WEBVTT - Drug Suspensions, Wildcards and Breakthroughs

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Hi everybody, and welcome to the Renee Stubs Tennis Podcast.

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:18.800
<v Speaker 1>It is truly the Renee Stubs Tennis podcast this week

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>because it's just me gallivanting around in Spain. Is Caitlin

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:25.799
<v Speaker 1>and she's having a good old time over there doing

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the things that she loves to do, which is play

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 1>on clay play in Europe. Pretend she's Spanish and she's

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>having a good old time over there. So happy for her.

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:38.239
<v Speaker 1>But in the meantime, we've got to do this podcast

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 1>because the people expect the pod and there's a lot

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:45.480
<v Speaker 1>to talk about. Clearly, certainly on the women's side, there's

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot to talk about. But I'm going to get

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to that story in a minute. I'm also going to

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>get to readers questions because I know that you guys

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>send in a bunch of questions on the tweet out

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>that I did last week, so I appreciate you all

0:00:57.360 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>writing those questions, and we'll get to those at the

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>end of the But let's get into the crux of

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the last week in the women's and men's world of tennis.

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to start by giving a huge shout out

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 1>to Francis Tfo. Great job, FO, what an amazing effort

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to finally get you know, that kind of a win

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>under your belt, to beat someone like Taylor Fritz in

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the final, who you know, through the years, you've had

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>some tough losses against and nice to see Taylor also

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>get to the final. You know, over the years, Taylor

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 1>has sort of gotten the best of Francis in some

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:36.399
<v Speaker 1>of these bigger matches. Also, Taylor has been struggling with

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 1>his own injuries of late, and I feel like, and

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I've been talking about this for quite some time over

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the last twelve well certainly the past six months, is

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>that Taylor needs, you know, a little bit more match play.

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>He needs to get fitter, he needs to get into

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that position where he feels like he can trust his knee,

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and it looks like that's starting to happen, which is

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>really nice to see. And I feel like it's a

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>good build up for him coming into Wimbledon. But just

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>super happy for Francis, you know, to get the win

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>for him his first five hundred on the tour, which

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:12.959
<v Speaker 1>was really great, and particularly after the loss that he

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 1>sustained in Paris when he lost to Analdi, where he

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>was you know, it looked like it was absolutely said

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and done, there's no chance that he was going to lose,

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and then unfortunately for Francis, he found a way to lose,

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and that sort of wears on you a little bit

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>as a player. And to bounce back this well and

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>get the job done in Hulla is just testament to

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:38.799
<v Speaker 1>his you know, his work ethic, what he's done, the

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>work that he's put in to win these tournaments, and

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, his new coaching team that has been around

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>him now for a little while, and so just really

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>pleased that he was able to put the disappointment of

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Paris behind him and get on with it and play

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>as well as he did in Hulla. So huge props,

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>really great Hopefully he can bring that sort of momentum

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know, just absolute confidence of coming into Wimbledon,

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 1>where I know he can do well. He can play

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>well in grass and it's nice to see him doing well.

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:17.239
<v Speaker 1>And you know, to be in another American in the

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>final is never easy. And also for Taylor, great job

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>making the finals. Of course, a huge win in the

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 1>semifinals against Alex Ozverev, certainly in Germany. To do that

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and beating him seven, five and third, this bodes well

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.359
<v Speaker 1>for Taylor, because one of the things about Taylor that

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I've been discussing all year is just the lack of

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of fitness and his ability to hang in the

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>matches due to that knee injury that he sustained at

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the sort of end of last year beginning of this year.

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>And Taylor needs to be able to sort of you know,

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>somebody said something about him being soft a couple of

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago. I'm like, he is so far from soft.

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>This guy. His locker room reputation is that he will

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>go for days on a court, and he proved that

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>in that semifinals, you know, almost three hour match, two

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>hours and forty minutes I think it was, and against

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the German crowd, against Alex vere who comes in with

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>obviously tons of confidence after winning the French So for me,

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>for Taylor to get that win was really fantastic. Maybe

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>he just had run out of legs in the final.

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:18.599
<v Speaker 1>Francis won his semi final very comfortably against Altmeyer, and

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>so Francis clearly goes into the final feeling really pretty fresh.

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 1>Although I mean to get through the match against Felix

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:29.720
<v Speaker 1>aguer Alisim in the quarters was quite the epic match.

