WEBVTT - Don’t Hate the Player: DJT, Bets, Funds

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:13.039
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to The Money Stuff Podcast, your weekly

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 2>podcast where we talk about stuff related to money. I'm

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:19.320
<v Speaker 2>Matt Levine and I write The Money Stuff com for

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Opinion.

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Katie Greifeld, a reporter for Bloomberg News and

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:24.480
<v Speaker 1>an anchor for Bloomberg Television.

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 2>What's going on, Katie?

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 1>All right? We are going to talk about DJT and

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:33.519
<v Speaker 1>your Phil. We're going to talk about sports gambling, and

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:38.160
<v Speaker 1>we're also going to talk about Ron Barron and Elon Mosk. Alright,

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>it's been a while though, sure. Hey, so we tell

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you to email us every week. We're specifically looking for questions.

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 2>So we want to do more of a mail bag

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 2>so that Katy and I can sing mail bag. Yeah,

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 2>And to do that, we need questions. So send us

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 2>to your questions.

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>All we need is a prompt.

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 2>All we need is a prompt. We don't want to

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 2>make up questions.

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 1>No, don't make us make up questions.

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 2>Send us your best questions at money Pod at Bloomberg

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 2>dot net. And then if you send us a good question,

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:14.959
<v Speaker 2>we'll answer it on air. And if you send us

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 2>only bad questions, we'll be forced answer those on air.

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>We can work with that.

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Dj T, Trump Media and Technology DJT.

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>They should sell stock. They can't sell stock yet, as

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>you write, because they're not yet a year old. But

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a way for them to get more shares out

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>there into the handle.

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 2>They can sell stock. What they can't do, yeah, is

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 2>an ATM just the silly finance start for an at

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 2>the market offering. If you're a meme stock, this is

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 2>like as me me as a memestock cats, right, Like

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 2>it has like a business that I sometimes say it's

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 2>like a moderately successful substock. They make like, you know,

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 2>a million dollars a quarter in advertising revenues. Not bad,

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 2>it's not bad for like one man operation, but like

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 2>it's got a bunch of employees, a seven billion dollar

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 2>equity market cap, which seems high for like a million

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 2>dollar quarter revenue operation that, by the way, lose a

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 2>lot of money because like they have to pay a

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 2>lot of people to generate that million dollars revenue. And

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 2>so probably some people there think that it's a business, right,

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 2>and like it's going to be like the future of media, right,

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 2>They're going to get into television and they're going to

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 2>be the biggest social media platform there is. They're not now,

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 2>but maybe one day they will be. But my impression

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 2>is that it largely trades like a meme stock. It

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 2>trades as a bet on the newsworthiness of Donald Trump,

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 2>and so it has this valuation that is largely not

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:39.799
<v Speaker 2>driven by business fundamentals. And I've written about that sort

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 2>of thing a lot over the years, and my feeling

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 2>is like, if you have a valuation that's not just fundamentals,

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 2>you should sell as much stock as you can because

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 2>then you have money, and you've transformed your irrational public

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 2>valuation into an actual pot of money that you can

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 2>use to build a business. And they seem to agree.

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 2>So they're like, we're going to sell stock. And the

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 2>way you sell that stock has to be to retail investors, right.

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 2>You have to go out and sell it in the

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 2>market to retail investors. You can't do a standard book

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:09.919
<v Speaker 2>builds offering where like you hire a big investment bank

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 2>and they call big mutual funds and hedge funds and

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 2>they say, would you like to buy stock? Because like, yeah,

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 2>like what does that pitchbuck look like? Right? What does

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 2>the what does the investor deck look like. So they

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 2>want to do an out of the market offering, they can't

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 2>because they haven't been public for long enough basically because

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 2>they're a Deespac company. And so they are doing this

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 2>weird quasi ATM offering where like they've hired Yorkville Advisors,

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 2>which is like a smallish fund in New Jersey.

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>That mountain side mountain side New Jersey.

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 2>You this podcast expert on New.

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Jersey to where I grew up, So.

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 2>It is your horse spin to mountain side. Probably not

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 2>I hire this mountain side fund to Basically, like, these

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 2>guys will buy their stock whenever they want to, and

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 2>then they'll turn around and sell it into the market

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 2>and look like like a two point seventy five percent fee,

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 2>and it's like a sort of quasi ATM offering.

0:03:57.960 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>And so they then sell it over the course of

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>three days, well.

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 2>I think it's like one or three days. Yeah, the

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 2>deal is for two and a half billion dollars, but

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 2>it's not like that's happening today. It's like two and

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 2>a half billion dollars over the course of up to

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 2>three years. And so on any day in that three

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 2>year period, the company can call the York Villa and say, hey,

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:16.720
<v Speaker 2>we want to do like twenty million today. They say

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 2>a number of shares were I to do like a

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 2>million shares today? And York Villa will sell it those

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 2>shares over like three days. Yeah, give them the money.

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Reading it kind of made me think of them as

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>just basically very slow market makers. I know that's super

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 1>reductive and simplistic, but that's how I talked about it

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:35.840
<v Speaker 1>in my head to myself.

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 2>They're like a broker in an atm ufering. You hire

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 2>a bank or a broker and you tell them to

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:41.479
<v Speaker 2>sell stock over the day.

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and they sell the stock.

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:43.840
<v Speaker 2>And they charge you a fee. And this is the

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 2>same thing, only like they're not technically a broker. They're

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 2>not technically doing it as a broker. They're doing it

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 2>as a principal. They're buying the stock for their own

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 2>account and then they're selling it into the market. The

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 2>thing that makes them any principle rather than just the

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 2>broker is that if they sell stock for thirty five

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:05.119
<v Speaker 2>dollars or whatever, they don't pay DJT the price they got.

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 2>They pay DJT the company Trump Media. DJT is the

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 2>ticker they pay DJT the volume weighted average price over

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:17.480
<v Speaker 2>the period they sell it. Actually the more complicated than that,

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 2>but they pay them like a price that is objectively determined.

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 2>It's not like if we sell stock for you thirty

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:24.599
<v Speaker 2>five dollars, we'll pay you thirty five dollars. It's like

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 2>we'll sell stock or we won't. And so the natural

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 2>thing to do is if you're paying the view op

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 2>over some period, you sell the stock over that period,

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 2>and then you've eliminated the risk, right, Like, you sell

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 2>it the view op and you pay the view up.

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 2>But like there's no obligation for them to sell, no

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 2>obligation to them to sell during the pricing period. And

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:47.359
<v Speaker 2>so because of that, everyone can say, this is not

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 2>a deal in which DJT is selling stock to the market.

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:52.840
<v Speaker 2>This is just the deal in which DJT is selling

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 2>stock to Yorkville. And what Yorkville does with the stock

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 2>is its own business. Now clearly, because they're paying like

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 2>the volume weighted average price over like period of time,

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 2>their incentive is to sell the stock over that period

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:07.720
<v Speaker 2>of time. And like there are like various indications that

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 2>they're not going to hold onto the stock, right, Like

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 2>they're a thirty million dollar assets under management fund buying

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 2>two point five billion dollars of Trump stock. Right, there's

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:16.840
<v Speaker 2>like a limit that they can't buy more than four

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 2>point nine nine percent of the stock. Two point five

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 2>billion is like a quarter of the stock. So they're

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 2>not going to hold onto the stock, but they're going

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 2>to sell the stock, but they don't have to. There's

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 2>no arrangement for them to sell the stock. The other

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 2>thing I would say is, like the way the pricing

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 2>works is that each day they look at the volume

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 2>weighted average price and they take the lowest of those

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 2>view ops and that is the price that they pay.

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 2>And so that it creates incentives. Right, if you sell

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:43.919
<v Speaker 2>the stock like one third each day, then like the

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 2>lowest day is the price you pay it and the

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 2>other two days are like gravy for you. So you know,

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 2>their incentive is to have one day be really bad

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 2>so that they can pay DJT a low price for

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:55.719
<v Speaker 2>the stock and like sell it for a high price.

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>And with a meme stock, that's probably gonna happen. You're

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 1>gonna have one rocky day, You're.

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:04.359
<v Speaker 2>Gonna have volatility. Right, Essentially, what Yorkville is getting is

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 2>a series of short term options that they're getting kind

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 2>of for free, right, because of the stock is like

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 2>forty dollars one day, thirty five dollars the next day,

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 2>and forty dollars the following day. Then like they sell

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 2>stock at like an average price of like thirty eight,

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 2>but they pay like thirty five to DJT because that's

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 2>the lowest of the three of view.

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Ops to just tie a bow on this. So they're

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>a broker in ATM, but it's totally on djt's terms. No, Well,

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>DJT is selling them the stock.

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 2>So a broker in an ATM, yeah, like a bank.

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 2>The way it works is that the company calls them

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 2>every day and says, hey, we want to sell twenty

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 2>million dollars off their stock or whatever, and the broker

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 2>sells that stock for the company and then pays the

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 2>company the money it received minus a fee. Right, yeah,

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 2>and this is different, Like this is the DJT calls

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Yorkville and says, hey, you want to sell some stock,

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 2>and Yorksville says, okay, we'll give you the money in

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 2>three days. But they don't have to sell the stock,

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 2>and they're acting as principal and they're getting a lot

0:07:59.880 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 2>of like little options on DJT stock. Right, So basically,

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 2>if the stock is volatile, they make more money. That's

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 2>not true of a broker in an ATM, right, Yeah,

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 2>broker in a the ATM, if the stock is volatile,

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 2>then like they're just selling it on behalf of the

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 2>company here. Because they are a principal, they are making

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 2>probably a lot more money than a broker in an

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 2>at would. Also, they're not a broker, because that's sort

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 2>of important for legal reasons. If they're doing it as

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 2>a broker, then this is an ATM and it doesn't

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 2>really work. And by the way, this is not an

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 2>uncommon thing where a company wants to sell stock to

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 2>investors in the market and like there's some impediment and

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:36.319
<v Speaker 2>so they do this sort of thing where they instead

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 2>sell the stock in some structured way to some investor

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:44.199
<v Speaker 2>who specializes in intermediating these traits. Some of those people

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 2>get in trouble for doing a sort of like the

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 2>SEC says, you know, you're doing a brokerd offering and

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:50.959
<v Speaker 2>you're not supposed to do that, or you're supposed to

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 2>be registered as a dealer. So there's some possibility of

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 2>getting in trouble here when companies do this. Yeah, I

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 2>think Borkville has a track record of doing it and

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 2>not getting in trouble, so it seems okay, But it's

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 2>a complicated kind of trade.

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, as you can tell, I'm trying to work through this.

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>So Bailey Lipschultz wrote the article on Yorkville for Bloomberg News,

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and I was chatting with him about it, and I

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>have to say, I've never thought about this before, And

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I was like, is this like a booming business? Like,

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:15.679
<v Speaker 1>who else does this?

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Specs? Well, Yorkfool is a ton of these respective.

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, he was saying, Yorkville is kind of one

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of one when it comes to this.

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 2>They are one of one in this particular flavor of it. Yeah,

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 2>but like when bed Bath and Beyond was sliding into bankruptcy,

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 2>they did not this a different kind of trade, but

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 2>I kind of looked the same. It was kind of

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 2>like also a deal where like a investor agreed to

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 2>buy stock from a company and sell it out into

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 2>the market, but they weren't required to sell it out

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 2>into the market, And so it was like, they're like

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 2>flavors of this. You know. There was for a whilely

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 2>business of what are called death spiral convertibles are not this,

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:55.679
<v Speaker 2>but they're not unrelated to this, right, So, yeah, Yorkville

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 2>is one of one in this particular line of business,

0:09:57.360 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 2>and this seems to be a better way of doing

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 2>it than some of the other ways. But yeah, like

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 2>this sort of thing of like selling stock to an

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 2>intermediary to like sell out to the market is the

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 2>thing that people do.

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, does this business go away for Yorkville

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 1>once DJT is more than a year old.

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Maybe, But there's always more companies.

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>That need it, that's true. I'm just wondering. Yorkville has

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>done a ton of these, but it's a moment in time.

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's probably right. It's a moment in time for

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 2>each company. But there's always like companies that need weird financing, right,

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 2>and so like this is the being in the financing

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 2>weird companies kind of business, the one that I like

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 2>in weird companies. Yeah, I don't know, just.

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Move on, I think so. So sports gambling, So, sports gambling,

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:00.040
<v Speaker 1>you can't be too good at it if you run.

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 2>It sports scampling website. What you want is problem gamblers, right,

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry to laugh at that, but like what you

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 2>want is people who bet a lot of money. And

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:15.679
<v Speaker 2>are very bad at Now there are regulatory problems with that,

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 2>because if you mostly get problem gamblers, like eventually you're

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 2>gonna get shut down, or like regulators are gonna step in,

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 2>are going to limit you in some way. Right, what

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 2>you don't want as a sports gambling website is people

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 2>who are really good at gambling and keep making money

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 2>off of you. And so there's a Wall Street Journal

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 2>article this week about basically some people who have built

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 2>reasonably good sports gambling systems and actually make money doing it,

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 2>find that the big sports gambling sites limit their accounts

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 2>so they can't bet very much money because they were

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 2>making too much money, and the gambling sites don't like that,

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 2>and so they make them smaller amounts, and they complain

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 2>and like regulators and politicians say that's not fair. But

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 2>of course the sport's caadpling sites, they control the entire apparatus, right,

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 2>they're both the market maker for the bats, and also

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 2>if they provide the website and they take the client information,

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:09.079
<v Speaker 2>so they know who's good and who's bad, and they're like,

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 2>we don't want to bet against the people who are good.

