WEBVTT - Broadcom Soars, New French PM 

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:12.119
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cardplay and Android

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 2>outo with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 2>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to go back to the stock market and

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 3>look at shares of Broadcom up a whopping nineteen percent.

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 3>I want to get more with kushon so Bonnie and

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Intelligence senior semi analyst, so we know the story.

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 3>The numbers for its AI revenue were super high. Their

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:38.879
<v Speaker 3>outlook looked really good. Is it justified in a one

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:40.520
<v Speaker 3>trillion dollar valuation right now?

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 4>Look going into the earnings, the top concerns where how

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 4>is AI going to do next quarter? What are the

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 4>numbers looking like for twenty twenty five and sort of

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 4>no visibility beyond that. So can this rarey sustain those

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 4>numbers that are driving the stock?

0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 5>Really gives investors three to three to.

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 4>Four years quantifiable target and milestone to look at and

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 4>now just track the execution.

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 5>And those numbers are pretty huge.

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean you're talking about three to four x fold

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 4>growth in just the Sam just from his three customers,

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 4>not even including the additional two that they're working on.

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 6>So Kulj help us think about Broadcom now in comparison

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 6>to Nvidia and maybe even some of the other players.

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 6>How's this industry as it relates to AI? How is

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 6>it shaking out here?

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:29.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 4>I mean when you look at Broadcom just barely six

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 4>months or a year ago, people didn't even think of

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 4>it as an AI company, right. It was primarily the

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:40.919
<v Speaker 4>investor base. It was really loved for his free cash flow,

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 4>generating ability, highly profitable, sustainable, slow, mid to high, high

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 4>single digit grower. Now suddenly AI is going to become

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 4>a huge chunk of its semi connective revenues. And in combination,

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 4>you still have the software revenues at high margin generating

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:00.639
<v Speaker 4>significant amount of cash. So you have this really growing

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 4>and media type or even growing faster in certain areas

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 4>going forward than in AI story. Along with all the

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 4>goodness of what do you want from a large gap

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:11.839
<v Speaker 4>which is high profitability, high operating margin, high free cash

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:12.799
<v Speaker 4>flow for the.

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 3>Non AI stuff like the chips that go into like

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 3>phones and cars and all that kind of stuff, How

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 3>is that part of the business doing? Because it hasn't

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 3>been doing very well. We've were waiting for their cycle

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 3>globe recovery to kind of kick up.

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 7>Where do Broadcom land on this.

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean they are aligned very well to what

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 4>rest of the cyclical semis are doing. I mean, look,

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 4>twenty four was the bottom for.

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 5>Most of its business.

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:39.359
<v Speaker 4>We do expect recovery starting early next year, but it's

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 4>going to be really slow turning corners, so we don't

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 4>expect any sort of fireworks there. But the good news

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 4>is the way AI is expected to grow, that portion

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 4>of the business is going to shrink and become a

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 4>significantly smaller part of the chip business.

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:56.519
<v Speaker 6>All right, So as you step back from the semispace

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 6>these days, Kunjan, what are the conversations you're having about

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 6>the space in general? Is it in Vidia all the time?

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 6>Do I want to own a basket of these things?

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 6>What are some of the conversations you're having with your

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 6>investor clients.

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the top question is sort of searching for the

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 4>next in media, trying to add more and more AI

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 4>exposed names and who else in the semi sector and

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 4>the peripheral sectors, whether it's foundries, whether it's memory, whether

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 4>it's semiconductor equipment providers can benefit from this broadening AI boom.

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 4>You know, the first beneficiary, almost entire.

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 5>Beneficiary, was just one name in media. So that's a

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 5>conversion we have and we have been actually.

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 4>Calling out Broadcom and Marvell for quite a while now

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 4>that these are going to be sort of the next

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 4>set of beneficiaries from the coverage that we cover.

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 3>When we take a look at Broadcom though, and the

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 3>stock reaction in the near term, are we borrowing faith

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 3>from like twenty twenty five or twenty twenty six, or

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 3>is this like legit comp number rally?

0:03:56.080 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 4>I mean, there is definitely a huge weightage given on

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 4>their ability to execute to that large sam that they

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 4>have laid out. You know, investors have been who have

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 4>been following Hawk for many years, don't take what he

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 4>says lightly.

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 5>There's a big degree.

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 4>Of conviction in what Hawks is and can deliver. So

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 4>there's definitely a huge reliance in what you see in

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 4>the stock movement that they will be able to sort

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:23.479
<v Speaker 4>of meet or execute on those numbers.

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 6>So is the when we see like a big number

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:32.280
<v Speaker 6>coming out of the likes of Broadcom, does that give

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 6>you pause for the NVIDIAs story that maybe there's a

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 6>market share shift going along, that maybe the competition is

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 6>starting to step up here.

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 5>Not in the near term.

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 4>Look, the merchant silicon GPU that and media sells versus

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:50.839
<v Speaker 4>the custom that Broadcom does right now are being used

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 4>for two different use cases, and both of those use

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 4>cases that demand is booming, right, so it's a win

0:04:56.520 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 4>win for everyone right now. Eventually, in theory, if this

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 4>demand rarely does normalize and there is some kind of digestion, Look,

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 4>there's only so much these hyperscalers will spend, right, So

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 4>eventually down the road we will come to a point

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 4>where they will have to decide do they want to

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 4>spend more in their custom and the GPU and what

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 4>are people demanding for. At that point there will be

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 4>wallet share competitiveness, but not at this given point, just

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 4>because the use cases and applications are very different.

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:27.279
<v Speaker 3>They get the majority of their revenue really from Apple

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:30.919
<v Speaker 3>and WT Microelectronics. Right then it comes sort to Alphabet

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:34.239
<v Speaker 3>and Meta with about six to eight percent of its revenue.

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:36.839
<v Speaker 7>Thank you so much. Supply chain analysis function on the terminal.

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 3>Are they trying to diversify that in a meaningful way

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 3>or are they comfortable with that sort of waiting.

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 4>I think it's just organically going to get diversified.

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 4>The wireless from Apple is not a fast growing business.

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 4>It's a sort of mid single digit at best. Right, So,

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:54.839
<v Speaker 4>and there are some concerns around that it's too mature

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 4>to talk about it. But even if you assume that

0:05:56.800 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 4>business continues, and like the speed at which the AI

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:01.280
<v Speaker 4>business is.

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:03.720
<v Speaker 5>Going to increase, the speed at which Google.

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 4>Meta and these other hyperskillers are become going to become

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 4>a larger portion of broadcom, it is organically going to

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 4>diversify away from the top two customers that you pointed out.

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, John, thanks so much for joining us.

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 5>KU.

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 6>John Sobani, senior analyst on semiconductors. He's over there Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 6>based in our San Francisco office right there in Silicon Valley,

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 6>close to all those big tech companies that he covers.

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 6>So that's a real advantage for us, Sir John Cobani

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 6>Sobani joining us there.

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a heck of a move for a company, you know, one.

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 6>Trillion dollar market cap stock to move twenty percent. I've

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 6>said it when I was seeing some of the moves

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:41.720
<v Speaker 6>from Nvidia, when they were moving ten twenty thirty percent

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 6>a day. This is huge amounts of shareholder wealth being

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 6>created in this space. It just the absolute dollars are

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 6>kind of stunning for to take a look at it.

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 6>So this isn't any penny stock at there.

0:06:55.080 --> 0:07:00.840
<v Speaker 2>So you you're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:04.239
<v Speaker 2>us live weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 2>and Android Otto with a Bloomberg Business Act. You can

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 2>also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 2>York station, Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 7>All right, let's get two overseas.

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 3>We're going to France President Manuel Maulcrant appointing Francois be

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 3>Roux as France's new prime minister to navigate a fractured

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 3>I feel like that's a nice way of saying a

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 3>political landscape and there's a to do list that's very difficult.

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 3>Alan Katz's Bloomberg Paris bureau chief joins us. Now, Alan,

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 3>does he have to get like approved or voted for

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 3>or is he just in power and then he's going

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 3>to make it work.

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 8>So the latter, he's just in power and he has

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 8>to make it work in France. The president gets to

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 8>nominate where he wants as prime minister. So great, so

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 8>now you've got corns by who. But he has to

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 8>get a few things done, most importantly as a twenty

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 8>twenty five budget, and that's what caused his predecessor got

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 8>nay Michel Bannier to get booted out in an confidence

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 8>vote last week.

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>So that's going to be his first order.

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 8>Well, his first order of business really is getting a

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 8>cabinet together, getting in government together, and then it's going

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 8>to be trying to get a twenty twenty five budget passed.

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 8>So that's really the first things he's got to start

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:14.119
<v Speaker 8>to do, and it's not going to be easy.

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 6>So alan, is there any reason to believe that this

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 6>new prime minister will have any better luck with the

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 6>right and the left which caused the demise of the predecessor.

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 8>So that's a good question. I guess the best answer

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:34.839
<v Speaker 8>is maybe he is. He's a centrist, right, so he

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 8>he has been known to do. I mean, originally sort

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:40.439
<v Speaker 8>of his party was more aligned with the sort of

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:42.839
<v Speaker 8>the center right back in the in the eighties and

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 8>the and the nineties, but then he famously voted for

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 8>a socialist for president in two thousand and seven rather

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 8>than the conservative guy, so he sort of he's reached

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:54.439
<v Speaker 8>out to both sides over time. He also was very

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 8>famous for having supported malheinm le Penn's right to run

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 8>for president in two thousand and two and Francis to

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 8>get five hundred signatures and local officials to be able

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 8>to run for presidents, and he said, well, she's very popular.

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 8>We can't not have her run. That would be really

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 8>bad for democracy. I don't support her personally, but I

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 8>supported right to run, and the far right remembers that.

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 8>So he's got sort of possibilities. But then really getting

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 8>people onside is going to be much more difficult. Michelle

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 8>Baarnier the guy again who just got ousted. He sort

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 8>of had the far right on side for a while

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 8>also until they weren't. So far everyone today has been giving,

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 8>I guess, sort of mildly positive comments. They're going to

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 8>say we'll wait and see or what depends on what

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 8>he presents, but it's really not clear that he's necessarily

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 8>going to have any better luck than Michelle Banier did.

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 3>What does The far right and the far left want.

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 8>Very different things, but mostly what they want is someone

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 8>who's going to allow them to look good to their

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 8>voters as they get toward the twenty twenty seven presidential election.

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 8>That's one of the problems that we have in France

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 8>right now, which is that you have this big block

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:04.680
<v Speaker 8>on the left and a big block on the right.

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 8>On the right is led by a woman in Marine

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 8>Le penn and there's the most popular politician in many

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 8>polls in France, and certainly the person who leads polls

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 8>if the next presidential election was to happen today, the

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 8>person who's frequently number two, or if not number two,

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 8>number three is the guy on the far left, Nam

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 8>Jean Luke Bentent Chanp and the two of them are

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 8>definitely looking to the next presidential election. So all of

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:28.680
<v Speaker 8>their decisions in the short term, in terms of what

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 8>happens in parliament, passing a budget or any other laws,

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 8>is all about what does this mean for how voters

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 8>are going to perceive me in twenty twenty seven, And

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 8>that makes for a very difficult relationship because sometimes there

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 8>are things that you might say, well, that's obvious, sure

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:44.079
<v Speaker 8>they should like this, but then they don't. In the

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 8>case of Michaud Valgniert, he basically gave in to most

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 8>of the far rights demands, basically three out of four

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 8>main ones that they had, and they voted, you know,

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:54.679
<v Speaker 8>they voted for emotion of no confidence anyway, because they

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 8>decided it was in their interest, in their longer term

0:10:57.120 --> 0:10:59.959
<v Speaker 8>interest to do so. So that makes it really quite difficult.

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 6>Alan, thank you so much, appreciate your reporting. Alan Katz,

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 6>Paris bureau chief for Bloombergers. How cool is it that

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 6>we get people on the ground, really smart voices pretty

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 6>much everywhere around the world, and they come on the

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:13.559
<v Speaker 6>air with us.

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 7>Very cool.

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 6>That is such a great and they really know what

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 6>they're doing advantage and they know exactly what they're talking.

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 6>I want to ask that next next time we talk

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:20.599
<v Speaker 6>to Alan, how big of a story is it in

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 6>Paris and France the reopening of the Notre Dame, Because

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 6>I when you saw the damage from that fire five

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 6>years I'm like, they're never going to fix that stuff.

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how do you fix that?

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean we went to Paris last summer and it

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:36.679
<v Speaker 3>was like, that's it's never gonna You're gonna be so behind,

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:39.080
<v Speaker 3>And then they did it. I would think the culturally, yeah,

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 3>and the message it sounds is pretty It's pretty spectacular.

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 6>I mean I give my Corona pat on the back

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 6>and the French people pat on the back because that

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 6>was awesome.

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to go prices and fuel prices, prices and

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:51.320
<v Speaker 1>fuel prices. I get it. So we'll have more on

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 1>that coming up.

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:11:57.080 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, card playing and

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 2>out with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:07.199
<v Speaker 2>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 3>All right, so we get the Fed on Wednesday, highly

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 3>expect to cut rates in December. The question then becomes

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 3>what happens in twenty twenty five if that neutral rays

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 3>moving up, as Bill Dudley, a former FED governor, was

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 3>talking about on surveillance, If he thinks the neutral rate

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 3>is three point five are a little bit higher, what

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:24.839
<v Speaker 3>does that mean then for the trajectory of cuts, And

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 3>then what does it mean for sectors that are really

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:30.200
<v Speaker 3>waiting for those cuts to kick in, like real estate,

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:32.839
<v Speaker 3>maybe private markets, private equity. We want to deb a

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 3>little bit deeper into this with Miguel Sosa, head of

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 3>market research and strategy over Blue Rock. He joins us

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:42.080
<v Speaker 3>now from Dallas, Texas. Before we get to the nitty

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 3>gritty of say, private credit and real estate, just give

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 3>us your broad views on twenty twenty five.

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 9>Yes, thank you, Alex. So we're excited about twenty twenty five.

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 9>We think that the markets are poised to perform well.

0:12:56.720 --> 0:13:00.319
<v Speaker 9>We've seen strong performance for twenty twenty four with a

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:03.679
<v Speaker 9>change in administration. We think that the administration is very

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 9>business friendly, so that should provide an additional tailwind in

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 9>addition to having the high interest rate environment behind us.

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:14.959
<v Speaker 9>And so what we're seeing is gradually moderating interest rates,

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 9>a predictable and shallow decrease in that interest rate curve

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 9>on the short end, stable in the ten year side

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 9>of the interest rate curve of the yield curve. And

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 9>so we think that twenty twenty five will be a

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 9>positive year for all asset classes.

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's talk real estate here.

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 6>Where do you see opportunities in real estate?

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:38.679
<v Speaker 1>Here?

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 6>We've got the Fed cutting rates. I would think that's

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 6>good for that asset class. Where are you guys seeing

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:45.199
<v Speaker 6>the most opportunities?

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 10>Yes, sess correct.

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 9>So reducing the short end of the curve, the Fed

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 9>funds rate is beneficial indirectly for real estate because naturally

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 9>it moderates the cost of capital. We're seeing opportunities in

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 9>the indust space, in the multifamily space, and really in

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 9>the specialty space as well, and so these are all

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 9>sectors that are seeing low vacancy rates, and so that

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 9>helps to drive lease rates up because there is much

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 9>more demand relative to the supply that's available. And if

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 9>lease rates go up, the net operating income goes up.

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 9>ANDI for short, is a key driver of value. So

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 9>what we've seen recently in the last two years is

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 9>the capital values have come down significantly, but NI has

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 9>gone up significantly. So in other words, you can buy

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 9>more real estate at a discount, and that real estate

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 9>is generating more income and so that will hopefully drive

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 9>returns in the future.

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 3>How much of this is predicated on rates being cut

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 3>from the FED and how much of it is just

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 3>sort of the economic cycle.

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 9>I would say the majority is driven by the economic cycle.

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 9>The change in interest rate environment really inflated cap rates,

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 9>which was the main driver why prices were down. But

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 9>unlike the global financial crisis, which was the last big

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 9>drawdown for real estate, there's very strong fundamentals that are

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 9>driving real estate. Currently, like I said, vacancy rates are low,

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 9>and it's much harder to construct new developments new property

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 9>developments today versus fifteen years ago because of inflation, construction

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 9>costs are up. The other factor, for example, specifically for

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 9>the industrial space, is that we're all buying more products

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 9>online and we want them shipped to our houses faster,

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 9>and so that causes demand for warehouses that are closer

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 9>to city centers so they can get to our homes faster.

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 9>But nobody wants warehouses in city centers or close to cities,

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 9>and there's no vacant plots available for those warehouses. So

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 9>there's that inbound as well. And we have examples across

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 9>the board. Data centers for example, another great example, because

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 9>everybody is consuming more and more information constantly every year,

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:14.479
<v Speaker 9>so that drives significant demand for data centers.

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 6>And tay all those warehouses for servicing New York City

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 6>and Philadelphia. The right in my backyard, in John Tucker's

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 6>backyard in Central Jersey, access to the New Jersey Turnpike, Garden,

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 6>State Parkway, all that kind of stuff to eighty seven.

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 6>You can serve both Philadelphia and New York.

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 7>Maybe that's why the UFOs are there. Maybe, yeah, exactly,

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 7>I mean we can make that length exactly.

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 6>Hey, hey, Miguel, let's say I want to go out

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 6>and buy some commercial real estate. Is my bank going

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 6>to lend me money? Where do we get the debt

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 6>financing these days?

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 9>So typically commercial developers will go to specialty lenders, and

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 9>depending on what type of property one is buying. If

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 9>it's a fully developed and occupied building it's stabilized, as

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 9>they say, because the occupancy rate is high, then lenders

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 9>are much more willing to provide capital for that and

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 9>increase the loan to value on that property. But if

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 9>it's a empty plot of land and it's a development project,

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 9>then those are typically construction loans, and so there's a

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:23.640
<v Speaker 9>wide variety of sources for capital. Banks have typically been reluctant,

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 9>especially recently, to provide capital for sectors that are struggling

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 9>from the office space, but there's certainly a broad variety

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 9>of sources of capital, starting from banks all the way

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 9>to individual investors who are happy to provide some of

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:41.120
<v Speaker 9>those short term construction loans.

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:45.120
<v Speaker 3>Before I let you go for say, private credit. Where

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 3>are the opportunities they are going into twenty twenty five.

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 9>Yes, private credit is one of our favorite sectors specifically because,

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:57.159
<v Speaker 9>as I mentioned, the interest rate is in this goldilocks

0:17:57.160 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 9>phase where we aren't in twenty three year twenty four,

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 9>where we don't have that visibility or uncertainty of how

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 9>long and how far interest rates will climb. And so

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 9>interest rates are at a point where the peak is

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 9>behind us, but they're not at zero either, and so

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:19.880
<v Speaker 9>that favors the lenders versus the borrowers. Now you can,

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:24.120
<v Speaker 9>especially in private credit and alternative private credit, you can

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 9>receive nine percent, ten percent even interest rate on loans

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:34.159
<v Speaker 9>to corporations that are established, they're mature, they're cash flowing,

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:38.200
<v Speaker 9>and that are going to pay through that debt until maturity.

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:40.239
<v Speaker 1>Begail, thanks so much for joining us.

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 6>Migel Sosa, head of market research and Strategy at Blue Rock,

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:46.439
<v Speaker 6>joining Ustart talking about the commercial real estate business, and

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 6>of course a commercial real estate business, as is residential

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 6>real estate really dependent upon interest rates.

