1
00:00:04,480 --> 00:00:12,399
Speaker 1: Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

2
00:00:12,440 --> 00:00:16,079
Speaker 1: and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

3
00:00:16,120 --> 00:00:19,720
Speaker 1: I'm an executive producer with iHeart Podcasts and how the

4
00:00:19,760 --> 00:00:22,239
Speaker 1: tech are you. It's time for the tech news for

5
00:00:22,320 --> 00:00:27,080
Speaker 1: the week ending Friday, April twenty sixth, twenty twenty four,

6
00:00:27,200 --> 00:00:31,240
Speaker 1: and first up. I covered one really big news item

7
00:00:31,320 --> 00:00:34,199
Speaker 1: earlier this week on Wednesday's episode, which is that the

8
00:00:34,320 --> 00:00:37,920
Speaker 1: US Senate approved a bill that gives the Chinese company

9
00:00:37,960 --> 00:00:42,000
Speaker 1: byte Dance one year to divest itself of TikTok or

10
00:00:42,040 --> 00:00:47,120
Speaker 1: else face a nationwide band. President Biden signed that bill

11
00:00:47,280 --> 00:00:50,800
Speaker 1: into law as was expected. And the only other update

12
00:00:50,840 --> 00:00:54,240
Speaker 1: I really have is that Reuter's reports Byteedance would rather

13
00:00:54,440 --> 00:00:58,920
Speaker 1: choose to shut TikTok down than to sell it off

14
00:00:58,960 --> 00:01:02,400
Speaker 1: to someone else. Of course, that's not likely to happen

15
00:01:02,640 --> 00:01:05,000
Speaker 1: right away. I mean, for one thing, they have a year,

16
00:01:05,080 --> 00:01:08,480
Speaker 1: but by Dance also plans to challenge the law on

17
00:01:08,600 --> 00:01:12,920
Speaker 1: constitutional grounds, as do others, So we have a ways

18
00:01:12,959 --> 00:01:16,320
Speaker 1: to go before this story ends one way or the other,

19
00:01:17,000 --> 00:01:21,840
Speaker 1: whether courts uphold it or say that in fact, it's unconstitutional.

20
00:01:22,080 --> 00:01:25,399
Speaker 1: And if you're wondering why bite Dance would rather just

21
00:01:26,080 --> 00:01:29,200
Speaker 1: scuttle all operations in the United States and just call

22
00:01:29,240 --> 00:01:31,800
Speaker 1: it a loss. It really comes down to that juicy

23
00:01:31,959 --> 00:01:35,440
Speaker 1: recommendation algorithm that TikTok uses, you know, the one that

24
00:01:35,720 --> 00:01:39,520
Speaker 1: former engineers for an earlier app called ninety nine fongs

25
00:01:39,520 --> 00:01:42,560
Speaker 1: say is their work and that they should be compensated

26
00:01:42,600 --> 00:01:46,319
Speaker 1: for it. Byte Dance does not want to part with

27
00:01:46,440 --> 00:01:49,960
Speaker 1: that algorithm. It is a key component of other apps

28
00:01:50,080 --> 00:01:53,520
Speaker 1: that the company owns and operates, including the Chinese cousin

29
00:01:53,560 --> 00:01:56,680
Speaker 1: to TikTok do Yin. And that's it for the update

30
00:01:56,680 --> 00:02:00,800
Speaker 1: for that story. This week, the US Federal Communiticationations Commission,

31
00:02:00,880 --> 00:02:05,919
Speaker 1: or FCC reinstated some, but not all, of net neutrality

32
00:02:06,040 --> 00:02:08,560
Speaker 1: regulations in the United States. So as a quick reminder,

33
00:02:08,800 --> 00:02:12,640
Speaker 1: net neutrality covers a fairly broad spectrum of concepts, but

34
00:02:12,680 --> 00:02:14,800
Speaker 1: you can kind of boil it down to say that

35
00:02:14,960 --> 00:02:19,400
Speaker 1: the rules mean all companies that provide internet infrastructure agree

36
00:02:19,480 --> 00:02:23,440
Speaker 1: to let all traffic cross their networks without interference, no

37
00:02:23,520 --> 00:02:26,520
Speaker 1: matter who it's from, to whom it's going, or what

38
00:02:26,600 --> 00:02:30,880
Speaker 1: kind of device the endpoint is using. So under net neutrality,

39
00:02:31,280 --> 00:02:35,040
Speaker 1: a provider would not give advantages to their own content

40
00:02:35,160 --> 00:02:39,240
Speaker 1: while throttling traffic from competitors. So if you got your

41
00:02:39,280 --> 00:02:43,359
Speaker 1: Internet service from Comcast, Comcasts wouldn't be allowed to put

42
00:02:43,360 --> 00:02:46,760
Speaker 1: its own services on a fast lane while inhibiting stuff

43
00:02:46,800 --> 00:02:50,240
Speaker 1: from like you know, Netflix or Max or Hulu or whatever,

44
00:02:50,680 --> 00:02:54,120
Speaker 1: or charging those companies an arm in a leg in

45
00:02:54,200 --> 00:02:56,959
Speaker 1: order to also be in the fast lane. The measure

46
00:02:57,080 --> 00:02:59,720
Speaker 1: passed three to two in the FCC. It went right

47
00:02:59,760 --> 00:03:02,560
Speaker 1: down party lines, which is pretty much par for the

48
00:03:02,600 --> 00:03:07,200
Speaker 1: course these days. So three Democratic appointees voted for it

49
00:03:07,240 --> 00:03:10,480
Speaker 1: and to Republican appointees voted against it. Now, to be clear,

50
00:03:10,800 --> 00:03:13,880
Speaker 1: this is not the first time the FCC has established

51
00:03:14,000 --> 00:03:17,400
Speaker 1: net neutrality rules. It did so under the Obama administration,

52
00:03:17,720 --> 00:03:21,920
Speaker 1: but then under the Trump administration the FCC revoked those

53
00:03:22,000 --> 00:03:25,000
Speaker 1: earlier rules, so this should really indicate that these rules

54
00:03:25,040 --> 00:03:28,680
Speaker 1: are far from set in stone. A tech analyst named

55
00:03:28,840 --> 00:03:33,480
Speaker 1: Ming chi Quo has posted in Medium that Apple has

56
00:03:33,520 --> 00:03:38,480
Speaker 1: scaled back its production of the Vision Pro mixed reality headsets. So,

57
00:03:38,520 --> 00:03:42,280
Speaker 1: according to this post, Apple initially expected a demand of

58
00:03:42,320 --> 00:03:45,640
Speaker 1: seven hundred thousand to eight hundred thousand headsets, but this

59
00:03:45,760 --> 00:03:49,360
Speaker 1: cut will bring it down to a little bit around

60
00:03:49,400 --> 00:03:51,720
Speaker 1: the half of that. Like four hundred thousand to four

61
00:03:51,760 --> 00:03:55,000
Speaker 1: hundred and fifty thousand units. Further, the post says that

62
00:03:55,040 --> 00:03:58,440
Speaker 1: Apple expects sales to dip even more next year, and

63
00:03:58,480 --> 00:04:01,480
Speaker 1: that the company has adjusted its product roadmap as a result.

64
00:04:01,840 --> 00:04:06,360
Speaker 1: So Apple often releases updated models of its various tech

65
00:04:06,520 --> 00:04:09,720
Speaker 1: platforms from year to year, like Max and iPhones and

66
00:04:09,720 --> 00:04:11,720
Speaker 1: that kind of thing. But the post says that the

67
00:04:11,720 --> 00:04:14,560
Speaker 1: company is no longer planning to release a new headset

68
00:04:14,600 --> 00:04:17,919
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty five. So could it be that mixed

69
00:04:17,920 --> 00:04:22,159
Speaker 1: reality is one arena in which Apple's reality distortion field

70
00:04:22,240 --> 00:04:25,320
Speaker 1: just doesn't extend. So in the past I've predicted that

71
00:04:25,400 --> 00:04:27,760
Speaker 1: various Apple products wouldn't go very far. I mean, the

72
00:04:27,839 --> 00:04:30,680
Speaker 1: iPad is a really big example of one where I

73
00:04:30,800 --> 00:04:33,680
Speaker 1: whiffed big time. So I've been so incredibly wrong in

74
00:04:33,720 --> 00:04:36,920
Speaker 1: the past. But maybe the challenges of getting a broad

75
00:04:36,960 --> 00:04:40,400
Speaker 1: audience for a mixed reality headset are too great even

76
00:04:40,440 --> 00:04:43,200
Speaker 1: for Apple, and to be fear to the company, mixed

77
00:04:43,200 --> 00:04:45,840
Speaker 1: reality is a very tough sell. I mean, the headsets

78
00:04:45,839 --> 00:04:48,320
Speaker 1: are expensive. You know, you have to wear them on

79
00:04:48,360 --> 00:04:51,400
Speaker 1: your head, so that's got a strike against it for

80
00:04:51,440 --> 00:04:54,040
Speaker 1: a lot of people. And there's a very limited number

81
00:04:54,080 --> 00:04:56,880
Speaker 1: of applications for these headsets right now. Despite the fact

82
00:04:56,880 --> 00:04:59,839
Speaker 1: that what they do appears to be really incredible, it's

83
00:04:59,839 --> 00:05:02,720
Speaker 1: a a very limited set of things that they do,

84
00:05:03,480 --> 00:05:06,800
Speaker 1: so with all of these things taken into account, it's

85
00:05:06,920 --> 00:05:10,960
Speaker 1: tough to get traction. So it's a pretty big uphill battle,

86
00:05:11,080 --> 00:05:14,520
Speaker 1: and I don't think Apple's gonna win it. Tesla has

87
00:05:14,560 --> 00:05:16,720
Speaker 1: had a wild week that I think proves the point

88
00:05:16,760 --> 00:05:19,640
Speaker 1: that if we live inside a computer simulation, there's some

89
00:05:19,720 --> 00:05:23,440
Speaker 1: serious bugs in the programming. So Tesla held its twenty

90
00:05:23,480 --> 00:05:26,039
Speaker 1: twenty four Q one earnings call this week, and the

91
00:05:26,040 --> 00:05:29,160
Speaker 1: company revealed that, at least according to The Verge, Tesla's

92
00:05:29,200 --> 00:05:32,720
Speaker 1: net income is down nine percent year over year and

93
00:05:32,760 --> 00:05:36,559
Speaker 1: has hit a six year low. Oh and quote, net

94
00:05:36,640 --> 00:05:41,159
Speaker 1: income attributable to common stockholders has slid fifty five percent

95
00:05:41,400 --> 00:05:44,760
Speaker 1: end quote. That's according to Andrew Hawkins of The Verge,

96
00:05:44,839 --> 00:05:48,480
Speaker 1: and he attributes this both to Tesla's price cutting efforts

97
00:05:48,600 --> 00:05:52,520
Speaker 1: and cooling demand for evs among the buying public. Elon

98
00:05:52,600 --> 00:05:56,080
Speaker 1: Musk says the auto industry in general has pivoted from

99
00:05:56,200 --> 00:06:00,480
Speaker 1: EV's back to hybrids, and that certainly is going on

100
00:06:00,560 --> 00:06:02,919
Speaker 1: here in America. I mean, we have seen a few

101
00:06:02,920 --> 00:06:06,560
Speaker 1: different auto manufacturers switch gears to use a pun and

102
00:06:06,760 --> 00:06:10,640
Speaker 1: to favor hybrids over evs for at least the near term.

103
00:06:11,200 --> 00:06:14,919
Speaker 1: The earnings call included a section that teased Tesla's upcoming

104
00:06:15,040 --> 00:06:17,800
Speaker 1: robotaxi product, which we're told we're going to hear more

105
00:06:17,839 --> 00:06:21,200
Speaker 1: about on August eighth. I'll remind you that, according to

106
00:06:21,440 --> 00:06:25,839
Speaker 1: various states that have regulatory requirements for autonomous taxi services,

107
00:06:25,960 --> 00:06:29,280
Speaker 1: Tesla has not yet begun the licensing procedures to get

108
00:06:29,279 --> 00:06:32,600
Speaker 1: permission to operate such a service in those states. Now,

109
00:06:32,600 --> 00:06:36,200
Speaker 1: maybe that's changed since the initial teas of the robotaxi service.

110
00:06:36,200 --> 00:06:39,080
Speaker 1: Maybe Tesla has started to file that paperwork. I haven't

111
00:06:39,120 --> 00:06:42,720
Speaker 1: heard that. But what happened after this earnings call is

112
00:06:42,760 --> 00:06:46,000
Speaker 1: where things really went bonkers from me. So you had

113
00:06:46,040 --> 00:06:49,400
Speaker 1: this earnings call, things sound dire. You know, you're down

114
00:06:49,640 --> 00:06:54,000
Speaker 1: significantly from the previous year, and the stock price would

115
00:06:54,000 --> 00:06:57,520
Speaker 1: surge twelve percent in trading on Wednesday. So I told

116
00:06:57,520 --> 00:07:01,720
Speaker 1: you is a mad world out there. The stockholder enthusiasm

117
00:07:01,760 --> 00:07:05,080
Speaker 1: appears to be linked to things like the upcoming robotaxi effort,

118
00:07:05,320 --> 00:07:09,000
Speaker 1: Musk claiming that Tesla isn't so much an auto manufacturer

119
00:07:09,040 --> 00:07:12,160
Speaker 1: as it is a digital platform, as well as Musk's

120
00:07:12,160 --> 00:07:15,640
Speaker 1: announcement that the company plans to introduce new models early

121
00:07:15,760 --> 00:07:18,840
Speaker 1: next year, if not sooner. I have no idea if

122
00:07:18,880 --> 00:07:21,480
Speaker 1: any of that is realistic. Keep in mind, we're also

123
00:07:21,520 --> 00:07:24,120
Speaker 1: talking about the same company that had delayed the launch

124
00:07:24,120 --> 00:07:27,320
Speaker 1: of the cyber truck numerous times before it finally rolled

125
00:07:27,320 --> 00:07:30,840
Speaker 1: off lots. But the shareholders seem happy for now. In

126
00:07:30,920 --> 00:07:35,760
Speaker 1: other Muskie news, Elon's Ai company x Ai, because Elon

127
00:07:35,880 --> 00:07:39,200
Speaker 1: Musk continues to be obsessed with the letter x is

128
00:07:39,280 --> 00:07:43,080
Speaker 1: getting close to raising six billion with a B dollars

129
00:07:43,080 --> 00:07:48,240
Speaker 1: in investments on evaluation of eighteen billion dollars. According to

130
00:07:48,280 --> 00:07:51,200
Speaker 1: tech Crunch. Not that long ago, the numbers looked a

131
00:07:51,200 --> 00:07:53,880
Speaker 1: lot different. It was more like an effort to raise

132
00:07:54,080 --> 00:07:58,960
Speaker 1: three billion dollars with evaluation of fifteen billion. But various

133
00:07:59,000 --> 00:08:02,040
Speaker 1: heavy hitting and groups charged forward to get a piece

134
00:08:02,040 --> 00:08:05,840
Speaker 1: of the action, and Xai quickly tweaked those numbers. So

135
00:08:05,840 --> 00:08:08,320
Speaker 1: it's kind of like running a lemonade stand. You know,

136
00:08:08,360 --> 00:08:11,920
Speaker 1: you've been selling tall, frosty glasses of tangy lemonade for

137
00:08:11,960 --> 00:08:15,360
Speaker 1: like twenty five cents, but then there's this great lemon

138
00:08:15,480 --> 00:08:17,920
Speaker 1: blight that wipes out nearly all lemons except for the

139
00:08:17,920 --> 00:08:20,440
Speaker 1: ones that you have. And it also coincides with like

140
00:08:20,440 --> 00:08:23,679
Speaker 1: a massive heat wave, and you've got the market cornered

141
00:08:23,680 --> 00:08:26,240
Speaker 1: on your sweet and sour zipper, so you hike the

142
00:08:26,240 --> 00:08:29,640
Speaker 1: price to five bucks for a shot. Anyway, the sales

143
00:08:29,680 --> 00:08:32,199
Speaker 1: pitch for XAI sounds like something from a science fiction

144
00:08:32,320 --> 00:08:35,000
Speaker 1: film where we find out how the killer robots got

145
00:08:35,040 --> 00:08:39,319
Speaker 1: their start. So, namely, Musk plans to leverage data from

146
00:08:39,320 --> 00:08:43,880
Speaker 1: his various other companies to use as training information for

147
00:08:44,240 --> 00:08:48,640
Speaker 1: the AI developed by XAI. So those businesses include stuff

148
00:08:48,720 --> 00:08:51,880
Speaker 1: like x formerly known as Twitter, which is a stakeholder

149
00:08:52,120 --> 00:08:57,559
Speaker 1: in XAI, SpaceX, Tesla, and even Neuralink that's the brain

150
00:08:57,600 --> 00:09:01,160
Speaker 1: computer interface company that Musk has. So Musk's vision is

151
00:09:01,200 --> 00:09:04,319
Speaker 1: a world in which all these other businesses are feeding

152
00:09:04,440 --> 00:09:08,720
Speaker 1: his XAI with real world data and experience and thus

153
00:09:08,840 --> 00:09:14,280
Speaker 1: accelerating that AI's learning patterns, and voila, we get miracle

154
00:09:14,400 --> 00:09:18,840
Speaker 1: robots and such. I remain skeptical. Now, a quick hop

155
00:09:18,880 --> 00:09:21,120
Speaker 1: away from Tesla will take us over to a story

156
00:09:21,160 --> 00:09:24,800
Speaker 1: about Fisker, which is an electric vehicle auto company that,

157
00:09:25,000 --> 00:09:28,720
Speaker 1: according to SFGate dot com, is now on the brink

158
00:09:28,760 --> 00:09:32,080
Speaker 1: of collapse. Huh, I'm business on the brink. That would

159
00:09:32,080 --> 00:09:34,880
Speaker 1: actually be a really good name for a podcast. Anyway,

160
00:09:35,160 --> 00:09:38,600
Speaker 1: this week, Fisker filed with the SEC and revealed that

161
00:09:38,679 --> 00:09:41,760
Speaker 1: the company is pretty much broke. Back in March, it

162
00:09:41,880 --> 00:09:44,480
Speaker 1: was unable to make an interest payment. Now, granted, it

163
00:09:44,520 --> 00:09:46,760
Speaker 1: was a whopper of an interest payment, it was eight

164
00:09:46,800 --> 00:09:50,440
Speaker 1: point four million dollars. But the filing revealed that, you know,

165
00:09:50,559 --> 00:09:54,319
Speaker 1: this company, Fisker is on borrowed time. So unless creditors

166
00:09:54,360 --> 00:09:57,840
Speaker 1: give the company some serious slack or it hits some

167
00:09:58,000 --> 00:10:01,160
Speaker 1: crazy financial windfall, the screw will need to file for

168
00:10:01,240 --> 00:10:05,720
Speaker 1: bankruptcy within thirty days. The filing doesn't sugarcoat things either. Essentially,

169
00:10:05,720 --> 00:10:08,480
Speaker 1: it says giving us more money is really risky because

170
00:10:08,480 --> 00:10:10,840
Speaker 1: we haven't proven we're able to do what we need

171
00:10:10,840 --> 00:10:13,600
Speaker 1: to do. But yeah, we've seen a few stories about

172
00:10:13,600 --> 00:10:16,680
Speaker 1: startups attempting to establish a foothold in the auto industry.

173
00:10:17,040 --> 00:10:20,400
Speaker 1: More often than not, it does not work out. Okay,

174
00:10:20,760 --> 00:10:23,080
Speaker 1: we've got a lot more news stories to get through

175
00:10:23,120 --> 00:10:25,199
Speaker 1: before we get to that. Let's take a quick break

176
00:10:25,240 --> 00:10:37,160
Speaker 1: to thank our sponsors. We're back and we're going to

177
00:10:37,240 --> 00:10:40,000
Speaker 1: take a little stroll over to Meta Meta also held

178
00:10:40,040 --> 00:10:43,040
Speaker 1: an earnings call this week, but investors were not nearly

179
00:10:43,080 --> 00:10:45,960
Speaker 1: as charmed by the revelations as those who were following

180
00:10:46,000 --> 00:10:49,520
Speaker 1: the Tesla announcements. The call began with talk about AI

181
00:10:49,920 --> 00:10:53,000
Speaker 1: to no big surprise, and then Zuckerberg also talked about

182
00:10:53,040 --> 00:10:55,880
Speaker 1: the metaverse, which is funny because you don't hear that

183
00:10:56,080 --> 00:10:59,520
Speaker 1: term bandied about nearly as much these days. I think

184
00:10:59,600 --> 00:11:03,320
Speaker 1: AI I largely displaced the metaverse concept that became like

185
00:11:03,600 --> 00:11:06,880
Speaker 1: the new thing that business leaders got excited about. But

186
00:11:07,000 --> 00:11:11,520
Speaker 1: as CNBC's Ashley Caput put said, quote, he spent almost

187
00:11:11,600 --> 00:11:14,760
Speaker 1: the entirety of his opening remarks focused on the many

188
00:11:14,800 --> 00:11:18,920
Speaker 1: ways Meta loses money end quote, Mizcaput, I believe you

189
00:11:19,000 --> 00:11:22,000
Speaker 1: have spilt some tea all over the place. But yeah,

190
00:11:22,080 --> 00:11:25,360
Speaker 1: Meta is very good at spending a lot of money

191
00:11:25,400 --> 00:11:28,360
Speaker 1: on stuff that isn't making very much by comparison. So,

192
00:11:28,440 --> 00:11:31,760
Speaker 1: for example, Reality Labs brought in four hundred and forty

193
00:11:31,760 --> 00:11:34,720
Speaker 1: million dollars in sales, and that's a lot of cheddar,

194
00:11:35,160 --> 00:11:38,000
Speaker 1: but that same division racked up a financial loss of

195
00:11:38,080 --> 00:11:44,240
Speaker 1: three point eighty five billion dollars. Anyway, Zuckerberg also seemed

196
00:11:44,360 --> 00:11:47,880
Speaker 1: prepared for the financial blow that would follow this earnings

197
00:11:47,920 --> 00:11:51,240
Speaker 1: call because he acknowledged that investors are generally not very

198
00:11:51,240 --> 00:11:54,640
Speaker 1: happy about Meta spending billions of dollars on projects that

199
00:11:54,679 --> 00:11:58,079
Speaker 1: are not yet monetizable. Sure enough, in the wake of

200
00:11:58,120 --> 00:12:01,640
Speaker 1: the earnings call, Meta's stock price dropped nineteen percent in

201
00:12:01,760 --> 00:12:05,040
Speaker 1: extended trading at some points. As for the future, Zuckerberg

202
00:12:05,080 --> 00:12:08,560
Speaker 1: revealed that the company estimates capital expenditures for twenty twenty

203
00:12:08,559 --> 00:12:10,960
Speaker 1: four to be in the thirty five billion to forty

204
00:12:11,080 --> 00:12:14,280
Speaker 1: billion dollar range. That's more than what the company had

205
00:12:14,320 --> 00:12:18,839
Speaker 1: previously estimated, So I guess making the future is real expensive.

206
00:12:19,320 --> 00:12:22,440
Speaker 1: Microsoft also had an earnings call this week, and the

207
00:12:22,440 --> 00:12:27,120
Speaker 1: company explained that the absolute rush to develop AI has

208
00:12:27,200 --> 00:12:30,840
Speaker 1: meant the demand for cloud based computing power is greater

209
00:12:31,000 --> 00:12:34,120
Speaker 1: than the supply of resources. So the report showed that

210
00:12:34,160 --> 00:12:38,520
Speaker 1: Microsoft has increased capital expenditures by nearly eighty percent year

211
00:12:38,559 --> 00:12:41,080
Speaker 1: over year in an effort to meet this demand to

212
00:12:41,080 --> 00:12:44,160
Speaker 1: build out things like data centers and such, and the

213
00:12:44,200 --> 00:12:47,600
Speaker 1: company is going to have to spend even more in

214
00:12:47,640 --> 00:12:51,160
Speaker 1: the next couple of years in order to really feed

215
00:12:51,400 --> 00:12:54,599
Speaker 1: the hungry beast that is AI. This is kind of

216
00:12:54,640 --> 00:12:58,280
Speaker 1: like seeing Parkinson's law of data on steroids, So Parkinson's

217
00:12:58,320 --> 00:12:59,960
Speaker 1: law of data in case you don't know what that is,

218
00:13:00,200 --> 00:13:03,560
Speaker 1: it says that information will fill any space made available

219
00:13:03,640 --> 00:13:07,400
Speaker 1: to it, like it doesn't matter how big your library

220
00:13:07,720 --> 00:13:12,240
Speaker 1: or filing cabinet or storage drive is, any way of

221
00:13:12,920 --> 00:13:16,160
Speaker 1: having a way of retaining information, it will fill up.

222
00:13:16,400 --> 00:13:19,760
Speaker 1: Like I remember when we would get a computer with

223
00:13:19,760 --> 00:13:22,439
Speaker 1: a hard drive like one hundred and twenty eight megabytes

224
00:13:22,520 --> 00:13:24,880
Speaker 1: or something, and I'd think, oh, we'll never fill all

225
00:13:24,880 --> 00:13:28,720
Speaker 1: this up, which was ridiculous obviously, Well, this seems to

226
00:13:28,720 --> 00:13:31,920
Speaker 1: be that same kind of issue. The compute power instead

227
00:13:31,960 --> 00:13:34,679
Speaker 1: of storage power just will get swallowed up as soon

228
00:13:34,720 --> 00:13:37,400
Speaker 1: as you make it available. Microsoft keeps adding to it,

229
00:13:37,440 --> 00:13:39,880
Speaker 1: and customers in the form of companies running these AI

230
00:13:39,920 --> 00:13:43,600
Speaker 1: implementations just buy it right up. But the expenditures that

231
00:13:43,640 --> 00:13:46,000
Speaker 1: Microsoft is making in order to meet this demand so

232
00:13:46,120 --> 00:13:49,000
Speaker 1: far are actually outpacing income. So that could be a

233
00:13:49,040 --> 00:13:51,720
Speaker 1: sticky wicket. At some point you could meet a tipping

234
00:13:51,720 --> 00:13:55,320
Speaker 1: point where it just you're spending more money than you

235
00:13:55,320 --> 00:13:58,600
Speaker 1: could possibly bring back in, especially if some of these

236
00:13:58,640 --> 00:14:01,800
Speaker 1: startup AI companies of fizzle out. So we'll have to

237
00:14:01,800 --> 00:14:04,839
Speaker 1: see where this kind of levels out. I'm sure there

238
00:14:04,880 --> 00:14:07,400
Speaker 1: will be a point, I don't know when that'll happen.

239
00:14:08,200 --> 00:14:11,680
Speaker 1: Google is facing sanctions in South Korea after that nation's

240
00:14:11,800 --> 00:14:16,200
Speaker 1: Fair Trade Commission, the Korea's version of FTC, determined that

241
00:14:16,240 --> 00:14:20,760
Speaker 1: Google's practice of giving YouTube Premium subscribers access to YouTube

242
00:14:20,840 --> 00:14:25,040
Speaker 1: Music as well essentially amounts to bundling these services together

243
00:14:25,280 --> 00:14:29,680
Speaker 1: and is an anti competitive practice that has hurt domestic

244
00:14:29,720 --> 00:14:34,520
Speaker 1: companies streaming platforms. So YouTube Music became the top music

245
00:14:34,560 --> 00:14:37,880
Speaker 1: streaming service in the Korean market, it surpassed even the

246
00:14:38,000 --> 00:14:42,160
Speaker 1: native Korean services, and the FTC launched an investigation into

247
00:14:42,200 --> 00:14:46,080
Speaker 1: the matter last year and now is preparing to determine sanctions.

248
00:14:46,120 --> 00:14:48,960
Speaker 1: But meanwhile, Korean companies are saying this is too little,

249
00:14:49,000 --> 00:14:51,800
Speaker 1: too late, and that the whole determination process is just

250
00:14:51,880 --> 00:14:54,200
Speaker 1: far too long to be of any good because by

251
00:14:54,240 --> 00:14:56,840
Speaker 1: the time a decision has arrived at the damage has

252
00:14:56,920 --> 00:15:02,000
Speaker 1: already been done. Meanwhile, the u US FTC, in our case,

253
00:15:02,000 --> 00:15:05,800
Speaker 1: it's the Federal Trade Commission, ruled that companies are no

254
00:15:05,880 --> 00:15:10,320
Speaker 1: longer allowed to force employees into non compete agreements. This

255
00:15:10,400 --> 00:15:14,400
Speaker 1: applies across all industries, obviously, but inside the tech world

256
00:15:14,520 --> 00:15:18,480
Speaker 1: it is a particularly huge development. Companies have long relied

257
00:15:18,520 --> 00:15:21,560
Speaker 1: on non competes to prevent employees from jumping ship and

258
00:15:21,600 --> 00:15:26,120
Speaker 1: working with a competitor, potentially bringing valuable skills and knowledge

259
00:15:26,200 --> 00:15:30,040
Speaker 1: to that competitor. In fact, some of the podcasters you

260
00:15:30,200 --> 00:15:34,800
Speaker 1: listen to may have non compete clauses in their work agreements,

261
00:15:35,400 --> 00:15:37,720
Speaker 1: you know, like ones you might be listening to right now.

262
00:15:37,880 --> 00:15:39,920
Speaker 1: But the FTC says that kind of thing is not

263
00:15:40,000 --> 00:15:42,640
Speaker 1: going to fly anymore. And you, as you might imagine,

264
00:15:42,920 --> 00:15:46,360
Speaker 1: that decision has not exactly been met with universal approval

265
00:15:46,360 --> 00:15:50,280
Speaker 1: among corporations out there, including tech companies. So on the contrary,

266
00:15:50,440 --> 00:15:54,200
Speaker 1: industry groups are already suing the FTC, arguing that the

267
00:15:54,240 --> 00:15:57,880
Speaker 1: agency lacks the authority to make and enforce such a ruling.

268
00:15:58,280 --> 00:16:01,400
Speaker 1: This rule will go into effect on August twenty second

269
00:16:01,520 --> 00:16:04,640
Speaker 1: of this year, at which point all current non competes,

270
00:16:04,760 --> 00:16:07,680
Speaker 1: at least for anyone who isn't in an executive policy

271
00:16:07,720 --> 00:16:10,640
Speaker 1: making position and earning you know, more than one hundred

272
00:16:10,640 --> 00:16:13,360
Speaker 1: and fifty thousand dollars a year, all non competes will

273
00:16:13,360 --> 00:16:15,480
Speaker 1: be null and void, and companies will not be allowed

274
00:16:15,520 --> 00:16:18,640
Speaker 1: to issue new ones. The lawsuits will continue until a

275
00:16:18,840 --> 00:16:22,120
Speaker 1: final decision is made. My guess is that ultimately this

276
00:16:22,240 --> 00:16:23,520
Speaker 1: is going to have to go all the way to

277
00:16:23,560 --> 00:16:26,640
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court. That's going to take years. So in

278
00:16:26,680 --> 00:16:31,440
Speaker 1: the meantime, I say, make hay while the sun shines. Okay,

279
00:16:31,440 --> 00:16:33,920
Speaker 1: I got a couple of weird AI stories to get throughs.

280
00:16:33,960 --> 00:16:36,200
Speaker 1: First up is a case in Maryland in which the

281
00:16:36,360 --> 00:16:39,360
Speaker 1: athletic director for a high school was found to have

282
00:16:39,480 --> 00:16:43,080
Speaker 1: used AI to impersonate the voice of that school's principle.

283
00:16:43,400 --> 00:16:47,040
Speaker 1: So the accusation goes that this athletic director fabricated and

284
00:16:47,160 --> 00:16:50,880
Speaker 1: audio recording using an AI copy of the principal's voice,

285
00:16:50,960 --> 00:16:55,320
Speaker 1: and this recording included some really awful stuff like racist

286
00:16:55,320 --> 00:16:59,520
Speaker 1: and antisemitic messaging. Apparently this all happened back in January

287
00:16:59,560 --> 00:17:03,320
Speaker 1: when the principle informed the athletic director that his contract

288
00:17:03,400 --> 00:17:06,200
Speaker 1: was not going to be renewed. There were various issues

289
00:17:06,200 --> 00:17:09,800
Speaker 1: and problems with this particular staff member. The athletic director

290
00:17:09,880 --> 00:17:12,720
Speaker 1: then fabricated the recording and posted it to social media,

291
00:17:12,760 --> 00:17:15,880
Speaker 1: which prompted a viral response. It led to the principle

292
00:17:16,000 --> 00:17:19,879
Speaker 1: being placed on leave. And now it's revealed that the

293
00:17:19,920 --> 00:17:24,000
Speaker 1: whole thing was a fraud. And I'm sure we'll never

294
00:17:24,040 --> 00:17:27,879
Speaker 1: hear of any other outlandish potentially criminal uses of AI

295
00:17:28,000 --> 00:17:32,840
Speaker 1: in voice replication technology, he said sarcastically. The other weird

296
00:17:32,880 --> 00:17:35,920
Speaker 1: AI story deals with Drake and it's about a disk track.

297
00:17:36,080 --> 00:17:38,320
Speaker 1: And yes, I know how lame it is to hear

298
00:17:38,680 --> 00:17:41,679
Speaker 1: me say the phrase disc track. I have not earned

299
00:17:41,800 --> 00:17:44,760
Speaker 1: any place at all within rap or hip hop culture,

300
00:17:45,080 --> 00:17:48,320
Speaker 1: but anyway, this particular track was aimed at Kendrick Lamar,

301
00:17:48,720 --> 00:17:52,320
Speaker 1: and the track included a recording of an AI impersonation

302
00:17:52,359 --> 00:17:54,880
Speaker 1: of Tupac Shakur, who, of course died at the age

303
00:17:54,880 --> 00:17:58,880
Speaker 1: of twenty five. Way back in nineteen ninety six. Shaquur's

304
00:17:59,040 --> 00:18:02,439
Speaker 1: estate issued a cease and desist order against Drake and

305
00:18:02,520 --> 00:18:05,480
Speaker 1: threaten legal actions saying that the estate did not give

306
00:18:05,520 --> 00:18:09,119
Speaker 1: permission for the use of Shakur's audio likeness on this track.

307
00:18:09,440 --> 00:18:12,119
Speaker 1: Shakur wasn't the only artist who is replicated for the

308
00:18:12,119 --> 00:18:16,119
Speaker 1: purposes of hyping up Drake and or dissing Lamar. Snoop

309
00:18:16,160 --> 00:18:19,639
Speaker 1: Dogg was also copied by AI, and you know Snoop

310
00:18:19,640 --> 00:18:22,840
Speaker 1: dog is very much alive. The issue really highlights the

311
00:18:22,960 --> 00:18:26,960
Speaker 1: legal gaps that currently exist with regard to technology's ability

312
00:18:27,000 --> 00:18:29,840
Speaker 1: to copy not just a specific work, but a person's

313
00:18:29,960 --> 00:18:34,240
Speaker 1: voice or style. Those sorts of things aren't eligible for copyright.

314
00:18:34,440 --> 00:18:37,240
Speaker 1: You cannot copyright a voice or a style. You have

315
00:18:37,280 --> 00:18:39,320
Speaker 1: to have something that's set down in some sort of

316
00:18:39,400 --> 00:18:42,000
Speaker 1: established format for it to be eligible for copyright. So

317
00:18:42,280 --> 00:18:45,199
Speaker 1: in the absence of copyright protection, the best avenue for

318
00:18:45,240 --> 00:18:49,720
Speaker 1: those who have been copied tends to relate to publicity rights,

319
00:18:49,920 --> 00:18:53,240
Speaker 1: which doesn't really apply to most of us. It's really

320
00:18:53,280 --> 00:18:56,560
Speaker 1: more of something that applies to notable people. But anyway,

321
00:18:56,760 --> 00:18:59,600
Speaker 1: I'm sure we'll never hear of any other versions of

322
00:18:59,640 --> 00:19:04,520
Speaker 1: this very problem due to AI sarcasm. Again in good

323
00:19:04,520 --> 00:19:06,639
Speaker 1: space news, NASA was able to fix some issues with

324
00:19:06,640 --> 00:19:09,840
Speaker 1: the Voyager one spacecraft, which is currently the human made

325
00:19:09,840 --> 00:19:13,199
Speaker 1: object that is furthest from its home planet. Voyager is

326
00:19:13,240 --> 00:19:16,080
Speaker 1: in interstellar space, and last year the spacecraft had a

327
00:19:16,119 --> 00:19:18,720
Speaker 1: malfunction that prevented it from being able to send data

328
00:19:18,800 --> 00:19:21,480
Speaker 1: back to Earth. So for months, engineers at NASA worked

329
00:19:21,480 --> 00:19:24,119
Speaker 1: to fix this problem, and now Voyager can send at

330
00:19:24,200 --> 00:19:27,800
Speaker 1: least some data relating to its health and operations back

331
00:19:27,840 --> 00:19:30,919
Speaker 1: to US, and NASA hopes to get other operations online

332
00:19:30,960 --> 00:19:34,639
Speaker 1: in the near future. The solution largely revolved around addressing

333
00:19:34,720 --> 00:19:38,280
Speaker 1: operations to different sectors of the computer system's memory. That

334
00:19:38,359 --> 00:19:40,240
Speaker 1: must have been hard, because we're not talking about a

335
00:19:40,400 --> 00:19:42,840
Speaker 1: massive amount of space here. I mean there's a massive

336
00:19:42,840 --> 00:19:45,320
Speaker 1: amount of outer space, sure, but not a massive amount

337
00:19:45,320 --> 00:19:49,040
Speaker 1: of computer memory space. Voyager has long since completed its

338
00:19:49,040 --> 00:19:52,760
Speaker 1: primary mission, which was, along with Voyager two, to observe

339
00:19:52,840 --> 00:19:55,360
Speaker 1: the outer planets of our Solar system, and now it's

340
00:19:55,359 --> 00:19:58,160
Speaker 1: giving us information on the nature of interstellar space, which

341
00:19:58,200 --> 00:20:02,359
Speaker 1: is pretty darn cool. Okay, I've gotten article recommendation for

342
00:20:02,440 --> 00:20:05,239
Speaker 1: y'all before I sign off. It's from torrent Freak. It

343
00:20:05,280 --> 00:20:09,200
Speaker 1: was written by Andy Maxwell. It's titled us Know Your

344
00:20:09,240 --> 00:20:12,719
Speaker 1: Customer proposal will put an end to anonymous cloud users,

345
00:20:12,920 --> 00:20:16,000
Speaker 1: which is alarming. The piece explains the whole issue, including

346
00:20:16,040 --> 00:20:18,840
Speaker 1: the reasons behind wanting to clamp down on anonymity in

347
00:20:18,880 --> 00:20:21,360
Speaker 1: the first place, and how this could impact services such

348
00:20:21,359 --> 00:20:24,440
Speaker 1: as VPNs and such. It's well worth your time. That's

349
00:20:24,480 --> 00:20:27,159
Speaker 1: it for this week. I hope you're all well, and

350
00:20:27,200 --> 00:20:36,280
Speaker 1: I'll talk to you again really soon. Tech Stuff is

351
00:20:36,280 --> 00:20:40,840
Speaker 1: an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the

352
00:20:40,880 --> 00:20:44,520
Speaker 1: iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

353
00:20:44,560 --> 00:20:48,840
Speaker 1: favorite shows.