WEBVTT - Hostage Deal, OpenAI Saga, and Deere Earnings

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg is now on your dashboard with Apple CarPlay and

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto. It gives you access to every Bloomberg podcast,

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:11.560
<v Speaker 1>live audio feeds from Bloomberg Radio, print stories from Bloomberg

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>News in audio form, and the latest headlines of the

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>click of a button with Bloomberg News. Now it's free

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 1>with the latest version of the Bloomberg Business App. That's

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App. Get it on your phone in

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the Apple App Store or on Google Play. Just download

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the app, connect your phone to your car and get started.

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>And it's all presented by our sponsor, Interactive Brokers.

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 2>my co host Matt Miller.

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:44.279
<v Speaker 1>Every business day we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros,

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg experts, along with essential market moven news.

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:51.839
<v Speaker 2>Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast called Apple Podcasts or wherever

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 2>you listen to podcasts, and at Bloomberg dot Com Slash podcast.

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Let's flip gears. Let's head back to the geopolitics of

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 2>it all impact it has on the market. You know,

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 2>the news coming out of Israel that I'm reading out

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 2>on the Bloomberg kerminal Here Israel and Hamas agreed to

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 2>her short truce for hostage release. Agrees to free fifty hostages,

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 2>possibly more in days ahead. The deal would mark the

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 2>first lull in the war since the attacks on October seventh.

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 2>So I guess if nothing else, that in and of

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 2>itself is probably some good news. Bobby Ghost joins is

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 2>he's an editor with Bloomberg Opinion. He joins his life

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 2>here in our New York studio. Bobby, I mean, just

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 2>to me, it feels like good news, maybe a little

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 2>bit of thawing here. How do you read it?

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:38.680
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't go quite so far as to say that

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 3>there's a thought it is good news. Okay, Look, it's

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 3>great news for the hostages and their families. It gives

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 3>ordinary civilians in Gaza a break from the bombing. It's

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 3>a cessation of hostilities for fort days. And Israel is

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 3>already saying Prime Minisnetnya, who's already saying, moment that ends,

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 3>we go back to bombing Gus, we go back to fighting.

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 3>So there's you know, it's not really a thaw. It's

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:10.119
<v Speaker 3>a deal that was struck in Katar with very strong

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 3>pressure from the United States on all parties to make

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 3>this happen, and we should thank God for small mercies,

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 3>as they say, and as I said, for the people

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 3>who are benefiting the most from this deal, the mercies

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 3>are not small.

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 4>They're quite absolutely.

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:29.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we're seeing fifty hostages from Gaza will be freed

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 5>and the release of one hundred and fifty Palestinians who

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 5>are in Israeli jails at the moment. But tell us fabi,

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 5>because this is exactly what Israel has not wanted, in

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 5>the sense that any pause is a chance for Hamas

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:47.399
<v Speaker 5>to regroup, get the military operations back together. I mean,

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 5>this is that something to be feared then that there

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 5>could really be maybe an escalation in the violence after this.

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 3>I think it's I think this is why it's taken

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 3>this long for the truth to happen. Israel had to

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 3>be absolutely certain that the chances of Hamas regrouping and

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 3>rearming we were as small as possible. If I mean,

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 3>there's always that possibility. But Israel would not have made

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 3>this deal if it didn't have a high degree of

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 3>confidence that it can prevent that from happening, or it

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:23.679
<v Speaker 3>can manage how much Hamas rearms. Presumably this means it

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:26.359
<v Speaker 3>will be paying much closer attention to the borders, much

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:29.399
<v Speaker 3>closer attention to those tunnels through Egypt to make sure

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 3>that Hamas does not get and it has already brought

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 3>so much damage on Hamas infrastructure that there must be

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 3>a high degree of confidence that you know, Hamas's arms

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 3>making facilities in Gaza City, for instance, will be will

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 3>not easily be revived.

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 2>That's kind of where I wanted to go, because I

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 2>know that the stated objective of Israel is to destroy

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 2>Hamas and its leadership. How do you define that? How

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 2>do you know when it's happened? If I kind of

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 2>fear it's like the drug cartel, tick out one kingpin

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 2>and then the next person just rises right up again.

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is not and they're not fighting a conventional military.

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 3>This is a terrorist group. And you know, the leadership

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 3>can change and has changed as well, has a long

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 3>history of taking out top Hamas leaders. The thing just

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 3>keeps coming back. And you also have to remember that

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 3>in the process of trying to eliminate Hamas in this way,

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 3>it's also creating the circumstances the for Hamas to be

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 3>able to recruit. You've got sure hundreds of thousands of

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 3>young Palestinians in Gaza and elsewhere who are outraged by

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:43.720
<v Speaker 3>what they see, and a small proportion of that population

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:48.039
<v Speaker 3>will be more amenable to joining Hamas now, shall we say,

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 3>than there were before. So it's you know, this is

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:52.919
<v Speaker 3>not this is not the kind of war where where

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 3>which ends with people signing an armistice and making a

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 3>peace deal. And that's been the problem. The Biden administration

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 3>has said consistently from the beginning that they've been asking

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 3>the Israelis to define what victory looks like and explain

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 3>what happens the day after, and until now, the Israelis

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 3>have not provided that information. They've not communicated it in

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 3>private to the Biden administration. They certainly have not communicated

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 3>it publicly.

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:23.599
<v Speaker 5>And of course whatever that timeline may be as well,

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:27.679
<v Speaker 5>is probably pretty daunting to think of, Like the task ahead,

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 5>how long that may take makes me wonder if there

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 5>could be perhaps the need for more cease fires in

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 5>the time to get to that endpoint.

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So we'll see if this one works and everybody

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:47.159
<v Speaker 3>shows good faith, and that then hopefully creates the circumstances

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:49.720
<v Speaker 3>for another one down the line, and another one, and

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 3>maybe this is the kind of conflict where, because everyone

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 3>is so painted into their own corners and the opposite

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:59.799
<v Speaker 3>ends of the room, that the advances that can only

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 3>be incremental. It might be that this is the only way, slow, painful,

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 3>deadly as it is, this might be the only way

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 3>we begin to move towards some kind of resolution.

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Is there a scenario where Israel does not end up

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 2>occupying Gaza? I can't think of a scenario where they

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:20.840
<v Speaker 2>don't to preserve the piece. I mean, does a UN

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 2>player role? I mean, what do we think about the

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 2>day after?

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, so here's the thing. Now, Israel has a signal

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 3>that it is willing to do that in order to

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:32.919
<v Speaker 3>make sure Hamas does not come back. But this is

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 3>not a popular idea among Israelis. For a start. Israelis

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:39.840
<v Speaker 3>don't want an occupation of Gaza because they know what

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 3>that will entail, not just in terms of costs, but

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 3>also the risks that come with that. Nobody else wants

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 3>to do that. Nobody else wants to perform that role.

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:53.479
<v Speaker 3>I don't think any Western peacekeepers would have credibility there.

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:57.719
<v Speaker 3>The United Nations will eventually have to play a role,

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 3>but until now, you know, Secret General gu terrorists has

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 3>been sort of saying, look, we're not this is not

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 3>going to become a protectorate of the United Nations. The

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 3>Arab countries, who would logically be part of the biggest

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 3>part of any peacekeeping effort. Their view is why should

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 3>we clean up Israel's mess. This can't become a thing

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 3>where you go in and bomb Palestine or parts of

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 3>Palestinian territories to smithereens and expect us to come and

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 3>clean it up for you afterwards. So there's going to

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 3>be a lot of reluctance. The crucial question for everybody

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 3>is peacekeeping toward what end? If there is a clear

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 3>path after the fighting is over for a two state solution,

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 3>then I can see and their sort of cost iron

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 3>guarantees to that. Then I can see the Arab states

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 3>saying all right, we will take some of this responsibility

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 3>if there is a clear path that this never happens again.

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 2>All right, So on that two state solution, who is

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 2>the biggest impediment to that actually happening at this point?

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there's so many impediments, and at different times

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 3>their you know, their relative weight changes, but Israel is

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 3>an impediment. The current administration Israel. The coalition government that

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 3>Benjamin Ettania who has put together has no interest in

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 3>a two states solution. Many of his partners have openly

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 3>said that's not what they want, that they will oppose it.

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 3>The Palaestine authority, which is deeply corrupt, deeply completely inept,

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 3>and has not dared to test its popularity with an

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 3>election in years and years and years. They are an impediment.

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 3>And of course Hamas and hamas is enablers is Iran

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 3>is a very big part of the piece problem too.

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, the problem a problem, this intractable and this complicated.

0:08:56.920 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 3>There are lots of people who have to share the blame.

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 5>Just really quickly. Hear Bobby in our last thirty if

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 5>you could just explain to us what this second stage

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 5>could look like with a possible extension to free more hostages.

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:11.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, so there's some talk that after these fifty, if

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 3>Hamas continues to release hostages in a sort of steady

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 3>set of ten and day fifteen a day, then there's

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 3>some hope that the cessation of hostility the truth can

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 3>be extended again. This is something we should all hope

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 3>for and keep our fingers crossed. It it happens, but

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 3>we'll believe it when it happens.

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, all right, Bobby, thank you so much for

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 2>joining us.

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 6>Bobby go.

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 2>She's a calmnist for Bloomberg Opinion, has got a tremendous

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 2>amount of experience in international affairs reporting, certainly in that

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 2>part of the world over there in the Middle East.

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 2>We appreciate getting a few minutes of his time. Here.

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.959
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the tenth Can't Live program Bloomberg Markets

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 6>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 6>iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen on

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 6>demand wherever you get your podcast.

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's around table this open AI. I'm gonna

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 2>call it a debacle, and that's editorializing, but that's just

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 2>it just seems to me. It's a debacle, and I

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 2>think Silicon Valley should be embarrassed by what's happened over

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 2>the last four or five days. But we're gonna bring

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 2>some smart people who analyze this stuff much better than

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 2>I do. Man deep Seeing, he's a senior tech Analystrom

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence Ed Ludlow Bloomberg Technology hosts out in San Francisco,

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 2>so that he has to take some of the blank

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 2>He's part of the culture out there.

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 5>Ed.

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I guess we have Sam Altman going back

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 2>to open AI. I guess that's good news. The next

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 2>question I think most people have is who's going to

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 2>be on this board and will it be an effective board?

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean the mechanics of it are that Brett Taylor,

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 8>who was once the Coco of Salesforce, but he's I

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 8>guess he's more famous for being the chairman of Twitter

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 8>that's sold to Elon Musk, is taking a board seat.

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:01.119
<v Speaker 8>Then you have Larry Summers, well known to this program,

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 8>this network. Reminder that Larry Summers is a pay contributor

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 8>to Bloomberg Television. I'm supposed to say that, and then

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:14.439
<v Speaker 8>beyond that, The news for me is that and this

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 8>is you know, we've covered the ins and outs of

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 8>the negotiation pretty closely, right, guys that I know that

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 8>Sam Altman and Greg Brockman were pushing really hard to

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 8>get at least temporary board seats in this whole thing,

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 8>but they didn't. So this thing's far from settled. The

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 8>reason I'm late, and I apologize for that, is I

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:36.599
<v Speaker 8>was on the phone with the source who's involved in

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 8>all of this, and Sam Altman goes back. Most people

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 8>get what they wanted, but it ain't the end of

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 8>the story. There's a lot we still have to find out.

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 5>Well, you know, I would like to bring in Man

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 5>Deep here because this has been, as Paul said, very

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 5>chaotic four or five days. And for those of us

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 5>who are maybe just joining Man Deep, if you could

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 5>take us back to when Sam Alman was suddenly ousted

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 5>from open Ai. Again, I don't think we have really

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 5>a reason yet as to why that happened, but maybe

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 5>if you could give us a timeline of what has

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 5>transpired from them to now.

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean clearly, you know, it was a shocker

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 4>to everyone in terms of the way he was outid

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 4>and there wasn't any transparency around the reasons. In fact,

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 4>when they made the three new board member announcement today

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 4>they said there will be an independent investigation. So clearly

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 4>there's a lot to unpack. As Ed was alluding to,

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 4>but look for a company like OpenAI that has a

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 4>convoluted structure. So last week they I think it came

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 4>into focus that they have a profit structure within a

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 4>nonprofit and now we are trying to you know, make

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 4>sense of what would a good governance structure look like.

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:49.959
<v Speaker 4>We have three board members. We know, this is pretty

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 4>unusual the CEO not being on the board. So if

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 4>Sam is going back to be the CEO and he's

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 4>not on the board, who the other board members are?

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 4>There is so much to you know, talk about here,

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 4>and this is not the way it's going to pan out.

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the reason why no one cared until last

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:10.599
<v Speaker 4>week is because you know, open Aye was a startup

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 4>and you know it had the backing of Microsoft, so

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 4>corporate governance wasn't as big of a focus. But the

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 4>way he was ousted, it's like, this is so unusual,

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 4>and I'm sure a lot of the startups are thinking

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 4>about their corporate structure now, you know, and their backers,

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 4>the vcs and the early investors.

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Ed, what are you hearing from your sources out there

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 2>as to maybe the value the impact on the value

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 2>of this company here that's been really impacted negatively and

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 2>how so.

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 8>I love this question for me. This is the question

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 8>because the story of the last five days is that

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 8>open aiyes valuation, which right now, based on a transaction

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 8>we can get into that's pending, is eighty six billion dollars.

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 8>I reported a couple of months ago. Revenue has a

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 8>run rate of about a billion dollar for this year

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 8>billion dollars of sales, eighty six billion dollar valuation.

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 5>Wow.

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 8>And the basics of this for the audience listening all

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 8>around the world is we care because open ai is

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 8>the leading AI startup. Let's just accept that as a baseline.

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 8>What we learned is that its value is intimately tied

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 8>to the intellectual capital that's there. In other words, Sam Altman,

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 8>Greg Brockman, and the seven hundred and sixty eight other

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 8>people that work there, all of them started a mutiny

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 8>to try and bring Sam back. They were successful, but

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 8>there was a real threat that all seven hundred and

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 8>seventy employees would just resign, They would just leave. Then

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 8>what are you left with? A very large building in

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 8>downtown San Francisco with incredible compute costs and no one

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 8>in it. That's the way to frame it, right, I

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 8>don't think that that's unreasonable. And sources this morning and

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 8>keep phoning me and saying that's the story like on paper.

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 8>You know the people behind this, there aren't that many

0:14:57.120 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 8>of them, And I think, yeah, sorry, guys, you know

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 8>I jump in, but for me, that's that's the kind

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 8>of key point.

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, No, I think that's spot on. And I mean, Mandy,

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 5>maybe you can help us, like, you know, break down

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 5>this math a little bit here. As you know, as

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 5>we're just hearing that we've got one billion in revenue

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 5>to an eighty six billion valuation, I mean my head

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 5>is spinning. What does that make sense to you?

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 4>Well, so look at you know, all the startups and

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 4>you can go back in time in terms of, you know,

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 4>the companies that have ridden these technology waves. There is

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 4>that promise. Okay, if you have a breakthrough technology, investors

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 4>don't really focus that much on the revenue that you

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 4>have right now, but the potential.

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 2>And in the works problem.

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think this is different. Opening Eye does have

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 4>an intellectual property and they are foundational. I mean think

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 4>of Nvidia, right, they are foundational to what is going

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 4>on in AI with their chips. Well, this is another

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 4>foundational element in terms of you know, a lot of

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 4>companies are standardizing on open Eeye's base model and they

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 4>have embedded it in their tech stack. Everything is happening

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 4>on top of what Opening Eye is offering at the baseline.

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 4>In terms of a large anglid model. But now I

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 4>think it puts doubts in the mind because think of

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 4>operating system like Windows operating system was the standard on

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 4>which all these applications were built. Opening Eye had that

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 4>kind of aura, and suddenly that has put doubts and

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 4>that's why there was this high valuation. So I'm not

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 4>surprised by the evaluation, but the chain of events has

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 4>kind of put doubts in people's mind right now.

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Hey, ed to be honest, before this, I really didn't

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 2>know who Sam Altman was, and I certainly wasn't aware

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 2>of the kind of the presence he really does command

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 2>within a tech space and within Silicon Valley. How do

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 2>you think, I mean, where does he go from here?

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it seems like he's gonna be the focus

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 2>of now I'm gonna pay attention to whatever he says

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 2>and does going forward. I mean, his role in all

0:16:57.520 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 2>of this, it's taken a much higher profile.

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 8>Look, Sam Altman is a serial entrepreneur, a serial founder.

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 8>He has been a name out here in Silicon Valley

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 8>for some time. He has really been thrust to prominence

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 8>as open Ai became the face of AI. You know,

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 8>that's the reality of it. In the last year, you know,

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 8>he's just beloved by the open Ai staff. You know,

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:27.680
<v Speaker 8>I'm not exaggerating. Almost the entirety of open aas entire

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:30.399
<v Speaker 8>company threatened to resign if he was not brought back.

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 8>The investors love him. The investors were adamant that he

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 8>came back, and that they were behind the scenes trying

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 8>to do that, including Microsoft. Right Satya Nadella, the Microsoft CEO,

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 8>was a real peace broker in all of this. We understand.

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 8>And yet this is why I say that this story

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 8>is not finished. There will be an independent investigation as

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 8>to why the board fired him in the first place.

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 8>We have got no idea, to be frank, why they

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 8>did that. I just, you know, without being self serving,

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 8>I did report on Saturday as an example, that he

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 8>was out there weeks, within the last few weeks raising

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:11.360
<v Speaker 8>almost one hundred billion dollars for a new chip company

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 8>to take on Nvidia make custom silicon for training AI models.

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 8>One hundred billion dollars from a standing start. That's the

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:22.160
<v Speaker 8>kind of command he has, and the investors, like SoftBank,

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 8>move battle La, they were willing to jump in.

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the one thing I would point out is

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:32.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, whenever a founder gets more attention than the company,

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 4>that's never a good thing. If you go back in time,

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, the focus is just on the founder and

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:41.120
<v Speaker 4>what he's doing that hasn't been viewed very well by

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 4>the investors. And if they are thinking about doing an IPO,

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 4>that's the last thing you want is the founder getting

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 4>all the focus and taking you know, the focus away

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 4>from the core product, which is the large acred model

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 4>they have developed.

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 5>Could say it sounds like another sam perhaps of fts.

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Ed love, thank you so much for joining us, Ed Lolo.

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 2>He's in our San Francisco office. He is embedded in

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 2>that Silicon Valley space. And then man Deep Singh, he's

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 2>our senior technology analysts here at Bloomberg Intelligence. He's seen

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 2>it all. He's seen the tech come and go, he's

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 2>seen the tech mobiles come and go. So we appreciate

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 2>getting their perspective. So it seems like it's quieting down

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 2>there in Silicon Valley in Open AI. And now we'll

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:25.680
<v Speaker 2>just see how it's kind of fleshes out the board

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 2>and some governance issues and some ownership and you know,

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:31.439
<v Speaker 2>but I guess the last fridays it's kind of like

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:33.680
<v Speaker 2>a do over, so we'll keep on top of that.

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the tape. Cat's are live program Bloomberg

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 6>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:43.880
<v Speaker 6>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 6>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:52.439
<v Speaker 6>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Street Kumark. He's the president of Street Kumar Global Strategies,

0:19:56.600 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 2>former Chief Global Strategists and Chairman Asset Allocation Commitie at

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:03.400
<v Speaker 2>TCW Group. A little asset manager out there in LA.

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:06.639
<v Speaker 2>But the highlight on his extensive resume for me for

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 2>your senior vice president at Drexel Burnham Lambert. Those folks,

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 2>they were slinging it back in Maybe they were slinging

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 2>it back in the day, folks, Shwi, thanks so much

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 2>for joining us. You're based out in LA, but we're

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:21.400
<v Speaker 2>in New York, so we appreciate you. You coming in here

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 2>to our New York studio. Talk to us about how

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 2>you viewed twenty twenty three. We're closing out a pretty

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 2>decent year here for most you know, most markets here

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 2>closing out twenty twenty three, and how are you thinking

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 2>about twenty twenty four.

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 7>Paul, great questions, and I think twenty twenty three we

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 7>had expected by now to be in recession, which is

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 7>not come yep. The labor market is very strong, the

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 7>consumer spending is very strong. I think what was underestimated

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 7>was the extent of stimulus that was in the system,

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 7>both in terms of the fiscal stimulus, which came from

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:57.680
<v Speaker 7>the final months of the Trump administration first few months

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 7>of the Biden administration. And don't forget the balance sheet

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 7>of the Federal Reserve doubled from bloated levels from the

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 7>beginning of COVID to the beginning of twenty twenty two.

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 7>And we had zero interest rates for a long period

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 7>of fact, so everybody loaded up. And one and a

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 7>half years later after the tightening began, I think we

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:21.360
<v Speaker 7>are still not back yet. But the point I make

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 7>and I say to my clients is that recession is

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 7>something that has been postponed, but it's been delayed, but

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 7>it's not denied. So I think we are still going

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 7>to see signs of a recession. And what is me

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 7>the most is as you have interest rates, having risen

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 7>and the balance sheet of the FED is still being tightened.

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:44.880
<v Speaker 7>It did not pause, and when the two of them

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 7>go together, that there is something that's going to break

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 7>in the system in the first half of twenty twenty four.

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 5>So how do you then distinguish between what a lot

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:54.880
<v Speaker 5>of people will say right now are signs that we're

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:58.640
<v Speaker 5>heading towards soft landing, and that you're in the camp

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:00.880
<v Speaker 5>here that recession is so possibility.

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I do not believe in soft landing, Molly, and

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:07.199
<v Speaker 7>I would think that when you look at what has

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 7>happened in past history, it all looks very nice until

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:14.400
<v Speaker 7>the thing gets out of control. It happened with two

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 7>thousand and seven, and toward the end of the year

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:20.639
<v Speaker 7>we had the FED Chairman Ben Bernanke say to us

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 7>that the subprime mortgage situation was just a fifty two

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 7>hundred billion dollar problem. We found out in the next year,

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:31.120
<v Speaker 7>two thousand and eight, it was just a terrible situation,

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 7>not just a minor problem. Same thing happened in nineteen

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:38.639
<v Speaker 7>ninety eight when you had long term capital management, a

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 7>small hedge fund which was never going to fail because

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:43.640
<v Speaker 7>two Nobel Prize winners.

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Ran its rank you.

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:51.120
<v Speaker 7>And it was done again with no leverage, it was thought,

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:54.159
<v Speaker 7>but then they had enormous amount of leverage and a

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 7>lot of risk and it failed as well. So it

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 7>is all I like to say that it is all

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:02.399
<v Speaker 7>lit up till it darkens, the opposite of what we

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:03.160
<v Speaker 7>normally say.

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:05.679
<v Speaker 2>Is there some event out there that you're concerned? Could

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 2>be that long term capital management moment, or could be

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:12.679
<v Speaker 2>the subprime issue for in two thousand and seven two thousand,

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Is there something after that concerns you in terms of catalysts.

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:18.640
<v Speaker 7>Paul, I have a few candidates. One is I had

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:21.679
<v Speaker 7>said before the March regional banking crisis that might be

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 7>a credit event, but we survived that it was a

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 7>credit event. The next one, my top candidate is a

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:33.400
<v Speaker 7>bigger banking institution, maybe an institution which is medium sized,

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 7>and why do they suffer. They suffer because they loaded

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 7>up on long dated bonds when Jerome Powell told us

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 7>inflation is going to be transitory. So in that case,

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:47.160
<v Speaker 7>I should buy ten year treasuries to two percent because

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 7>I'm expecting it to go to one percent. Right it didn't.

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 7>It went the other way. So that's one candidate.

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:55.880
<v Speaker 5>Commercip have already happened though by now if that were

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 5>to blow up, you know, similar to the small banks

0:23:58.320 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 5>that we saw in March.

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 7>Not yet, Molly, And I'll tell you why I think

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:06.640
<v Speaker 7>it hasn't happened yet. If you look at the bank numbers,

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:10.879
<v Speaker 7>the deposits with the US banking system has been steadily

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 7>going down, the delinquency rate is starting to pick up,

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 7>and the balance sheet is being reduced. As far as

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:22.120
<v Speaker 7>the FED is concerned. When you put them all together,

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 7>suddenly something clicks. It doesn't happen gradually, so which is

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 7>why I think, timing wise, I would look for the

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 7>first quarter of twenty twenty four is when something breaks again.

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:36.920
<v Speaker 7>So we talked about commercial real estate is the third.

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:40.440
<v Speaker 7>You can also have again a crunch on the credit side,

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:44.359
<v Speaker 7>which is already taking place. My final candidate is the

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:48.360
<v Speaker 7>repeat of what happened in the United Kingdom September October

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 7>of twenty twenty two. Bond eels rise a lot. There

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 7>it was the guilt eels, and here we are talking

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:58.640
<v Speaker 7>about treasury eels and pension funds incur huge losses. They

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:02.159
<v Speaker 7>have not done well into of general performance, and that

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 7>situation worsens and puts pressure on the FED.

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:07.440
<v Speaker 2>One of the things as we think about this economy

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 2>in a hard landing soft landing recession is the labor market.

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 2>We got some more labor data today. Initial JAMAS claims

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 2>came in at two hundred and nine thousand, below expectations,

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 2>less than we saw last month. I mean, this labor

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 2>market seems to defy most logic in how robust it is.

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 2>What do you make of the US labor market.

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 7>Yes, the labor market so far has been very robust,

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 7>and I think the reason that has been the case

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 7>once again traces back to the amount of stimulus. There

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 7>is so much money that you were able to give,

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:42.119
<v Speaker 7>and also the shortage of labor which took place due

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 7>to COVID with one part of the working force typically

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 7>the wives who stayed behind to provide childcare, that in

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:52.679
<v Speaker 7>turn reduce the workforce. I think we are just coming

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 7>back to it. But if you look at the layoff numbers, Paul,

0:25:56.920 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 7>you're seeing that after a period of very strong now

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:06.200
<v Speaker 7>despite today's initial jobless claims, the unemployment has started to rise. Yep,

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:10.159
<v Speaker 7>and they don't. Once again, it doesn't rise gradually, and

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 7>history tells you that when it rises, it just surges suddenly,

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 7>and I wouldn't be surprised to see that happen in

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 7>the next two to three months.

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 5>So let's go back to these stimulus payments, because there

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 5>right now is such a debate in economic circles of

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:27.359
<v Speaker 5>how much excess savings the consumer has. I feel like

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:29.880
<v Speaker 5>I see a different report on this every day that

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 5>savings are dwindling, there's nothing left. Another one will say

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:35.640
<v Speaker 5>there's more than we really thought, and that's what's giving

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 5>the consumer still a lot of gas right now to

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 5>keep spending. And same with like the on the credit

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:44.679
<v Speaker 5>side as well. You mentioned delinquencies are picking up, and

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 5>we've seen credit card balances getting higher, but as a

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:51.160
<v Speaker 5>share of total deposit's still very low. So how do

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 5>you assess right now these conflicting messages about the health

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:55.400
<v Speaker 5>of the consumer.

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:59.439
<v Speaker 7>That's again a very timely question, and I would answer you,

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 7>Molly by saying that while the aggregate numbers in terms

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:09.920
<v Speaker 7>of delinquency, the aggregate numbers still seem really benign. There

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 7>is a difference across income groups, meaning the numbers are

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:17.879
<v Speaker 7>showing recently that even the consumer spending, a good chunk

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 7>of the increase is coming from the highest one or

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 7>ten percent maximum in terms of the income groups, and

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:29.119
<v Speaker 7>the lower income groups are actually cutting back delinquency wise.

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 7>The credit card delinquencies are the first to show up.

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 7>And the reason is it is easy for you not

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 7>to pay. You don't have to go and ask anybody

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 7>to give you a loan, and so that is starting

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:43.159
<v Speaker 7>to happen the next If it starts to happen also

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:45.880
<v Speaker 7>in terms of what happens to the payments to the banks,

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:48.880
<v Speaker 7>then I would be even more concerned. But it is

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:52.919
<v Speaker 7>already happening with low middle income groups. It's not happening

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:54.399
<v Speaker 7>yet with the high income groups.

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Swebaut thirty seconds left a lot of geopolitical issues

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 2>out there for you know, investors to deal with. How

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:04.639
<v Speaker 2>concerned are you with again the Middle East in Ukraine

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 2>and what that means for maybe the global economy.

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:09.680
<v Speaker 7>I'm concerned again to reply to you very quickly, Paul,

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 7>that I'm concerned mostly from an economic side. What happens

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 7>to inflation? Okay, And yes today we are seeing a

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 7>big drop in oil prices. But if the Hamas Israel

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 7>ceasefire doesn't happen, or if it does, if it breaks up,

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:28.640
<v Speaker 7>then you're talking about war escalating and that in turn

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:33.160
<v Speaker 7>would mean much higher oil prices. Oil prices are nothing

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 7>or a huge problem, one extreme or the other. It

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:39.239
<v Speaker 7>either goes down or the oil price goes to one

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 7>hundred and fifty dollars a battle, and that's a risk

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 7>we run for the geopolitical situation.

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely.

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Shre thanks you so much for joining us. Shri Kumar.

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 2>He's a president of Shri Kumar Global Strategies based somewhere

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 2>in California and one of those beaches or something like that,

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 2>but he's actually coming to the world capital, New York City,

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 2>so we appreciate him coming into our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio.

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the tape Can's are Live program Bloomberg

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 6>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 6>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 6>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 6>flagship New York station Just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Earnings Deer. They put out some numbers. I guess the

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:26.560
<v Speaker 2>beat current quarter results, but their guidance was very disappointing

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 2>to the street. I see the stocks off about three

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 2>and a half percent, but that's the high intra day

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 2>high of the day, so it had been a lot

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 2>lower earlier. Let's bring on the anasto follows this compedy

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Chris Chile, you know, he's the industrials analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 2>joining us via zoom from Princeton, New Jersey. So Chris,

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 2>talk to just about what we heard from your good

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:46.480
<v Speaker 2>friends at Deer.

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 9>Fairly conservative guidance heading into the print, just given what

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 9>we've seen with softer commodity prices, lower farm income, and

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 9>I think it was pretty well anticipated that the cycle

0:29:57.120 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 9>was turning, but this outlook is material below what we

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 9>had anticipated. Deers projecting that income will drop to about

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 9>eight point eight billion dollars at the midpoint next year.

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 9>That implies roughly twenty eight twenty eight to fifty dollars

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 9>in earnings, which is thirteen percent below the street. You know,

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:21.360
<v Speaker 9>commodity prices are still at historically high levels above long

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 9>term averages, the edge of the fleet is still quite old,

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 9>and farmer balance sheets are quite healthy, so we really

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 9>see a more modest downturn. This really sets just a

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 9>low bar and really an overly conservative outlook.

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it looks like, you know, this sector here Chris

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:40.920
<v Speaker 5>is otherwise showing some other, you know, some other evidence

0:30:40.960 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 5>of slowing. We saw that the rival over to Deer.

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 5>CNH Industrial said that it's reducing salaried workers, that their

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 5>equipment sales are slumping. In Corteva, which makes seeds, has

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 5>also warned of a slow down in demand from farmers.

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 5>So tell us you know the broader outlook of the

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 5>farming sector right now and really why people should be

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 5>paying attention.

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean, we hit peak production this past year,

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 9>so twenty twenty four will be a slower or lower

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 9>growth year. This has been kind of well advertised by

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 9>the pullback we've seen in commodity prices. CNH certainly cautioned

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 9>when they reported that volumes will be down in twenty

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 9>twenty four, and we actually saw a Deer reduced production

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 9>too at their harvest Works factory in their fiscal four

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 9>q In North America, inventory seem to be in good condition,

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 9>but as you look globally Europe and particularly South America,

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 9>they plan to underproduce retail demand next year, so further

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 9>production cuts to come.

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 2>What's the lead time? Like, tell to us about the

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 2>cycle for a company like deer. I know it's a

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 2>cyclical business and it's based upon farming, but just give

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 2>us a describe as cycle for us.

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean, ultimately they're driven by where crop prices

0:31:57.000 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 9>are and that ultimately dictates farmer incomes. You know, we've

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 9>had three very strong years here in North America. So

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 9>we were roughly thirty percent above mid cycle in twenty

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 9>twenty three, which was you know, pretty comparable to the

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 9>twenty thirteen peak. So again it comes down to where

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 9>crop prices are. They're still you know, supportive of making

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 9>capital investments, just not at the level we had seen

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 9>over the last two years.

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 5>Tell us, Chris, about some other markets that are really

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 5>important for the farming space that you know, Brazil probably

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 5>being one of them, and maybe some other regions in

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 5>the world that are really important when we're thinking about

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 5>the outlook for farming.

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, if you think about the markets that matter most

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 9>for deer, it's North America and it's Brazil. Those are

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 9>the larger crop producing nations. They are more conducive to

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 9>the larger high horsepower equipment, which which drives higher margins

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:57.480
<v Speaker 9>for deer. And ultimately it is corn, soybeans, and wheat.

0:32:58.720 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 9>Those those are really move the needle.

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 2>All right, Chris, I'm a farmer. I'm in Moline, Illinois.

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 2>How often do I replace those big, big tractors that

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 2>I love to drive to help me, you know, get

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 2>my crops out of the ground.

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 9>So if you think about a piece of large farm equipment,

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 9>you know, typically the useful life runs about fifteen years,

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 9>but that includes a pretty robust trade cycle of four

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 9>or five different users. You know, some of the larger

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:30.480
<v Speaker 9>operations we'll we'll swap out equipment more frequently, just given

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 9>some of the technology and upgrades you know, really make

0:33:34.600 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 9>farmers more productive and help lower some of the input costs.

0:33:38.800 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 9>And combines, you know, tend to have a little bit

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 9>shorter useful life, used a little bit more intensively, particularly

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:45.720
<v Speaker 9>down in regions like South America.

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:48.360
<v Speaker 2>So when I what's a combine? I gon to get

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 2>one of us big combines that I see, you know

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 2>with the big cabs and they got all the bells

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 2>and whistles. What's that going to set me back?

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 9>You're gonna have to break out the wallet, and you know,

0:33:57.400 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 9>a large combine could run you know, close to all

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 9>dollars with all the bells and whistles and the new technology.

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 9>They are a large capital investment.

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:09.719
<v Speaker 2>And so I have to finance that, right, So if

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:13.279
<v Speaker 2>I got interest rates, they're no longer zero. So it's

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:15.760
<v Speaker 2>just like buying a car, isn't it's a lot more expensive.

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:16.799
<v Speaker 3>It is.

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 9>But you know, interestingly enough, we've seen you know, higher

0:34:20.160 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 9>interest rates, you know, to this point, really haven't had

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 9>a detrimental impact on equipment sales. And I think a

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 9>lot of that has to do with you know, crop

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 9>prices were you know, historically elevated farm income. We set

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:34.279
<v Speaker 9>a record in twenty twenty two, so farmers have had

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:36.720
<v Speaker 9>a lot of money in their wallets, and we've actually

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 9>seen a lot of farmers go out and buy equipment

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 9>with cash, the exception being more at the smaller and

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 9>more consumer driven products those had ten historically been a

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 9>little bit more rate sensitive. That being said, now with

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 9>the pullback and crop prices and lower farm incomes, you're

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:57.880
<v Speaker 9>starting to see some of that interest rates sensitivity deteriorate

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 9>some of the buying power for the law larger operations.

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:06.560
<v Speaker 5>Let's go back to the deer earnings call that happened earlier. Today,

0:35:07.400 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 5>management brought up labor costs a lot as mentioning that

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:15.720
<v Speaker 5>this is the largest inflationary item within their production bucket,

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 5>and that a lot of it is contractual, mentioning that

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 5>the labor contracts that they have in their factories have

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:24.440
<v Speaker 5>these scheduled step ups in the year. So is that

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 5>saying that labor costs are going to get even more

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 5>expensive for Deer?

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 9>Yes, that being said, production costs we actually saw for

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 9>the first time in three years this fiscal quarter turned

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:41.799
<v Speaker 9>into a tailwind. So while labor costs are going up,

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:47.000
<v Speaker 9>other costs are coming down, which is helping mitigate some

0:35:47.040 --> 0:35:52.000
<v Speaker 9>of those higher and labor inflationary pressures. So net, they're

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:55.759
<v Speaker 9>anticipating twenty twenty four that production costs will actually be

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 9>a tailwind.

0:35:57.280 --> 0:35:59.759
<v Speaker 2>So how's the supply chain here? I mean, I know,

0:35:59.800 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 2>for while they're like the automobile industry, you know, the

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:05.839
<v Speaker 2>industrial equipment guys couldn't get the chips, they couldn't get

0:36:05.880 --> 0:36:08.840
<v Speaker 2>some of the parts they need to build these things,

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 2>how is the supply chain these days?

0:36:11.920 --> 0:36:15.920
<v Speaker 9>The supply base has you know, really normalized. It really

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 9>is not a factor at this point anymore. There are

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:22.520
<v Speaker 9>pockets from time to time, but we've seen a normalized

0:36:22.560 --> 0:36:25.799
<v Speaker 9>supply chain. I'd expect you get a little bit of

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:28.839
<v Speaker 9>tailwind some factory efficiencies as we move into next year.

0:36:29.360 --> 0:36:31.880
<v Speaker 9>But it's normal course of business.

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:34.920
<v Speaker 5>A lot of times when we see companies set really

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 5>low guidance. My initial reaction, and maybe this is just

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:41.440
<v Speaker 5>the cynical person in me, is thinking, oh, you know,

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 5>setting the bar low so that they can what's that

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 5>phrase to under expect to outperform?

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, under promise, over deliver.

0:36:48.800 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 5>That there, thank you. I knew you would say everything

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 5>is that? Is that, Chris? What you think is happening here?

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 5>Or it really is as dire as Deer is making

0:36:56.080 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 5>it out to be.

0:36:57.719 --> 0:37:00.319
<v Speaker 9>No, I think that's exactly what's happening here. I think

0:37:00.320 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 9>they set a very low bar, and I wouldn't be

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:06.480
<v Speaker 9>surprised to see beats and raises throughout the year. You know,

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:10.279
<v Speaker 9>we had an anticipated fairly conservative guidance just given some

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:14.440
<v Speaker 9>of the macro uncertainty, pharm economy uncertainty, so that was

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:17.720
<v Speaker 9>to be expected. But to see you know, double digit

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 9>top line to crime declines across all businesses, pretty heavy

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:26.600
<v Speaker 9>decremental margins, you know, thirty five percent plus, that's more

0:37:26.600 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 9>indicative of a more severe contraction. We just don't see

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:32.440
<v Speaker 9>that as a realistic scenario at this stage.

0:37:33.200 --> 0:37:35.960
<v Speaker 2>I remember when Chris was young, he wasn't so cynical.

0:37:36.120 --> 0:37:38.759
<v Speaker 2>He would take management's guidance at face value. But now

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:41.400
<v Speaker 2>he's calling him out, saying that maybe either kind of

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:44.239
<v Speaker 2>thrown in the kitchen sink here. That's that's a mark

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 2>of a good analysts. He's become a great, great analyst

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:49.480
<v Speaker 2>for us. Chris Gielino, industrials analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence. He

0:37:49.480 --> 0:37:51.719
<v Speaker 2>follows all the fun companies. I think like Deer. He

0:37:51.719 --> 0:37:53.799
<v Speaker 2>gets a ride around on tractors and stuff like that.

0:37:54.000 --> 0:37:54.839
<v Speaker 5>Is that part of the job.

0:37:54.920 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, you go to an analystate, you got to

0:37:57.160 --> 0:38:00.839
<v Speaker 2>check out the merch so they take Yeah, it's okay. Yeah,

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 2>so it's good stuff. They have good time. Now my

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:04.160
<v Speaker 2>job is better because I used to get to go

0:38:04.200 --> 0:38:07.280
<v Speaker 2>to movie premieres for the Disney, go out on cruise

0:38:07.280 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 2>ships with Disney and all that kind of fun stuff.

0:38:09.840 --> 0:38:11.960
<v Speaker 5>And now you're here in the album here one of

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:14.880
<v Speaker 5>the biggest in person office proponents I've ever.

0:38:14.719 --> 0:38:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Met, exactly, and I've thrown into talent that I've kind

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:20.839
<v Speaker 2>of figured it all out. My kids are saying forget

0:38:20.880 --> 0:38:22.359
<v Speaker 2>about it. You've lost that fight.

0:38:24.200 --> 0:38:27.319
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcasts. You can

0:38:27.360 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:34.920
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:38.200
<v Speaker 1>at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three and on Fall.

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast.

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:43.439
<v Speaker 2>You can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio