WEBVTT - Markets, Cannabis Industry, Yelp Survey

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Panel podcast. I'm Paul swing you

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>along with my co host Lisa Brahma Wicks. Each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor, find a Bloomberg penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. We're getting some earnings. It's been

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>a great year for pretty much everything because we have

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>experienced the everything rally that if you were entirely expecting.

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:31.479
<v Speaker 1>Joining us on to talk about how to position heading

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>into your end is Greg han. He is chief investment

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 1>officer for Winthrop Capital Management, joining us here in our

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Interactive Broker studios. So, Greg, what are you doing

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 1>cashing in, sitting on your hands and waiting for the

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:46.279
<v Speaker 1>year to pass. No, I wouldn't say we're cashing in,

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>but we are moving to risk out of portfolios, both

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>on the fixed income side and the equity side. This

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>is something we started probably midway through the last quarter

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and we're trying to get it done before mid November.

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>So what is your view for as we know pair

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:03.319
<v Speaker 1>through these earnings here and we start to look out,

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 1>do you think the FED will be continued to be

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>supportive and you might go a little bit more risk

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>on as you head into next year. Um, so this

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>is a change for us heading into this quarter. What

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at, we would have been saying, yes, we're

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to de risk. We're seeing enough momentum

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>in Brexit and US China trade issues that could be

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>a catalyst for fixed investment and consumption from a global standpoint,

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>those barriers get reduced. I don't know that they'll be removed,

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>but reduced. We could actually see this economic recovery go

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>into the next two quarters in two thousand twenty. So

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:42.960
<v Speaker 1>which assets in particular look like a bye that wouldn't

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:46.479
<v Speaker 1>have otherwise looked like a bye? If Brexit is resolved

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and there is some sense of some sort of trade

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>truce between the US and China. Large cap equity has

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>had a great run, so the S and ps up

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>over but when you look at mid cap and small cap,

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>small caps legged. So that's one area, and with private

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>credit expansion, we'd expect small cap to do well. The

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>other areas the international space, developed countries have lagged. We

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>have not been a big mean reversion kind of firm.

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>We're looking for capital flows to help support that, and

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>so we'll probably increase our allocation to international next year.

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>And does that include emerging markets? It does, Yeah, as

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>long as capital is flowing. And that was historically the

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>European banks were big lenders into the the emerging economies. Um,

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's right now, it's still It looks like a

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:28.679
<v Speaker 1>train wreck when you look backwards, but you have to

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>look forwards and look for the opportunity. So right now,

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>what's your sort of breakdown in terms of the US

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:39.959
<v Speaker 1>versus international exposure? We're um in our in our portfolios

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>were about fift internationals, so it would be developed, developed,

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>five percent emerging. So in your fixed income portfolio, you know,

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting to think about credit quality a little bit

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>more as were you know, ten eleven years into this

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>economic cycle. It's got to end sometime. What are you

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>see in terms of the credit quality? So we have

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>been watching closely for a shift in credit and it's

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:08.239
<v Speaker 1>a great question. We're focused in the leverage loan market.

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>That's where the biggest his you know, where the change

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>in covenants, that's the first sign of a deterioration. But

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>when you look at banks, the when you when you

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>look at the loan lost provisions, UM, they're the banks

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>are really really healthy right now. So we're not seeing

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>it in the credit side. Go back twenty five years

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and two thirds of the investment grade market was rated

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>single and higher. Today two thirds of the corporate market

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>is rated triple B and lower. It's it's you know,

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>it's it's shifted and we have lower interest rates and

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>lower cost of capital for companies. It doesn't make sense

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>from great So so people have been raising this issue

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>for a while, and everyone's been looking for the cracks

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>in credit markets, and some people point to leverage loans

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 1>UH and even higher bond saying that there is a

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>slice of them, both markets that have fallowen out of

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>bed recently plunging in price. Is this a market event

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>or an economic event. That's a good question, Lisa Um.

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>From from the standpoint of capital flows, I would say

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>that this is this is a capital market event, UM.

