WEBVTT - Investing Strategies For Crypto, ESGs, And Telecommunications

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>called Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.639
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com Slash podcast. Let's get into the

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>cloud right now. We've got Ido Susan with us, founder

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>of drive nets UM. He had founded Into Sales Sol

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Cisco worked for them for a while UM, but now

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 1>he's back out there building a bigger company. You've got, uh,

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I know what, two hundred two hundred million dollars in

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:44.880
<v Speaker 1>funding already. Yes, So what are you doing at drive nets?

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 1>What's your main focus after coming out of Into Sell

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and Cisco. I will go it's basically to change the

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>network and the Internet infrastructure design and building operators of today,

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>supporting with the custom of the operators like A T

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and T and other UM to reduce a cost per

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>bit and to create new revenue because the way that

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>we consume the network UM as consumer enterprise different change

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 1>dramatically and the network didn't. And we are here to

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>support and then drive the transformation to the cloud. Yeah,

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>you would think that a lot of that would have

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:25.040
<v Speaker 1>been accelerated to the pandemic, But somehow we look at

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>our country and we're still pretty woefully behind. It is

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>that fair to say? Um? If you you know, we

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:37.400
<v Speaker 1>operate worldwide, so the US market advancing in this area.

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>But I think, um, the boorders between consumers and enterprise

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:45.680
<v Speaker 1>does not exist anymore. Our home it's our new office.

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>And if the operators will not focusing to all out

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>fiber to the home five G WiFi C capability, um,

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>we will not be able to walk to study from

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>home and to support the demand. Yeah, I'm looking for

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>houses right now in the Tri state area, and every

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>place that I look at takes pains to point out

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>there's room for a home office. It's it's recently been rewired,

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, or if it hasn't, it just stays on

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the market for a hundred and fifty days and nobody,

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>nobody wants to buy it. How is it competing ido

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>with your former employer, with behemos like Cisco and Juniper

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>and these gigantic companies. How do you get um, I

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>know you recently got a contract with a T and T.

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>How do you get contracts um with with with these

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 1>huge clients when you have to compete with you know,

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the biggest goliaths in the world. First of all, as

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, um, Um, you know Cisco was a qualet

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>my previous company. And I'm not forget what I'm coming from,

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the amazing company and also the rest of the incumbent

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>in this industry. But because I'm coming from Cisco, I

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>know how it's how then almost unpossible to change that

0:02:56.880 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>you're doing business because you need to support the stock,

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you need to run after the quarterly revenue, and to

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>do transformation to your technology and the way that you

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:10.959
<v Speaker 1>are selling and create a value to the customer. It's

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 1>very hard, um. So you know we are here to

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 1>do challenge money. It's not our drive anymore. And we

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>are here to transform um the network industry, begin industry

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and to create value and the customer. Like A T

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:29.639
<v Speaker 1>and T and other looking for the startups like us

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that will help them to disrupt the way that they

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 1>are operate and build their network in order to again

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>create new revenue and too, would you say the cost

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering also with the shift to the home office.

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>What the cybersecurity concerns are. I know that's a huge

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>issue that a lot of employers are struggling with. Yes, cybersecurity,

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a big thread all over. UM. It's not related

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>only to home, to our mobile, to our privacy. UM.

0:03:56.320 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>We see a lot of challenges. I think, UM, the

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>way and the opportunity for the operators UM to help

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to protect our privacy and to help to drive more

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>security to any type of device that we all connected,

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:19.719
<v Speaker 1>if it's IoT, mobile, home, you name it. UM, it's

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a big opportunity and I think, UM, I cannot share

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:25.280
<v Speaker 1>too much, but I can tell you that they are

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>walking around it and this is one of the revenue

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>generation that they all play to have in the next

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:34.599
<v Speaker 1>coming years. And of course it would benefit of US.

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I know we had recently uh a US infrastructure buil

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:43.599
<v Speaker 1>five billion dollars in new spending has earmarked a pretty

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:47.840
<v Speaker 1>sizeable piece, UM for what you're doing, and I'm sure

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>other countries also are going to be spending money to

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:53.599
<v Speaker 1>try and improve the infrastructure. How much of a boost

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>will that give you over the coming years. It's a

0:04:56.760 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>huge boost boost, UM, we see it. Yes, as you mentioned,

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not only here in the state, it's all over,

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 1>it's worldwide. UM. It's help us. UM, it's help our

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>customer to moderate their infrastructure and to think out of

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the box. And also for US, it's UM we're getting

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>a big and very nice contracts to move ahead. UM.

