>remittance of sending money back home like a PayPal Western Union,

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>they take ten to twelve percent feets large largely because

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>they solve the last mile problems, and whereas a crypto

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>currency transaction will range probably from point zero zero one

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>percent to maybe a point one percent or one percent,

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>depending on which cryptocurrency you're using so all of a sudden,

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>un like if you're trying to use the existing financial

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>system from the US trying to send money to let's

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>just say Europe, even you send a bank wire will

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>cost and it will take a day or two um

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to actually get there, whereas I could send that same

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>amount of money more cheaply using a crypt a currency.

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>And if it's a large amount, maybe I want to

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>make sure that it's stable and value so there isn't

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>a volatility risk there. I'm able to move money around

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>uh much more easily. Um. But going back to your

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>question about why would I want to use the sur

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>by this, If you're a retail investor, unless you're sending remittances,

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 1>are dealing with international cross border payments, then most good enough.

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>PayPal is good enough, voll is good enough. People in

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the US largely don't need this right now. And I

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>believe that cryptocurrency stable points are going to more largely

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>take place and grow outside of the US and more

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>developed countries. UM. So that's who would use it. People

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>who think that the cryptocurrency is better than their either

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>currency where they live or they're dealing in a country

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>like Cyprus, which took a certain percentage out of bank

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>account several years ago. And so that's why a retail

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>person I use it. Why would an investor UM investment

0:15:57.000 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>a stable cooin UM? Generally you don't invest in the

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>stable coin. You're either investing in the company behind the

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>stable coin, a profit sharing agreement, or there's a secondary token.

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>And so when we're dealing with feed dollars in a

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 1>bank account, the general business model is very similar to

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>a PayPal where they're getting a yield on the app

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the dollars in the bank account from whatever bank that

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>they're storing it with. And so it's more money that

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you're holding, more stable point upstanding, the more interest revenue

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that you're collecting UM not all or like an insurance company. Right,

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>so they have that float, they can invest the invest

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>what they're holding, right, And that's actually where it becomes interesting.

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Where's the different types of financial institutions that people could use.

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Whether it's a trust company like a Gemini, whether it

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>is an MSP like trust token UM, what you're allowed

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to do and what investments you're allowed to make are

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 1>very different depending on the type of financial institution that

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>you're regulated as and so that's just something to consider. Um,

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>what is the money that is back in the stable point,

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>where is it, what is it being used for? And

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:05.199
<v Speaker 1>you just want to make sure that people aren't just

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>making large debts that you won't get any benefit at

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the end. But then again, a stable coin is meant

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:14.640
<v Speaker 1>to not appreciate. Yeah, exactly, it's not meant to appreciate.

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 1>So from a from a retail user perspective, UM, if

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that stable coin could hold value better than whatever fiat

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>currency I have available to me, that's one option why

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I'd want to use it UM. The other option would

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>be UM. I mean the other option is an investor

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make sense because it's stable. It's not I want

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>to invest in something that's going to go up in

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>value and the stable coin is not supposed to do that. UM.

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Now why do we see so? And I guess you

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 1>answered so. The reason why we see big companies vcs,

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>etcetera starting stable coins UM, the play, the probably the

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>predominant revenue play would be to have those assets under

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 1>management which they could invest and make more money on. Yeah,

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>that's one reason why people would be interested in it. UM.

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>And at the end of the day, data is valuable

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 1>at the bitcoin isn't anonymous, it's pseudo anonymous. If you

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>run a node like you would get access and you're

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 1>able to UM parse the data and analyze that data properly,

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you're able to learn a lot about a transaction. And

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 1>when I think about conglomerates creating their own cryptocurrency and

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:24.680
<v Speaker 1>running the validator nodes themselves, even if they're not collecting

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:28.959
<v Speaker 1>personal data directly by looking at your idea or anything

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:32.680
<v Speaker 1>like that, they're able to glean information about your spending

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>habits and what you're using this for. And I think

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>that is probably I don't know if that's more valuable

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 1>than the interest from the money backing it, but I

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 1>do see that there's value in that as well. Yeah,

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:46.199
<v Speaker 1>so that's what some of these stable coin companies would be.

