WEBVTT - Evan McMorris-Santoro & Dave Weigel

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Molly John Fast and this is Fast Politics,

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>where we discussed the top political headlines with some of

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>today's best minds and.

0:00:09.480 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 2>New Reuters ipso's poll says fifty one percent of Americans

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:20.119
<v Speaker 2>are opposed to military strikes against drug boats.

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:22.639
<v Speaker 1>We have such a great show for you today. Notice

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>his own Evan McMorris, San Toro stops by to talk

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 1>about the post Epstein email fallout. Then we'll talk to

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Semaphore's Dave Weigel about the vibe shift since election Day.

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:39.560
<v Speaker 1>But first the news.

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 3>What would you say if I told you that Trump

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 3>is taking his cues from Zoronmandani.

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I would say that I wouldn't actually be that surprised,

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>because I had some reporting that's said as much.

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, now all everybody's talking about is affordability, and I

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 3>think it's a very interesting story that particularly more is

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 3>Cats told on our podcast last week that when everybody

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 3>was thinking of other things, Zoron had a hunch that

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 3>even though the pulling said othertherwise, that affordability was the

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 3>real thing people needed to talk about.

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 4>And now it's trickled all the way up to the

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 4>White House.

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>So we know that Trump found Mondani to be popular

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and to be charming, and that he had sort of

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:29.320
<v Speaker 1>like game recognized his game, Like he saw a politician

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>that had that thing that he has, and he was

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>both threatened and also inspired by it. But the problem

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>was affordability for Trump. Is that Trump is now, I mean,

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>he's basically in if you do the math, his fifth

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>year in office, and he has yet to make anything

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>more affordable. If anything, things seemed to be less affordable

0:01:57.880 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>than ever.

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 3>Right, you walk in the grocery aisles, your jaw drops

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 3>at the prices these days.

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Right, So the idea that Trump could somehow vibe shift

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>this seems in my mind to be kind of not

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>But maybe he'll be able to do it. But this

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>affordability issue is kind of like I just don't think

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you can put lipstick on a pig like this. I mean,

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>it's this idea that the richest cabinet in the world, right,

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the richest cabinet, These are the richest people in the

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>world serving in the government. You have an administration that

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the first three months you had Elon Musk practicing reverse philanthropy.

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to spin this as now they care about

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>affordability just because Democrats want an election on affordability.

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:50.839
<v Speaker 3>So Fanny Willis's Georgia election interference case against Trump will

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 3>carry on for now with a new prosecutor.

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah again, look, this is super interesting because, like, this

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>is something that Trump does not want, just like the

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Epstein files being released, just like the Supreme Court arguing

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>against his tariffs, right, just like him hearing some of

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>his Supreme Court justices complaining about the tariffs or pushing

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>back on the tariffs. This is not what Donald Trump wants.

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know, little cracks in Trumpism are showing, and

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, you could say I'm being overly optimistic, but

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I really think that's what this is. Like, he is

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>losing his power over the Republican Party. When Marjorie Taylor

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Green and Lauren Boepert and Nancy Mays and Tomas Massey,

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>when these people are breaking with him, they're breaking with

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>him because they see opportunity, because they see a place

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 1>where the party is no longer Donald Trump's. And so

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>things like this, every little bit of this starts to

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>disintegrate the power of trump Ism. And these things are meaningful.

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>And Georgia is a really good example of the place

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>where there are two Democratic senators. They lost a state

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>house race. I think this is meaningful.

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, I totally agree with you that I think

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 3>this is a show of the increasing weakness. So weird,

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:22.480
<v Speaker 3>weird week of lots of related news stories. We see

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 3>such a disturbing story in the New York Times about

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 3>former congressman and Trump's ag pick, Matt Gates and a

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 3>seventeen year old girl who is trying to get braces.

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:35.479
<v Speaker 1>Think about this is like a backlash to a backlash

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>to a backlash, right, me too, you know, sort of

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>canceled a lot of these bad guys, and then there

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:44.719
<v Speaker 1>was kind of a backlash and Donald Trump got reelected,

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and now we come back to this fact that some

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>of these people are just bad people. So here's the story.

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Trump initiated a g pick. He denies report he paid

0:04:56.200 --> 0:05:00.680
<v Speaker 1>for sex with a homeless seventeen year old saving money

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>for braces. Like, every part of the story is so bad.

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>But these kind of stories, people don't come up with

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>these things haul coths usually, so a bombshell bipartisan report

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>from the House Ethics Committee. By the way, the House

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Ethics Committee is known to be toothless. So the idea

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that they have come up with something that is this

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>bad is a pretty good sign that my man Matt

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:31.919
<v Speaker 1>Gates was too no good that he Gates regularly paid

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>women to engage in sexual activity. One of those transactions

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>involved a seventeen year old girl in twenty seventeen. The

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>girl's lawyer, Lord be Wolf, spoke to The New York

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Times after a federal judge unsealed documents related to the

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 1>seventeen year old's alleged experience. So she's homeless, she is underage,

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and she's being taken advantage of. Greenberg later paid her

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 1>four hundred dollars to meet him on his boat. Greenberg

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>is an ally and friend of Gates is who was

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:01.719
<v Speaker 1>in jail for sex trafficking. Greenberg contacted her again and

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>paid first sex seven times before inviting her to a

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>party at the home of Chris Dorthworth, a former Republican

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>member of the Florida State House of Representatives. Gates attended

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the party, which took place Underly fifteenth twenty seventeen, had

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:21.720
<v Speaker 1>sex with the seventeen year old twice that evening. Her testimony,

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>which was included in the report seen by The New Time,

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:27.239
<v Speaker 1>stated that she was paid four hundred dollars documents stay

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>she danced in front of them and swam naked in

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the polls popper. She then moved to Texas to use

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:37.599
<v Speaker 1>her minimum wage income to pay for braces. The alleged

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>incident only came to light when Greenberg was investigated for

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>mailing fake letters to a school where a political opponent worked,

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>claiming the opponent had sexual relationship with a student. Look,

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 1>this guy could have been the head of the DOJ.

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Like the DOJ.

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 3>Everybody think he was running for governor this round, And yeah,

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 3>I think this is the end of that.

0:06:57.440 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 4>In congratulations Governor Byron do.

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>It's so so so disturbing, and it's so dark and

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>it's just horrific.

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 4>Speaking of Florida, not my favorite state.

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 3>When we did our little dot com project twenty twenty five,

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 3>one of the things you really noticed reading that document

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 3>is these people are real excited to get their warped

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 3>ideas into schools. And what we now see is Florida

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 3>will be adopting the Heritage Foundation's school agenda.

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>This is so if Florida has really cooked its own

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>education crew and just beyond and they've adopted this conservative

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>education plan, it is from Heritage. Heritage is pretty cooked.

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>It's developed by again, this is Project twenty twenty five.

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Basically Florida Governor Ronda sant All Governor Ronde Santas wants

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>is to be president and he thinks that if he

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>goes the most MAGA, he will be president. And there

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>is almost really no evidence to support that MEGA is

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>ideological as much as it is just you know, charismatic

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of ways, MAGA is really just whatever

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump wants it to be. But this crew has a

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of ideological bent. And so they're going to take

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 1>over these Florida schools and you know, God only knows

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 1>what they'll do to these kids. They'll teach them, you

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>know that dinosaurs were not you know, real, and who

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:39.200
<v Speaker 1>even knows, But Florida students and families deserve investment in

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>their public schools, not a political pledge written by outside groups.

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Isn't this actually just political campaigns? Like it's a little

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>ironic trojan horse. Here, here we are, ladies and gentlemen,

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and there we go. Dave Weigel is a reporter at

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>some before. Welcome to Fast Politics, Evan, Alight, thanks for

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>having me. I'm so excited to have you to talk

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:17.079
<v Speaker 1>about how this insane moment in American political life.

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 5>That's your evergreen intro, right, you use that for every

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 5>episode pretty much.

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I think today sometimes American politics is just really disappointing

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes it's really worrying. But right now we're in

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>this period like I feel like the first nine months

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>of Trump's administration, it was like, oh shit, this American

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>democracy experiment may be over. And now I feel like,

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 1>oh no, these guys are doing what they did last time.