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:57.119
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:18:57.200 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and royd

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:03.920
<v Speaker 2>Otto with a Bloomberg Business. You can also listen live

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:07.199
<v Speaker 2>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station just

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:09.879
<v Speaker 2>say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 3>Here was a headline that was interesting. Well, I mean,

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 3>I think for anyone listening it was interesting. Is the

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:18.400
<v Speaker 3>Trump advisors are considering raising salt right off limit from

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 3>ten thousand to twenty thousand.

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 7>Why not forty thousands?

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Exactly?

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:26.440
<v Speaker 7>Why justinate it twenty just you know, move it up there.

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure your property taxes.

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 7>It's a good question. If can you multiply third fourteen thousand?

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 7>I think, well, okay, is that about?

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:39.119
<v Speaker 1>That's about around these parts?

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:39.680
<v Speaker 7>Is it a wow?

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 5>Nothing?

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 7>Is it a wow?

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:42.160
<v Speaker 10>That's pans.

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>You go north of New York City into Westchester and

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>that's really low. It's like in the twenties for just

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a regular house.

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 3>I live in an apartment building. Yeah, like a fourteen

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 3>hundred square put apartment building. And every year I feel

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 3>like the property taxes goes up. That's when I knew

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:56.919
<v Speaker 3>I was an adult.

0:19:56.920 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 1>But you're here in Brooklyn.

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm in park Slow Parks is like the non post

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 3>places where people go to head babies and dogs.

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 7>Anyway.

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:07.439
<v Speaker 3>Henry Andaturs is managing partner and director of Economic Policy

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 3>of Beta Partners. And she joins us, how real can

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:11.719
<v Speaker 3>we take this salt tease?

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 11>Very seriously? So good news for you, for sure. I

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 11>commiserate with folks who want it larger. This is the

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 11>minimum I think they have to have for a tax

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 11>bill to pass next year the salt caucus. And indeed,

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 11>a lot of the Republican gains in the House of

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 11>Representatives have come from new voters that they're finding in

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 11>New York, Connecticut, New Jersey, California, states where these salt

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 11>caps are extraordinarily painful, and the members are being very

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 11>clear and vocal.

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:43.360
<v Speaker 10>They've gotten more and more.

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:46.639
<v Speaker 11>Adamant and united over the last seven years since this

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 11>tack built passed that they have to see a change

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 11>to salt if there is any tax title in any

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 11>legislation going forward. So they'll try to get it in

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 11>the first reconciliation bill. If there's a second, they'll try

0:20:56.760 --> 0:20:59.159
<v Speaker 11>to get it into that, and they will threaten their votes,

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 11>which with the zero of a margin in the House,

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 11>means that you have to cater to their requests.

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:08.120
<v Speaker 6>Henrietta, can you give us the latest on the expectations

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 6>for confirmations of some of President Elect Trump's more contentious

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:15.640
<v Speaker 6>nominees for cabinet positions.

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Have we seen any movement one way or the other.

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 11>I think we have a long way to go here,

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:22.959
<v Speaker 11>and you can see the various factions coming out behind

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 11>the scenes trying to sink or lift various candidates. One

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 11>of the things that would make me expect those stories

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:34.919
<v Speaker 11>to continue negatively, for example his nominee hexas or for

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 11>Tulsi Gabbard, is that there are other folks waiting in

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 11>the wings who know that in the event that their

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 11>nominations fail, they could be the ones to gain.

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 10>So there's a lot of.

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 11>Negativity that you see sort of in the behind the

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 11>scenes work, specifically on Tulsi Gabbard.

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 10>I would say that.

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 11>Is going to continue to eat into the next month

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 11>of the conversation, until the negotiations really start in the

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 11>confirmation hearing start and they get these folks up for

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 11>a vote in late January.

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 10>So there's a long way to go.

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 11>I think Chelsea Gabert in particular is pretty empowerlled right now.

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 3>Other news that struck me overnight was the Wall Street

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:12.919
<v Speaker 3>Journal reporting that potentially Trump could get rid of the

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 3>FDIC and put deposit insurance in hands of Treasury now,

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 3>abolishing a whole unit of the government like that would

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 3>be very rare.

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 7>Can you walk me through it? You think of that potential.

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 11>I don't take those claims particularly seriously. One of the

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 11>things that we should just keep is our base case

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 11>is understanding that Congress has the power of verse, and

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 11>that is something that the Supreme Court has stress tested.

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 11>In nineteen seventy four and in other iterations. Bill Clinton

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:39.680
<v Speaker 11>famously tried a line at him Vito where he tried

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 11>to just cancel out entire lines of funding that the federal.

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 10>Government or Congress had authorized. It's just not legal.

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 11>It is unconstitutional and runs a foul of so many

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 11>different things.

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 10>Plus you have a lot of members who.

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:56.360
<v Speaker 11>Get really uncomfortable moving agencies into other auspices. Another example

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 11>to pile on the FDIC thing would be the USTR.

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 11>Electron has said that he's going to put US Trade

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 11>Representative and that office underneath the Department of Commerce, and

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:08.640
<v Speaker 11>immediately you see members come out of the woodwork and say, Hey,

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 11>that's not what we're into, that's not.

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 10>What it's supposed to be. Keep these two things separate.

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 11>That was very similar to what we saw on Trump's

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 11>first term and Ultimately those did not come to pass.

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk DOGE.

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:24.119
<v Speaker 6>It's been a week or so of I guess no

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:27.639
<v Speaker 6>news on kind of that front. Is that whole cost

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 6>cutting aspect, How should we think about that and how

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 6>might that play out in the first one hundred days.

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean we can talk about DOJ, they can

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 11>have committee hearings, they can form caucuses in the House

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 11>and the Senate y'or even bipartisan now in the House.

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:43.880
<v Speaker 10>But let's look at what's really happening.

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:46.959
<v Speaker 11>They just voted on in the House a National Defense

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 11>Authorization Act that increases defense spending by one percent. Next week,

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 11>starting on Sunday, they will roll all out a continuing

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 11>resolution that provides one hundred billion dollars in additional funding

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 11>for hurricanes and typhoons. There is additional a to Ukraine,

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:04.439
<v Speaker 11>there's additional aid to of all host of factors, and

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:07.200
<v Speaker 11>federal spending next year will continue to rise.

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:08.880
<v Speaker 10>Whether DOGE exists.

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 11>In holds meetings or not, federal spending is.

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 10>Going to rise into next year.

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 11>They'll vote on it as soon as Thursday of next week,

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 11>and you can take that to the bank.

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 7>What else are you paying attention to?

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:20.880
<v Speaker 3>As we head out of twenty twenty four into twenty

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 3>twenty five as well, not only from President like Trump

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:25.159
<v Speaker 3>but also President Biden.

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 11>The most important thing for me is watching the Senate

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:31.159
<v Speaker 11>and the House budget committees. I know it sounds fluky,

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 11>but this is the single most important thing to watch

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 11>going into next year. What we've already seen from Senate

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 11>Republican leadership and new leader Fune is that they are

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 11>appreciating and expecting for the tax bill to take all

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 11>year to write. We started off with the Salt Caucus conversation.

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 11>It's because of that one point two trillion dollars revenue

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 11>raiser being completely unpalatable to eighteen members of the House

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:55.199
<v Speaker 11>that they're going to have to negotiate all year on

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 11>a tax bill. So what that first tells me is

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:00.119
<v Speaker 11>that the deficit appetite for the tax bill is going

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 11>to be very controversial. It's very problematic, and they want

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 11>to take that voat much later in the year. They'd

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 11>like to score some smaller sort of red meat wins

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:13.399
<v Speaker 11>on immigration, increasing border spending, increasing energy and oil and

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 11>gas permitting that kind of legislation, and that strategy is

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 11>going to come out on January fourth, when House Republican

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 11>leadership has a meeting with the full Republican Conference to

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:27.680
<v Speaker 11>see if they can tolerate a two reconciliation bill strategy

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 11>or just one.

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 10>So the conversations behind.

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 11>The scenes are already taking place there. Invessors should be

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 11>very much following that right now.

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 10>It has huge.

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:40.120
<v Speaker 11>Implications for tax policy, for immigration, defense spending, deficit spending, bonds,

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 11>everything happening now Henrietta.

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 6>To what extent, if at all, the folks really the

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 6>folks inside the beltwagh that people that are there year

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 6>in year out, do they view President Electrump as a

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 6>lame duck president.

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:58.680
<v Speaker 11>I think there's two ways of looking at that. One

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:02.680
<v Speaker 11>that you have and impetus to actmediately, So that's really

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 11>relevant for them. On the trade front, it takes forever

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 11>to negotiate with foreign nations. We've seen that from twenty seventeen.

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 11>In twenty eighteen, we still do not have a trade

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 11>agreement with the EU, We do not have a trade

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 11>agreement with Canada, with China. So I think the trade

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:20.639
<v Speaker 11>agencies are going to kick off much earlier in the

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:23.679
<v Speaker 11>second truck term than they did in twenty seventeen. That

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 11>year we had to wait the full year for the

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 11>tax builder you're written, and then we could get into

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:30.360
<v Speaker 11>the trade universe. This time, I expect the tax agency,

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 11>excuse me, the tariff agencies USTR, Commerce BIS to come

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:38.120
<v Speaker 11>out guns blazing immediately. So that's acknowledgment that you only

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 11>have four years to operate, and it takes forever just

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 11>to hold a meeting with China to pick out what

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:46.160
<v Speaker 11>location you're going to be meeting in, if they'll even

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 11>come to the table and negotiate with you in the

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 11>first place. So I think Lame Duck has a sense

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 11>of nothing will happen on the trade front. I think

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 11>it means everything needs to happen immediately so that you

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 11>have and are taking advantage of the limited four years

0:26:58.000 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 11>that you do have.

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 3>Which I love how you brought that up, because then

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:03.199
<v Speaker 3>it's a sequencing conversation, right, If you have taxes, you

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 3>have immigration, and you have tariffs, and you what's the

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 3>sequencing of all of that.

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, this sequencing is critical. So the tax bill is

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:12.680
<v Speaker 11>not going to be written until the end of the year.

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 10>The deadline is not till the summer thirty first, They.

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 11>Will not do it until your end Immediately, then you're

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:20.399
<v Speaker 11>going to have tariffs, and the tariffs are a massive

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 11>hit on American consumers one point four billion dollars in

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 11>real income per month hit from just the existing tariffs.

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 10>So when we double them.

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 11>And put them at thirty five percent or higher sixty percent,

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 11>as President life Trump has advocated, that's going to be

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 11>a substantial hit to the US consumer in advance of

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:42.400
<v Speaker 11>any certainty about tax policy that will come.

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 10>At the end of the year.

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 11>The immigration component also will happen immediately. You're seeing that

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 11>in both Canada and Mexico now as those two nations

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 11>try to accommodate Trump before he comes into office uses

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 11>the IEPA authority to impose tariffs.

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 10>And limits immigration that way.

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:58.920
<v Speaker 11>So you're going to see the hit to immigration and

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 11>the tariffs earlier than you're going to see any certainty

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:05.439
<v Speaker 11>around the straight line extension of the existing tax rates.

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:07.399
<v Speaker 11>I think it's important to note that we're not talking

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 11>about additional tax cuts to offset maybe the negatives of

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 11>these tariffs. You're talking about a four point six trillion

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 11>dollar cost of just keeping tax cuts.

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:17.920
<v Speaker 10>At their current rate, tax rates at their current rate.

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, this one we're doing, Alex.

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 6>We're sending Henriette to Washington to just fix things, just

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:23.720
<v Speaker 6>get stuff done.

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>That's how good she is.

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 6>Henrietta Tres, Manager partner and director of Economic Policy at

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:28.199
<v Speaker 6>Vita Partners.

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd send her at Washington tomorrow to get stuff done.

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 1>She knows what she's talking about there.

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apples, Spotify,

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you will get your podcasts. Listen live

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 2>each weekday, ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 2>Bhart Radio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:50.959
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg terminal