WEBVTT - 147 | Playing General Manager: 2022 Seattle Mariners

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>This time the stage you lacers brazy, we will sue you.

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 2>Tis the Gunner. Welcome Tuesday, January twenty fifth. Welcome to

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 2>the Just Baseball Show. That's Jack McMullan and Arm Lighton

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 2>and I am Peter Apple. We had a crazy NFL

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 2>weekend that we haven't all gotten to speak about yet,

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 2>but it is Mariner's week. We're playing general manager with

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 2>the Seattle Mariners today. Bill's Chiefs. Though, before we continue,

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 2>is it the greatest game we've ever seen in the NFL? Jack?

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 2>You said that on Twitter.

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I said it's the best game I've ever seen,

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 3>and it's not close. Granted, I'm twenty three years old

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 3>and I, you know, watched the NFL at a pedestrian pace,

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:16.759
<v Speaker 3>So like I think I tune into the best games.

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 3>Like Javier Ray has brought up.

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 2>A good point.

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 3>He said Rams Chiefs in Mexico City a couple of

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 3>years ago gave off those vibes like, oh, best game

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 3>I've ever seen. Yeah, but yesterday it was twenty five

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:31.040
<v Speaker 3>points in the last minute fifty two of regulation. Yep,

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 3>that's stupid.

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:36.759
<v Speaker 2>I was. I was thinking about this. Arm. I'd rather

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 2>have Tom Brady with two minutes to go down a touchdown.

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 2>But if you're down thirty seconds, give me Patrick Mahomes

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 2>over any quarterback. He got within field goal range in

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 2>thirteen seconds. Have you ever seen that before?

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 4>No? No, that's That's something I've absolutely never seen. And

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 4>the weirdest thing to me, though, dude, is like I

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 4>feel like it is and I understand like defense is

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 4>giving cushion and everything, but thirteen seconds. That should never

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:08.679
<v Speaker 4>happen ever, ever, ever, ever, ever to be able to

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 4>drive down the field and get a field goal like that.

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:11.639
<v Speaker 4>But I always feel like at the end of a

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 4>ball game, offensive sliders get bumped up to ninety nine

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 4>across the board and just offense becomes so easy. And

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 4>I get it, they're they're giving cushion, but like, why

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 4>if it's that easy, why not just play regular defense?

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 4>And it's never that easy. That's the part that always

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 4>blows my mind. But that part aside, Other than the

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 4>Greg Camrio overtime touchdown for the o in thirteen Dolphins,

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 4>I think it was Ohen fifteen Dolphins. You lost my

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:41.519
<v Speaker 4>game to beat the Ravens. Jack, that was the best

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 4>game ever.

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 2>I was the Owen fifteen Dolphins. No. One remembers that game.

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 3>Can you say that name one more time? Greg Camrio?

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 4>Greg Camerrio got it and just got lost over the

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 4>middle and touchdown. Dolphins won a game Jason Taylor mob

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:58.800
<v Speaker 4>in the field. That was one of the best football

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 4>games I've been too over time, but I'll take this

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 4>one over that.

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 2>And this Bill's Chiefs game went into overtime, and the

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 2>overtime rules in the NFL are so stupid compared to

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 2>the MLB rules. I mean, I know everyone has seen

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 2>this quote all over Twitter. It's like someone hits a

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 2>walk off home run in the top of the tenth

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 2>inning and in the bottom half the home team doesn't even

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 2>get to defend themselves. It's kind of similar to when

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:26.359
<v Speaker 2>we knew when that coin toss was flipped, whoever had

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 2>the right call was going to win that football game.

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 2>The Chiefs ended up with the ball to start the

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 2>overtime period, and they ended up winning it and on

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 2>a touchdown for Patrick Mahomes. I mean, it's not that hard.

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 2>It's the Chiefs, but if Josh Allen had another opportunity

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 2>to do so, you probably would have continued and that

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 2>game might have gone on for three four more hours.

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 2>If it was just touchdown, touchdown, touchdown, I don't know

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 2>who would have won.

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm pro college overtime rule, I really am. Like I

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 3>don't like the two point conversion bullshit that they started

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 3>doing this year when you've got like nine overtimes with

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 3>Penn State. But the old one where you know, you

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 3>start at the opposing twenty five yard line, give me

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 3>your best shot. Other team has a chance to respond here.

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 3>I like that. And after two overtimes you have to

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 3>go for two if you score a touchdown. I love that,

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 3>Like that is big time.

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 4>Or just give the other team a chance to match

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 4>it right, like you can do college ot but regular football,

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 4>like kick it back off to the bills and give

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 4>them a shot and see what happens. Like even that,

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 4>in my opinion, is an upgrade over what we're seeing

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:33.599
<v Speaker 4>right now, because it's it's just I don't like the

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 4>idea of forcing overtime and then you could easily just

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 4>not even get a chance to touch the football on

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 4>the offensive side of things. I don't really think there's

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:44.559
<v Speaker 4>a parallel to that in sports in any other way.

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 4>There's no other similar type of example where you see that,

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 4>And I think the baseball metaphor is the best because

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 4>that's the only other sport where you're on offense slash

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 4>defense and it's not like is fluid, whereas like soccer,

0:04:57.360 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 4>you give the ball back, you get it back, same

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 4>with basketball. If baseball has that cut and dry, I

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 4>think football should too. And that's something they got to

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 4>figure out. And don't forget it used to just be

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 4>field goal. You kick the field goal, the game was over. Yeah,

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 4>that was the craziest shit ever. Like that was horrible.

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 4>So at least it's a little bit better, but yeah,

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 4>they still they got to fix that. I think they will.

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 2>And just finishing up the recap. On the NFL weekend,

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs were the only favorites to win. The Bengals

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 2>beat the Titans, the forty nine Ers beat the Packers,

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 2>and like I said, the best team in football, the

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Los Angeles Rams beat the greatest of all time and

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Tom Brady. It's a crazy football weekend but really really exciting,

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 2>which was good. But what's more exciting. What's more exciting, boys,

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 2>is the Seattle Mariners to us at least because we're

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:42.599
<v Speaker 2>the just baseball show. So I'm excited to play general

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:46.719
<v Speaker 2>manager with you. Guys. Any, just quick words before I

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 2>get into a little bit of introduction about who the

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Seattle Mariners truly were in twenty twenty one.

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 3>They're good, like they have a chance to be really

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 3>really good. In twenty twenty two, they missed the boat

0:05:57.360 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 3>by a game. Obviously, it went down to the last

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 3>game of the regular seas and they did it. I

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 3>think two years before their window should have opened. And

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 3>now I'm bumping their window up a year, like there

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 3>is a world where they are a World Series contender

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 3>this year.

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, from what about you?

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 4>A fun differential, I'm liking it. I think they've got

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 4>a shot this year to do some fun things. I

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 4>could also see it going the other way though, too,

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 4>So this is one of those teams where I think

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 4>there's a wide range of outcomes, and I think that's

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:27.719
<v Speaker 4>why they're so fun to talk about.

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:30.840
<v Speaker 2>They are fun to talk about. So let's start at

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 2>the beginning. On April first, the Mariners open up the

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:35.920
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty one season with a seventy two and a

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 2>half win projection. Seattle crushed that puny projection, finishing with

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 2>a ninety and seventy two record just two games out

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 2>of the second wild card spot. This team finished with

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 2>a negative fifty one run differential, but the fun differential

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:53.280
<v Speaker 2>was off the charts. So were they lucky or were

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 2>they good? They were both. Ty Franz and Chris Flexen

0:06:56.920 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 2>took huge steps forward, but Kyle Lewis didn't really and

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 2>Jared Kalnick struggled in his rookie campaign. They traded away

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Kendell Graveman at the trade deadline, and all hopes seemed

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:08.359
<v Speaker 2>to be lost in Seattle, even though the team was

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 2>still eight games over five hundred at the time. They

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 2>went thirty six and twenty four after the trade deadline,

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 2>slingshotting themselves into playoff contention and right into the veins

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 2>of baseball fans everywhere. Fangrafts rated this twenty twenty one

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Mariners offense as the clutchest of all time. Seattle was

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 2>America's team in twenty twenty one, But can they be

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 2>world champions in twenty twenty two? That's what we are

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 2>here to answer, boys. Straight away. Straight away. We got

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 2>a lot, a lot of moves to make. We're going

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 2>over free agency stuff, We're going over trades that they

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 2>can make this offseason, while also just going over what

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 2>happened in twenty twenty one. So let's get into it. Boys, Jack,

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm throwing it over to you with your handy Danny whiteboard.

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so I'm kind of a hipster. I've got an

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 3>orange background with a plane blacklaw sleeve T shirt, and

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 3>I've got an iPad that I take notes on with

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 3>an apple pencil. So am I am I Jobs?

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Am I?

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Steve Cha?

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 2>I was just about to say, young Steve Jobs with

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 2>his whiteboard? What did Steve Jobs have back then?

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 3>Like A, well, he didn't have the iPad he made

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 3>Steve Jobs was the iPad. Yeah, so here's what I got.

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 3>I got position players on one note sheet with prospects there.

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 3>I've got pitchers both the starting rotation and the bullpen,

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:32.199
<v Speaker 3>with prospects there. I've also got some additions that I

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 3>want to make. But let's run through like we have

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 3>in the last couple of weeks, just like what they

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:39.319
<v Speaker 3>have right now, a depth chart. Do we want to

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 3>start on the mound or do we want to start

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:45.439
<v Speaker 3>with the bats? Let's start with the bats? Okay, catching position,

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 3>Tom Murphy is pretty much the everyday catcher right now.

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 3>Cal Raley is pretty solid. I like Cal Raley, and

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 3>then Luis Torrenz is a third option here Areum, what

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 3>do you think about the catcher position here?

0:08:56.920 --> 0:08:59.319
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean Riley struggled, but I still like him.

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:01.319
<v Speaker 4>I still think you can figure it out. I like

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 4>the bat He's fine defensively Torren's. The big question is

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 4>is the defense. But that's another iron in the fire.

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 4>And then, like you said, they've got at least three

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 4>guys that I think are all borderline regulars that could

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 4>kind of take it to another level. I think they're

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 4>more than fine at the catching spot.

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:22.200
<v Speaker 2>Pete, Yeah, I mean they're all right at the catcher spot.

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, just overall, before we just get into this offense.

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 2>They finished twenty second in run scored in twenty twenty one.

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 2>They finished last in batting average, They finished fifth lowest

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:36.559
<v Speaker 2>in war among position players, and twenty seventh in ops.

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 2>So the numbers didn't look great. But like I said,

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 2>Fangrafts rated this offense as the clutchest of all time

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 2>according to their clutch Metric. So at catcher, I would

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 2>say they're around major league gaverage right now. Arm you'd say,

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 2>cal rally, you think he can be above major league

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 2>g average in twenty twenty two or.

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 4>I think he can.

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Man Like.

0:09:56.760 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 4>It was a bad year for him. I don't think

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 4>there's any way around it. But I mean, the guy

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:03.679
<v Speaker 4>I can really swing it from both sides of the plate.

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 4>I think he just really was in his own head.

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 3>It was.

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 4>It was one of those things where it just seemed

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 4>like every rookie that came up kind of struggled out

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 4>of the gate. I still think Raley will figure it out.

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:13.719
<v Speaker 4>It was only one hundred and forty eight played appearances,

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 4>and I guess we know it takes a lot for

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 4>guys to get acclimated up there. But what he did

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 4>in Triple A was crazy. Three twenty four, three seventy seven,

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 4>six oh eight, hit for power from both sides. I

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 4>think he's gonna he's gonna be okay. And I love

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 4>the swing and did the defense there is already at

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:30.959
<v Speaker 4>least average, you know, so I think at least in

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:32.680
<v Speaker 4>a complimentary role he should be fine.

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 3>So former Mariner bias here, but do you see a

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 3>little bit of Mike Zanino in the pop department?

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? Yeah, I mean, like I think he's got a

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:42.839
<v Speaker 4>little bit more consistency in terms of like bats of ball,

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 4>but he can run to baseball. I don't know if

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 4>he has quite the ability to impact it like Zanino.

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 2>I think he's more like thirty bombs, yes.

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 4>And he knows got some crazy juice. But I mean

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 4>he did hit twenty two jacks. I know, actually, excuse me,

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 4>twenty nine jacks back in twenty nineteen. I think most

0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 4>of those came in hig A. But like, this guy

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 4>can really really swing it through the minor leaks. He

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 4>showed that he can and again is a switch hitter.

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 4>He's not getting blown up on either side of the plate.

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 4>I think it was it was just a tough transition

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 4>for him, But I think he's going to start to

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 4>feel it out.

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Zannino had like a hilarious amount of swing and miss

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 3>when he was in Seattle. I thought it was very

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 3>funny watching Mike Zanino just like not make contact with

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 3>anything when he was a Seattle, America.

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 4>I think he was closing his eyes.

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:25.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it was bad. First base Terenz can fill in there,

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:28.079
<v Speaker 3>but for the most part it's commandeered by Ty France,

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 3>who is awesome, and then Evan White, who is Evan White.

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he gloved first first baseman.

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Love those guys glove first. I mean the glove is phenomenal,

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 2>But the thing is ty France could have won a

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 2>goal glove at first base with his defense this year.

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 2>Like I don't think there's any need for Evan White.

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if Evan White could go play an outfield position.

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:54.559
<v Speaker 2>But even if we move him to the outfield, can

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 2>he hit at all? I mean, I guess what's the point?

0:11:57.240 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 3>Like is his bat MLB worthy as the big goal?

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:01.319
<v Speaker 2>I don't don't see anything, do you or them?

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 4>No, But like you gotta find out, right, Like you

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 4>got to give him a little bit more shot. He

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 4>might get traded. He might get traded, honestly, I mean,

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 4>I don't think there's much value there, but we'll get

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:17.079
<v Speaker 4>into it. Like the Mariners have a lot of and again,

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 4>like I really feel bad using like metaphors or like

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 4>words to describe players, but like they have fat to

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 4>trim and I hate using that and in a way

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 4>to describe the team because that's human beings. But like

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 4>you look at like Taylor Treml, Jake Frayley, there's not

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:41.199
<v Speaker 4>room for all of these guys or in front of

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:43.439
<v Speaker 4>the lineup but my back. But like you look at

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 4>you look at that team, like, there's a few guys

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 4>across the board between beyond that too. You know you're

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 4>looking at White, those guys are probably complimentary pieces. How

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 4>about Justice Sheffield. We'll get to him too, But like

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 4>there's a lot of guys that are like, okay enough,

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 4>quadruple A type dudes are a little bit better that

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 4>they could probably move. So so yeah, White's probably just

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 4>a depth piece right now at this point, right, I mean,

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 4>it's all he can really be.

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 2>I'd like to give arm a lot of credit for

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 2>ty France because I think even before Project the Plate

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:15.200
<v Speaker 2>was even an idea, before we even you know, got

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 2>on these phone calls to create just Baseball. Aram was

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 2>on ty France early and often.

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 4>I was obnoxious about it.

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 2>And Arm he's another one of these prospects that doesn't

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 2>have a flashy tool. You know, he's not running super

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 2>hard out of the box at crazy speeds, he's not

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 2>hitting four hundred and fifty foot home runs. But the

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 2>guy just hits.

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 4>He just hates. That's why we've coined the ty France

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 4>effect of any prospect that fits that description that you

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 4>just mentioned. And yeah, I think he's gonna keep doing

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:46.079
<v Speaker 4>it too. I think we can pencil him in for

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:47.679
<v Speaker 4>that kind of production next year.

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:51.199
<v Speaker 2>And on a team that had the lowest batting average

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 2>as a team. Say what you want about batting average,

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 2>it still matters in that sense. Howbody hits you get it.

0:13:57.160 --> 0:14:00.120
<v Speaker 2>As Betty and Betty at bats they had the oh

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 2>it's at two twenty six, but Ty France to ninety

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 2>one batting average. Since the guy who could put back

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 2>to ball, do you think he could win a batting

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 2>title one day?

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 4>Actually in today's game, dude, I think anyone can win

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 4>a bat seriously, but I don't think I'll quite get there.

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 3>Unfortunately, anybody but Mike Sanino can win a batting title.

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 3>Other corner infield spot is somewhere that they need to improve.

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 3>As of right now, Abraham Toro and Donovan Walton are

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 3>the two options at third base, and I am saying

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 3>nay to both of those in a heartbeat.

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Are you saying nay to Abraham Torro?

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 3>I am. He's not on a World Series winner, He's

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 3>not the starting third baseman.

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 2>I guess there were some things to like. He at

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 2>least had a he had a decent second half. He

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 2>just had a really good August. But yeah, I mean

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 2>he was around one hundred WRC plus. He just didn't

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 2>slug really at all. That's why his slugging percentage was

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 2>down as ops was bad. But he was a round

0:14:55.960 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 2>league average last year according to WRC plus. But yeah,

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't I just don't think we should give up

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 2>on Toro yet. I don't think he's that bad of

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 2>a player, and he can provide a ton of defensive

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 2>versatility across the field. I know he could play second,

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 2>you can throw him in a quarter olefield as well

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 2>as Wall's third base. I bet he could play first

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 2>in a pinch if Evan White, you know, whatever happens

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 2>to him, and if ty Franz you know, plays the age,

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure he could get thrown over there too. So

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't be so quick to just give up on Toro. Yeah,

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Toro is.

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 4>Weird because I think in another situation he would make sense.

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 4>But it's weird to me because the Mariners go get

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 4>Adam Fraser because I like Toro's batmore at second, I'd

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 4>be more excited about the idea second base.

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Right. That's hilarious though, to say what over Adam Fraser,

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 2>considering whatever just was, but like that's it is. It's

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 2>got a fact though.

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 4>So I look at that infield man, and I'm like,

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 4>they need slugging from third base. You just talked about

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 4>their offensive metrics and the guy that was giving them

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 4>a majority of that slug was Kyle Seger. Now you're

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 4>replacing Kyle Seger with a bat to ball third baseman,

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 4>and I just look across that infield, I'm like, they're

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 4>not going to have a single eight hundred OPS guy

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 4>outside of Tay France at first base, who has that's

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 4>a prerequisite for first base. You have to have an

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 4>eight hundred OPS. So I'm looking at the infield, I'm

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 4>like JP Crawford glove first, Fraser's bats to ball, and

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 4>now at third base, you're giving up power too, Like

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 4>you're gonna have a lot riding on those outfielders, those

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 4>young outfielders to be able to produce. I want to

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 4>pick a stick.

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 2>At third That's a good point. I mean, you got

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 2>to replace thirty five home runs and one hundred RBIs

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 2>on a.

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 4>Team that that was like the majority of their like sloting, Like,

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 4>you know, production.

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 3>As it stands right now, you've got Fraser at second

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 3>JP Crawford at shorten Dylan Moore as the third middle

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 3>infielder here. So like this infield needs a facelift for sure.

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 3>Outfield probably does not, because I'm looking at a five

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 3>deep outfield right now without zero additions and discounting Julio

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 3>Rodriguez who is waiting in the wings here, as Lewis

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:05.400
<v Speaker 3>who comes back from a meniscus tear, Jared Kelnick, Mitch Hanneger,

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 3>who is a nine hundred ops guy love Hanneger, Love Hanneger.

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:12.920
<v Speaker 3>And then you've got Taylor Tremmel and Jake Fraley is

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:15.640
<v Speaker 3>the two defensive options in the outfield too, Like they

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 3>are really really good in the outfield. They're really really

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 3>good in the outfield. Mitch Hanniger coming off thirty nine

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 3>bombs and he's thirty one years old, and I was

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 3>on his Instagram earlier today and he's working out like

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 3>a fiend. I mean, he's grinding and he feels like

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 3>kinda he is the face of the Mariners in a way.

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 3>And Jared Kelnick is one of the best prospects in baseball,

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 3>was traded in the Robinson Cano deal, and he's surely

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 3>going to have a good twenty twenty two, But I

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 3>think the best outfielder is not even on the team yet.

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Just like you said, Jack, I think Julu Rodriguez will

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 3>be an All Star very soon and will be a

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 3>perennial time All Star in his career. I think he's

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 3>going to be an MVP winner. I think Julio Rodriguez

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:04.400
<v Speaker 3>is my personal and I know in just Baseball dot

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 3>Com we have Bobby Witten, Adlei Rutchman, and then Julio Rodriguez.

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 3>Me personally, I like Julio at number one.

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 4>What do you think We'll see what the update looks like.

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 4>It's funny. I had a good conversation that episode's coming out.

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:17.719
<v Speaker 4>It will actually be out by the time people are

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:20.680
<v Speaker 4>listening to this with a Baseball America's writer, one of

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 4>the writers, Jeff Ponts, and we spent more time than

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:25.199
<v Speaker 4>I thought we would on who number one is? It's

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 4>splitting Harris, but they went Adlee number one and it

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 4>was a fun conversation about just that trio that I

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:33.639
<v Speaker 4>think people might enjoy for the call up on that podcast.

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 4>But the other side of it, though, I look at

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 4>centerfield and that's the question. I love all of their

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 4>outfielders I concur with everything you guys said, But who

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 4>the hell's playing centerfield? Yeah, I mean, just just for

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of perspective here their center field situation.

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 4>Last year, Jared Kallenick played seventy five games out there,

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:53.879
<v Speaker 4>negative six point four defensive rating for fangrafts, negative sixteen

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 4>defensive run saved, very bad. Tarya Tremel six or thirty

0:18:57.400 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 4>six games out there was about league average. Kyle Lewis,

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:02.679
<v Speaker 4>he can't play center anymore at this point, a catastrophic

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 4>knee injury, a meniscus injury. I think it would be

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 4>stretching him thin to put him out in center. And

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 4>then Freiley.

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Is a guy.

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:11.880
<v Speaker 4>Then you know, he makes the flashy plays, but he's

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 4>not a defensive center fielder. That's a big question. And

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 4>you look at what Jerry Depoto said. He said, yeah,

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 4>I think Kelnic's gonna play some more center field. That's

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 4>not a priority for us. I take that as posturing

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 4>because at the end of the day, they were the

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 4>ones calling up Pittsburgh and saying, what's the deal with

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 4>Brian Reynolds And they ask him price with Julio Rodriguez,

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 4>so they hung up. I think centerfield is a priority

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 4>for them. Maybe it's not the utmost priority. I know

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:39.879
<v Speaker 4>they don't want to have Kellenick out there in center

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 4>if they don't have to. And that's the big question

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 4>is who's playing center field for this team next year?

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:47.360
<v Speaker 4>Because if it's Kelnick, as Depoto says, I mean, they're

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 4>giving up a lot there in terms of defensive value

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:52.920
<v Speaker 4>and one of the most important places defensively in the

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 4>entire field.

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:56.920
<v Speaker 3>Just the thought of like Kyle Lewis and left and

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 3>Kelnick and center, and Julio and right and hanneger is

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 3>the dah is enough for me, like I can I

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 3>can give some defense in center field there with with

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 3>that quartet being the three outfielders in the DH. Do

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:11.399
<v Speaker 3>you think Jared Keelnick's a good enough athlete to at

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 3>least be able to make the move over to center

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 3>and at least be major league gaverage He can get better.

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 3>He didn't get better, And I feel like he hasn't

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 3>played a lot of centerfield in his career right He's

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:23.199
<v Speaker 3>mostly been a corner who had to move over and

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 3>kind of start taking reps in.

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Centerfield center in the miners, mostly played center in the minors,

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:31.160
<v Speaker 2>and then came up and wasn't that good and center?

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:33.679
<v Speaker 2>You're saying, was he at least better in the miners

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 2>when he played the position?

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:39.120
<v Speaker 4>He was okay, it's okay, Yeah, it's funny. I actually

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 4>looked at I was like, I wonder how much he

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 4>played in center, Like, going all the way back, he

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 4>always played center. So here's the problem. I think he

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 4>put on some weight, I think, but in.

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 2>A good way though.

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 4>It's like good Way, good Way.

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:52.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but you know no, he's just he's just chubby now,

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 4>just like out there. So the one thing I do

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:58.719
<v Speaker 4>think though, and I am a firm believer in this,

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 4>is I think he took some of those offensive struggles

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 4>out there at the center. I mean we see that

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:05.399
<v Speaker 4>with young players all the time. I think he can

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 4>get better, yeah, obviously, So I mean if he gets better,

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:09.400
<v Speaker 4>then yeah, you deal with it, right because you're gonna

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 4>get so much offensive production out of there. But ugh,

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 4>it was bad. They were the only team in Major

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 4>League Baseball with a negative f war from center field

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 4>last year. I know a lot of that was because

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 4>Countic didn't hit, but I mean a lot of that

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 4>most of that was the defensive struggles. So it should

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:26.120
<v Speaker 4>be interesting.

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 2>It's hard to believe that Jake Failey isn't a good

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 2>defensive centerfielder because I've never seen a man rob more

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 2>home runs than.

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 4>Just early now.

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 2>He's a magician. He is a magician. I mean, I

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 2>think he's the best robber of home runs maybe in baseball.

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 4>That's funny, Okay.

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 3>So here's what I'm thinking. I've got some names that

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 3>I want to add offensively, but I also have some

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 3>pitching names here. I think we should go through like

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 3>because I think it's a quick conversation on the pitching side,

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 3>and then I think our big splashes are going to

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 3>come offensively. I think we should go through the starting

0:21:57.440 --> 0:21:59.679
<v Speaker 3>rotation of the bullpen right now, like, talk about that

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:02.880
<v Speaker 3>real quick, and then we can circle back and make

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 3>some additions to the lineup. You guys, cool with that?

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:06.359
<v Speaker 2>More than cool with that?

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 3>All right, So let's just jump right back in with

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:10.920
<v Speaker 3>the starting rotation here, because they just signed Robbie Ray

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 3>of five years, one hundred and fifteen million dollars. He

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 3>is like the number one of a ten deep rotation

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:19.119
<v Speaker 3>or a twelve deep rotation. I mean, I'm looking at

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 3>it right now. Opening day, the starting five probably looks

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 3>like Ray, Marco Gonzalez, Cris Chris, Flexten, Logan Gilbert, and

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:30.639
<v Speaker 3>Justin Dunn. That's a good five. But then you've got

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 3>who's gonna make their MLB debuts this year George Kirby,

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 3>Emerson Hancock, Matt Brash. Then you also have Brandon Williamson,

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 3>who are I know you're really high on, And then

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm kind of still holding him out like a teensy

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:46.919
<v Speaker 3>bit of hope on Justice Sheffield, and then Nick mar

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Gavic's too. Like there are eleven MLB starters right now

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:52.159
<v Speaker 3>for the Mariners to choose.

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 2>From, and with Robbie Ray at the top, five years,

0:22:56.960 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and fifteen million to those Seattle Mariners coming

0:22:59.880 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 2>up off an al Ciung Award with the Toronto Blue Jays.

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 2>But there's a lot of debate on whether Robbie Ray

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 2>is actually good or not, whether he had kind of

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:11.919
<v Speaker 2>a lucky twenty twenty one, or if he's actually a

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:15.679
<v Speaker 2>good pitcher moving forward. I'm in the boat where I

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:18.159
<v Speaker 2>do think Robbie Ray is still an excellent pitcher in

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 2>this league. Is he a top tier ace? Is he

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:23.160
<v Speaker 2>a top ten pitcher in baseball? Probably not? But due

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:25.439
<v Speaker 2>to I think that he learned something from Pete Walker,

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 2>one of the best pitching coaches in baseball with the

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Toronto Blue Jays. Yes, do I think that he could

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 2>give you a three four ERA with two hundred and

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:36.120
<v Speaker 2>thirty strikeouts in over two hundred innings. I also think

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 2>that's the case. That's what I think we're gonna see

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 2>from Robbie Ray. So you hear all this slander about

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:43.359
<v Speaker 2>how Robbie Ray's peripherals weren't that great in twenty twenty one,

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:46.200
<v Speaker 2>so people are just automatically calling him a bad pitcher. Still,

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm on the boat that's just not the case. He's

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 2>still gonna be a really good pitcher, maybe just not

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 2>top ten. Would you agree with that arm.

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, totally. I mean you look at the peripherals. I

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 4>would argue that you can offset those peripherals with the

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 4>fact that he's going from pitching in environments that were terrible,

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 4>whether it was duddied in or Buffalo or then you know,

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 4>even at times Toronto, and then going to a place

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 4>in Seattle, which is one of the more pitcher friendly

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 4>ballparks in baseball. I think that'll offset some of those peripherals.

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 4>So I'm not entirely concerned about him taking a huge

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 4>step back. I think we'll take maybe a small step

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:24.399
<v Speaker 4>back naturally. I mean, the guy was one of the

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 4>best pitchers in baseball last year. And I think the

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:28.919
<v Speaker 4>big strength for the Mariners is going to be that

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 4>no matter what day it is of the week, they're

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 4>going to have a good chance at a quality start.

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 4>And I think that's just as important as having two

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:39.919
<v Speaker 4>studs at the top, is that when it comes to rotation,

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 4>I think you're as good as your week as link Like, yeah,

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:43.120
<v Speaker 4>you have a guy every fifth day that can give

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 4>you a win, but if you also have a guy

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 4>every fifth day that puts you a whole every single game,

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 4>then you're in trouble. And I think they're not going

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 4>to have that issue because, as Jack mentioned, every time

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 4>one of these prospects or young pitchers goes down or

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 4>falters or whatever, they've got another guy just waiting, just

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:02.120
<v Speaker 4>ready to go. It's outrageous. I've never seen anything like it.

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 3>Here's the thing, Like I was just talking to you

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 3>guys before we started recording, I mean in August, like

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 3>August one through six. If we're looking at the Mariner

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 3>schedule right now, and Robbie Ray has to miss three

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:15.879
<v Speaker 3>starts or something like maybe he pulls a hammy and

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:18.360
<v Speaker 3>he's just like went down to the spring training complex,

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 3>like stretching that bad boy out using a thera gun

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 3>on it, and he's going to be back in two weeks.

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you could put together a five man rotation

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:30.199
<v Speaker 3>of Logan Gilbert, Justin Dunn, George Kirby, Emerson Hancock, and

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 3>Matt Brash, and I'm gonna want to tune into all

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 3>five of those games without their ace on the mount.

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:36.119
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. I mean the prospects are loaded. This system is

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 2>loaded with some of the best pitching prospects in baseball.

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 2>And I know Arm could speak to that even more

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 2>highly than me. I mean, they got cause I was

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 2>even thinking Arm And you know this is not an

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 2>MLB the Show simulation, but in actuality, if the Mariners

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 2>decided to do so, they could package some of the guys,

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 2>some of the guys in the farm system. I don't

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 2>think they'd have to even gut the entire thing for

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 2>a guy like one Soto. So I don't exactly have

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 2>a trade for one Soto, but just talk about these

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Mariners prospects, because if we wanted to, we could actually

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 2>propose a fair trade for one soda.

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean they could trade theoretically. I mean, I

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 4>think they put together a package that nobody in baseball

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:29.439
<v Speaker 4>can match. Like, that's the craziest thing is, even unless

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 4>you're trading from the big leagues, if you put together

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 4>a minor league package, there's not a team in baseball

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 4>that could match what the Mariners can give you, because

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:38.680
<v Speaker 4>pitching is a premium. Not only are these guys all

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 4>high upside pitching prospects, they all saw double A last year.

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:44.160
<v Speaker 4>Every single last one of those guys you just mentioned

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:47.159
<v Speaker 4>saw double A last year, some in varying amounts. And

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 4>I mean even Brandon Williamson, who's like the afterthought of

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:52.639
<v Speaker 4>this conversation, is a guy that actually averaged twelve and

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 4>a half case for nine innings in Double A as

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:58.399
<v Speaker 4>a left So I'm looking at this whole list and

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm like, yeah, you could at some point during the

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 4>season trade from one of those guys and go get

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 4>somebody or before that, which we'll talk about, but yeah,

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 4>I mean, to Peter's point, the fact that they could

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 4>actually put together a package that, based on market value,

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:14.639
<v Speaker 4>which whatever the hell market value would be for Juan Soto,

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 4>Like if you put it in that godforsaken trade machine,

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 4>they could match up the trade value I think with

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 4>the prospects they have, which is just outrageous and kind

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:25.399
<v Speaker 4>of explains, you know, what they have going on there.

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:27.679
<v Speaker 4>And I know Peter like someone Peter. I think he

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 4>tailed a decent amount last year. It was like Chris Flexen,

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, that guy's not bad. Like that's a solid,

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:35.399
<v Speaker 4>solid rotation piece for you too. And it's not like

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 4>he's thirty five having a career like Renaissance. He's still

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 4>twenty seven, I believe. So like they've got young guys

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:42.440
<v Speaker 4>up there too that that are pretty solid.

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:45.399
<v Speaker 2>So I do really like Chris Flexen. Chris Flexen is

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 2>another guy who outperformed his peripheral similar to a guy

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:51.640
<v Speaker 2>like Robbie Ray. I mean, if we just look at

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 2>for example, like fit numbers and expected era numbers, I mean,

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 2>he had a three six one ERA compared to a

0:27:57.440 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 2>three eight nine fIF and a four point three zero

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:03.160
<v Speaker 2>expected e er. He doesn't strike out that many guys,

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 2>but he also doesn't walk that many hitters. His stuff

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 2>isn't elite, but it's above average. I'm super interested to

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:16.400
<v Speaker 2>see what I'm going to see from Chris Flexen next year. Like,

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 2>if I gave you an ERA total of around three

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 2>six zero, do you think he outperforms that or do

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:25.719
<v Speaker 2>you think he underperforms that. Jack's going way over yeah,

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 2>like in a good way or wait, like lower than No.

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:31.400
<v Speaker 3>I think he's like a three to nine guy. Oh okay, interesting,

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 3>Like that's fine, fine, that's a five.

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but maybe he is better than that. Maybe he

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 2>is better than that. Maybe he's a guy who can

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 2>continue to out perform these peripherals.

0:28:43.600 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 3>Here's the thing that with the talent that you have

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 3>waiting in the wings in terms of starting pitching, I'm

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 3>fine with Chris Flexen at a three to nine and

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 3>everything he gives me above that is gravy, Like yeah, good,

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 3>Let's keep running him out there until Kirby and Hancock

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 3>are ready, because Kirby and Hancock are just better than

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 3>Chris Flexen, objectively better pictures than Chris Flexen. Here, I again,

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 3>I do not condone trading for Juan Soto if you're

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 3>the Seattle Mariners. I like, this is my parental warning, like,

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 3>do not trade for one Soto. You've got enough here.

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 2>But that's what. Don't trade for Won Soto.

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 3>So if they don't trade, because you gotta gut the

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:22.200
<v Speaker 3>ship out of this thing.

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean.

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 3>But here's the thing though, Like if we're just hypothetical again, hypothetical,

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 3>does Noelvie Marte, who's one of the best shortstop prospects

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 3>in baseball right now, George Kirby and Emerson Hancock, that

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 3>Trio get it done for Sodo.

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 2>No throwing Matt Williams in trade.

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 4>Maybe I can't even answer that because I don't know

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 4>what a trade for Juan Sota looks like.

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't exist.

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't throw four of the best prospects at baseballttom.

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 4>You're gonna have to gut your whole like some of

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 4>your top top guys, and then you know what, You're

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 4>not gonna be able to pay him after. So it's

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 4>like what you're you're gutting, you know, the future for

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 4>a couple of years of SOD. And that's the problem

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 4>is I don't want to give up that years. We're

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 4>talking about five six years of control with each of

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 4>these guys for two years of SODO. That that's the struggle.

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 2>At least now that Kevin Mather is out old president

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 2>and CEO of the Mariners. He's gone after last year,

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 2>they did commit more money to some of these guys.

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 2>So maybe now with their payroll near seventy one million dollars,

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 2>one of the lowest in baseball new ownership, maybe they

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 2>think to themselves, you know what, maybe we should give

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 2>one so five hundred million dollars of fifteen years. No,

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 2>that's not that's not actually going to happen. But talking

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 2>about another guy that starting rotation, Logan Gilbert, who you know,

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 2>his era was four to sixty one, but his peripherals

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 2>were much better. He looked actually like a much better

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 2>pitcher than what his era said. He had a three

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 2>seven three FIP and a four point h nine expected era. Jack,

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 2>would you rather have Logan Gilbert or Chris Flexen in

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 2>your rotation? I'd rather have Gilbows.

0:30:58.240 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 3>I'd rather have Logan Gilbert.

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 2>You'd rather have looking Gilbert to.

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, I think Gilbert's got like number two upside,

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 4>probably closer to a number three. But he figured it

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 4>out down the stretch, had a really good final six

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 4>starts of the season. The command's good. He's figured out

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 4>a way to make the fastball play. I think he's

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 4>gonna be I think he's gonna be a really solid

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 4>pitcher for them. And another guy that I mean, he's

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 4>He's probably closer in the middle of the rotation, but

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 4>I love what he's got going on. And a high

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 4>floor guy that still has some upside.

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 2>You taking Kucci is now gone, that's something interesting. But

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 2>they don't need him at all. But he's a guy

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 2>who at a four four one era wasn't that great

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 2>last year, even his peripherals were even worse. But you know,

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 2>they're losing him. I don't really have a point there,

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 2>just more like, you know, that's someone that they're losing.

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 2>It's someone who's been a baroner for a while. Now.

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 3>Can we just note that you're big into the peripherals

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 3>right now. I'm telling you again, get your head out

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:51.840
<v Speaker 3>of the Excel sheet.

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm just look, I'm talking, I'm looking.

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 3>We're talking baseball, you know, Spare me, all right, Let's

0:31:57.160 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 3>talk about the bullpen here before we jump back into

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 3>what they need to add hitting wise, because this bullpen

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 3>is sneaky, kind of awesome They've got. I'm gonna run

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 3>through these guys real quick. Drew stecken Ryder, former Miami

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 3>Marlin arm can speak to him. Plus fastball. He's got

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 3>a miss slider, but he's got a good change up

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:19.440
<v Speaker 3>to Casey Sadler, who is cutter, dominant, but a stupid curveball.

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:22.840
<v Speaker 3>That thing is nasty. Paul Sewald who had a forty

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 3>k rate, a seven percent walk rate in a sub

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 3>one whip, who was pretty awesome. Diego Castillo who had

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 3>a sub one whip in fifty eight innings this year

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 3>across his time with Tampa and Seattle, Andres Munos is

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:38.560
<v Speaker 3>coming back from injury. Muno sits one hundred with his fastball,

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 3>and then Ken Giles is coming back from injury, and

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 3>Ken Giles not too long ago was like the best

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 3>slider pitcher out of the bullpen in baseball. I mean,

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 3>they've got serious depth here. Problem is they're all right handed.

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, yeah, they had a lefty.

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 4>The craziest part is, you know we just talked about

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 4>I was talking about the Padres prospects. Ray Kerr, the

0:33:04.720 --> 0:33:08.719
<v Speaker 4>guy that they actually sent over to San Diego in

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 4>that Adam Fraser deal, is a lefty who throws one

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 4>hundred with a wipeout breaking ball that would have fit

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 4>really nicely in there. So the fact that they were

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 4>really willing to trade Ray Kerr, who I think you know,

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 4>will be in the big leagues right away for the Padres,

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 4>it tells me that they've got something up their sleeves,

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 4>whether they're going to you know, sign a free agent

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 4>there's still so many free agent lefties out there, or

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 4>or you know, maybe going to just make another upper

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 4>minor league level trade. I think they'll satisfy that part.

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 4>But Munios is someone that doesn't get enough attention. Came

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 4>over in that trade from the Padres in with ty France,

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 4>and Munios is somebody that they really believe, and I

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:46.800
<v Speaker 4>think they gave him a four year deal off of

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 4>an injury where he only threw two thirds of an

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 4>inning last year. He's going to be a legit, dude.

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't be shocked if he's the closer in a

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 4>couple of years for them.

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 2>And Anthony Musavitch is another lefty in their pen who

0:33:57.560 --> 0:33:59.880
<v Speaker 2>through fifty four innings he was pretty good, not great.

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:01.920
<v Speaker 2>It's solid, and I feel like he'll at least contribute

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 2>as a left handed reliever. But I agree Jack, they

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 2>there's an arm. There's plenty of free agents out there,

0:34:07.320 --> 0:34:09.400
<v Speaker 2>and you're already you're already grinning there because you know

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 2>a couple of lefty free agents that they should go grab.

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 3>All right, I'm gonna go. I'm gonna go least sexy

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 3>to most sexy names. And sexy doesn't mean best fit.

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 3>I think sexy just means like it's gonna produce the

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:23.319
<v Speaker 3>most intense reaction from you guys. So I'm gonna go,

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 3>you know, most subdued reaction to most like fuck you

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:28.960
<v Speaker 3>get out of my face, or let's do it reaction.

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:29.359
<v Speaker 1>Cool.

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 3>Right, Let's start at the bottom with Daniel Norris. Are

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 3>you interested in Daniel Norris at all?

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 4>Then?

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 2>Daniel Norris live in a van? Yes? That particularly. No,

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm not interested in Daniel Norris that much.

0:34:40.800 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 3>Okay, fair because of the van. It sounds like because

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:43.920
<v Speaker 3>of the van.

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 2>No, not because of the van thing, just you know,

0:34:45.600 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 2>connecting dots in my bad he lives.

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:50.399
<v Speaker 3>No, it sounds like you don't like the van thing,

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:55.319
<v Speaker 3>all right? Moving on, Jake Jake's anti van. Are you

0:34:55.320 --> 0:34:56.240
<v Speaker 3>anti Jake Deegman?

0:34:57.680 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 2>No, not even a little bit. No, Jake Deemon, Yes,

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:02.160
<v Speaker 2>I like that name.

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 3>Arham you look anti Jake Deepon, like, sure, okay, a

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 3>little bit more sexy reaction here, Brad Hand.

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:13.080
<v Speaker 4>No, he was pretty bad last year, man, but like

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 4>he's not this guy. But this isn't like an important role,

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 4>like this is just the lefty for them.

0:35:18.600 --> 0:35:19.759
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I'm in.

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:20.239
<v Speaker 4>I'm in.

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 2>On hand Hand's gonna be like weirdly expensive, though, I

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 2>feel like still maybe just.

0:35:25.880 --> 0:35:28.319
<v Speaker 4>Because it's value and he can kick rocks. But if

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:30.640
<v Speaker 4>he knows that he's not worth that much anymore, and

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:31.239
<v Speaker 4>then yeah, I'm in.

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:32.399
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:35.240
<v Speaker 3>How about Andrew Chaffin, Yeah, much better.

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 2>It's not perfect, yeah, perfect veteran lefty mustache. Give it

0:35:41.120 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 2>to me now, my pick?

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 4>All right, I know who this is.

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:45.680
<v Speaker 3>Andrew Miller.

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:47.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, no, thank you.

0:35:47.760 --> 0:35:48.920
<v Speaker 4>He's given to me.

0:35:49.560 --> 0:35:50.239
<v Speaker 3>Give them to me.

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:53.960
<v Speaker 2>What do you want from Andrew Miller anymore? Eighty nine

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 2>with just the slider. They know that's coming that he

0:35:56.280 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 2>can't throw for a strike anymore.

0:35:57.719 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I want Miller in hopes of ringing the last

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 3>bit out of the towel. I also want him for

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:09.200
<v Speaker 3>this insane veteran presence that is needed on this team

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:11.920
<v Speaker 3>because we talk about how much young talent there is here,

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 3>where's the veteran presence now that Kyle Seger's gone.

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 2>I'd rather have Jake Deekman than Andrew Miller.

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:21.560
<v Speaker 3>But Miller has won thing. Steekman has never won anything.

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 3>Chafen one things, Chaffin's one thinks no, never.

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:27.240
<v Speaker 4>Don't think he's anything.

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:30.840
<v Speaker 3>Andrew Miller was the guy on a team that was

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:32.640
<v Speaker 3>like an inning away from going to the World Series

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:33.960
<v Speaker 3>or from winning the World Series.

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:36.600
<v Speaker 2>But does a back end reliever who's not going to

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:40.080
<v Speaker 2>contribute much on the field, is he that winning guy

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 2>that will dispel the Donnas Haslam? That's what I'm saying you.

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 2>You don't need to sign.

0:36:46.800 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 4>Much like Haslam and pitched to lefties a little bit.

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:53.000
<v Speaker 3>But I see not looking for Bam out of bio.

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:54.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm wking for you, Donnis Haslam.

0:36:54.600 --> 0:36:56.839
<v Speaker 2>I see what you're saying, Jack, because and that's just

0:36:57.000 --> 0:36:59.840
<v Speaker 2>to point out how good this Mariner's bullpen is currently.

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:03.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you've named all the guys. I think according

0:37:03.000 --> 0:37:06.320
<v Speaker 2>to f Ward, they were the sixth best bullpen in baseball.

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 2>According to that stat they were a really good bullpen.

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 2>So they just need a little bit of tinkering here

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 2>and there. So I understand what you're saying with the

0:37:14.360 --> 0:37:16.719
<v Speaker 2>veteran presence with Andrew Miller, But I just feel like

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:19.360
<v Speaker 2>there's plenty of other guys that provide that same presence.

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Maybe they haven't won championships, but they still can provide

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:24.359
<v Speaker 2>that spark that they need.

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:26.880
<v Speaker 3>So we agree that Chafin is option one, and then

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:28.720
<v Speaker 3>everybody else can go kick sand.

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:31.160
<v Speaker 2>I think Jack Deekman's a good option. I like that one.

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know why we're throwing that one to the wayside.

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think Daniel Norris is a good option because

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:37.239
<v Speaker 3>I like the Van thing.

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:39.719
<v Speaker 2>Peter, all right, Well, good for you. I like the

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:40.399
<v Speaker 2>Van thing too.

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:44.440
<v Speaker 3>All right, Anti Dorris, let's transition back to the bats,

0:37:45.040 --> 0:37:47.479
<v Speaker 3>and I just have one quick question for you guys,

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 3>because Seattle going into twenty twenty two is one of

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:53.960
<v Speaker 3>nine teams with north of one hundred million dollars of

0:37:54.080 --> 0:37:58.080
<v Speaker 3>luxury tax base to work with. They've got one hundred

0:37:58.080 --> 0:38:00.759
<v Speaker 3>and six if I'm not mistaken million to work with

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:02.799
<v Speaker 3>before they hit the penalty. They're not going to get

0:38:02.800 --> 0:38:06.560
<v Speaker 3>anywhere close to that. But are you team trade or

0:38:06.600 --> 0:38:10.200
<v Speaker 3>are you team by start with arm?

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:13.719
<v Speaker 4>I mean, obviously the answer is always if. If it's

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:16.120
<v Speaker 4>about the money for them and like they're okay spending

0:38:16.160 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 4>a little bit more. I know, I look at third

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 4>base and it's a challenge right to address that position

0:38:24.200 --> 0:38:28.480
<v Speaker 4>outside of Matt Chapman. And if we're talking about attainable

0:38:28.520 --> 0:38:31.960
<v Speaker 4>realistic trades, how many other third base candidates are They're

0:38:32.000 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 4>really out there. Josh Donaldson, Josh Donaldson's a potential guy

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:38.279
<v Speaker 4>as well, but I think the Twins may actually try

0:38:38.280 --> 0:38:40.320
<v Speaker 4>to try to keep him and just see what happens.

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Is why.

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:46.400
<v Speaker 4>But if it's not Donaldson or Chapman, I think you

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:48.600
<v Speaker 4>gotta go and make a signing. Which I'm not going

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:50.520
<v Speaker 4>to steal your thunder jacause I know I know who

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:54.160
<v Speaker 4>you want for them to go sign, but I think

0:38:54.200 --> 0:38:56.000
<v Speaker 4>that makes the most sense probably is go make a

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:58.720
<v Speaker 4>signing if you can't. If you can't, go get Matt Chapman.

0:38:59.320 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm marvel at the thought of just Matt Chapman and

0:39:02.680 --> 0:39:04.880
<v Speaker 4>JP Crawford on the left side of an infield together.

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 4>That would be a lot of fun. And I think

0:39:07.000 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 4>Chapman would give you very similar type of production to

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:11.640
<v Speaker 4>what you got from Seger last year, which is low

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:15.360
<v Speaker 4>batting average, a lot of power, but with better defense,

0:39:15.800 --> 0:39:19.120
<v Speaker 4>and I think probably a little bit more room offensively

0:39:19.200 --> 0:39:19.920
<v Speaker 4>to produce.

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 3>Peter, you team by or team trade.

0:39:23.600 --> 0:39:26.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm team by. You look at the payroll and I

0:39:27.040 --> 0:39:29.239
<v Speaker 2>know that you know they're not a team that has

0:39:29.239 --> 0:39:31.759
<v Speaker 2>the propensity to spend a bunch of money. But can

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 2>you finally once you see the team at ninety and

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:37.719
<v Speaker 2>seventy two with the farm system that they're cooking up,

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:40.960
<v Speaker 2>is it finally time to sign that big free agent?

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:44.440
<v Speaker 2>And Jack, I'm teeing you up right now because I

0:39:44.480 --> 0:39:49.239
<v Speaker 2>know Mariners fans are probably clamoring for Jose Ramirez trade proposal,

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 2>and the Mariners could do it, but we've spoken about

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:54.759
<v Speaker 2>this before. We don't think the Guardians will sell, and

0:39:54.800 --> 0:39:57.440
<v Speaker 2>we kind of don't think that they should sell either.

0:39:58.040 --> 0:40:02.000
<v Speaker 2>So I know oaking round about Wuan Soto trade rumors,

0:40:02.000 --> 0:40:04.720
<v Speaker 2>and I'm sure we could just throw out random rumor

0:40:04.760 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 2>mill trades, because you know, I love to do that,

0:40:07.040 --> 0:40:08.839
<v Speaker 2>just out of nowhere. Just get the rumor milk cooking.

0:40:09.239 --> 0:40:11.960
<v Speaker 2>I like the hot stove, but it doesn't I don't

0:40:11.960 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 2>think that the Mariners would get Jose Ramirez, So I

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:16.920
<v Speaker 2>just I don't think it's worth going over.

0:40:19.080 --> 0:40:23.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I hear you I like the Chapman idea for trading.

0:40:23.640 --> 0:40:25.799
<v Speaker 3>I'll get to the signing in a moment. I like

0:40:25.880 --> 0:40:28.640
<v Speaker 3>the Chapman idea. If you're gonna go trade, I want

0:40:28.640 --> 0:40:30.400
<v Speaker 3>to throw another name to you in the trade market

0:40:30.400 --> 0:40:33.120
<v Speaker 3>that I think is probably worth a little bit less

0:40:33.120 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 3>than Chapman, who can also be good here, and that's

0:40:35.640 --> 0:40:39.120
<v Speaker 3>Jamer Candelario. Does that name do anything for you, guys?