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, you know I did. I was in a

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 5>c SPAN analyst on election night, so I sat there

0:09:58.000 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 5>all night a.

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Question try and to make me jealous.

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 4>No, yes, exactly, but no.

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 5>The fun thing about doing on CCS.

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 1>On you know, I'm like obsessed with c SPAN, and

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 1>you take calls.

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 5>And everything, and the funny thing about it is that

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 5>it's like you're just kind of like a learning the

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 5>studio with the host and you're watching all of the.

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>And also no one is watching it, but may that's right.

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 5>Well, you only had some callers it, Okay, my mom watched,

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 5>I think, but they they do a lot of uh

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 5>they you know, they show all the speeches and everything.

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 5>So it was fascinating for me because that night was

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 5>sort of as you say, it was this moment of like,

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 5>oh right, like politics are actually still happening, Like this

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 5>administration is failed to message itself because you know, heading

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 5>into that cycle, right, the whole idea was this administration

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 5>is so different. This is a dimocrat of politics. Right,

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 5>They're going to be able to stay in power forever.

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:53.439
<v Speaker 5>We're going to win every election. Democrats have nothing, they

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 5>can't do anything. And then sort of every different kind

0:10:57.120 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 5>of style of Democrats they were around the ballot effective

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 5>won all over, which is I was a strange moment

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 5>of like, oh okay, I guess the loss of Grabby

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 5>do apply. And then of course the most hilarious part

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:13.079
<v Speaker 5>about that is that I'm like home that someday or whatever,

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 5>whatever Sunday, that what recent Sunday, doing my newsletter that

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:18.840
<v Speaker 5>I have you for notice, and like as we're watching

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 5>this implosion of the democrats shutdown strategy happen in real time,

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 5>and I was another moment where all of a sudden,

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 5>everyone's like, oh my god, the Democrats they're they're they're

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 5>they're doing it, they're blowing it. It's this oh my god,

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 5>and we're and we're backing this idea that like politics

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 5>is broken forever and the Democrats are blowing it. And

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 5>then where we sit today, the President looks completely feckless.

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 5>He's had his own business yelling at him by H

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 5>one B. Visa's telling him about Epstein, yelling him about

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 5>the things he's been saying and doing.

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 5>And the Democrats, which like three days ago were like

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 5>forever gone and destroyed because of this of this shutdown

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 5>thing that's like agent history now and now we're back

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 5>in this world in which Trump is once again bad

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 5>and not and has no control and can't handle anything.

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 5>So you're right, And this is one of the wildest

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 5>roller coasters I had been on, and I think it

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 5>does sort of end with Trump is like not doing

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 5>that great and his administration is not doing a great

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:19.200
<v Speaker 5>job of communicating or rechiging itself very well.

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:24.559
<v Speaker 1>He's also, my man is underwater on all the things.

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:28.959
<v Speaker 5>Look, the most interesting thing I've been tracking this since

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:32.319
<v Speaker 5>the beginning of the administration, right, because the main thing

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 5>this administration tried to do and pitch, just like on

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 5>administrations do, was twenty twenty fours economics an economy election.

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 5>This president said, I'm an economy guy where I do

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 5>a bunch of economy stuff, and I've been tracking through

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:48.560
<v Speaker 5>the entire time kind of the messaging that they've been

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 5>trying to do, and if it has mostly been look,

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:54.679
<v Speaker 5>we know what we're doing. People are going to tell

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 5>you this is bad, but it's actually really good. You

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 5>got to hang out air, trust us, and you've got

0:12:57.600 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 5>to believe us. Right, the polts have shown that that's

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 5>now really been working, and now this president has reverted

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 5>to the kindie economic messaging that was just the Biden

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 5>economic message. You like, actually, you the American people are wrong.

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 5>Everything is great, We're doing great. Everything rocks. And that

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 5>is kind of a funny full circle moment because you're

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 5>in the situation where you're just looking at this. I've

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 5>talked to Biden officials throughout the administration like sort of

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 5>like from the beginning of this, Like you can go

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 5>back and look at the reporting I was doing in

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 5>January to now, and I ran the story a bunch

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 5>of times of like officials from a Biden administration being like,

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 5>oh my god, Like they're saying the same stuff that

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 5>we said. They're doing the same stuff that we said. Right,

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 5>Because this this central challenge of like, we have these

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 5>basic economic problems that will probably take a long like

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 5>need long term solutions, but the public wants short term solutions.

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:51.319
<v Speaker 5>This guy was supposed to be able to figure that out,

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:52.959
<v Speaker 5>because the whole thing about Trump is he's such a

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:55.439
<v Speaker 5>great communicator, he's so well trusted and so well believed

0:13:55.679 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 5>that he's the guy people will follow into hell because

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 5>some promises there, but the other side things will be good,

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 5>and that is one thousand percent not happening. And so

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 5>you were watching them flail around the same way that

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:13.680
<v Speaker 5>other administrations short face the same problem flail around, which

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 5>is that way they have no way to explain to

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 5>people what to do about these prices and things like that.

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that a real difference between trump

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Ism and normal administrations of any stripe is that Trump

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>did tariffs, and tariffs made things more expensive. So like

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>he ran saying like I'm going to make bacon cheaper

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and then almost immediately did everything he could to make

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>things more expensive. Now, I don't think he thought that's

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>what he was doing, but that is a direct a

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>direct consequence of.

0:14:56.160 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 5>The tariffs, that's right. And I'm going to tell you

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 5>they had no plan for this have been talking to that.

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 5>I think I've been reporting on just being an administration, okay,

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 5>because I kept asking them, you know, like there's a

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 5>political supporter perspective, So what's your plan from prices go

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 5>up because of terrorists? What's your plan? What are you

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 5>going to say?

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 6>What are you going to do?

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 5>And what they would say to you repeatedly over and

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 5>over was they're not going to go up. They're not

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 5>going up. It's not going to happen. They're not going

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 5>to go up. They're not going to go up. Lately

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 5>they've been saying things like, well, look a little bit

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 5>of short term pain, you know, but they haven't been

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 5>doing that right along, and they can't. And now they're

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 5>talking about me piling back some of these teriffs. You know,

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 5>just switch over. But I'll say, you know, the other

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 5>major difference is that they don't appear to have a

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 5>message that at all connects with what people are actually

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 5>feeling and thinking about. You know, like a lot of

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 5>things with the Biden administration, they did a lot of

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 5>stuff that actually sort of like was sort of what

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 5>experts and a lot of folks think it's sort of

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 5>the right thing to do to freeze and manufacturing jobs back,

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 5>raise wages. You know, you can look at the inflation

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 5>and the rest of the whole world and the inflation

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 5>of America, and it was like kinds of better in

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 5>America during that inflationary period, et cetera. They couldn't really

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 5>communicate that because of various and surnry reasons, primarily you know,

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 5>Biden was not the best person to be commun getting it.

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 5>The Trump administration is like face planting wildly with its attempts.

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 5>Like a thing that really fascinated me to happen recently

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 5>was almost sudden You're like, oh, what about a fifty

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 5>year mortgage?

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 6>Guys?

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 7>Cheaper it's longer, it's gonna be fifty years, so like

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 7>it's cheaper to get it because you have to pay

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 7>less money every year. Brilliant and like immediately maga world

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 7>and sort of folks who aren't like the populists right

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 7>said like what are you talking about? Like you wann't

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 7>be able to pay more money to the banks? You

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 7>want there to be more debt, like.

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 5>Like like this this is a solution that like when

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 5>it was rolled out, it was like strutting around like

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 5>a ha, we got it, Like did off fifty year mortgage.

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 5>And it's like immediately everyody's like this insitute i've ever

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 5>heard and you've not heard about it again, right, this

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 5>This is the kind of thing that's happening, is that

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 5>the reality of the situation is they have got to

0:16:57.040 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 5>give you know, they wanted they get an affordability message

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 5>that actually like takes on some of this stuff like

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 5>prices and things like that and some destructural stuff that

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:08.919
<v Speaker 5>they're just not that interested in. Tariffs were supposed to

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 5>do it. But tariffs again makes everything more expensive right now,

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 5>Theoretically down the road, it doesn't. And they needed Trump

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 5>to be the guy to carry the public forward with them,

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 5>and it's not happening. One the taco thing, right, he

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 5>kept flipping around on these terairufs.

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 6>Anyway.

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 5>Two, they can't stand the heat, which no administration can

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 5>stand either, which is like they're doing this, well, holy crap,

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 5>we could just drop the tariffs and maybe prices will

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 5>go down, and they're gonna do that's what they're talking about.

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 4>Truth.

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 5>But you know, the healthcare thing, they have no plan

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 5>on the healthcare thing, as they've never had, right, Democrats

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:47.199
<v Speaker 5>had a plan out, They've talked about it they have

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 5>an idea of how to bring healthcare costs down. In

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 5>this particular case, this ACA subsidy thing that would shut

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:55.879
<v Speaker 5>down what's about was like literally a moment where you

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:59.640
<v Speaker 5>could sign it, build and bring costs down. Republicans don't

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 5>want to do it. They're trapped in their own kind

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 5>of world on this. And I think it was sort

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 5>of always coming. But everybody just thought that these magicians

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:14.919
<v Speaker 5>in Trump's White House, led by Trump himself, that somehow

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 5>have some sort of magic beings that could you know,

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:21.880
<v Speaker 5>get through through this. They don't have it. And now they,

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 5>you know, they look like people who are just kind

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 5>of like grabbing anything they can get their hands on,

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 5>like a fifty year mortgage that nobody wants.

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Yes, the fifty year mortgage that nobody wants. What you

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 1>see with this administration when you when you see them

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>start to fall apart. What I think is so interesting

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 1>is you see what good messaging looks like and bad

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:49.119
<v Speaker 1>messaging looks like. For example, Ebstein. So this administration is

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>on the run from Ebstein, right, And there was this

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:56.919
<v Speaker 1>dump yesterday of thousands of emails. They had things like,

0:18:57.119 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, Trump in Epstein, an in Palm Beach Thanksgiving

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen. Now did they have a meal together, Who knows,

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>But there are emails that say they were both there

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>at the same time after Trump was already president, which

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>means that Trump's timetable, if these emails are true, is incorrect. Right,

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that his timetable of not speaking to the guy since

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and four is bullshit. So they're just the

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>dump after dump after dump of emails and this and

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>this one and that one, and a lot of them

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that say Trump is stupid, like a lot.

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, very traffic emailing.

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that's right, Yes, I mean a lot of typos.

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>What are your take? What's your I want to talk

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 1>about the messaging on the Epstein, but first I want

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you to talk about your take on the Epstein emails.

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 5>Wellok, the Epstein emails themselves. I don't know that what

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 5>we had seen, Like you mentioned this idea of like

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 5>the timeline changing and things like that. I think all

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 5>you have to know about whether or not the administration

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:02.639
<v Speaker 5>was worried about out more Epsteam stuff coming out is

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 5>because of how worried they are about more stuff coming out,

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 5>they're casting, you know, they drag Lauren Bobert through the

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:12.479
<v Speaker 5>situation room to try and get her to kill this

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 5>discharge petition.

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Did it work the first and last time that Lauren

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Bobert will ever be invited to the situation room?

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 5>Oh no, I mean never say never. Twenty twenty eats

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 5>up that far away, Molly, I shut up?

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Why do you hate me? But as Sarah Palin Lauren

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Boebert ticket.

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 5>Now, I think it's a Bobert emptg. I think I

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:36.959
<v Speaker 5>think it's like it's time to get the space lasers

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:37.440
<v Speaker 5>onto the sky.

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 4>I think it's well, you do.

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Not use my queen's name in vain and continue.

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 5>But anyway, so you only have to know that they

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 5>that they don't want themut because it worked too hard

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:48.679
<v Speaker 5>to think you get them out in ways that are

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 5>really embarrassing. I mean, you know they've tried to pressure

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 5>lawmakers and they couldn't get them to do it. On

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 5>the messaging front, I will tell you I spent yesterday

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:58.199
<v Speaker 5>or the day after the emails came out. I just

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 5>sort of watched every stream daily stream of and email

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 5>and checked with my colleagues, reached out to every single

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:09.879
<v Speaker 5>one of the right wing influencers that got that binder

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:13.439
<v Speaker 5>back in February from PAYM Bondy the Epstein Binder that

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:15.200
<v Speaker 5>like completely kicked off his entire.

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Things was such a disaster, right, amazing, You've reached to

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 1>every single one of them.

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 5>I reached out to everything one of that. Well, we

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 5>reach out to a one or watch their st because

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:26.120
<v Speaker 5>we all do daily streams and stuff. So we checked

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 5>in and see what they were all doing and saying. Right,

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 5>and in general, what they're saying is that like, look,

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 5>these emails don't don't change the story. Trump is like

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 5>not part of this. He's not the bad guy, and

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 5>these emails like he's not the bad.

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Guys in all the emails.

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 5>Their view on the substance is that this doesn't actually

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 5>incriminate him more. And look, look these emails, they don't

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 5>say anything. They're not definitive, right, definitive is that birthday book?

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 6>Right?

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 5>That's like, oh wow, things are this is very bizarre.

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:57.920
<v Speaker 1>But I do say things like he knew about the girls.

0:21:58.160 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, but like you know, you look at the context,

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 5>like whatever, this is what they said. But on the

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 5>messaging front, I will tell you, on the messaging front,

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:10.400
<v Speaker 5>they are absolutely baffled. One guy said, I don't know

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 5>why he keeps using the word hoax. I think he

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:19.159
<v Speaker 5>doesn't know what the word hoax means. Like, wow, everything

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 5>that the White House is doing to try to shut

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:24.120
<v Speaker 5>this down Trump talking about a hoax. You know they

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:26.919
<v Speaker 5>were not into the distart petition. I will say, like,

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:28.919
<v Speaker 5>you can look at some messaging, like I don't know

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 5>what the White House is doing in terms of.

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 6>Pocket of these folks.

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 5>My colleague Jasmine is pretty sure that they are fairly

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 5>regularly reaching out to the right wing media spear on

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 5>this issue. Though as yet it's not like those influencers

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 5>were egging the Republicans on to break with the president

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 5>and vote for the and vote for the bill to

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 5>get these morripcing files out. But they were baffled at

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 5>the messaging, very confused and really like I said, this

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:57.919
<v Speaker 5>whole thing, but you know, he doesn't know what a

0:22:57.920 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 5>word hoax is, Like why he keep staying oaks Like

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 5>you're in the emails, this is real. What you've told

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 5>people is that you didn't do anything wrong and you're

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 5>not part of any of the amy criminal And the

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 5>emails don't seem to change that conversation. Why not just

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:12.399
<v Speaker 5>let them out? Why not just talk more about that

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 5>and put that more out. It's opposed to this weird

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:16.639
<v Speaker 5>thing of like this is not a real story. This

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 5>is not a real story. So that's from people who

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 5>like desperately want want that to be real. They're the

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 5>ones who are saying Trump is really messing up this messaging.

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 5>So that to me was really fascinating, and I think

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 5>there was a really illuminating as to where this moment

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 5>is that like they really don't know how to deal

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:36.400
<v Speaker 5>with this because they've got a guy at the top

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 5>to keep saying, what are you talking at? Hoakx fak,

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 5>they're making this up and like nobody thinks that everybody

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 5>wants to see these emails, and they're not able to

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 5>get up in front of it because they have this

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 5>weird message of like this is not a work, this

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:52.920
<v Speaker 5>is a waste of everybody's sorry, and like which by

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:55.880
<v Speaker 5>the way, may end up very well being, but like,

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:57.359
<v Speaker 5>who do you want to see this?

0:23:57.400 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 6>At this point?

0:23:57.800 --> 0:23:58.679
<v Speaker 5>Who doesn't want to see them?

0:23:58.680 --> 0:23:58.880
<v Speaker 6>Though?

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>My favorite for problematic messaging problem involves Megan Kelly, who

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:16.440
<v Speaker 1>had a clip where she was saying a young fifteen

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 1>year old is not the same as a five year old.

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Live your life, so you are never defending the difference

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>between having sex with teenagers and having sex with toddlers. Fair.

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 5>Fair, it's a good word to live. I do have that.

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 5>I do have that tattooed on my arm. You know,

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:40.160
<v Speaker 5>I think it's a good it's a good rule of thumb. Look,

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 5>how did she get.

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>To how did she mental gymnastics herself into a moment

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 1>where she was defending that?

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:52.159
<v Speaker 5>So I look, I think I don't really know what

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 5>to get in the head of digging Kelly particularly, but

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:56.439
<v Speaker 5>I will. You know, this is this thing of how

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 5>they're all trying to cretchel themselves to deal with this,

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 5>and you know, this is a good this this is

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:07.680
<v Speaker 5>the very like only like the weirdest libertarians you've ever

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:10.639
<v Speaker 5>met in your life are the ones who do the like, well,

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 5>actually California is actually right, like it doesn't really particularly

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 5>matter very much, like, but but down this road, it's like, yeah, yeah,

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 5>this is this is one of those stopp incriminating yourselves conversations,

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 5>you know, right, But I think that, But I think

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 5>that it's because they're in this really tough spot because

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 5>they have they have nothing to grab onto because nobody

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:40.120
<v Speaker 5>like the messaging of this thing is not like, yeah,

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 5>put them all out. We're fine, We're fine, but please

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 5>don't release anything else. And also like, look, you know

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:49.240
<v Speaker 5>it's been interesting because Megan tell you think it is

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 5>representative of something going on in the concerative movement right now.

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 5>You know, she was the one who really cluded me in.

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 5>I watched her stream and clued me into all the

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 5>posts Charlie kirk assassination and talk about the conspiracies and

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 5>you know, about Israel, about exactly Israel and the idea

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:09.400
<v Speaker 5>like she was only clued me into all that because

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 5>she was the one talking about Candice Owens being a

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 5>genius and all that sort of stuff.

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:15.919
<v Speaker 1>So she's anti Semitic too.

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 6>Well, I don't know anything about that.

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 5>She says that she's not at all. She's like, she's

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:22.120
<v Speaker 5>very strongly she strongly does.

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Think Israel might be responsible.

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:29.880
<v Speaker 5>Well, no, she had a whole clip that was talking

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:32.199
<v Speaker 5>about Candace. This is right off the assassination things. You know,

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 5>there's things have changed ince then. But she talked about

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 5>how there was a you know, this sort of leading

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 5>that Charlie Kirk was supposed to have had at Bill

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:44.400
<v Speaker 5>Appman's house and like this, you know, and and how

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 5>it was. The whole idea was that Charlie Kirk was

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 5>moving into an anti Israel position. And this is only

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 5>just very worthwhile to note all their worked while to

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:54.880
<v Speaker 5>understand and this is a really reasonable conversation to have,

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 5>and like that is a sort of growing conversation as well.

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 5>And so when you see making Kelly's saying something that

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 5>sounds like really like the sort of farthest right take

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:08.880
<v Speaker 5>on stuff, it's because like that far right is really

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:11.919
<v Speaker 5>gaining a lot of traction right now, and at the

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 5>same time, the White House is trying to figure out

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 5>its way through this you know, really self imposed thicket

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 5>that if I mean, you know, it grew a thicket

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 5>and jumped into it when it comes to this, you know,

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 5>to this Epstein stuff, I mean, it's you know that

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 5>I don't know. The Binders are the perfect example of that,

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 5>where it's like they didn't release all the files but

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 5>said that they did, and like the whole thing was

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 5>really really wild.

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 1>But like I think this there's all.

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 5>Swirling in a moment right now where like just suddenly

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 5>this whole political project does not seem that standing on

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:47.719
<v Speaker 5>such a firm ground right now, they're talking about you know,

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 5>there's some in this conspiracy world. They're Taksinbau, who counts

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:54.919
<v Speaker 5>as a panophile. These were paying Megan Kelly, you know

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 5>even the other people are talking about is the presence

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:00.239
<v Speaker 5>bringing up talking about a hoax? Is it is kind

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 5>of like a moment where if you were in politics,

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 5>if you were running for something right now, you would

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 5>not want to be in their camp. Yeah, and that

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 5>is like a rare moment that has not been true

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 5>since sort of November of last year.

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, oh man, it's all happening.

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:19.200
<v Speaker 6>It is.

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it really is like a very very very

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 5>rapid plip. But it's getting weirder and weirder. Molly, I

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:26.400
<v Speaker 5>think it's like a I.

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Don't know, you mispronounced stupider and more depressing.

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:35.639
<v Speaker 5>I don't know, we get that a shutdown conversation and

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 5>like just just right after we get coming up from

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 5>New Year's break. So I mean, if you.

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Like that, thank you, Evan, of course.

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 5>Molly, thank you. Please help me on as it gets

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 5>weirder and weirder.

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Evan McMorris Santro is a reporter at Notice. Welcome

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>to Fast Politics, Dave.

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 6>Blagle, It's good to be here. Thanks for having me.

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 1>We find ourselves and yet an they're incredibly strange but

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:05.960
<v Speaker 1>also very stupid moment in American history. You're an intrepid reporter,

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and you have been intrepidly reporting. What are you seeing?

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Here's the fundamentally worst question ever in American politics? What

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>are the vibes?

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 6>Is that the worst?

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 6>Okay, I'll roll with that. So they shifted. I guess

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 6>that's the worst answer to that question. They did shift,

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 6>And I wrote it about this last week, and I

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 6>followed up a little bit this week after I went

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 6>to Omaha and talked to Democrats in a swingy region

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 6>there that before Tuesday there was a worry this is

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 6>very different than eight years ago, a worry that Trump

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 6>actually was more popular than Democrats, understood that Poles were

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 6>underrating him, and that he had made games with Latinos

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 6>and young people that Democrats were not doing good job

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:50.800
<v Speaker 6>of reversing. And you saw this in coverage. I'd say

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 6>more coverage of New Jersey than Virginia. Reporters going into

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 6>the field, it's finding that, Okay, we went to a

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 6>Latino event, they don't seem that excited. Therefore, things that

0:29:59.440 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 6>have been moving in Trump's direction, and then the election

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 6>happens and they weren't. So you saw that big shift

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:08.600
<v Speaker 6>in how Democrats conceive of the electorate and its concerns,

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 6>which is, if I could sum it up, what we

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 6>need to do as Democrats is to point out the

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 6>costs are still high and a bunch of other economic

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 6>problems are still bad. And Trump didn't fix this, and

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 6>so he hit us with She's for them and he's

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 6>for you. We're going to him with my Republican opponent

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 6>is for Trump, and I'm for you. I'm the one

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 6>who cares about you. This guy is just making money

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 6>for himself. He's cutting tax for his friends. Insert the

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 6>rest of democratic messaging. But what changed is that they

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 6>weren't sure it was working, and now that thin get.

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Is Yeah, I'm going to tell a story that sounds tangential,

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 1>but I actually think is really relevant. I have a

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:43.719
<v Speaker 1>friend who's a very smart strategist. He's very smart, but

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a little bit centrist in a way

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that I think is a little bit destructive. But I

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 1>heard him on a podcast saying voters are so angry

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 1>that Biden is going to lose and we're going to

0:30:56.240 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>have backlash to backlash to backlash. Basically like voters are

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 1>just going to they don't have patience, so they'll kick

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>one person out and then they'll kick that. They'll change

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 1>so quickly they'll be bodship to bib ship to bid ship.

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Is that what's happening here?

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:14.720
<v Speaker 6>That was the concern. And specifically, let's say that everyone,

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 6>if you average of everyone's media consumption of politics, the

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 6>country is less trusting of institutions than it was at

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:25.479
<v Speaker 6>any point in modern history. Enterplayed mass media history and

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 6>that benefits Republicans. That was the worry for Democrats is

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 6>that occasionally we're going to be the party that's not

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 6>in power, and we can exploit that. When we're in power,

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 6>we don't know how to make people stop rejecting us.

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 6>And so this was a lot of the angst about Biden.

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 6>And I covered this over the course of the year.

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 6>Ye's not over, but I think most debates were mostly

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 6>happening before November. Hey, we Democrats, we reponsible Democrats tried

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 6>this with Joe Biden. We did a bunch of populous

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 6>stuff and it didn't benefit us. So gosh, maybe we're

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 6>stuck in a backlash loop. Like you were saying forever,

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:57.840
<v Speaker 6>and I don't think that was changed by the election.