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>It was only two and a half hours, but the

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:34.840
<v Speaker 1>amount of match points that France has saved in that match,

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>he has to feel like when he got through that match,

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and you do feel like this is a player you're like, oh,

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean I'm playing with house money now. I mean

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I should have been out of here. So, you know,

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>just some really great wins from Taylor and and from

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Francis throughout the week. Taylor beating Ben Shelton seven six

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:57.159
<v Speaker 1>and the third. I mean there were some unbelievable matches

0:04:57.200 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>in Hlla, Altmeyer beating Medvede have six to four in

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the third. It was just it was just great match

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>after great match after great match. So super happy for

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Francis to you know, get that five hundred title under

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>his belt and he is to come into Wimbledon feeling

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 1>really really good about himself and that is only a

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>good thing for tennis in general, because we know how

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 1>exciting Francis is to watch play. So huge Bratz, big Fox,

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:25.239
<v Speaker 1>really happy for your mate. That's just an excellent, excellent

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>week for you and your team. So well done. Of course,

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>on the wimmerside, what in the hell is going on?

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean again the Hunger Games, well you could say

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the men's was a bit of a hunger games as

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>well and Halla, but you know, again noscover biggest win

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 1>of a career. Congratulations to her. She's now inside the

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 1>top ten the WTA. She takes out Jess Pergola in

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 1>the final. What an effort from her, especially after you

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>know Jess Pagoula has, you know, finally gets that win

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>over Sablenka. You think she's going to go in the

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 1>final with all this confidence and she's gonna win the tournament,

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and she's won so many tournaments in her career comparative

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>to Noskova, But Noscova just gets the job done. I mean,

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>what an effort. Just big ball striker, huge serve when

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>it's on. And let me tell you something, no one's

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>going to want to play her at Wimbledon because of

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the way she plays. These chech players. They know how

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to move forward, they know how to hit a flat ball,

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:24.839
<v Speaker 1>they know how to hit a big ball and grass,

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and she proved it by winning this tournament. What an

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>awesome week for her. Great for Jess. She's one of

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:35.359
<v Speaker 1>my favorites at Wimbledon, and I talked about that prior

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>to this when she lost early at the French Open.

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I was like, it's kind of a blessing in disguise sometimes,

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>especially as someone who doesn't really love the clay, to

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>get sort of an early start on the grass, and

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Jess certainly took advantage of that by playing as well

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>as she did. But there is massive, massive question marks

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>on Sabolenka and Rebukin are coming into Wimbledon. These are

0:06:56.560 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 1>two players that, without question are going to be betting

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>favorites to win Wimbledon. Sabal Anca, Rebakina, Pergula. You have

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to put she on tech In there's defending champion. We'll

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>see how she does in bud Hamburg this week and

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>how she looks on the grass. But you know, grass

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and bud Humburg slightly different. I mean it's supposed to

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>be the same because it was laid down by the

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>All England Club, but I just feel like there's no

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>grass quite like Wimbledon, and no grasscourt really plays like Wimbledon.

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Wembledon feels a little bit more like a hard court.

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Certainly with the heat we're having in London this week,

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>that's how it's going to play a little bit next week,

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>although it's going to get very a lot cooler next

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>week here at Wimbledon. But for the players that hit

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a big ball, they're going to love these conditions because

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>it's fast and it's good. But as I said, cool

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>at temperatures will prevail next week in the first week

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>at Wimbledon. But Noskover, I don't know what it is

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and what they put in the water in the Czech Republic,

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>but or chechia whatever they're calling it now. I spoke

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 1>to a check player last week and they're like, I

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know why we changed it at check e ELP,

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>so just doesn't make sense anyway, I will say they're

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>from the Czech Republic. And so for Niskova, that was

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>just a hell of an effort to get through the week.

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>And you saw when she won the match how delighted

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>she was and huge congrats to her. Okay, everyone, Well,

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>let's get to the biggest story over the last twenty

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>four hours in the tennis world, and that is, of course,

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the acceptance of the wild cut from Serena Williams to

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>play in the singles draw at Wimbledon. Huge news that

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>she's chosen to accept this wild card and have an

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 1>opportunity again to play on the courts at Wimbledon, the

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>fans are going to be given a treat to be

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>able to watch arguably the greatest female tennis player of

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:39.439
<v Speaker 1>all time come back onto the Orleans Club lawn and

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>give them a show. And I'm excited clearly being a

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 1>part of her coaching team, there's no secrets here from

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>my standpoint, and she's been working her tail off to

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 1>get here. She's been doing everything she can to be

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>as ready as possible. Clearly, she would have loved to

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>have had a lot more matches under a belt in

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:02.679
<v Speaker 1>the doubles, but for since circumstances like sadly Vicky Ambocco's

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>injury in Queen's and then the first round loss in Berlin,

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:09.679
<v Speaker 1>she would have loved to have had more matches under

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a belt. But you know, since then, she's been putting

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the work in on the practice court, and you know,

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>someone like her is not going to accept a wild

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>cut if she doesn't feel like she can compete. And

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>so I think, you know, for the fans of that

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 1>have tickets to Wimbledon, I think it's an incredible opportunity

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>to see, you know, the greatest female tennis player with

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:30.199
<v Speaker 1>all of the records out there one more time playing

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'm excited for it clearly, And you know, I

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>think that any great player that wants to come back

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and give their all. And you know, as I'm doing

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>this podcast, you know, interestingly enough, her oldest sister, Venus Williams,

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>is competing big time in bud Humburg. She hasn't played

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of matches over the last few months, you know,

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 1>has lost you know, first rounds of a few tournaments.

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>But put her on grass and she's competing currently playing

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:58.679
<v Speaker 1>Begu at four to three in the third and by

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the time this pod finishes, I'll know the result of that.

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>So you can never count a great player and a

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>great champion down. And you certainly cannot count somebody who

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 1>plays as well on grass as Venus and of course

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:14.199
<v Speaker 1>Serena on grass, and with their serves, with their ability

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to return the ball, their movements still at their age

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>is pretty pretty incredible. So as far as I'm concerned,

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Serena's put the work in. She's doing everything she can

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to be prepared for her match on Monday or Tuesday,

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>whenever that day comes. And you know, I hope that

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the tennis world appreciates it and recognizes the amount of

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>work that's going to be going into her being prepared

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 1>for that first round. I'll give you a little insight,

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>like being on the practice court with her and seeing

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 1>her in the gym and doing all the work, and

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>she's in a really great place. She's super happy, and

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is a moment that she's been thinking

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>about clearly over the last few months, and so for

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>her to make this decision, it's great. And I think

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the greats when they want to come back. I mean,

0:10:57.240 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>imagine if Tiger Woods said in a year's time, after

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>everything that's happened to him in the last like four

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to five years, with these accidents and shit that hit

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the fan with his life, It's like if he got

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 1>himself sober and he got himself together and he decided

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to take a wild carter an acceptance into playing the Masters.

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:15.079
<v Speaker 1>You think people are going to be like, no, he

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be doing that, he shouldn't be taking it, and

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah. It's like, listen, the greats don't try

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to play unless they feel like they can compete. And

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 1>so as far as Serena is concerned, she's going to

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 1>start walk on that court and want to compete and

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 1>play her best. And I think that the tennis world

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and the fans of Wimbledon and the people watching on

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 1>TV should be beside themselves with knowing that they have

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity to see her play one more time on

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:42.959
<v Speaker 1>the grass at Wimbledon. And as we speak, Venus Williams

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 1>currently up five to three and the third against Begu

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and so don't count out the great champions as particularly

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the ones that love to play on grass, as both

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 1>those two do, and of course they will be playing

0:11:55.360 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 1>doubles as well. So I'm super happy. I think everyone's

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.679
<v Speaker 1>excited about it and we'll see what happens. Also today

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 1>in the news, tough news really from my standpoint, ma

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>ketv Androsova band for four years from the tour, guys,

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know how I feel about this. You know,

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>she didn't want to do the test. There was all

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 1>this circumstances around why she didn't want to do the test.

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:26.839
<v Speaker 1>But I just I just four years. I just I

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>just don't know. I just don't know how I feel

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 1>about this. I mean, I know Marketta, I've been around

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 1>her a lot. She just seems the last person in

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the world that would take anything to enhance her performance. Seriously,

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I feel so indifferent about this. It just feels so heavy,

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and four years it's just it's a lot. That's a

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>life sentence in terms of a tennis player. You know,

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 1>when you think about what's happened over the last few

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>years and you think about this girl, her reputation is

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>just ruined because of this. Her career is essentially probably

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>over because of this. I mean, four years is just

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 1>a death sentence in a professional tennis world, you know,

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and that on that subject, you know, I just saw

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Max Pressell, for example, just came back after his drugs

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>suspension and won his first doubles tournament in Japan as a

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>smaller challenger. So I was super happy to see Max,

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, win there and come back and prove that

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>he can still play. And that's really nice to see.

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>And I'll be happy to see how he does over

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of months. Clearly, you know, this guy

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:35.319
<v Speaker 1>has done more really well in doubles. He's won multiple

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Grand Slams, so hopefully hopefully he can find you know,

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>his form at the bigger tournaments. That will take time,

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I suspect, But at the same time, I'm just you know,

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>super happy for him, but really hard to imagine that

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>things could get any worse for Marketa Vandrosova after hearing

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 1>that news, I'm just I'm really I'm pretty devastated for

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>her because I just feel like it's just four years.

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Is just it's just ridiculous from missing a test. I

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 1>just I don't know, I don't know. I mean, I'm

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:08.839
<v Speaker 1>really interested to see how you all feel about it,

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure you'll let me know clearly by telling me,

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>but I just I don't know, I don't know how

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I feel about it. So let me know how you

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>all feel about it, because for me, I just feel

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>like it's just it's just too long. It's just too long.

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I think you should be two years max. That's the

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>max it should be for something like that. That anyway,

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>all right, guys, we're going to take a short break

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to come back after that, and I'm

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>going to get to your reader questions and so come

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>back and join me after the break. Okay, Okay, hi everybody,

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and welcome back. Okay, it's time to get to your questions.

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>And actually, you you asked me so many questions last

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>week that I didn't get to all of them, so

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go through them all this week. So

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>let's get to Susan Clapp. Susan, Yes, Susan, you made

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>it in time. You did right that you were too late,

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>but this time I'm still here for you, all right, Susan.

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>How do you believe players social media accounts impact their

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>tennis positives negatives? Well, Susan, I think it affects them

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>more than you realize. I certainly know from players that

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>have put out things on Instagram when it's certainly it

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>usually comes from people that are betting on tennis and

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>they write some horrible, horrible comments to players on tour,

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and I just think that is such bullshit. I think

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>if you're betting on tennis or a sports, if you

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>think going after an athlete or you know, a tennis player,

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>especially a lot of them are younger, you just need

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to get a life. And also, I just feel like

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of players have so much stress on them

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>they don't need to be looking at social media. But

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard, especially these young players that are on

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, Instagram and all these social media sides and

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>TikTok and all that sort of stuff. So I do

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>think it impacts them slightly. I mean, probably the most

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>famous of that is when Coca Goff decided when she

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>won the US Open to sort of saying to all

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the haters out there. I was like, oh boy, you know,

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>so she's clearly reading those messages as well. So I

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>think it does affect them in some way. But you know,

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>if I was advising any of them, I would probably

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>say stay away from social media. Okay, Bence, what's Serena's

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>plan for the US Open? Swing? Bence? Everything is weak

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to week, so I have no idea, and I'm really

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>being honest when I answered that question, So sorry, I

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>don't have anything more for you. Okay. L J. Goston.

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>It seems like there are a lot of injuries during

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>clay and grass season. What steps do the players have

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>to take to adjust from clay to grass. Are there's

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>specific training methods to players use or should use to

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>avoid injuries that are unique or unnecessarily unnecessary for hard courts.

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>What a great question. First of all, yes, there is

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 1>so much dynamic difference to footwork and how you place

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>your feet, how you slide on clay, how and actually

0:16:57.160 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of players, even Janick Sinna said that he

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>tried to sort of move on grass a certain way,

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and then he started realizing that, you know, I can

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>slide on grass. So one on I slide instead of

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:08.199
<v Speaker 1>trying to plant his foot because he's so tall, he

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:10.159
<v Speaker 1>finds it easier to slide on the grass. And so

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>if you can do that, then good luck. I mean,

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:15.360
<v Speaker 1>that's not easy to do, but these players do adjust

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things that are different about clay is

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that when you slide, it's a lot easier on your body,

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 1>which is why I like to play on clay now

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 1>over hardcore, because I can slide into the ball rather

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 1>than plant and run, and you know that's quite abrasive

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 1>on your body. But on grass you have to be

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 1>lighter on your feet. On clay you can slide into

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the ball. You know, you can really run really hard

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 1>to the ball and slide into the shot, whereas on

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 1>clay you have to run hard, but you have to

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 1>be really careful how you place your feet. You have

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>to sort of put the foot in a different position.

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 1>You have to plant it differently. Your butt is used more,

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:50.919
<v Speaker 1>your groin is used more. You're using more power, and

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you know in your legs a little bit differently to

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing on clay. You can be a little

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>bit more upright on clay than on grass. You've got

0:17:57.880 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to be lower. There's so many little intricate things that

0:17:59.840 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you can do in the gym to make you better

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 1>at that, and clearly on the court also, you can

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>do things on the court and practice it with your coaches,

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:08.199
<v Speaker 1>and in the gym you can simulate as much as

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>you can. But in the end, you have to just

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>be very conscious when you're on grass to not push

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>really hard on the outside of your foot. And that's

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 1>what you know. We saw with Vicki Embocco for example.

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>She was running one direction, tried to change direction and

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>her feet went from under her. Because the little stubby

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 1>things on the bottom of your grasscots shoes, you have

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:29.679
<v Speaker 1>to get them to grip on the grass and sometimes

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you just don't quite catch that, and that's where you

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 1>see the slipping. And so you will see that first

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>one unders who at Wibledon. You will see it throughout

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and players have to be really smart about how they

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:43.640
<v Speaker 1>move on grass compared to other surfaces. And I always say,

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:47.399
<v Speaker 1>twinkle toes, twinkle toes on grass. Okay, Nebi, what do

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you think of the claim that grass is not a

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 1>surface suited to the modern game. Are we seeing increased

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>injury risk or grass compared to before. Absolutely not. There's

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>as much risk now as there was before. Because players

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 1>are serving in bowling, they were planning their feet, they

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:04.399
<v Speaker 1>were still moving on the baseline. Nothing's changed other than

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the fact that maybe the points are a little bit

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 1>more aggressive. But these players are so good now that

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 1>they have to adjust. I mean, how many times did

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>she Roger Federer fall over on grass? Not many times? Why?

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Because he knew how to move on grass. He was

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 1>light on his feet, he knew how to sort of

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:21.479
<v Speaker 1>like plant the foot. You just have to learn how

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to move on grass. I was a player that really

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:24.959
<v Speaker 1>felt comfortable on grass. I did not fall a lot

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 1>on grass, and so you just have to adjust how

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:31.919
<v Speaker 1>you move. And no, I don't think that. I mean

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:34.880
<v Speaker 1>they've changed the grass to suit players from the baseline.

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 1>So no, I don't want to see any changes. And

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the modern game is affected by playing

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:43.639
<v Speaker 1>on grass. Okay, Nancy, Yes, what's Coco's plan back to

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>her winning form? Honestly, I think she should travel with

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 1>her mum and a physio and shut off all the

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:51.119
<v Speaker 1>serve and technique stuff let her get back to playing

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:54.680
<v Speaker 1>more freely. Well, that's an interesting way of putting it, Nancy,

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:57.639
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, Like I am. I was going to say,

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm over talking about Coco and her you so, all

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the things that she does well and doesn't do well,

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>because it's like it seems like every week we're sort

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:08.439
<v Speaker 1>of picking on her. I don't know the answer to that,

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I really don't. I don't know what they're

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 1>working on. I don't know the conversations they're having. I

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:16.399
<v Speaker 1>don't know the thought process she's going through. All I

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>know is that Coco GoF is one of the nicest

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 1>kids you could ever meet in your life, and so

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:23.119
<v Speaker 1>I just pull for her all the time. Grass is

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 1>never going to be a surface that she's going to

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 1>be overly comfortable on with her style of play, with

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>her grip on her forehand. I mean, you know, similar

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 1>to Sam Stoza, for example, where Grass wasn't suited to

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:37.359
<v Speaker 1>her game kind of thing, you know, whereas players that

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 1>hit the ball flat and hard tend to do better

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:43.439
<v Speaker 1>on Grass. I don't know, I don't know. You know,

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it's I'm sure they've thought about it all. I'm sure

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 1>she's thinking about it NonStop. I'm sure her team's thinking

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>about it NonStop. Questions only she can answer. Unfortunately. All right,

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 1>let's get to Phil. No win. Why Serena not playing

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 1>with Venus in the lead up events? Phil? That is

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:03.359
<v Speaker 1>a question I don't know the answer to. And well,

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:06.120
<v Speaker 1>she was going to play with VICKI, she had some

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 1>other players that she was set to play with, and

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:12.479
<v Speaker 1>now she's playing with Venus and it's a great story.

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:16.680
<v Speaker 1>And if Venus wins her match today, got a little

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:19.119
<v Speaker 1>confidence under her belt. So that's a good thing. And

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's great. They're going to be super comfortable

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 1>with each other on the court, and really it's about

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>what they want and it's not anything to do with

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>anyone else making that decisions for her. Okay, Jax, Has

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Serena changed any of her major techniques after returning on

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the court, If so, what was it? Jack's absolutely not.

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Why would you change anything about the greatest player of

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>all time. There's nothing to change, absolutely nothing. Still, the

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 1>technique is there, the serve is there. I will say

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that I've been working on her volley a little bit

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and getting her back sliced backhand, improving that a little bit.

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Other than that, everything is as good as it's ever been.

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:00.919
<v Speaker 1>She's hitting the ball as well she's ever hit it,

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and technique wise, there's not too many people that technically

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 1>hit the ball as sound as she does from the

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>back of the court. So really nothing to change, basically,

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:14.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm there just to watch, just kidding, okay, Ao, Champion Sloan,

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:17.479
<v Speaker 1>you're such a great double's mind. I'm curious how you're

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 1>working with Serena on double strategy court positioning. Find it

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 1>interesting how Venus volleys are so textbook and Serena's form

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:26.879
<v Speaker 1>is much more unorthodox. Well, I will tell you this.

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 1>One of the things about Serena that impresses me a lot.

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Her forehand volly is very good, her technique is very good.

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>We are working on her back endbally, but she has

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that swinging back and vollie that's unbelievable. And yeah, Venus

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 1>has always been a little bit more comfortable at the

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>net when it comes to that. But at the same time,

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Serena has really good hands, so if you go at her,

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>it's going to come back. So yeah, I mean, listen,

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 1>there's little tweaks here and there that I'm working on,

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 1>but it's pretty tough to tell her how to win

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>doubles matches when she won more Grand Slams than me.

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>So lol. You know, I do help with some strategy

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>here and there, but overall, you know, I think they

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:04.919
<v Speaker 1>know what they're doing. Okay, more to tennis than the

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Big three. Maybe, was Emma Radakano correct to take a

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 1>break after the Queen's Club. When she won the US Open,

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>she played NonStop. Well, she gets critique for playing too much,

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 1>She gets critique for not playing enough, she gets critique

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>for coaching changes, she gets critique. I mean, this girl

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 1>can't win. I think it was good for her. She

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 1>did well at Queen's, she's taken a bit of a

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 1>break afterwards, and she's been practicing her butt off at Wimbledon,

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:31.199
<v Speaker 1>and she's ready to go. She's comfortable on grass. As

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:32.880
<v Speaker 1>far as I'm concerned, I think it was a good move.

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:35.200
<v Speaker 1>To be honest, we know that she's a little bit

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>questionable sometimes with injury, So why push through and play,

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:40.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, a ton of matches going to Wimbledon when

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:43.479
<v Speaker 1>you already feel really good on grass. So I'm totally

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 1>fine with her not playing a lead up totament to Wimbledon.

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:48.159
<v Speaker 1>All right, guys, you've got so many questions for me.

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I need to take another break, So let's take a

0:23:49.640 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 1>quick break and I'll be back with you after that. Okay,

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 1>let's get to Martin Turner. How good will Andreva get?

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Looks like? Very well? I would say, at her age,

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>already winning a major, pretty bloody good. I think there's

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 1>improvements on her forehand that she can continue to make.

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I know that Conchita Martinez works on that NonStop. Her

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 1>serve is fantastic. I think she's going to do well

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:27.400
<v Speaker 1>on grass. It'll be interesting to see what she does

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and how she plays at bud Hamburg and comes into

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:33.919
<v Speaker 1>this tournament into Wimbledon with even more confidence, and so

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:35.679
<v Speaker 1>I'll be interested to see how she does there and

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:37.399
<v Speaker 1>how she handles playing on the grass, and how she

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 1>handles the pressure now of being, you know, one of

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the favorites going into Wimbledon. But I think that we're

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 1>looking at a player that's going to win multiple Grand Slams.

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 1>There is absolutely no doubt in my mind, especially with

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the women's draws being so open. So yes, I think

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:53.639
<v Speaker 1>she's going to be very good, okay, blue collar tennis.

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Any memories of playing against Rana, Pascual and Suarez. Oh

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:58.640
<v Speaker 1>my god, what a blast from the past. I feel

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>like they invented one up one doubles, dominate teams early

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:04.640
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight, Majors ten for VV a Hall

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>of Fame worthy. Even though I know they won't get in.

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>They will not get in, And I'll tell you why

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:10.440
<v Speaker 1>they won't get in, because Lisa Raymond and Kara Black

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't get in and they have more Grand Slams than

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Bibi and Virginia. Let me tell you about them. You

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:20.400
<v Speaker 1>are correct. They are the ones that invented the two back,

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>one up, one back style of doubles. And I remember

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 1>when Lisa Raymond and I played them for the very

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:27.119
<v Speaker 1>first time and we're like, we're going to kill these guys.

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 1>They stay back bah and then after the match we're like,

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, they're so good. So lol. Now everyone

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>plays like that, which I don't think is the way

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 1>to win doubles, FYI. But because you look at the

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Sunee Kova's and Taylor Towns and they're still playing at

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the net, They're still trying to move at the net,

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 1>they're still trying to play some kind of doubles ish

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 1>type of tennis. But they were the absolute ultimate. They

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>used to piss me off so much because they were

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>always happy on the court and it used to drive

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:56.719
<v Speaker 1>me crazy. Funny enough, Kara and I played against them

0:25:56.800 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>quite well. We beat them probably more times than we

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:01.880
<v Speaker 1>lost it to but they were such a great pair

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and such great girls, and what a blast from the past.

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Blue collar. Thanks for that question, okay, Nancy, you're back.

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 1>Also more pressing for me is how Serena played backhand

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>with Carolina. Seems you would want their strengths in the middle,

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah. Well, I'll tell you why Carolina wanted

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to play the forehand, and Serena said, I can play

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the backhand, and that's how they came to that conclusion.

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Very simple. Sometimes it's not calculated. Sometimes it's not complicated.

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it's just as simple of what side do you

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 1>want to play? Forehand? Okay, I'll play the back end.

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 1>And Serena actually played pretty well on that side. And

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:36.120
<v Speaker 1>for somebody who hasn't played that side in I can't

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 1>even remember last time she played that backhand side, she

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>played pretty well. It's actually, I think she played better

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 1>in Berlin than she did in Queen's so that boded

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 1>well for her doing some good things. Okay, Charlie Turner,

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 1>do women players with Janick Sinner like builds and loads

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 1>of skilled joint Tagger? But button Kova need to get

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:59.199
<v Speaker 1>more muscle to succeed in women's game, And then you

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:01.639
<v Speaker 1>put in parenthess these hope not. No, I don't think

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:03.439
<v Speaker 1>so at all. When you look at Maria Sharrapova, I

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 1>mean Maria didn't have too many muscles on a body.

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I think when you're that build, you're that built as

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 1>long as you have the timing and you have the power.

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Look at Rebuckin, I mean, she's not that muscle, and

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:14.679
<v Speaker 1>she's probably a little bit mus more muscle on her

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 1>body than Tagger and the players that you mentioned. But no,

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. If you have the power, you

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 1>have the power, and so just as long as you

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:24.399
<v Speaker 1>keep you know, your body strong, you'll be fine. Okay,

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Garamhara does Grass in its current version still rewards servant

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>volley and variety. Even the great Roger Federer retreated more

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>to the baseline, but given the rise of variety, tennis

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 1>again I'm hopeful, thoughts, I don't think we're going to

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 1>see a true servant volleyer anymore. I do think the

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 1>better the volleyers are in tennis these days, and they're

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 1>good from the back of the court aka our kraz

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Yannick has improved that, Novak improved his volleys and comes

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:53.120
<v Speaker 1>forward as much as he can. There's no doubt that

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:55.919
<v Speaker 1>that helps them. So I if I was teaching a

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 1>young boy to play right now, yes, they have to

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 1>have the ability on the baseline, but they have to

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:05.120
<v Speaker 1>be able to finish points somehow. Everyone moves so well

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 1>from the back of the court, everyone hits the ball well.

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 1>You have to differentiate yourself somehow. So yes, I would

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>love to see players serve and volley Moore and we

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 1>see it like Tommy Paul throws that in every now

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and again. Yannick or serve and volley. Carlos serves and

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:19.680
<v Speaker 1>volleys from time to time, and there's no doubt it's

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:21.919
<v Speaker 1>a good play. So I would love to see that

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>developed more. Will we see a true servant vollyer anymore?

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:29.199
<v Speaker 1>Probably not? Okay, jose Where did Lisa Raymond rank in

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:31.359
<v Speaker 1>terms of voling skills? I watched her up close to

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the US Open towards the end of her career and

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>thought she had great hands. Well, let me tell you, Josie,

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Lisa Raymond, without a doubt, top five volleys of all

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 1>time on the women's side, and the reason why is

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>that when the ball hit Lisa's racket at at the

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 1>net and she volleyed it, it came back harder than

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>any volleyer I've ever played against. She had harder volleys

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>than any player ever. Martina and Avrelova great. You know,

0:28:57.600 --> 0:29:00.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a list of long, older players that had great volleys.

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 1>But you know, when you're talking about true servant volleys

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and great volleyers, there is no doubt that I put

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Lisa Raymond in that category absolutely. When I played doubles

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>with her, there were times that she hit volley so

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>hard that I was like, damn, that is so good.

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I was a very good servant vollyer. I

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>was a very good vollyer, and Lisa's volleys were just

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 1>next level, So you are correct. I would say my

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 1>hands were quicker, though, but don't tell Lisa that, Okay,

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Harrison Moby, I was really hoping that after the early

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 1>exit in Paris, Coca would travel either to Queen's or Lebema.

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not quite sure that is maybe in another tournament

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and asked for wildcard. She did neither. Do you think

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>it was a mistake for her not to play other

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 1>matches before Berlin? You know, maybe, but you know, you

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know what's going on with somebody. Maybe they need

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>a break, maybe they need a mental break, maybe they

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 1>need a physical break. Maybe she went home. I don't

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 1>know if she went home or night. And sometimes you

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>just need to get away. So you know, La Grass

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 1>is never going to be super comfortable for her, so

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe she just thought that was just not the way

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to go. I don't know. I'm not in her team.

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't discuss these things with her. But it's a

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 1>good question, and I guess the only way to answer

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>that question in the end is how well she does

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 1>it Wimbledon. Okay, Brendan Churchill, what are the bigger changes

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>to Serena's game in these four years? Look, I think

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the only thing that is, you know, she's four years older,

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 1>so you know, we'll see physically how she does. But

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 1>other than that, that's about it. Did Stubbs coach Serena

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 1>on doubles tactics, Doctor Sook. Look, if you're coaching Serena,

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of course you're going to tell her things, and of

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 1>course I'm telling your stuff like that. But you know,

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to get into what I'm telling her

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>too much because that's for me to know. Okay, A,

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 1>j always love seeing you working with Serena. How do

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>you feel about mirror being a top three favorite to

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 1>win Wimbledon. Look, she just won the French Open. She's

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 1>quite capable of playing on every surface. I would put

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 1>her in that category. I would put her maybe just

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>behind Jess Pagoula, even though Jess lost just you know,

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the other day to Noskova. Just feel like Jess there's

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 1>something that she hasn't I think, you know that loss

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>she lost. Speaking of Androsova, I think that that's a

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 1>memory that she probably like to put behind her because

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I do believe she probably could have won that year.

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 1>But I think the Jess is real contender at Wimbledon.

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 1>But I definitely put Andreva and the top I would

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 1>put her in the top four. Okay, so here we go.

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to get to the last couple of questions.

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Call me Champ, do you think the tours should combine

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and have a commissioner. Are the big four sports? Absolutely?

0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 1>If you listen to this podcast, you have heard Caitlin

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and I talk about that ad nauseum, no question that

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 1>they absolutely should do that. All right, Patrick ClOH Hessi,

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 1>what does Eger need to do to retain at Wimbledon

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:37.479
<v Speaker 1>this year? She needs to have warm weather and she

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 1>needs to come in with a lot of confidence. Hopefully

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 1>she gets a couple of matches under a belt at

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>bud Hamburg and depending on her draw, that's what it

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:49.480
<v Speaker 1>comes down to. Confidence draw and hopefully getting some matches

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:54.240
<v Speaker 1>under her belt. All right, guys, last question, because I've

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of sort of answered a lot of the questions

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 1>that some of you already asked. Florida Hawaii man, Yes,

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 1>now that's very has won the French Open. Who is

0:32:01.880 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the best player to never win a major? Ooh, that's

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 1>a good question. Let me think about that playing currently.

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'd put Taylor Fritz up there. I would

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:16.680
<v Speaker 1>put Taylor up there. I just think with the results

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 1>he's had over the last few years, getting to the

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 1>finals of the US Open, I guess he's probably in

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 1>that category now of best players to not win a

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Grand Slam. It's probably a couple of others, but I

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 1>can't really think about that right now. Okay, guys, I've

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 1>answered so many of your questions that I might go

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and leave the rest for next week, and so yeah,

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 1>so anyway, listen, I really appreciate their questions. I really

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you you making the effort for that, and I

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 1>hope I answered enough of them this week. We've got

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a big week coming up. Next week. Caitlin will be back.

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'll even get Peco on site at Wimbledon to

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 1>discuss what's happening. And of course, next Monday, maybe maybe

0:32:55.840 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe we'll get me talking about hopefully Serena winning her

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 1>first round. If not, it's all okay, everyone. The world

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 1>will go on thanks to your ears this week, and

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I look forward to your questions next week. I will

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 1>put a little question and answer again because there are

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 1>only a few questions left, and I'll get to them

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:15.960
<v Speaker 1>next week. But I appreciate all of the questions this week.

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 1>And guys, it's bloody hot and in Wembledon this week,

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's going to cool down next week and we're

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 1>back to reality on the grass here at Wimbledon, see

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you next week. Everybody, Bye,