Speaker 1: You're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Get more from Buck by following him on
Speaker 1: social media at Buck Sexton on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
Speaker 1: The damage they do will be permanent and will be irreversible.
Speaker 1: Can't let it happen. Nothing and no one will be
Speaker 1: able to stop them. These Senate seats are truly the
Speaker 1: last line of defense. Now, I must preface that by saying,
Speaker 1: because they'll say he just conceded. No, no, So we
Speaker 1: have quite an important race today determining control of the
Speaker 1: United States senators. You know, Republicans already have fifty seats,
Speaker 1: Democrats have forty eight seats. There are two Senate seats
Speaker 1: in play because there was no one who got more
Speaker 1: than fifty percent in the election, so that forces a runoff.
Speaker 1: And now we have this battle between these candidates playing
Speaker 1: out with the whole country watching very closely because so
Speaker 1: much is at stake. You got us off hoping to
Speaker 1: defeat per Due. You have war knock up against Kelly Leffler,
Speaker 1: and many people now sitting around wondering what would happen?
Speaker 1: I mean, the President even understands the stakes here. What
Speaker 1: would happen if the Democrats had uncontroled, well, I shouldn't
Speaker 1: say uncontested, but majority control. Hopefully we'll contest it no
Speaker 1: matter what majority control in the House, the Senate, and
Speaker 1: and of course having the presidency as well. What are
Speaker 1: the kinds of things that they would do. Often we
Speaker 1: talk about politics in more general terms, perhaps even we
Speaker 1: focus in on things that are more theoretically impactful, that
Speaker 1: are more a question of what is best, what is right,
Speaker 1: but not necessarily what will affect you the control of
Speaker 1: this Senate, especially when you take into account the very
Speaker 1: high likelihood that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, the ninety
Speaker 1: nine point nine percent likelihood that they're going to be
Speaker 1: the president and vice president of the United States in
Speaker 1: just a matter of weeks. Here the Senate is as
Speaker 1: the president as our current president. Trump pointed out the
Speaker 1: last line of defense, and if you have Harris and Biden, gosh,
Speaker 1: I didn't mean to say it in that order, but
Speaker 1: seems right, doesn't it. Increasingly this will look like a
Speaker 1: Harris presidency with this guy named Joe Biden who's hanging
Speaker 1: out the Oval office but not really calling the shots.
Speaker 1: That's my prediction. But if they don't have the Senate.
Speaker 1: They're not able to do the same kind of long
Speaker 1: term damage, and they're much less likely to be able
Speaker 1: to do damage that will affect you. Here's what they're
Speaker 1: not telling you. Here's what you're not hearing about what
Speaker 1: this will influence. If we have Democrats in control of
Speaker 1: the House, the Senate, and the White House, you will
Speaker 1: see a major increase in taxes. You will see an
Speaker 1: effort to try and come up with a public option,
Speaker 1: which will expand the one thing. Do you know what
Speaker 1: drives most states deep into the red unions? Do you
Speaker 1: know what the single biggest budget item is that pushes
Speaker 1: states into debt and then causes more borrowing, and then
Speaker 1: there's interest payments, which means, guess what more tax on
Speaker 1: all of you. It is Medicaid. It is the government's
Speaker 1: idea of providing healthcare for people at a certain income level.
Speaker 1: That's the single biggest driver of state debt. Do you
Speaker 1: think that a public option is going to be a
Speaker 1: plan that people will want to be on. The only
Speaker 1: way that happens is if they're getting a much better deal.
Speaker 1: They're getting much more out of it than they pay
Speaker 1: into it, and that's going to drive up the cost
Speaker 1: of healthcare for everyone else, because you're going to be
Speaker 1: subsidizing that public option, like your taxes currently pay for Medicaid.
Speaker 1: So that's one thing they'll definitely do that. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's a given. There'll be environmental policies, There'll be an
Speaker 1: increase in the corporate tax rate to whatever it will be,
Speaker 1: twenty eight percent or thirty percenter, who knows, which means
Speaker 1: that you'll see a decline in the stock market, you'll
Speaker 1: see decline in your four oh one ks, Hiring will
Speaker 1: go down just at a point when we could see
Speaker 1: a major economic recovery. And we can tell based on
Speaker 1: what's already happened this year under Trump, that there is
Speaker 1: a lot of cash on the sidelines. There a lot
Speaker 1: of people just waiting, just waiting for that green light
Speaker 1: for the economy to open back up again post COVID,
Speaker 1: and there'll be a flurry, a frenzy of productive wealth
Speaker 1: creation for Americans all across the country. That can happen.
Speaker 1: But if you have these Democrats able to do whatever
Speaker 1: they want without Republicans having a majority in any and
Speaker 1: any aspect of the rulemaking and implement part of the
Speaker 1: government right, if they have the White House and the
Speaker 1: Congress all locked up. They're going to do whatever they want.
Speaker 1: So those are things that will absolutely happen, and then
Speaker 1: we get into the what could happen? Now, we get
Speaker 1: into the what if things get really bad? And for
Speaker 1: that I would just bring you to the long term
Speaker 1: structural changes that Democrats can go for right away. They
Speaker 1: are already talking about and they're still doing it going
Speaker 1: right into an election. Here they're talking about statehood for
Speaker 1: DC and Puerto Rico, which would add four United States senators,
Speaker 1: which means they're going to have a Senate majority for
Speaker 1: the next let's say decade or two. And that's really
Speaker 1: just baked into the cake. That's all done. If they
Speaker 1: do that, they're going to try to pack the courts.
Speaker 1: They will, I shouldn't say try. They will pack the
Speaker 1: courts with activists. They'll pack the courts with people who
Speaker 1: think that you should say amen and a women, you
Speaker 1: know it. They'll pack the courts with social justice warriors,
Speaker 1: with those who are so brainwashed by wokeness and political
Speaker 1: correctness that the law will not matter because they see
Speaker 1: a greater justice in diversity and inclusion efforts than anything
Speaker 1: actually written in statute or the Constitution. They'll have judges
Speaker 1: that reject science while claiming to embrace it on issues
Speaker 1: of the right to life in the womb. They'll put
Speaker 1: judges forward that will make sure that your liberty is
Speaker 1: only at the whim of the state. There's no freedom,
Speaker 1: there's no protection that you have. When some Democrat demogogue
Speaker 1: comes along and says, oh, but this is really important,
Speaker 1: Oh but COVID means that the constitution no longer counts.
Speaker 1: The left is all on board with an ideology of
Speaker 1: the eradication of your rights when they think it's convenient,
Speaker 1: when they think it's necessary. There is no right that
Speaker 1: you have that the state cannot violate, including just the
Speaker 1: right to a fair trial, the right to not be
Speaker 1: detained for no reason. The most basic kinds of justice
Speaker 1: are under assault in the COVID era. You have things
Speaker 1: like the bill in New York statele they'll be able
Speaker 1: to detain you because you're considered a public health risk.
Speaker 1: Who determines whether you're a public health risk? The people
Speaker 1: in charge. How do you even get to fight that?
Speaker 1: You don't They can just take you now. Whatever happened
Speaker 1: to habeas corpus, whatever happened to due process, Democrats are
Speaker 1: abandoning all this. But we're not paying attention to that
Speaker 1: as a country, are we. No. No, We're supposed to
Speaker 1: focus on Trump's phone call in Georgia. Oh my gosh.
Speaker 1: Impeach him again. Impeach him for what exactly. The President
Speaker 1: believes that the election was stolen from him. He thinks
Speaker 1: that Raffensburger is an incompetent buffoon, and he is, so
Speaker 1: he doesn't trust Raffensburger's word when he says, oh, no,
Speaker 1: you have the wrong numbers. And once again they're telling
Speaker 1: us the President, because of what he said on a
Speaker 1: phone call, should be impeached, and I suppose removed, because
Speaker 1: it's never enough for them. It wouldn't be enough even
Speaker 1: if Trump were removed from office at this very late
Speaker 1: stage and then prosecuted, they would still feel like Trump
Speaker 1: got off easy. And this is what we are up
Speaker 1: against with these Democrats. And that's why I want to
Speaker 1: tell you. In the same way that Trump turned around
Speaker 1: the idea of fake news on the Lib media. One
Speaker 1: of the great things about trumps um has been his willingness,
Speaker 1: his ability, his tenacity in fighting back against the fake
Speaker 1: news media. He turned the term around on them, and
Speaker 1: they absolutely hated it because remember in the early days,
Speaker 1: they were saying that fake news was the only reason
Speaker 1: people wanted to vote for Donald Trump. It's because Trump
Speaker 1: voters were such easily fooled imbeciles that they could see
Speaker 1: things on the Internet that weren't true and say, yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna vote for Trump. That was what fake news
Speaker 1: was supposed to be. Then Trump said, no, you the
Speaker 1: mainstream media, you are the fake news. You lie, you
Speaker 1: lie about things and pretend that you are the truth tellers,
Speaker 1: which makes it even worse. And they hated that. They
Speaker 1: hated it because he turned it around. Well, I say
Speaker 1: that we borrow from them once again. It is time
Speaker 1: for the hashtag resistance, and I this will drive them mad.
Speaker 1: Remember this. In the beginning, the very earliest days of
Speaker 1: the Trump presidency, they said that they were going to resist,
Speaker 1: and they were explicit comparisons between the French larisistance fighting
Speaker 1: against occupied Nazi rule. That was what they were trying.
Speaker 1: They're trying to create this comparison between them and the
Speaker 1: fighters of fascism. Well, this time around, when we know
Speaker 1: who the true fascist impulse comes from, where we know
Speaker 1: who the real authoritarians are the Democrat Party and the left.
Speaker 1: I say we take a page from their playbook. We
Speaker 1: resist at every stage. The Senate would give us a
Speaker 1: very powerful tool in process, but also Trump appointed judges
Speaker 1: should hold to the law, because by doing that they'll
Speaker 1: be sufficiently problematic for the authoritarian left, and so therefore
Speaker 1: that will become another avenue of resistance. We resist, and
Speaker 1: this Georgia Senate battle today is an important peace in
Speaker 1: all of that. If we have a Senate majority, we're
Speaker 1: able to stifle stimy, hobble the agenda of Biden, Harris
Speaker 1: and the left wing Libs, we can effectively make them
Speaker 1: inept more so than they would already be. That's what's
Speaker 1: at stake today. I certainly hope that anybody listening to
Speaker 1: this in Georgia, and I know there are many of you.
Speaker 1: I certainly hope that people listening to this who are
Speaker 1: legally able to and still can vote, and we're expecting
Speaker 1: massive turnout today from Republicans. Early voting tends to go
Speaker 1: the Democrats way, but this time around, I'm hoping republic
Speaker 1: show just what turnout on election day really means. The
Speaker 1: stakes are indeed very high. They're high for you the
Speaker 1: Georgia Senate seats in play right now will determine how
Speaker 1: much money you have in your bank account. At some
Speaker 1: level a year from now, it will determine what kind
Speaker 1: of healthcare options you have, what kind of environmental regulations
Speaker 1: you live under, and perhaps whether or not you can
Speaker 1: even have the option of voting for a Republican party
Speaker 1: that has a realistic shot of taking back power at
Speaker 1: the national level. Those are the kind of things that
Speaker 1: are on the ballot. As they say, the radicalism of
Speaker 1: the left needs to be defeated, and at a minimum,
Speaker 1: at a minimum, we need to have tools like a
Speaker 1: Senate majority and an emboldened Republican base that's willing to
Speaker 1: continue this fight no matter what happens in the Trump
Speaker 1: reelection recount battle. Those are the stakes, friends, That's what
Speaker 1: we're up to today. We'll continue to look very closely
Speaker 1: at all aspects of this fight. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: The Buck Sexton Show podcast. Get the latest news and
Speaker 1: information from Buck by heading to Bucksexton dot com. Tomorrow,
Speaker 1: each of you is going to vote in one of
Speaker 1: the most important runoff elections of the history of our country. Runnance. Frankly,
Speaker 1: forget about runoff one of the most important elections. Really,
Speaker 1: it's really not runoff, it's elections because it's a biggie.
Speaker 1: Our country is depending on you. The whole world is
Speaker 1: watching the people of Georgia tomorrow, and you've got to
Speaker 1: swamp them because everything's so crooked around I mean, and
Speaker 1: not here they're saying, oh, he's complaining about Georgia. No. No,
Speaker 1: I'm complaining about eight different states, and I think we're
Speaker 1: gonna win them all. He says he's gonna win them all.
Speaker 1: But let's focus on what he's saying first here about
Speaker 1: the Senate race. It is absolutely critical for the reads
Speaker 1: we're outlining it with Asof and Warnock. You do have
Speaker 1: a quite a duo of Democrats who are really representative
Speaker 1: of the ideological trajectory of that party right now. I
Speaker 1: mean Asof, I mean, this is a guy who what
Speaker 1: is well, why should John Asof be a United States Senator?
Speaker 1: What exactly has he done? He's done a little bit
Speaker 1: of staff work for somebody else in the House, and
Speaker 1: he's rich because of who Dad is. Well, that's not
Speaker 1: particularly impressive, but the Left loves this guy. So that
Speaker 1: tells you a lot, doesn't it. And then you have
Speaker 1: mister Raphael Warnock, the Reverend Raphael Warnock, who is a
Speaker 1: doctrinaire leftist who says what he needs to say in
Speaker 1: order to appeal to his favored constituencies. And what would
Speaker 1: he do. Well, they'll do whatever the Democrat left wants
Speaker 1: them to. It's not even really clear in any way
Speaker 1: what they would push for on their own. They're going
Speaker 1: to be functionaries largely if they win in the Democrat machine.
Speaker 1: But that's all they have to be. They just have
Speaker 1: to go along with it. And there's the Republican candidates
Speaker 1: in this case, who are, let's just be honest, not
Speaker 1: particularly strong. They're good enough, They're far better than these Democrats,
Speaker 1: and good heavens, please don't let me giving you a
Speaker 1: little bit of honesty here dissuade any of you in
Speaker 1: Georgia from going out there and casting your vote for
Speaker 1: these two candidates. But Leffler has done okay, and Purdue
Speaker 1: is also okay. You know you really look at it
Speaker 1: and say, okay, well, but they're Republicans and they will
Speaker 1: at least support policies that will be better off for
Speaker 1: the rest of us, whether Democrats realize it or not.
Speaker 1: But Trump is clearly upset as well at what's going
Speaker 1: on in the state of Georgia. And this is a
Speaker 1: big problem. This is Georgia, friends, this is not some
Speaker 1: place that we thought we'd be having these kinds of troubles.
Speaker 1: So Democrats, there's the immediate power issue here of control
Speaker 1: of the Senate and also Trump continuing to contest the
Speaker 1: outcome in Georgia. But then there's the what does this
Speaker 1: place look like? What does the state of Georgia look
Speaker 1: like in two years? What does it look like in
Speaker 1: four years? This is a in the center of the
Speaker 1: South trending blue state, and we have to look at
Speaker 1: why that is and what's going on. And you have
Speaker 1: to think that the GOP state apparatus is not doing
Speaker 1: a particularly impressive job at all. And Governor Camp in particular,
Speaker 1: who just barely beat Stacy, Remember Stacy Abrahams, the fake
Speaker 1: governor of Georgia. Just Kemp barely beat her. Trump is
Speaker 1: unhappy with Kemp to the point where he's already threatening
Speaker 1: to campaign against him. Play fifteen. I'll be hearing about
Speaker 1: a year and a half campaign against your governor. I
Speaker 1: guarantee that I shouldn't say this. I shouldn't say this
Speaker 1: because I just don't want you to tell anybody outside
Speaker 1: of this room other than the minions of paper up now.
Speaker 1: But you know, I endorsed him. He was in last place,
Speaker 1: and I endorsed him. He went to first place very
Speaker 1: like immediately, and then he won the primary. And then
Speaker 1: I gave him a couple of rallies, which I don't
Speaker 1: like doing for other people. I was telling Keim, I
Speaker 1: had him do rallies for other people. I do him
Speaker 1: for me. Right The president has had the incredible ability
Speaker 1: to pass his support to other people. You know, Obama,
Speaker 1: as popular as he was among Democrats, his popularity did
Speaker 1: not translate to others. When Trump shows up and says
Speaker 1: this is my guy or gal, it tends to really
Speaker 1: move the needle in impressive ways. And that may continue on.
Speaker 1: We'll see. We'll have to look and watch for what
Speaker 1: the president's next moves will be. He very clearly has
Speaker 1: no interest in going quietly into the night. We know
Speaker 1: that much. And he's saying that he's continuing to contest
Speaker 1: this election. But right now, we gotta spend the next
Speaker 1: the next you know, let's see twelve hours, friends, all
Speaker 1: that really matters, All that really matters for the rest
Speaker 1: of today going into tonight, just slay the rest of today,
Speaker 1: forget about the twelve hours. Is that we get this
Speaker 1: Georgia election done and we get these two Senate seats.
Speaker 1: Everybody out there Team buck Georgia. Go vote, Tell your
Speaker 1: friends to vote, stay in line. Once you're in line,
Speaker 1: it's all on you, my friends. Godspeed, You're in the
Speaker 1: Freedom Hut. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast from
Speaker 1: more buck Head to Bucksexton dot com and remember to
Speaker 1: subscribe to the podcast. What has gone wrong with the
Speaker 1: rollout of the vaccine that we've seen phone lines jammed,
Speaker 1: websites crash, a lot of them, and I mean, I
Speaker 1: think at the end of the day we excuse me,
Speaker 1: excuse me if I could finish my question? Just said
Speaker 1: what has gone wrong? So I'm answering the question if
Speaker 1: I could complete the question though, So you're gonna give
Speaker 1: a speech? Are you going to answer? Ask a question?
Speaker 1: With due respect? Governor? You asked the question, I'm going
Speaker 1: to answer it. Finish You're you're you're given a speech.
Speaker 1: You asked the question I am trying to ask you
Speaker 1: that you're going to ask how many questions you get three?
Speaker 1: They only got one question why do you get three
Speaker 1: with I'll due respect, Governor, I'm just asking if I
Speaker 1: could finish my question. You didn't you finish the question.
Speaker 1: I did not. My full question is what went wrong
Speaker 1: with the rollout of the vaccine when we've seen phone
Speaker 1: lines jammed, website you're reading your question to complete it
Speaker 1: for you, Governor. We've seen websites crash, and also senior
Speaker 1: citizens waiting overnight for the vaccine. Where was that at
Speaker 1: We've seen it in Duval, Broward, Orange and Lee County.
Speaker 1: Why was like in Lee? Why did that happen? Did
Speaker 1: you investigate why? That's my question to you, Governor. You're
Speaker 1: the governor of the state. I'm not the governor of
Speaker 1: the state, okay, but you didn't investigate why that happen
Speaker 1: like in Lee County? Why was there a big line?
Speaker 1: Did you did you investigate? Why could you tell us?
Speaker 1: Because we distributed vaccine to hospitals and the hospital said
Speaker 1: first come, first serve, if you show up, we'll do it,
Speaker 1: so they didn't use a registration system. There wasn't anything
Speaker 1: that was done, and there's a lot of demand for it,
Speaker 1: so people are going to want to go ahead and
Speaker 1: then from the state to make sure that senior citizens
Speaker 1: didn't wait outside overnight. So the state is not dictating
Speaker 1: the hospitals. How we're not dictating the Carlos Mogoya how
Speaker 1: he runs his operations here. That would be a total disaster.
Speaker 1: These guys are much more competent to be able to
Speaker 1: deliver healthcare services than a state government could ever be
Speaker 1: knockout from Ron descentis against it a CNN fake news journo.
Speaker 1: I've never seen that one before, but there she was.
Speaker 1: I I like this. Republicans have to do this. When
Speaker 1: you're up against the ninety five percent Democrat media, when
Speaker 1: you're up against a news a news apparatus that will
Speaker 1: do everything in its power to help one side and
Speaker 1: to crush you, to attack you all the time, You've
Speaker 1: got to take every opportunity to point out the bias,
Speaker 1: because otherwise they get what they want and they win.
Speaker 1: So you've got to say, hold on a second, why
Speaker 1: why is the premise of your question based in the
Speaker 1: failures of this state? And you want to do some
Speaker 1: long rambling speech. Look, she wanted her MSNBC moment, Well,
Speaker 1: she got her Fox News moment. Perhaps she wanted to
Speaker 1: be able to attack Ron de Santis, who has been
Speaker 1: the best governor of a large populous state in the
Speaker 1: country at handling COVID. All right, people vote with their feet.
Speaker 1: Then numbers don't lie. When you see the top places
Speaker 1: where Americans are moving and this is from there's a
Speaker 1: U haul in the big moving company. They put out
Speaker 1: their data. There's other moving companies have done the same.
Speaker 1: Where is everybody going? Right now? All right, we've been
Speaker 1: in a crisis. States are doing different things, and this
Speaker 1: is the way it's supposed to be. Right. States are
Speaker 1: able to pursue their own pathways to deal with a
Speaker 1: crisis like this. And where are people fleeing? And where
Speaker 1: are people showing up? Well, they're leaving in unprecedented numbers,
Speaker 1: at least in modern history. New York, California, New Jersey.
Speaker 1: They're leaving big blue enclaves right the heart of the
Speaker 1: Democrat financial money and political power, infrastructure. They're saying, this
Speaker 1: is just crazy. Where are they going? Florida, Tennessee, South Carolina,
Speaker 1: North Carolina either somewhat read or very red states, but
Speaker 1: also states that have low or no income tax, states
Speaker 1: that have been more open during the COVID pandemic. Rhonda
Speaker 1: Santis has been basically running one big move here. It's
Speaker 1: better ad during all of this, and to our our
Speaker 1: listeners in the Miami area and in the Tampa area,
Speaker 1: we got to WFLA and WIOD. To our listeners down
Speaker 1: in the Florida area, we would just say congratulations for
Speaker 1: already being down there, right. Good job, a good job.
Speaker 1: So I've just got to tell you, I'm I'm amazed
Speaker 1: that the broader perception hasn't shifted faster here. You see,
Speaker 1: everyone's going to places that are doing a better job
Speaker 1: with this, and they're fleeing the places that the media pretends.
Speaker 1: Gavin Newsom and governor and Governor Cuomo Governor's Newsom and
Speaker 1: Cuomo are a disaster, an absolute disaster, and all the
Speaker 1: data shows it. You've got twenty two thousand dead in
Speaker 1: Florida from COVID with two million more in population, You've
Speaker 1: got over thirty thousand and now I think it's like
Speaker 1: thirty three or thirty war thousand dead in New York.
Speaker 1: That's a lot more. That's a much bigger death toll.
Speaker 1: And Florida has an even higher percentage of seniors. Remember
Speaker 1: that the biggest vulnerability group is senior citizens. You'd think
Speaker 1: that Florida would have been hit worse than anybody by this,
Speaker 1: But no, And in terms of in terms of death
Speaker 1: per capita, they're essentially in the middle of the pack.
Speaker 1: But understand this, they're in the middle of the pack
Speaker 1: for a state that has a lot of pretty dense cities,
Speaker 1: and also for a state that hasn't been closed down.
Speaker 1: The closed down states should be They should be able
Speaker 1: to point the lockdown states should be able to point
Speaker 1: at more open states and say, oh my gosh, look
Speaker 1: at what a terrible job you've done. Look at how
Speaker 1: much better off we are. Not going to do that
Speaker 1: in California right now, California is having its worst ever
Speaker 1: period of COVID cases. Los Angeles hospitals, according to The
Speaker 1: Daily Mail, have suffered a one thousand percent spike in
Speaker 1: admissions because of COVID and ambulances have been told to
Speaker 1: stop transporting patients with little chance of survival. Now, Los
Speaker 1: Angeles was held up as a model for all of
Speaker 1: us that I think we need to remember this. Los
Speaker 1: Angeles and California. They were see, we wear masks, unlike
Speaker 1: you dumb Trump supporters, which is even true, people all
Speaker 1: across the country wearing masks, But they had this belief
Speaker 1: that the only people that don't wear masks are Trump supporters,
Speaker 1: and therefore they were really they're really horrible about this too.
Speaker 1: You know, it was our It was our fault when anyone,
Speaker 1: when anyone on the right got sick, it was it
Speaker 1: was our problem that we had created. Well, what's the
Speaker 1: situation Los Angeles? Why why is COVID so out of
Speaker 1: control there and has a relatively moderate climate. I mean
Speaker 1: it's not quite Florida, but pretty close to it. Why
Speaker 1: is it so much worse off? The people that told
Speaker 1: you they knew what to do and their policies would
Speaker 1: work were wrong. They were wrong. They could deny this
Speaker 1: as much as they want. They can pretend it's not true.
Speaker 1: They were wrong. Didn't work. They can say it's because
Speaker 1: we didn't do a good enough job. They can have
Speaker 1: all the excuses they want. But at the end of
Speaker 1: the day, you know, if this is a war, their
Speaker 1: battle plan did not succeed. All right, the generals need
Speaker 1: to get fired. That's what's happening in California. I Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: in Florida, Yes, it's not perfect. Obviously, there are a
Speaker 1: lot of people who are getting sick. And a lot
Speaker 1: of people who are dying in Florida from COVID. But
Speaker 1: that's happening everywhere, but Florida is still open, and Rohn
Speaker 1: de Santis isn't going to sit there and have a
Speaker 1: CNN reporter do a speech in the you know, do
Speaker 1: a speech under the guise of a question to basically
Speaker 1: be why you're doing such a bad job at the
Speaker 1: vaccine role out. Have you seen such an aggressive question
Speaker 1: posed by any CNN journalist to Governor Cuomo ever, particularly
Speaker 1: about his disastrous COVID response. No, of course not, because
Speaker 1: this is all important to the overall narrative. There's a
Speaker 1: broad narrative here of who is better at handling this
Speaker 1: public health challenge, the same way that we would have
Speaker 1: this on issues of national security? Do you trust Democrats?
Speaker 1: Are Republicans more on national security? For a long time
Speaker 1: it was a huge, clear favorite of Republicans, and then
Speaker 1: that balanced out a little bit after some of the
Speaker 1: Mid East Wars, But I think it would still be
Speaker 1: Abut have to check the most recent polls. Republicans tend
Speaker 1: to have an advantage there well on who do you
Speaker 1: trust to do a better job in a pandemic? They've
Speaker 1: blamed Trump for all this, but really you have to
Speaker 1: look at this on a state by state level, and
Speaker 1: Republican states are doing better in their fight against COVID,
Speaker 1: then Democrat then large Democrats states are and now I
Speaker 1: know one of the highest deaths per capita states, for example,
Speaker 1: as Massachusetts, where you have a technically Republican governor, but
Speaker 1: it's a Democrat state. It's overwhelming the Democrat voters and
Speaker 1: the and the politicians that have power there are, you know,
Speaker 1: and it's this guy is not like some Trump supporting
Speaker 1: Republican either. He's kind of a fakey Republican, you know.
Speaker 1: But you look at the places that have had the
Speaker 1: worst results, New York, Michigan, New Jersey, Massachusetts, now California,
Speaker 1: really bad results from this, and the media can allow
Speaker 1: this to be a widespread recognition. They can allow people
Speaker 1: to figure out, Hold on a second, I thought Democrats
Speaker 1: were the science people and they wear masks, so it's
Speaker 1: all so much better? Why is it so much worse
Speaker 1: in their states? They probably argue about population density, which
Speaker 1: is that is a reasonable point to make, but that
Speaker 1: doesn't explain the full disparity. Look at Texas, look at Florida,
Speaker 1: where would you have rather been during this during this pandemic,
Speaker 1: and it's states that are more read, even with large cities,
Speaker 1: even with huge populations, You'd rather be in a state
Speaker 1: that's more read. And then you also have the growth
Speaker 1: of the tyranny mindset among Democrats. Do you know that
Speaker 1: in New York right now, there's a bill that has
Speaker 1: been in circulation that would allow Governor Cromo to just
Speaker 1: detain people who are believed to be a public health risk.
Speaker 1: Let me get into this because these details, this is chilling.
Speaker 1: And if they can do it to New York, trust me,
Speaker 1: they're going to want to do it in California. There
Speaker 1: are other places they'll try this as well. And if
Speaker 1: you think the federal government under a Bide administration is
Speaker 1: going to try to step in and protect your basic
Speaker 1: constitutional rights, you're in for a surprise. You're in the
Speaker 1: freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Get
Speaker 1: more from Buck by following him on social media at
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. I think one
Speaker 1: of the biggest things I learned, and I say this
Speaker 1: is a neurosurgeon. You know, someone who operates on people
Speaker 1: who are in the worst of situations. Often is that
Speaker 1: is that science cannot rescue us from ourselves. We can
Speaker 1: have these incredible breakthroughs and we will in vaccines and
Speaker 1: therapeutics and new forms of testing. I mean, it is
Speaker 1: really just remarkable to see, and I think we will
Speaker 1: be a different world as a result of the medical
Speaker 1: innovation that we have seen this here, But if we
Speaker 1: don't lean into the basic health practices, they make such
Speaker 1: a big difference. I mean, even now, hundred years after
Speaker 1: the great pandemic of nineteen eighteen, the same things made
Speaker 1: the biggest difference. Wearing masks, keeping distance, washing hands. We
Speaker 1: can talk about mr Anda, vaccines and all those things,
Speaker 1: but washing hands and wearing a mask makes as big
Speaker 1: a difference. It doesn't sound as neat or as fancy,
Speaker 1: but it can make such a huge impact. And it's
Speaker 1: something I will now always remind my patients of. I
Speaker 1: want you to be very clever. This. Here you have
Speaker 1: the CNN's favorite on air doctor, doctor Gupta telling you
Speaker 1: that washing hands and wearing masks is as important as
Speaker 1: a vaccine. Does anybody really believe that? I know there
Speaker 1: are people who have been brainwashing blue, but think about
Speaker 1: that for a second. The vaccine is ninety five percent effective.
Speaker 1: So how are we supposed to take this hand washing
Speaker 1: and mask wearing is ninety five percent effective? Well, then
Speaker 1: explain California to me. Doc. Oh, this was all so obvious.
Speaker 1: It was so obvious that at the very beginning of this,
Speaker 1: all these so called experts were telling us they know
Speaker 1: the history, they know about the pandemic of nineteen eighteen.
Speaker 1: At the beginning, there's saying, no, I don't wear masks.
Speaker 1: That's that's how obvious this was in medicine, right. But
Speaker 1: there they just doesn't matter. They just keep saying it.
Speaker 1: What are they going to do admit that they've been
Speaker 1: wrong this whole time about really important stuff. No, they're
Speaker 1: never going to do that. So they tell you that
Speaker 1: we can't save us from ourselves. You didn't do a
Speaker 1: good enough job. That's that's the takeoil you're supposed to have. Yeah,
Speaker 1: masks and hand washing, really show me the show me
Speaker 1: the hand washing as a means of stopping COVID data.
Speaker 1: I'm just here, show me that data. Prove that one
Speaker 1: to me. Stop telling me. Prove it to me. Oh,
Speaker 1: but you know, we did their study where people said
Speaker 1: they thought they wash more hands because they wash more hands.
Speaker 1: Maybe they thought, no, no, I want proof, like I'm
Speaker 1: going to inject something in my arm that's going to
Speaker 1: save my life kind of proof. Not Oh, I think
Speaker 1: if you wash your hands, maybe theoretically it could help
Speaker 1: prevent some tiny percentage of spread, which, when played out
Speaker 1: hundreds of millions of times over the course of a month,
Speaker 1: may result in you know how many fewer cases A handful?
Speaker 1: Who knows? This is what they're saying. That's right. It
Speaker 1: was all about masks to see the whole time, that's
Speaker 1: all we needed. Oh wow, okay, so somehow mask compliance
Speaker 1: goes up dramatically ninety seven percent in a lot of
Speaker 1: these states, and yet we're having the worst outbreaks we've
Speaker 1: ever had, worse than when nobody was wearing masks. Really
Speaker 1: or very few people explain that to me. Make that
Speaker 1: make sense? Oh and they come up with all these
Speaker 1: and then their explorations you say, well, that doesn't make
Speaker 1: any sense, that's not true. And then you say, shut
Speaker 1: up science, that's what they do. Well, that's all happening.
Speaker 1: You have things like New York Bill A four sixteen.
Speaker 1: Now I know, for those of you are listening in
Speaker 1: other states all across the country, you're probably thinking, well,
Speaker 1: this isn't my problem. Remember I told you the stuff
Speaker 1: you're seeing in New York, the crazy lockdowns, the nonsense
Speaker 1: that we're all being put through New York City that
Speaker 1: is now replicated in many other Democrats cities and states
Speaker 1: across the country. So get ready for stuff like this
Speaker 1: New York Bill A four sixteen. It would give the
Speaker 1: governor the ability to imprison or deport anyone he says
Speaker 1: is a public health threat. But not only is this,
Speaker 1: now this is detaining people without without trial. Now I
Speaker 1: know they're gonna say, oh, but it's but you know,
Speaker 1: it's like quarantine. Yeah, taking quarantine powers for sick people
Speaker 1: for things, you know, for if somebody has smallpox or
Speaker 1: somebody has a bola, that's one thing. But this is
Speaker 1: quarantine powers for well, we think there's the possibility you
Speaker 1: may be sick with COVID even though you feel fine
Speaker 1: and the tests are too sensitive, but we can still
Speaker 1: lock you up. This is from the bill. This is
Speaker 1: from the text of the bill. Quote. Upon determining by
Speaker 1: clear and convincing evidence of the health of others may
Speaker 1: be endangered by a case contact or carrier or suspected
Speaker 1: case contact or carrier of a contagious disease that, in
Speaker 1: the opinion of the Governor, may pose an imminent and
Speaker 1: significant threat to the public public health, resulting in high mortality.
Speaker 1: The Governor or his or her delegee, including local health
Speaker 1: department commissioners, may order the removal and or detention of
Speaker 1: such a person or a group of persons by issuing
Speaker 1: a single order. That's right, the governor or any health
Speaker 1: department official, or anyone else that he designates, can lock
Speaker 1: you up, can detain you because they think you are
Speaker 1: a health threat. Oh but this won't be abused, right,
Speaker 1: This won't be used to get compliance. Really, speak out
Speaker 1: against lockdowns. Refuse to wear your mask. You gotta get
Speaker 1: locked up. You're a threat to public health. Don't you
Speaker 1: see how this is playing out. Don't you see the
Speaker 1: threat to your freedom and to your liberty from this.
Speaker 1: It's not just in New York. This is the Democrat
Speaker 1: mentality nationwide. It's not a question whether they want to
Speaker 1: do this, it's do they have the power to implement
Speaker 1: this kind of authoritarian insanity because they want to. You're
Speaker 1: in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: From more buck Head to Buck sexton dot com and
Speaker 1: remember to subscribe to the podcast. Let's check in with
Speaker 1: our friend John Cardillo. He is a former NYPD officer,
Speaker 1: now a Florida residence, which comes into much of our
Speaker 1: discussion these days, and also a TV host, radio host,
Speaker 1: and commentator on the right. My friend, mister Cardello, good
Speaker 1: to see you again. Ready to see you, Buck. How's
Speaker 1: everything going. I'm good man. You know you you are
Speaker 1: one of the original voices, kind of the with the
Speaker 1: siren call of make your way down to Florida. It's
Speaker 1: nice here. I've already lost I've lost two of my brothers.
Speaker 1: I think they're never coming back. They're now flirta Florida guys.
Speaker 1: They love the flip flops, the beautiful weather, the right
Speaker 1: of center politics. I know there's still some big blue areas,
Speaker 1: but they're they're having a good time. Um, what was
Speaker 1: what was just your your your thought when you saw
Speaker 1: Governor DeSantis dealing with that CNN report, which you know
Speaker 1: she's doing the classic CNN thing. Let me just explain,
Speaker 1: let me do an editorial of your failure and then
Speaker 1: just sort of drop that in front of you and
Speaker 1: let you sit there and fumble around with it. The
Speaker 1: way that De Santis handled that question, given his record
Speaker 1: this year in governing, makes me think maybe this guy's
Speaker 1: got even bigger plants. You know, buck I have. I
Speaker 1: was critical around De Santis early on this year when
Speaker 1: covid firth became a thing right, and I have never
Speaker 1: been happier to be dead wrong about a politician, especially
Speaker 1: a Republican conservative. I treat him today after watching him.
Speaker 1: He took down rows of Flora's from CNN for that
Speaker 1: moronic question. Basically, she was trying to set him up, saying, well,
Speaker 1: why is it the hospitals in Lee County, Florida, that's
Speaker 1: the Fort Myers area, have these crazy crowds outside? Why
Speaker 1: is there no system in place? And she had started
Speaker 1: to ask the question and then wanted to pontificate like
Speaker 1: these left wing reporters do. Just I'm throwing this out
Speaker 1: there for the viewers reference point, and the Santis just
Speaker 1: cut her off. He said, first of all, he's look
Speaker 1: basically said, you're testifying, You're not asking a question, You're
Speaker 1: asking three questions in one. Everybody else got one. But
Speaker 1: what I loved was his answer. He said, the state
Speaker 1: doesn't dictate how hospitals administer the vaccine. The state's gonna
Speaker 1: get the vaccine at the hospital. And then he specifically
Speaker 1: pointed out a healthcare executive. He was at Jackson Health,
Speaker 1: which a big facility down to Miami, and he pointed
Speaker 1: the guy out, mentioned his name and said, they know
Speaker 1: how to do what they do hospitalization and healthcare far
Speaker 1: better than the state does. That the state does it,
Speaker 1: it's a disaster. And as answer in Lee County was
Speaker 1: that the hospital in Lee County, at Fort Myers Area
Speaker 1: Hospital said first come, first serve, we've got the vaccine.
Speaker 1: That was great demand and people crowded it. Well, she
Speaker 1: tried to blame it on him, and he said, hey, look,
Speaker 1: we're not going to tell the state is not going
Speaker 1: to tell hospitals how to administer healthcare. I think Ron
Speaker 1: de Santis, there should be mandatory training with Ron de
Speaker 1: Santis on how to handle hostel leftist media for Republican politicians.
Speaker 1: At this point, he's doing a great job. Yeah, And
Speaker 1: I also have noticed a game that the lib media
Speaker 1: likes to play where if you if you let the
Speaker 1: decision making, if you put the decision making in the
Speaker 1: hands of the experts, and it's it's you know, there's
Speaker 1: their problems. It's not rough you you have you know,
Speaker 1: you've abdicated leadership. What's wrong with you? But if you
Speaker 1: decide that you, as the you know, executive branch official
Speaker 1: at the state level or even at the federal level,
Speaker 1: are going to make the final call, it's why aren't
Speaker 1: you listening to the experts? Right? You can't win either way,
Speaker 1: to lose lose for the look they CNN, MSNBC, The
Speaker 1: New York Times, the Washington Post ideologically, they cannot bring
Speaker 1: themselves to admit that the private sector and the free
Speaker 1: market exists. Let alone does things right, let alone has
Speaker 1: the right to do things. So to them, it is
Speaker 1: it is utterly perplexing. They're befuddled when a politician points
Speaker 1: to a business executive and says, hey, that guy knows
Speaker 1: how to do his job far better than we in
Speaker 1: government do. If if if we in government did, it's a disaster.
Speaker 1: That's horrific. That's horrific. That's like the torture of puppies
Speaker 1: to the mainstream media, I mean, they can't think of
Speaker 1: a more terrifying concept than giving the private sector the
Speaker 1: freedom to operate. We're speaking of John Cardilla, former NYPD
Speaker 1: and a conservative commentator John By the time people hear this,
Speaker 1: they may have a little bit more info than we
Speaker 1: do on on Georgia. But but just going into this
Speaker 1: big day to day what are your thoughts, how are
Speaker 1: you feeling about this? Obviously big steaks, you know, big stakes.
Speaker 1: I'm just shocked. I am absolutely shocked at the Trafalgar Pole. Now,
Speaker 1: Trafalgar Associate has been one of the better polling firms.
Speaker 1: Robert Gaheley who runs it, a good guy, very reputable guy,
Speaker 1: one of the few traditional pollsters I'll actually give credence to.
Speaker 1: It is absolutely mind blowing to me. Buck at Raphael
Speaker 1: Warnock with his history of racist statements, anti Semitic statements,
Speaker 1: blocking a child abuse investigation at his camp, to which
Speaker 1: the Georgia Bureau of Investigation Investigators, one of the most
Speaker 1: professional law enforcement agencies in this country, said they've never
Speaker 1: seen obstruction like that to his wife's allegations about abuse.
Speaker 1: That this guy is polling a point ahead of the
Speaker 1: Republican that John Assafa a Hollywood transplant into Georgia. So
Speaker 1: I don't know if it says that the Republican Party
Speaker 1: has dropped the ball on grassroots. I don't know if
Speaker 1: it says they didn't spend enough money or if fraud
Speaker 1: is just that rampant, and people like Stacey Abrahams have
Speaker 1: done a good job combining that fraud with outreach, especially
Speaker 1: in minority communities. But I'll tell you one thing, it
Speaker 1: shouldn't be the Republicans in Georgia. You should be up
Speaker 1: by six seven, eight points. And we need to do
Speaker 1: a really, really thorough post mortem on how the Republican Party,
Speaker 1: from the GOP to the National Republican Senatorial Committee, these
Speaker 1: fundraising entities have operated throughout this election cycle. I think
Speaker 1: it's abysmal that where where we are, and I'm concerned
Speaker 1: that we might lose the Senate. We might wake up
Speaker 1: tomorrow to Leader Schumer. But even more concerning buck last
Speaker 1: point on this, why are we now being told yet
Speaker 1: again that we might not have the results of this
Speaker 1: election tonight, that it might take weeks. What is this
Speaker 1: new president where we can't count an election on election
Speaker 1: day and you've got the Georgians Secretary of State Ravensburger
Speaker 1: acting very petty, acting questionably. He was interviewed by Martha
Speaker 1: McCallum on Fox and his answer seemed like it was
Speaker 1: a grudge match against him and David Purdue. Something really
Speaker 1: isn't right in Georgia. And I believe that this is
Speaker 1: going to be Brian Kemp and Ravensburger's last term in politics.
Speaker 1: I don't think either one of them survives a primary
Speaker 1: in twenty two And what do you think about the
Speaker 1: President's continued what do we call it now? I mean
Speaker 1: he's not conceding, he said last night at the rally.
Speaker 1: We've got the Senator Ted Cruz along with I believe ten, oh,
Speaker 1: no more than ten now because Leffler said that she
Speaker 1: would also you know, if she is able to, she
Speaker 1: would also stand with the president of this one or
Speaker 1: she will I mean she's already said that she'll do
Speaker 1: that because I guess it will happen this week. So
Speaker 1: what exactly what do you think happens as a result
Speaker 1: of this demand for the ten days of further investigation
Speaker 1: into the presidential election vote situation in Georgia. I think
Speaker 1: I hope something will happen. I don't think anything's going
Speaker 1: to happen. Look, the Democrats have the majority, right, so
Speaker 1: back in twenty sixteen, I think it was six or
Speaker 1: seven Democratic senators objected to Donald Trump's election. Donald Trump
Speaker 1: was inaugurated on January twentieth. I don't know barring. I mean,
Speaker 1: I mean the Hiroshima, the the you know, the fat
Speaker 1: Man and Little Boy nuke level of evidence that would
Speaker 1: be required to overturn this barring that coming to light
Speaker 1: today in tomorrow, that would force our entire judicial system, DOJ,
Speaker 1: the courts, congres into action. I don't see anything changing
Speaker 1: the outcome, and unfortunately, I think we're gonna endure a
Speaker 1: Joe Biden presidency for a little while than a Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris presidency until twenty twenty four. It because if they had,
Speaker 1: if this smoking gun evidence existed, if this nuke level
Speaker 1: evidence existed, I it would have been presented already. DC
Speaker 1: leaks like a sieve. You and I are in this business.
Speaker 1: We now that goes. It wouldn't have been under wraps.
Speaker 1: I think the awareness is great. I love that a
Speaker 1: few million people are showing up in DC tomorrow. I
Speaker 1: think we could shine a bright later an election fraud.
Speaker 1: We could make some changes in the party, more America
Speaker 1: First people. But I just don't see the results of
Speaker 1: this election changing. I'm disappointed because I really do believe
Speaker 1: and I know you do too, And we've talked off
Speaker 1: a lot about this extensively, that there were there were
Speaker 1: intentional distortions and essentially subversions of the electoral process by
Speaker 1: Democrats in this election year, so that it would be
Speaker 1: very easy to commit fraud and also, and this is
Speaker 1: the critical point, very hard to prove it. Said, I
Speaker 1: also think that you know, they needed, we needed a clear,
Speaker 1: bright red line caught fraud moments in this to blow
Speaker 1: the whole thing open. And I'm not even going to
Speaker 1: it's not that I don't think that happened, John, but
Speaker 1: the inability to find that, and I know it's you know,
Speaker 1: it's a short period of time everything else. You just
Speaker 1: it's not what you know, it's what you can prove.
Speaker 1: That's right. Yeah, Look, I mean you and I have
Speaker 1: agreed on this for months. We spoke about it, We
Speaker 1: saw it till last week at dinner, we spoke about this.
Speaker 1: The problem is that I'm gonna place blame right here,
Speaker 1: and I'm gonna name names. The Republican National Committee and
Speaker 1: GOP chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel. They sat on hundreds of
Speaker 1: billions of dollars for two years. They were warned about
Speaker 1: voter fraud memos were generated with them a year ago
Speaker 1: when the election was really in full swing. They did nothing.
Speaker 1: They did nothing until the president deployed lawyers on a
Speaker 1: election night, not even election night. The next morning at
Speaker 1: about five am, is when he really weaponized and actionized
Speaker 1: Reridy Giuliani to put a legal team in place. The
Speaker 1: RNC could have had a preemptive legal strategy. They could
Speaker 1: have had mathematicians, statisticians, litigators, election law experts, constitutional scholars.
Speaker 1: They should have had all been in place for the
Speaker 1: last year they were born. For two years. They saw
Speaker 1: Russia Gate, they saw the nonsense, the impeachment sham. They
Speaker 1: did nothing. They raised about a quarter billion dollars for
Speaker 1: this legal effort to fight election fraud. They spent about
Speaker 1: four million of it. Where is that the rest of
Speaker 1: that quarter billion? So I squarely put this on the
Speaker 1: shoulders of the RNC. They should have been in front
Speaker 1: of this. They should have been proactive, and they handed
Speaker 1: they handed the White House to Joe Biden because I'm
Speaker 1: with you, there was glaring, rampant electrical front. But we
Speaker 1: had to prove it, you know, we had we had
Speaker 1: we had these meetings and hearings and you know, we're
Speaker 1: sitting here saying okay, and ultimately I just feels like
Speaker 1: yet another there was the the miss. You know, there
Speaker 1: was the width at bat, so to speak, leading up
Speaker 1: to election day, and then afterwards. Maybe it was asking
Speaker 1: too much because of all the stuff that happened before,
Speaker 1: but they had to get it together. It just feels
Speaker 1: like they weren't able to pull that off. And I
Speaker 1: just want to ask you this. You know, buck filings,
Speaker 1: court filings take a while. The other side can run
Speaker 1: the clock. It was ludicrous to start this effort after
Speaker 1: election day, given us two months to do. It should
Speaker 1: have been a year. Down there, Georgia was filing lawsuits
Speaker 1: in Georgia a month ago for the special election. Before
Speaker 1: the special election, they weren't waiting till the morning in
Speaker 1: January sixth. The Democrats, John, do you think that there's
Speaker 1: a hope or what do you what do you want
Speaker 1: the Republican machinery of? And I'm just gonna say it.
Speaker 1: I think we should take the term resistance back from
Speaker 1: them now, you know, or we should use it and
Speaker 1: turn it around in their face and say, okay, now
Speaker 1: we're the hashtag resistance and we'll see how much we
Speaker 1: have to do with that, depending on what the final
Speaker 1: come here is on the Senate side. But well, do
Speaker 1: you think that they can put more America First, more
Speaker 1: MAGA type people in roles at the r NC, or
Speaker 1: is the old GOP. Is this like the Empire strikes back?
Speaker 1: What's gonna happen. It's a great question. I mean, I'll
Speaker 1: tell you I've been very vocal about it. I'm working
Speaker 1: over time to probably to help gut that place that
Speaker 1: that's a swamp of swamps. I think one of the
Speaker 1: things that needs to happen under the president, Like she's
Speaker 1: a fan of yours. We know that he said so publicly.
Speaker 1: If the President does happen to see this, I'll say,
Speaker 1: mister President, rescind your endorsement of Ronna Romney McDaniel. Cut
Speaker 1: the r RNC leadership on your way out the door,
Speaker 1: and understand it's your party, we make it in your
Speaker 1: America first image. Take that party over out the door.
Speaker 1: That's the only way he needs to rescind that. One
Speaker 1: of the biggest mistakes Donald Trump made was endorsing Rona
Speaker 1: McDaniel for another term as RNC chairwoman. She is not
Speaker 1: an ally. She's done nothing in fact, she and her
Speaker 1: ilk they despise America First. But I will tell you this, Buck,
Speaker 1: I've had a lot of meetings you and I've spoken
Speaker 1: about the SOLF line with very high net worth former
Speaker 1: RNC megadonnors who will never give the RNC another penny.
Speaker 1: They'd rather donate directly to candidates or to entities that
Speaker 1: will be a thorn America first, entities that'll be a
Speaker 1: thorn in the side of the RNC. John Cardillo, everybody
Speaker 1: follow him on social on Twitter if you're not already,
Speaker 1: and keep an eye off for some things he's got
Speaker 1: coming this year. John, my friend, good to have you,
Speaker 1: always great to see about. Thanks