WEBVTT - What does a tire company know about food?

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you should Know, a production of I

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark,

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>and there's Charles w Chuck Bryant. Jerry's out there lurking

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>like an Internet weirdo, and this is stuff you should know. Yeah,

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I've got a question for you. Okay, have you ever

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>been to a Michelin starred restaurant? Yes, I don't know

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>if I have or not. Surely you have, I don't know.

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean I've never sought one out, sure, but I

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:44.560
<v Speaker 1>may have accidentally done it. Uh, yeah, it's possible. Um,

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 1>there's there's a decent there's enough one star restaurants out

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>there that that is entirely possible. You've been to one

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>one star? Um? Actually, I've been to a three three

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>starred restaurant once. Yes. Well it was for a very

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>special occasions in my engagement. UM. I contacted our friend Hodgeman,

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>who was kind enough to contact his friend Adam Sacks,

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 1>who was a restaurant critic, UM, who pulled some strings

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>to get me reservations at Danielle in New York City.

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>And it was a three star restaurant. It was amazing.

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:29.119
<v Speaker 1>It was just totally amazing. Yeah, I think, I mean,

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I went to Atlanta's not on and you'll you know,

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll go over all this in this episode, but Atlanta

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>is not covered under the Michelin Guide, but plains why

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 1>back Inalia doesn't have a star. Yeah, back Inalia or

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:43.839
<v Speaker 1>Staple House, I could see having a star. I haven't

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>been there. Staple Houses the best meal I've ever had

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>in my life. What kind of food. It's a tasting menu. Um,

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>just like wings, mostly wings, ribs, other things you can taste.

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>This sounds pretty good. Uh, it's very renowned Uh in

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta and around the world, Like people fly to Atlanta

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to go to Stable House. It's that good, and it's

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>it's really something else. It's the best meal I've ever had.

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:16.239
<v Speaker 1>And from the food to the service and the ambiance,

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>it was just It's a five star night, regardless of

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>what Michelin says. That's what my Yelp review is. But

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:27.519
<v Speaker 1>doesn't that say everything about Michelin That the highest honor

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>you can get his three stars. It's like everybody else

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>is going with four or five. Michelin's like three tops,

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you know. Yeah, But as as you'll see, this was

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 1>their star rating came out long before the Internet existed exactly.

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Um and so you you might be like, Michelin, I've

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>never heard of that guy. But there's a tire company

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>called Michelan out there, and we are here to tell

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:54.920
<v Speaker 1>you that they are one and the same company. That

0:02:55.040 --> 0:03:00.519
<v Speaker 1>the tire manufacturer is also the publisher of the world's

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>most renowned restaurant guide of all time. Yeah, and and

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>once we explain it, it's like it's one of those

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>things that at the same time you say, oh, well,

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>now I guess it makes sense, but also still very weird.

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>It is, but it is part of this guid Yeah,

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>there's tire cartoon, tire man. If you're like, oh, you know,

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>this is pretty haughty stuff. No, one of their symbols

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>is the Michelin man licking his lips and making the

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>okay symbol. So let's all maintain a little bit of

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>perspective here, Okay. Yeah, absolutely so. Um So with the

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>with the the connection to the tired company, I think

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a pretty satisfying explanation. But all the way back

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>in what was it the nineteenth century, for sure, I

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>believe eight nine, um Andre and Eduard Michelin started making

0:03:57.240 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>tires and this is you know, they're making bicycle time

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>tis I believe at first, Um, but they ended up

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>making tires for just about everything, including trains. I did

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>not know that there were tires for trains, but rubber

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>tires for trains. UM just had no idea that that

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>ever existed. Maybe it's one of those things where they

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>tried it and it failed spectacularly, but it's still worth remarking.

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if they're still around or not, but

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>these guys started making tires at a really good time

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>because UM, around that time, Uh, in addition to bikes,

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you also started to need tires for your car, and

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 1>the Michelin brothers were there for it. Apparently France was

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>like one of the early hot spots of um, the

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>auto manufacturing world around the turn of the last century. Yeah,

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>they built more cars than anyone else between eighteen ninety

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and sort of the mid to late nineteen forties, and

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>they sold a ton of tires, and um, the Michelin

0:04:55.120 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>man himself debuted in eight which is pretty remar parkable,

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and there was I think, uh, I think it was

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Dave Ru's right, Yeah, I believe so. Yeah, Dave can

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 1>point you and if you're in a place where you

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 1>can look this up on the internet. Um, just type

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>in bibendum b I b E N d U M,

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:16.599
<v Speaker 1>which was the original name of the Michelin Man, which

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:25.119
<v Speaker 1>comes from a Latin toast attributed to Horace uh Nun's sbendum.

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Now is the time to drink and just look up

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the poster. Type in bibendum poster and you'll see what

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:37.160
<v Speaker 1>is exactly a very creepy poster of an early Michelin

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>entire man. It's um it is very creepy and sort

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>of it is it's like, what is wrong with all

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the people at the table. There's something terribly wrong with everybody.

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>But apparently be Bendam is still his name in Europe,

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>or Bibbs affectionately. But um so the be bendum debuted

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a little actually before the time of the guide. The

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:03.039
<v Speaker 1>guide for made its appearance in nineteen hundred. And the

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>reason why the guide ever existed as far as the

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Michelin Company's concerns, because they're the Michelin brothers were looking

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>for a way to um sell more tires by getting

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:17.479
<v Speaker 1>people to drive more, and they figured, well, if we

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>make a guide book saying hey, you gotta check out

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:24.919
<v Speaker 1>this place in Leone or Burgundy or Champagne Um or

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>sparkling Wine, like all these different places in France. Um.

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 1>Then they'll actually go out and take road trips to

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>these places. And that was the origin of the Michelin Guide,

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:38.279
<v Speaker 1>was to tell people about all these different spots and

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to make you know, to let you know about them,

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and maybe you should go check this out. Yeah. So

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>um it was first given away for free when it debuted. Um, they,

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>like he said, we're just sort of listing restaurants where

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you could go. But eventually in ninety six they started

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 1>recommending restaurants and uh, in nineteen thirty one is where

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the star system was finally debuted, which is one star

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>a very good restaurant in its category, two stars excellent

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>cooking worth a detour, or three stars exceptional cuisine worth

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>a special journey. And uh, I really think they missed

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>a big opportunity by not rating these one to four tires. Uh.

