1
00:00:01,960 --> 00:00:04,040
Speaker 1: For those of you just joining us on radio, this

2
00:00:04,080 --> 00:00:07,480
Speaker 1: is a Bloomberg special report the Fed Decides. I'm Scarlett Fell,

3
00:00:07,480 --> 00:00:10,280
Speaker 1: along with Tom Keen and Mike McKee. Mike, Well, let's

4
00:00:10,280 --> 00:00:12,639
Speaker 1: find out what it must be like inside the room

5
00:00:12,680 --> 00:00:14,920
Speaker 1: today and talk with somebody who was inside the room

6
00:00:14,960 --> 00:00:18,640
Speaker 1: for several years. Former FED governor now University of Chicago

7
00:00:18,680 --> 00:00:21,720
Speaker 1: Booth School of Business professor Randall Krosner. He's joining us

8
00:00:21,760 --> 00:00:25,040
Speaker 1: live from Chicago. Randy, you know they're going to be

9
00:00:25,120 --> 00:00:27,800
Speaker 1: talking about the inflation numbers today, and you know they're

10
00:00:27,840 --> 00:00:30,440
Speaker 1: gonna be talking about the possibility that the Phillips curve

11
00:00:30,560 --> 00:00:33,960
Speaker 1: is back. We're gonna see wage inflation. The question is

12
00:00:34,840 --> 00:00:39,200
Speaker 1: can monetary policy stay ahead of inflation given that it's

13
00:00:39,200 --> 00:00:41,839
Speaker 1: so low, Can it catch up if it starts to

14
00:00:41,880 --> 00:00:44,800
Speaker 1: accelerate or is the FED going to be behind the curve?

15
00:00:44,840 --> 00:00:46,519
Speaker 1: Is that going to be one of the questions that

16
00:00:46,560 --> 00:00:51,160
Speaker 1: they're debating today. I think that's dead on. That's exactly

17
00:00:51,280 --> 00:00:54,960
Speaker 1: the issue that's on the table, exactly where is inflation going.

18
00:00:55,160 --> 00:00:57,560
Speaker 1: So we have seen very low inflation of the last

19
00:00:57,600 --> 00:01:00,279
Speaker 1: few years. We've now seen a few signs of a

20
00:01:00,320 --> 00:01:02,960
Speaker 1: little bit of an increase um if you look at

21
00:01:02,960 --> 00:01:05,600
Speaker 1: the core numbers from today, a little bit of move up,

22
00:01:05,959 --> 00:01:09,160
Speaker 1: But if you look to the labor market, you're really

23
00:01:09,160 --> 00:01:11,040
Speaker 1: not seeing much wage pressure there. We just had a

24
00:01:11,080 --> 00:01:14,320
Speaker 1: report out today that suggests that incomes were declining, real

25
00:01:14,360 --> 00:01:16,560
Speaker 1: wages were flat, And if you look at the numbers

26
00:01:16,560 --> 00:01:18,640
Speaker 1: that came at the beginning of the month, we saw

27
00:01:18,760 --> 00:01:21,880
Speaker 1: a decline in the work week and a slight decline

28
00:01:21,880 --> 00:01:27,680
Speaker 1: in nominal wages. So the traditional impact of low unemployment

29
00:01:27,760 --> 00:01:31,400
Speaker 1: rate would be towards more more wage pressure. We haven't

30
00:01:31,400 --> 00:01:32,720
Speaker 1: seen that, and so there's gonna be a lot of

31
00:01:32,720 --> 00:01:35,000
Speaker 1: debate about the table. When is it coming and is

32
00:01:35,040 --> 00:01:38,560
Speaker 1: it coming? Is it coming? That's the question. Do you

33
00:01:38,600 --> 00:01:41,280
Speaker 1: think that at this point we are set up for

34
00:01:41,360 --> 00:01:43,680
Speaker 1: an acceleration of inflation later in the year that is

35
00:01:43,720 --> 00:01:47,640
Speaker 1: going to lead the Fed to move more quickly to

36
00:01:47,840 --> 00:01:50,680
Speaker 1: raise rates and surprise the markets. Do the markets have

37
00:01:50,720 --> 00:01:55,560
Speaker 1: inflation right or does the Fed? Well? I think I

38
00:01:55,600 --> 00:01:58,120
Speaker 1: wish somebody knew. My crystal ball is pretty cloudy on that,

39
00:01:58,200 --> 00:02:01,360
Speaker 1: because the inflation performance has been different than it typically

40
00:02:01,360 --> 00:02:03,680
Speaker 1: has in the past. By this time the cycle, we

41
00:02:03,720 --> 00:02:06,680
Speaker 1: would normally be seeing a little bit more wage pressure

42
00:02:06,680 --> 00:02:08,760
Speaker 1: we'd be seeing a little bit more inflation. Certainly, the

43
00:02:08,800 --> 00:02:11,120
Speaker 1: FED has tried to provide a lot of liquidity to

44
00:02:11,200 --> 00:02:15,079
Speaker 1: the system to hopefully get the money supply growing and

45
00:02:15,440 --> 00:02:17,960
Speaker 1: get to get inflation towards a two percent goal. We

46
00:02:18,000 --> 00:02:20,960
Speaker 1: haven't gotten there yet. So this is unusual circumstance. And

47
00:02:20,960 --> 00:02:24,040
Speaker 1: in those unused room circumstance, reasonable people are going to disagree.