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>They have a play possibly on the data as well

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>as whatever the float they can do with the float. Yeah,

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 1>got it now. Um let's so with stable coins um

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:02.919
<v Speaker 1>for dominantly, they're all centrally controlled. You talked about the

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>counterparty risk as well, they're essentially controlled, and they're trying

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to peg to something more more stable. So whether that's

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a currency of basket of assets or whatever um, And

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing there's all different types of ways that they

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:21.879
<v Speaker 1>can try to hold that peg um. But historically, doesn't

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:24.680
<v Speaker 1>it seem like all pegs have always broken, even even

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>nation states haven't been able to hold their pegs. Yeah,

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 1>you have to get all stakeholders involved interested in protecting

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:36.919
<v Speaker 1>the peg. And that's sort of I could speak to

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Reserve because I know that much more intimately than I

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:43.159
<v Speaker 1>know the other stable print projects out there. But the

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:46.399
<v Speaker 1>way we approach this differently is we have a secondary

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:50.399
<v Speaker 1>token that incentivizes arbitragers to keep the teg on exchanges.

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 1>You're always like, you're never gonna be able to keep

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the teg unless it's relatively constant on exchanges. But the

0:19:57.520 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 1>question is how do you do that. You could perform

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 1>your own market making function, but then you're never going

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to get to decentralized and there's gonna be a lot

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>of other issues of trying to keep a peg yourself.

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:10.920
<v Speaker 1>But if you trust that people are incentivized because they're

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:14.160
<v Speaker 1>going to profit by keeping the peg, all of a sudden,

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe that will Like will that work? Um, we haven't

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:19.880
<v Speaker 1>seen it done yet, so i'd like to think it

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:23.640
<v Speaker 1>could work, But I think you have to incentivize everyone

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 1>in the ecosystem to keep the peg because it's in

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:29.159
<v Speaker 1>their best interests to do so. In a normal the

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>outcoin back stable coin, why does a user, why does

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the market make The people that are buying it just

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 1>want to be able to arbitrage and on exchanges, that's

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>where their profit is. They're not interested in making it

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 1>stay a dollar because they don't make money off of that.

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>They'd rather it's be different. Yeah, I mean George Soros

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the most famous and prolific investors in the world.

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's famous because of breaking the peg, right,

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>So he made a billion dollars in a day by

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>breaking the peg. And so that's why it just seems

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>like man if if if nations can't even do keep

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the peg, how are these smaller institutions going to do that.

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's an interesting challenge that I guess we'll have

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:09.879
<v Speaker 1>to wait and see how that plays out. Yeah, in

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:12.119
<v Speaker 1>our white paper, we discussed the saurus attack, and we

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 1>think we've created mechanisms to prevent against run on the

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 1>bank and a saurus attack, largely by after a certain point.

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>If we're saying that there are certain assets that appreciate.

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>If that means are volved filed, they could go down.

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it tries to read defaults in a foreign jurisdiction

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>for whatever reason, it could default, and maybe that starts

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>triggering itsel Off. Our protocol has a mechanism in place

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 1>where it basically prevents withdrawing after a certain point, just

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>limited to a paradis share of the basket. That way,

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the first people coming aren't going to take it out.

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 1>They have to sort of trust that the pig will

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:49.679
<v Speaker 1>be restored to a dollar later on. But it prevents

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 1>a run on the bank and prevents a sourrous attack. Yeah, well,

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a really good framework for for the stable coin talk. Um,

0:21:58.040 --> 0:22:00.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll get let's let's jump into some stuff. It's maybe

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more in your wheelhouse, which is more

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 1>on the regulation side of things. Obviously you understand the

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>technical side very well with your background, and so thanks

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>for jumping into that with us. But on the regulation side,

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:14.120
<v Speaker 1>you talked about like working with Venmo and the problems

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 1>they had even transferring money. Um, but now we're talking

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:21.439
<v Speaker 1>about stable coins and global regulations. So you even just

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>said right like most stable coins maybe don't make sense

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 1>in the US, but they make sense abroad. And then

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>of course you start running into all different types of

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 1>regulations and things like that. So what are some of

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:35.159
<v Speaker 1>the big I'm guessing regulations is probably the biggest hurdle

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that stable coins will have to make uh to reach adoption.

