WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance TV: September 30th, 2025

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 2>with Lisa Bromwitz and Amrie Hordernt. Join us each day

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 2>for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 2>from our global headquarters in New York City. We are

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.319
<v Speaker 2>am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 2>Terminal and the Bloomberg Business App. Investors bracing for a

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:41.160
<v Speaker 2>potential government shutdown to begin at midnight, Mark hay Fley,

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 2>the chief investment officer in UBS Global Wealth Management, right

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 2>in the following. With the direct impact of a government

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 2>shutdown on financial markets likely to be muted, we maintain

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:53.959
<v Speaker 2>a positive outlook for US secrates. Mark joins us now

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 2>for more make welcome back is Vincin long, my friend,

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about what's anchoring that view. What's making you

0:00:58.200 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 2>bullish right now?

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think we've had continued strong earnings. We've seen

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 3>this continued investment on the AI side, and then we

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 3>have the FED cutting rates, so those are positive backdrops

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 3>would also add in there, you know, the strong fiscal

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:24.679
<v Speaker 3>spend that continues, and that's been supporting the economic picture

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 3>as well.

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Mark, I know that these are real numbers, real revenue,

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 2>real profits. There's been some concerns recently about circle of finance,

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 2>financial engineering. Do you see any pockets of speculative behavior

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 2>that concern you and the team?

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely that there is, you know, and there has been

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 3>for several years, speculation in various parts of the market.

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 3>I think focus on quality is something that we have

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 3>maintained and will continue to maintain a focus on cash flows.

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 3>There are plenty of stocks. It does seem like, you know,

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 3>you could put dot Com in your name and your

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 3>stock would go up. Now you put AI in your

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 3>name and your stock would go up. That kind of

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:13.360
<v Speaker 3>thing is a worrisome sign to a degree, and that's

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 3>why you really do have to start digging in on

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 3>particularly I think on the cash flow side, Mark.

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 4>Until now, a lot of the money that's gone into

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 4>tech investment has been cash flow free cash flow. Now

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 4>we're starting to see more leverage get introduced to more

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:30.359
<v Speaker 4>of these deals. I'm thinking of the core Weave Core

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 4>Weave deal right now, that we announced this morning.

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 5>With Meta Core.

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 4>Weave is a below investment grade rated company that relies

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 4>heavily on the debt market, and this comes along with

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 4>a slew of LBOs and other deal activity. Does that

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 4>raise concerns about the debt side of the financing structure

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 4>heading into a really uncertain economic time.

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think it's a I think it's a good point,

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 3>as you've noted. I think rightly we're starting to see

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 3>really just kind of the beginnings maybe of some of

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 3>the more excitement on the institutional side about IPOs and

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 3>other things. So, you know, I think some of this

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 3>financing is absolutely something to watch, but we still believe,

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:19.679
<v Speaker 3>you know, some of it in the around the core,

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 3>around some of the core of the hyperscalers. That's still

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 3>very early, but there's no question that there are pockets

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 3>of leverage as well building up in the system. I think,

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, the way the way we look at it

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 3>overall with the AI project, it's something that we think

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 3>is one of the longer term themes that we want

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 3>to stay invested in because we do see the productivity growth,

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 3>we hear it from our clients who are our customers.

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 3>That's something they're investing in. We still like the power

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 3>and resources story associated with that, We still like the

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 3>healthcare story. These are areas you know, there are big

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 3>problems for governments UH and and where there's big problems,

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 3>there's big money going in. We've seen the President of

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 3>the United States say we're going to win it. We

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 3>must win on AI. These are existential, ultimately defense issues,

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:17.719
<v Speaker 3>both for companies and for nations, and so I think

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:19.919
<v Speaker 3>that gives it something of a little bit of a

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:22.600
<v Speaker 3>different quality. And those are the kind of longer term

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:25.479
<v Speaker 3>trends we want to be behind. Even if there is

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 3>certainly the potential for some choppy trading into the end

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:29.720
<v Speaker 3>of the year mark, if you.

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:31.919
<v Speaker 4>Do have all of this investment, the IPO is the

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:36.039
<v Speaker 4>deals activity. Can you get a real acceleration in growth

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 4>heading into the fourth quarter without a reacceleration and inflation.

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Look, we think there might be some acceleration of inflation.

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 3>It's I think it's something about how much the Fed

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 3>and other central banks would be willing to look through that.

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 3>But also keep in mind for some of if you

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 3>take the tech sector, that inflation is not necessarily an

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:09.160
<v Speaker 3>issue for them, because if you take the hyperscalers. They're

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 3>not that reliant on debt financing, right, So there again,

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 3>I think it could be a time to get a

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:22.559
<v Speaker 3>little more selective about who can continue to benefit given

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 3>the very large changes we've had in the way the

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 3>economy has been moving forward this year.

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:30.039
<v Speaker 2>Mark, I've got to squeeze this in. Got about forty

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 2>five seconds. You're at UBS. I've got to ask you

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:35.679
<v Speaker 2>about gold, the move we've seen this year this month.

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Can you walk us through how investors have taken exposure

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 2>to the precious metal, whether it's physical paper, and if

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:45.040
<v Speaker 2>it is physical, whether they're choosing to store it closer

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 2>to home.

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 3>All of the above. Jonathan, you should come visit the

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:56.159
<v Speaker 3>vault someday. Long long equities and long gold has worked

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 3>very well for us, and we think that will continue

0:05:58.839 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 3>to work.

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 5>Stay with us.

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Multilomberg Surveillance coming up after this. Monica Querra of Mark

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:16.359
<v Speaker 2>and Stanley Ontica, welcome to the program. A lot of

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 2>people looking through this Wall Street saying it doesn't matter

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 2>to show me the economic tanctor and everything's okay. Do

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 2>you think about it slightly differently?

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 6>I think you have to look at it, you know,

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 6>from where the risk actually could bubble up. Now, historically

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 6>markets do look through. You get Marcus outperforming at average

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 6>about four point four percent during periods of shutdown. Granted

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 6>they can last from you know, three days to thirty

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 6>four days, so that's a huge window in time. But

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.039
<v Speaker 6>typically even with the long shutdowns, you still have markets

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 6>out performing. So the risk comes and which industries and

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 6>sectors are most reliant on those government contracts and that's defense, healthcare,

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:55.720
<v Speaker 6>et cetera. Is this a nice by opportunity potentially if

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:58.479
<v Speaker 6>you're trying to you know, take a tactical approach, But

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:02.039
<v Speaker 6>again it's a short to a short window where markets

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 6>like to look through.

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, that last shutdown that was thirty four to thirty

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>five days in the end, what kind of impact did

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>that have on Wall Street and the economy?

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 6>Very little, because the macroeconomic factors were really important. The

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 6>other thing that's critical here is that it was a

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 6>partial shutdown. It wasn't a full shutdown. So in twenty

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 6>thirteen we had a full shutdown, and I think the

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 6>estimate from the CBO is that they lost about twenty

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 6>four billion or so in productivity in twenty eighteen, even

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 6>though it was a double the length twice as long

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 6>or more of a shutdown, They only lost eleven billion

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 6>three billion net at the end of the day after

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 6>everyone was made whole.

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 5>So even with.

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 6>That length of time, there could be you know, a

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:46.239
<v Speaker 6>variety rate of factors that could impact growth.

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>The conversation I'm hearing out of Washington yesterday today this

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>morning talking to people is obviously the government is shutting down,

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>it's the length. What are you thinking about in terms

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>of how long the government will be shut down?

0:07:56.840 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 6>So when we're thinking about the political factors here, right

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 6>with the Democrats, they are taking a stand. Earlier this

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 6>year when Schumer came to the table and they passed

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 6>the cr there was a large outcry within the Democratic electorate.

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 5>Right upset that they moved so quickly.

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 6>So I think it does behoove them from a voter standpoint,

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 6>right of speaking to their base to actually hold a

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 6>firm line. Then they have to balance that with pressures

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 6>that can potentially come from the White House.

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 5>They were calling for mass layoffs.

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 6>That's likely not to happen, but other areas that could

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 6>be a catalyst is potentially, you know, apportionment control, meaning

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 6>that the president could deny a transfer of funds posts

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 6>or daring this shutdown as essentially a catalyst opportunity to

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 6>look under the hood and see where they can cut.

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 4>Why has that been the shift and focus away from

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 4>possibly some sort of mass layoff program and more just

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 4>shifting where money goes in the government.

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 5>So we look at what happened with DOGE.

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 6>They were largely unsuccessful, right, They were able to get

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 6>some cuts through. There was such significant power within the

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 6>federal unions protecting the status of workers, and the legal

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 6>response right was essentially a significant pushback. They don't want

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 6>to run into that sort of hurdle again. So I

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 6>think it's more of an issue of which agencies, which programs,

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 6>which departments are ideologically aligned with the president, and could

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 6>those areas actually be in trouble if they choose to

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 6>withhold funds.

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 5>Okay, so let's talk specifics.

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 4>What are the areas that could possibly see reductions in funding?

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 4>What are the areas that could potentially see increases in

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:35.719
<v Speaker 4>funding as soon as the next few weeks if there

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 4>is some sort of shutdown, I mean you.

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 5>Could see some risk.

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 6>I mean, this is pretty high level and widespread. It's

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 6>already happening right on the DEI front that's likely to continue.

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 6>They could also look at anything that's clean energy related.

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:51.679
<v Speaker 6>You could maybe see some impacts to EPA. And then

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 6>the other areas that I think are critical is on

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 6>the Medicaid healthcare front. They're continuing to want to clamp down,

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 6>especially on those ACA subsi that the Democrats are looking

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:02.319
<v Speaker 6>forward to extending.

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 5>Do they get that that's the big question. What's the

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 5>off ramp. The off ramp here, I.

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 6>Think is if you start getting really notable aggressive activity

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 6>from the White House, and then that could move the

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 6>Democrats forward because there's a significant amount of programs that

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 6>they don't want to lose and they want to make

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 6>sure that their support outside of ACA subsidies. Right now,

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 6>this is their bargaining chip. This is the thing that

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 6>they want to get a win on. If they can't

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 6>get that and everything else starts to see this, you know,

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 6>you start to see the train go off the tracks

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 6>in other ways, that could be the catalyst that gets

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 6>the Democrats.

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>The Vice President yesterday was talking about rural healthcare policy

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and how potentially that is one place where they can

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 1>come to an agreement.

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 5>Is this where the off ramp.

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Will be, though it will be in the healthcare policy sector.

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 6>If Democrats get a concession, that's their off ramp.

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 5>The other piece that I'm talking about is.

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 6>The stick off room, right that if the White House says, no,

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 6>we're not negotiating with you, we're not giving you those subsidies,

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 6>then you have to come to the table because we're

0:10:58.000 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 6>going to cut other things. Right, And it's more of

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 6>a fear tactic now on the ACA and rural healthcare component.

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 6>When you're looking at red states, Rural red states their

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 6>most reliant on ACA. They didn't do Medicaid expansion, so

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 6>the Medicaid rulebcks don't really impact them. So it is

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 6>really all about ACA subsidy extension, and that is an

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:20.079
<v Speaker 6>area where you do get bipartisan consensus.

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 4>Taking a step back and looking at some of the

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:25.439
<v Speaker 4>macro implications, not clear what the longer term macro implications

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 4>are for bond yield. It's based on just sort of

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 4>this broader sense that it isn't essentially an economic issue.

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 4>You do see though, longer term an impact on the dollar.

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 4>There has been a weaker dollar associated with shutdowns. Do

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 4>you expect that to be correlation that continues this time around?

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 6>Yes, this is a historical relationship. One of the things

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 6>that we want to note though, is that the length

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 6>of time right is going to impact that how week

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 6>it goes. So if we get a week, that's going

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 6>to be very different than if we get another thirty

0:11:57.080 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 6>five day window.

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:02.839
<v Speaker 2>Sight with us more Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 2>FI Lorlando, a Federated Global Investment sees momentum building. He

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:18.959
<v Speaker 2>writes the following. Given the potential for a strengthening labor

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 2>market and moderating inflation, economic growth could accelerate in the

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 2>second half of this year. Phil joins a snapper more, Phil,

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 2>good morning, good morning, Thanks for having me back, thanks

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 2>for being here. Just to build on that quote, is

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 2>that the story we're priced for.

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 7>Stock market's up thirty eight percent since the Liberation Day

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 7>lows back in the middle of April. So clearly they're

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 7>not jumping out of the upper floors of the towers

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 7>because they're concerned that the labor market's collapsing. Has the

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 7>data been soft the last four months, no question, But

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 7>in our view the data was sort of troughing here

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:56.680
<v Speaker 7>and has the potential to accelerate going in the next

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:57.079
<v Speaker 7>couple of.

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 2>Months relative to what this is what I want to understand,

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 2>were priced for a lot of this going into twenty six.

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:05.559
<v Speaker 2>Expectations have already picked up. We've had the equity market rally.

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:07.719
<v Speaker 2>How much of that has been about earnings? How much

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 2>of that is just a better economic story or reading.

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 7>So the earning situation we think is excellent. You know,

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 7>you look at the first quarter. In the second quarter,

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 7>second quarter, revenues up six percent, earnings up twelve percent,

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 7>much better than expected, the consensus expectations for the third

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 7>quarter starting to come in. Those numbers look pretty strong.

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 7>We're in the process of upgrading our earnings estimates for

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 7>full year this year, full year next year. So the

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 7>earnings pictures in pretty good shape. Clearly, the labor market

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 7>has been the weekly. Now you look at the August

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 7>jobs report, it was terrible, admittedly, but there are a

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 7>couple of things associated with that number. One, August tends

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 7>to be the quirkiest month of the year. You've got

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 7>you know, schools starting and starting up again, factories taking

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:59.680
<v Speaker 7>downtime to retool, temporarily furloughing workers. So the August non

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 7>farm payroll report historically is the quirkiest report of the year.

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 7>So you look at for example, Kevin Hassett, the National

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 7>chairman director, came out and said that they're expecting seventy

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 7>thousand jobs to be revised up over the course in

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 7>the next couple of months. That's consistent with what we've

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 7>seen historically. All of the noise and the nonsense in

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 7>August tends to gets revised up. All right, that's point

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 7>number one. Point number two. When we saw the initial

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 7>weekly jobas claims the first week of September, the numbers

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 7>were terrible. I think it was about two hundred and

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 7>sixty four thousand. The market was freaking out a little bit,

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 7>but you know, we suggested take a deep breath. Number one,

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 7>it's a holiday shortened week. And number two, you had

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 7>the allegations of claims fraud in Texas. So as we

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 7>went to the next week, which was the survey week

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 7>for September, the number came down on about two hundred

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 7>and thirty thousand, and then last week came down further

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 7>about two hundred and seventeen thousand. So we think the

0:14:57.760 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 7>claims are pointing to the fact that the numbers are

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 7>to be pretty good. And then you know, we were

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 7>talking about nonfarm versus ADP. Going into this, the expectations

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 7>for ADP about fifty thousand plus. That's kind of the

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 7>number we're looking for for nonfarm That would be a

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 7>number roughly double what we saw in the month of

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 7>August for nonfarm So we think the labor market there

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 7>may be a little too much pessimism built in, so

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 7>our expectation that the number is probably troughed here and

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 7>we'll start to see some improvement.

