WEBVTT - MLB: Leading Off September 23rd, 2022 (Ep. 602)

0:00:12.000 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in Frindos de leading off on Fantasy Pros. I

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>am your host, Chris Welsh, of course, who is not

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>on the right microphone, which I'm gonna fix in just

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>one second, as I see mister Chris Claig is in

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the house. Chris, what's up, buddy?

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh, not too much?

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 3>And I see I've got a I'm being Kelly Kirby

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 3>today the Wonkee Penguins.

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>So it's all good.

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm glad to be here and I'm looking forward to

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 3>chatting it up man. Big weekend slate coming up, final

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:40.559
<v Speaker 3>full week of the season approaches and I'm sad. Hey,

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm Chris Claig, Jay Rod last week, so it's all good,

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:45.840
<v Speaker 3>having fun.

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:51.200
<v Speaker 1>We fixed the clean audio. There we run cam action. Kelly,

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>you looked a little different. It looked a little different.

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>It's the Chris and Chris Show. What is up everybody?

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully everybody's doing good on a Friday, And this isn't

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>like official office. But Chris, I think this is the last.

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>This is your last Friday show because or on this well,

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 1>there's a rumor on the streets that there might be

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 1>this bald guy that might be appearing next week I've

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>got a confirm it. Of course, there's a rumor on

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the streets that this bald dude might be coming on,

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:17.960
<v Speaker 1>but no guarantees. But we'll knock it out because we've

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>actually got a great topic. We've got a bunch of

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>things to talk about. There's one great topic I'm very

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>excited to get into when we get into the stats,

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>because it's kind of close to home at least to

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:29.040
<v Speaker 1>one of your partners that we can talk about. But

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>let's get into the stuff. As Aaron Judge is going

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 1>from Maris and no one was really happy yesterday as

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Judge went over to with three walks, three walks and

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>extra innings against the Red Sox and the fans not

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>super happy when Waka had walked him in his first

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>two at bats. Red Sox having absolutely no part, no

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>part of being the ones that have the home run

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>tie or giving it up.

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and it's not surprising. I mean you almost just like,

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, want to just give these guys the like

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 3>these home run records like poo Hooles and Judge like,

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 3>I just want to groom some fastballs and see what

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 3>they can do. You know, I know that's not like

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 3>especially in a rivalry, You're not gonna do that, but

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 3>still it's a Judge almost did it. He hit that

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 3>one to the warning tracks, almost hit sixty one. But

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 3>I think he's gonna obviously get the record. I mean,

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 3>there's still plenty of times, so he'll uh, he'll definitely

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 3>break that al record for.

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>That call was one of the best of the season,

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>by the way, like Aaron Judge, it's go, It's go,

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:35.119
<v Speaker 1>It's caught. I mean, like the defeat that was taken out.

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 1>They thought this thing was hit to the moon and

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>it was just hit to the warning track as all

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that it was. It was a magnificent call. It really

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>is the excitement of that type of stuff when it fails.

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>It's just the masochist in me gets me kind of

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 1>going and excited. But it's gonna easy break it. But

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I was listening to there's like multiple takes

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 1>on it. I guess I was listening to something on

0:02:57.000 --> 0:02:59.239
<v Speaker 1>Jake Arietta was talking about the pool whole stuff, and

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the pool whole stuff is the same

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 1>as the Judge stuff, where at this point what Arieta

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>was saying with poolholes is like listen, at this point,

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 1>you know you've earned it. I'm gonna groove you. You know,

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 1>fastballs and if you can hit it, you can hit it.

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna give this to you or anything. But

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>like the idea that even with the judge stuff, that

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:20.799
<v Speaker 1>any players, whether it's the Red Sox or not, are

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>just not going to even go at him. It's just

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>it's disappointing. I mean, the pool stuff is different. I

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 1>suppose this is like a you know, a hat tip

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to one of the great players to hit a record

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>like that. No one needs a judge to do this.

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>But bottom line is just it ain't happening against the

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Red Sox if they have anything to do with it.

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Nope, they don't want it. They don't want that happened

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 2>in a rivalry game, for sure.

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Following an altercation with teammate Yandy Diaz earlier in the

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>week which had him miss a couple of games, Randy

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Rose Raina went three for four with two RBI and

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>also stole a base on Thursday as the Rays law

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>victor won on the Blue Jays. What was the altercation?

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I think I missed this on the note. Did you

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>see what the altercation was? Wonky?

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Do you know what I did not see that, honestly.

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Yandy altercation. I'm curious about this. Were they were they fighting?

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's what I would altercation. I don't see

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>anything about all right, So multiple sources confirm that there

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>was a physical altercation between Yandi and a Rose Arena

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:21.840
<v Speaker 1>in the parking lot on Monday. The two had to

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>be separated after a disagreement, and neither played on Tuesday.

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>So little parking lot action. That's never good. But Randy

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Rose Arena got back into it, been very good. Alec

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Stump of dk Pittsburgh Sports reports that the Pirates are

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>calling up prospect Jinhuin Bay from from TRIPAA Indianapolis. And

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>we saw him in the Arizona Fall League last year.

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 1>Massive massive contact hitter who he's kind of got that

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>that classic like almost we're gonna try to say, like

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 1>the inchy row with the legs kind of together and

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>comeback stance. It's not a power swing that there's some power.

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:04.039
<v Speaker 1>He's massively massively fast and he actually I've got that

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>anyone cares, But I've got this video on my timeline

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 1>that you guys might care about. It is funny and

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:13.600
<v Speaker 1>it's Bay in the AFL hitting a ball. Crazy. I

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know what the ev was, but crazy heart. At

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 1>the picture, Pitcher comes around, does a backwards catch on

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:22.039
<v Speaker 1>the glove and then Bay as he's walking away does

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:24.279
<v Speaker 1>the like sniper thing, like that was a sniper catch.

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 1>It's just a great video from the AFL. But talk

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to me about your thoughts on on Bay with Pittsburgh.

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 3>I really liked what I saw from him last year

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 3>in the AFL, and it kind of backed up what

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 3>we saw him doing double A last year.

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 2>And you know, really talented prospects.

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 3>You mentioned from a hit standpoint, like the field of

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 3>hit is incredible, really high contact skills. He sprayed a

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 3>lot of line drives, you know, kind of all over

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 3>the field in the AFL, and his line drive rate

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 3>is up this year in Triple A, which is encouraging.

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 2>I think he's going to hit for a high average.

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 3>He might get ten home runs over a full season

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 3>from him. But the average and the speed is a

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:01.840
<v Speaker 3>real game changer. Where he he's already stole in thirty

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 3>bases is here in Triple A, and he's certainly capable

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 3>of doing that in the Major. So if he's playing

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 3>consistently down the stretch and he needs some steals, bagging average,

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 3>like I'd pick him up, see where it goes. I mean,

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 3>who's blocking him?

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I mean, you know, unless they ever want

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to start doing the crew stuff into the outfield, it'd

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>be interesting to watch. But I mean, they've got Castillo,

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>who they'd liked to play around with, and they got

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>some guys in the future, but they're gonna give a shot.

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I am surprised that they kind of gave up the

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Pirates did on Lyova Paguero, and they just want to

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe just give They also might be auditioning Bear or

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 1>something like that, but again, he's just kind of caught that.

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 1>Like leg comes into the body, full body comes forward,

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>makes tons of contact on the season, tweety nine batting average,

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>eight homers, thirty stolen bases, one hundred and twenty one

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>hits on the year. He's just not a big big

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>like this is a big homer guy. Twenty three doubles

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>not too bad for him, six triples, eight homers, over

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and twenty one hits. You know, that is

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>his game. It's singles, getting on base and hopefully stealing

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>some bases. He'd be a top of the lineup type

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>of guy. So he might be a dart throw if

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna get these last couple of games for a

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>few stolen bases and some batting average, But I wouldn't

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>be playing him for the other three categories. That's just me.

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Zach Gallen delivered an unbelievable performance in of course, a

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>tough luck loss against the Dodgers. He had thirteen strikeouts

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>over eight innings of one run baseball and actually over

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>in this league. Bagrain and I are doing a very

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>early mock draft for doing a slow twenty twenty three

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>mock draft that we're going to be breaking down next

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>week on the end of Fantasy Baseball podcast. And in

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the fourth round, I gave serious consideration to Gallen. I

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>had not taken a picture yet. I ended up going

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>with little Spencer Strider for the strikeouts, but I feel

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>like those two are kind of in the same general range.

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>But Manda's Gallon game after game moved himself up as

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>far as the territory of sp He's going to be

0:07:57.560 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>next year.

0:07:58.520 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I agree, And I think he was having a

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 3>pretty quiet dominant season up until about the last month

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 3>and then everyone kind of started taking notice. And then

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 3>he's been even better down the stretch, and he's lowered

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 3>that era to two four six, zero point eight to

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 3>nine whip just ridiculous stuff. And the K minus BBB

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 3>and over twenty percent just really really good. And it's

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 3>I think he's gonna be a top fifty pick next

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 3>year pretty consensuously. So interesting comparison with Stryder, you'll probably

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 3>get more k's with Strider. Gallon has a little bit

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 3>higher floor, a little bit of safer bet. But since

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 3>who he's this is who he's been outside of last year.

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know in twenty nineteen, who he was,

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty, shorten seasons who he was, But last

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 3>year is kind of an anomaly, it seems. And I

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 3>think Gallon's a borderline ace moving forward. Yeah, And I'm

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 3>actually trying to take a look real quick. This is

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 3>bad business here, man, I'm trying to.

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Take a look at where and if he went, so

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>in that fourth round, I still, oh, man, is he

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna make it? I hope no one I know? There

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>he went? He went in the fourth round. It's a

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>fifteen team draft. He would the thirteenth pick in the

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 1>fourth round, so a little bit after top fifty probably

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a good value Peralta, Bieber, Freed, and Radon and Streider

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>all went ahead of him. Is there anybody you don't

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 1>think next year should go ahead of him? Because I

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think Paralta, I don't think. I'm not sure I

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>would go per Alta, Bieber or Freed over Gallon at

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>this point.

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, definitely not Paralta in my opinion, and I love Freed,

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 3>But I just think Gallen's kind of proved his work

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 3>to be ahead up.

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 2>I think it's semi closed. I think it's fair.

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 3>Bieber has just been a bizarre case this year where

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, everything's kind of down a bit, but the

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 3>results have still been good.

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 2>So I don't fully know what.

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 3>To make of Bieber for next season or who he'll be.

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I think Gallon's the safer bet over all

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 3>three of those.

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I mean, and you know, my logic on

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the Strider stuff is just elite strikeouts, probably a better

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:56.079
<v Speaker 1>team context in general. But I think Era and maybe

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Whip could be a little bit more dicey going into

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:01.319
<v Speaker 1>next year versus Gallon, even though you know the Diamondbacks

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>have been kind of at the Diamondbacks are putting together.

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>They're putting together a competitive roster and they're going to

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>have it next year with Kesic McCarthy and var Show

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and Carol and really Christian Walker. Christian Walker has had

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a very quiet, insanely productive season. Once he improved the

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>batting average on the second half. I think he's up

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:19.319
<v Speaker 1>into the two thirties or whatnot. And if you get

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 1>him into the you know, forty range, if you're getting

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 1>close to forty homers, I mean, what more could you

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:27.439
<v Speaker 1>ask for? That's more valuable than Kyle Schwarber's two nine

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 1>or whatever it is batting average and forty homers tell

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>you that. Here's a fun fact, speaking prospects, Hayden Wasnuski

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>threw an immaculate inning last night in the fifth against

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the Pirates. There have now been forty three immaculate innings

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 1>since twenty ten. There were only thirty one from nineteen

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:47.839
<v Speaker 1>ninety to two thousand and nine. In the one hundred

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and fourteen MLB seasons before that, there were only thirty one.

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:54.200
<v Speaker 1>So trying to do quick math sixty two, that would

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>be one hundred and five total immaculate innings in the

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>history of baseball, which almost equates to an immaculate inning

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>per year. But here's what I ask you, does immaculate

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Do immaculate innings get you going? Because I hate to

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>be the like you know how I I everybody knows

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 1>like I get excited about perfect games and no hitters,

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:15.439
<v Speaker 1>and I like cycles way more than anybody else. For

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>some reason, maculate innings aren't really like a thing for me.

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm just like that's cool, Like it doesn't like, it

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't impress me, and it probably should because if there's

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 1>only been essentially one per year in the history of baseball,

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>that is a very very elusive record. What are your

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on the immaculate inning.

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's just a bit of a surprise with that

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 3>stat in general, Like how few there've been that surprised me.

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 3>I feel like you hear about it every so often.

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't say it's a regular thing, but you know,

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 3>we've looked there's been forty three since twenty ten to

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 3>twelve seasons. That's still not that many when we think

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 3>about it. Yet three per year. I think it's pretty cool.

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Like you said, I'm not crazy like about it, like

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 3>perfect game obviously cooler and no hitter like those sorts

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 3>of things, but pretty impressive. I'd still say. I mean,

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 3>I like Weston Askui a lot. I think it's awesome

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 3>what he's been doing so far.

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Wonky, if you were a Cubs fan, you would

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>be a big fan of a Maga. Sure, Macula innings

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 1>are cool and everything, But I kind of agree with

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:13.719
<v Speaker 1>what coke Cart said in the chat here with the

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Peanuts and the Cracker Jacks, three pitch innings he likes more.

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I kind of agree. I think three pitch innings are

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>more impressive when you can just get three straight outs.

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it's just triple I like triple plays

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>more than immaculate innings. Does anybody like an immaculate inning

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:32.679
<v Speaker 1>more than a triple play? Probably not? Yeah, right, triple plays?

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agree.

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Pretty exciting. This day in baseball nineteen eighty eight, Jose

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Canseco becomes the founder of Baseball's forty homer forty Stolen

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 1>bas club by stealing two bases in a nine to eight,

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>fourteen inning win over Milwaukee. He also hit his forty

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 1>first home run of the year. How many forty forties

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>have we had? Have we had any five?

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:58.679
<v Speaker 3>Because they go let's see really, Yeah, Soriano did it

0:12:58.800 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 3>on this.

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Seasons.

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 3>Soriano definitely did it in five or six.

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I feel like we just did this. I no,

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 1>it says. In total, only four players have reached the

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:13.080
<v Speaker 1>forty to forty club in MLB history, and none have

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>done so more than once. One of those, let's see,

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>of these three were right handed batters and one was

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:24.839
<v Speaker 1>left handed. Two players, Barry Bonds and Alex Rodriguez, were

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>both forty forty. So you have Conseko, Bonds, Ramirez, and

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:30.679
<v Speaker 1>then who is the third? Oh, I'll find so Sorryana,

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:33.080
<v Speaker 1>So those are the four players that have Okay, you

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:35.679
<v Speaker 1>know what, I'll take forty forty seasons over immaculate innings too.

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:37.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what I'll take immaculate. We need to

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>find what I'll take an immaculate inning over, because I

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know what to tell you. Apparently it's just not impressing. Impressing.

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Milwaukee is losing it. We have nothing else we else.

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Just just let us have it. You guys can have

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 1>it totally. Immaculate inning is something, but I'm just saying

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:56.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm not quite there. I'm not quite there with it.

0:13:56.800 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Over on the stat hereos this is where I wanted

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:01.079
<v Speaker 1>to get into something. Let me go through them, and

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:02.959
<v Speaker 1>then you're gonna probably know the player I'm gonna pick

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to talk about. Colton Wong three for four with three homers,

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 1>five RBI, three runs, Thank you very much. Championship with Merrifield,

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 1>a rare anything game, two homers, three RBI, two runs.

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Randy Roseraine, as we mentioned, had a stolen base win

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>three for four. Brian Reynolds three for three with an

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>RBI and a stolen base, a lot of those big

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>hit games for him lately. Jonathan Ronda two for four

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>with a homer and RBI. John Carlos Stanton had a bomb,

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Brendan Donovan had a bomb. Mana Machado with a homer

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and a stolen based Combo Large Newt Bar one for

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 1>two with a homer and two runs, and Jared Kelmick

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>two for three with a homer, two RBI and two runs.

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Chris clegg I was just having a conversation with somebody.

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it was actually Andrew Seipher, maybe off air.

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>We were talking about a few of the things and

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>we got into Jared Keelnick and it was like if

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 1>you almost had the pass as soon as Cross finally

0:14:56.440 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>gave up on Kelnick. For the most part, everyone felt like, Okay,

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>we can do this. I'm curious that your take on

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Jared Klnick, because came in hit minor league has been

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>all right, still looks very quad aish I had mentioned,

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, he lowered his k percentage versus what he

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>did in the majors, but it's still the second highest

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 1>of his major minor league career. Was his strikeout percentage?

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Contact looked dicey. You know, he had a hissy fit

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>or whatever it was about the social media and taking

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the Mariners off. But either way, it doesn't matter. He

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 1>hits a homer, he's productive with a few hits. We're

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna do this. We're gonna fall into the Jared Klnick

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>trap again.

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so, not this year. At least.

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, he making go in the offseason and make

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 3>some changes and come back. But like, what's the realistic

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 3>expectation for Kilnick at this point, I guess is the question.

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 3>And it's certainly not what we once thought, or many

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 3>of us once thought. And I think I've lowered my

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 3>expectation a pretty good bit. And you look, and he's

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 3>been good in triple A like just dominant, but obviously

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 3>triple A is a totally different world than the majors,

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 3>where we've got a five and and four played appearance

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 3>sample and two fifty OVP three forty slug. I mean

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 3>the power speeds there, nineteen home runs, eleven steals, but

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, I'm not sure he makes enough contact

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 3>to be a high end or even like a top

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 3>one hundred fantasy player at this point.

