WEBVTT - Will America SURVIVE Donald Trump’s Presidency?

0:00:00.000 --> 0:00:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Hello there, I'm chucked out. Welcome to another episode of

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:05.880
<v Speaker 1>The Chuck Podcast. And yes, I'm still the host of

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 1>my own podcast. I tas because I don't know who

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:11.960
<v Speaker 1>else would do it if you're going to name it

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the Chuck Podcast. But I digress. I welcome new listeners,

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:20.800
<v Speaker 1>new subscribers to the content, whether you've liked and subscribed

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:24.080
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube, Apple, Spotify, wherever you get your podcast, if

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you watch us in video form as well, thank you.

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>We've seen the growth lately. It's great, it's reassuring, and

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>it's good to know. Look, this is a tough business

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to get into the independent media business, especially if you're

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:37.880
<v Speaker 1>not a partisan hack.

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot easier to be a partisan hack in

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>this world in order to quote get attention. But when

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you're building something that I'm hoping to be building here,

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:50.199
<v Speaker 1>it's incremental. So it makes you more grateful that I

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>know I'm earning every like and subscribe that you get,

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>rather than just trying to ride a grievance wave, whether

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a liberal one or a concern a bit of one.

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>On this front, I'm going to go through three topics, well,

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>two topics today, plus a fun interview hip the Welcome

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to Welcome to Reality with the World of Epstein, Jeffrey

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Epstein and the Epstein Files going to tackle a little

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>bit of where Elon Musk if he chose to actually

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:28.320
<v Speaker 1>engage in third party politics, where in twenty twenty six

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 1>he could be the most impactful I'll give you that

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>guide there. Then my interview with Marjorie again and Jim Roddy.

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Jim and Marjorie have hosted the Jim and Marjorie Show

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>throughout the Boston media markets on a variety of places

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that currently with WGBH, which is Boston Public Radio. I've

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>appeared on their show for over a decade and I'd

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>never had them appear in my show, so finally I

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>get them. It's lively, it's fun, it's interesting. If you

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>love politics, you're going to love these two. Well, you

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>talk every thing future of media. If you like your

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Kennedy politics, We talk a little Kennedy. What happened to

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the Kennedy mystique? Is it still viable? How much is

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Kennedy Junior sort of destroyed the brand? So a

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>fun conversation will be had there. We even touched on

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the Epstein Files a little bit, And that's where I'm

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>going to begin, because I think the most distressing thing

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 1>here is that you know what happens when conspiracy theorists

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 1>become the government, and that's that's you know, this is

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the lesson right. You know, the expressions you reap with you,

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>so you know when you when you create an information

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem that's built on conspiracy and built on distrust, that's

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>all well and good. If that's how you're going to

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>exploit and profit from it. Your Dan Bongino's did that

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>your cash betels Donald Trump? There's no doubt quite a

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>few people in the right wing ecosphere has created this

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>misinformation nightmare that we've all been living in a lot

0:02:56.880 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>of distrust and many folks on the right and particular,

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>but frankly with Jeffrey Epstein, there isracy. The conspiracy theorists

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>are not on one side of the aisle. They're everywhere.

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>The belief that there is always more that's hidden than

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>what's been revealed, and it's I'm not going to sit

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>here and discount that that isn't true. Why won't I

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>discount it? Because our government only in the last month

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>admitted that the CIA had a file on Oswald before

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and even had and there was even a case worker

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>on Oswald, Lee Harvey Oswald, before he shot Kennedy. So

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the CIA had been trying to deny anything like that

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>for decades. So if our government is capable of keeping

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>a secret like that for over sixty years, I understand

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>why there's so much skepticism of how government handles anything,

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>let alone something that could be as controversial as Jeffrey

0:03:55.080 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Epstein's alleged client list. Right, I say alleged because there's

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>been reporting that it exists, and then suddenly it supposedly

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't exist, et cetera. I'm one of those, as

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>many of you know. I'm an Okham's razor person. I

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>also think it's very hard for conspiracies to sort of hold,

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 1>if you will, right, there's always a break. I mean,

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I I'm on Kennedy. I've always believed that the government

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy is simply covering their ass. It's not CIA at

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>c YA. They're paranoid that they did that one of

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>their guys, somebody they were keeping an eye on they

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>weren't doing a good job with, because if they had

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:40.159
<v Speaker 1>kept a really good eye on them, maybe they would

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>have been able to stop them. And my thesis on

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>that has always been that that it with the CIA

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to admit that it messed up like this.

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>That's been my thesis, not alone in that thesis. Others

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>believe that it must be if they're concealing that what else?

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:01.840
<v Speaker 1>So they're concealing And it's a reminder. I've talked to

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>some good friends on this issue of the JFK conspiracy.

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:08.599
<v Speaker 1>Is there anything the government could release that would say, Okay,

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 1>I now know the whole story, anything right? And the

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>answer I get is, well, know that the assumptionet is

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>if you if you give them some moll out, you

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>hit that or there must be something more hidden. And

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>that brings me to the Jeffrey Epstein phenomenon. Right and

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:26.679
<v Speaker 1>right now, you know this is the akin of Maggie

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Maga eating itself. Right, They're literally this this. The snakes

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 1>are swallowing their tail, their own tails, if you will.

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 1>And it's because they've created you know, they created an

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 1>information of distrust, They created an atmosphere of distrust. They

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>raised expectations and turned rumors into potential facts. Uh, and

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 1>they were going to get to the real story once

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 1>they got power. And you know it. You know this

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>isn't deep state figures. You know this that's in power.

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>These are the conspiracy theorists themselves got the power. They

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>got the keys, they got the access. Tulsa Gabbert got

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>access to the JFK files, right, Cash Betel and Dan Bongino,

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Dan Bongino in particular, who has become wealthy trafficking and

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>these conspiracy theories and misinformation. They got the keys to

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the kingdom. And either there are now participants in this

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:25.919
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy that they have been railing about for years and

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>now the shoes on the other foot, which some in

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 1>MAGA now believe, or the more likely result is, oh,

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the truth is the truth, and there's no more there

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>than anybody else could hope, might have hoped that there was,

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>because you know, this has been some you know, desperate

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:49.039
<v Speaker 1>attempt to try to you know, look, I understand, you know,

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 1>when you have this moment that we live in, which

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:52.599
<v Speaker 1>is just a lot of people don't like the elites,

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:55.839
<v Speaker 1>don't like their station in life, and so they want

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:58.239
<v Speaker 1>to believe that the elites are like not human beings,

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that they are off and creating pedophile islands and all

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>sorts of bizarre, weird behavior because it makes it easier

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>to then hate the elites and dehumanizing the elites. And

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>now we're now now now you have the Trump administration

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>that can't get their own people to believe what they're saying.

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>They're not going to believe it, especially because of Pam Bondi,

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>who while Attorney General, kept trying to play into the story.

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Right She was leaning into the story a few months ago,

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>claiming she was going over the client list, she was

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>getting ready to They did that ridiculous pr stunt where

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>they handed these notebooks to the to these right wing

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>influencers who all flashed it in front of the White House,

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of part one of all these secret

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>files that they were going to release. And now suddenly

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:49.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're trying to wrap it up. And look,

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the behavior of the administration is extraordinarily defensive. Donald Trump's

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>immediate shutting down of the question of Pambondi and the

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>cabinet meeting shows you. It's just they consistently are behaving

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>as if they do have something to hide. Now, I

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>happen to think what they're hiding is that they've been

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>bullshitting you for years. They've been making stuff up about

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>this for years and now, but at the end of

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the day, they don't want to admit that they were lying,

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>because the minute you admit you were lying, then what

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>else are you lying about?

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>So this is the trap that the Trump misinformers, who

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>are now in office and are now supposed to be

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 1>those that have the government facts that who is to

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>believe anything? And this is the concern that I think,

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of people have had about our

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>misinformation crisis, about the big tech companies only surfacing information

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 1>based on popularity or interest rather than in truth, is

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>that we now have a situation where nobody knows what

0:08:56.320 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to believe. Number one and number two an assumption of

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>everybody's lying, and you've got to somehow find a way

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to be you know, you're sort of you're guilty until

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>proven innocent. And in the in the world of social media,

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the world of internet algorithms, it's pretty hard. It's pretty difficult.

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:20.679
<v Speaker 1>In a world where you've got Elon Musk reprogramming artificial

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 1>intelligence programs in order to reflect his not so mainstream politics,

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 1>then all of a sudden, you know, you've got even

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>more reasons why people are going to question anything they read,

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>anything they hear, anything they see. And so this moment

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>here where Maga is essentially not wanting basically not wanting

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to accept what Trump's government is telling them, this should

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:55.199
<v Speaker 1>be this should be the moment that everybody takes a

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>step back and says, oh my god, what have we done?

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>What have we done to the the information ecosystem we

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:05.439
<v Speaker 1>have now? You know, I think it's perfectly reasonable now

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>for most folks to assume that Trump is bullshitting first,

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and the truth is somewhere. You're going to have to

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:16.680
<v Speaker 1>hope for seven different reports to figure out the truth

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 1>that everything is sort of you know, this is the way.

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>By the way the American information ecosystem worked in the

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth century. Nineteenth century wasn't such a good century for

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:30.319
<v Speaker 1>us politically. We were divided the entire time. You know,

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 1>there was at one point a storming of the capital,

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>storming of the capital city in Washington, DC, based on

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>some bizarre conspiracy about the pope. This is in the

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>eighteen fifties. This was before the start of the Civil War.

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:50.199
<v Speaker 1>So the America the nineteenth century, which was in many ways,

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>had a information, a daily information ecosystem that was very unsteady.

0:10:56.240 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Trust me, go do some research in old archives and

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 1>read news stories about events that we now know what happened.

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 1>And then you read during there would be all sorts

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of partisan takes and every city had their own politically

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>aligned news organization. Frankly, it's very similar to what the

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>last ten years have looked like on cable news or

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>what you've seen on social media and sometimes what you've

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>see and now in the world of independent media. But

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 1>this moment where we don't know was was Dan Bongino

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:38.199
<v Speaker 1>lying to you then or lying to you now? It's

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Cash Betel lying to you then or lying to you now.

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 1>It's Pam Bondi lying to you then or lying to

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you now she lying They lied to you at some point.

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>And what you've created is is not an information you

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>know is now we're in a We're living in a

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>world where you just don't know what the truth is.

0:11:56.600 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>This is life in Russia. Talk to or Russian somebody

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>who lives in Moscow who's not a Putin fan and

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:05.079
<v Speaker 1>ask them, how do you know? What's you know? What

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>do you believe? And they're like, it's hard to know

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:09.679
<v Speaker 1>what to believe. This is what life is like many

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 1>times in the Middle East, and the way the media

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>is sort of both consumed and interpreted, lots of skepticism.

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Nobody believes anything. And by the way, the only people

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>that benefit from a world where nobody believes anything are

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>those in power, right, because then they get to manipulate

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the information. They're the ones in power. So is this

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 1>should be this should be a five alarm fire, right,

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a moment and we're going to have more

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>of these where the government is going to say something

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and literally seventy percent are not going to believe it.

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 1>And we're in a situation with Epstein. And look, there's

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:54.680
<v Speaker 1>partisan reasons for it.

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 1>You have those on the left, they're convinced that there

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>is something there in Trump's just a frame of how

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:04.200
<v Speaker 1>many times he shows up in the so called Epstein files.

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 1>There's those on the right that believe that that maybe, well,

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 1>they're covering something up. Maybe it is not about Trump,

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>but maybe it's about somebody else in the quote elite

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem that just happens to be on the right side

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>rather than on the left side. But when you stoke

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>conspiracies and automatically assume there's a conspiracy and then you

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>get power, and then you realize the truth, and then

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you realize you don't know how to release the truth.

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:34.719
<v Speaker 1>You don't know where to put it where people will

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>believe it. And right now, I mean the number two person,

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the number one and number two people at the FBI,

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>how are we supposed to believe anything they have to say?

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>The Attorney General, how are you supposed to believe anything

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>she says? So this is real crisis. I mean, you know,

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>in the short term, arguably the president probably ought to

0:13:57.240 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>fire all three of these folks, because if you don't

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 1>have the if the public isn't going to believe what

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>you have to say in law enforcement, you're in trouble.

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>You're completely inoperable as ahead of a law enforcement agency.

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>So now perhaps those three just had to take the fall.

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>But look, there's reason for the phrase you reput yourself

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and this is a classic case of that. But instead

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>of dunking on them, this is you know, this is

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>why I'm here, This is why I want to rebuild

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the local news ecosystem. We need to rebuild mainstream media.

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 1>We need to rebuild trust because too many partisan hacks

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 1>like Dan Bongino and others have systematically helped accelerate distrust

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and purposely did it in order to gain power. And

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>you can sit here and say, isn't it rich that

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>now that they're in power, they're not believed. Well, they

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 1>did it. They did it to themselves, but more importantly,

0:14:57.880 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>they've done it to all of us, and they've done

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>it to the country, and they're doing it to the government. Look,

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the government has earned its distrust the Iraq War. Just

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>look at the last twenty five years, right, no WMD,

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the financial crisis, nobody held accountable, government did shit, did

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>squat right. Not a single banker, not a single person

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that took down the entire world economy was held accountable

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>for their actions. COVID happens upon that after the fact,

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and only adds to it the Russia investigation. All of

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>these things that were not fully that were you know,

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>in some ways manipulated, in some ways you had misinformers

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to get involved. But it doesn't matter. It created

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>an environment of distrust that was built on two particular issues.

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Where that distrust was was was earned right, And then

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I'd go back to the core one that I brought up,

0:15:57.040 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>which is the government took sixty two years to finally

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>admit that it had a file in that the CIA

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>was following Oswald. So it is obviously government did this

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to themselves. But the but the people that have tried

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to benefit have tried to essentially profit off of this.

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're they're they're the they're on the I mean,

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>at least they're the ones having to deliver this message

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and they're watching their reputations with with their right wing

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy friends go down the train. But again, if this

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 1>were a functional presidential administration that was not sort of

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the way it operates right where it's just on the

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:42.239
<v Speaker 1>whims of one person. But if this were an administration

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 1>that did care about whether the public was going to

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>believe its law enforcement agencies, all three of these people

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>would be fired tonight, Bondi, Patel and Bongino because they're

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>just they've they've been they're too toxic. They're two points

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I it is, I go back, why should anybody believe

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 1>anything they say? And they did it to themselves, all right.

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to pivot here to a topic I touched

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>on a little bit about Elon Musk and third parties.

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:16.879
<v Speaker 1>So a little bit of what I wrote about in

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:19.639
<v Speaker 1>my substack piece this week as well. You can go

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>read the fuller version of this, because look, this is

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a theme I want to say, Hey, Elon Musk, welcome

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to the party. Right, this is a theme I wrote

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 1>two months ago. I've been talking about here a lot.

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 1>I do think the two party system is on the

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 1>brink of collapsing, and if it does, it's actually could

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:36.159
<v Speaker 1>be very healthy.

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 1>If we want to rebuild this democracy, a functional democracy

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 1>for the twenty first century, we need to create us

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the condition so that we can be a multi party country.

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:49.959
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I just had an interesting conversation for a

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 1>for an episode of my new sphere show that'll be

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>coming out in a couple of weeks with the head

0:17:56.600 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 1>of the George Washington Presidential Library, And you know, she

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>was telling me that the founders, you know, whether it

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>was Hamilton Adams all, you know, they knew parties were

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 1>going to form, but the assumption wasn' be factions, that

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 1>there'd be multiple parties. They really thought it would operate

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a bit more like the UK, even though we were

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a parliamentary system, but we did sort of emulate the system.

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 1>And the fact that she put it to me, many

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 1>of the founders saw themselves as Whigs, you know at

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the time, which was a borrowed essentially a borrowed political

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 1>movement from the UK, and the assumption was it would

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>be multi party, that it wouldn't it wouldn't sort of

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:39.399
<v Speaker 1>devolve into what we have, which is this two just

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:43.359
<v Speaker 1>a two party system, And look, the work that it

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>would take to break it up is is where is

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:50.439
<v Speaker 1>where you would need rich people to get involved. But

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 1>the fact is, you know what's bothered me about the

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:58.479
<v Speaker 1>coverage of Musk is that it's it's the conversation has

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 1>shifted not towards the vulnerability of the parties, whether whether

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>actually there's a market for this, which I believe there is.

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I've been making that case for a while, but instead

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 1>it's been focused on him. Right, you know, all things Musk.

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I get it right, Musk is sort of sticky all

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. What's his motive? What's his angle? Is it

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a brand play? Is that revenge is at boredom? All right?

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I get it. But I also don't want you to

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 1>dismiss anything Musk is up to just by saying, well,

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:32.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, look what he did with Twitter, because you know,

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the blind squirrel finds an acorn a stop clock is

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>right twice, and Elon Musk is right right. Our two

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>party system doesn't fit the moment because right now both

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 1>parties our cultural are stitched together in culture. Neither the

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Party of the Republican Party. It's held together by

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>any sort of coherent ideology. The glue is cultural identity,

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 1>economic policy, foreign policy, institutional theory. These are all fractures

0:19:58.680 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>within both of these parties.

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Right on the Democratic side, you've got a growing divide

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 1>over capitalism itself. Democratic socialists like Zorn Mamdani and others

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>are openly questioning whether the system can even be salvaged.

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>And they're not on the fringe anymore. They have momentum,

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>they have organizing power, and they have a sharp critique

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>of both Wall Street and Washington. On the right, the

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>old Reagan coalition is just simply gone. The Party of

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Free Markets and Globalization has morphed into a party skeptical

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of trade, allergic immigration, isolationists. In his worldview, you've got

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:30.439
<v Speaker 1>the Mago wing on one side and what's left of

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:32.679
<v Speaker 1>that Chamber of Commerce crowd on the other trying to

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 1>hang on. So if ideology isn't binding, these parties together.

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>What is well we know it is it's cultural grievance,

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 1>tribal loyalty, fear the other side. And that's the problem

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>because that kind of glue is very brittle, doesn't hold

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:48.440
<v Speaker 1>under pressure. It makes people dig in deeper. But it's

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>also the vulnerability as to why I think a third

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and fourth party could come up and if we had,

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>if ballid access were fair, and again I do think

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 1>that there is not equal access, and I think it's

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 1>a violation of the Constitution. I think these ballot access

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:08.639
<v Speaker 1>rules that favor the two major parties over minor parties

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 1>in each states are unconstitutional and probably ought to collectively

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:16.159
<v Speaker 1>be challenged in a smarter and better way. An interesting

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>use of elon musks of money, by the way, But

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact of the matter is we've got we've got

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:22.919
<v Speaker 1>a country that would be a lot more comfortable in

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>four parties. A populist nationalist right, a pro business center right,

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:31.160
<v Speaker 1>a progressive economic justice left, and a liberal institutionalist center

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 1>left right. That is the four sort of groups of voters,

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:37.399
<v Speaker 1>and they are about twenty twenty, twenty and twenty with

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 1>another twenty percent of the country just all over the place.

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 1>So those factions are there. The voters are there, but

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 1>they've been awkwardly stuffed into this binary system that no

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 1>longer fits. And that's why we get this dysfunction. That's

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>why we get the performative politics, and that's why we

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>get loyalty tests instead of policy debates. So I want

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:01.639
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, the demand for a real alternative is there.

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:06.199
<v Speaker 1>The market exists. What's missing is infrastructure and patience. So

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>just because Elon Musk's is involved, don't just dismiss it

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 1>because you you know, he'll lose interest and he'll do

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>all that you know, and he'll make bad decisions and

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:18.880
<v Speaker 1>all those things are true. Right, maybe he's smart enough

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to let somebody else do it, and that's going to

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>be something I'm looking for. But the fact is it's possible,

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and I just wouldn't dismiss dismiss this moment. I think

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>we've never been I don't think the two parties collectively

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>have been this week in a long long time, because

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:42.439
<v Speaker 1>neither party is stitched together in policy. They're only stitched

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:44.479
<v Speaker 1>together on identity and feared if you could break that,

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:47.639
<v Speaker 1>the volatility could end up breaking the two parties. So

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>while I'm very skeptical that Musk is going to follow through,

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 1>but if he does. If he does, there is a

0:22:56.119 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>path for him. He is something few others have in

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>this goal to start a third party. He's got money.

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Ross Bureau was filthy rich, and that's what helped him

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:10.679
<v Speaker 1>get on the ballot. He used it in the nineties

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>to break through the ballot access wall. He built a

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>political party. Musk could do the same. He could build

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure and if he wanted to play the long game,

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 1>not just make headlines, he could actually reshape the party

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:25.959
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure for decades to come. So if he is interested

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>in doing this, and if I were advising him politically,

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I'd say this number one, don't try to create one

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 1>centrist party. Create two. A center right party, say in

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the state of Texas, and a center left vehicle stay

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 1>in the state of Florida. Those are my two test cases.

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Use those two states as your test markets. Thank you

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 1>for yourself as sort of a startup right because if

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:47.640
<v Speaker 1>it works in those two places, it's going to work everywhere.

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 1>And those two places, why do I pick there? Because

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the ruling party is dominant, but it's internally divided. Texas

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 1>is divided between sort of that John Cornyn institutionalist wing

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:02.119
<v Speaker 1>and the ken packstif Magna win, what an opportunity for

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 1>Musk right now to go get build an infrastructure that

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 1>John Cornyn could run in as a third party candidate

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 1>and probably win in a three way or four way race.

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:15.160
<v Speaker 1>And in Florida you have a divided Republican party there

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>is somewhat it's a little more personality divide, very loyal

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>to Trump, distrustful of There's not a lot of love

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>these days. For DeSantis, it's more of a personality issue.

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 1>But there's a large independent population and a fractured Democratic

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:33.400
<v Speaker 1>party that's kind of broken, but a center left independent

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:38.119
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting. So the point is is that both you

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:41.439
<v Speaker 1>have two big states that would be very expensive. But

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>if you're Musk, money is no issue, and I think

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 1>it's the two best proving grounds.

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>His goal is to see if he can elect three

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 1>or four independent senators right to become sort of the

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 1>majority makers of Senate control. So if you're going to

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:57.399
<v Speaker 1>go down that, this would be the states that I

0:24:57.400 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 1>would be targeting first. So I gave you my Florida

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and Texas big examples. So you obviously need more than

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:05.919
<v Speaker 1>just two targets. The next two places I'd be targeting

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>if I were him, would be Maine in Alaska. Both

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:13.239
<v Speaker 1>states have a history of electing independent candidates. There's an

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:17.120
<v Speaker 1>independently elected senators in both states right now, Murkowski one

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>not because she was outside the Republican Party structure, and

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Angus King and Maine one outside the Democratic Party structure.

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps Susan Collins, who's not very popular inside her own

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Republican party these days. Maybe she would take the third

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 1>route on that and he could get her to become

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:35.160
<v Speaker 1>a member of his party. You know, you can get

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that quickly. The point is that both states also have

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>easier ballot access laws. They're both ranked choice voting states,

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 1>so there is almost an openness and it allows you

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to do this. So again, two places to do. Michigan

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 1>is another place. There's going to be a very competitive

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 1>three way governor's race thanks to Mike Duggan, the former

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:57.360
<v Speaker 1>mayor of Detroit, running as an independent for governor. Well,

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:00.439
<v Speaker 1>if you have a highly contested three way race for governor,

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 1>easy to create the conditions to make the Senate race,

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:06.360
<v Speaker 1>which is an open seat. Gary Peters, the Democratic senator

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:09.360
<v Speaker 1>not seeking reelection there's going to be a Democratic primary

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>there of interest, and then some going to probably not

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:17.679
<v Speaker 1>be a Republican primary. We'll see Mike Rodgers, who lost

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty four, is going to run again as

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a Republican nominee. So you could find a third party candidate,

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:26.880
<v Speaker 1>be cut and basically ride the codetails of the governor's race.

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Then the four other states that I would be looking

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>at where there are divides on Republican philosophy are in Ohio, Kansas, Nebraska,

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:37.719
<v Speaker 1>and Iowa. Me take Kansas, Nebraska, and Iowa together. These

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 1>are the farm states. These states are getting hit extraordinarily

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:44.439
<v Speaker 1>hard on the tariff war, and the trade war is

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 1>going to make people poor, particularly Republican voters poor. In

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>those three states, there's opportunity. It fits Musk's ideology of

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of center right, pro business, pro trade. I think

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the opening is there any of those states. We already

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:04.120
<v Speaker 1>see there's an independent candidate in Dan Osborne running against

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Pete Ricketts. Osborne's worldview is probably further afield than where

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Musk is. He maybe actually is pro tariff as Trump

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 1>on some things, but we've seen Osborne have some success.

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a weak Democratic Party in Nebraska, so you could

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 1>see that. Throw a third party, a third independent, a

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 1>second independent candidate in Nebraska, and suddenly you have a

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>very interesting three way race and it creates what Musk

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:33.439
<v Speaker 1>claims he wants, which is a potential check on the

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:36.640
<v Speaker 1>MAGA majority, if you will. And then there's Ohio right

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:38.879
<v Speaker 1>where you have a real divide between sort of the

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 1>institutionalist wing think Mike DeWine and the MAGA wing like

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Vivik Ramaswami and JD Vance. You've got a Democratic party

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that's struggling with its brand, but it's fairly competitive, especially

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>if Shared Brown or Tim Ryan ends up running. But

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I think you could go a long way. I think

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 1>some of their success is winning over some voters who

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:03.880
<v Speaker 1>normally wouldn't be Shared Brown voters, but they can't stomach

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:10.640
<v Speaker 1>supporting MAGA. That's the constituency that Musk his center right

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 1>party could so it's another testing ground. And then two

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 1>other states I might throw in in senate races. You

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>have the open seat in Kentucky. He's already going to

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:21.680
<v Speaker 1>probably spend some money helping Thomas Massey out in the

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Kentucky house race.

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:22.880
<v Speaker 3>There.

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Ran Paul is certainly no maga guy. So I do

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:28.119
<v Speaker 1>think there could be an environment and interest of an

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:32.879
<v Speaker 1>alternative to the Maga Republican Party in Kentucky and then Colorado.

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 1>While John Hickenloop is not somebody that I think is

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 1>very vulnerable, Colorado is a state. It's kind of a

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 1>weak Republican party these days. It's a state where he

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 1>could get some traction with a third party that, even

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 1>if you don't win the race, just getting over ten

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>percent in any of these places could get you semi

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>permanent status for the next election, i e. The presidential election.

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>So that would be the path I would advise him.

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't take advice very well. But if that is

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>what you were looking to do as a third party,

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to both be disruptive and to find places you could

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 1>actually win, that's where I'd be focused Texas, Florida, Maine, Alaska, Michigan, Ohio, Kansas, Nebraska,

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and Iowa, with maybe Kentucky and maybe Colorado throwing bones there.

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 1>When do it everywhere, focus there, you might win two

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 1>or three of those races. Because I think things are

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I just think this electorate just think it's a bit

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 1>more unsettled, all right, Yes, midterms more or less operata

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 1>as a referendum on the incumbent party. But I just

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 1>think this is going to be a very volatile electorate,

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 1>so keep an eye on it. And look, I am

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>somebody who believes if we can actually break up the

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 1>duopoly create a healthy four party system, you may need

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 1>some money, like from people like Elon Musk in order

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to in order to pursue, in order to succeed sort

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of breaking these barriers. If he's willing to spend his

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>money but take a step back in his personality, the

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 1>possibilities are really there. And look, it's it's I'm one

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of those who believes a two party system isn't bending anymore.

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 1>It's calcified, and if we want to fix it, we

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>need we may need a break for both parties. All right,

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll sneak at a break and when we come back, a

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 1>fun conversation with my friends from Boston politics and Boston media,

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Jim and Marjorie. So for over a decade, every Thursday,

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I've made an appearance on Boston Public Radio w GBH,

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the Jim and Marjorie Show. And now that I have

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 1>a podcast, I realized I have never been able to

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 1>flip the script on them, and instead of them peppering

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>me with questions and basically trying to goad me to

0:30:58.520 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 1>end my career in some sort of viral moment in

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the Boston media market, I want to try to present

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>them with the same opportunity. And you know what I

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 1>was doing the mathire guys. I realized, I've been doing

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 1>this over ten years, and then are you have you

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 1>guys been doing this for thirty years close together since

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety nine.

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 3>We've been doing radios for twenty six years, six years,

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 3>and we did an under the radar television show that

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 3>absolutely nobody watched for a bunch of years before that.

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 2>When I say nobody, I don't mean nobody.

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean nobody watched this television show, not even our

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 3>pounds watching television show.

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 1>One of my first shows was a cable access show.

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I know it should talk about those. That's how you learned,

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 1>That's how.

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:44.560
<v Speaker 4>You learn, That's how we learned.

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 1>When I was at the Hotline. We started a show

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 1>in ninety eight or ninety nine on a cable access

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that was only available on like one of the cable

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 1>systems in DC. And it was and the channel itself

0:31:57.400 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 1>was owned by some looney tune widow who was sort

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of like crazy right wing, was willing to fund this

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 1>channel and they just needed a film programming. And I

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 1>remember our pre the guy who who was our the

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 1>show that preceded us, Billy Bush, oh before Billy Bush

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 1>made it like he was scrabbing Billy Bush. Yes, yes, god,

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 1>you know he was a local DC DJ.

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:23.760
<v Speaker 2>I didn't know.

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 1>But but it's funny. You guys have been in this

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 1>business a long time, you know, we we've all we

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 1>were all experimenting in the late nineties, and now we're

0:32:30.640 --> 0:32:33.680
<v Speaker 1>all kind of re experimenting again. You guys have shifted

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to a YouTube format from public radio a little bit,

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and obviously still doing public radio. I'm doing what I'm doing.

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 1>But in some ways, the more things change, the more

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 1>they stay the same, right, I hope.

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 5>So I don't I don't know where journalism is going.

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 5>I get you know, these are tough times for the business,

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 5>and I'm nervous about it. You know, people that have

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 5>their kids in college now say tell me about journalism,

0:32:58.520 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 5>and I don't know what to tell them.

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 4>Chuck, is it so different?

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 3>You know you don't even know this, Chuck Todd, But

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 3>you are part of a quote. We have a feature

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 3>on Friday on our show, one of our segments called

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 3>press Play. We started about I don't know three months ago,

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 3>and I ask every guest the same question every week,

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:18.160
<v Speaker 3>and it goes like this, I said, a couple of

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 3>months ago. Marty Baron, form writer of The Boss and

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 3>Globe and the Washington Post, was on our show. A

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 3>day later, Chuck Toddho's with Us every Thursday was on

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 3>our show. And it was right after Ruth Marcus had

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 3>not only had her problem with the bosses of the

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 3>Washington Post, but had been honest enough to write in

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 3>a long piece in The New Yorker that at least

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 3>on two of her columns, one of which I think

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 3>was about Bezos who owns the Washington Post, one of

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 3>which I think was about Trump, where she admitted she

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 3>pulled back from what she was going to say. And

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 3>we asked, Marty Baron, do you know any about the

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 3>Washington Post reporters, not editorialists, who are even if it's

0:33:55.160 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 3>not truly intentional or pulling back a little. He said,

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 3>absolutely not. We asked you the same question and you said, yes,

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:04.120
<v Speaker 3>that there were people at NBC. That's What really worries

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 3>me that people with good intentions who are worried about

0:34:07.160 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 3>their boss, worried about their own career, are not trying

0:34:10.719 --> 0:34:14.239
<v Speaker 3>to be unprincipled, but maybe doing things that are unprincipled

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 3>in the spirit of self preservation.

0:34:16.160 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 2>I hope I'm wrong. I hope you're wrong.

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I hope so too. And yet you know, I understand

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 1>it's human nature, right, some of this, right, which is

0:34:24.680 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to You think, well, if I can just

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:29.279
<v Speaker 1>survive the storm in the moment, then I can do

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Then I can you know, if I can stay in

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the room, you know, it'll it'll help in the long run,

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:38.720
<v Speaker 1>you know. And we're I mean, you know, the rationalization

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:43.320
<v Speaker 1>for why you compromise a principle or compromise an ethic,

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:46.319
<v Speaker 1>right like, and it makes sense until it doesn't, right,

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 1>until you've twisted yourself into a pretzel. And so I

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:53.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know, But Marjorie, it's interesting you don't. Here's the

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:56.560
<v Speaker 1>way I give hope on journalism. Okay, so young journalists,

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I say, well, because I got my start in nineteen

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 1>ninety two, which was a time of terrible transition for

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 1>legacy media at the time. Right, you had newspaper consolidation.

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:09.799
<v Speaker 1>It was the beginning of the cable boom. Broadcast TV

0:35:09.960 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 1>was pulling back. It was very similar to this, and

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:14.759
<v Speaker 1>then O. J. Simpson happened, and then the rise of

0:35:14.800 --> 0:35:19.880
<v Speaker 1>cable with internet as almost like an accelerant with it helped.

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:23.320
<v Speaker 1>But it was a disruptive time, and as a young person,

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:25.799
<v Speaker 1>I got a lot of opportunity that I wouldn't have

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:28.760
<v Speaker 1>gotten if it hadn't been a disruptive time. So I do.

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:31.240
<v Speaker 1>That's how I give hope to younger journalists.

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:33.800
<v Speaker 5>Okay, you want to hear my serious give hope to

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 5>younger journalism thing. What I usually say to people is.

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:39.280
<v Speaker 2>We should say you were a big time columns.

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 5>I was a newspaper report and most of the people

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:45.400
<v Speaker 5>on talk radio in Boston come from newspaper, not you,

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:46.919
<v Speaker 5>But I did.

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 1>And would you say, this is two big chapters you've

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 1>had in journalism. One was print and one was radio.

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Is that how you put it, Marjorie?

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:55.719
<v Speaker 5>Well, I did print until just a few years ago.

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:58.240
<v Speaker 5>So I've been a newspaper person most.

0:35:58.080 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 4>Of my life.

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:01.080
<v Speaker 5>And I added on the radio, you know, I'm a

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:03.400
<v Speaker 5>divorce a and I needed the two jobs.

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I was just going to say it's whatever. Print journalists.

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Why did print journalists move to another medium?

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:08.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Never, because the other mediums better. We all know writings better.

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Writing is the best of the mediums, right, you never

0:36:15.320 --> 0:36:17.319
<v Speaker 1>it yet? But why do you do other mediums?

0:36:17.560 --> 0:36:21.000
<v Speaker 5>It's money, money, yeah, But I tell the young journalists.

0:36:21.640 --> 0:36:23.960
<v Speaker 5>Gay Talise was a great writer. He wrote for the

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 5>New York Times. He wrote for a lot of places.

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:27.920
<v Speaker 5>He wrote novels and books. But he wrote something called

0:36:27.920 --> 0:36:30.360
<v Speaker 5>The Kingdom and the Power about the New York Times

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 5>years ago, maybe thirty thirty five years ago, and he

0:36:33.680 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 5>talked about how becoming a reporter enables young people, kids

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:43.240
<v Speaker 5>from you know, middle class backgrounds, working class backgrounds like Talise.

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:45.680
<v Speaker 5>Maybe they didn't go to the best schools, but they

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 5>can go become a newspaper reporter and they can meet

0:36:48.800 --> 0:36:51.320
<v Speaker 5>people and talk and ask questions to people.

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 4>They would never get a chance and any other opportunity.

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:58.880
<v Speaker 5>Presidents, governors, mayors of cities, celebrities, to be able to

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 5>cover trials and fam as people. And I think that's

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:03.240
<v Speaker 5>so true, and I think of when I look back

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:07.279
<v Speaker 5>in newspapers what I got to do, and in radio too,

0:37:07.320 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 5>but in newspapers because you had to actually go to

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 5>the scene. I got experiences that I would never ever

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 5>have gotten working anywhere else. I think being a reporter

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:19.240
<v Speaker 5>is one of the great jobs of all time. And plus,

0:37:19.280 --> 0:37:23.800
<v Speaker 5>you know, you could actually make a difference in people's lives.

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:26.279
<v Speaker 4>And I think that that that's kind of neat.

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:32.240
<v Speaker 1>You've Marjorie, You've worked all over New England, big markets

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:33.319
<v Speaker 1>in small markets.

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:35.280
<v Speaker 2>Is it?

0:37:35.360 --> 0:37:38.720
<v Speaker 1>You know it? I sort of live in this fantasy

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:41.839
<v Speaker 1>world that I that it is ultimately as a as

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a newspaper reporter, economist, that it is better to be

0:37:44.520 --> 0:37:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the big fish in the small pond. You really can

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:49.680
<v Speaker 1>have bigger impact locally than trying to have you know,

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Bob Woodward like impact nationally. Yeah, is that is that

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:53.200
<v Speaker 1>your experience?

0:37:54.080 --> 0:37:55.280
<v Speaker 4>I think I think.

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:58.400
<v Speaker 5>That's probably true. You know, I spent most of my

0:37:58.440 --> 0:38:02.359
<v Speaker 5>life working for the tabloid in town. Uh my former

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:04.239
<v Speaker 5>husband worked for the Globe and they, you know, we

0:38:04.239 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 5>were so I'm so old.

0:38:05.120 --> 0:38:06.080
<v Speaker 4>They had a nepotism rule.

0:38:06.280 --> 0:38:08.800
<v Speaker 1>You that's quite the mixed marriage, right, It was a

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 1>mixed people have Jews and Catholics exactly exactly.

0:38:13.719 --> 0:38:15.920
<v Speaker 5>I just say that, so people, don't you know know

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:17.239
<v Speaker 5>that I could have been at the Globe, but I

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 5>wasn't at the Globe, you see, I just say that

0:38:18.640 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 5>to make myself puff myself up. But but but the

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 5>point is that, you know, you write something about somebody

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:30.239
<v Speaker 5>that got really screwed in some way, and this is

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:32.880
<v Speaker 5>the working class, blue collar paper was in all the courtrooms,

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:35.719
<v Speaker 5>all the subways, all the buses. You wrote something with

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:37.839
<v Speaker 5>someone that got screwed, and it would matter, you know,

0:38:37.960 --> 0:38:40.279
<v Speaker 5>that the checks would come in, or the phone calls

0:38:40.320 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 5>would come in, or the head of Charlie Baker.

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 4>I remember he called me.

0:38:44.760 --> 0:38:46.759
<v Speaker 5>When he used to be an administrator in the in

0:38:46.760 --> 0:38:49.720
<v Speaker 5>the Weld administration, called me and said, you know, uh,

0:38:49.760 --> 0:38:50.799
<v Speaker 5>I'm going to fix.

0:38:50.600 --> 0:38:51.480
<v Speaker 4>This, you know.

0:38:51.640 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 5>And I did a lot of stories about child welfare,

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:57.000
<v Speaker 5>which is no one wants to read those cases. So

0:38:57.040 --> 0:38:59.719
<v Speaker 5>it's it's a it's a wonderful, wonderful job. I would

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 5>never ever want to do anything else and be a

0:39:02.000 --> 0:39:04.439
<v Speaker 5>newspaper reporter because of that.

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:06.719
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, in all fairness, Chuck, I think we

0:39:06.800 --> 0:39:09.160
<v Speaker 3>have to add when Marjorie saying, you know, writing about

0:39:09.200 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 3>people who got screwed, one of the people who Marjorie

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:14.840
<v Speaker 3>knows got screwed because of one of her columns.

0:39:14.480 --> 0:39:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Was me I was doing.

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:20.200
<v Speaker 3>I was doing a ballot question in nineteen ninety against

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:20.680
<v Speaker 3>the woman.

0:39:20.840 --> 0:39:22.759
<v Speaker 1>This is how you guys? Met is this how you guys?

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:27.120
<v Speaker 5>We're not sure you doesn't remember I made question impression.

0:39:27.120 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't even remember a.

0:39:28.120 --> 0:39:30.760
<v Speaker 3>Woman who was the doyen of the tax cutting movement

0:39:30.840 --> 0:39:33.600
<v Speaker 3>master since Barbara Anderson had a question on the ballot

0:39:33.920 --> 0:39:37.320
<v Speaker 3>and I was leading the opposition, and in an attempt

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:40.120
<v Speaker 3>to throw the vote to Barbara Anderson, Marjorie wrote a

0:39:40.160 --> 0:39:45.440
<v Speaker 3>column saying one the opponent that be me drove a

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:48.680
<v Speaker 3>Volvo station wagon. I never owned a Valvo station one.

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:50.759
<v Speaker 2>We did. After the column, I'm not done yet. It

0:39:50.800 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 2>was two years later. Why don't you tell them what

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:54.640
<v Speaker 2>you said I wore, Marjorie?

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:57.200
<v Speaker 4>Why don't you Oh, I said he wore whale pants.

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:02.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah in Nantucket, like applying, he's like a vineyard nine.

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:07.040
<v Speaker 3>So let's not say like Marjorie's career helping me oppressed

0:40:07.200 --> 0:40:08.240
<v Speaker 3>because I was the oppress.

0:40:08.360 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Ee, yeh, from Cambridge, I know, I know the oppressed oppressed.

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:17.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah that's right, from Cambridge. That's right, that's right.

0:40:18.400 --> 0:40:21.560
<v Speaker 1>So Jim, your path to this is is you were

0:40:21.600 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 1>politics really activists at this? I mean you both there's

0:40:25.680 --> 0:40:28.719
<v Speaker 1>two ways into this world, right, what is you know

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:32.720
<v Speaker 1>starting you know, the small newspaper Falls River right going

0:40:32.760 --> 0:40:38.920
<v Speaker 1>through and there's you know you were on the activism side.

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there's so many things. I mean, this is

0:40:41.880 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 1>why I think your partnership is so good in that

0:40:44.120 --> 0:40:47.120
<v Speaker 1>you had different experiences. In that way you can you

0:40:47.160 --> 0:40:50.680
<v Speaker 1>can attack sort of issues and questions and even media

0:40:50.760 --> 0:40:54.200
<v Speaker 1>coverage from both of those perspectives. What did you think

0:40:54.239 --> 0:40:57.320
<v Speaker 1>of the media when you were an activist.

0:40:57.400 --> 0:41:01.440
<v Speaker 2>That it never treated us as fairly should.

0:41:01.360 --> 0:41:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Like everybody else feels about the media, right, Like, yeah,

0:41:05.120 --> 0:41:05.680
<v Speaker 1>tell you something.

0:41:06.080 --> 0:41:08.520
<v Speaker 3>This is beyond dispute, and this is something that I'm

0:41:08.520 --> 0:41:10.000
<v Speaker 3>going to take to my grave with me. It's nobody's

0:41:10.000 --> 0:41:13.760
<v Speaker 3>fault in I can't even mention because she's.

0:41:13.600 --> 0:41:14.239
<v Speaker 2>Gonna mock me.

0:41:14.640 --> 0:41:17.600
<v Speaker 3>I led what I believe was probably the single largest

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:20.480
<v Speaker 3>pro taxt rally maybe in the history.

0:41:20.520 --> 0:41:22.160
<v Speaker 4>You wanted to raise everybody's tax.

0:41:23.840 --> 0:41:26.560
<v Speaker 1>So that you jumped into the Boston harbor and pulled

0:41:26.600 --> 0:41:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the tea out. Is that what you're saying.

0:41:28.560 --> 0:41:31.040
<v Speaker 3>I'd say that's a variation on a theme. And unfortunately,

0:41:31.120 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 3>even though it was the biggest rally ever. It is

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:35.279
<v Speaker 3>a bad example because it's not the media's fault. You

0:41:35.280 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 3>know what happened on the exact same day as a rally,

0:41:37.239 --> 0:41:39.759
<v Speaker 3>tim and square And as a result we got to

0:41:39.800 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 3>paragraph everybody.

0:41:40.920 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 1>You got to pick which is the lead today.

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:48.120
<v Speaker 3>But one experience that neither of you had, and it

0:41:48.160 --> 0:41:50.520
<v Speaker 3>wasn't just doing politics, because they did do politics.

0:41:50.520 --> 0:41:53.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, ran campaigns, You ran for government. Well, I

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:55.440
<v Speaker 2>ran for governor for months. No, but that wasn't these stories.

0:41:55.600 --> 0:41:57.520
<v Speaker 3>I ran for governor for a month in nineteen ninety

0:41:58.360 --> 0:42:02.400
<v Speaker 3>but I did run, unfortunately, and won a city council

0:42:02.480 --> 0:42:06.319
<v Speaker 3>seat in Cambridge. And while both of you may mock

0:42:06.440 --> 0:42:09.120
<v Speaker 3>me for that.

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:11.480
<v Speaker 1>That people's you must have been the conservative let's compared

0:42:11.480 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to everybody.

0:42:12.640 --> 0:42:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Let me tell you something, it was one of the

0:42:14.040 --> 0:42:16.719
<v Speaker 3>most valuable experiences in terms of what we do now.

0:42:16.760 --> 0:42:19.399
<v Speaker 3>And even though it's a low level kind of thing.

0:42:19.800 --> 0:42:21.239
<v Speaker 3>When you're on the other side of the fence and

0:42:21.280 --> 0:42:24.799
<v Speaker 3>you're getting screamed at by not screamed abt ask tough

0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:29.760
<v Speaker 3>questions by reporters, scream that by constituents, your one's ability

0:42:29.920 --> 0:42:32.360
<v Speaker 3>to understand what the hell you're doing when you're asking

0:42:32.400 --> 0:42:36.759
<v Speaker 3>the questions is enhanced a millionfold and so well, it

0:42:36.840 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 3>was a horrible experience in many ways because the people

0:42:40.080 --> 0:42:42.120
<v Speaker 3>in the city Council on Cambridge is sort of believe

0:42:42.160 --> 0:42:44.759
<v Speaker 3>they're in the United States Senate, not in the But

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:46.520
<v Speaker 3>it was really value I wouldn't really say it was

0:42:46.560 --> 0:42:48.480
<v Speaker 3>a really valuable tool in terms of what it is

0:42:48.520 --> 0:42:48.759
<v Speaker 3>we do.

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Now do you worry Jim that let me ask you this,

0:42:52.800 --> 0:42:56.080
<v Speaker 1>would you if you know, if you were knowing what

0:42:56.160 --> 0:42:58.359
<v Speaker 1>you know now, would you still run for office? Would

0:42:58.400 --> 0:43:00.719
<v Speaker 1>you still have tried it? Or do you look at

0:43:00.719 --> 0:43:05.839
<v Speaker 1>how hard it is to sort of not get you know,

0:43:06.520 --> 0:43:10.480
<v Speaker 1>pilloried and docksed and all these things, or you know,

0:43:10.560 --> 0:43:13.520
<v Speaker 1>your families get targeted. I mean the Tom Tilli situation.

0:43:13.600 --> 0:43:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I tell people about this one all the time. Now

0:43:16.560 --> 0:43:19.960
<v Speaker 1>now that Tillis chose to retire. You know, he was

0:43:20.000 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 1>going to vote against Hagseth and he didn't. And one

0:43:22.680 --> 0:43:25.239
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons is his family was getting harassed. It

0:43:25.280 --> 0:43:27.399
<v Speaker 1>wasn't just him, and it was people that hadn't They

0:43:27.400 --> 0:43:29.759
<v Speaker 1>didn't run for office. He ran for office, and he

0:43:29.920 --> 0:43:33.239
<v Speaker 1>just decided to back off of that. The way we

0:43:33.760 --> 0:43:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the pugilistic nature of politics today, where there is no

0:43:37.880 --> 0:43:40.880
<v Speaker 1>there seems to be no rules, right, and the elected

0:43:40.880 --> 0:43:45.600
<v Speaker 1>official is seen as a dehumanized figure. How do we

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:47.880
<v Speaker 1>encourage people like you to run again? You know, how

0:43:47.880 --> 0:43:50.480
<v Speaker 1>would you encourage yourself to run again? Or are you

0:43:50.560 --> 0:43:51.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of fearless about it?

0:43:51.880 --> 0:43:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'd like I'm fearless about nothing.

0:43:53.719 --> 0:43:55.840
<v Speaker 3>By the way, let me clear about that, to be

0:43:56.600 --> 0:43:59.719
<v Speaker 3>totally honest. But you know I was going to have

0:44:00.000 --> 0:44:02.359
<v Speaker 3>I was going to answer your question by saying, which

0:44:02.400 --> 0:44:04.920
<v Speaker 3>is true? When I did political stuff, particularly against the

0:44:05.040 --> 0:44:09.200
<v Speaker 3>very popular anti text leader, I got death threats all

0:44:09.239 --> 0:44:13.200
<v Speaker 3>the time in our earlier career on the radio, death threats.

0:44:13.239 --> 0:44:16.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'm not trying to show.

0:44:16.120 --> 0:44:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Braver now, I understand them. I've been getting them for

0:44:18.680 --> 0:44:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a while, and you sort of shrug them off because

0:44:20.680 --> 0:44:24.240
<v Speaker 1>you'll know that is nine percent of them aren't true, right, Differently,

0:44:24.280 --> 0:44:25.959
<v Speaker 1>worry about the one percent is the.

0:44:25.920 --> 0:44:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Kids and the family, the wife, the husband, the kids

0:44:29.880 --> 0:44:32.439
<v Speaker 3>that don't And I don't know what the answer because

0:44:32.760 --> 0:44:34.200
<v Speaker 3>one of the things we talk about a lot on

0:44:34.239 --> 0:44:37.440
<v Speaker 3>the show is how leaderless we are in lots of ways.

0:44:37.480 --> 0:44:39.440
<v Speaker 3>And if one believes one is a person and principle,

0:44:39.480 --> 0:44:41.440
<v Speaker 3>look it up. Believe you'd like to think you'd take

0:44:41.480 --> 0:44:44.000
<v Speaker 3>the opportunity, but I can't answer, honestly say to you

0:44:44.440 --> 0:44:46.160
<v Speaker 3>that I'd be willing to do it in this sort

0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:49.200
<v Speaker 3>of environment because it's dangerous in lots of ways. Which

0:44:49.239 --> 0:44:51.880
<v Speaker 3>is I'm almost embarrassed to say those words, but I

0:44:51.920 --> 0:44:54.319
<v Speaker 3>think that's unfortunately.

0:44:53.760 --> 0:44:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Real, Marjorie. This is my biggest concern that we have driven.

0:44:59.600 --> 0:45:01.640
<v Speaker 1>It is such a toxic place that good people are

0:45:01.680 --> 0:45:04.000
<v Speaker 1>fone around.

0:45:04.040 --> 0:45:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Listen.

0:45:04.480 --> 0:45:06.239
<v Speaker 4>I could not agree with you more.

0:45:06.360 --> 0:45:13.480
<v Speaker 5>I can't believe how insane things have gotten. It's really

0:45:13.480 --> 0:45:16.000
<v Speaker 5>bad now. But I think it started to start with

0:45:16.040 --> 0:45:18.080
<v Speaker 5>Obama or did it even start before then?

0:45:18.840 --> 0:45:20.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's funny, you could keep going back. I've

0:45:21.000 --> 0:45:24.799
<v Speaker 1>thought about this, right, which is, you know when did

0:45:24.840 --> 0:45:27.600
<v Speaker 1>it start? You know, we could go to New Kngridge, right,

0:45:27.840 --> 0:45:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you could go to the Clintons and then you could say, well,

0:45:31.000 --> 0:45:33.440
<v Speaker 1>it goes back for the Robert Borke. Right, some people

0:45:33.480 --> 0:45:35.279
<v Speaker 1>on the right will bring up Robert Borke and that

0:45:35.280 --> 0:45:38.239
<v Speaker 1>that was a character assassination. You can keep going, but

0:45:38.320 --> 0:45:45.439
<v Speaker 1>we've been slowly increasing the character assassination quotient in politics. Yeah,

0:45:45.840 --> 0:45:48.719
<v Speaker 1>all you know, almost on a steady rise. Right and

0:45:49.800 --> 0:45:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to here we are. You know in what I hope

0:45:52.680 --> 0:45:55.759
<v Speaker 1>is that we can't get that it can't get worse. Well,

0:45:55.960 --> 0:45:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that's my optimism.

0:45:56.960 --> 0:45:58.839
<v Speaker 3>I know this is the dread of local angule as

0:45:58.840 --> 0:46:01.200
<v Speaker 3>Mardie would call it, But don't you think it was?

0:46:01.440 --> 0:46:04.280
<v Speaker 3>The Willy Horton ads were a pretty major moment against

0:46:04.280 --> 0:46:06.840
<v Speaker 3>the Caucus. And by the way, I hope people realize

0:46:06.880 --> 0:46:09.719
<v Speaker 3>while they blame it on George H. W. Bush, I

0:46:09.760 --> 0:46:12.600
<v Speaker 3>believe the first person to talk about Willy Horton was

0:46:12.600 --> 0:46:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Al Gore in the primary against.

0:46:14.760 --> 0:46:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Was right and he did it the New York primary.

0:46:17.200 --> 0:46:21.440
<v Speaker 5>John willy Horton was a black guy ken furloughs and

0:46:21.480 --> 0:46:23.799
<v Speaker 5>then ended up going out in a weekend furlough and

0:46:23.920 --> 0:46:27.759
<v Speaker 5>raping a woman. And that was something to Caucus did

0:46:28.200 --> 0:46:31.120
<v Speaker 5>for lifers, would give them these weekend furloughs for good behavior,

0:46:31.480 --> 0:46:32.560
<v Speaker 5>and I think that was the end.

0:46:32.680 --> 0:46:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Was it not?

0:46:33.239 --> 0:46:36.640
<v Speaker 2>Well? Then the commercials Willy fort Horton with a who's

0:46:36.640 --> 0:46:38.359
<v Speaker 2>a black man? A close up on his.

0:46:38.520 --> 0:46:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the I think the person who made the

0:46:42.040 --> 0:46:44.200
<v Speaker 1>was it Floyd Little was the guy's name. I think

0:46:44.200 --> 0:46:46.720
<v Speaker 1>it was an independent. It's one of the first super

0:46:46.760 --> 0:46:48.880
<v Speaker 1>PACs and we didn't call him then that it was

0:46:48.920 --> 0:46:51.640
<v Speaker 1>an independent The actual ad itself was not paid for

0:46:51.680 --> 0:46:55.040
<v Speaker 1>by Bush or the RNC. It was an independent committee. Right,

0:46:55.080 --> 0:46:57.440
<v Speaker 1>it was this there was. But by the way, when

0:46:57.480 --> 0:46:59.279
<v Speaker 1>you watch the ad today, most people would be like,

0:46:59.320 --> 0:47:02.000
<v Speaker 1>really that was contra you're a meeting, like because we

0:47:02.320 --> 0:47:06.040
<v Speaker 1>see such garbage now you know that. But at the

0:47:06.120 --> 0:47:10.200
<v Speaker 1>time it sort of it it crossed the whatever the

0:47:10.239 --> 0:47:13.480
<v Speaker 1>line is, as Bill Hurt said in broadcast News, they

0:47:13.600 --> 0:47:15.880
<v Speaker 1>keep moving the sucker, right, you know, with the line

0:47:15.920 --> 0:47:20.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever this line is. But look, I actually go back

0:47:20.520 --> 0:47:23.799
<v Speaker 1>to Roger Ales and Roger Stone in Nixon and that

0:47:23.960 --> 0:47:29.680
<v Speaker 1>if you actually look, you know, ultimately the entire invention

0:47:30.000 --> 0:47:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of the liberal media phrase liberal media didn't you don't.

0:47:34.160 --> 0:47:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I believe you cannot find liberal media as a phrase

0:47:37.920 --> 0:47:41.840
<v Speaker 1>before nineteen seventy two, and that it was the Watergate coverage.

0:47:41.840 --> 0:47:44.000
<v Speaker 1>It was the initial sort of I don't know if

0:47:44.000 --> 0:47:46.160
<v Speaker 1>it was Buchanan that came up at the line or

0:47:46.200 --> 0:47:48.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the Nixon operatives is or Ales.

0:47:49.080 --> 0:47:52.359
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Roger Als' entire professional career after leaving

0:47:52.440 --> 0:47:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Nixon was about exploiting this concept that the liberal media

0:47:57.200 --> 0:47:59.800
<v Speaker 1>is out to get conservatives, and it began with Richard Nixon.

0:48:00.120 --> 0:48:02.880
<v Speaker 1>And and you know, for me, I look at it,

0:48:02.880 --> 0:48:04.920
<v Speaker 1>it may be that this is the end of the

0:48:05.000 --> 0:48:07.680
<v Speaker 1>long arc. This is the the ultimate and the fact

0:48:07.680 --> 0:48:10.480
<v Speaker 1>that Roger Stone's still alive, right, He's the only one

0:48:10.560 --> 0:48:12.680
<v Speaker 1>left of that Nixon ar are still alive. But these

0:48:12.719 --> 0:48:15.879
<v Speaker 1>were the people, and so many of them are derivatives

0:48:16.440 --> 0:48:18.480
<v Speaker 1>that are left where you know, here they are with

0:48:18.640 --> 0:48:22.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, Roger als built the ecosystem that Donald Trump

0:48:22.680 --> 0:48:26.319
<v Speaker 1>exploited to sort of finally right every wrong that they

0:48:26.320 --> 0:48:28.920
<v Speaker 1>believe happened to Nixon. So I kind of think this

0:48:29.080 --> 0:48:32.240
<v Speaker 1>is the endpoint of that. But that's just the thesis

0:48:32.280 --> 0:48:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I've been working on lately.

0:48:33.520 --> 0:48:35.239
<v Speaker 2>You know, Can I get back to one thing you asked,

0:48:35.320 --> 0:48:37.759
<v Speaker 2>you know about running for office kind of thing. With

0:48:37.800 --> 0:48:40.560
<v Speaker 2>all the scary stuff that's happening, how about the flip side.

0:48:40.560 --> 0:48:42.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if we've ever talked to you about this.

0:48:42.400 --> 0:48:48.160
<v Speaker 2>I continued to be amazed that that other than the.

0:48:48.600 --> 0:48:53.160
<v Speaker 3>For example, let's take senators, Republican senators who probably can't

0:48:53.160 --> 0:48:55.200
<v Speaker 3>read a stop sign, you know, like a Tuberville or

0:48:55.200 --> 0:48:57.120
<v Speaker 3>whatever the hell's name is that kind of a guy.

0:48:57.360 --> 0:49:00.560
<v Speaker 2>But those who were relatively intelligent, and.

0:49:00.960 --> 0:49:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Tom Cotton, who got you know, who was educated at.

0:49:02.960 --> 0:49:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Cabridge how well, and he's gone right, yeah, So how

0:49:08.560 --> 0:49:10.680
<v Speaker 3>do they live with themselves? I mean, I don't know.

0:49:10.880 --> 0:49:13.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean I'm not naive enough to say all of

0:49:13.400 --> 0:49:14.960
<v Speaker 3>a sudden, the majority are gonna wake up. They got

0:49:14.960 --> 0:49:18.560
<v Speaker 3>to go home and face their kids, their grandkids, their spouse.

0:49:19.040 --> 0:49:21.839
<v Speaker 3>I always think, if you're a politician, do you think

0:49:21.840 --> 0:49:25.160
<v Speaker 3>about the first paragraph of your obituary in your paper?

0:49:25.280 --> 0:49:28.160
<v Speaker 3>What's it going to say, Trump's sycophant voted to cut

0:49:28.160 --> 0:49:30.400
<v Speaker 3>a trillion dollars from Medicaid voted?

0:49:30.600 --> 0:49:31.880
<v Speaker 1>What if that isn't the media?

0:49:32.120 --> 0:49:32.239
<v Speaker 2>Like?

0:49:32.480 --> 0:49:36.719
<v Speaker 1>What if I read a very disturbing stat today that

0:49:37.480 --> 0:49:39.960
<v Speaker 1>seventy percent of the country is unaware that Donald Trump

0:49:40.040 --> 0:49:41.600
<v Speaker 1>has a cryptocurrency business.

0:49:42.440 --> 0:49:46.120
<v Speaker 2>I can't even what did you? Yeah, go ahead, you

0:49:46.160 --> 0:49:46.719
<v Speaker 2>see what I mean?

0:49:46.800 --> 0:49:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Like, so you know, it may be that those that

0:49:50.800 --> 0:49:52.800
<v Speaker 1>know will know, and those that don't won't.

0:49:53.880 --> 0:49:56.520
<v Speaker 5>I am such a believer in that, Chuck Todd I

0:49:56.560 --> 0:49:58.520
<v Speaker 5>was telling Jim I was talking to somebody over the

0:49:58.560 --> 0:50:01.840
<v Speaker 5>weekend who used to be in politic dish in Boston

0:50:01.960 --> 0:50:05.640
<v Speaker 5>his whole life, and he was we were talking about

0:50:05.640 --> 0:50:08.279
<v Speaker 5>the Trump administration. He said, well, you know, look at

0:50:08.360 --> 0:50:10.279
<v Speaker 5>Marco Rubio. He's been a stand up guy.

0:50:10.760 --> 0:50:11.680
<v Speaker 2>And I said, the.

0:50:13.400 --> 0:50:16.360
<v Speaker 5>Guy who's been in fifty years in politics, And I said,

0:50:16.640 --> 0:50:19.880
<v Speaker 5>Marco Rubio, who was the guy that stood up for

0:50:20.080 --> 0:50:24.200
<v Speaker 5>US aid that would you know, have the the the

0:50:24.400 --> 0:50:28.880
<v Speaker 5>HIV virus and food for starving children, all the things

0:50:28.880 --> 0:50:31.960
<v Speaker 5>that they did, disease prevention and stuff like that. Who's

0:50:32.000 --> 0:50:34.399
<v Speaker 5>now done a complete one eighty and he has been

0:50:34.400 --> 0:50:36.360
<v Speaker 5>the architect of getting rid of us AI D.

0:50:36.480 --> 0:50:37.480
<v Speaker 4>And I thought that.

0:50:37.520 --> 0:50:42.480
<v Speaker 5>This person doesn't know about Marco Rubio is really upsetting

0:50:42.640 --> 0:50:45.759
<v Speaker 5>to me. And I don't know the explanation, because he

0:50:45.800 --> 0:50:48.400
<v Speaker 5>is a smart guy.

0:50:48.640 --> 0:50:49.120
<v Speaker 4>I think that.

0:50:49.239 --> 0:50:52.320
<v Speaker 5>But I think that the Fox News and social media

0:50:52.800 --> 0:50:55.359
<v Speaker 5>has been really effective. We get text here we are

0:50:55.440 --> 0:50:58.680
<v Speaker 5>when an NPR station. We get text messages all day long.

0:51:00.080 --> 0:51:03.240
<v Speaker 5>We get text matches just from people who basically believe,

0:51:03.400 --> 0:51:07.360
<v Speaker 5>you know, there are little men walking on on Mars.

0:51:08.239 --> 0:51:11.800
<v Speaker 5>It's crazy stuff and they believe it. And I think, wow,

0:51:11.960 --> 0:51:13.120
<v Speaker 5>what's going on here?

0:51:13.719 --> 0:51:16.560
<v Speaker 3>So some little men walking in Mars, some little men

0:51:16.640 --> 0:51:20.239
<v Speaker 3>walking on Inside RFK Junior's brain, those are the.

0:51:20.320 --> 0:51:21.759
<v Speaker 4>Ones that might be little men walking.

0:51:21.880 --> 0:51:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, this is a good transition. This is a good transition.

0:51:24.239 --> 0:51:28.400
<v Speaker 1>When you guys began your career together, the word Kennedy

0:51:28.440 --> 0:51:33.000
<v Speaker 1>meant something. Yeah in Massachusetts, Uh, in a way that

0:51:33.280 --> 0:51:36.640
<v Speaker 1>was just you know, it was still a gold brand. Yes,

0:51:36.719 --> 0:51:39.440
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't perfect, and no, Joe Kennedy the second couldn't

0:51:39.440 --> 0:51:42.239
<v Speaker 1>get elected governor. You know, it wasn't it wasn't you know,

0:51:42.280 --> 0:51:45.759
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't as if it was an automatic, but there

0:51:45.840 --> 0:51:48.439
<v Speaker 1>was a reverence that went with it. Is it done done?

0:51:48.520 --> 0:51:48.800
<v Speaker 2>Now?

0:51:49.000 --> 0:51:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Is this thing?

0:51:49.800 --> 0:51:49.880
<v Speaker 3>Like?

0:51:50.080 --> 0:51:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Is this the are we at like the Freuling Housen stage?

0:51:54.000 --> 0:51:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Like there for those of you who are like not

0:51:56.600 --> 0:52:00.560
<v Speaker 1>total American history dorks like me, Freuling Housen, there was

0:52:00.560 --> 0:52:02.799
<v Speaker 1>a Freuling Housend in Congress I think for like two

0:52:02.840 --> 0:52:04.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred straight years out of New Jersey. You know, it

0:52:04.960 --> 0:52:08.239
<v Speaker 1>was this constant like sort of regional family name, and

0:52:08.560 --> 0:52:10.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think they were signers, and I think

0:52:10.680 --> 0:52:13.239
<v Speaker 1>there was a Rodney Finland Housen in the nineties in

0:52:13.280 --> 0:52:17.600
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey. And eventually sort of you know, the names

0:52:17.640 --> 0:52:20.920
<v Speaker 1>go away and all of that. Where would you put

0:52:21.560 --> 0:52:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, we saw Joe Kennedy the third lose a

0:52:24.520 --> 0:52:27.759
<v Speaker 1>primary right, So a Democratic primary. So and this was

0:52:27.760 --> 0:52:32.440
<v Speaker 1>before RFK is crazy. What's what's the state of the

0:52:32.520 --> 0:52:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Kennedy brand?

0:52:35.160 --> 0:52:37.160
<v Speaker 2>What do you think, Marjorie Well?

0:52:37.320 --> 0:52:41.480
<v Speaker 5>I think that even when we began, when Ted Kennedy

0:52:41.520 --> 0:52:43.799
<v Speaker 5>was still alive, and people might argue that in terms

0:52:43.840 --> 0:52:47.080
<v Speaker 5>of getting legislation passed, he was one of the most

0:52:47.640 --> 0:52:52.759
<v Speaker 5>successful settlers ever. But even then, when you would talk

0:52:52.800 --> 0:52:56.040
<v Speaker 5>about Ted Kennedy, the messages would come through about chap

0:52:56.040 --> 0:52:58.600
<v Speaker 5>equintic And I think, as as.

0:53:00.000 --> 0:53:02.879
<v Speaker 1>I know, is that an original sin? Is this an

0:53:02.880 --> 0:53:07.120
<v Speaker 1>original sin? That boy talk about a do over in life?

0:53:07.120 --> 0:53:09.600
<v Speaker 1>What would have happened if he'd just I think like

0:53:09.960 --> 0:53:12.919
<v Speaker 1>I choked, I fessed up. I was afraid. I looked

0:53:12.960 --> 0:53:15.239
<v Speaker 1>out for myself first. I didn't want her to die.

0:53:15.800 --> 0:53:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I just I choked. I panicked, you know, And if that's.

0:53:19.200 --> 0:53:21.560
<v Speaker 5>The better, it might have been better if you'd done that.

0:53:21.600 --> 0:53:23.680
<v Speaker 5>Because he never admitted it. I thought the rest of

0:53:23.680 --> 0:53:26.200
<v Speaker 5>his life was like the as we Catholic sate to

0:53:26.440 --> 0:53:29.960
<v Speaker 5>venance for letting a woman die in that car and

0:53:30.800 --> 0:53:33.240
<v Speaker 5>going off and going back to that hotel and sleeping

0:53:33.320 --> 0:53:35.880
<v Speaker 5>and getting up in the morning and having breakfast.

0:53:35.480 --> 0:53:37.319
<v Speaker 4>And knowing that she was in that car.

0:53:37.440 --> 0:53:39.759
<v Speaker 5>I thought, I think he was trying to make up

0:53:39.800 --> 0:53:42.040
<v Speaker 5>for it, but because he never admitted it, you know,

0:53:42.120 --> 0:53:44.719
<v Speaker 5>you can't you get a tone right, and he never did.

0:53:44.760 --> 0:53:49.640
<v Speaker 1>The stories I hear about him in the nineties and

0:53:49.680 --> 0:53:52.799
<v Speaker 1>the aunts I went to school with somebody who had

0:53:52.840 --> 0:53:56.040
<v Speaker 1>no health insurance, and he put them This was a

0:53:56.080 --> 0:53:58.560
<v Speaker 1>student at GW and he put him on staff to

0:53:58.560 --> 0:54:01.760
<v Speaker 1>get him healthcare, to get him the right. They've extended

0:54:01.760 --> 0:54:04.840
<v Speaker 1>this person's life an extra five years. Like the number

0:54:04.880 --> 0:54:07.400
<v Speaker 1>of stories like that that you'd hear that nobody he

0:54:07.440 --> 0:54:10.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't ask for attention. You're right, it almost feels like,

0:54:10.840 --> 0:54:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, that was the inner Catholic in him. I've

0:54:12.600 --> 0:54:15.800
<v Speaker 1>got I've got to I've got to right the wrong.

0:54:16.200 --> 0:54:18.879
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I always thought that. I don't know if that's true,

0:54:18.920 --> 0:54:20.200
<v Speaker 5>but I always thought that.

0:54:20.960 --> 0:54:22.680
<v Speaker 3>Let me give you a personal story if I can,

0:54:22.760 --> 0:54:26.719
<v Speaker 3>about Kennedy's effectiveness, which doesn't answer your question, but does

0:54:26.760 --> 0:54:29.920
<v Speaker 3>speak to how incredible he was. I was the president

0:54:29.920 --> 0:54:32.680
<v Speaker 3>of the union that represented legal services lawyer secretaries and

0:54:32.719 --> 0:54:36.440
<v Speaker 3>paralegals from Ronald Reagan proposed abolition of legal services for

0:54:36.480 --> 0:54:39.120
<v Speaker 3>the poor, and the two champions were a freshman in

0:54:39.120 --> 0:54:42.400
<v Speaker 3>the house, Barney Frank and Ted Kennedy, and so a

0:54:42.400 --> 0:54:44.400
<v Speaker 3>bunch of we were affiliated with the United Order Workers.

0:54:44.400 --> 0:54:47.719
<v Speaker 3>A bunch of us met with Ted Kennedy, first time

0:54:47.920 --> 0:54:49.560
<v Speaker 3>any of us had ever been in office with him.

0:54:49.600 --> 0:54:51.960
<v Speaker 3>We're all, for the most part, from all over the country.

0:54:52.360 --> 0:54:54.080
<v Speaker 3>He says, I'm gonna do this, I'm gonna do that,

0:54:54.160 --> 0:54:56.200
<v Speaker 3>and I'm going to meet with the senator whose name

0:54:56.239 --> 0:54:59.959
<v Speaker 3>I forget, from Texas, who is wildly anti legal service,

0:55:00.200 --> 0:55:02.080
<v Speaker 3>is not talk to him. And so we say thank you,

0:55:02.120 --> 0:55:04.040
<v Speaker 3>we got in the hole, and we're all saying that

0:55:04.120 --> 0:55:06.080
<v Speaker 3>was great, But I mean, really, I mean, the guy

0:55:06.320 --> 0:55:10.080
<v Speaker 3>is the most right wing, vicious, anti poor person. Okay,

0:55:10.320 --> 0:55:12.480
<v Speaker 3>next day we go back to his office. Who do

0:55:12.520 --> 0:55:15.080
<v Speaker 3>we see in the distance walking arm in arm down

0:55:15.160 --> 0:55:17.600
<v Speaker 3>the hole but the Texas Center and Kennedy and we're

0:55:17.640 --> 0:55:20.640
<v Speaker 3>still incredulous. Nothing's going to happen. The vote comes up

0:55:20.680 --> 0:55:21.359
<v Speaker 3>the next day.

0:55:21.680 --> 0:55:22.080
<v Speaker 2>I forgot.

0:55:22.080 --> 0:55:24.960
<v Speaker 3>It was an amendment about class actions or something around

0:55:25.000 --> 0:55:30.600
<v Speaker 3>legal services lawyers around the country, and we have a

0:55:30.719 --> 0:55:34.240
<v Speaker 3>the word we need. I can't remember what the exact

0:55:34.320 --> 0:55:37.440
<v Speaker 3>vote was, but this guy's vote, he has still not voted.

0:55:37.480 --> 0:55:39.680
<v Speaker 3>The guy from Texas was the critical vote that was

0:55:39.719 --> 0:55:42.360
<v Speaker 3>going to was going to kill our ability to do

0:55:42.400 --> 0:55:45.000
<v Speaker 3>class actions. You know what happened. Didn't show up for

0:55:45.040 --> 0:55:48.080
<v Speaker 3>the vote, and it was totally a function of Ted

0:55:48.160 --> 0:55:52.560
<v Speaker 3>Kennedy getting a guy who had nothing but hatred for

0:55:52.680 --> 0:55:56.880
<v Speaker 3>legal services for the poor to dissa exactly because he

0:55:56.920 --> 0:55:58.320
<v Speaker 3>had respect for Ted Tenny.

0:55:58.360 --> 0:55:58.920
<v Speaker 2>So that maybe a.

0:55:58.880 --> 0:56:02.239
<v Speaker 3>Small thing, but he was really one of the most

0:56:02.239 --> 0:56:03.319
<v Speaker 3>effective characters ever.

0:56:03.320 --> 0:56:04.320
<v Speaker 2>Now and answer your question.

0:56:04.760 --> 0:56:07.680
<v Speaker 3>Even though young Joe Kennedy lost to Ed Markey, I

0:56:07.719 --> 0:56:09.720
<v Speaker 3>am among those who thought he'd beat Ed Markey.

0:56:10.360 --> 0:56:10.879
<v Speaker 1>I did too.

0:56:10.800 --> 0:56:13.440
<v Speaker 3>Expect for Markey, but I think he would generational kind

0:56:13.440 --> 0:56:15.240
<v Speaker 3>of thing. I'm not sure he's done.

0:56:15.400 --> 0:56:17.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I haven't spoken to him in recent times.

0:56:17.440 --> 0:56:17.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:56:18.200 --> 0:56:21.160
<v Speaker 3>But he is a really skillful, talented young guy. And

0:56:22.120 --> 0:56:24.040
<v Speaker 3>I think it's maybe too early to write off the

0:56:24.080 --> 0:56:25.279
<v Speaker 3>whole family name.

0:56:26.200 --> 0:56:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's fair. I mean, you would you would think.

0:56:28.200 --> 0:56:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I wonder how much damage Bobby Kennedy Junior is doing. Ah,

0:56:33.719 --> 0:56:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I think he's look I am irrational about I'm pretty

0:56:37.280 --> 0:56:39.360
<v Speaker 1>irrational about him. And I think I went off on

0:56:39.400 --> 0:56:42.160
<v Speaker 1>your show once you did. I mean, I just find it.

0:56:42.239 --> 0:56:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm just I'm gross I'm just sickened by this, intentionally

0:56:46.400 --> 0:56:52.160
<v Speaker 1>watching kids die, having measles, like letting the outbreak happen.

0:56:52.840 --> 0:56:58.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm just I just like, who does this? Who does this?

0:57:00.200 --> 0:57:01.759
<v Speaker 1>Just shocking to me?

0:57:02.040 --> 0:57:05.600
<v Speaker 4>Aren't we saying that almost about everything that is stopping?

0:57:05.760 --> 0:57:11.440
<v Speaker 5>I know who talks about Alcatraz, you know, alligator Alcatraz

0:57:11.480 --> 0:57:16.240
<v Speaker 5>and seems to repels merchandise. Apparently now you can buy it,

0:57:16.440 --> 0:57:21.120
<v Speaker 5>could buy the merchandise. And who thinks it's okay to

0:57:21.240 --> 0:57:25.320
<v Speaker 5>throw to give million take away the healthcare of millions

0:57:25.320 --> 0:57:28.439
<v Speaker 5>and millions of people so you can give tax breaks.

0:57:28.120 --> 0:57:31.320
<v Speaker 3>To I'll tell you who thinks okay, everybody? Because nobody's

0:57:31.360 --> 0:57:33.720
<v Speaker 3>doing anything, are they. We talk about this all the time,

0:57:33.800 --> 0:57:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Chuck on the show, and I'm sure with you too.

0:57:36.600 --> 0:57:39.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, you raise the tuition for public universities in

0:57:40.080 --> 0:57:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Paris and there are a million people on the street.

0:57:42.680 --> 0:57:46.800
<v Speaker 3>The next day, you take twelve million people off healthcare

0:57:46.920 --> 0:57:49.520
<v Speaker 3>or whatever it is. Let's go on the list the

0:57:49.600 --> 0:57:54.680
<v Speaker 3>poor people who are wonderful members of our communities on

0:57:55.200 --> 0:57:57.080
<v Speaker 3>and we tweet about it or.

0:57:57.200 --> 0:57:59.080
<v Speaker 2>X about it or whatever the hell we do. I

0:57:59.120 --> 0:58:01.120
<v Speaker 2>think the answer is we're.

0:58:01.080 --> 0:58:04.439
<v Speaker 1>Look, I got I have family, members who don't look

0:58:04.520 --> 0:58:07.960
<v Speaker 1>like you and me who are American citizens who were

0:58:07.960 --> 0:58:10.560
<v Speaker 1>detained off a plane and had to prove their citizenship.

0:58:10.560 --> 0:58:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, And this just happened recently, and it's

0:58:15.520 --> 0:58:19.360
<v Speaker 1>it's you're just sitting there, You're just you know, I

0:58:19.400 --> 0:58:23.760
<v Speaker 1>think it's because until it happens to you, you don't,

0:58:23.920 --> 0:58:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you know. It's like, you know, what's the great poem?

0:58:26.560 --> 0:58:30.040
<v Speaker 1>First they came for the you know, the Jews, and

0:58:30.120 --> 0:58:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I just you know, said, well, it's not me or

0:58:31.840 --> 0:58:34.960
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is. You know that that lioselle poem. That

0:58:35.240 --> 0:58:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and and that's I guess the world we're living in.

0:58:38.640 --> 0:58:41.200
<v Speaker 1>This is where I always vacillate. Do we are we

0:58:41.360 --> 0:58:43.600
<v Speaker 1>in a Is this a five alarm fire, a seven

0:58:43.640 --> 0:58:47.960
<v Speaker 1>alarm fire? Or where I try to end up? Hey,

0:58:48.000 --> 0:58:51.280
<v Speaker 1>we've done this before. We survived George Wallace, we survived

0:58:51.320 --> 0:58:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Joe McCarthy, we survived Charles Lindberg, we survived Civil War,

0:58:55.400 --> 0:58:59.520
<v Speaker 1>we survived you know, I I vacillate, right and I

0:59:00.120 --> 0:59:04.439
<v Speaker 1>choose right now. I choose to make the case we've

0:59:04.480 --> 0:59:06.760
<v Speaker 1>been through this before, we know how to and this

0:59:06.880 --> 0:59:09.200
<v Speaker 1>should give you comfort that we know how to get

0:59:09.200 --> 0:59:09.960
<v Speaker 1>out of it again.

0:59:10.160 --> 0:59:12.200
<v Speaker 3>But can I tell you we have had this discussion

0:59:12.280 --> 0:59:17.400
<v Speaker 3>with three relatively reputable historians in recent times, Heather Cox,

0:59:17.520 --> 0:59:21.480
<v Speaker 3>Richardson ken Burns, and Darris Kurrn's Goodwin. Every single one

0:59:21.520 --> 0:59:25.560
<v Speaker 3>of them's answer to our question is exactly yours. And

0:59:26.280 --> 0:59:28.400
<v Speaker 3>I'll mean this with any because I have huge respect

0:59:28.400 --> 0:59:30.160
<v Speaker 3>for all three of them. I'm not sure any of

0:59:30.200 --> 0:59:31.200
<v Speaker 3>the three of them believe it.

0:59:32.520 --> 0:59:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I think we asked, you know, I don't know if

0:59:35.200 --> 0:59:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I believe it. I choose to believe it. That's why

0:59:37.280 --> 0:59:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I emphasize.

0:59:38.200 --> 0:59:40.880
<v Speaker 3>That's why they asked Dars and she said exactly that

0:59:41.280 --> 0:59:42.920
<v Speaker 3>I need or I choose to believe it.

0:59:43.000 --> 0:59:46.320
<v Speaker 4>Who's the president who's been this corrupt? Who's the president

0:59:46.400 --> 0:59:48.000
<v Speaker 4>this live as much as he has?

0:59:48.240 --> 0:59:49.720
<v Speaker 5>You know, I was listening to one of my favorite

0:59:49.720 --> 0:59:53.160
<v Speaker 5>podcasts besides of course, the Check podcast This Morning and Daily,

0:59:53.600 --> 0:59:58.320
<v Speaker 5>and they were talking about a man who had uncovered

0:59:58.680 --> 1:00:02.400
<v Speaker 5>cigarette smoking. He did big expose on cigarettes, and then

1:00:03.320 --> 1:00:06.120
<v Speaker 5>they were threatening. Then I think it was again CBS

1:00:06.120 --> 1:00:09.320
<v Speaker 5>and CBS people know has just knuckled under to Donald Trump.

1:00:09.320 --> 1:00:11.520
<v Speaker 5>They're going to give him sixteen the whole Parent corporation

1:00:11.560 --> 1:00:13.600
<v Speaker 5>par I'm not going to give him sixteen million dollars

1:00:13.640 --> 1:00:16.640
<v Speaker 5>to his library to get out of this lawsuit. This

1:00:16.640 --> 1:00:21.480
<v Speaker 5>this this frivolous, ridiculous lawsuit. But anyway, he was saying that,

1:00:21.520 --> 1:00:24.600
<v Speaker 5>the interviewer said to him, well, it was the same

1:00:24.680 --> 1:00:26.880
<v Speaker 5>thing that they that you were under pressure not to

1:00:26.880 --> 1:00:30.600
<v Speaker 5>tell the truth about cigarettes from the cigarette companies. As

1:00:30.680 --> 1:00:33.040
<v Speaker 5>what's going on now? And he said no, because then

1:00:33.080 --> 1:00:36.240
<v Speaker 5>it was the cigarette companies. Today it's the President of

1:00:36.280 --> 1:00:39.520
<v Speaker 5>the United States, and it's a Justice Department and the

1:00:39.560 --> 1:00:44.120
<v Speaker 5>wheels of power and ice agencies and doing all these

1:00:44.480 --> 1:00:46.960
<v Speaker 5>This is this is the power of the federal government,

1:00:47.360 --> 1:00:51.120
<v Speaker 5>which is more powerful than any other entity in the country.

1:00:52.120 --> 1:00:53.040
<v Speaker 4>Picking on is.

1:01:01.240 --> 1:01:03.959
<v Speaker 1>This administration is now realizing you reap what you sew.

1:01:04.760 --> 1:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>The Epstein story, right, they create this, you know, they

1:01:08.720 --> 1:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>they all make money Dan Bongino, cash Betel, they you know, Pambondi,

1:01:13.680 --> 1:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>They all make political hay and and get their viral

1:01:16.320 --> 1:01:19.480
<v Speaker 1>clips and get their notoriety by by flirting with this

1:01:19.480 --> 1:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Epstein story. And then they're the deep state. Yeah, you know,

1:01:24.520 --> 1:01:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and here we are. But you know it is damaging

1:01:27.000 --> 1:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>because guess what, who do you believe, Jim, Do you

1:01:31.720 --> 1:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>believe the government on Epstein or not.

1:01:34.000 --> 1:01:34.160
<v Speaker 5>Uh.

1:01:34.800 --> 1:01:37.720
<v Speaker 2>I honestly don't know. I don't know what I believe.

1:01:37.840 --> 1:01:40.200
<v Speaker 2>And answer isn't that the problem, isn't it?

1:01:41.920 --> 1:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I do not believe, you know. I'm one of those

1:01:43.840 --> 1:01:48.840
<v Speaker 1>who believes that if it were as if it were

1:01:48.920 --> 1:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>is uh, if what is alleged is true, there's no

1:01:52.600 --> 1:01:55.919
<v Speaker 1>way this these secrets hold, right, Maxwell would have used

1:01:55.920 --> 1:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it to get out of going to Jay Okay, So

1:01:59.200 --> 1:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't think there there. I think all

1:02:02.200 --> 1:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>these people hung out with him. I think they all

1:02:04.360 --> 1:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>knew you. Oh yeah, Jeffrey's a little bit this right,

1:02:07.160 --> 1:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>but you know, but he gives me free rides and

1:02:09.320 --> 1:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>his plane or I rather like hanging out at his resort. Man,

1:02:12.680 --> 1:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>it's really fun to get served pina coladas by these

1:02:16.040 --> 1:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>scantily clad girls.

1:02:17.800 --> 1:02:18.000
<v Speaker 3>You know.

1:02:18.600 --> 1:02:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Do I think all of that was true? You know?

1:02:21.040 --> 1:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>But the next level of it, right, like, look, if

1:02:24.120 --> 1:02:28.800
<v Speaker 1>there was another Prince Andrew, wouldn't we know? Yeah, That's

1:02:28.840 --> 1:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of where I'm at. That said, I understand if

1:02:32.680 --> 1:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>most people go I don't know what to believe anymore,

1:02:35.480 --> 1:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>because the same people who were telling me don't believe

1:02:38.000 --> 1:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>what the government's telling you are now the government and

1:02:40.920 --> 1:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>they're telling you believe what the government is telling you.

1:02:43.880 --> 1:02:47.120
<v Speaker 2>So let me pose a question return in the other direction.

1:02:47.600 --> 1:02:51.520
<v Speaker 3>Let's assume that what was exposed were unsavory conducts. Talk

1:02:51.520 --> 1:02:56.160
<v Speaker 3>about euphemisms with Bill Clinton and Donald Trump. I would

1:02:56.240 --> 1:02:58.919
<v Speaker 3>posit that Bill Clinton would never be invited to any

1:02:58.920 --> 1:03:01.600
<v Speaker 3>event again for the rest of his life, and Donald

1:03:01.600 --> 1:03:04.800
<v Speaker 3>Trump would be the same as if nothing had happened

1:03:04.800 --> 1:03:05.360
<v Speaker 3>the day before.

1:03:05.440 --> 1:03:06.920
<v Speaker 2>Is that a fair And.

1:03:07.440 --> 1:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you another one. You caught Donald Trump's line

1:03:10.520 --> 1:03:13.440
<v Speaker 1>on Friday where he said I hate all Democrats. Of course,

1:03:14.480 --> 1:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Barack Obama had said that after the passage of Obamacare,

1:03:17.320 --> 1:03:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I hate all Republicans. What would happen?

1:03:19.480 --> 1:03:22.120
<v Speaker 2>That is so true? That was on July fourth.

1:03:22.160 --> 1:03:24.880
<v Speaker 3>By the way, didn't this didn't Carolyn leven or whoever

1:03:25.120 --> 1:03:27.600
<v Speaker 3>was say this is going to be a unifying things.

1:03:27.680 --> 1:03:30.120
<v Speaker 2>This is a thing where he reaches out to other

1:03:30.160 --> 1:03:30.960
<v Speaker 2>than Democrats.

1:03:31.160 --> 1:03:33.800
<v Speaker 1>This idea that you only govern for those who support you.

1:03:33.920 --> 1:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is really the virus that I really

1:03:38.480 --> 1:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm you know, I did you see the axiom? I'mous.

1:03:42.400 --> 1:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Here's something I've been curious your guys take on.

1:03:44.840 --> 1:03:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Marjorie.

1:03:45.120 --> 1:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll let you take the first bite. I assume you

1:03:47.520 --> 1:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>saw the Axios newsletter this morning, Mike Allen. They had

1:03:50.600 --> 1:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the little nugget about how they had these anonymous Democratic

1:03:53.840 --> 1:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>members of Congress who said, hey, man, the base is

1:03:56.560 --> 1:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>really fired up. They they don't care if we break

1:04:00.400 --> 1:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>rules to fight Trump. In fact, they don't understand why

1:04:03.560 --> 1:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>we're You know, if you have to start a fire,

1:04:05.680 --> 1:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>get shot whatever, it is like, fight fire with fire.

1:04:09.760 --> 1:04:11.760
<v Speaker 1>And this has always been my concern that a second

1:04:11.800 --> 1:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Trump term was going to not change just the Republicans,

1:04:15.760 --> 1:04:19.680
<v Speaker 1>but it would change the Democrats. And in the zeal

1:04:19.840 --> 1:04:24.479
<v Speaker 1>with defeating trump Ism, how many rules are how many

1:04:24.480 --> 1:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>norms and rules is it okay to break if it's

1:04:26.760 --> 1:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>in defiance to Trump, right like? And what kind of

1:04:30.320 --> 1:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>slippery slope art could we be ending up on. It's

1:04:33.160 --> 1:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>a concern I have, yeah, but I understand the Democratic anger.

1:04:38.000 --> 1:04:41.720
<v Speaker 2>That's a tough an answer. I don't think well.

1:04:41.800 --> 1:04:44.120
<v Speaker 5>I was going to say, maybe I'm being Pollyanna here

1:04:44.160 --> 1:04:48.520
<v Speaker 5>in Massachusetts, but I want some leadership for the Democrats.

1:04:48.560 --> 1:04:52.800
<v Speaker 5>I don't think that they should lower themselves to steal

1:04:52.920 --> 1:04:57.000
<v Speaker 5>and cheat and lie and do what Donald Trump has done.

1:04:57.000 --> 1:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I'm with you. I think Kamala Harrison

1:04:58.800 --> 1:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I got as many votes as she got because they're

1:05:00.840 --> 1:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the party that isn't doing that.

1:05:02.680 --> 1:05:05.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I hope so, but I don't know. I don't know.

1:05:05.440 --> 1:05:07.560
<v Speaker 5>I think the Democrats have going to do something you

1:05:07.600 --> 1:05:10.200
<v Speaker 5>mentioned Kamala Harris. I think the Democrats have got to

1:05:10.240 --> 1:05:12.840
<v Speaker 5>do more to recognize talent. You know, you don't want

1:05:12.880 --> 1:05:18.320
<v Speaker 5>to keep putting up people. You know, Barack Obama was wrong.

1:05:18.840 --> 1:05:21.600
<v Speaker 5>Biden should have run against Donald Trump the first time around,

1:05:21.880 --> 1:05:23.320
<v Speaker 5>not Hillary Clinton that was.

1:05:23.680 --> 1:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>So un anybody else, or it should have been an

1:05:25.840 --> 1:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>open primary. Should maybe Barack Obama shouldn't have been the

1:05:29.120 --> 1:05:32.600
<v Speaker 1>one to decide who. Let the voters decide. Had the

1:05:32.720 --> 1:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>establishment decided in know seven, Barack Obama never would have

1:05:35.560 --> 1:05:36.160
<v Speaker 1>been the nominee.

1:05:37.000 --> 1:05:37.720
<v Speaker 2>That's a good point.

1:05:37.720 --> 1:05:40.240
<v Speaker 5>I also think it was too bad that the Democrats.

1:05:40.480 --> 1:05:42.800
<v Speaker 5>You know, Kamala Harris was a tough candidate when she

1:05:42.880 --> 1:05:45.800
<v Speaker 5>ran for president, she was eliminated very quickly. I think

1:05:45.840 --> 1:05:48.520
<v Speaker 5>she I mean, obviously there was sexism, there was racism,

1:05:48.560 --> 1:05:50.840
<v Speaker 5>but in general, I don't think she's that talented a

1:05:50.840 --> 1:05:53.680
<v Speaker 5>politician to have growne up against Donald Trump. And I

1:05:53.680 --> 1:05:56.680
<v Speaker 5>wish they'd had a primary then with the Josh Shapiro, etc.

1:05:57.080 --> 1:05:58.720
<v Speaker 5>So anyway, that's I'm getting off.

1:05:58.640 --> 1:06:01.440
<v Speaker 2>For break is rule breaking, the rule breaking.

1:06:01.840 --> 1:06:04.360
<v Speaker 3>I understand the rule breaking that you don't want the

1:06:04.400 --> 1:06:07.560
<v Speaker 3>Democrats across. I'd like them to break some rules. I

1:06:07.560 --> 1:06:10.200
<v Speaker 3>mean the example, I'll give you an example, Martin and

1:06:10.280 --> 1:06:12.840
<v Speaker 3>I talk about it quite regularly. A bunch of years ago.

1:06:12.960 --> 1:06:15.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure you'll remember this, Chuck, they had to sit in,

1:06:16.040 --> 1:06:20.000
<v Speaker 3>and I thought they had to sit in because wouldn't

1:06:20.000 --> 1:06:21.040
<v Speaker 3>allow voting guns.

1:06:21.200 --> 1:06:23.840
<v Speaker 2>Do you remember how the sit in, this principled sit

1:06:23.960 --> 1:06:25.040
<v Speaker 2>in were breaking.

1:06:25.480 --> 1:06:26.600
<v Speaker 1>They were breaking house rules?

1:06:26.600 --> 1:06:30.240
<v Speaker 2>You're right? Do you remember remember how the sit in ended?

1:06:31.320 --> 1:06:35.160
<v Speaker 3>It was a holiday weekends and they ended they ended

1:06:35.200 --> 1:06:37.040
<v Speaker 3>the sit in because they had to.

1:06:36.960 --> 1:06:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Get home for the holidays.

1:06:38.840 --> 1:06:41.480
<v Speaker 3>I would argue a little more rule breaking might be

1:06:41.520 --> 1:06:42.200
<v Speaker 3>a thing.

1:06:42.320 --> 1:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So I get that. That's that's you know, as

1:06:46.480 --> 1:06:49.439
<v Speaker 1>as John Lewis love to call it, good trouble yo truck.

1:06:51.720 --> 1:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we all know there's this line. You know, look,

1:06:54.520 --> 1:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a whole group of democratic consultants who want to

1:06:56.920 --> 1:06:59.439
<v Speaker 1>come up there like, hey, the right wing is doing

1:06:59.520 --> 1:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>this information, maybe we auto too, you know what I mean? Like,

1:07:03.040 --> 1:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that's the slippery slip I'm worried about.

1:07:04.960 --> 1:07:05.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that's true.

1:07:06.320 --> 1:07:08.720
<v Speaker 5>I think you wonder why the Democrats aren't better at

1:07:08.760 --> 1:07:11.000
<v Speaker 5>certain things. The old line about how you know the

1:07:11.040 --> 1:07:13.600
<v Speaker 5>Democrats are showing up with scissors or a gunfight, or

1:07:13.680 --> 1:07:17.200
<v Speaker 5>knives at a gunfight, or the Republicans were brilliant enough

1:07:17.280 --> 1:07:20.240
<v Speaker 5>after Roe v. Wade to spend twenty or thirty years

1:07:20.400 --> 1:07:23.640
<v Speaker 5>organizing the judicial pipeline which has brought us the Supreme

1:07:23.640 --> 1:07:25.760
<v Speaker 5>Court we have now. I don't know why Democrats are

1:07:25.920 --> 1:07:29.520
<v Speaker 5>better at those kinds of things, why we get out smarted,

1:07:29.560 --> 1:07:33.120
<v Speaker 5>why we didn't know so much about Project twenty twenty

1:07:33.120 --> 1:07:38.919
<v Speaker 5>five before the election, or maybe people didn't didn't care.

1:07:39.000 --> 1:07:43.160
<v Speaker 5>But the Democrats are lousy I think at messaging to

1:07:43.280 --> 1:07:43.800
<v Speaker 5>meant too much.

1:07:43.800 --> 1:07:45.520
<v Speaker 2>But even when they're good, I mean, look at this.

1:07:46.840 --> 1:07:50.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm hesitant to be critical of these two things because

1:07:50.160 --> 1:07:54.120
<v Speaker 3>so many people saw them as great moments in political history.

1:07:54.400 --> 1:07:57.720
<v Speaker 3>Corey Booker stands up without paying for twenty six hours

1:07:57.760 --> 1:08:00.000
<v Speaker 3>or whatever he did and gave a speech.

1:08:00.160 --> 1:08:01.200
<v Speaker 2>I heard about an hour of it.

1:08:01.240 --> 1:08:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Was pretty impressive eight hours or whatever for a king.

1:08:04.200 --> 1:08:07.240
<v Speaker 3>Jeffreys and the words of Peggy Lee that you're not

1:08:07.280 --> 1:08:09.200
<v Speaker 3>old enough to remember her famous song.

1:08:09.720 --> 1:08:11.400
<v Speaker 2>Is that all there is at the end of both

1:08:11.640 --> 1:08:13.200
<v Speaker 2>I saw it, and I don't have a better idea.

1:08:13.880 --> 1:08:14.760
<v Speaker 2>Is that all there is?

1:08:15.080 --> 1:08:19.400
<v Speaker 3>Long speeches that are substantive and well, and then you

1:08:19.400 --> 1:08:19.840
<v Speaker 3>go home.

1:08:19.960 --> 1:08:20.559
<v Speaker 2>I mean, what is it?

1:08:20.640 --> 1:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, here's what all? Right, I'll throw something else. I

1:08:22.600 --> 1:08:26.439
<v Speaker 1>had Kristin Sultez Anderson on the show last week and

1:08:26.520 --> 1:08:29.160
<v Speaker 1>she said something that I thought she just thinks we

1:08:29.200 --> 1:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>were talking about mom Donnie right and the whole Why

1:08:33.160 --> 1:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>did he win? Did he win on substance or did

1:08:34.960 --> 1:08:35.679
<v Speaker 1>he went on style?

1:08:36.320 --> 1:08:36.519
<v Speaker 2>Right?

1:08:36.920 --> 1:08:39.519
<v Speaker 1>Essentially right. I think there's still this debate was it

1:08:39.560 --> 1:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>substance or style? And her she is basically saying, look,

1:08:44.320 --> 1:08:47.800
<v Speaker 1>he really is like Trump. He filled he filled all

1:08:47.880 --> 1:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the empty space with entertainment, if you will. It was

1:08:51.920 --> 1:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>substantive entertainment. But oh, you know, I'm going to show

1:08:55.000 --> 1:08:56.960
<v Speaker 1>up here, I'm going to show up there. Yes, it

1:08:57.000 --> 1:09:00.559
<v Speaker 1>was a little performative. She thinks you have to be

1:09:00.680 --> 1:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>performative now in order to be seen as legitimate. Right,

1:09:04.800 --> 1:09:06.439
<v Speaker 1>And this is sort of a problem in the in

1:09:06.479 --> 1:09:09.519
<v Speaker 1>the media space. Right, good journalism isn't enough?

1:09:09.560 --> 1:09:09.840
<v Speaker 3>Are you?

1:09:10.240 --> 1:09:11.439
<v Speaker 1>Do you know how to sell it. Are you a

1:09:11.439 --> 1:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>good influencer?

1:09:12.240 --> 1:09:12.360
<v Speaker 2>Right?

1:09:12.400 --> 1:09:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you know how to go viral? Do you know

1:09:13.800 --> 1:09:16.960
<v Speaker 1>how to do these things? And that that is the

1:09:17.040 --> 1:09:20.439
<v Speaker 1>skill set and that in some ways right right, this

1:09:20.439 --> 1:09:22.559
<v Speaker 1>this comes back to like Donald Trump's been doing this

1:09:22.560 --> 1:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>this whole life. Suddenly the media ecosystem changed to his strength.

1:09:29.479 --> 1:09:34.080
<v Speaker 1>He didn't, he didn't change. It's just suddenly his style

1:09:34.160 --> 1:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>of zero attention span suddenly was an asset when it

1:09:38.680 --> 1:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>used to be a liability, right, Like you know, it

1:09:41.080 --> 1:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>was sort of we evolved towards we devolved arguably towards him,

1:09:45.160 --> 1:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>uh in our in the way we consume information. But

1:09:48.400 --> 1:09:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that was sort of her conclusion. She's not alone here,

1:09:51.120 --> 1:09:56.800
<v Speaker 1>thinks that performance is more crucial than ever and performative

1:09:57.320 --> 1:10:00.439
<v Speaker 1>being knowing how when do when to do these So

1:10:00.560 --> 1:10:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you, Jim. I don't know what the hell

1:10:03.720 --> 1:10:06.559
<v Speaker 1>either got you because you because here's the thing. It

1:10:06.640 --> 1:10:08.479
<v Speaker 1>wasn't like it was going to lead to a new vote.

1:10:08.680 --> 1:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>There wasn't like there was going to be this is

1:10:10.640 --> 1:10:14.679
<v Speaker 1>not mister Smith, that suddenly you've persuaded people who are watching,

1:10:15.200 --> 1:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>all right, I'm now going to vote with him, Right,

1:10:17.600 --> 1:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Corey Booker wasn't changing a vote. A Kim Jeffreys wasn't

1:10:21.080 --> 1:10:25.320
<v Speaker 1>changing a vote. They were there literally to raise money. Okay, Now,

1:10:25.320 --> 1:10:27.320
<v Speaker 1>when Corey Booker did it, I think it it was

1:10:27.360 --> 1:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the day of those special elections. It was April first,

1:10:30.560 --> 1:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and it was the day of those special and I

1:10:32.120 --> 1:10:34.840
<v Speaker 1>think it was an asset to turn out in Wisconsin

1:10:34.880 --> 1:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and in some of these places because it gave base Democrats. Hey,

1:10:39.160 --> 1:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>while you're getting ready to vote, are you excited about this?

1:10:41.560 --> 1:10:41.760
<v Speaker 2>Right?

1:10:42.080 --> 1:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>So, I do think the theatrics. I think what we

1:10:46.080 --> 1:10:48.320
<v Speaker 1>have to learn from Trump is that the theatrics do matter.

1:10:48.920 --> 1:10:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Filling the space matters, dominating the space matters. And you

1:10:52.960 --> 1:10:56.479
<v Speaker 1>know who understood this accidentally, It turns out who Bill Clinton?

1:10:57.000 --> 1:11:00.519
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, right, because Bill Clinton. We were assumed by

1:11:00.560 --> 1:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>all things Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton loves to go to McDonald.

1:11:03.320 --> 1:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Bill Clinton's going to a football game, Bill Clinton. You

1:11:05.360 --> 1:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>know this, Bill Clinton that, And it drove the right

1:11:08.320 --> 1:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>wing crazy, right, And yet it was profied arguably Ronald Reagan.

1:11:13.640 --> 1:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Reagan, this, Ronald Reagan that, and it drove the

1:11:16.320 --> 1:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>left wing crazy. You know, they couldn't seem to touch

1:11:18.439 --> 1:11:24.439
<v Speaker 1>this guy. I you know, I don't like to admit

1:11:24.479 --> 1:11:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that that's where we are. But maybe that is where

1:11:26.360 --> 1:11:26.639
<v Speaker 1>we are.

1:11:27.280 --> 1:11:29.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, why can't you be? I mean, it's funny we

1:11:29.720 --> 1:11:32.960
<v Speaker 3>have this exact same conversation. I don't know if you

1:11:32.960 --> 1:11:37.120
<v Speaker 3>know nik Koaha, who's the podcast for a Vulture and

1:11:37.360 --> 1:11:40.240
<v Speaker 3>rights for New York Magazine too today.

1:11:40.240 --> 1:11:41.479
<v Speaker 2>I don't even know how we got into this.

1:11:41.600 --> 1:11:44.840
<v Speaker 3>Oh, because he had a conversation with mom Donnie about

1:11:44.840 --> 1:11:49.040
<v Speaker 3>what podcasts he was listening to and whatever. And I

1:11:49.080 --> 1:11:53.520
<v Speaker 3>think we the three of us, agreed that the delivery

1:11:54.280 --> 1:11:56.880
<v Speaker 3>was hugely important with Mom Donnie. But I would argue,

1:11:57.000 --> 1:11:59.880
<v Speaker 3>you can be both things. You can be substantive and

1:12:00.160 --> 1:12:03.920
<v Speaker 3>be good messager, as opposed to Donald Trump, who's an

1:12:03.920 --> 1:12:08.920
<v Speaker 3>incredible messenger and has no substance whatsoever. So I don't

1:12:08.920 --> 1:12:12.760
<v Speaker 3>think being I don't think valuing the quality of the

1:12:12.800 --> 1:12:15.719
<v Speaker 3>message and how it's delivered means you have to cheap

1:12:15.840 --> 1:12:21.200
<v Speaker 3>one has to cheapen the policy prescription of the messenger.

1:12:21.840 --> 1:12:23.679
<v Speaker 4>We don't have one at the moment, do we.

1:12:23.680 --> 1:12:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, we were just.

1:12:24.280 --> 1:12:26.519
<v Speaker 3>Talking about how Mom Donny, in a local way, if

1:12:26.520 --> 1:12:28.240
<v Speaker 3>you like his politics, is doing both.

1:12:28.320 --> 1:12:28.479
<v Speaker 2>You know.

1:12:29.200 --> 1:12:31.080
<v Speaker 1>So look, I think Mom Donnie is an important you know.

1:12:31.240 --> 1:12:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I think if he sparks, there isn't a necessary debate

1:12:36.360 --> 1:12:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that the left needs to have about socialism versus capitalism.

1:12:39.760 --> 1:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>And I mean this like, I do think that there

1:12:41.479 --> 1:12:45.679
<v Speaker 1>is a true dispute. Is capitalism too broke, too broken

1:12:45.720 --> 1:12:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to fix? Or can you know you know which side

1:12:48.840 --> 1:12:51.679
<v Speaker 1>of this column you're on. I remember, remember Elizabeth Warrenson,

1:12:51.720 --> 1:12:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm a capitalist. I want to reform it. You know

1:12:54.880 --> 1:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>something Bernie Sanders wouldn't say. It was her way of

1:12:57.080 --> 1:13:01.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to differentiate herself between Sanders and her I think, mom,

1:13:02.040 --> 1:13:04.639
<v Speaker 1>Donnie's I do think this is an important debate because

1:13:04.640 --> 1:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I do think we're in this weird moment with both

1:13:07.760 --> 1:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>parties where they're the only thing that keeps them together

1:13:11.520 --> 1:13:15.200
<v Speaker 1>is cultural issues, not economic issues.

1:13:15.680 --> 1:13:15.920
<v Speaker 2>Right.

1:13:15.960 --> 1:13:18.799
<v Speaker 1>The divide in the Republican Party is essentially free trade

1:13:19.280 --> 1:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>versus protectionism or isolationism versus internationalism. And it's a real divide.

1:13:23.840 --> 1:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're papering over it. You know. Trump's personality

1:13:27.040 --> 1:13:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I think in the Democratic Party really is it's sort

1:13:28.840 --> 1:13:33.599
<v Speaker 1>of socialism versus a technic what I call technocratic capitalism, right,

1:13:33.680 --> 1:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of that public private partnership, but for the most part,

1:13:38.160 --> 1:13:42.559
<v Speaker 1>a regulated free market, if you will, and we weren't

1:13:42.600 --> 1:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and the left wasn't having that debate. They're just so

1:13:44.720 --> 1:13:48.160
<v Speaker 1>consumed with not being divided, and maybe having this debate

1:13:48.200 --> 1:13:48.799
<v Speaker 1>will be healthy.

1:13:50.920 --> 1:13:51.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:13:51.200 --> 1:13:54.519
<v Speaker 5>Well, I also think, you know, there's a difference between

1:13:54.560 --> 1:13:58.600
<v Speaker 5>being a democratic socialist and being a socialist, and socialism

1:13:58.640 --> 1:14:02.960
<v Speaker 5>has got more to do great, I know, but that's

1:14:03.000 --> 1:14:07.000
<v Speaker 5>sort of That's another problem is that we seem to

1:14:07.240 --> 1:14:11.880
<v Speaker 5>have people that either don't care to learn about you know,

1:14:11.920 --> 1:14:13.080
<v Speaker 5>they all detoke.

1:14:12.840 --> 1:14:14.640
<v Speaker 4>The line that we all read in college.

1:14:15.040 --> 1:14:17.880
<v Speaker 5>You know, this republic only survives if it's got it

1:14:18.040 --> 1:14:21.000
<v Speaker 5>educated electorate. And I don't know that we have an

1:14:21.080 --> 1:14:23.120
<v Speaker 5>uneducated electorate, but I think we have an electricate doesn't

1:14:23.120 --> 1:14:26.320
<v Speaker 5>pay much attention. And I think that's a problem because

1:14:26.360 --> 1:14:28.760
<v Speaker 5>you do have to kind of pay a little bit

1:14:28.800 --> 1:14:30.360
<v Speaker 5>more attention and know a little bit.

1:14:30.240 --> 1:14:31.040
<v Speaker 4>More what's going on.

1:14:31.200 --> 1:14:35.000
<v Speaker 5>But I think socialism is to help with your childcare.

1:14:35.320 --> 1:14:38.760
<v Speaker 5>I don't think socialism is getting help on rents. You know,

1:14:38.800 --> 1:14:40.200
<v Speaker 5>they could people can turn it.

1:14:41.080 --> 1:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, actually, I would argue you're arguing that now helping

1:14:44.840 --> 1:14:47.960
<v Speaker 1>with childcare isn't socialism, it's part of the the sort

1:14:48.000 --> 1:14:51.920
<v Speaker 1>of the how government should assist with capitalism. Well, if

1:14:51.920 --> 1:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you're helping with childcare, you're helping people participate in the

1:14:55.120 --> 1:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>private sect. Well versus socialism, it's everything right, Well.

1:14:58.760 --> 1:14:59.960
<v Speaker 4>We've got social Security.

