WEBVTT - Saudis Go In For The Kill As They Target U.S. Oil Producers

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penl podcast. I'm Paul Swee you.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa brahma Witz. Each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.959
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Well, it has been an historic

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:24.279
<v Speaker 1>forty eight hours for the global energy markets. We have

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>w t I crewed yesterday trading well negative for the

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>first time ever. We're a little bit positive today on

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 1>that May contract. That's the last day for the trading

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>of the May contract. To give us a sense of

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:38.239
<v Speaker 1>what is going on in the global oil markets. Who

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 1>welcome John Kilduff, founding partner of Again Capital, based in

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:43.599
<v Speaker 1>New York City, New York City, John, thanks so much

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. What does negative oil negative? W t A.

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>What did that mean yesterday? Well, it meant that there's

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>just an abject gluts of oil uh in the US,

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>particularly you're in the Gulf Coast in the Pushing Oklahoma region,

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>that any more additional barrels are having a problem finding

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a home. Basically, the folks who have storage all of

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>a sudden found themselves not sitting on a oil tank,

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>but sits sitting in the penthouse. And uh, we're able

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>to charge accordingly. Other words, not only am I going

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to get free oil, you're gonna pay me to take

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>your oil. And again, it's because of what's happened here

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:29.479
<v Speaker 1>over the past number of weeks now, and it's just

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>crash in demand both globally and hearing United States, where,

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>for example, gasoline demand has so John, I'm looking right

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>now at the June contract w T I, which has

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>plummeted to about fourteen dollars of barrel, just to give

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you a sense. Back in March, when things we're not

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>looking too pretty, Uh, they were twenty almost twenty four

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars a barrel, comparatively high. Um where we headed here.

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Are we going to see the same kind of trading

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>activity in the June contract as we did in the

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>May one? Yeah, it's very much my sense that we

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>we will. I mean that this is going to be

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>a steady march lower. The physical market conditions are only

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>going to worsen over the next several weeks for a

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>couple of reasons. Um, even though we have the US

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>recount plunging and we are starting to finally see some

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>US oil production get get reined in and decline by

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 1>about seven thousand barrels from the recent peak by the way,

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>but this market is going to have to stare down

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>a massive amount of Saddi Arabian crude. Oh, the Sadie's

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 1>are going in for the kill here. It looks like,

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and um really just you know, put a knockout blow

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>onto our domestic producers, particularly the shale players, because they

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>have barrel schedule to be heading our way over the

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>course of the next couple of months here that are

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>going to compete for what little available storage space remains,

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>uh and use that crew to run it through their

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>refinery in Texas. That will preclude them from you know

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>what they usually do, which is by at least some

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>US Gulf of Mexico produced crude oil. So, Um, this

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>is gonna get a lot worse still before it gets better,

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:10.640
<v Speaker 1>all right, So give us a sense of what that's

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>going to mean for the US oil producers, the shale

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:18.359
<v Speaker 1>patch uh companies. Um, you expect a wave of bankruptcies

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 1>consolidation if in fact this does come to pass unless

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the administration comes through with some kind of aid package.

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:29.080
<v Speaker 1>There's been some hint of that. Yes, there's there's no

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>one there's no way around it that these and these

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>negative prices are are just uh, they're problematic for even

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>companies as large as Conuco and Exxon Mobile, although they

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>will withstand it, uh, and they will you know, be

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>on the other side of this thing and probably be

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the ones picking up the pieces. Here. You're going to

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>see a consolidation and concentration u emerge in the industry

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>where there's probably only be a handful of really significant

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the large players because they're the ones with the deep

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>pockets that can afford to a whether this arm and

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>then you know, buy out or or buy these assets

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>out from the auctions and bankruptcies that ensue. So, John,

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you did mention President Trump's uh pledged support of the

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>energy industry. So let's go there, President Trump tweeting earlier

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>this morning, we will never let the great US oil

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and gas industry down. I have instructed the Secretary of

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Energy and Secretary of the Treasury to formulate a plan

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:23.719
<v Speaker 1>which will make funds available so that these very important

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>companies and jobs will be secured long into the future.

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>How much do you sort of uh foresee that helping

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>things given the fact that, yes, federal law does authorize

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 1>the Energy Department to set aside emergency supplies, but the

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>agency has only ever used about two thirds of that capacity.

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>So how much are we can actually end up seeing here? Well,

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, for starters, you know, you know that the

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabia has never been a friend of ours. Whenever

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>there's oil market turmoil, when the prices are sky high,

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>they're very slow to put moral on the market to

0:04:57.240 --> 0:05:00.680
<v Speaker 1>help us out. And then and and right now, Um,

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:02.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't you know, I don't want to be over

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the top about what they're doing, but I mean they

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>are really coming at us hard here. Uh. This is

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>not something an ally or a friend were certainly a

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>country that benefits from our protection should be doing. If

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:16.039
<v Speaker 1>I was the president, I had urged the president to

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>embargo there oil and keep these forty tankers off and

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 1>away from this market. But um, what we don't want

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 1>to have happened here, um, is for the oil industry

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to get wrecked and then we find ourselves once again

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable to the policies of OPEC. Plus and Russia and UM,

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and we get a tight market where consumers, the US

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 1>consumers get squeezed again, we go through the whole cycle

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>one more time. UM. That's what I'm concerned about. And

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I think to the extent that the administration can lend

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:46.719
<v Speaker 1>some kind of aid and prop up at least a

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>portion of the industry, they should. They should definitely do it.

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>They should get oil into the Strategic Patrolling Reserve. I

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>have always been an advocate of using that aggressively because

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 1>we're up against the cartel. Um. You know, we least

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the oil when when when OPEC is tightening the spigot,

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and build it up now when prices are super low,

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 1>and we'll have an insurance policy in the future, so

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, hopefully they'll get aggressive on an administration we

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>can do something about this. This is not an entirely

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>free market. That's the problem. John Kildeff, thank you so

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:19.160
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us. John kilda founder of Again

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Capital on the oil markets not entirely a free market.

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Although you can get oil for free if you can

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:27.919
<v Speaker 1>store it somewhere, in fact, someone will pay you to

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:29.840
<v Speaker 1>take it off their hands. At least when it came

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 1>to the main contract. Interesting to see whether we'll see

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the same dynamic again play out with the June contract.

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>John Kilduff saying it looks like it's the very likely

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>possibility given the supplied to Man dynamic and the glut

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 1>out there of crude. Well, one thing I think investors

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:50.479
<v Speaker 1>are beginning to become accustomed to in this coronavirus era

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the markets is volatility. I'm looking at

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the VIX right now up a little more than three

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.159
<v Speaker 1>full points here to forty seven. That's a long way,

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly from the peak several weeks ago about eighty, but

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 1>it's also a long way from where we've historically been

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>trading in the thirteen fifteen kind of level, So a

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>higher risk environment for short. Someone to give us some perspective,

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>there's nobody better than David Kotok. He's a chairman and

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>chief investment officer of Kumblan Advisors, about three billion dollars

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>under management. So David, thanks so much for joining us.

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we've really chatted much at all since

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>this coronavirus has really become the narrative of not only

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 1>our lives but also financial markets as well. I would

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>love to get your long term perspective on kind of

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>how you're thinking about this new world that that we're

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>in and how to allocate capital. Well, thank you, Paul.

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>We are hunker down as everyone else in the world

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>who can hunker down just doing our view is a

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>cash reserve in equity portfolios is necessary in bond portfolios

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>highest grade credits. We are about to watch the dismemberment

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>of the credits related to lower grade energy sector, and

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>we expect that to be a worldwide phenomenon. And we

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>have to wait for the elements that we know we

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>must obtain, and they are testing, testing, testing, immune system

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>enhancement antibodies, vaccines, and robust, credible treatments. And as soon

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>as we have those, we can open up and we

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>can get back to work and we can eventually fully recover.

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>We cannot recover before we have these things, and any

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>attempts to recover before you have them is a high

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 1>risk gamut. We're about to tell that in the United States,

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 1>where we see people in bowling alleys in Georgia and

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>on the beaches in Jacksonville and assembled at state capitals protesting,

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna find out in two or three or

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 1>four weeks. If there are infectious surges in those locations

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 1>or tied to people who participated in those activities, we're

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>going to have that evidence very soon. And a lot

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of people are worried about what the economic damage would

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 1>be from a resurgence of cases. You're saying that it's

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 1>important to hide out in the safest of investments through

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>this all as there is a washout effect of the shutdowns,

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and we're seeing that certainly in the bond market today.