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just the beginning. I think more and

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:29.239
<v Speaker 1>more money will go from government to those infrastructure because

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 1>everybody understands that if you want to move ahead with

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>any segment, if it's healthcare, if it's education, if it's

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>you name it, you need very robust infrastructure, networking infrastructure

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to support the demand of the traffic. UM. And the

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>way to do it it's with technology like US and

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 1>others as well, UM, that we help to convert it

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to be cloud based solutions, software based solution. UM. So

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:02.159
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just the beginning. Yeah. Absolutely. I'm still

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>working on upgrading my electric panels and after I get

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>past that, then I'll boost the cloud computing power of

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>my house. Ido, thanks so much for joining us. Ido

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Susan there. He is the founder of drive nets, coming

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 1>out of into Cell and Cisco. Talking to us about

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the move away from hardware and into the cloud. That

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:25.280
<v Speaker 1>we've all taken part in over the past few years,

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>but we need to accelerate. I promised you we would

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:36.799
<v Speaker 1>talk about corporate governance and UM E s G investing.

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 1>Maya Becker joins us. She's the director of Corporate Governance

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Responsible Investment with rbc UM and Maya, it's great to

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>have you on. You know, there was a time when

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>we would have thought of this maybe as a fat

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>as a trend, but it now seems like a strategy.

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 1>How do you see it? Yes, thank you so much

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>for having me. Absolutely, we are seeing that the E

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>s G and climate change is absolutely top of mind

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>for institutional and sters. Rbc GAM actually just completed out

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>fifth innual Responsible Investment survey of eight hund global institutional

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>asset managers and it showed that not only our investors

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:14.559
<v Speaker 1>concerned and interested in E s G, but climate change

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>is their top priority after anti corruption and cyber security.

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>And for those that care about E s G, their

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>top E s G concern is climate change. And this

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>concern and this focus is really more felt, certainly by

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>European investors who are paying the closest attention, and we

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>see regulation as a real key driver of that. I

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>am curious about developed versus undeveloped nations here or under

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>developed nations. You know, we were having a conversation this

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>morning with a representative from Mercy Corps was doing work

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:48.679
<v Speaker 1>in Nigeria and really talking about the lack of support

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that they were getting as a lot of conflict was

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>breaking out in the country over climate related issues. Do

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you think that these promises being made a COP twenty

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>six or going to start moving the needle for the

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>countries that need it most. I think that's a great question,

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and what we're seeing at the COP twenty six Climate

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Conference is really there are a lot of high level

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 1>commitments that are being made by governments. One of the

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 1>key focuses of those conversations and negotiations is how advanced

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>economy can provide support to developing nations, exactly what you're

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>referring to their I think what we're going to want

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to see moving away from COP as COPS closes very shortly,

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>is how do those commitments start to turn into government frameworks,

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>policies or legislations and what are the actions that governments

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 1>will be taking as they walk and leave COP twenty

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:42.679
<v Speaker 1>six with those commitments made, and will that actually generate

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>support for developing nations too, in many ways are those

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that are most vulnerable to climate change, and that is

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 1>a really important piece. As the investors when we look

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>at E. S G and we look at climate change,

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>our focus is really on integrating climate change into the

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>investment process, and that means looking at how climate risks

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>and opportunities will impact different sectors and different geographies, because

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>they'll each be impacted in different ways, and we need

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:10.959
<v Speaker 1>to be taking those considerations into account when we look

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:13.680
<v Speaker 1>at our investments. And government has a key role to

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 1>play in addressing climate change and in supporting that just

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 1>an orderly transition for all global nations. And it feels

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to me like we'd rather pass out band aids to

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>underdeveloped nations than fix the gaping wounds in our own Um.

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>We can't even in the US, in Germany, in France

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:37.959
<v Speaker 1>agree to phase out internal combustion engines at our manufacturers

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>over the next twenty years. I mean, it's I feel

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>like COP twenty six achieved really very little in terms

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 1>of meaningful commitments from the biggest nations. Am I wrong?

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Am I being too cynical? Well? I think, firstly, if

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>we think of what we can take away from COP

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:55.959
<v Speaker 1>twenty six and it is still long agoing, there's still

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a few days left here. As we did see governments

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:02.200
<v Speaker 1>make some significant cap commitments that CAUGHT twenty six new

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>climate pledges, which will do this year since it is

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the fifth conference after the Paris Agreement, and that is

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>something to take encouragement from those commitments that are being made.

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>They're also specific sectors we're so far off from We're

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>so far off from hitting the climate pledges we made

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 1>it Paris in two thousand fifteen. I mean, what's the

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 1>point in making new promises if we can't even meet

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the old ones. Well, what will be important is when

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:28.439
<v Speaker 1>we leave CAUGHT twenty six is seeing how these pledges

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and these commitments get turned into policies and practices and

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>looking at what those sector transition plans are, because I

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>think that's what we're talking about here. How does each

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 1>sector transition to net what does that look like? What

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>is the price on carbon, what are the subsidies, what

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 1>are the commitments that are made at a sector level,

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>because each of those sectors needs to have a plan

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>of how they're going to transition to net zero the

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>climate change and why it's so complex and challenging is

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>because it affects all sectors and all geographies, although in

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>different ways. And what we do need to be able

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 1>to find is to be able to find solutions that

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>bring all sectors along that pathway to that zero when

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:10.319
<v Speaker 1>he said that give us is a direction, but you're right,

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't give us an indication of the speed of

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>travel and the path of that travel will take and

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>just thirty seconds or so here may because you know,

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:20.839
<v Speaker 1>there's this great question now in the US about the

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 1>disclosures needed out of the SEC. Do you think that

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:27.839
<v Speaker 1>that can be done this year in a way that's

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:32.719
<v Speaker 1>meaningful to someone like you? Well, I think disclosures absolutely

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>is a priority. We need a single, ideally global sustainability

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>of reporting standard for investors in order to integrate and

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>consider how fun it is impacting an individual issue where

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>we need that information to be consistent, comparable, and publicly disclosed.

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 1>We're starting to see more interest from regulators in putting

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in place those consistent and comparable disclosures. What I would

0:11:55.760 --> 0:12:00.200
<v Speaker 1>say we did here announced um during COP is the

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 1>i f r S Foundation has formed a new International

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Sustainability Standards Boards and the hope there is that that

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>will establish that common consistent standards for reporting, because absolutely

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that's something investors, Nathan, it is an important piece of

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>all of this. Yeah, that's the key. That's that's that's

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>got to be a key move for you and for

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 1>your clients. UM, and that's I think what listeners investing

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 1>in E s G want to want to get more of. Maya,

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Maya Becker is the

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:30.680
<v Speaker 1>director of Corporate Governance and Responsible Investment over at RBC

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Global Asset Management, talking to us about E s G

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and COP Let's get to crypto right now. I am

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>pomped to talk to our next guest. Brett Harrison is

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the president of f t X and UM. This is

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>a company we've been just watching absolutely explode. Brett, thanks

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>so much for coming on the program with us. Let's

0:12:55.880 --> 0:13:00.679
<v Speaker 1>talk about the um accept the broader acceptance crypto. It's

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>been amazing to me. Ten years ago, I spent two

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:07.680
<v Speaker 1>weeks living only on bitcoin, stopped using dollars, and it

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>was kind of a side show. It was a clown event.

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>It was silly. It worked, but um, it was an oddity.

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's say, and now everybody, uh in every age group,

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 1>in every walk of life wants to know something or

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>does thinks they know something about crypto. How have you

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>experienced the acceptance? Yeah, I think personally, I have a

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>similar story. You know, before joining f t X, had

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 1>very little experience with crypto. I had primarily been in

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the proprietary trading space on the equities and equity prohibitive

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>side for my whole career, and coming to crypto it

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 1>was very new to me as well. But it does

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 1>feel like it is. It's ubiquitous now. Everyone wants to

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 1>know something about crypto, understand the space, either invest in

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>it or build on top of it. And it's more

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 1>than just you know, a potential new currency or a

0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>means of transfer. It an entire technology platform that people

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 1>really excited for the applications of. Now. I'm really curious

