WEBVTT - Learning to Love (or at Least Live With) Email

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Right now, I have two thousand and twenty six unread

0:00:03.760 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>emails in my inbox. And you know what, I'm totally

0:00:07.520 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>fine with that. We're talking about learning to live with

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and love your email. This is game plan. Hi. I'm

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca Greenfield and I'm Francesco Weedy, and this week we

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>are talking about everyone's favorite thing to hate email mail. Yeah,

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>so everybody really hates on email. Emails the worst. I

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>get so many of them, busy and important, but the

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>o there's a lot of articles talking about how emails

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the cockroach of the Internet, and it's so distracting, and

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:49.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean I can see why. I mean, I just

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that I have over two thousand unread emails in

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>my work email. Yeah, but you seem to be able

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>to live with it. Yeah, I actually love email. My

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Gmail box is very different than my Bloomberg in box.

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>My Gmail inbox has no one reading emails. Wow, that's impressive.

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I think I have several thousand unready. Feel like we're

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 1>actually opposite because you have no one reads in your Bloomberg, right,

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm working on that for my boobs. Yeah. Well, my

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>issue with email is that, um, I get so many

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>emails that are not for me specifically, I'm just they're

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:28.479
<v Speaker 1>either spam emails, I'm copied on them along with ten

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>other people, and I don't need to respond to them

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that it fills up my inbox so quickly that I

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>miss important emails. So I've since I came back from

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:39.959
<v Speaker 1>maternity leave, I made a resolution to try and delete

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>all of my unimportant emails every day. Well, so, I

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:46.119
<v Speaker 1>think this is one reason that email is so loved

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and hated and loved to be hated, is because it

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>gives us so much anxiety, Like it takes a lot

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>of brain space. So people feel the need to either

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>be like an inbox zero person, right, so you can

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about or I'm not even going to think about

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>all these emails in my inbox person. I guess I'm

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>both of those people. Yeah, let's let's talk about in

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>box zero. Do you want to explain what it is

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>for people who don't know it's this way of life?

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Religious about it? Yeah? Where you have I'm not sure

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>is that either no emails at all in your inbox

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 1>or no unready emails. I think it's no unready emails,

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>but maybe like a purist what, Yeah, I think there

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>might be a purist version of it, where it's like

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>no emails at all, and if there's an email that

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:29.079
<v Speaker 1>needs to be saved, it goes into a folder. Yeah,

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and I relate to this because if I have an

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>unread email in my Gmail, it will not at me

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:36.959
<v Speaker 1>because it's telling me I need to do something right.

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I use it in that way, and I think that's

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:43.360
<v Speaker 1>how inbox zero people use it. But you have a misillian. Well,

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>my feeling about inbox zero has changed a little bit.

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>It used to be I used to think it was

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the biggest waste of time, and it was this kind

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:56.079
<v Speaker 1>of artificial sense of superiority or accomplishment that you got

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:58.679
<v Speaker 1>from deleting all these emails when actually you were investing

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>all of this time and delete emails. And if you

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>could just learn to be okay with having unread emails

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>in your inbox, then your life would be exactly the

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 1>same and you wouldn't have an empty emox. But then

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I wish I didn't have these pathologies that do Yeah,

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:14.639
<v Speaker 1>and I think a lot of people do. And then

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:16.919
<v Speaker 1>I I still eventually I had to come to grips

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>with the whole like missing an email from my boss

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>because it was buried under like six hundred, you know,

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>spam email from emails from PR people or notes from

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the facility staff on like the bathroom downstairs being closed.

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>And so as soon as I started doing that, um, actually,

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>it became a lot more like it to do list.

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Like now I know if I have an email in

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>there that something needs to be done about it. And

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>most of the time it's just to delete it. But

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>if it's if it's sitting there for longer than a

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>few hours, that means like require some kind of action.

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the fold. Yeah, although I'm not like that

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>with Bloomberg. But but email is also so hada that

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>some people have tried to get rid of it in

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>their lives. There are offices that tell their internal staff

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>they cannot use email to communicate. Wow, So what's the alternative?

