WEBVTT - FFW Micro - Rashaad White

0:00:01.880 --> 0:00:07.520
<v Speaker 1>You found Fantasy Football Weekly Micro, a deep dive on

0:00:07.520 --> 0:00:10.800
<v Speaker 1>one player in just five to ten minutes. Now here's

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>your host, Paul Chargian. It's a Thursday edition of Fantasy

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:19.479
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly Micro Edition. I am Paul Charchi, and my

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>co host today is Guillotine League's dot com writer Tyler Cannabily.

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, we've done Christian Watson, we did Damian Pierce.

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>We did Miles Sanders yesterday, right, Miles Sanders, Yes? Who

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>do we have lined up today?

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 2>We got White of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, the new

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:43.840
<v Speaker 2>and improved.

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think so either. The Bucks could be

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>a five win operation this year.

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they want Drake May, they want Caleb Williams.

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't blame him. I wouldn't do Yeah, I mean,

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>you know they if if it would not make it

0:00:57.240 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't It wouldn't be the worst idea to tank.

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 2>It's not even they don't they even have like a

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 2>terrible roster either. It's just for some reason, like they

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 2>got a lot of big name guys that you know,

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 2>like they like, look at Carolina, they don't have anyone

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 2>that you know really right on Tampa Bay. They got

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:14.760
<v Speaker 2>Mike Evans, Godwin. Yeah, worfs on the old line, so

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:17.400
<v Speaker 2>they got some pieces where I think a good quarterback

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:20.040
<v Speaker 2>could go there and do okay. But we're not talking

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 2>about We're not talking about KAYB Williams and how he's

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 2>gonna transform the Buccaneers franchise around. We're talking about Rashad White,

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 2>who Finis says the RB thirty four. Last year he

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 2>was the RB forty six in an average points per

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:33.559
<v Speaker 2>game and he's currently going as the RB twenty five five.

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:36.959
<v Speaker 1>People are people they step up, Yeah, expecting the expecting

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>him to hold the role as the go to back

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 1>for Tampa. If they're taking him at RB twenty.

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Five, Yeah, you obviously hope that he has a better

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 2>role than he did last year, at least because he

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 2>started off the season behind Fournette, didn't get much playing time.

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 2>But then kind of Week ten onwards is I remember

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 2>the first game where he kind of broke out was

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 2>that game in London against the Seahawks. I think he

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 2>had he had like ten carries for one hundred yards,

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 2>not ten carries, like twenty carries for one hundred yard.

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 2>But he any of that monster stiff arm I remember,

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 2>So that was a big thing.

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>That was awesome.

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 2>Got another two times shout out Kyle Brand Angry run edition.

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 2>But so he had That's kind of where he kind

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 2>of started to take some of the work away from Fournette.

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Because from week ten to seventeen, White had eighty seven carries,

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 2>thirty three targets, thirty catches, and then Leonard Fournette had

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:24.080
<v Speaker 2>sixty eight carries, thirty three targets, thirty catches.

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so White started to, you know, Fournette, I think,

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:28.799
<v Speaker 1>wore down. To me, it looked like this was less

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>about White earning the extra carries and more than Fournette

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:36.959
<v Speaker 1>was just freaking cooked. And I know Fournette was playing

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:38.519
<v Speaker 1>a little hobble too. And now he's total, he's a

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>totally he's a free agent right now, still not on

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:43.079
<v Speaker 1>a roster Fournette. So you know, most people, I think

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>would look at that and say, yeah, it does look

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>like Fournette's done, and he probably is. So to me,

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>White did not dazzle me with his play. But we

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>care about opportunity, and right now, there's a lot of

0:02:56.600 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 1>opportunity in in Tampa Bay, even with Baker Mayfield.

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 2>A lot of opportunities. He only he should have a

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:04.920
<v Speaker 2>lot more opportunity this year is I think that's what

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 2>everyone's hoping on. He only had three touchdowns last year,

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 2>and two of those were receiving, so only one rushing touchdown,

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 2>which is that number has to go up. It might

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 2>even be two, but it's gonna go up.

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna go up for.

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and Tampa Bay was also last in rushing attempts

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 2>per game. That you would hope that number goes up.