1:15:00.040 --> 1:15:02.799
<v Speaker 5>I don't see that's socialism, right, we know what's complaining

1:15:02.800 --> 1:15:06.200
<v Speaker 5>about that or Medicare. So I think you have to

1:15:06.560 --> 1:15:08.000
<v Speaker 5>people have to stand up and say this is not

1:15:08.640 --> 1:15:11.519
<v Speaker 5>social Maybe you're right, maybe no one is too dim

1:15:11.600 --> 1:15:13.799
<v Speaker 5>witted to get the nuance I'm messaging.

1:15:13.840 --> 1:15:16.519
<v Speaker 2>The answer is don't use the terms. Is the is

1:15:16.600 --> 1:15:18.160
<v Speaker 2>the thing? I mean? You know what we talk a

1:15:18.160 --> 1:15:19.040
<v Speaker 2>lot on the show. Do remember that.

1:15:19.240 --> 1:15:21.559
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure you've seen this the great Jimmy Kimmel thing

1:15:21.560 --> 1:15:24.519
<v Speaker 3>when he sends a reporter at the Hollywood Boulevard and says,

1:15:24.520 --> 1:15:27.640
<v Speaker 3>which do you prefer the Affordable Care Actor Obamacare? And

1:15:27.680 --> 1:15:30.800
<v Speaker 3>everybody hates Obamacare and Olibrett loves the Affordable Care Act.

1:15:31.000 --> 1:15:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Marjorie says this on the show all the time.

1:15:33.040 --> 1:15:37.240
<v Speaker 3>If you take away the alleged radical left slash democratic

1:15:37.320 --> 1:15:41.759
<v Speaker 3>socialist agenda and say, do you want more affordable childcare?

1:15:41.800 --> 1:15:44.080
<v Speaker 3>Do you want some control on rent so I can

1:15:44.120 --> 1:15:45.960
<v Speaker 3>go down the whole mom dummy or whatever list?

1:15:46.200 --> 1:15:48.439
<v Speaker 5>Do you want to give taxes to rich people? Almost

1:15:48.439 --> 1:15:52.040
<v Speaker 5>everybody got climate change. Almost everybody will not an agreement

1:15:52.040 --> 1:15:53.640
<v Speaker 5>and say this is what I want. But if you

1:15:53.760 --> 1:15:58.160
<v Speaker 5>then said either socialism or democratic socialism, and I don't

1:15:58.160 --> 1:16:00.840
<v Speaker 5>think anybody knows the difference except who are one of

1:16:00.840 --> 1:16:03.000
<v Speaker 5>those things, You're going to lose a lot of people.

1:16:03.000 --> 1:16:06.000
<v Speaker 5>But on substance that debate should be had.

1:16:06.040 --> 1:16:08.400
<v Speaker 3>And if you can avoid the terms without Donald Trump

1:16:08.439 --> 1:16:10.479
<v Speaker 3>forcing you to use them, I think it'd be really

1:16:10.560 --> 1:16:13.200
<v Speaker 3>valuable for a party that doesn't quite know where it's going,

1:16:13.240 --> 1:16:13.439
<v Speaker 3>you know.

1:16:14.800 --> 1:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Let me, for my entire professional life, Massachusetts has been

1:16:19.479 --> 1:16:23.559
<v Speaker 1>sort of among the heartbeats of American politics, right, not

1:16:23.640 --> 1:16:27.599
<v Speaker 1>the sole heartbeat, but among the heart beats multiple people

1:16:27.680 --> 1:16:31.559
<v Speaker 1>coming running for president, multiple nominees, and my professional life.

1:16:31.600 --> 1:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>So I'm always right in on both sides of the

1:16:33.680 --> 1:16:37.080
<v Speaker 1>aisle we've had. We've had since nineteen eighty eight former

1:16:37.120 --> 1:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>governors of both parties of the state of Massachusetts been

1:16:41.040 --> 1:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>major party nominees. Is the brand of Massachusetts tainted too

1:16:48.920 --> 1:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>much now for anybody to rise up and become a

1:16:51.760 --> 1:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>nominee again? Is there like too match Buyer's remorse on

1:16:55.120 --> 1:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the left and sort of Taxachusetts branding on the right.

1:16:59.240 --> 1:17:04.160
<v Speaker 1>For for the next generations of Massachusetts leaders to populate

1:17:04.200 --> 1:17:07.320
<v Speaker 1>our national political debate, or or or am I buying

1:17:07.360 --> 1:17:10.719
<v Speaker 1>into the to the right wing and left wing spins

1:17:10.880 --> 1:17:12.559
<v Speaker 1>of Massachusetts politics?

1:17:14.120 --> 1:17:16.720
<v Speaker 3>Jim Well, you know, I guess I would say, on

1:17:16.720 --> 1:17:21.439
<v Speaker 3>one hand, a really smart, really competent, talented senator run

1:17:21.560 --> 1:17:24.080
<v Speaker 3>for president and she didn't even win her home state.

1:17:24.200 --> 1:17:27.880
<v Speaker 3>That was Elizabeth Warren So and she's I think she's

1:17:27.920 --> 1:17:32.240
<v Speaker 3>a really talented person. But I mean, let's do both

1:17:32.280 --> 1:17:35.599
<v Speaker 3>sides of the equation. While there is no Republican Party

1:17:35.640 --> 1:17:38.720
<v Speaker 3>for him anymore, if Charlie Baker decided to run to

1:17:38.840 --> 1:17:43.320
<v Speaker 3>represent that minority part of the Republican Party, he'd.

1:17:43.200 --> 1:17:46.040
<v Speaker 2>Do better than his former boss Bill Well did. So

1:17:46.520 --> 1:17:49.519
<v Speaker 2>at some point, hopefully trump Ism is going to die

1:17:49.600 --> 1:17:53.400
<v Speaker 2>and Republicanism comes back, there'd be a place for that

1:17:53.520 --> 1:17:54.160
<v Speaker 2>kind of person.

1:17:54.680 --> 1:17:57.479
<v Speaker 3>And I don't buy. I don't buy the notion. I

1:17:57.520 --> 1:17:59.960
<v Speaker 3>know you're just asking a question, not positing an answer.

1:18:00.520 --> 1:18:03.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't buy the notion that our influence is going

1:18:04.000 --> 1:18:07.360
<v Speaker 3>We have a lot of really talented politicians here, and

1:18:07.840 --> 1:18:10.400
<v Speaker 3>I think the question is just Tommy, don't you.

1:18:10.400 --> 1:18:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Think Martin Well, I've always thought the reason that is

1:18:12.360 --> 1:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>for what it's worth is that the local politics is

1:18:14.640 --> 1:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>so well informed, you know, I mean I you know,

1:18:19.439 --> 1:18:24.799
<v Speaker 1>every little township seems to produce some pretty quality people.

1:18:24.880 --> 1:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Not to say there isn't less quality people too, but

1:18:27.960 --> 1:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>that there is. And this is New England in general, right,

1:18:31.040 --> 1:18:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that there's a bit of a there's still a legacy

1:18:35.120 --> 1:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>or an expectation that all politics is local and and

1:18:39.720 --> 1:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and they kind of mean it in New England. Am

1:18:42.080 --> 1:18:45.519
<v Speaker 1>I am I overlyingizing Marjorie Listen.

1:18:45.600 --> 1:18:48.760
<v Speaker 5>I have lived in Massachusetts my whole life, and I

1:18:48.800 --> 1:18:52.040
<v Speaker 5>am more grateful than ever that I live in Massachusetts,

1:18:52.080 --> 1:18:59.799
<v Speaker 5>because I don't think people were outraged when Ramesa Osturk

1:18:59.880 --> 1:19:03.680
<v Speaker 5>was taken off the street by masked ice people in

1:19:04.240 --> 1:19:08.479
<v Speaker 5>Somerville for writing co authoring on OpEd. When they took

1:19:08.520 --> 1:19:11.120
<v Speaker 5>that young man that was on the way to volleyball practice,

1:19:11.840 --> 1:19:14.000
<v Speaker 5>ice did and hauled him out of the car. When

1:19:14.040 --> 1:19:17.400
<v Speaker 5>they broke a window in New Bedford with children in

1:19:17.439 --> 1:19:18.960
<v Speaker 5>the back seat to get people out of the car,

1:19:19.000 --> 1:19:20.160
<v Speaker 5>people took to the streets.

1:19:20.240 --> 1:19:21.280
<v Speaker 4>They were outraged.

1:19:21.640 --> 1:19:24.760
<v Speaker 5>If you're a gay person in Massachusetts, I don't think

1:19:24.760 --> 1:19:28.200
<v Speaker 5>you have to be afraid to live here. You know,

1:19:28.240 --> 1:19:30.840
<v Speaker 5>it's tough for trans people. But it's better here than

1:19:30.880 --> 1:19:33.800
<v Speaker 5>there's a lot of other places. You have people like

1:19:34.320 --> 1:19:37.040
<v Speaker 5>more Heally when she was Attorney General, and Andrea Campbell,

1:19:37.240 --> 1:19:40.719
<v Speaker 5>the journey General now who are taking Trump to court

1:19:41.080 --> 1:19:43.960
<v Speaker 5>on all these outrageous things. We have some very talented

1:19:44.360 --> 1:19:48.080
<v Speaker 5>politicians here. We have a very good school system here.

1:19:48.120 --> 1:19:51.080
<v Speaker 5>If your kid is disabled, you may have to fight.

1:19:51.000 --> 1:19:54.120
<v Speaker 1>To get always been, I mean, it's always been. Public

1:19:54.120 --> 1:19:56.479
<v Speaker 1>school rankings, Massachusetts is always number one.

1:19:56.600 --> 1:19:59.559
<v Speaker 5>I think a lot of people would be lucky to

1:19:59.600 --> 1:20:02.320
<v Speaker 5>live here here. It's very expensive to live here, tough

1:20:02.360 --> 1:20:05.760
<v Speaker 5>to buy a house here. But I'm really proud of Massachusetts.

1:20:05.840 --> 1:20:08.000
<v Speaker 2>We also have a mayor on our show tomorrow who

1:20:08.080 --> 1:20:10.679
<v Speaker 2>kicked Congress's as a couple of months ago.

1:20:10.960 --> 1:20:15.160
<v Speaker 5>Only one I've ever seen give as good as she got,

1:20:15.200 --> 1:20:19.120
<v Speaker 5>better than what she got with a nursing child, infant

1:20:19.160 --> 1:20:21.920
<v Speaker 5>newborn at her breast, I might add, I love that

1:20:22.120 --> 1:20:23.439
<v Speaker 5>for all the women of America.

1:20:24.439 --> 1:20:27.519
<v Speaker 1>Well, what I was that was actually going to be

1:20:27.640 --> 1:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>how I was going to land this plane, which is

1:20:29.600 --> 1:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the Boston Mayor's race. Yeah, and mister Craft, is it

1:20:33.680 --> 1:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Josh Craft? Josh Craft that's running? It looks like an

1:20:39.120 --> 1:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>invisible campaign at the moment in that it's a lot

1:20:43.000 --> 1:20:47.400
<v Speaker 1>more advertisements than it is hand to hand campaigning. But

1:20:47.439 --> 1:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>you tell me you guys are on the ground there.

1:20:51.720 --> 1:20:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Well.

1:20:52.080 --> 1:20:56.080
<v Speaker 5>People are mad about the bike lanes in Boston and

1:20:56.120 --> 1:20:57.160
<v Speaker 5>Michelle Man, that's.

1:20:57.000 --> 1:20:59.679
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to being mayor of any town. It's a huge

1:21:00.880 --> 1:21:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I get it where you park space.

1:21:06.040 --> 1:21:07.320
<v Speaker 4>I have been amazed by her.

1:21:07.920 --> 1:21:10.960
<v Speaker 5>She's got a great backstory as a mother with mentionalininess,

1:21:11.040 --> 1:21:13.679
<v Speaker 5>raised her two younger kids, brought them all to Boston,

1:21:13.720 --> 1:21:15.960
<v Speaker 5>the mother and the two younger sisters, while she went

1:21:15.960 --> 1:21:19.800
<v Speaker 5>to Harvard and Harvard Law School. Uh. She, as I said,

1:21:19.840 --> 1:21:22.679
<v Speaker 5>she out smarter them all in Congress. I've not seen

1:21:22.720 --> 1:21:26.040
<v Speaker 5>anybody do as well in one of those gang bangs

1:21:26.320 --> 1:21:29.439
<v Speaker 5>as Michelle Wu did and as I said, a nursing

1:21:29.479 --> 1:21:33.000
<v Speaker 5>mother of three. We've had a chance to interview a

1:21:33.000 --> 1:21:37.160
<v Speaker 5>lot of politicians in our time, Jim. Is there somebody

1:21:37.240 --> 1:21:39.439
<v Speaker 5>that knows more about the city of Boston as the

1:21:39.479 --> 1:21:43.599
<v Speaker 5>mayor than Michelle Wuh, she's very impressive. Whether she's going

1:21:43.680 --> 1:21:46.160
<v Speaker 5>to do I think she. I think she will win

1:21:46.439 --> 1:21:49.080
<v Speaker 5>big again. I could be wrong, but I think I

1:21:49.120 --> 1:21:50.200
<v Speaker 5>think she'll win big again.

1:21:50.240 --> 1:21:52.679
<v Speaker 1>By the way, can you be mayor mumbles anymore and win.

1:21:54.360 --> 1:21:57.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, can I tell you something? They loved him.

1:21:57.320 --> 1:21:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I know they did.

1:21:58.240 --> 1:22:00.559
<v Speaker 3>There was a level that came out about him and

1:22:00.760 --> 1:22:03.960
<v Speaker 3>a predecessor of his, Ray Flynn, which are two of

1:22:04.000 --> 1:22:05.559
<v Speaker 3>the most amazing pauls ever saw.

1:22:05.960 --> 1:22:06.800
<v Speaker 2>I think the Globe did it.

1:22:06.840 --> 1:22:09.519
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure have you ever you have ever met

1:22:09.560 --> 1:22:11.599
<v Speaker 3>the mayor of Boston? And by the way, it didn't

1:22:11.640 --> 1:22:14.080
<v Speaker 3>mean have you been at a rally where he spoke

1:22:14.240 --> 1:22:15.400
<v Speaker 3>or in an auditorium?

1:22:15.680 --> 1:22:16.360
<v Speaker 2>Have you ever.

1:22:16.280 --> 1:22:18.800
<v Speaker 3>Met and it was in the high fifties and low

1:22:18.920 --> 1:22:23.479
<v Speaker 3>sixty percent. Yeah, major American city where people had met

1:22:23.560 --> 1:22:25.519
<v Speaker 3>Tominino or ray Flynn.

1:22:25.680 --> 1:22:28.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's just it is that's become a traditionary wor.

1:22:27.960 --> 1:22:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Old school really old school? Is Mayor wu this way?

1:22:31.360 --> 1:22:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Does she do the same thing? Do you see her

1:22:33.120 --> 1:22:33.519
<v Speaker 1>out there.

1:22:33.439 --> 1:22:33.960
<v Speaker 2>The same way?

1:22:34.160 --> 1:22:35.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean she has a brand new baby, as you

1:22:35.640 --> 1:22:37.839
<v Speaker 3>probably know. As Marty said, she bought the baby to Congress.

1:22:37.840 --> 1:22:39.680
<v Speaker 3>She often brings the baby to our radio show and

1:22:39.680 --> 1:22:43.360
<v Speaker 3>then hands it off to her husband, who has decided

1:22:43.360 --> 1:22:46.560
<v Speaker 3>to put his career on hold to take care of

1:22:46.560 --> 1:22:50.240
<v Speaker 3>of the baby for the time being. But yeah, she's

1:22:50.360 --> 1:22:53.920
<v Speaker 3>I think they established this notion. If you're not out there,

1:22:53.960 --> 1:22:56.639
<v Speaker 3>Marty Walsh, doo, if you're not out there meeting people

1:22:56.800 --> 1:23:00.320
<v Speaker 3>almost twenty four to seven, this is not the job

1:23:00.439 --> 1:23:00.840
<v Speaker 3>for you.

1:23:00.880 --> 1:23:02.400
<v Speaker 4>So touchcraft. We should give credit.

1:23:02.439 --> 1:23:04.320
<v Speaker 5>I mean, Josh Kraft ran the Boys and Girls Clubs

1:23:04.320 --> 1:23:07.200
<v Speaker 5>of Florid for I mean in Boston for years and

1:23:07.240 --> 1:23:09.120
<v Speaker 5>years and years, and we did a great job. I'm

1:23:09.120 --> 1:23:11.839
<v Speaker 5>not sure why he's running at this particular juncture.

1:23:12.000 --> 1:23:13.800
<v Speaker 3>I tell you, I'm laughing. I left him because of

1:23:13.800 --> 1:23:15.519
<v Speaker 3>this covers that you just mentioned a minute ago. We're

1:23:15.560 --> 1:23:17.360
<v Speaker 3>talking about bikelnes. I love that you said a chuck.

1:23:17.439 --> 1:23:20.080
<v Speaker 3>You know where do you park? All our listeners mocked

1:23:20.120 --> 1:23:22.000
<v Speaker 3>me because I made the big mistake when we had

1:23:22.000 --> 1:23:25.000
<v Speaker 3>our first bike line discussion about six months ago, mentioning

1:23:25.160 --> 1:23:27.840
<v Speaker 3>was my birthday last year and I couldn't. I had

1:23:27.880 --> 1:23:29.640
<v Speaker 3>to get my own cake, which is bad enough to

1:23:29.680 --> 1:23:33.080
<v Speaker 3>begin with, and I couldn't find a space nearby side

1:23:33.120 --> 1:23:35.519
<v Speaker 3>to walk two blocks to get my own birthday cake.

1:23:35.800 --> 1:23:36.840
<v Speaker 3>And I will never live.

1:23:38.200 --> 1:23:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Was it raining at the time or snowstorm?

1:23:40.280 --> 1:23:44.439
<v Speaker 2>Both ways? Actually, and I was boiling unbelievably hot, and

1:23:44.520 --> 1:23:47.160
<v Speaker 2>I was snowing. It was uphill. It was hard.

1:23:48.200 --> 1:23:52.519
<v Speaker 1>So is this you know, I do think there's an

1:23:52.520 --> 1:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>anti incumbent vibe that is nationwide.

1:23:55.200 --> 1:23:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Right.

1:23:55.439 --> 1:23:58.920
<v Speaker 1>You saw at Pittsburgh's incumbent mayor lost. We saw that

1:23:58.960 --> 1:24:03.519
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco's at mayor loss. So I look at these

1:24:03.520 --> 1:24:05.920
<v Speaker 1>things through that national lens. Are we going to see

1:24:06.320 --> 1:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>more of this? I think it's a terrible time to

1:24:08.040 --> 1:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>be an incumbent, right, just in general? Definitely, you can

1:24:10.880 --> 1:24:13.160
<v Speaker 1>feel it, right, people are just like you know, I

1:24:13.160 --> 1:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>think this is why we've had three one term presidents

1:24:15.080 --> 1:24:17.080
<v Speaker 1>in a row. You know, people didn't vote for Trump.

1:24:17.120 --> 1:24:19.360
<v Speaker 1>They just voted against, you know, they voted against at

1:24:19.439 --> 1:24:23.120
<v Speaker 1>least that final slice of voters did. How concerned should

1:24:23.120 --> 1:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>she be about that? In Boston? Is that you've sense

1:24:26.400 --> 1:24:26.920
<v Speaker 1>that feeling?

1:24:26.920 --> 1:24:29.559
<v Speaker 3>In all Jim not as concerned as the other guys

1:24:29.600 --> 1:24:32.519
<v Speaker 3>should be about the fact that his father, fairly or

1:24:32.560 --> 1:24:36.400
<v Speaker 3>unfairly has a friendship with Donald Trump, and some major

1:24:36.680 --> 1:24:40.240
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump donors have given a huge pile of money

1:24:40.240 --> 1:24:41.439
<v Speaker 3>to a pack that's sports truck.

1:24:41.560 --> 1:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>So she she's gonna be able to turn him into

1:24:43.240 --> 1:24:45.559
<v Speaker 1>a Trump she'sis or something like that.

1:24:45.600 --> 1:24:48.920
<v Speaker 3>She's trying. And even though he has said I a

1:24:49.040 --> 1:24:55.519
<v Speaker 3>poor Donald Trump. He has supported members of Congress who

1:24:55.600 --> 1:24:59.880
<v Speaker 3>are trumpified and are bailed on every issue except Israel

1:25:00.640 --> 1:25:04.720
<v Speaker 3>and uh choice, anti choice, anti same sex marriage. So

1:25:04.760 --> 1:25:07.240
<v Speaker 3>I think the answer is a fair unfair. That's I'll

1:25:07.280 --> 1:25:09.400
<v Speaker 3>leave that up to voters. That's going to be a

1:25:09.640 --> 1:25:12.760
<v Speaker 3>has been and will be a major thrust the of

1:25:12.800 --> 1:25:16.519
<v Speaker 3>the She often says to at events. He just moved

1:25:16.520 --> 1:25:18.719
<v Speaker 3>here too, from Chesnut Hill, which is right across the

1:25:18.880 --> 1:25:19.320
<v Speaker 3>thing there.

1:25:19.560 --> 1:25:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Boston, Josh. That's funny that that worked well.

1:25:22.800 --> 1:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>That worked well against Andy Cuomo was like, oh, hey,

1:25:25.120 --> 1:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>welcome to New York.

1:25:26.560 --> 1:25:29.720
<v Speaker 5>I know that was It was an amazing That was

1:25:29.720 --> 1:25:31.280
<v Speaker 5>an amazing race in New York City.

1:25:31.479 --> 1:25:33.760
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see and it's not over, you know, we

1:25:33.760 --> 1:25:36.120
<v Speaker 1>we That's say I saw a poll today that you

1:25:36.160 --> 1:25:42.679
<v Speaker 1>can if there's consolidation behind somebody, there's you can see

1:25:43.160 --> 1:25:46.439
<v Speaker 1>that Mom, Donnie has a harder ceiling. Yeah, Now the

1:25:46.560 --> 1:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>question is is it forty five or is it fifty one?

1:25:50.080 --> 1:25:53.680
<v Speaker 1>But the ceiling is there and you can see. You know,

1:25:54.080 --> 1:25:56.880
<v Speaker 1>it was interesting the pole I saw broken up by

1:25:56.880 --> 1:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Burrow and he's the mayor of Brooklyn today already. You

1:26:02.040 --> 1:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>know that's not a problem. It's a coin flip in Manhattan,

1:26:05.680 --> 1:26:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and he doesn't win any other borough. So look, you

1:26:08.800 --> 1:26:11.120
<v Speaker 1>can win it on the strength of Brooklyn and Manhattan alone,

1:26:11.160 --> 1:26:14.120
<v Speaker 1>So it doesn't matter. But you can see the path

1:26:14.160 --> 1:26:17.720
<v Speaker 1>to stopping mom Donnie if there is, if there is

1:26:17.800 --> 1:26:19.639
<v Speaker 1>reason to do it, I guess would be the way

1:26:19.640 --> 1:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I'd look at it.

1:26:21.080 --> 1:26:23.240
<v Speaker 3>I think you for a Cuomo to have a shot,

1:26:23.240 --> 1:26:25.519
<v Speaker 3>as he has to decide, well, I should accept the

1:26:25.560 --> 1:26:29.479
<v Speaker 3>endorsement of only one sexual harasser, Bill Quinton, not a second.

1:26:29.640 --> 1:26:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Don't you think there's a there's a ceiling to that?

1:26:32.200 --> 1:26:34.479
<v Speaker 2>And then yeah.

1:26:34.000 --> 1:26:41.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, culture, No, I think I don't understand. And this

1:26:41.680 --> 1:26:45.160
<v Speaker 1>is where I think Schumer and Jeffries have escaped accountability. Here,

1:26:45.600 --> 1:26:49.160
<v Speaker 1>your national leaders that live in New York City, you

1:26:49.200 --> 1:26:52.200
<v Speaker 1>look the other way while everybody rallied around Andrew Cuomo.

1:26:52.320 --> 1:26:54.679
<v Speaker 1>You want to lead the Democratic Party seriously.

1:26:54.960 --> 1:26:58.439
<v Speaker 3>And also if they endorse Mom donniet or no.

1:26:58.720 --> 1:27:01.240
<v Speaker 1>No, they haven't. I mean, you know they've They've got

1:27:01.240 --> 1:27:04.040
<v Speaker 1>this massive problem now that is dividing the Democratic Party.

1:27:05.680 --> 1:27:07.599
<v Speaker 1>I think it'll be healthy in the long run, but

1:27:07.680 --> 1:27:10.880
<v Speaker 1>still it is. And you're the the facto leaders of

1:27:10.920 --> 1:27:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the party right now. There's nobody else. You're the Senate leader,

1:27:13.880 --> 1:27:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and you're the House leader. You're both New York City guys,

1:27:16.120 --> 1:27:18.439
<v Speaker 1>and you and you. You couldn't find a better candidate

1:27:18.439 --> 1:27:19.599
<v Speaker 1>than Cuomo. Seriously.

1:27:20.880 --> 1:27:23.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, I don't know that they've been that.

1:27:23.880 --> 1:27:25.280
<v Speaker 1>You want to be my late tech salesman.

1:27:25.600 --> 1:27:31.559
<v Speaker 2>Come on. They reached out to Joe Biden, but he

1:27:31.640 --> 1:27:32.400
<v Speaker 2>was unavailable.

1:27:35.640 --> 1:27:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait till Biden runs for Wilmington mayor h

1:27:38.880 --> 1:27:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Beach mayor. I feel like that's coming. I feel like

1:27:41.720 --> 1:27:44.520
<v Speaker 1>something like that, or Hunter Biden runs for mayor of Wilmington,

1:27:44.880 --> 1:27:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Like I just you know, something like that's going to

1:27:47.920 --> 1:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>happen sooner than we think, because you know, you know,

1:27:52.040 --> 1:27:56.640
<v Speaker 1>every every TV series needs a needs an episode like that.

1:27:57.280 --> 1:27:59.960
<v Speaker 5>Can I ask you a quick question before we leave here, Chuck, yes, ma'am.

1:28:00.040 --> 1:28:01.280
<v Speaker 5>Are we going to get out of this mess?

1:28:01.320 --> 1:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you think, well everything ends, It's just going to

1:28:05.920 --> 1:28:09.599
<v Speaker 1>end badly and here's the here let me ask. I'll

1:28:09.680 --> 1:28:12.120
<v Speaker 1>leave you as this will make my real out question. Okay,

1:28:14.400 --> 1:28:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this is a a you know, the

1:28:16.960 --> 1:28:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Trump arrow will come to an end. My guess is

1:28:19.360 --> 1:28:21.640
<v Speaker 1>it'll be abrupt, and I don't know how right, Like,

1:28:22.040 --> 1:28:24.639
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's a natural disaster, maybe it's an economic collapse,

1:28:24.640 --> 1:28:27.679
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's something else. It's going to be a mess.

1:28:28.479 --> 1:28:30.640
<v Speaker 1>There's going to be one of two directions we go

1:28:30.720 --> 1:28:33.439
<v Speaker 1>as a country. We decide, uh, that's never going to

1:28:33.479 --> 1:28:35.960
<v Speaker 1>happen again, and we move on, or we try to

1:28:36.000 --> 1:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump proof the Constitution and the government so that we

1:28:39.720 --> 1:28:43.439
<v Speaker 1>don't allow that to happen again. Which direction do you

1:28:43.520 --> 1:28:44.479
<v Speaker 1>expect us to go?

1:28:45.000 --> 1:28:50.040
<v Speaker 4>Marjorie, Well, I'm not discouraged.

1:28:50.080 --> 1:28:53.080
<v Speaker 5>I'm not encouraged by the ability of the Republicans and

1:28:53.160 --> 1:28:57.960
<v Speaker 5>Democrats to agree to to to do something as dramatic

1:28:58.040 --> 1:29:01.400
<v Speaker 5>as Trump Proof. But maybe if Trump is gone, because

1:29:01.439 --> 1:29:04.519
<v Speaker 5>I don't see a jd. Vance or anybody able to

1:29:04.640 --> 1:29:08.040
<v Speaker 5>take up that charismatic place he holds for the country,

1:29:08.040 --> 1:29:08.960
<v Speaker 5>maybe then they could.

1:29:09.960 --> 1:29:12.479
<v Speaker 4>I don't know. I don't know. I'd like to think

1:29:12.520 --> 1:29:16.000
<v Speaker 4>they could do that, but I don't know. I'm sorry,

1:29:16.000 --> 1:29:16.800
<v Speaker 4>I don't have a good answer.

1:29:16.800 --> 1:29:19.639
<v Speaker 3>We want to do something that people love. In talk radio,

1:29:19.680 --> 1:29:23.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna argue both sides very quickly. Well, I don't

1:29:23.160 --> 1:29:26.200
<v Speaker 3>think there will ever be another leader who can do

1:29:26.280 --> 1:29:28.680
<v Speaker 3>what Trump does, even though they've tried. Ron Desanta's being

1:29:28.720 --> 1:29:32.599
<v Speaker 3>a perfect example bismal failure. I think the freedom that

1:29:32.640 --> 1:29:36.599
<v Speaker 3>Trump has given to people to be like him is.

1:29:36.560 --> 1:29:38.479
<v Speaker 2>Going to be hard to get rid of.

1:29:38.600 --> 1:29:40.880
<v Speaker 3>I think people find it liberating to be able to

1:29:40.880 --> 1:29:44.639
<v Speaker 3>say they're worse innermost thoughts and things like that. Having

1:29:44.680 --> 1:29:47.240
<v Speaker 3>said that, the other side is I'm a huge believer

1:29:47.280 --> 1:29:50.240
<v Speaker 3>in leadership, and I'm not the first person who said

1:29:50.240 --> 1:29:53.439
<v Speaker 3>if Ronald Reagan had run as a liberal Democrat, he

1:29:53.439 --> 1:29:55.440
<v Speaker 3>would have been elected in a landslide.

1:29:55.880 --> 1:29:59.120
<v Speaker 2>Leadership really matters in this country. It really matters to me.

1:29:59.640 --> 1:30:02.439
<v Speaker 3>And I think if the people with the right thinking

1:30:02.520 --> 1:30:06.480
<v Speaker 3>approaches find a leader who has charisma, who is youngish,

1:30:06.840 --> 1:30:11.920
<v Speaker 3>who is tough, I think this could end in a

1:30:11.960 --> 1:30:14.800
<v Speaker 3>far better way than I worry that it will. It's

1:30:14.800 --> 1:30:16.680
<v Speaker 3>such a great point. My wife says this all the time.

1:30:16.880 --> 1:30:18.559
<v Speaker 1>She goes, if Joe Biden had been a better leader,

1:30:18.600 --> 1:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>there would have been no second Trump term. Yeah, and

1:30:22.160 --> 1:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a fair ethic, it's the fairest critique of it. Look,

1:30:26.040 --> 1:30:30.040
<v Speaker 1>it just is true. He just wasn't the leader that

1:30:30.160 --> 1:30:33.240
<v Speaker 1>was necessary to have us turn the page. Maybe it

1:30:33.280 --> 1:30:35.000
<v Speaker 1>was due to age, maybe it was due to other things,

1:30:35.040 --> 1:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>but he wasn't And that you're right. Leader leadership can

1:30:38.160 --> 1:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>overcome a lot of things. If you have good leadership

1:30:41.080 --> 1:30:42.280
<v Speaker 1>or bad leadership.

1:30:43.280 --> 1:30:45.560
<v Speaker 4>That's what we're looking for. If you are not.

1:30:45.800 --> 1:30:47.840
<v Speaker 3>Before we leave, I just say one thing for the

1:30:47.880 --> 1:30:50.679
<v Speaker 3>record here so people know this. I did not own

1:30:50.680 --> 1:30:56.080
<v Speaker 3>a Volvo station Wagon and I did not have pants.

1:30:56.600 --> 1:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>It was probably a suber Uh.

1:30:58.479 --> 1:30:59.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry, I can't talk about.

1:31:00.120 --> 1:31:03.960
<v Speaker 5>I also called him the heart throb of economics one

1:31:04.000 --> 1:31:04.439
<v Speaker 5>oh one.

1:31:04.520 --> 1:31:06.600
<v Speaker 2>That was very complimentary.

1:31:06.960 --> 1:31:11.160
<v Speaker 1>And let me let me uh, Will Bond and Cornheiser

1:31:11.240 --> 1:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>actually can socialize like they're off off camera?

1:31:15.600 --> 1:31:15.880
<v Speaker 2>All right?

1:31:16.000 --> 1:31:20.439
<v Speaker 1>How how are you guys able to socialize like off hours?

1:31:21.320 --> 1:31:24.320
<v Speaker 2>You have enough of friends tonight the road tonight?

1:31:24.720 --> 1:31:26.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, the.

1:31:26.680 --> 1:31:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Red Sox just make some gnats ass this past Fourth

1:31:29.840 --> 1:31:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of July weekend beautiful. That was embarrassing, lovely.

1:31:32.360 --> 1:31:34.240
<v Speaker 2>It was expression made you.

1:31:34.120 --> 1:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Guys look like, gave you guys hope.

1:31:36.880 --> 1:31:37.320
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

1:31:37.439 --> 1:31:39.320
<v Speaker 3>Now we're playing the worst team in baseball, right, so

1:31:39.360 --> 1:31:40.919
<v Speaker 3>it's even more we're very excited.

1:31:41.280 --> 1:31:43.160
<v Speaker 1>No, you just played the worst. I thought you just

1:31:43.160 --> 1:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>played the worst even baseball? Who is it?

1:31:44.800 --> 1:31:48.880
<v Speaker 2>Tonight? Do you get the rock in Colorado even worse? Yeah?

1:31:47.200 --> 1:31:52.280
<v Speaker 1>The Gnats have more losses than the Rockies since twenty nineteen,

1:31:52.560 --> 1:31:55.800
<v Speaker 1>so really, yeah, we've really done well.

1:31:55.800 --> 1:31:56.200
<v Speaker 4>Sausage.

1:31:56.360 --> 1:31:59.000
<v Speaker 5>Think of those sausage things tonight, the sausage and onions things.

1:31:59.000 --> 1:31:59.720
<v Speaker 2>That was the fun things.

1:32:00.040 --> 1:32:03.280
<v Speaker 3>They're bold sausage onions, onion things.

1:32:03.880 --> 1:32:06.439
<v Speaker 2>I'll have a salsage and onion thing. Please, thank you.

1:32:06.880 --> 1:32:09.679
<v Speaker 1>Now everybody knows why. This is my favorite half hour

1:32:09.720 --> 1:32:10.920
<v Speaker 1>that I spend every Thursday with.

1:32:11.120 --> 1:32:16.840
<v Speaker 2>We love well. Thank you, the guests, the audience, Chuck. Thanks.

1:32:26.640 --> 1:32:29.000
<v Speaker 1>It's always fun when you get to interview friends and

1:32:29.040 --> 1:32:30.360
<v Speaker 1>people you just like each other.

1:32:30.720 --> 1:32:31.000
<v Speaker 5>Uh.

1:32:31.240 --> 1:32:34.360
<v Speaker 1>So, I hope you enjoyed that conversation. I enjoyed having it,

1:32:34.680 --> 1:32:37.960
<v Speaker 1>so I hope you enjoyed listening to it. All right,

1:32:38.040 --> 1:32:40.599
<v Speaker 1>let me do a few questions, and I love it, man,

1:32:40.640 --> 1:32:45.599
<v Speaker 1>The questions are getting better and better. Feedback's amazing. Uh

1:32:45.640 --> 1:32:47.800
<v Speaker 1>And I admit I'm getting to the point where we

1:32:47.840 --> 1:32:50.360
<v Speaker 1>may have to do entire episodes that are just as

1:32:50.479 --> 1:32:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Chuck as Chuck. The real reason is because you want that,

1:32:57.680 --> 1:33:00.559
<v Speaker 1>You want that sort of that music's kind of familiar,

1:33:00.560 --> 1:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>but you don't know where it belongs. That's the trick, right,

1:33:04.960 --> 1:33:07.439
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's start with this, this comes from Grants.

1:33:08.960 --> 1:33:12.760
<v Speaker 1>It looks like he's writing from Alabama, and he writes,

1:33:12.840 --> 1:33:15.679
<v Speaker 1>Chuck love the pod, especially the longer episodes. Well, all right,

1:33:16.160 --> 1:33:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the roganification of podcasts are here. Don't do any podcasts

1:33:20.439 --> 1:33:22.439
<v Speaker 1>under an hour and a half, right anyway? I tease.

1:33:23.560 --> 1:33:25.880
<v Speaker 1>He continues, great insights and analysis. I wanted to bounce

1:33:25.880 --> 1:33:27.479
<v Speaker 1>something off of you. Have you noticed how the left

1:33:27.479 --> 1:33:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and right seem to have switched places when it comes

1:33:29.439 --> 1:33:32.240
<v Speaker 1>to cultural orthodoxy? He goes, when I moved to d

1:33:32.360 --> 1:33:35.600
<v Speaker 1>C from Alabama, I felt judged by moderate dem staffers

1:33:35.600 --> 1:33:38.639
<v Speaker 1>for things like smoking, but my GOP and libertarian friends

1:33:38.680 --> 1:33:41.519
<v Speaker 1>never cared. Is this hall monitor vibe a bigger challenge

1:33:41.520 --> 1:33:44.559
<v Speaker 1>for the Democratic Party? And can they shed it? Would

1:33:44.560 --> 1:33:50.000
<v Speaker 1>love to hear your thoughts. You're right, I especially sort

1:33:50.000 --> 1:33:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of Southern Democrats, right, you know, you know, I'll give

1:33:53.800 --> 1:33:56.840
<v Speaker 1>you another one. It's not as common, right for a

1:33:56.960 --> 1:34:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Democrat in d C to bechure going, and yet it's

1:34:01.360 --> 1:34:03.920
<v Speaker 1>quite common in the South for everybody to be church going.

1:34:04.320 --> 1:34:06.519
<v Speaker 1>So I think you're not wrong that there's a little

1:34:06.520 --> 1:34:09.240
<v Speaker 1>bit of that going on. But let me flip the

1:34:09.280 --> 1:34:12.400
<v Speaker 1>script here. You know where I thought you were going

1:34:12.439 --> 1:34:16.040
<v Speaker 1>at first had to do with the nanny state, and

1:34:16.080 --> 1:34:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I sort of more focused on sort of the bizarre,

1:34:20.720 --> 1:34:23.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of the bizarreness, if you will. It's not really

1:34:23.960 --> 1:34:27.519
<v Speaker 1>that bizarre anymore of Kennedy, at least on the right

1:34:27.720 --> 1:34:31.040
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to that, which is you know, ten

1:34:31.120 --> 1:34:33.320
<v Speaker 1>years ago, when Michael Bloomberg was trying to get rid

1:34:33.360 --> 1:34:36.799
<v Speaker 1>of the big gulp, the right went crazy. Sarah Palin

1:34:36.920 --> 1:34:39.720
<v Speaker 1>came out and gave speeches with a big gulp as

1:34:39.760 --> 1:34:42.320
<v Speaker 1>a prop. You know, it was their way of going

1:34:42.360 --> 1:34:44.680
<v Speaker 1>after the crazy left. You know, I don't know if

1:34:44.680 --> 1:34:47.640
<v Speaker 1>we were calling it woke then. Right now, who's the

1:34:47.640 --> 1:34:49.920
<v Speaker 1>one trying to get rid of sweets and trying to

1:34:49.920 --> 1:34:52.200
<v Speaker 1>get rid of you know, trying to decide, no, you

1:34:52.200 --> 1:34:54.639
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't eat this and you shouldn't eat that. Right, it's

1:34:54.680 --> 1:35:00.560
<v Speaker 1>suddenly the right. So I do think these things go cyclical.

1:35:00.640 --> 1:35:02.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'll give you another thing. Right, it was

1:35:02.800 --> 1:35:09.320
<v Speaker 1>more likely you'd see a Democrat, a Democratic voter or candidate,

1:35:09.640 --> 1:35:11.439
<v Speaker 1>would you know, if you saw somebody with more than

1:35:11.439 --> 1:35:14.920
<v Speaker 1>one tattoo, you would assume they were their politics were

1:35:14.920 --> 1:35:16.920
<v Speaker 1>on the left. Now these days, if you see somebody

1:35:16.920 --> 1:35:19.679
<v Speaker 1>with more than one tattoo, you might assume their politics

1:35:19.720 --> 1:35:22.519
<v Speaker 1>is on the right. So I do think some of

1:35:22.520 --> 1:35:25.439
<v Speaker 1>this thing can be generational or subgenerational, and we don't

1:35:25.479 --> 1:35:30.160
<v Speaker 1>see it. I do think I'm smoking. There's a few

1:35:30.200 --> 1:35:35.240
<v Speaker 1>things smoking. Maybe I would have said three or four

1:35:35.320 --> 1:35:40.679
<v Speaker 1>years ago, tackle football, where if you were on the left,

1:35:40.720 --> 1:35:43.719
<v Speaker 1>you might get judged by your friends on the left

1:35:43.920 --> 1:35:46.960
<v Speaker 1>on some of these things. So look, I do think

1:35:47.040 --> 1:35:50.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the core problems, and I've said this, is

1:35:50.120 --> 1:35:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that if there is a basic sort of one line

1:35:54.040 --> 1:35:58.320
<v Speaker 1>descriptor problem that the Democrats have is that the Democrats

1:35:58.360 --> 1:36:00.680
<v Speaker 1>seem to be always wanting to tell you how to

1:36:00.720 --> 1:36:03.160
<v Speaker 1>live your life, where Republicans are trying to agree with

1:36:03.600 --> 1:36:06.240
<v Speaker 1>are always going out of their way to agree with

1:36:06.320 --> 1:36:07.920
<v Speaker 1>your grievance about life.

1:36:08.160 --> 1:36:08.439
<v Speaker 2>Right.

1:36:10.439 --> 1:36:13.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's sort of the idea that in general,

1:36:13.479 --> 1:36:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Democrats are telling you, well you no, no, no, no,

1:36:16.880 --> 1:36:19.040
<v Speaker 1>that isn't the most important issue. This is really the

1:36:19.040 --> 1:36:21.200
<v Speaker 1>most important issue, versus the Republicans are saying, oh, you

1:36:21.200 --> 1:36:23.760
<v Speaker 1>think that's the most important, okay, Right, They go out

1:36:23.800 --> 1:36:25.360
<v Speaker 1>of their way to try to agree with the voters.

1:36:25.760 --> 1:36:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Democrats go out of their way to try to tell voters,

1:36:28.640 --> 1:36:30.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, no, no, no, you should think about it

1:36:30.439 --> 1:36:34.080
<v Speaker 1>this way. So, yes, I think there's I think this

1:36:34.720 --> 1:36:38.040
<v Speaker 1>what you've hit on something. I don't think it's as clean,

1:36:38.400 --> 1:36:41.519
<v Speaker 1>quite as clean as you've gotten it. But but I

1:36:41.560 --> 1:36:43.320
<v Speaker 1>know exactly what you mean, and I think it is

1:36:43.360 --> 1:36:47.120
<v Speaker 1>a there is a slight. It does feel as if

1:36:47.360 --> 1:36:50.519
<v Speaker 1>you're somehow. When I was growing up, it was the

1:36:50.560 --> 1:36:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Republicans that were the judge Party. Now it feels like

1:36:53.439 --> 1:36:56.479
<v Speaker 1>it's the Democrats of the judging Party. If we wanted

1:36:56.520 --> 1:36:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to be simplistic about it, and it's and it's something

1:36:58.800 --> 1:36:59.400
<v Speaker 1>they have to shed.

1:36:59.560 --> 1:37:00.360
<v Speaker 2>I know it.

1:37:01.360 --> 1:37:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Here's a good question for a local government administrator from Peoria, Illinois.

1:37:05.520 --> 1:37:09.599
<v Speaker 1>How's it playing in Peoria? An old phrase for an

1:37:09.600 --> 1:37:12.760
<v Speaker 1>older set, Chuck. I make a genuine effort to source

1:37:12.760 --> 1:37:15.040
<v Speaker 1>my news from multiple perspectives, and the Check podcast has

1:37:15.040 --> 1:37:16.639
<v Speaker 1>been one of my sources for a long time. Today,

1:37:16.680 --> 1:37:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I have two mostly unrelated questions. First, every empire rises

1:37:20.040 --> 1:37:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and falls. Are we currently living through the fall of

1:37:21.840 --> 1:37:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the American Empire? Second, as a timestamp, I'm listening to

1:37:24.560 --> 1:37:27.280
<v Speaker 1>your interview with Ian Bremner. Bremmer, what do you think

1:37:27.280 --> 1:37:30.040
<v Speaker 1>it would actually take for the magabase to abandon trump Ism,

1:37:30.040 --> 1:37:32.559
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily Trump himself given out strong echo chambers, or

1:37:32.560 --> 1:37:35.040
<v Speaker 1>for both parties. Hope you find either or both of

1:37:35.080 --> 1:37:37.920
<v Speaker 1>these worth tackling on a future pod. Happy Independence Day,

1:37:37.920 --> 1:37:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Scott Sorow Scott, I appreciate the question, and I guess

1:37:41.880 --> 1:37:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I would tackle it. You know, the last people to

1:37:48.040 --> 1:37:49.880
<v Speaker 1>know when an empire falls are those that are part

1:37:49.880 --> 1:37:58.960
<v Speaker 1>of the empire. Right, I'm I'm way back in my

1:37:59.080 --> 1:38:02.760
<v Speaker 1>previous life when I was working at National Journal and

1:38:02.840 --> 1:38:07.920
<v Speaker 1>also working a bit with The Atlantic. They and an

1:38:08.040 --> 1:38:13.000
<v Speaker 1>editor there who wrote a book that was titled Are

1:38:13.120 --> 1:38:16.360
<v Speaker 1>We Rome? And I think it came out in twenty ten, Right,

1:38:16.520 --> 1:38:19.200
<v Speaker 1>so you're talking, you know, here we are fifteen years later,

1:38:20.400 --> 1:38:23.639
<v Speaker 1>And for what it's worth, I feel like about every

1:38:23.680 --> 1:38:27.519
<v Speaker 1>fifteen or twenty years, this concept of hey, you know,

1:38:27.640 --> 1:38:29.559
<v Speaker 1>are we in the late stages of something? Is this

1:38:29.720 --> 1:38:32.679
<v Speaker 1>like late stage Roman empires collapse, et cetera, et cetera.

1:38:34.840 --> 1:38:37.400
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I think it's fair to say that

1:38:37.720 --> 1:38:42.000
<v Speaker 1>a fall of a country politics or constitution, or however

1:38:42.120 --> 1:38:45.280
<v Speaker 1>you would call the fall of the American Empire, it's

1:38:45.439 --> 1:38:48.320
<v Speaker 1>going to feel I'm sure it would feel the same way,

1:38:48.680 --> 1:38:51.559
<v Speaker 1>just like the metaphor about bankruptcy. Right first it happened slowly,

1:38:51.600 --> 1:38:54.519
<v Speaker 1>then quickly, right all of a sudden, it's gone. Right,

1:38:54.560 --> 1:38:58.000
<v Speaker 1>And we've seen that when the fall of leaders, right Assad,

1:38:58.240 --> 1:39:01.240
<v Speaker 1>when Assad fell, whoa we all I think eventually we

1:39:01.240 --> 1:39:04.000
<v Speaker 1>all thought eventually Aside's going to fall, but nobody knew

1:39:04.000 --> 1:39:05.679
<v Speaker 1>when it was going to happen. And then when it happened,

1:39:05.720 --> 1:39:09.040
<v Speaker 1>it just happened. It was like gone overnight. Now he's

1:39:09.080 --> 1:39:13.200
<v Speaker 1>shopping at Russian grocery stores. So you know, it is

1:39:13.240 --> 1:39:19.920
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that that I think that I

1:39:19.920 --> 1:39:23.639
<v Speaker 1>think the better way to look at it is if

1:39:23.640 --> 1:39:25.880
<v Speaker 1>we're not careful, we could end up on the path

1:39:26.200 --> 1:39:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and we could see the fall of the great democratic experiment.

1:39:29.840 --> 1:39:30.040
<v Speaker 2>Right.

1:39:30.880 --> 1:39:34.439
<v Speaker 1>The challenge to capitalism is that if we don't figure

1:39:34.439 --> 1:39:38.799
<v Speaker 1>out how to reform capitalism in a way that feels

1:39:38.840 --> 1:39:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that everybody's got a shot. If people feel as if

1:39:43.120 --> 1:39:48.080
<v Speaker 1>they don't have access to the American dream, the country's

1:39:48.120 --> 1:39:51.559
<v Speaker 1>politics is going to collapse. It just is because it's

1:39:51.600 --> 1:39:54.200
<v Speaker 1>when people feel like they don't have an ability to

1:39:54.200 --> 1:39:56.840
<v Speaker 1>make a living, they don't have an ability to better

1:39:56.880 --> 1:40:00.680
<v Speaker 1>their lives on their own, that's when governments fall. That's

1:40:00.720 --> 1:40:05.800
<v Speaker 1>when revolutions happen, that's when you're able to gather people up.

1:40:08.600 --> 1:40:10.680
<v Speaker 1>So if you look at it through that prism, right,

1:40:10.720 --> 1:40:12.240
<v Speaker 1>if you look at it to see you know, how

1:40:12.280 --> 1:40:14.800
<v Speaker 1>did Venezuelan fall? How did Turkey fall? If you will,

1:40:16.680 --> 1:40:19.040
<v Speaker 1>there are few things that concern me. I think our

1:40:19.120 --> 1:40:24.240
<v Speaker 1>rural urban divide is is UH is very makes us

1:40:24.360 --> 1:40:29.360
<v Speaker 1>very vulnerable to a collapse because when you look at

1:40:29.400 --> 1:40:35.639
<v Speaker 1>what happened to Venezuela, it was an authoritarian taking advantage

1:40:35.680 --> 1:40:39.479
<v Speaker 1>of poor, of the rural poor and pitting them against

1:40:39.479 --> 1:40:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the UH. The elites of Caracas. Airdwan got to power

1:40:45.520 --> 1:40:48.719
<v Speaker 1>using both religion and and and resentment at the elites

1:40:48.760 --> 1:40:52.639
<v Speaker 1>in Istumbul. You know his weakest is you know he's

1:40:52.640 --> 1:40:56.040
<v Speaker 1>weakest in Istumbul because that's where the money people live.

1:40:56.080 --> 1:40:58.200
<v Speaker 1>That's where the elites live. That's where they're basically the

1:40:58.240 --> 1:41:01.880
<v Speaker 1>pro Democrat, pro small deed to myocracy folks live. So

1:41:03.200 --> 1:41:10.519
<v Speaker 1>the the fact that that there is a monolithic political

1:41:10.560 --> 1:41:13.559
<v Speaker 1>identity in rural America, I think is potentially dangerous for us.

1:41:14.120 --> 1:41:16.120
<v Speaker 1>And it's why the Democratic Party has to find a

1:41:16.120 --> 1:41:20.920
<v Speaker 1>way back into because that's where the seeds of this

1:41:21.080 --> 1:41:24.759
<v Speaker 1>could could get worse. So I'm you know, I would

1:41:25.600 --> 1:41:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't put this as a flashing red light, but

1:41:29.080 --> 1:41:31.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's one of those if if we continue to

1:41:31.720 --> 1:41:35.320
<v Speaker 1>make bad decisions over the next decade or so, then yeah,

1:41:35.920 --> 1:41:38.200
<v Speaker 1>we may look back and say, oh, it's late stages

1:41:38.280 --> 1:41:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of of the fall of the American Empire. But I

1:41:42.080 --> 1:41:45.240
<v Speaker 1>choose to be optimistic. I choose to believe that We've

1:41:45.280 --> 1:41:51.599
<v Speaker 1>had these near misses before, Mcarthyism, isolationism, a civil war,

1:41:54.200 --> 1:41:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and we and we got through it. We're in one

1:41:57.400 --> 1:42:00.360
<v Speaker 1>of those moments. We're going to get through it. Why

1:42:00.360 --> 1:42:02.600
<v Speaker 1>do I believe that? Because why do I want to

1:42:02.640 --> 1:42:05.639
<v Speaker 1>believe the alternative? Ask for your second question, what would

1:42:05.640 --> 1:42:13.840
<v Speaker 1>get mega? Well, what brought the isolationists sort of what

1:42:13.960 --> 1:42:19.160
<v Speaker 1>brought the isolationists back to the mainstream in the nineteen thirties,

1:42:19.960 --> 1:42:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Pearl Harbor. So you're asking what would it take to

1:42:22.680 --> 1:42:27.599
<v Speaker 1>sort of for the MAGA world to essentially abandon trump Ism.

1:42:27.640 --> 1:42:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's two things. One if trumpsm harms their livelihood.

1:42:32.360 --> 1:42:35.479
<v Speaker 1>So I think the terror for the trade wars makes

1:42:35.520 --> 1:42:38.960
<v Speaker 1>it very vulnerable when it doesn't work, and I just

1:42:39.000 --> 1:42:41.280
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's going to work. But I'm you know,

1:42:41.840 --> 1:42:43.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be sitting here watching with the rest

1:42:43.560 --> 1:42:47.920
<v Speaker 1>of you when it fails. The people that are going

1:42:47.920 --> 1:42:50.839
<v Speaker 1>to get harmed the most are is that mega coalition. Particularly,

1:42:50.880 --> 1:42:53.280
<v Speaker 1>like I said, rural farmers, those in the agricultural sector

1:42:54.080 --> 1:42:58.160
<v Speaker 1>are going to get hit the hardest. That could be

1:42:58.200 --> 1:43:01.599
<v Speaker 1>one thing. But the isolation it's back was, you know,

1:43:01.720 --> 1:43:08.120
<v Speaker 1>an attack on Americans themselves. So you know, I have

1:43:08.760 --> 1:43:11.240
<v Speaker 1>one of my theories as to why we're so polarized

1:43:11.280 --> 1:43:14.200
<v Speaker 1>today is we don't have the Cold Wars as a

1:43:14.200 --> 1:43:17.160
<v Speaker 1>as a way to sort of keep people from going

1:43:17.200 --> 1:43:20.799
<v Speaker 1>to their political fringes, right, the threat of war with Russia,

1:43:20.920 --> 1:43:24.840
<v Speaker 1>nuclear war, fear of that the Cold War kept the

1:43:24.920 --> 1:43:30.280
<v Speaker 1>fringes in the fringe, and party leadership left and right

1:43:30.640 --> 1:43:33.760
<v Speaker 1>did their best to sort of right. There was an

1:43:33.800 --> 1:43:36.840
<v Speaker 1>agreement who the enemy was. There was a disagreement on

1:43:36.880 --> 1:43:41.320
<v Speaker 1>how to confront the enemy, but that was the divide. So,

1:43:42.760 --> 1:43:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, those would be the two ways that I

1:43:44.080 --> 1:43:48.479
<v Speaker 1>could envision Maga leaving Trump is and these folks leaving

1:43:48.479 --> 1:43:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Trump is. I'm gonna take one more question here and

1:43:51.400 --> 1:43:54.960
<v Speaker 1>then wrap it up for the for the day. This

1:43:55.040 --> 1:43:57.920
<v Speaker 1>comes from Micah Chuck You've talked extensively about the need

1:43:58.000 --> 1:44:01.080
<v Speaker 1>for more options for political parties in the States. Yes,

1:44:01.200 --> 1:44:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I just did it again. To the biggest factors of

1:44:03.320 --> 1:44:05.639
<v Speaker 1>poor performance in the pastor money and personality. If Must

1:44:05.680 --> 1:44:08.519
<v Speaker 1>launches this America Party, it seems like those two factors

1:44:08.520 --> 1:44:10.800
<v Speaker 1>are less of a problem. Obviously, he's very polarizing, and

1:44:10.800 --> 1:44:12.919
<v Speaker 1>while I myself do not agree with most of his ideas,

1:44:13.200 --> 1:44:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I am intrigued by the possibility that he could actually

1:44:15.400 --> 1:44:17.960
<v Speaker 1>rupture the two party system. He stated that his strategy

1:44:18.000 --> 1:44:19.439
<v Speaker 1>would focus on a few seats in the House in

1:44:19.479 --> 1:44:21.759
<v Speaker 1>the Senate. Which states do you think he would focus

1:44:21.800 --> 1:44:24.400
<v Speaker 1>on traditional swing states or red leaning libertarian es states?

1:44:24.600 --> 1:44:26.200
<v Speaker 1>And if he were to run for Senate in Texas

1:44:26.280 --> 1:44:28.719
<v Speaker 1>right now, could the combination of him and Paxton running

1:44:28.720 --> 1:44:31.320
<v Speaker 1>as the Republican be enough to give Democrats an even

1:44:31.360 --> 1:44:35.200
<v Speaker 1>greater fighting chance? Thanks Micah, Well, obviously, here I am

1:44:35.240 --> 1:44:38.360
<v Speaker 1>answering your question after I've given you the beginning of

1:44:38.360 --> 1:44:46.120
<v Speaker 1>this podcast my guide the states I would advise Must

1:44:46.160 --> 1:44:49.599
<v Speaker 1>to go through. And you add an important point, which

1:44:49.640 --> 1:44:52.200
<v Speaker 1>is Musk has Texas business ties. Right He's building his

1:44:52.240 --> 1:44:56.080
<v Speaker 1>own compound in Austin for all of his children, to

1:44:56.120 --> 1:44:57.880
<v Speaker 1>potentially live in. I don't think all of the mothers

1:44:57.880 --> 1:45:00.680
<v Speaker 1>of his children have decided they're comfortable living together in

1:45:00.720 --> 1:45:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a compound in Austin. But he's building one there and

1:45:03.400 --> 1:45:06.720
<v Speaker 1>hopeful for that he's trying to start. He's incorporated his

1:45:06.760 --> 1:45:10.120
<v Speaker 1>own city. We know that as well, with SpaceX there.

1:45:12.160 --> 1:45:14.479
<v Speaker 1>But no, I don't think Musk himself should run ask

1:45:14.800 --> 1:45:17.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, Henry Ford once ran for US any lost

1:45:17.520 --> 1:45:22.320
<v Speaker 1>primarily because he was exposed as an anti semi But

1:45:23.600 --> 1:45:28.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, the rich people that fund their own campaigns.

1:45:28.280 --> 1:45:30.840
<v Speaker 1>And I put that caveat on there because Donald Trump's

1:45:30.840 --> 1:45:32.719
<v Speaker 1>a rich person who did not fund his own campaign.

1:45:33.120 --> 1:45:35.240
<v Speaker 1>But rich people that fund their own campaigns usually make

1:45:35.320 --> 1:45:38.320
<v Speaker 1>terrible candidates because they think about everything through the prism

1:45:38.360 --> 1:45:40.120
<v Speaker 1>of their own. You know, this is theirs, they own it,

1:45:40.200 --> 1:45:45.080
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, et cetera. So I continue to believe the

1:45:45.120 --> 1:45:48.439
<v Speaker 1>best way Musk can help break up the two parties

1:45:48.920 --> 1:45:54.080
<v Speaker 1>is if he writes the checks and sort of handles

1:45:54.120 --> 1:45:56.320
<v Speaker 1>it the way he handles SpaceX, which is he lets

1:45:56.360 --> 1:45:58.880
<v Speaker 1>competent people run the day to day parts of the company,

1:45:58.880 --> 1:46:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and he plays dreamer. He plays pie in the sky guy,

1:46:01.840 --> 1:46:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and he plays funder. If that's what he is, maybe

1:46:06.400 --> 1:46:09.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a possibility there. The problem is must personality.

1:46:09.320 --> 1:46:12.240
<v Speaker 1>You can just see totally blowing this thing up and

1:46:12.320 --> 1:46:14.960
<v Speaker 1>becoming too definitional to the party. And then it's what's

1:46:15.000 --> 1:46:17.280
<v Speaker 1>going to scare people. I mean, I think, you know,

1:46:17.479 --> 1:46:21.719
<v Speaker 1>I think in all these places, you know, the minute

1:46:21.760 --> 1:46:24.960
<v Speaker 1>you introduce a third candidate that gets over five percent

1:46:25.000 --> 1:46:27.720
<v Speaker 1>of the vote, you scramble all of the coalitions and

1:46:27.840 --> 1:46:31.479
<v Speaker 1>it opens the door for all sorts of outcomes that

1:46:31.560 --> 1:46:35.760
<v Speaker 1>are unexpected. So in theory what you just described, yes,

1:46:35.880 --> 1:46:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Musk and Packston, Yeah, two very unlikable people. I do

1:46:39.920 --> 1:46:42.479
<v Speaker 1>think that opens the door. But I think if it's

1:46:42.520 --> 1:46:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Corn and Packxton and already I'd put my money on

1:46:44.960 --> 1:46:47.320
<v Speaker 1>corn and to win that three way race. And the

1:46:47.400 --> 1:46:49.599
<v Speaker 1>question is do you want what is the goal?

1:46:49.880 --> 1:46:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Right?

1:46:50.600 --> 1:46:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Is the goal to elect more of the of the

1:46:53.000 --> 1:46:57.040
<v Speaker 1>other party or is the goal to create a fulkroum

1:46:57.040 --> 1:47:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of folks who can sort of decide which side, sort

1:47:00.320 --> 1:47:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of the way that the the lib Dems had been

1:47:02.960 --> 1:47:04.880
<v Speaker 1>in the UK, right they were sort of the third

1:47:04.880 --> 1:47:07.120
<v Speaker 1>partyment would they work with conservatives? Would they work with

1:47:07.200 --> 1:47:11.639
<v Speaker 1>labor who needs the numbers? You know, maybe that the

1:47:11.640 --> 1:47:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Tories will become that party, that they'll be the third party.

1:47:14.439 --> 1:47:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Do they end up? You know, it'll be interesting. Would

1:47:17.439 --> 1:47:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Tories team up with the with Labor in order to

1:47:21.240 --> 1:47:24.920
<v Speaker 1>stop Nigel Ferrage and the Reform Party?

1:47:25.000 --> 1:47:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Right? You know?

1:47:25.720 --> 1:47:28.240
<v Speaker 1>So the point is, the minute you open the door

1:47:28.280 --> 1:47:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to a third and a fourth party, I think you

1:47:30.040 --> 1:47:32.880
<v Speaker 1>opened the door to all sorts of potential outcomes that

1:47:32.960 --> 1:47:37.080
<v Speaker 1>are unpredictable because we've not had many you know, we

1:47:37.120 --> 1:47:39.760
<v Speaker 1>don't have enough instances to know exactly we to sit

1:47:39.800 --> 1:47:41.880
<v Speaker 1>here and tell you for certainty which way things would go.

1:47:42.760 --> 1:47:45.360
<v Speaker 1>But again I go back to what would be healthier

1:47:45.360 --> 1:47:47.479
<v Speaker 1>for the democracy more choices?

1:47:47.800 --> 1:47:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Right?

1:47:49.360 --> 1:47:51.599
<v Speaker 1>Are you comfortable shopping at a store if you were

1:47:51.600 --> 1:47:53.519
<v Speaker 1>trying to buy a shirt and all they offered was

1:47:53.760 --> 1:47:55.080
<v Speaker 1>small and extra large?

1:47:55.760 --> 1:47:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Right?

1:47:56.280 --> 1:48:00.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's all we seem to to give the only

1:48:00.200 --> 1:48:02.240
<v Speaker 1>two options we get the voters when people would like

1:48:03.160 --> 1:48:04.920
<v Speaker 1>do they have extra small, do they have extra large?

1:48:05.040 --> 1:48:06.880
<v Speaker 1>They have medium? Do they have sh medium? Do they

1:48:06.880 --> 1:48:10.559
<v Speaker 1>have medium large. I'm not saying we need seven new parties,

1:48:11.840 --> 1:48:15.960
<v Speaker 1>but a more robust Libertarian party would be an interesting

1:48:16.120 --> 1:48:19.479
<v Speaker 1>check on the Republicans, and a more robust Forward Party

1:48:19.479 --> 1:48:22.719
<v Speaker 1>could be an interesting check on the Democrats. So there,

1:48:24.120 --> 1:48:27.640
<v Speaker 1>all right, I think I'm going to call it an episode.

1:48:27.680 --> 1:48:27.880
<v Speaker 2>There.

1:48:27.920 --> 1:48:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate you listening, Thanks for sticking with me spending time.

1:48:32.479 --> 1:48:35.000
<v Speaker 1>If you enjoyed the listen, give me that five star

1:48:35.040 --> 1:48:37.839
<v Speaker 1>review wherever you want to do it, Tell your friends

1:48:38.000 --> 1:48:40.360
<v Speaker 1>like and subscribe. By the way, have a sub stack,

1:48:40.720 --> 1:48:43.920
<v Speaker 1>so please go over there and subscribe to that. I

1:48:44.000 --> 1:48:48.960
<v Speaker 1>post every Tuesday, and I have a more detailed guide

1:48:49.160 --> 1:48:53.439
<v Speaker 1>to how and where a third party candidates could really

1:48:53.520 --> 1:48:56.360
<v Speaker 1>which states would it make the most sense to target

1:48:56.360 --> 1:48:58.639
<v Speaker 1>if you were Elon Musk, So you will enjoy that.

1:49:00.240 --> 1:49:00.599
<v Speaker 2>We got.

1:49:01.520 --> 1:49:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll have a new episode on the new Sphere app

1:49:05.160 --> 1:49:08.720
<v Speaker 1>coming up this Sunday with Rom Emmanuel, so be sure

1:49:08.760 --> 1:49:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to check that out as well. If you haven't had

1:49:10.800 --> 1:49:12.400
<v Speaker 1>your free try to go grab it so that you

1:49:12.439 --> 1:49:16.680
<v Speaker 1>can catch that episode in full. And with that, I'll

1:49:16.720 --> 1:49:18.160
<v Speaker 1>see you the next time we upload this