0:31:57.960 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 6>But Democrats in Virginia, New Jersey, in New York all

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:05.240
<v Speaker 6>have opportunities to deliver something in the context to don

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 6>Trump being president trying to undermine them. And so what

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 6>was really powerful for Mamdannie and Cheryl more than well

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 6>the whole year for Demo president In Virginia, the fact

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 6>that Trump was was firing federal workers was toxic Republicans.

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 6>They never came up with an answer. They punted, they

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 6>got destroyed. In New Jersey and New York, it was

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 6>more direct. The President out of spite, is going to

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 6>be cutting things. New York and New Jersey was expecting

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 6>things they paid through the tax dollars paid for. So

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 6>New York was suing all year and I mean, you

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 6>know this suing all year for just funding that the

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 6>city had received that the administration wanted to take back.

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 6>In New Jersey, it was the Gateway tunnel. Trump in

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 6>a snit was just going to cancel this funding that

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 6>the state fought twenty years for. That threat is going

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 6>to continue existing. And so this is a new dynamic

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 6>for Democrats is the parties in power in a bunch

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 6>of places. It's going to try to do things and

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 6>Trump will be they're undermining it. And will voters say,

0:32:56.680 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 6>we wish you would change your policy and just agree

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 6>with Trump, or will they say, dang, I wish Trump

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 6>was not screwing this up. Is it giving them not

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 6>in the jail out, get out of jail free card,

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 6>but something to say if let's say, in four months, mom,

0:33:11.240 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 6>Donnie's entire agenda has not been in place. Yeah, I

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 6>think it does. And Republicans experienced us under Biden. It

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 6>was easier for their incumbents even to get elected with

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 6>a very few exceptions under Joe Biden because they could say, look,

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 6>I'm greag ab but I'm trying to fix the border,

0:33:25.280 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 6>and this administration screwing with me a less intense versus

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 6>of that, I think happening. Fewer people being trafficked in

0:33:31.400 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 6>buses across state lines, but I see that happening already.

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 6>And I want to repeat myself too much from the

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 6>first question, But there was a year Democrats not being

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 6>sure if that was true. But maybe maybe it turns

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 6>out that voters do think Trump is right. And you

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 6>saw this in New York right away because I from

0:33:48.200 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 6>the story I wrote yesterday or for Wednesday. I talked

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 6>to people who've been on the Spikey Cheryl campaign and

0:33:55.160 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 6>then we're going to work for Kathy Hogel, and they

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 6>this is at least to Fanic was not that threatening

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 6>to them on Tuesday last week, very much less so

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 6>on Wednesday, because it looks like she's just going to

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 6>defend the Trump agenda even if it hurts the state,

0:34:11.200 --> 0:34:13.840
<v Speaker 6>and that's a terrible place Republicans to be. They figured

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 6>that out.

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:17.359
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I think that's right. Has there ever been a

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 1>politician with worse timing than a least to phonic.

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 6>Maybe Hillary Quittin and Kamala Harris because they both Hillary

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 6>and then Kamala in twenty nineteen ran at the one

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:28.879
<v Speaker 6>time in history when being a Democrat who was tough

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:34.879
<v Speaker 6>on crime was bad. Maybe that first Stephanic. She's one

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 6>of many House members who are going to run statewide

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:40.880
<v Speaker 6>this next year. The leading candidates for governor of Iowa

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 6>for governor of Wisconsin the Republican primary have been in Congress,

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:48.840
<v Speaker 6>voting for Republican priorities in Congress and against Democratic bills.

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:50.919
<v Speaker 6>She has done the same thing, but in a much

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 6>more intense way, and her campaign. I don't know if

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:56.399
<v Speaker 6>if she is an auxiliary of the New York Post

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 6>or the New Ropost and auxiliary for every day her

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 6>campaign is basically at least dephonics said something terrible at HOKL.

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:04.319
<v Speaker 6>But when your post has a feature on it and

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:06.560
<v Speaker 6>then the campaign puts out what the New York Posts said,

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:08.920
<v Speaker 6>a bottles to phonic, that was always going to exist.

0:35:09.080 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 6>But is this a bad cycle to be a Republican

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:14.880
<v Speaker 6>on record for their whole agenda? It looks like it

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 6>kind of is, because what was the benefit from the

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:20.359
<v Speaker 6>tax bill so far Republicans If they all voted for

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 6>the tax bill this summer in bluespates, that means they

0:35:23.080 --> 0:35:25.440
<v Speaker 6>could say, hey, I cut your taxes with the salt deduction.

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:28.279
<v Speaker 6>They did fine in Nassau County and that's it. I mean,

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:30.239
<v Speaker 6>they got they got pretty creamed. And the rest of

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 6>New York, certainly in the high tax parts of New Jersey,

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:35.719
<v Speaker 6>Morris County is the sort of place that it's full

0:35:35.719 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 6>of people who want, we're going to use that salt deduction.

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:40.719
<v Speaker 6>And it had been a Republican and it flipped to

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 6>Mikey Sheryl again, I compare a lot of stuff in

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 6>twenty seventeen twenty eighteen, because I think Democrats are in

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:49.319
<v Speaker 6>a different position, but Trump is also more eubuistic and

0:35:49.560 --> 0:35:52.920
<v Speaker 6>less limited by his advisors. In twenty eighteen, Republicans say, well,

0:35:52.920 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 6>at least we have an economic situation that people are

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:57.239
<v Speaker 6>not blaming Trump for. It's pretty good where you can

0:35:57.320 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 6>run on that no matter what other things blow up

0:35:59.600 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 6>for Trump and immigration was really their biggest weakness in

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:05.480
<v Speaker 6>twenty eighteen. Now Republicans are a week if you look

0:36:05.480 --> 0:36:08.279
<v Speaker 6>at polling on who's handling the economy? Did are their

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:10.359
<v Speaker 6>policies helping you? And they're just pretending that they're not.

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:14.239
<v Speaker 6>They're pretending to hear Republicans. It's the Scott Bessett line.

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:15.879
<v Speaker 6>It's all going to be great yet next year, don't

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 6>worry about it. Now, there's a little bit of punitory saying, well,

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 6>that's exactly what Joe Biden was doing four years ago.

0:36:22.560 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 6>It didn't work. Biden had an okay midterm considering.

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, part of the problem for Biden was the

0:36:27.920 --> 0:36:31.040
<v Speaker 1>way overperformed in the midterms, and that gave him confidence

0:36:31.080 --> 0:36:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to run again.

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:36.240
<v Speaker 6>Yes it duh. So the economy though might one people

0:36:36.320 --> 0:36:39.719
<v Speaker 6>see they didn't see Biden at that point, and over

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:42.080
<v Speaker 6>time they blamed him for inflation, even after inflation had

0:36:42.080 --> 0:36:45.640
<v Speaker 6>gone back down. But in polvan And said who's responsible

0:36:45.640 --> 0:36:48.319
<v Speaker 6>for the econmy Biden and wagging Trump already owns that,

0:36:48.400 --> 0:36:50.520
<v Speaker 6>and Trump wanted to own it. Trum Trump that talks

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:54.080
<v Speaker 6>about the golden age of America beginning on his inauguration

0:36:54.239 --> 0:36:56.719
<v Speaker 6>day and talked about how great the economy was all year,

0:36:56.760 --> 0:36:59.279
<v Speaker 6>and in the same interview they'll say that things are

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 6>better and also if they're bad, it's Joe Biden's fault.

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 6>This is the JD. Dvance line we inherited and Joe

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:06.359
<v Speaker 6>Biden but fully suggests the voters don't think that. And

0:37:06.840 --> 0:37:10.319
<v Speaker 6>you're seeing the most significant response to that since the

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:13.319
<v Speaker 6>election has been the administration rolling back some tariffs. Are

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 6>saying it's going to and not saying sorry, we're wrong,

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 6>that the terroriffs actually cost you money and they're unpopular,

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:21.279
<v Speaker 6>but saying to lower prices. We're going to get rid

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 6>of these tariffs. Who knows who put them in there.

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's not like Trump has been on the

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:32.840
<v Speaker 1>record just musing about how great tariffs are all the time.

