WEBVTT - Coreweave's CSO on the Business of Building AI Datacenters

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast.

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joe Wisenthal.

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Tracy, you know, we've done tons of course on like

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:34.559
<v Speaker 2>electricity and AI and data centers and all that stuff,

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 2>but we've never actually done like a well, we've never

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:41.560
<v Speaker 2>talked to someone who is building data centers.

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 1>Putting it all together, you mean.

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, putting it all together like what you know, just

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:47.880
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of you know, I've had consultants, so we

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 2>talked to energy people, but like, how does this business

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 2>of essentially, I guess, building a building, putting a bunch

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 2>of chips in there, getting the electricity, and then in theory,

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 2>selling all of that at a markup? Like, how does

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 2>it actually work?

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 3>You know?

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>What I was reading recently This is kind of a tangent,

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 1>but not really because we're talking about the physical and

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>financial process of building these things. But I saw this

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>is online. There's a guide to the like physical Planning

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>around an IBM system three sixty from like nineteen sixty

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:27.399
<v Speaker 1>three or something, and it's two hundred and thirteen pages long.

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Have you read it yet?

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I did flip through it, there's like there's guidance on

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>minimizing vibrations obviously, like temperature and humidity and stuff like that.

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I did not read the full two hundred pages, but

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of thinking like if this is what if

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>this is all the thinking that had to go into

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>like one computer, albeit a supercomputer in the nineteen sixties,

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>but like a pretty basic machine. When we look back

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>on it now, how much planning and thinking has to

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>go into building like these huge cloud servers and all

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>their associated infrastry structure, both physical and software as well.

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 2>No, totally, and you know, we you know, one of

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 2>the ways that we've touched on this subject a little

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 2>bit is in our conversations with Steve Eisman, who's been

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 2>investing at least as far as we know, in a

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:19.079
<v Speaker 2>lot of these like industrial HVAC companies and electricity gear

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 2>companies and stuff like that. So like companies that have

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 2>actually been around for a really long time, sort of

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 2>standard cyclical businesses, and then they've like caught the secular

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 2>tailwind because with this boom in AI data center construction,

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 2>suddenly there's this sort of continuous bid for all their

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 2>gear and services.

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to start an anti vibration floor maker or something.

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that's a viable business? Does anyone care

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>about vibrations anymore?

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 2>I am certain that in various high tech environments you

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 2>do not want to have vibrations. You know, you have

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 2>like a valuable chips, you don't want them to be

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:54.639
<v Speaker 2>like degrading.

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Because people are walking around.

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, or just you know what, all the machine and

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 2>all your air conditioners and equipment and all that stuff,

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 2>you can't be having that stuff degrade.

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, the other interesting thing that's happening in the space now,

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>So in addition to the physical challenge of building a

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>bunch of this stuff, there's also the financial aspect of it.

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>And I guess as AI becomes more and more of

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>a thing, and clearly, as you laid out, there's a

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of enthusiasm around the space. At the moment, you

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>are seeing a bunch of financial entities get interested as well.

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:29.799
<v Speaker 1>So obviously venture capital has been pouring money into the space,

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>but we're starting to see some new types of financial

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>investments in AI. And I'm thinking about one thing in particular,

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>and it is the recent GPU or chip backed loan

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>that was reported by the Wall Street Journal and I

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>think we should talk about that aspect.

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Of it too, totally, because one of the things that's

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 2>happening in tech is this big sort of shift from like, okay,

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 2>we're all of your costs in the past, where a

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 2>lot of them were sort of op x, the cost

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 2>of engineers, et cetera. And now suddenly tech companies have

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 2>to think about CAPEX for the first time, these big

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 2>upfront costs that are in theory going to pay off

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 2>for a long time, which in theory then changes how

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 2>you should think about the financing model.

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely well, I am.

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Excited to say because we literally do have the perfect

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 2>guest we're going to be speaking with, Brian Venturo. He

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 2>is the chief strategy officer at core Weave. Corewave. For

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:27.480
<v Speaker 2>those who don't know, it's probably the company right now

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 2>that people most associate with being at the heart of

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:35.359
<v Speaker 2>the AI data center boom. They have a bunch of

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 2>in video chips, they have investments from in Nvidio right

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 2>here in the sweet spot. As you mentioned, one of

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 2>the interesting things that's going on is they not long

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 2>ago announced a debt financing facility sit back basically by

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:53.679
<v Speaker 2>the GPUs that they would acquire, so literally the perfect

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 2>person to understand like the business of these AI cloud

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 2>data center So Brian, thank you so much for coming in.

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for having me. It's the second time I've been

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 3>on the podcast.

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 2>That's right. We talked to Brian years ago. It's interesting

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 2>to think about at that time because I think that

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 2>may have been like twenty twenty or twenty one, and

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 2>the excitement then was that these chips could be used

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 2>for crypto mining and other things like sort of distributed

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 2>video editing and stuff like that, and then Ethereum stopped

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 2>using mining. But it was sort of fortuitous timing because

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 2>right around then AI went crazy and that's probably I

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 2>don't know, in my view, maybe a higher use of

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:34.479
<v Speaker 2>these chips before we get to that. Do you worry

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 2>about vibration in your data center?

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 3>So everywhere that's close to a fault line is designed

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 3>around that and is part of code. So you know,

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 3>the engineering firms that help us build these data centers

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 3>have taken all of that into account, and all of

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 3>our racks are you know, seismically tuned to make sure

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:57.239
<v Speaker 3>that we can withstand the normal vibration from the Earth.

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, it's been something that's been in those annuals

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:03.360
<v Speaker 3>for a long time. Some of our hardwer manufacturers actually

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:06.479
<v Speaker 3>have vibration testing labs where they put the racks on

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:08.839
<v Speaker 3>top of a big kind of platform that shakes, and

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 3>it's pretty dangerous and uncontrollable and hard to watch. But

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:14.239
<v Speaker 3>you know, there's people out there that have been solving

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 3>this problem for decades.

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Now I missed the boat on that business choir. It

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 1>sounds like it's been dealt with decades ago. Okay, well, actually,

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>why didn't I start with a very simple question, which

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>is when when you're looking at the business of core Weave,

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>so a specialized cloud service provider, let's put it that way,

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>what are the different components that you have to think about?

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:41.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, Joe kind of alluded to all these different

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>ingredients that go into the business, but walk us through

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>what those actually are.

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Sure, so, there's there's three pieces that as a management team,

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 3>we think are incredibly critical to the business. The first is,

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:55.479
<v Speaker 3>you know, our technology services that we provide on top

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 3>of the hardware, right and this is everything from the

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 3>software layer through the support organization to you know, how

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 3>we work with our customers. This isn't the type of

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 3>thing that you just go plug in and it works.

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.279
<v Speaker 3>In these large supercomputer clusters, there may be two hundred

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 3>thousand infinibank connections that connect all the GPUs together, and

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 3>if one of those connections fails for whatever reason, the

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 3>job will completely stop and have to restart from its

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 3>previous checkpoints. So, you know, everything that we do on

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 3>the software side and engineering side is to make sure

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 3>these clusters are as resilient and performant as they possibly

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 3>can be to ensure you know, our customers can run

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 3>their jobs, you know, increase efficiency and get all of

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 3>the kind of monetary value they can out of the chips.

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 3>So technology piece is really hard. It's something that I

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 3>think is very overlooked by the market, but it's just

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 3>as hard as the two other kind of pieces that

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 3>this business stands on. The second is, you know, the

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 3>physical nature of the business in that you have to

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 3>actually build and run these data centers and those hundreds

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 3>of thousands connections inside the supercomputers. Like somebody has to

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 3>go put those together and make sure they're clean and

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 3>make sure they're labeled correctly to be able to remediate failures.

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 3>And when you're building a thirty two thousand GPU supercomputer

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 3>that is one of the fastest three computers in the planet.

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 3>You know, you're running thousands of miles of cable inside

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 3>a very dense space, right. These data centers are built

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 3>very tiny to make sure that you can connect everything together,

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 3>and that becomes a huge logistical challenge. So, you know,

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 3>the data centerpiece, which we're going to talk more about today,

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 3>is very challenging to design for the use case. And

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 3>then the third piece is how the hell do you

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:32.959
<v Speaker 3>finance the whole thing? Right, And you know, we've been

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 3>very successful in the financing aspect of this, but you know,

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 3>whether you're financing technology operations or the physical build of

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 3>these things, it is an incredibly capital intensive business and

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 3>constructing those financial instruments to back our business is very hard,

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 3>and we have to be very very thoughtful around who

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 3>the counterparties are, how do we think about credit risk,

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 3>how do our investors think about that credit risk, How

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:59.319
<v Speaker 3>do we deal with contingencies inside the contracts to make

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 3>sure that they are financeable on the scale that we've

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 3>done over the last eighteen months.

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Talk to us a little bit more. We could probably

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:09.319
<v Speaker 2>talk about data center financing credit and have have that

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 2>be a whole episode, but when you think about you

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:16.079
<v Speaker 2>have to think about your counter party's credit risk. Talk

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 2>to us a little bit about what you're who those are,

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 2>what the type of entity is.

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 3>Sure, so I'll get myself in trouble if I just

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 3>start naming them off. Yeah, some of them are more

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:28.559
<v Speaker 3>public than others. You know, I'm going to refer to

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 3>them as you know, hyperscale customers. We have AI lab customers,

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 3>we have large enterprise customers. We've really constructed our portfolio

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 3>of business around the idea that you know, if we're

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 3>going to build ten billion dollars of infrastructure for somebody,

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 3>we have to know there's a balance sheet we can

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 3>lean into behind it, right, and we're the pace at

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 3>which we've grown. You know, our customers are demanding scale

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 3>so quickly that the credit of the counterparty is incredibly

0:09:57.360 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 3>important to find the low cost of capital we have

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 3>with these ADIT facilities we've announced, right, So you know,

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 3>when people talk about how this is a credit facility

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 3>backed by GPUs, it's not really backed by GPUs. It's

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 3>backed by you know, commercial contracts with large international enterprises

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 3>that may have triple a credit, right, So you know

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 3>it's it's the framing of the.

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Aid receivables finance.

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 3>Basically it's closer to trade receivables financing than it is Hey,

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 3>we're going to go leverage up a bunch of GPUs

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:22.959
<v Speaker 3>and see what happens.

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Huh, okay, well walk us through the I guess like

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the sequence in some of these financing agreements. So you know,

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:33.959
<v Speaker 1>if a customer comes to you and they say, we

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>want a certain amount of compute, can you do this

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>for us? And you start going down the process of like, okay,

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:43.320
<v Speaker 1>what do we need to make this happen? What do

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 1>those like financial agreements actually look like. And who's bearing

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the initial risk? Is it the customer? Is it you?

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Good question?

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 3>So when we're approached by a customer, right, you know,

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 3>the ask is typically going to be pretty pretty general,

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 3>and they're going to say, hey, we're looking for facity

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 3>in Q one of next year. What's the largest thing

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 3>you can do? And you know, we take that effectively

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 3>as a mandate of okay, hey, you know this customer.

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:09.199
<v Speaker 2>We're not business.

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 3>But before you know, we're really comfortable with them, we

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 3>know that we're going to get a contract done. We'll

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:14.719
<v Speaker 3>go out and we'll try to secure an asset to

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, to go build it. And we may have

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 3>it in our portfolio already. We maybe it may have

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 3>been a strategic investment that we made. But once we

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 3>find the data center asset, that's when we go back

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 3>to the customer and say, okay, like we can commit

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 3>to doing this. This is the timeline. We'll structure a

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 3>contract around it. Depending upon who the customer is. There

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 3>may or may not be some credit support associated with

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 3>it around the scaling of the you know, that asset,

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 3>and then we'll get a commercial contract in place, and

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 3>we will initially fund a large portion of that project

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 3>off of our own balance sheet. Right. It's why you

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 3>also see us raising equity, right, is we have to

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 3>have the capital to accelerate the business. And then once

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:52.439
<v Speaker 3>we have that and we're making progress, you know, think

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 3>about it as you're building real estate. Right, you have

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 3>a construction loan and then you have a stabilized asset loan,

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:59.439
<v Speaker 3>and we basically fund the construction loan piece off of

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 3>our balance sheet. When we get to a more stabilized asset,

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:03.679
<v Speaker 3>that's when we go out and kind of do that

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 3>trade financing or trade receivables financing our with our partner lenders.

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 3>You know, they worked with us before, they know that

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 3>these things are going to stand up, They know how

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 3>they perform, and at that point in time, it's it's

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 3>pretty easy for them to underwrite that risk.

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:35.479
<v Speaker 2>It's funny. Tracy and I had coffee with someone yesterday

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 2>who is sort of in the space I want docs here,

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:40.560
<v Speaker 2>And I was like, what should we ask Brian? And

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 2>he's like, ask him why he won't let my company,

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 2>why I'm still on the waiting list or something, or

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 2>why he hasn't approved my company to use core weave.

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 2>But what are some of the bars or the threshold?

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 2>So you know, I apparently there's a lot of demand

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 2>for compute these days. What does it take to get

0:12:57.360 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 2>in the door and get access to some of your

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:01.319
<v Speaker 2>chips and electricity?

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 3>So it's it's a great question. It's a question that

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 3>we get all the time from our sales teams, right

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 3>is you know, we're faced a lot with a sales

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 3>team that is incredible at delivering product to customer and

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 3>we don't have anything to sell. And it's kind of

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 3>my job. As the strategy organization at Core, We've were

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 3>responsible for two things. It's product and infrastructure. Capacity, and

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, I spend most of my time going out

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 3>and finding those data centers and being able to support

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 3>those deals and the growth that we had over the

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 3>past twelve months. The company was pretty flat out right

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 3>in building and delivering this infrastructure. You know, publicly on

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 3>our documentation page it says that we have three regions.

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 3>We'll have twenty eight regions online by the end of

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:44.439
<v Speaker 3>the year. I think we delivered eleven of them in

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 3>Q one alone, Right, So we're building at a scale,

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, i'd say that almost larger than some of

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 3>the three big hyperscalers. But in terms of how do

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:56.959
<v Speaker 3>you become a customer of Core, it's really relationship driven,

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 3>right is. We want to make sure that we're going

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 3>to be able to be successfu with our customers and

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:03.679
<v Speaker 3>have an engineering relationship and we're aligned on what they

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:04.079
<v Speaker 3>need and.

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 2>We can deliver what they need.

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 3>The last thing that we want is for somebody to

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 3>walk in the door and say, hey, I need this

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 3>for three weeks and two weeks into it, they're unhappy

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 3>and we can't give them what they need to be successful.

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 3>Right is, you know, our customers are making such large

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 3>investments in this infrastructure, that we have to have, you know,

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 3>a lot of conviction that we will be successful with

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 3>them and provide a good experience. So it's not that

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 3>we're trying to keep people out, it's we're trying to

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 3>ensure positive experiences for people that we do bring on board.

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Do you build complete housed facilities or is it all

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 2>you're going to bring your chips and expertise into an

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 2>existing Tier one data center and essentially rent floor space

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 2>from them.

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so a year ago it was we were effectively

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 3>just a co location tenant, and now we've gone a

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 3>lot more vertical for some strategic builds where we're either

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 3>a partner in the project where we own equity and

0:14:56.680 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 3>the development company, or we're building the project ourselves. We've

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 3>been scaling that team up over the past six months,

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 3>and we had to at our scale to be able

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 3>to guarantee outcomes. Right, is, we were in a position

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 3>where we had data centers getting delayed with things that

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 3>weren't communicated to us, and you know, we had to

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 3>go build the capability to handle that situation and you know,

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 3>make sure we can still deliver for our customers.

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>One of the differentiators that you and some of your

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 1>colleagues have emphasized previously, is this idea that you're designing

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the server clusters kind of from the ground up, whereas

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>like other hyperscalers maybe are doing it on a sort

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of different mass scale. But can you walk us through

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>like what is the benefit of doing it that way?

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>And then secondly, does that end up being an impediment

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>to I guess efficiencies or economics of scale and how

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>customized Like do you really get here?

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 3>So from a customization perspective, it's aggressive, right, And I

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 3>say that because you know, our customers are involved in

0:15:57.040 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 3>the design of you know, our network topology of the

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 3>East West fabric for the GPU to GPU communication, for

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 3>things like cooling. You know, I have customers that toward

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 3>the data centers under construction process with me like once

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 3>a week, and it's to the point that they're impacting

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 3>how we build the base level networking products to ensure

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 3>they have enough throughput to you know, meet their use

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 3>case needs. Whereas in you know, what I what we

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 3>call the legacy hyperscaler installations, It maybe they have a

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 3>couple thousand GPUs that are in a data center that

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 3>was really built for CPU computation or to provide services

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 3>to ten thousand customers that is really with a much

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 3>lower base expectation of what they're going to be doing. Right,

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 3>So it's things around connectivity for storage, it's things around

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 3>power and cooling, It's things around how they want to

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 3>be able to optimize their workloads inside of the GPU

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 3>to GPU communication. You know, we have some customers that

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 3>even customize their infiniban fabrics and the size of those

0:16:57.240 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 3>fabrics and how they connect together. So you know, we

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 3>work with them to really understand what their use case is,

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 3>where they're worried currently and in the future, and then

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 3>design around that. So it's a pretty comprehensive program when

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 3>we're building something from the ground up.

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>And how much complexity does that introduce into the business

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and does it end up being a limiting factor on

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:18.199
<v Speaker 1>your growth or is demand just so strong at the

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>moment that it's not really an issue.

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 3>The customization that we do is typically going to be

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 3>above what our base level offering is, meaning the environment

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 3>will be more performant because the customer required it. So

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 3>it's typically not going to be limiting to us from

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 3>a future you know, revenue or resale perspective. It's going

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 3>to make the asset more valuable. But you know, we're

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 3>we're designing our reference builds for ninety nine percent of

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 3>use cases, and we're trying to price it efficiently, and

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 3>then when customer wants something above and beyond, you know,

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:49.360
<v Speaker 3>it impacts price. But for these installations it's probably deminimus, right,

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 3>So you know, it doesn't really add a lot of

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:54.919
<v Speaker 3>complexity for us from a business perspective, so we're happy

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:55.239
<v Speaker 3>to do it.