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>They use something like flack or hip chat or whatever

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>social network that your company is on. And I think

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>it does cut down on emails, and I think that's

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>happening organically at a lot of companies. But I don't

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:21.719
<v Speaker 1>see how you can avoid email communication altogether if you

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:23.840
<v Speaker 1>have any sort of role where you communicate with people

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:26.719
<v Speaker 1>outside of your office. Right, and as we've talked about

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>in other episodes, those alternatives can get cluttered up and

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>start taking up your time to write. You can spend

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>too much time sending and receiving messages on a chat platform.

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, on top of having all these notifications now

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:41.720
<v Speaker 1>from your chat app, it really doesn't get rid of

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>email altogether in most offices. So I think instead of

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to get rid of something that is never going

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to go away, we need to embrace it and learn

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to live with it and maybe even if you're like me,

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:57.720
<v Speaker 1>one day you'll love it. And to tell us how

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to get to that point, our guest today a as

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>a behavioral economist at Duke. His name is Dan Ari Yellie.

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 1>He wrote a book called Payoff, the Hidden Logic that

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>shapes our motivations, and he's going to teach us how

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to trick ourselves into loving email. Thanks for coming on

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>my pleasure. So, Dan, you have an elaborate approach to email,

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:31.039
<v Speaker 1>and I would love to just start by talking about

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>what happened when I emailed you to talk about coming

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>on this show, um to give to give our listeners

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a sense of how much work and how much thought

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you've put into your own email strategy. So I want

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to do you want to tell people to sit down

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and kind of take a drink of something. Yeah, exactly,

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you sit down and get comfortable. So I emailed you

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:52.839
<v Speaker 1>to see if you would be interested in coming on

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the show to talk to us. And what I got

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>back was a long and very detailed automatic response, and

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:02.160
<v Speaker 1>it had a list of frequently asked questions that I

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>assume was to head off the questions you get from

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people that can be answered really easily.

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>And then it had another list of contacts that wait

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>before before you did you? Did you look at any

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>of the frequently asked questions? I didn't. I assumed it wasn't.

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I assumed none of my issues. So so here's what

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I recommended you do at some point to go back

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to those and look at the last two. The last

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 1>two are a general positive response or a general negative response.

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>So I asked people, if you just want me to say, yes,

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>you're right, you're smart, and so on, click here and

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>you get the YouTube with me agreeing with you. And

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>if you want me to disagree with you, there's another

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 1>link to another YouTube. Will I tell you it's a

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>stupid idea and you should never do that. But but

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:47.279
<v Speaker 1>there's some there's some real answers there as well. I

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>love that it's the most entertaining automatic email response I

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>think I've ever received. But yeah, it assumes people read

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:56.720
<v Speaker 1>automatic email responses. Well I did. I mean, as soon

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>as I saw it, I saw that there was enough

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:00.120
<v Speaker 1>there that I was probably going to have to do

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>a little more work than just emailing you and forgetting

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>about it. So I saw that if you had an

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:07.359
<v Speaker 1>interview request, for example, you should email your publicists. And

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I did that, and here we are. Can you talk

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about this, what led to you developing

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>that response, and you know, like how you got there? Yeah?

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>So first, well, you know, I do apologize because it's

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of an arrogant thing to do, right. People email

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 1>each other and all of a sudden I say, hey,

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, I know you emailed me, but you know,

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>here's the whole list of the emails and things I

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>want you to do to email me. And there's some

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>something very arrogant about it. And I've been holding off

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>for a while trying not to do that. But um,

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the same thing is that I get about three hundred

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>emails a day, and it's just very hard to to manage.

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>And you know, there's there's like a level of personal stress,

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, waking up in the morning and seeing you know,

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>handling some emails, just waiting. Sometimes I wake up and

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>now early just to do email, and an hour later

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>when I just finished, I have more email then when

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I started. So so, partially I think that when people

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>send an email, we're not really good at conveying our intentions,

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>like what exactly do you want? What? What? How? How

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>you do it? What is this email about? You're asking

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>a question? Do you want something? So, so emails are

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>often long and hard to understand what people exactly know.

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I need to read the long email and say what

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>what do they actually want from me at the end

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of this of this email? Um so so part of

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>it is just the inability to to cope and the

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>stress that comes with it. So so I had this

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>outgoing message and then I try to direct people two

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>different things. So first of all, I say, if you

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>want to me to give a talk, my schedule is online.

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Um you can look every day of the year where

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm at and you can see by yourself if I'm

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:49.440
<v Speaker 1>busy or not. And then if you if you want

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:51.319
<v Speaker 1>to if you still want to write me after all

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of this, please go to this a website. And I

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:59.439
<v Speaker 1>got somebody to write me a program that is called

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>short will. That's the term we gave it. And in

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that system, I asked people to write me, but by

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>first answering a few questions. So I ask people to

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>tell me what is this about? Is this a request

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>for talking, interview advice, just to chat, exchange information the

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>different options, and then they ask people tell me when

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>they want an answer by do you want like for

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>me to drop everything and answer immediately, end of the day,

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>end of the week, end of the month, or no

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:31.679
<v Speaker 1>response necessary. And and then I say, okay, now tell

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>me what the question is. And this has actually been

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>incredibly useful. So let me ask you to kind of

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>guess from all the people who write me through this system,

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>what percentage of the emails do you think having the

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 1>title drop everything and answer me immediately? I would think

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>a very low percentage, or maybe it's a lot of people,

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 1>because I don't know. I think I'm important and you

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>are important, But but you know, what do you think

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>is the percent give me numbers? I don't know. I

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>would say maybe Becca, I have to go high now,

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>so okay, so it's two percent, right, So so first

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of maybe two even maybe even two percent is too high.

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>But but it is amazing, right when you give people

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>a chance to stop and reflect and say, shoot the person.

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>The moment you send somebody an email to somebody, it

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>does beep, right, and they do, to some degree, even

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>for a few seconds, stop everything and look at it's

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>what you've asked them. And I give people, you know,

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the request to tell me like what's the time scale,

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and very very few people say drop everything and answer

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 1>me now. And that's a wonderful thing because I have

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>my my email set up so that if people say

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:49.199
<v Speaker 1>that my email pinks and I'm notified immediately. If it's not,

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>it goes to a different inbox. What I love about

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>that is that that figure is probably a lot lower

0:10:56.400 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>than as the email receiver. That's you probably have a

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>higher percentage of emails that you would personally think or

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>drop everything and respond now emails. So if you are

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>making the decision, you might think it's a higher percentage. Yeah,

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and and but you know so, so two percent of

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the people say please answer me very quickly, and I try.

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>But the rest of them, they go into folded that

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>says end of the day, end of the week, end

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>of the month, and and I deal with those in time,

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and everybody gets to benefit. I don't get my I

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>don't get my email. My work interrupted three hundred times

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 1>a day, right for every usually for every email you get,

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>you get a notification. This way, I get a notification

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>only for the things that need immediately immediately response and

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>then and not. The question is what percentage of the

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>email you think have the title no response necessary, the

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>classification no response necessary. I would think yeah, I would

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>think that one. Because if you're forced to think about

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 1>it and you realize there's no response necessary, maybe that's

0:11:57.080 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>when you just back off and don't send the email

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:05.680
<v Speaker 1>at all. It's more about what my father. I don't

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:08.319
<v Speaker 1>think you're right in the white bother right. If somebody says,

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, thank you, I want you to know I

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 1>read this book, I thought about this, or somebody says

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 1>here is an article that I think you might be

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 1>interested in reading. So we wrote this little program called Filter,

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and we asked people to check it out. And this

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>program goes into email and basically takes forty of your

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>of your last emails and say when would you want

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to see this email? And we did a couple of ways.

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 1>The way that filter works is by the name of

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:41.559
<v Speaker 1>the person, right the email that comes from this person

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>when you want to see it. But we also did

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 1>it in another way through a different approach, and we

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 1>sample four emails from people. We went to a company,

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 1>a big, big tech company. For each person, we took

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>fully of the emails they sent and forty of the

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 1>emails that they received, and we said, for those emails,

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>which one of those like? We went one by one

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and we said, for each one of those, is this

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>email you wanted to know immediately when you got it,

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>within the hour, two hour, four hour, the end of

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the day, end of the week, or never wanted to

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 1>know about it? And we did it for both things

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>that people send out and for the things that they received.

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:18.680
<v Speaker 1>And unsurprisingly, you know, people, things that people said out

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>they think are more important than they think that they received. Okay,

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 1>that's fine, but the percentage of things that people have

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>said they wanted to never know about was was between

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 1>fot and that's because we have so much email running

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>around that you put you you add people just in

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>case they might want to know one day you wanted

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:44.439
<v Speaker 1>to be in their archives. So if they want to

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to get it one day, they'll have it there. But

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 1>you certainly don't want people to be disturbed in the

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 1>middle of the work day to basically be notified that

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>there are you know, the eighth person B. C. Seed

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 1>on some email about a new procedure that is happening

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>in the company. Right, you want to be able to

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 1>say you sent it to them. You want to say,

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and then at some point they search for it. You

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:08.839
<v Speaker 1>want them to have access to it. The idea that

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 1>this something needs to beep and interrupt somebody's day multiple times,

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>it is kind of shocking. And you know we took

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>We take lots of different types of communications and we

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>call them email, like when things come to your house

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>in the mail, at least you see regular envelopes and postcards,

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and you see junk mail, and you see catalogs, and

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>they look very different and you know how to approach

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>them differently. Right, You never start by opening the ones

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that are You start by the personal letters and the

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>rest of them. You probably kind of know immediately that

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing in a hurry about this but an email.

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 1>We treat everything is if we're in a hurry, right,

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>And Gmail has made an attempt to try its hand

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 1>at sorting these emails into the most important and less important,

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>right they have. But but here's the thing. There's a

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>huge difference between important and urgent. And this is no

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>disrespect to my mother, but but everything my mother rights

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>me is important. Nothing has yet been urgent. And and

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that what what we need to do is

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 1>we need to think both about importance and urgency. You're

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you're a behavioral economist. Are you using behavioral economics when

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>developing these apps and websites and theories? Yeah? So partially

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>you know this question about how do we frame things? Okay,

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>so let's let's start from the beginning. One thing is,

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I am actually acutely aware of the cost of distraction. Right.

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Somebody doesn't know the research might say, oh, you know,

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>my phone BIPs, nothing happens. But the reality is if

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>your phone bibs or your computer bibs, something big happens.

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>You're just not aware how big it is. So there

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>was one study in which they took undergrads and they

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>got them to solve math problems in the computer, and

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>they paid them by how many math problems they were solving, right,

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>so they were highly motivated to solve these math problems

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 1>as quickly as possible. And they asked them to put

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>their phone on the side and not to touch their

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>phone for the time that they were solving these problems,

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>and unbeknown to them, from time to time they would

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>text them, and from time to time they would call them.

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 1>And what they saw was the incredible reduction in people's

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>ability to solve these problems, not only when the phone

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>was being called or vibrating because of texts, but it

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>lasted for a few minutes after that. So when when

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>we have a notification on that something is happening, we think, oh,

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just that notification, But in ten seconds we're back

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to it. Now we're not really back to it. So

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:35.479
<v Speaker 1>I I have an agenda of fighting notifications, so I'm

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 1>aware of of the cost of distraction that I'm trying

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>to minimize it. That I think is number one. The

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 1>second thing is this idea of thinking about urgency rather

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>than importance. And you know, I wish I could ask

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>people how how important is your email? Could I live

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>without it? But but that that's aside understanding that the

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>real issue is urgent, seeing what is the time frame

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of how to deal with this? And that email create

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous burden when you have a big to do

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>list and you are burndened by the fact that you

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>have a big to do list and it just sits

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>there on your mind and weighs on you. And I

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 1>have a big one, and we all have actually big ones,

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>often in the form of email that just sits there

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and wait for us to respond to it. So I'm

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:26.119
<v Speaker 1>doing as much as I can to think about what

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>are those kind of cognitive challenges that we've created for us,

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>how much stress are they creating? And what can we

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:35.359
<v Speaker 1>do to fight them? So let me ask you on

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:38.880
<v Speaker 1>that urgency topic. Has have you ever been stung by

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:41.120
<v Speaker 1>your by putting your phone to sleep? Because I think

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that's a big worry that people have that they'll miss

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 1>something urgent. Yeah, I have. But but you know, this

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 1>question of you know, what are you willing to lose

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>for what gain? Is a question of do you appreciate

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:58.439
<v Speaker 1>the gain and the losses? Right? So what happens I

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 1>think that we all see the losses like a missed

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>call and you say, my goodness, I would have gone

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to this other building that that happened to me. I

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:09.360
<v Speaker 1>went to the wrong place for a meeting, and from

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 1>time to time I missed something. Yeah, there is a cost,

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>but the question is what's the benefit. And if you

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 1>think that the benefit is very small, you say not

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 1>worth it. But if you realize how big the benefit

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>is of not having it, then you would be willing

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to take some cost for it. That's such an economist viewpoint.

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Just think of cost benefit analysis. You have to you

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 1>have to write. So here's another principle that we find

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 1>is that there are things in life that are more

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>visible and there are things in life that are less visible.

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>So you know, email is very visible, and the real

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>work you want to do is less visible. Think about

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>like something like writing a book. Right, And you don't

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>have on your calendar every day two hours dedicated to

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:58.199
<v Speaker 1>writing a book. It's just something you you want to do,

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and slowly you can. You work, and you work, and

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you work, but but email comes. And now the question

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 1>is which one takes priority, the book or email. Email

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 1>is here and it shows up. And there's a beautiful

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 1>term called structural procrastination, the feeling that we make progress

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:19.199
<v Speaker 1>even though the only thing we're doing is making to

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 1>do list and crossing them off, or you know, deleting

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 1>email that nobody should have sent us from the beginning.

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>But it gives us the sense of progress. Who is

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:30.639
<v Speaker 1>writing a book doesn't give you the same feeling of

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>progress because maybe you work the whole day to try

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and explain some topic and at the end of the

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>day decide you didn't do a good job and you

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:41.119
<v Speaker 1>have to start again tomorrow. I feel like like we

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>don't get the same sense of progress. We get a

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 1>sense of progress from all of these emails and to

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 1>do list and things like that, but it's not the

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 1>real progress. I mean, how many people are going to

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>die happy knowing that they you know, they got to

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:58.920
<v Speaker 1>invoke zero seven twenty one days during their lives. This

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 1>is just not the stuff that makes long happiness. But

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:07.640
<v Speaker 1>because it is present and immediate and beeps and somebody

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:10.639
<v Speaker 1>is waiting, it actually takes precedent over the things that

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 1>are important to us. We let other people determine our

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:17.159
<v Speaker 1>priorities rather than us controlling them. Taking this approach, the

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 1>behavioral economist approach, means kind of trying to affect other

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>people's behavior. You know, it also means so I think

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 1>it's the first thing it means is it means to

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 1>understand the real costs and benefits and understand that our

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>psychology is not mechanical, and something like a notification or

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>something like it to do list can can miss direct us,

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:41.959
<v Speaker 1>and something like it to do list can switch our

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>priority lists and so on. Then the second thing is

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:47.919
<v Speaker 1>to try different things, right, just experiment, just try to

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:51.239
<v Speaker 1>figure out what works and doesn't work. And then in

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>this particular case, it also meant, you know, even though

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>it's arrogant and um, you know, not a nice thing

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to do, let's let's put as on the people who

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 1>are writing me because I can't find another solution. I

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 1>wish I did. But but you know this, this other

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:10.479
<v Speaker 1>thing that is happening with this email response is it

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 1>gives me permission to respond more slowly. Right, so, so

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 1>we have this idea of we expect things very very quickly,

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 1>but but the moment you have a notification, all of

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:25.639
<v Speaker 1>a sudden you say, hey, you know, it's it's okay

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>not to respond so quickly, and we're trying and approach.

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>This is just in design stages, but you know, lots

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>of times you you call somebody and they're driving. When

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:38.959
<v Speaker 1>you text somebody and driving and you don't know. And

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the things we're trying to do is for

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:45.680
<v Speaker 1>your phone to respond automatically when you're driving, say thanks

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 1>for the call, Dan can enter now he's driving, or

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 1>thanks for the text, Dan can't respond now he's driving.

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>And that would basically clear the feeling that you have

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to respond quickly. Plus it would make it so that

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:00.959
<v Speaker 1>if you do respond quickly, people would say, hey, are

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:03.439
<v Speaker 1>you driving and texting at the same time. Yeah, that

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>could make the roads a lot safer if people really

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 1>used it. But but we do have. You know, the

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the natural way of discussion is you ask a question

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:14.919
<v Speaker 1>and you respond. You don't wait three hours. So so

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 1>we have a tendency a desire to respond quickly, and

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:22.919
<v Speaker 1>and and this email buffer kind of gives me permission

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to say, no, I can I can focus for the

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>next few hours, and and it could be Okay, well,

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:32.399
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for coming on and talking to

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 1>us about email Okay, bye. I want to go back

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:48.880
<v Speaker 1>to this idea that Dan brought up about structured procrastination.

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about this before on the show, and I

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:54.400
<v Speaker 1>agree that it's a thing and definitely a problem when

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>you do something that's busy work and convince yourself that

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 1>it's real work. And that is my big complaint about

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>in Buck zero in a way, Oh yeah, exactly, that

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>was your whole main first problem with it. But I

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>want to push back on this a little bit and

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 1>say that sometimes email is a part of my job.

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I think communication is a part of our jobs and

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:17.199
<v Speaker 1>an important part of our jobs. Like we don't a

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of us, at least in my job and a

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:21.199
<v Speaker 1>lot of other people's jobs. We don't just work in

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>these vacuums like communicating the skill it's part. I don't know.

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't like this idea that, like all email, it's

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:28.879
<v Speaker 1>a waste of time, right, we dismiss email as this

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 1>distraction from our work, But for a lot of people,

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>email is our work. It's part of our job, so

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:37.119
<v Speaker 1>getting Yeah, as you say, communication is a skill. And

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I think we often hear of these apps or movements

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to not have email from people whose jobs are more solitary,

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:48.640
<v Speaker 1>like engineers, for example, who aren't known for their communication skills.

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think that it's not the reality for some

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 1>of us, like me, whose job is super communication based Yeah,

0:23:55.160 --> 0:23:56.879
<v Speaker 1>and you don't always have a job where you have

0:23:56.920 --> 0:24:00.680
<v Speaker 1>like a tangible product, you know, I mean you your journalists,

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:03.439
<v Speaker 1>so you can say I wrote this article, that's what

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I did today, or that's what I did this week.

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 1>But there are a lot of people whose job descriptions

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>are a little bit more nebulous, or they coordinate projects,

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 1>and email is kind of the way that they show

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 1>their work. Yeah, which I guess is why it does

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:19.199
<v Speaker 1>kind of get out of control because it'll it'll be

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:22.120
<v Speaker 1>like I am doing this thing, c C. Everyone. Yeah.

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I have definitely worked in places where you get a

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of unnecessary updates on projects with bullet points from

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:31.159
<v Speaker 1>people that just show you so that they know how

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to format emails. Well, that's let's all to say that

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 1>emails not going away. And I love it and I

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 1>want you all to to I don't love it yet,

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:43.919
<v Speaker 1>but I think I can handle it all right. And

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:51.159
<v Speaker 1>now it's time for half big takes, happy fake takes

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>before we get to our own half pig takes, we

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>had a listener right in and remember you can call

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>into our hotline at two on two six zero one

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:02.959
<v Speaker 1>six six and leave your own half baked take. So

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>our listener Emma wrote in saying in meetings, women should

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 1>not take notes. Even though I feel more comfortable taking

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>notes because it's the best way I can remember what

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 1>we discussed, I end up becoming the de facto secretary

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 1>of the meeting, so now I'm spending more time focusing

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 1>on remembering the meeting and not taking notes. I have

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 1>no idea if this is going to work or not,

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 1>but hey, that's why you call it a half baked take.

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:29.719
<v Speaker 1>I liked this because she's so right. She's so right,

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 1>but also not even the gender thing. When I take

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>notes and meetings, I mean, you should look at my

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:36.679
<v Speaker 1>notepad and you've seen it. First of all, it's eligible,

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>but also it's mostly me doodling my name over and over,

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Like what are we Are we really going to look

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:44.199
<v Speaker 1>back at those notes? I think notes can be useful,

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and I'm with her on being a little bit at

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:47.640
<v Speaker 1>sea about like what if I don't If I don't

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>take notes, how well I know what's going on? But

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 1>there is Like I was at a meeting recently with

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a few men and a few woman in the person

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>who usually takes notes in the meeting wasn't there, and

0:25:56.880 --> 0:25:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the man leading the meeting was like, well, somebody ought

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to take notes, and I just sat there frozen and

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I was hoping none of the women in the room

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>were given and eventually one of them did it. Just

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:10.120
<v Speaker 1>there's something wrong with taking notes if it works for you,

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 1>But being the note taker, I don't know. It just

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:15.919
<v Speaker 1>feels kind of like a demotion and a meeting. Sometimes

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe it'll make people pay better attention. Anyway, maybe everyone

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 1>should take notes. Another half pick that I just made

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 1>her half bay take a two third take wait, three fours. Sorry,

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:31.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to mad. What is your half piked

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 1>idea this week? Francesca? Okay, this one might blow your mind,

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:39.680
<v Speaker 1>so be prepared. I have the perfect response to a

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 1>passive aggressive comment of any kind, and it will just

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 1>it will stun your passive aggressive opponent into silence or confusion.

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>It is thank you. Do you want to do? You

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 1>want to try an example? Okay, so say something passive

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>aggressive to me. I don't even know I needed I

0:26:56.760 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't know. Oh. Um, just be like, oh,

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:08.119
<v Speaker 1>it's so great that you don't really feel the need

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to advance too quickly in your job. Oh it's so

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:14.360
<v Speaker 1>great that you don't feel the need to advance too

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:18.160
<v Speaker 1>quickly in your job. Oh my god, thank you, it's

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:21.239
<v Speaker 1>pretty good, aren't you? Just like disarmed? And because the

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 1>thing is is your instinct is to respond to passive

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:26.880
<v Speaker 1>aggressive comments by saying something that shows that you know

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:29.119
<v Speaker 1>that they're being passive aggressive and you're going to be

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:31.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of snotty too, and then you say something passive aggresive,

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and then it just goes back and forth. But if

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 1>you say thank you, it's just not the response that

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:38.719
<v Speaker 1>they were looking for. And it also it frees you

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>from having to ever feel affected by what they say,

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 1>because you can just pretend everything is a compliment. Try it, Okay,

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna try it. I'll let you know how it goes.

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sold, but I'm not not sold. I just

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I understand. Thank you anyway, what's your

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>half bag? Take mine? Is that people are putting their

0:27:57.440 --> 0:28:02.719
<v Speaker 1>grocery store baskets away improperly. Oh I worry I might

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:04.399
<v Speaker 1>be doing this. Tell me what I'm doing wrong. So

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I use a basket when I go to the grocery store,

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and usually not getting that many things like a carry basket,

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>And so you go to the register to check out.

0:28:11.160 --> 0:28:13.879
<v Speaker 1>You put your things on the belt, and then you

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:16.119
<v Speaker 1>put your basket at the front of the register to

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:19.120
<v Speaker 1>stack it up, and often people will put it so

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:21.400
<v Speaker 1>that the handles criss cross on top of each other,

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:25.440
<v Speaker 1>making it impossible for me to stack mine inside that basket.

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:28.679
<v Speaker 1>And it's wrong and rude and really annoying. So then

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I have to take an extra second to fix the

0:28:30.760 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 1>error so I can stack mine in right when they

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 1>could have just taken a split second to do it

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 1>on there before exactly. And I get it. That's one

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>second is a little annoying, it really is. It's it's

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the feeling I get when I make my bed in

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the morning. I don't want to do it. This will

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>take one second, and I do it and then everything

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 1>is in order. And it's also just this fundamental thing

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of remembering like we're all living in a society together.

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's just not be jerks. I love that. Alright, this

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 1>has been half big Takes. Hath Thicke takes. Thanks for

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 1>listening to another episode of Game Plan. You can find

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter at rs Greenfield and I'm at Francesca today.

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 1>You can tweet your Hathnike takes at us at at

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 1>game Plan, or you can call into our very cool hotline.

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:21.959
<v Speaker 1>It's two on two six seven zero one six six.

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 1>If you like this episode, please rate, review us on iTunes,

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and subscribe. And while you're looking at Bloomberg podcasts, why

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 1>don't you check out material World, a podcast about all

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the things that we buy. This week's episode is all

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 1>about tequila. This show was produced by Liz Smith and

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:43.479
<v Speaker 1>Magnus Hendrickson. The Head of podcast is Alec McCabe and

0:29:43.520 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>we will see you next week later. H oh, that

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 1>is for another podcast episode. You know how I feel

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 1>about that.