WEBVTT - Whirlpool and Mattel CEOs Share Insights on the Consumer

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Wait Inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>gloom War, Business finance, and tech news. The Bloomberg Business

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Week Podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:24.639
<v Speaker 2>Worldpool and on. I spent the last seventy five years

0:00:24.680 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 2>becoming lawn v ex first. But now that make it

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 2>easy for everybody, all.

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 3>Right, who doesn't have a vintage commercial Whirlpool, of course,

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 3>and they are front and center today we're watching the

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 3>share price down about fourteen percent here. What we love

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:45.879
<v Speaker 3>about these kinds of companies is they can tell us

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 3>so much about what's going on, certainly in the minds

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 3>of the US consumer and what's going on in the

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 3>US economy. And this is a great conversation, especially Tim,

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 3>if you think about it. On a day where we

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 3>got GDP, we expected it to be hot, and it

0:00:57.480 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 3>came in even hotter than expected.

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 4>In fact, Treasury Secretary Annie Yellen just in the last

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 4>couple of hours telling Bloomberg exclusively that the surge that

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 4>we're seeing in longer term body yields in recent months

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:10.320
<v Speaker 4>that's a reflection of the strong US economy not of

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 4>a jump and government borrowing driven by that widening fiscal deficit.

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 3>All right, so good to know. And that GDP report

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 3>for the third quarter, it was fueled by surge and

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 3>consumer spending. So let's get to our guests. We're Pull Corporation.

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 3>Mark Bitzer, he is with us. He is chairman, he

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 3>is president and CEO of Whirlpool, and he joins us

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 3>on Zoom from Benton Harbor, Michigan. Mark, it is good

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:34.319
<v Speaker 3>to have you back with us. Your company. You came

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 3>out and you trimmed your full year profit outlook, amen,

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 3>and uptick in promotions. Investors noticed, and the stock is

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 3>down the most and to the lowest since twenty twenty.

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 3>So investors, definitely you are upset about what they heard

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 3>from you.

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:48.919
<v Speaker 5>Guys.

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 3>First of all, let's take the big picture. What's it

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 3>like operating in today's environment right now?

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, First one, Carolyn, thanks for having me back on

0:01:58.560 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 6>the show.

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 7>I mean, what would be communicate today is a third

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 7>quarter which I would still describe as pretty solid results.

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 6>That we year the year we grew our business.

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 7>We hadn't grown our business for six quarters in a row,

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 7>and now we grew our business more than three percent

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 7>revenue growth, we expanded market share, and year year we

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 7>expanded our margin by about one.

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 6>Hundred basis points.

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 7>But yes, we trimmed our forecast technically not on the

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 7>ongoing EPs because we also had some text benefits, but

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 7>we as opposed to seven point seven and a quarter

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 7>EBIT margin, we lowered it to six and a quarter

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 7>to six and a half. So that is trimming the

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 7>EBIT margin, and the market reacted. You could in many

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 7>ways argue probably overacted, but it is what it is.

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 7>But I think that's the essentially what happened. The underlying

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 7>results which we had I would still consider very solid

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:55.079
<v Speaker 7>and particularly compared to the pre COVID levels and also

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 7>compared to Q two where we essentially went sideways. But

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 7>in all transparency, we expected our margins to continue to

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:04.639
<v Speaker 7>improve and instead of it by basic move sideways. And

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 7>I think that's what we see today, a lot of

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 7>reactions out there.

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 6>Underneath that.

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 7>That's probably getting to your broader question about the consumer.

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 7>You know, the consumer right now in our industry, we

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 7>see strong replacement demand. I even products breakdown and you

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 7>have more applnes usage post COVID, but the discretionary side

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 7>of a consumer, which is so much driven by consumer confidence.

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 6>That is the soft part of a business.

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 7>That is also the inherently more attractive part of a

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 7>business because it comes with higher margin and higher mix.

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 7>So we see right now a pretty heavy shift of

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 7>consumer spending towards replacement side and lesser to a big

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 7>discretionary purchase.

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 4>That's interesting and that that makes sense given you know

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 4>what else we're hearing with the economy mark. Where else

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 4>are you seeing when it comes to the consumer in

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 4>the US weakness when it comes to consumer spending? Is

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 4>there certain categories that you can out line for us

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 4>where you're seeing weakness? Are there geographies? Is it the

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 4>higher end consumer that's that's actually struggling more than a

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 4>consumer you know, the in the middle or lower end.

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 4>Tell us, tell us what you're learning and what you're seeing.

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, and again it comes back to my early comment

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 7>about replacement demand. You know a replacement demand just put

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 7>yourself in consumer shoes. If you have a washer or

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 7>refugeral breaking down, you want to have it replaced with

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 7>two days. You don't do the big shopping around and

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 7>the mixed up you want to replace. So that is

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 7>just a one on one sale, which again is typically

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 7>not a very mix or margin tractive business. The discretionary side,

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:40.239
<v Speaker 7>where people plan for a new kitchen or remodel house,

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 7>is the soft part right now, and that's the much

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 7>richer part of that. So in general terms, you could say, yeah,

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 7>there's a little bit of a trading down on a

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:54.280
<v Speaker 7>consumer landscape. There's a segment of call it a premium consumer,

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.480
<v Speaker 7>which is pretty resilient, but it's kind of a big

0:04:57.520 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 7>mass in between where you just don't see trading up

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 7>if at all. Right now, you just see more trading

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 7>down coupled with you know, a promotion environment which we

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:09.160
<v Speaker 7>described as return back to pre COVID levels.