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, dominant might be a little bit of a stretch.

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>He's been fine, he's been good, but for a guy

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 1>of his pedigree that's had multiple stints in the majors

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and come back down like this is a pretty good

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>minor league season, but we've seen exponentially better from guys

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>who have been much less. I mean, Moyst's you could

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>argue moiss Gomez, who is, you know, a nothing burger

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of people's eyes, who at one point

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>led the miners and Homer's former raised prospect. I think

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 1>with the Cardinals right now, you know he had a

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>better minor league season and moving a couple levels like

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the I think what this is is this is the

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Mariners getting a last ditch effort to figure out what

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>we have in Kelnick. And also, I really, really truly

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 1>believe this is them showcasing him for the off season.

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I think there's Kelnik is quite a personality. I think

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a chemistry thing with this team, and I don't

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>know if kel Nick fits it. I really don't anymore.

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Even though kel Nick and Julio have a great relationship,

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know where that is right now. And

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I think Kelnick wants out and this is a good

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for him to have some you know, he can

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 1>build up a little bit off the low minor league

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>you know production that he's had, and if he can

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 1>string a just I mean, all you gotta do is

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:32.920
<v Speaker 1>string a couple games together. Hell, I mean, I think

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 1>is he eligible for He should be eligible for. I

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know is he eligible for the playoffs because I

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>think you had to be on the active roster going

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 1>into September, But since he had been an active roster

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:45.639
<v Speaker 1>guy before, I don't know if that makes him ineligible.

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Because as in say, anything he can do right now

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to push up that you know, that ability, it's gonna

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>be great for trades in the off season.

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's interesting. Take.

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean and I could certainly see it and maybe

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 3>maybe he needs a fresh start somewhere. But you know,

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 3>they obviously got Jay Rod out there. You'll have Hanniger

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:06.959
<v Speaker 3>still out there. They've got, you know, several of their

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 3>mouths to feed too. I mean, I know Winker hasn't

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 3>been good and he's DHD a lot, but you know,

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 3>he plays some left field. So it'll be interesting to

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:17.879
<v Speaker 3>see how it all shakes out in Seattle and if

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:19.479
<v Speaker 3>they do n up trade them. And also we're forgetting

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 3>about Kyle Lewis, who's been banged up most of the year.

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:23.880
<v Speaker 3>But I have a lot of guys that they could

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:26.680
<v Speaker 3>Taylor spot. Yeah, I've always liked Tremille.

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:29.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, the they do this a lot, but there's

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 1>just something about it. Maybe it's because they've made so

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>many trades. I just feel like the Mariners and Reds

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:35.360
<v Speaker 1>are going to pull the trade off again and Kelnick

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to become a Cincinnati Red. Like you know what,

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe trade garbage for garbage, trade Nixon Zel for Jared Kelnick,

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Nixon Zell in a little something for kel Nick could

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 1>just move spots and get them off the team. But

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't fall into this for anybody, He's not a

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:50.719
<v Speaker 1>pick up at this point. I would rather go and

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>pick up Jonathan Ronda with Tampa Bay, who has you know,

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 1>potential to be leading off through the rest of the way.

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Then I would going to pick up Jared Kelnick. If

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>anyone's wondering in Dynasty, there definitely is something to maybe

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:05.880
<v Speaker 1>bye bye bye Low. But he's got to be really low,

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>like really really low for me to be interested in that,

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I think, and you agree with that, right.

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm not paying much of anything for him.

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:12.200
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Over on the picture side, Kyle bradish a phenomenal eight

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and two thirds two hits, just missed the complete game

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:23.400
<v Speaker 1>ten strikeouts. On the Astros was paying attention to that too,

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>because Verlander was one of the props for yesterday and

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 1>was a no go the props over on the cheet

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:33.919
<v Speaker 1>she didn't do so well because also one of the

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:36.120
<v Speaker 1>guys I forgot to mention at the top, which we'll

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 1>mention in the zeros here got absolutely lit up and

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Bradish out performed him. Zach Allen, who we talked about,

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:45.119
<v Speaker 1>struck out thirteen and eight innings. Jamison Tyon had eight

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 1>strikeouts and six Brandon Woodruff eleven strikeouts and six and

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Heasley, who's been kind of like a guy who've

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>been honed in on streaming six innings, only two hits,

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>three strikeouts in a pretty good performance on the stat

0:19:56.880 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 1>zero side, Seth Brown, Cavin Bigie at Thirostrata, Trent Isham,

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Carlos Santana all Oh for four with three k's, and

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you had some for three with three ks in Joey

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>gallow and Gavin Lux the pitcher that got blown up,

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Jose Barrios two innings, struck out one in six, earn

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>six earned runs over seven hits, and George Kirby two

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:19.199
<v Speaker 1>and one third gave up five earned runs. This is

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I hate this, Actually, you know what I was about

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 1>to say. I hate to see this. I actually love

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>to see the Kirby thing from a dynasty and redraft perspective,

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 1>as long as you're not owning him right now, simply

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 1>because I want him to be a little bit cheaper

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:32.159
<v Speaker 1>next year. And I think, do you agree with that?

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:33.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's that's fair.

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:35.880
<v Speaker 3>It'd be nice to I think he can blossom into

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:38.919
<v Speaker 3>an Ace like young Ace that we're seeing.

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:42.360
<v Speaker 2>But I'm not opposed to just for the price. I'm

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 2>with you.

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, over on our home run calls, friends, would you

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:49.959
<v Speaker 1>believe this? Check this out. Congrats to Jim's Mick Sorley

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:55.119
<v Speaker 1>for calling the only correct home run yesterday, the only one.

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 1>And listen to the call, Mike Yastremsky, You've got to

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 1>be kidding me. That's an unbelieved So the board did move,

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:04.719
<v Speaker 1>cat Fox and el Scale are still tied at fifty

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>five at the top, Helpless is at fifty four, High,

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>covees at fifty two, and d Blum is at fifty.

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Go cards right behind the board did not move whatsoever.

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I mushed Albert Poolholes trying to get you know, trying

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 1>to get six to ninety nine and didn't happen, which

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 1>almost means for sure it's going to happen today. Just

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:24.919
<v Speaker 1>pointing out to everybody because that is just how the

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>world works. But one of Cat Fox, l Scale, Helpless, High, Covey,

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 1>d Blum, probably the first three that I mentioned are

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>going to win as signed jersey from Fernando Tatis Junior

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 1>for winning this contest that is going on all season long.

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 1>And you could do it over in the discord on

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros, which is pretty cool. It's very fun contest,

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and I know Wonkee set this up for football as well,

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 1>so I'm into it. I'm into it. Hopefully you guys

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>are even more into it next year. And congratulations to

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 1>the dudes that cannot reach Aaron Judge at this point,

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 1>no one can reach Aaron Judge with what he's done

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>in real life versus this to some bets. Mister Chris

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 1>Clegg are boys over at bet MGM. They want to

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>give a one thousand dollars risk pre bet to you

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>or anybody if you're eligible where you can. All you

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 1>got to do is use the promo code leading Off.

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:13.679
<v Speaker 1>Go and type it in, do the thing, put in

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the code, get your free bet. And I've said this

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a million times over. Bet MGM probably one of the

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 1>best books. And I've used all the big major four.

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 1>As far as what they give you an extras and

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>free bets and bonuses, I don't even think they're matched.

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>So go and check them out today. Support Fantasy pros

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and leading off by using the promo code leading Off.

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I got some bets for you, and I want to

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 1>get your takes on them. The strikeout ones are really interesting.

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>They didn't have a great day as far as what

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the algorithm of Fantasy pros uses its projections and it

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>ties it into the props and it tells you, based

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 1>on their projections, what are really good deals. And I

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>do on this show is I'll give you like the

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 1>very top of a category and then maybe the top

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:54.159
<v Speaker 1>plus money. And they've got they just didn't do well

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 1>last yesterday, but let's see how they do today on

0:22:57.720 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 1>the total basis. The number one bet of all bets

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:04.439
<v Speaker 1>is Paul Goldschmidt for one one base, that's all he

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:07.399
<v Speaker 1>needs a single and it's juiced up at minus one

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>seventy against the Dodgers. He's projected at four and a half.

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>That's a wild bet. I mean, playing it singly is

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 1>just one of those comfortable moments for you of like,

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting bad odds as far as the juice is

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:22.680
<v Speaker 1>on it and minus one seventy, but you need one

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>total base from Paul gold Schmith. Love it. And this

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 1>is on DraftKings. The top plus money play is also

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:32.880
<v Speaker 1>with the Cardinals, and it's Paul de Young. He only

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 1>needs one total base. He's projected at too, and that

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>pays plus one twenty. On DraftKings. The two pitchers you've

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>got Chris Bassett, who's projected at six strikeouts, is numbers

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 1>at four and a half on bet MGM it's minus

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:48.679
<v Speaker 1>one fifty five, and Edward or Rodriguez is a plus

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>money play at four and a half strikeouts versus the

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>White Sock so Goldie, de Young, Bassett, Rodriguez, Cleig. Any

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 1>of these you like? Do you hate them all? Do

0:23:57.760 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 1>you love them all? What do you got?

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the Goldie one is, like you said, as

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:05.200
<v Speaker 3>safe as it can get. He mashes lefties the Dodgers

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 3>rolling out Andrew Heeney tonight, so that seems like a

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 3>pretty safe bet even with the juice. Like you said,

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 3>not sure. I like the de Young one at all,

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 3>Like he doesn't hit lefties. He hasn't really hit at

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 3>all this year, so that one's kind of a no

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:25.160
<v Speaker 3>go for me, even at the plus money strike out

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 3>once are interesting, obviously a pretty favorable matchup for the Mets,

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 3>and in Bassett and e rod has just been such

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 3>a wild card this year. It's just tough, really peg

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:36.160
<v Speaker 3>what he can do?

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:40.640
<v Speaker 3>His last outing was also against the White Sox, and

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 3>he struck out seven over six and a third with

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 3>two earned runs, So that but to me, like that

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 3>one's risky just because we haven't seen him go over

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 3>or hit five very often this year. It's only been

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 3>a couple of times, and he's been so inconsistent. So

0:24:57.400 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 3>I feel like Bassett and the Goldie bets are are

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 3>pretty good. Like, I feel like both those are pretty safe. Obviously,

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 3>as you mentioned, they're juiced up, so it makes sense.

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>The problem I have is like the plus I think

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the plus money plays, especially the top

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 1>ones because again I'm giving you the top strikeout on

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the top total base, I think they're kind of just

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>being like exposed to like just basic projections and putting

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>it out. Like the best plus money plays are finding

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>elite players and getting one and a half total bases

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 1>all throughout the year. We've gotten plus money on guys

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:29.679
<v Speaker 1>like Jordan Alvarez at one and a half and stuff.

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not playing those. Some of the best, though, are

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 1>these one total bases that are juiced up. And I

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>mean I am literally considering just unloading my entire account

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and putting it on the Goldschmidt one today to not

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 1>even get that great of a return, But I just

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 1>love it so much. I really like that one. Over

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>on DraftKings. I'm sorry FanDuel for the DFS soide don't

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>have the DraftKings numbers. Here's some pitching prices if you're

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>going to DFS it today, your top dogs Garrett Call

0:25:56.880 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 1>at ten six, Aaron Nolet at ten to three, show

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Heyo Tani's at ten one. I personally really like the

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Eronola one. If you want to get sneaky, Jeffrey Springs

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:07.680
<v Speaker 1>at seven to nine and Cody Morris at seven to eight,

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:10.439
<v Speaker 1>even though these are single pitcher ones, those might be

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 1>two I would look at on the and I would

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:14.680
<v Speaker 1>just translate those to the DK side. If you want

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:17.399
<v Speaker 1>to have a really low rotation. Uh, I mean, I

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 1>probably would do something like a Cody Morris and a

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Nola or something like that, or Jeffrey Springs and a

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:24.639
<v Speaker 1>Nola if I was putting them together. But I really

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 1>like those prices. As far as the stacks go, the

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:30.679
<v Speaker 1>only over five implied run total teams were San Diego Milwaukee,

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:33.200
<v Speaker 1>but I also like Tampa Bay and Chicago White stock

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:37.120
<v Speaker 1>stats stacks if I'm putting them together. Obviously, Elevisanders has

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>been really hot at the top. I'd mentioned Jonathan Ronda

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>would be someone I would look at both leadoff hitters

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that I would be looking at for teams if I

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>was looking to stack those guys together. If you're playing

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 1>in some DFS home run calls for the weekend, Chris Klegg,

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:54.479
<v Speaker 1>are you gonna give us? Are you gonna give us

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 1>an Atlanta Brave? Who are you gonna give us? Give

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:57.640
<v Speaker 1>us anybody of a Judge?

0:26:57.960 --> 0:26:58.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm given.

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 3>I'm given another record Chasers. Albert pooh Hooles love it night.

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:05.879
<v Speaker 3>Tonight's great a matchup against the lefty Heaney, Like, I

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 3>really like the chances for a pooh Holes home run tonight.

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 3>That would be awesome to see him hit it this

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 3>weekend to get to seven hundred. We'll see, But I

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 3>do like him to hit one tonight.

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:18.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I told you I mostioned him yesterday, so that

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 1>means it's a guaranteed to go tonight. So Albert pool Holes,

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with Jordan Alvarez the Jordan Alvarez front.

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Last couple of days, he's been a little bit cool

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>on the home run front, but I think that's gonna

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:31.640
<v Speaker 1>pick up today. I like the matchup we've got Joe

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 1>with Judge. We've got Mayor with Raphael Devers and Walkee

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 1>has got Paul gold Schmith. Has there ever been a

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>time to feel even better? Not only do we have

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:42.399
<v Speaker 1>a one total base bet on Paul gold Schmith, but

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 1>we've got Wonky behind it with a home run call. Yes,

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and please, I thank you very much. Let's end the

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:50.399
<v Speaker 1>show with this real quick, because I caught this late.

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I just want to get your take on this because

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a great question. I didn't want to

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:57.920
<v Speaker 1>interrupt until we save it to the end. We obviously

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 1>put a focus on Jared Kellnick. I'll probably mayor have

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>this be the artwork of the episode because kel Nick

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 1>did a little bit. But your take Jared Kelnick versus

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:10.199
<v Speaker 1>Joe Adele as we leave the show, who would you

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 1>rather bet on for next season? Joe Adele or Jared Kelnick?

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 3>Oh Man, crazy enough, I think probably kill Nick. Adele's

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:25.119
<v Speaker 3>just been a huge disappointment kind of all around, and

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, neither have been good from a contact standpoint,

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 3>And really I felt like that Adele was the tools

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:35.159
<v Speaker 3>of your player. He still may be, but we just

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 3>really haven't seen it. So man, I think it's pretty crazy,

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 3>but I'm actually leaning with kell Nick kind.

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Of think I am too. I mean, I'm I'm worried

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the Adele stuff is beyond repair. I really truly believe

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Jared kell Nick needs a new destination. I think he

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 1>needs a reset. I'd like him to go to a

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 1>place that really has a focus as far as hitting goes.

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I would like a really locked in hitting coach and

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe some tutoring going on, you know, I mean, not

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 1>that it means anything, but like I was around the

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Mariners a whole lot in the in spring training, and

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, he was around guys like Winker in them,

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>but I don't really see them ever. Talk like you

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 1>would love almost like the Philly situation. You would love

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 1>a guy like a Bryce Harper to be there to

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 1>work and tutor some of the young guys like he's

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 1>done with Bryson Stott and Alec Bohm. I'd like for

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 1>him to go to destination where he had someone that could, like,

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 1>actually want to and really work with him. I don't

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 1>know it would change anything, but if I were making

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 1>a bet, I also would go with kill Nick over Adele.

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>But you know, at this point you might be better

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan rand Over both of them, Like I mentioned.

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 3>Right, it's probably worth noting that the Angels aren't even

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 3>playing Adele every day at this point, and I mean,

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 3>they have nothing to play for, like they should be

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 3>trying to develop these guys, but Mickey Moniac's getting run instead.

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know if that tells you what how

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 3>they feel about Adele, but kind of seems that way

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 3>to me.

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it does. I think it does, and it'll

0:29:57.040 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 1>be fun to follow, Friendoz. That is the episode. Thank

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 1>you to the Peanuts and cracker Jacks for everybody that's

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 1>hanging out. Guess what. As far as I know, next

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 1>week is it? Next week is all that we've got.

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 1>It'll be the final Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, unless

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>unless Fantasy Bros. Decides to do something different into the playoffs.

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I think this is all that you're going to get

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of me into next week. And this was all that

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>we got of Chris Clegg unless you know, a bald

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 1>guy doesn't show up as far as I've seen on

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the schedule, Clig, what do you got going on? What's

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 1>going down in your world?

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Not so much, man, It's trying to grind out.

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 3>The end of the season finished strong in leagues and

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 3>producing content still so so this is my favorite time

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 3>of the year, at least early in the off season

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 3>for Dynasty and Prospect stuff. Just really digging in and

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, doing film studies and the Prospect eval. So

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 3>my favorite time of the year and gearing up to

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 3>God's Arizona hang out with you and all the dudes

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 3>at the AFL.

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 2>So I'm looking forward to that asking me.

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Again, see you be seeing you in about five weeks. Yeah,

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>it'll be so much fun. Brendos. That is the episode.

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Thank you guys, as always for Chris Cleig, I am

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Chris Welsh. It's late off and we're out of here.

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 1>He's friends