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:07.440
<v Speaker 1>about what you think about the Bitcoin versus ethereum debate,

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>because on one hand, you know, I could talked to,

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>for example, Elizabeth Stark of Lightning Labs last week, and

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:17.599
<v Speaker 1>for someone like her, bitcoin is the ultimate crypto to

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 1>be building things on top of. But if you talk

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>to someone like Ken Griffin, he believes that Bitcoin will

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 1>be eventually replaced in concept by ethereum. How do you

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>make sense of a debate like that? Sure, you know,

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that one really needs to dig into the

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>details of these different cryptos and why they're built and

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>what they're used for to understand them. Bitcoin and ethereum

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 1>have very different applications. You know, Bitcoin itself was was

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the first real crypto to gain mass adopting, so it

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>has that staying power. But Ethereum is coming something some

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty separate. You know. It's a place where you can

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 1>build smart contracts, you can actually build applications on top

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of Ethereum. It's sort of like an Internet layer, are

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>some kind of software software platform, And even just those

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>two alone aren't going to be the only answers. You know,

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>there are other cryptocurrencies built on blockchains that have even

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>higher transactions per second, lower cost fees to do transfers,

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>like Salada. We're going to see more than just Bitcoin

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the theoryum that have staying power in the crypto ecosystem. Yeah,

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I think there are big differences there that maybe Ken

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Griffin doesn't take into account Um, and he might be

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>looking for something else rather than Um. Trying to appreciate

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the diversity in the crypto space. I wonder what you

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>think of the I've always had a question as to

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>why we'll necessarily need to buy whole tokens or multiple

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>tokens just because we like the technology platform upon which

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>they're built. For example, UM, I loved the Internet computer

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>when it came out. It didn't do so well, but

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the idea I thought was cool and the technology was cool.

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I didn't necessarily need to own a token, or if

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I was going to start a business on it wouldn't

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 1>have needed to buy two. I think you make a

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>really excellent point here, which is that there's the blockchain

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that's being built for particular applications, and then there's a

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>token associated with that blockchain or a token associated with

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>that application. And I agree with you. I don't think

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>we need thousands of different tokens or hundreds of different blockchains.

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I think what we will see as a real consolidation

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>over the next couple of years, where a few winners

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>will emerge in terms of you know, which blockchains are

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>actually going to be the ones that people build applications upon,

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 1>and the others probably will die off over the time.

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>They don't have as many unique characteristics, or they're not

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>going to outcompete, you know, the couple best ones. But

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>what's the utility of the token? I mean, if you

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>build um your business off of the Ethereum blockchain, you

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily need to acquire Ether to do that, do you. Well,

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>you might need to use Ether in order to silicate

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>a transaction. So, for example, when you do an Ethereum

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:06.880
<v Speaker 1>based transaction, you need to use Ether tokens to pay

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the gas fees required to do a transaction, or to

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:14.200
<v Speaker 1>pay a smart contract to evaluate some function. So that's

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the sense in which you need the token UM. But

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 1>there are also applications built on top of them where

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 1>they use different tokens, they can convert under the hood,

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and so it's not necessarily that you need to own

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:27.159
<v Speaker 1>them yourself in order to interact with them, you know.

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 1>But you have such an interesting background worked at some

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest market makers in the world, Jane Street,

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Citadel Securities, which is obviously is known for its relationship

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:39.640
<v Speaker 1>with Robin Hood. These days, I'm wondering if you think,

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and speaking of Robinhood, I'm wondering if you think crypto

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>how much it's truly a way to start to get

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 1>financial assets into the hands of more younger people who

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:55.440
<v Speaker 1>for a long time until now have not been trading,

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 1>have not been paying attention to finances um and have

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>had a mistrust for so many of you know, institutions

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:08.159
<v Speaker 1>in finance. Absolutely, it's not just a way and in

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 1>theory and in practices is what empirically we're seeing. And

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>there were um several polls done that showed that the

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>percentage of people who were underbanked owning crypto was actually

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:24.680
<v Speaker 1>considerably higher than those that were banked. In addition, demographics

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 1>that are you know, typically more minority demographics that are

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>have either not had the same kind of affair access

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to banking and investment opportunities in the past, are disproportionately

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:37.159
<v Speaker 1>involved in crypto. So I do think that there's a