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 6>Yes, and that turned out to be unpopular. So really,

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 6>like in New Jersey and Virginia, I was giving Democrats.

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:42.399
<v Speaker 6>And the piece I've written since the election is that

0:37:42.520 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 6>I think I said just that the interest of journalists

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:49.040
<v Speaker 6>and candidates are often at odds, and journalists wanted the

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:52.759
<v Speaker 6>Democrats to have more exciting messages to write and new

0:37:52.840 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 6>responses to Republicans. And also you saw this, I'm not

0:37:56.320 --> 0:37:59.040
<v Speaker 6>really being negative at the Year Times, but you saw

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:01.560
<v Speaker 6>a one year Time story by Shing Goldmacher a couple

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:04.200
<v Speaker 6>weeks for the election about demograph are still running around

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:06.800
<v Speaker 6>about Trump? Are they ever feeding the mistakes of the past?

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Does it work?

0:38:07.960 --> 0:38:10.000
<v Speaker 6>Does it work? And yes? The reason it worked is

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:12.560
<v Speaker 6>because Trump was taking credit for a great economy and

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:15.920
<v Speaker 6>voters thought, actually, tariffs are costing me too much, and

0:38:15.920 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 6>everything else is costing me too much, So I don't

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:20.040
<v Speaker 6>want to vote for the park. He's taking credit for

0:38:20.080 --> 0:38:23.240
<v Speaker 6>this economy and it's too late. You already see people

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:27.600
<v Speaker 6>blaming them for just prices not being that simple. Now.

0:38:27.600 --> 0:38:29.319
<v Speaker 6>There are layoffs that people who have been laid off

0:38:29.360 --> 0:38:31.080
<v Speaker 6>or unhappy about, but the main one is just he

0:38:31.120 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 6>said prices would go down, he cleaned they were down already.

0:38:33.880 --> 0:38:35.719
<v Speaker 6>They weren't, so he's just going to keep saying it,

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:38.200
<v Speaker 6>and he's the well part where he is. I think

0:38:38.360 --> 0:38:42.880
<v Speaker 6>analogus to Biden is the bidenminstration would say, Hey, good news, everybody.

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:46.360
<v Speaker 6>This one good that has been famously too expensive is

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 6>now much less expensive and people didn't care anymore. Oh

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:52.880
<v Speaker 6>we fixed the baby formula outage. Nobody cared. That is

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:55.320
<v Speaker 6>one thing they have in common that even Trump can't benefit.

0:38:55.360 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 6>If people are angry about something, and you're angry about

0:38:58.000 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 6>goes away, nobody says thank you, President for fixing it.

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 6>He's better at advertising than Biden, but hasn't really done

0:39:03.200 --> 0:39:04.000
<v Speaker 6>anything for him.

0:39:04.080 --> 0:39:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I also think the problem for him is there is

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a reason why politicians don't promise undoable things, and that's

0:39:11.640 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of political gravity that didn't apply to

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:17.839
<v Speaker 1>Trump is sort of catching up with him, right. Like

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:20.680
<v Speaker 1>he used to be able to say stuff and no

0:39:20.680 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 1>one would ever be like, well what about But it

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 1>does seem like now there's you said tariffs were great.

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:28.719
<v Speaker 1>Now everything's more expensive, you know what I mean? Like

0:39:28.760 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 1>there seems to be some amount of political gravity catching

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 1>up to him.

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I'm obsessed. I don't think I wrote about this

0:39:34.600 --> 0:39:37.200
<v Speaker 6>week except for social media. I'm obsessed with how the

0:39:37.200 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 6>deministration will keep floating that people are going to get

0:39:39.800 --> 0:39:42.440
<v Speaker 6>three months either a rebate check from Doze or from

0:39:42.520 --> 0:39:45.120
<v Speaker 6>teriffs or the terroriffs. From that positim than anything. And

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:48.280
<v Speaker 6>before we got on, I was just checking my email

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:50.960
<v Speaker 6>and indep I have a fundraising email. I'm on a

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 6>couple fundraising lists. Is to see what they get. What

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:55.240
<v Speaker 6>people who donate to the CAAAN it's get not they donate.

0:39:55.280 --> 0:39:57.879
<v Speaker 6>I just signed up. It's psychotic. Don't do it unless

0:39:57.880 --> 0:40:00.920
<v Speaker 6>you're reporter. But yesterday I have If you are a

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:04.319
<v Speaker 6>donor to Donald Trump, you got an email saying would

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 6>you accept a terror rebate check signed by Trump? And

0:40:07.560 --> 0:40:09.239
<v Speaker 6>I do think it's starting. I watch a lot of

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:11.840
<v Speaker 6>local news, partly because that's where campaigns are advertising and

0:40:11.920 --> 0:40:15.560
<v Speaker 6>spending time, and local loser report. How there are a

0:40:15.600 --> 0:40:17.360
<v Speaker 6>lot of segments, and there have been all year, but

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:20.400
<v Speaker 6>in the last week since this terror frebate discussion began,

0:40:20.680 --> 0:40:23.600
<v Speaker 6>segments that are just a version of the President says

0:40:23.640 --> 0:40:25.360
<v Speaker 6>he might send out a check. What would it look like.

0:40:25.360 --> 0:40:26.920
<v Speaker 6>We talked to an expert about whether you're going to

0:40:26.960 --> 0:40:29.880
<v Speaker 6>get your check after a while. I think it's reasonable

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:32.000
<v Speaker 6>for people to say I am unhappy because I thought

0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:33.920
<v Speaker 6>i'd get a check and I did not. That's what

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:34.680
<v Speaker 6>it's happening too.

0:40:34.920 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 1>That's a fundamental problem with Trump is is he has

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 1>only a couple of ideas, and he's like, well, send

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:42.759
<v Speaker 1>people money that work during COVID, but there's not a

0:40:42.800 --> 0:40:45.200
<v Speaker 1>mechanism for that. We got to talk about the shutdown.

0:40:45.520 --> 0:40:49.000
<v Speaker 1>So it feels like the Democrats in the House did

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 1>actually stay together, you know. I mean Mike Johnson helped

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:54.479
<v Speaker 1>them in a certain way by never bringing them back,

0:40:54.560 --> 0:40:58.439
<v Speaker 1>and it was the Senate that caved. Now, I from

0:40:58.480 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 1>someone who has covered the Senate deems the way that

0:41:01.760 --> 0:41:05.319
<v Speaker 1>this vote went down to have only people were up

0:41:05.320 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 1>for reelection in twenty thirty, people who were retiring, and

0:41:09.600 --> 0:41:13.160
<v Speaker 1>people who were not necessarily in danger voting to reopen

0:41:13.160 --> 0:41:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the government seemed a little bit too cute, I have

0:41:16.360 --> 0:41:20.520
<v Speaker 1>in my mind. Then, to have the Senate majority leader

0:41:20.920 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 1>vote now and give a long speech, it felt as

0:41:24.600 --> 0:41:27.480
<v Speaker 1>if the vibes were Chuck wanted to end the shutdown.

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:31.279
<v Speaker 6>That is fair. I've not been my colleague Burgess ever

0:41:31.320 --> 0:41:33.760
<v Speaker 6>it and other people who covered a Senate more closely

0:41:33.800 --> 0:41:37.319
<v Speaker 6>and daily than I do have gotten the feedback on this.

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:40.160
<v Speaker 6>So it's fair to say that Schumer and other Democrats

0:41:40.239 --> 0:41:43.920
<v Speaker 6>were pushed into this shutdown strategy that they did not

0:41:44.000 --> 0:41:46.440
<v Speaker 6>fully support, and they were surprised how well it works.

0:41:46.520 --> 0:41:49.439
<v Speaker 1>That is, and they turned it down in March, right,

0:41:49.520 --> 0:41:51.279
<v Speaker 1>and then they got so much pushback they had to

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:52.000
<v Speaker 1>go along with it.

0:41:52.160 --> 0:41:54.480
<v Speaker 6>One they got pushed back. I think also importantly, and

0:41:54.520 --> 0:41:57.080
<v Speaker 6>you've talked about this, is that in March the idea

0:41:57.120 --> 0:41:58.880
<v Speaker 6>of a lot of holdouts he did not want to

0:41:58.880 --> 0:42:01.560
<v Speaker 6>do a shutdown was if do a shutdown, russ vote

0:42:01.640 --> 0:42:03.400
<v Speaker 6>is going to fire a bunch more people because he

0:42:03.400 --> 0:42:05.960
<v Speaker 6>wants to do that anyway. And they learned over the

0:42:05.960 --> 0:42:08.040
<v Speaker 6>course of the year that russ vote was just gonna

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:11.120
<v Speaker 6>just fire people anyway. They actually did get well. One

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:13.640
<v Speaker 6>of the only things they got as a benefit from

0:42:13.719 --> 0:42:16.800
<v Speaker 6>ending the shutdown is officially that there's not gonna be

0:42:16.840 --> 0:42:18.919
<v Speaker 6>any more reduction the force while the government shut down.

0:42:19.040 --> 0:42:21.280
<v Speaker 6>Now in the law, there shouldn't have been any reductions

0:42:21.320 --> 0:42:23.799
<v Speaker 6>of forces during the shutdown anyway, but that changed everything

0:42:23.840 --> 0:42:26.560
<v Speaker 6>where Democrats said, we actually have a president who's just

0:42:26.600 --> 0:42:29.480
<v Speaker 6>going to try to fire people try to cut funds,

0:42:29.960 --> 0:42:32.360
<v Speaker 6>do it before court stops them, and then if the

0:42:32.400 --> 0:42:34.840
<v Speaker 6>court stops them, it's too late. That changed everything, and

0:42:34.880 --> 0:42:36.880
<v Speaker 6>I think that's gonna that's gonna That mindset will be

0:42:36.920 --> 0:42:39.920
<v Speaker 6>there for the next impass in January. I'm already predicting

0:42:39.960 --> 0:42:42.760
<v Speaker 6>an impass over over healthcare funding. They also became convinced

0:42:42.800 --> 0:42:45.280
<v Speaker 6>that if you're a Democrat, wanted to be over and

0:42:45.480 --> 0:42:48.319
<v Speaker 6>I actually Timillary has expressed this, I think better than

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:50.880
<v Speaker 6>a lot of Democrats had, is well, you've changed the

0:42:50.920 --> 0:42:56.839
<v Speaker 6>conversation to healthcare, right, which yeah, yeah, and you got

0:42:56.880 --> 0:43:00.400
<v Speaker 6>things queued up for the Epstein discharge petition, which is

0:43:00.440 --> 0:43:03.560
<v Speaker 6>an advantage. So you should just take this win and

0:43:03.640 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 6>go on because you're not going to get something out.

0:43:05.920 --> 0:43:08.560
<v Speaker 6>And that, to me is credible because there's no shutdown

0:43:08.920 --> 0:43:11.360
<v Speaker 6>the part in order to shut to the end the shutdown,

0:43:11.400 --> 0:43:14.160
<v Speaker 6>the President just gave the House or the holdouts whatever

0:43:14.200 --> 0:43:17.000
<v Speaker 6>they wanted. That's that's not crazy. But for the Schumer

0:43:17.080 --> 0:43:19.040
<v Speaker 6>role in it was that definitely that he was pushed

0:43:19.120 --> 0:43:22.520
<v Speaker 6>by both progressives and by reality and he was talking

0:43:22.560 --> 0:43:24.880
<v Speaker 6>to Robins trying to make a scandal out of this,

0:43:24.960 --> 0:43:27.400
<v Speaker 6>but he was taught, he was in contact with progressive

0:43:27.440 --> 0:43:29.719
<v Speaker 6>groups like Indivisible to Move On that were saying, please

0:43:29.719 --> 0:43:31.919
<v Speaker 6>shut the government down? Should he not be? I guess

0:43:31.960 --> 0:43:34.320
<v Speaker 6>the idea there is that Democrats should not listen to

0:43:34.400 --> 0:43:37.719
<v Speaker 6>their interest groups. But the end that's true, that that

0:43:37.840 --> 0:43:39.759
<v Speaker 6>is true, and those same interest groups are going to

0:43:39.800 --> 0:43:43.320
<v Speaker 6>want a new leader. But not to write Schumer's biography

0:43:43.320 --> 0:43:45.960
<v Speaker 6>for him. But the role of him as leader for

0:43:46.000 --> 0:43:48.239
<v Speaker 6>the next few weeks or a few years is going

0:43:48.320 --> 0:43:51.120
<v Speaker 6>to be losing a bunch of Donald Trump, maybe winning

0:43:51.160 --> 0:43:53.920
<v Speaker 6>the Senate and then maybe facing pressure. I actually already

0:43:54.000 --> 0:43:57.319
<v Speaker 6>facing pressure AT's retire next year. So it's like being

0:43:57.360 --> 0:43:59.160
<v Speaker 6>being the Senate leader is not a great is not

0:43:59.280 --> 0:44:01.840
<v Speaker 6>a great place to suddenly come in and dominate and

0:44:02.120 --> 0:44:04.360
<v Speaker 6>run your party's agenda. If did Bernie Sanders is in

0:44:04.520 --> 0:44:07.240
<v Speaker 6>the party leadership, like undermining you, that's part of a job.

0:44:07.800 --> 0:44:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Didn't he say that he was going to not run

0:44:10.600 --> 0:44:11.240
<v Speaker 1>for reelection.

0:44:11.600 --> 0:44:12.359
<v Speaker 6>He didn't say that.

0:44:12.440 --> 0:44:14.319
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't He hasn't come out and said it.

0:44:14.640 --> 0:44:14.799
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:44:14.960 --> 0:44:17.520
<v Speaker 6>So what happened with Biden was that Biden's team in

0:44:17.560 --> 0:44:21.399
<v Speaker 6>twenty nineteen let word go out for some reporters that hey,

0:44:21.440 --> 0:44:23.680
<v Speaker 6>he was considering a one term pledge, and so people

0:44:23.680 --> 0:44:25.879
<v Speaker 6>who wanted to think Biden would run for one term

0:44:26.160 --> 0:44:28.840
<v Speaker 6>got some got something to hang on. And I'm not

0:44:28.840 --> 0:44:31.160
<v Speaker 6>trying to insall he'll for not memorizing ever news article,

0:44:31.200 --> 0:44:33.600
<v Speaker 6>but that became like didn't I read one somewhere that

0:44:33.600 --> 0:44:34.879
<v Speaker 6>he probably one term?

0:44:35.160 --> 0:44:38.359
<v Speaker 1>It really did help him when because he could make

0:44:38.400 --> 0:44:41.799
<v Speaker 1>a case that maybe it was that Trumpian thing of

0:44:41.840 --> 0:44:45.880
<v Speaker 1>being a roar shack, right, you'll be whatever is wanted.

0:44:45.840 --> 0:44:48.799
<v Speaker 6>Yes, and that Schumer has not been that definitive. It

0:44:48.880 --> 0:44:51.399
<v Speaker 6>did just that people in New York politics looking at

0:44:51.400 --> 0:44:54.800
<v Speaker 6>his calendar, which includes Schumer used to be famous for

0:44:54.840 --> 0:44:57.480
<v Speaker 6>going to every county in the state every year. He

0:44:57.520 --> 0:45:00.800
<v Speaker 6>has not done that discycle. So he he turns seventy

0:45:00.800 --> 0:45:04.480
<v Speaker 6>five this month, he turned seventy six after the midterms.

0:45:04.680 --> 0:45:07.840
<v Speaker 6>Would he be announcing in twenty twenty seven that he

0:45:07.840 --> 0:45:10.359
<v Speaker 6>wants to run for reelection That would take him into

0:45:10.400 --> 0:45:13.719
<v Speaker 6>his mid eighties. That's the assumption. So does he want

0:45:13.760 --> 0:45:15.880
<v Speaker 6>to say I Chuck Schumer right now, want to give

0:45:15.960 --> 0:45:18.360
<v Speaker 6>up my leverages leader and say that I got bullied

0:45:18.360 --> 0:45:20.560
<v Speaker 6>out of this job by move on? Yeah? Probably not,

0:45:20.880 --> 0:45:24.400
<v Speaker 6>but the invisible I guess job application going on for

0:45:24.440 --> 0:45:27.000
<v Speaker 6>Senate leader. That's already been happening, and part of it

0:45:27.080 --> 0:45:29.960
<v Speaker 6>is people in New York saying we don't think Schuber's

0:45:30.000 --> 0:45:32.560
<v Speaker 6>going to run it again. There's so many different angles

0:45:32.560 --> 0:45:35.720
<v Speaker 6>on this, but I want to get too tangential about

0:45:35.719 --> 0:45:38.200
<v Speaker 6>who would replace Humor. That's already happening because a lot

0:45:38.239 --> 0:45:39.360
<v Speaker 6>of people think he's not going.

0:45:39.160 --> 0:45:40.760
<v Speaker 1>To run, who would replace Schuma.

0:45:41.000 --> 0:45:44.440
<v Speaker 6>So a lot of conversations about aoc NO in leadership.

0:45:44.640 --> 0:45:47.760
<v Speaker 6>In leadership, Brian Schottz Center for What Hawaii has done

0:45:48.239 --> 0:45:50.160
<v Speaker 6>most of the work to get himself ready for that

0:45:51.040 --> 0:45:54.160
<v Speaker 6>compared to other people Amy Clover Shard in the leadership

0:45:54.200 --> 0:45:56.319
<v Speaker 6>and would be in the position. No one else has

0:45:56.360 --> 0:45:59.040
<v Speaker 6>been making moves that way, especially because I do think

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:02.680
<v Speaker 6>there are their discrepancies between what progresses want the job

0:46:02.719 --> 0:46:04.840
<v Speaker 6>to be what the job ends up being. And so

0:46:05.080 --> 0:46:06.680
<v Speaker 6>a lot of progresses say, why can't we have the

0:46:06.719 --> 0:46:10.480
<v Speaker 6>most progressive fighter we have in the Senate every day

0:46:10.560 --> 0:46:14.239
<v Speaker 6>leading the messaging and the counterpoint. B Well, that's not

0:46:14.280 --> 0:46:16.560
<v Speaker 6>Republicans have Republicans didn't say, look at the Senate, we

0:46:16.600 --> 0:46:19.920
<v Speaker 6>need somebody like Josh Hawley or Rick Scott to lead us.

0:46:20.640 --> 0:46:22.960
<v Speaker 6>Rick Scott rand he lost. You have to be kind

0:46:22.960 --> 0:46:24.959
<v Speaker 6>of a sin eater in the job. You have to

0:46:25.000 --> 0:46:27.359
<v Speaker 6>be there for awful deals, and you have to if

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:29.719
<v Speaker 6>you let's say there's a big Senate if Democrats have

0:46:29.760 --> 0:46:32.000
<v Speaker 6>a great Senate election in the midterms and they win,

0:46:32.239 --> 0:46:35.160
<v Speaker 6>Sharon Brown wins the seat, and Mary Paul Tola and

0:46:35.200 --> 0:46:38.279
<v Speaker 6>Alaska wins and they get everything, they get almost everything

0:46:38.280 --> 0:46:39.960
<v Speaker 6>they want to. But there's a new demograph from Iowa.

0:46:40.200 --> 0:46:41.480
<v Speaker 6>Some of them are just not going to vote with

0:46:41.520 --> 0:46:44.040
<v Speaker 6>Progresses on everything, and so you'll need some of these.

0:46:44.080 --> 0:46:47.080
<v Speaker 6>So I'm not trying to That is why shots who

0:46:47.120 --> 0:46:49.160
<v Speaker 6>got elected as a progressive, he was appointed to the

0:46:49.200 --> 0:46:51.600
<v Speaker 6>seat and then got reelected with the supported Progresses over

0:46:51.640 --> 0:46:54.879
<v Speaker 6>a more conservative candidate. He's already been willing to buff

0:46:54.920 --> 0:46:57.400
<v Speaker 6>progressive on some issues, and that's why people think, all right,

0:46:57.440 --> 0:46:59.680
<v Speaker 6>well he's ready. He's getting himself ready to win if

0:46:59.680 --> 0:47:03.640
<v Speaker 6>he runs for leader. His colleagues, including conative more conservative Democrats,

0:47:03.680 --> 0:47:04.480
<v Speaker 6>to say, great.

0:47:04.640 --> 0:47:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Dave Wigo, I hope you'll come back.

0:47:07.239 --> 0:47:10.040
<v Speaker 6>Oh yeah, thanks for having me. All these post election

0:47:10.120 --> 0:47:14.759
<v Speaker 6>periods are we actually have data? Really are great, so

0:47:14.840 --> 0:47:21.800
<v Speaker 6>happy to do it. They're no more pfectly.

0:47:21.920 --> 0:47:27.040
<v Speaker 3>Jesse cannon Somali Trump and his administration as a weapon

0:47:27.120 --> 0:47:31.359
<v Speaker 3>they're just so thrilled to use against anyone whoever wronged them.

0:47:31.520 --> 0:47:34.799
<v Speaker 3>And friend of the show, Congressman Eric Swolwell is the

0:47:34.880 --> 0:47:39.000
<v Speaker 3>latest victim of their weapon. He just announced today that

0:47:39.080 --> 0:47:41.640
<v Speaker 3>he's going to be running for governor of California and

0:47:42.080 --> 0:47:44.000
<v Speaker 3>they're going to go after him for mortgage fraud.

0:47:44.360 --> 0:47:48.279
<v Speaker 1>Bill Pulti works in the Trump administration, and what he

0:47:48.320 --> 0:47:52.479
<v Speaker 1>does is he finds people who have mortgages, and then

0:47:52.760 --> 0:47:55.719
<v Speaker 1>he finds enemies of Trump and he puts that Vinn

0:47:55.760 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 1>diagram together. And I think that Eric is the fource

0:48:00.480 --> 0:48:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Democrat that Bill Poulti has accused of mortgage fraud, with

0:48:04.920 --> 0:48:08.759
<v Speaker 1>varying degrees of success. But you know, here's the thing

0:48:08.840 --> 0:48:12.520
<v Speaker 1>about prosecuting people politically, it doesn't have to work and

0:48:12.640 --> 0:48:17.080
<v Speaker 1>necessarily like it's clearly bullshit, but it doesn't necessarily have

0:48:17.239 --> 0:48:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to work in order for them to get the Jews

0:48:20.920 --> 0:48:24.719
<v Speaker 1>from it. So that's what we're seeing here is just

0:48:25.160 --> 0:48:29.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them sort of grasping at straws and

0:48:29.719 --> 0:48:33.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to get this going. I don't think that they

0:48:33.560 --> 0:48:36.040
<v Speaker 1>can get any of these going because they've just done

0:48:36.160 --> 0:48:39.440
<v Speaker 1>so many, and they've all looked so intentional. So I

0:48:39.560 --> 0:48:41.880
<v Speaker 1>don't think that Trump world will get to do this.

0:48:42.040 --> 0:48:43.920
<v Speaker 1>And like, this is one of these things where it's like,

0:48:43.960 --> 0:48:47.480
<v Speaker 1>thank god they're stupid, because if they had been smart,

0:48:47.880 --> 0:48:49.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, and they had been like and they had

0:48:49.719 --> 0:48:53.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of like made up different cases, like some were

0:48:53.160 --> 0:48:55.600
<v Speaker 1>mortgage fraud and some were this and some were that.

0:48:55.680 --> 0:48:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Like in Putin's Russia, people get arrested for stuff like

0:49:00.120 --> 0:49:04.560
<v Speaker 1>iss right. So I do think that as much as

0:49:04.600 --> 0:49:07.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a certain amount of this that is scary, it's

0:49:07.640 --> 0:49:12.560
<v Speaker 1>also so stupid and thank god it's so stupid. That's

0:49:12.719 --> 0:49:19.920
<v Speaker 1>it for this episode of Fast Politics. Tune in every Monday, Wednesday, Thursday,

0:49:20.120 --> 0:49:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and Saturday to hear the best minds and politics make

0:49:24.160 --> 0:49:28.160
<v Speaker 1>sense of all this chaos. If you enjoy this podcast,

0:49:28.520 --> 0:49:31.920
<v Speaker 1>please send it to a friend and keep the conversation going.

0:49:32.400 --> 0:49:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening.