WEBVTT - How to build a championship team, with Daryl Morey of the 76ers

0:00:15.604 --> 0:00:27.964
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Welcome back to Risky Business, our show about making

0:00:28.004 --> 0:00:30.764
<v Speaker 1>better decisions. I'm Maria Khannikova.

0:00:30.444 --> 0:00:32.964
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Nate Silver. Today on the show, we're going

0:00:33.004 --> 0:00:34.964
<v Speaker 2>to be talking about the topic that we always talk about,

0:00:35.044 --> 0:00:37.644
<v Speaker 2>should Democrats Panic? About the polls and the election which

0:00:37.684 --> 0:00:39.964
<v Speaker 2>is now less than two weeks away. And then we'll

0:00:40.004 --> 0:00:43.004
<v Speaker 2>speak with Daryl Morey, who is the president of basketball

0:00:43.044 --> 0:00:45.484
<v Speaker 2>operations for the Philadelphia seventy six ers and one of

0:00:45.524 --> 0:00:50.204
<v Speaker 2>the og stat nerds that made it big in professional sports.

0:00:50.244 --> 0:00:51.564
<v Speaker 2>I think you really like this interview.

0:00:52.164 --> 0:00:55.244
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm looking forward to that conversation. But before we

0:00:55.284 --> 0:01:04.444
<v Speaker 1>get to that, let's talk some politics.

0:01:05.164 --> 0:01:07.564
<v Speaker 2>So we're in week what is it, week number two

0:01:07.644 --> 0:01:13.604
<v Speaker 2>or three of Should Democrats Panic? I think the panic

0:01:13.644 --> 0:01:15.044
<v Speaker 2>meter has gone up a little bit.

0:01:15.244 --> 0:01:20.164
<v Speaker 1>Actually, yeah, I think so too. Obviously, still a toss up,

0:01:20.244 --> 0:01:23.204
<v Speaker 1>but it's not like we're seeing a surge or strong

0:01:23.204 --> 0:01:24.324
<v Speaker 1>results or anything like that.

0:01:24.404 --> 0:01:27.204
<v Speaker 2>But look, there are toss ups, and there are tossups. Maria,

0:01:27.204 --> 0:01:31.444
<v Speaker 2>would you rather have para jacks or Ace king off suit.

0:01:31.924 --> 0:01:34.204
<v Speaker 1>It's close, Yeah, it's close. It's close.

0:01:35.204 --> 0:01:37.644
<v Speaker 2>Right In the pair of jacks, it wins like fifty

0:01:37.684 --> 0:01:39.844
<v Speaker 2>five percent of the time, I think fifty six.

0:01:40.004 --> 0:01:41.924
<v Speaker 1>No, I think I think I'd always go for the pair.

0:01:42.524 --> 0:01:43.084
<v Speaker 1>That's just me.

0:01:43.684 --> 0:01:45.564
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I want the fifty six. I mean Trump is

0:01:46.604 --> 0:01:50.724
<v Speaker 2>We're taping this on Tuesday, early afternoon. The latest Silver

0:01:50.764 --> 0:01:54.444
<v Speaker 2>Bulletin forecast is Trump with a fifty three percent chance

0:01:54.444 --> 0:01:56.684
<v Speaker 2>of winning the electoral college, Harris forty seven percent. So

0:01:56.724 --> 0:02:01.884
<v Speaker 2>that is very close. But you know, a couple weeks

0:02:01.924 --> 0:02:04.084
<v Speaker 2>ago we have the opposite situation, where was Harris with

0:02:04.124 --> 0:02:07.564
<v Speaker 2>fifty three or fifty five percent. You have seen some

0:02:07.644 --> 0:02:11.404
<v Speaker 2>fairly consistent shifts in national polls where Harris led by

0:02:11.404 --> 0:02:12.804
<v Speaker 2>as much as three or three and a half points.

0:02:12.804 --> 0:02:14.764
<v Speaker 2>It's down to about a point and a half or

0:02:14.764 --> 0:02:18.604
<v Speaker 2>two points now, and an election is close, a one

0:02:18.724 --> 0:02:22.764
<v Speaker 2>one and a half point swing makes a difference. But again,

0:02:23.244 --> 0:02:26.004
<v Speaker 2>the bare case for Harris is that like she had

0:02:26.044 --> 0:02:31.964
<v Speaker 2>these various events that kind of temporarily inflated her numbers, denomination,

0:02:32.124 --> 0:02:35.004
<v Speaker 2>the convention, and the debate, and without that, the gravity

0:02:35.084 --> 0:02:37.004
<v Speaker 2>kind of drags her down to having this very narrow

0:02:37.084 --> 0:02:40.684
<v Speaker 2>national lead, which is maybe not enough in the electoral college.

0:02:41.004 --> 0:02:44.404
<v Speaker 2>Uh Michigan was coonstin Pennsylvania are now basically tied before

0:02:44.444 --> 0:02:49.284
<v Speaker 2>they had shown small Harris leads you can put lead

0:02:49.324 --> 0:02:51.164
<v Speaker 2>in scarepute if you want, but of a point or

0:02:51.164 --> 0:02:59.284
<v Speaker 2>two points, whereas Georgia, North Carolina, Nevada, Arizona, Nevada, Nevada

0:03:00.164 --> 0:03:05.404
<v Speaker 2>are also very close, but except for Nevada, probably leaning

0:03:05.444 --> 0:03:07.484
<v Speaker 2>toward Trump by a point or two and so and so.

0:03:07.604 --> 0:03:14.444
<v Speaker 2>It just makes Harris's path incrementally, incrementally a tiny bit

0:03:15.124 --> 0:03:21.644
<v Speaker 2>more difficult than Trump's. Yeah, a couple extra outs. Basically, yeah,

0:03:21.684 --> 0:03:22.204
<v Speaker 2>for sure.

0:03:23.964 --> 0:03:26.964
<v Speaker 1>I just voted, by the way, I just voted in Nevada,

0:03:27.324 --> 0:03:30.724
<v Speaker 1>so we've got we've got my swing vote working for

0:03:30.804 --> 0:03:31.924
<v Speaker 1>Clark County.

0:03:33.964 --> 0:03:38.204
<v Speaker 2>In Nevada. The early voting data based on party registration, Now,

0:03:38.244 --> 0:03:41.044
<v Speaker 2>we don't know what happens with unaffiliated voters. We don't

0:03:41.084 --> 0:03:43.924
<v Speaker 2>know how much votes being cannibalized from election day. We

0:03:43.924 --> 0:03:46.564
<v Speaker 2>don't even know that Republican registries are voting Republican. There

0:03:46.564 --> 0:03:49.564
<v Speaker 2>can be some Nikki Haley vote, I guess, I don't know,

0:03:49.684 --> 0:03:55.524
<v Speaker 2>let's say, But so far, through a few days of this,

0:03:55.604 --> 0:03:59.204
<v Speaker 2>there's actually a slight GOP edge and early voting in Nevada.

0:03:59.244 --> 0:04:02.284
<v Speaker 2>That's one of the few states where where it has

0:04:02.324 --> 0:04:04.884
<v Speaker 2>been more reliable in the past. Look, I'm ninety eight

0:04:04.884 --> 0:04:06.484
<v Speaker 2>percent of what you hear about early voting I would

0:04:06.524 --> 0:04:12.844
<v Speaker 2>chuck out. But have gotten kind of bad for Democrats.

0:04:12.884 --> 0:04:15.884
<v Speaker 2>The polls have gotten worse, and I think, on the

0:04:15.924 --> 0:04:19.284
<v Speaker 2>one hand, this can be exaggerated. If you cross the

0:04:19.324 --> 0:04:21.444
<v Speaker 2>line from fifty two percent to forty eight percent, it

0:04:21.444 --> 0:04:23.484
<v Speaker 2>feels like a big deal. On the other hand, I

0:04:23.684 --> 0:04:24.844
<v Speaker 2>know there are a couple of posts up at the

0:04:24.884 --> 0:04:29.364
<v Speaker 2>newsletter recently about you know, what is Harris's closing message

0:04:29.404 --> 0:04:31.724
<v Speaker 2>in the final two weeks ago, Like what is it?

0:04:31.764 --> 0:04:33.004
<v Speaker 2>What do you think you're closing messages?

0:04:33.324 --> 0:04:36.004
<v Speaker 1>You know, I just read your post about that and okay, biased,

0:04:36.644 --> 0:04:38.644
<v Speaker 1>Yeah you did bias me because I just read it

0:04:38.724 --> 0:04:42.084
<v Speaker 1>right before we started taping this. So for people who

0:04:42.084 --> 0:04:44.844
<v Speaker 1>have not read your newsletter, you drew a really interesting

0:04:44.844 --> 0:04:50.644
<v Speaker 1>contrast between Harris and Obama, which I actually thought was

0:04:50.964 --> 0:04:55.164
<v Speaker 1>really thought provoking, because Obama's messaging was much more a

0:04:55.284 --> 0:04:57.764
<v Speaker 1>call to action, like this is where we stand for,

0:04:57.964 --> 0:05:00.444
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of you know this, this is what

0:05:00.484 --> 0:05:01.804
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to do, and this is what I need

0:05:01.844 --> 0:05:04.284
<v Speaker 1>you to do right now, and Harris's is just like

0:05:04.324 --> 0:05:06.124
<v Speaker 1>fourteen days to go, let's go.

0:05:07.084 --> 0:05:10.284
<v Speaker 2>Okay, do you write enough things to say it's fucking election.

0:05:11.644 --> 0:05:14.284
<v Speaker 1>So so you know, fourteen days to go, Yeah, okay,

0:05:14.604 --> 0:05:15.044
<v Speaker 1>let's go.

0:05:15.284 --> 0:05:21.004
<v Speaker 2>Democrats still have more money in total, Harris isn't raising

0:05:21.044 --> 0:05:23.964
<v Speaker 2>record amounts. Maybe it's close to record. I'm not gonna

0:05:23.964 --> 0:05:26.364
<v Speaker 2>worry about inflation adjustments either way, she's raising a shit

0:05:26.404 --> 0:05:27.004
<v Speaker 2>ton of money.

0:05:27.524 --> 0:05:29.124
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a very good scientific term.

0:05:29.684 --> 0:05:31.524
<v Speaker 2>And they're usually a little bit more efficient with their

0:05:31.524 --> 0:05:35.284
<v Speaker 2>adviys they buy ads earlier and so so money is

0:05:35.324 --> 0:05:37.604
<v Speaker 2>not particularly the problem.

0:05:37.764 --> 0:05:40.924
<v Speaker 1>No, but there are definitely, you know, there are messages

0:05:40.964 --> 0:05:45.164
<v Speaker 1>that I think really matter and resonate with people like abortion,

0:05:45.644 --> 0:05:48.724
<v Speaker 1>you know, democracy, right, Like there are key words that

0:05:49.484 --> 0:05:53.324
<v Speaker 1>we can be using, and we have you know, election

0:05:53.444 --> 0:05:56.924
<v Speaker 1>tampering from Elon Musk, Like there are things like you know,

0:05:56.964 --> 0:05:59.564
<v Speaker 1>you have the you have the Republicans calling out Democrats

0:05:59.604 --> 0:06:02.124
<v Speaker 1>all the time, and I know that as you say, like,

0:06:02.164 --> 0:06:05.124
<v Speaker 1>don't want to antagonize, but like to fourteen days, right,

0:06:05.164 --> 0:06:08.244
<v Speaker 1>if that's your message, that use those damn fourteen days

0:06:08.684 --> 0:06:11.764
<v Speaker 1>to like, you know, to do everything you can to

0:06:11.844 --> 0:06:15.044
<v Speaker 1>get those swing states. And man, I wonder like inside

0:06:15.044 --> 0:06:18.004
<v Speaker 1>that campaign, I'm just looking at some New York Times

0:06:18.084 --> 0:06:21.564
<v Speaker 1>and other headlines this morning being like Shapiro's doing his best.

0:06:21.604 --> 0:06:24.444
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, inside the campaign, are there any people being like, fuck,

0:06:24.844 --> 0:06:27.004
<v Speaker 1>we really should have got with Shapiro.

0:06:27.884 --> 0:06:30.124
<v Speaker 2>Well, they were kind of doubling down on this likability

0:06:30.644 --> 0:06:34.644
<v Speaker 2>vibes factor with Walls, right, and now you see, by

0:06:34.684 --> 0:06:36.204
<v Speaker 2>the way, when all this was happening in the summer,

0:06:36.284 --> 0:06:39.244
<v Speaker 2>then it seems like things were evolving incredibly rapidly, and

0:06:39.324 --> 0:06:42.164
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to see even for me. You know, at

0:06:42.164 --> 0:06:44.084
<v Speaker 2>some point I was like, oh, maybe these vibes are working.

0:06:44.204 --> 0:06:47.164
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if there's a theme of like my newslayer

0:06:47.164 --> 0:06:51.284
<v Speaker 2>this year, it's that Democrats face a real uphill battle

0:06:51.564 --> 0:06:54.804
<v Speaker 2>in the selection, and it's not fake polls or anything else.

0:06:56.004 --> 0:07:00.644
<v Speaker 2>Biden's age, on top of everything else, made it nearly impossible,

0:07:00.844 --> 0:07:03.844
<v Speaker 2>whereas Harris is fifty to fifty ish or Ace King

0:07:03.844 --> 0:07:08.084
<v Speaker 2>against Jack Jack. But it's a difficult race to win

0:07:08.204 --> 0:07:13.124
<v Speaker 2>when you're kind of like running away from the incumbent,

0:07:13.644 --> 0:07:16.084
<v Speaker 2>but can't really say that explicitly. Maybe you just fucking

0:07:16.164 --> 0:07:21.244
<v Speaker 2>throw Joe Biden under the bus, right, I'd like, this

0:07:21.284 --> 0:07:25.364
<v Speaker 2>motherfucker undermine me. This motherfucker was way too old. You

0:07:25.484 --> 0:07:27.524
<v Speaker 2>fucked it. The debates I'm good at debates unlike him,

0:07:27.564 --> 0:07:30.324
<v Speaker 2>So a reduced number of debates. Yeah, gave me the

0:07:30.404 --> 0:07:32.804
<v Speaker 2>fucking gave me the fucking border to undermine me.

0:07:36.404 --> 0:07:40.324
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I think that our panic meter P panic,

0:07:40.484 --> 0:07:42.004
<v Speaker 1>pea panic is.

0:07:42.084 --> 0:07:45.044
<v Speaker 2>Uh is the silver bulletin for it a fifty three

0:07:45.044 --> 0:07:48.644
<v Speaker 2>percent panic. If I had to make a bullish case

0:07:48.724 --> 0:07:57.404
<v Speaker 2>for Harris right then I'd say the following. I'd say that, uh,

0:07:58.204 --> 0:08:01.724
<v Speaker 2>First of all, vibes don't really mean anything, and if anything,

0:08:01.724 --> 0:08:05.324
<v Speaker 2>they're kind of a contrarian indicator. You saw that a

0:08:05.364 --> 0:08:07.524
<v Speaker 2>little bit in twenty twenty two where the bull showed

0:08:07.524 --> 0:08:09.204
<v Speaker 2>a close race and there was all this talk about

0:08:09.204 --> 0:08:13.524
<v Speaker 2>like a red wave. You know, I'd say she'd probably

0:08:13.524 --> 0:08:15.564
<v Speaker 2>have a better turnout operation and have more money in

0:08:15.604 --> 0:08:21.324
<v Speaker 2>the final two weeks here. You know, I'd say, I mean,

0:08:21.364 --> 0:08:23.404
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to make the case she's a favorite, you

0:08:23.444 --> 0:08:24.844
<v Speaker 2>know what I mean, It's easy to make the case

0:08:24.844 --> 0:08:26.124
<v Speaker 2>that it's still a toss up. I missed what the

0:08:26.164 --> 0:08:30.564
<v Speaker 2>models say basically, right, But maybe yeah, maybe I'd say, like,

0:08:32.044 --> 0:08:34.604
<v Speaker 2>maybe I'd say, yeah, you have some enthusiasm advantage in

0:08:34.644 --> 0:08:36.564
<v Speaker 2>the polls for Republicans, and people are just kind of

0:08:36.564 --> 0:08:40.004
<v Speaker 2>psycking themselves out a little bit. But she's never really

0:08:40.004 --> 0:08:41.804
<v Speaker 2>had like that much of a lead the Electoral College

0:08:41.804 --> 0:08:45.724
<v Speaker 2>in this point, in this whole campaign is the issue

0:08:46.324 --> 0:08:49.404
<v Speaker 2>she's never really clearly pulled ahead.

0:08:49.844 --> 0:08:52.244
<v Speaker 1>I think that's absolutely true. And if we go back

0:08:52.284 --> 0:08:54.964
<v Speaker 1>to our poker Jacks versus Ace King, I think that's

0:08:54.964 --> 0:08:57.004
<v Speaker 1>actually a pretty good metaphor, like she needs to hit

0:08:57.004 --> 0:09:00.164
<v Speaker 1>her ace or her King, and all Trump needs to

0:09:00.204 --> 0:09:02.204
<v Speaker 1>do is avoid her outs, right, like he needs to

0:09:02.244 --> 0:09:07.764
<v Speaker 1>avoid those cards. And so it's that's that's why you'd

0:09:07.844 --> 0:09:09.244
<v Speaker 1>rather have the fifty six percent.

0:09:20.284 --> 0:09:22.404
<v Speaker 2>And now we're back with Darryl Morey, who, as we said,

0:09:22.484 --> 0:09:24.964
<v Speaker 2>is the president of basketball operations for the Philadelphia seventy

0:09:25.004 --> 0:09:27.164
<v Speaker 2>six ers. The NBA season is starting this week, so

0:09:27.284 --> 0:09:28.404
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking forward to this chat.

0:09:28.484 --> 0:09:31.644
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm really excited for this conversation. Nate and I

0:09:31.684 --> 0:09:35.924
<v Speaker 1>have both known Darren for a while, and I said, Darryl.

0:09:37.484 --> 0:09:42.244
<v Speaker 2>He said, let's let's let's good to us. I use

0:09:42.284 --> 0:09:43.364
<v Speaker 2>a replay challenge.

0:09:45.324 --> 0:09:49.284
<v Speaker 3>I thought, I thought you were doing really well, Maureen,

0:09:49.404 --> 0:09:51.484
<v Speaker 3>and then I.

0:09:51.564 --> 0:09:52.724
<v Speaker 1>Sucked it all up. All right.

0:09:53.204 --> 0:09:58.364
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So first question, I want to make a deal here, Darryl,

0:09:58.404 --> 0:10:01.644
<v Speaker 2>if you give me your NBA Championship pick which teams

0:10:01.684 --> 0:10:04.444
<v Speaker 2>are in the finals and who wins. I'll give you

0:10:04.444 --> 0:10:09.844
<v Speaker 2>my election pick. Okay, okay, all right, Oh.

0:10:08.564 --> 0:10:11.524
<v Speaker 1>My god, and I and I am the lucky person

0:10:11.564 --> 0:10:14.724
<v Speaker 1>who gets to hear this for the first time before

0:10:14.764 --> 0:10:16.244
<v Speaker 1>anyone else. This is amazing.

0:10:17.164 --> 0:10:19.564
<v Speaker 3>No, I think I think that's great. I mean, obviously

0:10:19.644 --> 0:10:24.844
<v Speaker 3>the Philadelphia seventy six ers on the on the east side,

0:10:24.924 --> 0:10:28.924
<v Speaker 3>and I think I'll I'll jump in and just go

0:10:29.004 --> 0:10:29.924
<v Speaker 3>with Oklahoma City.

0:10:29.964 --> 0:10:30.604
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I don't.

0:10:31.044 --> 0:10:34.084
<v Speaker 3>I don't feel like, uh, that's sort of a boring pick.

0:10:34.164 --> 0:10:38.244
<v Speaker 3>But they they have so many assets. They have so

0:10:38.284 --> 0:10:40.724
<v Speaker 3>many assets. Even if they're they're close, they're going to

0:10:40.804 --> 0:10:42.324
<v Speaker 3>put it over the top with then you too.

0:10:42.524 --> 0:10:45.524
<v Speaker 2>So so my election pick is.

0:10:48.124 --> 0:10:50.604
<v Speaker 4>So cheated. Okay.

0:10:50.724 --> 0:10:53.044
<v Speaker 1>I knew we Daryl, We should have known that it

0:10:53.084 --> 0:10:55.404
<v Speaker 1>was too good to be true. He was never actually

0:10:55.444 --> 0:10:58.764
<v Speaker 1>going to deliver on that. He was always going to.

0:11:00.324 --> 0:11:01.244
<v Speaker 4>Yeah exactly.

0:11:01.964 --> 0:11:04.444
<v Speaker 1>I was like, well, we finally get Nate to commit.

0:11:04.484 --> 0:11:08.044
<v Speaker 3>No, I'm excited to be on because you guys are

0:11:08.044 --> 0:11:09.124
<v Speaker 3>all about decision making.

0:11:09.204 --> 0:11:13.244
<v Speaker 4>That's the only thing I do. So I'm on.

0:11:13.404 --> 0:11:16.804
<v Speaker 3>I'm on twenty twenty two years. I think I think

0:11:16.844 --> 0:11:20.284
<v Speaker 3>that's right. Yeah, of just making decisions for teams.

0:11:20.284 --> 0:11:24.444
<v Speaker 2>So for people who don't know you are a true Varian,

0:11:24.604 --> 0:11:26.284
<v Speaker 2>to use a term from the book Gerald, like you

0:11:26.284 --> 0:11:29.404
<v Speaker 2>even play. I mean you're really competitive and you like analytics,

0:11:29.604 --> 0:11:30.484
<v Speaker 2>but you really want to win.

0:11:30.644 --> 0:11:33.684
<v Speaker 4>I just like, yeah, yeah, exactly exactly.

0:11:34.604 --> 0:11:36.604
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that's a motivation that we can

0:11:36.764 --> 0:11:38.924
<v Speaker 1>we can all relate to.

0:11:39.604 --> 0:11:43.884
<v Speaker 4>It's funny because of you, and thank you God, Maria. Sorry,

0:11:44.284 --> 0:11:44.844
<v Speaker 4>no no.

0:11:45.364 --> 0:11:50.804
<v Speaker 1>I was giving a talk in Miami at uh at

0:11:50.804 --> 0:11:52.684
<v Speaker 1>a conference where where there were a lot of people

0:11:52.724 --> 0:11:56.044
<v Speaker 1>who were very into analytics, and we were talking about,

0:11:56.084 --> 0:11:58.404
<v Speaker 1>you know, different strategies and all of this, and I

0:11:58.444 --> 0:12:00.484
<v Speaker 1>was like, you know what, but like the bottom line

0:12:00.524 --> 0:12:02.724
<v Speaker 1>is like I love poker, but like I want to

0:12:02.724 --> 0:12:05.044
<v Speaker 1>fucking win, right exactly.

0:12:05.444 --> 0:12:06.564
<v Speaker 4>You guys that.

0:12:08.084 --> 0:12:11.964
<v Speaker 3>Congratsar on the brace. You're you're you're one up on Nate.

0:12:12.004 --> 0:12:14.164
<v Speaker 3>As far as I know, I'm zero.

0:12:14.364 --> 0:12:18.484
<v Speaker 2>So it's not hard to thank you so much. Darryl Darresl,

0:12:18.484 --> 0:12:21.404
<v Speaker 2>I've played poker against you and two or three times

0:12:21.524 --> 0:12:25.524
<v Speaker 2>or something. Darryl, I'm just gonna tell people has very

0:12:25.524 --> 0:12:30.324
<v Speaker 2>bad chip etiquette. You're supposed to stack your chips and

0:12:30.404 --> 0:12:33.884
<v Speaker 2>piles of twenty twenty. Absolutely, if you don't do that,

0:12:33.884 --> 0:12:36.044
<v Speaker 2>that's actually kind of a disadvance of the players. I

0:12:36.044 --> 0:12:37.164
<v Speaker 2>can't see any chips you have.

0:12:37.884 --> 0:12:40.684
<v Speaker 1>But assets, Daryl, I like you so much.

0:12:40.844 --> 0:12:41.324
<v Speaker 4>Don't know.

0:12:41.844 --> 0:12:44.444
<v Speaker 2>I'm totally like if a player is seen as good

0:12:44.444 --> 0:12:47.164
<v Speaker 2>for the game, there might be less requests.

0:12:48.324 --> 0:12:52.524
<v Speaker 3>No, I sadly I haven't put the time into poker,

0:12:52.844 --> 0:12:54.924
<v Speaker 3>and I get invited to a lot of games and

0:12:54.964 --> 0:12:55.764
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure why.

0:12:55.804 --> 0:12:57.284
<v Speaker 4>Maybe because I don't win very often.

0:12:57.324 --> 0:13:00.204
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I will say though, Maria, you're you're a pro,

0:13:00.324 --> 0:13:04.564
<v Speaker 3>so's Nate. I try and at least let my ego.

0:13:04.964 --> 0:13:06.684
<v Speaker 3>Given the fact that I don't win poker a lot,

0:13:07.164 --> 0:13:09.604
<v Speaker 3>I handle it by pointing out them usually playing with

0:13:09.684 --> 0:13:12.684
<v Speaker 3>two or three pros, and it doesn't seem very fair.

0:13:14.364 --> 0:13:17.524
<v Speaker 1>If you guys, Absolutely not fair, And I promise I'll

0:13:17.564 --> 0:13:20.644
<v Speaker 1>be nice to you if you let me play with.

0:13:21.964 --> 0:13:24.444
<v Speaker 4>You definitely want me in your game area, that's for sure.

0:13:24.244 --> 0:13:25.764
<v Speaker 2>You are very aggressive.

0:13:26.164 --> 0:13:26.924
<v Speaker 4>Do you use.

0:13:28.724 --> 0:13:31.964
<v Speaker 2>Game theory in any way in decision making?

0:13:32.644 --> 0:13:33.084
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:13:33.124 --> 0:13:36.884
<v Speaker 3>So, I mean probably the easiest one to talk through

0:13:37.084 --> 0:13:39.964
<v Speaker 3>is like the two for one is a pretty easy

0:13:40.204 --> 0:13:43.564
<v Speaker 3>sort of game theory problem. No one's really gotten to

0:13:43.724 --> 0:13:47.004
<v Speaker 3>the extreme game theory. But it's coming. It's definitely coming.

0:13:48.124 --> 0:13:50.364
<v Speaker 3>So two for one, just for your audience. There's a

0:13:50.404 --> 0:13:53.444
<v Speaker 3>twenty four second shot clock in the NBA. If you

0:13:53.484 --> 0:13:57.004
<v Speaker 3>have the ball, let's say forty seconds or thirty five

0:13:57.044 --> 0:14:00.364
<v Speaker 3>to forty seconds. You can either run your normal offense

0:14:00.644 --> 0:14:03.484
<v Speaker 3>and get a shot in twenty seconds and now there's

0:14:03.484 --> 0:14:05.644
<v Speaker 3>fifteen remaining, so you get one shot and they get

0:14:05.684 --> 0:14:10.604
<v Speaker 3>one shot, and or you can take a shot quickly

0:14:10.684 --> 0:14:12.484
<v Speaker 3>and then the other team only it's went for second,

0:14:12.524 --> 0:14:13.404
<v Speaker 3>so you'll get the ball back.

0:14:13.444 --> 0:14:16.124
<v Speaker 4>Well, it turns out in thousands of thousands of.

0:14:16.164 --> 0:14:17.964
<v Speaker 3>Trials at every level of basketball, this is going to

0:14:18.004 --> 0:14:21.124
<v Speaker 3>shock your audience, which I'm sure is pretty sophisticated. Two

0:14:21.164 --> 0:14:23.884
<v Speaker 3>shots are better than one shot. I know, I know

0:14:23.964 --> 0:14:28.884
<v Speaker 3>that will surprise people. But even even even materially worse,

0:14:29.044 --> 0:14:32.124
<v Speaker 3>two shots are better than one shot. There are some

0:14:33.204 --> 0:14:36.204
<v Speaker 3>exceptions in the fourth quarter and things like that, but

0:14:36.204 --> 0:14:39.524
<v Speaker 3>but in the first three quarters it's pretty straightforward. Well, obviously,

0:14:39.564 --> 0:14:41.924
<v Speaker 3>if the other team says, okay, I'm gonna shoot such

0:14:41.964 --> 0:14:44.644
<v Speaker 3>that I force you into the two for one, the

0:14:44.684 --> 0:14:49.204
<v Speaker 3>other side isn't just this blod you know, undynamic opponent,

0:14:49.884 --> 0:14:52.644
<v Speaker 3>they can then shoot even faster, faster back at you.

0:14:53.364 --> 0:14:55.364
<v Speaker 3>In fact, the Utah Jazz when Jerry Sloan was there,

0:14:55.364 --> 0:14:56.924
<v Speaker 3>would do this more than any team.

0:14:56.764 --> 0:15:00.244
<v Speaker 4>That I can recall. And then so now.

0:15:00.004 --> 0:15:03.884
<v Speaker 3>There's there's a whole set of other strategies that if

0:15:03.884 --> 0:15:06.164
<v Speaker 3>they somehow manipulate the clock better than you, you can

0:15:06.204 --> 0:15:09.084
<v Speaker 3>then regenerate the two for one like fouling them or

0:15:09.564 --> 0:15:11.724
<v Speaker 3>being super aggressive to speed up their offense.

0:15:11.844 --> 0:15:14.044
<v Speaker 4>There's a whole set of things. So that's just one

0:15:14.564 --> 0:15:15.204
<v Speaker 4>off the top.

0:15:15.284 --> 0:15:18.924
<v Speaker 3>Obviously, there's game theory and in in game in terms

0:15:18.964 --> 0:15:21.804
<v Speaker 3>of like how do you react to you know, they

0:15:21.844 --> 0:15:24.444
<v Speaker 3>put five out shooting lineups on the floor, how do

0:15:24.484 --> 0:15:25.044
<v Speaker 3>you guard that?

0:15:25.244 --> 0:15:29.724
<v Speaker 1>Things like that, So, and what about when you're making

0:15:30.364 --> 0:15:33.084
<v Speaker 1>roster decisions, when you when you're thinking about trading, and

0:15:33.124 --> 0:15:36.484
<v Speaker 1>when you actually have to think about yourself as one

0:15:36.644 --> 0:15:40.164
<v Speaker 1>player in a multiplayer game because there are other yous

0:15:40.324 --> 0:15:43.564
<v Speaker 1>out there who are responsible for other teams who are

0:15:43.564 --> 0:15:45.604
<v Speaker 1>going to be making different moves and responding to you.

0:15:46.324 --> 0:15:47.964
<v Speaker 1>So how do you think about it off the court

0:15:48.004 --> 0:15:49.324
<v Speaker 1>in that kind of that metagame?

0:15:49.644 --> 0:15:54.004
<v Speaker 3>That's right, and it's a heavily repeating game because you know,

0:15:54.004 --> 0:15:57.644
<v Speaker 3>it's the same thirty teams. What's really interesting is it's

0:15:57.644 --> 0:16:01.164
<v Speaker 3>a heavily repeating game, but they can replace the key

0:16:01.204 --> 0:16:03.364
<v Speaker 3>decision maker, So it's actually a repeating game at the

0:16:03.404 --> 0:16:06.604
<v Speaker 3>ownership level more than it is at my level, where

0:16:06.644 --> 0:16:09.124
<v Speaker 3>people can get fired. So there have been such sort

0:16:09.164 --> 0:16:12.764
<v Speaker 3>of these famous examples of people, you know, making future

0:16:12.804 --> 0:16:16.444
<v Speaker 3>promises or things like that that they then try to

0:16:17.244 --> 0:16:20.204
<v Speaker 3>duck out of and things like that. So, yeah, we're

0:16:20.204 --> 0:16:23.484
<v Speaker 3>in a repeating game that can work to advantage if

0:16:23.524 --> 0:16:27.884
<v Speaker 3>you treated as such. Again, your audience probably probably pretty

0:16:27.884 --> 0:16:31.924
<v Speaker 3>familiar with like whether non repeating or repeating game type differences.

0:16:32.004 --> 0:16:37.324
<v Speaker 2>So so NBA teams place an extremely high premium on

0:16:37.484 --> 0:16:41.204
<v Speaker 2>superstar talent, especially in the short term. You know, the

0:16:41.204 --> 0:16:42.964
<v Speaker 2>New York Knicks. What they give up for bridges like

0:16:43.004 --> 0:16:47.964
<v Speaker 2>four or five first round picks and he's a good player,

0:16:48.044 --> 0:16:52.284
<v Speaker 2>but probably the third best player on a contending team.

0:16:53.084 --> 0:16:57.364
<v Speaker 2>Are gms too short term focused because of the incentive issue,

0:16:57.484 --> 0:17:01.084
<v Speaker 2>or are like analytics nerds doing the math wrong and saying, actually,

0:17:01.124 --> 0:17:04.764
<v Speaker 2>these draft picks are not that valuable, and superstars are

0:17:04.884 --> 0:17:08.484
<v Speaker 2>very valuable because if you run it through some model,

0:17:08.524 --> 0:17:12.484
<v Speaker 2>it's like, okay, well, the draft picks worth like, you know,

0:17:12.524 --> 0:17:17.204
<v Speaker 2>twenty five million dollars a year in excess returns, and

0:17:17.524 --> 0:17:19.884
<v Speaker 2>Bridges is underpaid by ten million, And I don't know,

0:17:20.444 --> 0:17:21.164
<v Speaker 2>you know what I'm saying.

0:17:22.284 --> 0:17:25.524
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think teams are basically wrong at both extremes.

0:17:25.764 --> 0:17:30.724
<v Speaker 3>So they're both not aggressively long term enough. You probably

0:17:30.724 --> 0:17:32.644
<v Speaker 3>like if you actually run the math and you just

0:17:32.684 --> 0:17:36.204
<v Speaker 3>say that you're optimizing you know, p you guys talked

0:17:36.244 --> 0:17:39.444
<v Speaker 3>about p doom on your list the p P Championship

0:17:39.524 --> 0:17:42.884
<v Speaker 3>over three years, if you actually were just optimizing that variable,

0:17:43.324 --> 0:17:45.324
<v Speaker 3>and I can promise you no team actually does do

0:17:45.444 --> 0:17:49.404
<v Speaker 3>that really like twenty something like twenty four of the

0:17:49.444 --> 0:17:52.724
<v Speaker 3>team should be fully rebuilding, just long term every year,

0:17:53.964 --> 0:17:56.244
<v Speaker 3>because if you don't have a top five player, your

0:17:56.244 --> 0:18:02.604
<v Speaker 3>odds of PEA Championship are extremely low. So it's so

0:18:02.684 --> 0:18:06.004
<v Speaker 3>I would say, you know, that's sort of the first thing.

0:18:06.084 --> 0:18:06.604
<v Speaker 4>The second thing.

0:18:06.644 --> 0:18:09.204
<v Speaker 3>I just just wanted to set up the for people

0:18:09.204 --> 0:18:13.484
<v Speaker 3>to quite understand why the superstars are so important and

0:18:13.484 --> 0:18:16.084
<v Speaker 3>why it's important to sort of save your assets for

0:18:16.244 --> 0:18:20.644
<v Speaker 3>those moves. I think the easiest way I describe it

0:18:20.644 --> 0:18:23.884
<v Speaker 3>as take show heyo Tani, you know, the best hitter

0:18:23.924 --> 0:18:28.404
<v Speaker 3>in baseball, now, when show heo Tany hits a home

0:18:28.484 --> 0:18:32.364
<v Speaker 3>run against the Mets, he then has to wait eight

0:18:32.444 --> 0:18:36.884
<v Speaker 3>more times before he gets to hit again. Basketball is

0:18:36.924 --> 0:18:39.164
<v Speaker 3>like show Heyo Tany. He comes on the floor, hits

0:18:39.164 --> 0:18:40.844
<v Speaker 3>a three, and then when he comes on the floor

0:18:40.844 --> 0:18:42.924
<v Speaker 3>again and he goes like, I'm still the best player,

0:18:43.444 --> 0:18:46.924
<v Speaker 3>so I'm shooting again. So just imagine show Heo Tany

0:18:47.004 --> 0:18:49.644
<v Speaker 3>being able to hit every single time with sho heyo

0:18:49.764 --> 0:18:52.044
<v Speaker 3>Tiny's on the base. So that's what you can do

0:18:52.044 --> 0:18:55.964
<v Speaker 3>in basketball. It's actually gotten worse lately, and this will

0:18:55.964 --> 0:18:58.284
<v Speaker 3>be a little bit for the NBA nerds, but because

0:18:58.364 --> 0:19:00.404
<v Speaker 3>a lot of these players who are so great can

0:19:00.444 --> 0:19:03.524
<v Speaker 3>only be guarded by switching, pick and roll. So pick

0:19:03.564 --> 0:19:06.804
<v Speaker 3>and roll is one of the staples of our sport. Basically,

0:19:06.844 --> 0:19:08.924
<v Speaker 3>someone knocks your man off from guarding you.

0:19:09.644 --> 0:19:13.324
<v Speaker 4>Simple. The easiest way to guard that, but one.

0:19:13.124 --> 0:19:15.084
<v Speaker 3>That hadn't been used because you can end up with

0:19:15.124 --> 0:19:18.244
<v Speaker 3>seven feet people on six foot people is you just

0:19:18.284 --> 0:19:21.804
<v Speaker 3>switch the screen and that the person who gets hit

0:19:21.884 --> 0:19:23.924
<v Speaker 3>stays with the guy that they were hit on and

0:19:23.964 --> 0:19:29.164
<v Speaker 3>the other person switches. So the smart NBA players you know,

0:19:29.964 --> 0:19:34.244
<v Speaker 3>see that now and they they can basically screen and

0:19:34.484 --> 0:19:37.244
<v Speaker 3>decide who guards them. So now imagine show heyo, Tony

0:19:37.244 --> 0:19:39.484
<v Speaker 3>not only bats every time he's up, he gets to

0:19:39.484 --> 0:19:42.284
<v Speaker 3>select the pitcher on the other team he gets to

0:19:42.324 --> 0:19:45.404
<v Speaker 3>go against every time down the floor. So and now

0:19:45.444 --> 0:19:48.684
<v Speaker 3>you understand why you know someone like Lebron James can

0:19:48.764 --> 0:19:52.084
<v Speaker 3>at his peak be worth thirty, like close to thirty

0:19:52.164 --> 0:19:55.524
<v Speaker 3>wins on eighty two games, like an insane impact that

0:19:55.804 --> 0:20:00.444
<v Speaker 3>is not even closely replicated in any other sport. So

0:20:00.524 --> 0:20:02.844
<v Speaker 3>back back to original question, Nate, which now I feel

0:20:02.884 --> 0:20:04.684
<v Speaker 3>like I've gone far afield.

0:20:04.764 --> 0:20:06.044
<v Speaker 4>But it's a podcast.

0:20:06.884 --> 0:20:09.844
<v Speaker 1>The entire is that, how it works, how we're it

0:20:09.884 --> 0:20:10.444
<v Speaker 1>is it is.

0:20:10.604 --> 0:20:14.364
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, that did I answer your original question?

0:20:14.364 --> 0:20:18.244
<v Speaker 2>I feel like I didn't, Well, because you're famous for

0:20:18.324 --> 0:20:21.684
<v Speaker 2>having this kind of in fantasy basically called the stars

0:20:21.724 --> 0:20:26.124
<v Speaker 2>and scrubs yep. Approach, Like not to denigrate the back

0:20:26.164 --> 0:20:28.244
<v Speaker 2>half of the current seventy six ers roster, but like

0:20:28.324 --> 0:20:31.124
<v Speaker 2>they're all they're all a minimum, salaries are just barely

0:20:31.124 --> 0:20:34.844
<v Speaker 2>above minimum. Is that partly because you think that you

0:20:34.884 --> 0:20:39.324
<v Speaker 2>can actually get the average talent instead of replacement level talent?

0:20:39.484 --> 0:20:41.764
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so I think that becomes a linear This is

0:20:41.884 --> 0:20:43.764
<v Speaker 3>the this is the geek podcast, so I can geek

0:20:43.764 --> 0:20:45.884
<v Speaker 3>out of it. It becomes a linear it becomes a

0:20:45.924 --> 0:20:50.964
<v Speaker 3>linear programming problem. So the most efficient spending in the

0:20:51.044 --> 0:20:55.204
<v Speaker 3>league are on minimums and draft picks who are playing

0:20:55.284 --> 0:20:59.364
<v Speaker 3>above their above their weight, essentially where you can they

0:20:59.364 --> 0:21:02.324
<v Speaker 3>can be worth double or triple while you're paying them.

0:21:02.684 --> 0:21:05.244
<v Speaker 3>The problem is you can only put about eight players

0:21:05.284 --> 0:21:09.964
<v Speaker 3>on the floor, so you can't actually fully capture that efficiency.

0:21:10.044 --> 0:21:13.844
<v Speaker 3>Like if I could put sixty draft picks or minimum

0:21:13.884 --> 0:21:17.564
<v Speaker 3>players that I've carefully selected that are worth more than

0:21:17.604 --> 0:21:19.764
<v Speaker 3>I'm paying them, I could, and I could do that,

0:21:19.844 --> 0:21:22.764
<v Speaker 3>I could win the game. But unfortunately you're only allowed

0:21:22.764 --> 0:21:24.244
<v Speaker 3>to put five on the floor at a time, and

0:21:24.524 --> 0:21:28.444
<v Speaker 3>only really eight even play, usually especially in a playoff series.

0:21:29.004 --> 0:21:32.804
<v Speaker 3>So when you look at the how do you like

0:21:33.004 --> 0:21:37.124
<v Speaker 3>generate the most wins? Even a even a player who

0:21:37.204 --> 0:21:40.724
<v Speaker 3>is just worth his salary that's highly paid, is actually

0:21:40.724 --> 0:21:43.604
<v Speaker 3>more important than these players who are worth double or

0:21:43.604 --> 0:21:46.684
<v Speaker 3>triple worth they're paid at the minimum. Then on top

0:21:46.724 --> 0:21:49.804
<v Speaker 3>of that, because of the mac salary, often the top

0:21:49.804 --> 0:21:52.244
<v Speaker 3>player you have is not only paid the most, but

0:21:52.284 --> 0:21:54.524
<v Speaker 3>also worth quite a bit more than what you're paying them.

0:21:55.124 --> 0:21:58.644
<v Speaker 3>Because of the dynamics I said before, which is so yes,

0:21:58.804 --> 0:22:02.644
<v Speaker 3>I really really love good players and I can't get enough,

0:22:02.924 --> 0:22:06.004
<v Speaker 3>and people talk about it, but the reality is, like

0:22:06.604 --> 0:22:08.404
<v Speaker 3>USA basketball, what works?

0:22:08.564 --> 0:22:10.164
<v Speaker 4>I mean, yeah, if you.

0:22:10.124 --> 0:22:14.004
<v Speaker 3>Get lots of highly skilled basketball players together, it generally

0:22:14.044 --> 0:22:14.884
<v Speaker 3>works really well.

0:22:16.124 --> 0:22:19.844
<v Speaker 1>How do you factor in kind of the uncertainty factor

0:22:19.964 --> 0:22:23.284
<v Speaker 1>when you're when you're in a game of individuals and champions,

0:22:23.324 --> 0:22:27.884
<v Speaker 1>right when you're dealing with people who are superstars? How

0:22:27.884 --> 0:22:29.684
<v Speaker 1>does your thinking work or do you just kind of

0:22:30.164 --> 0:22:32.924
<v Speaker 1>not even think about it in terms of injury and

0:22:33.084 --> 0:22:36.444
<v Speaker 1>that risk probability? Where right? If you actually, like, if

0:22:36.444 --> 0:22:39.404
<v Speaker 1>you invest everything in one superstar and like game one

0:22:39.684 --> 0:22:42.404
<v Speaker 1>should happens, Like, how do you think about that.

0:22:42.324 --> 0:22:47.404
<v Speaker 2>Because the superstar happens to be injury prone? Hypothetically hypothetical.

0:22:47.444 --> 0:22:50.804
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's very analogous to the starting pitcher issue that

0:22:51.004 --> 0:22:51.804
<v Speaker 3>baseball teams have.

0:22:51.924 --> 0:22:54.004
<v Speaker 4>But just multiply it by ten again.

0:22:55.324 --> 0:22:58.644
<v Speaker 3>Again, if we were trying to just be the fifth

0:22:58.724 --> 0:23:02.444
<v Speaker 3>best team, then it would become a much harder problem

0:23:03.204 --> 0:23:07.404
<v Speaker 3>because then the trade offs of injured superstar comes in.

0:23:07.444 --> 0:23:09.844
<v Speaker 3>But because you're trying to be the best of thirty,

0:23:11.404 --> 0:23:13.604
<v Speaker 3>you have to buy risk all over the place. And

0:23:13.644 --> 0:23:15.484
<v Speaker 3>it's really just like what risk are you buying? Are

0:23:15.524 --> 0:23:17.524
<v Speaker 3>you buying risks that they're not good enough? You're buying

0:23:17.564 --> 0:23:20.124
<v Speaker 3>risks at their bad people and they'll create off the court.

0:23:20.284 --> 0:23:22.364
<v Speaker 3>Are you buying risks that they're injured all the time,

0:23:22.444 --> 0:23:24.964
<v Speaker 3>or are you buying risks that they're shot might might

0:23:25.044 --> 0:23:25.724
<v Speaker 3>fall apart?

0:23:25.764 --> 0:23:27.364
<v Speaker 4>Like what risk are you buying?

0:23:27.404 --> 0:23:30.084
<v Speaker 3>Because if if you're not buying risks, you're not going

0:23:30.164 --> 0:23:32.764
<v Speaker 3>to win, right you have, Like beating the SMP by

0:23:32.804 --> 0:23:35.084
<v Speaker 3>three to five percent is not winning you the title.

0:23:35.644 --> 0:23:39.644
<v Speaker 3>So I tend to like buying injury risk because when

0:23:40.004 --> 0:23:43.004
<v Speaker 3>if if it all hits together, you have a team

0:23:43.044 --> 0:23:46.844
<v Speaker 3>that can win, I'll take I'll take that over a

0:23:46.844 --> 0:23:50.324
<v Speaker 3>player who's twenty percent worse but available all the time.

0:23:50.404 --> 0:23:54.484
<v Speaker 3>And I'm pretty sure the math depends out on that.

0:23:55.684 --> 0:23:55.884
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:23:55.924 --> 0:23:59.604
<v Speaker 2>I tried that for my fantasy basketball league last year.

0:23:59.644 --> 0:24:02.244
<v Speaker 2>I had Embiid, I had Personius, I had John Morant,

0:24:02.324 --> 0:24:07.204
<v Speaker 2>right Cade Cunningham, all these injury risks, and it totally

0:24:07.244 --> 0:24:08.724
<v Speaker 2>felt on in his face. I was the worst team

0:24:08.724 --> 0:24:09.964
<v Speaker 2>in the league so far.

0:24:11.084 --> 0:24:13.844
<v Speaker 4>I can't believe, like you're arguing with the anecdote, Nate,

0:24:13.924 --> 0:24:14.924
<v Speaker 4>I can't. I can't believe it.

0:24:15.924 --> 0:24:21.524
<v Speaker 1>Well, Nate, you read Nate's book on the Edge, and

0:24:21.524 --> 0:24:24.044
<v Speaker 1>and we talked about this on the podcast, But Nate

0:24:24.244 --> 0:24:28.004
<v Speaker 1>bet over a million dollars on sports for for research

0:24:28.044 --> 0:24:30.204
<v Speaker 1>in one year, and Nate, can you remind me how

0:24:30.244 --> 0:24:32.084
<v Speaker 1>much you ended up winning.

0:24:32.924 --> 0:24:35.924
<v Speaker 2>At one point eight million dollars on the NBA and

0:24:35.964 --> 0:24:36.364
<v Speaker 2>this is not.

0:24:38.644 --> 0:24:40.724
<v Speaker 1>He bet. He bet one point eight And how much

0:24:40.724 --> 0:24:41.204
<v Speaker 1>did you win?

0:24:42.844 --> 0:24:45.724
<v Speaker 2>Five K? So if you do the math, that roughly

0:24:45.764 --> 0:24:49.884
<v Speaker 2>equates to per hour. Do you need to like working

0:24:49.924 --> 0:24:55.884
<v Speaker 2>at KFC after taxes and even before taxes?

0:24:56.004 --> 0:24:58.404
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Maria, how are your poker winning?

0:24:58.444 --> 0:25:01.684
<v Speaker 3>Since you're getting on Nate for his UH for his

0:25:01.924 --> 0:25:03.924
<v Speaker 3>UH sports wagering.

0:25:04.364 --> 0:25:07.884
<v Speaker 4>They're good, They're good per hour. You're looking better than night. Okay,

0:25:07.884 --> 0:25:08.284
<v Speaker 4>that's good.

0:25:08.604 --> 0:25:12.524
<v Speaker 1>Yes, they were better than Nate. I had a horrible

0:25:12.564 --> 0:25:16.284
<v Speaker 1>summer at the World Series during the Summer Series and

0:25:16.404 --> 0:25:18.804
<v Speaker 1>was down over one hundred K, which is not good,

0:25:19.764 --> 0:25:23.644
<v Speaker 1>and then went to EPT Barcelona where I had a

0:25:23.684 --> 0:25:26.124
<v Speaker 1>score for almost one hundred and forty thousand, which put

0:25:26.164 --> 0:25:28.684
<v Speaker 1>me in the black for the year, and then went

0:25:28.764 --> 0:25:32.244
<v Speaker 1>on to you know when when the bracelet last week

0:25:32.644 --> 0:25:35.964
<v Speaker 1>have an eighth place finish in another bracelet event, so

0:25:36.324 --> 0:25:38.964
<v Speaker 1>and I have a few other deep runs. So so

0:25:39.004 --> 0:25:41.804
<v Speaker 1>now I'm now I'm doing more than a five k

0:25:42.004 --> 0:25:45.924
<v Speaker 1>in the black to be fair. To be fair, I

0:25:45.924 --> 0:25:48.364
<v Speaker 1>don't think I've had one point eight million dollars in

0:25:48.404 --> 0:25:51.684
<v Speaker 1>poker buy ins in my entire history of playing poker

0:25:52.204 --> 0:25:54.844
<v Speaker 1>over the last five and a half years, however long

0:25:54.884 --> 0:25:55.524
<v Speaker 1>I've been playing.

0:25:55.684 --> 0:25:58.404
<v Speaker 4>So I'm just actually running a long con on poker

0:25:58.444 --> 0:26:00.124
<v Speaker 4>on Nate. So we're going to do it.

0:26:00.324 --> 0:26:01.324
<v Speaker 1>You're a hustler, Dearly.

0:26:01.404 --> 0:26:05.204
<v Speaker 3>We're doing like we've done like ten events together, where

0:26:05.244 --> 0:26:07.164
<v Speaker 3>he sees how aggressive I am and then I'll just

0:26:07.204 --> 0:26:10.124
<v Speaker 3>tighten up when he when he's shoving on me one

0:26:10.124 --> 0:26:11.164
<v Speaker 3>of these times.

0:26:12.044 --> 0:26:16.244
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of all In, you had a very aggressive strategy.

0:26:16.604 --> 0:26:20.044
<v Speaker 2>Uh this summer where you cleared out all your salary

0:26:20.124 --> 0:26:23.004
<v Speaker 2>cap space and then you traded for is a sign

0:26:23.044 --> 0:26:24.444
<v Speaker 2>and trade. You just signed him out right.

0:26:24.484 --> 0:26:27.004
<v Speaker 4>Just signed out right, Yeah, which is rare, super rare.

0:26:27.004 --> 0:26:33.364
<v Speaker 2>Signed out right, which is rare. The superstar, our superstar

0:26:34.164 --> 0:26:39.564
<v Speaker 2>adjacent player named Paul George's a two way player, superstar player.

0:26:39.444 --> 0:26:41.484
<v Speaker 4>Top top. I mean, I don't know, he's top in

0:26:41.524 --> 0:26:41.844
<v Speaker 4>the league.

0:26:41.844 --> 0:26:43.924
<v Speaker 2>Come on, he's a very good player Paul George, who

0:26:43.964 --> 0:26:50.604
<v Speaker 2>compliments your existing roster. Well, I mean, did you think

0:26:50.644 --> 0:26:52.924
<v Speaker 2>you had a reasonable chance of I want to get

0:26:52.964 --> 0:26:55.244
<v Speaker 2>you in a tampering situation? What was Plan B if

0:26:55.284 --> 0:26:56.964
<v Speaker 2>Paul George hadn't become available.

0:26:57.684 --> 0:26:59.004
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we didn't love Plan B.

0:27:00.724 --> 0:27:03.724
<v Speaker 3>Well, to be to be clear, when we started off

0:27:03.764 --> 0:27:07.244
<v Speaker 3>on that plan, there were several plan as they just

0:27:07.604 --> 0:27:09.804
<v Speaker 3>you know that they're you know, they sort of faded

0:27:09.844 --> 0:27:11.724
<v Speaker 3>their A one, A two, A three, A four, But

0:27:11.764 --> 0:27:15.244
<v Speaker 3>they faded over time, as you know, different things happen,

0:27:15.284 --> 0:27:19.964
<v Speaker 3>different trades, different happiness with team, things like that. We

0:27:20.044 --> 0:27:22.324
<v Speaker 3>felt quite confident this was our best strategy. But I

0:27:22.324 --> 0:27:24.844
<v Speaker 3>would say it's not to be recommended. I really don't

0:27:25.524 --> 0:27:29.164
<v Speaker 3>think people have tried to like write, oh, this is

0:27:29.284 --> 0:27:31.124
<v Speaker 3>like a new way to do things.

0:27:31.164 --> 0:27:32.084
<v Speaker 4>I really don't think. So.

0:27:32.244 --> 0:27:37.204
<v Speaker 3>We we given our team, given how our contracts laid

0:27:37.244 --> 0:27:40.804
<v Speaker 3>out when I came to Philly into twenty twenty, this

0:27:41.124 --> 0:27:45.684
<v Speaker 3>we thought was the right approach. But it could have

0:27:46.364 --> 0:27:48.204
<v Speaker 3>we would have been doing what I was talking about,

0:27:48.324 --> 0:27:51.484
<v Speaker 3>like sort of a waiting move again if we were

0:27:51.484 --> 0:27:55.124
<v Speaker 3>into Plan B, where we were doing moves that could

0:27:55.124 --> 0:27:57.764
<v Speaker 3>be flexible down the road. If the you know, the

0:27:57.764 --> 0:28:02.644
<v Speaker 3>next Paul George became available. But this one obviously there's

0:28:02.724 --> 0:28:05.604
<v Speaker 3>just any move because you know, again, only one team wins,

0:28:05.604 --> 0:28:08.924
<v Speaker 3>so the math is horrible. But we ended up sort

0:28:08.924 --> 0:28:11.284
<v Speaker 3>of on the We ended up playing. We had sort

0:28:11.284 --> 0:28:14.844
<v Speaker 3>of Maria's arc there. We had a last season was

0:28:14.884 --> 0:28:17.964
<v Speaker 3>sort of our you know, we lost whatever we didn't we.

0:28:17.924 --> 0:28:19.444
<v Speaker 4>Didn't have a great year.

0:28:19.604 --> 0:28:21.964
<v Speaker 3>And then you know, then we you know, sort of

0:28:22.084 --> 0:28:25.964
<v Speaker 3>got the front office bracelet and that.

0:28:26.084 --> 0:28:28.364
<v Speaker 4>We were we hit on the sort of high end

0:28:28.404 --> 0:28:29.764
<v Speaker 4>of what we were hoping to do this summer.

0:28:35.124 --> 0:28:36.284
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back right after this.

0:28:39.644 --> 0:28:39.884
<v Speaker 4>M H.

0:28:52.004 --> 0:28:56.444
<v Speaker 2>What are the incentives like for regular season versus maximizing

0:28:56.524 --> 0:29:01.444
<v Speaker 2>championship potential? So you have a undoubted superstar Joel Embiid

0:29:03.124 --> 0:29:05.364
<v Speaker 2>and you listen to all the NBA podcasts and you're like,

0:29:05.484 --> 0:29:09.004
<v Speaker 2>we think that Joel embiid Is should rest more in

0:29:09.044 --> 0:29:11.004
<v Speaker 2>the regular season. I mean, do you AI, do you

0:29:11.084 --> 0:29:16.124
<v Speaker 2>have a plan and be philosophically, what are you trying

0:29:16.124 --> 0:29:18.684
<v Speaker 2>to maximize? Because if you're bringing your thirteen year old

0:29:18.764 --> 0:29:20.604
<v Speaker 2>daughter to the six years game and buy some nice

0:29:20.604 --> 0:29:24.164
<v Speaker 2>seats and it's who's your backup, it's on Obamba, who's

0:29:24.164 --> 0:29:27.244
<v Speaker 2>your you know, Andre Drummers. Yeah, come on, man, I mean,

0:29:27.444 --> 0:29:30.364
<v Speaker 2>you know, look, it's a drop off, I'd say an

0:29:30.404 --> 0:29:31.444
<v Speaker 2>excitement and.

0:29:32.764 --> 0:29:34.364
<v Speaker 4>Right now drop off.

0:29:34.364 --> 0:29:37.724
<v Speaker 3>He keeps trying to do things like Joelle in the preseason,

0:29:38.204 --> 0:29:41.564
<v Speaker 3>which has had mixed mixed results. But we love, we

0:29:41.604 --> 0:29:45.884
<v Speaker 3>love Andre. He's definitely gonna buffet when Joel's out. Look,

0:29:45.924 --> 0:29:50.884
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we definitely optimizing for the postseason. A lot

0:29:50.924 --> 0:29:53.964
<v Speaker 3>of the analysis you see out there aren't isn't very

0:29:53.964 --> 0:29:58.604
<v Speaker 3>well structured. They they do all these hyper correlated analysis, like.

0:29:58.564 --> 0:30:02.044
<v Speaker 4>Oh, teams in the top four, the ones that win.

0:30:02.204 --> 0:30:05.484
<v Speaker 3>You know, well, yeah, if you happen to get if

0:30:05.484 --> 0:30:08.404
<v Speaker 3>the Warriors had gone through a year when they had

0:30:08.484 --> 0:30:10.924
<v Speaker 3>Kevin Durant where everyone was hurt, but then they're healthy

0:30:10.964 --> 0:30:13.764
<v Speaker 3>for the postseason, I'm pretty sure they're gonna make the

0:30:13.804 --> 0:30:15.124
<v Speaker 3>finals or win it that year.

0:30:15.684 --> 0:30:17.364
<v Speaker 4>So you know it.

0:30:18.204 --> 0:30:21.044
<v Speaker 3>For us, it's like, if there's one guiding principle, it's

0:30:21.084 --> 0:30:24.484
<v Speaker 3>just it's the players stupid, Like it's just get the

0:30:24.484 --> 0:30:28.524
<v Speaker 3>best players. And the analysis I talked about before of

0:30:28.564 --> 0:30:32.044
<v Speaker 3>Shoheo Tani, it gets even more pronounced in the playoffs

0:30:32.084 --> 0:30:34.964
<v Speaker 3>because players go from playing thirty to thirty five minutes

0:30:35.004 --> 0:30:40.804
<v Speaker 3>to forty to forty five minutes. Rotations shrink, so all

0:30:40.884 --> 0:30:44.764
<v Speaker 3>the impacts of star players actually again goes up. Superstar

0:30:44.804 --> 0:30:47.604
<v Speaker 3>players are also the player Everyone gets worse in the playoffs.

0:30:47.644 --> 0:30:48.204
<v Speaker 4>When I say.

0:30:48.044 --> 0:30:53.084
<v Speaker 3>Everyone, I mean on average everyone, some some get better,

0:30:53.484 --> 0:30:56.724
<v Speaker 3>but in general everyone gets worse as the competition level

0:30:56.764 --> 0:30:59.924
<v Speaker 3>goes up. But superstars drop the least, so they get

0:31:00.164 --> 0:31:03.284
<v Speaker 3>they they don't fall as much as pretty much everyone else.

0:31:03.364 --> 0:31:07.724
<v Speaker 2>So and there's not much advantage to I mean, if

0:31:07.804 --> 0:31:10.204
<v Speaker 2>you start as a seven seed, then it's not actually

0:31:10.204 --> 0:31:11.924
<v Speaker 2>that harmful, right.

0:31:11.844 --> 0:31:14.204
<v Speaker 4>Seven has become a little more harmful because the playing.

0:31:14.124 --> 0:31:17.084
<v Speaker 2>Oh you're in the playing Yeah, so six six six.

0:31:16.924 --> 0:31:20.724
<v Speaker 3>Is fine because yes, you know, a seven game series.

0:31:20.404 --> 0:31:23.124
<v Speaker 4>Where you're one more on the one more on the road.

0:31:23.844 --> 0:31:26.044
<v Speaker 3>It turns out to be not I think that's a

0:31:26.044 --> 0:31:27.804
<v Speaker 3>pretty small swing in percentage.

0:31:27.804 --> 0:31:30.204
<v Speaker 4>I think it's like two to three percent. It's not massive.

0:31:31.204 --> 0:31:39.004
<v Speaker 2>Why did the NBA get religion on analytics before after baseball,

0:31:39.204 --> 0:31:40.684
<v Speaker 2>I suppose, but yoube not that much.

0:31:40.564 --> 0:31:42.844
<v Speaker 4>In oh, I think even at the league level.

0:31:43.044 --> 0:31:46.684
<v Speaker 3>I think before they were the first to do a

0:31:46.724 --> 0:31:48.804
<v Speaker 3>lot of analytics on the business side that was shared

0:31:48.844 --> 0:31:52.044
<v Speaker 3>with teams. So I would say the NBA was sort

0:31:52.044 --> 0:31:54.684
<v Speaker 3>of for the teams on baseball were before the teams

0:31:54.684 --> 0:31:57.644
<v Speaker 3>in basketball. But at the league level, I think I'm

0:31:57.684 --> 0:31:59.524
<v Speaker 3>pretty confident the NBA was first.

0:31:59.884 --> 0:32:00.764
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:32:01.084 --> 0:32:04.524
<v Speaker 2>So my Pitt theory is that, uh, this is because

0:32:04.564 --> 0:32:08.724
<v Speaker 2>the NBA tends to attract new money owners. So people

0:32:08.804 --> 0:32:11.764
<v Speaker 2>in financezer tech who not some old magnate of some

0:32:12.964 --> 0:32:16.164
<v Speaker 2>shitty beer company. You're not to demean by the way

0:32:16.164 --> 0:32:19.444
<v Speaker 2>sponsor us Bush Bush and bud Light. We went your

0:32:19.444 --> 0:32:22.804
<v Speaker 2>sponsorship can advertise your hard Seltzer produce.

0:32:22.884 --> 0:32:26.204
<v Speaker 3>One of the top agents in basketball is like the

0:32:27.524 --> 0:32:30.604
<v Speaker 3>nephew of the Bush Anheuser Busch empire.

0:32:30.764 --> 0:32:34.764
<v Speaker 4>So but yeah, no, I think you're one hundred percent right.

0:32:34.764 --> 0:32:35.284
<v Speaker 4>In eight, the.

0:32:35.444 --> 0:32:41.284
<v Speaker 3>Owners both the price point and you know, the sophisticated

0:32:41.324 --> 0:32:43.844
<v Speaker 3>owners who were buying in in the late nineties through

0:32:43.884 --> 0:32:50.124
<v Speaker 3>the two thousand to twenty ten, twenty fifteen range, they

0:32:50.204 --> 0:32:54.444
<v Speaker 3>all sort of saw the NBA getting more global, getting bigger,

0:32:54.484 --> 0:32:58.444
<v Speaker 3>They saw baseball declining, They saw the cat like the

0:32:58.524 --> 0:33:02.324
<v Speaker 3>cap system in the NBA has better, and so yeah,

0:33:02.364 --> 0:33:05.004
<v Speaker 3>all the sophisticated owners came into the NBA, I think

0:33:05.124 --> 0:33:08.364
<v Speaker 3>before pretty much all these other major leagues.

0:33:08.484 --> 0:33:13.164
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, when you're watching the game, would you say you're

0:33:13.564 --> 0:33:16.764
<v Speaker 2>I know the answer this question, so don't lie. Are

0:33:16.804 --> 0:33:18.884
<v Speaker 2>you relativelys in when you're watching a game?

0:33:20.044 --> 0:33:22.124
<v Speaker 4>If I'm watching, I'm very nods in? You know. That's

0:33:22.124 --> 0:33:25.724
<v Speaker 4>why I know it make a terrible coach. I spent.

0:33:25.844 --> 0:33:29.484
<v Speaker 3>I even have a formula sadly for when I go nuts,

0:33:29.524 --> 0:33:32.284
<v Speaker 3>and it's it's it's basically just like when the win

0:33:32.444 --> 0:33:36.124
<v Speaker 3>probability of either a game or even a play goes

0:33:36.204 --> 0:33:40.324
<v Speaker 3>way up to where you start as even a probabilistic thinker,

0:33:40.844 --> 0:33:43.164
<v Speaker 3>you start to go to one instead of point nine

0:33:43.404 --> 0:33:45.884
<v Speaker 3>you know in your head, and then it doesn't happen.

0:33:46.044 --> 0:33:48.884
<v Speaker 3>For especially if it doesn't happen for some really dumb

0:33:48.924 --> 0:33:51.444
<v Speaker 3>reason that could have been prevented, it gets Yeah, that

0:33:51.484 --> 0:33:54.444
<v Speaker 3>gets really annoying and hard given how much time and

0:33:54.644 --> 0:33:58.204
<v Speaker 3>work and effort goes into things from the front office,

0:33:58.284 --> 0:34:01.564
<v Speaker 3>from the players, from everything. So example, you know you're

0:34:01.644 --> 0:34:04.324
<v Speaker 3>up twenty five in a playoff game, you know that,

0:34:04.804 --> 0:34:07.524
<v Speaker 3>and you lose it, that gets tough. Or you know

0:34:07.884 --> 0:34:11.044
<v Speaker 3>the small ones which are done, which is like breakaway.

0:34:11.164 --> 0:34:13.604
<v Speaker 3>We get a steal and it's a breakaway and the

0:34:13.684 --> 0:34:16.924
<v Speaker 3>guy like you know gets fouled from behind, but they

0:34:16.924 --> 0:34:18.884
<v Speaker 3>don't call it, you know that, Like that kind of

0:34:18.884 --> 0:34:22.004
<v Speaker 3>stuff just throws me for a loop. It makes no sense,

0:34:22.044 --> 0:34:25.884
<v Speaker 3>but it does. Yeah, I'm very zen when the when

0:34:25.924 --> 0:34:29.964
<v Speaker 3>the odds of winning drop very low, I just sort

0:34:29.964 --> 0:34:33.444
<v Speaker 3>of like try to like learn things at that point.

0:34:33.724 --> 0:34:35.844
<v Speaker 1>So that's called fatalistic nun zend.

0:34:36.924 --> 0:34:41.524
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I call pessimistic optimism. That's my it. Is it

0:34:41.564 --> 0:34:43.604
<v Speaker 4>called fatalistic or nihilistic?

0:34:44.164 --> 0:34:46.204
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, at that point when you're like, Okay, there's just

0:34:46.324 --> 0:34:47.924
<v Speaker 1>no way in hell this is happening.

0:34:48.084 --> 0:34:50.164
<v Speaker 4>So so what would be the poker covent?

0:34:50.204 --> 0:34:53.844
<v Speaker 3>Like you're in a hand that you're you're pot you're

0:34:53.884 --> 0:34:57.964
<v Speaker 3>heavily pot committed, Like the right strategy is still to

0:34:58.004 --> 0:35:00.844
<v Speaker 3>stay in the hand even though your odds of winning

0:35:00.924 --> 0:35:02.764
<v Speaker 3>it at that point, you know, have to be like

0:35:02.924 --> 0:35:04.444
<v Speaker 3>twenty percent or something like that.

0:35:04.964 --> 0:35:09.204
<v Speaker 1>No, I mean, I think I think in poker, you know,

0:35:09.684 --> 0:35:13.004
<v Speaker 1>being done is quite important. And I would say there's

0:35:13.044 --> 0:35:15.844
<v Speaker 1>no situation where your pot committed and you have to

0:35:15.844 --> 0:35:17.444
<v Speaker 1>stay in the hand if you think your odds have

0:35:17.524 --> 0:35:20.004
<v Speaker 1>dropped to twenty percent, as long as you have any

0:35:20.084 --> 0:35:23.244
<v Speaker 1>chips behind, you can always fold. And I think that

0:35:23.244 --> 0:35:25.404
<v Speaker 1>that's really important. And I think that people who get

0:35:25.444 --> 0:35:28.484
<v Speaker 1>too emotionally invested forget that, they forget that you are

0:35:28.524 --> 0:35:30.924
<v Speaker 1>always allowed to fold, and they get to this point

0:35:30.924 --> 0:35:33.044
<v Speaker 1>where like, no, but like this was supposed to go

0:35:33.164 --> 0:35:35.484
<v Speaker 1>this way, and so they like end up putting those

0:35:35.484 --> 0:35:37.524
<v Speaker 1>final chips in the middle. And I've done that, and

0:35:37.564 --> 0:35:39.844
<v Speaker 1>I've written about doing that, and it's a horrible feeling,

0:35:40.124 --> 0:35:42.484
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you like, either when someone else goes

0:35:42.484 --> 0:35:45.124
<v Speaker 1>you into it or when you god yourself into going

0:35:45.164 --> 0:35:48.244
<v Speaker 1>broke even though you like you knew that you were maid.

0:35:48.484 --> 0:35:51.924
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and so on your trip sixes or whatever it

0:35:52.004 --> 0:35:54.164
<v Speaker 3>was to knock you out of the World Series at

0:35:54.204 --> 0:35:57.004
<v Speaker 3>place eighty seven, how were you, Darrel?

0:35:57.284 --> 0:36:01.644
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna bring that up? Is we should talk about els?

0:36:03.404 --> 0:36:06.524
<v Speaker 2>The twenty seven consecutive miss three pointers.

0:36:08.124 --> 0:36:08.764
<v Speaker 4>We all name this.

0:36:09.564 --> 0:36:12.484
<v Speaker 3>We don't name its twenty five because the league report

0:36:12.564 --> 0:36:15.644
<v Speaker 3>after said they followed this on two. So the official

0:36:16.004 --> 0:36:22.004
<v Speaker 3>the official record for me is twenty five misses. So so, well,

0:36:22.044 --> 0:36:27.044
<v Speaker 3>you asked how ZENI was, so it seemed to bait.

0:36:28.644 --> 0:36:31.564
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you don't really actually a little bit ambiguused.

0:36:31.844 --> 0:36:35.084
<v Speaker 2>You don't really have any influence over the game. I've

0:36:35.084 --> 0:36:38.604
<v Speaker 2>talked about this before. What are you allowed to communicate

0:36:39.284 --> 0:36:42.644
<v Speaker 2>to other people that are on the floor during the game.

0:36:43.324 --> 0:36:46.004
<v Speaker 4>So it's actually even gotten more ridiculous.

0:36:46.564 --> 0:36:50.724
<v Speaker 3>So they they at first the league, even when I

0:36:50.884 --> 0:36:53.884
<v Speaker 3>first started league, like two thousand and four, I joke

0:36:53.964 --> 0:36:57.124
<v Speaker 3>with them in a very you know, geeky nerdy way. Unfortunately,

0:36:57.924 --> 0:37:03.204
<v Speaker 3>they they banned electromagnetic signals to the bench, like you

0:37:03.244 --> 0:37:07.804
<v Speaker 3>couldn't text anyone, you can't call any common well it

0:37:07.844 --> 0:37:09.084
<v Speaker 3>was all data calls by.

0:37:08.964 --> 0:37:11.844
<v Speaker 4>Then, so but you could still.

0:37:11.884 --> 0:37:14.204
<v Speaker 3>I could still sit behind the bench to rows and

0:37:14.284 --> 0:37:18.724
<v Speaker 3>yell to my So vibrating molecules are fine for communicating,

0:37:18.764 --> 0:37:23.364
<v Speaker 3>but electromatic signals not allowed by the league, which to

0:37:23.844 --> 0:37:25.404
<v Speaker 3>this day I believe that's the rule. But then they

0:37:25.444 --> 0:37:29.324
<v Speaker 3>made it even worse. This year they passed a ridiculous

0:37:29.924 --> 0:37:34.004
<v Speaker 3>band on anyone using cell phones forty five minutes before

0:37:34.044 --> 0:37:39.164
<v Speaker 3>the game till after which we'll see how that goes.

0:37:39.764 --> 0:37:41.764
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I can still sit behind the bench and

0:37:41.844 --> 0:37:45.684
<v Speaker 3>yell to my hearts content and hand signals, yeah, smoke

0:37:45.724 --> 0:37:46.924
<v Speaker 3>signal like the popes use.

0:37:47.004 --> 0:37:50.244
<v Speaker 4>We can do that. We have lots of yeah that

0:37:50.244 --> 0:37:53.364
<v Speaker 4>that we can well, no, it's electric. Oh, shoot, I

0:37:53.364 --> 0:37:53.844
<v Speaker 4>screwed up.

0:37:53.844 --> 0:37:57.004
<v Speaker 3>We're allowed to use the electromatic spectrum in the visual range.

0:37:57.164 --> 0:37:59.884
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry, So we can use the ones our eyes

0:37:59.924 --> 0:38:02.524
<v Speaker 3>can see. We're still to use, but all others are banned.

0:38:03.724 --> 0:38:07.084
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, So I to answer your question, I don't

0:38:07.084 --> 0:38:11.524
<v Speaker 3>have much impact. Sometimes there's some halftime things where I'll

0:38:11.524 --> 0:38:16.004
<v Speaker 3>mention something, but our coaches are very good. It's never

0:38:16.044 --> 0:38:19.524
<v Speaker 3>anything relevant that would change the outcome of something.

0:38:19.844 --> 0:38:24.364
<v Speaker 2>So are there examples of where the nerds have gone

0:38:24.404 --> 0:38:27.724
<v Speaker 2>too far? Things that were kind of superficial conclusions based

0:38:27.724 --> 0:38:28.444
<v Speaker 2>on the analytics?

0:38:28.604 --> 0:38:30.404
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean hot hands, the easy one.

0:38:30.844 --> 0:38:32.804
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think anyone who played which I did play,

0:38:32.844 --> 0:38:34.964
<v Speaker 3>that was, you know best suppose my sport I wasn't

0:38:35.084 --> 0:38:37.604
<v Speaker 3>very good. I can play at the pro level, of course,

0:38:37.684 --> 0:38:41.724
<v Speaker 3>but you do sort of get that feeling of muscle

0:38:41.804 --> 0:38:45.404
<v Speaker 3>memory and all that. The hot hand was thought to

0:38:45.484 --> 0:38:48.404
<v Speaker 3>not exist, mostly because they didn't factor for people who

0:38:48.404 --> 0:38:51.364
<v Speaker 3>think they're hot shooting really hard shots. So once once

0:38:51.404 --> 0:38:55.124
<v Speaker 3>you adjust for that effect, there is a hot hand effect.

0:38:55.364 --> 0:38:59.324
<v Speaker 4>That's one I think. Gosh, there's got to be a

0:38:59.324 --> 0:39:00.124
<v Speaker 4>bunch like.

0:39:00.444 --> 0:39:06.164
<v Speaker 2>I mean clutch performance. You are the former possessor of

0:39:06.364 --> 0:39:08.404
<v Speaker 2>Ben Simmons's NBA playing rights.

0:39:11.764 --> 0:39:16.524
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think that one's a tough one. No, they're

0:39:18.044 --> 0:39:20.764
<v Speaker 4>you just never have enough end to confidently say.

0:39:21.124 --> 0:39:23.644
<v Speaker 3>But for sure when people look back, they can show

0:39:23.764 --> 0:39:26.564
<v Speaker 3>player X or Y was more clutch and high leverage moments,

0:39:27.444 --> 0:39:29.004
<v Speaker 3>but no one's been able to show that they could

0:39:29.004 --> 0:39:29.524
<v Speaker 3>predict that.

0:39:30.004 --> 0:39:35.324
<v Speaker 4>You know X post So clutch is a good one.

0:39:39.244 --> 0:39:56.484
<v Speaker 2>And we'll be right back after this break. We're going

0:39:56.564 --> 0:39:58.084
<v Speaker 2>to try to wrap up in the next few minutes.

0:39:58.964 --> 0:40:03.084
<v Speaker 4>To Nate, though, I have to call it Nate yesterday, please.

0:40:03.644 --> 0:40:08.684
<v Speaker 3>So Nate, being a very good Chicago crad, assumed efficient

0:40:08.724 --> 0:40:13.244
<v Speaker 3>market theory is correct, and he managed he managed to

0:40:13.284 --> 0:40:15.764
<v Speaker 3>stumble into like one of the areas of which there's

0:40:15.804 --> 0:40:19.484
<v Speaker 3>thousands of papers where it's not correct, and there's lots

0:40:19.484 --> 0:40:23.324
<v Speaker 3>of hypotheses and even some leading hypotheses it's not. So

0:40:23.724 --> 0:40:26.684
<v Speaker 3>he took an anti momentum stance. And to be clear,

0:40:26.764 --> 0:40:30.004
<v Speaker 3>you have to get very very geeky and say, like, yes,

0:40:30.684 --> 0:40:33.124
<v Speaker 3>there is a it is mostly a random walk from

0:40:33.484 --> 0:40:37.404
<v Speaker 3>day to day, which I think you mentioned the stock market.

0:40:37.524 --> 0:40:39.604
<v Speaker 3>We're in the stock market, but you use like the

0:40:39.604 --> 0:40:42.364
<v Speaker 3>stock market is a proxy of live momentum can't exist

0:40:42.404 --> 0:40:47.444
<v Speaker 3>in political markets or probably doesn't exist when momentum is

0:40:47.564 --> 0:40:51.044
<v Speaker 3>for sure a factor to use the quant So ray

0:40:51.084 --> 0:40:53.684
<v Speaker 3>I whand ask you who used to run quantic gold sacks,

0:40:53.684 --> 0:40:56.044
<v Speaker 3>and I, you know, I have a lot of money

0:40:56.044 --> 0:40:59.764
<v Speaker 3>in that factor because it's worked for one hundred years,

0:40:59.884 --> 0:41:03.284
<v Speaker 3>hundreds of years. And they think that momentum is a

0:41:03.324 --> 0:41:05.764
<v Speaker 3>real thing in the stock market that you can trade on,

0:41:05.964 --> 0:41:07.284
<v Speaker 3>even though everyone knows it.

0:41:07.284 --> 0:41:09.364
<v Speaker 4>It breaks every for a couple of reason.

0:41:09.484 --> 0:41:13.604
<v Speaker 3>And one they think that there's a lot of papers

0:41:13.604 --> 0:41:17.244
<v Speaker 3>when people are slow to react to information, so you know,

0:41:17.324 --> 0:41:19.884
<v Speaker 3>there's some news and people don't at the beginning to

0:41:19.924 --> 0:41:24.004
<v Speaker 3>realize how big that might end up being until multiple

0:41:24.084 --> 0:41:24.604
<v Speaker 3>days later.

0:41:24.724 --> 0:41:26.604
<v Speaker 4>So so of course you can be wrong.

0:41:26.644 --> 0:41:29.324
<v Speaker 3>But again the the the overall bet is the momentum

0:41:29.484 --> 0:41:33.084
<v Speaker 3>does slightly work and you can trade it. The second

0:41:33.124 --> 0:41:35.564
<v Speaker 3>one is that there are these you know, to use

0:41:35.564 --> 0:41:40.644
<v Speaker 3>a there are these whale insiders that move markets, and

0:41:40.684 --> 0:41:45.484
<v Speaker 3>you're basically free writing on their information when they when

0:41:45.484 --> 0:41:48.924
<v Speaker 3>they first make those first make those bets. So those

0:41:48.964 --> 0:41:50.404
<v Speaker 3>are two of the reasons.

0:41:51.084 --> 0:41:53.364
<v Speaker 2>So number number go up on number.

0:41:54.764 --> 0:41:58.444
<v Speaker 3>If done very characters sophisticated, I would I would definitely

0:41:58.524 --> 0:42:02.964
<v Speaker 3>recommend that both of you put some some percentage of

0:42:03.004 --> 0:42:06.364
<v Speaker 3>your of your wealth and a momentum stock because it's

0:42:07.364 --> 0:42:08.844
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's similar to do you know about the

0:42:08.844 --> 0:42:12.444
<v Speaker 3>long shot and gambling? I'm sure you do, They ain't sure.

0:42:12.884 --> 0:42:18.884
<v Speaker 3>So people don't like to bet sure things. They like

0:42:18.964 --> 0:42:20.964
<v Speaker 3>to bet long shots. So because of that, the sure

0:42:21.044 --> 0:42:24.684
<v Speaker 3>things have this long, long history and it still exists

0:42:24.844 --> 0:42:28.404
<v Speaker 3>if they let you put any money down, it still

0:42:28.444 --> 0:42:31.364
<v Speaker 3>exists that if you bet the favorites and you bet

0:42:31.404 --> 0:42:37.084
<v Speaker 3>that with enough money that you can that you can

0:42:37.764 --> 0:42:40.844
<v Speaker 3>you know, overall win essentially, and I know people have

0:42:40.884 --> 0:42:44.484
<v Speaker 3>funds that do exactly that. Oh there's one last reason

0:42:44.564 --> 0:42:47.884
<v Speaker 3>they think momentum still exists. It's that's because people hate

0:42:48.044 --> 0:42:53.964
<v Speaker 3>losing their money, right, And there's a fatter tail on

0:42:54.084 --> 0:42:57.324
<v Speaker 3>the downside of momentum then there is on an upside.

0:42:57.324 --> 0:43:00.484
<v Speaker 4>Does that make sense? So, so you you're.

0:43:00.324 --> 0:43:05.084
<v Speaker 3>More likely to lose big with momentum strategies in certain

0:43:05.524 --> 0:43:06.724
<v Speaker 3>in certain market.

0:43:06.564 --> 0:43:08.044
<v Speaker 4>Environments than others.

0:43:08.684 --> 0:43:10.164
<v Speaker 2>But over I hadn't thought about that.

0:43:10.484 --> 0:43:15.404
<v Speaker 3>But over time it absolutely wins over one hundred years plus.

0:43:15.524 --> 0:43:17.884
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, yeah.

0:43:17.684 --> 0:43:20.124
<v Speaker 3>Well can I ask so given you just got a

0:43:20.124 --> 0:43:23.924
<v Speaker 3>crash course in quant momentum is there any I would

0:43:23.964 --> 0:43:26.124
<v Speaker 3>think one of those fits that that if people are

0:43:26.164 --> 0:43:32.164
<v Speaker 3>betting heavily on Trump or or or Kamala, that there

0:43:32.244 --> 0:43:36.124
<v Speaker 3>may be signal that the market hasn't picked up yet.

0:43:37.084 --> 0:43:44.084
<v Speaker 2>Could I am skeptical about empirically the betting markets under preform, okay,

0:43:45.084 --> 0:43:47.324
<v Speaker 2>under from polling based methods.

0:43:47.164 --> 0:43:50.884
<v Speaker 4>Got it? I mean it's weird. Let's say just polls.

0:43:50.964 --> 0:43:54.804
<v Speaker 4>Can you is their momentum to polls? The potentially there's

0:43:54.844 --> 0:43:55.484
<v Speaker 4>a good question.

0:43:55.564 --> 0:43:58.844
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean it's you can get these feedback effects

0:43:58.884 --> 0:44:01.724
<v Speaker 2>and it's some question as to whether they're real or

0:44:01.724 --> 0:44:04.564
<v Speaker 2>whether they're fake. Right, But like in principle, can it

0:44:04.564 --> 0:44:07.124
<v Speaker 2>has a good poll that that gets good media coverage,

0:44:07.164 --> 0:44:10.884
<v Speaker 2>which gets more polling, But then quilibrium kind of shifts

0:44:11.364 --> 0:44:13.644
<v Speaker 2>because people get bored and now expectations are higher, so

0:44:13.644 --> 0:44:16.364
<v Speaker 2>you kind of wind up with like a sine wave pattern.

0:44:16.404 --> 0:44:18.604
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, no, I mean it's it's a lot of

0:44:18.644 --> 0:44:23.004
<v Speaker 2>things where to a first approximation, ignore the hot hand,

0:44:23.404 --> 0:44:25.724
<v Speaker 2>ignore momentum. Then you start studying and it's like, okay,

0:44:25.764 --> 0:44:27.604
<v Speaker 2>now we're advanced enough where we have to think about

0:44:27.604 --> 0:44:32.604
<v Speaker 2>the second approximation and a third order effects and so forth.

0:44:32.684 --> 0:44:35.844
<v Speaker 2>And and you know, the sophistication of the NBA now

0:44:35.924 --> 0:44:37.644
<v Speaker 2>or of Wall Street or a poker are such that,

0:44:37.764 --> 0:44:40.244
<v Speaker 2>like you do have to take into account the edge

0:44:40.244 --> 0:44:41.364
<v Speaker 2>case stuff sometimes.

0:44:41.644 --> 0:44:44.004
<v Speaker 3>Can I ask him, Maria, because you're probably the best

0:44:44.004 --> 0:44:45.804
<v Speaker 3>poker player on here is my guess.

0:44:47.004 --> 0:44:50.084
<v Speaker 1>How much do you are winning the World Series of Needles?

0:44:51.684 --> 0:44:52.124
<v Speaker 4>Do you.

0:44:53.564 --> 0:44:56.644
<v Speaker 3>What is what is the meta? Like do you have

0:44:56.724 --> 0:44:58.924
<v Speaker 3>to train with like a solver all the time or

0:44:58.964 --> 0:45:00.644
<v Speaker 3>do you just play a lot? Or how do you

0:45:00.684 --> 0:45:02.684
<v Speaker 3>get reinforcement learning? Yeah?

0:45:03.004 --> 0:45:06.684
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think these days, because the solvers are quite

0:45:06.684 --> 0:45:10.644
<v Speaker 1>good and there are really great ais that you can

0:45:10.684 --> 0:45:13.884
<v Speaker 1>play against, I think that that's actually quite important, so

0:45:13.924 --> 0:45:15.964
<v Speaker 1>that you can get that feedback and see what the

0:45:15.964 --> 0:45:20.004
<v Speaker 1>optimal strategy would be. And then it's like with everything, right,

0:45:20.044 --> 0:45:23.644
<v Speaker 1>that's your baseline, and then you absolutely deviate, right because

0:45:24.084 --> 0:45:27.324
<v Speaker 1>the people you're playing against in large field events do

0:45:27.444 --> 0:45:30.444
<v Speaker 1>not play like the solver, right, unless I am playing

0:45:30.484 --> 0:45:32.884
<v Speaker 1>like the ten best players in the world, Like, they're

0:45:32.884 --> 0:45:35.604
<v Speaker 1>not going to be playing optimal strategy. And sometimes they

0:45:35.604 --> 0:45:38.644
<v Speaker 1>don't even understand what optimal strategy is in the sense

0:45:38.724 --> 0:45:40.404
<v Speaker 1>that like, so aren't.

0:45:40.124 --> 0:45:44.124
<v Speaker 4>There mix is? Aren't there mixed player simulators.

0:45:43.404 --> 0:45:47.404
<v Speaker 1>Or yeah, yes, well no there aren't there There aren't

0:45:47.564 --> 0:45:50.884
<v Speaker 1>unless unless what you do. So you can play around

0:45:50.924 --> 0:45:54.004
<v Speaker 1>with the ranges, right, This is like any algorithm, garbage in,

0:45:54.084 --> 0:45:57.804
<v Speaker 1>garbage out, yeah, right, and good stuff and good stuff out.

0:45:58.604 --> 0:46:01.524
<v Speaker 1>And so you make assumptions about hand ranges before you

0:46:01.764 --> 0:46:04.244
<v Speaker 1>before you do any of this, before you run sims,

0:46:04.324 --> 0:46:07.324
<v Speaker 1>before you kind of do a hand deconstruction where you say,

0:46:07.604 --> 0:46:10.364
<v Speaker 1>I think the player in this position is open these hands, right,

0:46:10.724 --> 0:46:13.124
<v Speaker 1>and I think that this player is playing these hands.

0:46:13.604 --> 0:46:15.404
<v Speaker 1>And you can be right or you can be wrong.

0:46:15.484 --> 0:46:18.724
<v Speaker 1>But there's a thing called node locking, which is something

0:46:18.724 --> 0:46:21.164
<v Speaker 1>that you can do when you mimic bad players, right,

0:46:21.204 --> 0:46:23.284
<v Speaker 1>So you can node lock it to say, okay, no,

0:46:23.484 --> 0:46:25.844
<v Speaker 1>you're telling me that the correct thing here is to raise,

0:46:26.204 --> 0:46:28.604
<v Speaker 1>but I'm going to say that this person never raises, right,

0:46:28.644 --> 0:46:31.564
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to node lock. It's not an option.

0:46:31.924 --> 0:46:34.764
<v Speaker 4>I've been node locking my whole career. I've been node locking.

0:46:35.444 --> 0:46:37.884
<v Speaker 1>Then, so then you can see how the strategy changes.

0:46:37.924 --> 0:46:40.044
<v Speaker 1>So you can play with the solvers to show you

0:46:40.044 --> 0:46:42.964
<v Speaker 1>how to deviate against specific opponent types. But you know,

0:46:43.004 --> 0:46:46.284
<v Speaker 1>as Nate said, like when it comes to when it

0:46:46.284 --> 0:46:48.644
<v Speaker 1>comes to anything like it can be dangerous, like you

0:46:48.684 --> 0:46:51.204
<v Speaker 1>need to make sure you really understand the baseline and

0:46:51.204 --> 0:46:55.084
<v Speaker 1>that you really like have the ground strategy really solid,

0:46:55.244 --> 0:46:57.164
<v Speaker 1>so you have to do both. But these days I

0:46:57.204 --> 0:46:59.164
<v Speaker 1>do think you need to use the solvers and the

0:46:59.244 --> 0:47:03.444
<v Speaker 1>analytics as well. So I think that's important, and I

0:47:03.484 --> 0:47:06.444
<v Speaker 1>know that we're basically out of time, Nate. Between you

0:47:06.524 --> 0:47:10.604
<v Speaker 1>and Darryl needling each other, it was definitely a nice

0:47:10.684 --> 0:47:15.444
<v Speaker 1>reality TV edition of Risky Business. So I hope everyone

0:47:15.444 --> 0:47:18.564
<v Speaker 1>has enjoyed that very much. And I've loved being I've

0:47:18.604 --> 0:47:20.604
<v Speaker 1>really enjoyed like just being a fly on the wall

0:47:20.644 --> 0:47:22.404
<v Speaker 1>for those back and forth exchanges.

0:47:22.444 --> 0:47:22.724
<v Speaker 4>I love it.

0:47:22.804 --> 0:47:24.484
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's do it more, Daryl, We'll have to have

0:47:24.524 --> 0:47:24.924
<v Speaker 1>you back.

0:47:25.884 --> 0:47:30.484
<v Speaker 4>He resisted any Nicks zings. Thank you name, Darryl.

0:47:30.564 --> 0:47:32.284
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I look, it was a great series. You

0:47:32.324 --> 0:47:34.364
<v Speaker 2>guys fought hard. You guys fought hard. It was an

0:47:34.404 --> 0:47:36.324
<v Speaker 2>excellent basketball series, and as a Knicks fan, I was

0:47:36.324 --> 0:47:38.204
<v Speaker 2>happy with the outcome. So thank you for that and

0:47:38.244 --> 0:47:38.964
<v Speaker 2>thanks for coming on.

0:47:39.244 --> 0:47:40.564
<v Speaker 4>Thanks Thanks Branda, thanks for that.

0:47:45.804 --> 0:47:47.964
<v Speaker 1>Let us know what you think of the show. Reach

0:47:48.044 --> 0:47:53.484
<v Speaker 1>out to us at Risky Business at Pushkin dot FM.

0:47:53.604 --> 0:47:57.044
<v Speaker 1>Risky Business is hosted by me Maria Konnikova.

0:47:56.364 --> 0:47:57.724
<v Speaker 2>And by me Nate Silver.

0:47:58.084 --> 0:48:01.604
<v Speaker 1>The show is a co production of Pushkin Industries and iHeartMedia.

0:48:02.124 --> 0:48:05.684
<v Speaker 1>This episode was produced by Isabelle Carter. Our associate producer

0:48:05.764 --> 0:48:09.284
<v Speaker 1>is Gabriel Hunter Chang. Our executive producer is Jacob Goldstein.

0:48:09.604 --> 0:48:11.724
<v Speaker 2>If you like the show, please rate and review us

0:48:11.764 --> 0:48:13.844
<v Speaker 2>so other people can find us too. And if you

0:48:13.844 --> 0:48:16.204
<v Speaker 2>want to listen to an ad free version, sign up

0:48:16.244 --> 0:48:18.844
<v Speaker 2>for Pushkin Plus. For six, ten and nine a month,

0:48:18.844 --> 0:48:21.644
<v Speaker 2>you get access to ad free listening. Thanks for tuning in.