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned that some of the hyperscalers, yes they have GPUs,

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 2>but they like built in an environment for like legacy CPUs.

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Can you talk a little bit about a just the

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 2>difference between the legacy architectures and the new one and

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 2>then in the design, like what kind of bottlenecks you

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 2>run into? Is there issues with labor like the types

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 2>of people who know how to string these things together well,

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 2>or other different cooling requirements for this type of compute

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:28.439
<v Speaker 2>environment that did not exist, Like what are what are

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 2>the challenges in building out these sort of like fundamentally

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 2>different environments.

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so that that's changed also in the last twelve

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:38.640
<v Speaker 3>months in that you used to be able to take

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 3>what was an enterprise data center and you know, creatively

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 3>retrofit it to be capable of supporting the AI workloads

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 3>to a certain density level. Okay, right, Like instead of

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 3>filling up a cabinet, you could put two servers in

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:52.439
<v Speaker 3>a cabinet and you could meet the power and cooling

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 3>requirements of the installation. It you use a lot more

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:59.360
<v Speaker 3>floor space, but it was doable. One of the incredible

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 3>things about is that they're always pushing the boundary on

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:04.919
<v Speaker 3>the engineering side, and their next generation of chips is

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:08.400
<v Speaker 3>largely dependent upon much more aggressive heat transfer, and they've

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 3>introduced liquid cooling to the reference architectures. So as liquid

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 3>cooling comes in, it changes what type of data center

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:18.239
<v Speaker 3>is capable of doing this, and it truly requires that

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 3>ground up redesign and almost greenfield only build to support it.

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:25.640
<v Speaker 3>Is you've gone from an environment where you could take

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 3>an enterprise data center and deploy less servers per cabinet

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 3>and get away with it to hey, nobody's ever built

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 3>this before. It's at an incredible scale and it has

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:37.399
<v Speaker 3>to happen on a yearly cadence now, so the data

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 3>center industry is in't a full sprint to figure out, Okay,

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 3>how do we do this? How do we do it quickly?

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 3>How do we operationalize it right? And you know that's

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:46.680
<v Speaker 3>kind of where I've been spending all of my time

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 3>over the past six months.

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Can I ask a really basic question, and we've done

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:53.959
<v Speaker 1>episodes on this, but I would be very interested in

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>your opinion, But why does it feel like customers and

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:02.719
<v Speaker 1>AI customers in particular, are so I don't know if

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>addicted is the right word, but like so devoted to

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:10.160
<v Speaker 1>in Nvidia chips, Like what is it about them specifically

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 1>that is so attractive? How much of it is due

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 1>to like the technology versus say, maybe the interoperability.

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 3>So you have to understand that when you're an AI

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:25.239
<v Speaker 3>lab that has just started and it is a it's

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:27.439
<v Speaker 3>an arms race in the industry to deliver product and

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:30.880
<v Speaker 3>models as fast as possible, that it's an existential risk

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 3>to you that you don't have your infrastructure be like

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 3>your Achilles heel. Right, And and Vidia has proven to

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:44.119
<v Speaker 3>be a number of things. One is they're the engineers

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:49.879
<v Speaker 3>of the best products, right. They are an engineering organization first,

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:52.640
<v Speaker 3>and that they identify and solve problems. They push the limits.

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, they're willing to listen to customers and help

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 3>you solve problems and design things around new use cases.

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 3>But it's not just creating good hardware. It's creating good

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 3>hardware that's scales and they can support at scale. And

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 3>when you're building these installations that are hundreds of thousands

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 3>of components on the accelerator side and the infinband link side,

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 3>it all has to work together well. And when you

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 3>go to somebody like in Video that has done this

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:19.680
<v Speaker 3>for so long at scale, with such engineering expertise, they

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 3>eliminate so much of that existential risk for these startups. Right.

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 3>So when I look at it and I see some

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 3>of these smaller startups saying we're going to go a

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:29.640
<v Speaker 3>different route, I'm like, what are you doing? Right? You're

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:32.640
<v Speaker 3>taking so much risk for no reason here? Right, this

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 3>is a proven solution, it's the best solution, and it

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:38.399
<v Speaker 3>has the most community support, right, Like go the easy

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 3>path because the venture you're embarking on is hard enough.

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Is it like the old what was that old adage?

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:46.879
<v Speaker 1>Like no one ever got fired for buying Microsoft? Is

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>it like no, yeah, or IBM something like that.

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 3>But the thing here is that it's not even nobody's

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 3>getting fired for buying the tried and true and slower

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 3>moving thing. It's nobody's getting fired for buying the tried,

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 3>true and best performing and you know bleeding edge thing.

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 3>So I look at the folks that are buying other

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 3>products and investing and other products almost as like they're trying.

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 3>They almost have a chip on their shoulder and they're

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 3>going against the mold just to do it.

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:17.880
<v Speaker 2>There are competitors to in video that they claim cheaper

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 2>or more application specific chips. I think Intel came out

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 2>with something like that. First of all, from the core

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:30.640
<v Speaker 2>weave perspective, are you all in on in video hardware?

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:31.439
<v Speaker 3>We are?

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Could that change?

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 3>The party line is that we're always going to be

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 3>driven by customers, right, and we're going to be driven

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 3>by customers to the chip that is most performant, provides

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:47.479
<v Speaker 3>the best TCO, is best supported and right now and

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 3>in what I think is the foreseeable future, like I

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 3>believe that is strongly in video.

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Think about okay, maybe one day you guys IPO And

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking through the risk factors, and one of the

0:22:56.840 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 2>risk factors, right, we have a heavy reliance on in

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 2>video chips. There is a risk that a competitor thing,

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:05.919
<v Speaker 2>what would it take for one of these competitors that

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 2>does ostensibly over cheaper or hardware or perhaps lower electricity

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 2>consumption in your view, To make one of those risk

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:15.120
<v Speaker 2>factors real.

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 3>I think that they'd have to be willing to quote

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 3>unquote buy the market. And when I say that, I

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:24.199
<v Speaker 3>mean they'd have to subsidize their hardware to get a

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.439
<v Speaker 3>material market share. And from what I've seen, there's no

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:29.640
<v Speaker 3>one else that's really been willing to do that so far.

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 2>And what about Meta with Piedtorch and all their chips.

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:36.479
<v Speaker 3>So they're in house chips. I think they have those

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 3>for very very specific production applications, but they're not really

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 3>general purpose chips, okay, right, And I think that when

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 3>you're building something for general purpose and there has to

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:49.159
<v Speaker 3>be flexibility in the use case. While you can go

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:52.399
<v Speaker 3>build a custom AASIC to solve very specific problems, I

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:54.679
<v Speaker 3>don't think it makes sense to invest in those to

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 3>go to be a five year ass set if you

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 3>don't necessarily know what you're going to do with it.

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:03.439
<v Speaker 1>So you talked about the advantages of Nvidia hardware like

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:05.919
<v Speaker 1>the chips themselves, but one of the things you sometimes

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 1>hear is that those same chips might perform differently in

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:13.200
<v Speaker 1>different clouds. So what is it that you can do

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to sort of boost the performance of the same chip

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>in your structure or ecosystem versus say an AWS or

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:22.439
<v Speaker 1>someone like that.

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:24.440
<v Speaker 3>Sure, a great question. We do a lot of work

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:26.959
<v Speaker 3>around this internally and it's a big part of our

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:30.919
<v Speaker 3>technical differentiation. And what we call it internally is mission control.

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 3>And mission control is effectively a portfolio of different services

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:37.399
<v Speaker 3>that we run on our infrastructure to make sure that

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 3>these incredibly complex supercomputers are healthy and performant and are optimized,

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, where we take a lot of that responsibility

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 3>off of our customer engineering teams, right, And it sounds

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 3>like that might be an easy lift, but when you're

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:54.679
<v Speaker 3>running supercomputer scale, you know you need a team of

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 3>fifty to do that, right, So we provide a ton

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 3>of software automation around that, providing that health checking and

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:03.680
<v Speaker 3>observed ability to our customers. But it's also the engineering engagement, right,

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 3>is you know, working with our customers to understand, Okay,

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 3>what are you doing, what's the best way to optimize this,

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 3>how do we you know, how did we design the

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:12.919
<v Speaker 3>data center to be more performant, to make sure your

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 3>storage solution was correct, Your networking solution was correct. So

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:20.120
<v Speaker 3>it's not just a hey core we've provides like this

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 3>one little thing that makes it better. It's the comprehensive solutions,

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 3>starting from the data center design, through the software automation

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 3>and health checking and monitoring, via mission control, via the

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 3>engineering relationships that really add that value.

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about electricity, because this has become this huge

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 2>talking point that this is the major constraint and now

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 2>that you're becoming more vertically integrated and having to stand

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 2>up more of your operations. We talked to one guy

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:46.199
<v Speaker 2>formerly at Microsoft who said, you know, one of the

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 2>issues that there may be a backlash in some communities

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 2>who don't want, you know, their scarce electricity to go

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 2>to data centers when they could go to household air conditioning.

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 2>What are you running into right now or what are

0:25:57.880 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 2>you seeing?

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 3>So we've been very very selective on where we put

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 3>data centers. We don't have anything in Ashburn, Virginia, right

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 3>and the Northern Virginia market, I think is incredibly saturated.