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:42.239
<v Speaker 3>Candelario is a one nineteen WRC plus guy. He's got

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:44.719
<v Speaker 3>two more years of control. He had a three point

0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:45.239
<v Speaker 3>two war.

0:40:45.680 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 4>No, I love him. I just don't think he's available.

0:40:47.880 --> 0:40:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's an extra base hit guy in Detroit, where

0:40:52.120 --> 0:40:54.560
<v Speaker 2>the park is huge. I wonder if he went to

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:56.840
<v Speaker 2>a better ballpark if some of those doubles could end

0:40:56.920 --> 0:40:57.920
<v Speaker 2>up being home runs.

0:40:58.360 --> 0:40:59.319
<v Speaker 4>I think they're trying to win.

0:40:59.760 --> 0:41:00.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agree.

0:41:00.640 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 4>I don't think they're gonna do it, but I think

0:41:02.200 --> 0:41:05.000
<v Speaker 4>they're trying. So I've been Candelario. I love him. I

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:07.040
<v Speaker 4>would love that as a fit me too. Don't think

0:41:07.120 --> 0:41:08.080
<v Speaker 4>the Tigers would do it.

0:41:08.280 --> 0:41:08.840
<v Speaker 2>Are they?

0:41:08.880 --> 0:41:11.640
<v Speaker 3>Are they entirely in Detroit? Are they entirely gone on

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:12.600
<v Speaker 3>East sac Parades?

0:41:14.440 --> 0:41:16.799
<v Speaker 4>I don't love them. I don't love them.

0:41:16.960 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 3>Did they because they did.

0:41:19.360 --> 0:41:20.839
<v Speaker 4>I don't think they love them that much.

0:41:21.960 --> 0:41:23.759
<v Speaker 3>Peter, do you like Esac Preadis at all?

0:41:24.719 --> 0:41:25.560
<v Speaker 2>Not? Particularly?

0:41:26.440 --> 0:41:28.719
<v Speaker 3>What if they want Torque to play third base? Like,

0:41:28.800 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 3>do you keep Candelario?

0:41:31.120 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Are they gonna want Spencer Torksen to play third?

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:34.680
<v Speaker 3>They want him to play third?

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:37.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they want. Yeah, I want to fly too, but

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:40.920
<v Speaker 4>like it's just not an option. I think he's stuck

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:45.279
<v Speaker 4>it first. Personally, Yeah, I hear you, all right. I

0:41:45.360 --> 0:41:48.720
<v Speaker 4>think the Seattle Mariners should go sign Chris Bryant. YEP,

0:41:48.800 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 4>I really do. Chris Bryant is a Swiss army knife.

0:41:52.239 --> 0:41:55.000
<v Speaker 4>If you need somebody to play center, chances are Chris

0:41:55.040 --> 0:41:57.360
<v Speaker 4>Bryant is gonna be your best option in center field.

0:41:57.400 --> 0:42:00.680
<v Speaker 4>If Kelnick is playing poorly. Chris Bryant has played solid

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:03.800
<v Speaker 4>center for the San Francisco Giants down the stretch. Chris

0:42:03.840 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 4>Bryant immediately solves your problem at third base. This guy

0:42:07.040 --> 0:42:10.239
<v Speaker 4>had a one twenty three WRC plus last year. I

0:42:10.280 --> 0:42:13.920
<v Speaker 4>mean he had what three six war hit two sixty

0:42:13.960 --> 0:42:15.560
<v Speaker 4>five with a three fifty three OBP.

0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:19.680
<v Speaker 3>This guy is durable as shit too. I mean I'm

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:23.040
<v Speaker 3>looking back to twenty fifteen, his rookie year, his game

0:42:23.120 --> 0:42:27.560
<v Speaker 3>totals one fifty one, one fifty five, one fifty one,

0:42:27.840 --> 0:42:29.839
<v Speaker 3>one oh two, and twenty eighteen was an outlier. He

0:42:29.880 --> 0:42:32.600
<v Speaker 3>was dealing with some stuff. Then twenty nineteen back to

0:42:32.680 --> 0:42:35.319
<v Speaker 3>one forty seven, and then in twenty twenty one, one

0:42:35.400 --> 0:42:38.000
<v Speaker 3>hundred and forty four games. He's gonna play all the

0:42:38.120 --> 0:42:41.080
<v Speaker 3>time for you. He's striking out a lot less than

0:42:41.080 --> 0:42:44.600
<v Speaker 3>he ever has. He's walking near a career high clip.

0:42:45.040 --> 0:42:49.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Chris Bryant is your better batting average, same

0:42:49.360 --> 0:42:54.080
<v Speaker 3>amount of power, can be a run producer and defensive versatility.

0:42:54.200 --> 0:42:56.359
<v Speaker 3>And you know what, I know he's a Boris guy.

0:42:56.400 --> 0:42:59.120
<v Speaker 3>I know it's Chris Bryant. I don't think he's gonna

0:42:59.120 --> 0:43:01.600
<v Speaker 3>be that expensive. I think you're handing out another Robbie

0:43:01.680 --> 0:43:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Ray deal and we can clean up. Say that's it.

0:43:05.880 --> 0:43:07.600
<v Speaker 3>Mariners are one of my World Series favorites.

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:09.560
<v Speaker 2>I have a question for the both of you. We've

0:43:09.600 --> 0:43:12.200
<v Speaker 2>done a lot of this GMS episode. You know, we've

0:43:12.200 --> 0:43:17.200
<v Speaker 2>done the Padres, the Reds, other teams. Now I'm forgetting

0:43:18.520 --> 0:43:21.879
<v Speaker 2>is has there been a better free agency fit than

0:43:21.960 --> 0:43:24.759
<v Speaker 2>Chris Bryant to the Mariners that we've talked about. I

0:43:24.800 --> 0:43:28.759
<v Speaker 2>think it's like a glove. How good of a fit

0:43:28.840 --> 0:43:30.680
<v Speaker 2>Chris Bryant fits with the Mariners.

0:43:30.680 --> 0:43:33.000
<v Speaker 4>Oh, I totally agree, And I to answer your question, no,

0:43:33.360 --> 0:43:35.080
<v Speaker 4>I don't think there is a better fit because literally,

0:43:35.120 --> 0:43:37.200
<v Speaker 4>like you have someone now that actually could play center

0:43:37.200 --> 0:43:39.840
<v Speaker 4>in a pinch too, which is it's just crazy, but

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:41.279
<v Speaker 4>being able to play all over the dime and the

0:43:41.360 --> 0:43:44.520
<v Speaker 4>versatility was something that Topoto really wanted when they were

0:43:44.520 --> 0:43:47.560
<v Speaker 4>looking at him in the trade deadline. The Mariners were

0:43:47.600 --> 0:43:50.600
<v Speaker 4>reportedly the team that was the closest to getting him

0:43:51.080 --> 0:43:54.400
<v Speaker 4>besides the Giants. And you know, I think that says

0:43:54.440 --> 0:43:56.239
<v Speaker 4>a lot. I think that kind of shows you that

0:43:56.280 --> 0:43:59.000
<v Speaker 4>the interest is there. And I bet they make an offer.

0:43:59.040 --> 0:44:00.880
<v Speaker 4>I bet they. I bet they make an offer. I

0:44:00.880 --> 0:44:02.760
<v Speaker 4>don't know if it's going to be the best offer,

0:44:03.040 --> 0:44:05.800
<v Speaker 4>but I bet they do. And I think that changes

0:44:05.840 --> 0:44:08.360
<v Speaker 4>everything for them. Their lineup instantly becomes better.

0:44:08.800 --> 0:44:09.040
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:44:09.160 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 4>There they have that versatility, and yeah, it's an upgrade

0:44:12.560 --> 0:44:15.399
<v Speaker 4>Overseeker from last year. And so your lineups getting better

0:44:15.560 --> 0:44:18.600
<v Speaker 4>in other ways naturally, and now you upgraded third base.

0:44:20.080 --> 0:44:22.520
<v Speaker 4>This would change a lot. Just one move I think

0:44:22.520 --> 0:44:25.320
<v Speaker 4>could make move the needle a lot for this team.

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:27.880
<v Speaker 3>You've got that world series winning presence too. I mean,

0:44:27.920 --> 0:44:31.200
<v Speaker 3>we talk about veteran presence. Is screw the Andrew Miller Think.

0:44:34.840 --> 0:44:38.040
<v Speaker 2>He signed Chris Bryan Andrew Miller immediately becomes expendable.

0:44:38.480 --> 0:44:40.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, oh yeah, and he's not even on the team

0:44:40.600 --> 0:44:41.600
<v Speaker 3>yet and he's expendable.

0:44:43.800 --> 0:44:46.239
<v Speaker 2>Just get one other guys, what a world series title? Well? Now,

0:44:46.320 --> 0:44:47.760
<v Speaker 2>why why even signed Edrew Miller?

0:44:48.800 --> 0:44:49.719
<v Speaker 3>I don't think you have to.

0:44:50.000 --> 0:44:50.799
<v Speaker 4>It's one or the other.

0:44:51.560 --> 0:44:54.960
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it's one of the other. What if that was like, ah, ship,

0:44:55.040 --> 0:44:57.240
<v Speaker 3>we just signed Andrew Miller. We can't sign Chris Bryant.

0:44:57.320 --> 0:44:59.719
<v Speaker 2>Now we're not interested to Poto comes out with that

0:44:59.719 --> 0:45:02.839
<v Speaker 2>report or to bargers fans, could you imagine, Oh.

0:45:02.520 --> 0:45:04.719
<v Speaker 3>God, I mean, they'd kill him. They'd tell him he's

0:45:04.719 --> 0:45:06.000
<v Speaker 3>playing fantasy baseball again.

0:45:06.600 --> 0:45:08.600
<v Speaker 2>And it's funny just going back to the starting rotation

0:45:08.640 --> 0:45:11.440
<v Speaker 2>because we didn't really add anything over trades or you know,

0:45:11.760 --> 0:45:14.520
<v Speaker 2>through free agency, and yet this team finished with the

0:45:14.560 --> 0:45:18.680
<v Speaker 2>sixteenth best era in baseball as a staff. But they're

0:45:18.719 --> 0:45:21.040
<v Speaker 2>just so freaking loaded. I don't do we have to

0:45:21.080 --> 0:45:23.279
<v Speaker 2>do anything to the starting rotation. I would think maybe

0:45:23.320 --> 0:45:25.960
<v Speaker 2>you add a fifth starter, because I mean, how good

0:45:26.200 --> 0:45:29.959
<v Speaker 2>actually is justin done but no, I give Justin Dunne

0:45:29.960 --> 0:45:30.440
<v Speaker 2>a chance.

0:45:30.880 --> 0:45:33.319
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think Dune's a better I mean, like,

0:45:33.400 --> 0:45:36.040
<v Speaker 3>think about it. You can go as I click back

0:45:36.040 --> 0:45:38.799
<v Speaker 3>to my starting pitcher sheet on the iPad here. I mean, like,

0:45:39.760 --> 0:45:43.800
<v Speaker 3>in reality, you can have Rey Gonzalez, Flexen, Gilbert Dunn,

0:45:43.960 --> 0:45:47.960
<v Speaker 3>Kirby Hancock, and Brash. That's nine guys.

0:45:48.880 --> 0:45:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Does any rotation in baseball? Is there anything deeper? Any

0:45:53.680 --> 0:45:57.279
<v Speaker 2>team that has more than nine of those kind of

0:45:57.320 --> 0:45:59.160
<v Speaker 2>guys in all of baseball?

0:45:59.200 --> 0:46:01.239
<v Speaker 3>I don't think so. So it's not the best, like

0:46:01.280 --> 0:46:04.440
<v Speaker 3>there is not. Robbie Ray is the worst of the aces.

0:46:04.560 --> 0:46:06.600
<v Speaker 3>I think, Like I'm still kind of a Robbie Ray

0:46:06.640 --> 0:46:08.080
<v Speaker 3>hater because I got to see him do it again.

0:46:08.520 --> 0:46:10.960
<v Speaker 3>But like Robbie Ray is the worst of the elite

0:46:11.000 --> 0:46:14.280
<v Speaker 3>pitchers cy Young caliber, Like I'm taking Robbie Ray last

0:46:14.280 --> 0:46:17.279
<v Speaker 3>in the fantasy draft of cy Young caliber pitchers. But like,

0:46:17.400 --> 0:46:20.040
<v Speaker 3>if Ray does it again, boom, You've got your ace

0:46:20.680 --> 0:46:24.399
<v Speaker 3>and then you've got so many pieces that could be phenomenal,

0:46:24.520 --> 0:46:28.160
<v Speaker 3>Like the potential to be phenomenal is through the roof here.

0:46:28.640 --> 0:46:32.840
<v Speaker 3>So like, yes, not the best staff in the division,

0:46:33.560 --> 0:46:37.239
<v Speaker 3>in the American League by any stretch. But I think

0:46:37.280 --> 0:46:39.239
<v Speaker 3>in two years we could be having the conversation that

0:46:39.280 --> 0:46:41.240
<v Speaker 3>the Mariners have one of the best stabs in baseball

0:46:41.280 --> 0:46:43.560
<v Speaker 3>because that is how good the prospects are.

0:46:44.000 --> 0:46:47.680
<v Speaker 2>Can we do something really fun? Yeah? Can we rank

0:46:48.600 --> 0:46:53.840
<v Speaker 2>like Flexen and Gilbert and Brash and Kirby and and

0:46:54.120 --> 0:46:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Cock and just kind of see where they stack up

0:46:57.000 --> 0:46:59.920
<v Speaker 2>against their prospects. And I mean, ar, you're the per

0:47:00.239 --> 0:47:03.640
<v Speaker 2>person to throw that to first, you know you got

0:47:03.840 --> 0:47:07.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, let's just go through them again quickly. George Kirby, Emerson, Hancock,

0:47:08.080 --> 0:47:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Matt Brash, Brennan Williamson, Logan, Gilbert, and Chris Flexen. Am

0:47:14.160 --> 0:47:17.360
<v Speaker 2>I living in road? Justin Dunn in there too. I

0:47:17.440 --> 0:47:19.759
<v Speaker 2>think Justin Dunn would be last. But that's just me

0:47:20.120 --> 0:47:23.279
<v Speaker 2>in that rank like next year, No, just like I

0:47:23.320 --> 0:47:26.760
<v Speaker 2>guess the pictures that you like the most moving forward,

0:47:26.840 --> 0:47:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Maybe not just twenty twenty two, because these guys are rookies,

0:47:30.360 --> 0:47:34.319
<v Speaker 2>but I to give I guess us and Mariners fans

0:47:34.320 --> 0:47:36.560
<v Speaker 2>and anyone else listening kind of to see where their

0:47:36.640 --> 0:47:39.440
<v Speaker 2>prospects rank up with their current MLB talent.

0:47:40.560 --> 0:47:43.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, all right, all right, I've got seven.

0:47:44.400 --> 0:47:46.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Question that is I know what a loaded question.

0:47:46.880 --> 0:47:50.240
<v Speaker 2>But it's a one, and I feel like it's important. Kirby,

0:47:50.719 --> 0:47:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Kirby number one, brash. Wow, yeah yeah, Brash. Then m

0:48:00.800 --> 0:48:05.480
<v Speaker 2>Gilbert is Gilbert in here? Yeah?

0:48:05.560 --> 0:48:12.319
<v Speaker 4>Gilbert or Hancock. I'll go Hancock Williamson.

0:48:13.120 --> 0:48:17.040
<v Speaker 2>So so we went Gilbert three, Gilbert's three, and Hancock's four.

0:48:17.400 --> 0:48:19.719
<v Speaker 3>Oh wait, no, Gilbert is not even off the board.

0:48:19.520 --> 0:48:23.600
<v Speaker 4>Yet Williamson Gilbert.

0:48:24.239 --> 0:48:25.919
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:48:26.000 --> 0:48:33.000
<v Speaker 4>Then I'm gonna go Justin Dunn. Then Flexen. Did I miss.

0:48:32.880 --> 0:48:35.160
<v Speaker 2>Somebody you like done better than Flexen?

0:48:35.680 --> 0:48:38.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? If he's healthy, I like done better than Flexin.

0:48:40.080 --> 0:48:43.120
<v Speaker 2>That makes me so sad, not just it is because

0:48:43.120 --> 0:48:45.560
<v Speaker 2>I trust you on that, and I love Chris Flexen

0:48:45.640 --> 0:48:47.719
<v Speaker 2>and I watch both of them, and I just I

0:48:48.200 --> 0:48:51.080
<v Speaker 2>think I see Chris Flexen as a better picture. But

0:48:51.680 --> 0:48:54.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, maybe Justin Dunn can be better. I don't know.

0:48:55.040 --> 0:48:57.400
<v Speaker 2>I guess. You know, sometimes my betting gets in the

0:48:57.400 --> 0:49:00.480
<v Speaker 2>way because I'm just tailing Chris Flexen when he's undervalued

0:49:00.480 --> 0:49:02.919
<v Speaker 2>according to Vegas, and he just continues to win game

0:49:02.960 --> 0:49:04.919
<v Speaker 2>it a game out, I'm like, what are you missing here?

0:49:05.080 --> 0:49:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Same thing with Cal Quantrill of the Guardians. Yeah, they

0:49:08.480 --> 0:49:10.960
<v Speaker 2>just went. They just figure out ways to put their

0:49:11.000 --> 0:49:12.920
<v Speaker 2>teams in positions to win, they all game.

0:49:14.760 --> 0:49:17.400
<v Speaker 4>I think Flexen and Don are the biggest toss up

0:49:17.400 --> 0:49:17.880
<v Speaker 4>in the world.

0:49:18.040 --> 0:49:22.919
<v Speaker 5>Personally, Yes, I guess all right, I've got Kirby one,

0:49:23.680 --> 0:49:31.960
<v Speaker 5>Hancock two, Gilbert three, Brash four, Williamson five Done, six

0:49:32.200 --> 0:49:33.400
<v Speaker 5>flex and seven.

0:49:34.760 --> 0:49:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Flex and seven.

0:49:37.880 --> 0:49:39.560
<v Speaker 3>But who's he better than on that list?

0:49:39.760 --> 0:49:45.560
<v Speaker 2>I think I think Flexen is better than Done. I

0:49:45.560 --> 0:49:49.360
<v Speaker 2>guess I would still put Chris Flexen above Brendan Williamson.

0:49:49.800 --> 0:49:52.040
<v Speaker 2>But maybe that's just me. So let me do mine.

0:49:52.080 --> 0:49:53.799
<v Speaker 2>So I would go George Kirby one. I would go

0:49:53.880 --> 0:49:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Brash too. I would go Hancock three. I would go

0:49:58.400 --> 0:50:05.239
<v Speaker 2>Gilbert four, flex and five, Williamson six Done, seven, nick

0:50:05.280 --> 0:50:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Mark gavic Is eight. Nick Mark gavage Is eight.

0:50:09.680 --> 0:50:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Eighty eight with the fastball from the left side should

0:50:11.920 --> 0:50:12.319
<v Speaker 3>change up.

0:50:12.360 --> 0:50:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Though. What that should go to show is that although

0:50:16.200 --> 0:50:18.799
<v Speaker 2>Logan Gilbert and Chris Flexen have already made their MLB

0:50:18.920 --> 0:50:21.160
<v Speaker 2>impact and of our and already look at least at

0:50:21.160 --> 0:50:24.080
<v Speaker 2>the bottom between a two or a four in a

0:50:24.080 --> 0:50:28.920
<v Speaker 2>good rotation, you have three, four, five guys waiting that

0:50:29.000 --> 0:50:33.400
<v Speaker 2>are all arguably better. This is what the Seattle Mariners

0:50:33.520 --> 0:50:36.840
<v Speaker 2>have to look forward to in twenty twenty two and beyond.

0:50:37.239 --> 0:50:39.239
<v Speaker 2>Do you think any of those guys are gonna make

0:50:39.320 --> 0:50:42.640
<v Speaker 2>an impact in twenty twenty two, not just pitch, but

0:50:42.719 --> 0:50:45.640
<v Speaker 2>make a legitimate impact. And who's going to be those

0:50:45.760 --> 0:50:49.400
<v Speaker 2>those guys, all of them with the exception of Williamson.

0:50:50.120 --> 0:50:52.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, really, I think Williamson's the one that threw the

0:50:52.640 --> 0:50:56.279
<v Speaker 4>most innings in double A last year, ironically, and I

0:50:56.320 --> 0:50:58.520
<v Speaker 4>think could come in into some sort of lefty reliever

0:50:58.640 --> 0:51:02.279
<v Speaker 4>roll down the stretch. Worst case, I think Hancock is

0:51:02.320 --> 0:51:04.759
<v Speaker 4>the least likely to chip in next year. I think

0:51:04.760 --> 0:51:10.640
<v Speaker 4>he's the furthest away and still will get pulverized if

0:51:10.640 --> 0:51:14.120
<v Speaker 4>he gets called up too early. The fastball just isn't

0:51:14.160 --> 0:51:17.160
<v Speaker 4>there yet. Brash could be in a big league bullpen

0:51:17.280 --> 0:51:19.080
<v Speaker 4>right now. They were talking about calling him up at

0:51:19.080 --> 0:51:22.440
<v Speaker 4>the end of the year last year. Kirby has seventy

0:51:22.520 --> 0:51:25.560
<v Speaker 4>five grade eighty grade command of a fastball that's ninety

0:51:25.600 --> 0:51:28.600
<v Speaker 4>nine miles per hour. Kirby's the guy that's going to

0:51:28.640 --> 0:51:30.440
<v Speaker 4>help the most. I think right away, as long as

0:51:30.440 --> 0:51:33.839
<v Speaker 4>he's healthy, then I'd probably go Brash in some sort

0:51:33.880 --> 0:51:38.040
<v Speaker 4>of of way. However, he's deployed out there. Those two

0:51:38.080 --> 0:51:39.640
<v Speaker 4>guys I think are one and two in terms of

0:51:39.680 --> 0:51:40.120
<v Speaker 4>who's going.

0:51:40.080 --> 0:51:40.440
<v Speaker 2>To help me.

0:51:40.600 --> 0:51:45.320
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so when Kirby comes up, I think Kirby immediately

0:51:45.440 --> 0:51:48.000
<v Speaker 3>enters the Alec Manoa conversation where we're talking about, like,

0:51:48.120 --> 0:51:49.800
<v Speaker 3>best young pitcher in baseball?

0:51:52.360 --> 0:51:54.920
<v Speaker 2>Who does George Kirby remind you, guys of currently does

0:51:55.320 --> 0:51:57.840
<v Speaker 2>because he doesn't really remind me of Alec Minoa. But

0:51:57.880 --> 0:51:59.239
<v Speaker 2>I think what you were saying, Jack is not that

0:51:59.280 --> 0:52:00.680
<v Speaker 2>he reminds you of Alec and no, but that he

0:52:00.920 --> 0:52:03.120
<v Speaker 2>can provide that type of impact once he comes up

0:52:03.160 --> 0:52:03.880
<v Speaker 2>to the big leagues.

0:52:04.000 --> 0:52:05.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and people are gonna watch him and like not

0:52:05.840 --> 0:52:08.560
<v Speaker 3>be able to see enough George Kirby. Like George Kirby

0:52:08.600 --> 0:52:11.760
<v Speaker 3>is gonna be. He's gonna be like the top pitching

0:52:12.360 --> 0:52:14.960
<v Speaker 3>vote getter for Rookie of the Year either league.

0:52:15.040 --> 0:52:17.680
<v Speaker 2>Does George Kirby remind you a little bit of Zach

0:52:17.719 --> 0:52:19.279
<v Speaker 2>Wheeler per chance.

0:52:21.560 --> 0:52:25.520
<v Speaker 3>A little bit, but the command's better, Like we haven't

0:52:25.560 --> 0:52:28.479
<v Speaker 3>seen command from a prospect like this.

0:52:31.400 --> 0:52:33.879
<v Speaker 2>Armed can you tell the story of George Kirby, Because

0:52:33.920 --> 0:52:38.320
<v Speaker 2>George Kirby is is not a guy who went drafted.

0:52:38.440 --> 0:52:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Was this immediate can't miss pitching prospect, But then he'd

0:52:42.160 --> 0:52:45.920
<v Speaker 2>just start throwing harder and harder, and he and the location,

0:52:46.400 --> 0:52:49.279
<v Speaker 2>the command never left, but he just started getting up

0:52:49.320 --> 0:52:51.680
<v Speaker 2>there from ninety to ninety two and now he's throwing

0:52:51.760 --> 0:52:54.279
<v Speaker 2>ninety nine miles an hour. The story of Kirby is

0:52:54.320 --> 0:52:55.680
<v Speaker 2>honestly kind of incredible.

0:52:56.719 --> 0:52:59.160
<v Speaker 3>Arm One quick thing before you answer this about Kirby,

0:52:59.160 --> 0:53:00.879
<v Speaker 3>I do just want to point out his junior year

0:53:00.920 --> 0:53:03.120
<v Speaker 3>at Elon when he went in the first round eighty

0:53:03.120 --> 0:53:06.400
<v Speaker 3>eight and the third innings one hundred and seven punch outs,

0:53:06.800 --> 0:53:10.520
<v Speaker 3>six walks, dude one oh seven to six. His junior

0:53:10.600 --> 0:53:12.960
<v Speaker 3>year at Elon, So we always had the command, But

0:53:13.120 --> 0:53:15.320
<v Speaker 3>how has this stuff progressed?

0:53:16.200 --> 0:53:19.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean the command is outrageous. And that was

0:53:19.600 --> 0:53:21.560
<v Speaker 4>that kind of what got him into the Cape. You know,

0:53:21.600 --> 0:53:23.480
<v Speaker 4>he was he was a closer for the most part

0:53:23.520 --> 0:53:25.839
<v Speaker 4>in the Cape, which is wild too. Where out there

0:53:25.960 --> 0:53:28.919
<v Speaker 4>twenty four k's one walk. So it was the same

0:53:29.000 --> 0:53:31.840
<v Speaker 4>trend throughout throughout that entire collegiate career. But then he

0:53:31.880 --> 0:53:36.000
<v Speaker 4>gets to Seattle, or not necessarily Seattle, but he gets

0:53:36.000 --> 0:53:39.439
<v Speaker 4>to their organization and starts throwing ninety eight ninety nine

0:53:39.520 --> 0:53:41.280
<v Speaker 4>and then up to one hundred and so the command

0:53:41.280 --> 0:53:43.840
<v Speaker 4>didn't go to the wayside though, so you had the

0:53:43.880 --> 0:53:47.600
<v Speaker 4>same elite command with ninety eight ninety nine one hour fastballs.

0:53:47.640 --> 0:53:49.759
<v Speaker 4>The big issue with him, and not even issues, just

0:53:49.800 --> 0:53:52.440
<v Speaker 4>the one question is the quality of the secondaries. But

0:53:52.560 --> 0:53:54.640
<v Speaker 4>he commands them well. He's starting to show a better

0:53:54.640 --> 0:53:57.040
<v Speaker 4>feel for the change up. The curveball and slider are

0:53:57.080 --> 0:53:59.799
<v Speaker 4>good enough. I mean, when you have the baseline of

0:53:59.800 --> 0:54:04.160
<v Speaker 4>that fastball, it's it's pretty easy to at least be decent.

0:54:04.800 --> 0:54:06.560
<v Speaker 4>So I think, you know, he's in great shape. But

0:54:06.840 --> 0:54:09.040
<v Speaker 4>his story too, I mean, is not really the most

0:54:09.080 --> 0:54:11.840
<v Speaker 4>recruited guy in the world, had a pretty iffy freshman

0:54:11.960 --> 0:54:15.520
<v Speaker 4>year and then just really put it together beyond that.

0:54:15.640 --> 0:54:17.520
<v Speaker 4>And it took a team like the Mariners to see

0:54:17.560 --> 0:54:19.560
<v Speaker 4>him and say, Okay, we can develop this guy. And

0:54:19.640 --> 0:54:23.439
<v Speaker 4>this is yet another dude where it's it's you have

0:54:23.840 --> 0:54:26.239
<v Speaker 4>the pitch ability and then you take the stuff to

0:54:26.280 --> 0:54:28.520
<v Speaker 4>the next level. And that's exactly what they did with Kirby.

0:54:28.680 --> 0:54:30.359
<v Speaker 4>I think the secondary stuff is going to keep getting

0:54:30.400 --> 0:54:32.880
<v Speaker 4>better and better. This guy's got such a high floor

0:54:33.160 --> 0:54:35.640
<v Speaker 4>without the compromising of his ceiling. It's so exciting.

0:54:35.960 --> 0:54:38.000
<v Speaker 2>So what do you guys think about my Zach Wheeler

0:54:38.040 --> 0:54:40.120
<v Speaker 2>comparison to George Kirby a little bit.

0:54:41.320 --> 0:54:42.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm telling you better commands.

0:54:44.200 --> 0:54:45.600
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that's bad at all, though.

0:54:46.640 --> 0:54:51.400
<v Speaker 3>No, it's pretty solid. Hey, real quick, areum? You and

0:54:51.480 --> 0:54:53.439
<v Speaker 3>I have a mutual friend, Tim Leonard, who does great

0:54:53.440 --> 0:54:55.960
<v Speaker 3>college basketball stuff. But Tim was my partner out on

0:54:56.000 --> 0:54:59.759
<v Speaker 3>the Cape with the Brewster Whitecaps calling games, and there

0:54:59.800 --> 0:55:03.960
<v Speaker 3>were two players out there that fully captivated our attention,

0:55:04.080 --> 0:55:06.600
<v Speaker 3>like this is a major league baseball player. Like we

0:55:06.760 --> 0:55:09.040
<v Speaker 3>took the headset off between innings and we're like, oh

0:55:09.080 --> 0:55:12.200
<v Speaker 3>my god, what just happened. Spencer Torkelsen hit two of

0:55:12.200 --> 0:55:16.000
<v Speaker 3>the loudest home runs that I've ever seen and ever heard,

0:55:16.520 --> 0:55:20.760
<v Speaker 3>and then George Kirby closed a game out in Brewster.

0:55:21.719 --> 0:55:24.600
<v Speaker 3>We ended the broadcast, took the headsets off, and Tim

0:55:24.640 --> 0:55:26.759
<v Speaker 3>turned to me and was like, that's a major league

0:55:26.760 --> 0:55:29.759
<v Speaker 3>baseball pitcher if I've ever seen one, Like, and this

0:55:29.920 --> 0:55:33.479
<v Speaker 3>was before a hundred like Kirby just he looked the part.

0:55:33.560 --> 0:55:36.880
<v Speaker 3>I was like, oh my god, this guy is so

0:55:37.120 --> 0:55:38.400
<v Speaker 3>freaking good at baseball.

0:55:39.320 --> 0:55:41.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, that's the best way to sum it up.

0:55:41.760 --> 0:55:44.720
<v Speaker 4>And I think he's continued to back that up throughout

0:55:44.719 --> 0:55:49.240
<v Speaker 4>the minor leagues. If the secondaries just are even above average,

0:55:49.960 --> 0:55:52.280
<v Speaker 4>he's in business. I mean I was watching his starts.

0:55:52.280 --> 0:55:53.879
<v Speaker 4>The way he can put the fastball on either side

0:55:53.880 --> 0:55:56.160
<v Speaker 4>of the plate, the way he commands it, He's gonna

0:55:56.160 --> 0:55:57.919
<v Speaker 4>be damn good. And I think he's he's pretty much

0:55:57.960 --> 0:56:01.840
<v Speaker 4>close to ready. Even with the secondaries being big league caliber,

0:56:02.040 --> 0:56:03.879
<v Speaker 4>he'll be able to be successful at that heater.

0:56:04.600 --> 0:56:07.480
<v Speaker 2>And Matt Brash looks like Freddy Peralta with the fastball

0:56:07.520 --> 0:56:09.799
<v Speaker 2>slider combo. I mean, he's another guy who could be

0:56:09.840 --> 0:56:12.120
<v Speaker 2>in ace potentially in this league. And not enough people

0:56:12.160 --> 0:56:13.839
<v Speaker 2>are talking about Matt Brash.

0:56:14.560 --> 0:56:17.440
<v Speaker 4>No, and Brash is a guy we talked about way

0:56:17.480 --> 0:56:20.439
<v Speaker 4>back right, And I mean that that breaking ball, it's

0:56:20.440 --> 0:56:24.680
<v Speaker 4>like a power curve, slurvy type pitch. It's disgusting. It's

0:56:24.719 --> 0:56:27.520
<v Speaker 4>gonna have that same kind of Freddy Peralta ridiculous numbers.

0:56:27.520 --> 0:56:30.600
<v Speaker 4>The fastball is insane, and he needs to find a

0:56:30.600 --> 0:56:34.160
<v Speaker 4>feel for the changeup, but has shown some ability at times.

0:56:34.480 --> 0:56:37.319
<v Speaker 4>But like Peralta, he doesn't need Paralta doesn't need the

0:56:37.360 --> 0:56:39.880
<v Speaker 4>third pitch really that often. He just needs to sprinkle

0:56:39.880 --> 0:56:43.239
<v Speaker 4>it in rarely to really take himself to where he

0:56:43.280 --> 0:56:46.040
<v Speaker 4>needs to be consistency wise. I think Brash is right

0:56:46.040 --> 0:56:47.400
<v Speaker 4>in that same boat, and I think he can do

0:56:47.440 --> 0:56:49.439
<v Speaker 4>the same type of thing right out of the gate.

0:56:49.440 --> 0:56:51.719
<v Speaker 4>I think he can be that dominant as long as

0:56:51.760 --> 0:56:54.000
<v Speaker 4>he throws strikes. And I thought the command got better

0:56:54.000 --> 0:56:54.560
<v Speaker 4>as the year went on.

0:56:55.239 --> 0:56:58.839
<v Speaker 3>Okay, one more question on the Mariners. If they make

0:56:59.000 --> 0:57:03.920
<v Speaker 3>zero additions, no Chris Bryant, know anybody, and Pakoda sets

0:57:04.000 --> 0:57:07.520
<v Speaker 3>their win projection at ninety are you taking the over

0:57:07.640 --> 0:57:08.680
<v Speaker 3>or under?

0:57:09.320 --> 0:57:12.719
<v Speaker 2>That's just lofty. And if they don't do anything else,

0:57:12.840 --> 0:57:15.160
<v Speaker 2>like they need to address this offense, they need to

0:57:15.200 --> 0:57:17.640
<v Speaker 2>address their base. Like I said, I like Toro, but

0:57:17.680 --> 0:57:20.200
<v Speaker 2>I agree with you guys that if you guys want

0:57:20.240 --> 0:57:22.360
<v Speaker 2>to win ninety games, it'd be a perennial you know,

0:57:22.800 --> 0:57:26.480
<v Speaker 2>wild card team, playoff team like this. This infield as

0:57:26.560 --> 0:57:28.640
<v Speaker 2>currently constructed, I don't think is going to do it.

0:57:29.040 --> 0:57:32.680
<v Speaker 2>And you're relying a lot on the Julio Rodriguez of

0:57:32.720 --> 0:57:34.720
<v Speaker 2>the world, who I love, but a lot of these

0:57:34.760 --> 0:57:37.440
<v Speaker 2>young guys to make their leaps immediately when maybe it

0:57:37.520 --> 0:57:40.000
<v Speaker 2>might take them a year. That's why the Chris Bryant

0:57:40.080 --> 0:57:43.840
<v Speaker 2>signing has to happen, because that changes the fabric of

0:57:43.880 --> 0:57:46.200
<v Speaker 2>this team, not only from just a third base, not

0:57:46.240 --> 0:57:49.120
<v Speaker 2>only from a slugging profile, but just because you said

0:57:49.120 --> 0:57:52.200
<v Speaker 2>it before, his his Swiss Army knife abilities, the fact

0:57:52.240 --> 0:57:53.960
<v Speaker 2>that he can go play center. He can fill in

0:57:53.960 --> 0:57:57.440
<v Speaker 2>the holes that the Mariners have, and you're filling it

0:57:57.480 --> 0:58:01.240
<v Speaker 2>in with Chris Bryant. So I would go under if.

0:58:01.040 --> 0:58:03.240
<v Speaker 3>They if they add Chris Brian, give me a win total,

0:58:06.560 --> 0:58:11.400
<v Speaker 3>you first, Pete, you can go first there, just KB.

0:58:12.600 --> 0:58:15.760
<v Speaker 3>If they just add KB and Chaffin and.

0:58:15.680 --> 0:58:18.440
<v Speaker 4>Chan, I put it right in ninety. Yeah, put it

0:58:18.520 --> 0:58:20.920
<v Speaker 4>right in ninety. I think ninety give or take a couple,

0:58:21.160 --> 0:58:22.880
<v Speaker 4>and that that could be what puts them in or

0:58:22.960 --> 0:58:25.200
<v Speaker 4>takes them out. I think, you know, at the end

0:58:25.240 --> 0:58:27.640
<v Speaker 4>of the day, they are forced to rely on the

0:58:27.720 --> 0:58:29.800
<v Speaker 4>young guys. And as Peter said, I mean, if if

0:58:29.800 --> 0:58:32.680
<v Speaker 4>you can hedge some of that and take a little

0:58:32.680 --> 0:58:35.120
<v Speaker 4>bit of that off of those young guys, that's important.

0:58:35.200 --> 0:58:36.280
<v Speaker 4>But at the end of the day, you're gonna have

0:58:36.320 --> 0:58:38.360
<v Speaker 4>to rely on some young pitchers, You're gonna have to

0:58:38.360 --> 0:58:40.840
<v Speaker 4>rely on some young outfielders, and you know that can

0:58:40.880 --> 0:58:42.960
<v Speaker 4>go any any which way. And I think that's a

0:58:43.000 --> 0:58:45.760
<v Speaker 4>really important thing to to monitors I mean, if if

0:58:45.840 --> 0:58:48.160
<v Speaker 4>Julio struggles a little bit, or if Kelnick doesn't quite

0:58:48.520 --> 0:58:52.520
<v Speaker 4>parlay that fantastic final month, if Kyle Lewis is just

0:58:52.640 --> 0:58:55.960
<v Speaker 4>not quite healthy, there's a lot to be to be

0:58:56.000 --> 0:58:58.840
<v Speaker 4>answered there. But on the flip side, those guys look

0:58:58.880 --> 0:59:00.520
<v Speaker 4>like they're taking the steps in the right direction. They

0:59:00.520 --> 0:59:03.080
<v Speaker 4>look like they're in a good spot. You're adding Julio

0:59:03.160 --> 0:59:05.240
<v Speaker 4>to this team, You're adding Kyle Lewis to this team,

0:59:05.240 --> 0:59:07.120
<v Speaker 4>who barely played last year and was the Rookie of

0:59:07.160 --> 0:59:09.160
<v Speaker 4>the Year. So there's a lot of reason to be

0:59:09.200 --> 0:59:12.160
<v Speaker 4>optimistic as well, because even if he's just thching, you're

0:59:12.160 --> 0:59:15.000
<v Speaker 4>getting a big bat in Kyle Lewis back in the

0:59:15.040 --> 0:59:18.320
<v Speaker 4>fold there for you. I think ninety wins is attainable

0:59:18.720 --> 0:59:21.320
<v Speaker 4>because I think they overperformed in some ways last year,

0:59:22.000 --> 0:59:24.760
<v Speaker 4>and you know, the clutch thing. I think that that

0:59:25.120 --> 0:59:26.960
<v Speaker 4>has a little bit of luck built in, right, so

0:59:27.440 --> 0:59:29.280
<v Speaker 4>you got to kind of find that balance, and I

0:59:29.320 --> 0:59:31.160
<v Speaker 4>don't think you can come up big every single time

0:59:31.320 --> 0:59:34.000
<v Speaker 4>in a clutch situation and count on that. So I

0:59:34.000 --> 0:59:35.919
<v Speaker 4>think they're going to get better and be right around

0:59:35.920 --> 0:59:37.560
<v Speaker 4>the same spot where they were last year on gems

0:59:37.560 --> 0:59:38.200
<v Speaker 4>of wins.

0:59:38.520 --> 0:59:42.400
<v Speaker 2>I think they're an eighty five ish eighty six win

0:59:42.560 --> 0:59:45.920
<v Speaker 2>team without adding KB or Chaffin. But let's go over

0:59:46.000 --> 0:59:50.200
<v Speaker 2>the roster again, with all those completions in there, what

0:59:50.280 --> 0:59:53.680
<v Speaker 2>we think the twenty twenty two Mariners roster should look

0:59:53.720 --> 0:59:56.120
<v Speaker 2>like with our additions, and then I'll tell you whether

0:59:56.160 --> 0:59:57.520
<v Speaker 2>I think they could win ninety games.

0:59:57.680 --> 1:00:03.640
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So catcher, Murph Raleigh and Torents the first, France

1:00:03.760 --> 1:00:08.440
<v Speaker 3>and Evan White, Second, Adam Fraser and Dylan Moore. Short,

1:00:08.520 --> 1:00:12.720
<v Speaker 3>JP Crawford with Dylan Moore as the filler, third, Chris Bryant,

1:00:12.760 --> 1:00:18.640
<v Speaker 3>Abraham Toro, Left, Kyle Lewis, let's say, center, Jared Keelnick

1:00:18.680 --> 1:00:22.400
<v Speaker 3>let's say with Jake Frayley as the backup right, Mitch Hanneger,

1:00:22.680 --> 1:00:25.640
<v Speaker 3>Taylor Tremmel as the fifth outfielder if you're counting Freley

1:00:25.640 --> 1:00:30.520
<v Speaker 3>as the fourth. Starting pitching Robbie Ray, Marco Gonzalez, Chris Flexen,

1:00:30.600 --> 1:00:35.480
<v Speaker 3>Logan Gilbert, Justin Dunn with George Kirby, Emerson Hancock, Matt Brash,

1:00:35.880 --> 1:00:39.360
<v Speaker 3>Justice Sheffield, Brandon Williamson waiting in the wings the bullpen

1:00:39.840 --> 1:00:45.000
<v Speaker 3>Andrew Chaffin, who we're adding, Drew Steckenrider Casey Stadler, Paul Sewell,

1:00:45.080 --> 1:00:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Diego Castillo, Andres Munos, Ken Giles.

1:00:48.680 --> 1:00:49.600
<v Speaker 4>That's a great bullpen.

1:00:49.880 --> 1:00:50.720
<v Speaker 2>That's a great bullpen.

1:00:50.880 --> 1:00:51.800
<v Speaker 3>That's a great team.

1:00:52.240 --> 1:00:55.680
<v Speaker 2>That team, that team wins ninety games twenty twenty three,

1:00:55.720 --> 1:00:59.040
<v Speaker 2>they might win one hundred and sixty two games. Yeah, like, yeah,

1:00:59.160 --> 1:01:02.360
<v Speaker 2>you're really twenty twenty three is going to be insane

1:01:02.400 --> 1:01:06.480
<v Speaker 2>for the Seattle left out Julio and we left out

1:01:06.560 --> 1:01:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Julio Reguez No exactly. I thought you left out Julio

1:01:08.600 --> 1:01:11.320
<v Speaker 2>on purpose, just to say, like, what twenty twenty three

1:01:11.360 --> 1:01:13.760
<v Speaker 2>is gonna look like? Yeah, like Julio's gonna be there.

1:01:14.400 --> 1:01:15.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think he's gonna be there in like three

1:01:15.840 --> 1:01:18.080
<v Speaker 4>weeks into the season, so you know, And I think

1:01:18.120 --> 1:01:20.360
<v Speaker 4>then Kyle Lewis goes to DH and you probably split

1:01:20.360 --> 1:01:25.080
<v Speaker 4>hanneger And and Lewis with the DH outfield time. That's crazy,

1:01:25.440 --> 1:01:28.320
<v Speaker 4>that's crazy. I love that. One other move I would

1:01:28.320 --> 1:01:30.560
<v Speaker 4>love to see them make, though, to be honest, I

1:01:30.600 --> 1:01:33.600
<v Speaker 4>would love to trade one of those Freiley Tremel, one

1:01:33.600 --> 1:01:37.240
<v Speaker 4>of those guys for a defensive minded Brett Phillips type

1:01:37.280 --> 1:01:40.040
<v Speaker 4>fourth outfielder. So just in case late in ball games,

1:01:40.040 --> 1:01:43.120
<v Speaker 4>you can go throw a defensive stud out there in center.

1:01:44.000 --> 1:01:45.120
<v Speaker 3>You've got it with Freiley.

1:01:45.960 --> 1:01:47.840
<v Speaker 4>No, he's not a center field he's not a plus

1:01:47.920 --> 1:01:48.600
<v Speaker 4>center fielder.

1:01:48.680 --> 1:01:50.360
<v Speaker 3>He's not Rob's bombs.

1:01:50.600 --> 1:01:52.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's great.

1:01:53.320 --> 1:01:57.480
<v Speaker 4>He's flashy. That's great. They need a fourth outfielder that's

1:01:57.480 --> 1:02:00.440
<v Speaker 4>like a wizard defensively, a Jake morrisnik type. Maybe they

1:02:00.480 --> 1:02:03.480
<v Speaker 4>can go get Christianistic.

1:02:04.960 --> 1:02:07.320
<v Speaker 2>If you squint a little bit, he kind of looks

1:02:07.360 --> 1:02:09.960
<v Speaker 2>like Harrison Vader if you squint to Jake Freyley.

1:02:10.600 --> 1:02:13.640
<v Speaker 4>But you understand, like Mauristmik serves a purpose. He serves

1:02:13.680 --> 1:02:16.400
<v Speaker 4>a purpose. Poor outfielder, what purpose does he serve? With

1:02:16.440 --> 1:02:23.560
<v Speaker 4>the padres and the astros, Like you need afford the fielder,

1:02:23.640 --> 1:02:25.760
<v Speaker 4>like it's good defense matters.

1:02:25.880 --> 1:02:29.000
<v Speaker 2>It does, especially in the outfield. You want to turn

1:02:29.040 --> 1:02:30.360
<v Speaker 2>those doubles and outs.

1:02:30.880 --> 1:02:33.240
<v Speaker 4>Yes, Brett Phillips.

1:02:32.640 --> 1:02:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Brett Phillips, I could see. Brett Phillips s.

1:02:37.040 --> 1:02:40.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I care about the things that maybe most people

1:02:40.080 --> 1:02:41.680
<v Speaker 4>don't care about.

1:02:41.960 --> 1:02:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Brett Phillips bumps up the fun differential for sure, But

1:02:44.640 --> 1:02:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Jake losing him dampers the fun differential. So you gotta

1:02:47.760 --> 1:02:49.000
<v Speaker 2>you gotta your give and take.

1:02:48.880 --> 1:02:50.960
<v Speaker 4>There, So trade Trammel. He's so boring.

1:02:51.240 --> 1:02:53.480
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't do anything for the fund differential. That's for me.

1:02:53.600 --> 1:02:57.280
<v Speaker 3>No, do you guys, I like Trauell I to stop moving.

1:02:57.400 --> 1:02:59.280
<v Speaker 3>I want him to stop apartment hunting.

1:02:59.440 --> 1:03:01.560
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I know, I do. I don't want to trade it.

1:03:01.600 --> 1:03:04.040
<v Speaker 4>I feel bad for him at this point. The guy's

1:03:04.040 --> 1:03:06.800
<v Speaker 4>been passed around. It's it's it's Unfortunately.

1:03:06.240 --> 1:03:09.280
<v Speaker 2>The Marlins would love Taylor Tremont feels like a perfect Martlin.

1:03:10.040 --> 1:03:11.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they'll think, yeah, I'll fit right in.

1:03:12.160 --> 1:03:13.360
<v Speaker 3>We should end the pod with that.

1:03:14.480 --> 1:03:16.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah more than oh no, not thank you.

1:03:16.680 --> 1:03:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Everybody. First, go get your just Baseball merch people. It's

1:03:19.920 --> 1:03:23.360
<v Speaker 2>in the episode description of this podcast. I'm rocking up

1:03:23.480 --> 1:03:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Just Baseball t shirt. We also have not gambling Advice

1:03:25.920 --> 1:03:29.840
<v Speaker 2>merch hoodies. It's still freezing cold outside. Get you just

1:03:29.920 --> 1:03:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Baseball hoodie. Also check out arms podcast to Call Up

1:03:33.520 --> 1:03:35.720
<v Speaker 2>Now on the Just Baseball network as well. He's going

1:03:35.760 --> 1:03:38.200
<v Speaker 2>over all the prospects. He's gonna do a Seattle Mariners

1:03:38.200 --> 1:03:40.600
<v Speaker 2>prospect episode, right even though we kind of don't, just

1:03:40.600 --> 1:03:42.000
<v Speaker 2>because it's so freaking exciting.

1:03:42.480 --> 1:03:44.200
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, oh yeah, I can't wait.

1:03:44.400 --> 1:03:46.920
<v Speaker 2>I can't wait. That's just some so fun system is

1:03:46.920 --> 1:03:48.480
<v Speaker 2>so fun. So we're gonna have write ups as well

1:03:48.480 --> 1:03:51.840
<v Speaker 2>about these Seattle Mariners on Just Baseball dot com and

1:03:51.840 --> 1:03:54.080
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna have another episode later. You know, we got

1:03:54.080 --> 1:03:55.840
<v Speaker 2>to interview somebody from the Mariners. We got to see

1:03:55.840 --> 1:03:57.760
<v Speaker 2>if any of these moves make sense. I mean, who

1:03:57.760 --> 1:04:00.360
<v Speaker 2>would say no to Chris Bryant on the Mariner Maybe

1:04:00.440 --> 1:04:03.840
<v Speaker 2>Jeppoto might be Jerry Depoto, the GM of this this Mariners,

1:04:03.880 --> 1:04:05.800
<v Speaker 2>might be the only person to say no to Chris

1:04:05.840 --> 1:04:07.360
<v Speaker 2>brand because he doesn't want to spend any money, but

1:04:07.440 --> 1:04:08.600
<v Speaker 2>we want him to spend money.

1:04:08.880 --> 1:04:15.600
<v Speaker 3>I like shortening it to Jepoto.

1:04:15.600 --> 1:04:18.040
<v Speaker 2>And go also give us a follow on TikTok and

1:04:18.080 --> 1:04:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Instagram at Just Baseball Fans, anything else before we end

1:04:21.560 --> 1:04:22.000
<v Speaker 2>the pod.

1:04:21.840 --> 1:04:25.720
<v Speaker 3>Boys Nope, So I got well with that.

1:04:26.280 --> 1:04:30.280
<v Speaker 2>Thank you everybody,