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 1>And it's when you look at concentrations in certain sectors,

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>like the energy sector in the high yield space, that's

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>citiosyncratic I think in that area, UM. But the rest

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>of the market looks. I mean it's it's credit has

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>been really really healthy, consumers healthy, and we'll tell you

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 1>the manufacturing sector is healthy. So the FED meets next week,

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:33.359
<v Speaker 1>UM on the what do you expect from the Fed?

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:36.039
<v Speaker 1>And do you think the Fed will continue to be

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>dubbish and supportive of this economy? Yeah, Paul, I think

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>this is um. We we're expecting twenty five basis points

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and then in December our base case has shifted out

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to a hold with improvement. It's all contingent on what

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>we see how a Brexit and the US China trade issues.

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>So right now, what do you like the least to

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>own heading into your end? That's a great question. So

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>financi twill assets have been challenged probably the least. Right

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>now we are reducing significantly high yield. So we still

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>have a short sleeve in short duration high yield, but

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>hi yell pulling that that out, uh anything levered so

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 1>leverage loans, b dcs. We want to stay out of

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the levered part of UM the markets, and we're really

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>running right up the middle UM dividend paint stocks we

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>still are invested in, So I was gonna shift gears

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 1>to stocks. So Again, one of the things we hear

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot from folks that are managing money is need

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 1>to be defensive. But me talk defensive whether it's utilities

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>or reads or consumer staples. We also hear that those

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>sectors aren't cheap, and so you kind of run into

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the risk because how do you manage that balance? Yeah,

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:46.239
<v Speaker 1>that's that's that's another good point that both bull sectors,

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>reads and utilities have had a great run this year.

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:51.279
<v Speaker 1>And really what it is now is named names specific

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and if you're investing in e t F, you've gotta

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 1>be careful because a lot of E t F sleeves

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 1>have concentration issues in um single names like Microsoft in

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.359
<v Speaker 1>the in the technology sleeve. So you kind of have

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>to do your homework to see what's in there. And

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>you've got to pick your stocks right. So let's say

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you do everything right heading into your end, what kind

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>of returns are you expecting? So if we ended the

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:15.920
<v Speaker 1>year today, which was I start to say that uh

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the S and P WED it would be twenty it

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>would be return and bonds at eight percent in this

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>interest rate environment, to have an eight percent return in

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>fixed income is surreal, So then why not just cash

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>in well, we have to stay fully invested. Were so

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>much of what we do is either funding liabilities or

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 1>relative return, and we're not market timers, and we're not

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>good at that the timing thing. So we're about a

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>fifth of the way through earnings. Anything jump out at you.

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Here's you kind of parsed through some of the early

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:46.599
<v Speaker 1>country reporting. Yeah, the banks have done really well. Again,

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I was surprised at how well the bank earnings have

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>come through, and and um, so that was that was

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:53.799
<v Speaker 1>a pleasant surprise. We're we're gonna be looking at Microsoft

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 1>coming up and the Amazon comes up this week also,

0:06:57.640 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>so we're watching that. Sorry, are you long the banks

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>right here? How's your exposure? Yeah, we've we've we've shifted. Um,

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>we we swapped Bank America into City. We still own

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan and we're trying to get into the regional sleeve. Um,

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 1>we've been longholders of Wells Fargo and we're encouraged by

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>new management. So very good. Greig Han, thanks so much

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Craig Han as President, chief Investment Officer

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Winthrop Capital Management based in Indianapolis, but joining us here

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>in our Bloomberg Broker's Interact. Their Brokers studio. Greig, thanks

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. All Right, now let's shift

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>gears to UBS for getting earnings from a number of

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>banks UVS reporting it's investment bank lagging behind here with

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>all the details. Alison Williams, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Financial Analyst. Alison,

0:07:57.040 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>what are sort of the highlights of the financial report here? So?

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the number one highlight was the strong wealth flows,

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>especially in Asia. This is of strategic importance for you,

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>bas It's I think why a lot of investors own

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the stock and we saw sort of a dip last quarter,

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>very strong flows there and invested assets at a record.

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Obviously we have to watch what's happening with asset prices

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>going forward. The negative, um was the investment bank because

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you pointed out and so profit coming in below expectations. Um,

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of companies have been beating the numbers.

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 1>However they're beating, they're beating beaten down expectations and unfixed

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 1>income treating which isn't a big as big of a

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>piece for UBS. But I think that the critical thing

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>that they talked about was they are they're reorganizing the bank.

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:48.679
<v Speaker 1>This is something that Bloomberg News has reported on UM.

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>They didn't say specifics there, but they did say they're

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>going to take a one hundred million dollar restructuring charge

0:08:55.440 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>leading to ninety million dollars of annual savings going forward. So, Alison,

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>what do you think what is your view of UBS?

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Can they continue to be? Well? First of all, are

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>they a global investment bank? And if so, can they

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>continue to be Because we've seen, you know, Deutsche Bank

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:13.319
<v Speaker 1>essentially say we're not a global investment bank and we're

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>cutting back. What's the UB strategy? So I think they

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>are global investment bank, but they do have a little

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 1>bit of a different mix. So they are more focused

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>on Asia and they are more focused on Europe UM,

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and so they say they're gaining share in those areas.

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>We don't have sort of all the numbers in from

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>from some of those local competitors to sort of validate

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that UM, but they are generally more focused on those

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>areas which have been feeling the pressure. And I was

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:43.559
<v Speaker 1>waiting for you, Paul to ask me if the savings

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 1>meant staff cut. That's where I was going. And I

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:49.079
<v Speaker 1>was prepared with my answer this time, which is you

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>always asked me this class savings me and staff cuts.

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>And my answer to you is always like, well, there's

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>staff with Zoso technology and we're seeing both at ubs.

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>And basically what they're saying is, look, you know, we

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 1>are gonna cut some staff a hundred percent of the

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>cost savings are going to be in compensation, but we're

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to invest in technology. And I think

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>that's important because I think that's really what the US

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 1>banks have done, right, is that you know, they sort

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:17.439
<v Speaker 1>of benefited from this virtuous cycle about our economy. We

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 1>got the tax cuts, they were able to spend. But

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, UMS has had some interesting anecdotal

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:29.319
<v Speaker 1>wins in their research department. They have this UM Evidence lab.

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>They've also invested in their electronic trading platform, and I

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>think that's the story we're going to continue to hear

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>more about. In terms of fixed income trading. We also

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>got this big announcement from Deutsche Bank. We knew they

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>were going to be making cuts to their rate business,

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:45.679
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News saying they think it's going to be ten

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>per cent. Um also saying, and again this is hearsay,

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:51.680
<v Speaker 1>but you know that the bank is going to continue

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to invest on technology. You know, the shift in fixed

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>income trading that we've seen in equities trading I think

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to continue, and I think it is important.

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>And to your point, if you want to be a player,

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that you need to invest just get your sense. Do

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>you think that UBS would be better off just as

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a wealth management unit and not with its investment bank?

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I think And that is the questions that investors asked

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>because I think, you know, when people look at companies

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>like UBS and Credit SUITEZ, that's what they want to own.

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>They want to own the wealth management business, recurring revenue,

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 1>very high return on equity um. But there are sort

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of benefits of having the investment capabilities. Think about wealthy

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Asians that want to sell their businesses, the M and

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:42.559
<v Speaker 1>A opportunities, the financing opportunities, and UBS and credit switets,

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, continue to pound the table to make the

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>case of the synergies between the banks. You know. I

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>do think that there is some, uh, there is some

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>validity to that argument, um. And I think we will

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>see from from Credit Suite next week, who has also

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>been under pressure given they're sort of trailing trading revenue

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of which I do think it is due

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to mix. You know theyy I think are going to

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>continue to outperform when they report next week. Alison William

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:11.319
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. We really appreciate. We

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 1>know it's a busy time with the global investment banks

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 1>reporting earnings. Allison's the senior analysts covering global investment banks

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and asset management for Bloomberg Intelligence, joining us on uh

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the phone. Well, we all know that the cannabis market

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:43.320
<v Speaker 1>in the United States is growing rapidly and there's a

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:45.959
<v Speaker 1>lot of players that are trying to find their niche

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 1>within the business that includes the marketing and advertising and

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>education around cannabis, and our next guests are certainly trying

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to make their mark there. We welcome Jeremy Jacob's, co

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 1>founder and chairman of Enlightened, and Colby mackenzie, co founder

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>also on their board of managers of Enlightened. Both of

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>them join us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio.

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>So Jeremy and let me let me start with you,

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>which give us a sense of what Enlightened is and

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 1>what you guys are trying to do in this market. Yeah,

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>so Enlightened feels a really interesting niche. We're the largest

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>media company within the cannabis space. We operate a network

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 1>of television screens and roughly a thousand cannabis dispensaries across

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty six states and three countries. Really to kind of

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 1>get a feel. If you imagine standing in line and

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 1>you look up and there's a television screen. It's educating you,

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 1>it's entertaining you, but it's also advertising to you. That's

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the biggest part of enlightened business. So Colby, how often

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>are people standing online at a cannabis dispensary able to

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>watch television? Yeah, it's It's actually an interesting thing because

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I was definitely a newbie to the space when I

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:50.439
<v Speaker 1>co founded this with Jeremy and expected it to be

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 1>like most of a retail where you just walk in

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>walk out as fast as you can. But you've kind

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of seen this trend in retail as a whole, and

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>cannabis is kind of leading that, and it's really become

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>like this experience. So you're not going there just to

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>have a quick general store type transaction. Instead, you're going

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>there to experience and learn and really find your niche

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 1>within the space. And so we actually have tracking technology

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 1>that says they're in there for twenty one minutes. Okay,

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>when when when you say you're in cannabis dispensary for

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>an experience, I know, I just think, okay, so you

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 1>go there to get high? Is that? What's going on? UM?

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>A little different than that. So, because there's so many

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 1>different strains, so many different types, so many different things

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that you have options, it actually is like information overload

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and it turns into this like please help me, like

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>deer in the headlights type experience. And that's why our

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 1>screen is there to kind of guide them along the

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>way without feeling embarrassed. So, Jeremy, what are the types

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of advertisers that advertise on the Enlightened Network? Great question. Really,

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>they fall into two categories. The first one is obvious,

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the endemic advertisers the products that would be carried on

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the shield same way if you had a screen in

0:14:56.880 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 1>a convenience store and be obvious to promote candy balls

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:04.239
<v Speaker 1>and cokes, well, vape pins, edibles, uh, you know, premium

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>bud that's prepackaged. Those types of advertisers. But what we're

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing really more than anything, is an increasing demand from

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>non cannabis companies that have decided to focus on that

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>cannabis market. For example, Vice Showtime, a lot of entertainment

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>companies that come out with programs like Long Appetite Obviously

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>that's catered towards the cannabis market. Uh. And then you

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 1>look at companies like door Dashes an advertiser of ours,

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and Vans delivery of food that's excellent for cannabis consumers

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>both hungry and lazy, as well as Vans, you know,

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a very popular skateboarding shoe. So there is a portion

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>of the cannabis demographic that that fits perfectly. So we're

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>really seeing a growth in the non endemic advertisers in

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a really big way. How many cannabis dispensaries are there

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>so interesting question because it is a transition from a

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>gray market in many states to a legal market. So

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>from a legal perspective, you're looking at about five thousand

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>cross the nation. So I guess that when you say

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a gray area, are there other facilities that have

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>access to your television feed? Sadly, no, we actually only

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>work in the legal ones. But sadly, when I say gray,

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>you're talking largely about like a California market where it

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>was medical and it was very kind of gray as

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 1>to what was a dispensary. We've always had a role

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>in a board. Our board is very strict on this rule,

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>legal or no TV for them. So so Jeremy, give

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>us a sense of and Kobe as well. I know

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>you guys have maybe some maybe different thoughts. Where are

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>we Just give us a sense of where are we

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the states, How many states have legalized marijuana,

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and what is I would guess the holding grail for

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the industry would be a federal legalization. Give us a

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>sense where you think that might be. Yeah, so you've

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 1>you've got about a dozen states that are now recreational. Uh,

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and you know that's really when the tipping point occurs,

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 1>especially for sales volume, is when you go recreational. Outside

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>of that totality, you've got around thirty thirty three thirty six,

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 1>depending on how you look at medical marijuana, whether it's

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>been elected or actually implemented. So you're looking at two

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>thirds of the country past that there's at least decriminalization

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:12.119
<v Speaker 1>and most of the other states. There's very few states

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:15.439
<v Speaker 1>that don't have some sort of cannabis legislation that's in place.

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:18.160
<v Speaker 1>As far as federal legalization, I think that's a big

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:20.399
<v Speaker 1>debate with everyone, but most of us with inside the

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>industry definitely feel it's within two years. You know, it's

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 1>a strong political marketplace right now, and so everybody wants

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to grab ahold of that. I wonder how much though

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the vaping scare recently has sort of set that effort

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>back me. I mean, have you've seen a sort of

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>fewer people showing up to the dispensaries or if not

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that more pushback from regulators and so the interesting thing

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>on the vaping scare is, I feel like you saw

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a ton of reaction outside the industry. Inside the industry,

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>it was it wasn't really viewed in any major capacity

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 1>because it actually shows a sign that you need to

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>move towards legalization because with legalization you have more regulation,

0:17:56.880 --> 0:18:00.679
<v Speaker 1>particularly coming from federal assistance and money, and all of

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the illegal activity and kind of the vaping scare came

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 1>from stuff that turned out to be not legal. Jeremy,

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 1>we have literally twenty seconds. How much buying power do

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:13.120
<v Speaker 1>these people have? Cannabas consumers are some of the strongest

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 1>bars on the planet. There's some of the most loyal

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>They're big spenders. They spend on averages short of a

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:21.159
<v Speaker 1>hundred extra dollars on cannabis, and so they've been proven

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to be some of the most loyal, biggest spenders. Jeremy

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Jacobs as well as Colby Mackenzie, co founders of the

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:35.160
<v Speaker 1>company Enlightened, which runs a television in dispensaries across the country.

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Who knew that it was twenty one minutes in in

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a cannabis Who knew a lot of these things. We're

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>having so many people associated with the cannabis business come

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 1>in here, and there's so many different ways that this

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 1>is actually growing as a business. Yeah, and then it's

0:18:47.520 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a it's a real big money maker. The official data

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:10.919
<v Speaker 1>is confusing, conflicted, and often not enough. That has been

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 1>the conclusion of many investors certainly that are looking for

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 1>alternative sources of data, one of them being yelped, where

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 1>you write reviews of the places you go. Uh. Carl Biolic,

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:24.119
<v Speaker 1>Data science editor joining us here for yelp in our

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Blombergadder Actor Broger Studios. Carl, can you give us a

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>sense you have this yelp economic average? Can you give

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>us a sense of what it is and what it's

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:35.639
<v Speaker 1>showing us right now? Sure, it's a look at how

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 1>businesses are doing, and how consumers are engaging with businesses

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and how that's changing. And it's across many different industries

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:47.359
<v Speaker 1>and all across the country, including in fifty metros that

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:52.160
<v Speaker 1>we track, And we just released today our third quarter findings,

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:56.880
<v Speaker 1>which show that things were pretty flat. The economic average

0:19:56.920 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>was up about zero point one percent, so a little

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:02.879
<v Speaker 1>bit of good news, sort of the sum total of

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 1>all the different things we saw affecting the national and

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:08.159
<v Speaker 1>local economy in the third quarter. So, Carl, is there

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>anything did you guys in your data see any regional differences.

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Are certain parts of the country doing better than others. Yeah,

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>this time we really focused on California and California metros

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 1>which have been struggling, in particular in the Bay Area.

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 1>San Jose, out of the fifty big metro's we've been

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 1>tracking for almost three years now, has fallen the most

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and San Francisco has fallen the second most, So it's

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:35.160
<v Speaker 1>a pretty clear picture. In northern California, Sacramento is also

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>below average. And then if you go to southern California,

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 1>San Diego is one of the worst performing metros. In

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:42.400
<v Speaker 1>l A is in the bottom town as the West

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 1>wrong with California. Well, so this has changed since the

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>third quarter of fourth quarter of sixteen. So there's certainly

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:51.239
<v Speaker 1>many great things going on in California. I say, is

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 1>you know California based business. I mean, there's there's great

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>things in the economy. It would be one of the

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:58.360
<v Speaker 1>world's largest economies. There is what nasty letters from people

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 1>living in California. But you know this has changed, so

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 1>there are struggles. There are declines that we attribute, we

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:07.679
<v Speaker 1>think mainly to just the difficulty of being able to

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 1>set up shop in California and then to find workers

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>who are near your business and to be able to

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:15.160
<v Speaker 1>pay them enough that they can afford to live near

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 1>your business while still turning a profit and having enough

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>customers nearby who are going to give you that density

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>that you need to to stay competitive. Are there areas

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>where you saw a surprising amount of strength. Yeah. We

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>we've been tracking for the last two quarters. A We

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:32.159
<v Speaker 1>call the five boom towns, the ones each quarter that

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:34.639
<v Speaker 1>have grown the most since the start of this series

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>three years ago. This time, Milwaukee was the strongest. There's

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 1>also strength in Buffalo, Portland, Maine, Honolulu. You know, maybe

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>these are not the ones you would put on a

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:47.880
<v Speaker 1>list normally, and you know, what do we say they

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>have in common besides that they've been doing very well

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 1>in the ELP economic average. But we do think there

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>are these smaller metros that have been able to attract

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:58.399
<v Speaker 1>businesses and uh, you know, allow people to take more

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 1>risks perhap. But is this is this a real sort

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 1>of sense of where we are in terms of you know, however,

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>many years into this economic recovery, the areas that kind

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:11.439
<v Speaker 1>of lagged behind for longest are finally seeing some positive

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>momentum in their local growth. Is that sort of the

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 1>story here? I think that's a big part of it. Yes,

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I think we are seeing that there are places that

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 1>if you had checked in, you know, ten years ago

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and where were they relative to each other, you might

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>see something really different. And that this last three year

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 1>periods of interesting period, as you're saying, like in terms

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of recovery. We've had a new president during this time.

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:35.639
<v Speaker 1>So it is really just this change through the history

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:37.399
<v Speaker 1>of this average, and we're gonna be interested to see

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 1>what's the boom town in one year, in five years. So, Caroll,

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the great things about the YELP reviews is

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the restaurant reviews, So what are you seeing in that categories.

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you guys have a lot of data points there. Yeah,

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:52.679
<v Speaker 1>and we're looking at reviews potentially, but also all the

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 1>other things people do with restaurants and seeing that really

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the lower priced restaurants and the restaurant and food options

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:01.639
<v Speaker 1>that you might go to when you really want to

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>eat at home and they're supplying food that you're gonna

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>take and eat at home, those are the strongest um.

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, there are some exceptions, but we're also seeing

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>some of the more expensive categories and restaurants declining, which

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, could be a signal that people are being

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:18.120
<v Speaker 1>more frugal, but they might also just want to eat

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 1>food made outside the home more often, so they're going

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to lower priced options to make that possible. But it's

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see strength in some of these categories like

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>pizza and chicken wings and delis. Although this all goes together, right,

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:32.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the higher priced markets are seeing the slowest growth,

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know, when whether it's in other businesses as well. California,

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I know that New York with property, but you're also

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing slower growth or less popularity at the higher end

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of restaurants. What is the implication economically if the high

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>end is starting to pull back a bit, I mean,

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 1>it could it could suggest that there's some lack of

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:55.639
<v Speaker 1>confidence in you know, spending money and consumption. Uh, there

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:57.719
<v Speaker 1>are other signals we look to for that, of course,

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 1>but you know, I think that it's it's a complex

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>picture because I think there's also just shifting geographically and

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that may have to do with how expensive markets are,

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>but also what the local regulations are and opportunities for

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:14.160
<v Speaker 1>workers in different sectors around the country. And in terms

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 1>of food, I think one thing that we've seen as

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a company in general is just a stepping up of

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:22.160
<v Speaker 1>quality in the lower price categories. So I think people

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 1>also have recognized that that, you know, what used to

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>be considered like fast food, let's say, has has really

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>stepped up in a lot of cases. You know, some

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of the lower priced local restaurants as well have really

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>been competitive in quality. Carl bial like, thank you so

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Carls a data science editor for YEP,

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 1>joining us here in our Bloomberg Inactive Broker studio. Thanks

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:47.679
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>whatever podcast platform you prefer. Paul Sweeney, I'm on Twitter

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 1>at pt Sweeney. I'm Lisa abram Boy. It's I'm on

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Lisa A. Bramwoy. It's One before the Podcast.

0:24:56.240 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio to

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>belated