WEBVTT - Inflation, Markets, And Crypto (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. We my coin based

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>down twenty two today, so we need to talk a

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit about crypto. We're gonna do that in just

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>a moment. Bloomberg Markets brought to you by Commonwealth, supporting

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>more than two thousand independent financial advisors with the solutions

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>they need to grow a thriving business. Commonwealth go where

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 1>you grow. Visit Commonwealth dot com to learn more. Johanna,

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 1>a singer, joins us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio.

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>She's cross asset reporter from Bloomberg News based in Singapore

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:48.279
<v Speaker 1>but in New York. This week's we said we need

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:50.959
<v Speaker 1>to get Joanna in the studio. When there's a ton

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>going on, the perfect time for Johanna to come here.

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, want the hell is going on. Sorry for

0:00:58.280 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>saying hell, but you can't talk about hell if you

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 1>can't say hell, right, Um, we have not only the

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>drop in Bitcoin, which to me it's not abnormal to

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>see this kind of I've been watching it for eleven

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:14.319
<v Speaker 1>years now and this happens, but um, the move in

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Tara is shocking to me. I mean, still day two,

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm stunned that this supposed stable coin can fall to

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>this morning twenties on the dollar. It's like x ute no, no,

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the ticker on the Bloomberg terminal. Right, Um, got it? Okay,

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you got it? All right? Okay, So what happened? What?

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:42.960
<v Speaker 1>What are? What is? There's there's this uh algorithm based

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>stable coin. It's supposed to automatically make changes to stick

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>exactly to one dollar. It works in combination with another

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>um uh coin called Luna, which then I guess buys

0:01:56.560 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin and avalanche and other stuff. There's this dude, a

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>total bro and I don't like to use that word pejoratively,

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>but I will right now. Who is the backer of it?

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:10.839
<v Speaker 1>He says he might have a solution what's going on? Well,

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>this is the thing with these algorithmic stable coins is

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that they work until they don't. And there has been

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>this history of these things not doing well, and you know,

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>there are a few that have lasted a while, but

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>they can blow up in spectacular fashion. And you know,

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 1>people have talked about this where if you have volatile

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>assets that you wrap together, sometimes they can be volatile,

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>they won't necessarily maintain that desired peg to the dollar.

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>So it's really just been quite dramatic. And there are

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who put faith in ust doing

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>well in having these yields if you stake to it,

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>that or more people were counting on that stuff, and

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>now it doesn't look like that's happening. And the thing is,

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>how do you restore confidence once it's been lost? This

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>question about both of you, what's the breakdown? And do

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you think an investor base for a lot of these

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>crypto assets, whether it's Big Corner or anything else, institutional

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>versus retail. Oh jeez, I don't know numbers per se,

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 1>but institutions have been getting into them. But there are

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:25.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who are regular investors who just

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>looked at it and said, hey, twenty yield sounds awesome.

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna put a lot of money in there. And

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I have been hearing just anecdotally about people who have

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>lost some decent amount of their savings on stuff like this. Yeah, well,

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I know a ton of people who have to be fair,

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>UM made a made a lot of money over the

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>last few years, UM that have gotten into this. People

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>like my trainer. You know, I have a cameraman who

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>have made hundreds. Well no, I don't. Actually I hired

0:03:57.200 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the guy and then we started hanging out for beers

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and we don't really training. Now we're just buddies, different

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of training. But but so you're paying him to

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>be your buddy. But these these guys have made a

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of a lot of money in crypto, but they're

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>into all of these schemes right, anything where they can

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>make a sick return or leverage, you know, get leveraged up.

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>And also stable coins are a huge part of the

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>way they trade. The interesting thing to me, Joanna is

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>that while this story is so shocking, we haven't seen

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>much of a ripple effect across um the crypto universe.

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:37.239
<v Speaker 1>We haven't too much. Although some of the other stable

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 1>coins are down just a tad um like Tether. I

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 1>mean it's it's very minimal, but Tether is off you know,

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>point one cent or something. But yeah, you're right, that

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the other stable coins, but Tether and usd coin, for instance,

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>do claim to be backed by dollars and other assets,

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>so it's um, you know, you could say they're kind

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>of a frint thing from some of these other algorithmic

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>stable coins. But definitely Terra is the one that's getting

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>all the attention and seems to be a lot of

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the focus. Of course, the whole crypto complex is down

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>significantly in recent days anyway, so that's not helping things either.

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>And again I started off with coin basis now off

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty three percent today, off seventy eight percent year to date,

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:27.599
<v Speaker 1>r at a fifty two week low, still a market

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>cap of twelve and a half billion. But I'd look,

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the coin base is kind of the everyday person's opportunity

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to get exposure to crypto, and so this kind of

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:42.479
<v Speaker 1>feels like it's meaningful. It's still could be. So look,

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 1>coin base is still going to be the major exchange

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:49.039
<v Speaker 1>that Americans used, or one of the major exchanges that

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Americans used to trade crypto. The key here takeaway in

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 1>my opinion for retail or for any investor is don't

0:05:57.120 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>hold your crypto on the exchange. When you get a

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>wallet you can use coin bases wallet, which they make

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>it easier for you to access, but they hold the

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>private key, or you can hold it on an off

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>exchange wallet where you have to remember the private key.

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>That's the one that I forgot um with my blockchain wallet.

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>But the problem is coin based said if they go bankrupt,

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>all of your crypto that they hold could be lost. Yeah,

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>that is a scary prospect. But you know, it doesn't

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:33.039
<v Speaker 1>sound like they're anywhere near that point yet, but they are.

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 1>The price is just so dependent on where bitcoin is.

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Coin bases price peaked around at the same time Bitcoin did,

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>so you know you've noticed that what I have in

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>my hand, cold hard cash. That's how players roll. Johanna

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>austing Er, thank you so much for joining us live

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>here in the Bloomberg and actor Brooker's studio. Join Austinger,

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a cross asset reporter for Bloomberg News. Bring us the

0:06:53.720 --> 0:07:00.599
<v Speaker 1>latest on the vault crypto space. We've got in trades.

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>We had a hot inflation number today. Uh, just kind

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>of markets are trying to figure out which way to

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>play this year. We do have green on the screen here,

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>but again a lot of uncertainty out there. That's kind

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of what we're seeing in the volatility. Doug Baker, He's

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 1>a portfolio management had of preferred securities at Nuvene. They've

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>got a couple of shekels under management. Doug, What are

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>you and your team? How are you thinking about putting

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>money to work these days? Given the inflation print we

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>saw this morning, given what we've seen from this Federal

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Reserve over the past couple of months, how are you

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>guys approaching the market? Yeah? Absolutely, um so, so thanks

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>for having me on um. You know, our views are

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more sing going as as far as

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>as rates are concerned. We we do feel a lot

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>as priced into the curve today and and really our

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>our outlook as far as the Fed is concerned by

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>year end is is a slightly slightly more constructive than

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the market. So we we do feel that the Fed

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 1>will will get to about two and a half percent

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>by year end. UM the ten years probably gonna be

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>slightly north of three percent by that time, but we

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>you feel that what's important important takeaway here is that

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot is priced into the curve, and when we

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>do look at at rates and where they are today,

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I think some people are are are looking a little

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>too bearish lye and and feel that there's a lot

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>more move to come. We're we're we're really positioned from

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the perspective that, um, we need to look at what's

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>priced in and and trade accordingly. Now we want to

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>remain relatively conservative when it comes to interest rate risk

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>or duration risk, and you'll see that reflected across our strategies.

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>What about investors who want to return here? Absolutely, is

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 1>it a good time to get in? We think so.

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 1>We think credit spreads are actually very attractive in fixed

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>income space, whether you're talking about investment grade bonds, high

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:47.719
<v Speaker 1>heel bonds, and in my space and preferred securities, the

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>credit spreads are actually very attractive UM. And when you

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>look at the underlying fundamentals, they're they're pretty strong. Corporate

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 1>America really from a liquidity and a leverage perspective isn't

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:00.080
<v Speaker 1>isn't too extended. And actually the consumers and really a

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>good spot too. UM. They had elevated savings rates during

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>COVID and are really coming into this environment UM fairly

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 1>well protected to with with some ability to absorb the

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>impact of inflation like we saw today, still kind of

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:16.199
<v Speaker 1>coming in higher than than what most people are expecting, Doug,

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:17.839
<v Speaker 1>we don't talk a lot on this show. I don't

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 1>think about preferred stocks in general and the preferred market.

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:24.199
<v Speaker 1>Give us your kind of thirty second elevator pitch for

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 1>preferred How are you guys thinking about that part of

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the market. Yeah, absolutely so. I think it's important that

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the first takeaways is that this is a

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>high quality investment solution. Most of our issuers are banks

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:39.679
<v Speaker 1>and insurance companies, and those two categories combined account for

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>about eight percent of our issuer base. So at the

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, these are highly rated, typically and

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:50.479
<v Speaker 1>highly regulated issuers, and interestingly enough, both of those sectors

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>arguably benefit the most from a rising rate environment. So

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>so the outlook for the fundamentals in our space are

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty strong. Now, a lot of our preferred securities are

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>either long dated or perpetual nature, so so the thought

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>is by most folks that this must be a long

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>duration or high interest rate sensitivity solution, and so some

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>people could be a little scared by that, but actually,

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, through active management and security selection, you can

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:21.359
<v Speaker 1>actually put a portfolio together with a very reasonable duration exposure.

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 1>For example, our our mutual fund at at the end

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>of the month of March this year was running a

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>duration of just over three years. So so I think

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:35.119
<v Speaker 1>that there are possibilities and UM very attractive ones to

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of the preferred market and and to do

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>so while also managing your your interest rate risk to

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>a fairly reasonable level. What do you think about UM

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Europe or other regions than the US. I mean, you

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 1>say preferred, I think about Volkswagen. You say preferred, I

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:56.319
<v Speaker 1>think about Porsche. Right, these are just they have famous

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>preferred stocks. I don't know if you like them particularly.

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Why do they have famous preferreds? That's that's the doctor trades. Yeah,

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>vow three at g y okay, yeah so, but but

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>it just makes me I mean obviously not banks, although

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>they have massive financial arms. UM. What do you think

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>about the UH outside of the US? UM right now?

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Sure so, so outside the US banks are still very

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>large issuers of preferred It's it's a slightly different categories

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 1>something that we've referred to as contingent capital securities. But

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>definitely here in the US, it seems there's a misperception

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>about how strong these Western European banks aren't. It shocks

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>most people when we put data in front of them,

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and we demonstrate that on average, UH, these banks are

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 1>better capitalized and even our US banks and so so

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>we do think that there are tremendous opportunities, especially in

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Western Europe. Now are there a handful of names obviously

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>we'd like to avoid and maybe some particular regions indeed,

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>but we've we've gone through the Western European bank space

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to pull out things like, hey, how much Russian Ukraine

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:05.079
<v Speaker 1>exposure is there? What if this was all written down,

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 1>what would that mean for for that segment of our market?

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>And and to be honest, with the amount of capital

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>that's in the bank system today in Europe, um, they

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 1>should be well positioned to absorb any any sort of

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>hit or write down UH and and even the knock

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 1>on effects that we expect to hit the European economy,

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 1>those banks should be well positioned. A reminder for everyone

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 1>US banks, European banks, they're stress tested regularly to to

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:38.839
<v Speaker 1>determine whether they can survive dire economic conditions worse than

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:40.559
<v Speaker 1>what we saw in two thousand and eight, two thousand

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and nine. So when people are you know, starting to

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:48.199
<v Speaker 1>raise the specter of of of a recession, that doesn't

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>really bother us too much. In in in in the

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:53.319
<v Speaker 1>scheme of things, good stuff. Doug Baker bringing it today,

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Doug Baker Portfolio Management had to preferred securities at noeu Ven.

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's get over to Michael Dean right now, Bloomberg Intelligence

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:07.959
<v Speaker 1>autos analysts out of London. He covers Volkswagen has been

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:11.679
<v Speaker 1>doing a bang up job of it for years. In fact, Um, Michael,

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the calls that you made UM are

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:18.560
<v Speaker 1>are now coming true. At the main one of them

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>being that UM, folks Wong is finally gonna I p

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:24.079
<v Speaker 1>O Porsche. Before we get into the Scout announcement, which

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm pumped about, UM, talk to us about the Porsche

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I p O and how how important this is, How

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>big is this going to be for a company that has, like,

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, ten other brands, Hi, good morning. So yes,

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:42.439
<v Speaker 1>if you look at some you know what's happening to

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:45.559
<v Speaker 1>Tesla in terms of the market capitalization. If you look

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>at Ferrari, you look at the very strong valuations that

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:51.679
<v Speaker 1>that luxury brand has, and then you look at Volkswagen,

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>which is trading on near crisis multiples. It's very important

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>for them to do something and by I poing Porsche,

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>they can actually extract some value for shareholders and hopefully,

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:04.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, Porsche will be valued at a similar sort

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>of level to to Ferrari Volkwagon. By the way, Volkswagen

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 1>trades for about eighty eight billion euros in total right,

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>which is like a tenth of Tesla. How much is

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Porscha going to be worth post ipl so we think

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>it could be worth up to eighty billion euros, so

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 1>so almost the market cap of its parent company in total.

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>So this is huge for the company. Why is Volkswagen

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>trade at such a discount? Dude? Imagine this means you

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>get Bentley, Lamborghini, UH Party, CRT, Scolder, Volkswagen. I don't

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>know what I'm missing, all for free Audi, all for

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Let me ask the expert, Michael Dean. Why is that? Well,

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>you just look at any European auto company or any

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 1>legacy auto company. They're trading on crisis multiples, which means

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>that it's effectively the market saying that their their ice business,

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>their internal combustion engine business um will take them down

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>or or the company won't exist in the future, even

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 1>though they're spending huge amounts and they're going to convert

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>very quickly to too battery electric vehicles, so it's a

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>very tough market valuation for them at the moment. Well,

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>let me talk to you about Herbert DS because I'm

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna interview in this afternoon. I've been following this guy

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>since he came from BMW. He produced one of my

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>favorite motorcycles there, the r N and t UM among

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>other things. But now at Volkswagen he has led up.

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Can I say ball to the wall, charge towards electrification,

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>towards the future? Um is he? Do you think doing

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>doing all the right things now? I think so? I

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>mean partly, Um, you know they're big charge into battery

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 1>electric so I think you know, Volkswagen can overtake Tesla

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of volumes for battery electric vehicles in two

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>thousand twenty four, but indirectly because of what happened with

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>diesel gates, Volkswagen was kind of forced into battery electric vehicles.

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>But Deese has sort of taken the helm and he's

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>really pushed and you know, they're they're way forward in

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>terms of their transition compared to other legacy bronze. He

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>has no blood on his hands from diesel Gate. By

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the way. It's personally a sad, a very sad story

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>for me because I love a diesel power train. I don't.

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I just adore I still have a diesel. You haven't,

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Isn't it great? My first car that I ever bought

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>with my own money was Audi a four two point

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>five t D I. I loved it. My new favorite

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>power train is GM's Babydramax, a little in line six diesel.

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I think they're fantastic propulsion systems and given where pump

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 1>prices are, I mean the economical as well, So I'm

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>very happy to have a diesel at the moment. All Right,

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Michael talked to us just about the car industry in general. Like,

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the questions I have is just, you know,

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, kind of the average production with

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 1>sixteen seventeen million cars a year, I'm told we're not

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>going to see that again. How do you think about

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 1>production and inventory levels at the dealers? Matt's gotta wait

0:16:56.520 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>like eighteen months for his truck. Is that the new normal? Yeah?

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 1>It's so interesting at the moment. So, you know, initially

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 1>we had these production shortfalls because the semiconductor constraints. Now

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:10.199
<v Speaker 1>we've had other supply issues on the back of the

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine War. So so yeah, we look at the first

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>quarter results this year, many automakers their production was down,

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 1>but their margins are up. So they finally realized that

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>they don't have to go for volume, and actually it's

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 1>probably a good thing for profitability for the industry. That's

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>they're producing fewer cars, they're producing higher marching cars, and

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 1>they're producing less of you know, the smaller saloons, which

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:37.159
<v Speaker 1>aren't very popular anymore. By the way, I can't wait, um, Michael,

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>until you come over here to the US and get

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>to ride in my truck. Hopefully I have it by then.

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>But let me tell you something about this truck I ordered.

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 1>It just launched in February. It's a g M. Chevy

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Silverado z R two. They priced at sixty seven, sorry,

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 1>sixty six in February. Then at the end of the month,

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of March, they probably is to raise

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the price to six. Then at the end of March

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:07.360
<v Speaker 1>they raised the price again to sixty nine to five.

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:10.360
<v Speaker 1>So they've raised the price, um, more than three thousand

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>dollars in the space of like two months. Is that normal? Yes,

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I've got another example. I was looking to buy the

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 1>BMW I X so that's sort of X five equivalent

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 1>battery electric vehicle. When I first looked it was eighty

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:26.439
<v Speaker 1>five thou pounds. It's gone up to a hundred and

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>five thousand pounds. So the inflation is real. Yes, it's everywhere,

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and they can get these prices. People are willing to

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 1>pay it. Yeah. And you've got to remember the most

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:40.920
<v Speaker 1>vehicles of finance now, so um, it's whether you extend

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the finance over another year, so you make the monthly

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:45.400
<v Speaker 1>payment the same, so that it's not really hitting consumers

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 1>pockets at the moment. So are the days over? Michael?

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>And we we pull into a lot and it's just

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:54.920
<v Speaker 1>dozens and dozens and maybe hundreds of cars on a

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 1>dealer's lot, and we get the have a little bit

0:18:57.680 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 1>of a negotiation over the race you're gonna pay. Are

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>those days over for consumers? Yeah? I think so. I

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>mean in Europe that was never the model, you always

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 1>ordered the vehicle, and and in the US it's probably

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>better for the manufacturers if it goes that way, because

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:14.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, you probably have more options, and options are

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 1>very profitable as you know for cars, So so for

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>long run, profitability. Um, yeah, I think it's better for

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the car makers, and that's the way it's going to

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>go in the US as well. All Right, I'm keeping

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 1>my two thousand fourteen BMW five thirty five I in

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:31.639
<v Speaker 1>Duke Blue with manual transmission. Dude. It's a great engine,

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a great transmission, and I don't see anything wrong

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 1>with keeping that. Um, I gotta uh, just a minute

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 1>left here, Michael, What do I ask Herbert D's today?

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 1>What should what should my most important question for the

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Folkswagon be this afternoon? I just confirmed that

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 1>they're going to ibi Porsche in the fourth quarter. Um,

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:55.439
<v Speaker 1>that would be the key item of my agenda. But

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:58.200
<v Speaker 1>also just about battery electric vehicles. So he's talking about

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the cost of batteries or the equivalent cost of of

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:04.639
<v Speaker 1>a BEV compared to Anne being pushed back maybe a

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>year or two. So when will cost be comparable? Originally

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>we thought it was gonna be two tho. We forgot talk.

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:13.719
<v Speaker 1>We forgot to and probably to you, it didn't you

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>weren't you weren't um you know, slobbering over a scout

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 1>as a young teen, Michael, because I never had the

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>scout you've never had it, but it's so cool for

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the US. I mean, does Volkswagen as a brand really

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 1>have a chance in America? Well, they suddenly do on

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:32.439
<v Speaker 1>on the Beth side of things, um, and they've got

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>good market show at the moment, so they're catching up

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 1>with Tesla. There's suddenly in with a chance on the

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 1>new power trains. Yeah, the battery electric vehicles they had,

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the I D four is quite cool. The microbus, everybody's

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:45.400
<v Speaker 1>waiting for that. Greg Jarrett's waiting for that to come back,

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and then the and then the new Scout will be

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>like a Rivian competitor. Michael Dean, Bloomberg Intelligence analyst, uh,

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 1>covering autos for US at Alan and great to have

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 1>you on the program. Thanks so much for joining us,

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and do tune in later this afternoon. I'm Inberg Television

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 1>and Radio from my interview with the CEO of Folkswagen

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Herberts Professional here doing this stuff for living Christian Ladeau,

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:16.360
<v Speaker 1>director of investment research at cap Trust. UM Richard, I'm

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:19.159
<v Speaker 1>just kind of reading some notes here about half of

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the broad US market, we'll call that the Russell three thousand,

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 1>About half are down over from the fifty two week highs.

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 1>That's a bear market? Are are things worse out there

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:32.159
<v Speaker 1>than we think they are in terms of you know,

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:36.919
<v Speaker 1>the equity markets? Good morning guys. Yeah, there's there's a

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:39.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of I don't want to say sketchy, but let's

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 1>say questionable business models in some of those companies. So

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 1>we've we've really had a period of froth that had

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:50.439
<v Speaker 1>to come down, and we're seeing that in the broad

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:54.679
<v Speaker 1>swath of industries, mostly in the tech and health care areas.

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 1>But you know, you talked about real economy stocks, those

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>are the ones holding up a little bit. Are certainly

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 1>the ones in inflation beneficiary areas like energy and materials.

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 1>All Right, So I don't know if you kind of

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>got this message early in your career like I did,

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>which is don't fight the Fed, But if you did,

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of makes investing hard over the next six to

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:19.120
<v Speaker 1>twelve eighteen months because we have a federal reserve that's

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:23.400
<v Speaker 1>certainly in a hiking mode. Indeed it is. And yes,

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>my entire career has been in periods where interest rates

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>are going down. Uh, we don't know yet just how

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>far the Fed will have to go. Consensus has it

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>going to three and a quarter percent by UM at

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 1>least that was the last read, and that was really

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:46.160
<v Speaker 1>predicated on inflation remaining high, and you know, it's too

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>too early to know. I think we have to have

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that debate internally about whether this is a nineteen seventies

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 1>type of inflationary spiral or whether it's more like World

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>War two where the gis came home and did a

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:00.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of spending and there wasn't a lot the goods available,

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and sooner or later that got solved. We had John

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Author's on yesterday. He was comparing what we're watching in

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the markets right now to what we saw in which

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:17.439
<v Speaker 1>which was a little bit uh scary, to be honest.

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about valuations here? Um, What do

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>you think about the possibility of a bottom? What do

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>you think about investors kind of waiting into this and

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>picking things up? Yes, I see a lot of similarities

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to those those pockets of speculative stocks, certainly do. UM.

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:41.640
<v Speaker 1>The prospects of bottoming here is really company by company

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and industry by industry. You have some really attractive stocks

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 1>at current prices. You can get a five six percent

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:54.640
<v Speaker 1>dividend yield with cash flows cheap on earnings, good balance,

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 1>sheets and you're probably going to be fine with that

0:23:57.400 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of stock, but to really get into the specul

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of his stuff, you really need to see inflation come

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>off in the FED, taking the foot off the gas pedal.

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 1>A T and T what you call their Christian You

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:12.199
<v Speaker 1>picked that, you picked the poster child. And what I

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>just said that is the that is a kind of

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>company that I feel has very little downside. Here. You've

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:23.440
<v Speaker 1>got a company that divested the media business that was

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a real drag on that company, and it's saying that

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:30.200
<v Speaker 1>it's going to stay straight and narrow from here. It's

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>going to start raising prices, it's going to start cutting costs,

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 1>and then it gets that evaluation boost to make it

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:40.639
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more in line with its peers Verizon

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and T Mobile, and you can get a thirty percent game.

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:47.640
<v Speaker 1>The stog like that, is this a whole new management

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>team there at A T and T. Because they two

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of the worst acquisitions I can remember, and I covered

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the media industry for thirty years as analyst. Was direct TV,

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:00.880
<v Speaker 1>a business that was clearly on the downside, and then

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>A T and T with I mean buying Time Warner

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 1>in business they didn't really know with a really tough

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 1>capital structure. Is the management has it turned over such

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that you have confidence in their ability. Well, let's just

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:16.880
<v Speaker 1>say this management team has been sufficiently chastised. I think

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the market has given it a clear signal. It had

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>been a dog for five years, and I think it's

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 1>known now that it's not going to be able to

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>do that kind of transaction anymore. In the market simply

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>won't let it. An activist investor would jump in there

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and tell him to stop. But now the management team

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>hasn't turned over to a great extent yet. If they

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:39.119
<v Speaker 1>were to make missteps from here, I think you'd see that.

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>How about the homebuilders there? A lot of folks are

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:44.119
<v Speaker 1>concerned about the homebuilders. I know you have Pulti Group

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 1>on there, but because rates, yeah, rates rates, I mean

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:50.880
<v Speaker 1>prices are already high, um, and now you've got mortgage

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 1>rates rising. Does it make a difference. Oh? Absolutely. This

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:58.200
<v Speaker 1>is in the industry that's likely to hit a recession

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty soon. But that's a beauty of a cycle like this.

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 1>This stuck has peaked a year ago and business has

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:08.639
<v Speaker 1>still been getting good. So in other words, investors know

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:12.199
<v Speaker 1>this is coming, and now the question is what's going

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>to happen a year from now, and I think you're

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 1>going to have a pretty shallow recession. Now, that's that's

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:21.639
<v Speaker 1>where we could debate this. But if we see rates

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>come down, because inflation has come down about six to

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>nine months from now, and you know, we still still

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:30.479
<v Speaker 1>have a structural shortage of housing, we could see the

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:35.920
<v Speaker 1>other side of this housing recession coming real quick, shallow recession.

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>That he's a gaucho, by the way, who Christians a gaucho? UCSB? Oh,

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 1>that's right? Then is there any more beautiful place? And

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I was just I can't imagine going to school in

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a cooler place. How was it? Tell us here on

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the on the East coast? What was it like going

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:59.640
<v Speaker 1>to college at U C. S B. It was horrible

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to know how I ever got myself out of bed boy,

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and it stays like this in the market that I

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>wish I was back there. Yeah, exactly, all right, Christian,

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>good good stuff. We appreciate you coming on. Christian Lado,

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:13.879
<v Speaker 1>he's in director of investment research at cap Trust. Talking

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:15.879
<v Speaker 1>about some of the names that are looking at it again,

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 1>you know some of the names A T and T, Broadcom,

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:21.919
<v Speaker 1>Poulti Group, those are some of the names that they're

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:23.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, allocating some capital too. Here and in the

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 1>markets today, a little bit of a mixed SMP and

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>NADAL up about four to six tenths of one percent

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:31.919
<v Speaker 1>of the nasdac UH that's trading off about half of

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 1>one percent, So a little bit of a mixed market.

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Here is the market digest UH. This CPI print that

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>we had this morning. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews with

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller.

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:52.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller three. Put on fall

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney before the podcast.

0:27:55.960 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.