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Tenure treasure yelled back at near all time lows zero

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>point five FO. You've been covering treasuries, you could cover.

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>You understood the FED inside now for decades. Where do

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you think the tenure yield is going basis points here, Oh,

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:12.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, because the FED is trying to follow

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>a world war to model. Lisa and the World Work

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:20.080
<v Speaker 1>to model essentially took the FED and said, we're going

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to help the Treasury finance all it has to finance,

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to become partners with Treasury, and we're

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna set aside moral hazard discussions for later. We're gonna

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 1>set aside FED independence for later, and we'll deal with

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 1>that after the crisis and that's what's it worked. So

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:48.079
<v Speaker 1>in World War Two, the FED stabilize the entire treasury

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>curve within a few basis points and it became predictable

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and a reference point. My expectation is the FED will

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:59.319
<v Speaker 1>get to that here as well, and we'll have a

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 1>positive of lee sloped full yield curve of treasuries managed

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and stabilized by the FED. I sure hope so, because

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 1>that will then become a platform reference for high grade

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>credit for the entire world, and it is much needed

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>right now. David Kotalk, this is fantastic and really interesting.

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>In other words, yield curve control will be the policy

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 1>from the Federal Reserve, as it essentially monetizes the debts

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:35.199
<v Speaker 1>of the United States by buying up the excess treasuries

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that the US government sells cells to plug its deficit.

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Given that model, how big can the Federal Reserve balance

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>sheet get? My estimate is the Federal Reserve balance sheet

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 1>could grow to between eight and eleven or twelve trillion,

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and it would be able to be financed and managed

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and maybe larger. In World War two, when once Pearl

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Harbor occurred and the FED policy changed in it went

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>on for four years. The Federal Reserve assisted the United

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>States of America in financing the war, and the debt

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:24.320
<v Speaker 1>to GDP exceeded a hundred percent, and it had to

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>do it, and we were able at the end to

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>be victorious in a war. This is a different kind

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 1>of war, but the models of the same and federal

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>finances needed. It's needed in the states and hospitals, in

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the cities, in agencies and nonprofits for assistance to business

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:48.479
<v Speaker 1>or else. We will have a mass of financial failures

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and bankruptcies and there's no reason to have them. If

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the policy is to gap across the valley to the

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>other side of the crisis in science and medicine will

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>fit this. So, David, about thirty seconds, just give us

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 1>your sense of what the government's fiscal stimulus to date

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and what else you think needs happen. Well, we have

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 1>two trillion direct, we have an argument of three or

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 1>four trillion which would be indirect, and we have a

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 1>current debate for another half a trillion. My view is

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>will need a number of more chanchas of that, and

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:31.439
<v Speaker 1>sooner is better than later. So I hope politicians realize

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>it and deliver it. David Kotalk, thank you so much

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 1>for taking the time. All my best to your family

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and to yourself as you manage through this. David Kotalk,

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>chairman and chief investment officer at Cumberland Advisers talking yield control,

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:47.440
<v Speaker 1>your guild, curve control, and that's actually something that a

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 1>number of strategists are saying. We seem to be headed

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>towards with the federal reserve buying. The bulk of the

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 1>treasury issue is that the federal that the U. S.

0:13:57.080 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Treasury is selling to plug the skill deficit that we

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>are developing to pay for some of these necessary bridges

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 1>to get together side. Paul, Yeah, and David suggested it

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>from a fiscal stimulus perspective, there's very likely going to

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 1>need to be more just given our sense of timing

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>of how this may play out here. So you know,

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:18.719
<v Speaker 1>it looks like the government is going to have to

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>remain pretty active here. The Fed has certainly done its

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>job as the dollar continues to strengthen. In light of

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 1>this flight to haven, flight to quality is the fate

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>of emerging markets, and especially given the fact that the

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 1>developed nations really have been strapped on their own and

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>dealing with the coronavirus We're so lucky Eric Fine joining

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>US portfolio manager of focusing on Emerging markets fixed income

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>strategy at van Eck Global. We have touched with it,

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>based with him yesterday after the I M F meetings

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and some of the focuses that everyone is looking at.

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I just want to start with the flight of cash

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>from developing markets. How much appetite are you hearing from

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>your colleagues and from frankly uh staff within your own

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>company about putting money to work within the developing world

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>given the pain that we're seeing in in places like

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the United States and Europe and the lack of wellness

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>to take risk. Thanks for the question, and uh So,

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>first of all, last week saw the first influence e

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>M bond funds UM. So that's a narrow answer to

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>your question. Second, I'd say more broadly, e M is

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>different from the pre global financial crisis e M. Before

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the before the Global financial crisis, when I spent about

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>half of my career UM when something went wrong in

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the world, all the money flowed out and that was

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the end of the story. UM. After the Global financial crisis,

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 1>markets learned that having high real interest rates, independent central banks,

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>good fiscal policy. UM actually generated good returns. And so

0:15:56.960 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the big change from this I m US meeting compared

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to UH past crisis meetings was the discussion was very

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>much who are the winners? Who are the losers? Obviously

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>everything is kind of a loser, right, so it's going

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>to be a big relative question to a big extent. Um.

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>But uh, last week we saw the first inflows in general. Right.

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I can't talk specifically about my company, of course, um.

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Um yet um, because that's a matter of official timing issues. Um.

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>But uh, but it hasn't been as bad as it's

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>as it's been in the past. And the other thing,

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I'd say official support. A lot of this official support

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>is not just to their own economies, it's to the

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>e m s and that's also a big change. So, Eric,

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>we've seen just unprecedented volatility and energy markets over the

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>last couple of days. How does that kind of impact

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets broadly defined? Great question? Um. The problem with

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>oil is it tends to correlate with everything, and when

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the markets seat oiled down, they think it's risk down

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>because they think it's demand down. Um. I think that's

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 1>generally right, but I don't think that's the right characterization

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:10.439
<v Speaker 1>of why oil is down right now. Um, it is

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>about a storage capacity, and it is about a supply shock,

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily a demand shock. So that's the broadest point

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I'd made. The second point I'd make is there are

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>winners and losers. UM. Consumer the consumption basket. The typical

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:29.639
<v Speaker 1>consumption basket in an emerging economy is food and energy.

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of these countries are seeing their inflation

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:35.679
<v Speaker 1>going down. UM. They are not just a bunch of

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 1>oil exporters. UM. There are even some explicit winners, like

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:42.919
<v Speaker 1>South Africa. Strikes me, so I thought that it's complicated

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 1>and all these countries, but they export gold and their

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>import of oil. UM. So the oil story generally correlates

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:56.400
<v Speaker 1>badly and for legitimate reasons. But for me, it's all

0:17:56.440 --> 0:18:00.200
<v Speaker 1>about the details. UM. And there are winners and losers.

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 1>And I was glad to see and I m meetings

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 1>that the focus was not oh, just exit and sell everything. UM,

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:10.159
<v Speaker 1>it was very much careful analysis of country by country

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:12.479
<v Speaker 1>and what it means. One of the biggest countries in

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>this complex is China, and I've heard a real bullcase

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>made that China will recover first, given the fact that

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 1>they were first to experience the coronavirus, and we did

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>see signs of that in the economic data. However, they

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 1>are now facing the decline into band for the supply

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>chain items that they have previously supplied. Given the fact

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 1>that the rest of the world is shut down, what's

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:39.119
<v Speaker 1>the prospect there? Yeah, China is UM. China is one

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 1>of the most important countries, not just because it's the

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>largest economy and PPP terms from you know, second biggest UM,

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>but UH, if you're going to see a V recovery anyway,

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>it seems to me it's most likely a V shaped recovery.

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Letters are probably not the best way to answer economic

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>questions this time around, but the most likely to see V.

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:01.679
<v Speaker 1>This is the biggest fiscal sting know US they've had ever. Basically,

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 1>UMU the lockdown team to have been working and they're

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>unwinding and the early data, as you refer to is

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:12.400
<v Speaker 1>has been positive. Another key feature of China is it's

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>acting as a global stabilizer. UM. They are keeping their

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>effects stable. That is a very unusual role and it's

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>an important anchor for UH for the e m UM.

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>You will also, I think a big signal will be

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:31.439
<v Speaker 1>on whether the Policy Committee coming up gets delayed or

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 1>not on the last one I see on China is

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>look for lower rates in our framework. Real interest rates

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>are too low there, but you know what frameworks. There's

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a time for frameworks, and then there's a time for

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of more narrative common sense thinking. UM. I would

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 1>I I don't think looking at zero percent or a

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:53.199
<v Speaker 1>zero is an extreme sort of UH grabbing statement. But

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 1>I think much much lower interest rates in China as

0:19:56.160 --> 0:20:00.200
<v Speaker 1>it stimulates fiscally is a very very reasonable um uestion

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:02.440
<v Speaker 1>to be asking, and that would boost it. But I

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>would say it's the likeliest to be UM. There are

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>some early signs UM and UH, and so this some

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:14.360
<v Speaker 1>of this optimism UM is not unfounded. Hey, Eric, thanks

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Really appreciate your thoughts. Eric Fine,

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:21.360
<v Speaker 1>portfolio manager for Emerging Markets fixed Income Strategy at van

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Eck Global, based in UH New York City. So it's

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>interestingly so you think about the risk UH that emerging

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:30.679
<v Speaker 1>market investors typically take on for that presumably better return.

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.200
<v Speaker 1>One could argue there's quite amount of risk of potential

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:36.680
<v Speaker 1>return in more developed markets. Now, given some of the

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>pullbacks we've seen in the volatility, we've seen. Yeah. I

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 1>think what Eric was saying though about the details is important.

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:44.919
<v Speaker 1>The idea that lower oil prices will be beneficial for

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:49.199
<v Speaker 1>countries that import, even though they could decimate, say the

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 1>budgets of the likes of Nigeria. Yeah exactly, yeah, exactly.

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 1>So one one one hand, it's good in terms of inflation.

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, if you're producing that commodity like

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the emerging markets do clearly a big issue.

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Market selling off today SMP off two point nine. We'll

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>have more. This is Bloomberg. As we watch oil prices plunge,

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the question is what does this mean for inflation when

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>you see that the FED is trying to fight it

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:23.199
<v Speaker 1>with everything that they have. The idea of this disinflationary trend,

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:25.919
<v Speaker 1>the FED would like to see more inflation. We are

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:30.479
<v Speaker 1>yet seeing inflation expectations fall once again. Ira Jersey joining us.

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>He's been talking about the disinflationary pressures. He's chief US

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:37.360
<v Speaker 1>interest rate strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence. I want to start there.

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Given the price of oil, what we're seeing, how correlated

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:44.119
<v Speaker 1>has that been to inflation expectations in the near and

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:47.879
<v Speaker 1>long term and the fedsibility to change that yeah, so,

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 1>so traditionally it's been very high. So the correlation between

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>short term inflation expectations, like you know one year and

0:21:54.560 --> 0:22:00.200
<v Speaker 1>two year is at times over well over correlated. Now,

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the issue with the current move is that

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:08.160
<v Speaker 1>even though UH front end contracts of oil so you know, May, June, July,

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>those are all coming down, but when you look at

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>what the markets still expecting for oil in say UH January,

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>it's still over thirty dollars. So the so the thing is,

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:21.679
<v Speaker 1>even though we might have a short term dip in

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>headline inflation because of what's going on with the spot

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>oil price, and then your trim oil prices, if they

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>do go back up to those kind of thirty ish levels,

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 1>then you wind up seeing um basically an unchanged energy

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>component of cp I. So so actually today, ironically and

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 1>even yesterday, you didn't get significant moves in the market's

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>expectations of inflation. So I were thinking about, you know,

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>all the money that the government is spending here in

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 1>fiscal stimulus, how concerned is the treasury market for you know,

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 1>the US budget deficit made quadruple this year to almost

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>four trillion dollars. How's that being reflected in the market place.

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 1>At some point, we gotta start paying this stuff back.

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not being reflected at all, UM And in fact,

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:06.120
<v Speaker 1>it's just the other way. So that you know what

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 1>what tends to happen with treasuries. So unless you think

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that the federal government actually will be UM in default

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>at some point in the future, what what tends to

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:17.920
<v Speaker 1>happen is treasure yields tend to go down as the

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Treasury is issuing more and more debt. And the reason

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>for that is because they're issuing that debt into economic weakness.

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>So two things occurred during during those periods. One is

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a lack of appetite for other fixed income assets,

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:32.679
<v Speaker 1>and people want to be in the safest assets, so

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:35.640
<v Speaker 1>they jumping in by treasuries. And that's exactly what you've seen.

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>That's the flight the quality bid that UM that's been

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of the government bond markets over the

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:43.920
<v Speaker 1>past couple of weeks. UM. The other the other thing

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>is is that when the I think the expectation by

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:49.679
<v Speaker 1>the market is that the Federal Reserve will continue to

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:54.439
<v Speaker 1>be very large buyers of the treasury market. And because

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of that UM there's not a lot of impetus, and

0:23:57.359 --> 0:23:59.639
<v Speaker 1>and it's very hard to get short the market because

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:02.159
<v Speaker 1>you're worried that the that the Federal Reserve is just

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:04.120
<v Speaker 1>going to keep on buying and buying and buying, so

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>you won't be able to um to profit from being

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>short the market, except maybe in very short term trade.

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 1>This is sort of a strange concept. The FED has

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 1>thrown everything it can think of and may try to

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>throw more at the markets, with its balance sheet expanding

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 1>by two trillion dollars in a month. You've got Congress

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>expanding its deficit, and yet you have city analysts rate

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>strategists saying that they don't think the Fed's views are

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>expansionary enough that they aren't necessarily easy and accommodative to

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the degree that would be required given the shock that

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing to the economy. Do you agree? So? I

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:48.919
<v Speaker 1>disagree with them because I think that there's nothing zero

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that central banks can do that will stimulate the economy

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>without getting people back to work and having physical distancing

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 1>rules change at the end of the day, and economy

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 1>is made up of transactions, and when you have a

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 1>significant reduction in those transactions that are occurring, and I

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 1>mean real money transactions, I mean me, you know, I

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>just take me as an anecdote, I've gotten I used

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:14.439
<v Speaker 1>to get gas once a week in my car. I

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 1>have not gotten gas in a month. Right, So you

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>know you wonder why oil prices are low, Well, right,

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:21.879
<v Speaker 1>there is the reason and that and you do that

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>over mill Yeah exactly, well, in in part, in part

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>it is and that's because you know of this physical

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 1>distancing that we're all doing. So because you know our

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:37.719
<v Speaker 1>economic activity is lower by ten twenty percent, you know,

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>anything that the Fed does is not going to stimulate

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>demand for credit growth, and that's what you need in

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 1>order to UM And that's how monetary policy helps, is

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:50.160
<v Speaker 1>that it helps people who want loans to be able

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 1>to get them at much cheaper levels. And they just

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you know who who's getting out alone at this point

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 1>to start a business or to buy a car that

0:25:57.480 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>you can't go to a car show room, so how

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:01.359
<v Speaker 1>are you going to buy a car? So alright, just

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:05.119
<v Speaker 1>quickly we had we saw negative oil prices yesterday, or

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:08.919
<v Speaker 1>we can see negative interest rates. Um well you have

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of places, and in fact in the

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:15.680
<v Speaker 1>treasury bills traded negative earlier today, so you have, um,

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:18.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that the Federal Reserve will cut interest

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 1>rates to negative But you know, is it possible for

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 1>T bills to trade their on occasion? I think there is,

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:26.199
<v Speaker 1>just because of that flight the quality bid that the

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 1>markets continuing to absorb. Thank you so much, Yeah, thanks

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. We appreciate that. Ira Jersey,

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Chief Interest rate Strategists for Bloomberg Intelligence. Thanks for listening

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. Paul Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:51.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm Lisa bram Woyd's I'm on Twitter at Lisa A.

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Bram Woit's one before the podcast. You can always catch

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:55.679
<v Speaker 1>us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio