WEBVTT - College Football Rivalry Week Preview - Part 2

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal ull.

0:00:05.080 --> 0:00:08.600
<v Speaker 2>That for me. I'm a man, I'm for I've heard

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:10.639
<v Speaker 2>so many players say, well, I want to be happy.

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 2>You want to be happy for a day?

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Edith Steak, is that woof?

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Woof?

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>And then and tie.

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:23.079
<v Speaker 2>Dan Robinstein. It is the last week of the regular season.

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:26.439
<v Speaker 2>We did a part one for Rivalry Week back on Tuesday.

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 2>We've got a part two coming everybody's way right now,

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Rivalry Week Part dua, thank you, Thanksgiving in the good

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 2>old us of a a busy week in the forballer hood,

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 2>my good friend, welcome back to the show.

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>How are you great to be here? I'm doing great.

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I looked at the document because we did part one

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>for all of the pre Saturday action. I looked at

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>part two, which is just Saturday, and I just said

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to myself, too many bangers, too many games, too much

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>greatness on the line, too much emotion. How do we

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>do this all in one show? Well, friends, I'm here

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>to tell you we're gonna try. We are absolutely gonna try.

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back, Welcome one, Welcome all, hit follow, hit subscribe

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:14.399
<v Speaker 1>if you have yet to do so. Hopefully, if you

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>are on the go, out and about on the way

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>to grandmother's house for Thanksgiving, wherever it is you may be.

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for downloading, for supporting. We will do our

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 2>part over the next hour or so to keep you entertained,

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 2>to get you up to date with everything going on

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 2>in and around the world of college football. If you're

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 2>curious about what's going to happen on the Thursday and

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Friday games, if you are listening to this episode in

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 2>advance of those, go back and listen to the Tuesday episode.

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 2>That's when we cover them. On today's episode, we're going

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 2>to cover everything that's going to transpire on Saturday, some

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 2>of the scenarios that could play out depending on how

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 2>things break down. Do our best to dive into all

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 2>of that and much much more. But make sure you

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 2>hit follow, make sure you hit subscribe if you are

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 2>amongst the people this Thanksgiving, depending on when you're listening

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 2>to this.

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I like that you said if you're amongst the people,

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>as if this show is exclusively framed and directed at aristocrats,

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of course, of course, if you're with the people.

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 2>If you are out with the people, let them know

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 2>about the show so that we can continue to grow

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:21.559
<v Speaker 2>the verboler hood. Last, but certainly not least playruntheboard dot com.

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be a big in this week.

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 2>It is sixteen rivalry games, all of which have a

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 2>cool nickname or a cool trophy.

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Play rundboard dot com.

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 2>We'll give you more intel on how to get in

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 2>on that game. We have not determined what the prize

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 2>is going to be yet. Yeah, and it was actually

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 2>kind of fun last week to just sort of throw

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 2>random thoughts out there and then weave them together in

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 2>the end. So I have taken on that burden as

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 2>you are thinking up Dan, what would make sense to

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 2>use as a prize in week fourteen. Just throw the

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 2>word out. I will find a way to weave them

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 2>together in the end. We'll give out a gift card

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 2>or something fun.

0:02:57.720 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>You send me a link to something called an adult

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>swing and I did not. I did not say that.

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>My computer is telling me that it is is a

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:09.519
<v Speaker 1>very specific kind of recreational device. I don't know what

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:12.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of STU appropriate you're googling over there in Chicago.

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>But Joyce, I have no idea what that. I did

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>not know where that came from. I did not send

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>that to you.

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 2>My mother is listening.

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, where are we going? Where are we going, So

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>we have to come up with the prize as we're going.

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>You know that makes sense in alignment with our conversation.

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 2>It's our big pickup game. Yeah, yeah, we'll come up

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 2>with We'll come up with some word association here. The

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 2>deeper we get into this thing, Dan, it is rivalry

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 2>week this week, which does mean only one thing. I'm

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 2>gonna let you do the honors. If you are ever

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 2>so inclined.

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 3>Ty, you have got to throw the records out, Dom

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 3>out the window, dow them out the window, get them

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 3>out of here.

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 2>More and more coaches every year, every year now some

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 2>of these coach pressers that we see in the build

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 2>up to Rivalry Week, coaches start talking about, look, you

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 2>gotta throw the record.

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>You just got to throw the records out. Was it

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Brahm? This year somebody said everybody.

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 2>Somebody sent me a tweet saying, look, you just got

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 2>to throw the records out in this rivalry?

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah you do. Who's Northampton High's rival? The Catasauqua Rough Riders.

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll get out of here. Rough got calbas A Girl High,

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers. Oh my god, I think that's where Clay

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Matthews went yeah, I believe you know who went to

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>my high school. Who's that? Nobody? Nobody, not even the

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:34.600
<v Speaker 1>famed early two thousands alt rock group Incubis. No.

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 2>No, we had Jim Druckey Miller, we had Brian Schneider,

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:40.919
<v Speaker 2>we had Denny Oncott's back in the day, but otherwise

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 2>we had no.

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 1>No, we had we had Tapanga from Boy Meets World

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and Jesse Spano from Saved by the Bell and Jim Rome. No,

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>we don't have anybody of merit and me and used.

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 2>So look, throw out the records. It is rivalry week.

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna go through all of these and much much

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 2>more before we do, though, just because we are interested

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:10.159
<v Speaker 2>in being completists, not gonna yell. We have new college

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 2>football playoff rankings. We talked about the for Baller top

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 2>twelve on the last episode. Here is the actual top

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 2>twelve per the powers that be, if that's something you

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 2>care about, all right, Oregon, Ohio State, Texas one, two, three,

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:25.480
<v Speaker 2>Penn State still holding on at four.

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Over Notre Dame.

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 2>Notre Dame hanging on over number six, Miami number seven, eight,

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 2>nine are Georgia, Tennessee and SMU cracking the top ten.

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Good for them.

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Tennessee drops or excuse me, Indiana drops below Tennessee

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 2>and below SMU to number ten, Boise at number eleven,

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 2>Clemson clet'son up five now to number twelve. The first

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:58.160
<v Speaker 2>four out per this ranking system are number thirteen Alabama,

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:02.840
<v Speaker 2>number fourteen, Old Miss number fifteen in South Carolina, number sixteen,

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Arizona State. Then and your reaction to this, do we

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 2>gloss over it?

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Do we move on?

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Obviously this is going to get a little bit weird

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:14.159
<v Speaker 2>after this weekend, will it not?

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh, it will get weird. But this is basically our

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 1>moment to say, through what are we at through thirteen weeks? Yeah,

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:26.679
<v Speaker 1>of data points, this is where the committee has landed,

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 1>and so we typically have said, you know, most famously

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 1>like when TCU was in the top four a decade

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:37.159
<v Speaker 1>ago and they destroy Kansas and do nothing to say

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>that they're not a top four team, but they get

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>jumped over, they get leapt over whatever by Ohio State

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that year. I believe that you're like, well, what did

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>this team do that was so bad? In the case

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of Clemson at twelve, it's particularly interesting because they have

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a high profile opponent, they have an opportunity to cement

0:06:56.640 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>themselves as a top twelve team by that game in Clemson, right, yep,

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>that's correct, by beating a headline rival, and it at

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:09.279
<v Speaker 1>least sets up the possibility that the ACC is going

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to get a couple teams in, which has been a

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>question with the ACC and the Big twelve ACC More,

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I would argue with, you know, now three ACC teams

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>in the top twelve heading into the final week. So

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting to me. And so yeah, just in all

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of these it sets up the idea with Boise State.

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Now we still have conference championship weekend, of course, but

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>with Boise State where they are, with SMU where they are,

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:35.679
<v Speaker 1>with Tennessee where they are, and most of these teams

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>where they are that are you know, angling for an

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 1>at large bid that this is a significant statement by

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the committee heading into rivalry weekend. They're like, Okay, this

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>is how we view this team after you know, eleven games,

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and that should mean probably more than a single data point,

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 1>but we'll.

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 2>See, we'll see. The Other thing that I think is

0:07:57.200 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 2>of interest if you look at this, Arizona State is

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 2>at sixteen. Also, yes, interesting, it is the highest ranked

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Big twelve team per this ranking set. How that changes

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 2>by beating Arizona. I don't know if it changes much

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:16.559
<v Speaker 2>by beating Arizona. Arizona's pretty bad. There could be teams

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 2>in front of ASU that lose that essentially helped to

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 2>move up their standing within this ranking. The Big twelve

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 2>is in really interesting territory. I think you're probably looking

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 2>at a win in a conference championship game that would

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 2>move Arizona State up a little bit more and would

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:37.839
<v Speaker 2>insulate them perhaps from somebody like a two lane.

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>ASU at sixteen. It's Iowa State at eighteen. So either way,

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>if if the Big Twelve championship ends with Iowa State

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>beating Arizona State, somebody who felt pretty damn good about

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>being in this twelve team field is being booted. Yeah.

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:58.319
<v Speaker 2>And furthermore, TWU Lane is at seventeen in the rankings.

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 2>And so the place going with this is the way

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 2>that the rules are set up. Your only guaranteed spots

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 2>are for the top five ranked conference champions right by

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 2>it does not specify that they have to be Power

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 2>Conference right victors.

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>So there is at least a.

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Slim chance, and I don't think it's likely, but there

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 2>is a slim chance that a team like al Tulane

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 2>could sneak in ahead of a Big twelve champion depending

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:30.959
<v Speaker 2>on how things go this weekend, right, I mean a

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:32.679
<v Speaker 2>lot can go wrong, a lot ca and go hay wire.

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 2>The Big twelve is already kind of in this blender,

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 2>but just something to kind of file away in the

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 2>back of your mind. Tulane sitting there at nine and two,

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 2>they are only two losses to Power Conference opponents. They've

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 2>been playing pretty well. There's a real chance here if

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 2>things really get hay wire this weekend, if Tulane goes

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 2>on to beat Army for that American title, that they

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 2>could end up sniping that final spot.

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>We'll see. I'm also I was curious as for Texas

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 1>A and M's rank because Texas A and M losing

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:01.559
<v Speaker 1>and quadruple overtime I'm on the road to Auburn. They

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 1>sit at twenty. Yeah, and so now we talk about

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the potential, albeit a low chance, but a chance, a

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>potential leapfrog situation of Texas A and M at home,

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>beating Texas and beating Georgia in the SEC Championship game,

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and the SEC potentially not getting a first round by

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>if Boise is taking care of business and finishes the

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>season at twelve and one. Yep, and keep they keep

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>moving up with you know, teams ahead of them losing whatever.

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess that that would well, that's what would stand

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>in the SEC's way of getting that by right, it's wild.

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Man, I tell you there there are some real interesting

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 2>scenarios here.

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Because I don't think it'll be two lane standing in

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 1>their way. Probably not.

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 2>It probably won't. We have gotten to the point now, though,

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 2>where there are a limited number of games that can

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 2>give you that upward mobility and a limited number of

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 2>teams that actually have upward mobility.

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Given what's left.

0:10:57.480 --> 0:10:59.559
<v Speaker 2>Obviously, if you're not playing a conference championship game, you

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:02.679
<v Speaker 2>got to show out this weekend. The other thing that

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 2>I did want to point out Dan before we move on,

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:10.079
<v Speaker 2>the coaching carousel is starting to spin now, and North

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:11.319
<v Speaker 2>Carolina has made.

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 1>The move on Mac Brown.

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Mac Brown, notably, a couple of weeks ago, said he

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 2>wasn't going anywhere. This followed reports from earlier in the

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:22.199
<v Speaker 2>season after that James Madison game where he kind of

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:24.680
<v Speaker 2>offered to resign if it would be helpful, and then

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 2>everybody had his back. Mac didn't have any imminent plans

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 2>to walk away. North Carolina has other ideas. North Carolina

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 2>is going to move on from Mac Brown. He's going

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 2>to coach this weekend against NC State. It's unclear right

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 2>now if he's going to be in the bowl game

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 2>or not. I would just call this out simply because

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 2>right now North Carolina is the top Power job on

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 2>the board, and I wonder if that's the reason they

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:53.079
<v Speaker 2>made the move, if they are kind of the darling

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 2>job that is available right now at the Power five ranks,

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Power four.

0:11:56.720 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Ranks, right, and it's the only one right. I believe

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:01.320
<v Speaker 1>he won, So it's both. It's also the worst available

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Power Conference job available. It's possible, Yeah, yeah, it's possible.

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 2>But the fact that they are on the board early

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:10.719
<v Speaker 2>trying to court some others who might be interested, I

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 2>think is intriguing and puts UNC in a spot that

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:15.680
<v Speaker 2>I can't ever remember them being in. We'll see what

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:19.680
<v Speaker 2>they decide to do. But if you are either a

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 2>lower level Power whatever coach looking to move up, if

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 2>you're a G five looking to move up, if you're

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 2>a hot coordinator looking to move up, UNC is out there.

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 2>UNC is the name on the board right now. That

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 2>is courting any and all who are interested, So we'll

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 2>see which direction they end up going.

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I saw Bruce mentioned John Summral in his first

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>year at Tulane, Jamie Chadwell who's been pretty successful at

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Liberty now after his coastal time. Glenn Schuman is going

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to come up in these jobs because of how many

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 1>games he has won as an assistant and coordinator. Yeah,

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Arthur Smith came up because he's a North Carolina guy

0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and weirdly enough, they're like and his dad is super

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>loaded as a fed X. Yeah, there's a lot interesting there.

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a very good job. It is a good job.

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:09.959
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to rivalry week though, are you ready ready?

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Let's do it?

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Yah, time they need the week.

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 2>I didn't want to short change any games this week

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 2>because we've got so many great rivalries. We are still

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 2>going to do our big games at the top. We're

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 2>going to do our part to rattle off all the

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 2>big name rivalries, the ones with the cool trophies, all

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 2>the stuff that you actually care about. So if we

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 2>do a little bit more rapid fire when we get

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 2>to Quad Fathers in that segment, forgive us. We want

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 2>to make sure we give every rivalry it's due this week.

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:41.599
<v Speaker 2>If you're cool with that, Dan Ruis.

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Yes, of course we do need to start though with

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the one they call the game. Yeah, oh my gosh,

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>of course the game.

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Maybe the game isn't quite as big of a game

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 2>in terms of national relevance as it was a year ago,

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 2>but the game is still the game. It's at high noon,

0:13:58.160 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 2>it's on Fox.

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>It is Michigan at Ohio State, Ohio State.

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Playing another noon game.

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 1>This is when they play there.

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Of course they are Ohio State favored by twenty one

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 2>at home. And look, did you see what Ryan Day

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:12.079
<v Speaker 2>had to say about this game?

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I think he basically said, losing this game has been

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the worst experience of his life, short of like things

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>happening with his family, So short.

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Of losing his father, he says, losing this game has

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 2>been the worst thing that has happened to him and

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 2>his family. Yes, which seems like a lot personally, seems

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 2>like a lot.

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>But this is Michigan, Ohio State. Whether or not that

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>is a good thing to have in our world. That

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>you are devastated to the point of emotional destruction annually

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>over this game. Whether you're a fan of coach, a player,

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. That's the reality. I don't know.

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 2>I want to know from Ohio State people, does it

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 2>make you feel better to hear him say that or

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 2>does it make you wonder if the coach has a

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 2>screw loose?

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that's all. I think both can be sort of true.

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anybody doubts. I don't think any like

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>rational college football fan feels as if their coach is

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>not taking an incredibly huge, storied rivalry seriously and personally.

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know how much better it makes you feel.

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>The only thing that makes you feel better is winning.

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 2>To that end, Michigan has won the last three they have,

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 2>as you might expect, effectively driven Ohio State Ryan Day

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 2>a little bit crazy, and to an extent, this entire

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 2>offseason was about loading up to beat Michigan right, even

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 2>if Ohio State bombs out of the playoffs, which who knows,

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 2>depends on their pathway through this season. On some level,

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 2>is going to be judged by did beat Michigan? Did

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 2>break the stream right? And they are a healthy favorite

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 2>to do that. So I guess from the Michigan side,

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 2>given where they have been this season, some of the

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 2>obvious flaws that this team has that we know about

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 2>at this point, is the best case scenario look ahead

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 2>spot for Ohio State with a likely game against Oregon

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 2>on deck next week.

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're just not living in reality to think

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 1>that in any capacity Ohio State's looking past Michigan.

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they are. I think that is foolish

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 2>to assume as much. I am trying to craft the

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 2>universe in which Michigan actually has a chance to win

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 2>this game. Oh, sure, that was what I came up with.

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 2>There's a look ahead spot. The defense muddies it up,

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 2>they keep it close, basically due to Ohio State when

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 2>Nebraska did to Ohio State the week before the Penn

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 2>State game.

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Sure take advantage of a line that is beat up

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and has shuffled bodies around, that has held up I

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>think in past blocking and past protection.

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Enormous stretch to me, Dan, Okay, I'm not saying I

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 2>buy this.

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I am trying.

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 2>Is there another universe that you can craft that gives

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 2>Michigan the over Ohio State for the forty Yeah?

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's just a Will must Champ game, that's

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 1>all it is. I mean, the it's very easy to

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:09.879
<v Speaker 1>not see happening, but it's very easy to sort of

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>imagine how it happens. And let's just turnovers and special

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:17.679
<v Speaker 1>teams and freak plays. And you know, Davis Warren hasn't

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>been all that good of a quarterback for a very

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:24.399
<v Speaker 1>disappointing passing attack, but he hits a screen that you know,

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Mullings or whoever take for eighty three yards randomly. That's

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>uncharacteristic of Ohio State's defense. But this is college football.

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Freak plays happened, freak results, you know, crazy close games happen.

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Bad weather affects things. It's going to be freezing across

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.159
<v Speaker 1>the Midwest, below freezing across the Midwest. I don't know

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>how that affects things. Likely not these teams practicing this

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:46.399
<v Speaker 1>and training this all year long. But yeah, you just

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:49.640
<v Speaker 1>it's your game simmed one hundred times. This thing only

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:51.159
<v Speaker 1>happens three times out of one hundred.

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:54.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm just not sure where the points are coming from

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 2>for Michigan. Sure, I feel like a broken record. I've

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 2>said that time and again here against better teams. The

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 2>offense at this point is pretty telegraphed, and they are

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 2>not the dominant ground team. That they've been over the

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 2>last couple of seasons, and you know, you could say, okay, well,

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Indiana did get something going on the ground against Ohio State,

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 2>which is true to an extent.

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:17.679
<v Speaker 1>That's true.

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 2>But Indiana also had a deep passing game, and I

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 2>think the Buck guys are far more interested in that

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:25.399
<v Speaker 2>side of their offense. That's why they took it away.

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 2>They were content to let them run runtil they're blue

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 2>in the face. Didn't match right, Just don't beat us

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 2>deep with the pass, don't inch your way back in

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.640
<v Speaker 2>on the back of Curtis work. I don't know where

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 2>the points coming from from Michigan. It seems like an

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 2>entirely different situation. I think Ohio State clearly far and

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 2>away as a better team. I think if they can,

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 2>they're going to run it up, and I think they

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 2>might have the chance. So I've got this one at

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:52.120
<v Speaker 2>thirty five thirteen, Buck guys, I've got a big win.

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 2>I've got a close cover. I think they break the

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 2>streak here, start a new one on their own. Thirty

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:00.880
<v Speaker 2>five thirteens. My final forty five to thirteen.

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Wow, I think it's limb from limb. I think you

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>have exercise demons you leave in starters, even though Ohio

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>State will have played a bunch of weeks in a

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 1>row and a bunch of big games in a row

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:15.680
<v Speaker 1>starting with last week and in Indiana, And I don't

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>think there's real hangover just because there's no inspiration. You

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>don't need to get up extra early. You don't need

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to pinch yourself to get excited for Ohio State Michigan.

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>So yes, exercise demons. It's a Herbrook style again again

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:35.199
<v Speaker 1>because it's in Columbus and so yeah, I short of

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Michigan overwhelming Ohio State's offensive line, which maybe they will

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:41.119
<v Speaker 1>at times, maybe they'll get to Will Howard a little bit,

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>claps and pockets with those defensive linemen, they're good on

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:47.679
<v Speaker 1>the edge. Michigan did score fifty without any sort of

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>consistent downfield passing last week against Northwestern, So that's a

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:54.359
<v Speaker 1>skill that you know, could they score thirty against Ohio State.

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:56.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't see it happening, But it's a skill to

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:58.679
<v Speaker 1>score fifty without a downfield passing attack.

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Look, there is a school of thought that Michigan could

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 2>just keep doing what it's done the last three years.

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Sure that now, I don't think their line is as good.

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't think, as they said, they're a dominant ground

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:11.440
<v Speaker 2>team as they have been.

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Noel Johnson like, yeah, there's just.

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 2>But there's there's a school of thought and I've seen

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 2>it discussed online. Don't subscribe to this that Michigan like,

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 2>why why change it if it ain't broke, Just try

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:30.200
<v Speaker 2>and do the same thing that they have done and

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 2>beat their brains in make the game muddy. It would

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 2>have to be a close win, but just do that again, improve,

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 2>make Ohio State prove that they can stop it this year.

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean they have to get off the field

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>on third or fourth and short always like Nebraska was

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 1>able to do. Like when Ohio State has had a

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>slowdown on offense, they haven't been able to convert some

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of those higher leverage moments early on in games. Anyway, Yeah,

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that's what it would take. It would take Michigan winning

0:20:56.760 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>seventeen thirteen, twenty to seventeen something. It's just wild that,

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's maybe out of nowhere, there's crazy gusts

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:07.920
<v Speaker 1>of wind sustained wins that completely slow down Ohio State

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:10.639
<v Speaker 1>through the air. Again, this is how you have to

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>construct it, because otherwise, if it's just a straight up

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:17.199
<v Speaker 1>back and forth. It favors Ohio State immensely forty five

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:17.719
<v Speaker 1>to thirteen.

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:21.119
<v Speaker 2>I'm I'm not going to dive into wild hypotheticals with

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:25.439
<v Speaker 2>this one. Just know there are some wild hypotheticals if

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 2>Ohio State were to lose here.

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, if in the event that Ohio State loses, Penn

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:32.360
<v Speaker 1>State is in the conference championship game.

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Penn State's of the Conference championship game, Ohio State drops

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:41.639
<v Speaker 2>in the polls, I think they would have to be

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:45.680
<v Speaker 2>slotted somewhere in front of Indiana starts to question whether

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Indiana gets in, starts like it.

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>It sets off a whole.

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Chain reaction of other questions, not the least of which

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 2>is what happens to Ryan Day after the season?

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:57.159
<v Speaker 1>Okay, what happens to Ryan Day. It's not a great loss.

0:21:57.320 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>If Ohio State lose now Michigan in terms of where

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Michigan has been here.

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm just I don't want to go there, because

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:05.880
<v Speaker 2>this is this is inventing stuff out of thin air.

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:09.439
<v Speaker 2>But just know that there are a whole other series,

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 2>a whole other universe of weird possibilities that will show

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 2>its ugly face should Ohio State lose this one, but

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 2>we throw out the records in the rivalry. I'm taking

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 2>this game kind of in a vacuum, and I'm not

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:26.920
<v Speaker 2>trying to assume too much one way or another other

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 2>than what we have seen this season, which is Michigan

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 2>on offense is no boyno. So we'll see yep three

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 2>thirty on Fox Territorial Cup Dan Yes, Arizona playing host

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 2>to nine and two Arizona State. Arizona State trying to

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 2>get to ten and two. They are a eight point

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 2>five point favorite. This is a big game for ASU,

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 2>to say the least. Arizona one by thirty six a

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:01.199
<v Speaker 2>year ago. They've actually won the last two. This season,

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Arizona has been the second worst FBS team against the spread,

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 2>so they have not been good at covering at all. ASU,

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:11.959
<v Speaker 2>though has almost exclusively played in one score games against

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 2>teams from power conferences, they have not been out there

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:18.680
<v Speaker 2>separating themselves in any kind of impressive capacity. So feels

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 2>like something's got to give here. Arizona very bad against

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:26.120
<v Speaker 2>the spread. Arizona State not necessarily the team you want

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:28.479
<v Speaker 2>to rely on when the point spread is greater than

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 2>a touchdown.

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>And Arizona State coming off of an enormous, enormous, emotional

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:37.639
<v Speaker 1>last second whatever you want to call the Kenny Dillingham

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 1>on field freak out, horrible clock management, crowd rushes the

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>field twice moment. I'm going to go ASU here same.

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Arizona is capital B bad, and I wonder how much

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 2>they've got left in the tank at this point.

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>They've had no tank this year, They've had no tank.

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 2>They're really limited on offense with how they can beat you.

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's it's noa fafita, It's team Mac.

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 1>It's team Mac orbust. Yeah, and even that has not

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>been a winning formula. It's been winning for everybody being

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>able to ooh and ah over team axibility, but hasn't

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:15.879
<v Speaker 1>translated to the.

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Rud blocking has not been good for Arizona either. It's

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:21.399
<v Speaker 2>just been very very one dimensional.

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 2>I can see a scenario in which Arizona State goes

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 2>limb from WIM and beats them by forty. I am

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 2>not banking on that. I'm going to take a much

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:35.919
<v Speaker 2>more responsible approach here and say it's something like thirty

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:39.440
<v Speaker 2>one to twenty somewhere in that neighborhood. I think ASU

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 2>gets the road win there is that question about what

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:46.199
<v Speaker 2>they've got left given somewhat down potential. But I just

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:47.879
<v Speaker 2>feel like they are playing with a full head of

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:53.119
<v Speaker 2>steam right now. And outside of maybe Kansas, Arizona State's

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 2>probably the team in the Big twelve that nobody wants

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 2>to play.

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I have thirty five seventeen as it's not like

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>ASU is getting on a plane. This isn't Notre Dame

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 1>USC or Oregon Washington where you're getting on a plane

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to play your arrival. I believe Oregon Washington would be

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>getting on a plane, but certainly Notre Dame US. So

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you've taken buses two hours down the road, so this

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 1>isn't crazy in terms of travel. Even if there's a

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:20.399
<v Speaker 1>letdown effect, you get right up because it's a territorial

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 1>cup and ASU smells blood in the water. Kenny Dillingham

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 1>rightfully so is absolutely ruthless. And this is a big

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 1>recruiting spot, of course, and there's absolutely blood in the

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:35.640
<v Speaker 1>water with Arizona as one of this year's elite losers.

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>So I have ASU.

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Big also at three point thirty. This one on ABC

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:44.679
<v Speaker 2>this year, not CBS. Yeah, it's taken a little bit

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 2>of getting used to not gonna lie. It is Auburn

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:52.120
<v Speaker 2>at five and six, It is Alabama at eight and three.

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Bama is an eleven and a half point favorite in

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 2>the Iron Bowl.

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 1>This game.

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 2>More often than not, more often than not, has.

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Very weird energy.

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, weird things that have happened with respect to this game. Now,

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Bama's won the last four Since twenty eighteen, this game

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 2>has alternated between being a blowout and being a close

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Alabama win. Yeah, last year it was twenty seven to

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:27.880
<v Speaker 2>twenty four Alabama. So if the pattern holds, then we'd

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 2>be looking at a blowout this year. The point spread

0:26:30.280 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 2>is saying blowout. The pointspread at eleven and a half

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:34.680
<v Speaker 2>is saying double digits.

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:40.400
<v Speaker 1>What is Dan Rubinstein saying? I have Alabama covering this

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and I went back and forth. I don't think they'd

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>cover whatever it would be on the road eight nine

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>points against Auburn, but there is something and look Auburn

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:52.399
<v Speaker 1>players as exhausted as they are after last week's quadruple

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 1>overtime win. It's also kind of a proof of concept

0:26:56.440 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that Auburn can finish and hang with a perceived superior team.

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:05.919
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not discounting that. I just think an on

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:09.679
<v Speaker 1>Alabama as evidenced against I guess it was Drew Pine

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:16.399
<v Speaker 1>missoo or against LSU, and on Alabama, if they're able

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to game plan something that isn't just Jalen Milroe Jalen

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Milroe left and right, that they can put up points,

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 1>that they can get stops that Peyton Thorn, for as

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 1>fun as some of his bigger throws this year have been,

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:35.199
<v Speaker 1>is still pretty turnover prone and on the road in

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the Iron Bowl. Even with Peyton Thorn nearly beating Alabama

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>last year, I just think if Alabama is kind of on,

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 1>they win this game by twenty. If they're fully off

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>once again and they are down on themselves and Kaylen

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 1>de Boor is not able to get this team up

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 1>after last week's lost to Oklahoma, that says more about

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Kaylen de Boor. But what's this dude's record in November.

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 1>What's this dude's track record and getting teams up for

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 1>really huge rivalry games late in the season. Man, it's

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:10.640
<v Speaker 1>really good. I could not disagree with you more on

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 1>this pick. Auburn's my home dog.

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:19.679
<v Speaker 2>Of the wink Wow, the Yokos home dog of the week.

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:24.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm I'm not going to act like I'm crazy about Auburn.

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, they were good last week. Yeah.

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 2>The main thing for me is that Auburn's got a

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:33.679
<v Speaker 2>solid defense and Alabama's offense feels.

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Very telegraphed at times.

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's very Jalen Milroe centric. That's part of why

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 2>we liked Oklahoma last week, was it not? It is

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 2>good defense against an offense that's entirely dependent on one player.

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 2>I think Auburn can ugly it up. I think they

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 2>can do enough on offense to keep it within striking distance.

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 2>I think again, this is something like twenty seven to

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 2>twenty four Alabama. I would not be surprised to Auburn

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 2>won this game out right. This just feels to me

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 2>like a good spot for Auburn. They want they absolutely

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 2>want to get Bull eligible. They need this one to

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 2>get Bull eligible. It's on the road at Tuscalosa, which

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 2>is not an easy place to play by any stretch.

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 2>But this rivalry tends to be real weird.

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 2>I see a close game here. I will happily take

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 2>eleven and a half points.

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 1>They scored seven points against Vanderbilt like three weeks ago.

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 2>I know, I know, it doesn't always need to make

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 2>sense though in the Iron.