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Instead they did one to three stars. But as Day

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>points out, if you'll notice, what they're saying is, hey,

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>this restaurant, you should really drive to your Michelin tires

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot, right, Yeah, maybe lay some rubber and do

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>some donuts on the way totally. So that language is

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>still in use today. Like those are the current explanation

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>for stars as well, even though the point isn't to

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>get you to use up your tires, Uma, but they

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>do still signify the same thing, where like a three

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>star restaurant to the to the Michelin the editors of

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the Michelin Guide is it's with a trip in and

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>of itself, like it's worth getting in a plane and

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 1>flying to a different country to eat this meal at

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>this restaurant and then getting on a plane and flying back.

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>That's basically what a three star Michelin rating means. That's right. Um.

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>The first one outside of France was in Belgium in

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>nineteen o four. Uh, and then it kind of spread

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>through Europe with other guides North Africa. Um. They did

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>publish an English language version in nineteen o nine, but

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>it was just for France. Still. Um, America didn't get

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:34.679
<v Speaker 1>its first guide and this is very surprising to me

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:38.680
<v Speaker 1>until two thousand five when they started their guide to

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>New York City, because you know, they were like the

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>only good food in Americas in New York. Yeah, yeah,

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and not only that, only good French restaurants are in

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>are what is in New York, in New York and

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>in America. You know, they took a lot of flak

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:57.439
<v Speaker 1>for that first one. UM. In its defense, they didn't

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 1>they hadn't put together a team of American inspect or.

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>They had they had used some of their existing European

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>inspectors to go over and they have no idea what

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>they're doing aside from French cuisine apparently, so they did

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:11.320
<v Speaker 1>just basically put an American guide book out to the

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 1>best fresh French restaurants in New York. That was the

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>first American guide. But they have since as we'll see,

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 1>like really kind of um kept pace a lot more

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>since then. Yeah, they've tried to. Uh. The modern guide

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:30.199
<v Speaker 1>has more than forty restaurants in thirty four countries here

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>in the States. You have New York. Uh, they cover

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the state of California, and then the cities of Chicago

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and Washington, d C. And that's all as far as

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the US goes so far. Uh. And they sell these

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 1>things now they sold um they've sold thirty million of

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>them over the last hundred years. Uh. And then next

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 1>year they are going to hit in Moscow. Um. They

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>have them for Tokyo, Hong Kong, uh, sort of other

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>places all over the world. Now, like you said, because

0:09:57.600 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to I think shed and we'll talk more

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 1>about this, but shed a little bit more of that

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>stag snooty only French kind of thing, right, which is

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>why they're releasing a guide book on Topeka next year

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>as well. So, um, if you uh, if you open

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:18.439
<v Speaker 1>up one of these Michelin guides or go online, that's

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 1>all online as well too. Um. When you when you

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>hear about three stars, like that must be you know,

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:28.439
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous amount of detail explaining why and all that.

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>That is not how a Michelin guides work. There's a

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>tremendous amount of work and effort and thought that's put

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>into um, the kind of rating or symbol that a

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>restaurant gets in the Michelin guide. But the guide itself

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>is basically like just trust us. Here's one star or

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>two stars or three stars or no stars. Here's a

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 1>little right up about the restaurant, what you can expect, um,

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the chef and what the chef's known for. And in

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a couple of paragraphs they they make or break a

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:02.319
<v Speaker 1>restaurant around the world old. Yeah, and they have UM

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 1>very I mean, if you don't know anything about it

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and you just pop it open, like you said that,

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you could get confused by all the weird symbols that

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 1>it uses to convey their qualities. UM. We'll get into

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>some of those in a minute. But UM, the star is,

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:18.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously the highest honor you can get. UM.

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 1>The criteria, there are five criteria to judge um these

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>restaurants for stars. It's not it's only about the food.

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>It's not the decord, it's not the service or the

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>ambiance or where it is. It's literally just the food

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>on the plate. Uh. And these five criteria, which are

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>quality of the ingredients, mastery of flavor and the cooking techniques, UH,

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>personality of the chef, UM, the harmony of flavors, and

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:48.680
<v Speaker 1>then the consistency between the visits. UM. I also saw

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>value for money? Is that not one? I didn't see

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 1>that anywhere except in this thing that we were given.

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Did you see that elsewhere? Now? I saw that that

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>would make much more sense for the bib rmand, which

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about. Yeah. I mean this was taken Uh.

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I got mine from an interview within actual New Yorker. Okay, yeah,

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:11.839
<v Speaker 1>I missed that part. So um, when you put all

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>those criteria together, and again, like you said, it's just

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>they're just talking about the food. But they're talking about

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the food too, the point where a three star rating

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:29.319
<v Speaker 1>means that that restaurant puts out consistently, over time, technically

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 1>scientifically perfect food no matter what you order, and no

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>matter what time of day, no matter what day of

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the year, no matter who you are, you're going to

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>go in and get a perfect meal every time. That's

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>what a three star rating is. And there's a lot

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of criticism of those criteria, as we'll see, but it

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 1>really is a remarkable, a remarkable thing that they're they're

0:12:56.280 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>basically saying, like, this is a perfect meal no matter

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>what you order. That's that's kind of hard to find

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:05.239
<v Speaker 1>in other industries. You're not just like well like, um,

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>you know this is a this is a perfect shoe

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that I'm wearing. You know, if it fits this This

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>is weird. You know, five boxes of criteria that are

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 1>being checked off no matter what what shoe model, shoe,

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the shoe is going to be perfect, no matter what

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:25.559
<v Speaker 1>that's You don't find that everywhere else. You know that

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I really love that symbol or that analogy. Thank you.

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:34.079
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, there are only a hundred three stars worldwide.

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>There are four hundred and fifty nine two stars and

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 1>two thousand, four d and eighty six one star restaurants.

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:47.239
<v Speaker 1>A man, very famous man um chef name Elaine Dukasa.

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>How do you pronounce that? I think it's Ellen. I

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>think there's so much French in here that I'm gonna murder.

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>But um, he has the He has thirty six restaurants

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 1>in between them, twenty Michelin stars, including three three star restaurants,

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:08.559
<v Speaker 1>which is quite an accomplishment. Um And I think we

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>should take a break maybe, and then we'll talk about

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>some of those more weird symbols in the guide. Does

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that sound good? Lallah learn it's too with Joshua John. So,

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the Michelin Guide is most well known for the stars

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 1>that it gives, right, um and, we should say, even

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>being mentioned in the Michelin Guide, it's not like a

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>comprehensive listing of restaurants in It's like, these are the

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>most noteworthy restaurants in New York and then the starred

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>ones are the best of the most noteworthy. Um So,

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>just being in there is is an honor um, but

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>they I guess it's kind of like recognition that there

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>are some restaurants out there there are still really good

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and that you should still go check out. They just

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily check the boxes of the five criteria of

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the perfect meal every single time, but it's still definitely

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>worth checking out. They came up with other criteria and

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>they found um. The first one, I believe, which it

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>came out in nineteen, was the Bib Gourmond that we

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned a minute ago. Um and Bib being again

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Bi Bendam or the Michelin Man. Yeah, this is like

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>his faves totally, as evidenced by him licking his lips.

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Give me the okay symbol? Yeah, so um, you're right.

0:15:57.040 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>It started in the fifties as uh. The original symbol

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 1>is a little red are which stood for our E

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 1>p a s French for meal. I'm not going to

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>pronounce it, but it's basically Gorman means good little restaurant,

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and it actually comes out it's it's in, it's the

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>regular guy, but it also comes out as its own

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>separate guide, Um, the Bib Gourman Guide after the Michelin Guide,

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 1>is published, and these are good quality, good value cooking.

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>And the idea is that you can go to a

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>bib Gourman restaurant and you can get what they say

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 1>is a three course meal. I also saw one of

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the inspectors say like a main course, a dessert, and

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>a glass of wine, but like kind of like three

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>things for about forty dollars per person, which they consider

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>a good value. And that is if you're talking like

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>really really good stuff. Um and three thousand three six

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>restaurants right now are listed as bib Gourmand's. Yeah, so

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a kind of like anybody can pick that up

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and be like, let's see where we're gonna go to

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 1>dinner tonight. Basically, you know, um, forty dollars. You could

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you can drop forty dollars a person at like um

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>out back pretty easily. So that that is pretty that

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>is pretty remarkable that they I guarantee it's eleven or

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:22.960
<v Speaker 1>twelve bucks. You think, sure, let's look right now you talk.

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:25.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna look up how much a bloomen onion is.

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say, I haven't been to an outback steakhouse since, uh,

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, probably two decades but um, that bloomin

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:37.640
<v Speaker 1>onion is bloom and delicious. Uh yeah, yeah, for sure

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and delicious. You made a joke while we were on

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>UM on the road the other day about how we

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>should go to out Back and I was like, yeah,

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>blue an onion would be pretty good. But it turns

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:48.639
<v Speaker 1>out it was just a joke and we didn't end

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:53.919
<v Speaker 1>up there. Mm hmm. How's that for an anecdote? It's

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>good until the part where you didn't go and get

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 1>one of those bluemen onions on your road trip, right,

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>so you can get yourself bluemn onion for eight dollars

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and nine cents I stay corrected, all right? That sounds

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 1>about right with tax though you're approaching ten. Yeah, and

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:12.679
<v Speaker 1>if you want a regular size cheese fries it's eleven bucks.

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>So but you gotta get some extra sauce with that

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>bluemen onion, so that probably pushes it over ten unless

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a freebe I don't know how they were gallon size?

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh were you? Were you thinking the bluemen onion was

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:28.640
<v Speaker 1>going to make an appearance in this episode on Michelin

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Stars and did not? Um? I give that four tires though?

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:37.879
<v Speaker 1>All right? So another symbol they have is the plate

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>to Michelin. How are you gonna pronounce that in French? Uh?

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Las yet? Yeah? Las yet? That sounds about right. Uh.

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 1>This is a symbol of a dinner plate flanked by

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a knife and a fork. This debuted in and this

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 1>is just good cooking. Uh it is not. It means

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't have a star. It's not a bib gourmon.

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:01.880
<v Speaker 1>But they call it quote simply good food. I'm not

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>entirely sure what the distinction is between the plate in

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the bib gourmand rating it. I think it's money. Okay,

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 1>so this could still be expensive or is it cheaper

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 1>than the bib gourmand. No, no, I think the bib

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:20.880
<v Speaker 1>gorman is specifically cheap, and the plate to Michelin can

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>be pricey but just not good enough for a star,

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>just not good enough. It's like a substar rating. I

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>guess substar, but more expensive than forty bucks a person. Okay,

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>otherwise it would be a big gormant. They also one

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>other way to kind of understand the bib gourmand is um.

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:40.639
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about the inspectors a little bit um in

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a in a minute, but um, apparently the ratings are

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 1>they used a hive mind kind of thing where they'll

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>have different inspectors go to see what they think about

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 1>an inspector's rating of a restaurant, and then they kind

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of pull them all together and the average is what

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 1>the what the restaurant gets. Um, that was one explanation

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I saw, and by proxy, the bib Gourmand is say,

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>like one inspectors like, if you happen to be talking

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to a Michelin inspectrum and said, what's your what's your

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:14.159
<v Speaker 1>real favorite restaurant in this town, they'd probably give you

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>a big Gourmand recommendation. Not necessarily everyone in the Michelin

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:22.400
<v Speaker 1>organization would would agree that it deserves a star three stars,

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>But this one inspectors like, this is really honestly the

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 1>best restaurant in town. Right, And then they would take

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you into an alley and strangle you to death because

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:33.399
<v Speaker 1>you're not supposed to know who I am write exactly.

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:37.439
<v Speaker 1>You am so sorry, but you know too much like

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 1>the talent to Mr Ripley at the end, Oh spoiler?

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Uh was it? No? It doesn't matter? Okay? Uh. You

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 1>have the Green Star, which debut just last year that

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>has restaurants and chefs who are practicing sustainable gastronomy UM,

0:20:55.880 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>sourcing locally, reducing waste, renewable energy in the restaurants. Uh.

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Then you have the covert or covers uh. And that

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:08.639
<v Speaker 1>is based I think. I mean, the food's got to

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>be good too, but it's really has to do with ambiance.

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>You can get one to five covers um, which means

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 1>like if you really want to go to a like

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a special, like a romantic dinner or something, you might

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:22.680
<v Speaker 1>want to look under the cover section. Yeah. And and

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:26.239
<v Speaker 1>to make it even more arcane and obscure that you

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>can have five covers, but if it's in black ink,

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:32.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not as good as a few covers in red ink. Yeah,

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a little confusing. So if you have if there's a

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 1>place that has five covers in red ink, it's their

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>most charming, splendid um atmosphere of any restaurant they've ever encountered. Um.

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>But yet it does surely it has to do. It

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:48.440
<v Speaker 1>takes the food into account to they're not going to

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 1>send you like a slop bucket that's really charming, but

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 1>they the whereas the stars are just the food. This

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of takes into account the ambiance more. Yeah, and

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>then they started. You can see symbols for different specialties

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>in different regions, Like in Spain they'll have a little

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>toothpick and wine symbol for tapas like the best tapas places,

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:13.199
<v Speaker 1>and the UK and Ireland they'll have beer mugs for

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the best pubs. If you see little grape symbols, that

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>means someone might have a really good wine list, or

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 1>a cocktail glass obviously for good cocktails, or a sake bottle,

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. So if you see all these little symbols, obviously,

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there's a uh, what do you call it?

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 1>A legend? Yeah, legend It explains all this stuff. But

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>we're here to do that for you. Yeah, from what

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I can tell, you have to be basically a trained

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Michelin inspector to decipher some of this stuff once it

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>gets real deep. You know. Well, we've been seeing this

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>word inspector without explaining that, and people are probably going,

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 1>why do they keep talking about detectives, But we're not

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about detectives. We're talking about inspectors, which is their

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:02.719
<v Speaker 1>word for reviews. Yeah. Actually I don't even think they

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>call them that. They call them um anonymous restaurant. Oh no,

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>they do call them inspectors. I'm sorry I misread um

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:13.239
<v Speaker 1>so well. And that makes a lot of sense too,

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:16.400
<v Speaker 1>because there is this definite haughtiness to this whole thing.

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:20.719
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, from what Michelin has finally

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 1>started to choose to reveal about its inspectors, UM, they

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 1>do seem to actually be worthy of such a kind

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 1>of haughty title. UM. They are typically trained in and

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 1>having like real life experience in the hospitality industry, the

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:44.959
<v Speaker 1>restaurant industry, UM, hotel industry, UM. And they will train

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>uh and actually go through this kind of um vetting

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>process for about a year basically that also includes an

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:55.920
<v Speaker 1>apprenticeship because this is not the kind of thing where

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you can be like, oh, these are the five criteria.

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I totally understand this. It's a lot more nerve racking

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 1>than that. And also, if you ask me, the best

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:09.880
<v Speaker 1>way to lose love of food would be to become

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 1>a Michelin restaurant inspector because it sounds like a lot

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of not fun work. Yes, I would much rather just go, uh,

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, enjoy a meal at a restaurant than have

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to review it any day of the week. Yeah, there's

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 1>a cool article I read from Forbes from twenty nineteen

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>by Carla Allen Do called the Secret Life of an

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Anonymous Michelin Restaurant Inspector, where they talked to this woman

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:41.200
<v Speaker 1>who was an inspector and they remain anonymous even when

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:44.239
<v Speaker 1>they're interviewed, which um, as we'll talk about in a bit,

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>is happening a little bit more over the past, like

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 1>ten to twenty years. But um, you know, she talks

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:55.200
<v Speaker 1>about the rigors of the process, and you know how

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:57.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of them are trained Somalia. Some of

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:00.479
<v Speaker 1>them were chefs, but they were They're all all in

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the restaurant industry at some point. Uh. And they get

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>there obviously their travel and hotel and their food all covered.

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to find the pay. I saw some

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>guesses that it was maybe close to a hundred thousand

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars a year. Uh to eat about three hundred meals

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:21.679
<v Speaker 1>a year in these restaurants. UH. To not be allowed

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to eat with your at least if you're reviewing the restaurant,

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>um too with a spouse or any other friend, like

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you're supposed to be in there alone. Um, you gotta

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>take these pictures, which um, you know people do that

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 1>a lot now any day, so that's not gonna make

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you stand out. But uh, the thing that I saw

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 1>was that the hardest part, at least from the point

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 1>of view of this one inspector, was maintaining your anonymity,

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 1>because I think they said you're allowed to tell your

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>closest family members, but really no one else. And in

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:54.919
<v Speaker 1>this day of social media, it's I don't know how

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 1>much of a social media presence you can even have.

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:00.719
<v Speaker 1>It would be a giveaway if you were, like, you know,

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:06.200
<v Speaker 1>in in New York. Again, these ten meals out this week, right, Uh,

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:08.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm in Paris, now, I'm in Los Angeles, now,

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm in Chicago, I'm in Tokyo. Like people would kind

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of catch on. I think, yeah, you just yeah, I

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 1>think you're supposed to just be a lot more kind

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of playing Jane or playing James. I guess I've never

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 1>heard of put that way, but I think I just

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 1>came upon something to where you're just kind of unremarkable

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and not really noticeable. Um, but at the same time,

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:32.199
<v Speaker 1>you're not sticking out because you're so unnoticeable, and you

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:35.440
<v Speaker 1>just kind of have to live a life of anonimity, anonymity,

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 1>not just at work, but in general, like you're saying,

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 1>like it's a good grind, it sounds like a big grind,

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>like ten meals a day or ten meals a week,

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 1>UM very frequently you know, launch and dinner and we're

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:52.639
<v Speaker 1>talking like, like you said, tasting menus or you know,

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>prefixed menus where they're eating like multiple course meals. UM.

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I saw that that new worker interview with UM maxim

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 1>or m is what they nicknamed her UM the Michelin Inspector,

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 1>And I guess they order as many courses as the

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 1>restaurant offers, so if they have you know, soup, salad, appetizer, main, pasta, dessert,

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>like you would be expected to order a dish off

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:24.119
<v Speaker 1>of each of those courses for lunch and then go

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:27.120
<v Speaker 1>do the same thing for dinner five days a week,

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 1>three weeks out of the month, all year long. It

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>does sound like a grind for sure. Yeah, for by yourself,

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>eating by yourself, it's it can be kind of liberating

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>in fun, but after a while that is one of

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the loneliest things you can possibly do. And the other

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:45.199
<v Speaker 1>thing too is if it's if it's frowned upon for

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:48.479
<v Speaker 1>you to bring a friend or a family member. Um,

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I guarantee it's frowned upon for you to just be

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 1>sitting at your phone. So you're just sitting there like

0:27:55.560 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>a total weirdo by yourself at dinner, paying a tench

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 1>to the salt shaker. Basically is what you're what you're doing,

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 1>m Yeah, enjoying your world class meal. It does not

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:10.160
<v Speaker 1>sound fun to me at all. I just rather it's

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:11.639
<v Speaker 1>just one of those things I'd just rather be at

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:14.399
<v Speaker 1>everyday person and just enjoyed on that level. Like I

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 1>feel bad for people who are so into making movies

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that they can't enjoy a movie anymore. It's the same

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:21.639
<v Speaker 1>exact thing You're like, I just want to be a

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 1>regular guy at a three star restaurants sitting there looking

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 1>at my phone. Right. I want to be able to

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:29.919
<v Speaker 1>be on Twitter the whole time. All Right, I think

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>we should take another break and then we'll talk about this.

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>All sounds rosy, but we'll talk about some of the

0:28:35.080 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 1>criticisms right after this with Joshua. All Right, So we've

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 1>talked about the um kind of sun the prey, Well

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 1>did we sing praises? Well though they are definitely well

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>trained and all that. But but the thing is with

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 1>their inspectors, Michelin has always been the term is they're

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>famously anonymous, like they really, like you were saying, go

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to great links to hide their their people, um and

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 1>their their identities. And a lot of people are like, well,

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 1>who are these people? Are they actually qualified? And that's

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of caused a lot of controversy in itself. Yeah,

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and I kind of more meant singing the praises of

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the guide itself. But um, it's all become sort of

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>controversial over the years, and there's been a lot of

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 1>criticism levied. Um, like you mentioned first of all of

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the inspectors. Uh, there have been some things that have

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>come out over the years. Uh. There was a book

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 1>written by an inspect yere Um after they left the job,

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>called The Inspector Sits Down at the Table by Pascal Remy,

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 1>where Pascal said, they're not nearly enough of us. They're

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>a way fewer. Um, we're not going to these restaurants

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 1>as much as we should. There have been restaurants that said, hey,

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I was knocked down a star, and I know for

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 1>a fact that no one even came into the restaurant

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 1>this past year. Uh, no inspector came into our restaurant,

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>So how do we get not back a star? Uh?

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:31.880
<v Speaker 1>And there's kind of a general I think within the industry,

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a general feeling of this thing has too much

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>importance over and too much hold over us as chefs

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and as restaurateurs, and we're kind of beholden to this

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 1>book to the point where people, Uh, I mean, there

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 1>was there was one chef who took his own life,

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Bernard French chef Bernard Lusseau, who lost a star. He

0:30:56.320 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 1>had famously said, if I ever lose my stars, will

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 1>kill myself and uh, in two thousand three that happened

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and he he shot himself in the head with a shotgun. Uh.

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 1>He very much was suffering from depression. So we're not saying,

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is all at the hands of the

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Michelin Guide, but it just sort of hammers home the

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 1>stress of trying to achieve and then maintain these stars. Yeah,

0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 1>it's it goes both ways, right, Like, if you don't

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>have the stars yet and you're just starting out, you

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>want to get them or else people are gonna be like, well,

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I thought you were like an up and coming superstar

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 1>where your Michelin stars, but then once you get them,

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's just this albatross around your neck trying

0:31:39.600 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to keep them. Um. And the guy who's restaurant you

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 1>me and I went to for our engagement, Danielle um Boullard.

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I believe um he actually took uh or sorry ballued Um.

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 1>He took a kind of a cool attitude to the

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>whole thing. He had three stars and he got knocked

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 1>down to two after I had been there. Um. But

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>he he was basically like, look, you know, I mean,

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 1>we make a lot of changes to our menu, and

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it's stuff that we want to lock in and

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 1>put on the menu. Anytimes it's us just messing around,

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 1>but our customers seem to really like it. Um. And

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 1>so if if that means that we're not putting out

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 1>perfect food every single time, but we're being more creative

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and spontaneous, I'm okay with that. That was a very

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:34.479
<v Speaker 1>very rare attitude from what I saw. More likely, if

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 1>you lose a star, you openly weep, like Gordon Ramsey

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>did when one of his restaurants, The London in New

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 1>York City. Um lost two stars. It had two stars

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 1>and it lost them both from one guy to the

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 1>next and he wept. Apparently he won't talk about it

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:52.160
<v Speaker 1>if you ask him about it. Um. That is much

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 1>more the reaction to Michelin Stars than than Danielle's response,

0:32:56.680 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of like, you know, I'll take it

0:32:58.840 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 1>or leave it. It just kind of ruined your life

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 1>one way or the other. And I think a lot

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 1>of people in the restaurant industry really resent that this

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 1>anonymous group of people whose qualifications they're not even sure of,

0:33:11.240 --> 0:33:14.479
<v Speaker 1>hold that kind of sway over their lives, over their

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 1>entire careers. You know. Yeah, Actually, now that I think

0:33:17.960 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 1>of it, Emily and I stayed at the London one time,

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:22.479
<v Speaker 1>and I think we ate breakfast there. There you go

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 1>two stars. Yeah, I'm not sure when it was as

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 1>far as his stars coming and going, but uh yeah,

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 1>so we ate there. Another sort of rarity was when

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 1>French chef Sebastian bra said, Hey, Michelin, guide, can you

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:44.720
<v Speaker 1>remove my stars and and take them out of there?

0:33:44.760 --> 0:33:46.800
<v Speaker 1>And and there's a couple of interesting quotes. He said,

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 1>after twenty years under the banner of three stars, I

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 1>wanted to find serenity, freedom and independence, but three Stars

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 1>represented a form of permanent and growing tension for me

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and today I only want to be accountable to my customers,

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 1>so too much stress. And he was like, I want

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to I want to experiment, and I want to try

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 1>different things, and I don't want to necessarily live my

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 1>or spend the rest of my career just trying to

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 1>maintain these stars. And by all accounts, it was a

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:18.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty liberating experience for him. Yeah yeah, yeah, so um

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 1>that again, that also is very rare. For the most part,

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:23.319
<v Speaker 1>it's like your your career is about trying to get

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and then trying to keep those stars. Um, and just

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the kind of the frustration that goes along with it

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:34.759
<v Speaker 1>has has made a lot of people level accusations toward

0:34:34.800 --> 0:34:39.439
<v Speaker 1>the Michelin Guide, um, including that you know, they hand

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 1>out like that. One guy's expose said that they hand

0:34:42.000 --> 0:34:45.239
<v Speaker 1>out stars or maintain stars amongst some of their friends,

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 1>like very friendous French chefs. That is absolutely not fair.

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 1>But and there are definitely plenty of people out there,

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:56.560
<v Speaker 1>um who just go to these restaurants so that they

0:34:56.560 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 1>can brag about having gone to this restaurant, and that

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 1>probably makes up a substantial part of the chef's clientell

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:06.359
<v Speaker 1>or the restaurant's clientele, and I would guess if you're

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 1>a chef in this area, you probably hate people like that,

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:12.560
<v Speaker 1>even though you know they're coming to your restaurant. They're

0:35:12.600 --> 0:35:15.840
<v Speaker 1>just being d bags. That's why they're there, is just

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 1>show off what a d bag they are. Can we

0:35:18.120 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 1>say that? Yeah? And I bet you half of those

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:23.880
<v Speaker 1>people say like, oh my god, what one of the

0:35:23.880 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 1>best meals in half of them say I don't know

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:29.399
<v Speaker 1>why this thing is three stars right? Exactly exactly. Yeah.

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:32.360
<v Speaker 1>So there is that too it where people are like,

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:34.919
<v Speaker 1>there's too much sway, are these people even like being

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 1>fair about this? And then the star system attracts people

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 1>who are just just there to say that they ate

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 1>at a restaurant and aren't actually enjoying the food. All

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that exists. But it really seems over the last century

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:52.880
<v Speaker 1>that the Michelin Guide has like it is legit Like

0:35:52.920 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 1>if you go to a three starred restaurant, you're probably

0:35:57.000 --> 0:35:59.919
<v Speaker 1>going to have the best meal that you've ever had

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:03.360
<v Speaker 1>in your entire life. Like that's probably true, and that

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 1>in and of itself legitimizes it, or at least, you know,

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 1>lends credence to the idea that generally it's a legitimate

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 1>if not crushing um rating system. Yeah. Um, there's been

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:20.800
<v Speaker 1>some other controversies over the years. In twenty nineteen, that

0:36:20.960 --> 0:36:27.160
<v Speaker 1>was a lawsuit filed by French chef Mark Verrat, who said,

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:31.279
<v Speaker 1>my restaurant and Maison de how do you pronounce that

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:35.320
<v Speaker 1>last part? Not boise Idaho, but I think boise boise,

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:39.239
<v Speaker 1>Maison de boise. Yes, all right, let's go with that. Uh.

0:36:39.520 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 1>He was downgraded from three to two stars. He said, quote,

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:47.359
<v Speaker 1>it's worse than the loss of my parents, which I'm

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:51.439
<v Speaker 1>sure his parents were like Marcy for that. Uh. And

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 1>apparently the word on the street was the inspector accused

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the kitchen of using just a very common English cheddar

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 1>cheese in a souffle dish that he says he was

0:37:03.640 --> 0:37:07.320
<v Speaker 1>sacar blue. He was really mad. He said, I demand

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to see that report. Michelin says, I don't know who

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:13.360
<v Speaker 1>you think you are, but you better watch it. You

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 1>can lose all your stars, buddy, but you you can't

0:37:16.080 --> 0:37:18.759
<v Speaker 1>see our reports. He filed the lawsuit. It became known

0:37:18.800 --> 0:37:21.560
<v Speaker 1>as cheddar Gate, and then the case is thrown out

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:25.000
<v Speaker 1>when they couldn't produce evidence that actually hurt his business.

0:37:25.000 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 1>It actually helped his business. Because all the publicity, so

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 1>that report thing actually struck me as surprising. I saw

0:37:32.160 --> 0:37:34.960
<v Speaker 1>that they will share their reports. I mean, you know,

0:37:35.040 --> 0:37:37.880
<v Speaker 1>really yeah, they won't They obviously it won't say what

0:37:37.960 --> 0:37:40.319
<v Speaker 1>inspector came from or anything like that, but they that

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 1>restaurants who want to improve or get a starback or

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 1>whatever and want to know what happened, they will share

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the reports. So I didn't understand that maybe what I

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 1>read was was wrong. But the Michelin Guide has responded

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to this kind of like criticism and bad publicity. Um

0:37:57.200 --> 0:38:03.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, the suicide of um what was his last name? Yeah,

0:38:03.600 --> 0:38:07.720
<v Speaker 1>uh in two thousand three was really a dark cloud

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that hung over the Michelin Guide. Um you know, the

0:38:10.680 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 1>criticism for basically raiding the best French restaurants in New

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:16.959
<v Speaker 1>York and their first American guide, all this stuff really

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:19.560
<v Speaker 1>amounted some bad press for the Michelin Guide and it

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:23.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of evolved in the twenty one century to become

0:38:24.560 --> 0:38:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot more um worldly, a lot less franco centric,

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:33.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot less stuffy, and to expand. And today actually

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the country for the city with the largest number of

0:38:37.600 --> 0:38:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Stars among its restaurants is in Paris. It's tokyo. How

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 1>about that right to say tokyo. I've been saying it wrong. Um,

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 1>he says tokyo. Yeah, I've been saying it wrong for

0:38:52.160 --> 0:38:55.120
<v Speaker 1>almost fifty years. Yeah, I'm catching up to you. Forty

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:58.240
<v Speaker 1>four for me because that was my first word. Actually, yeah,

0:38:58.680 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I've been saying tokyo since I was in the womb.

0:39:02.719 --> 0:39:06.439
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it's it's opened up to Asia. Um, it's

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 1>expanded in the US market. Like we mentioned before, they

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:12.960
<v Speaker 1>they awarded their first ever start to a hawker stall,

0:39:13.640 --> 0:39:17.640
<v Speaker 1>which is uh Singapore street food, which is really cool. Um.

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 1>It was Hong Kong soya sauce, chicken, rice and noodle,

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 1>which Man, that thing got a star and I just

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:27.200
<v Speaker 1>want to go there right now and eat it. The

0:39:27.280 --> 0:39:31.880
<v Speaker 1>other thing I want to eat is in edition um

0:39:31.920 --> 0:39:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to Taipei, they had a take out only street stall

0:39:35.840 --> 0:39:38.279
<v Speaker 1>that has one thing on the menu, which is a

0:39:38.280 --> 0:39:41.520
<v Speaker 1>steam pork bun with ground peanuts and cilantro. They've been

0:39:41.520 --> 0:39:44.680
<v Speaker 1>serving this for sixty years and they gave that a

0:39:44.719 --> 0:39:52.400
<v Speaker 1>bib gourman um whatever metal or the licking lips and okay,

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:55.239
<v Speaker 1>licking lips. Guy, I want to eat that pork bun

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:58.720
<v Speaker 1>more than anything. I can think of. The thing is chuck.

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Is the thing that I hate almost as much as

0:40:02.719 --> 0:40:05.600
<v Speaker 1>waiting at a red light when there's no cars coming

0:40:05.640 --> 0:40:09.240
<v Speaker 1>from the other direction, is standing in line for food.

0:40:09.680 --> 0:40:14.239
<v Speaker 1>I hate that. I feel like such a chump, such

0:40:14.280 --> 0:40:17.160
<v Speaker 1>a sucker, and after X number of minutes, it is

0:40:17.239 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 1>not worth it. It doesn't matter how good the food is,

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:23.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not worth it. Because I also usually don't like

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the people I'm standing in line with, you know, like

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:30.520
<v Speaker 1>a certain kind of like food fan or kinds that

0:40:30.520 --> 0:40:32.320
<v Speaker 1>will stand in line for an hour and a half.

0:40:32.360 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 1>They're They're also probably the ones that brag about the

0:40:34.719 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 1>number of stars or whatever. Um. So there's a lot

0:40:38.080 --> 0:40:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't like about that. And it turns out Michelin

0:40:42.360 --> 0:40:47.800
<v Speaker 1>has has heard my concerns. And Jiro Sushi um, the

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the the sushi place that that they did the documentary about.

0:40:52.239 --> 0:40:55.759
<v Speaker 1>After that documentary, you could not still to this day,

0:40:55.760 --> 0:40:57.759
<v Speaker 1>I think that documentary is from like two thousand nine

0:40:57.840 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 1>or ten. To this day, you cannot get into Juro's.

0:41:02.640 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a ten seat sushi bar that's probably the best

0:41:05.160 --> 0:41:08.480
<v Speaker 1>sushi in the world, um, and you just can't get in.

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:10.800
<v Speaker 1>It's sorry, t s. You have to basically be ahead

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:13.480
<v Speaker 1>of state or a celebrity these days. And it was

0:41:13.600 --> 0:41:18.400
<v Speaker 1>a ten seat, three star, three Michelin star sushi restaurant

0:41:18.600 --> 0:41:23.439
<v Speaker 1>in a train station in Tokyo um and Michelin took

0:41:23.440 --> 0:41:27.760
<v Speaker 1>its stars back because they say, the guide is meant for,

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, any person to be able to go to

0:41:30.800 --> 0:41:33.960
<v Speaker 1>these restaurants, the restaurants they recommend anybody should be able

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:36.680
<v Speaker 1>to get into. Like, yes, some people are going to

0:41:36.719 --> 0:41:40.400
<v Speaker 1>spend a much more substantial portion of their annual salary

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:43.000
<v Speaker 1>than other people, but you should be able to get

0:41:43.040 --> 0:41:45.880
<v Speaker 1>into this place one way or another. And with Jero's

0:41:45.960 --> 0:41:47.879
<v Speaker 1>you just can't do that anymore. So they actually took

0:41:47.880 --> 0:41:50.360
<v Speaker 1>their stars back. They said, Jero, we wish you the

0:41:50.360 --> 0:41:52.239
<v Speaker 1>best of luck, not that you need it, but you

0:41:52.280 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 1>don't need these stars and you can't really have them

0:41:54.040 --> 0:41:57.160
<v Speaker 1>because you can't the average person can't get a seat

0:41:57.200 --> 0:42:01.480
<v Speaker 1>in your place anymore. Yeah, you know what this episode

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:06.200
<v Speaker 1>has really made me want to do eat eating a restaurant. Yes, dude, yes,

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 1>this is very cruel to to put this one out

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:11.319
<v Speaker 1>right now in retrospect, because all I want to do

0:42:11.400 --> 0:42:14.480
<v Speaker 1>is eat in a restaurant. Man, so bad. Just a

0:42:14.520 --> 0:42:20.040
<v Speaker 1>good multi course meal, starting out with like Martinier drink, Yes,

0:42:20.280 --> 0:42:24.240
<v Speaker 1>a bluemen onion in there somewhere, maybe a side of ranch.

0:42:24.280 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like, yes, I cannot wait. It will happen

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:32.800
<v Speaker 1>again one day, man, I know for sure. Okay okay, uh, Well,

0:42:32.920 --> 0:42:36.040
<v Speaker 1>since Chuck said for sure, that means, of course, everybody,

0:42:36.080 --> 0:42:41.719
<v Speaker 1>it's time for listener mail. I'm gonna call this. And

0:42:41.719 --> 0:42:43.319
<v Speaker 1>we've gotten a few of these lately, but this one

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I tagged about a month ago from people who have

0:42:46.680 --> 0:42:50.160
<v Speaker 1>who finished their stuff. You should know Journey and listen

0:42:50.160 --> 0:42:54.600
<v Speaker 1>to all the episodes. Hey, everybody, I've done it. It

0:42:54.640 --> 0:42:57.440
<v Speaker 1>took me two years of listening anytime I was driving,

0:42:57.840 --> 0:42:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and I have to drive a lot for work, but

0:42:59.200 --> 0:43:01.359
<v Speaker 1>I finally gotten through the entire back catalog, going all

0:43:01.400 --> 0:43:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the way back to how Grassoline works. Those first episodes

0:43:06.320 --> 0:43:10.319
<v Speaker 1>were so not very good. I don't know what I'll

0:43:10.360 --> 0:43:12.160
<v Speaker 1>do in between new episodes now, but I wanted to

0:43:12.160 --> 0:43:14.680
<v Speaker 1>say thanks for the many, many hours of learning and

0:43:14.880 --> 0:43:18.680
<v Speaker 1>laughing and what has to be hundreds of Simpson's references.

0:43:19.080 --> 0:43:23.040
<v Speaker 1>At least my favorite episode was either nuclear Semiotics or

0:43:23.080 --> 0:43:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the uh the at Loft Pass mystery. But but I

0:43:27.120 --> 0:43:30.359
<v Speaker 1>need to thank Josh for introducing me to Teddy the Beaver.

0:43:31.600 --> 0:43:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, Teddy the baby beaver. He's the one that

0:43:35.440 --> 0:43:37.480
<v Speaker 1>built like the damn at that in the doorway of

0:43:37.520 --> 0:43:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the bedroom. Right. Oh was that? I think? So? He

0:43:41.520 --> 0:43:44.680
<v Speaker 1>was so cute, so cute. The greatest moment in the show, however,

0:43:44.760 --> 0:43:48.680
<v Speaker 1>was during what I recall uh to be the Beagle

0:43:48.760 --> 0:43:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Brigade episode, when Josh predicted COVID nineteen by talking about

0:43:54.600 --> 0:43:58.600
<v Speaker 1>someone's getting a disease by eating a bat. Yeah. A

0:43:58.600 --> 0:44:01.399
<v Speaker 1>lot of people say I predicted that. I called out

0:44:01.440 --> 0:44:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a magazine article that I read that predicted it. I

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:06.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I particularly predicted it, but thank you

0:44:06.600 --> 0:44:10.120
<v Speaker 1>for that. And I don't even know if that's the

0:44:10.160 --> 0:44:12.640
<v Speaker 1>origin of COVID. Now, isn't that sort of a dispute?

0:44:13.360 --> 0:44:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. The last thing I heard was that

0:44:15.600 --> 0:44:17.520
<v Speaker 1>it was either a pangolin or a bat. I've heard

0:44:17.600 --> 0:44:20.680
<v Speaker 1>bat more than anything. You know what I'm saying, Well,

0:44:20.680 --> 0:44:24.279
<v Speaker 1>you're going to the wrong websites, buddy, so you need

0:44:24.320 --> 0:44:29.800
<v Speaker 1>to find the truth. That's right. Oh God, cartoon sweat,

0:44:30.560 --> 0:44:34.000
<v Speaker 1>He says. Also, sorry, Chuck, but shark Nato can suck it.

0:44:34.600 --> 0:44:36.239
<v Speaker 1>I wish you know, for sure, but my mind was

0:44:36.239 --> 0:44:38.839
<v Speaker 1>blown away when Josh said it. Thanks again for all

0:44:38.840 --> 0:44:40.319
<v Speaker 1>the hard work and I look forward to twelve more

0:44:40.440 --> 0:44:46.160
<v Speaker 1>years worth of episodes. And that is from Kyle in Phoenix, Arizona,

0:44:46.520 --> 0:44:48.680
<v Speaker 1>who I guess went to our live show there. He's

0:44:48.680 --> 0:44:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a great live show on Kellogg by the way, arm

0:44:51.200 --> 0:44:52.759
<v Speaker 1>of that Phoenix show. That was a good one. That

0:44:52.880 --> 0:44:54.239
<v Speaker 1>was a good show. I think that's the one where

0:44:54.280 --> 0:44:58.560
<v Speaker 1>we got Lasso's. Oh it absolutely was. I still got

0:44:58.600 --> 0:45:01.319
<v Speaker 1>that thing, Kathy with a K. That's right, I love

0:45:01.400 --> 0:45:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that lasso. H. Well, if you want to get in

0:45:03.680 --> 0:45:07.279
<v Speaker 1>touch with us, you can send us a email to

0:45:08.080 --> 0:45:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Stuff podcast at iHeart radio dot com. Stuff you Should

0:45:17.040 --> 0:45:19.319
<v Speaker 1>Know is a production of I Heeart Radio. For more

0:45:19.360 --> 0:45:21.799
<v Speaker 1>podcasts for my heart Radio, visit the iHeart Radio app,

0:45:21.920 --> 0:45:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.

0:45:26.880 --> 0:45:26.920
<v Speaker 1>H