48
00:02:24,200 --> 00:02:26,040
Speaker 1: And you've got a lot of reasonable people around the table,

49
00:02:26,120 --> 00:02:28,560
Speaker 1: and I think there's a lot of disagreement. Professor Cross

50
00:02:28,600 --> 00:02:31,560
Speaker 1: and I believe there's a school north of the University

51
00:02:31,600 --> 00:02:34,800
Speaker 1: of Chicago. I think it's an Emisade, Illinois. I think

52
00:02:34,800 --> 00:02:40,560
Speaker 1: it's called Northwestern University. We've got to I can't hear you.

53
00:02:40,320 --> 00:02:44,760
Speaker 1: Here's Robert Gordon, the giant of Northwestern economics, saying to

54
00:02:45,200 --> 00:02:48,519
Speaker 1: us the other day, with great non Gordon optimism, that

55
00:02:48,639 --> 00:02:53,680
Speaker 1: if labor participation turns up, that's the signal. We've got

56
00:02:53,720 --> 00:02:59,160
Speaker 1: the signal. What does that mean for you? So we've

57
00:02:59,200 --> 00:03:01,640
Speaker 1: seen a little bit of a take up of labor

58
00:03:01,680 --> 00:03:04,480
Speaker 1: force participation, but it's still at very low levels compared

59
00:03:04,520 --> 00:03:07,480
Speaker 1: with where it was um So it would be great

60
00:03:07,520 --> 00:03:09,280
Speaker 1: to see more of that. I think that would be

61
00:03:09,400 --> 00:03:14,000
Speaker 1: tremendous because, as you were discussing before the even though

62
00:03:14,000 --> 00:03:16,520
Speaker 1: the unemployment rate may be down below five percent, people

63
00:03:16,520 --> 00:03:21,200
Speaker 1: are not feeling the benefits of five percent unemployment rate.

64
00:03:21,240 --> 00:03:23,000
Speaker 1: A lot of people are outside in the labor market.

65
00:03:23,400 --> 00:03:25,280
Speaker 1: We need to get people back into the labor market.

66
00:03:25,280 --> 00:03:30,519
Speaker 1: We need to be creating jobs and hopefully raising real wages. Randy,

67
00:03:30,560 --> 00:03:32,560
Speaker 1: are we at full employment or will we only know

68
00:03:32,680 --> 00:03:36,720
Speaker 1: it after the fact? Well, this is one of these

69
00:03:36,800 --> 00:03:38,960
Speaker 1: questions that we're not even sure that the concept of

70
00:03:39,000 --> 00:03:43,520
Speaker 1: full employment really fits anymore, because we typically looked at

71
00:03:43,600 --> 00:03:46,200
Speaker 1: something like the unemployment rate, um, but now there are

72
00:03:46,200 --> 00:03:49,000
Speaker 1: these broader measures that Janet Yellen and others have talked about,

73
00:03:49,040 --> 00:03:52,680
Speaker 1: the so called U six that includes people who are

74
00:03:52,760 --> 00:03:55,600
Speaker 1: part time, would prefer prefer to be full time, people

75
00:03:55,640 --> 00:03:58,560
Speaker 1: who are have not looked for a job in the

76
00:03:58,640 --> 00:04:00,720
Speaker 1: last month, but it looked some time the last year

77
00:04:00,720 --> 00:04:03,360
Speaker 1: and one a job. That number is much higher. That

78
00:04:03,480 --> 00:04:06,000
Speaker 1: number is over ten percent, and that number is always

79
00:04:06,080 --> 00:04:09,040
Speaker 1: higher than the regular unemployment rate. But maybe that's telling

80
00:04:09,080 --> 00:04:11,000
Speaker 1: us more about the true state of the labor market

81
00:04:11,200 --> 00:04:13,800
Speaker 1: than the traditional unemployment rate. So the debates on even

82
00:04:13,880 --> 00:04:16,280
Speaker 1: what number to look at to try to assess that

83
00:04:16,279 --> 00:04:18,640
Speaker 1: that question one of the numbers the FED likes to

84
00:04:18,640 --> 00:04:21,080
Speaker 1: look at. And let's go inside the Bloomberg terminal and

85
00:04:21,200 --> 00:04:25,080
Speaker 1: look at inflation expectations to five year forward. For those

86
00:04:25,120 --> 00:04:28,160
Speaker 1: of you on radio, we've gained twenty one basis points

87
00:04:28,160 --> 00:04:31,400
Speaker 1: over the last two weeks to three weeks in terms

88
00:04:31,440 --> 00:04:35,200
Speaker 1: of inflation expectations. They've completely turned around to what extent

89
00:04:35,360 --> 00:04:39,560
Speaker 1: does the FED have to uh ratify the markets Randy

90
00:04:39,600 --> 00:04:42,360
Speaker 1: and say, you know, we are aware of this. How

91
00:04:42,400 --> 00:04:45,920
Speaker 1: far can they go? Well, I think that the Fed

92
00:04:46,000 --> 00:04:48,760
Speaker 1: has been very clear in its first paragraph about talking

93
00:04:48,800 --> 00:04:52,000
Speaker 1: about not only inflation but inflation expectations, and they had

94
00:04:52,080 --> 00:04:56,800
Speaker 1: noted how the market based measures had declined reasonably significantly,

95
00:04:57,279 --> 00:04:59,840
Speaker 1: And and my guess is they will acknowledge a bit

96
00:04:59,880 --> 00:05:01,720
Speaker 1: of a turnaround in those as well as a bit

97
00:05:01,720 --> 00:05:03,840
Speaker 1: of a turnaround and core inflation. Does that mean that

98
00:05:03,880 --> 00:05:06,200
Speaker 1: they're going to be moving immediately. No, But I think

99
00:05:06,200 --> 00:05:08,919
Speaker 1: that gives them the foundation for at least having a

100
00:05:08,960 --> 00:05:12,839
Speaker 1: serious discussion over the summertime about moving rates. You know,

101
00:05:12,839 --> 00:05:15,359
Speaker 1: we talked earlier about the distinction between good inflation and

102
00:05:15,360 --> 00:05:18,320
Speaker 1: bad inflation. I just had a gloomber customer message me

103
00:05:18,360 --> 00:05:21,160
Speaker 1: and say, good inflation is demanded induced inflation. Bad inflation

104
00:05:21,240 --> 00:05:23,800
Speaker 1: is fed induced inflation. Well, you know that can be

105
00:05:23,920 --> 00:05:25,880
Speaker 1: part of it. You could say the same with deflation

106
00:05:25,960 --> 00:05:29,000
Speaker 1: or disinflation. Professor Krasner, quickly here and then we'll have

107
00:05:29,080 --> 00:05:33,520
Speaker 1: you back for for more. Aren't banks supposed to surprise

108
00:05:33,680 --> 00:05:37,520
Speaker 1: when it's least expected? Why couldn't we get a droggy

109
00:05:37,640 --> 00:05:42,760
Speaker 1: moment out of our fed today? I don't think that's

110
00:05:42,760 --> 00:05:45,360
Speaker 1: what Janet Yellen is going for because, as you know,

111
00:05:45,440 --> 00:05:48,240
Speaker 1: with what happened with with Europe the e c B,

112
00:05:48,400 --> 00:05:51,280
Speaker 1: when they made the announcement of their big Bazuka the

113
00:05:51,520 --> 00:05:55,920
Speaker 1: the europlummeted, interest rates plummeted. Then at the press conference

114
00:05:55,960 --> 00:05:58,800
Speaker 1: when Aero Roggy said well there may be limits to hello,

115
00:05:58,880 --> 00:06:01,320
Speaker 1: we can go on interest rate because of concerns about banks,

116
00:06:01,600 --> 00:06:05,000
Speaker 1: you had this whipsaw and the euro uh spiked up,

117
00:06:05,360 --> 00:06:07,400
Speaker 1: interest rates spiked up. I don't think that's what Jenne

118
00:06:07,440 --> 00:06:09,080
Speaker 1: Ellen is trying to achieve. I think she wants to

119
00:06:09,160 --> 00:06:13,719
Speaker 1: minimize volatility, not add to it. All right, Randy Krasser

120
00:06:13,880 --> 00:06:16,039
Speaker 1: of the University of Chicago Booths School of Business, you

121
00:06:16,040 --> 00:06:17,919
Speaker 1: will be sticking with us, will also have more with

122
00:06:18,040 --> 00:06:21,039
Speaker 1: Richard Clarada of PIMCO. Shortly and over the next few

123
00:06:21,080 --> 00:06:24,600
Speaker 1: hours full fed coverage, Alan Blinder of Princeton University joining

124
00:06:24,640 --> 00:06:26,960
Speaker 1: us along with Bill Gross of Janni's Capital. Not to

125
00:06:27,000 --> 00:06:29,360
Speaker 1: mention Ira Jersey of uppen Higher Capital