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 2>We talked about the bad teams running the ball in

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:23.639
<v Speaker 2>the last episodes.

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yep, and Baker Mayfield's not slinging the ball forty.

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Times exactly exactly. And then at the moment there's no

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 2>competition the running back room. I'm not scared of Keishawan

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 2>vaugh In the run in Tampa.

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>So this is a team that could go running back

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>over Shure.

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 2>I also think I saw something they had like the

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 2>third or fourth most running back visits to the team.

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh interesting, yeah, season visits?

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Yeah, so maybe I mean we can't visits don't really.

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 2>I think visits are overplayed a lot, a little bit

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 2>too much nowadays, but it is worth I think they

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 2>are probably a good candidate draft running back. So but

0:03:56.280 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 2>I think as long as it's not Vijon Junior Gibbs

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 2>or Charbonnet or even I put Dobyn Cook on there too,

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 2>just because we don't know, but it seems like you know,

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 2>but we don't know, as that's the rest of us.

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 2>But as long as it's not one of those four,

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm not too worried about who they bring in because

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 2>I'd really like Rashad White the player. If there is

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 2>a highlight tape on YouTube, Rashad White at Arizona State

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 2>is the best highlight tape I've seen in my life.

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Now I know it's highlights, but it's it just has

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:26.479
<v Speaker 2>me in so in on rashadway because his ability to

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 2>make guys miss. He has a great size, profile, great speed,

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:32.160
<v Speaker 2>he has power, He seems like he has it all.

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 2>He just needs to get the ball in space and

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:37.279
<v Speaker 2>be used kind of in that like Tony Pollard type

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 2>of way where he's getting the high leverage touches, the

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 2>valuable touches that we talk so much about as a

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 2>fantasy community. And I really like the player, and I

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:45.840
<v Speaker 2>think if we can kind of see him in that

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 2>sort of role, that's where he's going to be at

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 2>his best.

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>The Buccaneers offensive line will be better this year.

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's another thing healthier.

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>They hopefully will draft into their offensive line as well,

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:03.279
<v Speaker 1>get some improvement there, so that's could help as well.

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>We just hope that there's enough balance from the passing game.

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know, currently Baker Mayfield, I know, they're absolutely

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a candidate to draft Will Levis later in this you know,

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 1>somebody you know, perhaps Hendon Hooker or somebody else at

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:19.479
<v Speaker 1>this point, but presumed Baker as the starter, and even

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>if it is one of those rookies, it still feels

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 1>like an offense that could really be helped by running often.

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you you touched on earlier. Baker's not throwing the time,

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 2>throwing the ball forty times a game. I mean, he

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 2>was a game manager in Cleveland. That was when he's

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 2>at his best when they have a good running game

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 2>with Nick jobb For sure, Cam Bakers really came out

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:38.799
<v Speaker 2>at the end of last year when Baker was the quarterback,

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 2>So that's kind of maybe some correlation there. And then

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:43.720
<v Speaker 2>also I don't want to say his name, Dan Kney

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 2>maybe as he's he's the new OC in Tampa Bay.

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 2>He's been in Seattle since twenty ten with Pete Carroll,

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:52.839
<v Speaker 2>so he definitely comes from that heavy.

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Running breaks Sean Lynch years.

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, we've always seen these Seattle running backs, whether

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:01.040
<v Speaker 2>it's Lynch, even Chris Carson, or or even last year

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:03.280
<v Speaker 2>with Kenneth Walker. It seems like there's a Seattle running

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 2>back or even Rashad Penny too. We always see it with

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 2>these Seattle running backs. They've been good. I feel like

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 2>every there's been at least one top twenty four. The

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 2>fil't committee.

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, Pete Carroll's running backs, he gets his guy

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and that guy's twenty carries and you know, they don't

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>dork around with committees. Yeah, and that would be great

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:22.720
<v Speaker 1>for Rashad White as well if that happens here.

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that would be If Rashad White goes in the

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:28.280
<v Speaker 2>opening day as the clear RB one, I would be

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 2>way comfortable drafting him way above this. But I think

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 2>the assumption is that there's gonna be somebody else that

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 2>comes in here. We just kind of don't know his

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 2>role yet. But if he is, I've always been saying

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 2>I've been very heavy on skeptical of the opportunity, like

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 2>if somebody else get to come in, But yeah, if

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 2>he's the guy there.