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, as a consumer, I'm saying, yay promotions, Mark, I'm

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 3>going to be quite honest with you, but it does

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 3>say something to kind of move the needle right to

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 3>get consumers kind of off the thinking area into the

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 3>actual you know, buying of something. So how aggressive are

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 3>your promotions and are you anticipating that in terms of

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 3>maybe some weakness and the need for promotions that this

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 3>continues into well into twenty twenty four.

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, and in rones called today, what we refer to

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 7>is we consider a promotion environment as having normalized, ie

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 7>call it past tense, which AWS implies we expected stabilized

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 7>going forward. So in terms of the depth of duration

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 7>of promotion, this is not any different from pre COVID,

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 7>and frankly it is something which we expected, but it

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:04.720
<v Speaker 7>happened and occurred maybe one or two quarters early when

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 7>we originally anticipated. And that again comes fully back to

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:12.719
<v Speaker 7>the discretionary side of a demand, post mortgage rate increases,

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 7>post all these horrible world news messages that tumbled pretty

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 7>much call it in Q two, and consumer confidence ultimately

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 7>drove that lower discretion of demand, which in turn drove

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 7>a higher promotional intensity and the environment.

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:31.039
<v Speaker 4>What about the other part of your business, the part

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 4>about workers attracting and retaining talent costs that you have

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 4>in terms of buying the equipment necessary to build these machines.

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 4>How are wages for whirldpool workers right now? Are they

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 4>up yere over year?

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, So, first of all, to put it in a

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 7>broader context, as you know, over the last three years,

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 7>we were not only concerned about cost, we were also

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 7>concerned about resilience and the strength of our supply chain.

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 7>The latter part we basically have I would say pretty

0:06:59.000 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 7>much fully resolved.

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 6>Our supply chain is intact.

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 7>We don't have major availability issues, so that make a

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:07.840
<v Speaker 7>check mark behind it. On the cost side, over the

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 7>last couple of years, we saw the biggest increase of

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 7>cost on basically raw material and transport. Transport has come

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 7>down quite a bit, and raw materials are starting to

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 7>trend down and that is a favorable trend which we

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 7>observe particular second half of this year, and we also

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 7>expect into next year well wage side, and again that

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 7>is more driven by of our US factories. One is unionized,

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 7>once are non unionized. We basically have every year wage adjustment,

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 7>and we in phase of a labor shortage, particular in

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 7>twenty one and twenty two, we did already fairly significant

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 7>moves on that wage side.

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 6>So so I would.

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 7>Say this year we're not confronted with a massive wage increase.

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 7>We still of course do year the year increases and

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 7>that kind of helps us dealing with a labor shortage.

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 7>And right now I would say across the board, maybe

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 7>with some fewer regions option, we're pretty well staffed and

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 7>beliebor shortage is it's a lot less of initiate than

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 7>in most for example two years ago.

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Mark, so what do you make of when we

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 3>get the like the retail sales numbers that come out

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 3>and it shows a really strong consumer and which kind

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 3>of surprises everybody because we keep talking about student loan

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 3>payments or car payments that are going to slow down

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 3>the consumer. I see what you said about replacement versus discretionary.

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 3>But do you does that retail sales data sometimes surprise you?

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 3>Do you when people say resilient consumer, does it kind

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 3>of just say, well, resilient but maybe.

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 5>Not so much.

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I'm in Carol.

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 7>I mean I would say, I think you need to

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 7>move from a headline into the details. And yeah, with

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 7>consumer spending, and that's that's confirmed. The question is on

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 7>what is for consumer spending? And we saw there's a

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 7>lot of spending on services. Restaurant calls have gone up,

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 7>travelers gone up quite a bit. Our part of a

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 7>business consumer durable. And again I'm talking of a discretionary side,

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 7>not a replacement site. For most families, buying a washing

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 7>machine or remodeling kitchen is a very significant part of

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 7>a disposable income. You only do this expenditure if you

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 7>have confidence in your economic future and the broader environment

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 7>and consumer confidence. And you can look at whatever index

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 7>that is one which kind of call it. April may

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 7>dropped off pretty sharply. So yes, I do cbover consumer spending.

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 7>I think more durable categories is a slightly different picture.

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 7>They're just on the long term big disposable items or

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:37.959
<v Speaker 7>big ticket items. There's some reluctance of the discretionary side. Again,

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 7>replacement site is very solid, but on a discretionary side

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 7>is soft.

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 3>Do you guys talk a lot about a recession coming?

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's been coming for two years, and some

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 3>would say, listen, we've already had you know, certain parts

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 3>of the market have seen you know, or certain parts

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 3>of our economy have seen it. But what's your best

0:09:57.679 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 3>guess as someone who runs a company, you've seen some

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.199
<v Speaker 3>any different. You know, we've gone through a very tough

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 3>market cycle, certainly coming off the pandemic that was bad,

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 3>and then it was actually pretty good. People were doing things,

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 3>especially on their homes. So do you think a recession

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:13.319
<v Speaker 3>is likely in the United States? Your biggest market here

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 3>certainly by revenue.

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, First of all, I would start with a cabin

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 7>there's probably a lot more people more confident.

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 6>About that subject than I am.

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 7>So it's the way I would look at it. Our company,

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 7>in many ways is a cannery in the coal minor.

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 7>We see certain trends earlier. What I mean with that,

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 7>we saw the cost inflation in our business a lot

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 7>earlier than most companies saw it. The same time, we

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 7>saw the beginning for cost inflation a little bit earlier.

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:44.199
<v Speaker 7>And we probably also see the kind of a normalized

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 7>consumer promotion environment that livered early. So most of the

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 7>broad economy sees we tend to see maybe call it

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 7>three to six months earlier that in mind, you know,

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 7>it's kind of I think broader terms, the US economy

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 7>is more resilient than most people thought. So from that perspective,

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 7>I personally do not see a scenario for a deep recession.

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:08.439
<v Speaker 6>Cooper be something shallow.

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:12.199
<v Speaker 7>Yes, I think the key element will be going forward

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 7>to is you know, when when will the Feds signal

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 7>a kind of a stabilization of a plateau of interest rates?

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 6>That is a big element.

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 7>And then of course what is a little bit more

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 7>difficult to answer, when do you when do always horrible

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 7>world news become a little bit more less or or

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 7>are we getting numb against it. So that's for consumer

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:37.679
<v Speaker 7>confidence part of it. But again from a person perspective,

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 7>we don't expect a big boom, but we don't expect

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 7>the scenario for deep recession. We're prepared to very small,

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 7>modest growth in our industry, but were also prepared to

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:50.560
<v Speaker 7>deal with a shallow recession.

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 4>Mark on that subject of everything that's happening around the world,

0:11:56.520 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 4>are focused certainly not numb. Yeah, and our boocus certainly

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 4>on the Middle East in addition to other parts of

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 4>the world. But there's also the business side of this,

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 4>which is oil prices. And I'm wondering how you're watching

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 4>energy markets, how you're watching oil prices, and if we

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 4>do see a spike in oil prices, what that does

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 4>to your business?

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, And then and let me be maybe a radio

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 7>cause maybe not a perfect form to comment on this

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 7>horrific attax and the subjequent subsequent human tragedy coming out

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 7>of this one. So it's kind of difficult to move

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:31.839
<v Speaker 7>from mad to economic impact. Having said that, of course,

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 7>there's you know, the entire Middle East situation, if it

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 7>would further escalate, has some risk on the oil prices. Again,

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:42.080
<v Speaker 7>there's a big if if it further escalates in an

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:45.719
<v Speaker 7>uncontrolled manner. As you've seen the last two days the

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 7>oil price from initial spike, they came down a little

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 7>bit and and right now in our internal forecast, but

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 7>again there's people who probably know a lot more about it.

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 7>We expect also stabilization sideway to move off the oil,

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:05.079
<v Speaker 7>but it's a lot depends on will there be stability

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 7>in what is an extremely difficult Middle East environment.

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 3>No, absolutely, Mark, We so appreciate your time. You've always

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 3>been so generous, especially throughout the pandemic coming off of it,

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 3>trying to help make sense of that cycle. And we

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 3>really appreciate your time trying to understand what's going on

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:26.839
<v Speaker 3>and really appreciate it. Mark Bitzer. He is chairman, president

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 3>and CEO of Whirlpool, joining us on Zoom from Benton Harbor, Michigan.

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 3>A great gauge on what's going on in the economy

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:36.679
<v Speaker 3>at a time when there is so much heavy news,

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 3>so much uncertainty. Really appreciate what's more to come. Right

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 3>here on.

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 1>BusinessWeek, you're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern Listen

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg dot Com, the iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Business App, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:13:57.280 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 3>As promised, we do have the Mattel's CEO on christ

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 3>joining us from Elsagundo, California on Zoom.

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 8>Hi Carolim, it's great to be with you.

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 3>It's so great to be with you. I feel like

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 3>I have a million questions. I feel like I want

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 3>to go to a bar, have a drink with you

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 3>and just sit and talk. I want to start with

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 3>the Israel Hamas conflict. You're born in Israel, studied at

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 3>Tel Aviv University before heading to the West coast of

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 3>the United States of America. I hope your family and

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 3>friends are safe. I pray that they are safe. How

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 3>are you thinking about all of this right now and

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 3>this conflict and is there a way to peace in

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 3>that region?

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, thank you for asking my family. My family is okay,

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 8>My immediate family is okay. But and you know, of course,

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 8>in Israelia, this is very personal to me. And I

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 8>know too many people who lost loved ones or have

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 8>relatives that have been kidnapped and are now being held

0:14:55.760 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 8>hostage in Gaza. You know, on behalf of Mattel. We

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 8>condemned the terrorism and atrocities perpetrated by Hamas and stand

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 8>against hate and violence in all forms. We express hope

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 8>for the safety of Israelis and Palestine and children and

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 8>families part in the Israeli Hamas war. As a company.

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 8>Since the Hamas attacks on October seventh, the Mattel Children's

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 8>Foundation has been focused on humanitarian work, including cash and

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 8>toy donations with shelters and hospitals who support children who

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 8>are suffering. And we're sitting here all wishing for a

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 8>swift resolution to the war and more peaceful times in

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 8>the future.

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 4>Well you know, and it's something that you know, people

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 4>who are wow, gosh, I mean up to eighty years

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 4>old at this point have dealt with their entire lives

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 4>in that area of the world. And I'm wondering to you,

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 4>and not speaking on behalf of Mattel, but just getting

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 4>your thoughts personally, how this ends. If a two state

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 4>outcome is the only solution to ending the conflict there

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 4>once and for all.

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 8>You know, it's a complicated conflict, and were now sitting

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 8>at a time that is very volatile. We see risk

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 8>of escalation, and we just hope for a swift, swift

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 8>resolution and wishing peace for everybody as soon as we can.

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 3>I want to talk about Mattel. I have one more

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 3>questions for you. Do you think Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyah

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 3>who is not going to be the leader that brings

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 3>lasting peace.

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 8>And this is not the time to get into the

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 8>political discussion right now. Everyone is focused on resolving the situation.

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 8>Israel articulated its priorities. We're all really looking forward for

0:16:55.600 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 8>the release of the hostages. There are thirty run under

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 8>the edge of sixteen that are being held at captive

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:07.879
<v Speaker 8>right now, about half the hostages of women, and we

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 8>really believe that this should be a resolved as soon

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 8>as possible, and we pray for the release, safety and

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 8>release of all the hostages that are now being held captives.

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 3>You are absolutely right, but we do appreciate you weighing

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 3>in on this because we have talked to you about

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:29.639
<v Speaker 3>serious issues in the past, so really appreciate this. No

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 3>easy segue, but I do want to talk about the

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 3>business of Mattel. Talked to us about last quarter and

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 3>the outlook. It was a tough day in the equity

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 3>market for you guys. You did talk about tougher industry conditions.

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 3>What are those tougher industry conditions that you guys are

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:47.880
<v Speaker 3>worried about.

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 8>What they see the industry being soft in the third

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 8>quarter and near to date, and as a result, we

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:01.440
<v Speaker 8>adjusted our expectations and expect and believe the industry will

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 8>decline mixing a digit for the full year. But don't

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 8>you need to remember that this is after the industry

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 8>was up twenty two percent from twenty nineteen to twenty

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 8>twenty two, reaching an all time high. So coming off

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:24.160
<v Speaker 8>after such a strong increase, especially in a challenging microeconomic environment,

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 8>we believe that this is a reasonable situation and doesn't

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 8>reflect on the strength and resilience of the industry long term.

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 8>The toy industry has been growing for over ten years

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 8>and it's a growth category, So we feel very good

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 8>about the industry and it's a growth process. And even

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 8>in that environment, even in a softer market, Matsel performed

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:56.639
<v Speaker 8>very strongly. Our quarter exceeded, our quarterly result exceeded expectations.

0:18:56.680 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 8>We showed meaningful sales groat margin with very strong free

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 8>cash flow. Intercourse, we saw consumer dement increasing and we

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 8>continue to outfreitz the industry.

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 4>I think a lot of investors today, at least sending

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 4>shares down about seven percent, were concerned that you guys

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.159
<v Speaker 4>maintained your full year sales outlook despite all of the

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 4>success of the Barbie movie. So what would have to

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 4>happen Eon to bring in more than the one hundred

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 4>and twenty five million dollars expected from the Barbie movie

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 4>and related products? What needs to happen at MATEL or

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:32.919
<v Speaker 4>in the industry for that to happen or for the consumer.

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 9>I should say, while we maintained the top line expectations,

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 9>we increase our outpook for a ghost margin for our

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 9>EPs and EBIDA, and still expect a very strong free

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 9>cash flows to float through.

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 8>What they change is that relative to our initial expectation

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 8>at the start of the year is that the industry

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 8>is we believe will now decline amidst of the digit

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:04.400
<v Speaker 8>but the fundamentals are strong. We do expect an accelerated

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 8>growth rate in the fourth quarter and significant expansion and

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:11.919
<v Speaker 8>growth margin compared to the prior year, and for consumer

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 8>demand to be positive for Mattel in the holiday season,

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 8>in the fourth quarter and the full year. So we

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 8>are performing strongly. We're heading into the fourth quarter, seeing

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 8>stronger support from retailer, more shelf space, more representation in

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 8>major holiday catalogs, and overall a strong position with a

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 8>very broad based offering, a product across a play patterns,

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 8>crash points, and we believe we have very well positioned competitives.

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 3>So just to follow up there, the one hundred and

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 3>twenty five million that you put out there, the estimate

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 3>from the Barbie movie and related products, would you say

0:20:57.800 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 3>it might be even conservative a little bit?

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 8>You know, well, we did say it's at least one

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 8>hundred and twenty five million dollars revenue at sixty percent

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:09.439
<v Speaker 8>operating income margin.

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 9>But the.

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 8>Takeaway from this is that this is one movie in

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 8>one year, and as we continue to scale our strategy

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 8>and have more movies, more executions, and not just in film,

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 8>but also in television, in location based entertainment, theme parks,

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 8>consumer products, digital experiences, music, and other verticals in some

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 8>cases that are actually bigger than the toy industry, we

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 8>believe that we have an opportunity to capture significant value

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 8>from our franchises. And we're not saying that everything let's

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 8>go there as successful as Barbie, but we absolutely believe

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 8>that in the aggregate there's a meaningful opportunity for us.

0:21:57.200 --> 0:21:59.159
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's go there. And I've got to say, you know,

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:00.920
<v Speaker 3>I remember when we start talking to you or you

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 3>was it the early days of the Barbie Movie or

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 3>you started filming. So it was kind of fun to

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 3>be along for that process. But it was a movie

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 3>that made us laugh, made us cry, and like I said,

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 3>it appealed to a lot of different ages, which was

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 3>pretty pretty wild. So what are the key brands that

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 3>you think have life beyond a kid's toy chest and

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 3>that you think we should be all kind of waiting for.

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't know whether it's six months, twelve months, the

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 3>next couple of years that are going to be brought

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 3>to life in different ways.

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 8>Well, the division of Mattel's Films is to collaborate with

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 8>leading filmmakers to create stand out quarterly movies based on

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 8>our iconic brands that will resonate in culture and a

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 8>field of global audiences. And the Barbie Movie and I'm

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:47.920
<v Speaker 8>glad you enjoyed it as much as you did, is

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 8>a clear showcase it did.

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 3>And we have brought me back to the theater for

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 3>the first time.

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 8>I don't have to hear that, and we have fourteen

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 8>other movies in development right now, different demographics, different genres.

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 8>We have Hot Wheels in development with jj Abrams as

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:13.880
<v Speaker 8>Warner Brothers, Matchbox in development with sky Dams, which, as

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:19.640
<v Speaker 8>you know, produced the Mission Impossible movie that did very well,

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 8>and Top Dan We have a movie in development with

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 8>Vin Diesel around Rocking Stock and Robots Parley Pocket with

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 8>Lena Danham and Lily Collins. We have a Wishbone in

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:37.639
<v Speaker 8>development with Pitt Farley, Major Matt Mason with Tom Hanks

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:42.400
<v Speaker 8>as a star, Thomas the Tank with Mark Forrester as director,

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:46.440
<v Speaker 8>and the list goes on and off, so we really well.

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 4>You know, it's very good that you're so close to

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:51.400
<v Speaker 4>Hollywood out there. Yeah, it's good that you're so close

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 4>to Hollywood out there. Nel Segundo, Hey, we only have

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 4>about thirty seconds left. I'd love to hear comments on

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 4>the consumer going into the holiday season. Are you seeing

0:23:58.040 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 4>signs of weakness in the consumer.

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 8>Well, we expect a strong holiday season for Mattel. We

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 8>believe our retail partners and the industry as a whole

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 8>is well prepared for the season, and were very excited

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 8>to be able to care consumers of all ages with

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 8>a great product for in the holiday.

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to get yelled at, but I'm going to

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 3>ask twenty seconds, what's the hot toy for Christmas and

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 3>the holidays and for Hanukah? What is the hot toy?

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 8>Well, anything Barbie is a hot toy, especially even before

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 8>the holiday. For the spirit Halloween Barbie costume, watch out

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 8>for that. But of course hot Wheels is always the winner.

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 8>The basic car assortment and the five car pack assortment,

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:48.919
<v Speaker 8>and look out for the months the high four dollar assortment,

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 8>and you know that will will be very will be

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 8>hot selling toys for the holiday season.

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 3>God, you're speaking my language. I love Uno and I

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 3>love Barbie. En On Chris, thank you so much, truly,

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 3>your friends and your family are on our minds and

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 3>our thoughts. Chairman and CEO of Mittel.

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern on Bloomberg Radio,

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business app, and YouTube. You can also listen

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Just Say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, as we reported earlier, we talked about Sam makmin

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Free taking the stand in his fraud trial earlier downtown

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:40.400
<v Speaker 3>in New York City. Some special testimony jury was sent home.

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 3>It's very fascinating everything it feels like surrounding SBF and FTX.

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:49.200
<v Speaker 3>For the latest headlines though on that trial, just head

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 3>to Bloomberg dot com or check out the Bloomberg terminal.

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I've got to say, the rise and fall

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 3>of SBF it was just tim a few years ago, right,

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 3>Just go back to twenty nineteen.

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there was no such thing as ftx's six change.

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 4>By twenty twenty one, though, it was naming arenas after itself,

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 4>and by twenty twenty two it had become a force

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 4>in politics and pop culture. By then. By autumn it

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 4>was gone, along with much of its customers' money. The

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 4>question is how did this happen so quickly?

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 6>Well.

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 3>A new documentary by Bloomberg Originals Ruined the Sam Bank

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:20.439
<v Speaker 3>bin Fried's story captures the head spinning frenzy around Crypto.

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 3>Here's a little piece of it.

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 5>I don't think he even had almost a conception at

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:27.880
<v Speaker 5>some points that it was wrong or rights.

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 6>I think he just had them metality that he has

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 6>to win.

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 4>It was almost like trying to explain like business ethics

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 4>one oh one to a baby.

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 3>Sam has basically become a villain in everyone's minds.

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 5>This committee will not stop until we uncovered the bull

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 5>truth behind the collapse of FTX.

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Will this be the last of its kind? No, this

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 1>is the nature of capitalism.

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:58.879
<v Speaker 3>Get over it, all right, everybody with more on this

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 3>documentary by Bloomberg Originals ruined the Sam Magmin Freed story.

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 3>Let's bring in Pat ragne Or, editor of Bloomberg Markets

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:09.119
<v Speaker 3>Magazine and also the editor of Bloomberg BusinessWeek, Joel Webber,

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 3>both back at Bloomberg headquarters in the Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio.

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Joel Weber. I don't know if you know this,

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 4>but at a point last year, earlier this year, pat

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 4>Rick near was so involved in this story. I gave

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 4>him a new nickname, and it was called Crypto Pat.

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 4>So whenever he was walking around, I would say Hi

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 4>to Crypto Pat. And it's good. Didn't know that Pat

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 4>with us this afternoon. You didn't know that. But there's

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 4>a reason I gave him that nickname.

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:35.639
<v Speaker 10>Isn't there, Well, look like Pat is Pat is amazing

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:40.399
<v Speaker 10>and worked with Matt Levine last year on the Crypto Story,

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 10>where we went in BusinessWeek cover to cover and we

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 10>published it and we felt really good about ourselves. And

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 10>then the biggest story in crypto ever happened, which was

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 10>the collapse of FTX, like a couple of weeks.

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 4>Later, and we were like, thus far, biggest story crypto

0:27:57.600 --> 0:27:58.400
<v Speaker 4>thus far, Yeah.

0:27:58.240 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Thus far.

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:03.199
<v Speaker 10>So as that was happening, a small group of us

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 10>started talking about FTX and SBF and I helped basically

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 10>put what became this documentary in motion. And as we

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 10>were doing that, I was like, you know, who could

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 10>take everything that he's learned about crypto from working closely

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:22.119
<v Speaker 10>with Matt Levine on the Crypto Story and parlay that

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:26.159
<v Speaker 10>into whatever this effort becomes. You want to work with

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 10>Pat Ragnar And that's basically you know, here we are

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 10>a year later. Funny enough, the Crypto Story published a

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 10>year ago yesterday. I did don't know if you realized that, Pat, Wow,

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 10>So so here we are and a lot has changed

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 10>and actually today you cannot just make this stuff up.

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 10>It's like so perfect. So this documentary comes out and

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 10>Pat and I have been talking for a while about like, hey,

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 10>we should you know, write a story for Business Week

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 10>that sort of takes a step back and like tells

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 10>us all what it all means. And it's tied to

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 10>the documentary. And then oh, by the way, Sam bankman

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 10>Fried is taking the stand, So it all comes together

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 10>in elegant ways, sometimes so so pat when you kind

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 10>of started writing this remarks, and you know, here we

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 10>are having SBF just taking the stand for the first time.

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 10>You know what what stands out to you about it all?

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 5>You know, in preparing the documentary, we did some interviews

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 5>with a lot of people, we guys around one hundreds

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 5>of people. Yeah, but one person I spoke to who

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 5>is kind of a prominent crypto critic, a guy named

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 5>David Gerard, said something to me that really stuck in

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 5>my head. And he said, you know, people in well

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 5>regulated markets don't really understand what it means for something

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 5>to be unregulated. We take for granted how finance works,

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 5>even when we understand that finance is risky and full

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:56.720
<v Speaker 5>of full of opportunities for trouble and plunder. But there

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 5>are bank compliance departments. Actually, most importantly, when you're deal

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:02.960
<v Speaker 5>with traditional financial institutions, there's lots of checks and balances,

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:06.240
<v Speaker 5>splitting of roles, and in crypto, you're just kind of

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 5>like handing your money to a guy and you're kind

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 5>of hoping, you're hoping that that they're doing the things

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 5>that they're saying they're gonna do, and you really don't

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 5>know what will happen. And FTX was just this like

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:21.239
<v Speaker 5>kind of very vivid illustration about like, well, what can

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 5>happen is is that like everything your your your money

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:28.600
<v Speaker 5>can just you know, evaporate into a bankruptcy. And you know,

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 5>I think that was why people were willing to do

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 5>that and why regulators weren't able to get a hold

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 5>of this faster. Is like a puzzle that I've been

0:30:38.240 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 5>thinking about almost like every minute that I've ever been

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 5>looking at crypto. So I was kind of trying to

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 5>work through that.

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 10>So what came what happened at the trial today that

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 10>you found it trusting? Well it, you know.

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 5>So the main thing that happened was is that the

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 5>judge sent the jury home. Interesting, So what what they're

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 5>doing now is kind of we're getting a hint of

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 5>the testimony that he might give in front of a jury.

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:14.160
<v Speaker 5>As the judge decides what's relevant, and you know, I'm

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 5>reading between the lines on the excellent live blog our

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 5>reporters are doing from the courthouse to.

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 5>But but I think the implication is that he's making

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 5>a case that he had lawyers, and the lawyers were saying,

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:32.960
<v Speaker 5>this is fine, this is fine, this is fine, which

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 5>you know, I think goes to what it always looks

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 5>like his defense has been, which is that this was

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 5>an error and just a very big one. You know,

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 5>I blanked up, as he said more times than his

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 5>lawyers probably wishes.

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 6>That he would.

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 5>But that kind of seems to be the defense. And

0:31:52.720 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 5>then maybe he's adding that and by the way, my

0:31:55.120 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 5>lawyers helped me.

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:02.719
<v Speaker 3>Well, Pats, any time in putting this documentary together, did

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 3>you at one point think well, maybe they just yeah,

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 3>it was just a really mega mistake.