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a democratizing effect of crypto, and that it's so

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 1>low friction, so low barrier to get involved to invest

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think that that's why it's so popular among

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:50.400
<v Speaker 1>young people. And also there are so many applications again

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 1>of crypto. You know, it's not just about owning a

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin hoping that it goes up. Think about all the

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:59.359
<v Speaker 1>blockchain based gaming that we're seeing investments and including from

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 1>our own company f t X. Think about n f

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 1>t s and the the idea of having collectibles and

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:06.919
<v Speaker 1>collectible art and communities around them. These are all I

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 1>think very appealing to the younger generations. Is the SEC

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:12.640
<v Speaker 1>you going to figure out a way to regulate this stuff?

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so far they've allowed a futures based e

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:19.160
<v Speaker 1>t F, which is I think pretty silly, um, but

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really make much sense since it's an unregulated

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>product to begin with. So it's a very good question

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:32.160
<v Speaker 1>right now. People might not know that cryptocurrency exchanges are

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:35.159
<v Speaker 1>not regulated the same way as a stock exchange or

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 1>a futures exchange. They're regulated under the finn Send Money

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Services Business, which is not really the most appropriate regulatory

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:46.200
<v Speaker 1>regime for an exchange that can have millions of transactions

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:49.159
<v Speaker 1>per day happening, you know, by high frequency market makers.

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>And so there's we are in constant dialogue with the SEC,

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 1>with the CFTC. We believe that there is probably going

0:19:56.520 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>to be some sort of joint jurisdiction between these two

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 1>agencies of exactly what form we don't know, UM, that's

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to regulate these tokens because it's

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 1>it's tricky. You know, for every one of these tokens,

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:11.679
<v Speaker 1>they have different characteristics. Some of them have characteristics of commodities,

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 1>some of the characteristics of equities, and you know, we'll

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 1>we'll see where the where regulation heads and then your future.

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:20.159
<v Speaker 1>It's a very interesting point. Brett, thanks so much for

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:23.680
<v Speaker 1>your time. Really appreciate it. Brett Harris and their president

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>of f t X talking to us about the crypto world.

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's get over right now to Wendy Wong right now,

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>head of Sustainable Investment Partnerships at New York Life Investments. Wendy,

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:43.199
<v Speaker 1>we were talking earlier about the trend in or the

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 1>it's beyond the trend. I guess at this point the

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>strategy of E s G investing. How has COP twenty

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.679
<v Speaker 1>six changed things for you? First of all, thank you

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>so much for having me in for your interest in

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>E s G and besting UM COP twenty Yeah, it's

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a bit clear that it's a hot topic UM and

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>so you know, I think there's a realization that there's

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>only so much that governments can do UM. But there's

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>also a role that the private sector can play as well. Well.

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering the private sector as far as it goes

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:16.640
<v Speaker 1>do you think that some of the biggest strides can

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:21.879
<v Speaker 1>be made there? Uh, well, you know, we always believe

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>that when we work together for collective goal, good things

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.439
<v Speaker 1>could happen, and so that was the thinking between our

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:31.160
<v Speaker 1>i Q Dual Impact e t s. So it's meant

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:34.439
<v Speaker 1>to have a compelling investment thesis that is investing in

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>some of these themes that are so important to us

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>gender equality, climate, health and well being. But there's also

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:43.679
<v Speaker 1>UM a give back component as well. So we worked

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>with a nonprofit organization for each of these new e

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>t s and we reinvest our management fiece a portion

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of our management fees back to these uh these nonprofit

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 1>organizations so they can continue doing the work they're doing.

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 1>So it's a great partnership between the private during the

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>public sector. So what are the themes? Talk to us

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:04.959
<v Speaker 1>more about the c t F product. What are the

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:08.199
<v Speaker 1>themes here? We have four themes UM that we have

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>UM that are part of the i Q Dual Impact

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>e t F. We have a health and well being

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 1>theme that was designed with American Heart Association to help

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 1>people live longer, healthier lives. There's a gender equality e

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:25.880
<v Speaker 1>t F that was developed with girls who code investing

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:29.360
<v Speaker 1>in UH companies, US companies that have demonstrated a commitment

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:33.159
<v Speaker 1>to gender equality. There's a Cleaner Transport UM. It provides

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:36.399
<v Speaker 1>exposure to global companies that are helping us move to

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a more environmentally efficient transportation technologies. That includes bikes, rails, UM,

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>buses of course, electric vehicles. But it's also beyond all

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of that. It's sort of the grid and infrastructure that's

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:51.920
<v Speaker 1>needed to produce and UM support all of that, and

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the value chain UM. And then finally, we have an

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:57.880
<v Speaker 1>oceans themed e t F i Q oceans UM Clean

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 1>Oceans e t F o C e N that was

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>developed to aligned with Oceana and that that it offers

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>exposure to global companies that are helping to protect and

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:11.199
<v Speaker 1>achieve a cleaner ocean. Yeah. I'm curious about this because

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of you know, the newer generations that want

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to invest in socially friendly e t you know, E

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>t F and investment products, a lot of them feel

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 1>like they're getting exposures exposures to non clean items as well,

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:30.119
<v Speaker 1>especially when you're kind of investing in things that pertain

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:32.359
<v Speaker 1>to the broader market. I mean, what advice do you

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:35.639
<v Speaker 1>have to people who really want to start to limit

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>their investments towards things that are good for the environment

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 1>and good for society. Well, there's a lot of different

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>ways people incorporate e s G in the portfolio. You know,

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>we started sort of as an industry doing negative screaming

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>where we're sort of screening out since stocks and um,

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, fossil fuels. It's gone a lot more sophisticated. UM. So.

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:01.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, part of New York Life Investments is a

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 1>company called Candrium. They've been doing sustainable investing for over

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty five years. UM and you know, they were a

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:11.239
<v Speaker 1>key key part in developing these e t F and

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 1>they do a lot of scoring and screening of companies

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that they've been doing it for a long time. They

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 1>specialize this. UM. So it's just making sure that investors

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:22.959
<v Speaker 1>are doing their research, UM, that the product that they

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:26.639
<v Speaker 1>are investing it is in fact accomplishing what they wanted

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to do. And if that means more than negative screening

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and you know, sort of the top of the top,

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>then you know that's what they should look for. UM.

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>If you don't mind, I want to double up because

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>if I'm looking for example, the ocean e t F

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that you guys had formed. Some of the companies include,

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 1>if I'm reading this correctly, Home Depot, Microsoft, Procter and

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Gamble and even Semens. Some of the companies that are

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:55.239
<v Speaker 1>in here, how do you really assess them on some

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of the things that are doing that are good for

0:24:56.880 --> 0:25:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the environment, but also some of the things that aren't

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:03.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe not meeting the standards that we want to see

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 1>you in a few years. Yeah, so for will you

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 1>we can use ocean right, So that investment thesis is,

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, companies that are taking steps towards mitigating harm

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to the ocean. UM. You know, companies are not perfect,

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>no one is. We're all making we're making steps. It's

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of a gradual process. So it doesn't it includes

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>companies that are sort of um doing the best in

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>their sector among their peers of reaching towards that UM. So,

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:35.199
<v Speaker 1>in addition to some of the stocks that you had listed,

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:39.160
<v Speaker 1>it also includes um Adidas. You know, for the first

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:42.159
<v Speaker 1>time in more than half of the polyester that are

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 1>using their products are going to come from recycled plastic waste.

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:48.159
<v Speaker 1>We love that story. And then from four onwards their company,

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:51.239
<v Speaker 1>that company is committed to only using recycled polyester. So

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 1>it's that circular economy um. And you know a seafood

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>A seafood provider is also included from Norway and they

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>supply sustainably farm stand men and process seafood worldwide and

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:07.879
<v Speaker 1>everything that they sent out is sustainably certified. All right,

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Really interesting stuff. Wendy, thanks so much for joining us

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:13.159
<v Speaker 1>and talking to us about these products. Wendy Wong is

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 1>head of Sustainable Investment Partnerships at New York Life Investments.

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Talking about these thematic e t F s and the

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 1>broader um E s G trends that have really gone

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 1>beyond at this point, I think are becoming just a

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 1>mainstream strategy for investing as which we as we UH

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 1>confront these challenges with things like COP twenty six. Thanks

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:41.919
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Matt Miller three, pt on false Sweeney I'm on Twitter

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always catch

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 1>us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio