WEBVTT - Eco Data, Black Friday, Venture Capital

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penl Podcast. I'm Paul swing you.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Brahma Waits. Each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money. Whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Today we got a slew of

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:22.960
<v Speaker 1>better than expected economic data out of the United States,

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>including demand for US business equipment unexpectedly increasing in October

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>by the most since the start of the year. So

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 1>is it the time pop the champagne? Get ready for

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:35.919
<v Speaker 1>a tick up across the board next year? At Dan

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>North joining US now chief economist at North America at

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>youler her mays, Dan, can you give us a sense

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>first of all on how positive today's economic data was? Well?

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I think, first of all, good morning and happy almost

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Turkey day to you. Um. Looking at the month to

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>month data on a number of things this morning, I

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>mean you sighted durable goods, Yeah, it's up for the month,

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>but I tended to take a longer term view, and

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>if you look at core orders were still negative. Year

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>over year negative point eight A year ago that was

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>four point one percent, So the downtrend there. And if

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 1>you look at shipments UM, which go into g d P,

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 1>you know it's point four percent year over year, so

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>that bodes well poorly for fourth quarter g d P.

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>And you know a year ago was four point seven

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>percent UM. And you saw a few other things this

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>morning that looked kind of positive on the surface, but

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:34.839
<v Speaker 1>the biggest one to me is the indicator of the consumer.

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, the consumer has been sort of holding up

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:40.919
<v Speaker 1>the economy at least that's the narrative. Well this morning

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you see, uh, for the most recent data in October,

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>real consumption was only up point one percent to two

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>point three percent the last month of the year over

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>year last month that was two point six percent, was

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>three point two percent last year UM, and real income

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>was down point three So I think that's the most

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>important data of the morning, And certainly if you look

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>at a longer term trend, to me, it's it's distinctly negative.

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>So Dan focusing on the consumer again. The consumers you

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>mentioned has been kind of the bulwark of this economy

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>over the last several quarters. Are you concerned that the

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>consumer may not be able to do its part again

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:28.799
<v Speaker 1>for the economy. I really am. And and here's again

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>as a perfect example, real uh disposable personal income down

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>this month. What I see is, let's holiday sales are

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>coming up, right. I mean, in a few days we're

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>going to get the anecdote reports of how good holiday

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>sales are. And I think they're probably going to be

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. You know, By the way, I love this

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of cynical resignation that everyone who I've spoken to

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>this morning has about Black Friday. Way to go with

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the spirit, carry on. You're like, yeah, they're I said,

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be pretty good. Do we think we've

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>got the exuberance of consumer confidence of the stock markets high? So,

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, over the past few years it's something like

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>four percent holiday sales growth overall, more so on black variety,

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 1>of course. But let's say, you know, the consumer spends

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:21.360
<v Speaker 1>as much as usual for holiday sales, maybe more because

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 1>of the exuberance. I think that sets us up for

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a fall in the first quarter,

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>especially since income is trending down, and that's what really

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>gives us a concern about a future slowdown. We think

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>growth in the first quarter could be flat even Dan,

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you think there could be a US recession in or

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe we think there's definitely going to be a sharp slowdown.

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>We're looking at something like one point six percent GDP

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:53.839
<v Speaker 1>for all of you know this past year is two

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>point so for sure a significant slowdown, and if this

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>trade war picks up, you know, that could really knock

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>half or one percentage point off a GDP, And in

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>our world, that's a lot, Dan, sound go ahead. I

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>was just gonna say, we still do think that there's

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:18.359
<v Speaker 1>a possibility of recession, but certainly a slow down, no

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.039
<v Speaker 1>question about that. Dan. I'm trying to square what you're

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>saying with the consensus right now among at least Wall

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Street analysts which believe that who believe that the US

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>equity market is going to do very well, particularly in

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:32.159
<v Speaker 1>the first quarter or first half of the year, with

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>some accelerating growth. Why are they getting it so wrong?

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't start they're getting it wrong about the stock market.

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Number one. Two things, you know, we are really involved

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 1>in trade credit and we have to have a more

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>realistic approach to what's actually happening to business on the

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 1>front lines, and we're seeing an absolutely distinct deterioration there.

0:04:55.160 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>But the important point is um, the stock market isn't

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:04.799
<v Speaker 1>necessarily connected to the economy a lot of the time.

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>For instance, if you go back and look at the

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:11.840
<v Speaker 1>past ten recessions, the stock market only gave you some

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:15.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of warning three times, So it's not at all

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 1>uncommon for them to disconnect. So I can't argue with

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the banks and brokerages who want to sell investments who

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 1>were saying, yes, stock Mark is going to be great. Well,

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:27.279
<v Speaker 1>it could well be, you know, with low interest rates,

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's not a connection to the economy necessarily. Dan North,

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us, Dan Northeast, chief economist

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 1>for North America. For Euler Ermez joining us on the

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 1>phone from charm City, Baltimore, Maryland. Appreciate his comments. Time

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 1>to check in with Bloomberg Opinion. We're joined by opinion

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>calumnists retail columnists. Our house actually covers all things retail

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Opinion. She joins us from the Washington d

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 1>C Bureau. Sarah, thanks so much for joining us. Black

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Friday coming up, Cyber Monday coming up. What is the

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:15.720
<v Speaker 1>expectation for holiday sales this year? Yeah? So I think

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the expectations are largely upbeat for the season. Overall holiday

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 1>sales are expected to be up about four percent, and

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:25.159
<v Speaker 1>that's because consumers are feeling pretty good. And you know,

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>we saw quite a mixed bag of retail earnings results

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>in the last couple of weeks, with some strong performers

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and some weak performers. But I think that just suggests that, uh,

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>for for the ones that are executing well and do

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 1>have a good strategy, there are plenty of dollars out

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 1>there to to win and be fought for this season. Sarah,

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about Black Friday. This is the cliche of

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>people lining up at three am to bust through the

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:52.359
<v Speaker 1>doors and these manufactured televised events, And I'm wondering, is

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 1>that the reality anymore? Or is the vast amount of

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Black Friday shopping online? So it's definitely not the reality

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:03.839
<v Speaker 1>anymore more, folks are this isn't increasingly digital holiday. There

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 1>will be seven point five billion dollars spent online alone

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>on holiday and quotes, we're gonna just put that in

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>quotes but carry out. Yes, but we so certainly Black

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Friday is becoming more and more of a digital occasion. However,

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>stores still really matter a lot, and there will be

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>big crowds in the stores. Uh, both Thanksgiving evening when

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the retailers kick off their big deals events,

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and and all throughout the weekend. Um. You know, for

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the holiday season, overall, only about of shopping will happen online. Uh.

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 1>The vast majority of it will still happen in stores. Sir,

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>What are gen Z folks? How are they shopping? I

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>know they do a lot of e commerce, but did

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>they what is their store bricks and mortar experience? Are

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>actually even going to the malls? So interestingly they are,

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>in fact, they shop a lot more like us, older

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>than you might imagine. Um. So for purchases like food

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and beverage, they're still doing, you know, something like ninety

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>one to their shopping in stores for items like apparel,

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>seventy percent of their shopping in stores, and they actually

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>say in surveys they liked the experience of being in

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>a store. When we talk about this weekend specifically, uh,

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Deloyte did some survey work around this and asked, folks,

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>will you be out shopping with family and friends? Gen

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Z was most likely to respond amongst people who were

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>going to go to stores this weekend. Gen Z was

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>most likely to respond that they were doing it in

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>a social way, that they were doing it with family

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and friends. And I think if you've never been out

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>on Black Friday before, I've been doing this for seven

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:34.839
<v Speaker 1>years now as in my capacity as a reporter UM,

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and this is consistent with what you see is that

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>there aren't a lot of people out in the stores

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>this weekend who are just trying to check off their

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 1>gift list and you know, being very task oriented and

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 1>errand oriented. This is a social event. This is something

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 1>that people like to do with their family and friends.

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Are sort of a sport or ritual. I'm wondering about

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>this data that we got out today. UM. Retailers were choice.

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>This is on the Bloomberg terminal. There's never been a

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>better time to buy heading into a Black Friday, and

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>this was a look at buying conditions in the US

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>advancing to the highest ever levels. Does that foretell something

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>in your mind? And and sort of where they may

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 1>be shopping too, you know, I think that in terms

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>of where they're going to be shopping this year, I

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>think the winners are going to be the retailers that

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>have done the best job of kind of integrating their

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>online and in store experiences. I think Walmart, Target in

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Best Buy are clear examples of that, where it's easy

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to ping pong back and forth between their websites and

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>between their stores to place an order online and pick

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>it up in the store, or to browse in the

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 1>store and go and buy online later. I think those

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>kinds of factors are what's going to be shaping people's

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 1>purchasing decisions most and of course where the discounts are.

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>There's no doubt that this is a very deals oriented weekend, UH,

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and that that is shaping a lot of the decision

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>making about where dollars gets spend. Sir, with all the

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>changes in consumer spending, e commerce and so on, just

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:57.079
<v Speaker 1>give us a sense of how important still is this

0:09:57.160 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>how they shopping period for retailers, the all shopping period

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>is critically important. UM. It's more important for some retailers

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>than others. So toy stores, jewelry stores, for example, h

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>they do draw a more disproportionate share of their sales

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>during the holiday season than say a bookstore. UM. So

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 1>it varies by retailer, but this is a really important

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>time of year, not only for the actual dollars that

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 1>are pulled in, but just because it's a chance to

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>make an impression with a consumer that you know, in

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the case of an apparel store, you might only see

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>two or three times a year, right, And so if

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>you're not showing them when they come into your store

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 1>or pull up your website that you have good merchandise,

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>that you have good pricing, that you're sort of aspirational

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and inspirational, that kind of sets a tone that will

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:42.680
<v Speaker 1>stick with that consumer for the rest of the year.

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's a very important, uh, several weeks for the

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>retail industry. Sarah how Zac, thank you so much for

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 1>being with Sarah. How's that covers all things retail for

0:10:52.640 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Opinion Up, Well, it is the day before Thanksgiving.

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>People are gearing up for family and friends and food

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and also for a lot of us shopping on maybe

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>even tomorrow evening heading into Black Friday and Cyber Monday.

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>To get a preview, we welcome Mark Hamrick, senior economic

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst at bank rate dot Com, joining us on the

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:28.839
<v Speaker 1>phone from Washington, d C. Mark, Thanks so much for

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>joining us. I love to get your thoughts on how

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:34.319
<v Speaker 1>you think this holiday shopping, Stevens is going to kick

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>off on it's called Friday. Sure, good to be with you,

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Paul and Lisa. Well, I'm sure it'll start off with

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>a bang. Obviously, through this shopping period, which truly begins

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>before November one, Americans indicated they would start their holiday

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>shopping in that time. Hold on a second, when is

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 1>it just shopping? I mean, if you're starting before November one,

0:11:57.920 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>can we just call it shopping or is it this

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>typically for the holidays? So I think it's an intention

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>to buy holiday gifts. And I think from a consumer

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>standpoint that's quite wise because we know that this industry

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:12.319
<v Speaker 1>is promotional almost all the time anymore because it's so competitive.

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>And from a bank RT perspective, I also like the

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:17.200
<v Speaker 1>idea of not sort of taking the hit to the

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>either the bank account or the credit cards, um, you know,

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 1>uh late in the year, if if you have the

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>ability to spread out those purchases. So to ask your

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>question from a bank reat data perspective, we did ask Americans,

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>by the way, and just published this survey this week

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>whether they intend to spend more or less or about

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the same, and of Americans said they intend to spend

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>about the same as last year, only said they'd spend more,

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>said they'd spend less. We know the Yeah, So how

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>does this cohere with the idea that this is the

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 1>best time ever for consumers and that they're more confident

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>than ever heading into Black Friday? Um, I, you know,

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess the question best time for consumers? I I'd

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:00.160
<v Speaker 1>want to play that out a little bit and and

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 1>have an idea about how that works exactly. But there's

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>plenty of competition out there, and between online and brick

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and mortar, you certainly can uh pick and choose, and

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:15.839
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the apparel world, where it feels like that

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:18.559
<v Speaker 1>is sort of yesterday's news in the sense of things

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:22.199
<v Speaker 1>to have. So um, you know, I think also consumers

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>are always consuming, right, and so the question is, you know,

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:26.599
<v Speaker 1>I think for a lot of people who are you

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:30.079
<v Speaker 1>might call them well qualified consumers, what do they need?

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>And for many the answer is not much? And I

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>think that's one of the reasons why purchase of experiences

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 1>has become more of a thing, because you can always

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>have more experiences, but we don't necessarily need another sweater.

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:44.319
<v Speaker 1>So Mark, give us a sense of from your survey work.

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Are people gonna spend money they have. Are they going

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:49.839
<v Speaker 1>to rack up some debt here going into the holiday season. Yeah,

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 1>And of course that's one of our key concerns, right,

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and I think it should be our concern as a

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 1>society or as a nation as well. And so I

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>suppose the good news here is that a slight majority

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.679
<v Speaker 1>fifty said that they're going to spend money that they

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>already have. And then of those who gave us an answer,

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>in other words, if they had an idea about where

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>they would use their financial resources, said they'd use some

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>combination of credit. In that mix, only about six indicated

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>that they would use either most or all with credits

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>only six percent, or go leaning heavily on the plastic

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, which raises a question in my mind. We've

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>heard about the strength of the consumer powering the economic

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>recovery in the United States over the past five ten years.

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to understand how much this has been done

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 1>on credit and how much further it has to go,

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>given the fact that rates are still low, but that

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>we are starting to see delinquencies chack up a bit,

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>at least in credit cards and auto loans. Well, rates

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>are low from a credit card perspective, right. Uh. You know,

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>we survey this all the time, and the average rate

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>for consumer credit card is cent. Of course, you don't

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 1>need to take that eighteen percent hit if you're paying

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the balance off within the month and then store cards

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>are above twenty UM. So you know, I love the

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>use of reward oriented credit cards personally, but I loathe

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the idea of allowing those balances to go beyond thirty days.

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>But to your question, I think it has as far

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to go as the economic expansion has far to go,

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and as long as we can have actual gains and

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:26.239
<v Speaker 1>income or wages that is above the rate of inflation

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and so um. You know, I think that is sort

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>of the conundrum to use an Allen Green Spanish word,

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>uh that you know, while the FED is sort of

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 1>fighting to get inflation up to its would be target, uh,

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lot of consumers are sort of saying, hey,

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, what about education? What about healthcare? Those

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 1>should matter more, shouldn't they because those have the outsize

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>impacts on our on our finances, and they do matter

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Right, So what are we hearing and or

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>what are you seeing out there as it relates to

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>gen Z about how they're buying stuff out there. Are

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>they still buying stuff? Are they just more into experiences? Yeah,

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>this is a great question, and I'm glad you asked

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>it because I think this may be one of the

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that is going to be most

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>fascinating in the period to come. And So for those

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>who aren't all into the cohort categories here, we're talking

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>about those who are age eighteen to twenty two. And

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>of course millennials are perhaps the most talked about UM

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and to some degree take the most heat in print,

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>etcetera via views of the words latte and avocado toast,

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and I get a little tired of that. But but

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the real reality is that the gen Z folks are

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>really looking to be shaking things up with respect to

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 1>UH for example, looking to buy uh, you know, gently

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>used clothing for example. And when we ask people who

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>is focused on saving as a reason why they're not

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 1>spending more gen Z again, those eighteen to twenty two

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>popped up by far at the top of the list.

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>That was so, you know, these are the people who

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 1>truly have been digital only all their lives. Some of

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the millennials were a bit of a mix between analog

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:07.479
<v Speaker 1>and digital. And I think that there's a back uh

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 1>lash to that, just the same as in some ways

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:13.679
<v Speaker 1>the rest of society is having a backlash attack. Um.

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, tech is has become the punching bag that

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the bankers were ten years ago. Uh and and so,

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think that there are some valid reasons for that, right,

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the fact that people can be bullied in that space,

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and they also want to have touch points. Sure, and

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>there is now a shift towards some more social affairs

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 1>in addition to a big tech. Mark Cameric, thank you

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 1>so much for being with us. Mark Camerck is a

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>senior economic analyst with Banquet dot Com, joining us from Washington,

0:17:44.119 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>d C. The years of the unit corn of given

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>way to a year of skepticism with some high profile

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>misses when it comes to we Work and other darlings

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:11.160
<v Speaker 1>of the venture capital space. But this doesn't really paint

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the whole picture. Joining us now, Matt Miller, chief executive

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 1>officer of and broker, joining us from San Francisco. Matt,

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:21.359
<v Speaker 1>you've been surveying the venture capital space, but not just

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 1>the mega deals or the mega companies within the sector.

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 1>Can you give us a sense of what you're looking at. Yeah, sure,

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:32.120
<v Speaker 1>thank you. We work with thousands of venture back companies.

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Our company build an online platform for insurance, and venture

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:39.359
<v Speaker 1>back companies are one of our main customer segments. So

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>we get data from thousands of back companies, both small

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:44.879
<v Speaker 1>ones and large ones, and a few days ago we

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>publish a report with our findings on all of the

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:49.880
<v Speaker 1>data from twenty nineteen that we see across the entire

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:52.880
<v Speaker 1>venture industry. So what are some of the key takeaways

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>from your report, Because, again, as Lisa suggested, the VC community, uh,

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley broadly defined, has taken some lump here in

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the public market. Look, I mean, I think when you

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>look at the numbers, there's a lot of talk about

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 1>funding slowdown or were expecting one, but you don't really

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 1>see it yet. I think what we see as funding

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>activity is still quite strong, particularly in early in middle

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>stage investments, and so I think that we also see

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:20.160
<v Speaker 1>companies that are still able actually to raise pretty sizeable

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:24.120
<v Speaker 1>amounts of money despite having relatively small or even being

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>pre revenue. So I think from a deal activity standpoint,

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 1>at least right now, you still see investors trying to

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:32.400
<v Speaker 1>lean in and get deals done. How about the actual companies,

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>how are they doing. I think, you know, obviously it

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>varies across the span. I mean, there are companies that

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>are doing quite well, companies that are potentially slowing down

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and starting to hordcasts. I think one interesting tech trend

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:46.439
<v Speaker 1>we see when we look at the data is that

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>companies in California certainly are hiring fewer people relativity the

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:53.120
<v Speaker 1>amount of funding that they're raised than companies and other

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>parts of the country. I think obviously a part of

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that is just due to the cost of hiring here,

0:19:57.080 --> 0:19:58.439
<v Speaker 1>but I think a part of it could also be

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 1>companies that are trying to preserved capital. What are the

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>sectors right now that vcs are allocating maybe more money

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:10.400
<v Speaker 1>than maybe we've seen in the past. Yeah, I think

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:13.120
<v Speaker 1>certainly one of the things that we see is fintech

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>continuing to be particularly strong um both in terms of

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 1>average size of deals and overall deal flow UM. So

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:22.679
<v Speaker 1>I think that's an area where both just judging from

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the investor sentiment that we connect with but also looking

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>at the numbers, that I think we should expect to

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 1>see uh pretty wide and continued pattern of growth for

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:33.920
<v Speaker 1>fintech companies. But also I think we start to see

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>UM still still some decent traction and consumer goods and

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 1>consumer hardware and so companies that have had a couple

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of big accepts in the space, and I think there's

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:45.719
<v Speaker 1>investors that are still leaning in. Can you give us

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>a sense of the investments made by the venture capital

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:51.719
<v Speaker 1>community and sort of the trend line of them. Are

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:54.399
<v Speaker 1>they increasing, are they decreasing? Are they tending to shift

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>more towards the higher bigger companies, are the smaller ones?

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:00.920
<v Speaker 1>What are you seeing? Yeah? Um, I think we see

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:03.439
<v Speaker 1>in general it depends a little bit on the sector,

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>but overall continent UH pattern of growth. If you look

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>at the deal volume of total funding, I think you

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>know you do see a lot of still large growth

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:16.640
<v Speaker 1>deals coming into relatively small number of startups that are

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:19.439
<v Speaker 1>those that have the most traction momentum. But when you

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>broaden the aperture and look across the entire spectrum, I

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>think you continue to see UH a reasonably strong amount

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:28.639
<v Speaker 1>of activity, and not just in the usual places of

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>California and New York, but I think small venture deals

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>are getting done increasingly across the entire country. I think

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 1>one thing we definitely see is that as companies start

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>to branch out. Even though San Francisco is still the

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:42.120
<v Speaker 1>bulk of where we see most funding activity, there are

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>places like Utah and Texas where we're starting to see

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>a growth of startups and a growth of some early

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 1>stage deals as investors get more comfortable with technology companies

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:53.919
<v Speaker 1>being built outside of just the Bay Area. Man, I

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>know there's UM seed rounds, Series A, Series B. Are

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 1>all those kinds of rounds as conscious of those? Do

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 1>they share similar similarities in terms of strength or lack

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 1>of strength? It's a good question. Actually probably not. It

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>really depends. I think you can look at companies UM

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>that you call around a seed round or call around

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a Series A that have wildly different sizes of revenue

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:19.879
<v Speaker 1>and a number of employees, And so to some degree,

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the naming nomenclature really just varies depending on

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>how companies are trying to UH position themselves. But I

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>think you do see certain trends like to raise a

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>series A round. I think you most companies want to

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:36.440
<v Speaker 1>have UH an established business model, real revenue in the door.

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not quite a proven traction, but UM certainly enough

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>points where you know you can justify a larger size

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:44.679
<v Speaker 1>of investment, and companies that move on to a series

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>B of call it, you know, ten to fifteen million

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>dollars or more, tend to have a repeatable business model

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:51.880
<v Speaker 1>where you know you're doing something that works. People are

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>generally can see the pattern and see how you can

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 1>go into a much larger business. So, even though I

0:22:56.520 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 1>think there are differences specifically between companies at the at

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 1>each round, right, you do see some transmit that tend

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 1>to continue. Matt Miller, thanks so much for joining us.

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:08.439
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate your thoughts on the venture capital world. Matt Miller's

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of M Broker. They've just put out a

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>report kind of detailing their views kind of what they're

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:16.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing in the venture capital community. And I think it's

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a Tommy discussion because, as you mentioned, Lisa, twenty nineteen,

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 1>we came into the year thinking, boy, we're gonna really

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 1>spread the wealth of the venture capital and private equity

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 1>community to the public markets and public investors with you know,

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the Ubers and lifts of the world and we works

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 1>of course, uh and some of those big high profile

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 1>deals obviously been very disappointing for public equity investors. So um,

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the story we hear from the VC communities. Yes,

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 1>there were some big disappointments, but there's a lot of smaller,

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 1>midsized deals that continue to work well. Thanks for listening

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:49.360
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. Paul Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:57.639
<v Speaker 1>Sweeney and Lisa abram Boy It's I'm on Twitter at

0:23:57.680 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Lisa A. Bramwoit's one before the podcast. You can always

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.