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 5>You know, I mean, I think, I mean, my point

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 5>of view is that even if like, let's let's let's

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 5>have that be the generous interpretation, you don't get to

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 5>do that, you know, when you're running, when you're running

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 5>something where you have somebody else's money. At one point,

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 5>one of his lawyers said, you know, it's like, uh,

0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 5>this company never had a chief risk officer, and you know,

0:32:28.480 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 5>it's like you had to find time to find Tom

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 5>Brady and Gazelle. You know, maybe you should have like

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 5>not having a chief risk officer when you are in

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 5>the risk business is And again I'm just like saying, like,

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 5>let's let's be generous about it is. It's is its

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 5>own kind of massive problem. But I mean, look, he's

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 5>got three of his top lieutenants of gled guilty to front, right.

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I think you know, we can presume, well,

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 5>we will wait to see what happens with the jury

0:32:56.760 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 5>in this case about him, but ft X is I

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 5>think it's just a legal fact at this point that

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 5>FTX was a fraudulent enterprise. And what can be confusing

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:12.239
<v Speaker 5>about that is that, you know, there are often these

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 5>questions sometimes we will write like, well, what happened was

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 5>was that his trading firm borrowed from FTX and people

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 5>and I'll hear from people saying you borrow it, he

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:23.080
<v Speaker 5>took it, and you know, but that's actually the mechanics

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 5>of these kinds of things, like well, the mechanics of

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 5>how you take it as you borrow it. But that's

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 5>not it's not really different, you know, And it looks

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 5>this was a substantially fake business.

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 10>Okay, so you got to travel around the world with

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 10>a really talented crew. We had a lot of Bloembird

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 10>reporters participate. There are some other people that got to

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 10>participate in this film Ruined. Like who when you get

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:49.560
<v Speaker 10>to and we went through the premiere together last night?

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 10>Like when you got to watch that?

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Like what what sticks with you?

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 10>And like who are you so proud of getting a

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 10>chance to speak with?

0:33:56.680 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 5>Well, let's say I was very interested to speak to

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 5>Suzuo of of Three Arrows Capital, who, in many ways

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:09.200
<v Speaker 5>like that the the the trade that they made that

0:34:09.360 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 5>fell apart on Tara Luna was the first string that

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:18.439
<v Speaker 5>pulled everything out. It was interesting to listen to him

0:34:18.520 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 5>and his business partner Kyle Davies uh talk about their

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 5>experience of that. I will let viewers judge how they

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:28.840
<v Speaker 5>how they how they take that conversation. Uh. Suzu is

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 5>currently have has his own legal troubles. Uh, but uh,

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:38.640
<v Speaker 5>you know, so that's that that's fascinating. We also spoke to,

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 5>you know, a commissioner at the CFTC who had met

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 5>with Sam Bank and Freed Uh several times while he

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:49.320
<v Speaker 5>was lobbying to really get the US to open the

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 5>door to his business. And you really see from that

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 5>how hard he was pushing to become a h and

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:58.879
<v Speaker 5>how close he got, how close he and how close

0:34:58.920 --> 0:35:03.799
<v Speaker 5>he got, and and I think that's pretty scary. I mean,

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:08.680
<v Speaker 5>it seems like in some ways it's like if a

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 5>series of trades hadn't gone wrong at one hedge fund

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 5>and then that hadn't fallen through another hedge fund. I mean,

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:17.319
<v Speaker 5>I think at some level this always was going to happen.

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:20.000
<v Speaker 5>But if it hadn't happened at that particular time and

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 5>he had had a little more time to play it out,

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:24.920
<v Speaker 5>I think there would have been a lot more mom

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 5>and pop money at FTX. They were going hard getting.

0:35:28.760 --> 0:35:32.759
<v Speaker 4>That money, ay Pat. One thing that I've been thinking

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:34.680
<v Speaker 4>a lot about over the last year is what this

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 4>moment means for crypto. And it's interesting that this is

0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:40.359
<v Speaker 4>happening at a time where we've actually seen in recent

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:43.399
<v Speaker 4>days the price of bitcoin move higher on optimism around

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 4>a spot bitcoin ETF. But I do wonder, after you

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 4>spent a year really in this world, just I'm so

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:54.160
<v Speaker 4>involved in this world, and now you're on the other

0:35:54.239 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 4>side of it, I don't know if you have more

0:35:56.640 --> 0:35:58.680
<v Speaker 4>crypto projects planned. I don't know what Joel has planned

0:35:58.719 --> 0:36:00.160
<v Speaker 4>for you moving forward.

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:00.319
<v Speaker 6>But.

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 9>Do you.

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm just wondering, like, what is what is this as

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 4>an existential moment for crypto now that we're kind of

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:10.360
<v Speaker 4>on the other side of it.

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:12.880
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I I think they've got a lot of

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:14.760
<v Speaker 5>work to do. I think you have to be careful

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 5>not to overinterpret price moves. It's such a you know,

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:21.640
<v Speaker 5>it's a it's a pretty opaic market without a lot

0:36:21.680 --> 0:36:25.120
<v Speaker 5>of liquidity. And actually, even when it was hot, that

0:36:25.239 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 5>was always a question was like how many actual people

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 5>are putting money into this?

0:36:28.400 --> 0:36:30.400
<v Speaker 6>You know, I mean it was.

0:36:30.440 --> 0:36:32.799
<v Speaker 5>Actually very hard to get a read on, like where

0:36:33.000 --> 0:36:34.920
<v Speaker 5>where is a lot of this money coming from? You know,

0:36:35.480 --> 0:36:38.279
<v Speaker 5>classic problem which the documentary kind of talks about is

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 5>like we always talk about like, well this this tokens

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 5>worth billions, that token's worth billions on these kind of

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 5>very thinly traded markets, It's like how many people are

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:49.480
<v Speaker 5>actually trading this stuff? And you know it, you do

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 5>see that there is some institutional interest in this, you know.

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 5>I I try not to make predictions about what's what's ahead,

0:36:57.640 --> 0:37:03.239
<v Speaker 5>but you know, a whole part of crypto really fell away,

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:05.719
<v Speaker 5>and it's not I think fully captured by the fall

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 5>in market value. So I think crypto went from like

0:37:10.280 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 5>three trillion at its peak to below a trillion in

0:37:13.160 --> 0:37:15.360
<v Speaker 5>market value. It's come back up, it's about a trillion

0:37:15.440 --> 0:37:19.759
<v Speaker 5>and a trillion point three, but but you know that

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:24.279
<v Speaker 5>that changed from a trillion to one trillion, is from

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 5>three trillion to one trillion, doesn't really capture. Also, you

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:29.920
<v Speaker 5>know people who entrusted their money to something like a

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:32.080
<v Speaker 5>crypto bank and saw it and saw it go away,

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 5>people who put their money into exchanges and saw it frozen,

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:37.520
<v Speaker 5>people who were trying to get different kinds of yields

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 5>and had to go away. And it's it's hard for

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:42.320
<v Speaker 5>me to see that being an easy sell to anybody

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:43.319
<v Speaker 5>for a really long time.

0:37:44.520 --> 0:37:48.880
<v Speaker 10>Okay, So one of the things though, like crypto has this,

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:52.880
<v Speaker 10>has had this come down, and I think the SBF

0:37:53.000 --> 0:37:54.680
<v Speaker 10>taking the standard is a really good reminder of that.

0:37:55.200 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 10>And yet at the same time, like we've seen this

0:37:57.400 --> 0:38:01.759
<v Speaker 10>enthusiasm recently again where you know, Bitcoin's continue to like

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 10>go up up, and it's littal like reminiscent of other

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 10>moments in time where like bad things are happening, and

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:10.600
<v Speaker 10>yet it's like this thing, this thing that nobody quite

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 10>understands is going up. And that also made me ask you, like,

0:38:15.320 --> 0:38:19.280
<v Speaker 10>you know, so you know this ETF, that spot ETF.

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 10>There seems to be a lot of interest in that

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 10>is is that is that what it needs? Is that

0:38:24.200 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 10>what this industry needs to have a chance that you know,

0:38:26.840 --> 0:38:28.080
<v Speaker 10>redemption perhaps.

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:32.799
<v Speaker 5>You know, it would provide I think a simpler way

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:35.279
<v Speaker 5>to get in. It would get you know, on the

0:38:35.360 --> 0:38:41.000
<v Speaker 5>one hand, it would bring bitcoin into the regulatory world

0:38:41.280 --> 0:38:43.960
<v Speaker 5>right like you'd be you would be buying a security

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 5>when you you know, would be the easiest way to

0:38:47.040 --> 0:38:51.680
<v Speaker 5>buy bitcoin, you know, And obviously what the regulators are

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:56.400
<v Speaker 5>are wrestling with is can you bring this is is

0:38:56.520 --> 0:38:58.960
<v Speaker 5>this fit for the regulatory world? The fund will be

0:38:59.040 --> 0:39:02.800
<v Speaker 5>regulated and we'll be treated as regulated. But what's happening

0:39:03.160 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 5>behind the scenes in the bitcoin market. You know, a

0:39:05.120 --> 0:39:06.440
<v Speaker 5>lot of crypto people will say that you need to

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:09.880
<v Speaker 5>make a distinction between bitcoin and other crypto, you know,

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:15.080
<v Speaker 5>one of the things, and I would agree with that

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:20.959
<v Speaker 5>in so far as the the the the investment case

0:39:21.120 --> 0:39:23.440
<v Speaker 5>around a lot of the crypto that people were trading

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:26.239
<v Speaker 5>was like, you know, it was like a penny stock

0:39:26.320 --> 0:39:29.800
<v Speaker 5>market blossomed overnight. Bitcoin has kind of a different investment

0:39:29.880 --> 0:39:30.920
<v Speaker 5>case and a different theory.

0:39:31.080 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 3>But listen, we apologize, we've got to jump in, but

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:37.080
<v Speaker 3>it was interesting. We'd had a conversation with the folks

0:39:37.120 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 3>over at Wisdom Treaty and they have filed for a

0:39:39.040 --> 0:39:44.000
<v Speaker 3>spot Bitcoin ETF but waiting on regulatory Pat Ragnar, thank

0:39:44.040 --> 0:39:46.719
<v Speaker 3>you so much, and of course Joe Webber the documentary

0:39:46.840 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 3>Ruined the sam Baquin Free on the Bloomberg and on

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:52.919
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Originals and APM wull Street Time tonight, do not miss.

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:58.520
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Podcast, Apple, Spotify and

0:39:58.719 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 1>anywhere else you get your listen live weekday afternoons from

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 1>three to six Easterning on Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app,

0:40:07.239 --> 0:40:09.759
<v Speaker 1>tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App. You can also

0:40:09.880 --> 0:40:13.279
<v Speaker 1>watch us live every weekday on YouTube and always on

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg terminal.