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>But what specifically are you you think will be the

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>biggest problems there? Well, the problem comes down to where

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>are you located and who do you want your customers

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to be. If we're gonna say that you're either located

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>in the US or you want to have US customers,

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 1>your regulatory responsibilities are going to be very different, and

0:22:57.640 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a lot more onerous doing it here

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:03.400
<v Speaker 1>versus elsewhere, um in the world. And that's just sort

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:05.239
<v Speaker 1>of if you live in the US, this is what

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you have signed up for already. I didn't sign up

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 1>for it, right, UM. So I have this conversation regularly

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>with founders like, well, people are doing this elsewhere, um,

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:19.679
<v Speaker 1>and it's so much easier. There's much more complicated in

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the US. Like then leave specifically stable coins. Really the

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:29.120
<v Speaker 1>target market is out of the US, right, So now

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you have to deal with each individual country has its

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 1>own laws and then I'm guessing because you're a US company,

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you still have to really somehow be with US laws

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 1>as well. I mean, what's that challenge? Like, yeah, that's

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a it's a very big challenge. UM. I will say

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that the US is largely more onerous in terms of

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:50.200
<v Speaker 1>your regulatory obligations and what you have to do. So

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of jurisdictions actually where if you're

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>complying in the US, you'll be your compliance prophecies are

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be better than what they would require you elsewhere,

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:01.399
<v Speaker 1>and most regulators as will allow you to do that.

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:04.399
<v Speaker 1>As you are regulated in the US as a financial institution.

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:07.239
<v Speaker 1>Of course, you go into EU and some of like

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the more well some of the bigger countries, that's not

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 1>necessarily the case. But if you come in and being

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 1>regulated by the US, like you're going to be more

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>respected when you go to regulators elsewhere. But if you

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>are regulated by the US, there is certain information that

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 1>you need to collect and so, like one of the

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:26.639
<v Speaker 1>big issues is sort of the Sincon and o fat regime,

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:30.639
<v Speaker 1>which I sort of group into an umbrella called financial crime. Um.

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>This requires you to collect certain information about the people

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you're doing business with. But the information that you collect

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to be different depending on how risky this

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:42.439
<v Speaker 1>person is to your business model, and so you have

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to sort of make an assessment of what risk profile

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>is every customer that comes in. You need to collect

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>certain information, but you might need to collect even more

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 1>information if your research shows that this is an extra

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 1>risky person. And you also have to then monitor this

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:02.199
<v Speaker 1>person's account. Maybe they're sending very transactions, or they have

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of small transactions then a large transaction. Now

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 1>you have to analyze, well, what is this money being

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 1>used for? Are we uh like, is this being used

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 1>for legal activity? We need to get more information from

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:16.880
<v Speaker 1>this person. And on the flip side, if you're purchasing

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the stable coin, you need to know where that money

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 1>came from. And so if you're dealing with are developing

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:25.959
<v Speaker 1>country or a country outside the US, question is how

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>can you prove that the funds come from a legal source.

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you look at people's bank account records, maybe you

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>have them signed affidavit. If it's small enough, they're just

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 1>it just sort of depends, and it's going to be

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>very difficult because that's not really how you like traditional

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 1>technology scales, and that's not how many of the financial

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>UH industry works in these countries. If you go down

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to UH Columbia for example, Venezuela, Columbia for example. UM,

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 1>there are a bunch of UM market makers that just

0:25:56.520 --> 0:26:00.919
<v Speaker 1>don't do ky C, and you can't plug into that

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem if you're a US financial institution, So you have

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to sort of go around the existing financial systems and

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 1>build it a new and that's not easy. Yeah, And

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>then why would somebody want to comply with that when

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>they have other options where they don't have to, Because

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:20.200
<v Speaker 1>if you want to work out of the well, most

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 1>countries in the world have m L KYC policies. But

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about from a customer perspective, Like, if I

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>can deal with a market maker that doesn't require k

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 1>K y C, why would I go with somebody who's

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna request my children so security numbers in ten years

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 1>of bank statements or whatever? Right, Like, why would I

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 1>want to do that? Yeah, that's a very good question.

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Too much, too much friction, you know. UM. So, so

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 1>each country is its own challenge, so that that that

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:46.359
<v Speaker 1>that can make it very difficult. I I you know,

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>looking at the Facebook Libra coin, which made a bunch

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of noise this past week. It's technically a stable coin

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 1>as well, And it seemed like they didn't even plan

0:26:57.880 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to launch in the US. Really, they wanted to launch

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I think in India, which was their biggest market, because

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:04.399
<v Speaker 1>of what's app and like the right in India's just

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>like nope, you're a launching here, right? Is that kind

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of what happened? Yeah, India's been on and off. Cryptocurrencies

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>are illegal, not illegal, but um, they've been very skeptical

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and it felt largely from a consumer protection angle, Although

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:22.879
<v Speaker 1>I do appreciate that they focused on one country because

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a much easier and more targeted way

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of going about building your business and use case than

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 1>just going out globally saying Okay, here's a stable point

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:35.479
<v Speaker 1>everybody uses. You need to solve the real world problem

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 1>for people, and in India this would have potentially solved

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the real world problem. The problem is you have Facebook

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't isn't looked fondly on by the regulators lately. Largely

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:50.160
<v Speaker 1>these were data privacy issues, um, but now when you're

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about adding financial data and control of people's money,

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, people are going to look at

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that even more strongly based on the response be a

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 1>privacy before because there's nothing probably more important other than

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>health information than financial information and a person. Yeah, So

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:12.159
<v Speaker 1>the regulations they just continue to pile up. I know

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the G twenty was just meeting and they were talking

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 1>about this f T A f or whatever, right, the

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:21.160
<v Speaker 1>fat fat fat or whatever they call it, and uh,

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 1>they're wanting to impose more regulations and this travel rule

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 1>and whatnot, which I don't want to really want to

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 1>jump into too much, but I saw some comments today

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 1>where they said, uh. I think the Secretary of U. S.

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Treasury was saying, um. He said uh. He said, they

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure that virtual asset service providers do

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 1>not operate in dark shadows, UM, enable emerging fintech sector

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 1>to stay one step ahead of rogue regimes and sympathizing

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 1>sympathizers of illicit causes searching for avenues to raise and

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>transfer fund without detection. Um. And so they're like, we

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>want to allow cypic currency to become the equivalent of

0:28:57.640 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 1>secret numbered accounts, uh, etcetera, etcetera. Right, um, And so

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean they kind of get it and they want

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to stop this. I'm curious you know, for me, I've seen,

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, specifically around the Facebook thing they're talking about, Well,

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 1>we're always control the on ramps and off ramps, so

0:29:16.000 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 1>it seems like they at least have that. Of course,

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna always continue to UM regulate the exchanges as

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>best they can, specifically the ones that have on ramps

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and off rams. What for those that are listening on

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 1>ramps and off rams meaning the chance to go from

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>crypto back to FIAT. So whether I turned Fiat to crypto,

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:34.479
<v Speaker 1>crypto back to FIAT, that's an on ramp and off ram,

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 1>so always regulate that. But let's go back into the

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 1>money remittance market. So, uh, the big use case is

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 1>money remittance. If I want to and and I've done

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 1>this because I have people all over the world that

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 1>worked for me, and I try to send money Western Union,

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and I got to drive down to the location. It

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>takes me an hour while I'm there, it has to

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:00.239
<v Speaker 1>be done in cash. It takes thirty to forty five

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 1>minutes to do it. It's super expensive, etcetera. Right, and

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and and it's really expensive. So if I could just

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>send them crypto, then that that cuts all that out.

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 1>It's way cheaper, um, et cetera. Now, these as I

0:30:14.360 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>just mentioned, is fat these regulatory people trying to manage

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the on ramp, soft frames, etcetera. But where does remittance

0:30:21.400 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 1>fall into this? So like if I can just if

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 1>if somebody in Columbia or India can just download an

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 1>app and I can just transfer them points, Like, what

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>what can a regulator really do about that? Um, there

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 1>isn't much that a regulator can do about it. This

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 1>is this A is this? Do you see this as

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a war they're going to eventually lose? That's an interesting question. Um, yes,

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 1>but over a much longer horizon than anyone expects. UM.

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I haven't used sort of the financial crimes aspect looking

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 1>at this, but I look at it from the SEC

0:30:55.560 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 1>perspective of the example of decentralized exchanges. The essential eizes

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 1>exchanges as they currently exist are not really decentralized exchanges.

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Yes they're No, they're not taking custody of funds. So

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the argument. But you know who's building you largely

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>know who's building it, you know who's behind the project,

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you know who put it out there, you know who's

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 1>responsible up key, who to go with problems. That's not decentralized,

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's running it's an exchange. But what were to

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 1>happen if there was a truly decentralized exchange, no one

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>knew who was behind the project and people were just

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 1>able to with smart contracts posted at ask prices that

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 1>were executed automatically, which I believe, which I believe there

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 1>will be. There's a there's a need for it, so

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 1>someone's going to build it. Yeah, and I think this

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 1>is probably a tend to fifteen year horizon. Um, some

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 1>people might do it quicker. You might think way sooner hopefully,

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 1>but anyway, go ahead, right, But yeah, the question is

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:51.840
<v Speaker 1>there's no one to go after at the end of

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the day. You can't turn off, like there's no servers

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 1>to turn off because there it's around the world. And

0:31:57.520 --> 0:32:00.959
<v Speaker 1>so what happens when a regulator can't regulated thing that

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 1>it wants to regulate? So they control the on ramp

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 1>off ramp. But if I never need to get on

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 1>or off, what are they gonna do? Right? And what

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 1>happens when you could then spend that in the real

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 1>world like the market. That's a real question. The thing

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 1>is we're not at that point yet. We're currently dealing

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>with I c O S quad Quadraga, Quadrialga, exchange UM,

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 1>runaways UM, We're dealing with much larger fraud and other

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 1>things right now, where I just don't think that's really

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 1>on the regulator's mind. There's just so much low hanging

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 1>fruit right now with that actors that that's who regulators

0:32:40.240 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 1>will go after first. That's not to say that they

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 1>won't go after others later, but what you said, yes,

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 1>curious someone coming from Venmo and then working on stable coin,

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and then the remittance market is the big piece there,

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and the regulators are trying their best to stop that

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>from happening. But if you really open up the remittance market,

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 1>which is the big use case, then it almost has

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of this regulation. It's like you can't

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 1>really open up the remittance market. I think without that

0:33:12.000 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 1>it seems like, I mean, because as you're saying, right,

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to get all these individual countries with all their individual

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 1>laws to all work together, like, it's almost like it

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 1>probably would never happen, and so you almost have to

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 1>move outside of that. I would think, I think a

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 1>company like a PayPal um if you're not saying that

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the PayPal would do that I'm saying that a company

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that starts for nothing and takes the PayPal model of okay,

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 1>we need to go and figure out how to spend

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 1>money to each of these countries, and to go through

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the process in each of those countries. It's tedious, time consuming, extensive,

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's unclear whether it will even work because now

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 1>we're dealing with cryptocurrency as opposed to I don't know

0:33:51.800 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 1>digital money of financial institution, so that might be in

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 1>an even harder sell um. Or maybe let's say that

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 1>there are still Paypals not available in a lot of places,

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 1>which is why the money remittance is still trillions of dollars,

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 1>which is why I still have the Western Union because

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I can't pay Pal to those locations. Yeah, and there's

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 1>been a big pain point that if you're gonna send

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 1>remittances you have, like you said, you need to use cash.

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 1>The question is at some point cash has to enter

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the system. Yeah, and so at that you don't prevent

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:29.200
<v Speaker 1>money wandering. The idea is that if money wandering is found,

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you have enough information to have it go back to

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the regulators that are enforcing um whatever law they're up. So,

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:40.839
<v Speaker 1>for example, if I remitted money to you, and you've

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 1>never been ky C, but you send that money off

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 1>to someone else. I was KYC when I put the

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 1>money in the bank account. And they're gonna the let's

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:52.719
<v Speaker 1>say Finncent comes or the Department of Justice comes and says,

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 1>here's a subpoena. I need the records of Mark. Um,

0:34:56.160 --> 0:35:00.480
<v Speaker 1>give me his records, um, right um? Or we need

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to know who this went to, Like, well, I know

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I sent it to you. Here's all the information I

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 1>know about Mark. And you could have sent that off

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to someone else, but then they're just gonna go to you.

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:10.799
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, you could say I'm not going to help you,

0:35:11.200 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 1>but then they're gonna right you know um about cash, right,

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:23.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, none of this was even around fifty years ago.

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 1>The whole rolls cash. I mean when they when they

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:31.920
<v Speaker 1>raided the Iraq, Saddam Hussein had pallets and pallets and

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 1>pallets of cash. I mean even just a few years ago,

0:35:35.440 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the Obama administration sent planes of pallettes of cash to Iran.

0:35:40.960 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Pallets of cash he sent in the middle of the

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 1>night to Iran. Right um. And so like all this

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:49.759
<v Speaker 1>like financial regulation is to like we need to know

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 1>where every single penny is going and who's who? It's

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:56.040
<v Speaker 1>all this is all brand new, isn't it. Um. Yeah, well,

0:35:56.080 --> 0:35:57.439
<v Speaker 1>if you want to even go back to like two

0:35:57.440 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand seven, two eight in the financial crisis, I forgot

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:01.879
<v Speaker 1>which bank was getting a bail out. I don't want

0:36:01.880 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to see the wrong name. But they need an infusion

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of like a billion or two billion dollars um And

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 1>this was before Monday. The bill opened on Monday, but

0:36:11.040 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 1>thanks are closed after by PM on a Friday, and

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:16.239
<v Speaker 1>so there was no way to wire this money. So

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:19.440
<v Speaker 1>someone had to fly on a plane with a multibillion

0:36:19.440 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 1>dollar check to New York from Japan to be able

0:36:23.120 --> 0:36:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to get the money there in time. And yeah, this

0:36:26.600 --> 0:36:29.879
<v Speaker 1>could have we didn't have the solution before. But you're

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:32.399
<v Speaker 1>saying going back in and further it was all cash. Yeah,

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:35.799
<v Speaker 1>and that's our legacy financial system is something that this

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:39.279
<v Speaker 1>gets into philosophy, which like again we always have to

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 1>dip into this, but like, oh, this regulation, like it's

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:45.840
<v Speaker 1>it's all new, Like is it really even that important?

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:48.799
<v Speaker 1>And the world hasn't always operated like this, and so

0:36:49.000 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 1>if it hasn't done has if it hasn't been like

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:53.440
<v Speaker 1>this for very long, if we operated fine without it?

0:36:53.920 --> 0:36:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Do we need it? And couldn't we just moved to

0:36:57.520 --> 0:37:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a crypto only remittance market. We don't have it anymore.

0:37:00.960 --> 0:37:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's the world gonna end. No, it's the

0:37:03.840 --> 0:37:07.120
<v Speaker 1>crypto utopia. But um, we're not starting with a blank slate.

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 1>We're starting with many existing financial regulations, most recently got

0:37:12.600 --> 0:37:16.120
<v Speaker 1>more ownerous doctor in the financial collapse because the free

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:19.879
<v Speaker 1>market was greedy and we decided to be able out.

0:37:20.360 --> 0:37:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Um a lot of these companies. Um, some people and

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that with the crypto ethos would say, well they should

0:37:25.440 --> 0:37:27.320
<v Speaker 1>have all failed and it's a survival of fit it

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:33.920
<v Speaker 1>like pre market. Um, that's not what the US government does. Yeah,

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that's not what happened. And that's the U s government

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:39.360
<v Speaker 1>is responsible for protecting its citizens and they decided that

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 1>this is the right thing for us to do. Whether

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:45.200
<v Speaker 1>you agree with it or not, Like that's irrelevant. What's

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:48.360
<v Speaker 1>relevant is there are enough people in Washington, d C.

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:51.440
<v Speaker 1>That agreed that this was the appropriate response to take,

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:53.719
<v Speaker 1>and then they took it. And that's what we deal

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:57.880
<v Speaker 1>with by being in the United States. Yeah. Cool, Well,

0:37:58.200 --> 0:38:01.400
<v Speaker 1>this is such a fascinating topic one that I'm I'm

0:38:01.440 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 1>really intrigued in and we could sit here and go

0:38:03.680 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 1>on forever and ever, but I know we need to

0:38:05.719 --> 0:38:08.359
<v Speaker 1>wrap this up, so let me just ask you one

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:10.880
<v Speaker 1>last thing. So I'm just curious kind of in your position.

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:13.960
<v Speaker 1>You have this unique perspective on on payments and stable

0:38:14.000 --> 0:38:16.880
<v Speaker 1>coins and where you're at. What are you seeing right

0:38:16.880 --> 0:38:20.440
<v Speaker 1>now in the space that has you excited maybe for

0:38:20.480 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the near term, six months or twelve months out. I'm

0:38:23.640 --> 0:38:28.640
<v Speaker 1>really excited that UM people are more focused on cryptocurrencies

0:38:28.640 --> 0:38:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that have been out for a while. There's less scams

0:38:31.360 --> 0:38:36.920
<v Speaker 1>out there. UM people are not are raising less money. UM.

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:42.000
<v Speaker 1>The ones that are raising money are raising five million dollars,

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:44.880
<v Speaker 1>not the hundred million dollars that billions of dollars that

0:38:44.920 --> 0:38:49.480
<v Speaker 1>others have raised to build a technology. UM. So I'm

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:52.520
<v Speaker 1>excited about that UM for a bunch of reasons. I'm

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:56.440
<v Speaker 1>excited for the KIN lawsuit, because the Kin FBC battle,

0:38:56.520 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 1>because I'm really excited to see what we're going to

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:03.160
<v Speaker 1>get from that court case. Yeah. I don't think KIM

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:05.960
<v Speaker 1>has great facts to support the Howie tests, but their

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:09.760
<v Speaker 1>argument that how we tested and apply is a novel

0:39:09.840 --> 0:39:12.759
<v Speaker 1>and interesting argument that I'm curious to see if that

0:39:12.800 --> 0:39:15.959
<v Speaker 1>will hold any muster um under the in the court.

0:39:16.239 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 1>Do you think we'll see that play out over the

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:23.040
<v Speaker 1>next twelve months, um, some of it, But we won't

0:39:23.040 --> 0:39:25.840
<v Speaker 1>have an answer in twelve months, but there will be filings.

0:39:25.960 --> 0:39:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I assume Ken will file for emotion to the smiff

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:32.319
<v Speaker 1>at some point, because that's usually what you will do.

0:39:32.960 --> 0:39:37.160
<v Speaker 1>The SEC will respond to that, the court will likely say, Okay,

0:39:37.200 --> 0:39:40.240
<v Speaker 1>there's enough to go to trial over. And I expect

0:39:40.280 --> 0:39:44.160
<v Speaker 1>there to be a lot of legal that like not

0:39:44.200 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to call them battles, but legal back and

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 1>force to position each side. Um. And. I think we're

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna learn more information about what's going on there from that.

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:54.440
<v Speaker 1>But no, I don't think that this is going to settle.

0:39:54.520 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's going to end in the next year.

0:39:56.719 --> 0:39:59.759
<v Speaker 1>Year now and then we didn't talk about Facebook Libra

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:02.319
<v Speaker 1>really um and and we don't have any time left

0:40:02.320 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 1>to dig into it. But I guess that's something that's

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:08.520
<v Speaker 1>going to happen over the next six months or twelve months. UM.

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Let me get your opinion. They have been asked by

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 1>US Maxine Waters leading the charge to stop, to halt

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:20.319
<v Speaker 1>until this is get figured out. Do they halt or

0:40:20.320 --> 0:40:23.279
<v Speaker 1>do they continue and what does the next six months

0:40:23.320 --> 0:40:26.920
<v Speaker 1>look like? For that, the question is telling them the

0:40:26.960 --> 0:40:29.920
<v Speaker 1>halt is vague. I'm not sure. I didn't read what

0:40:29.960 --> 0:40:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the exact response was. But Facebook itself isn't in control

0:40:34.200 --> 0:40:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of the Libre Foundation. It's one of the founding members.

0:40:38.480 --> 0:40:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I think either they or Calibra runs a node for validation,

0:40:43.960 --> 0:40:49.279
<v Speaker 1>but Facebook itself doesn't control it really, And if they

0:40:49.320 --> 0:40:51.719
<v Speaker 1>wanted to like show a more decentralized thing, I think

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:53.719
<v Speaker 1>they should have taken a further step back so that

0:40:53.760 --> 0:40:57.400
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't get so much regulatory pushback. But hindsight is

0:40:58.239 --> 0:41:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and you obviously want the marketing push and being asociated

0:41:00.560 --> 0:41:04.360
<v Speaker 1>with that. I think what I'd be more worried about

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:08.080
<v Speaker 1>is you had already been approached by several regulators who

0:41:08.080 --> 0:41:11.719
<v Speaker 1>were talking about Facebook breaking up big tech companies, and

0:41:11.760 --> 0:41:14.319
<v Speaker 1>regardless of how you feel about that, when you add

0:41:14.360 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 1>financial too something when you're already being talked about as

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 1>being too big and controlling too much of people's lives, well, yeah,

0:41:25.239 --> 0:41:27.640
<v Speaker 1>so it was just a very poor timing. And so

0:41:28.360 --> 0:41:33.400
<v Speaker 1>ultimately I don't think Facebook has any legal obligation currently

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to stop doing it. It's whether or not they are

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:40.480
<v Speaker 1>worried enough that Congress might take some action that they

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:43.560
<v Speaker 1>don't like, whereas it would make sense to stop. And

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I just don't have access to their internal conversations or

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:49.799
<v Speaker 1>their risk profile or not information to guess whether they

0:41:49.800 --> 0:41:53.920
<v Speaker 1>will push back or not. So as a as a

0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:57.279
<v Speaker 1>hypothetical general counsel, do you tell them, hey, let's hold

0:41:57.320 --> 0:42:00.279
<v Speaker 1>off and see what happens first, or like she just

0:42:00.360 --> 0:42:04.160
<v Speaker 1>go for it. I don't launch in the US. Don't

0:42:04.200 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 1>launch in the US, right, I needed more information to

0:42:09.239 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the side if you completely stop or not, but at

0:42:12.040 --> 0:42:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the very least you're not dealing with US customers and

0:42:15.080 --> 0:42:18.960
<v Speaker 1>told us is handle got it? Got it? Great? All right? Well,

0:42:19.000 --> 0:42:20.719
<v Speaker 1>thanks for sticking your neck out on that one. I

0:42:20.760 --> 0:42:26.440
<v Speaker 1>know that's uh, that's always a tough one. Absolutely Well anyway, Matt,

0:42:26.480 --> 0:42:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I know we went a little bit long. Thanks so much.

0:42:28.040 --> 0:42:30.600
<v Speaker 1>It was a great conversation. I love talking about this

0:42:30.680 --> 0:42:33.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff and hopefully everyone enjoyed listening. Now you

0:42:33.480 --> 0:42:35.759
<v Speaker 1>have some really good perspectives. Where where would anyone to

0:42:35.800 --> 0:42:38.040
<v Speaker 1>keep up with you if they wanted? Um, you can

0:42:38.080 --> 0:42:41.560
<v Speaker 1>follow me on Twitter at m a Gurgler, or on

0:42:41.600 --> 0:42:46.160
<v Speaker 1>LinkedIn you could add me just Matthew Gurgler, Great, all right,

0:42:46.480 --> 0:42:48.840
<v Speaker 1>well good stuff. Thanks for taking the time to talk today.

0:42:49.520 --> 0:42:53.319
<v Speaker 1>It's been my pleasure. Have a great day. Hey. If

0:42:53.360 --> 0:42:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you like this episode of the Market Disruptors Podcast, please

0:42:57.000 --> 0:42:59.759
<v Speaker 1>help us take this to the top of the podcast charts.

0:42:59.760 --> 0:43:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Just please do me a favor and rate, review and subscribe.

0:43:03.239 --> 0:43:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Taking fifteen seconds to just leave a quick review goes

0:43:06.040 --> 0:43:08.359
<v Speaker 1>a long way in helping us reach more people and

0:43:08.480 --> 0:43:11.600
<v Speaker 1>disrupt more markets. I really appreciate you listening and I'll

0:43:11.600 --> 0:43:13.960
<v Speaker 1>see you next time on the Market Instructors Podcast.