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Bowl, and getting up for Vandy is different than getting

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 1>up for Alabama. I am still track record with. If

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you have the quarterback advantage, which I think Alabama still does, sure,

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 1>if you have the head coaching advantage, which to me

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Alabama still does. You're playing at home, and while the

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Auburn defense has gotten to be at times scary good

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and love Jarquez Hunter, if you have a quarterback who

0:29:57.120 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 1>is to this extent a wild card with turnovers, I

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 1>can't get on board. I get it.

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 2>I understand the logic.

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm either going to be crazy right or crazy wrong,

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>with almost nothing in between. This is just a much.

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 2>More flawed Alabama team than we are used to. I agree,

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 2>and it is somewhat telegraphed.

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:17.520
<v Speaker 1>It is.

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 2>It is highly dependent on Jalen Milroe to go out

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 2>there and make a play. And if we know it,

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 2>certainly a team like Auburn with a good defense also

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:30.960
<v Speaker 2>knows it. Agree, they've seen all the tape now they

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 2>know I don't know. Twenty seven to twenty four Alabama,

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 2>all right, we disagree, but stay in the three point

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 2>thirty block. They call it the Battle for the Jewels. Shalela.

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>It's on CBS.

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Still taking some time to get used to that. Notre

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Dame ten and one minus seven and a half points

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 2>on the road at USC. USC sitting at six and

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 2>five Notre Dame one by twenty eight last year. This year,

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 2>it's winning in the new playoff format. We just talked

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 2>about the rankings earlier. Their fifth A win gets them

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 2>a home playoff game in all likelihood. It depends on seeding,

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 2>depends where things shake out, probably as a five to

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 2>six seventh seed somewhere in that neighborhood they end up

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 2>hosting a playoff game. Depends where you look, depends on

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 2>your projections. Some have them against SMU, Others have them

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 2>against Boise. I've seen some against Tennessee. It varies pretty

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 2>widely right now because we just are grasping. But we

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 2>will see what happens if and when they end up

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Speaker 2>winning this game. But they got to win this one first.

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Da Oh great.

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 2>I've been surprised at your level of confidence regarding Notre

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Dame in this matchup. You seem to be fully sold

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 2>on Notre Dame beating USC because you're fully out on

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 2>SC You've sold on c stock.

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and no, I took a more ten thousand foot

0:31:57.440 --> 0:32:00.800
<v Speaker 1>view of Notre Dame in their schedule. True road games

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>have they played this year? Like two late three A

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and M and Georgia Tech. I want to.

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Say Georgia Tech was in Atlanta in Atlanta, Okay, Yeah,

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:12.960
<v Speaker 2>so they played Purdue, they played obviously then and M

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 2>game to start the year. They've played other games away

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 2>from home that neutral site. But in terms of true

0:32:18.840 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 2>road games, you've only been two, right.

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 1>And how many let's call it decent quarterbacks have they

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 1>faced this year? One in Tyler Shock probably, Yeah. I

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 1>mean Notre Dame schedule is benched Mac benched and bad

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Mac decent. Tyler Shock not good at Stanford back up

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 1>at Georgia Tech. That was Pyron, right, that's his name.

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Navy not a thrower, Florida State not good, Virginia not good.

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Army not a thrower, right. I just don't know. I

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's weird to go this far into the season,

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and maybe people would argue like this is Notre Dame.

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Every year, join a conference, cowards, blah blah blah. But

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 1>we just don't have a con Notre Dame down their

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>best corner defense irrefutably strong. They're performing as a good

0:33:05.880 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 1>defense should against this schedule. USC has been winning in

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 1>every fourth quarter, right. I saw the stat today that

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 1>they're one of five or six teams to have won

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:19.719
<v Speaker 1>in every fourth quarter, and they've lost five games and

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the other five or six teams have combined to lose bot. Yeah,

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 1>they've led every fourth quarter. They've led every fourth quarter.

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Something ridiculous. Yeah. USC is nothing if not a competitive

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 1>weekly team who is prone to gacking away games at

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the end, better at home games in LA. I'm taking

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 1>points here, No, I am taking points here. If there's

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 1>something USC gives up, it's big passes. If there's something

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame doesn't do, it's generate, consistent, successful downfield passes.

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Now Ryle Leonard's gotten better, they've become a more efficient

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 1>complete offense, but there's not a consistent deep threat element

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to this offense. And maybe that's just because they haven't

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>had to do it, because they just stomp everybody. I

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 1>think USC loses this game. The score of the spread

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>once again is seven, seven and a half. I got

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:14.399
<v Speaker 1>it at Yeah. I think it's a close loss for SC.

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:17.759
<v Speaker 1>It's something in the range of twenty seven to twenty three,

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:20.879
<v Speaker 1>because that's kind of SCSMO. This kind they'll be winning

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty three to twenty with eight and a half minutes left,

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:26.439
<v Speaker 1>give up a touchdown and Mayova throws a backbreaking pick

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 1>or something in the end zone late. I only managed

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:32.800
<v Speaker 1>nineteen against UCLA last week, by the way.

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:37.400
<v Speaker 2>I started from that point. Yeah, I started from that point,

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 2>and I tried to convince myself. Otherwise, I try to

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 2>convince myself because you know, my inclination will be to

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:46.000
<v Speaker 2>go points here, absolutely no points here. Rivalry, game, crive

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 2>and cross country a lot riding on at USC, if

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 2>nothing more. Has been plucky against some better teams on

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 2>their schedule, almost beat Pen State. They probably should have

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:57.360
<v Speaker 2>beaten Penn State, right, So that was my starting point.

0:34:58.000 --> 0:34:59.880
<v Speaker 2>I just come down on really liking the matchup for

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 2>Notre Dame, okay, because I think they're much more physical

0:35:04.960 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 2>in the trenches on both sides, and I think Riley

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Leonard kind of breaks what USC wants to do on defense,

0:35:12.000 --> 0:35:13.840
<v Speaker 2>which is blitz the crap out of you. That's what

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:15.880
<v Speaker 2>they've done all year. They blitz the crap out of you.

0:35:16.680 --> 0:35:20.359
<v Speaker 2>And the irony here is that though they're blitzing a lot.

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Their sack rates, their pressure rates are very low, which

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:26.360
<v Speaker 2>is basically a long way of saying that in this case,

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 2>if you're over committee against a mobile quarterback, that's not

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:31.880
<v Speaker 2>something that generally works. I have not seen that generally

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:34.320
<v Speaker 2>work in college football. I am not a defensive coordinator.

0:35:34.360 --> 0:35:37.360
<v Speaker 2>It seems like a bad formula to me. Riley Leonard

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:40.720
<v Speaker 2>is that mobile quarterback. Riley Leonard is obviously the focal

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:43.319
<v Speaker 2>point of this offense. Riley Leonard is also very good

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 2>at avoiding sacks in his own right. His sack avoidance,

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 2>I've said this a million times, very very good. He's

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:50.320
<v Speaker 2>good at avoiding the sacks. He just knows where pressure's

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 2>coming from. Not always the best quarterback out there, but

0:35:52.960 --> 0:35:56.319
<v Speaker 2>he's good at not getting taken down. True, I would

0:35:56.320 --> 0:35:57.799
<v Speaker 2>be a lot more worried about this if it were

0:35:57.800 --> 0:35:58.400
<v Speaker 2>Miller Moss.

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's where I went back and forth. See that

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the numbers and the competitive nature of these USC games

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 1>have not necessarily been on the back of Jade Mayava.

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right.

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:10.360
<v Speaker 2>If it were Miller Moss, I think I would be

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 2>with you and I would go points. But though I

0:36:13.760 --> 0:36:16.759
<v Speaker 2>like Jade Mayava, and the mobility that he brings. He

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:19.759
<v Speaker 2>is still relatively green, and I just think Notre Dame

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 2>is going to dare him to throw into the defense,

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 2>and I think that's where we see some mistakes.

0:36:24.160 --> 0:36:25.440
<v Speaker 1>So I think this is a good game.

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:27.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't think this is a runaway trained by any stretch,

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 2>and I think we're going to learn something a lot,

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:32.799
<v Speaker 2>hopefully about Notre Dame and what they've got in the

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 2>tank against a better opponent. This is the best opponent

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:39.040
<v Speaker 2>they've played in a while. Thirty one seventeen is my

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:41.720
<v Speaker 2>final for Notre Dame. I think they pull away late again.

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 2>I think they win this game the way they've been

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:46.399
<v Speaker 2>winning games, which is they're going to grind you down.

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:50.360
<v Speaker 2>They're going to make you make decisions against Briley Leonard,

0:36:50.520 --> 0:36:52.279
<v Speaker 2>who is mobile, who they can put on the run,

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:55.239
<v Speaker 2>who they can do RPO stuff with. I think he

0:36:55.320 --> 0:36:58.960
<v Speaker 2>will put this linebacking corps, especially in a bit of

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:02.359
<v Speaker 2>a bind, and it is that matchup that eventually ends

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:06.480
<v Speaker 2>up working for Notre Dame. Thirty one seventeen, Okay, we disagree,

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:09.400
<v Speaker 2>and everything you said is totally reasonable and for me

0:37:09.440 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 2>to pick against a team that has an advantage on

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:15.960
<v Speaker 2>neither line nor do they have an advantage at quarterback.

0:37:15.960 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 1>They're real big advantage is or not big advantage, but

0:37:18.719 --> 0:37:23.279
<v Speaker 1>they seem like that their depth of skill is at

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:25.360
<v Speaker 1>least a little bit. It might have a higher ceiling

0:37:25.680 --> 0:37:29.000
<v Speaker 1>given that Lincoln Riley has that background offensively, and look,

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Mike Denbrock is very good obviously, sure, but that would

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 1>be the advantage that those big offensive plays, if everything

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 1>is working out for both teams, might have an advantage

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 1>or might it might be USC's advantage. But no, I

0:37:41.200 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 1>think everything you said is sound. This is sort of

0:37:43.760 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 1>like a little bit of hoping to watch Notre Dame

0:37:48.120 --> 0:37:51.760
<v Speaker 1>play a competitive game rather than truly feeling great about

0:37:51.840 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 1>USC actually winning a game like this.

0:37:53.840 --> 0:37:56.719
<v Speaker 2>Again, if it were Miller Moss. If it were Miller Moss,

0:37:56.760 --> 0:38:01.320
<v Speaker 2>I would feel much differently the fact that it's Jade Mayava.

0:38:01.400 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I Look, it might be Miller Moss in the second quarter.

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Yeah knows. I think it might be done.

0:38:05.680 --> 0:38:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, seven point thirty on ABC. This is kind of

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:12.560
<v Speaker 2>a big another weekend. Texas ten to one Texas A

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 2>and M eight and three Texas is a five point

0:38:15.800 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 2>road favorite. It goes without saying that this is an

0:38:18.680 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 2>enormous game. This will be an enormous game if the

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:24.480
<v Speaker 2>stakes weren't already so high. But the way things have

0:38:24.560 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 2>gone now in the SEC, the winner of this game

0:38:26.680 --> 0:38:29.640
<v Speaker 2>is playing Georgia for the SEC title. It's a big deal.

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Kyle Field's gonna be rocking. Five points?

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Is a spread?

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Dan? Yeah, how do.

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:40.640
<v Speaker 1>You feel about that? I'm taking A and M. I

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:43.360
<v Speaker 1>don't love it. I'm going with the home team with

0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:46.400
<v Speaker 1>not the superior defense, but what can be an excellent

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:51.279
<v Speaker 1>defense in an environment that will be bloodthirsty.

0:38:51.480 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Let me ask you this because I have seen this

0:38:53.760 --> 0:38:57.360
<v Speaker 2>question pop up a fair amount recently because of the

0:38:57.360 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 2>playoff stuff, and I don't think we've really addressed it here.

0:39:00.719 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Have we been giving Texas too much benefit of the doubt?

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:06.279
<v Speaker 2>You know, because a lot of the arguments, Yeah, a

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:08.880
<v Speaker 2>lot of the arguments that people have made about strength

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:11.279
<v Speaker 2>of schedule. I'm not saying it's Notre Dame. I'm not

0:39:11.320 --> 0:39:14.200
<v Speaker 2>saying it's Penn State. I'm not saying it's Indiana, right,

0:39:14.200 --> 0:39:17.200
<v Speaker 2>But strength of schedule on the Texas side has been

0:39:17.280 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 2>something that has kind of come up here, and there

0:39:19.800 --> 0:39:21.799
<v Speaker 2>is Texas getting too much benefit of the doubt?

0:39:21.880 --> 0:39:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Right now, I think they're getting too much offensive benefit

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of the doubt. If anything, that I don't know if

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:30.239
<v Speaker 1>it's a rankings benefit of the doubt, because they're still

0:39:30.280 --> 0:39:34.160
<v Speaker 1>winning games. And while you can question the strength of

0:39:34.200 --> 0:39:38.000
<v Speaker 1>their schedule, and that's fine, and the quarterbacks who played

0:39:38.000 --> 0:39:41.080
<v Speaker 1>in those games, that's fine, But I don't have a

0:39:41.120 --> 0:39:45.279
<v Speaker 1>convincing argument to put a different team above Texas in

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 1>this moment. So I'll say, for the sake of predicting

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:54.360
<v Speaker 1>games for prognostication, yeah, maybe we are overrating Texas's ability

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:57.799
<v Speaker 1>to take care of business against good teams because I

0:39:57.800 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen it this year, right, It's just a mystery.

0:40:01.040 --> 0:40:03.839
<v Speaker 1>So in this situation, I'm taking Texas A and M

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 1>because they're at home, bloodthirsty crowd, huge emotional spot, quin yours.

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Beat up Texas on the road has not been lights

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 1>out on offense this year, and I'm just going to

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:19.359
<v Speaker 1>wager as as much as they just don't. I'm not

0:40:19.480 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 1>enamored with this beat up Texas A and M offense,

0:40:22.640 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 1>but I think they can pull this out based on

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:28.640
<v Speaker 1>where Texas is a where really where they haven't been.

0:40:28.680 --> 0:40:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's a tough situational spot for Texas

0:40:31.160 --> 0:40:33.640
<v Speaker 1>being a road favorite, where just whatever two to three

0:40:33.719 --> 0:40:36.840
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago against Arkansas they struggled to separate on the road.

0:40:37.400 --> 0:40:40.719
<v Speaker 1>That I just, I don't know. I'm not enamored with

0:40:40.760 --> 0:40:42.319
<v Speaker 1>Texas on offense this year in the way that I

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:44.920
<v Speaker 1>thought i'd be. So I'm gonna go A and M

0:40:44.960 --> 0:40:47.840
<v Speaker 1>bouncing back from a big emotional loss, because again, you

0:40:47.840 --> 0:40:50.600
<v Speaker 1>don't need to figure out how to muster the emotion

0:40:50.680 --> 0:40:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and will to get up for the return of Texas

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:55.719
<v Speaker 1>against A and M. So I wing A and M

0:40:55.840 --> 0:41:00.719
<v Speaker 1>outright to win this game twenty four to twenty outright

0:41:00.960 --> 0:41:04.879
<v Speaker 1>outright at home. Man, they're my home dog of the week,

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:05.719
<v Speaker 1>by the way, how about that?

0:41:05.719 --> 0:41:14.759
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, the Yakos home dog of the week. I

0:41:15.120 --> 0:41:17.800
<v Speaker 2>want to watch the A and offense is just off

0:41:17.840 --> 0:41:18.400
<v Speaker 2>for Texas.

0:41:18.400 --> 0:41:18.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:41:19.000 --> 0:41:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I want to watch the A and M fraught

0:41:21.640 --> 0:41:26.439
<v Speaker 2>against the Texas offensive line. Yeah, in particular, we saw

0:41:26.480 --> 0:41:29.440
<v Speaker 2>what Georgia did to the Texas offensive line.

0:41:29.880 --> 0:41:31.319
<v Speaker 1>Is A and M good enough to replicate that?

0:41:32.320 --> 0:41:35.359
<v Speaker 2>They're certainly good enough to try, and I think they

0:41:35.440 --> 0:41:38.319
<v Speaker 2>should because you mentioned Quinn Ewers is banged up. He's

0:41:38.320 --> 0:41:41.120
<v Speaker 2>out there on a bum ankle. This is an offense that,

0:41:41.480 --> 0:41:43.920
<v Speaker 2>to your point, yes, sort of struggled to separate, especially

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:47.880
<v Speaker 2>in the road. We've just gotten done talking about it. Frankly,

0:41:47.920 --> 0:41:51.000
<v Speaker 2>we talked about it on Tuesday. Where is this next

0:41:51.000 --> 0:41:54.279
<v Speaker 2>gear for the Texas offense? Does it have a next gear?

0:41:54.320 --> 0:41:56.359
<v Speaker 2>It feels like a Sark offense should be a little

0:41:56.360 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 2>bit better than this with all the artillery they've gotten.

0:41:59.000 --> 0:42:01.239
<v Speaker 1>Why is it now?

0:42:01.280 --> 0:42:03.480
<v Speaker 2>I do question if Marcel Reid has the juice.

0:42:03.239 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 1>To beat Texas. I like a question that too.

0:42:06.920 --> 0:42:10.719
<v Speaker 2>I like Marcel Reid. Does he have enough juice to

0:42:10.760 --> 0:42:11.880
<v Speaker 2>beat this Texas defense?

0:42:13.040 --> 0:42:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:16.399
<v Speaker 2>I do love the spot for A and M, though,

0:42:16.520 --> 0:42:18.760
<v Speaker 2>and I also have them outright. I've got it twenty

0:42:18.800 --> 0:42:21.719
<v Speaker 2>six twenty three, A, I love that from you. I've

0:42:21.719 --> 0:42:24.360
<v Speaker 2>got it twenty six twenty three. I probably should have

0:42:24.400 --> 0:42:26.440
<v Speaker 2>made it my home dog as well, but I was

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:32.040
<v Speaker 2>enamored with that Auburn pick. This would be an incredible,

0:42:32.400 --> 0:42:35.120
<v Speaker 2>incredible victory for A and M. This would throw a

0:42:35.160 --> 0:42:39.680
<v Speaker 2>lot into question with regard to the playoff, and part

0:42:39.680 --> 0:42:42.799
<v Speaker 2>of me is sort of enamored with that storyline. It

0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:47.920
<v Speaker 2>may have influenced my pick here a little bit, but

0:42:49.239 --> 0:42:51.440
<v Speaker 2>bear in mind they are restarting this rivalry for the

0:42:51.480 --> 0:42:54.840
<v Speaker 2>first time since twenty eleven, way back when Mac Brown

0:42:54.920 --> 0:42:57.720
<v Speaker 2>knocked off Mike Sherman twenty seven to twenty five.

0:42:57.600 --> 0:43:01.719
<v Speaker 1>In validate McCoy, Case McCoy. So it is just it has.

0:43:01.640 --> 0:43:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Been so long since we had this game. I find

0:43:04.120 --> 0:43:06.000
<v Speaker 2>it hard to believe that any one team is going

0:43:06.080 --> 0:43:08.840
<v Speaker 2>to blow out the other. So I'm taking points and

0:43:08.880 --> 0:43:10.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm taking a and m out right.

0:43:10.560 --> 0:43:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, we agree, by the way, that was case

0:43:12.760 --> 0:43:15.759
<v Speaker 1>McCoy sixteen of twenty seven four point one yards per

0:43:15.800 --> 0:43:19.759
<v Speaker 1>attempt taking down Ryan Tannehill, who threw three picks four

0:43:19.760 --> 0:43:22.560
<v Speaker 1>point six yards per attempt. Malcolm Brown on the ground

0:43:22.960 --> 0:43:26.400
<v Speaker 1>for Texas, Ben Molina on the ground for Texas, A

0:43:26.480 --> 0:43:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and m former Angels catcher Ben Molina or Ben Molina

0:43:29.560 --> 0:43:31.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the Molina brothers. Yeah, yeah, took a stab

0:43:31.960 --> 0:43:34.319
<v Speaker 1>at running the ball twenty five times in a rivalry game.

0:43:34.360 --> 0:43:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Markus Goodwin out wide with Jackson Shipley for Texas. Yeah.

0:43:41.560 --> 0:43:44.120
<v Speaker 1>When I looked at Texas's schedule again, through no fault

0:43:44.120 --> 0:43:46.680
<v Speaker 1>of their own, what have we seen against Texas with

0:43:47.080 --> 0:43:51.239
<v Speaker 1>a good defensive line and a decent quarterback? No, I

0:43:51.280 --> 0:43:54.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know, lose to Georgia, and that's kind of it.

0:43:54.280 --> 0:43:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Like Kentucky's got that good front, but they don't have

0:43:56.120 --> 0:43:58.719
<v Speaker 1>the decent quarterback. Oklahoma's got that decent front. They didn't

0:43:58.760 --> 0:44:01.480
<v Speaker 1>have a good quarterback. Florida decent front. It was an

0:44:01.480 --> 0:44:03.759
<v Speaker 1>Aiden Warner game like it. Just a guy doesn't mean

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:06.040
<v Speaker 1>they can't beat A and M. They most certainly can

0:44:06.160 --> 0:44:07.920
<v Speaker 1>beat A and M. They can beat an AM by

0:44:07.920 --> 0:44:11.799
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns. It's just been a long year of not

0:44:12.040 --> 0:44:13.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing it. That's all.

0:44:15.719 --> 0:44:19.480
<v Speaker 2>I think about. The heart, the passionate, the love, the commitment,

0:44:19.800 --> 0:44:21.320
<v Speaker 2>and the energy you're willing.

0:44:21.080 --> 0:44:21.759
<v Speaker 1>To put into it.

0:44:25.520 --> 0:44:27.719
<v Speaker 2>All Right, the Quad Father's Segment's gonna be a little

0:44:27.719 --> 0:44:31.920
<v Speaker 2>different this time around. We've just got a bunch of

0:44:31.920 --> 0:44:33.520
<v Speaker 2>games that we need to call out. You can pick

0:44:33.560 --> 0:44:35.879
<v Speaker 2>your own quads, but there are a bunch of cool

0:44:35.960 --> 0:44:38.560
<v Speaker 2>rivalries that I think we need to discuss here. We

0:44:38.640 --> 0:44:42.239
<v Speaker 2>will start at high noon on ABC. Tennessee nine and

0:44:42.360 --> 0:44:48.800
<v Speaker 2>two Vanderbilt six and five. Tennessee needs to win against Vandy.

0:44:48.840 --> 0:44:52.840
<v Speaker 2>They are a ten and one half point favorite. Vandy

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:57.200
<v Speaker 2>now with Diego Pavia has a chance to beat an

0:44:57.239 --> 0:44:59.320
<v Speaker 2>in state rival, has a chance to knock the in

0:44:59.400 --> 0:45:00.279
<v Speaker 2>state rival.

0:45:00.840 --> 0:45:01.799
<v Speaker 1>Out of the playoffs.

0:45:01.800 --> 0:45:04.520
<v Speaker 2>I would presume out of the playoffs if Tennessee finishes

0:45:04.600 --> 0:45:09.319
<v Speaker 2>with three losses. Does Vandy have more magic left?

0:45:09.360 --> 0:45:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Dan? I think they have covering magic. I'm gonna take

0:45:13.640 --> 0:45:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the points, Okay. I don't feel confident about Vandy scoring

0:45:18.880 --> 0:45:21.440
<v Speaker 1>enough to beat Tennessee. Though I'm not crazy high on

0:45:21.520 --> 0:45:25.719
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee's offense this year. I think they've slowly improved. So

0:45:25.800 --> 0:45:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to say, yeah, twenty seven to twenty, twenty

0:45:29.760 --> 0:45:32.160
<v Speaker 1>four to seventeen somewhere in that. I'm going to take

0:45:32.200 --> 0:45:34.160
<v Speaker 1>points here Vandy as a home dog.

0:45:34.280 --> 0:45:36.560
<v Speaker 2>This one was Tennessee minus twelve when I made the doc,

0:45:36.800 --> 0:45:38.600
<v Speaker 2>and since then it's come down a little bit.

0:45:39.280 --> 0:45:40.520
<v Speaker 1>For as much as I'd like to.

0:45:40.480 --> 0:45:44.440
<v Speaker 2>Go Vandy to make it really uncomfortable for the playoff committee.

0:45:44.080 --> 0:45:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's get real, that's all I care about.

0:45:46.560 --> 0:45:50.680
<v Speaker 2>I think the combination of Tennessee's defensive front with their

0:45:50.719 --> 0:45:51.760
<v Speaker 2>ability to throw.

0:45:51.520 --> 0:45:53.120
<v Speaker 1>The ball, I'm with you.

0:45:53.680 --> 0:45:56.080
<v Speaker 2>I think that's more than enough to get the w.

0:45:56.480 --> 0:45:58.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm kind of looking at this one like I did

0:45:59.239 --> 0:46:03.960
<v Speaker 2>South Carolina against Vandy with their defense are front.

0:46:03.640 --> 0:46:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Isn't it now? It would have been better if for

0:46:06.120 --> 0:46:10.280
<v Speaker 1>this specific game, if Vandy barely lost to Alabama, because

0:46:10.320 --> 0:46:14.960
<v Speaker 1>obviously Tennessee will have or Tennessee's attention will be fully

0:46:15.000 --> 0:46:19.839
<v Speaker 1>sweared on Vandy. Here, there is something about you use

0:46:19.880 --> 0:46:22.360
<v Speaker 1>what was the term you use, like controlling their own destiny.

0:46:22.360 --> 0:46:25.440
<v Speaker 1>There is something that, like diego Pavia is just destined

0:46:25.480 --> 0:46:26.880
<v Speaker 1>to hurt people's feelings.

0:46:26.920 --> 0:46:29.640
<v Speaker 2>I think this is this is his last regular season game.

0:46:29.719 --> 0:46:32.399
<v Speaker 2>He lost that appeal that he I mean, I don't

0:46:32.400 --> 0:46:34.120
<v Speaker 2>know where things stand in the court case to try

0:46:34.120 --> 0:46:35.760
<v Speaker 2>and get another year of eligibility.

0:46:35.320 --> 0:46:37.200
<v Speaker 1>You wanted to stay of some kind Yeah, yeah.

0:46:37.040 --> 0:46:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, with junior college eligibility or whatnot. I think this

0:46:40.239 --> 0:46:43.160
<v Speaker 2>is probably going to be his last home game short

0:46:43.160 --> 0:46:45.160
<v Speaker 2>of the bowl, whatever bowl they end up going to.

0:46:45.719 --> 0:46:47.479
<v Speaker 1>So maybe there's more magic in there.

0:46:47.680 --> 0:46:50.400
<v Speaker 2>I look, I'm all for it, but yeah, the win,

0:46:50.440 --> 0:46:52.400
<v Speaker 2>no bowl, But yeah, I've got a twenty seven to

0:46:52.480 --> 0:46:55.200
<v Speaker 2>fourteen Tennessee winning and covering going to the playoffs.

0:46:55.200 --> 0:46:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Disagree he's gonna hurt feelings.

0:46:57.440 --> 0:47:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Twelve o'clock ESPN South Carolina eight and three, Clemson nine

0:47:01.600 --> 0:47:04.360
<v Speaker 2>and two. Clemson favored by two and a half in

0:47:04.400 --> 0:47:08.080
<v Speaker 2>the Paul Metal Bowl. Dan, I'm going South Carolina.

0:47:07.640 --> 0:47:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Outright here, as am I.

0:47:09.680 --> 0:47:11.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm going outright ink Clemsons would be a big win

0:47:12.920 --> 0:47:15.480
<v Speaker 2>to get them to nine and three. I just genuinely

0:47:15.480 --> 0:47:19.000
<v Speaker 2>think they're the better team. I love their defensive front. Clemson.

0:47:19.280 --> 0:47:23.719
<v Speaker 2>I've come around on Clemson. I feel like I have

0:47:23.920 --> 0:47:27.640
<v Speaker 2>a weekly sort of check in with Clemson where I'm

0:47:27.680 --> 0:47:30.160
<v Speaker 2>not sure how I feel about them, but generally I

0:47:30.160 --> 0:47:33.120
<v Speaker 2>think it's shown improvement throughout the course of the year.

0:47:33.400 --> 0:47:35.480
<v Speaker 2>I just kind of like South Carolina more and their

0:47:35.480 --> 0:47:36.200
<v Speaker 2>defensive front.

0:47:36.280 --> 0:47:39.040
<v Speaker 1>So give me the game Cocks. Yeah, it's just a

0:47:39.080 --> 0:47:42.160
<v Speaker 1>consistency thing for me that South Carolina appears to be

0:47:42.760 --> 0:47:44.879
<v Speaker 1>peaking right now. Nearly lost to Misszoo, but I think

0:47:44.880 --> 0:47:47.680
<v Speaker 1>actually Miszoo has finally come into their own. It's taken

0:47:47.680 --> 0:47:51.239
<v Speaker 1>long enough, so I'm gonna go South Carolina here. I

0:47:51.320 --> 0:47:54.239
<v Speaker 1>just there is something about the trust of recent performances

0:47:54.280 --> 0:47:56.919
<v Speaker 1>that I don't have with Clemson. I mean, Clemson's very good.

0:47:57.280 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I think Dylan Stewart I have saw that there's some

0:47:59.760 --> 0:48:03.680
<v Speaker 1>like public negotiations on what his nil number is gonna

0:48:03.719 --> 0:48:06.040
<v Speaker 1>be next year. Okay, he might add like a quick

0:48:06.040 --> 0:48:10.160
<v Speaker 1>three hundred K by performing in this one so yeah,

0:48:10.200 --> 0:48:13.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go South Carolina here by the touchdown.

0:48:13.640 --> 0:48:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Also at noon in the SEC, it is the Governor's Cup.

0:48:17.800 --> 0:48:19.080
<v Speaker 1>It is Louisville in.

0:48:19.160 --> 0:48:22.920
<v Speaker 2>SEC Territory lex Tin Kentucky scoring off against their in

0:48:22.960 --> 0:48:26.520
<v Speaker 2>state rival Kentucky Wildcats. A battle of seven and four

0:48:26.520 --> 0:48:29.799
<v Speaker 2>against four and seven, louisvill favor by four.

0:48:30.960 --> 0:48:33.959
<v Speaker 1>Who's taking home the Governor's Cup? Dam? I have Louisville here,

0:48:34.200 --> 0:48:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know if Kentucky had average quarterback play

0:48:37.760 --> 0:48:40.319
<v Speaker 1>or proven average quarterback play. They made the change. Brock

0:48:40.400 --> 0:48:42.279
<v Speaker 1>Vandergriff will not be starting this one. It's gonna be

0:48:42.280 --> 0:48:47.560
<v Speaker 1>my guy, Butter Coally, Yes, Butter Kohley. But I think

0:48:47.600 --> 0:48:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Louisville is just too solid. The defense is average, but

0:48:50.040 --> 0:48:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Kentucky has the offense to take advantage.

0:48:52.480 --> 0:48:54.399
<v Speaker 1>Even though some of the skill on that team is good,

0:48:54.960 --> 0:48:56.879
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think they're I'll button up enough team

0:48:56.960 --> 0:48:59.120
<v Speaker 1>right now. So I have Louisville winning this one outright,

0:48:59.160 --> 0:49:03.320
<v Speaker 1>covering with relative ease something like now thirty one sixteen.

0:49:03.600 --> 0:49:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and Louisville's actually played well against the better teams

0:49:07.920 --> 0:49:12.239
<v Speaker 2>in their schedule. They beat Clemson pounded with Stanford. Ye, yeah,

0:49:12.320 --> 0:49:15.839
<v Speaker 2>pounded pit almost beat Miami. They hung with Notre Dame.

0:49:15.840 --> 0:49:20.040
<v Speaker 2>The Stanford loss was not great, right, However, they're absolutely

0:49:20.080 --> 0:49:21.839
<v Speaker 2>good enough to beat a team like Kentucky, which kind

0:49:21.840 --> 0:49:23.000
<v Speaker 2>of feels in disarray right now.

0:49:23.040 --> 0:49:25.239
<v Speaker 1>So I'm with you. That was across the country too

0:49:25.320 --> 0:49:27.200
<v Speaker 1>for Louisville. Stanford lost. Yeah.

0:49:27.280 --> 0:49:31.440
<v Speaker 2>Twelve o'clock ESPN two Kansas minus one and a half points.

0:49:31.480 --> 0:49:34.560
<v Speaker 2>This line has shifted in favor of Kansas against the

0:49:34.600 --> 0:49:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Baylor Bears. Dan, I am one hundred and ninety percent

0:49:38.600 --> 0:49:39.439
<v Speaker 2>on Kansas here.

0:49:40.080 --> 0:49:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, I love it.

0:49:41.200 --> 0:49:44.560
<v Speaker 2>I fully disagree and ninety percent They're the one team

0:49:44.600 --> 0:49:46.399
<v Speaker 2>the Big twelve I would not want to play right now,

0:49:46.960 --> 0:49:48.160
<v Speaker 2>even more so than Asu.

0:49:48.800 --> 0:49:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Kansas. I think they're out of gas. Oh.

0:49:52.480 --> 0:49:56.160
<v Speaker 1>With his not really being a rivalry game, I think

0:49:56.200 --> 0:49:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Baylor has done enough both at home and on the road.

0:50:00.160 --> 0:50:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm going Baylor here against this Kansas defense to take advantage.

0:50:04.080 --> 0:50:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Get off the field enough. Not a great defense, but

0:50:06.880 --> 0:50:08.719
<v Speaker 1>get off the field enough. I have Baylor winning this

0:50:08.760 --> 0:50:11.400
<v Speaker 1>one by I don't know, three or four points.

0:50:11.760 --> 0:50:14.760
<v Speaker 2>Two named rivalries that will move to the afternoon slate

0:50:15.480 --> 0:50:18.800
<v Speaker 2>twelve o'clock Big ten Network. It's the Land of Lincoln Trophy.

0:50:18.840 --> 0:50:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Have you seen this? By the way, have you seen

0:50:20.200 --> 0:50:22.239
<v Speaker 1>the trophy? You sent it to me? Looks beautiful? Is

0:50:22.239 --> 0:50:24.760
<v Speaker 1>that not a cool freaking trophy? The big gold, golden

0:50:24.800 --> 0:50:26.799
<v Speaker 1>looking top hat, top hat. I love it.

0:50:27.040 --> 0:50:30.279
<v Speaker 2>I hadn't seen it before. Illinois eight and three, Northwestern

0:50:30.320 --> 0:50:33.120
<v Speaker 2>four and seven. Illinois favored by seven and a half points.

0:50:34.120 --> 0:50:36.880
<v Speaker 2>Any reason to go to Arthwestern here? Now?

0:50:36.920 --> 0:50:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's Wrigley Field, I guess I don't know. No,

0:50:39.040 --> 0:50:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I have Illinois big.

0:50:40.200 --> 0:50:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Illinois big, Okay, ESPNU. They call it the Battle on

0:50:43.200 --> 0:50:47.919
<v Speaker 2>the Bayou matchup between Louisiana at nine and two. They're

0:50:47.960 --> 0:50:49.719
<v Speaker 2>a nine and a half point favorite on the road

0:50:49.760 --> 0:50:51.360
<v Speaker 2>at Louisiana.

0:50:50.880 --> 0:50:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Monroe Battle on the Bayou, Dan.

0:50:53.440 --> 0:50:56.760
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Monroe's made a good story. They can get eligible

0:50:56.800 --> 0:50:57.120
<v Speaker 2>with the win.

0:51:00.000 --> 0:51:03.440
<v Speaker 1>He lost five straight, which I don't love against not

0:51:03.560 --> 0:51:07.040
<v Speaker 1>so good defenses other than Auburn. I'm going with Louisiana

0:51:07.040 --> 0:51:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to win this one and cover on the road.

0:51:09.760 --> 0:51:12.520
<v Speaker 2>They're much better. Louisiana is much better, especially on offense.

0:51:12.680 --> 0:51:15.480
<v Speaker 2>So I think I'm with you. Okay, Let's get to

0:51:15.520 --> 0:51:18.120
<v Speaker 2>the afternoon block. Yeah, play, Welcome to the pain zones

0:51:18.120 --> 0:51:21.279
<v Speaker 2>where we live. Let's go to the pain zone. Could

0:51:21.280 --> 0:51:24.799
<v Speaker 2>this be the pain zone for the Miami Hurricanes. I

0:51:24.840 --> 0:51:28.799
<v Speaker 2>have Syracuse three thirty ESPN. Miami at ten and one

0:51:28.920 --> 0:51:32.400
<v Speaker 2>is an eleven point favorite on the road at Syracuse

0:51:32.400 --> 0:51:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Syracuse eight and three, very quietly eight and three. I'm

0:51:36.480 --> 0:51:38.799
<v Speaker 2>expecting a lot of points. Vegas is expecting a lot

0:51:38.800 --> 0:51:40.919
<v Speaker 2>of points. They've got the over under at sixty seven

0:51:41.000 --> 0:51:42.040
<v Speaker 2>and a half on.

0:51:42.000 --> 0:51:43.560
<v Speaker 1>A fast track in a dome.

0:51:43.800 --> 0:51:47.839
<v Speaker 2>JMA Wireless Dome DAN one of the weirdest places that

0:51:47.880 --> 0:51:50.680
<v Speaker 2>you could play, especially against a weird coach who does

0:51:50.719 --> 0:51:56.520
<v Speaker 2>not shower if he doesn't win, So the impetus is obvious.

0:51:56.719 --> 0:52:00.840
<v Speaker 2>I think for Miami, you win, you caull fly, not

0:52:01.120 --> 0:52:03.440
<v Speaker 2>just for the ACC title game, but most likely for

0:52:03.480 --> 0:52:08.719
<v Speaker 2>the playoff as well. Is Syracuse good enough to cover

0:52:08.760 --> 0:52:09.480
<v Speaker 2>this point spread?

0:52:09.920 --> 0:52:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Yes, they're also good enough to lose by thirty, but

0:52:12.480 --> 0:52:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I think they're good enough to cover as well. Yeah.

0:52:15.239 --> 0:52:17.759
<v Speaker 2>Is Syracuse the kind of team that is good enough

0:52:17.800 --> 0:52:21.239
<v Speaker 2>to lose by one score against everybody on its schedule? Maybe,

0:52:21.239 --> 0:52:24.520
<v Speaker 2>with the exception of pitt I think probably they feel

0:52:24.520 --> 0:52:25.400
<v Speaker 2>like one of those teams.

0:52:25.440 --> 0:52:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Even that pit game that was just a bunch of

0:52:26.880 --> 0:52:30.160
<v Speaker 1>pick sixes, five interceptions for Comport in that game.

0:52:30.440 --> 0:52:34.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I just wonder if Syracuse is the style team

0:52:34.280 --> 0:52:36.279
<v Speaker 2>that's going to find a way, come hell or high

0:52:36.280 --> 0:52:39.800
<v Speaker 2>water to keep this one close. Eleven feels like a lot.

0:52:39.880 --> 0:52:43.440
<v Speaker 2>I understand why it's at eleven. Miami is obviously very

0:52:43.520 --> 0:52:46.799
<v Speaker 2>very good on offense led by cam Board. I'm going

0:52:46.800 --> 0:52:48.160
<v Speaker 2>with the for animal, Baby.

0:52:48.560 --> 0:52:49.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm going with the f animal two.

0:52:50.400 --> 0:52:54.280
<v Speaker 2>I got it at thirty eight thirty one. Miami wouldn't

0:52:54.320 --> 0:52:56.640
<v Speaker 2>surprise me if Syracuse won the game out right because

0:52:56.640 --> 0:52:58.799
<v Speaker 2>of the for animal, because it's a weird place, weird

0:52:58.800 --> 0:53:02.359
<v Speaker 2>place to play, because Syracuse has a tendency to do

0:53:02.400 --> 0:53:07.120
<v Speaker 2>this to teams. So I'm going Miami, but not covering.

0:53:07.320 --> 0:53:11.080
<v Speaker 1>They've run well, Syracuse has and there is still something

0:53:11.080 --> 0:53:14.319
<v Speaker 1>about Miami where you want to be my top five team,

0:53:14.360 --> 0:53:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you want to be my top eight team. And I

0:53:17.000 --> 0:53:18.480
<v Speaker 1>know it was a special teams thing and it was

0:53:18.560 --> 0:53:20.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of a weird situation against wake Forest. What's the

0:53:20.520 --> 0:53:24.440
<v Speaker 1>score going into the fourth quarter last week twenty to fourteen. Yeah,

0:53:24.480 --> 0:53:26.840
<v Speaker 1>for as good as Miami can be at so many

0:53:26.880 --> 0:53:30.840
<v Speaker 1>different things on both sides of the ball, yeah, first

0:53:30.880 --> 0:53:34.600
<v Speaker 1>half separation, first three quarters separation. It just hasn't been

0:53:34.600 --> 0:53:36.799
<v Speaker 1>a thing for this team. This team is not a

0:53:36.880 --> 0:53:39.080
<v Speaker 1>take care of business team. And now you're going to

0:53:39.160 --> 0:53:42.840
<v Speaker 1>fly up to Syracuse, New York, play in a dome

0:53:43.320 --> 0:53:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and figure it all out to win this game against

0:53:46.160 --> 0:53:49.480
<v Speaker 1>a decent Syracuse team. I think they can win. I

0:53:49.480 --> 0:53:52.160
<v Speaker 1>think they should win. I have them winning, but I

0:53:52.200 --> 0:53:56.000
<v Speaker 1>have them winning. Thirty five thirty one, all right, we

0:53:56.080 --> 0:53:57.800
<v Speaker 1>agree that, Yes, we agree? Agree?

0:53:57.880 --> 0:54:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, three thirty ESPN two. Another ACC matchup weirdness. It

0:54:02.440 --> 0:54:06.640
<v Speaker 2>may sound to say Cal on the road at SMU,

0:54:06.760 --> 0:54:09.400
<v Speaker 2>SMU favored by thirteen and a half points at home.

0:54:10.800 --> 0:54:12.640
<v Speaker 1>This seems like far too many points to me. It's

0:54:12.680 --> 0:54:14.279
<v Speaker 1>just too many points to me. Yeah, I don't think

0:54:14.440 --> 0:54:16.600
<v Speaker 1>too many. And now this is it's a letdown spot

0:54:16.600 --> 0:54:19.760
<v Speaker 1>for Cal having beaten Stanford in a big emotional spot,

0:54:19.840 --> 0:54:24.560
<v Speaker 1>now traveling to Texas. I just think it's too many points.

0:54:25.920 --> 0:54:29.360
<v Speaker 2>It feels to me, though SMU has been really solid

0:54:29.400 --> 0:54:31.400
<v Speaker 2>down the stretch, and though I think they are getting

0:54:31.400 --> 0:54:34.279
<v Speaker 2>a little bit better each week, given the fact that

0:54:34.320 --> 0:54:38.319
<v Speaker 2>they've punched their ticket to the ACC title already, there's

0:54:38.320 --> 0:54:41.120
<v Speaker 2>a look ahead spot here. There's a look ahead spot.

0:54:41.640 --> 0:54:42.959
<v Speaker 2>I would not want to be in a look ahead

0:54:42.960 --> 0:54:47.800
<v Speaker 2>spot against a calgorithm no one more chance to put

0:54:48.280 --> 0:54:52.319
<v Speaker 2>one final scare into a notable team from the deep South.

0:54:52.400 --> 0:54:55.959
<v Speaker 2>Mind you, right, thirty four to thirty one, SMU wins,

0:54:56.000 --> 0:54:56.680
<v Speaker 2>but only barely.

0:54:57.080 --> 0:54:58.880
<v Speaker 1>So you have like a certain amount of calculus, and

0:54:58.920 --> 0:55:01.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not limited to SMU. You here a calculus of like,

0:55:01.680 --> 0:55:04.360
<v Speaker 1>how many games do we actually have left if we

0:55:04.480 --> 0:55:09.319
<v Speaker 1>are looking at a playoff berth, how much do we

0:55:09.400 --> 0:55:11.399
<v Speaker 1>want to show? How much were we willing to put

0:55:11.400 --> 0:55:13.480
<v Speaker 1>out there? How long are we willing to leave starters

0:55:13.480 --> 0:55:18.600
<v Speaker 1>in If you are a lot of these teams Miami, SMU,

0:55:18.800 --> 0:55:22.680
<v Speaker 1>any you know Tennessee if they're up reasonably so against Vanderbilt,

0:55:22.800 --> 0:55:27.000
<v Speaker 1>or again like Ohio State, that you want to have

0:55:27.200 --> 0:55:30.399
<v Speaker 1>enough in the tank to get to early January, middle

0:55:30.440 --> 0:55:34.240
<v Speaker 1>of January, late January, or whatever. No team is fully

0:55:34.280 --> 0:55:37.120
<v Speaker 1>prepared to do this because nobody team has potentially played

0:55:37.120 --> 0:55:39.279
<v Speaker 1>as many games as some of these teams will by

0:55:39.280 --> 0:55:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year. And so I think you're

0:55:42.680 --> 0:55:44.680
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at a number of coaches who are trying

0:55:44.719 --> 0:55:47.239
<v Speaker 1>to think about this in a newly smart way. Maybe

0:55:47.280 --> 0:55:49.040
<v Speaker 1>it'll work out for them. Maybe it won't, but I

0:55:49.040 --> 0:55:50.799
<v Speaker 1>think a game like this, I think is certainly an

0:55:50.800 --> 0:55:52.680
<v Speaker 1>example of where it could happen, where you're just like,

0:55:52.800 --> 0:55:56.439
<v Speaker 1>let's just win, stay healthy, pull this guy who's been

0:55:56.440 --> 0:55:58.640
<v Speaker 1>beat up early, and maybe that allows somebody back into

0:55:58.680 --> 0:56:00.879
<v Speaker 1>the game a little bit. We'll win. No, I think

0:56:00.880 --> 0:56:02.520
<v Speaker 1>that's where we are with smu CAL.

0:56:02.560 --> 0:56:05.480
<v Speaker 2>Three thirty Big ten Network, Maryland a twenty four and

0:56:05.520 --> 0:56:08.000
<v Speaker 2>a half point dog on the road at Penn State.

0:56:08.680 --> 0:56:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Penn State leads this series forty three to three. Yeah,

0:56:12.160 --> 0:56:15.640
<v Speaker 2>this game is almost never close. I think Penn State

0:56:15.719 --> 0:56:18.200
<v Speaker 2>is going to lay the wood in as we say,

0:56:18.560 --> 0:56:19.839
<v Speaker 2>forty one to fourteen.

0:56:19.600 --> 0:56:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Is my final.

0:56:20.320 --> 0:56:22.799
<v Speaker 2>I got Penn State big forty four to ten. Yeah,

0:56:23.239 --> 0:56:26.000
<v Speaker 2>well you agree, very close again. Three thirty FS one

0:56:26.680 --> 0:56:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Rutgers six and five Michigan State five and six. Michigan

0:56:30.680 --> 0:56:33.760
<v Speaker 2>State needs to win. They are a one point favorite.

0:56:35.520 --> 0:56:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Rutgers hurts feelings. Rutgers is going to win this game

0:56:38.160 --> 0:56:42.480
<v Speaker 1>by three. I love Michigan State here really, oh, I

0:56:42.520 --> 0:56:46.000
<v Speaker 1>love them. I mean, it wasn't a great game against Perdue,

0:56:46.000 --> 0:56:46.799
<v Speaker 1>but okay.

0:56:47.480 --> 0:56:50.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm treating this one like it's some sort of playoff game.

0:56:50.280 --> 0:56:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Truly. I think bowlel eligible and one I get Bowl

0:56:53.200 --> 0:56:54.000
<v Speaker 1>eligible in year one.

0:56:54.080 --> 0:56:57.319
<v Speaker 2>Jonathan's okay, yeah, yeah, we disagree. I'm gonna go Michigan State.

0:56:58.239 --> 0:57:02.600
<v Speaker 2>I also have listed here NC State on the road

0:57:02.640 --> 0:57:05.719
<v Speaker 2>at North Carolina. North Carolina, I have minus three and

0:57:05.719 --> 0:57:07.279
<v Speaker 2>a half. I don't know if that's changed since I

0:57:07.360 --> 0:57:10.279
<v Speaker 2>made the doc, but mac Brown's been fired. NC State

0:57:10.360 --> 0:57:12.239
<v Speaker 2>needs to win this one and get Bowl eligible. I'm

0:57:12.280 --> 0:57:14.200
<v Speaker 2>on wolf Pack here, give me the wolf oh man.

0:57:14.239 --> 0:57:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm on North Carolina and Max's final game. I think

0:57:16.440 --> 0:57:17.520
<v Speaker 1>they run wild.

0:57:18.160 --> 0:57:20.360
<v Speaker 2>A few named rivalries that I did want to call

0:57:20.400 --> 0:57:23.560
<v Speaker 2>out here, yeah, and then of course.

0:57:23.320 --> 0:57:25.600
<v Speaker 1>One other one. Did you say BC pitt I was

0:57:25.640 --> 0:57:27.280
<v Speaker 1>going to get to b C Pittes, Okay, just making

0:57:27.280 --> 0:57:29.360
<v Speaker 1>sure BC pit all right? So Pitt's seven and four,

0:57:29.440 --> 0:57:34.040
<v Speaker 1>they're a five point road dog against Boston College, who

0:57:34.080 --> 0:57:37.760
<v Speaker 1>is favored at home. You have a you have a leen? Oh?

0:57:37.800 --> 0:57:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I love Boston College? Here, do you? I think Pitts

0:57:40.240 --> 0:57:44.240
<v Speaker 1>season has collapsed from beneath it with Eli Holstein's injury,

0:57:44.280 --> 0:57:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a couple of other key injuries. I just I think

0:57:46.040 --> 0:57:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Boston College is in a nice place, so I have

0:57:48.520 --> 0:57:49.320
<v Speaker 1>them winning.

0:57:49.680 --> 0:57:51.960
<v Speaker 2>The three named rivalries that I wanted to call out.

0:57:51.960 --> 0:57:55.560
<v Speaker 2>The battle line rivalry is Sarkansas at six and five

0:57:56.120 --> 0:57:58.919
<v Speaker 2>against Missoo at eight and three. Missoo is favored by three.

0:58:00.440 --> 0:58:05.520
<v Speaker 2>I've got the Battle of I ten between Utip and

0:58:05.640 --> 0:58:08.240
<v Speaker 2>New Mexico State. Both teams are bad, but who cares.

0:58:08.280 --> 0:58:10.800
<v Speaker 2>It's a cool rivalry in Mexico State favored by two.

0:58:11.560 --> 0:58:16.040
<v Speaker 2>And then we've got deeper than height. You gotta say

0:58:16.080 --> 0:58:19.120
<v Speaker 2>it in that tone. You can't say deeper than.

0:58:19.040 --> 0:58:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Hate is deeper than heat.

0:58:20.720 --> 0:58:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, app State at five and five on the road

0:58:23.520 --> 0:58:26.800
<v Speaker 2>at Georgia Southern, which is seven and four. Georgia Southern

0:58:26.840 --> 0:58:28.640
<v Speaker 2>favored by two and a half points. Got to lean

0:58:28.720 --> 0:58:29.520
<v Speaker 2>on any of those games.

0:58:29.600 --> 0:58:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm going Georgia Southern, I'm going to New Mexico State,

0:58:32.480 --> 0:58:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going Missoo. I'm going home teams in an

0:58:35.280 --> 0:58:38.120
<v Speaker 1>advantage spot Missoos, as I mentioned, they've come into their

0:58:38.160 --> 0:58:40.520
<v Speaker 1>own a little bit right there about to beat South

0:58:40.520 --> 0:58:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Carolina obviously didn't go their way, but no Miszoo generating

0:58:44.080 --> 0:58:47.360
<v Speaker 1>bigger plays more recently. As much as I like Arkansas Offen,

0:58:47.440 --> 0:58:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I like Arkansas overall, but I just they haven't been

0:58:50.040 --> 0:58:52.040
<v Speaker 1>able to pull out games. I'm going missoo here to

0:58:52.080 --> 0:58:55.160
<v Speaker 1>finish strong and UH have an opportunity to finish the

0:58:55.160 --> 0:58:56.880
<v Speaker 1>season with ten wins. Ten wins.

0:58:56.880 --> 0:58:59.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you on all three of those, by the way, okay,

0:58:59.560 --> 0:59:00.920
<v Speaker 2>all three those we agree.

0:59:01.120 --> 0:59:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to.

0:59:01.920 --> 0:59:04.240
<v Speaker 2>The night and uh late.

0:59:04.320 --> 0:59:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Wait wait wait wait wait wait what Fresno State, UCLA, TCU, Cincinnati,

0:59:09.320 --> 0:59:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead? What do you got? Give me quicker? I

0:59:10.760 --> 0:59:13.320
<v Speaker 1>have Fresno State the week after for UCLA the week

0:59:13.400 --> 0:59:17.880
<v Speaker 1>after a rivalry game against a non headline opponent. As

0:59:17.960 --> 0:59:20.400
<v Speaker 1>much as I respect Fresno State, I think Fresno State

0:59:20.440 --> 0:59:24.080
<v Speaker 1>on the road here can cover TCU. I think beat Cincinnati.

0:59:24.320 --> 0:59:27.320
<v Speaker 1>They've been performing better and better on offense earlier on.

0:59:27.360 --> 0:59:29.760
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I have West Virginia over Texas Tech

0:59:29.840 --> 0:59:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Duke over Wake as well. In that early window. I'm

0:59:33.120 --> 0:59:35.439
<v Speaker 1>going with the road teams there. West Virginia better away

0:59:35.480 --> 0:59:37.600
<v Speaker 1>from Morgantown, and I like the Duke defense a lot

0:59:37.600 --> 0:59:40.160
<v Speaker 1>against Wake. Now we can move on. Let's move on. Now.

0:59:40.720 --> 0:59:43.920
<v Speaker 1>You have to achieve failure. You need to take it

0:59:43.960 --> 0:59:46.760
<v Speaker 1>that far. Nobody wants to go that far.

0:59:46.840 --> 0:59:48.240
<v Speaker 2>It's too scary.

0:59:48.440 --> 0:59:50.440
<v Speaker 1>You know something, I got news for you that's where

0:59:50.520 --> 0:59:51.120
<v Speaker 1>winning is.

0:59:51.240 --> 0:59:54.600
<v Speaker 2>That's where winning is. Dan yep, our final quad here

0:59:54.640 --> 0:59:55.600
<v Speaker 2>of the regular season.

0:59:56.040 --> 0:59:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess we.

0:59:56.480 --> 1:00:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Won't have quads next week. The whole thing's a big quad.

1:00:01.200 --> 1:00:05.640
<v Speaker 2>I forgot to put this game on the document, so disrespectful.

1:00:06.000 --> 1:00:08.720
<v Speaker 2>I forgot to put Washington against Oregon on the document

1:00:08.920 --> 1:00:12.200
<v Speaker 2>after all of the baggage from a year ago and

1:00:12.280 --> 1:00:16.440
<v Speaker 2>really throughout the rich history of this matchup. I forgot

1:00:16.480 --> 1:00:21.600
<v Speaker 2>to put Washington against Oregon. So I apologize, Okay, So

1:00:21.640 --> 1:00:25.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean no disrespect. It's an NBC game. It is

1:00:25.480 --> 1:00:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Washington at six and five. It is your Oregon Ducks

1:00:28.240 --> 1:00:32.040
<v Speaker 2>at eleven or zero. Oregon is a nineteen point favorite.

1:00:33.400 --> 1:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:00:34.520 --> 1:00:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Is there any universe in which Oregon does not absolutely

1:00:38.760 --> 1:00:41.240
<v Speaker 2>lay the lumber to Washington in this game.

1:00:42.000 --> 1:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, at the risk of echoing myself picking against Washington

1:00:45.520 --> 1:00:49.840
<v Speaker 1>both times last year and being wrong both times, it's

1:00:49.920 --> 1:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>trending in that way. Washington went on the road. Now

1:00:52.960 --> 1:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>it's cross country. It's a little bit different than staying

1:00:55.000 --> 1:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>in the Pacific Northwest. What was the final score against

1:00:56.920 --> 1:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Penn State a couple of weeks ago, two weeks ago,

1:00:59.200 --> 1:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>it's like thirty five to six. Yeah, Yeah, something like that,

1:01:02.360 --> 1:01:04.680
<v Speaker 1>they had to make a quarterback change. The turnovers are there.

1:01:05.760 --> 1:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I think even with Oregon not playing an a game

1:01:08.120 --> 1:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>on offense, I think the defense will get off the

1:01:10.840 --> 1:01:13.919
<v Speaker 1>field often enough. With Washington having some quarterback questions going

1:01:13.960 --> 1:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>between you know, Will Rodgers leaving the game for a

1:01:16.760 --> 1:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>couple couple of straight big games. I think it was

1:01:19.320 --> 1:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>against UCLA they pulled him after another suspect performance. So

1:01:24.920 --> 1:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I think Oregon's able to turn over Washington.

1:01:27.160 --> 1:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna be able to run on Washington.

1:01:29.600 --> 1:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Washington has good defensive stats against the pass, but really

1:01:33.200 --> 1:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the quarterbacks faced have been pretty disappointing, just like you

1:01:36.240 --> 1:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>know in the instance of Notre Dame schedule, so it

1:01:39.440 --> 1:01:41.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't work out against Penn State when they actually had

1:01:41.320 --> 1:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>to play against a decent offense. I don't think it's

1:01:43.160 --> 1:01:45.959
<v Speaker 1>going to work out against Oregon. And obviously Dan Lanning

1:01:46.000 --> 1:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>has done a very good job motivating this team this year,

1:01:49.000 --> 1:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>pulling away from teams even without you know, putting in

1:01:52.080 --> 1:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>an a performance. So I have forty five fourteen forty

1:01:57.440 --> 1:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>two to fourteen forty two seventeen something that like, and

1:02:01.240 --> 1:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Oregon hasn't been a team to score forty this year.

1:02:03.360 --> 1:02:05.439
<v Speaker 1>They haven't been that team. But I think there's something

1:02:05.440 --> 1:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>special about this.

1:02:06.320 --> 1:02:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm not feeling Washington this matchup here. I think

1:02:10.760 --> 1:02:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Oregon is about as close to a complete team as

1:02:13.000 --> 1:02:16.480
<v Speaker 2>we have seen so far this season, and I like

1:02:16.520 --> 1:02:19.280
<v Speaker 2>him in this matchup to exact some revenge. I have

1:02:19.360 --> 1:02:22.280
<v Speaker 2>to imagine, given what we know of Dan Lanning, he's

1:02:22.320 --> 1:02:25.800
<v Speaker 2>playing up that angle lost to him twice last year, Right,

1:02:25.880 --> 1:02:30.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean that's just sort of his jam. Give me

1:02:30.640 --> 1:02:31.720
<v Speaker 2>a Oregon minus the number.

1:02:31.960 --> 1:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I really don't even think Oregon has an incredible

1:02:34.120 --> 1:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>offensive game. I just think that the game gets away

1:02:36.760 --> 1:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>from Washington in too many phases.

1:02:38.960 --> 1:02:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Seven point thirty on Fox, they call it Pharmageddon, my

1:02:42.440 --> 1:02:46.520
<v Speaker 2>favorite nickname. It's great Kansas State at eight and three,

1:02:46.640 --> 1:02:49.080
<v Speaker 2>I will state at nine and two, I will state

1:02:49.160 --> 1:02:52.840
<v Speaker 2>favored by two and a half points. Look, I have

1:02:52.880 --> 1:02:54.240
<v Speaker 2>no idea who's winning this game.

1:02:55.080 --> 1:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>This game feels dead even to me.

1:02:56.600 --> 1:02:59.920
<v Speaker 2>I looked at maybe two or three other projection system.

1:03:01.200 --> 1:03:04.760
<v Speaker 2>Everyone has this as even. Yeah, everyone has this as even.

1:03:05.680 --> 1:03:07.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at this one. I'm saying, all right, it's

1:03:07.320 --> 1:03:10.440
<v Speaker 2>cold night and names. I want the better running team

1:03:10.840 --> 1:03:14.520
<v Speaker 2>and I think that team is Case State. So give

1:03:14.560 --> 1:03:17.760
<v Speaker 2>me k State outright. That throws the Big twelve, mind you,

1:03:18.240 --> 1:03:22.240
<v Speaker 2>perhaps into a further state of disarray because of the

1:03:22.280 --> 1:03:29.000
<v Speaker 2>as you win. It would mean that ASU potentially rematch

1:03:29.080 --> 1:03:31.880
<v Speaker 2>scenario conference championship game next week. I'm not going to

1:03:31.960 --> 1:03:35.880
<v Speaker 2>talk through all of these things, but Kansas State beating

1:03:35.920 --> 1:03:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Iowa State could mean some really weird things in this conference.

1:03:40.080 --> 1:03:41.720
<v Speaker 2>I just think they're the better running team and I

1:03:41.800 --> 1:03:44.440
<v Speaker 2>like their matchup here, So give me Can't State outright?

1:03:44.680 --> 1:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Can you? You can't calculate on the fly for me.

1:03:46.760 --> 1:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I know you had some sort of web app available.

1:03:48.560 --> 1:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I can, I can't. What do you want? Kansas State winning,

1:03:51.520 --> 1:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Arizona winning, Kansas State winning Aria, both Iowa State and

1:03:56.920 --> 1:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>ASU losing.

1:03:58.400 --> 1:04:02.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, in the event that happened is BYU Colorado, Okay

1:04:02.960 --> 1:04:07.520
<v Speaker 2>for the conference championship. That's just those are eliminators, all right,

1:04:08.000 --> 1:04:10.960
<v Speaker 2>to know exactly, and I do have in this block

1:04:11.000 --> 1:04:13.880
<v Speaker 2>as well. Another game to keep tabs on is the

1:04:13.880 --> 1:04:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Houston versus BYU game, because Houston beating BYU is the

1:04:18.480 --> 1:04:22.040
<v Speaker 2>one that unlocks true weirdness. We made a video about this,

1:04:22.160 --> 1:04:24.800
<v Speaker 2>We talked about this on the Tuesday episode that we

1:04:24.840 --> 1:04:31.200
<v Speaker 2>put out there, Houston beating BYU, also Cincinnati beating TCU.

1:04:31.280 --> 1:04:33.360
<v Speaker 2>If both of those things happen, and the rest of

1:04:33.400 --> 1:04:36.320
<v Speaker 2>the lot in the Big twelve is chalk, that's the

1:04:36.360 --> 1:04:39.240
<v Speaker 2>only instance in which Arizona State could win and would

1:04:39.240 --> 1:04:40.840
<v Speaker 2>not be into the conference title game.

1:04:40.840 --> 1:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>But I don't understand. So if ASU finishes the season

1:04:43.640 --> 1:04:47.280
<v Speaker 1>with two losses, right, and Iowa State finishes the season

1:04:47.320 --> 1:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>with two losses, right, how does BYU getting a third

1:04:51.280 --> 1:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>loss throw ASU out of it? It would be.

1:04:56.280 --> 1:04:58.560
<v Speaker 2>So what we'd be looking at is a scenario in

1:04:58.600 --> 1:05:02.560
<v Speaker 2>which Colorado, who also has two losses, and Iowa State

1:05:02.800 --> 1:05:06.800
<v Speaker 2>has two losses, two conference lows, two conference losses. Essentially,

1:05:06.880 --> 1:05:09.240
<v Speaker 2>because of the way that the tiebreakers are set up,

1:05:09.880 --> 1:05:12.920
<v Speaker 2>it would unlock a scenario in which we're looking at

1:05:13.000 --> 1:05:15.760
<v Speaker 2>opponents and conference winning percentage.

1:05:15.440 --> 1:05:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Ahead of full record, which obviously Colorado has a third

1:05:18.640 --> 1:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>loss overall to Nebraska. That's right.

1:05:20.720 --> 1:05:24.960
<v Speaker 2>And so in that instance, because Houston would knock off

1:05:25.000 --> 1:05:28.160
<v Speaker 2>BYU because they would give them a loss, and because

1:05:28.320 --> 1:05:33.160
<v Speaker 2>of the way that other tiebreakers would shake out, Arizona

1:05:33.160 --> 1:05:35.440
<v Speaker 2>State would not get the nod. It would go to

1:05:35.520 --> 1:05:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Iowa State. In Colorado, But that's the only instance in

1:05:38.880 --> 1:05:41.160
<v Speaker 2>which it happens. The only instance of which it happens

1:05:41.440 --> 1:05:47.280
<v Speaker 2>is Houston beating BYU, Cincinnati beating TCU, the rest of

1:05:47.320 --> 1:05:48.360
<v Speaker 2>it being chalk.

1:05:48.440 --> 1:05:51.160
<v Speaker 1>And Arizona State would obviously have the tie break over

1:05:51.200 --> 1:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>BYU because of head to head.

1:05:52.440 --> 1:05:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Arizona State would have the tiebreaker over BYU, but they

1:05:54.440 --> 1:05:57.400
<v Speaker 2>would not have it in that instance over both Iowa

1:05:57.480 --> 1:05:58.200
<v Speaker 2>State and Colorado.

1:05:58.200 --> 1:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Who would go to the conference title game?

1:05:59.640 --> 1:06:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, wow, okrazy, I trust you craziness.

1:06:04.360 --> 1:06:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I have BYU winning this game. I have BYU winning

1:06:07.280 --> 1:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>as well. And this is one of those matchups to

1:06:09.600 --> 1:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>where I just have a lot of doubts about Houston's offense,

1:06:12.480 --> 1:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>And so is the spread still twelve and a half?

1:06:14.760 --> 1:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Twelve and a half? Before looking at the spread and

1:06:18.840 --> 1:06:22.360
<v Speaker 1>considering the number itself, I said, Okay, Houston's defense has

1:06:22.400 --> 1:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>been consistently pretty good, has gotten stronger over the course

1:06:24.640 --> 1:06:28.920
<v Speaker 1>of the season. BYU's offense, while at times shaky or not,

1:06:28.960 --> 1:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>they're not super prone to like a crazy number of turnovers.

1:06:32.200 --> 1:06:35.680
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know, twenty three points sounds reasonable. I

1:06:35.680 --> 1:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>don't see Houston any more than ten. So I had

1:06:37.400 --> 1:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>a twenty three to ten, and it's twelve and a half,

1:06:39.720 --> 1:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>So I guess I'm rolling with given those points.

1:06:42.720 --> 1:06:45.360
<v Speaker 2>Gotta do it, man, Yeah, gotta do it. Who did

1:06:45.400 --> 1:06:46.960
<v Speaker 2>you pick in Farmageddon, by the way.

1:06:48.000 --> 1:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>And farm Again. I'm going with Iowa State. I'm going

1:06:50.600 --> 1:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>with the home team. It's gonna be freezing cold. I

1:06:52.920 --> 1:06:55.160
<v Speaker 1>have them winning by five or six points. I just

1:06:55.440 --> 1:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the how off and inconsistent Kansas State's offense have been

1:06:59.120 --> 1:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>has been on the road. I'm just even if Iowa

1:07:02.080 --> 1:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>State its own defense hasn't been typically very good as

1:07:06.240 --> 1:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>it has been these past few years. I'm going with

1:07:08.560 --> 1:07:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the Clones at home.

1:07:09.880 --> 1:07:12.680
<v Speaker 2>A couple other name rivalries that we got to call out, Yeah,

1:07:12.960 --> 1:07:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Commonwealth Cup, Virginia Virginia Tech. The winner of this game

1:07:17.080 --> 1:07:22.240
<v Speaker 2>gets bullligible. Virginia Tech favor by seven points. Kyen Drones

1:07:22.360 --> 1:07:23.120
<v Speaker 2>is questionable.

1:07:23.560 --> 1:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Colin Slee is questionable. Will I Shelee is questionable. Yeah,

1:07:28.320 --> 1:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>ill Virginia points.

1:07:29.840 --> 1:07:32.880
<v Speaker 2>I still think I like Tech a lot more, and

1:07:32.960 --> 1:07:35.960
<v Speaker 2>they've generally owned this series. They've won the last three.

1:07:36.600 --> 1:07:39.040
<v Speaker 2>They won by thirty eight last year in Charlottesville.

1:07:39.440 --> 1:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:07:40.480 --> 1:07:43.120
<v Speaker 2>There is also the possibility that Brent Pry is coaching

1:07:43.120 --> 1:07:46.120
<v Speaker 2>for his job, which I don't think is unrealistic at

1:07:46.120 --> 1:07:49.920
<v Speaker 2>this point, given Wow, given where Tech has kind of

1:07:49.960 --> 1:07:53.600
<v Speaker 2>finished up this year, it's definitely been very disappointing.

1:07:54.440 --> 1:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go Tech. I like Tech at Home

1:07:56.360 --> 1:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>minus the seven. I'm going Virginia. The quarterback situation scares

1:07:59.480 --> 1:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>me away too much, and I don't. I don't think

1:08:01.600 --> 1:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Virginia wins, but I think they'll. They're good enough to

1:08:03.720 --> 1:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>keep this pretty tight.

1:08:05.080 --> 1:08:10.320
<v Speaker 2>The Old Oaken Bucket ooh seven PMFS one Perdue is

1:08:10.320 --> 1:08:13.080
<v Speaker 2>one to ten. They're a twenty nine point dog against

1:08:13.120 --> 1:08:17.600
<v Speaker 2>ten and one Indiana for the Old Oakan Bucket. The

1:08:17.640 --> 1:08:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Old Oaken Bucket, by the way, named via pom almost

1:08:21.280 --> 1:08:24.839
<v Speaker 2>made a video on this, named after a poem Indiana

1:08:24.840 --> 1:08:27.360
<v Speaker 2>minus whatever that we got Limb from Limb Yeah, yeah,

1:08:28.040 --> 1:08:32.160
<v Speaker 2>eight pm, CBS Sports Network. It is Nevada, it is UNLV.

1:08:32.280 --> 1:08:37.000
<v Speaker 2>UNLV favored by nineteen points. Here, gotta win. They get

1:08:37.000 --> 1:08:39.519
<v Speaker 2>into the Mountain West title game. This is the battle

1:08:39.560 --> 1:08:41.040
<v Speaker 2>for the Fremont Cannon.

1:08:41.640 --> 1:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Dan.

1:08:42.360 --> 1:08:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Yes, some interesting historical points on the Fremont Cannon. Maybe

1:08:46.960 --> 1:08:52.000
<v Speaker 2>the most expensive rivalry trophy used to fire, literally fire

1:08:52.160 --> 1:08:55.840
<v Speaker 2>until I believe UNLV dropped it by mistake and no

1:08:55.920 --> 1:09:00.800
<v Speaker 2>longer is it functional. Oh that's something you care about.

1:09:00.880 --> 1:09:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Give me Devada plus the points. I think Nevada puts

1:09:02.920 --> 1:09:05.600
<v Speaker 2>them in the choke hold. I think UNLV wins, but

1:09:05.680 --> 1:09:06.200
<v Speaker 2>this is close.

1:09:06.840 --> 1:09:10.439
<v Speaker 1>Nevada has lost five straights but have been competitive, but

1:09:10.479 --> 1:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>it's been against kind of I mean, air Force has

1:09:13.160 --> 1:09:16.639
<v Speaker 1>been disappointing. They lose that one by three. Hawaii. They're

1:09:16.680 --> 1:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>not competitive against Fresno. They are competitive against It's really

1:09:20.080 --> 1:09:22.200
<v Speaker 1>difficult to gauge. I think they're up for this game.

1:09:22.360 --> 1:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>UNLV trying to get into the conference championship game without injury,

1:09:25.720 --> 1:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>so I think they get up comfortably. Nevada comes back

1:09:28.400 --> 1:09:29.519
<v Speaker 1>to at least cover this game.

1:09:30.400 --> 1:09:34.760
<v Speaker 2>We've also got Florida versus Florida State. Florida favored by

1:09:34.800 --> 1:09:37.439
<v Speaker 2>fourteen and a half points. I'm on Florida minus anything

1:09:37.600 --> 1:09:38.160
<v Speaker 2>in this game.

1:09:38.160 --> 1:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Game. Yeah, absolutely.

1:09:39.760 --> 1:09:43.360
<v Speaker 2>We've got Oklahoma at six and five against LSU at

1:09:43.400 --> 1:09:48.160
<v Speaker 2>seven and four. LSU is favored by six. Part of

1:09:48.280 --> 1:09:50.840
<v Speaker 2>me wants to sensationalize a bit and say that Brian

1:09:50.920 --> 1:09:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Kelly is also coaching for his job. I don't know

1:09:53.000 --> 1:09:55.200
<v Speaker 2>if that's a real thing. Okay, I do know that

1:09:55.200 --> 1:09:59.760
<v Speaker 2>there is obvious disappointment with where LSU has finished up

1:09:59.800 --> 1:10:03.840
<v Speaker 2>this season, and maybe we saw a bit of a

1:10:03.840 --> 1:10:07.519
<v Speaker 2>renaissance with Oklahoma beating Alabama in the manner that they did.

1:10:07.560 --> 1:10:09.559
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we're gonna see a lot more Jackson Arnold on

1:10:09.600 --> 1:10:12.479
<v Speaker 2>the run. I think they can keep this close. I

1:10:12.520 --> 1:10:14.240
<v Speaker 2>just don't know if they can keep it within the six.

1:10:14.640 --> 1:10:18.840
<v Speaker 2>I felt better about fourteen last week at home. Six

1:10:18.880 --> 1:10:21.000
<v Speaker 2>on the road in Tiger Stadium at night feels like

1:10:21.000 --> 1:10:22.120
<v Speaker 2>a different animal together.

1:10:23.880 --> 1:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm I think Oklahoma is just never going to

1:10:28.040 --> 1:10:34.759
<v Speaker 1>be what they were last week. Often just the defensive scoring,

1:10:34.840 --> 1:10:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the defensive putting your offense in position to score big

1:10:38.960 --> 1:10:41.800
<v Speaker 1>time plays from this defense, I'm with you. I think

1:10:41.840 --> 1:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>they regress to the mean in terms of total points,

1:10:44.680 --> 1:10:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to find themselves in that thirteen fourteen

1:10:47.360 --> 1:10:50.400
<v Speaker 1>point range. I don't love that. Garrett nus Meyers made

1:10:50.439 --> 1:10:52.920
<v Speaker 1>some boneheaded mistakes this year, but I have this as

1:10:52.960 --> 1:10:53.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty four to fourteen.

1:10:54.680 --> 1:10:59.040
<v Speaker 2>I've got this at nineteen to fourteen. Oh, okay, nineteen

1:10:59.080 --> 1:11:04.400
<v Speaker 2>to fourteen. Another stellar defensive effort from Oklahoma, but LSU

1:11:04.439 --> 1:11:08.000
<v Speaker 2>wins Okay fair enough. The only other game that I've

1:11:08.040 --> 1:11:11.439
<v Speaker 2>got here because it's a good matchup. Frankly eight and three,

1:11:11.520 --> 1:11:14.800
<v Speaker 2>Marshall eight and three, James Madison, James Madison favored by three.

1:11:16.640 --> 1:11:20.519
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, I'm going to Marshall. They've been I am

1:11:20.600 --> 1:11:23.519
<v Speaker 1>strong in conference. I like Marshall in this matchup, I

1:11:23.560 --> 1:11:25.759
<v Speaker 1>really do. I think it's a nice matchup for Marshall.

1:11:27.120 --> 1:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>One Thundering Heart.

1:11:29.000 --> 1:11:33.799
<v Speaker 2>If you are out and about amongst the people, download

1:11:33.800 --> 1:11:37.080
<v Speaker 2>the Varsity Network app right now. It's free Apple App Store,

1:11:37.120 --> 1:11:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Google Play story search for your school. You get the

1:11:39.280 --> 1:11:43.400
<v Speaker 2>content that you desire about your desire, desire about your

1:11:43.640 --> 1:11:46.400
<v Speaker 2>college football team. We are on there. A bunch of

1:11:46.479 --> 1:11:49.519
<v Speaker 2>other podcasts are on there. Our friends at the Varsity

1:11:49.520 --> 1:11:52.719
<v Speaker 2>Network do an awesome job. Go and download that for free.

1:11:53.920 --> 1:11:56.240
<v Speaker 2>There is one more game that we should probably discuss,

1:11:56.280 --> 1:11:57.520
<v Speaker 2>dan uh oh.

1:11:57.680 --> 1:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>If you drop that big stanky play drum and five

1:12:00.960 --> 1:12:07.519
<v Speaker 1>for me, baby baby, baby baby, let me cut the

1:12:07.600 --> 1:12:09.679
<v Speaker 1>music for a second. Please take a knee.

1:12:10.280 --> 1:12:12.599
<v Speaker 2>Can I tell you how many people message me about

1:12:13.000 --> 1:12:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Lehigh winning against Lafayette last week and then throwing the

1:12:16.680 --> 1:12:17.920
<v Speaker 2>goalposts in the Lehigh River.

1:12:18.640 --> 1:12:19.479
<v Speaker 1>I would assume many.

1:12:20.160 --> 1:12:25.160
<v Speaker 2>So the Bethlehem Police Department did fish the goalposts out

1:12:25.160 --> 1:12:28.160
<v Speaker 2>of the river. Yeah, for those interested, they got it

1:12:29.280 --> 1:12:34.519
<v Speaker 2>and now they are trying to find trying to find

1:12:34.560 --> 1:12:36.680
<v Speaker 2>whoever was responsible for throwing it in the river to

1:12:36.680 --> 1:12:37.680
<v Speaker 2>begin with. Good luck with that.

1:12:38.320 --> 1:12:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Does the Bethlehem Police have like a dedicated frogmen division

1:12:43.120 --> 1:12:46.799
<v Speaker 1>and Scooby a retrieval team something? Yeah, I gotta believe

1:12:46.800 --> 1:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>they do.

1:12:47.640 --> 1:12:50.600
<v Speaker 2>I gotta believe they have something like that because Bethlehem

1:12:50.640 --> 1:12:51.320
<v Speaker 2>is right on the river.

1:12:51.840 --> 1:12:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. What cars got to get fished out investigated? You know,

1:12:55.120 --> 1:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>weird situations happened.

1:12:56.400 --> 1:12:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, they fished it out. They're looking for those responsible.

1:13:00.360 --> 1:13:04.559
<v Speaker 2>And of note, the Northampton County District Attorney, who would

1:13:04.600 --> 1:13:10.720
<v Speaker 2>be I guess they'd have jurisdiction over whoever the assailants.

1:13:10.720 --> 1:13:14.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what you say, whoever the offending parties were.

1:13:15.200 --> 1:13:18.519
<v Speaker 2>It is of note that the Northampton County District Attorney

1:13:18.600 --> 1:13:19.559
<v Speaker 2>is a Lafayette alum.

1:13:20.240 --> 1:13:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Ooh so maybe throwing the book at him maybe a

1:13:23.280 --> 1:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit of yeah, a little bit of bad blood there.

1:13:26.400 --> 1:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I like that.

1:13:27.479 --> 1:13:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Don't know if it goes full on refusal as a result.

1:13:30.120 --> 1:13:31.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how these things work.

1:13:31.360 --> 1:13:34.599
<v Speaker 1>But who does Lehigh have Round one?

1:13:34.920 --> 1:13:39.439
<v Speaker 2>Lehigh has the Richmond Spiders in round one, a historic

1:13:39.560 --> 1:13:44.599
<v Speaker 2>FCS power. Of course, Richmond is a ten and one

1:13:44.720 --> 1:13:48.040
<v Speaker 2>half point home favorite here against Lee High Mountain.

1:13:48.840 --> 1:13:50.640
<v Speaker 1>How's the weather supposed to be in Richmond? Top of

1:13:50.680 --> 1:13:52.320
<v Speaker 1>your head? Let me know, I know you just follow

1:13:52.360 --> 1:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>this stuff anyway.

1:13:53.240 --> 1:13:57.400
<v Speaker 2>I have absolutely no idea, come on, absolutely no idea

1:13:57.439 --> 1:13:58.800
<v Speaker 2>of whether we'll play a factor here.

1:13:59.040 --> 1:14:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Richmond weather underground, that's my go to source. Tie Richmond,

1:14:03.960 --> 1:14:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Virginia weather conditions for the FCS opening round playoff matchup

1:14:08.439 --> 1:14:11.559
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday. Tie, you're not gonna believe this monsoon like

1:14:11.680 --> 1:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>can didn't know? Saturday it'll be in the thirties, low forties.

1:14:15.520 --> 1:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>That's fine. I'm gonna go uh, I'm gonna go Lee

1:14:17.439 --> 1:14:19.040
<v Speaker 1>High to cover this one. How about that? I'm going

1:14:19.080 --> 1:14:22.639
<v Speaker 1>to High out right out right? Baby? Who do they play?

1:14:22.760 --> 1:14:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Who would they be playing in the second round of

1:14:25.000 --> 1:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the FCS playoffs? Bring up the bracket as I vamp here,

1:14:27.880 --> 1:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Tie FCS playoff bracket? Who would Lehigh face? Not if?

1:14:32.320 --> 1:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>But when?

1:14:33.200 --> 1:14:37.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, when Lee High wins? Lee High would then? Okay,

1:14:37.760 --> 1:14:38.439
<v Speaker 2>where is it said?

1:14:38.520 --> 1:14:41.479
<v Speaker 1>Now? I can't find it here. Let's see Idaho. It

1:14:41.479 --> 1:14:42.479
<v Speaker 1>looks like I think Idaho.

1:14:42.680 --> 1:14:45.200
<v Speaker 2>I know you can beat Idaho. Come on, get on.

1:14:45.880 --> 1:14:49.519
<v Speaker 1>I know it's right there with Oregon week one, the

1:14:49.600 --> 1:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>number one team in America. Maybe they can't beat it.

1:14:53.120 --> 1:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Ida's good. I like their coach a lot. Let's go

1:14:57.000 --> 1:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Mountain Hawks. Let's go Mountain Hawks. Okay, that's all we got.

1:15:02.040 --> 1:15:04.719
<v Speaker 2>Thank you to one and all for downloading, for listening,

1:15:04.720 --> 1:15:07.439
<v Speaker 2>for supporting what we do. Make sure you get on

1:15:07.560 --> 1:15:11.160
<v Speaker 2>over to play rundboard dot com. We have not determined

1:15:11.160 --> 1:15:12.960
<v Speaker 2>what the prize is yet. We have not been dropping

1:15:13.080 --> 1:15:18.679
<v Speaker 2>any keywords throughout the course of episode. We have been

1:15:18.840 --> 1:15:23.280
<v Speaker 2>so transfixed by these rivalries in front of us that

1:15:23.360 --> 1:15:27.200
<v Speaker 2>it feels like we haven't really given this prize it's due.

1:15:27.640 --> 1:15:29.519
<v Speaker 1>We will have you. But well I mentioned cold weather.

1:15:29.800 --> 1:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>We will have a very big.

1:15:30.800 --> 1:15:34.639
<v Speaker 2>Prize next weekend for Conference Championship Week. Conference Championship Week

1:15:34.680 --> 1:15:36.920
<v Speaker 2>will have all the games that are played on Saturday.

1:15:37.240 --> 1:15:39.600
<v Speaker 2>We're going to mix in some player props. It is

1:15:39.640 --> 1:15:41.519
<v Speaker 2>going to be the conclusion of our run the Board

1:15:41.520 --> 1:15:45.320
<v Speaker 2>game before we go headfirst into whatever game we do.

1:15:46.080 --> 1:15:48.559
<v Speaker 2>Winter Wonders style for bowls and playoffs and all that,

1:15:48.560 --> 1:15:50.800
<v Speaker 2>which I have started working on already, and I need

1:15:50.840 --> 1:15:54.519
<v Speaker 2>to talk about that after the show. But as for

1:15:54.560 --> 1:15:57.400
<v Speaker 2>this the last weekend of the regular season, you mentioned

1:15:57.400 --> 1:16:02.719
<v Speaker 2>cold weather. Yeah, okay, obviously been talking about passion, passion

1:16:02.720 --> 1:16:06.280
<v Speaker 2>of rivalries, right, joy Swing Joyce Swing at the beginning

1:16:06.320 --> 1:16:08.719
<v Speaker 2>of the episode. Sure, we've talked about that.

1:16:10.560 --> 1:16:11.120
<v Speaker 1>For sure.

1:16:11.320 --> 1:16:14.600
<v Speaker 2>There is a lot of upset potential here. Yeah, to

1:16:14.720 --> 1:16:17.800
<v Speaker 2>only further, I think the emotional weight of some of

1:16:17.840 --> 1:16:18.840
<v Speaker 2>these rivalry games.

1:16:19.080 --> 1:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Yea.

1:16:20.560 --> 1:16:23.639
<v Speaker 2>And clearly this is a podcast. Clearly this is something

1:16:23.680 --> 1:16:24.280
<v Speaker 2>that you're listening.

1:16:24.400 --> 1:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Clearly this is we can all agree. That's right.

1:16:27.479 --> 1:16:33.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so cold Weather rivalry with Passion. Obviously this is

1:16:33.880 --> 1:16:37.240
<v Speaker 2>an audio only format. You want to give away some

1:16:37.240 --> 1:16:40.759
<v Speaker 2>sort of like cool, it's not everything can be viewed

1:16:40.800 --> 1:16:43.120
<v Speaker 2>on YouTube. Well, you need to listen to it otherwise

1:16:43.160 --> 1:16:44.400
<v Speaker 2>you don't really know what we're talking about.

1:16:44.439 --> 1:16:45.679
<v Speaker 1>That's true. Okay.

1:16:46.000 --> 1:16:48.200
<v Speaker 2>Do we want to give away some cool headphone situation?

1:16:48.479 --> 1:16:48.679
<v Speaker 1>Oh?

1:16:48.840 --> 1:16:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you like the you like the cut of my

1:16:51.439 --> 1:16:52.160
<v Speaker 2>jib here? Yeah?

1:16:52.200 --> 1:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>You got any good Black Friday deals? Any Bow's not

1:16:54.400 --> 1:16:58.839
<v Speaker 1>a sponsor, could be any Beats, any Apple? Yeah?

1:16:59.000 --> 1:17:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's get away a set of Bo's headphones, Dan.

1:17:03.840 --> 1:17:04.559
<v Speaker 1>Noise canceling.

1:17:04.680 --> 1:17:09.040
<v Speaker 2>Let's give away noise canceling headphones from Bows. Oh my god, Ty, yeah,

1:17:09.040 --> 1:17:12.719
<v Speaker 2>you're feeling saucy this week. Okay, big week, big prize.

1:17:12.720 --> 1:17:16.280
<v Speaker 2>They're on sale right now. We're gonna give away noise

1:17:16.320 --> 1:17:19.920
<v Speaker 2>canceling headphones. I guess they're called Quiet Comforts from bos Oh.

1:17:19.960 --> 1:17:22.679
<v Speaker 1>I wear those all the time. They're impeccable. I love them.

1:17:23.040 --> 1:17:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Keep the ears warm, Keep the ears warm when you're

1:17:24.880 --> 1:17:26.200
<v Speaker 1>on the plane. Yeah, yeah, of course.

1:17:26.680 --> 1:17:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Noise canceling headphones have changed my entire life. Oh my god,

1:17:30.200 --> 1:17:34.000
<v Speaker 2>especially when I'm doing travel. They've changed my entire entire

1:17:34.160 --> 1:17:35.759
<v Speaker 2>mood everything.

1:17:36.000 --> 1:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm. Give them away. Great battery life with these,

1:17:40.400 --> 1:17:42.519
<v Speaker 1>charge them up last you a long flight, no problem,

1:17:42.600 --> 1:17:45.479
<v Speaker 1>talking about baby. I think that's a great idea. Ty,

1:17:45.560 --> 1:17:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you nailed this one. Bose Quiet Comfort noise canceling headphones.

1:17:50.479 --> 1:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Unless you're scared to compete, play run the board dot com.

1:17:53.080 --> 1:17:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Get those picks in for a chance to win beautiful,

1:17:55.400 --> 1:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>beautiful headphones.

1:17:56.720 --> 1:18:01.960
<v Speaker 2>We will be back midnight Eastern on Saturday Night. We

1:18:02.040 --> 1:18:04.400
<v Speaker 2>have done this show now a couple of years running.

1:18:04.600 --> 1:18:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Every year we do the Week fourteen Recap Pod, the

1:18:07.960 --> 1:18:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Rivalry Week Recap Pod live on YouTube Live wherever we

1:18:12.040 --> 1:18:14.880
<v Speaker 2>might put it elsewhere. Who knows. Every week we do

1:18:15.080 --> 1:18:18.320
<v Speaker 2>every year we've done this. This week it has been

1:18:18.479 --> 1:18:21.720
<v Speaker 2>one of our biggest shows, and there is a lot

1:18:21.760 --> 1:18:24.360
<v Speaker 2>at stake here, so we encourage you to stop on, buy,

1:18:25.240 --> 1:18:28.200
<v Speaker 2>partake in the festivities with us. If nothing more, download

1:18:28.240 --> 1:18:31.120
<v Speaker 2>the episode, the next one that drops bright and early

1:18:31.200 --> 1:18:35.000
<v Speaker 2>on Sunday morning. Wherever it is that you are listening

1:18:35.000 --> 1:18:37.639
<v Speaker 2>to this episode, we hope you are safe. We hope

1:18:37.640 --> 1:18:40.000
<v Speaker 2>you are well fed. We hope you are happy. We

1:18:40.040 --> 1:18:43.280
<v Speaker 2>hope you're out there amongst the people and enjoying all

1:18:43.320 --> 1:18:46.320
<v Speaker 2>of this weekend has to offer, whether you're celebrating Thanksgiving

1:18:46.360 --> 1:18:49.160
<v Speaker 2>here in the States, whether you're out and about somewhere

1:18:49.160 --> 1:18:52.320
<v Speaker 2>else in far flong parts of the universe, just enjoying

1:18:52.400 --> 1:18:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Rivalry Week and all its glory. Wherever this finds you,

1:18:55.320 --> 1:18:58.439
<v Speaker 2>we appreciate your support. We hope you enjoy all that

1:18:58.479 --> 1:19:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Week fourteen has to offer, and we will be back

1:19:01.800 --> 1:19:05.080
<v Speaker 2>to help decipher everything that transpired on Sunday morning.

1:19:05.120 --> 1:19:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Dan, I agree with all of that. For that, go

1:19:07.960 --> 1:19:08.920
<v Speaker 1>over there, my good friend Dan.

1:19:08.960 --> 1:19:12.639
<v Speaker 2>For myself, Tie, As always, you know the drill, stay solid, Peace,