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 2>We ran a bet against the people who are bad.

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 2>So they cut people down or they limit their bet sizes.

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Seems like you got a lot of emails about this.

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't follow sports gambling that closely, but I'm interested

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 2>in like market structure, and I read a lot about

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 2>equity market structure, and in equity market structure in America,

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:30.599
<v Speaker 2>people are also very into this question of like, I

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 2>don't want to bet against people who are good, I

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 2>want to bet against people wo are bad. And so

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 2>what that means in practice and like US equity markets,

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 2>is that big market makers pay retail brokerages to trade

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 2>with their order flow. Because the idea is, if you're

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 2>a market maker, basically like some person on the other

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 2>side of the trade is either informed or not right.

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Either their their order is informative, it's not right. And

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:55.200
<v Speaker 2>if you are constantly trading like smart hedge funds or

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 2>with giant asset managers, then every time you sell them stock,

0:12:58.240 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 2>that stock is going to go up. Right, So every

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 2>time you sell them stock, you like lose little bit

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 2>of money. If you're constantly trading with retail traders, their

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 2>orders are not informative. They're not going to buy you know,

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 2>a million shares. They don't like have inside information and

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 2>so every time you sell them stock, the stock doesn't

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 2>go up, and so you don't lose money. So you'd

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 2>rather trade with the retail traders, and so you can

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 2>pay robin Hood or Fidelity or whatever to get their

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 2>retail orders, and then you get a better pool of

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 2>orders than you would with just trading in the public

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 2>market with like potentially institutions. And you know, so I

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 2>wrote about that. I was like, you know, like these

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 2>market makers in traditional finance and and you know equities

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 2>also try to segment their order flow to trade with

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:39.080
<v Speaker 2>the bad people rather than the good people. But what

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 2>I said was, like, what I don't know of is

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 2>any cases where people who are just good at bets

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 2>or keep making good bets get cut off by their broker, right. Accept,

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 2>there's an example that I'm aware of because like they've

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:53.439
<v Speaker 2>talked about it publicly three Hours Capital. You know the

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 2>crypto hedgeweb.

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I haven't heard that name in a long time.

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:59.199
<v Speaker 2>So those guys before they became a crypto hedge one,

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 2>they were like currency at a bank and then they

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 2>started a currency trading hedge fund that eventually morphed into

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 2>a crypto.

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Fund and then it was an existential event when it

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>went down, but in any.

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Case, like great for crypto, but like sorry, the super

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 2>bad for crypto, big crypto story. But before that, they

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:16.559
<v Speaker 2>were like a little FX story. And what they did

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 2>was they went to every bank and they signed up

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 2>for the bank's FX trading platform, where basically the bank

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 2>would like say, we'll trade currencies with you, and we'll

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 2>post prices and you can, you know, click and trade

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 2>at those prices and we'll take the other side of

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 2>the trade. And three Hours would sign up for every

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 2>bank's platform, and they just look at all the websites

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 2>and they'd see like sometimes one bank would post a

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 2>lower price than another bank, so they could buy from

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 2>one bank and sell to another bank and make a

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 2>guaranteed risk free profit. And they did that and the

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 2>banks got mad because that's just like taking money from them,

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 2>and so they kicked three Hours off their platform and

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 2>they said, we don't want to trade it with you anymore.

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 2>So I mentioned that when I wrote about it, and

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 2>someone else emailed me to be like when he was

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 2>an FX options trader, he had access to a bunch

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 2>of different banks single deal or platforms, and he also

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 2>armed the banks against each other. And he said I

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 2>can confirm that they really don't like that, and a

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 2>salesperson from each chewed me out and threatened to yank

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 2>my access.

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't really understand what that's bad.

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 2>It's bad because the banks lose money. It's not like

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 2>illegal people do it, but like the banks feel like

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 2>it's rude, so they don't. It's the same as with

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 2>sports campling. It's the point is not that it's bad.

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 2>The point is that if you have a client relationship

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 2>and the client keeps making money off of you at

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 2>your expense, you can just stop having that client relationship.

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 2>And that's what the sports sides too.

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>That seems more rude to me, but in any say, really, yeah,

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you're just arbitraging.

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, why should I let you keep arbitraging me?

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's a good question.

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 2>If I keep betting with you and I keep losing money,

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna stop betting with you.

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Don't hate the player or hate the game.

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm not hating you. I'm just not playing the game

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 2>with you anymore.

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Fine, I mean right.

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 2>It's a little weird that they actually call them up

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 2>and yelled them instead of just stopping trading with them like, yeah,

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 2>stop trading.

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I will say that I don't call me number one please.

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 2>But I also got an email from another reader saying

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 2>that he worked at a market maker, like one of

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 2>the big, you know, electronic trading firms that do trade

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 2>with retail orders, and he said, we built monitoring to

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 2>isolate and identify professional traders out of the stream of

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 2>retail orders, and so like they did identify people who

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 2>were doing arbitrages on burker dealers, basically, like people who

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 2>are good at trading stock options, not because they were

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 2>like geniuses, but because they could like are different broker

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 2>dealers against each other, And so he said, we called

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 2>up their broker and said, you have to kick them

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 2>off because they're making too much money off of us.

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 2>And the burger apparently did this. It's like a thing

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 2>that sort of happens in equities and equity options, like

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 2>in retail market making. Like it is apparently possible to

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 2>get kicked off your retail brokerage for being too good

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 2>at trading retail options, just as it is in sportscambling exactly.

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>And then you take a look at the Wall Street

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Journal store and you put an excerpt of this in

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>your newsletter. But the example they used is Dave Holmes

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:06.360
<v Speaker 1>sports partner in Chicago, so that he started to win

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 1>more using a math based wagering strategy. He ultimately got

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>kicked off. But I would love to know what that

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 1>strategy is because you think of where we sit as

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 1>journalists and we can't day trade, and if I wasn't

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:23.679
<v Speaker 1>a financial journalist, I would be a fiend. But I

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>think we can sports scamble. I think I can scratch

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>this itch.

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 2>So but I understanding is that a lot of the

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:32.360
<v Speaker 2>winning strategies are much like the three hours guys. It's

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:34.160
<v Speaker 2>like you sign up for a bunch of different sports

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:36.639
<v Speaker 2>pending platforms and you see where the odds are different,

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 2>and you like buy the cheap ods and sell the

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 2>expensive odds so that you end up neutral and you

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 2>just have a guarantee profit because you're basically harming the

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 2>sports books against each other. There are other ways, like, right,

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:49.400
<v Speaker 2>you can be really good at knowing who'll hit.

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:51.159
<v Speaker 1>A home run round study.

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, learn football, But I think like the people who

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 2>like really do that like kind of work for the

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 2>sports market makers. So yeah, I think that typically the

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 2>arbitrage method is the one that people reliably make money

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 2>on I want to say that he didn't get kicked off.

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 2>This is the other thing that's interesting about it. It's

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 2>not that when you win too much money they kick

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:11.199
<v Speaker 2>you off your platform. It's that when you win too

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 2>much money, they lower your bat size so you can

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:17.440
<v Speaker 2>still win, usually win like twenty bucks instead of twenty

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:20.439
<v Speaker 2>thousand bucks. And part of the reason for that is

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:22.679
<v Speaker 2>if they kicked you off, there'd be more of a backlash, right,

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:24.639
<v Speaker 2>And so the limits are a little bit more opaque,

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 2>and so you have a little bit less trouble with

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 2>like politicians and regulators. But another part of it is

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 2>they do want your bets. Right. It's not bad to

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 2>have on your platform someone who's really good at betting,

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 2>because that's informative to you. Or if you know someone

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 2>always wins, then when they make a bet, you can

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 2>bet along with them, which means basically adjusting the odds

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:44.879
<v Speaker 2>so that like you're informed by their beats. And this

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 2>is true in like market making too, right, Like if

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 2>you're a banking you of a client who's like, you know,

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 2>whenever they buy stock, the stock goes up, Like that's

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 2>useful information for you. You can probably make some money

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 2>on that, right, even if like you're the one selling

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 2>the stock and so you lose money on each trader

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 2>on them, Like having good information is useful. Similar with

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:02.640
<v Speaker 2>this scambling sites, like you want to keep the people

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:05.200
<v Speaker 2>who are winning betters because they're giving you information. I've

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:07.400
<v Speaker 2>written a little bit over the years about insider gambling

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 2>in sports m M because like in the US, like

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 2>the rules of insider trading for stocks are like kind

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 2>of clear, the rules of insider betting on sporting events

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:17.639
<v Speaker 2>are like less clear, and like it's more controversial, and

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 2>every so often, you know, someone who knows about, you know,

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 2>a football player's injury will bet on a game, and

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:24.719
<v Speaker 2>then it's like, oh, is that illegal or right? And

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 2>someone once told me that it used to be when

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 2>sports gambling was more of a sort of mob controlled activity.

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:32.639
<v Speaker 2>You could get in trouble for insider gambling, you know,

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 2>with the mob, but also there was a certain amount

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 2>that was tolerated because like what they would do is

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 2>like they would set a line set, like an opening

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 2>line on a sporting event, and then like the people

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 2>with inside information would come in and put bets or

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:46.360
<v Speaker 2>like the informed gamblers, like the good gamblers, but Also

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 2>the people i'd inside information would come in and make bets,

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 2>and then the bookies would get information from that and

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 2>they would adjust their lines so they'd be able to

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 2>make more money off the general public. So it's a

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 2>little of that here where like if you're really good, better,

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 2>the sports betting sites can use that to make money,

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:02.640
<v Speaker 2>but they don't want to just also pay you at

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 2>millions of dollars because you keep winning your bets, so

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:06.159
<v Speaker 2>they'll pay you at twenty dollars.

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and the mob's involved, Well, the.

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 2>Mob is not involved probably in the legal sports campling

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 2>sites for sure.

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 1>That's a good disclaimer. Just thinking back to Dave Holmes,

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 1>if they cut him down to twenty cents, like he

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:19.400
<v Speaker 1>should just increase his volume and make them pay.

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:22.680
<v Speaker 2>First of all, first of all, that's a very bad job,

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 2>right if like you're constantly making twenty cent bets, like

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 2>it's you know, you're like return on your time goes now.

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:30.159
<v Speaker 2>But secondly, like assuming your math based strategy generates you know,

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:32.199
<v Speaker 2>one hundred bets a day, like you can't make a

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:34.400
<v Speaker 2>million bets a day, right, it is true?

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well anyway, God bless him, take it up and volume.

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 1>So Ron Barren loves Elon Musk, one of Elon Musk's

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 1>biggest backer. When you think about you know who invests

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:07.159
<v Speaker 1>in various Tesla properties and Ron Barron, of course you

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 1>think of him as a mutual fund manager. And now

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 1>he's putting together these funds that are just for Elon

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Musk's private companies for individuals.

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:17.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, be fun to have, like Elon Musk mutual fund.

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Few weeks ago, I said, I want to launch a

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:23.359
<v Speaker 1>closed end fund of just Elon Musk. He's doing that

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>for one, yeah, for SpaceX and for XA, separate.

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Funds for one for each.

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 2>There's enormous retail demand for Elon Musk, right, And you

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:35.719
<v Speaker 2>can get a certain amount of Elon Musk by buying Tesla,

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:40.679
<v Speaker 2>but you can't get Twitter, slash X or XAI or

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX or the Boring Company or Neulink or all these

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 2>other things that he does. And a lot of people

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 2>want that. A lot of people want SpaceX, right, And

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 2>there's like you know, there's there's I think we've talked

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:54.360
<v Speaker 2>about people like I want to say on the golf course,

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:55.439
<v Speaker 2>so I own some space ax.

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 2>And so there's a booming business and giving it to them, right,

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 2>if you're like institutional and through like a friend of

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk, and you can put a slug of SpaceX

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 2>into a vehicle and sell shares of that vehicle, like,

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 2>people will pay you a lot of money for it.

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:13.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if they would describe themselves as friends,

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:17.399
<v Speaker 1>but Ron Barron and Elon Musk have a good relationship.

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:20.400
<v Speaker 1>But they met originally in twenty ten, and I mean

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Baron has just been buying Tesla stock forever. It feels like,

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:26.159
<v Speaker 1>I think this is really interesting. I mean for a

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of reasons. But also we've definitely talked about on

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>this program beyond just Elon Musk, there's just a lot

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 1>of demand among retail investors for private companies. It feels

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of the exciting companies right now are

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:45.640
<v Speaker 1>private companies, SpaceX probably being one of the best examples

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>of that. And this is a way to do it.

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Is it the most efficient I mean compared to some

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:53.160
<v Speaker 1>of the other vehicles that we've talked about, thinking about

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Destiny for example, exactly. So there you have.

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:02.919
<v Speaker 2>It, right, scarce supply of these private companies. There's a

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 2>lot of desire to invest in them. There are some

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:09.879
<v Speaker 2>legal restrictions, but not that many. Right, A lot of

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:12.119
<v Speaker 2>the investor class now are in credit and investors and can

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 2>buy private funds, and so there is a real demand

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 2>for this stuff. But I think is interesting is like

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:20.159
<v Speaker 2>the fact that there's a real demand for this stuff

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 2>and like a limited supply mostly means that people who

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 2>have that supply can make a lot of money, right,

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 2>And so we've talked about the Destiny Tech one hundred

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 2>fund where it traded an enormous premium to the net

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 2>ascid value because like they had like this limited supply

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:35.400
<v Speaker 2>of cool private tech stocks and so they could sell

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:38.199
<v Speaker 2>that at you know, ten times acid value, or like,

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, there are a number of other like SpaceX

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 2>or whatever vehicles where it's like the manager of that vehicle,

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:46.919
<v Speaker 2>the person who has actual SpaceX shares, can charge like

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 2>two and twenty style fees to just own one stock.

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:52.680
<v Speaker 2>The story about Ron Barn's SpaceX funds is that they're

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:54.880
<v Speaker 2>not doing that, right. They're charging like a mutual fundye

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 2>kind of fee structure where it's not an incentive fee

0:23:57.040 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 2>and like relatively cheap. And so what he doing, which

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 2>I think is more interesting, He's not like gouging it

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 2>for money. He is using it as essentially advertisement for

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 2>active management. Yeah, because like the point is like, if

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:11.719
<v Speaker 2>you run a mutual fund company, it's like a secularly

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 2>rough time to run a mutual fund company, right, because

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:17.920
<v Speaker 2>index funds and ETFs are really taking away market share

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 2>from actively managed stock mutual funds.

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 2>And if you're running an actively managed stock mutual fund

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 2>and you're like, no, I'm really good at picking stocks,

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:25.679
<v Speaker 2>so you should invest with me and pay me, you know,

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:28.679
<v Speaker 2>one hundred basis point fees instead of paying Blackrock, you know,

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 2>one basis point fees, that's like not a message that

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 2>people are very receptive to you now, because like there's

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 2>been a real popularization of the idea that index funds

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 2>are better. There's a lot of data on like the

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 2>persistence of mutual fund performance where it's like the people

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:46.919
<v Speaker 2>who are good at picking stocks, like, aren that good

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 2>at picking stocks? Right, And there's not a lot of

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 2>persistence from here to year of people who are good

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 2>at picking stocks. And so just saying like I'm a

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 2>good stock picker and you should invest with me because

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 2>I'll pick the right stocks for you is not a

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 2>good message anymore. But if you're like I will pick

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 2>the right thoughts for you. And SpaceX like that's not

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 2>in the index fund, right, I can't get SpaceX on

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 2>the index fund. And so if you're a stock picker

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 2>who has some mixture of private assets, like that is

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:12.920
<v Speaker 2>a more appealing message.

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So two points there on the fees to be specific.

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:19.359
<v Speaker 1>So these funds charged this is according to his story

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>from Miles Weiss. According to a person familiar with the matter,

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 1>the funds charge an annual management fee of around one

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:28.479
<v Speaker 1>percent lock up investor capital for about eight years. Rival

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>single purpose funds typically charge management fees of one to

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 1>two percent annually, with that performance fee of as much

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 1>as twenty percent. And in an interview, Ron Barn said

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:42.400
<v Speaker 1>exactly what you said. We're doing this because we want

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:44.919
<v Speaker 1>people to know about our mutual funds. I want my

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>business to last for one hundred years. And I mean

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:50.879
<v Speaker 1>that ties into the ETF story that I love that

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:52.919
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned. But I will say that stock picking and

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>ETFs is coming now. There's going to say coming back,

0:25:57.320 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's not coming back. It's becoming more of a moment.

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. But I think that the old model of like

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:05.639
<v Speaker 2>running a stock picking mutual fund and judging one hundred

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 2>basis points.

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Is like oh yeah, yeah, yeah.

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:10.919
<v Speaker 2>If you are running a sort of like actively managed

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 2>mutual fund complex and you want your business to last

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 2>for one hundred years, you were thinking something about private markets, right,

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 2>and like a lot of that is like these traditional

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 2>asset managers are buying private credit managers so that they

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 2>can get into that more lucrative, more not inexible business.

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:29.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 2>But this thing where it's like ah, SpaceX stocks, I

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 2>can do something with that. That's another way to do that,

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:35.919
<v Speaker 2>but like something in.

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Privates, yeah, you know.

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Or the alternative is like enormous scale out automation. You

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 2>can be a mutual fund manager if you're running gigantic

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:45.199
<v Speaker 2>index funds and you can afford to do that at

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 2>two basis points. But like I like to pick my stocks,

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 2>is like a harder business to stay in for the

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 2>long run.

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know. Again, I find the idea of

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 1>a highly concentrated portfolio of just these are my stocks

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that I like, here's like a dozen to two dozen

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of them, and I'm going to beat the market that way.

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:07.479
<v Speaker 1>I find that very compelling and you can see that

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the market. Yeah, if you beat the market that's a

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 1>big if.

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Look that is still a bits that works, right, I

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 2>mean Bill Ackman is out raising.

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I was wondering how long.

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Twenty five billion dollar funds to pick twelve stocks? But

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:21.680
<v Speaker 2>that's not really true, but it's partially true. I think

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:28.680
<v Speaker 2>the academic sort of consensus, the like regulatory consensus, there's

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:31.359
<v Speaker 2>like even a real move to the indexing and a

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 2>real move to suspicion of active stock picking.

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and like and for good reason, yeah.

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 2>And a lot of suspicion that like, if you are

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 2>a long only equity mutual fund manager getting paid no

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 2>incentive fees, there's a lot of suspicion that you're generating

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 2>very much alpha there, right, And if you're not generating alpha.

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Then like there's a good chance you're probably like a

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 1>closet indexer and you're not actually doing too much different

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 1>from the benchmark.

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:59.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you're charging a lot bigger fees than an

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 2>index fund, right, right, even if you're not consciously a

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 2>closet indexer, right, even if you're like consciously like trying

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 2>to pick the best stocks. Like the track record of

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 2>active equity mutual fund management, like, people have a suspicion

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 2>about it, now, and so like having something that is

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 2>objectively differentiated from like I'm buying stocks is just what

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 2>this moment calls for. And it feels like that's secularly true,

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:25.880
<v Speaker 2>and it feels like it's not like five years people

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:29.120
<v Speaker 2>back to like wanting a twenty five stock equity mutual fund.

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 2>It feels like that was a model from the last century.

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm taking the other side. I think I am.

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, you're watching the cool ETFs.

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 1>For example, in ETF launch that I was really excited

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to see Alistair Hibbert from black Rock. He's like their

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 1>star hedge fund manager. He was once paid more than

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Larry Fink. He just launched in ETF. The whole idea

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 1>is like, here are my best picks. It's twenty to

0:28:56.880 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty five stocks. We're gonna hold him for a while,

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's in an ETF wrapper. That's really cool. Yeah yeah, yeah,

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 1>so Ron Barren should launch an ETF. But then you can't, have,

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 1>of course SpaceX in it. Though there are a lot

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of people trying to figure out how to put private

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 1>assets in an ETF. I don't know how you do that,

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, yeah, I don't think I could do that.

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't know how you would do it,

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:25.719
<v Speaker 1>but listen. We've got some of our best and our

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>brightest on it.

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 2>So I'm excited for that.

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, is there anything else I should say?

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Today? In Money Stuff birthday announcements, we have Bob Greyfeld,

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 2>loyal listener.

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:43.480
<v Speaker 1>And father, huge Matt Levine fan. This is this is

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>a great present the shout out. Even better would be

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 1>him meeting you. You haven't actually met. You've spoken on

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the phone, though.

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 2>That's true, and now he's gotten the shout out on

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 2>the podcast.

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 1>This is huge.

0:29:58.520 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 2>And that was the Money Stuff Podcast.

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Levia and I'm Katie Greifeld.

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 2>You can find my work by subscribing to the Money

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 2>stuffnewsletter on Bloomberg dot com.

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>And you can find me on Bloomberg TV every day

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 1>between ten to eleven am Eastern. You can also subscribe

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to our show wherever you're listening right now and leave

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 1>us a review. It helps more people find the show.

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 2>The Money Stuff Podcast is produced by Anna Maserakus and

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Moses Onen.

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Our theme music was composed by Blake.

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Maples, Brandon Francis Nianimmess, Our executive producer, and Stage Bauman

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 2>is Bloomberg's head of podcasts. Thanks for listening to the

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 2>Money Stuff podcast. We'll be back next week. Before Stuff