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I love Rashod White this year, right, I think they're

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna draft a running back. I know that we don't

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>know that for sure. Let's talk about the players going

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>around Rashad White right now.

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:56.679
<v Speaker 2>All right, First one, we have cam Akers that RB

0:06:56.920 --> 0:07:00.159
<v Speaker 2>twenty four, great end of the season last year in

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Los Angeles.

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I think I would lean cam Akers because I

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>trust Sean McVay and his offense more than I trust

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Dave Canalees.

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Fair, very fair, fine, I can to arget that on that.

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Tyler L's year RB twenty six.

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>See, I'm pretty high on L's year. I know there's

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Elsier skepticism out there and people think

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 1>he's being overdrafted. But Falcons have a good offensive line

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and a run for his philosophy, and so I'm interested

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>in their lead back. And yeah, they give the ball

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to many other guys, but I'm still buying and I

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>liked I thought all was year got better as the

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>season one on.

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Falcons are also odds on favorite to draft Bijeon this

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 2>year too, So that would change every that was will

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 2>go twenty six to RB forty five?

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Fast, Yes, if that would put that would be the

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>end of Tyler else year.

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 2>All Right, your favorite guy, Joe Mixon RB twenty eight.

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Cooked not interested at all.

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Where do we think he's probably getting caught? I would

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 2>assume maybe maybe not, Maybe he does. But if he does,

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 2>where's he going to go?

0:07:57.120 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Joe Wickson?

0:07:57.880 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I don't know.

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're so many running backs, the glutt there's

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are so many running backs. We just

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Leonard Fournette available right now, and you've got this

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the deepest running back draft in my lifetime.

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Mm hm.

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean we're breaking down guys that are gonna be

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>like the ninth and tenth running back off the board,

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Douce Vaughan, and they're like, Wow, this guy's really good.

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Get a huge impact somewhere.

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's a terrible year to be an older,

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>dying running back. And Cincinnati, I think is a is

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna I think Cincinnati is gonna go running back in

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the first two or three rounds and we're gonna see

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 1>a you know, a Jamior Gibbs Land on that offense

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's gonna be sick. Yeah, that's what I think

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>is gonna happen. And Joe Mixon's done.

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 2>I agree with you. Whoever Cincinnati drafts, I think if

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 2>it's for sure they draft are running back, they have

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 2>to because this is their window now and they want

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 2>offensive playmakers and that defense is good enough to worry

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 2>about that. It maybe round one or round three, but

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 2>running back in second round is.

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Very much in play. Yes, I think it is all right.

0:08:56.760 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Javonte Williams at RB twenty nine, I think a top

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 2>two round guy last year.

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And given that we don't know the status of

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:09.559
<v Speaker 1>Javonte Williams ACL and the reports that he could be

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>out till mid season, can't I can't take him and

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I can't count on it even at running back twenty nine.

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna go Rashad?

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Why. Yeah, his ACL seems a little bit different than

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 2>all the other ones because he tore like his ACL

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 2>MCL and whatever CL Sure, I don't remember, but they

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 2>said it was like a very very bad ACL in TV.

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 2>So it could be, which is tragic because we saw

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 2>that the rookie year. Jamaish Williams good electric.

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. What do you think in Dynasty for Rashad? Why

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>is there is this a buy now opportunity? Are you?

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Are you holding. I feel like there's a lot of

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 1>shifting sands here, and you know, who's their quarterback next year,

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:49.559
<v Speaker 1>who's their quarterback in Week eight? You know, I don't know,

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>there's so many there's so many things that are changing

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 1>in the Bucks that feel like a team that's ready

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to retool.

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if you're like a put it on black all

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 2>type of like Dynasty player, this could be like a

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 2>move that absolutely smashes it. But if everything hits perfectly,

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 2>if for Shod White's the guy and this offense gets

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 2>good and you can get him for like a late

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 2>mid second round pick, yeah, that's a great investment on

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 2>your part. But if they bring in, if they draft

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 2>a Jamior Gibbs or like a Charbonnet or somebody like that,

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 2>and the offense isn't as good, then you're walking home

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 2>from Vegas with nothing in your pockets? Have it?

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:28.559
<v Speaker 1>If you put it on black, aren't you actually risk averse?

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's a really really it's almost a fifty

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>to fifty payout right, So unless the roulette wheel hits

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>green or red, right, I mean you know that's you know,

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>like if you put it all on seventeen, that's high risk.

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Rrect.

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if you put it all on black, isn't that

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>a relatively low risk bet?

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 2>I I would say so yes, But and I think

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:51.200
<v Speaker 2>that's kind of the situation we have right now. It

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 2>is fifty to fifty. But like I said, there's it's

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 2>both sides of the coin. It's either high risk, I reward.

0:10:57.360 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I knew a girl took a bunch of money to Vegas,

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and she her theory was, you bet black. You put

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you take your bankroll and you put like twenty percent

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>of it on black. If it hits, you just made

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent. If anything else hits, you then double it.

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>So then you're gonna turn your So now you're now

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:19.199
<v Speaker 1>you got forty percent that's out. So and you keep

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>doubling it. You keep doubling it because you'll get your

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>money back and then some right, So you just double

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 1>double double until you until this thing, until it hits

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know one of the odds that it's gonna go,

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna go red red red green, red red, and

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>then you know probably not gonna do that like eight times.

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>So you keep doing your doubling technique and eventually you'll

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:45.839
<v Speaker 1>you'll blackle it and you'll double your money. Now, if

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>it were that simple, everybody be doing it, so it

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>must not work. But she claimed it worked for her.

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:54.559
<v Speaker 2>I would say the the roulette tables are very it's

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 2>a very dangerous place. I went to North Carolina with

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 2>a couple buddies. Three guys put two hundred dollars on red.

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Hit red, red, it hit black black.

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>That's a short day.

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:06.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they called their bossing, hey can pick up some

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 2>more hours this week because it's good. I got bills

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:12.079
<v Speaker 2>of the pay and I just lost all my money

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:14.319
<v Speaker 2>playing roulette. I just read.

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I read a fascinating story about a guy who was

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 1>able to find roulette wheels across the world that were

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>just like slightly out of balance, and when he identified

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>when he would identified these wheels, he would be able

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to turn what a game that is a pretty hefty

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>house advantage into one that was a hefty advantage to

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>his side by just by just having like a one

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>percent degree of arc in the leveling of the roulette wheel.

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>He could figure out based on based on the the

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>way that is it a croupier or whatever that spins

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the ball. So he would never bet before the spin.

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>He would always bet after the So you know, they

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>spin for a while, the thing spins for a while,

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>spins for a while. The ball does right, it spin, spin, spins,

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and while it's spinning, you can keep betting. So he

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>would be watching it very very closely, and that on

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:16.559
<v Speaker 1>some spins he'd be throwing ten thousand dollars on the

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 1>bet that says it's gonna the ball's gonna land on

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>this third of the wheel. And he could hit it

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 1>so often that he was he was hitting these casinos

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>for a quarter million dollars a run, and nobody does that,

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 1>and roulette, nobody. It's such a bad odds game. And

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>so the the all these casinos start getting hit one

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>after another, and pretty soon the guy's getting thrown out

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:39.719
<v Speaker 1>of all these casinos. He's got to show up in costume,

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and they eventually and they could never figure out how

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:47.959
<v Speaker 1>he did it. And the best theory they've been able

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 1>to get is this one that the the alignment of

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:53.559
<v Speaker 1>the tables was just slightly off. They tried to they

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>tried to arrest him, but he wasn't doing anything criminal.

0:13:57.480 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, the house was just inadvertently giving him an advantage.

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:02.719
<v Speaker 2>You are about to lose a lot of people a

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 2>lot of money. They're gonna go to casinos. Now, why

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm watching a wheel get the level. So I think

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 2>the best way to end this episode would be for gambling.

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Help call one hundred Tennessee.

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, thanks for listening everybody. Tomorrow is the full

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>edition of Fantasy Football Weekly and we will be breaking

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>down the rookie wide receivers and tight ends on Friday's edition.

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Have a great weekend, everybody. Talk to you soon.

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Bye bye.