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 4>Given that backdrop, there's a mystery, and we were unpacking

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 4>that ahead of the Nike earnings after the bell This idea,

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 4>even CEOs don't know how much consumers will absorb price increases.

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 4>What is the connection right now between corporate profits and

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 4>potential inflationary pressure?

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 7>No question. If you look at the piece that I

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 7>wrote last week focused on how good the back to

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 7>school season was, back to school was up four point

0:15:56.960 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 7>two percent three months through August. Back to school a

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 7>year ago is only up two point three percent. So

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 7>the consumers in pretty good shape, particularly at the high end.

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 7>But I think there is absolutely some consternation about what

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 7>pricing is, particularly at the low end of the price spectrum.

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 7>So companies are going to have to you know sort

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 7>of weigh that that situation high end consumers can afford

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 7>a little bit more in pricing. But the question of

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 7>are there going to be any forced pricing issues because

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 7>of the tariff situation that companies need to pass on

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 7>in order to maintain profit margins. Profit margins have been

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 7>pretty strong up until now. Is that situation going to

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 7>deteriorate in the third quarter in the fourth quarter. We

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 7>don't know the data yet, but that's something that we're

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 7>going to have to say.

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 4>The big question mark over this has been holding back

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 4>the broadening out in the S and P five hundred,

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 4>in the RUSS of two thousand and the S and

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 4>P six hundred Pickure index. How much are you betting

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 4>that we are going to see that broadening out versus

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 4>just this consolidation in big tech, this idea that the

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 4>profits will continue to be driven by the biggest ten names.

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 7>We're absolutely in the broadening out camp, and that's been

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 7>our call for the last year. In case in point,

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 7>look how well the small camps have done both growth

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 7>and value over the course of the last couple of months.

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 7>In our view, the small caps were completely mispriced, and

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 7>once we began to see the fed kipped over their cards,

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 7>they're going to cut interest rates. An interest rate reduction

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 7>cycle is usually beneficial to the small cap companies. It

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 7>improves their ability to self finance, kicks off an M

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 7>and A and an IPO cycle, And you've got a

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 7>situation where domestically, we think economic growth is accelerating. Small

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 7>cap companies do eighty percent of their business here. If

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 7>the US economy is doing well, that's going to benefit

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 7>small cap companies.

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 1>But aren't more tariffs going to hurt small cap companies

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 1>even if they do business here? A lot of the

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 1>import could be coming from other countries.

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:57.679
<v Speaker 7>Well, again, that's a case by case situation. I was

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:01.239
<v Speaker 7>on Bloomberg Radio recently and we were talking about this,

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 7>and I got some random person that sent me an

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 7>email when I got back to the office asking that question,

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 7>isn't that going to impact pricing and imports and won't

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 7>Christmas sales be a disaster? And the answer in our

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:15.880
<v Speaker 7>situation is, we think it's going to be a case

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 7>by case situation. How is a company sourcing what they're selling?

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 7>What's the pricing of that? Can they source more domestically?

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 7>What's their labor situation? Immigrant versus native born that there

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 7>are a lot of factors here that are going to

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 7>dictate the answer to that question.

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Is there an area within the small caps that's immune

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:35.399
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of this.

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 7>We love healthcare and within healthcare biotechnology. These are biotechnology

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 7>gurus are telling us that the pipelines have never looked

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 7>better yet, the valuations have never been more extreme out

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.919
<v Speaker 7>of favor. And what we've been waiting for is some catalysts,

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 7>and we think the interest rate cutting cycle is that catalyst.

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 7>The big cap companies Pfizer and MERKETC will start to

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:03.920
<v Speaker 7>think about you know, M and A activity. Lower interest

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 7>rates again will make it easier to self finance, and

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 7>people are now going to focus on the really good

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 7>phase one, phase two, phase three clinical work that these

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 7>companies have done with their drug development. That's the sector

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 7>we think is poised to move higher.

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us more Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Investors looking for signals the US economy is heading back

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 2>towards stable growth of vlacility and higher inflation. Bruce Van

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Sun is the CEO of Citizens Financial Group, which serves

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:47.439
<v Speaker 2>approximately six million consumer and business customers. Bruce joins us

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 2>Now for more Bruce, good morning.

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 5>Good to see you.

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 8>Oh, it's great to be here.

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Do we say happy anniversary? Twelfth anniversary, Yeah, that's twelve years.

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 2>That's well, it is flown by. You've got to read

0:19:57.560 --> 0:19:59.640
<v Speaker 2>on both the consumer and businesses as well. We talked

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 2>a lot of our corporate confidence, the m and A,

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 2>the boom things picking up. Consumer confidence still hold back.

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Would you see across the business a difference between the two.

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 8>I'd say we're in generally good shape. So I think

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:15.640
<v Speaker 8>everybody's still a little holding back because of the uncertainty

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 8>around tariffs and some of the fiscal policies, but that's

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:22.159
<v Speaker 8>become the new normal, and so I think businesses now

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 8>are leaning in a little more. And I'd say consumer

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:29.160
<v Speaker 8>is split. So the higher end consumer is still enjoying life,

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 8>sees the stock market very strong, spending money, a little

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 8>more pressure at the lower end. Inflation still is persistent

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:40.679
<v Speaker 8>and real wage gains haven't fully covered that, so they're

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:41.719
<v Speaker 8>pulling in a little bit.

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 2>What opportunities are available to you and the team right

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 2>now to lean into that higher end consumer just a

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 2>little bit more higher income the private side of the business.

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:51.159
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So one of the moves that we made a

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 8>couple of years back was we tried to buy all

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:57.880
<v Speaker 8>the first Republic JPM. Ultimately was successful, but we hired

0:20:57.920 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 8>a lot of the talent, a lot of the private

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 8>bankers came over to citizens. Hired one hundred and fifty

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:05.879
<v Speaker 8>folks on day one, and then we've ramped that up

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:09.159
<v Speaker 8>now to close to five hundred people. We're a cross

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:13.400
<v Speaker 8>ten billion of deposits and we're kind of target at

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 8>year end hitting twelve billion in deposits eleven billion of AUM,

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 8>So the business is basically exploding in terms of new

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:24.360
<v Speaker 8>customers coming onto the platform. I think we're delivering really

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 8>good quality service at this point, and we're integrating that

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 8>with our commercial bank. So a lot of our middle

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 8>market companies are successful people. They have families in need

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:37.880
<v Speaker 8>of both business services on the commercial side and then

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 8>individual banking and wealth services for the family and for

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 8>the individuals, and so we bring that together to provide

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:48.359
<v Speaker 8>really robust solutions, and I think we're doing that better

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 8>than anybody in the market these days.

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:52.640
<v Speaker 4>Can you give a sense of just the rapid rate

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 4>of growth and what you see over the next say

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.919
<v Speaker 4>couple of years in terms of that wealth management sector

0:21:58.920 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 4>that's been driving growth.

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 5>I've been driving growth at a lot of the major banks. Yeah.

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 8>So one of the things we said is that by

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 8>this year that that business would be five percent accreative

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 8>to our bottom line. So it's basically a startup inside

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 8>a two hundred year old bank, And so we had

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:17.400
<v Speaker 8>all the expenses day one, and now revenues are kind

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 8>of exceeding those expenses, and we'll be well over five

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 8>percent of the bottom line this year. You played that

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:26.400
<v Speaker 8>out three to five years, this business could be fifteen

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 8>percent of our bottom line. So anyway, we're kind of

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:35.360
<v Speaker 8>continuing to be finding the sweet spot between growing it

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:37.919
<v Speaker 8>at a nice clip but growing it profitably. So one

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:40.439
<v Speaker 8>of the issues at First Republic had is their return

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:43.679
<v Speaker 8>on equity never got above eleven percent. We're running this

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 8>business today between twenty and twenty five percent. So we

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 8>have good operating discipline on this thing. As we continue

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 8>to grow, then we reinvest back in the businesses. We're

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 8>opening up new regions. We open southern California, We're going

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:59.439
<v Speaker 8>to expand in Florida, put more teams here in New

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 8>York tonight, in fact, we're opening our flagship private bank

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:06.679
<v Speaker 8>office on fifty second and six, so really exciting times

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 8>and great initiatives. Our team is executing very well on.

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:13.679
<v Speaker 4>It's amazing how many points of contact you have to

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 4>gauge consumer and business sentiment.

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:17.120
<v Speaker 5>As John was talking about, I just.

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 4>Wonder what is the sort of feeling not just about

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 4>investors people who are trying to manage their wealth. Is

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 4>it risk on, is it risk off? But also the

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 4>companies in terms of are they moving past that waiting pattern,

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 4>the holding pattern that we were talking about earlier this year.

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:33.639
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I'd say they're not fully leaning in yet, so

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 8>we're not seeing our credit lines that we have out

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:41.160
<v Speaker 8>with companies really being taken down to invest in growth,

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 8>in capex and things. But having said that, all of

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 8>our businesses are having very strong years, so cash flow

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:51.120
<v Speaker 8>is good, businesses are solid, We see no real credit issues.

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 8>I think with a little more certainty, they'd be leaning

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:57.119
<v Speaker 8>in more and they'd be doing more investing. So I

0:23:57.119 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 8>think that's still to come. The good news is on

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 8>the private equity side, on the kind of financial sponsor side,

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 8>there's now a kind of tick up in deal flow,

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 8>which we've been waiting for over three years to see that,

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:13.479
<v Speaker 8>and so our commercial bank has been positioned for this

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 8>to happen. We've really invested in it. We've got great people,

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 8>and so I think we're having a great quarter in

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 8>terms of our capital markets revenues. The deal machine is going,

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 8>the flywheels going, so I think that'll continue. So that

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:29.400
<v Speaker 8>feels really good. So the corporate side has a little

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 8>bit to catch up, but the financial sponsor side that's

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 8>ticking up very nicely.

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned Florida. How much wealth have you seen move

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>down from Florida, But you're still doubling down on New

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:41.400
<v Speaker 1>York and I want to be concerned about the mayor race.

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it's interesting. So we're focused big on three regions

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 8>right now for growth. One is the New York metro,

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 8>so we bought HSBC's East Coast branches to get a

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 8>foothold in New York. We bought Investors Banks and we

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 8>now have two hundred branches in New York City. We've

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:01.920
<v Speaker 8>invested in middlem market banking teams here, so we're really

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 8>gaining market share in New York. The other two regions,

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 8>one is Florida, as you mentioned, and one is California.

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 8>So we now have over three hundred people in both

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 8>locations and Florida has a lot of tailwind. During COVID,

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 8>a lot of people moved down to Florida. That's continuing

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 8>and so we started with a private banking team in

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 8>Florida and now we've added middle market, so we have

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:27.920
<v Speaker 8>both corporate and private bank working together. That's a market

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 8>where we don't have a lot of retail yet. So

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 8>in New York we have the full ground team with

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:34.880
<v Speaker 8>the retail. Florida, I say that we're coming in over

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 8>the top of that market to really bank successful people.

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 8>Same thing in California, over three hundred people there coming

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 8>in over the top. We have private banking teams, we

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 8>have corporate banking teams, and seeing a lot of growth

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 8>there as well.

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Survendics podcast, bringing you the best

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 2>in markets, economics, anngient politics. You can watch the show

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg TV weekday mornings from six am to

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 2>nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 2>or anywhere else you listen, and as always on the

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:11.719
<v Speaker 4>HM