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of growing backlash in that market around

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 3>power usage and you know, just thinking about how do

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:15.440
<v Speaker 3>you get enough diesel trucks in there to refill generators

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 3>that they have a prolonged outage.

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:20.159
<v Speaker 3>So I think that there's some markets where it's just

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:23.160
<v Speaker 3>like okay, like to stay away from that, and when

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:26.159
<v Speaker 3>the grids have issues and that market hasn't really had

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 3>an issue yet, it becomes an acute problem immediately. Like

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:32.159
<v Speaker 3>just think about the Texas power market crisis back in

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 3>I think it's twenty twenty one, twenty twenty, where the

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 3>grid wasn't really set up to be able to handle

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 3>the frigid temperatures and they had natural gas valves that

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 3>were freezing off at the natural gas generation plants that

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 3>didn't allow them to actually come online and produce electricity

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 3>no matter how high the price was. Right. So there's

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:51.239
<v Speaker 3>there's going to be these acute issues that you know,

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:53.439
<v Speaker 3>people are going to learn from and the regulators are

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:55.119
<v Speaker 3>going to learn from to make sure they don't happen again.

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 3>And we're kind of citing our our plants and markets

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 3>where our data centers and markets where we think the

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:04.160
<v Speaker 3>grid infrastructure is capable of handling it right, And it's

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 3>not just is there enough power, it's also on things.

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:10.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, AI workloads are pretty volatile in how much

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 3>power they use, and they're volatile because you know, every

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 3>fifteen minutes or every thirty minutes, you effectively stop the

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 3>job to save the progress you've made, right, and it's

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 3>so expensive to run these clusters that you don't want

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 3>to lose hundreds of thousands of dollars of progress, So

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:26.680
<v Speaker 3>they take a minute, they do what's called checkpointing, where

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 3>they write the current state of the job back to storage,

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 3>and that checkpointing time, your power usage basically goes from

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 3>one hundred percent to like ten percent, and then it

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:37.439
<v Speaker 3>goes right back up again when it's done saving it.

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 3>So that load volatility on a local market will create

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 3>either voltage spikes or voltage SAgs, and a voltage sag

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:47.120
<v Speaker 3>is what you see is what causes a brown out

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 3>that we used to see a lot of times when

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 3>people turn their cognitioners on and it's thinking through, Okay,

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 3>how do I ensure that, you know, my AI installation

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 3>doesn't cause a brown out when people are turning their

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:00.239
<v Speaker 3>you know, during checkpointing, when people are turning the air

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 3>conditioners on. Like that's the type of stuff that we're

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 3>thoughtful around, like how do we make sure we don't

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:07.680
<v Speaker 3>do this right. And you know, talking to engineerings and

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 3>in Video's engineering expertise, like they're working on this problem

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:13.400
<v Speaker 3>as well, and there they've solved this for the next generation.

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:17.160
<v Speaker 3>So it's everything from is there enough power there? What's

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 3>the source of that power? You know, how clean is it?

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 3>How do we make sure that we're investing in solar

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 3>and stuff in the area to make sure that we're

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:26.120
<v Speaker 3>not just taking power from the grid. To also when

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 3>we're using that power, how is it going to impact

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:28.920
<v Speaker 3>the consumers around us?

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you more about what in Nvidia

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:34.160
<v Speaker 1>is doing, but just on that note, what's the most

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 1>important metric for evaluating a data center's quality or performance?

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Is it like days without brownouts or an interrupted power supply,

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 1>or is it measures of efficiency like power usage effectiveness

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. If I'm serving a bunch of

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 1>data centers, I want to pick a good one. What

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>should I be looking for?

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 3>So right now, the market's pretty thin, So right now.

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Options Okay, I imagine I'm like the biggest customer on

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:04.960
<v Speaker 1>earth and I can get in anywhere. What should I

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>be looking for?

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 3>So it's the first thing goes back to the electricity piece, right,

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:13.719
<v Speaker 3>is the grid stable? Is there enough power supply? You know,

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 3>is there excess renewable generation in the area that doesn't

0:29:16.720 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 3>have the ability to make it too downstream consumers? Right?

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 3>A lot of the renewables that we have in the

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 3>US are built in places that don't necessarily have the consumers.

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 3>So you're citing these data centers in places where you

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 3>have this excess supply, So that that's the first piece, right,

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 3>is how good is the electricity supply? And how angry

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 3>are the people around me going to be if I

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 3>take it? Now? You go from there into everything else

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:41.560
<v Speaker 3>is kind of solvable, right, And the way that you

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 3>design it, and if you're building a green field, it's okay.

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:46.719
<v Speaker 3>You know what type of ups systems am I putting in?

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 3>Are they capable of handling that load volatility?

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 2>You know?

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 3>How am I thinking about my cooling solutions? There's been

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 3>a big shift to liquid cooling, right, and liquid cooling

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 3>from a PE perspective, isn't a thirty to forty percent

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 3>decrease in electricity utilization like people think? It's more like

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 3>sixty to seventy percent, right, And the reason for that

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 3>is it's not just the efficiency of the data center plant.

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 3>It's also that now if you're not cooling things with air,

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 3>you don't have to run the fans inside the servers

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 3>as well. And for these AI installations, because they're so dense,

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 3>the fans consume a lot of energy. Right. So everything

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 3>that we're building now is a combination of liquid and

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 3>air cooling, right. And the liquid cooling piece has solved

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 3>the PUE issue, right, And we're everything we're doing is

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 3>trying to say, Okay, how much power can we use

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 3>only for running our critical IT operations versus cooling the

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 3>environment making sure the environment's running correctly from a resiliency perspective,

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 3>And there's been big strides made there over the last

0:30:48.880 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 3>whole months.

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Does colocation trump grid reliability? Like if I'm Elon Musk

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 1>building some sort of new AI thing as I think

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 1>he's doing in Texas, say like, am I just going

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to have to find a data center in Texas? Or

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 1>how much flexibility do I have to use one further away?

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 3>So great question, it's it's a different answer for different

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 3>use cases at different times. And right now, you know,

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 3>we were in the middle of this rush to train

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 3>whether they're open source or proprietary foundation models at the largest,

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 3>most valuable companies in the world, and they're mostly worried

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 3>about access to contiguous compute capacity. Right, how much compute

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:49.959
<v Speaker 3>can I get in one location, all connected together so

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 3>I can go faster than the next guy. But when

0:31:52.720 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 3>the models are trained, they want that compute to then

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 3>be local to their customer base, right, is how do

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 3>they take it from the middle of nowhere and then

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 3>go serve it in the metropolitan markets. And as the

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 3>use cases are more distilled and they get more real time,

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 3>think like the type ahead suggestions that you get in

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 3>your Gmail account right as you're typing something, and it's

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 3>getting better and better. It's you know, that's an AI

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 3>model somewhere like predicting what you would want to say next,

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 3>And they want to make sure that's delivered at human speed.

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 3>So that human speed is a latency consideration. Right as

0:32:26.080 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 3>you're citing those GPUs and you're citing that compute to

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 3>be locals to the people that are using it. So

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 3>that move has started probably four months ago where we

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 3>saw customers finally becoming concern around latency for their serving

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 3>use cases. So initially training people don't really care where

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 3>it is cheap power, reliable grid. They just need it

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:48.440
<v Speaker 3>all contiguous and they need it fast. And then down

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 3>the road as their applications find success, they're more worried

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 3>about where the compute is for their customers.

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:54.720
<v Speaker 2>What are some of the areas that are going to

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 2>be the next Northern Virginia when it comes to data

0:32:57.920 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 2>center clusters.

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 3>So I think we're seeing it in Atlanta already, where

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 3>Georgia has paused or has attempted to pause some of

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 3>their tax incentives around it because they want to make

0:33:08.880 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 3>sure they do grid studies. I think that we're we're

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:14.560
<v Speaker 3>probably going to see it in some of the other hotspots.

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, you see aws up in Oregon who is

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 3>trying to find creative alternative ways to power their data

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 3>centers from non grid generation to alleviate some concerns there.

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:29.960
<v Speaker 3>But you know, I think that the market has to

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 3>solve this problem. And you know, you're starting to see

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 3>some of the startups around nuclear generation in you know,

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 3>the small reactors at the data center level. As people

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 3>are you know, being thoughtful for five to ten years

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 3>from now, do.

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 1>You have any influence on the type of power being

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 1>built in certain areas? You know, could you say to

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a utility company of some sort, we're here, we need

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 1>access to energy, but we want it to come in

0:33:56.240 --> 0:33:57.640
<v Speaker 1>a particular form.

0:33:57.640 --> 0:34:00.040
<v Speaker 3>So you can. But you have to understand that the

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 3>investment cycles and the physical build cycles for those are

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 3>so much longer than you know how quickly our customers

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:08.399
<v Speaker 3>need infrastructure, right. So you may go to a market

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 3>and say, hey, we're going to be here over the

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:11.880
<v Speaker 3>next ten years, we'd like you to install X y Z,

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:15.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, renewable, and they're happy to do it. It's

0:34:15.600 --> 0:34:17.240
<v Speaker 3>just that you have to find a medium term solution

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:18.800
<v Speaker 3>while that's being built.

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:20.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to ask a question. So there was a

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:23.800
<v Speaker 2>news story, and maybe you won't comment on the news story,

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 2>specifically about core Weave having made a one billion dollar

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:33.320
<v Speaker 2>offer for a bitcoin miner called core Scientific, apparently was rejected.

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 2>According to things I've read in the news. Setting aside

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 2>this deal, there's you know, there used to be a

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:43.439
<v Speaker 2>lot of crypto mining and then ethereum went from proof

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 2>of work to proof of steak and that all basically

0:34:45.480 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 2>disappeared overnight. There are still bitcoin miners. I never get

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:51.920
<v Speaker 2>the impression it's like that great of business. But whatever

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:55.960
<v Speaker 2>are there bitcoin miners that have latent value in the

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 2>fact that they I mean, I know those chips don't

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 2>the bitcoin mining chip, the actual acis don't work for

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 2>AI because all they are is bitcoin mining chips. But

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 2>are there by dint of their access to electricity, space,

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 2>et cetera, is there a fair amount of latent value

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 2>in the general physical structures that they've built for the mining.

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:18.960
<v Speaker 3>So I'm just not going to answer your question at all.

0:35:19.000 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna go on a tangent.

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that's fine.

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 3>So I think that when I think about core Weave

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:29.440
<v Speaker 3>and what our mission is, it's to find creative solutions

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:32.919
<v Speaker 3>to problems in in you know, various markets, and those

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 3>various markets can be blocking for us and our customers to.

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Achieve our goals.

0:35:37.400 --> 0:35:40.920
<v Speaker 3>So if power is a concern for us, and power

0:35:40.960 --> 0:35:43.720
<v Speaker 3>availability and substations and substation.

0:35:43.360 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 2>Transform, coin miners definitely have access to power.

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:46.959
<v Speaker 3>That that is true.

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:50.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm just stating fact you could keep doing it.

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 3>So you know, as we go and we try to

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 3>solve these problems, you know, we're going to go to

0:35:56.440 --> 0:35:59.799
<v Speaker 3>places that others may not have thought of, and we're

0:35:59.800 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 3>going to go do due diligence and I'm going to

0:36:02.200 --> 0:36:04.239
<v Speaker 3>personally go and walk the sites and I'm going to

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:07.239
<v Speaker 3>you know, look through and see, okay, can we.

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Pull this off?

0:36:08.360 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 3>And we're going to get our engineering partners in to

0:36:11.040 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 3>help us design retrofits. And you know, we're going to

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:16.560
<v Speaker 3>do deals with the companies that we believe have the

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:17.760
<v Speaker 3>ability to provide us value.

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Since we're doing stuff in the news. This has been

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:24.440
<v Speaker 1>in the news for a while, so it doesn't really count.

0:36:24.440 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 1>But the new Nvidia chips, the GB two hundreds, what

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:32.320
<v Speaker 1>will those do for core weave and when would you

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:33.360
<v Speaker 1>expect to get them?

0:36:33.680 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 3>What will they do for us? It's more about what

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 3>they're going to do for our customers, right, and I think.

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:39.799
<v Speaker 2>That they are.

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:45.720
<v Speaker 3>This is a great question. They are going to open

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 3>up a lot of both training and inference use cases

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 3>in the AI side that I think our customers have

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 3>been blocked by UH with the existing generation in that

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 3>you're now able to think seventy two of these GPUs

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:05.640
<v Speaker 3>together to work almost as one unit, and previously that

0:37:05.680 --> 0:37:08.799
<v Speaker 3>was limited to eight. They have a much larger what's

0:37:08.800 --> 0:37:10.719
<v Speaker 3>called the frame buffer, which is how much memory that's

0:37:10.760 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 3>usable for their matrix operations. So you know, I think

0:37:14.080 --> 0:37:15.839
<v Speaker 3>that we're going to see a lot of new use

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 3>cases show up for this stuff, but I think it

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 3>extends well beyond AI as well, and it's going to

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:25.000
<v Speaker 3>be a lot more useful for things like scientific computing.

0:37:26.000 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 3>One of the things that has me really excited is

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:32.760
<v Speaker 3>the computational fluidynamics and I'm specifically thinking about the uses

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:35.359
<v Speaker 3>for that in F one under the new regulation in

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:39.279
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty six. I'm excited for the new platform. I

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:40.840
<v Speaker 3>think in a year and a half people are going

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 3>to be using it for things that are different than

0:37:42.880 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 3>anybody expects today. And that's to me. The pace at

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:50.239
<v Speaker 3>which this is changing is the piece that's really cool.

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Wait, I'm sorry, I hate sports.

0:37:52.000 --> 0:37:55.920
<v Speaker 2>What's the six? Explain how the invidio is.

0:37:56.000 --> 0:37:59.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So the F one platform, they have very tight

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 3>restrictions around what type of compute and how much compute

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 3>you can use to do aerodynamic testing in your cars,

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:06.840
<v Speaker 3>and you can either do real life testing in a

0:38:06.840 --> 0:38:09.880
<v Speaker 3>wind tunnel or you can do it through CFD analysis.

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:13.960
<v Speaker 3>And what are the great uses for the you know,

0:38:13.960 --> 0:38:17.080
<v Speaker 3>the Grace Blackwell and the Grace Hopper architectures. Impairing that

0:38:17.200 --> 0:38:20.719
<v Speaker 3>Grace super chip with the GPU is they're great for

0:38:20.760 --> 0:38:23.319
<v Speaker 3>CFD workloads, right, and the.

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:27.239
<v Speaker 2>DAFD stands for computational fluid dynamics yep, yep.

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 3>And the regulations around the existing program in F one

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:33.359
<v Speaker 3>are they're only able to use CPUs. They have very

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 3>like specific limitations around it. But there's been a lot

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 3>of talk of that changing for twenty twenty six car models,

0:38:39.520 --> 0:38:43.239
<v Speaker 3>and for me, like, that's pretty cool and I'm gung

0:38:43.320 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 3>ho excited about possibly supporting that.

0:38:46.200 --> 0:38:48.920
<v Speaker 2>That does sound very fun. I want to get back

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:52.480
<v Speaker 2>to actually the financing a little bit because I guess

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:57.120
<v Speaker 2>two questions. So the logic of why you would borrow

0:38:57.239 --> 0:39:00.800
<v Speaker 2>money both I guess for the equal position of chips,

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:03.320
<v Speaker 2>and the chips are sort of collateral, but I understand

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:08.080
<v Speaker 2>they're not really chip back loans per se. A. Do

0:39:08.160 --> 0:39:12.799
<v Speaker 2>you see your clients getting more into debt financing rather

0:39:12.840 --> 0:39:15.759
<v Speaker 2>than equity financing. I mean, there's a whole generation of

0:39:16.280 --> 0:39:19.160
<v Speaker 2>software companies from the Zerp era that was just you know,

0:39:20.160 --> 0:39:22.640
<v Speaker 2>all equity and never had any debt at all, and

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 2>they never really had to think about like their compute costs,

0:39:25.680 --> 0:39:29.000
<v Speaker 2>or they did, but not as much. Do you think

0:39:29.040 --> 0:39:31.920
<v Speaker 2>that will rise their own use of debt instead of

0:39:32.000 --> 0:39:35.600
<v Speaker 2>equity in terms of their own financing. And another topic

0:39:35.600 --> 0:39:37.480
<v Speaker 2>we talk about a lot on the show private credit,

0:39:37.600 --> 0:39:41.000
<v Speaker 2>like there is there an emergence of an ecosystem of

0:39:41.280 --> 0:39:44.799
<v Speaker 2>lenders for whom this is going to become a specialty

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:45.359
<v Speaker 2>of some sort.

0:39:46.080 --> 0:39:48.400
<v Speaker 3>So the first piece of the question, I don't believe

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:51.239
<v Speaker 3>that the venture backed kind of AI lab startups will

0:39:51.239 --> 0:39:55.200
<v Speaker 3>ever take on debt in this type of environment, largely

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:57.520
<v Speaker 3>because they don't have the collateral to back it. If

0:39:57.560 --> 0:40:01.200
<v Speaker 3>they're buying cloud services to run their infrastructure. And you

0:40:01.239 --> 0:40:04.080
<v Speaker 3>may see some that start to buy their own infrastructure

0:40:04.080 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 3>and to do that themselves, but it is a herculean

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:08.719
<v Speaker 3>task to do this at scale. Right, There's a reason

0:40:08.719 --> 0:40:11.040
<v Speaker 3>why clouds exist is that there's a lot of complexity

0:40:11.080 --> 0:40:14.160
<v Speaker 3>that they abstract away. On the second question around are

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 3>is there a private credit sector that's going to be

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:19.160
<v Speaker 3>built to do this? I think that it's more you're

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:22.480
<v Speaker 3>seeing public lenders that are extending into the private credit

0:40:22.520 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 3>space because the opportunities are there. And I'm going to

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:29.479
<v Speaker 3>give you the party line answer that my CEO gives

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:31.839
<v Speaker 3>all the time is that you know, as we're thinking

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:34.880
<v Speaker 3>about financing our business, the biggest thing for us is

0:40:34.880 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 3>our cost to capital, and we're always going to do

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:38.960
<v Speaker 3>the things that provide us the lowest cost of capital.

0:40:39.000 --> 0:40:42.759
<v Speaker 3>And you know the lenders that we work with, including Blackstone,

0:40:43.200 --> 0:40:45.399
<v Speaker 3>that have been so wonderful for us, you know, them

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 3>extending on the private credit side as we go to

0:40:48.000 --> 0:40:50.520
<v Speaker 3>the public markets because we're dragged there by cost of

0:40:50.560 --> 0:40:54.480
<v Speaker 3>capital concerns, I would expect them to be involved as well, right, So,

0:40:54.680 --> 0:40:56.680
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a continuation of the business they've been

0:40:56.680 --> 0:40:58.520
<v Speaker 3>doing in the public markets, just kind of extending into

0:40:58.520 --> 0:40:59.960
<v Speaker 3>this capital intensive business.

0:41:00.560 --> 0:41:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Wait, what was I guess you can't get into specific details,

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:07.680
<v Speaker 1>but my impression was for these types of loans that

0:41:07.719 --> 0:41:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the interest rate is usually higher than like a basic

0:41:11.320 --> 0:41:14.560
<v Speaker 1>bank loan or say issuing a corporate bond.

0:41:15.200 --> 0:41:17.239
<v Speaker 3>I would definitely say our cost of capital is lower

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:19.320
<v Speaker 3>than some of the corporate issuance is out there, Okay,

0:41:20.560 --> 0:41:24.319
<v Speaker 3>but you know it's definitely higher than if our cost

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:25.960
<v Speaker 3>of capital today is definitely higher than if we were

0:41:25.960 --> 0:41:27.239
<v Speaker 3>republican public entity.

0:41:27.400 --> 0:41:30.840
<v Speaker 1>But specifically on the GPU backed loans, and I know

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you keep saying it's not really a GPU back loan,

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:36.080
<v Speaker 1>but that's sort of an uphill battle to call it

0:41:36.160 --> 0:41:39.359
<v Speaker 1>trade receivables financing instead. It sounds so much better that way,

0:41:39.520 --> 0:41:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know, but like on that in particular, Okay,

0:41:43.160 --> 0:41:46.640
<v Speaker 1>there's collateral, so maybe that brings the overall like borrowing

0:41:46.719 --> 0:41:48.640
<v Speaker 1>rate down. But on the other hand, it's kind of

0:41:48.640 --> 0:41:51.960
<v Speaker 1>a new thing, new structure. How does that compare with

0:41:52.040 --> 0:41:53.640
<v Speaker 1>more traditional types of finance.

0:41:53.920 --> 0:41:57.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so you know that every credit facility that we do,

0:41:57.600 --> 0:42:01.280
<v Speaker 3>the cost of capital declines, and it's declining because it's

0:42:01.560 --> 0:42:04.839
<v Speaker 3>the execution risk and the ongoing concern risk are reduced. Right.

0:42:04.960 --> 0:42:07.200
<v Speaker 3>And you know, when we first did this, people like

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 3>you guys are crazy. You have no history of execution.

0:42:09.880 --> 0:42:12.120
<v Speaker 3>And as we've gone through and we've done it, like

0:42:12.200 --> 0:42:14.879
<v Speaker 3>now there's a path that everybody that's underwriting these loans

0:42:14.880 --> 0:42:16.719
<v Speaker 3>now understands. Okay, this is what happens, this is how

0:42:16.719 --> 0:42:19.240
<v Speaker 3>it reforms, This is what we should expect from the customers.

0:42:19.239 --> 0:42:21.239
<v Speaker 3>This is what we should expect from receivables. They get

0:42:21.280 --> 0:42:23.960
<v Speaker 3>more comfortable, they're willing to do it at more aggressive rates, right,

0:42:24.000 --> 0:42:25.960
<v Speaker 3>so that the risk premium associated with it has just

0:42:26.080 --> 0:42:26.959
<v Speaker 3>decreased over time.

0:42:27.080 --> 0:42:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Got it.

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:30.040
<v Speaker 2>I just have one last question I sort of touched

0:42:30.080 --> 0:42:33.560
<v Speaker 2>on it earlier. But Okay, we know that power is scarce.

0:42:34.040 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 2>We know that, you know, there's not an infinite number

0:42:37.320 --> 0:42:41.360
<v Speaker 2>of Nvidia chips et cetera. Like those are quite scarce

0:42:41.760 --> 0:42:43.840
<v Speaker 2>for the other stuff. You know, we've done episodes in

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:47.760
<v Speaker 2>the past like talking about like just generic electrical gear components,

0:42:47.760 --> 0:42:50.239
<v Speaker 2>and we've certainly done a lot on like labor shortages.

0:42:50.480 --> 0:42:52.600
<v Speaker 2>What are you seeing on that front sort of like

0:42:53.000 --> 0:42:56.239
<v Speaker 2>simple gear and the sort of basic building blocks of

0:42:56.239 --> 0:42:59.640
<v Speaker 2>a new construction and how difficult that is to acquire.

0:42:59.760 --> 0:43:01.839
<v Speaker 2>Verse to say, if you were doing this, you know

0:43:02.000 --> 0:43:03.920
<v Speaker 2>you started in twenty seventeen, I imagine a lot of

0:43:03.920 --> 0:43:05.279
<v Speaker 2>the things were more plentiful back then.

0:43:05.520 --> 0:43:09.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so it's not even that they're less plentiful today

0:43:09.320 --> 0:43:11.600
<v Speaker 3>than they were. You know, the lead times were always

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:14.560
<v Speaker 3>the lead times for this electrical gear. It's that there

0:43:14.640 --> 0:43:18.160
<v Speaker 3>was capacity to go buy off the shelf, right there

0:43:18.160 --> 0:43:20.360
<v Speaker 3>was inventory in the data center market. And the inventory

0:43:20.440 --> 0:43:23.520
<v Speaker 3>is basically gone. And you know, I see deals today

0:43:23.960 --> 0:43:25.960
<v Speaker 3>that get brought to me and there's seven people bidding

0:43:25.960 --> 0:43:27.919
<v Speaker 3>on the same deal and they're all trying to sell

0:43:27.920 --> 0:43:31.000
<v Speaker 3>it to like similar customers. So the market has gotten

0:43:31.040 --> 0:43:33.200
<v Speaker 3>pretty thin. So now you're looking at it, going Okay,

0:43:33.480 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 3>my only option here is for new built, and you're

0:43:36.680 --> 0:43:39.240
<v Speaker 3>looking at lead times that haven't really shifted that much

0:43:39.360 --> 0:43:43.080
<v Speaker 3>on things inside of the data center. The substation transformers

0:43:43.120 --> 0:43:46.840
<v Speaker 3>are multiple years out, and part of that reason is

0:43:46.880 --> 0:43:49.160
<v Speaker 3>that it takes a year for them to cure after

0:43:49.200 --> 0:43:51.440
<v Speaker 3>they're manufactured. Like, there's no getting around that, there's no

0:43:51.480 --> 0:43:52.279
<v Speaker 3>speeding that piece up.

0:43:52.600 --> 0:43:53.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it takes a year.

0:43:53.800 --> 0:43:56.840
<v Speaker 3>You when the transformer is built, that's taking on so

0:43:56.920 --> 0:44:00.560
<v Speaker 3>much power that whatever the process is, it has to

0:44:00.600 --> 0:44:03.360
<v Speaker 3>sit for a year and harden before it's able to

0:44:03.360 --> 0:44:05.560
<v Speaker 3>take on that electrical load. So even if you went

0:44:05.600 --> 0:44:06.800
<v Speaker 3>and said, hey, I'm going to build ten more of

0:44:06.840 --> 0:44:08.840
<v Speaker 3>these this year, it's still a year away before you

0:44:08.840 --> 0:44:09.399
<v Speaker 3>can use them.

0:44:09.520 --> 0:44:10.399
<v Speaker 2>Huh right.

0:44:10.440 --> 0:44:12.799
<v Speaker 3>And those are the types of things from a manufacturing

0:44:12.800 --> 0:44:15.200
<v Speaker 3>perspective you just can't get around, and it takes time

0:44:15.239 --> 0:44:17.400
<v Speaker 3>for the supply chain to catch up. But you know,

0:44:17.719 --> 0:44:19.480
<v Speaker 3>the problems that I'm solving on a day to day

0:44:19.480 --> 0:44:22.920
<v Speaker 3>basis in these builds isn't even around the substation transformers.

0:44:22.960 --> 0:44:25.799
<v Speaker 3>It's around like small components that somebody missed it when

0:44:25.840 --> 0:44:28.480
<v Speaker 3>they ordered the gear sixteen weeks ago. And now you

0:44:28.560 --> 0:44:30.799
<v Speaker 3>have to go scramble and call in favors across the

0:44:30.800 --> 0:44:32.600
<v Speaker 3>country of Hey, who has this part? I need it

0:44:32.600 --> 0:44:35.400
<v Speaker 3>by tomorrow because I have fifty thousand GPUs that are

0:44:35.400 --> 0:44:38.319
<v Speaker 3>blocked by this one little thing, right, So it's a

0:44:38.320 --> 0:44:40.880
<v Speaker 3>lot of it is logistical and human coordination and solving

0:44:40.960 --> 0:44:42.239
<v Speaker 3>dumb problems in real time.

0:44:42.640 --> 0:44:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Ryan Venturro, thank you so much for coming on odd Laws.

0:44:45.600 --> 0:45:01.280
<v Speaker 2>That was fantastic. Thanks for having me, Tracy. I'm really

0:45:01.360 --> 0:45:04.240
<v Speaker 2>glad we did that conversation because there are a number

0:45:04.280 --> 0:45:07.160
<v Speaker 2>of these sort of like big picture ideas in there

0:45:07.160 --> 0:45:09.439
<v Speaker 2>that we've sort of hit on of course, about data

0:45:09.480 --> 0:45:12.359
<v Speaker 2>centers and AI and electricity consumption, and it was really

0:45:12.400 --> 0:45:15.600
<v Speaker 2>interesting to hear some of them. So, like, for example,

0:45:16.440 --> 0:45:19.200
<v Speaker 2>just this idea of like northern Virginia is out and

0:45:19.239 --> 0:45:22.960
<v Speaker 2>like needing this sort of hunt to find these spots

0:45:23.440 --> 0:45:27.840
<v Speaker 2>in the country where there is ample electricity and basically

0:45:28.080 --> 0:45:30.120
<v Speaker 2>nobody local is going to get upset at you for

0:45:30.239 --> 0:45:30.600
<v Speaker 2>using it.

0:45:31.320 --> 0:45:33.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no one will come out with pitchforks. The thing

0:45:33.400 --> 0:45:35.839
<v Speaker 1>that stood out to me from a bunch of these

0:45:35.880 --> 0:45:39.319
<v Speaker 1>conversations at this point is the arms race aspect of it,

0:45:39.400 --> 0:45:43.239
<v Speaker 1>and how urgent building out AI is for a lot

0:45:43.239 --> 0:45:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of these companies, and then there seems to be this

0:45:46.640 --> 0:45:52.399
<v Speaker 1>mismatch between the immediate need for scale and compute and

0:45:52.960 --> 0:45:58.960
<v Speaker 1>energy now versus these really long timelines of actually building

0:45:58.960 --> 0:46:04.239
<v Speaker 1>the stuff out and Brian mentioning the substation transformers taking

0:46:04.280 --> 0:46:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a care of cure.

0:46:05.080 --> 0:46:06.040
<v Speaker 2>I had no idea about that.

0:46:06.080 --> 0:46:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know that either. But that's a really good example.

0:46:08.640 --> 0:46:11.480
<v Speaker 2>That's super interesting, and of course now we have to

0:46:11.520 --> 0:46:14.440
<v Speaker 2>do a how do you build a substation transform.

0:46:14.080 --> 0:46:16.120
<v Speaker 1>How do you cure a substation transformer?

0:46:16.200 --> 0:46:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Totally? I mean maybe this is probably something that electrical

0:46:18.640 --> 0:46:21.000
<v Speaker 2>engineer is not interesting to them at all, But for me,

0:46:21.120 --> 0:46:23.759
<v Speaker 2>I did not realize that there was this one year long,

0:46:25.440 --> 0:46:28.400
<v Speaker 2>one year long curing process. You know, I think there

0:46:28.400 --> 0:46:31.520
<v Speaker 2>are like a couple other things that now I want

0:46:31.560 --> 0:46:35.200
<v Speaker 2>to talk more about, so I'm interested. I mean, like

0:46:35.280 --> 0:46:38.399
<v Speaker 2>Coreweave is an in video company. It's not owned by Video,

0:46:38.440 --> 0:46:41.120
<v Speaker 2>but you know it's joined at the hip in many respects.

0:46:41.280 --> 0:46:44.680
<v Speaker 2>So how difficult is it going to be either for

0:46:45.280 --> 0:46:49.040
<v Speaker 2>some other maker of chips, whether it's an Intel or

0:46:49.120 --> 0:46:54.160
<v Speaker 2>some other maker of software environments, whether it's Meta and

0:46:54.719 --> 0:46:58.160
<v Speaker 2>PyTorch going against Kuda or whatever, like that's a really

0:46:58.440 --> 0:47:02.080
<v Speaker 2>interesting question to me, Like, you know, we have to

0:47:02.120 --> 0:47:05.000
<v Speaker 2>do more essentially on like how much of a lock

0:47:05.080 --> 0:47:06.640
<v Speaker 2>and video really has on this industry.

0:47:06.719 --> 0:47:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this seems to be the really big question. And

0:47:09.480 --> 0:47:12.160
<v Speaker 1>then the other thing I was thinking about, and I

0:47:12.160 --> 0:47:15.600
<v Speaker 1>know Brian emphasized this and other Core Weave executives have

0:47:15.719 --> 0:47:20.200
<v Speaker 1>emphasized this before, but this idea that hyperscalers maybe are

0:47:20.239 --> 0:47:23.799
<v Speaker 1>starting from a point of being disadvantaged because they have

0:47:23.880 --> 0:47:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to retrofit all this old infrastructure for this new AI

0:47:29.040 --> 0:47:32.880
<v Speaker 1>technology totally, and like I can see that. But on

0:47:32.920 --> 0:47:37.439
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, these are insanely impressive companies. You are

0:47:37.520 --> 0:47:41.200
<v Speaker 1>explicitly trying to compete against Core Weave in this business,

0:47:41.560 --> 0:47:43.799
<v Speaker 1>and they're not going to stand still. And so I

0:47:43.800 --> 0:47:46.279
<v Speaker 1>guess there's an open question over how much progress they're

0:47:46.320 --> 0:47:49.400
<v Speaker 1>making or how fast that progress is actually happening.

0:47:49.600 --> 0:47:53.880
<v Speaker 2>Right, Large companies always are going to have some challenges

0:47:53.920 --> 0:47:57.000
<v Speaker 2>when there's like a new model or something. But these

0:47:57.000 --> 0:47:59.640
<v Speaker 2>companies have all the money in the entire world, right,

0:48:00.080 --> 0:48:01.520
<v Speaker 2>and they also have all you know, one of the

0:48:01.520 --> 0:48:03.680
<v Speaker 2>things that Brian said is like they if they were

0:48:03.719 --> 0:48:05.279
<v Speaker 2>if one of them are going to do it, they

0:48:05.280 --> 0:48:06.719
<v Speaker 2>would have to go out and to buy a big

0:48:06.800 --> 0:48:09.160
<v Speaker 2>chunk of the market, which again they have all the

0:48:09.160 --> 0:48:12.799
<v Speaker 2>money in the entire world. So theoretically, whether it's the

0:48:12.800 --> 0:48:16.240
<v Speaker 2>big companies and retrofitting the clouds or building new clouds,

0:48:16.719 --> 0:48:18.600
<v Speaker 2>or you know a lot of them like a Google,

0:48:18.680 --> 0:48:22.759
<v Speaker 2>even if they're for now using their TPUs internally primarily like,

0:48:23.440 --> 0:48:26.480
<v Speaker 2>it does seem like in theory the opportunities out there,

0:48:26.680 --> 0:48:31.239
<v Speaker 2>particularly with the the sky high amount you know, valuation

0:48:31.360 --> 0:48:33.840
<v Speaker 2>that a company like in video is getting.

0:48:34.000 --> 0:48:36.279
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, you mentioned the sky high valuation. That was

0:48:36.280 --> 0:48:38.719
<v Speaker 1>something that also stood out to me, just on the

0:48:38.760 --> 0:48:42.240
<v Speaker 1>financing side. So this idea of you know, the debt

0:48:42.239 --> 0:48:45.920
<v Speaker 1>financing deal that they did, and I'm not going to

0:48:45.960 --> 0:48:47.839
<v Speaker 1>call it trade receivables because.

0:48:47.680 --> 0:48:49.239
<v Speaker 2>No one GPU backed loan.

0:48:49.360 --> 0:48:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no one will be interested when we start talking

0:48:51.520 --> 0:48:55.320
<v Speaker 1>about trade receivables. But the GPU back loan. This idea

0:48:55.360 --> 0:48:58.080
<v Speaker 1>that like, okay, it's a new structure, but the more

0:48:58.120 --> 0:49:01.120
<v Speaker 1>you do it, the more the cost of particular capital

0:49:01.239 --> 0:49:03.680
<v Speaker 1>starts to fall, the more the market gets comfortable with it.

0:49:03.840 --> 0:49:05.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we can talk about whether or not it's

0:49:05.920 --> 0:49:10.239
<v Speaker 1>priced correctly for a new type of unfamiliar risk, but

0:49:11.040 --> 0:49:13.480
<v Speaker 1>it does seem like that might be a new avenue

0:49:13.680 --> 0:49:16.520
<v Speaker 1>for the vast amounts of capital that are needed for

0:49:16.600 --> 0:49:17.160
<v Speaker 1>this business.

0:49:17.360 --> 0:49:20.799
<v Speaker 2>So one, it's interesting to think about the idea that, like,

0:49:21.560 --> 0:49:24.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, I don't think it's like totally true. You

0:49:24.160 --> 0:49:26.960
<v Speaker 2>know that if you need compute at scale for AI,

0:49:27.520 --> 0:49:29.640
<v Speaker 2>that you don't just get to call up core weave

0:49:29.800 --> 0:49:31.600
<v Speaker 2>and get it, and you actually have to prove that

0:49:31.680 --> 0:49:34.279
<v Speaker 2>you're going to be a good customer and so like

0:49:34.560 --> 0:49:37.560
<v Speaker 2>have something that is probably going to be sustainable, have

0:49:37.680 --> 0:49:40.839
<v Speaker 2>the balance sheet capacity. So this even if the sort

0:49:40.880 --> 0:49:45.520
<v Speaker 2>of software the end users aren't themselves raising debt, it

0:49:45.560 --> 0:49:47.239
<v Speaker 2>does sound like they have to have a lot of

0:49:47.320 --> 0:49:53.319
<v Speaker 2>equity upfront just so that they're perceived as a sustainable,

0:49:53.480 --> 0:49:56.960
<v Speaker 2>viable customer for a company like corewev. I also thought

0:49:57.040 --> 0:49:59.759
<v Speaker 2>on the electricity front, like obviously we talk all the

0:49:59.760 --> 0:50:03.160
<v Speaker 2>time about just sort of the raw demand for electricity.

0:50:03.520 --> 0:50:05.680
<v Speaker 2>But this idea what he said, and I hadn't heard

0:50:05.719 --> 0:50:09.200
<v Speaker 2>anyone say it that the runs the modeling runs stop

0:50:09.239 --> 0:50:11.640
<v Speaker 2>everyone do you say thirty minutes and have to be saved.

0:50:11.680 --> 0:50:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, And so you have this big variability at times,

0:50:14.600 --> 0:50:17.880
<v Speaker 2>and that creates its own specific issue because it's not

0:50:18.000 --> 0:50:21.600
<v Speaker 2>just steady state flow of electricity and solving for that.

0:50:21.600 --> 0:50:26.640
<v Speaker 2>That's probably another area in which the legacy data centers

0:50:26.760 --> 0:50:30.439
<v Speaker 2>or cloud companies. Perhaps my guess would be that they're

0:50:30.480 --> 0:50:33.719
<v Speaker 2>just sort of the demand is more constant and therefore

0:50:34.120 --> 0:50:36.200
<v Speaker 2>something that would be a novelty for them.

0:50:36.239 --> 0:50:38.279
<v Speaker 1>Just thinking about the financing more, I do kind of

0:50:38.280 --> 0:50:41.440
<v Speaker 1>wonder how much of this is like AI built on

0:50:41.520 --> 0:50:44.960
<v Speaker 1>top of AI on top of AI. Like, yeah, to

0:50:45.000 --> 0:50:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the point where if if the bubble were to burst,

0:50:49.320 --> 0:50:52.000
<v Speaker 1>or if funding was suddenly pulled from a bunch of

0:50:52.000 --> 0:50:56.960
<v Speaker 1>these startups, like what would that mean for core weaves financing?

0:50:57.480 --> 0:51:00.200
<v Speaker 1>And what would that mean for black Rock, which lent

0:51:00.320 --> 0:51:03.480
<v Speaker 1>money based on the GPUs that the clients are taking on,

0:51:03.640 --> 0:51:05.480
<v Speaker 1>who might not be there anymore. I don't know.

0:51:05.760 --> 0:51:07.359
<v Speaker 2>By the way, have you ever looked at a chart

0:51:07.440 --> 0:51:09.000
<v Speaker 2>of riot lockschain?

0:51:09.200 --> 0:51:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, not for a while?

0:51:12.280 --> 0:51:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I mean they're still there as a minor,

0:51:14.200 --> 0:51:16.080
<v Speaker 2>but like here we are in the midst of this

0:51:16.320 --> 0:51:18.399
<v Speaker 2>pretty big crypto bal run. I mean, I guess it's

0:51:18.400 --> 0:51:20.600
<v Speaker 2>cooled a little bit, but and that stock is done

0:51:20.719 --> 0:51:24.560
<v Speaker 2>terribly so it's interesting to wonder, and apparently it doesn't

0:51:24.560 --> 0:51:26.440
<v Speaker 2>seem like anyone's made a bid for them. But it

0:51:26.600 --> 0:51:30.800
<v Speaker 2>is interesting to wonder, like, Okay, those chips are useless

0:51:31.000 --> 0:51:36.759
<v Speaker 2>for AI because they don't work for that, but you know,

0:51:36.840 --> 0:51:41.560
<v Speaker 2>they do have capacity and they do have electricity agreements

0:51:41.640 --> 0:51:44.360
<v Speaker 2>already in place. So it does make you wonder whether,

0:51:44.480 --> 0:51:46.879
<v Speaker 2>like some of the bitcoin mining companies which aren't really

0:51:46.960 --> 0:51:50.760
<v Speaker 2>getting a very the market is not excited about them, clearly,

0:51:50.840 --> 0:51:53.320
<v Speaker 2>even in the midst of this crypto bal run.

0:51:53.239 --> 0:51:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they should go back to being a diagnostics company.

0:51:56.800 --> 0:51:59.120
<v Speaker 1>That's what they were before, is it. I think so.

0:51:59.760 --> 0:52:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I think they're one of the ones that changed their

0:52:01.600 --> 0:52:05.000
<v Speaker 1>name and then like there something including blockchain, and then

0:52:05.040 --> 0:52:07.520
<v Speaker 1>their shares went up enormously and now they're back down.

0:52:07.640 --> 0:52:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Well they have been. Riot Platforms has been around, Okay,

0:52:11.840 --> 0:52:16.120
<v Speaker 2>now I'm curious. Yeah, so it's a bitcoin mining company,

0:52:16.160 --> 0:52:17.960
<v Speaker 2>but it's been the stock has been around since two

0:52:17.960 --> 0:52:22.759
<v Speaker 2>thousand and three. So pretty clearly, uh, pretty clearly they

0:52:22.760 --> 0:52:24.360
<v Speaker 2>were in some other business. I don't know what.

0:52:24.520 --> 0:52:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm looking on the terminal, it says Riot Blockchain,

0:52:26.880 --> 0:52:31.880
<v Speaker 1>formerly Bioptics, has ditched the drug diagnostic machinery business for

0:52:31.960 --> 0:52:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the digital currency trade.

0:52:34.800 --> 0:52:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, there you go. So if you have some sort

0:52:37.000 --> 0:52:38.799
<v Speaker 2>of computing power or something. I don't know what they

0:52:38.800 --> 0:52:41.520
<v Speaker 2>were doing before, but maybe it is interesting to think about.

0:52:41.719 --> 0:52:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Maybe some of the option value for some of these

0:52:44.040 --> 0:52:47.960
<v Speaker 2>miners isn't there. Non is in all the infrastructure other

0:52:48.040 --> 0:52:49.800
<v Speaker 2>than the bitcoin mining operation.

0:52:50.080 --> 0:52:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we should put in a bid.

0:52:51.560 --> 0:52:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Let's do it.

0:52:52.120 --> 0:52:56.239
<v Speaker 1>We can crowdfund and start our own business. Okay, maybe

0:52:56.239 --> 0:52:56.960
<v Speaker 1>we should leave it there.

0:52:57.040 --> 0:52:57.799
<v Speaker 2>Let's leave it there.

0:52:57.960 --> 0:53:00.719
<v Speaker 1>This has been another episode of the All Thought podcast.

0:53:00.840 --> 0:53:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway and.

0:53:03.920 --> 0:53:06.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart.

0:53:06.840 --> 0:53:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Follow our guest Brian Venturo. He's at Brian Venturo. Follow

0:53:10.480 --> 0:53:13.880
<v Speaker 2>our producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carman Erman dash Ol Bennett

0:53:13.920 --> 0:53:17.040
<v Speaker 2>at Dashbot, and Kilbrooks at Kilbrooks. Thank you to our

0:53:17.080 --> 0:53:20.040
<v Speaker 2>producer Moses Ondam. For more odd Lots content, go to

0:53:20.080 --> 0:53:22.719
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots, where we have transcripts,

0:53:22.719 --> 0:53:25.680
<v Speaker 2>a blog, and a newsletter and you can chat about

0:53:25.680 --> 0:53:30.280
<v Speaker 2>all of these topics, including AI, including semiconductors, including energy

0:53:30.400 --> 0:53:33.759
<v Speaker 2>in our discord discord gg slash.

0:53:33.400 --> 0:53:36.239
<v Speaker 1>Hot Lots and if you enjoy all thoughts, if you

0:53:36.440 --> 0:53:38.960
<v Speaker 1>like it when we talk about AI and chips and

0:53:39.160 --> 0:53:41.600
<v Speaker 1>energy and all that stuff, then please leave us a

0:53:41.680 --> 0:53:45.560
<v Speaker 1>positive review on your favorite podcast platform. And remember, if

0:53:45.600 --> 0:53:48.399
<v Speaker 1>you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to all

0:53:48.440 --> 0:53:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of our episodes absolutely ad free. All you need to

0:53:51.600 --> 0:53:55.000
<v Speaker 1>do is connect your Bloomberg account with Apple Podcasts. In

0:53:55.120 --> 0:53:57.560
<v Speaker 1>order to do that, just find the Bloomberg channel on

0:53:57.640 --> 0:54:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening.